_µT_m Scenarios, T₃₂(M)

The block of the ₁T₂-only-blockchain-distributed ledger, in the _µT_m-LETS case, would be replaced by a fiber of a _µT_m-fiberbundle whereupon fiberbundle arithmetics would actually be employed. The involved, strongly resisted, conception of functional process, because of the hologramic subsidence of natural-organic hierarchy, in no way subverts the notion that governance, on all its levels and in all its man[i]fest}ations, is the root of all evil. In terms of natural, and specifically organic, models of general systems function, ₁T₂-only blockchain tech is an utter disaster because it removes, and only removes, intermediaries, thus, by rescaling “renormalization” (a blackpsyche term revealing the mathematician-physicist's prejudicial binary-logical judgment), the ₁T₂-scale-hierarchy (essential to functional specificity) is abysmally reduced to a single synoptic monoscale alone -- howsoever distributed the P2Ped blockchain ledger may be -- whilst altogether ignoring the (_µT_m-valued) holographic principle (essential to functional integration) existent over boundaries-without-boundary, that principle whereby the part contains all the information of the whole. So, what's left -- after this overcompensation qua gross reductionism? When collective hysteria -- developed concerning N.H.Abel-related issues that remain largely unconscious -- is THE determining-attracting factor in decision-T_rees, the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ baby generally gets thrown out, while the ₁T₂-only bath water is retained. Those mathematician-physicists who fell away from physics and landed in the world of finance found -- however self-justified in individual cases -- quantum mechanics profoundly psychologically threatening. This level of clinger-psych amongst dropout physicists demands a securitized security blanket, a Linus-type blanket paralleled in the chemistry postdoc's -- steeped as heshe is in statistical thermodynamics and the molecular biology of the gene -- commitment to taking total control over the dodecaphonics of genomic informatics. At Cornell during the mid-to-late-'70s whenever I met a chem major at off-campus parties I always asked himher how many submolecular-biology-related required courses heshe had to take. The answer always amounted to: What the hell are you talking about? And the conversation went down hill from there. This condition of mind self-similarly affects supersets, sets, and subsets in mass assessments of the anthropogenic climate-shift “hypothesis”, as exemplified in, for instance, “Record Breaking Winter Cold? Don't Worry, the Climate Explainers Have it Covered”, Eric Worrall, WUWT, 28 December 2017. There's nothing in this article not intensively discussed at Cornell during 1975. ((Parenthetically, I note that, during December of 1961, I experienced -68 degrees F. [-55.5555556 degrees C.] at Eielson AFB [what a hoot! there were U-2s flying out of there during period of the Gary Powers shoot-down, not acknowledged even unto today, December 2017, reminding me of my childhood witness to Ashiya AFB's involvement {thus my first involuntary involvement in the Viet Nam war} in the 1954 resupply of Dien Bien Phu, similarly not acknowledged unto today], 26 miles south of Fairbanks, during a week-long period wherein the high for the day never got above -55 degrees F., an experience which drove home to me realization that the difference between 0 and -20 is major, between -20 and -40 major major, and between -40 and, well, -68 major major major: at the end of that week, overnight, the temperature jumped to -20 F. and we all took off our earmuffs and varsity jackets and for an hour or so played touch football in T-shirts in the snow and never felt cold, it seeming like a Spring day.)) Now, 42 years later, uh, that is, after Cornell in 1975, I'll say exactly what I said then: given the severity of brain damage human species has sustained, nothing whatsoever will get across the fact that during periods of far-from-equilibrium-phase-transition snapovers (no laidback mere rather regular Equinoxes), even those referenced to geological memetime, all, repeat all, extremes are explored -- including the extremely normal, which is to say the normotic. O, those normative normotics, how they have, in their normopathy, contributed to stability, that “stability” responsible for coming cuspover. And it appears that the neurological deficit is inevitably accompanied by fiscal deficits -- and deficient ₁T₂-only assessments relative thereto (not even an undistributed middle allowed). Quoting Mohamed El-Erian from “El-Erian: 'The World is Nearing a Tipping Point'”, Christoph Gisiger, Finanz und Wirtschaft, 22 December 2017:

We are heading toward a T-junction which has three fundamental implications: One is, that the road we’re on is going to end. The second message is that what comes afterwards is very different from what we've had. And the third message is that it can be one of two things. So it's a bimodal distribution with two modes: really good or really bad.

Just think of it! If ₁T₂-only passive-passing referential linear-time were not objective, were mere memetime, then there could be no “ownership process” by time investment, just [pre}tense thereto -- and what would that do to perpetrator profiling? The ₁T₂-only T-junction would become _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ and guilty-or-notguilty could not unhang juries. The MSM and MoSoSo being the way they are, and the internet having become manifestly mostly a corpus of entrapment devices, discreditation ops are so very easy to run for institutions, governmental or private, and wealthy individuals. Still, the fact they continue to bother with entrapment and discreditation clearly indicates that globalization of nazification has yet to reach the adolescence stage of cognitive development. You've come a long way, baby, but you still have much to accomplish. Oh crumbs! and godamercy, says a shamefaced folklorist to dear Ngaio, as regards the deaths of fools, curveting down, derry down, they do, don't they, sidling left, sidling right, from the spirit going down to their muttons, as they expectorate daft antiphony and geesey cachinnation upon making their entries into Babble-Under-Bapcomb. That locality is not absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct from nonlocality, that the instant is not absolutely sequentially specifiable as regards before and after, that duration of the moment is not absolutely quantifiable: these violations, amongst quite a few others, of ₁T₂ableness are extremely disturbing, antipathetic to the accustomed sense of personal identity, its apathetic lying-laid claim to absolute selfsameness, uniqueness, in|div[i]dual}ity, self-determination, ego autonomy, cognitive separability from mass mind. Indeed, even absolute physical-body distinction is called into question: one might as well take a general-anesthetic dose of ketamine sans the cocktailing “hallucinogen”-suppressing Valium as sit in a quantum physics classroom listening to that tripe. Put the cold scolds on hold, whydontcha! Quantum this, quantum that. Eck! Hmmm. Just as the MBS-bundle dropout-physicist delocalizes mortgages whilst leaving out the scary part, i.e., the fiberbundle arithmetics, so the block of the blockchain delocalizes whilst leaving out the scary part. Uh, that part which is animistic-pagan cum Taoist cum Buddhist. After explicating “Origination Is Identical To Nonorigination” (because -- due respect being given the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian m-logically-valued reference space -- all the information there is on the Schrödinger-memetime-independently, Abelian-E.T.Bellian cyclotomically-involutorily decomposed sheets is already all ready all ways and always being-therehere on the most-dense T_{zog-chen C}T_C+-AllBase sheet), Tu-Shun extrapolates into “Contemplation of the Complete Merging of Phenomena and Noumenon” as discoursed thusly in “Cessation and Contemplation in the Five Teachings of Hua-yen” (given in Entry Into The Inconceivable: An Introduction to Hua-Yen Buddhism, Thomas Cleary, ed./trans., U. of Hawaii Press, 1983), pp. 56-7 (referral to this passage by good offices of Lauri Love [nsh]):

Nonduality means that conditionally originated things seem to exist but are empty. This emptiness is not vacuity but turns out to be existence. Existence and emptiness are nondual; they are completely merged in one place. Here the two views [of existence and nonexistence] disappear, and emptiness and existence have no interference. Why? Because reality and falsehood reflect each other and completely contain and penetrate each other. What does this mean? Emptiness is emptiness which does not interfere with existence; it is empty yet always existent. Existence is existence which does not interfere with emptiness; it exists yet is always empty. Therefore existence is not existent -- it is apart from hypostatized existence; emptiness is not empty -- it is apart from nihilistic emptiness. Since emptiness and existence merge into one, with no duality, emptiness and existence do not interfere with each other; since they can take away each other's appearance, both are apart from either extreme. (amplification intercalated by translator)

This is definitely not a Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion take on things! Nor is the implied political economy that of neoliberal globalization -- be it that of the Washington Consensus or that of the Euro Consensus or that of whatwhomever. As regards Musculpt as user-friendly interface to… Whatever!, my I/i^m memories it-themselves back to Eielson AFB Teen Club, circa Fall Semester of 1960, the ping-pong room off to the side of the big space with the dance floor and jukebox: I am attacked by one of the off-base homesteader kids attending the on-base high school. That's Alaska for you! I put up no fight, couldn't be bothered -- even if minimally blooded. David Leblanc comes to my defense. Leave him alone! he's done nothing to you. Screw you! He's weird, just sits there, never says nothing. True enough, I silently acknowledge. Actually, I'm sitting there imaginably rehearing a jazz piece I'd heard that afternoon in the hobby-shop workspace where classmate Dave Saylor's father is finishing the cabinets for yet another super-expensive state-of-the-art his-self-assembled stereo system (my father buys the Saylor's last-used system when the new one is finished, and I keep it with me all the way through my time at Cornell two decades later, it's that utterly incredible). His, Dave Saylor's, father, a field-grade officer, is a technical type with a decades-old after-work focus on jazz and electronic music. The involved collection of long-playing 33.33-rpms, and tapes, is worth lots and lots. Who knows how much? Stuff I hear every time I go to the Saylor space in the hobby shop -- like nothing I'd ever heard before. Can't understand it, but some of which harks me back to, makes me think of, music I heard some years earlier in Japan. Musculpturally speaking: skew-parallel motion, as distinct from oblique motion. Weird stuff, that's for sure! So, what Musculpt there must have been in the head, and around the head, of Alice Coltrane whilst composing “Turiya and Ramakrishna”! If we are “whirling in the mire”, then a large part of the responsibility for that state is that we have not fashioned framework determining conditions facilitative to arriving in Turiya. Were _µT_m-processed m-valued LETS nesting-foams mapped over fractal e-boundaries adopted by, say, India in its abrupt leap into cashlessness, and Musculpt-as-maths-notation developed and adapted as user-friendly interface for carrying out _µT_m-LETS-currency transactions, then each _µT_m-LETS optimum currency domain could have its own unique monetary-analogue-qua-analog raga (for a discussion of the 72/32 thaats from which conventional ragas are derived, see “Grammatical Structures of the Ten Common Thaats of North Indian Classical Music: A Mathematical Approach”, Shodhganga, n.d. provided, take note of the binary numbers given for thaats and their floral representations), and, in its initial stages of evolution-through-use (a reverse engineering of “raga mining” may be extremely useful in this regard relative to the time-shapes mining involved in fiberbundle-chaining of _µT_m-LETS transactions, as per “Raga Mining in Indian Music by Extracting Arohana-Avarohana Pattern”, Surendra Shetty and K. K. Achary, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology, 1:1, November 2009), this raga, as would all other such ragas, would factor into the process of fine-grain tagging of measurables-indicators to values sheaved upon the ₁T₂-only encashed (buying a monetary engine that purports to run well without lubrication is really not a wise choice) base-state of the given _µT_m-LETS currency unit by being in part represented as a binary-number-feed-in to the Gödel-numbered Gödel number of each given transaction (as a transitional numbering algorithm in evolution-through-use, think of the Gödel numbers of entangled factorable quantum Turing machines, as explicated by Stephen Blaha in his book entitled The Metatheory of Physics Theories…, Pingree-Hill paperback edition, 2005, pp. 145-50) being signified such that it can be factored into the mappings collectively constituting the universal covering of the MVRS, the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian m-logically-valued reference space, by which the quantum-composite universal unit of account is to be defined and constantly modulated relative to the (ever better signified) changing Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth. Since the musical scale analogically models spatial scales, as does the fundamental frequency and its harmonics, the “basic shape”, grundgestalt, of the monetary raga, which is fully notatable as a binary number, would most basically immunologically signify self-identity of the given _µT_m-LETS optimum currency domain as contextualized by the fractal-e-boundary-articulated nesting foam. The m-values stacked upon the _µT_m-LETS-currency base-state would be signifying expressions of the other, i.e., modal-type, dimensions of the monetary raga, a notion that, in context of Musculpt as user-friendly interface, makes considerable sense due to: (1) the gematric properties of Sanskrit (as explicated by, for instance, John Woodroffe in his 1922 The Garland of Letters, and (2) the fact that every numerically-signifiable structural yantra has its signaturing functional mantra. Even though, in absence of a modicum of direct ontic engagement with _µT_m-relative-state ID-transparency, many motivational components are absent, still, as even ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains process occasions of multilevel perception (see, for a simulative indication thereof, the Shetty-Achary discussion of the “multilayer perceptron” as element of sigmoid-function-trained ANNs), Musculpt-assisted _µT_m-LETS-currency transactions should be -- the learning curve properly instituted as evolution-through-use proceeds -- easily managed by the average cell-phone user. Societies with Western music cultures would not have to adopt Indian music to create their own Musculpt-assisted _µT_m-LETS nesting foams. As there are an infinite number of possible music scales, and the number of those that can be usefully resolved by humans can be greatly expanded when the eye aids the ear, as is done in Musculpt, howsoever the relation between scales and modes is construed, there is undoubtedly more than adequate tropological material in the Western tradition, certainly if assisted by musical topos-theory and orbifold-musical-space considerations, such that a modal functional-equivalent to the monetary raga could be developed by evolution-through-use.

