_µT_m Scenarios, T₂₁(M)

Despite, or because of, Helicopter Ben's Strawberry-Fields-Forever orientation, what I can't understand is: why would anyone want to be someone in the Lebensweltorientierung we've imposed upon ourselves, the playing field being a pitch, actually, with a marked pitch to it? In apparent sympathetic resonance with that question, we have a great terminological innovation employed here with regards to the involved “cultural lag” (see: “These Are The Ten People Who Run The World…”, Zero Hedge, 27 September 2013: possessing scalene minds focused upon angles, obtuse angles, as distinct from those acute and honed in gulags of the world) -- to wit: “anachronistic legacy representational system” -- despite the fact that the lacking-in-correlation-between-institutional-base-and-Weltanschauung whys and wherefores of the involved anachronism are not explicated. Simple recognition and statement that termination date of 17th- and 18th-century political economy is long past due is, in and of itself, a major achievement. Why -- the flounderings of the uninformed flounderers aside? No jocose facetiousness involved in the preceding lugubrious statement -- lugubrious, given the implication as to prevailing normative state: consider, for instance, that the largest public-sector pensions (forget those private-sector for “ordinary people”) in the world are mere peanuts compared to the daily take-home of those WallStreeters what perpetrated the “improbable triple-fucking of ordinary people”, to quote Matt Taibbi (see: “Looting the Pension Funds”, RollingStone, 26 September 2013). An insouciant clutch of the scurrilous fostering scopulate growth slime-mold rampant, a bushy infestation of poiesis -- which is hardly scranel poesy in tufts, nor even an unmelodious self-justifying autopoiesis. Street cacophonous of uptempo hotchpotch: no gracing glances gifted on that golden -gata. The “top & bottom” Market whirling and twirling, gamboling about, bouncing up and down, tilting to and fro as if a doo-wop ditty splashing out of the Fifties: glandular Narcissus regarding himself in the mirror which is the lake of life -- so miniscule is the subjective competence. Remember, the (again quoting Taibbi) “fraud-ridden mortgaged-back securities” -- tenebrous malisons, peculations, malversations -- which WallStreeters BMed on pension-fund marks were/are bungled bundles of bundles rehypothecated and rehypothecated (this “re”-ing of the “re” being a subliminally-mediated psycho-regression take on vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”) into utter identity-transparency, but not into Everettian quantum relative-state because the physics dropouts in Wall Street firms did not employ fiber-bundle arithmetics in bundling the bundles they garbage-dumped (though I am sure they would have done so with the bundles they themselves made on such boiler-room deals had they only known how, uh, uh, that is, had they not been mistaught to “understand” Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function with probability theory, not with m-valued Lukasiewicz logics, probability amplitudes being one application of the mark-to-[prescriptive, in this case renormalizing]model accounting principle, another being the tweaking of the Minority-Report model such that those whom TPTB desire to be designated criminal are the model-predicted precriminals and preantisocials and preridiculers and preecologists). Talk about ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement in projective identification at collective transference (which, during 1967, I argued at Psychological Operations Group, JFK Special Warfare Center, using Office of War Information materials, in assisting at the teaching of what amounted to Intro to Propagandization, is the foundational notion of black propaganda production (see, for edification: “Interview with Matt Taibbi about JP Morgan and CNBC 'Presstitutes'”, exWallStreeter Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg, 2 October 2013) -- to the mystification of all witnesses: doubt it, then ask Ben Mitsugi Hirano (flash forward to a very lackluster East Bay Times obituary, 31 January 2016, for such an accomplished clandestine person, died aged 100), my immediate superior, whose post-Korea-war career was spent undercover running CI operations all over East Asia: if printouts of my personnel records are counted in linear inches, his unprintable -- heh-heh-heh! -- soft files, alone, surely must be numerated in linear yards) by sequential subclinical autogenic discharges as quantum measurement occasions! The uffish cooze PeterPanning her burbling News Channel mouth so as to Lorelei a gig of hip-hop hoggerel: all mimsy, frabjous and frumious jabberwock gyring and gimbling, not in the wabe, but in psycops tactics mistaken as strategy -- mistaken by means of ConveDD -- such that the resource base is squandered upon very much undue prolongation of a deader-than-dead paradigm, and while those identified therewith believe their long-outmoded beliefs will prevail, all they will “accomplish” is the perping of the megadeath lying in wait in the wings. The financial analogue being transference of unit of risk to larger and larger liquidity pools serviced by inverse interlocking positive feedbacks insuring ultimate leap from top of the Devil's Staircase thus projected. My O my. Awesomely packaged, primped and Photoshopped and airbrushed, Mark-to-model is an issue with regard to fine-grained tagging of indicator-measurables (all the better, my dear, done with MoSoSoed real-time economic data, as, flashing forward, discussed in “Is Gathering Real Time 'Inflation' Data With Smart Phones a 'Game Changer'?”, Mike Shedlock, MISH's Global Economic Trend Analysis, 16 October 2013) to the _µT_m-value-stack (m-plet of indices, speaking of an eigenvalue's multiplicity, uh, which is not a corpus of probability amplitudes) upon base-state of any given Lukasiewiczian LETS monetary unit (banh khoai, a sweet potato tortilla in VNese vernacular, no mean dip-dop doggerel) -- and that is why local m-scenarios computer gaming via Musculpted VirFut Q-Pro symformphonie on the e-commons is strongly indicated (as is “EscherFormDance”, enhanced by “perceptual computing”, as, flashing forward, explicated in “Wave fingers, make faces…”, Shara Tibken, C/NET, 29 November 2013). Had I the resources and the engerny -- which I/i don't -- I/i'd write a Musculpted hologramic HTMLed-note symformphonie nonorientable topos “novel” (not exactly the “sensory fiction” designed, on the road to total control, to deepen the induced states of “identification” -- as distinct from “empathy” -- characteristic of traditional fiction: flash forward to “Wearable book allows readers to feel emotions of characters”, Lucy Kinder, The Telegraph, 28 January 2014) to explicate the chronotopology of the operator-timed _µT_m-valued case -- something Hollywood, assisted by the Gates Foundation, should be doing, and a “project” I unsuccessfully tried to promote to several classes of Hollywoodites whilst living for three years on the WestLA-SantaMonica line and working one block off Rodeo Drive. Note that the GAAP with respect to fair-value accounting waned over a crumbling inverted credit pyramid that could not occur under coarse-grained nesting foams of _µT_m-valued LETS defined over prefractal --> fractal e-boundaries: that's what band-pass (dependent upon index of holelyness) fractal entrapment on the boundary-without-boundary of a fractal drum (in this case, a Lukasiewiczian LETS currency defined over a fractal e-boundary: see “Can You Hear the Fractal Dimension of a Drum?”, [reincarnation and elaboration of a famous 1966 paper by Marc Kac entitled “Can You Hear the Shape of a Drum?” -- memory serving, a paper Douglas A. Paine brought to my attention in 1975 during a Cornell discussion of music-sculpture in relation to complex-angular-momentum-cascade-beaten-out infrasound signatures of atmospheric theta-e surface topologies], Walter Arrighetti and Giorgio Gerosa, Applied Industrial Mathematics in Italy, 2005, with regard to the possibility of “hearable” Musculpted Lukasiewiczian-vonHayekian time-currencies [let the ear aid the eye in design of user-friendly interfaces to _µT_m-valued LETS], no mere scatted nonsense vocables and/or subvocables) is all about! While this is not to suggest -- Abas! Abas! -- a retrograde-inversion reincarnation of German mediatization or secularization, it is a recognition that, even without computerized fractal e-boundaries, autarky once functioned well (though one can hardly construe the Austrian Netherlands, duchy, barony, conventus, abbatia, bishopric, and other such… uh, opprobrious electorates bestowing the franchise on princes alone, electorates ad testatus of an historiographical-historiological “loop” with, arguably, a postmodern reincarnation, all domains of whatever echelon these days being pocket boroughs to one degree or another… as examples of self-governance), no matter how bewildering the hodgepodge tossed-salad map may have appeared to the unaided eye (note that, with regard to earlier memetimes, modern mappings of the Carolingian Empire, circa, say, 814, and surrounding domains, block-names according to ethnicities and terms like “tribes”, color-coding as if these blocks were somehow equivalent to modern nation-states: flash forward and observe that the best statement Father Raymond J. de Souza makes in his article entitled “The dead dream of Charlemagne”, National Post, 29 January 2014, is “Borders were rather a different matter in the days of Charlemagne…”). And given that mediatization was a Talleyrandy exercise largely imposed from without, it is hard not to view subsequent German collective action as compensatory abreaction. Indeed, regarding fractalization: double-stacked “framework determining conditions” -- not of the framework itself! Here, I raise no phallic finger as does Washington's monument, no, nor engage in coaxing-cajoling blandishment, on the contrary, I suggest -- no mere pisaller served up with piquancy to assuage pique -- that a wresting away of economic command and control (and inevitable associated militarization), by means of bottommost-upward deployment of _µT_m-LETS mapped on fractal e-boundaries would not involve a botchworked structural atomization, as many clearly would imagine -- supping [re}past is what political-economy retrogrades do, now don't they -- so much as functional anatomization on basis of a quantum-biology analogical model. Were the boundaries employed not boundary-without-boundary e-boundaries, à la plasmahaut, but ₁T₂-in-or-out cell-wall-type paper-mappable boundaries, then one could expect structural atomization and consequent loss of the economies of scale, competitive advantages, so on. What would be “suffered” with employment of fractal e-boundaries is an m-modulatable viscosity differentially dampening hot money flows according to the relative-state of the m-values codified in the global quantum economy's synoptic wave-function -- after the manner of e-self-regulation of metabolic pathway behaviors, ATP factories, et cetera, in, say, the human body. But this, of course, could not be implemented so long as Schrödinger's wave-function remains interpreted to probability amplitudes, not Lukasiewicz logics understood independent of the notion truth-value -- and that may well have been one largely-subliminal reason why the probability amplitude interpretation was so rapidly embraced, much to Schrödinger's chagrin. And were bureaucratic variables, plus domains for Musculpted computer-gaming of the externalities fine-grain tagged to the _µT_m-LETS value-stack, defined on fractal e-boundaries, then the principles of political self-governance would acquire a sensitivity to circumstantial change heretofore absent. Cascade hypertwists (re: Paine-Kaplan multiscale nested-grid numerical forecast model of tornadogenesis) into/out-of imaginary/hypercomplex domains speak directly to the crumble factor! Infrasound signatures and songlines: for the birds (as demonstrated, with good offices of Douglas A. Paine, by Cornell's pigeon people). Nature -- not just the spheres -- is herhistory's all-memetime greatest Musculptor; we just don't hearsee what is everywherewhen about us. It is instructive to consider that the trader's -- exclusively preoccupied with patrimony, which is not to say necessarily contemptuous of matrimony -- “pump and dump” is psycho-equivalent to the napalmist's “wet thrust”. In bombs we trust! If it becomes too complex, just drop a bomb on it. Surely there is no courage in being without fear -- lack of fear of death on the battlefield of life being a kind of chronic neurogenic shock -- but, then, what real need is there of courage when identity is apperceived in relative-state, one defining property of the post-Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung, were the involved paradigms not dissembled-dissimulated-dysinforming by exercise of Existentialist (existence precedes essence) intentionality? Newtonian institutions regulating post-Newtonian systems-processes. Heh-heh-heh! Underexpertised government regulators regulating private-sector superstars -- the regulators making a tiny fraction of the income stream pouring over those ostensibly regulated. Heh-heh-heh! No fixation upon human legacy is demanded; what concerns is the quantum-potential Bohmian-enfolded imaginary/hypercomplex-numbered “reincarnational” qua Lukasiewiczian world-line of the investment of elan vital which is life. In a civilization where the only heroes -- The Smartest Guys in the Room: Type A types trying on alpha-male personas, all the while squeaking out Songs in A Minor -- are career criminals of one sort or another, be they guys or girlguys (no Jane Doe's)… But the same can be said of virtually all other guys-girlguys in each and every “room”: corruption always trickles down, even if little else does. Now that sanguine prudent Peg Parsimonious is in a fuddle, governance and sandbanking having thus become synonymous with solace of corruption, the principle appurtenance to ₁T₂-property rights, will Whisk Worthwent, Dunne Furtive, Huge Jimmy, and Wily Allrigg, His Eminences at thick and thin of rump-steaks intrigue, receive the public disapprobation and banishment they deserve? Not hardly -- prevarication having become a watchword, if not an article designating indefinite Perfidious A. No pay, no play. In my many years as a nurseryman-gardener, for instance, I never once witnessed a landscape job performed at the personal home of a building general contractor that was not some sort of kickback: one reason why I stuck to pick-and-shovel work and stayed away from the business end -- and I am certain that that payola principle applied to every subcontracting building trade. As a onetime counterinsurgency-counterterror intelligence analyst, I find it hard to come up with, short of the plantation travesties inflicted under colonialism and slavery, an idea as to how better to fan flames licking a recruitment base (unless it's: Motown ain't Motowin no more, not since the Nipponese was outsourced ta provide ARVIN deir veehicles; beddie-bye on the bubbly swilled, yep). Governance-by-crime (legalized by political criminals, and illegal) is a hallmark in histories of human systems running down to snapover, once again bringing into question a proposition in so many ways challenged by divergence of the real from the ideal: the notion that the national interest is in the interests of the citizens of the involved nation-state. Immediately after cusp is transited, just like with the many “disappeared” precedent cases on record one could sight, mass snatching and concentration of incarceration likely will transpire (perhaps on a global basis this time): the unacknowledged to self and others real purpose -- partly subliminal, partly conscious -- incarnating the fact that “N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens”, James Risen and Laura Poitras, The New York Times, 28 September 2013 (increasing the collective fear factor, thus amplifying incidence of “[c]o[n]pportunities”?). Florid gimcrack espiocrats gadding about on gewgaw of espiegierie offering esperance in cogswallopy globaloney-tripe. Now that it is way too late, people have finally begun to worry about the Five Eyes; ergo, we must wonder what it will take to generate concern about the Five Fingers. One thing the documentary evidence, by extension, discloses is that there has never -- arguably all the way back to N. H. Abel's 1826 “Impossibility” Theorem -- been any significant attempt to redress the actual, if only subliminal, precipitators of the phenomenologies occasioning the purported need for increased top-down control (see, for an informative catalog: “Newly Declassified Documents Show How the Surveillance State was Born”, Jeffery Rosen, The New Republic, 28 September 2013). Ordinance, not ordnance, my dear. But, sir, mundane no less than divine ordinance is one sort of ordnance. Right. O, marvelous. Smashing. Plummy bastards, what. Flash forward to “Digital era confounds the courts”, Tal Kopan, Politico, 30 November 2013, to have a laugh-in with regard to superficiality of the prevailing “attempts”: a glutamate-etching, prescriptive ₁T₂-lawfare will never ever be capable of coming to terms with the impacts of _µT_m-quantum-based technologies. It is inherently, by definition alone, impossible! Transpose “South Africa” to “Planet Earth” and this thought by a Henning Mankell character is apropos of the current collective case (The White Lioness, 2009 Vintage edition, p. 563):

Maybe they haven't understood deep down that the future of South Africa will force them to reassess everything they've been used to. Many of them will never manage that. They would rather see the country destroyed in a cataclysm of blood and fire.

Skimming surface of the deep which we insist upon keeping dark matter: that's the value found in our risibilities at contemplation of, not so much peak government, as pre-trib-rap agovernance: Rolfing character-anchoring, muscular-armoring, Reichian Body Parts grafted as ad hoc effector agencies epexegetically in search of epibolic structural integration. Incidentally, having not become, as the record shows, one of the “Varieties of Delinquent Youth”, and to fulfill the forensic psychiatry disclosure requirements, I am a 7-7-5 (no relation to haiku, even as the theory goes back thousands of years to Vedic times with the guna-tendencies Sattvas, Rajas, Tamas, the three most basic types of superstrings primordially recognized, and though debunked by postmodern psychology, as one would expect) on the somatotype Richter scale (see: W. H. Sheldon's, Varieties of Temperament, Harper, 1942), something I/i discovered about myself during my mid-twenties, a discovery allowing my me to quench on a timely basis the imparted messianic complex, one reason for my persistent reticence. 7-7-5 belying the accusation: You have no body-knowing! Thrown at someone who had done very well in the physical aspects of Special Forces training and who, at JFKSWCS, passed the swimming tests for hard-hat-diving training. We don't need another sunny Superstar! No matter where you haven't been, there you are: Mad Max Beyond the Classical Limit, and into nonlocal _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency -- which means that “saying 'I'”, to thoughts that think one, is a travesty in denial of demergence. As those familiar with the antidote to neurotoxin glutamate -- i.e., endogenous ketamine flood -- well know, the ontological problem is not how me's become we, but how we becomes me's. Clan, caste, club, political parties, corporations, universities, religious institutions, academies, EMOs, NGOs, PACs… -- not only Madison Avenue, ₁T₂-psychiatry, yellow media-showbiz, nanny-state nag-factor black security agencies, nag-factor ₁T₂-software engineers, and underground marketeers -- are there to insure only insanity and genius exercise the natural right to non-consensual investiture of significance and meaning: in the particular case of which we speak, _µT_m-logically-valued significance and meaning (“synergistic saturation marketing” being a ConveDD of the _µT_m to the ₁T₂ undertaken in compensatory abreaction by binary minds of mousey marketeers). And just to be certain all that doesn't fail, feed children -- three-months prepartem till just prepubertal -- as much MSG and TV advertising as possible, so as to maximally effect glutamatergic neuronal etching at prescriptive enculturation-socialization. I decided long ago that it's best to live where I don't speak the local language, and out far enough where fast-junk food is pretty much not available. The Long Kiss Goodnight: Ron Paul says (see: “Ron Paul: 'The Country Is Bankrupt… The People Are Being Bamboozled'”, Zero Hedge, 2 October 2013), “…it is a philosophy of government that is to blame…” -- if he only knew how right he is. Mankind in Amnesia: unlike Samantha, have we been suffering collective focal anterograde amnesia ever since Abel's 1826 “Impossibility” Theorem? Is Paul bamboozling the piratical combatants who are waging war on privacy so as to insure “I think, therefore I am” ₁T₂-identity does not flag? Moreover, and paradoxically, all this m-valued stuff on my part is pretty much assured to remain what it has been all along: nothing but an exercise in self-edification, as, to my judgment -- functionally speaking -- the internet is already largely over with, personal computing soon to follow as PCs cease to exist and cloud-access-devices-only are manufactured, unmachined personal consciousness falling by the wayside not long after that when cloud-accessing chips are brain implanted by government mandate so as to insure cloud-assisted-₁T₂-[cog}nition-only transpires. Why paradoxically? Because, by ConveDD, the subliminal motivation for this whole techno-drift is suppression of the wide-ranging imports of unexpurgated m-valued logics. But I remain an optimist (perhaps not so optimistic as James Howard Kunstler, who uses the term “suicide party” in his, flashing forward, “Creepily Close” posting, Clusterfuck Nation, 14 October 2013): I/i have long forecasted a ten-percent human survival rate at planetarization of cuspover, a cognitive tidal bore we haven't seen since the ancient Greek rise of binary ratiocination on back of the breakdown of the so-called bi-cameral, but actually _µT_m, mind. As to the when of cuspover: a listening night, stars awatch. The evolving situation (see, for instance: “Hope in the Face of Disaster…”, John Sharry, The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability, 19 November 2013) has been well understood for at least half a century, and still there has not even been an attitude adjustment, let alone significant action taken. Who, glutamate etched as we all are, is not an agent of influence in [ser}vice to generic psyops division, political warfare department? Growth -- of everything -- is still the reigning watchword.

To those who have detected elliptical references and allusions to, plus the occasional opting of, the extraordinary range and accuracy of vocabulary employed with spontaneous ease by Robert Goddard, I offer the following justification regarding the involved intertextuality: though each of his novels individually contain no profound reflections, and thus must be considered popular fiction, their corpus, taken as a whole, must be accorded the status of high art fiction for the profoundly accurate portrait they provide of the human performance (as distinct from the self-justifying notion of a “human condition”) -- and what that portrait implies concerning how humanity is likely to (not to say: surely to) deal with the “Childhood's End” currently being imposed upon it by evolving multidimensional anthropogenic global circumstances. His is an enormous contribution to what still possibly could be the human welfare. Moreover, Goddard's novels illuminate the thesis that the ₁T₂-logical foundations of juridical administrative crenellations constitute one of humanity's greatest obstacles to surviving cuspover. The only way to deflect this thesis is to blame robbery, murder, and the like upon the ₁T₂-logic of single-level-enciphered genes -- an undertaking already ebulliently embarked upon. But the bind is one double: beyond all doubt, the greatest threat to life on Earth is not asteroids, comets, so on, but the human species. Where, thence, should allegiance lie? One can no longer in good conscience go with even “My species right or wrong!”.

As far as I know, and in my belief, my father did not suffer combat fatigue during WWII, though he saw a lot of air combat as a B-17 pilot shot down, lost and presumed dead behind enemy lines, eventually making his way out, with help from the French Resistance, uncaptured. Nor during the Berlin Airlift, flying air-sea rescue out of BW1 over the North Atlantic and over the Sea of Japan during the Korean war. And he did not sustain PTSD as a result of participating in the Viet Nam war -- though, clearly, he had many years of post-VietNam syndrome. In my judgment, combat fatigue was combat fatigue during The Good War, not PTSD, because it was The Good War. The Korean and Viet Nam wars, however, produced authentic PTSD because the largest and longest-persisting component of etiology-symptomology was experience-induced loss of prior belief in the virtuousness of the cause and the system pursuing the cause -- though, almost by definition, this was in large measure a subliminal change in structure of beliefs affecting viability of the introjections constituting the Umwelt (i.e., self-definition). For the nonce, let it be known that the singular is indubitably a nominative nomen dubium, be the person nominally first or third. SmartMob-funded Dr. Bitoff, one for use of flattery as to dis}miss}al, lives in DogMouth Soi, also known as BullRoar Lane -- and, in compensatory abreaction, coins silent insolence, incipient yet cloaked in a subtly derogatory deference. An outline is no silhouette of the man; nor is the profiler's profile: think we the sixth sense senses the world, but it's the Umwelt sensed, that which gives a sense of self. We do not construct ourselves; we are constructed, constructed in significant measure by how others identify with, or reject, the projections we make in transference at introjection of the shared enculturated-socialized -- i.e., that is, by glutamatergic neuronal etching -- elements making up our Umwelts. And, moreover, I think that, nowadays, PTSD is not really PTSD -- though there certainly be war-induced focality -- but CTSD, Continuous Traumatic Stress Disorder, because prior belief in viability of the global Lebenswelt is ontically drawn into question on a day-in/day-out basis, experience of petro-warfare providing one catalytic cognitive nexus of induction. Flashing forward, I anticipate reading Ann Jones' They Were Soldiers: How the Wounded Return from America's Wars, Haymarket, November 2013. One difference between PTSD and CTSD is seen, in my judgment, by the different types of drugs used, as essayed in “The Military's Prescription Drug Problem”, Kelley Vlahos, The American Conservative, 3 October 2013, with regard to CTSD. Another can be seen in reports such as “Human Assault Pushes Ocean to Limit Unseen in 300 Million Years”, Jon Queally, Common Dreams, 3 October 2013, describing the latest report from the International Programme on the State of the Ocean. Self-“medication” for Umwelt-Lebenswelt dyscombobulation with Jnana yoga (i.e., cognitive therapy), Jacobson's Progessive Relaxation and autosensory observation (with special attention given to the extra-ocular and pharyngeal muscles, i.e., a really early incarnation of “eye-movement reprogramming”), Autogenic Training, walking meditation, and Aurobindo-Gurdjieff concentration in self-observation being highly recommended Rx -- for those so inclined.

The longest paper I wrote for Elspeth Rostow, Spring of 1964, AU-SIS, Am Civ seminar, was on the Hamilton-Jefferson debates concerning the national debt. It was then that I really began to understand the degree to which the Cartesian-Newtonian worldview construct determined the course the nation would thenceforth follow. Jeffersonian democracy didn't have a chance because the Weltanschauung setting terms of the governance paradigm provided no metaphysical foundation justifying agrarian democracy (a theme, no matter that it was well argued, Elspeth Rostow -- W.W.'s wife -- did not put much stock in, which circumstance kept me in the library trying to learn more about the political-economy implications of the shift to New Physics) -- nor, nowadays, in respect to an ecological approach to initialization and maintenance of the Lebenswelt. When, during the mid-19th century, issues of slavery-race became conjoined in warfare to those of state's-rights/federalism and administrative centralization-decentralization, the die was set. Advent of the probability-amplitude dissimulation (suppressing _µT_m-valued logics and full-import of non-simple identity) of the quantum theory of collective and cooperative phenomena firmed up the setting of the die and prevented any tap from giving it the required hypertwist. Consequences of this serial historical formation are seen today in the debt-ceiling dilemmas debated in Congress, the media, and on the blogs.

My WAG (wild-assed guess) concerning the current U.S. Government shutdown and debt-ceiling hiatus (howsoever this particular instance turns out) is that it is being orchestrated as it is so as to contribute to the provision of a pretext for a forced shift to some sort of employment of IMF SDRs (where the USD would still be privileged relative to all but those few currencies allowed into the critical basket -- possibly to include gold -- used to define the new SDRs) as new international reserve currency (i.e., the next step up the Devil's Staircase), the shift possibly to be accompanied by a universal or near-universal Supertax (first step in planetarization of a transnational universal income tax). For the latest proposal on such a tax, see: “The IMF Proposes A 10% Supertax On All Eurozone Household Savings”, The Automatic Earth, 12 October 2013. While fear of social upheaval at economic chaos and upon wars surely in the cultural birth canal is the ostensible reason why-for the totalitarian lurch, the actual, if subliminal, reasons lie much deeper, as variously argued on this website and in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh. Digressing somewhat: if the cropped, still photograph conveys any profound metaphysics, it is that memetime must have a stoppage and LSTDs (limited spacetime domains: i.e., Cabalistic jewishdictions, a subversion of the Rabbinical interpretation of the Hebraic gematria of Genesis, which interpretation has been ConveDDed to “brand enclosures”) have their utilities. Since my Cabala tutoring at AU, circa 1963-5, provided by a Westchester princess, I've been against the Rabbinate and for the crafty Cabalate. Why, why, you have no sense of intimacy. You approach every relationship as if it were a learning environment! But what of the medieval painter's and relief-carver's frame where within the same [per}son can appear more than once? Does this depicted Catholic Cabalistic doppelganger capacity tell us as much about the m-valued chronotopological properties induced by quantal operator-time as about the quantal non-simple identity registered in the stacked strings of the medieval polyphony musico-analogically modeling The Anatomy of the Body of God (check out Figure VII, which has an uncanny heuristic resemblance to Szentagothai's cellular architectonics of human neocortex)? And what of the market's invisible magic hand? Not ₁T₂-statistics-and-probability, thermodynamically forcing the random deterministic chaos of the self-willed (and selfish-gened) competing against each other's self-interest on an imputed neoDarwinian, binary-logical, 2^nk “fitness landscape”; rather, that wholly ghost _µT_m-holistically the quantum-potential Arisen from non-simple identity and [per}son:ated in group behaviors as wave-guiding operator-time, as, analogically so to speak, the Gregorian “chant” of the trading floor. Belief in the invisible and the magical -- deemed angelic (and thus, according to Rabbinical and Thomistic application of the rules of ₁T₂-logic, also luciferian -- during the Middle Ages relied upon faith, and became a “cultural lag” -- like is the necktie, or as was “Maxwell's demon” -- in the secular religion named Capitalism. By contrast, if there is anything more common than the common sense of glutamate-etched normotics, we are sure to find it in cognitive castellations of the congressional caucus and the corporate boardroom -- neither of which, verbiage aside, have put much actual faith in invisible magic hands. From perspective of the huddling 99% -- if not uniformly distributed across plenum thereof -- it is, this straggle of fuzzy days, a matter, predacity aside, of little consequence whether government co-opts the megacorporation or the megacorporation co-opts government -- there being so little actual difference between these ₁T₂-fangs of national fascism socialized to the megacorporation, and due to the fact of the 99% having become tantamount to an economic fallacy, the Fallacy of Undistributed Middle class-set-type. As regards the near-term… well, we have a niggling-wheedling-simpering civilization pitifully unselfobservant, deceitful, deluded as to its history, nerving itself, sickening a normosis gouged into, scrabbling for, an anlage on a rash of unconnected feelings ensuriently, esemplastically cobbled together into a dawdling, if fugacious, flustered meander of subverted diagenesis, a recrudescent cognitive train, boarded up, decrepit, derelict, wailing along the shing-a-linging Boogaloo line leading to a rendezvous with… it a clue has not, nor ever it will.

Having once for many years been a gardener, I've noticed that all over the bamboo nursery named Southeast Asia there is no use of bamboo rakes; coarse reed brooms are inappropriately used for myriad tasks demanding rakes. Go figure -- and please stop trying to convince me that, at some historical juncture, the ₁T₂-market simply had to have been an efficient allocator of resources, to include labor. Is it just a few “greedy and corrupt individuals, not the system as a whole, [we] are to blame” or do “the faults within the corporate system run much deeper”? Quoting at greater length from the Introduction to Joel Bakan's The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (Constable and Robinson, 2004):

The key premise [of Bakan's book] is that the corporation is an institution -- a unique structure and set of imperatives that direct the actions of people within it. It is also a legal institution, one whose existence and capacity to operate depend upon the law. The corporation's legally defined mandate is to pursue, relentlessly and without exception, its own self-interest, regardless of the often harmful consequences it might cause others. As a result, I argue, the corporation is a pathological institution, a dangerous possessor of the great power it wields over people and societies.