While sozialisamess and kommunisamust are ana[the}ma, still, to me, mass commo, no less than mass transit and mass trash, should be public services, and, for one, no doctorin' should be enrichin'; so, those two attitudes side by side mean, for my part, not only an embrace of the distributed middle inherent to distributed systems, but a rejection of the ₁T₂-only Law of Non-Contradiction, such that any given single market action-directive can be multivalent via _µT_m-monetary e-units. Frankly, using my personal criteria of judgment, I've long been aware that I'm altogether unaware of any institution that has well served humanity, let alone the planet; in my belief, this circumstance has largely been the case due to the processes by which the various sorts of ₁T₂-only logic have overtly and tacitly predisposed formations of Weltanschauungs, associated Lebenswelts, resultant Umwelts, and their induced affect-charged identifications. Whatever authentically effective ways could be undertaken to overcome this condition, all those ways would involve having gotten rid of that “only” -- if only there were to emerge a collective will sufficient to such overcoming, a doubtful ₁T₂-only proposition at best. Autocognitive StratDeceptOps unleashing the hounds of Artemis Agrotera (wall-eyed stoners be the Wall Street wolves bundling MBSs, rehypothecating BTC tokens absent the fiberbundle arithmetics whereby localization and fusion commute, torts really, cultural icons like Laurel and Hardy, but contributing no mirth, nor myrrh, to the socius which they signify as living in infamy) for a kill-their-own-master romp, such that nature's complex-unto-hypercomplex ca|tech[is}m-valued, ca = cat[e}gory, is concealed in the probability fog con[cock}ed by the binary-mind to which The Clingers are anchored by projective-identification at transference (on the intrasubjective anima/animus contrasexual, interpersonal, and subject-[physical]object levels). There are just too many brain-impaired to beat them, and so what if you make them know you were here -- particularly so when the real adversaries are regressed collective-unconscious event-gradients, which no type or amount of discrete-concrete actions could possibly interdict effectively. Yeah, and our I-ams thought they all got schooled by their high screwalls and their institutions of higher enculturation. Brought down aught in suppressed hysteria upon the undistributed middle, vociferous hysteria at the decentering, identity-transparent, psychosexual, counter-₁T₂-only-logocentric imports of multiply-twisted fiberbundle arithmetics and their barely acknowledged underlying _µT_m-valued logics repressed, and hence regressed, such that the ill-logic instrument, i.e., bundled MBSs n-rehypothecated into CDOs unto synthetic CDOs n-synthesized cum associated CDSs, issuing from the wall-eyed Wall Street ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, that is, has maximized pathogenicity: a rum go at whiskey-pour and coke-snuff hullabaloo, thus do we find one dimension of the prevailing fintech-assisted, centered, uh, money-centered, pas[tic}he state of play. Ach, and that's illustration of the mulish deep-structure principle n-times over truculently applied, aye, as to how -- and why -- they get over them as they do, they! People still don't understand that the financial monster is a ConveDDing of the situation in higher mathematics and physics. Moreover, extra-institutional agents of change don't see that, so long as the ConveDDing remains, none of their prescriptions for change will meet their expectations, even if fully implemented -- which couldn't happen, in no small measure because of the ConveDDing they don't see. It's altogether parallel, even thematically so, with the half-century-continuing-to-run real-actual Post Vietnam Syndrome, as described by Major Danny Sjursen in his article “Wrong On 'Nam, Wrong On Terror”, ZeroHedge, 30 January 2018. I agree with substance of the article, so far as it goes, but it doesn't go very far, and is thus, for me, an elicitor of considerable laughter, particularly if the long body of comments is included. See also: “Vietnam and the U.S. 'Forever Wars'”, Alastair Crooke, Consortiumnews, 2 February 2018. You didn't have to be assigned to Strategic Research and Analysis, MACV-J2 to know, walking the corridors of MACV-HQ in the days immediately after TET-'68, that what Sjursen describes was a virtual inevitability; you only had to have ears and half a brain. Reading close-cropped Ameriko.mil.trash. Though I must admit that being a military brat, thus having an intimate understanding of the psychology of the military mind, would have been a help. I even remember the specific conversation, which transpired sometime immediately after the May of 1968 offensive upon Saigon, sitting over Western omelets in the first floor snack bar of MACV-HQ discussing how the IDHS computer militates against intelligent intelligence analysis, the Phoenix Program being a prime example of what issues from the likes thereof, saying: “It's perfectly clear. They surely will go super high-tech in their whole approach to warfare, which will magnify their vulnerabilities by orders of magnitude, which, in turn, will inculcate fulminating paranoia, which surely will induce the full spectrum of oppressive institutional behaviors”. Probably people will never understand that Communism was a stand-in in the American mind for InjunCuntry animistic-pagan “participation mystique” which was a stand-in for _µT_m-quantum relative-state identity-transparency. Oddly, Odd Arne Westad dates the Cold War from the late-19th century, as argued in The Cold War, A World History, Basic Books, 2017, and reviewed at length in “The World the Cold War Built”, Leon Hadar, The American Conservative, 31 January 2018. To my mind, Westad's analysis is all about surface-structure stuff, and that's why he doesn't go back far enough into the 19th century in identifying origins of what Niall Ferguson calls the “War of the World”, Ferguson regarding it as having begun, essentially, with WWI, and having ended with the “end” of the Korean war. Whereas I, addressing deep-structure stuff, date the present “War of the World” fulmination of Same Ol', Same Ol' to the near-pandemic back-reaction upon the 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr provided by N. H. Abel, and which has no chance of ending until m-valued logics are employed to interpret Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function. Going super quantum-high-tech and subliminally identifying quantum nonlocality with animistic-pagan identity-transparency yields SuperParanoids with lists of phobias as long as their armaments, uh, uh, in cognitive ordure up to at least their elbows. Fear and loathing tantamount to that occasioned by the specter of absolute nihil suggested by the very notion of a black hole. And, along the same lines, self-referential logics having been deemed signifiers of unknowability-due-to-reflexivities, strong supporter of a strong EU (and presumably of any strong ₁T₂-only-federated federal government, and federations of such federal governments, wherever found -- with the exceptions of… heh-heh-heh!), Soros, would have us believe that his foundational “…goal is to empower local people to deal with their own problems…” (second to last sentence of the linked article, the title of which bespeaks about who couldn't imagine: any intelligent person in COINOPS and aware during 1968 of the CICV-CDEC-MACV IDHS, the mainframed intelligence data handling system, database, I might nowadays add, highly paraconsistent, hence, excepting with respect to Kripke truth-fixed points (no night lights to my belief), m-logically-valued understood independent of the notion truth-value, i.e., the CDCed granddaddy of The Browser [there was then no backbone for an internet; you had to jeep over from MACV-HQ to the CICV building, “the largest air-conditioned building in Southeast Asia” located in the CICV-CDEC compound adjacent to the JGS compound to [bro}use the 4-valued scrapple-from-the-apple database with the IDHS employing the top-down-designated EEI, essential elements of information, the irritation of these many, many jeep trips probably being the main impetus to DARPA funding of research for creation of an ARPANET], certainly, even then, made projections as to the surveillance-society imports, for which such person hadn't read Animal Farm, 1984, Brave New World?). Being no planning-poker aficionado or believer in crowd wisdoms, I am opposed to initiating development of e-currencies, not only at the synaptic, oops, synoptic qua global monoscale, but also at the regional-bloc and nation-state scale levels. Top-down economic so-called decentralization, “reverse representation” politically speaking, may have some brief crisis management utility (e.g., like the VC political infrastructure widely instituted in MRs 2 and 3, i.e., throughout the Mekong delta, during the year-plus-long institutional preparations [an even now little-known, superbly successful, country-wide organizational phase transition accomplished at multiple echelons, i.e., the determinative strategic-capability breakaway] made for the launching of Tet-'68: one approach to handling the Byzantine General's Agreement Problem in distributed systems; in respect to the VCI, now there was a cellular framework exhibiting some aspects of a distributed system, sans techno-ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements [animistic-pagan ID-transparency being by far the best solution to the Agreement Problem: OB analysts observed VCI-administered VC units cut off from C&C acting just as if receiving C&C, instances of such constituting proof-of-concept attacks upon the Weltanschauung {talk about etiology of PTSD!} of all those true believers in CIcy techniques and tactics like the HES, like S&D, like the Phoenix elaboration upon the poor little CT team, like the Greek Projects]), but it cannot lay the basis for an adequate sustained system, particularly in face of the amplifying n-dimensional planetary crisis: adequacy is precluded by the top-down filtering qua “renormalization” of the locally-generated information essential to functional specificity and production of accurate manifold mappings of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”. But undermining eco[nom}ic functional specificity is not the only issue raised by mining blockchains of monoscaled crypto-e-currencies; adequate economic functional integration is also drawn into question, whether the currencies employed be single-state bitic or two-state q-bitic. If the q-bit can more effectively “handle” the Byzantine Fault Tolerance Problem (BFTP) than can parallel processed verifiable “secret sharer” VSS-protocall (consider “Sensory Deprivation in Autoscopic Illusion, and Joseph Conrad's 'The Secret Sharer'”, Michael A. Sperber, The Psychiatric Quarterly, 43:1-4, December 1969, pp. 711-18, in regards to glutamatergic ₁T₂-ConveDDs of ketaminergic _µT_m-identity-transparency) proof-of-work does in BTC mining, just try to imagine what the mu-it could do relative to the BFTP. Lukasiewiczian-Everettian _µT_m-relative-state is the Byzantine (n-body) Agreement Problem raised to the mth-degree, and nature has solved this problem in part by applications of the holographic principle over boundaries-without-boundary. Compare this natural solution, which is closely approached by animistic-pagan identity-transparency qua “participation mystique”, social-anthropology speaking, psychic “contagion”, with the ₁T₂-only Agreement Problem solution which is Hap Arnold's USAAC-RAND Delphi Method of structured commo targeting accuracy at forecasting. On a par with Vinegar Joe's “methods” of assessing the distributed middle in the China Theater, what. Talk about incommensurability! And hardly at all in the realms of VirFut Q-Pro, the underlying notions of which both RAND and Hewlett-Packard had brief dismissive glances at. “Hashes” is a good word, dontchathink, for encryption procedures, maybe even signifying the bipolar: as token value goes higher, BTC's exchange-unit utility goes lower, thus establishing a bivalent inverse relation between miners and users. How do transaction fees (a privately established-reaped transaction rent qua tax) affect BTC utility? What effects do blocksize transitions have upon BTC utility? Is the token price lesser with bigger blocksize? While Leemon Baird's Hashgraph program for distributed consensus may be a considerable improvement upon the blockchain program, it does not lead me to diverge from my assessment of, attitude toward, more accurately stated, ₁T₂-only blockchaining. Hashgraphing uses ₁T₂-only actually-memetime-bound supposedly-objective “consensus” timestamps on a Schrödinger-memetime-independent _µT_m-quantum system, whether that system is acknowledged so to be or not, and a ₁T₂-gossip protocol imitation of _µT_m-quantum relative-state identity-transparency ordered by a deterministic algo based upon -- shades of Newton-Locke -- a virtual-vector-summing “voter” analogue which makes consensus a distributed-middle (not simply “distributed”) ₁T₂-only yes/no decision problem. Binary undecidability (very easy to solve, iff you start with some definitions, heh-heh-heh) is Hashgraphically ruled out by tie votes being ruled as equivalent to yes, i.e., the marshaling of a renormalization rule. Such rigmaroles would be superfluous if Schrödinger's m-valued state-function were simply acknowledged to require interpretation with m-valued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value. All this binary stuff softwared upon hardware inherently _µT_m-quantum mechanical introjected as if me[channel}ical! Thus prevented is cryptocurrency mapping of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth. To me, it's of little note whether the blockchain and bitcoin were created by NSA or the hackset or some other entity dot-guv or dot-NGO, for both, chain and coin, clearly programmatically [con}form to the prevailing regressed collective-unconscious behavioral gradients informing the currently operative collection of ConveDDs.

Being an autopoiarchist, to me the anarchism of even the mildest-₁T₂-only-libertarian-flavored cryptocurrency-freak does not appeal -- the reasons being: all of the above. Anarchism, on the twisted-pasted politico-economic Möbius-strip cutup, is, not only non-orientable as to anarcho-capitalism vs. anarcho-syndicalism, but also a notion 19th-century bankrupted through inability to provide a credible theory of psycho-socio-politico-economic autopoiesis cum self-organization -- this inability being largely due to an incapacity qua incapability to think, even in rudiments, _µT_mly. Flash forward to see a perfect example of this. Quoting Antony Mueller, "Is Anarcho-Capitalism Possible?", Mises.ca, 23 March 2018:

Beginning with the sale of semi-public enterprises and public utilities, privatization should extend step by step to education and health and finally encompass security and the judicial system. Supervised by an Assembly whose members are selected by lot from the constituency of the citizens, the function of government would be handed out to a private government management company.

That got a belly laugh out of me -- and I won't further comment. Exquisite phrasing is a ₁T₂-way of getting at _µT_m-phasing: the master, the greatest of the great, at that was Ray Bryant: jazz piano was and is one way to countervail the impacts of Hiroshima and Nagasaki upon collective unconscious behavioral gradients. If extremely-rapid-onset dissociation is a psychic explosion generally converted into violence-murder, collectively into mass warfare, then it should be a surprise to no one hearing that two aspects of the collective yield from suppression of Lukasiewicz logics at interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function were total war and the atomic bomb. Moreover, given continued such suppression, is it any wonder prob-amp physicists still haven't mastered clean controlled fusion, hot or cold? No, no _µT_m-processed m-valued LETS-currency unit would be, even notionally, a derivative of a derivative of a derivative to the nth-power of this or that cryptomonocurrency. Mushroom-cloud-mimetic bubbles on bubbles on bubbles, instead of clocks within clocks within clocks: one more glaring ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement. If the trophy lice, uh, uh, wife, comes for prenuptial chump change, just imagine how easy are changes of change and changes of changes of change: that's about as far as the Wall Street lupus ventures into authentic quantum economies. No sense of _µT_m-relative-state conjugation of localization and fusion, specificity and integration, as exemplified by, for instance, the reasonings behind the name given FGCC, First Global Community College, by its founder Pramote Nakornthab. So, the convention has come to be Buy-the-Ass, oops, that is the Ask, -Guy: he's the downloaded SigInt effector-organ prefiguring-- whatever. Given that all sell-side man[eu}verings are supply-side dependent, “time-shapes” signify Everettian-vonHayekian critical states relative to… O, lordy, does Dirac crossover-time ₁T₂-cross-chain atomic-cum-nuclear swaps such that they Ripple down into supply-side trickle-down? Incidentally, the Office of Matsuyoshi Son (see the “???ö?” comment to this article) was informed as to the notion of _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams, circa 2000; the Office of George Soros, circa 1993. And, me oh me cum my oh my, “fractionally rehypothecating their coin inventories and counter-partying their client pools” (see the “zebra77a” comment to this article) such that the purported ₁T₂-only countervailing forces reinforce their shortings of their confidentially-purveyed bullish prognostications. Now that's ₁T₂-only “autopoiesis” for you! -- of the one-way, tiger-teeth, traffic-spike-gateway variety. Heh-heh-heh. Cryptocurrency T_ether-type Transparency (can't be all that transparent, as over the next few days it became apparent that link rot had set in) has nothing to do with the _µT_m-valued (think: relative-state identity-transparency) whereupon the m-value sheaving of the indicator-tagged LETS currency unit is effectively double stacked in being spatially placed within a fractal-e-boundary nesting-foam whist signifying supply-side Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” -- the _µT_m-LETS gateway “tether” qua viscosity being n-“directional” band-pass fractal-drum-like, i.e., fostering the microscale-unto-synopticscale-local-autonomy-sort of growth-and-repair-processes flexibility requisite to authentic autopoiesis and high-level self-organizational competency. Being no believer in acceptance of the drubbings delivered over the 2^nk bitfitness landscape of ₁T₂-only chaos-complexity theory, I am sure I wouldn't generate even nominal interest in a cryptomerchant bank.

As an 18-year-old AU-SIS student wandering through offices in Washington, D.C., I quickly became acutely aware of the fact that politics has always been primarily about money, ₁T₂-only-processed single-valued money (my first thoughts as to what eventually became the notion of _µT_m-processed m-valued LETS-currency nesting-foams came whilst contemplating multiple-qua-m-bank credit expansion during the period I was in Honors Econ during my senior year of high school, circa 1963, Fairborn, Ohio) -- all the more so today in this age of cryptomonocurrency disaster (psychotomimetically energy-and-computing-capacity hyperdissipative simply in order to securely ₁T₂-only mine cum ₁T₂-only speculate cum ₁T₂-only exchange). Given that money articulation is fundamental to the nature of constitutional democracy, there has always been a political dimension to my interest in the notion of m-valued-LETS monetary units. Discovery of the fact that the VCI, Viet Cong (political) Infrastructure, tacitly (i.e., a cultural-lag carryover from the boundary-without-boundary convention derived from the experience of identity-transparency which is all but defining of age-old pagan animism) mapped bureaucratic variables upon frequently changed boundaries throughout their double-stacked, tripartite, administrative hierarchy -- thus pioneering the holographic principle -- and that their Finance and Economy sections at each echelon employed multiple currencies plus barter and labor exchange for taxation and payments, focused my attention upon the value-valence index of currency employments relative to bureaucratic variables, particularly as legal-tender currencies have generally been defined on borders. Thus, to my mind, were currency value-valences, the holographic principle, logical properties of boundary-types, currency domains, boundary changes, assigned administrative mandates, bureaucratic variables such as job descriptions (nowadays, in this age of bitcoin, et al., ever more subject to labor ar[bit}rage: well, wap my heinie!), so on, brought into intimate juxtaposition. This juxtaposition having been of small concern to the MACV DIP (Director of Intelligence Production), circa 1968, and, subsequently, of even less concern to TPTB determining the fates of species and the various spheres of Earth -- and have been so doing for a long, long patch of memetime (I note that missing from the beginning-in-1840 on-and-on-and-on list of U.S. interventions provided by the “VIS MAIOR Mr. Universe” commenter to PCR's latest is the 1848 cannonading of the Port of Da Nang by Old Ironsides in retribution for an Annamite refusal to trade, an “event” [our actions are “events”; theirs, “aggressions”] which I learned of at AU's SORO, Special Operations Research Office, during the Fall Semester of 1963; this list added considerable impact to perspectives significantly fleshed out for me by the reading of a copy of Allan Burnett Cole's 1940 University of Chicago Ph.D. dissertation, “The Dynamics of American Expansion Toward Japan, 1791-1860”, a thick red-bound copy of which I found in the stacks at Cornell's Central Library during the summer of 1975; then there is the MAIUS IMPERIUM whereby the counterinsurgent gives away for free to the insurgent absolute control over the space and time variables). The atomic bomb: a virtual inevitability once the Born Rule was knee-jerk consensuated, rather than using m-valued logics to interpret Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function. One can be certain that the hallways to the abodes of the Masters of the Po[luni}verse have sufficient wiggle room to accommodate the waggles of the wenches. According to them, those Masters, that is, there's never enough nonsense to go around! Sexual congruence, uh, congress, has zero double entendre, y'know. No real [ma}lice and no controversial hot-button stuff, nonetheless goin' eyeball-ta-eyeball standoff, these steak-and-fries, apple-pie-à-la-mode-coddling do-nothings drowning in whipped cream, nothing substantively significant accomplished whilst awaiting their photo-op and accompanying boneheaded rant volley, a Clarion-Picayune small-coin op-ed striving to become a distributed ₁T₂-only Ledger-WarTrumpet. All butter beans, blap and bludge -- their specialty being an order of semblance. Howdyheying the hoi polloi. O, those pedestrian rank-and-file plebeians! Recoiling, they are, aren't they, TPTB, into their rampant Hwoodish raps celebrating celebcult ordure. Please, Y'awl, don't be so darned cornfused by the technosphere's jaded jamboree paraded in jubilee. The UTM, universal Turing machine, did not produce _µT_m, mu-tee-em; true believers in universality of the finite-iteration digital UTM have prevented advent of wave-effect _µT_m-processors. Moreover, ₁T₂-only capitalism did not innovate UTM or the internet: world war accomplished the former; prospective space-based planetary war, the latter. This clarity can be burden-of-proof adjudged, probability-amplitude-wise subscribing to the Born Rule, substantially more likely evidentially, and beyond a ₁T₂-only-reasonable doubt the truth and nothing but the truth, neither by a caterwauling “preponderance of the evidence” ₁T₂-only (Law of Excluded Middle) “proof”-demonstrated to be [pre}ponderant, nor by sober “clear and convincing evidence” ₁T₂-only (Law of Non-Contradiction) “proof”-demonstrated to be C n' C -- such “proof”-demonstrative lawfare outlawing _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m logics on basis of syllogistic justification by analogical modeling upon natural laws in subscription to a supposed “classical limit”, this outlawing being most elaborately the case when the operative conception of lawfair conforms to the philosophy embraced by the (₁T₂-only) Law and (₁T₂-only) Capital Movement. To my mind: this is the corrupted legalization underlying the legalization of corruption. Aye, the role of rules in the rule of binary laws servicing the highwaymaned confidence game and protection racket popularly known as governance. Boy-oh-boy! there sure is a lot of ConveDDing, conversion-disorder-displacement twistin'-n'-shoutin', goin' on; fear of the multivalue done been infectin' near unto every aspect of 5-star global monoculture. The psychic sort is the worst sort of pandemic, dontchathink. Doomsayer's Eve, ach, icy fear it was! -- in Honolulu, then in Tokyo. The long rancorous march from _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m cognition down-down-down, derry down, to the scintilla which is ₁T₂-only UTM began with acceptance of the first specialized shaman (banishing the notion that anyone could be shaman-for-the-day by demonstrating capability to take a trance reading on the relative-state-constellated collective need of the identity-transparent whole population corpus: somewhat evoked by a scene in Julie Dash's film Daughters of the Dust) -- and with that concurrence came surety of demise of the species-that-set-itself-against-nature-qua-nature, i.e., nature sans a supposed “classical limit”. O, how I do love that mimetic memetime: memetick, memetick, memetick… Aye-- and we surely must not forget the back-reactive, reductionist, “eternal return-recurrence”, ₁T₂-only, passing, passive, referential-memetime Rx of second-order topologically-active operator-time. Nietzsche, a narcissistic-grandiose Untermensch identified with that class of ground-state vectors -- a subset of the Erdgeist Ubermensch Earth Spirits locked away in Pandora's Box within boxes, i.e., signifying five Einstein elevators, which only super-expertise at Erdgeist-Kreuzwortratsel mining can release -- responsible for regressed collective-unconscious behavioral event-gradient Grundgestalts, having been, uh, that's Nietzsche now, sensitive to the Zeitgeist of the epoch (in aftermath of the 1870-'71 Franco-Prussian war, he wrote On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense [1873], by way of preparation for the ConveDDs to come) signified by the deeming qua [meme}ing, uh, uh, maiming, of N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr as being an Impossibility Theorem, anticipated the ConveDDing of Lukasiewicz responsible for the obsessive Zarathustran transhumanist overreach and for initialization of total war in Polish jokes and the blitzkrieg of Poland by writing the Beyond Good and Evil (1886) transvaluation of values, rather than Beyond True and False into _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+, the “God” Nietzsche referred to in proclaiming “Him” dead having been a personification of the ₁T₂-only propositional-predicate logic which the secular Rabbinate throws in the face of the Cabalistically-oriented post-structuralist cum postmodernist challengers of numerical selfsameness. I've never felt anxious concerning the physics-core of the ideas I've long worked with. The data gathered during the '70s strongly supported the involved notions, and the consensus-science conceptual framework has gravitated in their direction over the subsequent decades. If the species makes it through coming cuspover, these ideas, being apt characterizations of nature, will surface in one form or another, not likely ours, but the same core ideas, nonetheless: commo consciously received isn't required; once some mind gets empty enough to allow the collective unconscious to download a fundamental notion, that notion is constellated and its echoes will, in due course, appear to many minds. My writing was, and is, a sort of selfie, a cognitive record, bibliotherapy, a facilitator of inner work, something to look back over and do traffic analysis upon. Likely nothing more than that.