Though I substantially agree with the themes argued in his book, where I most disagree with Bakan is -- not about the missing Tet-'68 precursor to the missing 1971 precursor to the dysexplained 1973 formation of OPEC; or the missing 1853 dreadnaught precursor to the 1948 GATT precursor to the missing Structural Impediments Initiative in synchronicity to formation of the WTO compliment to the missing ISO cultural steamroller qua eco-diversity leveler (no derivative of the Levellers, with their misguided hope that a state could be authentically democratic); or the ridiculous assertion that most normotic up-the-organization types are good people, mothers and fathers just trying to keep up with the Joneses while making merit in their motherhood and fatherhood on an overpopulated resource-depleting planet; or that the “good life” is not psychologically vapid, vacuous, and violent at home, horrendously murderous abroad -- is with regard to his not supposing ₁T₂-bound law, in and of itself, as a system qua system, a corpus qua corpus, as a mind-mode set-piece, not just specific legal principles-decisions, like those involved in Dodge v. Ford, to be a deeply responsible culprit in the story he relates. Not only “against the law”, against the laws of the only logical-value order-type -- one of the many, uh, Cantorian infinities thereof, available -- embraced at codification-interpretation of law. War glorification by multimedia light-sound-fireworks display over and around Sydney Harbor -- prefiguring what? -- aside, my dissing of the fangs-of-₁T₂-logic law does not mean I am against T 'n H -- trap and hack: “high combat” as the perdue would have it -- counterterrorist operations, only opposed to making such tactics into a strategy, nor does it mean I am anarchistically subverting pole-licing, only for progressively reducing the coercion-need by incrementally implementing _µT_m-valued LETS nesting foams (per Sun Tzu, and as Clausewitz almost knew, control the “environment of the combat”, the “framework determining conditions”, not the firefights and not the framework itself, particularly its structural properties: not so incidentally, my assimilation of the notion “framework determining conditions” [Bennett's term], as generalization of basic Sun Tzu, came with repeated returns over decades to J. G. Bennett's “Systematics”, as explicated in The Dramatic Universe, 4 volumes, and, surely, I was pre-set for this assimilation by exposure to my father, a consummate supply-and-materiel troubleshooter, once he was taken off flight status due to collapsed lungs from having piloted B-17s in the days before pressurized cabins and John C. Lilly's WWII-research on flight-induced bends) and tropological metareferencing in design, such that elements of the Weltanschauung become highly correlated to the metaphysics informing the institutional base by handling employment of objects and execution of ADLs (activities of daily life) as subliminal “constant reminding factors”, as yantric-mantric phylacteries, with respect to allelotropic (of each other) relative-state as the most fundamental functional prerequisite of culture qua culture. The prevailing cultural imperative, whichsoever the concrete culture, its “internal necessity” with respect to self-preservation, is: take determination of “what we eat, what we watch, what we wear, where we work, and what we do” (Bakan, p. 5) and what we hear out of the hands of the Baconian-Newtonian ₁T₂-corporation and place it in the dexterous hands of… our _µT_mly capable hands. Spiritually-informed handicraft, as in days of old, the days when Tantric females controlled the weaving tropes, must again reign in realms of design. The advent of computerized-robotic REtooling systems -- whereby continuous retooling has become economically efficient -- makes a return, in industrial design -- only design spoken of here -- to, say, Mingei, handicraft possible: each building can once again have its own unique set of door knobs, so to speak. Cultural leveling by uniformizing technologies is no longer an economic necessity. Robotics slays economies of scale. Let the machines have their 80-percent of current human employments (see: “Dark Vision for Jobs: Jobless Future? Is It Different This Time?”, Mike Shedlock, MISH's Global Economic Trend Analysis, 11 October 2013), and, with deployment of _µT_m-valued LETS nesting foams, hand over “congenial tools” -- design criteria, and design of the design systems themselves -- to the hands of man. In context of such notions, I chose the most demanding, the most intellectually, emotionally, and physically challenging, and the most elaborately rewarded job I've ever become aware of: the pick-and-shovel work involved in digging trees, work employed as a format for deeper and deeper concentration in increasingly multivalent, voluntary inner separation, more and more adept autosensory and autocognitive observation. By means of the monetary system employed, take the smart-mobbed internet-of-things away from the REMOBing security services (and their Psychs: that's phonetic for SAiCs, Special Agents in Charge), and give it to handicraft artists, biofeedback-hologramic SmartDress fashion designers, biofeedback-hologramic smart-dancewear wearing break-dancers and Movements adepts, smart-appareled extreme-sports enthusiasts, Musculptors, nerdy crowd-funded _µT_m-quantum open-source software developers, dolphin-assisted sonic-visioning learners, biofeedback-equipped-Lilly-ThinkTank floaters, and so on. Don't pout, Moue, you droll little grimace, you fey ofay. Tootling down the decentralization metabolic pathway, make the Large Glass once again cosmogonically transparent, so it is no longer the Looking Glass which is war by this or that means. Peremptory and imperative “mandatory behavior protocols”: desiccating “democratic” government fatwas. Regardless of the Cabalistic Law of Se7ens, Cardinal Virtues don't purgatorily balance out, uh, resolve, that is, Deadly Sins. Why? Despite all peradventure and normal percipience, because this is not a diatonic ₁T₂-universe: there are no key signatures to the kingdom, uh, were there a KINGdom cosmic. The corporation: born in Bogus 500-years ago at Renaissance of the binary mind; destined to die in Bogus The Day After Tomorrow at _µT_m-quantum-mediated Resurrection of animistic-pagan relative-state identity-transparency. Anti-Cabalistic, secular-Rabbinical jewishprudence (the sacred-tablet approach to lawfare: only one among many possible) “afumitaxing” finance (kibbling even the suggestion of monetary slant rhymes so as to protect the “hummered” MBSs, CDSs, CDOs, and the rest of the elementary particle zoo requiring securitization), a “perscathing” psychiatry “blaxitoming” with psychotropics normotic schizophrenogenic ₁T₂-monostates “dejebbled” by _µT_m-bleed-throughs: none of this can prevent quietus of the corporate death rattle (certainly not by a charter-revoking Anti-Bubbly Act enforceable on Wall Street and in The City) or rigor mortis of the nation-state preserved in cognitive formaldehyde and subjugating the operative classes, dejecta which, these days, incorporate -- heh-heh-heh -- 99-percent of us. Thanks be to Lewis Carroll via Ed McBain for the in-quotes neologistic intens-indef-incho-imper indicatives employed. Binary incorporation in service to the Maximum Principle (still subject to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, despite infinite duration) as applied to the ₁T₂-laws of purported absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct properties: separation qua purdah of ownership (simple and interlocking) from management purview-purlieu; Newtonian limits placed upon the calculated liability of ownership; and, nowadays, the vacuum-state zeroing-out of simple/interlocking ownership liability and risk at management criminality, legal and illegal (psycho-regressed conversion-disorder-displacement, i.e., ConveDD, of _µT_m-quantum relative-state non-simple identity to purfling [pre}rog(ue)atives and perquisites granted glutamatergic lacuna-on-the-brain). Which is not to mention consequences of the making of the nuclear power plant, even its subsets, into discrete legal persons, LLCs without personal liability for their meltdowns (see: “Lessons from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident”, Arnie Gundersen, Global Research, 16 October 2013). At just the moment -- end of the 19th century -- the Axiom of Choice propelled toward _µT_m-logically-valued non-simple identity, the “natural” simply-identifiable corporate ₁T₂-person came legally of age to synchronistically fixate, by compensatory abreaction, socio-politico-economic attention cathexes into a collective ConveDD precluding assimilation of unadulterated quantum mechanics of collective and cooperative phenomena, thus insuring, amongst much else, onset of early-21st-century global crisis. Regarding this ConveDD: subclinical autogenic brain discharge as quantum measurement -- of particle or otherwise, per, say, Lemian “Solaris” (not the oracle's UNIX OS, one would think), whatever brand-logo is statistically consensuated, personified, ensouled, and projected -- will in due course be found to be the case in all quantum measurement occasions, e.g., that of the imputed godhead-personifying monotheistic Higgs boson [Adam}brating all things ₁T₂, when actually this bozo would herald pantheistic animistic-pagan _µT_m-identity-transparency in non-probabilistic Everettian relative-state, were there an adequate constituency. Regarding personification: As he moped along squinting, always the simpering scapegrace, then, at queuing of an unexpected sound, whirled about PDQ, the fog-frigid landview opened its reproachful mouth, bluffed and knolled, daled and streamed in a blight-besplattered march-past (anthropomorphic prefigures anthropogenic, and is nowise animistic-pagan generative-empathetic participation mystique with the natural surround). And then there are intellectual giants like M. Friedman, who, a century later, still had not actually registered existence of m-valued logics, let alone vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” (when Friedman wrote to me that he had no idea what I was talking about -- not that he disagreed -- I had to believe him). Blazoning blatherskites! It is by now over-abundantly clear that -- not only in practice but also in principle -- taxation with representation, legislated laws, police forcing, regulatory oversight, and the self-organizing processes of ₁T₂-logically-valued-market dynamics do not, separately or together, restore anthropogenic damage done to nature or adequately recompense society for the infrastructure utilized and the externalities generated (not to say: minimize same) by for-profit business activities conducted in a quantum-based techno-regime vectored upon, and strangely attracted to, ₁T₂-affluent-effluent excess: the levels of system conception at which these mechanisms act are insufficiently general to achieve the purposes for which the mechanisms were “designed”. But it is not just the corporation that borrows negentropy (at low-interest qua friction) and externalizes entropy to its n-dimensional environmental state-space (at low cost to itself): every memetime-bound, open engine of growth does that. This has been understood -- less, then more -- since advent of the steam engine. So, why is it still sloughed over? My answers are sprinkled throughout the present website. Moreover, also unmentionable is the fact that the “corporate person” is a legally-fused collectivity (without authentic relative-state identity-transparency) and, in the past, collective transgression -- a class of class actions -- elicited corporate punishment of the culpable corpus of individuals composing the collective at fault. Why is this, post-WWII, an unmentionable? Not only because of Holocaust law (it is instructive to consider Allen Hornblum's, Judith Newman's, and Gregory Dober's Against Their Will: The Secret History of Medical Experimentation on Children in Cold War America, Palgrave Macmillan, June 2013, reviewed in “'Against Their Will' looks at children used for tests”, Dennis Rosen, The Boston Globe, 8 July 2013) and R2P the limited-liability corporation. The corporation is as it is because it is a quintessential institutional embodiment of Old Physics and associated long-dead, but not disregarded, Weltanschauung. “Personally, I think” -- heh-heh-heh! -- prices should be based upon quantum measurement of the time-shape recognitions of THE _µT_m-quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular ₁T₂-brains, and not upon single-valued measurements of those quasi-containable ₁T₂-brains' wave properties (see, for an account of the burgeoning brain-wave-pricing scheme: just think of what brain implants will do for this scheme, outcomes depending upon whowhat does the implanting, of course!): “Is Your Coffee too Cheap? Using Brain Waves to Test Prices”, Frank Thadeusz, Der Spiegel, 10 October 2013). I rather think that -- under the memetime-bound theory of emergence, rather than operator-timed demergence -- the lizard has gotten a bad rap, for, if there is a corpus of minds cognizing in animistic relative-state identity-transparency, then, surely, lizard-mind is included amongst them. The marks of Gordon Gekko may have thought he belonged to the suborder gekkota, but your average house lizard, like the related f***-you too-kay lizard, is no sufferer of the Stockholm syndrome's “traumatic bonding” (read text of Terry Burnham's talk “The Stockholm Syndrome and Printing Money”, PBS Newshour, 8 May 2013: though I certainly agree with Burnham about QEing, not the PBS's Solman) by projective-identification at psychological transference, for, clearly, the bonding values embraced by geckos are rooted in comunitas, not “mean genes” -- as anyone who has lived in a riverside teak stilt-house in rural Cambodia well knows. Are the collective behaviors associated with market reflexivities to be explained by lizard-mind (as Terry Burnham would have it [read his Mean Markets and Lizard Brains, Wiley, 2008], or the “unknowability” of _µT_mly self-referential propositions, as George Soros would have it) -- or by the Lukasiewiczian processing engaged in by THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular ₁T₂-brains? Deny access to _µT_m-brain processing with glutamatergic neuronal pruning and couple the resultant to markets processing ₁T₂-logically-valued-only prices and what do you get? Bubble manias, perhaps? Heh-heh-heh! Ah, I presume Dr. Rectangle… uh, that is, Rechtnagel. Not the pinnacles, battlements, buttresses, but the troponumerological mason's metareferential monetary floor of the cathedral of capitalism! Incidentally, I spent the better part of year working as the intermittent stone-cutting assistant to an 80-year-old Italian stone mason, Biagio, who had devoted 30 years of his life to work upon the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. -- and, from the constant banter, learned a lot about the Middle Ages, and the Renaissance. Were the militaries/industrial-complexes not usurping most of it, we'd have the necessary expertise and computing power for the following. Actualization of BP's physics-trained Sir John Browne's “multiple-bottom”-line (Bakan, p. 41) requires accessing G. Spencer Brown's Laws of [capital] Form[ation] demonstration that “distinction” is more fundamental in logic than “truth-value”, a realization promoting the notion that “identity” qua identity (not identity-between) is more fundamental yet, even more basic than “distinction” -- understanding of which allows a non-fuzzy, hologramic, relative-state interpretation of multiple-valued logics, such that implementation of time-currency _µT_m-valued-LETS nesting foams (internalizing externalities on the monetary-system level, so as to minimize collateral damage caused by market action-directives) would establish framework determining conditions, e.g., logical-value order-types of monies employed, facilitating (₁T₂-profit --> _µT_m-profit; ₁T₂[cost/benefit}profit/loss --> _µT_m[state-function/time-shape}relative-state signified in allelotropic time-currency units) an authentic “multiple bottom” Lukasiewiczian-Hilbert Tzog-chen AllBase-functionspace relative to the vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” (accounted with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers), planet Earth.

Books I wouldn't take the memetime to write, given the ineffectiveness of the academic mode of production. Systemically Downsize or Die! The English Vice: Newtonian Incorporation. Narcissism: The Newtonian Nemesis. Descartes' Dummies. ₁T₂-Business is Dead. ₁T₂-Profit or _µT_m-People? War Is a Looking Glass. Tender Offenders: The Unexplicated Enfolded Dimensions of Derivatives. The Binary Mind Trust. The Inherent Criminality of Truth-Value. Transcending Countervailing Powers: Autopoiarchism in a Post-Newtonian World. The Oxymorons: Monoscale Democracy, Commanded Justice, and Totalistic Economy. _µT_m Is Not About Mass Media or Manic Mind. Stealth Fighter: The Corporate Persona. Probability as Cause? Common Ground in Private Hands: Myth and Reality of Quantum Non-Simple Identity. Is Right-Or-Wrong Right or Wrong? How Divine Right Granted by the Gods Enthroned Binary Logic by Means of Projective Identification. Planetary Resource Depletion: Pragmatic Utilitarianism of the Global Shopping Mall v. F. A. von Hayek's Time-Shapes of Total Capital Stock. Ego-Sphere Transference to Corporate Godhead: Profane-Sacred Personification and the Protestant Ethic. Descent of Sociality by Geometrodynamics. Existere Trumps Esse: Corporate Separatism in an Age of Existentialist Ethics. Allelotropic Value: Only Blind Faith Could Have Privatized Equity. The Object of Found Democracy: Imaginary Time and the Unit of Account. Neurotransmitters, Normative Notions, Normotic Nations: How Societies Devolve. Play-Doh of the Legal Person: Probability Amplitudes Descend Upon Schrödinger's M-Valued Wave-Function. Corporate Steroids: High-Mesomorph Muscular Armoring and the Character of Corrosion at Sponsorship to an Impressionistic Public. Glutamatergic Monopolization of the Social Structure of Attention Cathexes: Public Expression in Default by ₁T₂-MoSoSo's Failure to Fulfill Fiduciary Duty. The list could get a lot longer.

Even though I am for demergence of a post-science, post-paradigmatic (paradigms being logical-value-order-type dependent) Weltbild, this preference is not because I am against science per se: what I oppose is the popular mechanics of science, the utilities to which the technologies science has spawned have been put, the corpus of which is the “civilization” which technical “evolution” of warfare has in significant measure “created” (see: “War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies”, Peter Turchin, et al., PNAS, US of A, 23 September 2013; also, “Computer simulations reveal war drove the rise of civilizations”, Akshat Rathi, The Conversation, 24 September 2013). So, to me, being against war (see, for instance: War No More: The Case for Abolition, David Swanson, self-published, 2013) is utterly superfluous, insofar as one is for civilization, technology, and science. I am against civilization, technology, and science only to the degree they are based in falsifications of nature, a degree which has always been very considerable (incidence and intensity of warfare, in my estimation, being directly correlated to the degree of falsification of nature -- given that social, political, and economic institutions express the Weltanschauung). For the last 100 years, the greatest scientific hoax has been the theoretical physicists' imposition of a “classical limit” (dissimulation of Schrödinger's m-logically-valued wave-function to singly-logically-valued probability amplitudes being a “derivative” hoax, exercise of The Trickster archetype: both the pedestrian and maths meanings of “derivative” intended) upon the “world picture”, which no physicist worthy of the name actually believes nature herself (insofar as a herself-world can exist at quantum measurement independent of a world picture governed by archetypal gradients of the collective unconscious) actually subscribes to, however convenient such subscription would be for physicists -- “convenient” being a matter of prior psychological, metaphysical, religious, social, political, and economic commitments unexamined by systematic long-term practice of some introspective discipline. Doing an inner runner, fleeing psychological blackholes and the like. Imposition of the classical limit means that all sciences of the mid-levels, those scale levels not at the extremely small (quantum, under assumption of a classical limit) and at the extremely large (relativity, under assumption of a classical limit), are very substantially, if not catastrophically, flawed -- and flawing of the mid-levels may be the main reason why the quantum/relativity bifurcation persists in face of all GUTS. For instance, cellular-molecular biology denying substantive roles to quantum-relativistic processes, e.g., non-ionizing radiation exchange by free-electron-gas core of DNA playing a major role with respect to biological clocks, immunology, registration of chronic stress, switching genes on and off, and so on. Moreover, for one additional example among many to choose from, strip away the classical limit and both global-warming deniers and global-warming alarmists, who base their denials and alarms upon acceptance of atmospheric science as the science of a classical domain [a foremost tacit assumption undergirding geoengineering: flash forward and see “Let's play God: The scientific experiments that might save the world (or destroy it)”, Memphis Barker, The Independent, 20 October 2013, to flash backward to 1977 and end ENMOD; and flash farther forward to see the real paradigm for geoengineering as "anthropogenicity squared" in “…China eyes artificial rain to fight pollution”, RT News, 5 December 2013: were the Seventies already too late, as Paine came to pretty much believe by the end of that decade?], very probably greatly underestimate severity of the climate shift presently in its early stages -- UNDERestimate, for one, because quantum mechanics is the science of collective and cooperative phenomena not, under the mistaken assumption of a classical limit, attributable to atmospheric processes. The Geoengineers: swank swains-of-swag -- think, for example: you know who! -- officiating “ecological” initiatives, globalization's latter-day pannage, by Courting Swanimote judgments upon planet Earth, no meetings of swans encouraged or permitted. The vagrom guile (Anglo-French-Germanic gile, in OE the witch's wigle as gimcrackery) behind the vainglorious gain is geostrophic Gotterdammerung, like it or not.

Why is it, or ₁T₂ly speaking, why do you think, Roger Penrose (in The Road to Reality, Vintage, 2004) continues to embrace the “classical limit”, even though he clearly states he does not actually believe in it? Only because he has yet to find a way to get rid of it? Note that no mention is made of Lukasiewicz logics as being on The Road to Reality. This, in my judgment subliminal, sort of thing was confronted, in one way or another, during the 1970s in Doug Paine's Cornell atmospheric science classroom on virtually a daily basis -- given that, at nearly every turn, real-numbered and imaginary, he was introducing relativistic-quantum precepts, and sometimes even percepts, into a supposedly classical domain (let it be registered that Paine never broached the topic of Lukasiewicz logics to his students, because early stages of every approach thereto raised apperceived classroom silent-insolence affect-charge to criticality: I sat in on many Paineful lectures, so I can speak from feeling-tone-receptive direct personal experience, and this cannot only be blamed, we concluded, on Carl Sagan's influence upon Paine's students also taking Sagan's classes: much bigger issues were involved, and this fact, along with many other factors, would have made a debate with Sagan, after the McMaster University Velikovsky conference, where Paine and I met, counterproductive). Per the many discussions then held with Paine in regards to that, subliminal, shall we impute externality-to-hard-science-type, thing, I think, involuting from the many to the one, that the following implications of removing the classical limit have something to do with Penrose's up-to-2004 continuing embrace thereof (serious questioning of the “classical limit” may begin when hurricanes become big tornadoes). Does non-essay, ₁T₂-true/false “objective”-test, thumb-up/thumb-down -- howsoever complexified and concatenated -- vote, in the gladiator's coliseum which is political life, actually ascertain “the will of the people”? Has any democratic government ever really expressed the will of the people -- or has it always hoodooed the hoodies? Have the mass of shareholders (not large stock blocks held by governors) ever effectively “directed” (not to say managed) -- even merely established a “determining tendency” for -- a sizable LLC (not to say a megacorporation)? If so, surely it has been an event as rare as a democratic government authentically expressing the will of the people (“Is it [demo}cratic or, actually, demo{cratic]?” which is like “Is it dictatorship by the proletariat or, actually, dictatorship of the proletariat?”). The franchise indubitably cannot -- inherently, as a discovery algorithm -- ascertain “the will of the people” in individualistic societies where there are only willful persons; nor, inherently, can franchised representatives insure that governance expresses the undiscoverable will (singular) of the governed multiplicity (plural). Involved here are issues Schrödinger confronted, in analogous form, when he sat down to write his famous quantum wave equation, in full realization that no concatenation of Newtonian vector sums -- which Locke explicitly used in his Second Treatise to justify the franchise -- would do. Schrödinger had to go from single-valued variables (analogously, persons and prices) to m-valued variables, and from memetime dependency to memetime independency (Dirac and others reintroduced memetime, and formulated the probability-amplitude interpretation -- to which Schrödinger never really concurred). So, by analogy to analogy on Schrödinger, I am, fundamentally, opposed to employing the franchise in attempts to use a freed-up e-commons (which, after all, fundamentally, obeys Schrödinger's wave equation) to achieve a more-direct |demo>cratic framework. What I propose instead is employment of Musculpted e-commons computer-gaming of m-valued multiple-scenarios strategic planning (no relation whatsoever to ₁T₂-“strategic philanthropy”, whether or not it services foreign policies of Cartesian-Newtonian nation-states, or party platform-by-fundraising -- and no mere high-tech LEGO “Serious Play” at real-numbered-memetime “Real Time Strategy”), in nesting foams, to choose and implement m-logically-valued LETS currencies defined over fractal e-boundaries. Unlike Antony, who came to bury, not to praise, yet with little sympathy for the corporation's Will To Be Regulated in lieu of being Bubble Acted, I see no necessity to slay either governance or the corporation in order to save us from both. Howsoever regulated-governed, the principle of “market enclosure”, as externality-exclusion device, mirrors, by projective-identification at paradigm promulgation, the ₁T₂-closed and memetime-bound Second Law of Thermodynamics' running down to heat death -- so, in principle, even the well-regulated corporation + ₁T₂-market could hardly assistedly-self-organize solution to the running up of atmospheric debts, ecological debts, and so on. Is it really the corporation that externalizes what are pretended to be externalities, externalizes by government chartering under the for-profit-only legalism? I don't think so. Structurally and functionally speaking, it is market partitioning of economic absolute-Newtonian space and time under prescription to single-valued econometric variables, all-too-common ₁T₂-law, and employment of monotonic currencies defined over whole-integer one-dimensional boundaries that so [man}dates. No manipulation of the corporation could actually resolve the problem of externalities. It is not in the powers of presidents, prime ministers, judges, CEOs, CFOs, forensic accountants to solve this Weltanschauung problem. While the corporation incorporates portions of the population base, being quintessentially a ₁T₂-institution brought into being by ₁T₂-lawfare, it does not alter the identifications of those thus incorporated, such that authentic relative-state identity-transparency (the real driver-attractor of self-organizing processes and the foremost functional prerequisite to culture qua culture) is inculcated. Just as Schrödinger found a way to incorporate vector sums to the total energy operator, so could we find a way -- via computer-gaming -- to incorporate incorporation and the franchise -- as postmodern update to age-old village “human chess” -- into vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”: a way involving subjection (in the mathematical sense) of interest-rate/derivative “state price density” or “pricing kernel” or “stochastic discount factor” (see, for instance: Financial Calculus: An Introduction to Derivative Pricing, Martin Baxter and Andrew Rennie, Cambridge U. Press, 1996) to non-probabilistic _µT_m-valued Everettian relative-state, such that externalities are internalized on the level of currency units or monetary quanta (thus altogether undergoing-sidestepping corporate ₁T₂-law in general, and the “best interests” ₁T₂-principle in particular, which could remain intact whilst _µT_m works its autopoiesis upon market framework determining conditions which are ontologically-“before” market existential dynamics). Under presently existing economic space and time, what externalities-costs the for-profit corporation is forced to absorb will, in one way or another, be passed on to the consumer, not taken as a debit upon profit; whereas, under nesting foams of _µT_m-valued LETS currencies defined over fractal e-boundaries, those costs would be holomorphically distributed over the AllBase of the whole system which accounts the vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” -- as they should be, if the prerequisites for efficient autopoiesis qua high-level self-organizational competency are to be fulfilled. Is there hidden here some fairly simple (though, admittedly, going from ₁T₂ to _µT_m is not nearly so easily accomplished as going from _µT_m to ₁T₂, the former shift not being mimicked by bundling, even were fiber-bundle arithmetics employed -- because of the change in the nature, uh, logical-value order-type, of identity qua identity involved, or so I/i have come to believe) way to resolve the quintillion-dollars-worth-of-derivatives conundrum? I've found over the years, having been schooled at AU-SIS by a transdisciplinary, problem-based curriculum, that only fools rush into technical study of an area of thought having not first discovered an Ariadne's thread, for to do so is simply to eat the received “wisdom” and, thus, nevermore could such a thread be found. This last hidden-here suggestion could not be effectively pursued, of course, until the physicists transcend their memetime-bound, ₁T₂-probability-amplitude interpretation of m-valued Schrödinger, which has set the terms by which financial instruments have come to be constituted and analyzed. Moreover, as is usual with things human, those who are positioned, or possess the discretionary resources, to effectively act are, ₁T₂-logically enough, all (here, violating their own logic, the middle is not distributed) more or less bad guys and gals, girlguys and guygirls. And maybe, likely, probably, possibly there was only a small window of opportunity -- already closed -- since the ₁T^uring₂-machined internet has by now pretty much succumbed to its predetermined fate -- predetermined largely due to its warfare-DARPA-related origins. But, then, it's more than merely difficult to make a case that larger interests would be well served were humanity, long since identified with the ₁T₂-self-destruction archetype, the Jungian Shadow, to do well through the presently accelerating planetary crisis. The Shadow -- an excruciation of schizohysterical roots grounded in the population base -- being a conversion-disorder displacement of repressed, and hence regressed, _µT_m-processing by the quantum brain, a ConveDD at glutamatergic neuronal etching and associated quantum quenching induced via prescriptive enculturation-socialization. Impervious tarmacadammed minds earning a crust, stale and crumbly as it may be. Rood-screened, using truth-value as an affect-charged gatekeepered cheval-de-frise to protect Byzantine orthodox conceits. Mai pen rai. Mayhaps, following Japan's lead, the overpopulation impulse will be overcome by E. O. Wilson's the “death of birth” having become the birth of death (see, worth a ha!: “Why have young people in Japan stopped having sex?”, Abigail Haworth, The Guardian, 20 October 2013; and the VDO entitled “The Japanese Love Industry”, Zero Hedge, 23 October 2013, which describe-portray nothing new, nothing Atoms for Peace post-Fukushima, going back decades, the decisive turning point beginning with the generation of “MacArthur's children”: interesting to me, whose experience of Japan began in 1953 [in the house down the path and across a rice field, all the kids slept in a big pile on tatami, and I used to sneak over there to join them in their “cuddle cafe”], is absence of recognition that conflation/Confucian-confusion of modernization with Westernization and MacArthur's lawfare invocation of issue exclusion and issue preclusion by plutocratic sumptuary laws -- excluding the little rice field from public exposure, a privatizing-body-use zoning skirt blue law [just as the conquering Chinese made Vietnamese women wear pants] imposed on those who, in the rural areas at least, had no experience of panties as universal covering surface for her SoftBank, and precluding, with both legal and physical lawwalls, mixed public bathing -- forced, by intended consequences, i.e., smote and destroy the village of pagan-animistic identity-transparency communalism associated with plowing the big rice field and perceived by the gaijin to predispose to Godless communism, uh, to repeat, forced a huge extension of “minimal permissible distance” in traditional Japanese “personal space”, a counterEinstein-dilative way to privatize public space by introjection to Umwelt of the “market enclosure” qua shopping maul, and gated community, these and like introjections, e.g., the WTO's TRIPs reflecting, by ConveDD at projective-identification in collective transference, the intimacy state amongst Generations Y-Z, prefiguring flight of the fetish into the choice to altogether quench intimacy by recourse to technological means, MoSoSo and VR, these days, being in the forefront). O, woe be placed upon those behind The Human Effects of the Dalkon Shield carried by Captain America as he leads the culture of ignorance.

Given that a central authority sets the cap(s) and allocates credits accordingly, cap-and-trade (CAT) remains, essentially, a command-and-control (CAC) approach implemented by means of incentive creation. Potential effectiveness of CAT, as a device to internalize externalities, thus, falters over the central-authority issue, most decisively at the nation-state echelon of governance where consensus is most difficult to reach, impelling imperators toward further centralization and greater CAC. Since CAC does not interface well with the superintegrated autopoietic self-organizing processes (e.g., the relativistic-quantum atmosphere) seen all about us in nature, even greater CAC than already exists is likely to exacerbate the problems we face, rather than help resolve them. This is one reason, therefore, why I advocate bottom-up implementation of nesting foams of m-logically-valued LETS defined over band-pass fractal e-boundaries as the primary means to internalize externalities to the market. I think of VirFut Q-Pro-Musculpted multiple-scenarios strategic planning carried out on the e-commons as a means to identify-project, and entice consensuation of, strange attractors understood as existing in a function-space. The policy formulation process is initialized by disjointed incrementalism, by, that is, a slicing of the function space into nesting-foam sheaves understood as stacked (_µT_mly so) upon the base state-space of the function-space. Policy implementation is carried out bottom-up by trial-and-error, real-memetime, tactical improvisation -- with respect to market “framework determining conditions”, not the framework itself, primarily in terms of monetary system variables -- so as to minimize the likelihood of large-scale strategic failures. Fleshing out this very general notion would require, amongst much else, [1] exploration of the memetime dependency of financial instruments relative to operator-time (beginning with “discrete-time hedging on binary trees”? as do Baxter and Rennie, in their Financial Calculus: see above-provided link), and [2] studies of ₁T₂ valuation, pricing, coupons, yield, derivatives, credits relative to eigen values and relative-states and fiber-bundle arithmetics. As “The World Is Spending $1 Billion Per Day To Tackle Global Warming”, Global Warming Policy Foundation, 22 October 2013, it might be wise to spend some of it upon making fundamental improvements in the planning, policy formulation and implementation process.

One nonthing long-practiced tendance to phenomenologies associated with concentration in self-observation strongly suggests is that the infinite regress in reference frames for measuring flow rate of memetime (see: An Experiment With Time, J. W. Dunne, Faber and Faber, 1927: Dunne's cat superposed upon Schrödinger's cat) is arrayed upon a temporal Koch curve (deeply involved in formation of time-shape branes at temporal operations): as the baud rate of consciousness increases and memetime (a collective and cooperative learned behavior permitting degrees of “membership”) slows down, the holes (between identifications, which, at slow baud rates, are cognized as a stream) get “bigger and bigger” until memetime winks out. This is “when” the opportunity presents itself to become aware of pure (unsullied by discrete ₁T₂-valued contents: no-mind is not absence of mind, but presence of the multivalue) consciousness, in its active aspect, as the set of topological operators, i.e., operator-time, upon the m-logically-valued reference space (the Pure Land) employed by THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular brains. If an hour of truculence can overtake a century, and a mordant minute a millennium, than a Buddhological “one mind-moment” -- not so long as a trice, a jiffy -- could overtake all of memetime's subfuscous solicitations. Another opportunity is accorded the astronomer (naked-eye, or no), as recorded by Peter Ackroyd in First Light, Hamish Hamilton, 1989, p. 134 in the 1990 Abacus edition:

Everything on earth existed with him, shared his time with him in an ever-receding present moment; everything was connected, but this network of invisible relations was a network of simultaneity. Damien had to assume that there was such a thing as the past but any evidence for it was part of the present, too. All the world had ever known was a succession of present moments. There was -- there is -- nothing else.

Except these images [provided on screen by telescope] of a distant star, appearing now second by second but belonging to another time; and there in the sky itself, with traces of light which emerged thousands of millions of years ago. And yet what if these images were an illusion -- what if the pictures of Aldebaran were simply constructions with no reality beyond this particular time and place, this particular observer who now looked up at the sky from the dark observatory, looked up at the vast emptiness? And there shall be beautiful things made new, he thought, beautiful things made new for the surprise of the sky-children.

REM sleep, of course, is another such opportunity -- and that is one reason why Johannes Heinrich Schultz's late-1920's founding of Autogenic Training exercises upon analogy to then-conducted sleep research (see: Autogenic Therapy, Wolfgang Luthe and Johannes Heinrich Schultz, Grune and Stratton, 1969, in six volumes), such that the autogenic brain discharge became understood a centrencephalic, trophotropic, stress-release, detox mechanism (see: “Some Preliminary Considerations toward Development of a Mathematical Model of the Autogenic Brain Discharge as Spontaneous Localization in Quantum Measurement”, and for relevant present-day research, “Sleep helps brain stay fit by clearing waste”, France24, 17 October 2013) was so brilliant. If, as our model of DNA radiation exchange suggests (see: “A Dynamical Theory Describing Superconductant DNA”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. XV, 1979, pp. 333-41), the changing temperature oscillation rate of pi-electron parcels of free-electron-gas environment of DNA (note that the canonical equation of our model involves a nesting of temporal operators: for a brief accessible bit of background, see Journal of Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, June 2000) is the intracellular zeitgeber, then that notion may shed some light upon Steve Horvath's findings in regards to DNA methylation (see: “Scientists discover DNA body clock”, Ian Sample, The Guardian, 21 October 2013), though it may not support the idea of using iatrogenic DNA demethylation as a problem-free means to achieve life extension, a questionable objective on an overpopulated planet. Moreover, the notions of birth and, hence, death are ₁T₂-memetime bound -- or, to put it another way, by relative-state identity-transparency, _µT_mly speaking, their Samsara-reality is restricted to Avidya-Maya: they are tenebrous shadows on the walls of Plato's cave. Nonlocal elementary particle interactions are part of the process by which spacetime is; atoms, a memetime lapse of elementary particle interactions; molecules, a memetime lapse of atomic interactions; cells, a memetime lapse of molecular interactions; organs, a memetime lapse of cellular interactions; body, a memetime lapse of organ interactions: if memetime is a learned behavior, glutamatergically etched upon neural networks at prescriptive enculturation-socialization, then, so too is the localizable body, in some real sense, learned -- a notion which receives strong support, not only from Piaget's studies of the arising to proprioceptive and perceptive awareness of “object constancy” in mind of the child, but also from Shigehisa Kuriyama's The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine, Zone Books, 1999. Tarry no longer Ms. Bleakly, no more paltry of mewling sighs, no further parsimonious of tumbled distress in crumples.