Assuming there were existence-availability of wave-effect actual _µT_m-quantum processors, Gödel flashing (generating the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers enumerating the algebras of time-shape tabular-unto-fiberbundle models exhibiting _µT_m-logical properties), say, as distinct from cryptographic hashing (such as hashCoded or toStringed), would primarily ID-signify a time-shape (no mere proximity problem solution in geometric hashing) in superposition, with acoustically-modified gravity-wave mode signature, rather than primarily a searchable space-place, with digital signature. The flash function would presuppose nonlocalizable _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency as characteristic of “object” profiling vis-à-vis Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, rather than localized absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct ₁T₂-only-selfsame objects of a corpus that is space-place indexed. Lukasiewicz-Post, both understood independent of the notion truth-value (certainly not involving Kripke fixed-point semantics qua fixed-point theory of truth nor a truth-value glut or even a truth-value super-glut; moreover, such independence would also include exclusion of Gödel-Dummett logic considered a fuzzy logic where the propositional variables are regarded as being in the real closed interval [0,1], even if this interval be of the extended sort; for discussion of G-D logic as a fuzzy logic, see “From Intuitionistic Logic to Gödel-Dummett Logic via Parallel Dialogue Games”, Christian G. Fermuller and Agata Ciabattoni, Technische Universitat Wien, no date given but 2000 or later by bibliography), is required: for discussions of “On many-valued thinking” and as to why modal logics, intuitionistic logic, and paraconsistent logics are not m-valued, see “Many-Valued Models”, Walter Carnielli, Universal Logic.com, no date given but 2004 or later by bibliography. And the answer is-- Gong! The “relations between” logics of Thoralf Skolem (not truth-value-gapped strong-3-valued Kleene's connectives qua inferentials: see “Kleene Logic and Inference”, Grzegorz Malinowski, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 43:1/2, 2014, pp. 43-52), circa 1913, a Ph.D. thesis written in Norwegian (good offices of Jan von Plato, Studia Logica, 73:1, February 2003, pp. 153-7), the 1913 date of formulation cum partial publication throwing considerable light upon the deep structure origins of WWI. Isn't it interesting in this respect that Emil Leon Post, who independent of Lukasiewicz invokes m-valued logics in his 1920 Columbia University Ph.D. dissertation, did not, in 1936, go for an m-valued Post machine, but rather, independent of Turing's of the same year, invented a Turing-equivalent Post machine. The principles of quantum mechanics as developed subsequent to the 1926 consensuation of the Born Rule should not be arbiters (good offices of Francois Dubois and Zeno Toffano, “Eigenlogic: a Quantum View for Multiple-Valued and Fuzzy Systems”, arXiv, 7 July 2016) of an application of m-valued logics to interpretation of Schrödinger's 1925 m-valued wave-function: those principles should be de novo discovered on basis of the m-valued-logic interpretation. In respect to Skolem: think relative _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-states of identity transparency! that's m to the m to the nk, eh what (topologically-active operator-time temporal-CURLed time-shapes and identity-transparency states having a hologramic lot to do with each other) -- the most altered state being the “normal” normotic state. Heh-heh-heh! Not degrees, shades of grey (talk about mass ConveDDing!), gaps, gluts, and the like (some edification in this regard can be drawn from a critical reading of “Structural Completeness in Fuzzy Logics”, Petr Cintula and George Metcalfe, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 24 January 2009) -- and not both/and; rather, m/and.

Existing and nascent ₁T₂-only synoptic-monoscale cryptocurrencies express a financialized buy-side take on a pepped-up, arbed, and planetarized growth-only-organized economy in stumbling attempt to service 5-billion too many demand-side people, this meager (even once-flower-empowered California is wracked by a plethora of the impoverished -- more so than any other state of the union) attempt contextualized by an ever diminishing global natural resource base -- renewables going largely unrenewed -- making supply-side the only real-economy issue of authentic exponential import. Uh, uh, that's _µT_m-logical Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” supply-side, not the ₁T₂-only supply-side of PCR-cum-Stockman trickle-down, now prospectively Ripple-down, Reaganomics, a growth-only-organized economy not being too much longer sustainable absent much, much greater access to the convertibility of the elements than likely ever to be the case on planet Earth. The prevailing energy-intensely-dissipative, block-headed, buy-side, affect-charged and electron-driven, popular obsession with blockchaining is certainly one more prefiguration of the cuspover horrors to come. Just as P2P telepresence, blockchained or no, is a regressed-by-repression-driven ₁T₂-only ConveDD of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency, so, too, is ₁T₂-only-V2V, based as it is upon the nonsensical, non-quantum, agent-based-sociological account of collective and cooperative behaviors (whereas, Solly Angel, ₁T₂-paradoxically soon temporarily to become an aficionado of Against Method, during the early-'70s, at UC Berkeley's Graduate School of Urban Planning, was using Einstein's General Relativity field equations to effectively model traffic-flow patterns! this effort now long forgotten). A-a-a-ach! Hot monies: wanderful, wanderful, awfully, I shouldn't wonder, those vagabond ne'er-do-wells, what. Eck, aye, they made away with themselves, they did, didn't they -- ₁T₂-only borders being what they are. Biologically speaking, and successful-insurgency speaking, autopoiesis cum self-organization is, not by noise, as some postmodernists have essayed, but by resource exchange across _µT_m-boundaries-without-boundary, fractal-drum-type boundaries, plasmahaut-type phase boundaries, band-pass boundaries subscribing to the holographic principle, boundaries that automorphically alter in spontaneous adaptation to a changing environment, those alterations automatically modulating the component processes contained by the boundary unbound. Not European borders, not borders of nation-states (see, for a very interesting graphic portrait: “Visualizing All The World's Borders By Age”, ZeroHedge, 16 January 2018), not real-number-line borders -- rather, imaginary-numbered and hypernumbered “borders” in Buddhological sacred space qua Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian function-phase space, “borders” potentially available in concretion as fractal e-boundaries.

Attend to the interface! The closer _µT_m approaches _CT_C+, the less of the modus ponens-cum-tollens rules there are in the universe of logic. In the matter of states, “implies” falls away, having long since left “necessity” behind as the inverted “A” superscripts the identity-transparency characteristic of omnium gatherum.

Chidingly:
 
O, how we do love those churchy "ors"

      and shun those heathen "ands".

Exacerbation or assuagement,

      that is the question, deary.

Becoming arch, are we, then, wooman?

Roundabout as a pawt wrapped in its cosy!

      worse luck, what, she apostrophized waggishly,

      failing an attempt to be clownish.

You should be a hideaway in some inglenook

      contemplating vagaries of the undistributed middle,

      rather than spouting misbegotten quotations from Hamlet's tongue,

      observed he, jocularly, though the statement belied the jaws' display.

Well, I nevvver! she blurred with a wistful tilt,

      trying to hide a truculent churlishness.

Stall the noise! he ejaculated, that be gear of men.

Humph!

Neither eithered nor ored by the assault,

      and obviously beyond-non-contradiction unmollified:

Take yer 1T2 Lear gear and be off! demanded she, impishly.

Is being not-being in the nature of being-in-itself as distinct from being-therehere? “Where” upon the involutory-revolutory “ladder” does ontology appear-reappear? At the cusp of pre-pregeometry (“bucket of dust”) and pregeometry (_µT_m calculi of propositions)? Or does being not-being cohere pre-pre-pregeometrically at the interface between _CT_C and _CT_C+?

Behold! the numerologues. Lor', some daresay introjecting interjections -- toppermost loweringly intercalating pendant donors, as if thar write t'were the likes of helix-coil-transitioning shugaar-fosfate backbone -- is right up their laine, those miners of blockchain ledger domain. O, the index-slot of the value in a given sort of the activated array placed in a box -- x' qua !x, surely, [she}ave of the multivalue _µT_m-processed, and, she hail, indubitably no [me}m|ber of a me[me}d mere Trump suit, that sheave. Tho' miners: battlemented by nature for their insistence -- a numbery play, this bawdy survival, this residual of memetime's jig jangling down to a whoop -- upon the monoscale and the single-valued -- Aye, was one of them, was the singleton of the hash -- Drs. Sulk, they are, aren't they, for having lost their topohandles in their noisomely scruffy toolsheads. Auld and jung alike, it be the Lake of Clamjamperies they be skinkin' inta. Supraimmoral grotesquerie: more than mortal hard; aye, immortal hard, I'd say. No misers are those miners' hash numbers, long in the teeth that they be. And jus' fancy that! That the transaction-rent controllers, with their fees on, foster “perverse incentives” sure to doom, in the end, enterprise (essaying this thesis is Tom Luongo, of Gold Goats n Guns, 17 January 2018). They'd been greased, had been the "flying geese"; thus, the coast was clear for protectionist developmental regionalism superposing nationalist liberalism -- which superposition cryptocurrencies would now convert to monoscaleism. And so 'itis, laddy, churning down the line vaingloriously, uh, the line of line officers, one could rightly expostulate, like unto tho' towers strung along the Great Wall, what -- that wall enclosin' the blocks enchained with a monetary-algorithmic form of premixed Brevibloc. As regards hashes, that is speaking of initialisms, contractions, diminitives vis-ŕ-vis Pythagorean gematria representation of geometrodynamics, "breviation" signifies the Law-of-Sevens scaling of the involutory decomposition which is the number-functor treatment of geometric hashing of cascade dynamics. And some believe that blockchaining is the way to defang bungling, uh, uh, bundling, of mortgaged-backed securities (MBSs), as recently essayed by Matthew Leising in "Blockchain Tested for Making Mortgage Securities Easier to Track", Bloomberg, 18 January 2018. While the blockchain distributed ledger certainly would “improve security around data”, reduce the “paperwork” costs involved in bundling mortgages, and facilitate their tracking, consider that bundling is module-up, i.e., fusion, not module-down, i.e., localization -- and even Java virtual-machined OSGi (Open Services Gateway initiative) doesn't employ fiber-bundle arithmetics, let alone the m-valued state-functions apropos “spontaneous fusion” and “spontaneous localization”! In this age of peak everything and septicemia induced by population overgrowth cum mega-urban hypertrophy, stock market crashes and contracting economies are not the real issues of concern vis-à-vis MBS bundles. Little noted is that non-fiber bundling of single-valued and ₁T₂-only-processed mortgages-into-MBSs in their various types is that they ConveDD, conversion-disorder displace, locally-specific information cuing local-market action-directives by removing local multiplier effects to money centers where virtually all of the ₁T₂-only-profiteering from servicing of the loans is concentrated. This is not only, ultimately, misallocative of ever more scarce resources, but also completely undermines the possibility for _µT_m-relative-state conjugation of localization and fusion, specificity and integration in the nesting foam which is the actual actuality of the macroeconomy, however much veiled by globalized convergence toward a single planetarized monoscale. Binary-blockchaining -- sans fiber-bundle arithmetics leading into _µT_m-processing -- justified by the meager reasons noted by Leising, will only exacerbate the more fundamental problems.

So it has long been maintained: closest-packing has a limit excluding the Cantorian-hologramic _CT_C+ part-whole identity-transparency from which _µT_m-relative-state involutes unto ₁T₂-only concretion. Yet, contrary to the consensuated, I|m[man}ent in[car}nation is the real virtual (good offices of Riz Virk, Hackernoon, 15 January 2018), not the imaginary and hypercomplex. However, we shall about it be. Keep off! now. Anigh is denied by stolid individuality's laying-by, which intercedes personal space with imposition of a minimum permissible distance (unconsciously modeled upon that of Max Planck). The consensus plank: chivvying, it must be admitted as proved, has a limit, do tell, if all be right and proper with the laws of nature.

These days, in our planetarized prionic economy, it doesn't matter what it is, each “improvement” makes the thing junkier. Call that “covert inflation” (increase in the accelerations of monies and their instruments) if you will, but it's way more than that; it's deflation as to the quality of experience, an additional downer on top of the environment of the Lebenswelt becoming ever more clogged with degraded, dissipative, superfluous, logoed unnecessaries. It nowadays being a dicey do, only the very, very few have successfully resisted the call to pay through the nose to become walking sandwich-board adverts for companies owned by megasuperrich -- youthful bounders having become elderly fugs -- grandiloquent thieves: ₁T₂-only riches being synonymous with theft of the multivalue. Would an astute _µT_m-quantum observer note that, while one-percent of the population corpus own eighty-two-percent of the assets currently arrayed around the globe, that large percentage is of only the binary logical-value order-type among the corpus of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logical-value order-types of Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth? Going doggo they are, aren't they, those collapsing human billboards. O, how they love their sex.doll voice-commanded HomePod! But how thoroughly they neglect submolecular causes of misfolding, e.g., those covert e-zonal acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes. That's mud in your eye -- whatever such means. Nascent death (the linked article contains several interesting semi-technical links) this may be -- and hopefully there's a resurrection to follow. Down, down, down, derry down, postiche-echoing _CT_C+ via _µT_m unto the ₁T₂-Learer. Incarnation as “death” of the oversoul, then the trials and tribulations of the ensouled “brothers” acting as the band led by Robber-in-Hood, followed by a Jack-in-the-Box pop-up advertizing return to the transcendental, which we've known ever since 1823 begins with the quintic equation as to the variables parameterizing Being-in-and-of-Itself. “Brothers” -- subjects of concern to the Special Victims Unit -- standing vis-à-vis, then bending over like green-stick fractures in kowtow before the [pre}east, tain't exactly exemplary of skew-parallelism, y'know. Nosiree. Well, stink me and sink me! Addlepated is the up-on-spikes, new-fangled, fin-enteched market benefitting fat[u]ously-high heels overly well-heeled whilst low-moving. Those puddingheads! And they each say: If you were me, you could well take your own advice. Rump in a rumpus, he's a bit-trickster, is the finman. Won't have trouble, willy now, with two-bit 2-state qubits, is the bet with the odds -- come-fine-or-foul, as Commons said, Church-and-narrow-as-the-furrow-of-the-harrow. Pry on, oh thou, ye fintech prions! A farrago of tarradiddles, what. Get bent whilst levering up, whydontcha. As to what it is thus being lifted, no one knows, for, along with the ₁T₂-only fiats, and whatever Wharton cum Mayer may think, the ₁T₂-only cryptos involved have no worldly referent deeper than their synoptic monoscale; yet, zombie like, they're “mysteriously” going as rampant (can't watch a 1950s YouTubed-Western without being HighNooned by a wealth of crypto-pandering) as the Gangs of Malmo, as the legalized voting by illegal immigrants, and as is becoming CWD, chronic wasting disease. Those poor little dears! Though somehow not diagnostic, more and more population corpora around the planet appear to be succumbing to the confusional states characteristic of WFFI, working fatal familial insomnia. A sleepwalking species, just like Gurdjieff maintained. Darn the instructions on codon 178! And stitch-up the method-nine codon positioned on that dyscrasic allele. Yes, oh, yes: Out, out, damned-- “fineopathy”! Rummy, yet risible, right? -- how those funhouse mirrors do work! Passing strange, we back then noted, that weirdly CURLed, uh, uh, misfolded, prions were first discovered only several years after appearance of our temporal-CURL-type model of DNA radiation exchange mediated by superconductant pi-electron gas core (neglected, surely in part, for thermodynamically [temperature oscillations of pi-electron parcels, like unto those electron-temperature-enhanced inductions of hot auroras] pointing out a glitch in the minimum-free-energy account of closest packing: submolecular function-precedes-structure operator-timed functional-integration-insistent frequency-funnel assistance provided to molecular structure-precedes-function chaperoned-energy-funnel-delivered functional specificity). O, those Musculpting _µT_m-processed m-valued acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes in m to the m to the nk conformation-qua-articulation space. M espies: “When I play Bach or Mozart, I see colors and dancing shapes inside my head” (Mira Bartok, The Memory Palace, Free Press paperback edition, 2011, p. 90), but, given that these color-shapes are elicited by diatonic compositions, how deeply could she have decrypted her way into the PureLand of Asterism-ensounded Musculpt? The canonical equation of our quantum-DNA model specifies quantification of the way in which a radiation-induced change in the temperature oscillation rate of parcels in the pi-electron gas, acceleration of that rate of change, and the time rate of change of acceleration of that rate of change affect velocity, acceleration, and time rate of change of acceleration of DNA helix-coil transition as replication transpires and nucleosomes are histone-DNAically formed in facilitation of DNA supercoiling (our decades-ago speculation: the emitted coherent waves signature supercoil topologies signifying component processes of the “aspects” -- heh-heh-heh -- of the higher linguistic _µT_m-properties of the environmentally-superengauged m-level-enciphered genetic language). These rates, rates of rates, and rates of rates of rates are Zeitgebers, radiation-exchange modulated intracellular biological clocks, which affect protein synthesis. Back in the day, we speculated that induced such rate changes of magnitudes outside normative parameters (no mere “random events”, these), or those which trigger an inherited frequency anomaly, very likely would alter protein-folding processes, as vectorial directions in conformation-articulation space are variables dependent upon velocities, accelerations, and time rates of change of accelerations. The same basic principle, it seems, must apply to dynamics of the global economy, suggesting that an inordinate magnitude of QEing, say, could make conformations in that economy, and articulations between that economy and the natural surround, “prionic”. I, per[son}ally, first became aware of the basic principle involved whilst contemplating and speculating upon how relative rates of change of, say, supply- and materiel-related variables (my father's AFLC forte), particularly flows across the nesting foam of boundaries employed by insurgent infrastructures, effect “bends-warps-twists” in the state space representation of the stages of insurgency warfare (at SRA/MACV-J2, I almost, but didn't quite, put those exact words upon it during the May-stage of the Vietcong's Tet-'68 offensive). And I can forthrightly state that origin of the alleleotropic theory of autopoionomic value underlying the notion of a _µT_m-quantum-composite unit of account for ledgering the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” had nothing whatsoever to do with prions -- as I have yet, 35 years later, to contract a prionic disease of my ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brain.