Currently, I live by the sea and, on my daily beach walking meditations, like Dmitry Orlov, see evidence of ocean trashing. Now, I am finally starting to agree with Orlov! per his recent post to ClubOrlov (see: “The Sixth Stage Of Collapse”, 22 October 2013). When -- 1977, memory serving -- Cornell atmospheric scientist, Douglas A. Paine, stated to me (as a confidence to someone he had closely worked with) his gathering belief that it was already too late, a belief he foist upon no one else, so far as I know, I initially recoiled, but recovered in due course, Paine's statement having had a profound impact upon my major life decisions/orientation, eventually settling upon the hopeful optimism that a ten-percent human survival rate was likely (which means I have long been more optimistic than has been James Lovelock or presently is Dmitry Orlov -- despite having assimilated to a significant extent Paine's relativistic-quantum take on atmospheric processes) -- if somehow something like m-logically-valued LETS were implemented early enough into the inevitabilities we have already brought, and are sure to continue to bring, down upon ourselves. More than three decades later, that hope continues to sustain itself -- though I have never been able to imagine how the human mind in its present condition (entertain the notion that the state that is most altered is that of the glutamatergically-etched normal person) could manage to make a non-civilization-collapse shift back from ₁T₂ to _µT_m. The only way that has seemed possible is through technological exteriorization of internal Musculpt as mathematical notation (a prerequisite, it seems to me, to learning how to think rigorously in Lukasiewicz logics, rather than merely about Lukasiewicz logics by use of ₁T₂-logic), but, having been a military brat who spent time in experimental flight simulators at Air Force Systems Command as a high-schooler in Fairborn during 1962-3, and with Wright-Patt scientists periodically invited to our home for Sunday dinners, I had few doubts as to what uses the new technologies would be put (this contributed to my decision to attend AU-SIS, rather than accept a physics scholarship I had been offered per how I had done in honors PSSC physics). I focused upon the monetary system and multiple-bank credit expansion in high school honors economics because I realized that money is the main mechanism of human systems management, subsiding yet superseding government regulation. The juxtaposition of simultaneously being exposed to quantum mechanics in PSSC physics sowed the kernel of the idea which grew into the notion of _µT_m-valued monetary units. Everything since, with me, has been involved with fleshing out that kernel. Looking backwards, the path seems straight, obvious, and that I haven't gotten very far along -- when, in fact, it has been, as I experienced it, a long wild ride over a barely visible mountain trail. A little more than a decade after high school, I knew from the beginning that the relationship with tornado specialist, D. A. Paine, was going to be fraught with profundity: riding back to Cornell with him from the Hamilton, Ontario Velikovsky conference, where we had met, just after entering New York State, we passed a roadside sign marking a tornado touchdown, and at just that instant a child in a passing car flashed a Halloween mask at us -- and this was long before Halloween! People should investigate why the bulk of Paine's papers were never published. Negative reactions, by the otherwise avuncular amici curiae, to potentially important ideas are tells -- one-ers that accumulate -- which lend support to the possibility that the ideas are, indeed, important. Appositive opposition, no avulsion -- as avouchment. This can be seen. Preprandial hunger lies upon the bard like a traducing wolf: actuarial in its registrar. In the distance, a fritter of persons, objects, acts: peers are not pears are not peers for all that. Apothegmatically, acerbic heather scabs -- rather more like relict centers on refugium than aceldamas -- blister a tossocky scape bent with the occasional winded pine: yes, I've been there, been on that refulgent spray of Cape Breton Island coast. I like science pretty good, but don't care much for scientists -- any more than doctors, for the same reason -- their being mostly on the muscle, using their to-the-layman-unassailable authority by way of frequently dissimulating so as to protect their favored paradigm; some Ss-&-Ds, to occasionally service their personal interests. Due to techno-spinoffs -- massed warfare and total war prominent among them -- of “value-free” science conducted by value-laden scientists, quantity of people and things in the Lebenswelt went exponential, then hyperbolic, just as the quality of people and life went in the opposite direction, towards bottoming out. Contrary to the trumped up and leveraged archeo{anthropo}logical paradigm [man}dating that the nation-state and, later, a single supranational superstate were inevitable once human settlements reached population 300+, once upon a memetime, in many locations, planet Earth, subsistence was the best life has ever been -- human and otherwise.

Creation of m-logically-valued prices would not undermine competitive markets, the Law of One Price, or the no-arbitrage condition (by contrast, flash forward and consider the present shadow banking system: “Unfractional Repo Banking: When Leverage Is 'Limited' By Infinity”, Zero Hedge, 14 November 2013; and “The Unspoken Festering Secret At The Heart Of Shadow Banking: 'Self-Securitization'… With Central Banks”, Zero Hedge, 15 November 2013), in that the index-values, processed _µT_mly, would be stacked, i.e., superposed, upon the base-state one price, processed ₁T₂ly, of the given commodity, instrument, wage. Arbitrage could enter the market with such index-values (tagged to measurables capsulating externalities) were the index-values individually (or by sets) tradable independent of the base-state one price; carry-trade arbitrage would enter were such index-value trading allowed across the fractal e-boundaries upon which _µT_m-valued LETS were defined. These sorts of index-arbitrage could have intra-systemic and inter-systemic utilities similar to that envisioned for carbon trading. The _µT_m-valued price-index processing would make more explicit -- less tenebrous, less fuliginous -- than is presently the case, the collective and cooperative identity-transparent market reflexivities epiphenomenal to self-reentrant, nonorientable systemic properties. Base-state-value processing ₁T₂ly, and superposed-values processing _µT_mly, are, taken together, one way of understanding the relationship between decoherency and coherency in autopoietic self-organizing processes.

Try to focus vision upon an object located to the right whilst simultaneously imagining an object located above: pain results. This is a concrete illustration of the single-valuedness of ₁T₂-logic, the only logical-value order-type employed by the glutamate-etched brain. Now, why, shall we imagine, did Gurdjieff employ the term “self-remembering” to indicate (re: "calculus of indications") a state “where” ( --| = 90-degree twist from real simple into imaginary complex) enhanced self-awareness and enhanced object-awareness and enhanced “placedness” -- in order-type array, scale-level nesting, involution-evolution Ray of Creation -- are inseparable? And, moreover, unthinkable -- in that this state is registered not in thoughts, logical or illogical, but in fluctuations of feeling-tones capturing apperceived vividness changes, feeling-space close-far changes, temporal-density short-long/thin-thick changes in coupled percepts-propriocepts, these couplings being experienced as pleasurable (the other pole of the _painT_pleasure-logic of the glutamate-etched brain)? Because this state, while initially registering as pleasurable (due to endogenous ketamine titers rising by “inner counterwork” -- cf: Hubert Benoit -- conducted upon glutamatergic prescriptive enculturation-socialization to ₁T₂-only processing), when deepened, leads to “high indifference” -- cf: Franklin Merrell-Wolff -- as to the poles of the ₁T₂-order-type, such that the self remembered is, not the discrete egoic self, but that self identity-transparent with the whole of which it is, ₁T₂-paradoxically, a part? Concentration in self-observation induces (by reversion of libido or, shall we say, by Sat-cit-ananda “consciousness force”, by, that is, reinvestment of attention cathexes, or, in other words, by a self-reentering reflexivity productive of deautomatization) self-remembering, which, as it deepens, provides ketaminergic, i.e., Zen “no-mind”, access -- by degrees -- to the _µT_m-valued (i.e., order-types of self-referential propositions) processing (presented to ontic awareness as synaesthetic internal Musculpt symformphonie, an elaboration of photismic-paresthetic polymorphic colored-sound: think of, for instance, stimulation-erethismic Yayoi Kusama) engaged in by THE nonlocal quantum brain not contained by its localized molecular-cellular brains. A diffident trophotropic Buddha says (even if belligerent ergotropic Mao doesn't): _µT_m I am, therefore I don't ₁T₂-think. Can we -- even only our ₁T₂-brains -- doubt existence of THE nonlocal quantum brain when the wave-functions of the elementary particles composing the atoms of the molecules of the cells of localized brains are spread out over the whole universe until observed/self-observed? Does observation spontaneously collapse-localize the wave-function, while self-observation fuses-delocalizes it? Remember that self-object observation is inherently ₁T₂; self-referential/self-reentered observation, inherently _µT_m -- and that only a quantum measurement occasion carried out by an observer lacking in self-awareness, by an “abserver”, that is, could be restricted to the ₁T₂-order of logical-value, a fact which has a lot to say to Heisenberg's uncertainty inequalities read over Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function.

U-TRAK with JESUS-GPS: the latest on getting some back from JUDAS.gov whilst observing wry, cheek-out-tongue. The FED thinks it directs luck; the physicists think luck sets probabilities; the genetic engineers think that if anything conveys luck it's life's monovalent instruction set which they maneuver; the politicians are stultified by the thought that Luck is the Lord in control of their mezzanines. And the doofus berserker harrumphed a piquant conniption! Hug the self-organizing “smart rocks” (see: “'Spy Rocks' Could Be the Military's New Secret Weapon”, Allen McDuffee, Wired, 25 October 2013) flung amongst you, you engaged in SAs (see: “FBI 'Suspicious Activity Reports' target political dissent”, Thomas Gaist, World Socialist WebSite, 1 November 2013: mass surveillance is one aspect of mass hysteria, which severely undermines collective competence). What a ConveDDed projection they are, them rocks! But not so lethal as the nonlethal “pain beam” (see: “Army develops smaller nonlethal pain beam”, Joe Gould, Army Times, 26 October 2013) streamed at you -- were DNA's histological-type frequency-response windows open across 95 GHz in the radio frequency spectrum. And how many of us think that facial coding qua affect analysis (see: “Startup Gets Computers to Read Faces, Seeks Purpose Beyond Ads”, David Talbot, MIT Technology Review, 28 October 2013) and real-time neurocam iPhone EEG scan with correlation to recorded visual cathexes and potential “emotional interface” to other devices (see: “Strap an iPhone to your head for a window into your mind”, Tim Hornyak, C/NET, 29 October 2013) will only be used for benign (discounting the health risks) B2B and B2C purposes, not also SS2S (security services to subjects) purposes? Were they to develop techno-assisted-telepathic Musculpt symformphonie, given the prevailing cognitive set, most assuredly there would be built-in backchannel S2SS reflux. Binary-mind of the particle physicist: resting place of a malkin keeping an untidy annais spread over an ANN, a glutamate-etched, and, hence, artificial, neural network. Not only is the particle simultaneously in two different positions, but it arrived “there” before it departed “here” along all possible trajectories: thus does the binary-mind make book, try to conjure ₁T₂-valued propagation-sense out of _µT_m-valued identity-transparency. “Simultaneously” has no memetime existence, being a feature only of the e[pi, i]ternal now. Past-time, future-time: bicycle of memetime qua beamtime; time-present: portal of the 3-wheeled car, operator-time. Change of state has actually been with respect to pregeometry order-of-logical-value, and this the binary-mind resolutely tried to represent to itself as translation across spacetime -- and when that didn't work out too good, as geometrodynamics of spacetime. Geometry of no-thing is no geometry-of; rather, geometry-in-itself. Pregeometry: now, that's what I call a real vacuum state! No ponderable space, absence of memetime; no geometrodynamics, because no temporal operations on space: just T_zog-chen and its _µT_m-AllBase-state, floor of the cosmic pagoda, temple, cathedral, mosque. R2H, the responsibility to hold down the floor sat upon: that's “reciprocal maintenance”; that's quantum “relative-state”; that's “dependent origination”! Prefigurative pregeometry: dimensionless points or holes? that is the question, answer to which will determine fate of the progeny. What are the odds that points are holes? and where so [re}cognized black-hole sinks become zero-point sources? Moreover, at what divergence do external source/sink terms become internal source/sink terms? Different units for different kinds of massenergy? Massenergy under absolute limiting velocity… under absolute limiting acceleration… under absolute limiting time rate of change of acceleration. And so on? No, no so on! Three of ponderable space and three of operator-time are necessary and sufficient, per their pregeometric Calculus of Intentions -- by cancellation twice. See our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, pp. 333-344, for further explication of this point. Ackroyd's First Light, pp. 267-8, the Abacus edition: “In this place time might not simply go forward, forgetting and forgotten; it might move in other directions also.” What might it move? Only memetime is a something one could be in. A whatnot that can move? A wee-wau to grind smoke? Move in what? Wholly vacuity, lacuna within Bellona's bell jar: the binary brain. Ackroyd's First Light, p. 295: “He was standing on the cliff of himself… in case time ran out. But how could time run out? Where could it run? It was the shape of the universe itself.” Not only do soldiers and veterans require brain chipping (see: “DARPA developing implant to monitor brainwaves in real time”, Michelle Starr, C/NET, 28 October 2013), so do physicists need brain-chipped “emotional interface” to the internet via The Cloud, what took a tap from the NSA, if they are to sustain belief in their ₁T₂-interpretation of what transpires in their cloud chambers. And so do our saviors from genetic disease. Who (at the very least, not those who have viewed The Bourne Legacy) believes that, in retrospect, the Crispr method of genetic editing (see: “'Jaw-dropping' breakthrough hailed as landmark in fight against hereditary diseases as Crispr technique heralds genetic revolution”, Steve Connor, The Independent, 7 November 2013) will not be viewed as having used Rx of genetic diseases as entre to pandemic eugenics without, first, having comprehensively evaluated its advisability/inadvisability in respect to the quantum properties of DNA? That was most interesting, don't you think, Miss Dote? Most, I'd say. Evidence lies -- or is it lays? Planted by the Fates, the Traceries, the grand eternal Gradients. I could just, just -- throttle it! Do tell. Frightenly barmish. Too ghastly, really. Most, it should always be said -- uh, not to mock, of course. Must, it is must, I adore. Yes, tomaaatoes, my dear. Too staggering. Vulgar -- well, if entre nous at the very least, what. Relative-state: Fried Man's green tomaytoes, surely. One reason why this is so: don't expect $85-billion/month of QEing ever to be devoted to refilling the funding for entitlements (P.S.: I've never thought that Social Security should have been geared to maintenance of pre-retirement lifestyles, post-retirement) squandered on wars, embezzlement, fraud, or to fund food stamps for the structurally unemployed, rather than being used to feed, via drug-induced artificial stock market highs (see: “Kyle Bass Warns Fed Has Made 'Stocks Only Game In Town' So 'Rich Will Get Richer'”, Zero Hedge, 29 October 2013), the vacuous superrich ever more riches with which to feed their venal vapidities. One simply must wonder, mustn't one, how much the private-and-“sovereign”-bankrupt-banks-sustaining QE-supported mendacity of global growth differs from the “growth” stoked by the peculated privatization of sovereign debt to Hollow Sword Blade shadow banking and to the South Sea Company and its rivals' boons (see here and Robert Goddard's Sea Change, Bantam, 2000: a prescient piece of research and writing, it should be observed) by treasured Grooms of Stole charged with disposing of the exchequer's offal swoop-take accumulations. I mean: how much have the FED, the bailed-out megabanks, and the shadow banks become South Sea (i.e., South America) companies syzygialed to cheap-labor Asiento and trade-bloc arrangements (not codified on basis of fractal e-abuttals) during their clambering calamityings up the Devil's Staircase? No small much, I shouldn't wonder -- no matter how adept be the moves made upon slant of the checkered playing field. Indeed, formation of the quasi-private FED in all ways corresponds (self-similar, not self-same) to formation of the South Sea Company (chartered 1711, dissolved by Gladstone in 1852), except that the war debt secured by the FED came after formation, rather than before: one illustration of the powers of historical memory. Flow and ebb of the FED, however, may correlate (self-similar, not self-same) more closely to inimitable Law's inimical Mississippi Company, which fell off the back of a rising tide of the inflation incumbent upon a quantitatively-eased privatized public-qua-sovereign debt. Which is not to suggest that other quasi-private central banks are not today huddling in the same pisspot. Start-and-Finish of the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung's institutionalization subjected to the same thematic orchestration: how speaketh that of the Omniscient Author? Bluntman, Castwall, Sawbridge, Ughley, Crawlie, Baitman, Grigbehe, Asslabia, Craggy, Glower, Landsowne, Standnope… Bubble and bank-reform acts frequently being mere stock-propping legislations. Your Recognizances, as ruinous as you are, my dears grandee-gerent [De}puty, [Chance}llor, Earl, Bishop, Consul, Provost, Director, Cardinal, Pro-Governor, Chairman, Minister, Secretary, Commissioner, Grand Pensionary, Turnkey, Grand Duke, Groom, Governor-General, Proprietor of Pension, Baron, Vicount, so on, are less Errant in the eyes of Eyre, than are the public's acquittals of connivance: a feckly “achievement”, more feculent than fecund. Sorry to disabuse, but yes, yes, he surely has done, he has, that solicitous Mr. Sinister Sobersides, shorn of impertinence, yet never one to begrudge a grudge. Fuddled and weepy at no accolade bestowed, without compunction paid heed he'd do -- truckle, truckle -- to avoid the reach of wrath and reassemble his patronages. Married to Mrs. Typhoid Annuity, née Lymphogranuloma Valetudinareum, 'e is, isn't 'e, now? Those who look to the new technology for a resolution, those who express a love of the internet make elaborate display of their [cog}native deficit. Oopsa-daisy! The World Wide Web is the functional equivalent to glutamatergic neuronal pruning and associated quantum quenching: it imposes massive proscription and prescription. Ugh. Unck-ah. Uuuh-huh! Probably ninety percent of the information on the internet is access-limited; probably ninety-nine percent of the technical information on the internet is access-limited. Used to be libraries subscribed to periodicals, newspapers, scientific journals; now, to gain full access, each individual has to personally subscribe -- and lending libraries are getting out of the copyright-undermining business of being libraries, just as cutpurse banks are getting out of the archaic business of being banks. Search-engine algorithms are not exactly based upon the Dewey Decimal System, y'know! Being elaborate popularity contests and beauty pageants, they fan the bonfires of vanity, superficiality, faddism, cognitive conformity -- and altogether prevent creation and discovery of the authentically original, in fashion similar to the impact of marketing malisons upon centralized command publishing. Books you have to read three-hundred pages to find one interesting “notea”, which is to notion as idea is to ideation. Strip development of the mind of man.

“Measuring” time -- like demanded by any dynamic duration-articulated econometric behavior equation -- is to “evaluate” the relevant memetime, though this task is rarely actually performed. Memetime, while linear, is not an objective linear-time, nor is it first-order, i.e., linear, topologically-active quantal operator-time -- the whole of consensus quantum mechanics being a first-order theory (unlike relativity theory, which is a second-order theory, where “physics degree zero” is reached with supersession of acceleration qua gravity qua geometrodynamic curvature), the canonical state-vector not being exponentiated, i.e., squared or cubed, even as regards Everettian relative-state. And this lack of exponentiation (not to mention double-exponentiation) explicitly excludes temporal densities and chronotopologies and m-logically-valued identity-transparencies, such that relativistic time-dilations and spatial-contractions (second-order behaviors) do not integrate well with a quantization allowing unspeakable (because Lukasiewicz logics are excluded), altogether atemporal and nonspatial, “translation” qua identity-transliteration qua nonlocality. These proscriptions perpetrated by first-order-only theoretics prevent economists from adequately modeling market reflexivities: economists stumble over acceleration/deceleration, i.e., inflation/deflation, and hardly even imagine time rates of change of acceleration/deceleration, such being tantamount to economically unspeakable and, thus, not seen to be related to onset-formation of reflexivities qua self-reentries at absolute limiting values (i.e., divergence/convergence) of econometric variables -- nor that such “absolutes” are relative to nesting-foam boundaries-without-boundary, e.g., those over which risk is transferred and concentrated by employment of the financial instrument (think “operator”), say, the interest-rate derivative (think “operator-time” operating upon “framework determining conditions”, i.e., the currencies state-space, such that econometric time-shapes are generated -- even if left in a conceptual bag of nonviewability). With regard to, for instance, the coupons stripped away, leaving zero-coupon bonds, those coupons themselves need m-valuation, need sheaved indexing, if market reflexivities ever are to become explicit aspects of action-directives viewable by market micro-actors -- and such valuation, such sheaving, would have little influence to improve the level of market self-organizational competency (we need a less efficient, more competent market) were coupon sheaf theory not based upon m-logically-valued LETS time-currencies (locally-issued STRIPS being particularly relevant to LETS), whereover value-stacks on currency base-states internalize externalities by tagging to indicator-measurables, such measurables not being construed as memetime-bound, but as related to vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”. So, the question arises: is there some small set of algorithms, call them autopoietic operators, rather than apps, that could transform ₁T₂-derivatives such that the involved transformations could become part of the process by which _µT_m-valued LETS currencies are brought into being -- or would such a currency system have to be extant before ₁T₂-derivatives could be appropriately transformed? I am looking for an answer to that question. There are, of course, human factors involved. Consider, for instance, the standard initial modern/postmodern human stereotypic response to sudden endogenous-ketaminergic entrance upon direct ontic awareness of animistic-pagan, m-logically-valued relative-state identity-transparency. Quoting Peter Ackroyd, First Light, pp. 177, the 1990 Abacus edition:

Just walking [think: walking-meditation as a form of auto-sensory/cognitive observation practice], for in the country I was safe [because my cathexes were absorbed to identifications with the natural surround]. And it was at this moment of great calm that I felt that I was being watched. Now. If I were a madman, I thought, I would believe I was being observed by something inhuman [NSA, perhaps?]. Some god or devil. And in the same instant, I had that sensation. I was being watched. By some alien presence. And at that moment, too, I was filled with nausea. My body knew it before I did -- I was going mad…

And then it happened: it was as if my consciousness had been involved in some great convulsion. It radiated pain like a wound, and I was surrounded by some inexplicable and unfathomable horror. Horror of myself. Horror of something other than myself [schizotypal “ideas of reference”: ConveDD of my body, the myself referring to its body, the self of that myself… unto an infinite regress of “reference” frames, i.e., devas-suras, extrojected as, i.e., transformed into, invading “asuras”]. I cannot say how frequent, or how long, but there were successive waves of -- what? Not fear. Fear is too obvious a word. And not darkness, either, because the world seemed to be filled with some unfamiliar light [Sri Aurobindo's light?]… I believed I was Christ and looked around me fearfully, I believed that there was a conspiracy against me and that all those I knew were robots programmed to deceive me, I believed that there were microphones hidden within the cottage. There was some creature inside me. I was not of the human species. There was some presence within me, speaking through my own voice [think: bi-cameral mind]. And this was the greatest horror of all: that I was not my own self [lack of selfsameness at m-logically-valued identity]. Then I was sick upon the floor. And even as I suffered these things it occurred to me that insanity was simply the re-emergence of primal images [which, when sounded, are Musculpt symformphonie eidolons of the demergence to ontic awareness of the quantum relative-state identity-transparency processed by THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular brains]… I knew the natural world to be apart from myself, and yet now I saw every aspect of it as connected, malign, purposeful. I had become a primitive again. One of my own ancestors [temporal identity-transparency]. This was madness.

And so would it seem to most, were externalities actually internalized to the market, such that the vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth, became adequately attended, indeed, were propitiated in order that the biosphere in general and the human species in particular survive the gathering global crisis provoked by lack of such an attend dance. Manwokind in amnesia, sleeping about in caves, sleeping about what heshe does not know -- having no atemporal Platonic anamnesis of _µT_m: the clock's retort. Without out-of-the-body bird's-eye-view simulacra granted to binary-mind's abstracting-out of generative empathetic crashing-in, there is no identifying identities, the evidential evaporates into peachy fuzz, number disenumerates, nausea announces no fiduciary discovery of forensic facts afloating; the cosmic accountant having gone transparent, non-viewable, undiscoverability dominates all predominances for no thing coheres because everything decoheres: logic fails to impose evidence, even given that believing is seeing, and without that, that imposition, there can be no necessity, absent necessity and there is no control, out control and there is no self nor self's object as existential confirmation that “I think, so I am thus-and-so”; O-oh-O, the Great Nihil, for there is no selfhoody not the ₁T₂-self granted to binary-mind. Without VRed simulation of OBE, abstraction taken out of empathy, heshe is consigned to insignificance: participation inconsciente, primitive contagion, Everettian relative-state, dread state-of-nature. Trying to escape nature, one becomes a shuddering shaker ensconced -- and shuttering, more rapidly than the baud-rate of one's consciousness -- in one's mental anorak, one among THE species of memetime-burrowing animals. Quaking fear impels the world past a memetime-frozen self; lilting joy propels a kinetic self into a world as if freezing up by memetime-slowdown. How could the self-which-is-not-selfsame fear for the itself-of-the-self it is not the same as? Fear is order-of-logical-value dependent, a [bi, tri…n]nomial function of the state of self-identification, that state's index of _µT_m-heterostasis crossed into the inverse of its degree of ₁T₂-autoimmune reactivity -- as is ontological, as distinct from existential, guilt. Abstraction as flight: fear and loathing in disguise, as observed by Wilhelm Worringer and C. G. Jung. “Kill the 19th century dead!” as the lady said, yielding: probability irresolvable, uncertainty inconsolable, incompleteness irreconcilable. Moon shadows listening to the wind's tremble: a whole century of this, despite Lukasiewicz. Gertrude Stein's post-WWI chamber music in praise of the Neverlasting. Though I certainly entertain no nostalgia for Romantic Period concoctions, I realize that so long as suppression of the implications of Lukasiewicz lasts, there will be no competent meeting of the challenges humans have composed as the developing global crisis. As Debussy once said, “Let's leave. They are beginning to develop.” The cherished memory, the greatest intimacy, the most profound insight: tokens of life qua life, emblems of event streams coursing archetypal relief on cartographies of the collective unconscious, no signifiers of absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct self-existence -- but for the willfully adopted stigma, the sign placed in assignment space: one ensigns one's life to one's ₁T₂-self alone, thinking it in the cosmic design to so consign.

By “time-currency”, I designate (not Ithaca Hours or Time Dollars, i.e., service-time, beam-time, run-time monies; and not In Time lifetime currency) a currency the units of which represent a claim upon the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth -- not a fiat claim upon deferred, capitalized (see Michael Pettis on “the implicit capitalization of debt-servicing costs” as discussed at the end of this post) debt-currency obligations -- these time-shapes, given the “convertibility of the elements” injected into cosmos by the good-offices alchemy of Amaterasu, the Sun Goddess, being, for all intents and purposes, limited, i.e., a matter of scarcity, only by lack of creative imagination, lack of wisdom, lack of knowledge, lack of integrity, and the like. Absent strategically-computer-gamed, _µT_m-valued time-currencies there is little chance the interests of memetime-future generations will not be heavily discounted by memetime-present-oriented agents tactically-reactively formulating policy within a ₁T₂-valued monetary framework constituted of atemporal-currencies. Under the assumption that the m-value stacks (involving tags to indicator-measurables linked to externalities) upon the base-states of different _µT_m-LETS time-currencies would be different (having been chosen locally according to local requirements discovered and consensuated via e-commons computer gaming of local m-scenarios strategic planning), though there would still be one-price for a given commodity-instrument-wage, the sheaved indices of the one-price would differ from one currency domain (think: a given LETS) to another, one currency nest (think: for instance, a given regional LETS) to another, within the quantum-composite of monetary system nesting foams -- providing opportunities for arbitrage on externality-related sheaving values, after the fashion of trade in carbon credits, but, in this case, the arbitrage would be a feature of all inter-currency transactions, the involved additional transaction costs adding the viscosity required to constrain hot money flows (consequences of the absence of viscosity modulation are aptly characterized by Doug Noland: flash forward to see, “Credit is Gold #1 and Icebergs”, The Prudent Bear, 24 January 2014), and the value-stack differentials acting as fractal-drum band-pass filters on mobility of goods and labor, thus diminishing the need for top-down imposition of rigid monetary controls, tariffs, work visas, taxes, and so on (by contrast, whole-integer-₁T₂-border procedures, transfer protocols, and the various forms of internal travel visas, as they currently exist, were designed by the collective-suicide self-metaprogram to altogether quench parsimonious marshaling of the “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth, in response to the anthropogenic gathering global crisis). Such dampening of hot money flows, licit and less licit -- particularly if the fractal e-boundaries-without-boundary, upon which the externality-tagged _µT_m-LETS time-currencies were defined, change according to the holomorphic flux of the bureaucratic variables which they circumscribe -- would transpire in a manner analogous to a biological cell's plasmahaut phase-boundary acting as a quantum computer facilitating autopoiesis through enhancement of self-organization-by-resource-exchange between immunologically-coded (e.g., frequency-response windows or holding-time-spectral currencies defined there over) limited spacetime domains (this is no reference to higgledy-piggledy eminent domains enforced by mobocracy) -- the sort of “mechanism” any self-respecting supply-and-materiel troubleshooter would find of interest (so why should The Office of George Soros, the asymmetrical-bubble analyst [flash forward and see: “Asymmetrical Bubbles”, Lance Roberts, STA Wealth Management, 5 December 2013], not have been interested in _µT_m-LETS; because he is a speculator and no supply-and-materiel troubleshooter?). There would also be intra-domain trading of sheaving values stripped from the currency base-state, so as to accommodate the needs of labor, consumer, producer with respect to acquiring the sheaf-value-arrays required for specific types of purchases, one purpose for the stacking of sheaving values being to add subtlety of incentive-sanction to market action-directives. Let it again be observed that this notion can be considered to involve Adolf Lowe's “instrumental inference” (I read On Economic Knowledge during the late-'70s at Cornell) with respect to supposedly not-getatable information erewhile denied to market actors -- ah, yes, the issue of the missing hair in the matter of Delilah vs. Samson -- but not AL's I/I employed to inform governmental regulatory intrusion-implementation-intervention: to raise the market to higher and higher levels of self-organizational competency.