While design schools have no problem with the notion that “less is more”, neo-Keynesians and molecular biologists, indeed, all anti-fasting anti-homeopaths, trip over the idea, especially when it comes to deficit spending, QEing, and toxicology of the chemical cum electromagnetic types. Most awfully slow, lugged-up as ₁T₂-only thought; certainly not as hyperquick as _CT_C+ no-mind. O, such pant-o-minds! Even their taxonomic namings are given binomial no[men}ons! The gen, the real skinny? Ah, fiddlesticks! Cripes, even -- one should say. Cur[mudge}only cranky, tankerous bulldozing minds that lump it because they like it as mixed up as kedgeree or bibimbap or hash made from the whole of last-week's leftovers. The bobble-headed stupidity brought to, for instance, the built environment virtually everywhere on the planet is so over it's astounding, beyond comprehension even to reasonably intelligent people. Those stupidious stupidoomdoodle stoopidos, ol' owl-faced cinereouses hawking, oh… whatever, yellowshanking the hooting whoodos, terning wherever with the windblow, never into it facing. Minds, on the anthropic principle themselves statistical artifacts, protectively-projectively regarding decelerating response curves at m-leveled interfacing dependent upon frequency-window-specific responses -- and charge-selectivity-specific responses, intensity-level-specific responses, waveform-specific responses, temporal-window-specific responses -- as statistical artifacts. My opinion, that, that of my real-'I' -- that 'I' still, at heart, a tow-headed boy from GreenCastle-near-D.C.-no-Washington at play among the MidoriGaoka-qua-VerdantHills rice fields of the kita-Kyushu Yama-no-Kami. Chemicals quantum-quench -- uh, that's the nobs raising up their fat heads, mind -- no less than do aberrant impulses: just consider charge transfer complexes, electron transport chains, eh what. Aye, wonderful queer, magnificently 'im[mod}e|rate, are transports. Forms of intertextuality, are transfers. Well, they are, aren't they! Fiddlededee and tee-hee-hee is what they've said to it, then -- regretting not the rueful: being exposed to as many as 80,000 synthetic chemicals and having incorporated perhaps hundreds (in the linked article, search “hundreds”) of those execrables into my blood, I'm already, independent of becoming bionically-neuromorphic-substituted-CyberRat chipper (good offices of Stefano Vassanelli, Procedia Computer Science, 7:61-64, December 2011), a trundled-out synman with Monsanto colon (no reference to Colon, MI, intended: see, for instance, “Protective Effects of Lignite Extract Supplement on Intestinal Barrier Function in Glyphosate-Mediated Tight Junction Injury”, John J. Gildea and David A. Roberts and Zachary Bush, Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, 3:1, 2017). O, how our jazzy cells jus' love them JAMs bein' held in paracellular space between all them band-pass plasmahaut fractal boundaries-without-boundary! Indications are: if you don't eat enough, 'cause you can't find enough, glyphosate-free veggies and grains (1.2 billion pounds of glyphosate are spread around the planet per year, as noted by G-R-B and reported in Newsweek: I vaguely remember the chemical's 1976 commercial introduction as discussed in the elevators of Cornell's Bradfield Hall, high-rise home to plant and atmospheric science studies; we were then told by Cornell pomologists to use malathion on Doug Paine's apple orchard, as it is “safe enough you could eat it for breakfast”, but, being skeptics, we were super cautious in its light use) to have benefit of their breakdowns, restore some part of the benison with broken-down-plant-manufactured lignite, taken right along with your probiotics, your Dr. Jarvis' apple cider vinegar and honey.

My I/i^m suspect(s) that, according to cognitions in habitus upon the T_zog-chen-couch which is the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m AllBase, “if it's internally consistent, it's impossible”, except as ₁T₂-only Maya-illusory, enculturated-socialized, glutamatergically-anchored Samsara-hypostasis in hypotaxis. If so, then GUTs theorists, e.g., of the superstring and loop-quantum-gravity varieties, are binary-logic-identified dogs barking up the wrong tree at Schrödinger's pussycats hissing and mewling whilst sitting on their given branches -- and will remain such barkers so long as quantum computing is restricted to 2-state-qubitic Turing machines, hence-thence furthering continued denial as to applicability of unadulterated m-valued logics to Schrödinger's unmolested m-valued state-function. The Born Rule having been the Witch Bull of the 20th century, it might well have been hoped that the slit experiments would have been less voyeuristically interpreted with entry made upon the 21st century, but, alas, given the ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, which continue to be placed upon the casting couch (surrogate of the AllBase from which involutory decomposition is cast), that expectation anymore hardly seems credible. The voyeur always projects his own logic into the object-system sircumstance being observer-stated. Mass hysteria does as mass hysteria is. And that hysteria is, exists, in large measure-problem because physical consistency is, not only epistemologically, but primarily ontologically, derivative of logical consistency: when, in the barely acknowledged, yet ominously lurking, presence of m-valued logics, mainstream physics moves into pregeometries, concretion-algebras of the hypostatized moment, ontologies of purportedly-objective linear-time, is this not terrifying, if only on the collective-unconscious level, to the memetime-bound binary-mind utterly imprinted upon selfsame simple-identity? If a clearly selfsame body can't simply be, and be where it quite obviously is, unless my logic puts it there, keeps it there, OMG! that's simply the worst sort of which--, uh, witchery. Rage against the Groove-metal tritonal-stand-in-for-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ diabolus, that infernal machine at the source of her power, power which we (coercive “we”) must find Nu-Heavy ways to overpower, to Thrash. If domestication of the horse was associated with an early stage in rise of patriarchy, speculation would have it that mares were the first to be domesticated. So, sexual predation having been at pretty much of a constant since at least that early stage, why the recent hysteria? It must be supposed that a psychiatric couch deeper than the soft casting couch is involved, dontchathink? Like the hypnotist undergoing autohypnosis whilst orchestrating heterohypnotic induction. Ah-ooo! it's surely in mass-behavior download from collective-unconscious event-gradients. The WWII-initialized fact that logic gates can be made with electrons has reinforced the Materialist-cum-Existentialist (i.e., “existence precedes essence”) hypostatization of logic in the mistaken belief that physical consistency is ontologically prior to logical consistency. Turing likely ate the apple in part because he could find no way back to his prewar focus-orientation, a mind state that would not have so hypostatized.

No-mind is not absence of mind, it's presence of the multivalue. Such has been my assertion. Similarly, and deeply related, I maintain that Schrödinger memetime-independence, is not absence of time, but presence to consciousness of 3-fold operator-time. People most definitely don't like to hear that memetime-boundedness is a learned behavior, learned by good offices of the neural-network wipeout, first transpiration of which occurring in the womb (a valid ₁T₂ly-valued if/then: if the babe emerges from the womb, then memetime demerges there from; both/and, the womb and the babe), that this bound state is a result of prescriptive enculturation-socialization orchestrating neuronal pruning such that the temporal boundedness is glutamatergically anchored to localized ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains (generally the process of becoming so bound takes until the third or fourth postnatal year to reach full constellation) -- the high-titer-neural-toxic neurotransmitter glutamate being the antidote to the neurotransmitter ketamine, and likely also, at glutamate flood, a facilitator of the quantum quenching which progressively blocks conscious access to the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ processing engaged in by THE nonlocalizable quantum brain (this “also” being purely my speculation: I've never made claim to any sort of expertise). In a sense, this is one loose version of “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” -- understood relative to memetime-independent involution rather than memetime-bound evolution. Hey, kiddo, whadayathink about that, eh? Long-range phase-correlations (likely intimated by the MRI findings referred to in “Best friends' brains light up in the same way”, AFP, 30 January 2018), to my I/i^m's mind(s), are ₁T₂-reads on existence of THE _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-quantum brain. As to how the fetus-unto-newborn-unto-3-to-4-yearold learns memetime, consider this excellent prescription: “Ages & Stages: How Children Develop a Sense of Time”, Early Childhood Today, Susan A. Miller and Ellen Booth Church and Carla Poole -- appropriately, no date given. The experimental and theoretical issues are very informatively discussed by Christoph Hoerl and Teresa McCormack in their paper entitled “Time in cognitive development”. This last is drawn from The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, Craig Callender, ed., Oxford U. Press, 2013, negatively reviewed here by Craig H. Collins, 31 July 2015. Notice how repetitive “sampling” is recommended to be pointedly taught by M-C-P, and how this sampling is made by Collins into an explanation of the sense of time-itself, i.e., the “given time”, as Husserl would have it, as distinct from time taken-to-be-in-itself, memetime that is. A Sweet Whitman's theory of time, what! Strangely, perhaps, I sort of agree with Collins' notion of time as “…a measure of change in the spacetime configuration…” and that, further, “…our universe is based on a dimension called light, from which our everyday notions of distance and time devolve”. I would replace “light” with “absolute limiting velocity”, there being n-such, of lesser speeds and associated dilations, relative to each LSTD, limited spacetime domain, of the universal nesting foam -- absolute such limits, as regards velocity, acceleration, time rate of change of acceleration, being “where”, in retrograde-inversion, classes of temporal CURLings transpire at involutory decomposition. Instead of “spacetime configuration”, I have repeatedly said in numerous ways “configuration of the manifold-referencing-type Lukasiewiczian-logically-valued Hilbert function-phase space” which devolves to, using Collins' words, “our everyday notions of distance and time”, devolves, that is, by involutory decomposition, the changes of LOGICAL configuration being expressed unto concretion by 3-fold operator-time “writing out” the syntactical geometrodynamic imports of the semantic contents of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of the pregeometry propositions codifying those changes haptification-of-functor-space-encoded (see here and here and here for a suggestive analogue, theoretical Rx, and Musculpt-like explication-application), Braille-like, in pre-pregeometry point-set “buckets of dust” spread over the universal covering surface of the compacted MVRS, the m-logically-valued reference space. Moreover, I believe that there is no “classical limit” involved here, and that that has essentially been demonstrated relative to radiation-exchange at DNA helix-coil transition and cascade dynamics of tornadogenesis. There being, according to relativity physics, as noted by Collins, no universal “now”, eternal or fleeting, upon which to “place” past-present-future, the _CT_C+ universe's being-in-itself is in holo-relative-state (Cantorian part contains all the information of the Cantorian whole: Planck-distance and Planck-time lower bounds are epiphenomenal to employment of ₁T₂-only logic alone, such that an absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct ponderable-space unit and memetemporal instant can be specified-defined into existence as functional prerequisites to a “mathematically-designated space and time”, to use the term coined by F. S. C. Northrop in his The Meeting of East and West) both op-temporally and func-spatially, in the sense of “structure is function automatized”. Promulgators-eaters of the BornRule WitchBull straw-that-broke-the-camel's-back in deep-structure origins of WWII: if they somehow manage to avoid implementing an EMPing planetary conflagration, then, surely, they will instigate a subsonic global deflagration -- if only of the mass-minding nousphaira. That “they” hasn't been stigmataed, as it certainly should've been. Contrary to Goya: Asleep in ₁T₂-Only Reason Produces Monstrous Events. Little know do we, we of the binary-egosphere impounded-enbounded. O that prefigured introjection of the projected two-wheeled Segway PT. In the ₁T₂-brains' borning rooms, it's chicken-and-egg as to whether memetime births simple-identity or simple-identity births memetime. Analogically speaking, _µT_m-time-shapes of the resource base form an icono[hetero}stasis; the fractal drum, which is a _µT_m-LETS currency unit, acting as an Orthodox band-pass Beautiful Gate. While the corpus of nesting foams of Lukasiewiczian LETS would be no reallocative “magic wand” (good offices of Karen Kaplan, “Humanity will need to make some drastic changes if it wants to keep the 'good life' going”, Los Angeles Times, 5 February 2018), it's implementation would be a major step in the right direction. The [real}locative being a cascade product from hypercomplex to complex to real, and the hyperimaginary and imaginary order-types being a kind of Wheelerian magic-without-magic, there can be little doubt that bottom-up implementation of _µT_m-LETS, in due course, would radically transform banking, commodities and stocks and bonds and derivatives trading. But, if monetary systems analogically-tropologically reflect Lebenswelt expressions of Weltanschauung codifications, then synoptic-monoscaled ₁T₂-only-cryptocurrencies are headed in another direction from that of m-valued acoustically-modified gravity-wave-mode signaturing of the constant entropy surface which is the manifold mapping of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth (results of some useful research in regards to posted here) -- i.e., the cryptos are moving in the con-def “direction” indicated by hashgraph-timestamping so as to imprint the system upon memetime and national-cryptos RFIDing so as to pseudo-fix simple-identity within the system, both to be achieved by means of consensus-reaching algos, automatization algos, that is, in their neuropsychological aspect hardened in becoming glutamatergically anchored (structure is function automatized!) to ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains. I'm of the ilk who view the latest fintech as Cryptocurrency Maoism (see, for instance, James Rickards's NYTimes bestseller and summarizing article posted here, circa 5 September 2017), but not in the usual sense of one-hundred flowers setting up the bringing about of a Cultural-Revolution reordering of psychosexual, politico-economic, and social relations by changing so-called “human nature”; rather, by blockchained-hashgraphed cryptocurrenies making techno-address to moral failure -- liar, cheater, stealer, fraudster -- so as to techno-[insti}Gate, heh-heh-heh, circumvention or redirection (well tested in the prevailing internet business model), this escape from moral failure necessitating enormous energy expenditures (rather than the enormous ChiCom social-resources expenditures) to achieve the security promised of hash-encryption, proof of work, proof of simple-ownership, proof of priority, proof of simple-identity. An amazing lot of effort and dissipation to suppress and regress and ConveDD the animistic-paganism lurking in dark pools of the collective unconscious, and the foundations of quantum-relativity physics, I'd say. Aye, clearly, they will, if they can, place a Foucault's-pendulum-type ₁T₂-metronomish pacemaker on the heart of the _µT_m-[eco}nomy. By contrast to binary-logical synoptic-monoscale cryptocurrencies, _µT_m-logically-valued-LETS currencies would do a variation on the June of 2017 IMF recommended distinction, noted by Rickards, between “permissionless” and “permissioned” in CryptoSpace. There could be no _µT_m-LETS nesting foam absent some employments of the permissioned as regards to a Swedenborgian “Doctrine of Uses” in respect to the “Angelic speech” embedded in synaesthetic Musculpt-as-mathematical-notation becoming the user-friendly interface for L2ETS (Lukasiewiczian-LETS) transactions. In e-commons, multiple-scenarios, strategic computer-gaming of the m-values, fine-grained tagged to indicator-measurables, to be ensheaved upon the LETS-currency-unit base-state, playing of the StratPlan computer game for any given _µT_m-LETS currency would be permissionless; whereas, participation in consensus-algo-generation of the actual act of ensheaving (I note that discussion of “visual string transformation”, which involves “ensheaving”, provided on fuzzy-string.net is, to me, blocked by the network administrator: but how could we expect a ₁T₂-only internet not to block development of L2ETS? heh-heh-heh!) the base-state of currency unit of any given _µT_m-LETS currency would be permissioned only to those players fulfilling the defined residency requirements in the given currency area as specified over the fractal e-boundaries on which the currency is defined. Ach, aye, demergence of memetime and the permissioned. Memetime, folks, is THE Permissioner!

I know all these “things” must be involved -- but exactly how? Here's one probably-simple-minded general scheme that plausibly-could maybe-would be a good “place” to start thinking about the details of “it”. Indicators-measurables are to be made quantum operators on the encashed ₁T₂-only base-state (entropically speaking, the reference-level “temperature”, as per the discussion offered here in the first section) of the m-valued-LETS currency unit to be transactionally _µT_m-logically processed. The Boolean proposition of the definition of the operation performed by the given indicator-measurable is to be Gödel numbered. The binary equivalent to this Gödel number is to be hash-function encoded. This short series of transforms is to be performed relative to each indicator-measurable to be ensheaved upon the base-state of the m-valued-LETS currency unit. Now, the Gödel number of the Boolean proposition stating the PPP (purchasing power parity) of the unit, relative to units of the other m-valued-LETS currencies on the same level of the _µT_m-LETS monetary-system nesting foam, is to be Gödel numbered and hash-function encoded. The Gödel number of this base-state PPP of the given unit is to be Gödel numbered by each Gödel number of the indicator-measurable operating upon it. Similarly for each hash-function encode, so as to calculate the resultant higher-order hash-function encode of the given m-valued-LETS currency unit. Stacked existence on the currency-unit base-state of the indicators-measureables gives the m-valued-LETS currency in question fractal-drum-like band-pass properties. Changing indicator values are weights upon fuzzy-logical stop-go at, say, for instance, repatriation transactions. Changing values of measurables correspond to the array of commodity-backings-values (“commodity” here very inclusively defined relative to “capital stock”) of the given m-valued-LETS currency. Transactions within a given m-valued-LETS-currency domain, between m-valued-LETS-currency domains on a given level of the currency system nesting foam, and across levels would require _µT_m-logically-valued processing. This would necessitate conversion of the higher-order hash-function encodes of the involved currency unit or units into Alexander.Karpenko functors (of the Lukasiewicz propositions stating the parameters of the given transaction) mapped over the primes, the primes involved in the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of the involved currency unit or units. In terms of distributed ledger, these would be the numbers employed in the “block” (now a fiberbundle) of the “blockchain” (now the ensheaved-string transformation sequence) made user friendly by Musculpt as notation of “visual string transformations”. Since these Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers carry changing values of commodity backings, these numbers are the numbers mapped over the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, m-logically valued reference space qua T_zog-chen AllBase, such that their changing quantum-composite (i.e., global “unit of account”) formations-configurations on the universal covering surface of that MVRS are mappings of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth. The more elaborated the system becomes, the more accurate becomes the time-shapes modeling, outcomes of which “trickle down” in cascade, via changes on the quantum-composite global unit of account, through the nesting foam as modulators of the fine-grained taggings-ensheavings of indicators-measurables to currency-unit base-states of the numerous _µT_m-LETS currencies composing the monetary system.

Deep time and surface time. Deep, not in the sense of far into the past, but as to the 3-fold operational demergers of temporal covering surface from memetimelessness. W. v. O. Quine-reliant Stephen Blaha, among many others, in his commitment to ₁T₂-only logic, believes in a finite number of levels (The Metatheory of Physics Theories…, Pingree-Hill paperback edition, 2005, p. 136) because (1) each smaller level requires greater energy to probe, and (2) the total energy of the universe (and presumably the quantum-gravity total energy operator construed independent of topologically-active, 3-fold, Pauli-Paine operator-time) sets a limit upon the available energy of probeability. I don't believe the universe has a total energy, or that there is a smallest that is not identical to the largest (to include within each fractalized scale level where all measurements are made on Koch curves or the like). Blaha assumes a lineally-arrayed scale-level nesting foam that is spatially and temporally orientable, which is to say that he hardly at all credits an absolute limiting acceleration, and credits not at all an absolute limiting time rate of change of acceleration -- let alone scaled absolute limiting velocities, accelerations, time rates of change of accelerations relative to given LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, in the corpus of LSTDs (misregarded, thence misnomered, ₁T₂-universes of a ₁T₂-multiverse) on, across, leapfrogging, and (like during, say, tornadogenesis by 3-fold temporal-CURL-mediated complex and hypercomplex angular-momentum cascade) twistingly-reentering scale levels of nesting foam. Parenthetically, but relevantly, is the atmospheric energy-momentum cascade a cascade into molecular dissipation, as commonly believed -- or, considering complex and hypercomplex angular momentum (i.e., aka second- and third-order temporal CURL), does the cascade lead to an injection into crustal and core dynamics? Along with Rossby-planetary waves and tropospheric blocking, do vertically-propagating acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes contribute to polar-vortex-disrupting SSW, sudden stratospheric warming, events -- right along with the artificial electron-temperature enhancements conducive to formation of hot aurora in the "laboratory" which is Earth's upper atmosphere? Returning to the main argument, in not crediting, if not discrediting, relative absolute limiting values of these and other dynamical variables (the composite state[s] of which necessitate _µT_m-logically-valued processing), Blaha barely acknowledges reentry (second-order physics) and implicitly altogether rules out non-orientability (third-order physics). Moreover, he is thus stuck with E = mc² alone in calculating a supposed total massenergy of the universe by implicitly discounting E-prime/m-prime (connective massenergy) and E-double-prime/m-double-prime (configurational massenergy) in respect to c-dot and c-double-dot.

Despite part or all of two years direct participation in the Viet Nam war, and decades of subsequent unfettered documentary access, Paul R. Pillar clearly learned nothing substantive about the 1968 Tet offensive, as overwhelmingly demonstrated by his article entitled “Lessons From the Tet Offensive, A Half Century Later”, The National Interest, 29 January 2018. Floundering around in The [collective substitute] Memory Palace! According to the Clausewitzian conception, the term Pillar employs, i.e., “strictly military”, means those marshal actions, and the full litany of their supports, taken in order to achieve political “objectives-goals-interests” (Intro to World Politics, Abdul Aziz Said, AU-SIS, Fall Semester, 1963). In that sense, the Vietcong's 1968 Tet offensive was a strictly military success before it was even launched, and what happened after that launching was largely “irrelevant”, to quote PAVN Col. Tu speaking to USA Col. Summers. The foremost political objective sought and achieved was a countrywide (indeed, the out-country POLOB analysts at SRA/MACV-J2, under command of Maj. Reid, saw this spread as far as across North Thailand and into Burma) multi-echelon organizational phase transition, necessary to launch the offensive, but which was also long-term-strategy instituted such that the insurgency could be sustained indefinitely, and be spread geographically, if the evolving situation so demanded. This year-plus-long effort was superbly completed before Tet-'68. And this was the critical Clausewitzian strictly military achievement of the offensive, that offensive being a strange attractor without which the political objective could not have been reached. The most immediate political goal, nesting the primary political objective, was to execute an MO, a morale operation, on the American will to continue the war. This secondary, removed, ephemeral goal is what Pillar exclusively devotes his attention to. The most important “political” goal was actually economic-financial-monetary in character: to substantially amplify the guns-and-butter stress LBJ's take on the West[more}land-commanded New Frontier placed upon American society. This, too, was a supremely successful strictly military achievement, written out as the markedly increased run, associated with Tet-'68, on the gold-exchange mechanism of the Bretton Woods monetary system -- the David-stone that, still, may yet slay Goliath. While the American war in Viet Nam may have been surface-structure rationalized by most OpusDei-like policy wonks as an anti-Communist crusade, and deep-structure altogether unconsciously was a ConveDDed (conversion-disorder displaced) attempt to quench the quantum non-simple identity tacitly recognized as Resident Evil unlocalizable in gook Injun Cuntry, was it also subliminally designed to create circumstances within which the abhorred constraints -- imposed, upon possessor of the world's foremost reserve currency, by the BrettonWoods gold-exchange mechanism -- could easily be Nixed? Aye, the eremony, uh, ecomony, oops, economy driven, not by worker bees, but by oneries, whoopse, owner bees, that is, the type-A apex predators, those steroided-up paranoids, temper[a}mentally high mesomorphs, serviced by N.Prins' high-powered dark money, which isn't the USG's black money, money not publicly accounted and no part of the ESF, the Exchange Stabilization Fund made available to the Treasury Department (think of the suitcases of money used at start of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, then multiply that by orders of magnitude for the period post-WWII, particularly since advent of bushwacky GWOT, as dyspursed around the planet, and which eventually will avalanche home to the ZI, Zone of the Interior). Oh, those ruinous refugee rants rutting up resentments of the forced-draft-deruralization free-fire zones migrating back and forth between ₁T₂-only capitalism's mobility-of-labor impulse and the COINOPS upgrade of missionary zeal. Yes, a stone to the Temple which is the Central Bank founded in preparation for onset of the WWI battle of the War of the World.

One of my favorite things is the body of work produced by Alice Coltrane, but I wish she had shared her musical reflection on the creation of ponderable space.

M_{[the}or|et|ic} demerged _µT_mly
No M_[is}T|ic is, not a M_[or}on|ic
Dissembling
Of the ass[embl}age, supposed
Actually a deco[M}position in[vol}ute

Look, it's really not all that arcane a suggestion, the assertion that pre-pregeometry is on a Braille-enabled haptified touch-screen-like meta-M man[I/i}fold with universal-covering-surface AllBase, uh, base-state of n[I/i}^m -- given that the subclinical and clinical quantum-measurement-occasion's participatory interface conforms to the holographic principle as synaesthetic-Musculpturally “orchestrated” by pregeometric _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ processing of archetypal-themes with “complex”-variations played out by 3-fold operator-time's geometrodynamic actions levered upon Schrödinger's cum Everett's m-valued universal state-function. Ain't misbehavin'! that wave-function with two orders of non-linearity. We're talking here, in respect to _µT_m-LETS ensheaving, gematric clustering-algo syntax of n-indices Wheelerian “bucket [of dust] grid” band-pass interrupt, and improvements thereupon (search “bucket grid” in the patent-application description), where the hash function returns a fiberbundle-arithmetic concatenated index-tuple: geometric hashing via vector quantization to _µT_m-logically encode and compress-compact-condense-fuse multivalued autopoionomic multidimensional signals. One might even think of the k-means-clustered, fractal-e-boundaried, nesting-foams of higher-order Voronoi-cellular currency-area, band-pass plasmahauts, upon which _µT_m-processed m-valued LETS currencies are to be defined, as having haptic properties. Again with “we're talking here”: toroidal grids for second-order physics and Klein-bottle grids for third-order physics. One fine day, the user-friendly Musculpt interface to _µT_m-LETS-currency-exchange pragmatics may even get into taste polymorphism (Roland Fischer made me aware of this aspect of the m-valued, the very same Fischer of men whose paper on autogenic discharges and Vipassana Wolfgang Luthe asked me to present at the 1977 Kyoto psychosomatic medicine congress) and olfactory polymorphism. Heh-heh-heh! O the Musculpt-blind, square sleep of the pigheaded pug-nosed! as differentiated from the half-awake, well-rounded sleep of the sonic-visioning bottle-nosed. For them pugs, alias = error, and concatenation of aliases = error exponentiated n-times over -- not quantum non-simple m to the m to the n identity. To be in Everettian m-valued, relative-state identity-transparent, _µT_m-processed “magical thinking”, or not to be so in, by imprinting downon binary-logical-alone Wheelerian pregeometric, simply-identifiable, single-valued framework-determining-conditions of geometrodynamic magic-without-magic? That is the ₁T₂-only schizotypical question. Aye, that almond-fear centering ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains in consciousness-cutoff from processing of THE non-localizable _µT_m-quantum brain (the involved feature-vectored, object-fetished, data-spaced neural gas [facilitating demergence of Maya-Samsara: damn neighborhood functions on higher-D input space, and that backpropagation with gradient descent to lowdown-D -- and affirm the TeuvoKohonen self-organizing map! heh-heh-heh] being correlated to the corpora of superconductant pi-electron gas cores of intraneuronal and intraperineural DNA molecules). If, in face of global megacrisis, we want superconductor efficiency at use of total capital stock, planet Earth, then we must analogically model design of framework-determining-conditions (e.g., order of logical-value of the monetary units employed), for autopoionomy-type signal-transduction cascades, on the “design” of biological (and meteorological: the adjustable [i.e., order of entropic-qua-turbulent state cinematographically found to be inversely related to the order of logical-value employed by the n[I/i}^m of the observer] nested-grid-qua-level-set-cum-adaptation-memetime-step Paine-Kaplan cascade-theoretic computer forecast model of robustly convergent tornadogenesis employs facsimiles qua prefigurative variants of third-second-first-order-optimized hypercomplex-imaginary-real gradient descent algos under topologically-active “3-fold Pauli-Paine operator-time”, i.e., the effectuating temporal-CURL-enacting gradient-ascent-to-critical-states primed and double-primed cum dotted and double-dotted self-intersection cum self-reentrant point <<< CURLings cum cuspover >>> gradient-descent demergent involutory-decomposition operations) cases of superconductant processes.

In my Whiteheaded-Pauli take on Cantorian-fractal Jungian neoPlatonism, as viewed through extensions of Marie-Louise von Franz's Number and Time: Reflections Leading Toward a Unification of Depth Psychology and Physics, circa 1974, the Trickster archetype-in-itself, a mathematical-relation-structure aggregate of point-set complexes-in-themselves, is a _µT_m-quantum-composite on the MVRS, the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian m-logically-valued reference space, which, the archetype-in-itself, that is, when constellated, becomes an autopoietic operator, the operations of which are demergently actualized by logic operations brought into “material-girl” concretion by 3-fold topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time. As a “for instance”, consider that _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency is, in authenticity, on the MVRS, and only, if authentic, on the MVRS -- actually, by the holographic principle, only on the universal covering surface boundary-without-boundary of the MVRS. Yet, there are, among the “sensitives” -- those who, to one degree or another, at some critical temporal window, due to genetic predisposition, trauma, intense inner-work, “higher combat”, so on, have resisted the effects of prescriptive enculturation-socialization upon glutamatergic anchoring at neuronal plasticity -- bleed-throughs of _µT_m-quantum-brain processing to the processings of ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains. As regards the issue of identity-transparency: not only the transference phenomenologies associated with ₁T₂-two-against-the-world romantic love in support of the ₁T₂-only mores insisted upon by the ₁T₂-only nation-state, but, more elaborately, “I am my own father, who was his own mother”: temporally-, no less than spatially-, referenced _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency, authentic only on the MVRS, and less so by consciously elaborated tropes thereto, thoroughly regressed by binary-mind. Demergence _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m, processed ₁T₂-only, and altogether naively, automatically yields schizotypical personifications, introjective invasions, projective inflations, paranoias, so on, more elaborately, dissociative losses-of-memetime. Jiminy Crickets! They are surveilling me because they want to fix me, then bio-ID me, chip my brain, then substitute me. Find, fix, and finish. Such COINOPS! Ach, the replacement killers: surrogates, avatars, other I-am-me's-and-only-me's. OMG! This whole process. What a substitute, replacement, surrogate, avatar for _µT_m-non-simple quantum identity. Such ConveDDing! Operations of The Trickster set up collective-unconscious event-gradients which, by ConveDDing, conversion-disorder displacing, generate mimics of the complex-aggregate (itself ConveDDed to A2AD: anti-access, area denial [of service]) servicing the suppression-repression responsible for the (behaviorally, by Wolfish falo delle vanita: oral-to-genital-to-anal and retrograde-inversion thereof in cycles forecast by application of Elliott wave theory, heh-heh-heh!) regression-in-service-to-the-megaegoes: e.g., bungled bundlings of bundled MBSs-CDOs and their associated CDSs -- the ConveDDing being in regards to non-simple ownership of properties in the quantum economies created by massive econometrically-impactive “introjections” of _µT_m-quantum-based technologies dressed in Cartesian-Newtonian ₁T₂-only overcoats-personas. Whilst there are experts out and about concerning every area mentioned, and I've always done my best to learn as much as I can from them, I am nonesuch. Nonetheless, I feel pretty confident observing that that above asserted being the case, as it most certainly is, it's not at all surprising, and old, old olds, hardly new, new news, that pandemic collusion between-amongst the guvies and the 1-percent is the financial reality, whether or not demonstrated by academically-conducted statistical studies, these studies being explicated in “The Economist: It Appears Market Conspiracy Theorists Were Right”, ZeroHedge, 11 February 2018. Nor does it seem plausible that the usual run of reform-reset proposals, as distinct from thorough systemic monetary transform, to include complete reworking of the “framework determining conditions”, could-would, even if fully implemented, meet expectations of their proposers. While I am, for instance, all for variously-backed, LETS-up, government-created money (see, for one case of advocacy, “Economic System Reform: Saving the Planet; Salvaging the Human Prospect”, Robert Snefjella, Global Research, 12 February 2018), so long as that money is single-valued and ₁T₂-only processed, it cannot possibly be the foremost solution to, to mention only one fundamental issue, the myriad of problems constellated, indeed, de novo created, by the enormous “introjections” of _µT_m-quantum-based technologies, technologies ₁T₂-only-legalistically-anchored to the Cartesian-Newtonian institutional-base. It is also hardly contemplateable that “solutions” to such like as abrupt climate change on the geological memetime scale, Atoms-for-Peace Fukushimas (despite well-post-discrete-event hysteria, good offices of Michael Snyder, The Truth, 21 October 2013, reposted by Global Research, 9 February 2018, cum counter-hysteria, good offices of Andrew David Thaler, “28 fallacies about the Fukushima nuclear disaster's effect on the US West Coast”, Southern Fried Science, 29 October 2013), gene hacking, glyphosate saturation, mimetic estrogen flood, so on and so forth, would issue from government-created ₁T₂-only monies. At accelerating movement in close-approach to a science-created global conjuncture, whereupon open access to scientific research materials is essential if the science-instigated destruction of planetary health is to be mitigated, species extinctions curtailed, perpetual resource warfare stanched, climate-shift dynamics are to become better understood, human species survival insured, Aaron Swartz certainly chose, did Aaron, one of the critical issues to focus upon. Progressive denial of access to scientific information is necessary if ₁T₂-only institutions -- private no less than public -- are to continue to prevail in face of the gathering evidence that nature is fundamentally _µT_m, not ₁T₂. Quoth the man, the martyr: “I feel my existence is an imposition on the planet.” An epiphany strongly suggestive of a rising sense of _µT_m-quantum relative-state identity-transparency, always mediated by intense imprinting upon the natural surround, the deep-structure basis of the Gurdjieffian principle of “reciprocal maintenance”. My planet right and/or wrong -- and all stopovers in between! The ₁T₂-ownability of ₁T₂-only science! Heh-heh-heh. During the early-Renaissance, science-in-its-infancy was dry-gulched, bushwhacked, and usurped for to service Aristotelian ₁T₂-only logic, its taxonomic bent, and its nature-exploiting orientation -- nature being fundamentally _µT_m. Tying the economy to the fecundity of nature -- so said. Ah, and along came John Law -- appropriately named, even if it was all about speculation, advancing the cause of central banking and the sacred trust in national fiat currencies. And then there was multiple-bank credit expansion. The single-valued monies of the moneychangers have all along been primary means for inculcating ₁T₂-only cognition -- scratchety-scritch, thump-thump-thump -- and suppressing consciousness in habitus upon animistic-pagan _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency. Monetization of the rural economy, what. Monetization of mind, what. Nowadays, imposition of WiFied-DNA-frequency-response-window-intervening, cashless, cellular-utilized, ₁T₂-only crypto-e-monies as facilitators of the total GMOing-glyphosatizing of the rural economy. Just look, for instance, at what is being done to India.