I have never seen a detailed account of the differences between BrettonWoods-era Keynes' proposed bancor + clearing union and White's proposed unitas + stabilization fund (before this fund idea was transformed by others into the IMF). Both Keynes' and White's conceptions were, however, undoubtedly top-down command-and-control oriented. Brad Delong, in reviewing Robert Skidelsky's biography of Keynes, offers interesting reflections critical of Skidelsky's treatment of this area, but few concrete details. Since Monbiot altogether leaves out mention of unitas (discussed in testimony to the House Un-American Activities Committee concerning White's role, if any, in collapse of the GearWheel currency), I suspect the contrast was not quite as portrayed in his account (see: “Keynes is innocent: the toxic spawn of Bretton Woods was no plan of his”, George Monbiot, The Guardian, 18 November 2008). Moreover, what White personally wanted was not the same as what he was instructed to want by his uppers at Treasury and in the Executive (as made crystal clear by the memoir of his assistant, Ray Mikesell, particularly in the “Bretton Woods: Preconference Negotiations” chapter, Foreign Adventures of an Economist, U. of Oregon, 2000). Washington's Blog has recently posted a brief general discussion of some of the involved issues, e.g., currency basket vs. commodity basket (see: “Is the Dollar REALLY Losing Its Reserve Currency Status… If So, What Will REPLACE it?”, 29 October 2013). While bancor + clearing union may have been adequate in 1945, and for a short while thereafter, the subsequent massive uptake of quantum-based technologies has wreaked so many changes that no suspicion of current adequacy of Keynes' notions can seriously be entertained. Note that bancor (as was unitas), being a commodity-backed reserve, something Monbiot doesn't mention, had nothing to do with notions like the SDR, which is defined over a currency basket, not a commodity basket. The SDR, even if secondarily referenced to a commodity basket, would still possess many dimensions, and liabilities, of a vehicle currency -- simply because it is defined over a basket thereof (which neither bancor nor unitas was to have been). Regardless, no combination of these notions would work well today, given the nature of the evolving techno-regime -- and multidimensionality of the prevailing global crisis. It is not enough, anymore, to resolve trade imbalances and stabilize commodity prices so as to restore a store of value. Moreover, fundamentals ignored or not understood by Keynes (Lukasiewicz logics existed before WWI) are involved: both the synoptic trade/account-imbalances problem and the Triffin Dilemma (present-day consequences of this dilemma are aptly characterized by Charles Gave and Louis Gave in, flashing forward, “Gavekal Explains The Emerging Market Panic”, Zero Hedge, 27 January 2014) are epiphenomenal to ₁T₂-processing of ₁T₂-atemporal currencies marking transactions and defined over (1x2x3)integral-dimensioned (hundred-mile spread on land, more at oceanside, airspace-walling above, grounded counter-terror walls) monotonic [in{or}out] boundaries: no combination-modulation of these ₁T₂-variables and parameters and processes could conceivably be adequate today. Indeed, the very idea of a currency basket needs to be so generalized as to lose its ₁T₂-ness: that's why I advocate no reserve currency at all (and certainly am not sympathetic to a ₁T₂-bit/coin-type reserve currency: see “As Bitcoin Soars To Over $300, A Question Arises: Could It Become a Global Reserve Currency?”, Zero Hedge, 7 November 2013; and “Will the Dollar Lose its Reserve Currency Status to an SDR Currency?”, Charles Hugh Smith, Of Two Minds, 14 November 2013; and, flashing forward, “Citi: Bitcoin Could Look Attractive To Reserve Managers As A Complement To Gold”, Zero Hedge, 5 December 2013; and, flashing further forward, see, for very interesting perspectives on this issue, “Bitcoin -- The Potential Monsanto of Digital Currency?… Bitcoin is 'GMO Money'!”, Matthias Chang, Global Research, 10 December 2013), only a unit of account on an MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space). Variously back, with locally-chosen commodity baskets, the base-states of _µT_m-valued (by definition, no Left-or-Right solution: quantum complementarity, in my view, is epiphenomenal to psycho-identification with ₁T₂-valued logic; hence, I do not advocate _µT_m-LETS as, ultimately, complementary mutual credit currencies, and certainly not as complimentary currencies, after the fashion of Silvio Gesell, though I do view ₁T₂-complementary currencies as THE means by which a smooth transition from the present ₁T₂-fiat system to a backed _µT_m-valued system could, theoretically, be accomplished) LETS vehicle currencies (first-order abstraction) manifest in nesting foams (for a brief discussion of the idea of a multi-level monetary system, see page 205, The Future of Money, Bernard Lietaer, draft version posted online, copyright 1999: let it be noted that only now, online, am I reading Lietaer, as my access to books has been very limited over the last decade or so) and defined over fractal e-boundaries (with multicommodity-basket reference, the base-state would be in a tacitly m-valued-FUNCTION one-price state, but would not be m-LOGICALLY-valued). Employment of complementary parallel currencies using fiat currencies as units of account, instead of going to superposed logical values to internalize externalities, is an embrace, by ConveDD, of the probability-amplitude dissimulation of Schrödinger's wave-function and, pre-collapse of the wave-packet, associated split-off parallel-universes notion (parallel universes are not parallel, rather they are in “pencils of skew-parallels”, hence, are _µT_m-logically-valued relative-states of universe: each ₁T₂-instant from the indefinite past to the indefinite future of memetime is actually a time-shape of this one-and-only universe, a given time-shape amongst the superposed stack of _µT_m-relative-states of universe), and the ₁T₂-chaos-theoretic 2^nk-fitness landscape Rx of _µT_m-criticality, taken together, an animism-paganism-IdentityTransparency-escape dissimulation, in my judgment, at its origins, one of the foremost deep-structure precipitators of WWII (and likely PW1). Washington's Blog, in the above-linked article, suggests that all the world's currencies should be included in (i.e., conjugated to) the “We Are The World” SDR reserve currency basket, but this is not a basket-notion sufficiently generalized to function well in the current quantum-dominated techno-regime: not an n-nomial composite reserve currency (more or less as the French have proposed on and off from the 1960s), but a quantum-composite (second order abstraction), not made into a currency, but understood as the superposed Everettian relative-state of all the mutual credit LETS there are, planet Earth. What would this quantum-composite compost? The commodity references of the vehicle currencies. What would this quantum-composite compost to? Not to a supercommodity basket, but to the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” (third-order abstraction), planet Earth, as more and more thoroughly mapped, with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, over the MVRS (increasingly constellated by the growing corpora of sheaved _µT_m-values stacked upon LETS currency base-states as externalities are internalized: note that the anti-hoarding emergency-currency motivation for Gesell's negative-interest-rate-stamp-script is more comprehensively handled, in design of a non-emergency monetary system for normative quantum economies, by the _µT_m-sheaving topping off local-computer-gaming determination of the fractional reserve to be required -- one aspect of the algorithm of issuing (AoI) -- at local public bank lending of the given _µT_m-LETS: start off with whatsoever sorts of complementary currencies, then, likely, there will evolve a preponderance of mutual credit currencies, then incorporate commodity reference to the AoIs, then, as the system further matures, incorporate “time-shapes of total capital stock” to the AoIs). Time-shapes-in-themselves are not techno-regime related; “time-shapes of total capital stock” are so related. “Uses conjoin”, quoth we Swedenborg, as regards pragmatics of relative-state. Self-organization of optimum resource use, on a resource depleting planet, requires direct employment of market “framework determining conditions”, e.g., the orders of logical-value enjoined by very definition of the monies employed. I am against effecting blanket currency-demurrage (depositor paying interest on the deposits made and held as deposits over memetime: commodity storage fee is only one sort of demurrage and has always been integral to any backed currency, often just handled as an absorbed cost of doing business or a cost to be passed on without altering behavior) because “holding time” is a critical-state variable related to the “minimum time for spontaneous localization” (a kind of Maxwell's sorting “angel”: see Tranche 19) which is directly involved in determination of uses to which the “time-shapes of total capital stock” are put: this variable, more than all other of all the various variables, should not be artificially-extrinsically-iatrogenically sledgehammered by whatever means. Using universal (though why not with respect to this and that LETS?) demurrage to shift memetime focus from short to long, rather than employing Lukasiewiczian monetary units for this and other purposes, is like substituting a single pile driver for a shelf of jeweler's tools: besides, one wants a spectrum of appropriate memetime scales on the currency base-state, and multiple time-shapes riding thereupon. Establishing and maintaining sensitive dependence upon initial conditions (time-shapes of total capital stocks, local and synoptic), appropriate scales (temporal and spatial), and right uses (micro- and macroscopic) can only be accomplished by employment of nesting foams of _µT_m-valued LETS defined over fractal e-boundaries: modulation of the cost of capital, as a universal, does not do this. Especially cannot spatially-local, temporally-sensitive specific needs be reconciled with synoptic, long-term generic needs within a ₁T₂-logically-valued system referenced to memetime (variant of the ₁Triffin₂ Dilemma). But people sitting on their cognitive thumbs, thus immobilizing them, studying within only their areas of expertise, will not comprehend this. Life in general, however, figured this principle out long ago: see, for one take on the issue of quantum superposition, “Quantum physics proves that there IS an afterlife [actually an 'overlife' unreferenced to memetime?], claims scientist”, the foremost reason given being that “space and time do not exist in a linear fashion”, Prof. Robert Lanza, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, The Daily Mail, Victoria Woollaston, 14 November 2013). Robert Mundell's “optimum currency area” is the whole planet. I reject the notion of a universal currency because of the systemic loss of locally-specific information involved. Natural systems do not tolerate such losses, and ecology of Earth cannot be sustained by use of such a currency (e.g., a monetary system developed without parallel to, no analogical modeling upon, quantum-relativistic atmospheric dynamics has no chance of organizing optimum response to climate shift -- anthropogenic and/or no): even with nonlocality, quantum systems do not lose locally-specific information because of non-simple identity, relative-state, and the hologramic principle. What is required is not a universal currency, but a planetary unit of account. And what then would the unit of account be (I'd be more inclined to call it a gaia, than a terra which has moony denotations)? A quantum of allelotropic action (of each other: i.e., Wir, not Ich, because what are gifted, whenever omiyage are exchanged as expression of amae-Einfuhlung, are, or once were, signifiers of relative-state identity-transparency [“hau”: see The Gift by Marcel Mauss], the Bohmian quantum-potential wave-guiding autopoiesis and self-organization),

Contrary to the convictions of
The remaindered social Darwinists --
Those unsociablest of chuckleheads,
What think are synonymous
Peculator, malversator, and generator,
Ephemera and miscellany notwithstanding --
Who still, centuries later, tacitly take
The Newtonian vector summation
As the selfish magic hand held responsible
For self-organization's market mediation,
To them the woodwormed way
Cocooned in cognitive demesne

allelotropic upon chronotopology of the MVRS for the autopoionomy. I don't think we need worry much about military-industrial-legal-banking-political-academic elites-syzygy blocking emergence of a new monetary system, particularly since the German-Austrian-Rooseveltian suppression-of-decentralization precedent is sure to persist indefinitely (e.g., the prevailing adscititious idea, largely elaborated ad hominem, as to what “local” government is, increasingly is based upon the ad hoc principle of “reverse representation” as exemplified in ICLEI Global which issued out of the UN's World Congress of Local Governments), and sure to fail; rather, we need to worry about early enough (how early this might be, we cannot possibly know, according to the present argument, because the continuing embrace of a “classical limit” has severely dissembled the corpus of existing scientific paradigms by which the global crisis is assessed) creating adumbrations of that new, e.g., strategically placed foci about which autopoietic self-organizing processes can congeal in the period immediately after that syzygial interlock poofs-out by incendiary collapse -- this being the always-scorned position I have explicitly advocated ever since the mid-1970s -- oh, those Paineful Cornell days! -- with precursor thoughts going back through Strategic Research and Analysis, MACV-J2 and Ben and Nikki Hirano's “smoothing” of my experience of Psychological Operations Group, JFK Special Warfare Center and Elspeth Rostow's American Civilization seminar, AU-SIS and the Steve Lau and Fred Hornbacher mediated AIESEC connect to Senator Mundt (on the advisory board of AIESEC-US), HHH, and Douglas Dillon (whom, I've only recently learned, opposed the Diem-Nhu “de-position”, the challenging of which during an AU-SIS dinner, Mac Bundy the keynote speaker, almost led to my being expelled from AU-SIS a couple of weeks before the JFK assassination [after which, employing my childhood experience at penetration ops outfoxing the guard corps of Ashiya, AFB, to get at off-limits caves containing WWII paraphernalia, my low-wire experience at walking my cousin Eddy's circus-training tightrope, and swing-scaffold experience painting DEW-line radar domes -- precursors to working high-steel with native Americans ironworkers -- I climbed fire escapes and sill-to-sill in order to reach a rooftop providing the best perspective on the caisson and world leaders like De Gaulle, whose somber face still flashes in recollection of the event], but instead, most fortunately, to my being consigned by Dean Griffith to weekly remedial counseling [which turned out to be more like instructive sessions of reminiscence: was there ever a Dean like this Dean who, in the initial Welcome, Fall of 1963, honored those SIS students arrested during the Civil Rights marches of that summer? and, to be perfectly accurate, during one of his counseling sessions, he told me to steal books if I couldn't, as I couldn't, afford them! of course I never did steal books, as he knew I wouldn't] by retired Career Ambassador Loy Henderson, then associated with AU-SIS) and all the way back to Obaasan's tales of the (_µT_m-valued) yama-no-kami setting details of the planting method and cycle for Midori Gaoka, Ashiya-cho, kita-Kyushu (referenced to the operator-time-intersheaved, hence chronotopological, ma, i.e., the sacred space MVRS), even as late as 1956. This ma is a notion I first experienced (without conceptual insight) as an 8-11-year-old child at play in the valley space surrounded by the Verdant Hills which are Midori Gaoka (my Pennsylvania hometown is similarly named: Greencastle) -- and later as a student of Japanese gardening taught by a man who learned the art at beginning of the Taisho era (though the viewer's experience of the Edo-style garden -- not the hyper-Zen Ryoan-Ji [which I first visited in 1954] -- unrolled like an emaki-mono scroll by michiyuki -- strolling, or more elaborately, sacred flight paths marked by the cranes' cries, an early version of acoustically-modified gravity-wave mode superstring theory of acoustic-analogue to black hole computing studied, at D. A. Paine's urging, by the bird people in Cornell's Neurobiological Behavior Laboratory -- the traditional design process transpired by identification of embedded non-birds'-eye-view viewing points, the involved triangular fields of view being understood as superposed within the circumscribed ma which is the garden's sacred space, the space of design -- though a vertical ken unit length was employed, height of trees, so on, this verticality applied only to the ponderable space of the garden, not its sacred space conceived as a stack of flat 2D sheets time interconnected, such that the concrete vertical-horizontal distinction is indefinable, or so I was led to understand). Many epiphany moments of silence, inner and outer, were experienced in that Midori Gaoka space, 1953-6, particularly sitting under an ancient pine on the blood-grass covered mound watching wind-driven rain rip across the rice fields, a kami spot-instant, to which, in 1990, I returned, and found was no longer a mound, but was marked by a stone monument. It's not necessary to wait on Go-Dot, as spot-on Yayoi Kusama realized: done she before did even John A. Wheeler. And they have long since digitalized the black box within which interpretation of black-body radiation has been contained -- despite what Thomas Kuhn thought about the involved ₁T₂-paradigm. “Minute particles [i.e., Aurobindo “warm-golden dust”, a Borel set with respect to Wheelerian pregeometry] of KAMI [logic operators], as it were, fill that MA.”: quoting MA, Space-Time in Japan (Arata Isozaki, exhibition catalogue, Cooper-Hewitt Museum, 1979). Be aware that mathema, ma-thema, means awareness. The empty spaces, intervals, between the sounds-objects, as foundation of Musculpt symformphonie “harmonic theory” (cf: Heinrich Schenker and Victor Zuckerkandl and Karlheinz Stockhausen: tonal space as place) -- not the notes-rocks themselves. Quoting Big In Japan on Isozaki: “According to Isozaki's reading [posted to the internet on 22 October 2011: unfortunately, this site appears to have a lot of problems, though the cached copy contains this quotation -- when what is easily found and what remains posted is what is popular, facilitation of creative thought by intertextuality is severely undermined; alternatively see, “Place, Space, Void”, Gunter Nitschke, Kyoto Journal, 8, Fall 1988, based upon a 1976 Cornell presentation, though I have always considered this account binary-minded and reductionistic, in that, for instance, “imaginary”, “transcendental”, “sacred”, “space”, “place” are not understood as explicitly including number-theoretic denotations, an exclusion connoting a certain sort of mindset prevalent amongst Kyoto gaijin] of ma in pre-modern Japan, space was perceived as identical with the events or phenomena occurring within it [this being a Wheelerian idempotency, uh, the geometrodynamic transformation not changed in numerical value -- or logic order-type, Wheelerian pregeometry being ₁T₂-only -- when crossed into itself, I/i would observe, despite the idempotency being a holomorphic function of relative-state identity-transparency of the boundary-without-boundary “bounding” the space of consideration which that space is only heuristically distinguishable from: hand contour-drawing its own image, and vice versa], that is space was recognized only in relation to time-flow”. Unquote. Isozaki's, in my judgment, is, in certain respects, still a Cartesian-Newtonian take on the primordial-Shinto notion: I would substitute discontinuous quantal qua Buddhological (“dependent origination in one mind moment” of endogenous ketaminergically-accelerated baud rate of consciousness) active “operator-time” for Jamesian-streaming continuous referential “time-flow” as the connector of the circumscribed (like is Ryoan-Ji, and the LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, of relativistic-quantum Paine-Kaplan atmospheric dynamics) stacked-strung space-like sheets-branes. Readers of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, may recognize in this latter Isozaki statement -- as modified -- the fundamental basis for the manner in which the Viet Cong (political) Infrastructure (VCI) mapped bureaucratic variables upon the changing boundaries of the space within which their interplay transpired, this mapping, and analysis thereof, being the foremost means by which strategic initiatives, like the Tet-'68 offensive, were timed and organized. The involved notion of the opportune moment is similar to the Greek idea of Kairos, in that it is a “time-between”, a “sensitive interval”, a, shall we say Buddhological, “hole” in quantitative, sequential, seemingly continuous chronology, a hole through which time as quality, as qualia, appears, effecting -- not merely affecting -- events, i.e., the phenomena appearing within space and perceived to be identical to it, such that, quite explicitly in the VCI case, the boundary-without-boundary of the space hologramically possesses all the information contained by the space it encloses, Kairos denoting (quantum-potential) demergence by, via, ma, as an Ichoric eidolon of the pregeometry ontologically “before” ponderable space and lived place are existent, of the corpus of autopoietic boundary-without-boundary kami operators (in the present case, VCI cadres, i.e., organizers; please excuse the double entendre) in Everettian relative-state and effecting chronotopological transforms of the space circumscribed. My argument concerning this, dating to early-1968 at its sketchiest, CICV-Targets and SRA/MACV-J2 (mention of DNA, metabolic pathways, quantum physics, and so on was not infrequent at SRA), has never been that this way of understanding was fully conscious to the VCI, only that it was tacitly given by accretion of pre-modern [comp}re-hension still subliminally potent, particularly amongst the rural population only a generation away from significant levels of animistic “participation mystique” with the natural surround.

Yet another excellent post from Charles Hugh Smith (see: “Why Is Predicting Crisis/Reset So Difficult?”, Of Two Minds, 3 November 2013). Factors 2 and 7 are foremost, the others, to my assessment, being derivative (all three meanings). Heh-heh-heh! But what Smith doesn't get is that self-referential systems are not dependent upon feedbacks. Feedbacks transpire under relative absolute limiting accelerations/decelerations (re: inflation/deflation). Reentrant, self-referential reflexivities transpire under relative absolute limiting time rates of change of accelerations/decelerations (re: bubble-blown reverse-cascade climbs up the Devil's Staircase of risk concentration and displacement, and the inverse). Note the use of plurals (and, hence, the predication of m-valued universal physical constants processed by nature under _µT_m-valued logics). This insight (sans the near-universally-accepted “classical limit”), one of the major contributions issuing out of the quantum-relativistic Paine-Kaplan multiscale, nested-grid, numerical forecast model of tornadogenesis (a notion almost half a century old, yet still to be assimilated), has potential fundamental-economic and monetary-system applications, suggesting that, for one, 20-year-old-mathematics-Ph.D.-instigated high-frequency trading (see the VDO linked in: “Exposing Wall Street's Hidden 'Code'”, Zero Hedge, 4 November 2013) may not be only an abuse-hiding transform written over market chronotopology (not simply topology), but also a displaced-physicist-induced conversion disorder displacement (conversion of meaning, use displaced from one field to another, significance of which is subliminal: the explicit cue being the differential usage of the term “order-types” by HFTer quants and in the field of logic) of the above-noted insight, for a disabusing HFTing, employed in a monetary system based upon _µT_m-valued LETS mapped over fractal e-boundaries, might well be essential to systemic functional integration of the “contagion” (an ensemble's relative-state behavior) associated with reentrant, self-referential, market reflexivities, as suggested here, i.e., “Tranche 19” posted on this website. Such ConveDDs, conversion disorder displacements -- inherently unconscious -- are markers of the deep-structure etiology of the dead-man's grippe galumphing humanity into mass warfare and total war of both high and low intensity, ever since N. H. Abel's “Impossibility” theorem existence proof for transalgebras -- giving rise, by days of Lukasiewicz, to back-reaction against the involved resurrection of animistic-pagan “participation mystique” cognitively encoded, if only subliminally, by logical-value “order-types”. If, as regards application of higher mathematics to the market, the motivation is to make money, then that places one on a certain discovery track for possible analogical connections; if, however, the motivation is to raise the level of systemic autopoietic self-organizational competency, then one finds oneself on another track.

Though I have had a general-outline familiarity with the history described here (see the VDO entitled “How the Rothschilds and Bankers Control America”, 16 June 2013), I have until now (despite having, as a sixteen-year-old, been spellbound by sourdough Paul Connell's diatribes against FDR, and, as a student of Elspeth Rostow, having read some distance into the involved areas, and having listened, seemingly endlessly, to a Texan friend, a fellow AU-SIS student, and eventually a dropout like me, discourse upon the perfidies of the catpawing Eastern Establishment bankers as he strongly advocated the positions taken by Rep. Wright Patman, whose office he spent a fair amount of time in) been unaware of many of the details and interconnections revealed, e.g., salient global monetary factors involved in the fall of Tsar Nicholas II, even though I knew from, memory serving, my reading of Donald Keene's Emperor of Japan: Meiji and His World, 1852-1912, Columbia U., 2002, that Frankfurt-born American, qua Rothschilds associated, banker Jacob Schiff had played an important role in Emperor Meiji's decision to provide funds to Lenin -- and certainly had encountered few of the quotations attributed by the VDO to the major historical figures discussed. This is an extraordinary documentary which anyone interested in American civilization and the history of money would do well to watch. A better use for three-and-a-half hours would be hard to find, an opinion I tender even though I could not strongly endorse the concluding section featuring Milton Friedman's "ingenious solution" which ignores the wide spectrum of difficulties-complexities that Friedman never adequately contemplated, not the least of which being the vast array of externalities econo-professionally deemed economically non-existent.

Yellow, soft yellow, we all knew that, Cotswold yellow, stone hard, but yellow nonetheless. Right, a dipsomaniac imagining himself sitting in Cassiopeia's Chair starring at Andromeda, back to The Father. A radical loco foco, in opposition, but -- in spirit -- still part of the party, if only locum tenens. Biographer as an anaphoric who does anapest: he writes better than he does! Who is The Son, Andromeda; who, The Father biographer? Like in the Vedas, The Son fathers The Father -- nonorientably in reflexivity? I always wondered about The Savior, where the sniper looks through the wrong end of the scope, so as to distance himself from pagan-animistic identity-transparency: no ketamine in the Lilly Tank for him! Idolatry, Christian or pagan, requires a strange attractor: e.g., “JFK, Warmonger”. Attending SIS Teas, early-Fall, 1963, I knew much of this -- as it was discussed in hushes.

I do very much LIKE Caroline Glick: always read her because she gives the Israeli position unvarnished (e.g., “The Demise of Pax Americana”, Town Hall, 15 November 2013) and often presented hyper-₁T₂-rationally (i.e., secular-Rabbinically). Which is… clarifying. Just imagine, however, what _µT_m-fractal-e-boundaries Trees of Life would do to the various situations she is focused upon. But then, that would be (thanks be to my Westchester-County/AU-Jewish-Princess Cabala tutor) a Jewish-Cabalistic/Islamic-Sufi trans-al-jabr solution -- both, these days, universally scorned (for all sorts of deep-structure, largely unconscious, reasons that have little to do with reason, ₁T₂ or _µT_m). Well erenow, shades of yesteryear (circa 1966-7) for me: Special Forces Training Group arguments -- before I became a JFK Special Warfare Center intelligence analyst focused on the Middle East in run-up to The Six Day War -- with my good friend, and assiduous debater -- an extremely competent foil denigrating any fallacious series of deductions -- SuperJew Larry Friedman (What generation of SF created DF, and who ran the bureaucratic hurdles? Briggs' Plan in Malaya's Emergency was not the informing paradigm), a latter-day veteran of Desert One and one NCOIC of Delta Force.

Several times I asked my father what London was like when he was there during the war -- trying to get him to talk about his experience, which he never did, except, I imagine, amongst B-17 peers. An occasion of such query on my part, however, led into one of the deepest conversations I ever had with my father, a conversation which transpired in Greencastle. We were discussing the fact that I was coauthoring a novel, hopefully what would turn out to be a serious novel, when he said, “Don't be too hard on my generation. We thought we knew what the war was about, but were uncertain as to what had caused it, or the Great Depression, for that matter -- though we understood that both had colored every aspect of our lives.” So I tried to explain my idea that there is a complete absence of understanding that people's reactions to developments in higher mathematics, logic, and physics (as reflected in their knee-jerking evoked responses to new music, avant-garde art and literature) made the world wars an inevitability, whatever the politico-economic proximal causes may have been. Clearly, I was unable to get that idea across. All those farinaceous buskers living in Staffor-off-Sane, as illustrated by the “Map of the Day: Where the Brits never invaded”, Humanosphere, 7 August 2013. Aye, ochreous Old Stour: cricket or curry, not cricket and curry. Popular fantasy had Foxhound's Great Game down to “fair play, pluck, and daring-do”; whereas, today, it's Deerslayer's dirty tricks, paranormal heroics, and comic book scenarios: if the former is to be associated with the failed, albeit albescent, classical gold standard and world war, what unignorable order of crapulous failure (see “Wars Since 1900”, The Polynational War Memorial, posted somememetime post-2012) is to be presumed with regard to the latter's economics-by-fiat? Or is it already in the has been category -- as it were? Present perfect progressive. Why perfect?

My dear Madame, Caged silence cannot possibly supersede Musculpt, for there are sounds of silence inside sounds of silence inside sounds of silence -- astral and/or otherwise. All of brain chemistry could be rewritten in the terms of acoustics -- even as regards the brains of those brightened at Roequeen and Ratcliff. Mot juste is not generally [ep}sissi{MA] verba, and almost never epsissima vox. Ah, yes, the neural-hologram dynamics of Inner Musculpt: elaborated “mnemonics”, where unfurled memetime has been sliced and sheaved by temporal operators. Mozart's method to memorize a whole mass, having heard only a portion of it. Colors, shapes, susurrant music motifs transubstantiate words; abstract cineramic anime, numbers and tones and intervals -- particularly Gödel numbers and their Gödel numberings. The corpora of mⁿ-scenarios of the “piece” are in the forms of the form, the “fold”-invariants of their transforms over the ma manifold. No cognitive ochlocracy, that! More like the reductive-phenomenology Husserliana of the ontic contents of the various families of Samadhi states (think: Jordan Belson's “expanded cinema” in polytopes over emaki-mono scroll by michiyuki). And no open code musicological black PW-MO (political warfare dash morale operations) proletainment complementing pandemic prolfood. Highly recommended are Wolfgang Luthe's (memory serving, Vol. 5, of Autogenic Therapy, Grune & Stratton, 1970) discussions of, and patient drawings from, autogenic abreactions qua neutralizations -- particularly as regards the polymorphic multicolored cineramic visual phenomena dimension. Consider [1] the temporal aspects of Bohm implicate-order enfolding/unfolding, and [2] how exactly holographically-exteriorized Musculpt might become mathematical notation, and [3] the issue of what went missing when mortgage-backed securities and their derivatives were bundled into bundles of bundles without using fiber-bundle arithmetics when examining the following quotation from the “Topoi of Music” chapter of The Topos of Music, edited by Guerino Mazzola, Springer, 2002, pp. 427-8:

The idea [to use families of coverings to introduce the Grothendieck topology on global compositions] is now fully absorbed by topos theory in the context of sheaf construction from presheaf categories. Here the yoga of topology boils down to the gluing catechism which gives insights to compatibility of local data without having to deal with the original intuitive [this science-psyops “intuitive” indicating the self-evident obvious, which is the cognitive blowback of the glutamatergic neuronal etching associated with prescriptive enculturation-socialization] neighborhood connotations from Euclidian geometry. Therefore it is a natural idea to integrate the Grothendieck topos construction which generalizes the Cech cannon for the analysis of musical composition categories, or even the detonator categories provided they admit fiber products, a mandatory condition for the definition of Grothendieck topologies via covering families.

Mozart would just absolutely have loved this. Not to mention what it will do for theory of the coherent waves emitted at radiation exchange by free-electron-gas core of DNA, acoustically-modified gravity-wave mode analogues to black hole computers, sound-wave-generated water sculptures (viewed at the correct sheaf-flipping frequency or baud-rate of consciousness), and trans-air-gap ultrasonic transmission of malware. All of chemistry, for instance, beginning with the quantum chemistry of DNA, could be rewritten in the terms of The Topos of Music -- and I suspect that this someday actually will be done, which would be a major step toward bringing the full complement of human faculties, synaesthetically integrated, to the task of evaluating scientific ideas and experimental outcomes. Keep in mind, however, that these topos do not incorporate Lukasiewicz logics -- a considerable undersight, given that the main purpose for developing Musculpt as mathematical notation would be to facilitate thinking in _µT_m-logics rather than merely about _µT_m-logics by use of ₁T₂-only logic.

I don't by any means exonerate the chuntering 1% (the real “clash of civilizations”, that between the 1% and the 99%), or buy into that lot of nonlocal worthies' takes on the dilemmas associated with Social Security, Medicare, and Obamacare, to which QEing has not extended a boot splash. Bibulous anecdotalizing bandinage aside, oligarchical oligopoly, as quippery would have it: waddle on, Mates, we're the few in First Shute, what. Wiggle the waggle, that's how to wank it. Blimey, sweet as pigeon poop, she is, this loft, now isn't she. Yards of ale, feet first into inches and inches of single malts: right loyal piss-up be our commitment, Gents. Bugger the ant swarms, for red they be! I do not accept, however, the corpus of pedestrian critiques, which, valid or not, are restricted to surface structure. An obsession with the illusion of cradle-to-grave security melding into undue life extension unto a quenching of life via prosthetic mechanization (not against this per se, only when used to service immortality-simulacra obsessions), genetic manipulation, and cyberation via cybernation is altogether consonant with an attempt to effect planetary total control, a fixation upon paranormal heroics, a conversion of special effects, and, indeed, all of quantum-based technology to the servicing of mass psychopathology. Only a civilization, the metaphysical foundations of which have been utterly and irrevocably sundered, would engage in such behaviors. Two-hundred years into the sundering, we still have not even begun to address what, most fundamentally, is responsible for demise of the Weltanschauung informing the Lebenswelt with which we have established a state of identification such that our Umwelts could have become overstuffed with sacrosancts requiring protection by promulgation of war -- in its many dimensions -- to the bitter end, with prospects only of pyrrhic victory (for one possible instance, check out “the scenario of a serial chain reaction blasting apart nuclear plants along the Pacific Coast” of Japan: “Why TEPCO is Risking the Removal of Fukushima Fuel Rods…”, Yoichi Shimatsu, Global Research, 24 November 2013). Pyrrhic victory? Over what? Why the nature of Nature, of course -- which Lukasiewiczian post-quantum-relativity tells us ain't nothin' nearly like Planck and Einstein imagined, let alone the formulations of Newton and Descartes within which our institutional base is STILL rooted as an inviolable sacrosanct. Frankly, in almost seventy years of searching, I haven't found a single thing to like about the present civilization, least of all forced-draft urbanization as the development strategy to stoke the unending economic growth which has no purpose beyond superenriching a very few at expense of the planet's good health. Maybe we can imagine The White Lioness (as distinct from white-lying-ness) helping, not only Henning Mankell's South Africa avoid civil war at far-from-equilibrium phase transition out of the institutionalization of Apartheid (to me a particularly interesting take, me being a onetime student, and momentarily something of an understudy, of anthropologist [Swazi-no-Zulu] Professor Absolom Vilakasi: talked my way into his 9-credit-hour graduate seminar, African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, Fall 1965, AU-SIS: my declared SIS focus was African Area Studies, and I hung out at The Blue Nile restaurant downtown [vicinity of 6th and Florida, NW -- memory serving] where many African students made incidental spondulix working in the kitchen and chowing down on superhot and richer-than-rich saucy Ethiopian plus puffy injera, the seminar itself having been a bust because filled with grad students from elsewhere who had not been AU-SIS undergrads, and, hence, had not mastered enough of the basics to assimilate what V had to offer, thus forcing him to revert to yet another version of Intro to Anthro, V, therefore, not having the opportunity to get into what had long been pejoratively designated “participation inconsciente” and later upgraded to “participation mystique”), but also helping the human species to avoid space-based PW1 (Planetary War One) at far-from-equilibrium phase transition out of institutionalization of the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung. What, in the latter case, might be “the white lioness”? Is it really so, that “The spirits never left the country, never crossed borders” (The White Lioness, Vintage edition, 2009, p. 160) -- not even across African Fractal boundaries, not even the spirits' _µT_mly-relative states (i.e., the superposed, ever-present-origin “ancestors” of one's glutamatergically-etched [ratioci}nation)? This, I sincerely doubt, even though localization -- psychologically speaking, an integral aspect of the personification process -- is a constriction of consciousness, however normative it may have become. Animistic Lukasiewiczian identity-transparency insures that even ₁T₂-borderlands, uh, uh, potential barriers, are not insuperable obstacles to autopoiesis by temporal operations (which is not memetime travel via entanglement, leap, gravity, nonlocality, foam…). So-called “possession cults”, by tranced-out employment of so-called “participation mystique”, have always made “quantum potential” circulate for specific ends as wave-guide songlines (i.e., acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes, one case of the acoustic analogue to black hole computing).

Utility functions vary over memetime-periods t to t + X + …X_n (which is not to mention t², t³ and their absolute limiting values) not only because positive interest rates signify that preference functions more highly value memetime-present consumption over memetime-future consumption, and not only because interest-rate differentials vary according to length of the involved memetime-period, but simply because there exist, whether centrally planned or not, algebraic varieties of both generic + memetime/place-dependent utility functions and preference functions incorporating discount factors, varieties without which economies could not well operate. Availability of the full spectrum of utility functions is required if high levels of autopoietic self-organizational competency are to be achieved, whatever the momentary array of preference functions might be or how they are expressed. Maximization of microscale functional specificity in utility functions requires retention (the viscosities generated by, for two instances, bid/ask-spread transactional costs and short-selling constraints -- constraints reflecting preference functions [involving the hedging of risks via value tracking, immunization, et cetera] crossed into utility functions -- being essential to this retention) of the information spontaneously localized by transactional processes; whereas, maximization of synoptic functional integration in utility functions requires spontaneous fusion by superposition (not replication-recursion) of the local information retained: highly competent simultaneous localization and fusion can only transpire under autopoietic temporal operators employing a wide range of _µT_m-logically-valued order-types defined into economies on the monetary system level. Actual lack of frictionless, superconductive, perfectly-competitive ₁T₂-markets subject to an array of preference functions, and their reflexivities, not only practically undermines functionality of the one-price mechanism, but, even independent of the issue of externalities, demands _µT_m-markets (mere regulation of ₁T₂-behaviors is insufficient) if amplitudes of cyclical swings are to dampen by increased efficiency at spontaneous localization and fusion of economic information created and annihilated at transactions.