Zazen_µT_msatori-on-the-brain by endogenous ketamine flood. Those ₁T₂ly-tardy of mind, dyskinetic of conception: there's much fear of relativistic dilative endo-K-suspension of memetime and consequent contractive evaporation of ponderable space. The prospect of a buckboard ride for a life, unsung by no Tex Ritter, transubstantiated when the skateboard, the surfboard, the snowboard are traded in by extreme sports enthusiasts for the counterterror waterboarding of memetime encaptured. Humph! Ah, the NWO and its GWOT must be, just simply are, an exorcism of Abel, Cantor, Einstein's first wife, and Schrödinger's [a}dulcet, harsh-mewling cat, so very [an}euphonious to the ₁T₂-only, swell-tempered, harmonically-trained ear -- exorcised by Turing-machined lists, what! Epi[demon}ium unto pandemonium. Them damnable asuras. And, oh those glutamatergic neural-network prunings at neuronal plasticity orchestrated by prescriptive enculturation-socialization. The Rorschached hallucination of a ₁T₂-only order of objects construed to be selfsame-in-themselves, so construed by subjects self-attributing indelible identity, the binary-logic shaman's cognitive sheepskin shammy cloth having wiped away all endogenous-ketamine-flooded evidence of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+. Amae, einfuhlung, generative empathy, Buddhological compassion, as distinct from identification at projection in transference on the interpersonal and subject-object tears, uh, uh, tiers, of ₁T₂-only cognition: _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ levels of elaboration, such compassion? Being co-unto-multi-conscious (which requires voluntary dissociation begun with cultivation of “inner separation” by concentration in self-observation) of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency (the “basic unit”, insofar as such be construed, not simply present or absent at any given spacetime point, hence N not equal to 2ⁿ, but to Mⁿ) in/at a given demerged particular occasion (quoting Lama Ivo Kalushev writing “How does 'compassion' work” in his piece entitled “The meaning of compassion in Buddhist tradition”: “Compassion in the Buddhist context is the dissolution of the individual self… If we manage to dissolve completely the boundary between ourselves and others, our karmic perception will in turn dissolve”), not by superego(projected to Godhead or no)-imposed ₁T₂-moral imperative, but simply by percept-propriocept awareness thereof, isn't that precisely generative-empathetic compassion? Despite the fact that, again quoting the Lama's piece, “Buddhism does not speak of morality in the sense of the good/evil dicotomy…” and that “…this concept of 'morality' does not exist in Buddhism, at all”, there is, of course, an implicit _µT_m-moral imperative inescapably locked into direct ontic awareness of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency (for, by the Cantorian-part-whole-transparent holographic principle embedded in _µT_m-quantum-relative-state, attack across the “boundary”-without-boundary at Cantorian-fractal orders-of-infinity upon the illusory object-other would be an attack upon the illusory subject-self), but that moral imperative does not drive the awareness, the awareness drives that moral imperative.

Well, see, aye, hummm… being a soft-touch and having a knack for it, my I/i^m say(s), as regards The Moon of Hoa Binh: Piece be upon you! Jazz: surely the most extraordinary expressionist transformation of violence directed against-inward found in human history. Personally, I think jazz transcends the “abstract truth” and enters truth-value-independent realms _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ -- but I'm only a mere listener, and an uneducated one at that, having dropped out of Harmony 101 just as I did from Calculus 101, so what could I possibly know that wasn't simply simple-minded speculation? When Hollywood does real stuff, not just the VRed-verisimilitude-servicings of mass regression and/or pro[vision}ing as to the blackpsyche (maddishly turning mere announcements into Annunciations: Ah, Lady Day, I presume!) needs of the oligarchic oligopolies and monolithic, top-down, In[car}nation of iatrogenic governance (regards the criminal intents, including the unethical hacking of human rights, however legalized, informing all forms of government throughout hu-hu-hu{man] his-story), it's wonderfully facilitative, really transformative: no one of right mind would countenance the notion that the prevailing-tech expertise is not astounding and that the current crop of talent is not among the best there's ever been. It's just that… hmmm. Walking back ₁T₂-only glutamatergic anchoring (is this the initialization of the Integral Yoga Sri Aurobindo said begins only after the first experience of Nirvana?), think of the approach to _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency which the icons of psychic transmutation signify. Changelings. Musculpting shape-shifters. What, by ConveDDing (conversion-disorder displacing) and regressed hypostatizing-[hypo}sta(te)sizing concretion, the GMOers and saviors-from-genetic-disease are intent upon cloning: by projective-identification, the _µT_m-animistic-pagan-“participation-mystiqued” transformation masks of the Gods-of-Totem. Transmask ConveDDed into, for instance, organ-donor husheep cum labor-campers by the “ethical hackers” of nature's most important encryption, hacks perpetrated under the mistaken assumption that the involved code is a single-valued, single-level, digital-only cipher with no wave-effect components modulatable by non-ionizing radiation. Whowhat are the masks of God-projected-into-personifications, those transformation masks transcending abstract truth? Holographic techno-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt transformational grammars likely will involve MUXing/deMUXing of some sort, n-data-streams from the same m-valued source cum from multiple such sources in quantum-composite, a time-divided/frequency-divided sort involving processing under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logical-value order-types -- not merely by the ₁T₂-order-type maskings which each of the immediately-above-linked sites describe. Howfore whatwhere is the abstracted empathetic “co[M}passion” covering surface of the MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space T_zog-chen AllBase) _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-planesong quilt? Just think of THE actual illuminated Book of “Hours”, how those partition-algo-arbitrary n…hours-days-weeks-months-years-decades…n are all stacked acetate sheet by acetate sheet one upon another; now, give each transparent sheet a different logical-value order-type such that there is a nesting-foam. Considering time dilation and spatial contraction, memetime is a locally-recoverable encoded Peano-type plane-sheet space-filling curve that looks straight to the flatlanders living in a non-distributed and non-identity-transparent renormalized-cum-glutamatergically-anchored consciousness-state solely referenced upon that sheet where the nanoseconds are least densely packed, a [meme}tic(tok) trope (ah, Time Changes: 1964, a very good year, except that I did not hear Impressions of Japan, drawing forth my youth years there, and which I like much better than “Time Changes”, until Goat Lab at Ft. Sam, circa 1966, until, that is, Steve Coleson bought the disk along with that of Miles trumpeting his “Sketches of Spain”) of those flatlanders seeing through the backside of their one-way-mirror sheet the shadows cast through all the other sheets (think: stained-glass windows of, say, in respect to Rilke's “widening circles”, Notre-Dame de Paris: a homeomorphism on each circle of an infinite wedge of circles shrinking, good offices of John Dyer, to a single circle, tropologically the God of Rilke?) by the “divine light” of the cosmic laser illuminating All That Is, to include an “image” thus demerged of the MVRS as “seen” in the cathedral's maze so “projected” onto the consecrated-sacred “floor-plan” most-dense sheet, e.g., that of Chartres Cathedral (good offices of Sarah Jane Boss' “The cosmic womb”, no date given, 2000 or later by bibliography). O, the fearful asymmetry established by the shyster diagonals signifying the arrant pencils-of-skew-parallel transects and the fiberbundling twists temporal-CURLing Bohmian-enfolded dimensions into trophotropic world-knots! Telepathic-inner-MetaMusculpt identity-transparency (in process of being ConveDDed) supraordinate to, uh, whatchamacallit-- ah, the caus[is}try of Mannerist “abstract truth”? Quirky foible, what, that binary oddity: so says THE quantum-brain. Given that all neither-true-nor-false future contingents are truly-and-falsely always and all ways Zenwhen present on the MVRS (ConveDDed to HIBA open-source platform), if not ₁T₂ly-demergent by involutory decomposition, Gregorian chant _µT_mly sung on the twistor which is to be understood quantizor of the cascade demergor qua Annunciator, 3-fold (a signature in the sense of a collection of logical operators) temporal CURL? No MP-MT inferential operator, 3-fold temporal CURL, that angelic Gabriel, what: scotch such axiom(s) from Musculpt over man[i}folds, M, supraordinate to those truth-value englutted. And thus, according to Rilke, “So we are grasped by what we cannot grasp”.

One positive thing I will unreservedly acknowledge I learned from participating in team sports before and during high school, particularly during my junior year of basketball playing in Alaska, was how to be decisive without being impulsive -- and this melded with the autohypnosis my I/i^m later self-taught whilst in medical MOS assimilation at SFTG, Special Forces Training Group. It's not so much a matter of thinking ahead as of tacitly “perceiving ahead”, in sports mostly by “body-knowing”, and in Lebenswelt by differentially non-doing those residual-tension-carried intentionality-type doings which prevent passive-acceptance receptivity to inputs from the subliminal, inputs all too often assertively blocked by the can-do type-A obsession with immersion in ergotropic-activation states. As I some memetime ago came to stand under: “[meme}ories” of future contingents, i.e., perceiving ahead, are ₄T₄ly not true or false cum not-true and not-false cum true and false iff not consciously accessed -- or implanted. Fear and loathing of Nazi memory erasures may not be schizophrenogenic, but that shuddering alarm is certainly schizy unto altogether schizoid. Why? An erased memory -- by whatever means of trauma to the head-embedded, ₁T₂-only, molecular-cellular brain -- is tantamount to a loss of memetime, like in involuntary dissociation on the order of multiple personality disorder. One “ethical-hacker” self-justification for developing the technology for memory erasures and implants (see: “How to see a memory”, Helen Shen, Nature, 10 January 2018) is to rid ex-soldiers suffering PTSD of the memories causing their shell shock -- assuming, that is, that bad memories are etiological, not merely symptomatic. Even though memory images are handled as real stimuli eliciting both the non-specific stress and the specific immunological reactions, this assumption is spurious in my judgment based upon my experience of Autogenic Neutralization by orchestration of the Centrencephalic Safety Discharge System -- and its quantum substrate. Violence, especially lethal, witnessed, if somewhat less than that-survived, is an assault on the Umwelt-constructed selfhood and its ₁T₂-self/not-self boundaries, as well as the Weltanschauung from which the Umwelt introjects its components. What potentiates and perseveres the memory image and its underlying engram, likely, at foundation, hologrammic, as real stimulus is the assault upon, and induced changes thereof, the whole adrenergic-immunologic-neurologic nexus anchoring Umwelt-Weltanschauung to body image and the prescriptively enculturated-socialized glutamatergically-anchored sense of ₁T₂-only selfhood. Removing the memory-engram won't remove those changes -- the real etiology of PTSD, in my belief. But I must admit that memory manipulation would be less invasive Rx than non-dominant ECT and/or lobotomy. Memory serving, heh-heh-heh, it was during my last semester at Eielson AFB High School and into early summer of 1962 that I took from Mr. Moore an independent study course in topology. Subsequently, I forgot most of it, of course, but residuals of what I learned from working my assisted way through that textbook clearly very strongly influenced my coming to terms with the states of identity-transparency I had experienced in Midori Gaoka cum Ashiya, kita-Kyushu, circa 1953-6, ages 8-11. Man[i}folds, point-set-theoretically discrete and squishably-stretchably logotopo-continuous. Regards Riemann's 1854 public lecture on his Habilitationsvortrag construction of the notion manifold, quoting Erhard Scholz, “The Concept of Manifold, 1850-1950”, Quantum-Gravitation.de, no date given but 1999 or later by bibliography:

Basic to such a construction was, so Riemann explained to his audience, the presupposition of any “general concept” which allows in a [₁T₂-only] logical sense precise individual determinations.

Is this-'I', temporally located at any Husserl-given well-defined, hence non-quantum, moment, an “open unit ball” -- in the locally-Euclidian neighborhood homeomorphic, i.e., bi-only-jectively equivalent, to Euclidian space of dimension n -- homotopically squashable to some single-valued vanishing point amongst all such there are in my I/i^m's ambient surround? Maybe so, in respect to this-'I' only. WTHIT? Closed-compact. Without boundary, boundary at infinity. Homotopy vs. homeomorphic. Is there homotopy involved in the holographic principle, and, if so, what does that imply about holographic memory storage-erasure-implanting and the mapping of bureaucratic variables operative in AOs and TOARs upon managerial boundaries -- particularly if, heh-heh-heh, the SFOB is construed by projective-identification as a god's-eye located in a Vietnam-war-era helicopter or a GWOT-era global hawk? The reason I posed that question to myself is that bi-only-jection clearly was not involved in Viet-Cong-apparatus-in-the-South mappings of bureaucratic variables upon changing administrative boundaries, hence same dimensionality and homeomorphic equivalence were no parts of the picture. Inculpatory evidence that the VCI was guilty of innovating managerial application of the holographic principle was manifold and elaborate. Though by Tet-'68 I'd heard of holograms, I'd not yet heard of the “holographic principle” where total information contents of an n-dimensional state space are mapped upon its (n-1)-dimensional boundary-without-boundary. Even so lacking in knowledge, still I felt this VCI innovation to be highly original and of considerable general-systems-theory importance relative to principles of self-organization in self-generating cellularized hierarchies (holographically-distributed information in significant measure self-cancelling hierarchicality of the hierarchy). The most frequently encountered tipoff to boundary changes was alteration in letter-box-number (LBN) codings. More specifically, if the physical location of a changed LBN (this alphanumeric code, as well as that of the originating unit, and other ID codes, were written into most internal documents) fell into a different administrative jurisdiction than in earlier-captured documents from the same unit or under signature of the same cadre nom de guerre cum code, then it was certain there had been a boundary change. In a major reorganizational phase-change, like that prior to Tet-'68, associated with the boundary change would be wholesale changes of virtually every bureaucratic variable that had existed within the involved prior jurisdictions, such that personnel allocations, job descriptions, AOs, TAORs, subunit taskings, chains of command, so on, would be redefined relative to the new boundary. This could not have been by bi-only-jective mappings because the cellular framework overlay was tripartite; there were multiple-redundant chains of command; command cadres wore multiple hats; there was judicious use of reverse representation; the state of the echelon-hierarchy partition itself could change at multiple levels; crypto-current-information flow laterally, up and down through echelons, could course by multiple means, including cell-to-cell, and fast-track by skipping over echelons when critical states were reached. Bi-logic simply was not on the framework determining conditions. In fact, the whole line-and-block-chart characterization of VCI organization was a profoundly mistaken Westernized (Frankophilic-Amerikophilic) structuralization of a fundamentally functional-requisite-organized process-in-reality where “form [in process] follows function”. Given my Buddhological [orient}ation to cosmology: the [side}real black hole is, in my view, a collective projection of the psychological black hole = ₁T₂-only-bound egospheric identity-opacity allowing “precise individual determinations”. There is! I now read, homotopy in holographic principle, but, by definition, there being a dimensionality change, not bi-only-jective homeomorphism: “Topology of States on a Black Hole Event Horizon”, Lawrence B. Crowell, Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics, 12:IYL15-34, 2015, pp. 211-18. Entanglement to spacetime phase-change handled as a homotopy-type defined on the stretched horizon. Note that the phase-change is with respect to-- what? Nothing! How perfect. What better a receiver for projective-identifications? The vacuum. Flux of nothing, and boundary-without-boundary. Hmmm. Regardless of what Wheeler thought, “magic-without-magic” is not reliant upon pregeometry as calculus of binary propositions. Those propositions are _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logically-valued! And cosmically “understood” independent of the notion truth-value. Pretty interesting introduction to Sri Aurobindo's post-Nirvana Integral Yoga, what!

A[dumb}ratiocination or an infantile [Adam}bration, the notion that, on the demerged non-compact-Riemann-surface-like sheets of MVRS, the m-logically-valued reference space (the MVRS has hypersheaving due to its _CT_C+-logical-value order-types; it incorporates non-orientable third-order physics; demergence involves going to second-order orientable physics), Heraclitian “Everything is nothing but changes” is the same as, on the most-dense undecomposed-composite reference sheet, Parmenidean “Nothing ever changes”? Are _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly conceived Regge bones, operator-time-qua-temporal-CURL-informed oracle bones (in view of the I-Ching being The Book of Changes, not the book of chances, 'I' = Yi = "simple" cum "to change", the partitions of Higher Heaven and Lower Heaven possibly being related to Regge zones, and also considering the way hexa and 64 feed into so many aspects of higher mathematics) -- in that they “contain” incarnate thing-change categorifications readable in discorporate no-thing changelessness-acategorification? Is there an n-D “open unit 'ball'” qua simplicial polytope construed open, i.e., under higher-valued logics “faces without face” -- no n-boundary equivalents to end points; no n-boundary equivalents to limit points, as here dealing with infinite sets, not infinite sequences -- around each point of a _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-Regge lattice? Uh. Whoa. Oops. Am I getting flummoxed here? Scotching for the moment _CT_C+, the open unit “ball” of Regge calculus, if there is such, under _µT_m-logical-value order-types, thus Regge calculi, is not to be confused with UT(M), the unit sphere bundle of the tangent bundle of a Riemann manifold. Or is it? Or, rather, has it so been done -- by good offices of the Trickster archetype, the very same archetype inducing bungled bundling of bundled MBSs sans fiberbundle arithmetics? Hope is a big-bubble snake with two fat tails: fear and loathing. The second-order temporal operator twists these tails; the third-order temporal operator stuffs that twistor into the snake's mouth. O those unutterable holomorphies! The unsub which is the untwist sends the cascaded complex angular momentum underlying the Wheel of Memetime back to the Sun. Is the _µT_m-Regge-lattice point a homotopic squash-down of the open unit “ball”? Is this squash-down a convergence in the sense that every open “ball” around the _µT_m-Regge-lattice point contains “all but a finite number of [logical-value] terms”? Oops, that's where _CT_C+ comes in again, doesn't it? Whoa, self-reference really is vengeance-filled, is self-reference, it is, isn't it. If so, what homotopy-type is involved? Much to ponder here. The Kalachakra mandala is notionally a homotopic squash-down of the myriad, m, of mandalas, M? Does the boundary-without-boundary of the open unit “ball” constitute a mapping of all the _µT_m-logical-value-order-type points superposed on the given point of the nesting-foam nest-selection at issue, a foam-select which the given lattice represents-transliterates from the given manifold curvature configuration? And is each point of a _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-Regge lattice, given homotopic de-squashability equivalence to the open unit “ball”, the same point as the “location” of the holographic-principled 't Hooft qubit within the Planck-length-defined unit of area on the black hole event horizon where the homotopic phase change, described by Lawrence B. Crowell (“Topology of States on a Black Hole Event Horizon”, Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics, 12:IYL15-34, 2015, pp. 211-18) transpires? Whoops! again. If Planck's constant has m values, scaled to sheets of the nesting foam, processed _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly, then the single-valued Newtonian gravitational constant can't be used to determine the unit area-- uh, uh, unit areas nestingly superposed on the event horizon. So, then, is it the case that the 't Hooft qubit can be localized (involving simplicial localization of a homotopical category?) to a Planck-length-defined unit of area on the black hole event horizon iff the logic employed is truncated to ₁T₂-only?

Thanks be to the gods of the prevailing regime in dataism for the link (good offices of Julia Jus) to the talk, entitled “Will the Future be Human”, delivered by Yuval Noah Harari at the 2018 World Economic Forum. Very interesting. I'll have to have a look into his books, Sapiens and Homo Deus. And the one said to be forthcoming. I would observe, however, that the whole transhuman-posthuman-inorganiclife project is based upon the assumptions that there is no such as undi[sss}imulated-quantum biology (the principles of which would make successful, i.e., “long-lived”, heh-heh-heh, “digital dictatorship” in biology or any other area impossible by automorphic self-destruction: any attempt to executive-function-“manage” temporally and spatially non-localizable, non-selfsame, non-simply-IDable _µT_m-quantum processes will, in due course, lead to an auto[gene}tic meltdown); that “organisms are [₁T₂-only] algorithms”; that “distributed” is ₁T₂-only-distributed, not also _µT_m-quantum-relative-state-distributed such that any-one-thing contains all the data contained by All-Everything, if the holographic principle be stated, as it should, in terms of Cantorian-fractal _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-quantum relative-state identity-transparency; that “all of life was subject to the laws of natural selection and the laws of organic biochemistry”; that consciousness is emergent from ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains, not that those brains are demergent, via THE _µT_m-quantum brain, from universal consciousness(i.e., ergotropic)-as-the-set-of-all-topological-operators(re: operator-time)-on-the-MVRS(the m-logically-valued reference space being trophotropic universal consciousness); that Earth's atmosphere, for instance, is a classical domain to which quantum-relativity physics does not apply at the, say, tropospheric level; that there is no logic that is not tantamount to that binary; that executive functions, regards integration no less than specificity, are systemically functional, spatially localizable, and out front like the teensy-weensy self-selected subset that attends meetings of the WEF; that the genetic code is a single-level encipherment and solely a matter of molecular biology with no significant quantum properties; that Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function is properly understood relative to probability theory, not m-valued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value; that biological time is correctly understood because we correctly understand the nature of time; so on and so forth. In my view, it is more likely that the human species self-immolates, takes a tap, hits itself out, not by a successful transposthuman project, but because that project, an expression of collective psychopathology, crashes and burns, being based as it is on quite a few false assumptions about the nature of nature, and a wealth of ego-inflationary self-deceptions like that of identification with the Homo Deus man-god, an identification which is right in line with the mass ConveDDing (conversion-disorder displacing) currently repeating the Ubermensch-hubris-informed Nazification process on the global scale, over the exact same deep-structure issues, just with more sophisticated technology. Clearly, some members of the global leadership elite believe arrogant ignorance is better than ignorant arrogance. During the 1930s, the Germans had an explicit choice between natural autogenic brain discharges and techno-ConveDDs of those discharges, as delivered by electroconvulsive therapy; they chose ECT. And today why settle for ₁T₂-only techno-immortality when one could have cognizance of _CT_C+-Schrödinger-memetime-independent being-in-itself? Only because authentic inner-work is much harder than the techno-ConveDD? Or is there also a psychopathic compulsion involved? Suppressive denial productive of collective regression is a functional prerequisite to institutional psychosis and associated chaosiclysm. One imagines that, from the aperspectival _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ “perspective”, ₁T₂-only “dataism” is just one more Dadaism: the prospect of two-way commo between ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains and 2-state-qubitic computers, thus of the formation of an “interbrain net”, must be the prospect of mere child's play compared to “telepathic” (no “tele” or “pathic” required with full-blown _µT_m-ID-transparency, ponderable space and memetime being logically, ontologically, and existentially derivative in regards to precedence relations) registrations of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ Musculpt, an OBE-mode of being-in-the-world very likely the normative case-state (extrapolate implications of, for instance, Shigehisa Kuriyama's The Expressiveness of the Body and consider pre-acupuncture-Chinese and pre-Homeric-Greek notions of identity qua identity relative to “systems of correspondence” which today we might designate as exemplifying _µT_m-quantum relative-state: geomorphological and atmospheric dynamics were integral to diagnostic medicine) prior to the cognitive collapse (_µT_m-unto-₁T₂-only: whatever the causal details might have been; Mankind in Amnesia thereof, most likely) associated with the advent of speakable languages and the much later formalization-of-identification with binary-only “muscular” thought processes. Development of the notion that life is restricted to the con[cat}e|nations of organic compounds had its origins in the relatively recent (relative to -- crediting the dating methods and the operative consensus notion of time -- the 2.8-million-years-running human ancestral line and the four-billion years since advent [at thermal vents?] of organic molecules) attack upon cognizance of identity-transparency qua “participation inconsciente” qua “participation mystique” at root of pagan-animistic modes of comprehension, an attack mounted by the Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion (Mosaic-Judaic advent 3,500 years ago), the specter of a resurrection of which, i.e., pagan-animism, was raised, if only tacitly early on, by N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr designated an impossibility theorem by the dissemblers. The real questions, which recent-and-soon-to-come developments raise, according to my lights, are, not so much “Who should own the data?” and “How do you regulate the ownership of data?”, but “Should data be restricted to the most reductive logical-value order-type of the C+-infinite number of such order-types there are in nature?” and “Should those in possession of single-valued ₁T₂-only-processed monies alone be allowed to own any of the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ order-types of data supraordinate to that ₁T₂-only, the values ensheaved to the _µT_m-LETS currency unit, themselves, constituting an important element of a _µT_m-distributable self-regulatory framework?” Were, of course, such a radically-decentralized qua quantum-distributed-cum-quantum-composite (composite as regards the m-valued universal “unit of account”) monetary system implemented such that the pricing of even ₁T₂-only data could be, if not solely handled by its appropriate correlate, i.e., single-valued cash alone, made m-valued with transactions processed _µT_mly. Having techno-imposed a global-monoculture Lebenswelt based most fundamentally in codification by, through, onto/into, and to (readable thousands of years ago in the duality-framed Chinese oracle bone; nowadays, in the more and more flaccid-mushy-flocculent-softEarth culmination in the puzzle-palaced XX, last century, Dos EQuIS slapstick approach to remediation of ecocide-fratricide-patricide-matricide-cyborgicide…) ₁T₂-only logic; the even/odd-modulo Umwelt-introjective superpreference, not an Umwelt-introjective equanimity with respect to the neven/nodd modulos; the binary character of the pair-preferring rudimentary mathematical operations employed to define group-, ring-, field-algebraic-structure extensions over constituents-single-valued-and-selfsame numerical domains Z, Q, R, C; the distributed middle, with one very fat aggregate tail and one .001-percent soon-to-be even fatter tail; the huge ethnocentric fixation upon (₁T₂ XORed, 2-in<|>1-out) Boolean exclusive-OR operations, particularly if they are violent.mil.lethal; the church-state dyadic dictate as to elemental generator of the nuclear social unit; the cognitive coup-contrecoup; the bi-polar syndrome; the schizophrenogenic double-bind, so on and so forth, is it any wonder that there is conflation of identification with love, empathy with binary-moral imperative, generative empathy with symptom of psychosis, mathematical equivalence with identity understood an on/off condition, not n-states -- as distinct from degrees, levels, shades, grades, probability amplitudes -- of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency, aka the states of Buddhological compassion heuristically revealed in distinguishing features of the multitude of Samadhi states, states scurrilously imputed by some to be equal to Say[mad}he? Interesting, isn't it, that the choice was made to represent the identity element with a 0. Is “equivalence” identity-transparency? Is “congruence” identity-transparency? Hah! Ah, m-valued, non-selfsame, neoPlatonic, Cabalistic numbers, that most unforgivable of heresies. Hmmm. Gal-0-wa, what! Pal[imps}est: yep, that's what's theys is, all right. Scrape'm away for all my I's care, is what the non-commutators would say. The Trickster archetype at play in fields of the Lord: Evariste Galois, discover-creator of non-commutative groups-fields, dies in a duel at age 21, a duel over involvement in a love triangle -- gal-0-wa! -- where the affect-charge was non-commu[ne]tative, where projective-identification at transference was conflated to love at least partially unrequited. Quoting the “Groups, Rings, and Fields” posting linked above:

The other kind of finite field has a number of elements that is a power of a prime number. The addition operator consists of multiple independent additions modulo that prime. The elements of the field can be thought of as polynomials whose coefficients are numbers modulo that prime. In that case, multiplication is polynomial multiplication, where not only are the coefficients modulo that prime, but the polynomials are modulo a special kind of polynomial, known as a primitive polynomial. All finite fields, but particularly those of this second kind, are known as Galois fields.

And why has p-adicity not become consensuated as one of the principles employed to grok Schrödinger's m-valued state-function -- that p-adicity, that is, in the Alexander.Karpenko functors of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of the truth-table-independent, T_ransparency-relative _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+-state-space propositions covering the MVRS, the m-logically-valued reference space? Answer: the p-adic number system extends Q, the rational numbers, to quote Wiki “…by an alternative interpretation of the concept of 'closeness'…”. As regards how close, “…p-adic numbers are considered to be close when their difference is divisible by a high power of p: the higher the power, the closer they are.” Any me[sss}ing (“for any string, s, sss is equivalent to nothing”) about with the officially-sanctioned “concept of 'closeness'” has always been interpreted as the most diabolical of heresies (sss modally-cum-polyphonically-cum-quantum-relativity-wise superposed to that evil mephistophelian tritone, diatonic-triadic superposition being a particularly dire, sinful type of closeness), there being, according to Canon, necessarily His Intermediary and His Ghost, i.e., three order classes, not equivalence classes, denoted and, hence, held separate. Hopefully, Harari's forthcoming book will sketch out a viable path through the information overload dataism has created.

My guess is that some figure on the order of 39-percent of human “cognition” transpires as split between the subliminal and the personal unconscious; 60-percent, vis-à-vis the collective unconscious (CU). As to the conscious 1-percent, perhaps 10-percent of that is authentically volitional, i.e., not easily accounted for by the Pavlovian mechanisms described by the Behaviorists and relegated to the “moving parts of centers” by G. I. Gurdjieff. If these guesses are in the realm of reality, then the binary-ego's arrogation of creativity is grandiloquently mistaken, the CU's proprietary rights to copyright and patent far exceeding those presently accorded the person, individual and corporation, by ₁T₂-only lawfare. Moreover, though AI (including that generated by 2-state “quantum” computing) may soon meshwork-cum-cloud simulate with VRed simulacra some ConveDDed (conversion-disorder displaced) aspects of the CU, authentic CPU-mediated techno-replication thereof is highly unlikely, if the CU does not subscribe to the binary-logic of selfsame numbers “calculable iff recursive”. The whinnying binary-mind, in its peachy-keen but by no means fuzzy base-normotic state taxonomic by analogy to truth-tabling ratio[sin}ation, classifies, profiles, pigeonholes, names its inner and outer objects, particularly those ₁T₂ly understood to be of the natural surround, as mechanism of ₁T₂-only-existential confirmation in face of the chaos imputed to (largely unacknowledged m-valued and _µT_m-processing) holographic-principled, pagan-animistic-inspirited, yet AgentOrangeable and RomePlowable, identity-transparent nature, taking solace and comfort in Her supposed stability, equilibrium, and continuity, a continuity constructed by that binary-mind over its memetime line -- namelessness connoting non-existence to binary-minds, in the same fashion that non-bombability evokes fear and loathing of quantum non-simple identity. Those exhibiting that which is functionally equivalent to introspective nincompoopery, yet in full possession of operational-intelligence-only (not equivalent to actionable intel), even if Ph.D.ed, predominate at, likely, a hundred-thousand-to-one, maybe even as much as a million-to-one, thus insuring that… Despite the violence occasioning doggy-marking behaviors (think of: Thongchai Winichakul's Siam Mapped, recently summarized by Cindy A. Nguyen, and The Lost City of Z) establishing binary-logical bound-boundaries, and the largely disingenuous encomiums to embrace-of-the-wild side (unfortunately for human survival rate at coming cuspover, those least interested in notions of post-Newtonian institutionalization are those still intent on proving that they, too, can Westernize, and do it even better than did the West), even the most cursory exposure to quantum-relativity physics reveals that the “territorial imperative” is an aberration of nature unrooted to any natural fundament -- unless, of course, there is a “classical limit”. I saw this quite quickly, if only vaguely, as a high school student (who had been severely disciplined for walking out of 7th-grade Civics class in disgust) simultaneously taking PSSC physics and honors Econ. It's not necessary to understand Abelian trans-al-jabr, Cantorian transfinites, the Axiom of Choice, m-valued Lukasiewicz logics, m-valued Schrödinger wave-function, non-locality, quantum non-simple identity, the holographic principle, homotopy theory of boundary-without-boundary, so on, to realize that “property is theft” more expresses so-called Natural Law than do the notions “natural right and use” and “natural right and growth” tacitly informing the Turner Thesis concerning Manifest Destiny and even the sense of a New Frontier to be secured by the defective, uh, defensive, err, “defensive” actions of General West-more-land. It's very easy to see why there has to be, just has to be, dear God, a “classical limit”, for, if there weren't, oh Lord, what would become of us? OMG! life without bound-boundaries to our egospheres. The horror, the horror (good offices of Matteo Morganti) of relinquishing numerical selfsameness, ₁T₂-only logic alone, the Born Rule, objectivity of memetime cum ponderable space and, hence, thermodynamic separability at _µT_m-relative-state, which is not Everettian ₁T₂-relative-state, linearity of the canonical Schrödinger equation, single-valued universal physical constants, and so on into pregeometry and pre-pregeometery. Is the question as to existence of quantum-animistic-pagan _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency actually a question to be framed ₁T₂ly-only relative to individuality/non-individuality alone, and only on the level of spacetime ponderability? With 65 years of experience, I'm well accustomed to practice of the autosensory observation (think, for instance, of the fractal visual phenomena associated with autogenic brain discharge activity) which clearly establishes self-boundaries-without-boundary, having first stepped onto the autosensory path at beginning of judo-jujitsu lessons, Ashiya Air Force Base, Japan, circa 1953-6, aged 8-11, kyu orange belt only, a pretty darned difficult jujitsu grade to make in those days: what I continued with was self-observation, the martial stuff falling by the wayside and never again picked up, even in SFTG. The “classical limit”: a CrowdStrike, uh, uh, a strike against the _µT_m-smarts of the “mob”, aye, that's its unmolested collective unconscious knowing, if ever such a strike there was. De jure ₁T₂-only in-or-out []-bound boundaries -- such bound-boundaries themselves extending 200 miles landward cum seaward -- nixing rule of ₁T₂-only lawfare, not to mention _µT_m-lawfair, within the territory and pelagic expanse falling within such bound-boundaries themselves? Invasions of ₁T₂-only privacy and confiscatory violations of ₁T₂-only ownership are doubly crimes against _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ nature when perpetrated by ₁T₂-only corporate persons and ₁T₂-only forms of governance -- if it be considered that applicability of principles of quantum-relativity physics extends into the mid-levels of nature by the permission grant of m-valued universal physical constants Lukasiewiczian processed without regard to the notion truth-value. That's why, for instance, it's emotively unacceptable to TPTB for quantum-relativistic treatments of, say, atmospheric dynamics and climate-shift cuspovers, or the radiation-exchange processes conducted, heh-heh-heh, by in vivo DNA molecules, to be allowed acknowledgement by corporate persons and Cartesian-Newtonian-enframed, uh, enflamed, governments, or the scientists that they ₁T₂-only own. Hence, _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ “natural laws” that violate the notion of a “classical limit” are ₁T₂ly criminal, perhaps ₁T₂-criminally _µT_m-insane, according to the laws of ₁T₂-only lawfare. Therefore, real knowledge -- of what, by principles of non-dissimulated quantum-relativity physics, is the actual condition of Earth's atmosphere and the prevailing states of biospheric genomes and their collective-cooperative qua quantum-composite response (good offices of Albert Roy Davis and Walter C. Rawls, Jr.) to iatrogenic genetic man[i}PU|lations and anthropogenic alterations of Earth's EM norms -- is, effectively, against the laws-of-lands around the planet. The probable survival-rate consequences at coming cuspover of this juridical epistemic constrictor have yet to be diagnosed and pathogenically assessed. Aye, those with undo vested interest, what, establishing, as they do, don't they, planetary illfare -- no non-doing for them -- by investiture of the soporific heat of unsustainable exponential growth (good offices of Chris Martenson) -- the involved dissemblings making a mockery of the theoretical “principles” expectorated in echolalia by econometricians, optimum-currency-area advocates, ₁T₂-only-monetary-theory expostulators, F-R banksters, C-B fraudsters, megacorp boarders, and their [psycho}phants. Hain't, he is, “one of us”, is he; aye, he's not, he's nary, he's ne'er. Yep, bonny blue, the sky hain't: no, not him, that sky -- no how. Nope, not him. The blights brought on by those cocksure blighters will us yet ruin! Placatory replies to nature's protests are not to be found in their song-and-dance repertoire. Glib imp[u}dense. Not a jot of concern projected beyond their firms. Such insufferable sing-song rabbiting on! though. Roof-brain chatter clattering ₁T₂-only consensus reality into existence, its Lebenswelt readable on the Big Board nannying Rotten Rows. Trounce-trounce-trounce. More's the fool amongst them they cast[i}gate. Out, out! dark spot. No dour joy-killing bears, them -- what: Royce Rolling -- thrum, thrum -- silver ghosts through their quant getups, gold gleams glinting all eyes. Beggaring the natural surround, funnily balking at putting it to rights-- umm, back to rights, they are, aren't they. Worrying away elementary particles of hearasay, well, that ain't necessarily heresy, old geese, parapolitically explains the inveigling jecky-dan-cho to the hear-something-say-something neighborhood-watch association. A stiff-lower-lip intelligencer's consolation of bad faith: scatting BABBA-labba-labba-LABBA-doonk, as posted to My Weakly Banter. Received a Kite Guard Sauce of the Shower, err, Bath, what, in honor of services rendered! A fug of inconscientes collectif fastidiousness dissipating, so it is hoped, the frigid fog of fury and rage: for one, by globally instituting mass-targeting discreditation operations with antisocial discredit systems (“social credit systems” [see: “Big data meets Big Brother as China moves to rate its citizens”, Rachel Botsman, Wired, 21 October 2017] under the blackpsyche principle stated as “Call the thing by the name of its opposite!”, e.g., clearly, GMOs are 100-percent natural, as we can easily ascertain by reading labels), an explicit ConveDDing of the suppressed _µT_m-LETS systems needed to intelligently address the burgeoning crisis ever increasingly planetarized. “Who should own the data?” -- what data? nature's data? Lebenswelt's data? -- is just an update (re: massive infusion of _µT_m-quantum-based technologies into a ₁T₂-only private and public institutional base) on the 19th-century “Who should own the means of production?” question raised at the non-orientable, Möbius-strip, political-economy twistover where anarcho-syndicalism is indistinguishable from anarcho-capitalism. For relevant discussion, see John Michael Greer's “Systems That Suck Less”, Ecosophia, 27 December 2017. I certainly have nothing against n-type syndicalism or, for that matter, m-level marketing, but, IMHO, wide-area restructuring in their directions would be woefully inadequate to prevailing circumstances of the accelerating n-dimensional global crisis absent implementation of variously-backed, m-valued, _µT_m-processed LETS-nesting-foams defined over fractal e-boundaries, Musculpted e-commons computer-gaming of currency-unit-value stacks, planetary quantum-composite unit-of-account chronotopological mappings of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth (think of 3-fold operator-time-orchestrated demergence over pre-pregeometry, pregeometry, and geometrodynamics of spacetime relative to, for instance, à la Winichakul, Trai Phum cosmology: good offices of A. Ganwiboon). Imagine pre-pregeometry, not relative to the bound-boundaried egosphere, but to the 60-percent-of-“cognition” CU, Möbius-transformable (good offices of Rob Siliciano, “Constructing Möbius Transformations with Spheres”, RHIT Undergrad Math Journal, 13:2, Fall 2012; think of this paper and the referred to Douglas Arnold and Jonathan Rogness VDO as techno-exteriorization of the visual aspect of inner-Musculpt on the-way-to-find-out consensuation of Musculpt as maths notation of _µT_m-ratiocination, moving to a higher dimension being one of some [?], motion being another, nonlinear-perspective ways to represent semantic contents of higher-order-logical-value propositions) supRAegoRiemannSphere, boundaries of each of the tiles of the tiling pattern covering the sphere-cum-hypersphere being unbound, every tile of which is a neighborhood of a p-adic number embodying a ₁T₂-only “concept of 'closeness'” finite-field (subsets, sets, supersets of tiles understood a nested-grid bridgework of multi-sheet Riemann surfaces of the involved m-valued functions) approaching Unconscious-as-Infinite-Sets _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency, those collections of p-adic numbers being factorizable from Alexander.Karpenko functors over the primes used to Gödel-number Gödel numbers of the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ propositions covering the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space qua T_zog-chen AllBase, to which the Schrödinger-memetime-independent wave-equation refers.