Henning Mankell develops an interesting characterization in The White Lioness (p. 216, Vintage edition) which is apropos of me throughout my youth:

By that time [for me, 1956] he had learned to live with his trauma [the unmasking of what he had overzealously been taught to believe was the case as being a fabric of misrepresentations, distortions, lies], as he had been unable to find any way of solving it. His division was reflected in his personality. He could play the part of the right-thinking and convinced Afrikaner [in my case: member of the human species, American military brat subset] who did and said what was expected of him; but deep down, the sense of impending catastrophe was growing stronger. There was no-one he could talk to, and he lived an increasingly solitary life.

Moreover, Mankell accurately encapsulates the essential feature of the method employed to seek solution (p. 366):

He was apparently a split [more accurately, a “_µT_m-valued”] personality. The further he penetrated into the conspiracy [more generally, the “collective crisis”], the deeper he penetrated his own real life [and vice versa, this whole-part correspondence being one manifestation of the hologramic principle].

Italics added. Pellucid awareness of this discovery principle -- as written into my personal journal during early-Fall of 1965 and later incorporated into our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh -- was the foremost reason why I quit college: sequence-prescribed, extrinsically-motivated assimilation is incompatible with this form of discovery. I clearly, to this day, remember the initial incident setting me off in that direction: evening of the day the USS General George M. Randall disgorged me in Yokohama, Summer of 1953. Just turned eight years old, agog, wandering FLW's Imperial Hotel, Tokyo, mouth agape, totally stunned, watching how Japanese shoeshine boys not much older than me were being treated by American officers dressed in ballroom-formal uniform. No agapeic love feast. The next three years were quite an education for this Baka Ameko! -- to specify the least.

For heuristic purposes, one could think of the _µT_m-value stack placed upon the LETS currency ₁T₂-base-state as a kind of “compound of interests” used to internalize externalities to the market -- this “compound” being a quantum-composite of all the logical-values in the superposed stack. Such a monetary arrangement would make sense insofar as each of the interests thus “compounded” is understood as signifying an instant of memetime (maturity) which is actually a ₁T₂-take with regard to a given Everettian-vonHayekian _µT_m-time-shape relative-state. In a sense (imaginary- and hypercomplex-numbered), externalities are interests relegated to hidden-variable status: what the _µT_m-value stack would accomplish is a making of the enfolded implicate hidden-variables explicate in market action-directives by establishing and marking order-types of interests to be handled at every transaction (accomplishing localization/fusion of time-currency information vis-à-vis the m-logically-valued reference space, MVRS). The whole stack, taken altogether, is the wave-function represented by the given unit -- or “autopoy” -- of currency, which is a chronotopological quantum of “autopoiarchic” action. The currency unit's ₁T₂-base-state is a currency “strip” (i.e., Riemannian “zero” on MVRS, or, in other words, Gödel number not Gödel-numbered: zeros and sets thereof establish “locations” on MVRS; Gödel-numbering of Gödel numbers, the m-“couponing” of those locations, that is, the sheaving of the reference manifold employed with respect to the allelotropic reserve unit of account vis-à-vis the “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth); trading sequences of the stacked values, or sets thereof, a kind of “compounding” from perspective of the system as a whole. These stacked-value trading sequences (traded independent of their strips) are not parallels of the ₁T₂-base-state strips; rather, Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”, because semantic imports of order-types _µT_m are not expressible by any ₁T₂-concatenation (if they were so expressible, they would not represent authentic externalities).

Is the real question to be formulated as to whether Japan will, by one means or another, become, as I've forecasted since the late-1960s, a part of Greater China -- or is it that Japan will be made a UN trust territory? No matter how elaborate and intense the bluster becomes (flash forward and see, for instance, “Japan Press: 'China-Japan War To Break Out In January'”, Zero Hedge, 8 December 2013), as any targets analyst should readily see, the Japanese could not possibly long fight, let alone win, an all-out war given the number of nuclear power plants and associated fuel stockpiles there are sitting around their small country (if WWII led to probably-unnecessary atomic bombings perpetrated by the world's then-foremost democracy, how can one possibly expect that PW1 will not lead to nuclear bombings -- and worse, given the likelihood that, a quarter century ago, nuclear warheads became obsolete and were superseded by weapons even more destructive?). Fukushima (see: “What Is The ACTUAL Risk for Pacific Coast Residents from Fukushima Radiation?”, Washington's Blog, 1 December 2013: a must-read most-edifying report) and collective hysteria in response thereto (see: “Japanese Senator: 'The Path That Japan Is Taking Is The Recreation Of A Fascist State'”, Global Research reposting from Washington's Blog, 30 November 2013: consider what this indicates about actual conditions at Fukushima) are only two factors auguring for the above-given two scenarios. Obviously, Asian Pivot or no, Pacific currents and prevailing winds are two GEOpolitical factors favoring China in any reconstituted resurrection of the Great Pacific War. Then there is the provocative, evoked-response-eliciting NRO's logo, “Nothing is Beyond Our Reach” -- shades of Operation Ranch Hand's “We Prevent Forests”. Others include the quantum-wave properties of DNA (which mediate low-level, small-dose, non-ionizing radioecology's memetime-delay, hand-off interface with biological chronoregulation, immunology, epigenetics, synergistics, so on: for a dynamical microphysical model, see here and here, a model of little interest to the Japanese when a public lecture on it was delivered at Tsukuba University in 1990, and generally ignored by engineers identified with molecular-only biology of the gene, as seen, for instance, in “This is your future”, Ray Kurzweil, CNN, 10 December 2013) and the cascade dynamics of Earth's relativistic-quantum atmosphere (see here and here: even if it is ultimately found that greenhouse warming is not the primary driver of climate change, that would not necessarily mean there has been no anthropogenic forcing, e.g., modulations imposed upon the cascade of complex angular momentum through the atmospheric spectrum of wave motions). Because there has never been a democracy not a plutocracy, there has never been a corporate interest which was in any national interest; nor has there ever been a national interest in the human interest. Whether or not, long ago, the human interest was elaborated and acted upon in such fashion as to be in the interest of planet Earth is debatable -- if so, it was before “whether or not” became a convention of human cognition. The enantiodromic, anisotropic, circular, t'ai chi rotation of logical-values in the ₁T₂-Tao of physics, and the chronotopological sheaving of the Great Space, ma (root homonym from which all so-called “natural” speakable languages may have demerged), of animistic Shinto, suggest this may once have been the case. Allelulia for the of-each-other allelomorph! N. H. Abel's 1826 “Impossibility”-Theorem existence-proof for trans-al-jabr set in motion developments in higher maths and, later, theoretical physics and, later yet, technological innovation raising the specter of a resurrected Shinto-Tao equivalent not in the interest of any corporation, nation, plutocracy, ecclesiastic prelatocracy. The story behind the back-story: from popular-science capsule history to technical hard theoretics -- not vice versa. Already, a Franco-Prussian war and two world wars have been fought due to the clinging behaviors associated with this Weltanschauung conundrum -- and nothing significant has yet been done to transcend it; barely tears tears out of the soul at screams and howls of world pain; indeed, there is ever greater cognitive retrenchment obfuscating the paradigms and distorting the operative techno-regime as, allargando, accelerating uptake of _µT_m-quantum-based technologies more and more thoroughly forces the issue of Weltanschauung phase-transition and reinstitutionalization. One must share one of John le Carré's character's opinion of the prevailing application space within which quantum-based tech currently operates (Our Kind of Traitor, Viking, 2010, p. 242):

And his measured opinion was that they [secure “tank” rooms in command operation centers and safe houses] were places that guaranteed collective insanity. He'd watched how the body language changed as the Indoctrinated Ones abandoned themselves and their common sense to the embrace of their virtual world.

This assessment, imputable to a onetime MI-6er, probably applies no less to the spaces “projected” by MoSoSo and DoDed Hollywood (e.g., USC's ICT-developed riffs on exogenous-ketamine-dream The Lawnmover Man VR-tech) -- and is echoed in a class-action letter demanding a planetary Bill of Digital Rights (which won't be gotten right until they incorporate the _µT_mly non-digital into their demands): to wit, flashing forward (quoting “State surveillance of personal data…”, Tom Stoppard, The Guardian, 10 December 2013), “…our masters are in the grip of a delusionary nightmare”. But not to worry, for soon G-men the world over, not only hidden-variables _µT_mly valued, will be invisible: see, “Chinese scientists upbeat on development of invisibility cloak: One team has already made a cat 'disappear' with a devise that has huge military potential”, Stephen Chen, South China Morning Post, 9 December 2013. Such are the uses to which we choose to put quantum-based technologies! And you don't see members of the G-30 or WEF or the directorship of the BIS advocating _µT_m-valued LETS nesting foams defined over fractal e-boundaries -- nor does Google stray from ₁T₂-logically-valued maps, however “dragable, zoomable, panable” (see: “Google's Road Map to Global Domination”, Adam Fisher, The New York Times, 11 December 2013: obsession with advancement of “location awareness” haptification-of-space being in pathognomonic compensatory abreaction to experimental demonstrations of the [omni}pre-sense of quantum nonlocality and relative-state identity-transparency). Extreme sports and hyper₁T₂cybernetics enthusiasts are largely unaware of the mass of limitations imposed by consignment to Cyberia (see, for instance, though I have divergent views on particulars, the can't-be-too-highly recommended: “Cyberspace and Its Limits…”, Ronald E. Purser, San Francisco State U., October 1999). Quoting Purser:

Now, at the turn of the millennium, the human observer gazes through a technologized version of Alberti’s window. Gate's Microsoft “Windows” -- the dominant frame into the world of cyberspace -- carries forward residues of perspectivism. I will attempt to show that the new communication medium of cyberspace, as it is presently conceived and utilized in the late twentieth century, is a hyper-modernist extension of the perspectival world.

Hooray! Hooray! And this hyper-extension hypers all the psychopathologies involved. The transition prefigured by N. H. Abel in 1826 has yet actually to be entered upon. Rue the year, they do. Even theories of “Dimensional Accrual and Dissociation” (see the paper by this title authored by Mark Kramer, where “variant value” orientations are not with respect to logical-value order-types) altogether ignore existence of Lukasiewicz logics, as did Jean Gebser in The Ever-Present Origin, with the exception of a few unenlightened sentences: concretion of memetime onto and into ponderable space (as distinct from: consciousness in its active aspect is the set of all chronotopological operators on Great Space; consciousness in its passive aspect is the space acted upon: _µT_m-logical processing does not require localizable molecular-cellular brains not containing THE quantum brain, as the Indic notion of pure universal consciousness -- Satcitananda at Turangalila, cosmic love play -- long ago codified; interesting reflections along these lines, primarily as regards the ₁T₂-order-type of _µT_m, are provided in “Predictive Metaphysics: A Quantum Consciousness Model of the Physical Universe”, Richard P. Dolan, 2012) is not the integrator it is purported to be (for a concrete case, we can observe that the PAP, Provincial Amenity Platform, which Douglas Webster, the UC-Berkeley-educated urban and regional planner, Chief Urban Planning Advisor to the NESDB, National Economic and Social Development Board of the Thai Prime Minister's Office, recommended creating during the early-1990s -- best done via _µT_m-valued LETS -- in face of the “infamous Scenario C” concerning a possible faltering of the process of globalization, brought together by the similarly credentialed Laurence A. G. Moss, was not the petty pap which came to be spread amongst the pop.: one example of how demergence, absent _µT_m-scenarios -- as distinct from simply m-scenarios -- planning devolves to mere concretions of the ₁T₂-logically-valued, which may well be deemed Voltaire's bastards). Staunchest those biting, caustic, prickly, yet frowsty, bastards are, but as regards what mordant musty? The too-thin wrap of translucent plausibility (MOIRE m-membranes diffract more): though the world's Logicians of Strategy (derivatives of the Psychological Strategy Board, amongst others) predicate their geopoliticoeconomic analyses upon a tacit belief in truth-value's either/or, their Forth Estate “least untruthfully” expectorates neither/nor in quarter tones and eighth notes but fully fuzzy in the interval 0,1. Contemplated knee across knee and over elbow, chin well in hand. If world wars were early-term human responses to the 200-years-gathering “global crisis”, what are the late-term responses likely to involve? For one answer, or, rather, one part of a plausibly-adequate answer, see: “As tensions in Asia mount, danger of world war emerges”, Nick Beams, WSWS, 6 December 2013 (though, these days, and in reflective retrospect, one can hardly credit that the so-called democracies were -- and are -- actual “democracies” by any transparent plausible non-too-thin accounting of the meaning of that word; nor should one underestimate the psychological-overhang impetus 19th-century humiliations may provide at some critical-state conjuncture; moreover, any wait for the “international working class” to develop new ideas as to how to address new aspects of the evolving situation is likely to be a wait fruitless). So, it is hardly hyper-reactive over-reach to speculate that my WAG, as to a ten-percent human survival rate at cuspover -- a rate the G-30 seems intent upon realizing by policy exclusions no less than inclusions -- may well be over-optimistic. The ₁T₂-integrative centrencephalic discharge-modulator of interfaces to THE _µT_m-quantum brain has covered every base by thematic orchestration of the story-telling employed as existential confirmation deflecting existential threats like experimental demonstration of quantum nonlocality and non-simple identity: all routes to minimizing the death toll have been deemed one or another kind of illicit. The nearly-subliminal injunction: “Don't stop BAliev'in'!” lah-lah-lah. Popular fascination with dinosaurs is a collective psychological projection of the subliminal recognition of the nature of the soon-to-come human-species conjuncture. Is post-paradigmatic Weltbild beyond our ken? Certainly it is altogether off the political spectrum, well beyond the apolitical, into realms of the transpolitical, contains no notion of politics as beholding to decision science. The slow-motion moon staggers shadows of our souls, all but locking homo-sapiens' interiority to archetypal ellipses. The ClearChannel pedestrian belief: there is more than one m-Monstrum. Absolutely barking, what. Ergo… gawp.

Whilst some few -- by _µT_m-understanding that total presence would be no less an artifact of ₁T₂-memetime than would be total recall and total precall -- have trophotropic mindflinch at PKDick Total Recall of Johnny NewMonoic's panoptikonic-kaleidoscopic megaurban phantasmagoria, others are totally imprinted thereupon via glutamatergic neuronal etching, soon to be reinforced by memorymod, genetic bodymod, moodmod, indeed, VRed-surrogate modmod subrogation. Negative fiction and cinematic extrapolations, in offering no potential solutions, function less as countering cautionary tales than as prefigurations. The only sure way to countervail these projective embodiments of the collective unconscious “decision” to activate the species-suicide self-metaprogram is to tie humanity's greatest obsessive compulsion, i.e., money grubbing, to _µT_m-modes of cognition. It is not insistence upon the “mono” -- monotheism, monogamy, monoculture, mono-cultivation, mono-valent logic, mono-valued variables, monopoly, philosophic monism -- that is at the root of anthropogenic malfeasance, but the personification aspect of individual and collective transference governing the prescriptive enculturation-socialization informing glutamatergic neuronal etching and associated quantum quenching at neuroplasticity. Even in traditional polytheistic India, infinite regress was considered a logical fallacy -- and, surely, the unconscious processes involved in transference personification were predisposing in the naming of “imaginary” numbers and the designation of N. H. Abel's existence proof for trans-al-jabr an “Impossibility” Theorem. Without these three mathematical dissimulations of non-simple identity -- i.e., of animistic relative-state identity-transparency -- there could not have arisen the compulsive attachment to “the classical limit” which guides techno-applications of The New Physics even unto this day: carrying this perspective into evaluation of statements made by public “[serv}ants” enhances the risibility index of one's daily life, an unmitigated good relative to one's kill T-cell titers. The documents most relevant to this thesis are Eric Temple Bell's work concerning automorphisms on the primes in light of Abel's theorem relative to the quintic, e.g., Bell's 1912 Columbia University Ph.D. dissertation entitled The Cyclotomic Quinary Quintic, and work on Bell series generally. In the years immediately before, and while, assisting Douglas A. Paine at Cornell during the 1970s, I traced down and read many of Bell's books (see annotated bibliography to our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh), an exercise I found catalytic to development of my own thought, particularly about the nature of operator-time, where Bell's pet theme, the continuous vs. the discrete, is central. No mere galoot's ear-bashing, what. So as to give no misrepresentation: I never mastered any of this, for there simply was no occasion so permitting, and my main objective was to understand what I had experienced as a child in Midori Gaoka, a distinctly non-professional agenda.

By use of the terms “one-price” and the “Law of One Price”, I do not speak primarily of an absence of transaction costs and bid-ask spreads in the traditional heuristic notion of a perfectly competitive market where difference equations over the spread of subjective micro-actor preference functions and discount valuations sum to an objective one-price: I speak of price as a single-valued variable signified by one-to-one-convertible single-valued currencies employed in a market supply-and-demand dynamic processed under ₁T₂-valued logic. The market's “magic hand” (myriad actors freely pursuing selfish ends within unfettered markets yield for the common good the most efficient allocation of resources) in such a system is a “black box” wherein the involved ₁T₂-logically-valued paradox (selfish = altruistic; random = organized; individual = collective; so on: is it merely coincidental, or is it a meaningful coincidence, that the hand's “magic” is found in violation of the logic laws employed?) is not actually explicated much beyond provision of “noms de guerre”: the interaction of supply and demand; the maximum principle; analogous to vector summation; analogous to the probabilistic gas laws governing molecular motions at transit to the state of equilibrium under the molecular theory of temperature. However, the physical theory underlying these “noms de guerre” of the black box which is the magic hand has been superseded for a century: vectorial force has been replaced by spacetime geometry and geometry by pregeometry; single-valued-vector summation went the way of Schrödinger's multivalued wave-function of packets-particles with non-simple identity (not just wave-particle, but particle to particle, if not particle-type to particle-type, and wave-packet to wave-packet); we now speak of “electron-temperature enhancements”, thus belying the molecular theory of temperature; explications of self-referential (at issue in relation to logical-value order-types) reflexivity have undermined utility of the notion of equilibrium as a behavioral attractor. Very likely, selfish behaviors of individuals have never played any role in the achievement of this or that level of systemic self-organizational competency. If so, what then has been the hidden-variable “mechanism” responsible? Some Arakawa-Gins "mechanism of meaning" (thanks be to artists Gary Wojcik -- for whom I once worked as an assistant -- and David Smyth for introducing me thereto, circa 1976)? If the physical theory analogy has continued utility at seeking answer to this question, then, in light of The New Physics, the economics problem becomes a simile of the quantum measurement problem -- which is to say that the economic black box concerns, most essentially, valuation of payments, or, more fundamentally, the nature of price qua price. By Schrödinger, the heuristic Law of One Price cannot, and never actually could have, referred to single-valued prices processed under single-valued logic; and, by post-molecular theory of temperature, the thermodynamic analogy must incorporate the phase-superposition and Everettian relative-state observed in the collective and cooperative behaviors of elementary particles. For these reasons, do I urge a staged, bottom-up phase transition to _µT_m-valued LETS currencies.

While I generally agree with the observations of Marc Faber, and in the specific case of his piece entitled “That Financial Crisis Was No Accident”, Daily Reckoning, 3 December 2013, with the thrust of his argument, I must demur on two points I consider not to be minor. Firstly, I would observe that his statement, “The problem lies in timing the onset of the crisis”, is apropos only of the investor-speculator and policy mandarin, not those seeking framework determining conditions for markets of higher levels of self-organizational competency. Secondly, and related, use of the term “natural business cycle” attributes an objective state-of-nature status to what is an anthropogenic phenomenon predicated upon the largely-tacit assumption that memetime is identical to an objective linear-time (straight-edged or curvilinear), this attribution going quite some distance toward altogether precluding efforts to find the aforementioned framework determining conditions which are likely to involve time-currencies embodying nonlinear chronotopologies.

As community-driven Bulbapedia (not to be mistaken for Buddhapedia) informs, those Generation-II-types, understanding non-damaging (detect & protect as distinct from snatch & snuff) normal-type moves, know brain-trained MindReaders do not necessarily require a ConveDDed external device (see: “Method of recording brain activity could lead to mind-reading devices, Stanford scientists say”, The Almagest, 4 December 2013). Why? Because telepathic Ms. Clairaudient (Misssssssssss MuSculpt as mathematical notation, that is: “Mu”, it is certain, being found in the Buddha's encyclopedia) generally suffices for those in unmolested-Everett relative-state identity-transparency -- holding in mind, of course, that such commo is Unspeakable even in consensus Quantum Mechanics (whatever one's level of numerosity, the _µT_mly-formulated maths question not being statable/answerable in T-or-F “objective”-test-type terms). Whistleblowing leakers regarded snuffling tattlers, by cleaver snip-snap asnitching -- whilst actually betokening a stabbling with effort the muck throughither. Exoteric NSA: prevent terrorism (see, “World of Spycraft: NSA and CIA Spied in Online Games”, Justin Elliot and Mark Mazzetti, ProPublica, 9 December 2013); esoteric NSA: prevent employment of _µT_m-LETS, i.e., prevent LETS with prospective e-commons-Musculpted user-friendly computer-gaming of value-stack sheavings (who knows that the anonymous Japanese code-spilling originator of the Bitcoin program was not a subcontractor to the BIS or some such: ₁T₂-bit coin being the worst possible way to go with e-money, particularly if eventually fused to a gold-incorporating SDR-type reserve?). Enfolded implicate Musculpt, of THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular brains, as distinct from explicate ConveDDed MindReader devise, is, essentially, equivalent to the distinction between _µT_m-animistic gift-economy exchanging signifiers of quantum-non-simple identity and totalistic control-freaky (quoting the Almagest article's quoting of the Chairman of the Steering Committee of the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics: “…we may conceivably someday be able to manipulate the brain to affect how someone deals with numbers”: if this statement is not strong support for my thesis regarding Abel's “Impossibility” Theorem and origins of the world wars, then I don't know what could be: sozzled attempts at “Abolishing the War System” without address to, let alone effective mitigation of, its fundamental cause-push/attractor-pull precipitators are more ludicrous than merely laughable, for, like Prohibition [of alcohol, sex, drugs, which G-men have successfully suppressed, eh, heh-heh-heh!], the foremost effect of the Kellogg-Briand-Pact outlawing war was to drive that which is prohibited underground into undeclarable status, and various degrees of low-intensity, removed from purviews of parliamentarians, congressmen, senators) ₁T₂-economy relentlessly exploiting an apparently defenseless planet -- defenseless until cuspover, that is. A making of the home planet into an enemy hardly seems edified. I've never been against research of any kind, only against the largely tacit intents (established by _µT_mly-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious subverted by habitual ConveDDs glutamatergically-etched upon ₁T₂-only neural networks at prescriptive enculturation-socialization) sure to continue governing choices as to applications.

Back in the Seventies, at off-campus parties, I occasionally argued to Cornell grad students that our consciousness is two-dimensional, not 3D, and this generally elicited a smirk and a conversational transition to the next joke made by someone else. I never got the chance to point out that volumetrics of the primordial Japanese sacred space, ma, i.e., the stack of 2D sheaves connected by time, is with reference to slices made through a frequency cone on the frequency domain, which is chronotopological in nature. Nor did I refer to my idea from the Sixties (written up during the Spring of 1968 at SRA/MACV-J2 under the title, “Third Stage of Insurgency Warfare: A Dynamical Analysis of Vietnamese Communist Strategy, Tactics, and Intentions”, later reproduced in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, an intelligence product submitted to the DIP, Director of Intelligence Production, which many readers, then and subsequently, regarded a fabrication) that the Viet Cong tacitly knew this, as exemplified by their having mapped bureaucratic variables upon changing administrative borders (an application of the principle that the boundary of a space contains all the information circumscribed within it, boundary changes thereby becoming one sort of stigmergy-type “trace” promoting spontaneous order). As I wrote it into my personal journal during 1975, also reproduced in our novel (Vol. 2, pp. 584-5):

…we always reference the image in a higher dimension. Is there a reason why our visual imagination is extrinsic? Why are we unable to represent to ourselves an image intrinsically?… Could the reason for the extrinsic nature of our visual imagination have to do with how we are consciously related to time? Because of our relationship to time, we find it necessary to represent to ourselves an image always referenced to the next higher dimension? If our conscious relationship to time changed in a prescribed way, would it be possible for us to apprehend a 3-space object in an intrinsic fashion? I have been trying to glean a little understanding of The Non-Singular Cubic Surfaces (B. Segre).

Aldous Huxley knew that Time Must Have A Stop. In meditative states, passing-time can slow down. As this occurs, there is an alteration in our percept-awareness. On occasion, while walking-meditating in such a time-warp-state, action has appeared to me as if in slow motion. Then, as this time-slow-down intensified, there has been the distinct impression of being able to “see” an occurrence before it happens. Is this the beginning of apprehending 3-space intrinsically, without reference to a higher dimension? In this case, the higher dimensional reference has evaporated as time stopped. Perhaps these “eternity experiences” are not a breaking into the 4th or 5th dimension, but a breaking out of the 2D into a direct, intrinsic perception of the third.

I knew this had to do with what, since adolescence, I have called my dissociative, schizotypic “Plexiglas wall” -- which I later understood as having to do with the Husserl “horizons” of objects construed to be simply-located within 3-space (more accurately, with the _µT_m-“subjective” correspondants/complements -- inverted Brownian “crosses” by Calculus of Indications qua calculus of Husserlian-“anticipation” [“anticipation” if and only if logical processing is restricted to the ₁T₂-order-type alone and referenced to memetime, not 3-fold quantal operator-time] intentions -- to the adumbrative “profiles”, or “internal horizons”, of objects understood as composing the object field of “external horizons”). I feel sure most people would still give this a very big smirk -- but not so big by those aware of recent findings in relativistic-quantum cosmology. See, “Physicists discover 'clearest evidence yet' that the universe is a hologram”, The Independent, 12 December 2013, a report on papers published in the journal Nature, where it is said that the “Latest calculations chime with 1997 theory that reality is only perceived as 3D and is actually a 2D projection on the boundary of the universe.” Not the least chiming when coupled to the Luneburg theory of binocular visual space, which challenges objective localization qua Penrose OR, and the import that theory has for Hugh Everett's adoption of the vonNeumann formalism in the latter half of his famous paper, where that adoption was justified by the declaration that objects in our experience always have definite positions. This is utterly staggering, but probably passes right on by without registration being made as to what is implied concerning the shear depravity of the moment-to-moment “normative” state of consciousness -- and its negative contribution as regards cosmognonics and karma. Note that this work comes from Yoshifumi Hyakutake of Ibaraki University in Japan. As regards macroscopic objects, the apparent paradox is resolved with realization that the fundamental physical constants (e.g., the speed of light) are m-valued under _µT_m-valued logics. The implications of this, in Gebserian terms, is that the primordial pre-pre-perspectival -- of which we have little in the way of residual collective memory, only collective unconscious promptings -- had nothing significant, with respect to cosmosemantics, to distinguish it from what conceivably could become the _µT_mly-aperspectival (I, not believing, like did Husserl, in an ontologically-“given” linear-time, i.e., memetime, don't embrace Gebser's progressive ₁T₂-linear account of the history of human consciousness) -- were humanity actually to make the transition/trans-figuration signaled by N. H. Abel in 1826, a signal all but immediately cancelled by the transference-bound Evariste Galois. If history is to end in [re}cognition of the import of _µT_m-reflexive reentry/nonorientability, this will not have been due to collapse of the U.S.S.R., but to a breaking of the bonds established by the glutamatergic neuronal etching of the memetime-bound modes of cognition imposing a visual-dominance impairment of cosmosemantics. World Wide Web: rainman's buffet or fisherman's trammel, that is the question not to be fobbed off. What Ronald E. Purser, in “Cyberspace and Its Limits…" -- briefly discussed above -- imagines as Virtual Reality Two, “VR2”, I (not taking to the Gebserian notion of “verition” and, not believing truth-value to be the fundament of logic, having no place for “eteologeme”) have imagined as “exteriorized Musculpt”, a way to use _µT_m-quantum-based technology to once again learn to make consciously available “internal Musculpt” (which is far and away from what Julian Jaynes imagined as characteristic of a non-conscious “bicameral mind” sans THE quantum brain not contained by it molecular-cellular brains: actually, I regard this notion a Freudian projection on part of a Jaynes hyper-identified with ₁T₂-logic). Somehow it has been imagined that people experiencing what has been called “cosmic consciousness” have percepts and propriocepts similar to those of the “normal state of consciousness” -- only with an expanded attribution of meaning. This is utterly ludicrous. The main obstacle to VR2 is the impress prescriptive enculturation places upon neuronal plasticity at glutamatergic etching and associated quantum quenching. If, as Peter Gay knew, Sixties youth culture was Weimar youth movement thematics squared, then the current cyber version has a factorial exclamation attached: not a good sign. VR2: using hardware to collectively relearn the _µT_m-software built into THE quantum brain. Without VR2, as Sri Aurobindo never tired of repeating in his Letters on Yoga: his first experience of Nirvana came only after his baud-rate of consciousness increased enough -- i.e., endogenous-ketaminergic memetime-slow-down until memetime-stop -- that he could “see thoughts come in upon him” ontologically-before they arrived and could thenceforth easily escape roof-brain chatter (in Gurdjieffian terms: “inner separation” to the degree of “not saying 'I' to” thoughts) and distinguish it from unspeakable “semantic gestalts”, i.e., Musculpt, demerging nonverbally from Elsewhere, i.e., from THE quantum brain: the chatter which thus “comes in upon” those with a rapid enough baud-rate of consciousness was politicized by the priesthood, for population control/exploitation purposes, as “voices of the gods”. It takes only a reading of heuristic phenomenological accounts of the various levels of Samadhi -- not a cognitive scutching to separate fiber from flax -- to become certain that “No-mind is not absence of mind, but presence of the multivalue”. By the demergent terms of this primordial notion of nonlocal consciousness, “form [ontologically] follows function” in nature's automorphs -- no less than in Frank Lloyd Wright's “organic architecture” in general and “Usonian automatics” in particular. On the other side of the ledger, in referring to the varieties of atrocities, people have been saying “I can hardly believe people could do such horrible things to other people” for at least several thousand years: whatever whirlwinds humanity has-is-will reap have been, are, will be far less than it has-is-will deserve(d)(s). Nothing I've seen, experienced, learned prompts a belief in progress-evolution, the business of business; rather, suchness -- the isness of being-in-is. Though I do see all sorts of evidence of regression, as per, for instance, Purser's “VR1”: the militaristic e-stalker society's chosen path upon which to march out _µT_m-quantum-based technology regressed to the terms of ₁T₂-only cognition. Such as: “implanting” thousands of sensor-transmitters, i.e., “neural dust” (see:“Computerizing people may be next step in tech”, Steve Johnson, San Jose Mercury News, reposted to The News Herald, 23 December 2013: governments being the most likely mass hackers of implanted devices) in a ₁T₂-brain, an especially pellucid example of ConveDD (conversion-disorder displacement), in that John A. Wheeler's pregeometry as a Borel-set-type “bucket of dust”, Sri Aurobindo's “warm-golden dust of supermind”, Yayoi Kusama's dotty cosmology artfully embodying primordial Shinto's sacred space suffused with “kami dust”, ideoretinal dust, and so on (for another such take, see: “The Inflation Spacetime Model: Making Sense of the Standard Models of Particle Physics and Cosmology”, Richard P. Dolan, 2006) are regressed from _µT_m to ₁T₂-only and converted-displaced to an implant cloud. Alack, the day! Exaggeratedly concise, languidly lugubrious, lackadaisically laconic is this token of a talisman styled a strange attractor. Lackaday! No foreshortening anodyne, it's for you a real Looper -- dour blooper, rubbishy pooper, foozled foolery: psychopathic foppery written upon loop-quantum gravity, and against the _µT_m-orders of self-reference at foundation of Lukasiewicz logics and the non-simple identity-transparency inherent to Schrödinger's wave-function extrojected to other worlds and other memetimes. This is illustrative of one level upon which the impetus to mass warfare is stoked by inculcating the collective case of the “thematic evasion” type of “neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance” (see: Wolfgang Luthe and J. H. Schultz, Autogenic Therapy, Grune and Stratton, Vols. 5 and 6, 1970 and 1973). Talents of Hollywood talent are not at issue, only the connivance with insane motivation lying behind the impulse to cinematic chimerism.

And now, all these decades later, they are finally beginning to see the tip of the iceberg of m-level genetic encipherment. Check out: “Scientists Find Second 'Hidden' Language in Human Genetic Code”, Breitbart, 12 December 2013; and “Second DNA code: Stunned scientists find 'duons' that control health, diseases”, Examiner, 13 December 2013; and “Second Code Hiding in DNA”, Bioscience Technology, 13 December 2013. What about _µT_m-encoding in the higher-temporal “formants” of the quantum-wave properties of DNA's pi-electron gas core, correlated to duons, trions, et cetera, as possibly is implied by our paper “A Dynamical Theory Describing Superconductant DNA”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. XV, 1979, pp. 333-341? Mean Genes (read the book by Terry Burnham and Jay Phelan, Penguin, 2001) or a molecular biology that believes in monotonic genetic encipherment? As I've asked ever since reading -- in 1968 while at SRA/MACV-J2, on loan from Capt. Kelly L. Robinson -- David Kahn's The Codebreakers side-by-side with James Watson's The Double Helix: “What are the odds that nature's most important code is made up of single-level ciphers?” Not at all likely, eh. The Saviors From Genetic Disease have been making florescent chimeras ever since the 1980s as a way to increase Big Pharma's profit margins on new drugs: such are the asinine criteria employed to inform clipping, dragging, and pasting of nature's genes -- and why the always-obviously-false [sup}position (not [super}position) of single-level genetic ciphers has been so jealously guarded, to the patently psychotic -- I am God! -- extreme of patenting GMOs and even (as explicated in “Gene Patents in Europe Relatively Stable Despite Uncertainty in the U.S.”, Andrew Sharples, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 23 March 2011) unmodified “isolated genetic material” (the juristically imprudent forensic chemistry of all this is actually quite screwed, as, for instance, in vitro DNA is “not markedly different” from in vivo DNA only to the degree quantum chemistry and radiation biology of the molecule are ignored: that human societies should reward scientists and corporations for trashing the biosphere is only to be expected, given all the precedents established by thematic contents elaborated in course of his-story). Long-term consequences to the biosphere of hacking genomes possessing _µT_m-order-type ciphers are, at this juncture, so far beyond our capacity to imagine (not least because logicians have not learned to think in _µT_m-logics, only about them by use of ₁T₂-logic alone), one can only shudder at thoughts of the stack of critical-state thresholds surely hiding in the wings. I rather think Darwin was right to regard humanity an accident, something like a train wreck. Epistemic epitasis: an unwonted [dis}play of the wanton, as the smattering lot of them untrammeled pagans is wont to have it be? No. No superposition: rather, one magistracy substituted for another. Hah! Fiddlesticks. Eaves have ears snitches hide snatches within. Concur with demur? You bet. Hmmmmm, however: hardly pawky, canny, shrewd. Take leave to doubt -- but, now as then, be that the crime of being “Off the Beat”, an absence-of-fealty existential denial which the corpus of fatuously truculent genetic-engineering blighters can't abide. Yet, no magdalen for subfusc maudlin mind of the truckler. Might as well expand on the zero point, as does Maclaurin's series. Our quantum model of radiation exchange at DNA helix-coil transition is based upon the temperature oscillations of pi-electron parcels, mathematically described as harmonic oscillators, associated with DNA's free-electron gas core and involves the molecule radiating coherent waves in response to changes in its radiation environment, the properties of these coherent waves being correlated to the base pairings made at replication. The approach to “music” of DNA taken by Susan Alexjander and David Dreamer (see: “Microcosmic Music -- A New Level of Intensity”, Our Sound Universe, no date given; and “The Infrared Frequencies of DNA Bases, as Science and Art”, Susan Alexjander, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 1999) very strongly reflects the physics of our model, as presented in our paper, linked above. However, being oriented to the m-valued as regards acousto-optics, I am not much inclined to “register” microtones to a semitone schema, as, Musculpturely, I have heard-seen stacked phases (I dropped out of harmony class and composition studies at George Mason U. forty years ago in part because I did not want to self-metaprogram myself out of such hearing-seeing) as indicative of implicate-enfolded quantum-composite superposition within the “Sequencia” unfolded-explicate at replicative helix-coil transition -- for, after all, the thirty or so frequencies identified to each base pair “sound” simultaneously and, thus, are stacked. One question is (holding in mind that the processor and that processed, in this case, are one and the same, in the “diversely identical” sense of J. G. Bennett): under what collection of logical-value order-types (not probability amplitudes) are the wave-functions of the frequency-stacks processed for each quantum-DNA histological type (the frequency-response window for, say, collagen-cell DNA is different than that for, say, muscle-cell DNA)? It can be noted in this context that, in the derivation of our DNA model's canonical harmonic-oscillator equation, the counterforce to the pressure-gradient term is the gravitational acceleration, which may tell us something about the nature of the coherent waves emitted by the molecule in response to radiation impingement.

Internal Musculpt: an empathic concretion of abstraction, within which -- by diaphanous, _µT_mly-nonorientable, self-referential coalescence of sign and referent -- maths-logos are subject to synaesthetics. No doubt-compensating abreactive-compulsive fixation upon the hyperreal, upon the magically-real borne upon Platonic amnesis of the “bare object”. The “real” object world, “real” or “virtual”, being a product of enculturation-socialization glutamatergically anchored to brains not containing THE quantum brain. What is internal Musculpt, phenomenologically spoken of? A few research materials useful in gaining some notion thereof: Pupul Jayakar's The Earthen Drum (National Museum of India, 1980), a primordial fractal drum, suggesting that synaesthesia was subverted-automatized, with respect to conscious awareness, into separate sensory modalities by glutamatergic prescriptive enculturation-socialization and associated quantum quenching, this subversion being an abstraction which empathy subsequently tried to ketaminergically redress; Jacques Hadamard's An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (1954 Dover reprint of the 1945 original); Wilhelm Worringer's Abstraction and Empathy (1907 doctorial thesis, the 2007 Elephant edition); Wassily Kandinsky's Concerning the Spiritual in Art (2001 Tate edition of the 1912 original); the films of Jordan Belson; Vol. 5 of Wolfgang Luthe's and J. H. Schultz's Autogenic Therapy (Grune & Stratton, 1970) containing patient-produced art descriptive of visual phenomena presented to conscious awareness at autogenic abreaction; the medical literature on photisms, paresthesias, taste polymorphisms, and auditory hallucinations; the art work of Yayoi Kusama; the theosophical literature on astral sounds; illustrations drawn from the standard works on Cabala and gematria; the body of thought in the history of art devoted to the various theories of color. Neuronal pruning: pollarded in youth and never recovered. Those most familiar with internal Musculpt -- but not identifying it as such: most everyone, one must surmise, experiences this, while yet somehow dissing it -- are preadolescents not yet fully glutamatergically etched; those able to make some creative use of residuals of internal Musculpt (best studied, perhaps, in the art produced by schizophrenic children, art I was exposed to during the Summer following my high school graduation which I spent with my mother's lady friend who was a clinical psychologist specialized in the Rx of such children by use of their art), generally in the age range 15-25. So I judge by my own experience: it was largely in this age range that I personally had my most elaborate direct access (not merely memories/adumbrations thereof) to internal Musculpt. I reproduce here, as being illustrative of the phenomenological-experiential aspect, three quotes drawn from my personal journal which were incorporated into our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh:

When I am in the proper state of concentrated intensity, my experience of those subtle interpersonal exchanges is all in images and colors and inner lights and unusual sensations and tones. It's almost as if a person has a critical radius, a magic circle drawn around them. When I step into the circle of a woman I am in transference with, images spontaneously appear in my awareness. Often the images are a whole sequence of Cubist-like distortions or Expressionistic motifs that in some way capture the inner state of the person. Sometimes there will be a field of color -- a juicy green or a purplish pink -- that suddenly breaks down into a dynamic display of modulating forms and streamers flying off into space. At other times I will simply hear a tone, usually pleasant, but occasionally irritating and harsh. And there is a physiological thing that happens, too: I may feel light and airy like I want to dance, or everything becomes sticky and heavy like I am in an atmosphere of mud. (Vol. I, p. 356)

When an intuitive idea comes it is always associated with an electrical-type shock in the body. The electrical sensation is most often the more intense in the extremities. This shock causes everything inside to stop for an instant. I draw breath. All the attention is momentarily focused on the idea. The shock starts in the upper part of the body and slams into the soles of my feet. I know how important the idea is by the intensity of the shock. Very important ideas are associated with photisms. There may be an instant fainting feeling which immediately dissolves in a burst of emotional excitement. The scale of importance is always in terms of the metaphysical generality and implications of the idea: how the idea relates to the fundamental questions of existence, how my I-ness fits into the fabric of all-that-is. This is true even of scientifically-oriented ideas; the shock is the more intense the greater the metaphysical significance. These ideas are, of course, not absolutely new; just new to me. Sometimes there will be the electrical shock and I have not even realized that I have thought a new idea; it will be the shock that draws my attention to its existence. Without the shock, the idea would have passed on through and I would never have noticed its significance. How often is my mind thinking important thoughts and I am too busy with my ego I-ness identifications to pay attention? Ideas can be quite conscious, and yet one is not aware of them. (Vol. I, pp. 700-01)

An interesting discovery from self-observation. It has been sometime since I learned that a subliminal imagery process underlies all my verbal thought. Since then, this imagery has become progressively more conscious and hence, I think, more flexible. But now I discover another aspect of this: whenever I approach an area of study for the first time, I always use a certain method of learning without being quite conscious of it. In literature that concerns this new area, there are a great number of concepts, words, symbols which I do not understand. I do not make a definite effort to understand these terms on a one-to-one basis as I come to them. As long as there is a general feeling for the gist of the discussion, I always use the following method: I just accept the new terms, concepts, symbols as unknowns -- which I visualize or hear to myself as circles, squares, greens, reds, high or low tones, a moving in, a moving out, a twisting over, a twisting under, and et cetera as appropriate to what is being represented -- and, as I read along, just visualize and/or hear the differing contexts in which these unknowns recur. The continued recurrence in differing contexts adds more and more information (thus changing, for instance, the shade of green, the manner of the twist, the quality of the tone) to the growing concept of the unknown until, eventually, as my general knowledge of the whole area increases, the unknown progressively becomes a known. I make an area of concrete knowledge content into a personal abstract set of symbols and relations. The thing that keeps me going, when I am having difficulty apprehending the specifics of the actual content, is the personal abstraction; this is always in a state of flux and represents a constant interplay between the intuitive idea framework, that led me to the study of the area in the first place, and the concrete content the area presents. (Vol. II, p. 528)

Rightly or wrongly, initial efforts at acquiring fine and performing arts skills, say, for instance, in harmony class, as regards the OLD media, I am sorry to say, seemed too much to slow me down in respect to my real interest. In concentration upon intense intellectual conversation, a sounded-form spontaneously appears in presentation to awareness, the logical properties of the apparent potential transformations of which “capture” the overall possibilities of the m-logue encounter (something, I think, Anthony Blake has long since known and employed). As a new conversational direction is opened up by some participant, the sounded-form changes along one of its apparent transformational marches, thus forecasting the conversation dynamics before they actually transpire (it seems likely to me that both Mozart and Beethoven had this to an extremely elaborate degree -- far beyond anything I encountered, could even imagine -- as a fundament of their musical imaginations: the FutureCrime warrant of the [pre}date-to-reap by Predator and Reaper being a compensatory ConveDD of the lack thereof; and how many have the first inkling as to the ever-present origins of collective psychosis?). SpecOps Doom, the extreme prejudice executed by appropriately-named “id software”: as if the superrich -- prefigured in the 1930s run up to WWII; now amplified as to defining characteristics -- had-have any actual influence over the archetypal collective-unconscious event gradients setting terms of the unconscionable prevailing anthropogenicity: utilizing intelligent discretion, forget these people, as their “power” is altogether inconsequential, however momentarily presentable as omnipotent. Carrying grams of grievance, ounces of umbrage heartburned into kilos, into pounds. Rancorously, even pugnaciously, pecunious -- served up with punctilious effrontery: has any character flaw gone missing -- a chivvying prolixity, perhaps? Oh, All Rise! to the cinereous wrap of the memetime-bound jurisprudence appareling their personas entombed in magnum opera of levered precedent. How many of their progeny will survive cuspover? Moreover, at the deepest levels of concentration, memory flood is channeled by the transform trajectory, such that everything one has ever encountered relevant to that trajectory “sits upon” the sounded-form as subtle color-tone-shape gradations of its various facets-profiles-horizons (here with respect to the _µT_mly-Platonic “objects” from which ₁T₂-“real” objects demerge: on the one occasion I met a soon-to-die Timothy Leary, by good offices of the rather extraordinary Craig & Aliya, we attempted to discuss this, but the laughing gas got in the way). This is not analyzed; simply known, such that, say, a color hue can be “opened” (à la Kandinsky) as required to access its content in quasi-verbalizable fashion. I experienced this sort of thing (initially eyes closed; then eyes open as a kind of ghostly overlay, eyes closed recovering vividness) most frequently between the ages of 15 and 25, winding down through my mid-30s, and usability altogether gone by age 40, after that only rare residual echoes now nearly thirty years in abeyance. As a parenthetical, I would note that, as I got older, my spontaneous verbalization capabilities fell off precipitously, because I could no longer quickly “translate” between the Musculpt thought-forms (something William Sullivan may be familiar with) I had come to rely upon and the reductionistic words -- frequently got hung-up on the oscillation of a mordant mordent; but, as a social benison, I was, therefore, no longer a “conversation dominator” (as those who knew me in the “early days” would no doubt attest: identified with the arresting-pull of the sounded-form). Indeed, late in life, I have more and more avoided conversation, for no longer being cognitively adequate to it. I am trying here to be as accurate I can be. The sounded-form, in my experience, is personal (in the sense of freely created at use, and perhaps even at each use: I could never ascertain between these two possibilities, for the infuriating lack of the capacity to formalize it) -- though one entertains the possibility that there may be some universality lying behind it that could be “worked out” (evolution through use, by analogy to how a “natural” language grows) in course of technological exteriorization. Elaborating exteriorized Muscult is work to be done primarily by those 15 to 25. Such an effort would be facilitated, I think, by SmartDanceWear-appareled EscherFormDance pods (a notion aired with Gurdjieff Movements instructor James Tomarelli) learning sonic-visioning DolphinSpeak and employing biofeedback-equipped isolation-flotation Lilly tanks (seeing an Arakawa piece on a wall of Altered States producer Daniel Melnick's above-Sunset-Strip home, I unsuccessfully attempted to air this idea) as training aids in which they can “write” sounded-holograms (acoustically-modified, gauge-invariant, spin-2, short-range, self-gravity biogeons, I would argue to the ghost of John Archibald Wheeler: hopefully he was not 2000 years before his memetime, like Democritus) presented to their awareness, a “writing” after the fashion autogenic training adepts have produced images of visual phenomena presented during autogenic abreactions.

I use the word “demergence” somewhat like what is denoted by “involutory decomposition” and somewhat like the technical mathematical sense of “descent”. This usage on my part came about by virtue of my exposure to relativistic-quantum Paine-Kaplan cascade theory of gyratory tornadogenesis, which implies, it seems to me, formation of something like what are presently called “gyrogroups” at each angular-momentum cascade twist into and out of imaginary and hypercomplex domains, these twists involving what Doug Paine employed the term “temporal curl” (which may be thought of as analogous to a “gyro operator”) to indicate. Before my exposure to Paine-Kaplan, however, during the Fall of 1963, I ran across J. G. Bennett's notions of “pencils of skew-parallels” and “[non-selfsame] identity amidst diversity” (described in the technical appendix to his The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1). These Bennettian notions I recognized as somehow -- I needed to find out exactly how -- providing insight to states of consciousness I experienced as a child living in rural Japan during 1953-6. “Pencils of skew-parallels”, to my understanding, are something like “vector bundles” -- but not quite, as the non-selfsame identity implicit in “skew-parallelism”, in the sense used by Bennett, is not subject to the truth-value “subobject classifier” -- and, thus, requires sheaved Lukasiewiczian logical-value order-types not reducible to truth-value classification tables, their objects and schemes. “Demergence”, then, is not strictly “involutory decomposition” or “descent” because the topos and sheaves involved -- insofar as my meager understanding of these highly technical areas carries me -- do not predicate superposed quantum-composites (not referring here to composites of morphisms other than the identity morphism) of relative-state non-simple identity-transparency (the non-simple-identity morphism is: 1_X…n_X from X to X) _µT_mly logically-valued (hence, not categories or topos, which deal with selfsame objects [the simple-identity morphism is: 1_X from X to X] and their morphisms), _µT_m understood independent of the notion truth-value: their -- topos and sheaves (and stacks), that is -- ontological status and transformational dynamics are restricted (despite exclusions of the Law of Excluded Middle, but not of the Law of Non-Contradiction) to the truth-value-evaluated binary-logical case, and whenever Lukasiewicz logics are employed these are interpreted to the real interval 0,1. And, speaking in terms of “demergence”, the non-simple-identity morphism would actually be n_X…1_X from X to X -- no factitious, factitive factotum (what Jean Baudrillard doesn't get is that the nonorientable third-order autopoietic operator is ontologically-ontogenetically first, i.e., has involutory-decomposition precedence over the second and first orders, such that the demergent physical ₁T₂-world is glutamatergically-etched enculturated simulacra, model-map simulations being training aids in Husserlian-phenomenological approach to direct ontic awareness of the time-shapes of bare _µT_m-reality, i.e., warm-golden-dust pregeometry hyletic=psychetic data, time-shapes being function-assignments, i.e., chronotopological morphic multifunctors, which, as distinct from the generative constructionism of JohnSearle intentionality, do not require for their existence localizable minds or cellular automata, pre-pregeometry being the corpora of _µT_m-valued calculi of propositions Karpenko-functor mapped over the primes and numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers; this is in no way comparable to the marketeer's MadisonAvenue psyops which manufactures the MickeyMouse illusion of consent, or even to a VR-Matrix, howsoever reloaded: institutionalized scientism is bad enough, popularizations thereof make my stomach turn). Moreover, I would be willing to bet that, by the memetime recognition of m-level genetic encipherment takes neoDarwinian-evolution's “emergence” to nonDarwinian “demergence”, gyrogroups will have found application to modeling the radiation-exchange-mediated quantum-wave morphisms (think: wave-trace-velocities stigmergy cues in polymorphic messaging under first-order operator-time) associated with DNA helix-coil transitions. It would be interesting to know what the X of “from X to X” is with respect to DNA helix-coil transitions, immunological self-signification (beat-down-through-frequency-cones differing frequency-response windows of DNA histological types), and biological clocks (normative temperature oscillation rates of pi-electron parcels associated with DNA's free-electron gas core).

Despite my assertions concerning the rather esoteric deep-structure precipitators of mass warfare, total war, world wars, and prospective space-based planetary war, I have never discounted derivative precipitators like money politics -- and that is the reason I've long believed that, like the last time around at the end of WWII, no genuine systemic shift in fundaments of the global monetary framework (let alone a transformation of “framework determining conditions”, e.g., the logical-value order-type[s] of the monies employed, the number-theoretic underpinnings of the geographic boundaries upon which currencies are defined) will come independent of renewed global military conflict likely initiated by humanitarian killer peacekeepers (in aftermath thereof, actually). I came to this orientation in significant measure due to the observation made at SRA/MACV-J2 that the Viet Cong used acts of warfare (notably the Tet-'68 offensive) as weapons of financial attack designed to bring about conclusion of the war (the precipitator of that conclusion ultimately being the enhanced run up of gold-exchange demands leading to the closing of the gold window and collapse of Bretton-Woods One). An interesting essay related to this general topic has recently (21 December 2013) been posted to the Global Research website by José Miguel Alonso Trabanco, entitled “Dollar Hegemony, 'Monetary Geopolitics' and the IMF: The Symbiosis between Global Finance and Power Politics”.

O, the [con}science of those shilpits who, at glutamate's bedaubed be[con}ing, suffer cognitive cachexia: live, they do, quirky dawdles solely within clutches of the maundering operational intelligence (“…expand the scope of our [₁T₂] intelligence a billion-fold…” as Ray Kurzweil believes, and what would that glutamatergic Googling do to our remnant capacity for abstract thought?); thus do mental cairds become cairns undeserving of the decorative translucent adularia planted at their bases. Surely, in many parts of the world today, there are those who say to themselves, however naively: “Well, Excusez-moi! Dr. Insipid, a grieving upon the shriving Sacrament of peNance is what I bequeath to you, Dear Sir. With Kazantzakis, I fling red poppies down! May your progeny receive YOUR just deserts. With certainty, will my will fail, but upon that failure comes my brother, and upon his failure, his son. Though your limit was set out by Newton, no such do my brothers and their sons recognize.” And how could it be otherwise with political systems foundered upon polygamous and polyandrous marriages of convenience (a conversion-disorder displacement, a ConveDD, of m-valent metathetic decomposition overborne by the hologramic identity-transparency of that which is decomposed, no mere holopoliticographic “materialization” as displayed here and here) having become a blockhouse of marmoreal collective sentiment through which is mart mewling balderdash to opossums, wombats, bandicoots, kangaroos, and other possessors of marsupia, purses concealing the milking upon gushing public teats, if no futuristic bra? Chick-flicks: for forty years, at least, any confluence of three or more has been an encounter-group session focused on the poverty of US-sociality. Ugh! how very insufferably Hitchy -- and what a hinchy embarrassment that such should be proffered to the world as somehow exemplary, existence of the proffer being a measure of the pathogenicity.

Clearly, harmony-class studies would have been an over-investment, given where my actual interest lay -- so I dropped the effort (despite the insistent urgings of my instructor, a superlative performer of dodecaphonic vocal works and an accomplished pianist), and soon thereafter exited music comp at George Mason University, moving on to a pro bono assistanceship with D. A. Paine of Cornell. This was a calculated “sacrifice” (one eventually proving to have been highly rewarding in the “inner work” sense: the several decades of man-years my highly-esteemed wife Nha Trang and I have jointly performed pro bono have been the ONLY truly rewarding experiences of our long-enough lives), for I knew that that act of dropping insured that I would never hear a fraction of what is to be heard of the stacked themes Olivier Messiaen composed into his Turangalila-Symphonie (Turangalila = cosmic love play, in Sanskrit; unfortunately, dissertations of every sort are nowadays classified FOUO/SpecAcc, so I will never be able to bring this analysis to bear upon my non-sanctioned speculations). Incidentally, at the time of my George Mason studies, I was taking private Sanskrit lessons from a very nice lady housewife in Suitland qua Silver Hill, Maryland, piggybacked on Aikido at a nearby location, which, too, the evolving circumstance forced me to prematurely drop. Nonetheless, even given my lack of harmonic comprehension and failed effort to gain Sanskrit-access to The Garland of Letters (I carried this book and The World as Power, possibly the most ununderstood book of the last century, with me wherever I went for the next 45 years, as Jeff Petry can well attest, there having come to pass an instance of “voluntary suffering” imposed upon me when I was forced to leave these texts behind), over the decades I often imagined this symphony as musicologically embodying little-suspected implications of Paine-Kaplan cascade computerized-forecast model of tornadogenesis and the Paine-Pensinger harmonic-oscillator mathematical model of DNA radiation-exchange processes -- whatever their efficacy ultimately turns out to be (let it be known that, during the mid-1970s, the Paine-Kaplan quantum-relativistic computerized forecast model, run on the USAF's and NASA's then biggest mainframes, was “predicting”, over historical data sets, tornadogenesis 12-hours in advance, on a 1-km grid, this having been a decade before near-advent NOAA's TOTO-Dorothy depicted in the film Twister, and forty years before advent of TWISTEX). “Form in Process” autopoietically intitules with frequency-response-window signifiers, and proceeds under guidance provided by nested order-types of conservation laws, thus engaging in “regulatory arbitrage” across abuttals of laminated classes of limited spacetime domains -- and recognizes no state of intestacy. Topos of Music (far more general than orbifold chord geometries and their insistence to… well… any guesses as to why, back in the day, all thoughts of seeking to gain entrance to graduate studies at Princeton were put aside?), of course, but also gyrogroups, sheaf theory, and the Riemann surface characterization of m-valued functions of complex variables (be aware that Franklin Merrell-Wolff, in, memory serving, Pathways Through to Space, noted that this was where his maths expertise left off; such circumstance, to my judgment, prefiguring his notion that “substantiality is inversely proportional to ponderability”, a notion singularly absent “inner Musculpt” -- ponderability in F. M-L's conception being altogether analogous to the sort of ponderability attributed to “ponderable 3-space”, whereas _µT_m-mind might well regard ponderability otherwise: my parting of the ways with Beverley Oliphant, M.D., extraordinaire, transpired over this precise issue). As Sri Aurobindo surely knew -- as we can know because he periodically stated in his Letters on Yoga that “the Integral Yoga begins after the first experience of Nirvana”: there are states of consciousness beyond consciousness-without-an-object, the existence of which I have pointed at by making the statement, “No-mind is not absence of mind, but presence of the multivalue”. Endogenous ketamine flood in, say, Zazen, suddenly quenches ₁T₂-ratiocination, i.e., Satori, but a further elaboration opens to _µT_m-ratiocination, whereupon, by the necessarily involved non-simple m-valued identity, consciousness-without-an-object is held simultaneously in awareness with multiple order-types of the consciousness-of-objects (inner and outer): we is me, in the very form of consciousness; solipsism in its cosmic expression, as suggested by Everettian dissociation and the Bennettian “diversely identical”. In the state of conscioiusness-without-an-object, mere registration of the “experience” thereof is enough to quench it: “I am having this experience” -- Gurdjieffian “saying 'I' to it”, with all the readiness of dear Alacrity. Phenomenologically speaking, this “saying 'I'” comes, initially, not as a thinkable thought, but as the ingress of environmental awareness, first felt proprioceptually as a “dulling” about the enlivened post-central gyrus, then sensed as a “dimming” of the enveloping “bright light state”, such that “one” feels a thought “coming in”: even registration of “first” and “then” evokes dulling/dimming -- which “one” can escape “saying 'I' to” (this is not actually a reference to “inner voice”, but to the feeling-space sense of here-ness integral to single-valued 'I'-ness: the intentionality, with celerity, establishing “who” and “where” :: memorialized and recognized -- “when” being the relevant plentypotentiary neural hologram taken as a STRIP, harum-scarum part-whole equivalency denuded from the memory trace such that memetime is left as anal-stage retention, a linear lickspittle hiding behind resolute superciliousness) by reassertion of the facilitative tapas required to maintain sufficient diffuse concentration. This tapas is executed as a proprioceptive “turning away”, felt exactly that way, but with respect to Great Space, not ponderable space -- and, perhaps, it elicits a chronotopological transform that reconstitutes dissolution of memetime by reestablishing the requisite baud rate of consciousness. But each occasion this reassertion is executed, its competency falls off, until -- languor, languor, languor -- by what Aurobindo called the “psychological induction” established by the mean state of the corpus, the state of consciousness-without-an-object is quenched. Repeated exposure to this state -- which is repetition of endogenous ketamine flood -- however, opens other possibilities, generally accompanied by massive “unloading”, autogenic abreaction, trophotropic Vipassana “dumping”, even to the elaboration of conscious seizure. Accelerative “star-gate corridor” JordanBelsoneque phantasmagoria -- a “dropping” indistinguishable from a “vaulting” -- entrance to _µT_m-modes superposed upon the AllBase-state of consciousness-without-an-object. Exhaustion, long sleep, waking up to a shorter or longer period of Taoistic wandering about a Husserlian-Cubistic articulation “landspace”. But this, too -- in conforming to the defining properties of non-simple-identity transparency -- is subject to quenching by what Aurobindo called “psychological induction”. The neuropsychiatric term “generative empathy” (by bawcocks the world around imputed to be a sinister pathological state) signifies the halfway-house abode of ketaminergic quantum-non-simple identity-transparency -- the Full Monty always involving hologramic part-whole equivalency to the natural surround, the defining characteristic of pantheistic animism. Envy being a conversion-disorder displacement of generative empathy. Behold, my dear, Evelyn and his wife Adamistra, the envier enviers, and mendacious Mr. Dowripple, exemplar of the banker's montebankery, malanoids all, one may trust and none should wonder. These sorts of accounts are hardly any longer doubtable in view of how many people have independently written so idiosyncratically much about this “area”, and in light of what has been discovered about the neurotransmitters glutamate and ketamine -- and how supportive this is of a _µT_m-Lukasiewiczian interpretation of Schrödinger-Everett wave-function. Yet more: Euler, et al.'s, notion of mathematical function as correspondence (earlier: dependence) is similar to the “system of correspondences” informing traditional Chinese medicine, except that, for Taoist medical practitioners, the significance or meaning of function-in-correspondence is not restricted to the structure of correspondence. The Riemann surface has always seemed to me a dissimulation of the meaning of m-valued functions and a misdirection in respect to the path pathfinder Abel's “Impossibility” Theorem had found into the forest -- in that the bridges between the sheaved branches allowed, on a structural basis, the meaning of m-valued functions to be regarded as tantamount to the meaning of single-valued functions. No actual semantic divergence was to be construed or tolerated -- thus was Riemann consistent with 19th-century European values and norms (uh, uh, European, largely upper class, whatever Riemann's origins, MALE values and norms). But what if, as Paine's atmospheric studies suggest, universal physical constants are like Messiaen's stacked themes? Such themes, to the harmonically-opaque ear, are simply noise devoid of meaning, m-valued divergences the ear attempts to renormalize to single-valued sound-structures. Unsuccessful attempts, that is. Whereas, in the Paine-Kaplan model, divergence is understood a cascade-initialization signal (uh, initialization of Turangalila in its atmospheric guise). More generally, relative to gyrogroups and their velocity-vector boosts, if, at the absolute limiting velocity, memetime is snuffed out, and length in the direction of motion has gone to zero thus fractionating the involved dimension of ponderable 3-space, what is “lost” at absolute limiting acceleration and, moreover, at absolute limiting time rate of change of acceleration? Further, under m-valued universal physical constants, a largely unacknowledged corollary of Paine-Kaplan, the always-orientable Riemann surface is patently uninformative (the complex atlas would-must become hypercomplex to accommodate m-absolutes as regards limiting velocity, limiting acceleration, and limiting time rate of change of acceleration) because each sheet, and each sheave of each sheet, is, minimally, fractionated by these relativistic behaviors. Noise devoid of meaning -- unless Schrödinger-wave-function processed under _µT_m-valued Lukasiewicz logics semantically interpreted without reference to the notions truth-value and/or probability-amplitude. In this utterly aperspectival construal, no less than in Luneburg's binocular visual space, what is generally regarded “space and time” altogether do not exist independent of enculturated “psychometric distance functions” and temporal memes, and are, in their essentiality, “Beyond Measure” -- the “Copenhagen hegemony” being a sociology-of-science product predicated upon psycho-identification with the ₁T₂-logically-valued order-type alone. One of the more interesting aspects of current governance, be it institutional science and religion, political, economic, military -- an aspect I've found fascinating to contemplate since AU-SIS days, even since childhood military-brat exposure -- is the degree to which its superstars are dependent upon their psycho-sycophantic horseholders. This dependency is not only because of postmodern complexity and institutional constraints, but also due to the limitations imposed by identification with the socially-conferred role attribution, an identification which is essentially voluntary even if largely driven by status anxiety, which is driven by an existential anxiety molded by a mostly-suppressed ontological guilt at having made false claim to be absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct. There is a profound difference between bare-occupation of a role attribution and being identified with it, which may go some distance towards explaining how bad governance becomes an emergent property through the workings of social-Darwinian selection pressures. Practice of progressive relaxation and autogenic training in the biofeedback-equipped isolation-flotation Lilly tank is the prescribed Rx.

So… poof? Proof-theoretically speaking, I have never cared less. Proof-demonstration necessarily predicates ₁T₂-logical necessity, the challenging of which launched Lukasiewicz. This was a hundred years ago -- long before I was, without prior consent, born into this world by insistent motherhood! “Against Method” and all that, however revisionary, remains “motherhood and apple pie”. Birth is rebirth, as Buddhists are wont to have it, an existential retribution for ontological malfeasance -- and I would view this assessment as accurate were memetime an objective linear-time, which it isn't.

Parsimony displayed at the razor's edge ₁T₂-Ockham falsely accused nature to deploy against her very own omnium gatherum? One way to understand it: baud-rate of the consciousness-type, hardly a piquancy, mediated by the molecular-cellular brain doesn't speed up too well; that's what the schizoid “Plexiglas wall” is all about. More's the pity to pip-squeaks sipping their diuretic tonics of pipisisikweu. Pip-pip, Old Soul. The aperspectival world of Husserl-Picasso-Gebser lies behind the Plexiglas all in mosaic, like Debussy's piquant harmonies -- but to the ₁T₂-brain's mind, it's all in fragments, diagonals, overlays, clamor, noise. The speeding up, which is memetime slow-down, marks demergence into awareness of THE _µT_m-quantum brain's processing, and associated disappearance of the “wall”. But for removal of that separation, mistaken to be “the human condition”, to actually transpire, the identity-order-type shift involved has to be embraced, affirmed, not resisted -- and the viewing of everything through the wrong end of a telescope as the wall recedes, and the accompanying onrushing “blackout”, has to be outlasted, otherwise there is just momentary syncope and a shift, rapid or prolonged, back to the normative state (something Ouspensky never tired of emphasizing). But, always airbrushing, people don't like to hear that a migraine, for instance, or, as complement, an orgasm, results from resisting onset of deautomatization -- experienced as phenomenological content of the aura -- by engaging in “neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance” -- this resistance being due to how identified people are with being in one state of identification or another, even if wincingly so, tetchily. Nothing else for it. Not being ₁T₂-identifiable is experienced as “absolute nihil” -- the bet noire of all those claiming to be “absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct” (to use the term Hubert Benoit coined to explicate “theory and practice of detachment according to Zen”). A migraine, collectively speaking, might be a war, or even a fiat monetary system -- though I doubt Oliver Sacks would agree.

Ah, my sentiments, indeed (see: “Bitcoin: The Sexiest Non-Solution Of All Time?”, Brandon Smith, Alt-Market, 8 January 2014), not only about bitcoin and associates, but also the internet in general. Quoting: "While bitcoin proponents claim that their currency is a revolution against centralized oversight of monetary transactions, the truth is they have built the perfect centralized surveillance solution.” As for the rest… I performed my first infiltration ops aged eight and nine, 1953-4, Ashiya, AFB, kita-Kyushu, against the Japanese perimeter (consider my later insights as to the autopoietic functions fulfilled by boundaries-without-boundary!) guards enforcing the US-CIC's off-limits decree regarding the WW-II-era explosives-laced, but war-trophy-rich, caves nestled under runways' end. Let me tell you, the earliest days of extreme mountain-biking! These were the same guards from whom I was then taking jujitsu and bamboo-kendo lessons. Had I not run these ops, I would not have attended so acutely as I did to the flying boxcars originating off those runways that resupplied Dien Bien Phu! Nor would I later have gained insight as to how the Viet Cong mapped bureaucratic variables upon changing boundaries -- and how these mappings, repeat mappings, related to their use of the m-currencies at foundation of their m-valent (i.e., superposed) local-tax-base income streams. Whilst (or because) my post-collapsed-lungs, ex-B17-pilot father was a logistics troubleshooter extraordinaire, I came to be into the logistical aspects of the theory of autopoiesis, a subject not considered by those depicted in Zero Dark Thirty. Wanna know the real reason why “Al Qaeda Now Controls More Territory In The Arab World Than Ever Before”, Zero Hedge, 9 January 2014? Now map that insight back upon the m-valued functions performed by DNA radiation exchange across phase boundaries and the quantum-relativistic atmospheric limited-spacetime-domains cascade dynamics of far-from-equilibrium climate-shift phase transitions, where all extremes prevail during the deautomatized interphase period. If the functionally-prerequisite borders servicing autopoiesis are not there, then one has to entice one's opposition into creating them! How else could self-organization by resource exchange across phase boundaries (very essence of form-in-process of the biological cell -- and so much more) transpire?

The near-universal fixation on growth (for an interesting discussion of growth as no solution to conflict, flash forward and see, “Growth and globalization cannot cure all the world's ills”, Gideon Rachman, The Financial Times, 27 January 2014: though I altogether disagree with his final statement that growth and globalization are the best answers we have; utility/validity of this assessment being restricted to ₁T₂ly organized systems) as the be-all and end-all (no viable theory of growth-free organization available within the institutional framework embodying the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung, still the only extant institutional framework) is clearly seen in the negative attitude (see, for instance: “Everything you need to know about Japan's population crisis”, Sarah Eberspacher, The Week, 11 January 2014) taken toward the Japanese population fall-off, a contraction that should be viewed as potentially informative with regard to how humanity might fare better than otherwise through the coming global cuspover. Moreover, obsession with artificial life-extension (see, for instance: “The Era Of Cyborgs Has Begun”, Nicholas West, Activist Post, 11 January 2014) is a concomitant to the growth-fixation dictated by the expansion-imprinting institutionally imposed, and cognitively recorded in the memetime-bound theory of the Big Bang codifying our thermonuclear-detonation model of physical reality which eschatologically necessitates a frying in entropic heat-death. But there is likely a life-extension-diminishing downside even for individuals at their memetime scales, as discussed in “The 'smart life': How connected cars, clothes, and homes could fry your brain”, Kelth Wagstaff, NBC News, 13 January 2014: by contrast to THE _µT_m-quantum brain, glutamate-pruned ₁T₂-logical molecular-cellular brains ain't too good at m-tasking! Keep On Truckin'! they do, don't they. Bit-bit-bit fall the [cog}native “coins” in sequence, however hypered be the ₁T₂-parallel processing -- whereas authentic multitasking requires thinking in multivalued logics (not only about such logics by employment of binary logic). The Genie of Cyberia may never go back in the bottle, but human species will not survive ₁T₂-only-interface to _µT_m-quantum-based technology. The military-inspired VR1-route being taken, following upon the Bletchley-Park-induced ₁T₂-only finite-iteration Turing-machine truncation-renormalization (Lukasiewicz logics were on the scene before the first world war) of m/M-theoretic-analog-wave-effect-machine which WWII imposed, leads, if not to the outright-altogether extinction strange attractor, then to the 100-percent-cyborgization extinction and associated-fried-brains strangest attractor. Is this a slow-developing, nearly-linear-function, growth-related problem? Not so argues Gail Tverberg (flash forward and see her excellent post entitled “A Forecast of Our Energy Future; Why Common Solutions Don't Work”, Our Finite World, 29 January 2014). Is global energy cuspover decades away? Not so argues U.S. Army Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, as revealed in “US Army colonel: world is sleepwalking to a global energy crisis”, Nafeez Ahmed, The Guardian, 17 January 2014.

I am indebted to Lauri Love for drawing my attention to Laplander Sami Yoik (particularly “The Sami Yoik” article written by Kathryn Burke) vocalization as possibly having some relation to what I call “inner Musculpt” (in 1975, Douglas A. Paine made “Musculpt” a software programming instruction based on my use of the term “music-sculpture”). From the perspective of my long-term interest in infrasound signatures of atmospheric theta-e (equivalent potential temperature) surfaces, the yoiks most sympathetic to Musculpt would appear to be those unaccompanied, not employing words, and vocalized by shamans in trance states. While, as with inner Musculpt, a given yoik is idiosyncratic to the individual and, likely even to each vocalization, still, it seems that something in principle like infrasound signatures of theta-e surfaces may underlie it -- and this largely-subliminal signaturing would be most conscious to shamans in trance states (with the exception of the SonicVisioning of dolphins, that is). Quoting Ursula Lansman, as quoted in the Burke article:

A yoik is not merely a description; it attempts to capture its subject in its entirety: it's like a holographic, multi-dimensional living image, a replica, not just a flat photograph or simple visual memory. It is not about something, it is that something. It does not begin and it does not end. A yoik does not need to have words -- its narrative is in its power…

Quoting Harald Gaski, as quoted by Burke:

The reference to the object of a yoik is not something which someone may add to or leave out from the melody…[t]he melody is closely connected to the referential object in an indissoluble relationship. Linguistically this is expressed through the fact that one does not yoik about somebody or something, there is a direct connection; one yoiks something or someone.

The relative-state identity-transparency involved clearly violates the rule framework codified in ₁T₂-valued logic, and thus exhibits a parallel to the m-valued information content of the infrasound signaturing of theta-e surfaces. Back in the Seventies, Cornell atmospheric physicist and specialist in tornadogenesis, Douglas A. Paine, in response to reactions overtly viewable and nonviewable-but-pellucidly-sensed, felt there was zero chance that _µT_m-logically-valued properties of systems would be assimilated and embraced at any time in the foreseeable future, not short of “at least one-hundred years”; he, therefore, elected to devote little attention to investigation of these properties which he saw much evidence for existence of. While not actually disagreeing with his assessment of the cognitive sociology of scientists, I, on the other hand, felt this was not an issue that could be left to younger generations, given my belief that two world wars had already transpired largely due, on the deep-structure level, to suppression of the imports of higher-valued logics (perhaps we never will authentically ask, “What actually precipitated WWI?”: flash forward and see, for instance, “The Great War's Long Shadow”, Joschka Fischer, Project Syndicate, 29 January 2014), and my certainty that continued such suppression would be instrumental to catalyzing planetarization of crisis at civilization's rapidly approaching critical-state cuspover. Consider, for instance, the solely-linear nature of the “unitary operators” predicated by “united” and “union” (United States of America, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, European Union): despite advent of relativity physics, all such tacitly embrace world-lines ₁T₂-processed over an absolute, isotropic, flat, Euclidian space; despite the _µT_mly non-simple identity of quantum-composites operative in nature, political-economy unifications are truncation-renormalized to the ₁T₂-order-type alone and, since the Renaissance, increasingly re-scaling-renormalized toward a monoscale at the synoptic grid-length. Moreover, virtually to a person, particularly those who have logged no memetime in sensory-isolation flotation tanks, human population of the planet, now as then, cultivates adoration of those very aspects of the civilization which most threaten longevity and/or health of our species, other species, the biosphere, atmosphere, magnetosphere. The older I get the more thoroughly I understand how right I was the younger I was -- and why that would be so. Playing at, acting out, an identification, particularly in an important role attribution, amongst the memetime-bound glutamate-etched ₁T₂-domains of socially-constructed reality is rather more than merely demeaning to one's ontological status within the _µT_mly-bare base-state “framework determining conditions” according to which prescriptive enculturation-socialization is glutamatergically anchored to molecular-cellular brains and their binary minds. OMG! to be “a fashion identity” standing out in the Atomic Cafe overlooking the high-rise skyline of this or that mega-urban region. Just try to imagine it. Deep into Dante's Inferno, no matter how gold-plated the fashion, no matter at what socioeconomic level lived as a single-valued simple-identity. How could I -- then or now -- possibly arrive at a ten-percent WAG regarding human survival rate at cuspover of the presently evolving multidimensional anthropogenic global crisis? By sixty years -- ever since being exposed, as a child living in rural Japan, to animistic modes of comprehension -- of observation of the cognitive behaviors of those around me, coupled to fifty years of self-observation. The solidity, universality, and intensity of the obsessiveness with which the state of denial concerning importance of logical-value order-types not reduced to truth-value terms is protected cannot be overstated, though always underestimated -- and no other single factor will positively correlate more highly with human survival rate at cuspover than the degree to which this wall of denial is overcome. Goodness graceless, as I live and breathe! I find myself hard-pressed to discover sympathy for any of the subvocal-subtextural axes ground on CNN or the expurgated dalliances expostulated in more technical forums. Evangels of the Cartesian-Newtonian gospel, evangels of the Copenhagen hegemony spewing out their sermons from the exemplary City on the Hill. The idea of natural law, which lies at the reductionistic foundation of the post-Renaissance scientific Weltanschauung and its derivative institutionalizations, responsible for the prevailing global crisis, denies the existence of purpose independent of discrete localized mind, which denial nullifies the notion that “form follows function” on a universal basis, that functional requisites ontologically precede structural expressions, that there are m-logically-valued pre-pregeometric calculi of propositions numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers (pregeometry being a “bucket of dust”) in precedence to 2-logically-valued geometrodynamics, that _µT_m-logical operators express via 3-fold quantal operator-time acting upon Lukasiewiczian Hilbert space, that Pure Land nonlocal universal consciousness exists independent of ponderable spacetime and localized biological expressions, that there could ever be ₁T₂-physics Degree Zero. But all these denials exist as mere expressions of being-in-denial, a kind of being-in-the-world Heidegger forgot to mention in his discussions of dasein -- being-there, “there” pre-pregeometrically speaking of “the world”. The person more than any other who seems to me to have anticipated the manner of understanding denying this corpus of denials is John Godolphin Bennett, for before he coauthored the null-vector appendix to Volume One of his The Dramatic Universe (for an interesting take on Bennett, see: “The Meaning of Environmental Ethics in J. G. Bennett's THE DRAMATIC UNIVERSE”, Bruce Monserud, MA Thesis, U. of Florida, 2003), an appendix explicating “identity amidst diversity” and “pencils of skew-parallels”, he coauthored a paper (memory serving, both the appendix and the paper coauthored with R. L. Brown; I once had a copy of this paper which, again memory serving, was published in 1949) on higher-dimensional unified field theory. This was a 1950s approach to GUTS, an approach more or less centered upon Poland -- Poland being the place where Lukasiewicz logics were then best known. Though I am aware of no evidence that he overtly considered Lukasiewicz in formulating his approach to systematics, Bennett's transit from field theory to an explication of the non-simple identity involved in skew-parallelism suggests to me, at the very least, an intuitive realization that “something” more fundamental than Einstein's geometrodynamics underlies the notion “field” common to both quantum mechanics and relativity theory -- a “something” in violation of the ₁T₂-logic Law of Non-Contradiction, a “something” which he specified with the idea of “identity amidst diversity”. The title to this appendix, mathematically demonstrating what Bennett called the “diversely identical”, published in 1956 by Hodder & Stoughton (which I first read in 1963), is “The Geometrical Representation of Identity and Diversity” (perhaps better said, relative to the content of the appendix, as “identity in diversity”). I reproduce here the summarizing first paragraph before which Bennett-Brown's mathematical demonstration begins:

By “classical” we designate all geometries, Euclidian and non-Euclidian, metrical and non-metrical, in which the entities represented are assumed to be identical with themselves. Notwithstanding all the developments in affine and non-Euclidian systems [even the discipline of mathematical topology does not yet, to my knowledge, entertain _µT_m-logically-valued transformations, nor does continuum-hypothesis-related Cantorian or non-Cantorian set theory consider non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers -- though this is tacitly embedded in the notion “Karpenko functors” over the primes, and would become explicit were the Euler and Riemann zeta functions extended to hypercomplex numbers], classical geometry has remained tied to its primitive purpose of “earth measurement” in which the question whether or not an entity can be both “same” and “other” does not arise. If we are to set our ontology free from the limitation of single-valued existence we require a geometry that will enable us to represent situations in which each entity can be “more than one thing at a time”.

Though Bennett doesn't overtly mention logic in this appendix, the principle he invokes violates the ₁T₂-Law of Non-Contradiction and thereby suggests a pre-pregeometric conception consonant with Lukasiewicz, Lukasiewicz understood well beyond a mapping of logical-value order-types into the real interval 0,1 -- a mapping which violates only the ₁T₂-Law of Distributed Middle. Bennett's null-vector demonstration of the existence of entities “diversely identical” involved “construction” of a diversely-identical skew-cube with pencils of skew-parallels; were this notion generalized into quantum mechanics by interpreting Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function with m-valued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value, then the nature of the unitary bounded linear operator and automorphisms of Hilbert space could not be construed as involving retention of ₁T₂-selfsameness. Nor could _µT_m-selfsameness be resolved to the multi-₁T₂-worlds interpretation of Everett's relative-state formulation, for the _µT_mly processed m-values of the wave-function would not be removed to spatially and/or temporally distinct other ₁T₂-universes, universes thermodynamically incommunicado, as the multi-worlds interpretation of Everett would have it, because, as to the semantic dimension, no superposed concatenation of ₁T₂-universes is equivalent to a _µT_mly selfsame universe (a universe in violation of both distributed middle and non-contradiction, logic laws to which all ₁T₂-universes conform). This, of course, speaks directly to the quantum notion of entanglement, and involves issues like the firewall resolution to the black hole information paradox. When mutually entangled ₁T₂-particle-pair parcels split at the event horizon, the “one” returning to spacetime is entangled with the whole history of Hawking radiation emitted by the involved black hole -- or so it seems to ₁T₂-logic-bound observers yoked to memetime. Were, however, Hilbert space Lukasiewiczian “before” formation of black holes, black holes would _µT_mly demerge, rather than ₁T₂ly emerge, and the cosmic perspective on black hole evaporation would not be that of bound and yoked observers. Also involved here is the notion of “acoustic analogues to black hole computers”. Back in the late-1960s, Douglas A. Paine and Michael L. Kaplan, in numerically modeling tornadogenesis, concluded that these “dissipative structures” emit bursts of acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes (i.e., coherent waves, infrasound) when the involved cascade of complex angular momentum “runs out of spacetime”. And Paine, at least (I did not interact with Kaplan enough to know what he thought about such issues), understood that this was analogous to formation of a black hole. Two years before I met him, memory of my long ago readings of the report serving, in 1972 Paine submitted an NSF-grant report which stated this conclusion in so many words. Quoting excerpts, as quoted more extensively in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, pp. 324-5 (I no longer have a copy of this report, though Mike Kaplan probably does):

…the individual air parcel contracts to a critical radius beyond which the rotational wave breaks… This turning of the vortex tubes occurs wherever rotational waves break to create irrotational waves, which then subsequently may break to re-create rotational energy… Blackbodies and black holes exist within the spacetime frame of atmospheric dynamics… nonlinear dynamics leading to a mathematical singularity in theta-space (horizontal rotation disappears within an isentropic framework) would remain an unsolved mystery if our only point of view was the Newtonian… The progressive gravity wave is a manifestation of the transition from rotational to irrotational energy… cluster of intense squalls radiating irrotational waves from its perimeter, a process whereby energy from the rotational wave is perfectly absorbed and then re-radiated in the form of irrotational waves… The Role of Energy Feeder Bands Attached to the Convective Cluster… These trajectories take on the appearance of spiral helices adjoining the forward portion of the rotating storm and are comprised of undulating laminar flow along the axis of the roll cloud…

These statements were not well received by the involved NSF committee, to say the least. When John A. Wheeler gave a public lecture at Cornell during this period, Paine attempted to discuss with him implications of the physics behind the forecast model. Wheeler listened politely, and was politely dismissive, saying that he was not familiar with the equations of atmospheric science. Some years later, I, not Paine, sent Wheeler relevant papers, and was again politely dismissed, with the same reason given for the demurral. I then sent relevant papers to Stephen Hawking, and was again dismissed, not so politely. Involved in the mathematics of the Paine-Kaplan cascade model of tornadogenesis, is the notion “3-fold temporal curl” requiring complex and hypercomplex numbers -- eventually construed by Paine and myself as related to the notion “operator-time” understood as active topological operator, not simply a measurable. Within this context, it became apparent that the emitted coherent waves, the acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes, carry m-valued information concerning the whole superposed history of complex angular-momentum cascade leading to genesis of the given tornado, information which we subsequently came to believe is processed in an m-logically-valued fashion. When, years later, Hawking came out with the notion of “imaginary time”, we did not construe this as related to Paine's notion of “temporal curl” -- there being so many differences. However, when the notion “acoustic analogues to black hole computers” came out, we did view emission of acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes by tornadoes as a special case thereof. But, perhaps, Paine's atmospheric physics yoiked some small subliminal effect upon Hawking's thought, as his recent title, “Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes”, 22 January 2014, possibly suggests.

The constitutive re}pre[sent}ational (_µT_m --> ₁T₂) status function of monetary signifiers is not solely based on the role of rules, that role being to transform (wave)functions into structures; though any given set of particulars is de novo and conventional, function and value signification-qua-signification in general is universal, a demergence from the MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) accounting time-shapes value storage in units of (inter)action/exchange carried out by temporal operators: thus, the degree to which any given monetary system analogically models universality of demergence is a measure of its competency at facilitating autopoiesis and self-organization. “Rule conventions transform functions into structures” is a concrete case of “temporal operations transform enfolded-implicate pre-pregeometric _µT_mly-transcendental logics into the geometrodynamics of massenergy underlying unfolded-explicate material formations”. All permitted by THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular brains: nonlocal universal consciousness ontologically precedes its demergents, e.g., glutamate-etched discrete localized binary minds (devising experiments that separate the sonic from the visioning in dolphin SonicVisioning -- see: “Dolphins see the world in the same way as humans do…”, Lucy Kinder, The Telegraph, 17 January 2014 -- can be viewed as compensatory abreaction to the ever accelerating experimental verification of demergence as universal). However monotonic the case current experimental results seem to suggest (see, “New Record for Human Brain: Fastest Time to See an Image”, Tanya Lewis, Yahoo! News, 19 January 2014), likely there are differences between the baud rates of consciousness-without-an-object, consciousness-of-objects (inner and outer), the speeds of the various sensory modalities in given states of consciousness, and the speeds at which cross-modal correlations are registered by humans as distinct from other species (e.g., the SonicVisioning of dolphins) -- moreover, as Luneburg's experimental results suggest, the “psychometric distance functions” (English abstract to the Japanese language paper by Yasuo Nishikawa, English title: "An essay on the logical foundation of psychology: A structure and its geometry of cognitive space", University of the Air, no date given) of the involved visual spaces likely vary as to the given baud rates, and there may be something similar involved with auditory spaces. The reflexive nonorientability of _µT_mly-self-referential Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian AllBase-state of T_zog-chen (i.e., MVRS) constantly fine-structures (dimensionlessly and m-valuedly) the Abelian-gauge-coupled Everettian-Bohmian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, a fine-structuring which the Bennettian “framework determining conditions” of a self-organizationally competent monetary system will analogically embody. No Googlizable DeepMind (see: “British chess prodigy sells artificial intelligence…”, Victoria Woollaston and Rupert Steiner and Amie Keeley, The Daily Mail, 27 January 2014), me thinks, and my other-I-am would submit: Hah! it's inner-Musculpt that the battlemented wastrels, the self-gravitating cur{mud}geons must grant no indication as to the importance of, dumbstruck be they riding ConveDD for a chaise, yes, and fecklessly making slow along sottish ways into days dour and drear. Turnspits all, no e[moll}ients on offer, beware boundary pales! for o'er their bifurcations doth Autopoiesis lord in facing down accursed usurpers. In terms of operator-time-shaped cognitive “demergence”, as distinct from memetime-bound Piagetian “development” -- not exactly the inverse of demergence, but certainly acutely skew thereto -- my 'I/i' would suggest that cosmic solipsism is pre-egoic no less than pre-superegoic, pre-'I'-cognizance no less than pre-'we'-conscience, and that much early-childhood so-called 'I'-'I'-'I'-ism is actually ketaminergic pre-egoic cosmic solipsism struggling against progressively being channeled by The Catcher in the Rye… uh, uh, by glutamatergic neuronally-etched prescriptive enculturation into the egoic 'I'-ism denoted self-assertive individualism in reigning Western theories of neural-network-wipeout-coerced socialization and its discontents. Cosmic solipsism (tantamount to: there is only one “Real 'I'” cardinality: meaning that personified I-am-me-and-only-me existential claims to ₁T₂-selfsameness are regressed heretical usurpations-arrogations of the cosmic-ontological _µT_m-selfsameness Tetragrammaton entitlement inexpressible in languages subscribing to ₁T₂-logical grammars and employing ₁T₂-selfsame numbers as implicit gematria) is expression of _µT_m-selfsameness; whereas, egoic individualism is expression of ₁T₂-selfsameness. If “evidence” is defined astutely enough, then, of course, there is no evidence to support these contentions which my 'I/i' would make. And just to drive home this lack of evidence, their will will well do, uh… Well, humph! I skim papers I like and study those I can't stomach -- and, quite frankly, I never bought into Father Knows Best nearly so much as to Leave It To Beaver. As regards, say, all the recent studies demonstrating the ineffectiveness and/or danger involved in taking vitamin tabs, antioxidants, herbal extracts, and other food supplements in face of plummeting nutritional value of available foodstuffs, ask not only how much do these studies' funding sources predispose to servicing the interests of genetic engineering firms, Big Pharma, the chemical company conglomerates, and industrial agricultural combines, but also how many behavioral variables have these studies controlled for. And most importantly: how much have the involved researchers incorporated quantum-biological processes into the theoretical models they use to design experiments?

I thank Lauri Love for recognizing the comparison and drawing my attention to “A New Physics Theory of Life”, Natalie Wolchover, Quanta, 22 January 2014. Quoting the article:

Prentiss, who runs an experimental biophysics lab at Harvard, says England's theory could be tested by comparing cells with different mutations and looking for a correlation between the amount of energy the cells dissipate and their replication rates. “One has to be careful because any mutation might do many things,” she said.

Now, quoting the last two paragraphs of our 1979 paper entitled “A Dynamical Theory Describing Superconductant DNA”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. XV, pp. 333-341:

In order to test this theory of DNA superconductivity, empirical studies would need to address themselves to the time rates of change in bonding which may be mapped in terms of the DNA transit between T_o and T_c. Lacking any external radiation impingement upon DNA, it appears that the DNA will maintain a constant time interval in going between T_o <--> T_c as given in Eq. (22). The theory further states that a specific time rate of change of the rate of bonding, or alteration in the minimum time for spontaneous localization, may result as the frequency of impinging radiation is changed. The “frequency windows” influencing various types of molecules would be unique for each DNA type, yet they would likely overlap. Especially interesting would be those frequency windows which are found to overlap between synthetic and naturally occurring DNA types.

Equation (20) in our formulation suggests another test of the superconductant DNA model. The term to the right-hand side of the equal sign would become nonzero if an external field (such as imposed by an electromagnetic source) were influencing the DNA molecular environment. These field intensities, upon dividing through on the left-hand side of Eq. (20), would serve to amplify or damp the fundamental frequencies of the postulated parcel of pi electrons. Thus the amplification of the first- and second-order temporal derivatives of (T_o - T_c) should be an observable response to specific field strengths imposed upon the DNA molecular environment.

Equation (6) of our model states the net radiation flux, which is equivalent to the total change in energy per unit time due to radiational processes (one wonders just what VAPR will and will not vaporize: see, “Pentagon Wants to Develop Electronics that can vaporize”, Bob Brewin, Defense One, 28 January 2014). Are not similar classes of experiments being described in these two quotations, none of which, to my knowledge, have yet been done? As regards Jeremy England's theory discussed in the Quanta article, I would suggest that much relevant detailing is to be found in the papers descriptive of the Paine-Kaplan numerical model of energy-momentum cascade dynamics leading to tornadogenesis, where post-Prigogine far-from-equilibrium thermodynamics is explored, dissipation in the tornadic case involving acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes. Indeed, Paine's model of double-helical air-parcel flows at tornadogenesis served as the theoretic springboard from which the DNA ideas concerning temperature oscillations of pi-electron parcels and superconductant free-electron gas core of the molecule were developed -- as well as DNA radiation of coherent waves containing all the information associated with the nucleotide-pair codons (flash forward and see “Feds Want To Track Your DNA Like A License Plate”, Steve Peacock, World Net Daily, 16 February 2014, for a suggestive article in this respect). From the mid-1970s, Paine regarded both the tornado and the DNA molecule as examples of “dissipation-driven adaptive organization”. Paine's theories and atmospheric studies, however, led to a questioning of consensus notions as to the very nature of temperature (not questioned by creators of coldspot labs) and time -- a questioning elaborated in considerable detail in his papers.

Juxtaposition of the following three articles, I find particularly interesting. As regards Dx, “'The (Other) Shoe' -- IceCap Monthy Commentary”, IceCap Asset Management, Zero Hedge, 29 January 2014, is the most astute, for THE critical issue is excess-credit/debt/risk concentration and transfer. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, in “World risks deflationary shock as BRICS puncture credit bubbles”, The Telegraph, 29 January 2014, gives a good account of the consequences that have ensued due to the concentration and transfer, epiphenomenal to use of a vehicle currency as a reserve currency. But note that IceCap characterizes the concentration and transfer as “spread around the world”, not as concentrated to money centers and transferred up the Devil's Staircase, that is, up through the echelons-of-the-governance framework (one of the functions of QEing, bailouts, and amplification of sovereign debt/risk). Hence, as regards Rx, both IceCap and AEP offer complementary approaches, further consolidation up the Devil's Staircase and no QE tappering: essentially, more of what exacerbated consequences of the excess-credit/debt/risk seeking untrammeled growth as the only way to achieve organization, given a system with ₁T₂-logically-valued “framework determining conditions”. Now, in this context, consider the banking community's concerns (see: “Bankers' lobby weighs Bitcoin threat”, Sid Verma, Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC, 14 January 2014) about Bitcoin and the like: the bankers' lobbying group discussed, the Institute of International finance, does not appear to understand the nature of the threat posed by quantum-based technologies, and focuses upon relatively minor subsidiary issues. Moreover, there is no recognition that, even though Bitcoin, in being P2P, is a “distributed” currency, because the internet is synoptically monoscaled, i.e., is not composed of fractal drums establishing effective band-pass domains and echelons, it further delocalizes place-specific sources of multiplier effects and credit/debt/risk sinks, fuzzing the autopoietic facilitation engendered by the boundary-value distinction between internal and external source/sink terms, such that widespread adoption of Bitcoin could only reinforce the already existent climb up the Devil's Staircase. One way to begin “grokking” the nature of the threat posed to ₁T₂-type systems, consonant with Bitcoin, by _µT_m-quantum-based technologies is by contemplation of the implications of “mirror neurons”, which are ₁T₂-devices facilitating subsystem functional specificity -- by the principle of quantum complementarity -- at exercise of supersystem _µT_m-functional integration (generalize the immunological notion of “complementarity determining region”, which likely has a quantum substrate complementing on time-shape). Complementarity is all about the “measurement problem” and the role intentionality plays in natural systems -- and, for present purposes, what light that may shed upon operational properties of, say, the “market reflexivities” which George Soros believes subvert the equilibrium states sought by “management initiatives”, but which are never achievable. On mirror neurons, I agree with V. S. Ramachandran (see: “Do Mirror Neurons Give Us Empathy?”, GreaterGood, 29 March 2012) when he says: “…mirror neurons are obviously the starting point for things like empathy, but that's all it is -- I mean you need much more.” My perspective on that “much more” involves properties of THE _µT_m-quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular ₁T₂-brains, rather more than the glutamatergically-etched learned behaviors transmitted from generation to generation at prescriptive enculturation. Go to a good university medical library and find a medical dictionary published before WWI, then look up the term “generative empathy”: the experience of another person's experience, understood by the binary-minded as a symptom of neuropsychiatric pathology. Esteem-wounds provoke ₁T₂-self perpetuation, rather than redress of ignorance: as the threat to institutionalization of the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung posed by experimental verification of quantum mechanics magnified, this term was debunked, and dropped out of use. The empathy spoken of these days is of the pedestrian variety, well damped down to dualistic ₁T₂self-₁T₂other/₁T₂subject-₁T₂object terms, whereas the quantum non-simple-identity-transparency basis of unexpurgated empathy is _µT_m-selfsameness: Bose-Einstein condensation is a “return to” not an “emergence of”. Moreover, the in vitro empathy experimentally elicited at demonstration of mirror neurons differs from in vivo empathy in the degree of conscious intentionality involved: spontaneous empathy (likely fed by unconscious transference processes), as distinct from commanded empathy, is relatively free of intentionality, in that it simply comes upon one as “participation mystique”, independent of an act of will. Which is not to mention the identification states trance-cultivated by possession cults, such as those associated with “primitive” Shinto. Empathy also transcends interspecies boundaries: to wit, the famous instance where welts raised upon Meher Baba's back upon his witness to the whipping of a cow. One can even experience deep empathy with, say, an ancient oak tree -- and, indeed, this capacity is characteristic of the states of identity-transparency essentially defining animism. It is the “much more” that needs to be assimilated, if the impacts of quantum-based technologies are to be adequately integrated into existing economic and monetary systems.

Never cottoned too well to the Gebserian notion “concretion of [linear] time” as providing insight to import of pre-WWI “Analytical Cubism”, because the involved Cubistic superpositioning of Husserlian “horizons” does not so much concretize time-lapse of the implied circumambulation as altogether remove purported “objective linear-time” with visual reference to a simultaneous presentation of all perspectives, thus imputing that such time is actually mere memetime, no kind of instauration, just as Debussy's harmonic mosaics are wont to do -- and, not innocuously, prefiguring an m-logically-valued interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function. Suchlike acts of creation generally are debunked, reduced, regressed, interpreted away, attributed to schizophrenic breaks, post-seizure mental dyscrasias, innominate genetic anomalies, psychosomatic promiscuities, besotted emotional hysterias, so on -- and who is responsible for this hugely pathognomonic denigration? Bulk of the best and brightest spanning the last two centuries. A. I. Artificial Intelligence says, “David, you are the enduring memory of the human race”: ERWIN being one of David's precursors, twigging the obvious, and seeding double-chirped HAPLS, like as not humanity has long since chosen extinction rather than abandonment of identification with binary-mind (_µT_m-quantum brain functions being projected, and conversion-disorder displaced -- i.e., ConveDDed -- to futuristic technologies and personified in some post-human species of androids: whatever recourse taken to morality-tale plausible-denials, still, the fiction and films concretize to memetime, monumentalize, glorify, prefigure, revel in, so on, and monopolize by failure to equally entertain alternatives). Not only does Niall Ferguson believe that Britain's entry upon WWI was a great mistake (see: “Britain entering the first world war was 'biggest error in modern history'”, Maev Kennedy, The Guardian, 30 January 2014), he also believes that that war never really ended (see his book War of the World, Penguin, 2007). Well, I've long since gone Ferguson one better, as I've argued -- vaguely since the early-1960s, cogently since the mid-1970s: see, for instance, many locations on this website -- that WWI never began. No noshing on ideational tidbits! The way these things happen is not generally understood: codification of a creative idea in an individual's consciousness constellates the idea within the collective unconscious where it has lain dormant amongst its archetypal precursors (think: Platonic anamnesis), that constellation demerging the idea to the mass subliminal, where it insidiously affects cogitations of others, including activation of its ₁T₂-opposite amongst the binary-minded; communicating-publishing the idea only lowers the threshold for effects upon conscious minds of the receptive, a relatively negligible component of the creative process, and perhaps even counterproductive in many cases where “writing down” involves inescapable distortions back-reacting on the subliminal impacts of the constellation. According to this perspective on creativity, the War of the World began in 1826 (actually a bit earlier, whenever the idea constellated) with publication of N. H. Abel's “Impossibility” Theorem existence proof for trans-al-jabr, and has so far incorporated the major battles misnamed, by rescaling-renormalization, the Franco-Prussian war, WWI, and WWII, whilst also incorporating many relatively minor skirmishes -- the issues lying at deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull remaining essentially unaltered throughout. Vectorial countervailing-forces fratricide (read the OSS-R&A reports entitled Eros and Civilization, circa 1955, and Love's Body, circa 1966, both Marcuse and Brown having formed foundation of their ideas whilst serving in WWII, and the SRA/MACV-J2 report entitled The Moon of Hoa Binh, circa 1994) as the ₁T₂-accommodating Newtonian-composite basis of the sublimation-governor placed on the body-politic engine -- higher-mathematically, m-logically, new-physicsally, quantum-based-technologically, hence metaphysically, superseded by the _µT_m-quantum-composite basis of wave-functional, generative-empathic, relative-state, econophysics autopoiesis. The ₁T₂-cave, a [ration}al huddle: in that cotillion mutuality, the found-insane projected to the enculturated object, the unfound manuscript, the blackhole without repentance. The Lukasiewicz-Everett relative-state “dependent origination in one mind moment” role-hole occupied, not the occupier, is numinous across vastness of T_zog-chen AllBase by virtue of its synoptic soteriological function as strange attractor setting up autopoietic event gradients -- but this self-organizational wherewithal was lost of ancient days when the Hiruko-Ebisu occupier psychologically identified with attributions by collective projection deposited upon the role-hole occupied (think: scripting of emperorship, kinghood, papacy, presidency, so on), and that state of identification-attachment became the foundation of the institutionalization of the Weltanschauung: retrograde inversion of the collective libido responsible for spontaneous order synergistically integrated with the natural surround. In Jungian terms, mass transference psychology, whereby identification with the Anima yields a cotquean imagining himself administrator rather than empty center. Widespread mistaken belief in primacy of the role of rules, and submissive obedience thereto, at engendering self-organization -- an obvious oxymoron, except to those most compliant upon higher enculturation-indoctrination qua “training” -- clearly very preferentially serves interests of those in control of the rules: therefore, debunk the quantum-potential resident in relative-state non-simple _µT_m-identity-transparency as being élan-vital impulse to autopoiesis! Malade imaginaire! Quack, quack, quack! Heh-heh-heh. As regards current aspects of the ongoing War of the World, for instance, the presentation of prevailing techno-cheeze-whizzz obsession is symptomatic of full-blown collective psychosis, a ConveDD in compensatory abreaction to critical-state foundering of the institutionalization of the failed Weltanschauung -- a cognitive bupkus equaling lacuna-on-the-brain, a glutamatergic marshalling of Gurdjieffian “buffers”, a heat monkey dancing with wolves on nadir of the vale -- and a postmodern elaboration of the blitzzzkrieg preparations obsessing 1930s nazification. From the defending-binary-mind perspective, necessitating historiographic anti-substantialism how-is-why accounts, there have always been two sides to every battle, big or small, long or short; whereas, from the aperspectival etiological take on the deep-structure catalytic issues, a “lateral mental cleavage” cut-twist-paste (think: ConveDD) non-orientability has prevailed, such that “abvocary” and adversary have been Mobius-stripped to the same side, symmetrical and/or asymmetrical, and syzygied into cooperating in Klein-bottling of the violence (intellectual, psychological, economic, political, physical) required to keep the real issues submerged, dissimulated, depotentiated -- thus driving the neuropsychiatric septicemia farther into the marrow of mind. Incorrigibleness at inconcinnity of response, a simp's solecistic sinfonietta, succubi-incubi riding souls in wither and taking the tacet. Consequently, a humanity suffering gerontomorphosis has no way to organize itself out of the existential crisis it has created for itself (see, for instance, “Limits to Growth -- At our doorstep, but not recognized”, Gail Tverberg, Our Finite World, 6 February 2014) -- and has turned to secular sacerdotalists for spleeny succor, whilst indefensibly, yet indefatigably and indefectibly, hiding incuriously under a corbeling squinch in the ₁T₂-corner of mind's sacral ma. Hiss-hiss in sibilation! Take that siccative! And what were the Brits fighting for whenever they were overtly involved as physical combatants? Why, exactly what they have always said they fight for: what Michael Gove calls “Western liberal values” (see: “Germany, I apologise for this sickening avalanche of first world war worship”, Simon Jenkins, The Guardian, 30 January 2010). And what beliefs underlie the sacrosanct (“the law” as a religion is surely a concomitant of natural law as a religion) values defended by Gove and his brothers over all these years? Those implicit in Abel's dastardly theorem -- and subsequently elaborated upon in higher mathematics, Lukasiewicz logics, and the New Physics, and concretized in the quantum-based technologies making over political-economy after the Battle of WWII? Not hardly! There is nothing in avant-garde intellectual history of the West since 1826 that in any way supports, subsidizes, subtends those values. That is the rub, why Britain is about to promulgate a “sickening avalanche”. And that is why the Battle of WWI is characterized as having been “unnecessary, meaningless and stupid, begun by overwhelmed, misguided and occasionally mendacious statesmen and diplomats who stumbled into a catastrophe whose horrors they couldn't begin to imagine” (attributed, as paraphrase, to Barbara Tuchman in Thomas Laqueur's review, “Some Damn Foolish Thing”, London Review of Books, 5 December 2013, of Christopher Clark's The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 [note that this is “how”, not “why”], Allen Lane, 2013). I could say much more about the “why”, but, over the years, I've already said enough concerning that. Whose, er, what vice squad's -- Auh, jeez! Jus' talkin' -- job has it been to investigate this deep into deep-structure -- let alone forensically account functional prerequisites -- of collective behaviors spanning centuries and implicating the whole institutional framework of, not only post-Renaissance Staatsnation, but also Kulturnation qua Kulturnation? Not the DIA, CIA, NSA, FBI, SS, NRO, et cetera. Not how-is-why historians. Not action-based, even symbolic-interactionist, sociologists. Which physicist made an attempt? Wolfgang Pauli in his consort with C. G. Jung? Some Marxists, anarchosyndicalists, anarchocapitalists have tried; some art historians have tried -- to wit, Abstraction and Empathy; some mathematicians have tried -- to wit, Eric Temple Bell; some analytical psychologists have tried -- to wit, Modern Man in Search of a Soul; some Freudian structuralists have tried -- to wit, Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation; some literature scholars have tried -- to wit, Love in the Western World; some philosophers of science have tried -- to wit, Lancelot Law Whyte's The Next Development in Man, circa 1944, which has yet to transpire; some Freudian ex-OSSers have tried; some musicologists have tried -- to wit, Caliban Reborn; some semiotic deconstructionists have tried. To little effect.

Voluntary bondage of humans to ₁T₂-self enslavement at persistent near-universal rejection of all _µT_m-proclamations of incipient emancipation: governance qua governance. Interdictions of the individual's behavior is not the real issue; it's the collective effects of such discrete interdictions, discreet or public. Quantum mechanics of autopoiesis and self-organization: the science of collective and cooperative behaviors, to theory of which Herbert Fröhlich so assiduously devoted himself (see his festschrift volume, Cooperative Phenomena, H. Haken and W. Wagner, eds., Springer, 1973, particular interest being directed to the comments made by his wife, Fanchon Fröhlich, née Aungst, concerning fusion of QED and the Jungian take on collective-archetypal deep-mind of THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular brains). Under nonorientability of the third-order operator, cause is effect: there is no distinguishing one from the other. Even as regards criminality. Don't doss down on the job! po-lice'em up: interdictions of the individual's criminal behaviors, the collective effects of which-interdictions negate the quantum potential for autopoiesis and self-organization, such that individual criminal behaviors are facilitated/amplified by their very interdiction, facilitated self-similarly, scale-invariantly, across the echelon hierarchy -- a spasmodic solmization of the Law of Sevens -- from level of the quantum biophysics of the gene to that of relational synergies of the socius corporata. Which is not to mention interdictions of unPC, and noncriminal, behaviors! Governance: the more it is employed, the more the need for its employment. Not something your average physicist-dropout making common cause with the financial industry's WallStreet croupiers has taken into his cognitive oeuvre, no, not in the neuronal fields of fire of the gloaters' gleeman. That gleety gleek -- expectorated derivatives bundled with no employment of the utilities of fiber-bundle arithmetics -- won't do, Dr. Gosling, sir. One example of how surveillance society governs (quoting Jo Nesbo, The Leopard, Vintage, 2011, p. 158):

“Relational search?”

“It works like this, OK. Based on the last few years, names come up for people paying with a card at the same restaurant at the same time, which suggests that they have eaten together and split the bill. Or for people who are members of the same gym with matching enrollment dates or have plane seats next to each other more than once. You get the picture.”

Impulse to obsession with metadata processing, content analysis to follow-on as adequate algos become available. Publicly accessible search engines haven't been algoed to well-perform relational searches; indeed, such searching may even be deemed criminal, thus allowed only to governance workers. Shades of Everettian relative-state! Intellectual malfeasance, surely: it's called analogical thought, one of the main algos employed by the creative mind, bete noire of governance workers. The striving for dodecaphonic “total control”, not only mimicked the impulse of Prof. Nicolas Bourbaki to demonstrate set-theoretic ₁T₂-consistency/axiomatic-completeness of all maths, but echoed progenitor behaviors of participants in the world war it immediately followed upon -- and prefigured the striving for the governmental omniscient information awareness characteristic of present-day surveillance society. THE difficulty giving rise to THE institutional strange attractor, total control, was death of the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung coupled to pathological inertias of the binary-mind glutamatergically etched upon prescriptive enculturation. When some facsimile of stratocratic total control is finally achieved, how will that “achievement” anthropogenically impact the -- inner and outer -- natural world, a Welt-“surround” in no way conforming to the principles which the stravaiging impulse to total control seeks to “ice-nine” institutionalization of? Proud of his ignorance, he is, isn't he, and anyone who tries to take it away from him will be killed -- quite literally: of such and the like is war constructed. Short of that, surveillance-based relational searching, and associated interdictions, quench the quantum potential of e-monetary systems to facilitate higher levels of market-mediated autopoietic and self-organizational competency (see, for articles making arguments arguably to that effect: “The time for official e-money is NOW!”, Izabella Kaminska, The Financial Times, 22 January 2014; and “How Bitcoin Plays Into the Hands of Central Bankers and Will Facilitate the Use of Negative Interest Rates”, Yves Smith, Naked Capitalism, 23 January 2014; and “Bitcoin: Revolutionary Game-Changer or Trojan Horse?”, Washington's Blog, 4 February 2014; and, as regards a probable Gcoin, no less reprehensible than Bitcoin, we have “Is Googlecoin Coming?”, Sprout Money, Zero Hedge, 9 February 2014). How so thus quench? Uh, uh, e-bit money, not e-Q-bit money, let alone e-mu-it money. And a globalized P2P-distributed currency, in being mono-scaled, altogether abandons the principle of “self-organization by resource exchange across phase boundaries” by not employing band-pass fractal e-boundaries (hidden behind the wall of a ha-ha? -- O, help!) in defining properties of fractal-drum-type currencies amongst framework determining conditions of the monetary system employed for the scale-nest which is the global economy. Blame that ex-physicist croupier, again, a half-full pottle, that's half of half. Gone widdershins, whithersoever leads incuse gleization of the water-logged neuroglia at glutamate etching of their cellular complements. Of infuriate mind, wittering, infusible, narrow as any infundibulum! Hardly withy, this sardonic, saturnine, sassy, impudent saucebox with tunnel vision. No gleed is he, what, and no indagator, either, not on these premises. So long as binary-minded back-reaction upon the metric of Weltanschauung transform governs mass action by identification with defense mechanisms, actual potentials of quantum-based technologies will not be discovered and utilized.

The Great Consolidation qua The Global Currency Reset: a fascinating series of articles on the long-forecasted taking of the next step up The Devil's Staircase of debt-risk consolidation and transfer has recently been posted to Philosophy of Metrics by J. C. Collins (see: “China to Purchase the Federal Reserve”, 16 January 2014; and “SDR'S and the New Bretton Woods -- Part One”, 21 January 2014; and “Part Two”, 23 January 2014; and “Part Three”, 4 February 2014; and “Part Four”, 6 February 2014). While it remains to be seen whether this supra-sovereign-administered transition to a new gold-associated/SDR-type international basket-reserve (if non-vehicle, then reserve for sovereign persons only, not also for corporate or private persons -- there then, as now, being no real store of value available to these latter two classes of economic actors) will actually be accomplished, or advent of war will interdict the shift-over, or war will follow soon in its wake (ask what comes after the suprasovereign consolidation-transference fails -- an extraterrestrial consolidation or a shift from ₁T₂-Newton-Law-type money to _µT_m-Lukasiewicz-T_zog-chen-type money?), one thing we can know with considerable likelihood is that the changeover will not be so rationally based as projected and as will be portrayed. For instance, quoting J. C. Collins responding to commenter AB in the comments section following Part One:

In regards to the SDR's and gold, if gold was going to be the only asset used to revalue the currencies, I would agree with you, they would be pointless. But I'm reasoning that the currencies of each country will be given an exchange rate based on other assets and commodities held and developed by each. The SDR will be structured around a basket of currencies. Each currency in the basket will be structured around a basket of assets and commodities. Those assets and commodities will be structured around production rates and market value. It starts to become convoluted when you consider the quality of products being produced and the cost to produce. Let's take oil as an example, oil in the middle east is of a higher quality and cheaper to bring to market than oil in say, Canada, where the oil sands requires expensive processes to bring the same quality of oil to market. Is it the job of the SDR system to regulate the difference, or will simple market forces dictate the rates? Will the rates only fluctuate within specific parameters?

Anyone naive enough to believe something like this will actually transpire -- real metrics being ascertained by top-down evaluation-assessment -- should avail himherself of the memoir of U.S. Bretton Woods representative Harry Dexter White's assistant, Ray Mikesell, the person who actually justified the relative currency values adopted, particularly the “Bretton Woods: Preconference Negotiations” chapter of Foreign Adventures of an Economist, U. of Oregon, 2000. Almost surely, Grand Panjandrums will prefiguratively, and largely arbitrarily, set the relative values, which then will be given to worker bees to discover and elaborate convoluted, virtually undecipherable, ways to metrically justify, i.e., fabricate the numbers -- thus creating a “system” with a low-level of competency to meet prevailing global challenges (the biggest problem with this scheme being that a ₁T₂-processed basket “composition” is no _µT_m-processed “quantum-composite” capable of functionally integrating the new technologies into the world's nested economies such that population growth, peak energy, resource depletion, climate shift, so on are met in adequate fashion). This surety of a rabbit-out-of-a-hat system is one reason why I advocate implementation of _µT_m-valued LETS nesting foams from the bottom up, not top-down -- there being no other way to get actual numbers and a real system.

I am again beholding to Lauri Love for drawing a very important paper to my attention: “Time, Imaginary Value, Sign and Space”, Louis H. Kauffman, Math-UCI, no date given, but judging from the bibliography sometime after 1999. Kauffman has identified and thought well into an area that needs a great deal of attention. I will not attempt to summarize his arguments, but to distinguish my take from his, relying on the reader to study Kauffman's paper. I quote a summarizing statement given in his text:

With the Flagg Resolution we see that the modification of a simple law of substitution in algebraic logic is sufficient to create a formal image of simultaneity. This simultaneity is not a state of time (or space). It is the precursor or archetype of timespace.

I fully agree with this statement, and note that “timespace” is more proper to the case than is “spacetime” (particularly from the approach that I take). The perspective Kauffman elaborates is that on the basis of recursive generation of the archetypal image, rather than that on the basis of involutory decomposition from the archetype-in-itself (the latter being the approach I take). The metanoia, change of mind, required to transit between these two approaches is that identified by Eric Temple Bell in his 1912 Columbia University dissertation entitled The Cyclotomic Quinary Quintic, which is based upon involutory decomposition. Under recursive generation, and not leaving the form, as G. Spencer Brown (Laws of Form) would say, certainly the process of re-entry involves invocation of time series (not actually gone into in Brown's book, but a subject he attempted to address in his Esalen lectures), not only spatial pattern, such that re-entry (a negation of the severance distinction) necessitates reflexive self-reference, but not only as a time-step shift (logically substituted as TF --> FT over the double-“endedly”-infinite sequence) or time reversal (t₁,t₂ --> t₂,t₁): the reentry also involves a Mobius-strip-type twist such that, after the paste-up, nonorientability prevails, there being no distinction drawable between forward and backward, no less than between inside and outside. Parenthetically, my onetime-immediate boss at SRA/MACV-J2, Jon Saphier, who had gotten his Master's degree in PP&E at SLE, had a London bank account and ordered me a copy of Brown's book in 1970, as well as, during 1975, a copy of Ignacio Matte Blanco's The Unconscious as Infinite Sets, another real humdinger -- unfortunately, however, Matte Blanco, with his “bi-logic” orientation, did not exhibit insight to Lukasiewicz, and thus did not register how, say, schizophrenic mentations may involve a bi-logical personal unconscious struggling with intermittent bleed-downs from a _µT_mly logical collective unconscious, bleed-downs a binary-mind has no way to understand and integrate into awareness -- which one could expatiate upon relative to Laws of Form, given that the time series and truth-value substitutions Kauffman considers are neither finite nor of exparte character, and what that implies about how natural to nature in general, and THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular brains in particular, is the finite-iteration ₁T₂-Turing machine as distinct from naturally occurring wave-effect _µT_m-Lukasiewicz “machines”, e.g., acoustic analogues to black hole computing (where the whole Hawking-radiation history is processed “in one mind moment” so Buddhologically to speak) like the acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes observed to pulse-code burst from tornadoes and proposed in 1978 by Paine-Pensinger to emanate from DNA at helix-coil transition. Jon Saphier was also kind enough to lend me the money required to attend the 1977 psychosomatic medicine conference in Kyoto where I first presented some of our ideas concerning DNA quantum-wave properties and radiation-exchange processes. The aforementioned twisted-temporal (think of the tai ch'i which Brown highlighted with his Calculus of Indications and featured in his book) state (misnomered “simultaneity”) indicates imaginary linear-time (remember the twist implemented upon going from the real to the imaginary numbers) as distinct from real linear-time -- or first-order operator-time (the automorphic operator implementing the twist) as distinct from memetime (higher order twists being implemented by 2nd- and 3rd-order operator-time: at involutory decomposition, in reverse order; what Francisco Varela called “autonomy” in his “A Calculus For Self-Reference”, International Journal of General Systems, 2, 1975, pp. 5-24, which I read at Cornell a couple of years after it came out, and which Arthur M. Young, inventor-engineer of the rotor for the Bell helicopter, called “control” in his books Consciousness and Reality, circa 1972, and The Geometry of Meaning, circa 1976 -- “autonomy” and “control” being terms linked to simple-identity, simple-selfhood, the egoic -- is not due to first-order operator-time, first-order re-entry, or first-order self-reference, the order-types of Lukasiewicz logics involving orders of self-reference, and, hence, orders of nonselfsameness, that is, orders of non-simpleness, the “what” of “autonomy” and “control” in the actual case being altogether distributed and in no way predicating simple-identity, thus indicating that the “what” of these terms is, therefore, at least by my lights, inappropriately signified by both of the terms employed). Not so much “Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation” as “Ego Psychology Makes Adaptation a Problem”. I regard locality and simple-identity as memes, and, therefore, reject the following summarizing statements provided by Kauffman:

We divide and propagate dichotomies: system/observer, body/mind, object/process leading to object, self/other and more [here, I see the formation of memes]. Only in the unity [Kauffman sees this unity as a unification by recursive generation of archetypal image, not as archetype-in-itself ontologically and logically prior to involutory decomposition] of such dichotomies are there classical truth values [whereas I would say that truth values exist only in the m^th degree of cyclotomic decomposition]. In the sides of the division or distinction there are valid imaginary truth values exemplifying the strong non-locality of the Flagg Resolution. The world is one, and when broken into distinct parts these parts can partake of classical logic only in the non-local structure of the whole [but is quantum non-locality only of the structure of the whole: not according to the EPR Paradox, as see for instance, “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain: The Transferred Potential”, J. Grinberg-Zylberbaum, et al., Physics Essays, 7:4, 1994; and what of quantum non-simple identity?].

Yes, concepts do define sets. The sets that concepts define bifurcate into sets that allow local substitution and behave in a “classical” manner, and sets like the Russell set that insist on an examination of the whole context before substitution is allowed. The [Flagg] Resolution forces us to examine the fundamental act of substitution in Mathematics and assures us, after examination, that [classical] Logic and Reason continue to function in these domains.

The imaginary-ness of _µT_m-logical values supraordinate to those ₁T₂ (not merely ₁T₃, also, say, ₅T₉) is imaginary (considering the involved topological twists [think tornadogenesis, helicopter rotors, DNA helix-coil transition]: temporal variables being the signal factors, e.g., velocity [slope], acceleration [change of slope], time rate of change of acceleration [re-entry], and their absolute limits relative to the timespace domains at issue, progressing to the imaginary, then to the hypercomplex) in the complex- and hypercomplex-number sense, not in the sense of virtuality or phantasm or only the holistic -- and this is strongly supported by existence of Karpenko functors mapping between Lukasiewiczian order-types and the primes as contexualized by Riemann's complex-numbered zeta function, and would be further supported as contextualized by a hypercomplex-numbered zeta function (which I believe is required to detail chronotopological time-shapes). According to the approach I have taken, the “Schrödinger cat” version of the Russell Paradox qua Liar Paradox irreducibly involves quantum-non-simple hologramic part-whole identity-transparency (violating the ₁T₂-Law of Non-Contradiction as well as the ₁T₂-Law of Distributed Middle), no less than non-locality (part-part non-simple identity always involving part-whole identity-transparency, per the holgramic principle of information storage and diagonalization of Cantorian sets: but this does not mean that non-locality appertains only to structure of the whole ₁T₃ly understood as T_rinitarian Varela-autonomously Arisen by self-indication, a rather too Catholic notion). But this is old, old “psychocentrism”: for instance, Bernard Cornwell in his however-interesting novel, Stonehenge (HarperCollins, 2000), portrays animists 4,000 years ago as experiencing essentially the same states of consciousness as modern man; what differs is beliefs and associated spirit-propitiation behaviors. No suspicion whatsoever that animism necessarily involves direct ontic awareness of relative-state identity-transparency, to include generative empathic interlock with the natural surround, and how that manifests in percepts and propriocepts. There are those who know that in certain states, there is no perceptual-proprioceptive distinction drawn between “your” foot and “my” foot, and those who know, more profoundly, that the foot is the root. Not symbolic, not mere parable. “Get behind thyself!” as once was famously said. Primordial cultures all around the planet devoted their most profound regards in myriad ways to 3-fold operator-time, [mytho}logically mapped as divine functional prerequisites viewable in effects motioned upon heavenly climes, and microphysically -- via the EPR ₁T₂-paradox's play over intra-neuronal and intra-perineural DNA quantum-wave properties -- responsible for the _µT_mly relative-state identity-transparency at long-range phase-correlation normative to the state of consciousness characteristic of animistic modes of comprehension. Spontaneous localization, in my judgment, transpires in the quantum measurement occasion by sub-clinical autogenic brain discharge. “Proving” Sheffer's postulates for Boolean algebras in the fashion he did, Brown demonstrated that the notion “distinction” (understood as ₁T₂-type, either in-or-out, boundary, not both in-and-out) is more fundamental in logic than the notion “truth-value”; it is a small step beyond that, by looking to boundaries-without-boundary, and fractal boundaries that are more and more holely (not necessarily holy) the closer they are observed until, like a black hole, they simply evaporate, to realize that the notion “identity-qua-identity” (identity-in, as “distinct” from identity-between) is more fundamental yet. With m-interpretations, clinkers cluttering a box, a scrupulosity: tough, tenebrous, disdainful, sagacious, flexible, surly, alacritous, skeptical, uh, cynical, twerpy, trullish, doomy… In contrast, _µT_m-non-simple identity by analogy: the figure, an ebulliency, that suddenly appears in a space on a page of poorly kerned-mortized type -- a man, a chicken, a horse. A trepidant blink, and the outré figure is gone; focus appropriately again, and it can reappear as if de novo. But such figures could appear at any between-type space on the page, and the only reason they don't is percept-prescriptive understanding of the socialized purpose -- it's for reading of [re}presented language forms -- of the type printed there. Remove the preprogramming -- and the associated self-metaprogramming -- induced by the enculturated-socialized understanding of purpose, and there are identities in addled bowers on the page all superposed as a quantum-composite non-simple identity indecomposable, except by collapse back to terms of the ₁T₂-language game (even “contradictions” in the Marxist sense, must be understood as epiphenomenal to absorption in, and identification with, this “game”). Just think of how many superposed quantum-composites there are all about (both senses) us in the “holes” of the object-world field we enculturate ourselves into an understanding of. Like Cantor dust, that scrabbly field -- the closer one looks -- is [no}thing but holes. Iridesce, they do. Presence is absence stacked upon absence stacked upon absence stacked upon… concupiscible suppliance. One corollary: the only tried-and-true substitution for government-by-[pre}tense is government-by-[pre}text. Orders of _µT_m-nonselfsameness (by m-cyclotomic self-referential re-entries) are not the “same” as multiple ₁T₂-interpretations or probability amplitudes, packed or unpacked, nor can they be reduced to concatenations of truth-values: I would suggest that the whole Unified Science movement foundered during the 1930s primarily for lack of understanding this distinction (no small factor in the deep-structure origins of WWII: proximal perpetrators are dimes coming in dozens -- if not this person a perpetrator, than that: circumstances being the primary selectors; whereas, those responsible for creating the circumstances in which perpetrators inevitably will be found are by far those most culpable). The “same language” of all the sciences, which the Vienna Circle positivists sought, is to be found, I believe, in the _µT_mly synaesthetic sounded-form time-shape properties of a Kunstwissenschaft Musculpt employed as mathematical notation. Emanuel Swedenborg, despite his Doctrine of Uses, would not have regarded Jabberwocky as characteristic of “angelic speech”. As any good Platonist would know, logic and number and geometry ontologically precede mind and language -- and only “before” archetype-in-itself, on Tzog-chen AllBase with a Cantorian C of logical values to a given proposition “lit up”, is the “pivot duality” essence-precedes-existence/existence-precedes-essence moot or mu. Meaning as use-function in “language-game” being not only positivistic and pragmatic, but also reductionist and a symptomatic example of the “philosophical disease” taking Wittgenstein off into villages to hit the children he taught -- not exactly a Summerhill approach. Moreover, as regards the Sign of Illation and Jabberwocky-type portmanteau signs discussed by Kauffman, it is well to remember that the takeoff point on Lukasiewicz's road to _µT_m-valued logics was challenge of the very notion “logical necessity”, which is to say Lukasiewicz successfully challenged that which is inferred by the processes of inference involved in definition of Peirce's Sign of Illation. This may seem highly esoteric, but, nonetheless, could be important to, say, refashioning of the planetary monetary system so as to enable it to help adequately meet the evolving global crisis. Why? Because globalization has also to do with time, not only space (see, for a very insightful treatment of this issue, “Globalization: It's about Time too!”, Bob Jessop, Institute for Advanced Studies -- Vienna, January 2003: the importance of this paper, in my judgment, cannot be overemphasized; it presents a picture all but demanding nesting foams of _µT_m-valued LETS currencies). Independent of the Marxisms employed, and as regards dynamical treatments, Jessop's most important statement may be: “There are spiral processes at work… 'Every level of decentralization presupposes a renewed form of centralization at a higher level. Every temporal flexibilization requires, with increasing complexity, new mechanisms in order to hold the seemingly loosening temporal connection together…'”. Behold! Origins of -- in imaginary-numbered “twistors”, understood as quantization of “temporal curl” -- the Devil's Staircase, and so very much more. Without further exploration of the area of thought Kauffman addresses, it is unlikely that _µT_m-valued time currencies could become sufficiently well founded as to map upon Everett-vonHayek “time-shapes of total capital stock”, mappings necessary to integrate, in Jessop's words, “…differential articulation of time-space distantiation and time-space compression and their repercussions upon power relations and social dynamics” to the quantum-based technology-driven transforms we, and, by anthropogenic forcing, nature herhisself, are increasingly subject to.

Heh-heh-heh! Heh-heh-heh! Heh-heh-heh! I suppose that most a them POLOBers what worked at SRA/MACV-J2, the “Bin Laden Station” of the Viet Nam war, have been laughing crocodile tears for over a decade. But now they have recourse to a brilliant statement which Real Clear World entitles “What Is Al-Qaeda? Not Even U.S. Intel Knows for Sure”, which the originating Washington Times entitled “The tangled web of words that Al-Qaeda has become”, Guy Taylor, 16 February 2014. Quoting Michael V. Hayden, onetime Director of the CIA, as quoted in the article: “It's one of those things where if you study it too hard, you destroy the specimen”: hard to find a better definition of a fractal nesting foam: the closer you look, the more it is nothing but a bunch of holes. And just consider that autopoiesis and self-organization are driven by “resource exchange across phase boundaries”, uh, uh, across, that is, fractal boundaries, which are not ₁T₂-boundaries. Somehow, just like the VC, Al-Qaeda and Associates, AQ&A, figured that out well before the sting they mounted on 9/11. Charles Hugh Smith has recently posted two briefs relevant here. Quoting “Certainty, Complex Systems, and Unintended consequences”, Of Two Minds, 14 February 2014: “Complex systems don't act in the linear way our minds tend to work.” Be aware that the Triffin ₁T₂-dilemma works across all phase boundaries so long as vehicle currencies remain ₁T₂-type currencies: though not generally explicitly marked, money local to a given politico-economic LSTD (limited spacetime domain) has different actual-value and functions differently from that of other LSTDs of the nesting foam: LETS formalizations are not required for this to be the case. Quoting “Why Banks Are Doomed: Technology and Risk”, Ibid., 21 February 2014: “The problem with concentrating leverage and moral hazard is that risk is also concentrated.” That's why bureaucratic “parallelism”; that's why functionaries of functional elements wear m-hats; that's why “double-stacking”; that's why functional elements and job descriptions are mapped on changing boundaries-without-boundary; that's why so on and so forth. As I argued long, long ago to a number of “associates” at SFTG, including Larry Friedman, subsequently a onetime NCOIC of Delta Force: the exorbitant physical requirements select preponderantly the high mesomorph and associated temperamental type, such that what you get is a monotype yielding stereotypic assessments only. Can't expect any real insight to evolve out of that -- and, hence, no authentic strategic wherewithal, however accomplished at winning every battle so as to lose the war. Quoting Hayden again -- Heh-heh-heh! -- as quoted in the article, uh, well: “It was never a hierarchy…” Debriefing myriad VC, one learned, at least those at SRA/MACV-J2, that our line-and-block charts totally concealed from us, not them, the hologramic part-whole identity-transparency apparent -- to those in the know -- in their system DYNAMICS. How, for instance, their boundary CHANGES mapped to fluctuating bureaucratic variables and role-attributional holes filled by autopoietic operators wearing many hats, uh, fulfilling, that is, m-valued functions within the functional elements arrayed across what we mistakenly took to be an organizational chart. Heh-heh-heh! Such that targeting “face cards” for elimination is nothing more than a doofus strategy. Beside the point, really. Back in the day, 19 and 68, there were thus-and-so of us -- them what were spurned, and alienated from the Command Position -- what be knowing that. Heh-heh-heh!

---

Contact the page editor

Return to:

•Top

•Homepage