All those primordial-traditionalists who hated the modern world, and hated-hate most especially people who loved the modern world, the postmodern world, and now profess love of the prospective transhuman, the posthuman, the world of inorganic lifeforms, might consider that the collective-projective identification and associated techno-ConveDDs (conversion-disorder displacements) driving modernism, postmodernism, and the other “isms” extending the involved trajectory, hadhave their origin in the prescriptive enculturation-socialization orchestrating glutamatergic anchoring of cognizance exclusively to processing of ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains, the neuropsychiatric concomitant to the neuronal prunings and network wipeouts being recursively generated in a fashion ana[lag}ous to the process by which the, say, Mandelbrot set is recursively generated: consciousness of THE _µT_m-quantum-brain's processing regressively drowned in, uh, uh, downed to (think of all those infinity of infinities of selfsame single-valued-numerical points-of-argument at radii beyond the function's “beyond”, all of which are “thrown out” for not [re}cursing sufficiently locally), cognition of ₁T₂-only-definable Rorschach blot-patterns circumscribed within the fractal boundary of the Mandelbrot set. Tethered they are, those with, I'd wager, a rage to live in object-fetishized knicker tangles, what! My I/i^m is a ₁T₂ly-strange loop when self-reflexively apperceived without benefit of self-referential _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-value-order-type logics understood independent of the notion truth-value. Despite Douglas Hofstadter's acolytes being focused upon emergence (hence predisposed to love the notion “inorganic lifeforms”?) to the neglect of demergence, there exists the [orient}ation which holds that these two are Schrödinger-memetime-independently “covariate”, and, from the fullest-valued-logic take, essentially, mutually cancel each other, precedence relations -- logical, ontological, temporal -- being glutamatergically-anchored illusions. Got themselves up into spins, have they? O aye, that lot, that they have, old sod. No falling short of exasperations for those suchnesses in their tatty tangles, their twists-and-pastes. Speaking here of inner Musculpt and its techno-exteriorizations relative to symbolic interaction and tropological metareference, Musculpt, even in its visual aspect alone, by no stretch of the imagination, heh-heh-heh, being strictly reducible (the doctrine of “sight makes right” is too great a self-limitation of the whole to have become a law of nature, even if neoDarwinian evolution had unfolded, by accumulation of myriad non-adaptive micro-mutations, as the memetime line was played out) to animated geometric projections and topotransforms per se, in and of themselves. Same, certainly, for Musculpt-as-maths-notation adapted for user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS nesting foams: he's dashed and flummoxed is the binancial bizard ₁T₂-only synoptic-single-scale cryptomonocurrencying the planet whilst staring at the limited natural resource base. If a finite natural resource base, ₁T₂-fractally processed, has an infinite boundary, how many time-shapes does that resource base have _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-fractally processed under dictates of the holographic principle? Think metaphorically of the Rorschach blot-patterns, circumscribed within the fractal boundary of the Mendelbrot set, holographic-principle-relative to that boundary. Have we here the so-called “network error” where the streaming holographic animation abruptly stops? Likely so, if the logic involved in accessing (and the logical-value order-types of the monies involved in schemes pricing) the resource base is restricted to that ₁T₂-only. How many states of closeness, uh, uh, of consciousness universal, are there collectively unconscious? As many as there are p-adic numbers? More? Uh, _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ly-processed Cantorian cardinalities more? Not consciousness-force (tapasa qua “heat”) or consciousness-energy (chi, ki): these pedantic understandings are too, too Western-qua-modern pre-newest-NewPhysics bound -- and not experientially informed. Aye, interpretations made by those reliant exclusively upon syllogistic ₁T₂-only re[a}son. As if the metamodulus of absolute value were single-valued under all those logical-value order-types supraordinate to that ₁T₂! Heh-heh-heh. Is every p of the field Q_p of p-adic numbers absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct from every other such p under all logical-value order-types supraordinate to that ₁T₂? Not, according to my lights, by consideration given to the proposition that _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency Cabalistically-neoPlatonically appertains even to the very notion of number, thus challenging the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. Oh, that cursed, uh, recursed, oops, recursive son, what. Can't help those who take figures of speech literally, particularly so when such pandemic doings reveal memetime-bound intra-familial transference-capture dynamics preventative of Schrödinger-memetime-independent age-indifferent relatedness. Rather -- better said than with force-energy similes :-) -- like the quantal spectrum of discrete states being-there here, or, more accurately, those states of being-therehere, only in logical-precedence ultimates these ontological thereheres mu-jectively (not by bijection alone) spontaneously fusing spectrum into manifold continuum. “Around” is a rather Crumbie sort of infinity, don't y'think? Dellish deep be those entangled briar states demerging pre-pregeometry to pregeometry, laddy, leafy tessellations (near as I can see-tell, even the sedenion tesseract does not take you passed passive-referential l onto-over-into active-l,m,n-operator-time's 3-fold orders of temporal CURL) so heavily hung that the bough be broken, green-stick fractured in m-places, gimpy as cognitive cartography in regressions sung out quirky by tintinnabulating [in}SECT bellburrrs stuttering thistlelines of the aural aspect of the Musculpturally-enacted tesseract Regge-latticing the relatively unsung Entr'acte Zwischenspieling _µT_m-pregeometry with ₁T₂-geometrodynamics of ponderablespaced-cum-memetimed matterenergy configurations concretized qua demerged to persons, places, and things. In the universal Teichmuller space, T(1) (good offices of Leon A. Takhtajan and Lee-Peng Teo, “Weil-Petersson Metric of the Universal Teichmuller Space”, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 183:861, September 2006) related to the T(S)s (“the universal covering orbifold of the Riemann moduli space”) covering part of (Charles Musès' hypernumbers, possibly with improvements, being required for 2nd- and 3rd-order temporal CURL) the (obviously Schrödinger-memetime-independent) MVRS (Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian m-logically-valued reference space qua manifold, M to the m to the m…), is each member of the set of all my other-I-ams, including this-myself, a homeomorphic incarnate of each of the out-there object-other eachothers? “Equals”, “equivalent to”, “isomorphic”, “congruent”, “conformal”, “ambient-isotopic” mean “identity-transparent”? And are all these homeomorphs diffeomorphic with each and every of all object-others not members of the class of all my-other-I-ams including this-myself? Probably not that simple, unless all I-ams are pairwise twins identity-transparent to nonself object-other-pairwise-twins, as the “diffeomorphisms”, under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+, couldn't possibly be, could they, bijective, for surely they would have to be mu-jective if, at least, _muT_mly processed. My I/i^ms have for quite some memetime (see our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 1, p. 599) been trying to active-imagination-project themselves into T(1) extended to hypernumber spaces under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics, but for easy to see reasons have not made much progress with that.

Convinced, I continue to be, that no scripted notation, no matrices, no two-dimensional graphic notation can facilitate thinking in _µT_m-logics, as distinct from ₁T₂-thinking about what _µT_m-logical cogitation must be like. Tenacious with the woolgathering, what! Hapless hoity-toity: he's all top hat; she, Siamese meow of the cat -- lady with Manx syndrome, no fat tail to swish, no Schrödinger [duo}plicity. One-to-many and many-to-one. Whew, sweat off the brow. What a step-up! But how about 3,8,27,32,96,107…-to-many and many-to-3,8,27,32,96,107…, as would be processed by ₃T₁₀₇, ₈T₉₆, ₂₇T₂₇, ₈T₈, ₃T₃, for a few instances? Lest they [bet}ray the warder, Id[i}aughts _xT_orsizing the Ax[i}OM of Choice such that it becomes antiautomorphic! Well, 'e is not 'is ol' 'elf, is Ax[i}OM, subject by choice, as 'e 'as been, to act[u}al ID[i}ought coercion. Thus has 3rd-order (which is logically and ontologically first) operator-time been ruled out by neglect of the orientfolding which yields unoriented strings with no arrowheads, worldsheets being ₁T₂-takes (i.e., all conformal background fields encoded on the sheets being binary-logic processed) on logical-value order-type sheets, the ₁T₂-order-type-actor-alone being the act[u}al worldsheet parity operator upon the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbert manifold (good offices of Lennart Meier, Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas, 2014) skew-parallelizable (the Hilbert bundle [good offices of George A. Elliott and Katsunori Kawamura, “The Hilbert Bundle Characterization of Hilbert C*-Modules”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 360:9, September 2008] -- with base space a Grassmannian [see: “Other Interpretations of Grassmannians”, p. 154, in “How To Understand Grassmannians?”, Dorde Baralic, The Teaching of Mathematics, XIV:2, 2011], where idempotency of the operator for orthogonal projection is violated -- being tantamount to a J.G.Bennettian “pencil of skew-parallels” [the Clifford parallels of the Hoft fibration under operations of higher-valued logics?] obtained by temporal CURLing the Clifford-module spinor-bundle) under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-valued logics. Third-order operator-time, in our view, has much to do with the soliton-like aspects (see, for considerable analogical edification concerning this thesis: “Topological solitons in magnetohydrodynamics”, A. M. Kamchatnov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., i.e., Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 82, January 1982) of tornadogenesis and DNA helix-coil transition. I never saw this Kamchatnov paper before today, 10 March 2018, and I am struck strongly by how similar its concepts in exposition are to those independently developed by D. A. Paine -- laminated LSTDs re: stratified-configuration S³s mapped onto stratified-configuration S²s re: theta-e surfaces; double-helical air-parcel feeder-bands; twisting numbers; atmospheric analogue to Maxwell's equations; acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes rippling tornadic walls re: “bounding a plait of closed lines of force”; donuts inside of donuts; point-at-infinity as touch-down cum complex-angular-momentum-injection point; so on -- during the early-to-mid-1970s, and some of which are explicated in our papers of 1977 and 1978 entitled "Toward a General Theory of Process" and “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”. We understood then, during the late-'70s, that real progress at overcoming the constrictor which is the “classical limit” is largely dependent upon development of Musculpt as mathematical notation.

Though -- because, even -- nonorientability is of the essence of the case, time being more imaginary than Hawking would imagine, indeed, actively hyperimaginary, one cannot actively outrun what has passed, passage being deep-structure demergent as the logic-pregeometry “fabric” of mu-itic-mazic “gates” underlying geometrodynamics of spacetime, for, like the tortoise, the past will still be there out in front at the ₁T₂-only-logically-framed Möbius-Klein…n cuspover to catch you out, or in, or nth such, whatever the _µT_mly-aperspectival “direction” may be in any given particular case. Then there is the perspective of the prevailing censorial institutional base, which is oh-so-very wow! Ripping! Just fabulous! Such insightful calls. Yep, those guys have really got it. Scowling raised to an art form -- and posted to the forum: “Alarmists Resurrect Theory That Global Warming Is Making Winters Colder”, Michael Bastasch, The Daily Caller, 14 March 2018; and “Climate activists predict both outcomes -- more snow, less snow -- so they are never wrong”, Marc Morano, Climate Depot, 14 March 2018. March 14, O frajous day! they giggle. Mustn't forget the Aristotelian-Baconian-Boolean binary-logic Law of Non-Contradiction, eh what. Politico-economic and social-control impetus to such calls being at least tertiary, maybe even more removed than that. Profoundly spooked -- and hoicking up affect-charge, that hoicking reflected in the hiking of ₁T₂-egoic gruffness, their self-actuated remit being to stand and deliver defense (of the prevailing institutional base cum…) against any notion, construable even, Rorschached as a severe dissing of the sort of thought processes they habitually engage in, this dissing eliciting more deeply, perhaps in some instances altogether subliminally, the niggling presentiment of an existential denial of the particular type of psychological self-definition they choose to be identified with, all of this peculiar behavior act[u}al|ly driven by ConveDDing (conversion-disorder displacing) of the actual hu-hu-hu-man-species heteropoietic existential threat which the anthropogenic climate-shift dynamic (alteration of the frequency-response characteristics of Earth's atmosphere) actually is. But the other side -- the alarmist-activists cum the statistical correlationists -- is equally spooked by the prospect that their “classical-limit”-limited atmospheric science cannot actually explain why what is happening is happening. Douglas A. Paine privately complained that, with each new group of undergrads entering Cornell's atmospheric science program, he could teach less and less of what he actually believed to be the nature of atmospheric processes. Whenever he introduced any concept that, however indirectly, challenged validity-utility of the “classical limit” notion, the affective temperature of the classroom rose, it was sensible heat, reaching a critical state if the exposition was not cut short. Those most challenged, Paine maintained, where the students simultaneously taking courses from Carl Sagan. The protests were framed as: I can't understand-- this or that. The real reason for the back-reactions, Paine concluded, after watching this semester after semester, was: I will not tolerate the psychological, sexual, social, political, economic implications of this idea, that idea, those ideas. Therefore, I will do statistical studies and look for ₁T₂-only-classical cause-effect explanations, and, if I can't find them, resort to applications of ₁T₂-only-chaos theory to atmospheric dynamics. Is that dyadic “love” which romantically, ₁T₂-only two against the world, blanks out the environmental surround, other others and objects and places, love, or is it binary projective-identification in transference -- _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency always and all ways involving generative-empathic animistic-pagan-heretical participation mystique in collective and cooperative critical-state phenomena via Cantorian part-is-whole holographic principle? Undissimulated quantum mechanics is a hard sell to modernist and postmodernist young people, even those steeped in mythanalytic Denis de Rougemont's Love in the Western World. Pretty obvious, what, why Paine would not mention Lukasiewicz logics in the classroom, or refer to them in his papers. “The reviewers can't even assimilate the little bits of relativity and quantum physics incorporated into the model. How do you think they would react to explicit mention of m-valued logics challenging the probability interpretation of Schrödinger's wave-function in the atmospheric sciences?” We are talking mid-1970s here, twenty-five years after, Paine felt, the ongoing climate-shift dynamic had become irreversible, amelioration of severity being the only real option left. In the event of having written such a paper late in the decade, the reviewer never got past the title to the paper! What becomes of the simplistic notion “global warming” if temperature, for instance, is m-valued at a given instant (not simply varying in value over time) under _µT_m logics, not that ₁T₂-only, like the state-function of the Schrödinger wave equation should be understood? What is “temperature” as regards, say, “electron temperature enhancement”? Certainly not the classical notion: a measure of molecular motion. Quoting our paper entitled “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, circa September of 1978: “The macroquantum description of a superconductant domain [think: a union of open intervals] treats TEMPERATURE AS A MAP OF DIFFERENTIAL SPIN whose temporal configuration [think: chronotopology] is precisely described”. Are we talking here infinitely differentiable? Multivariate differentiability classes of functionals with component functions, f₁,…,f_m? Conceptually going from simply-measurable thermometer temperature to mean potential temperature to the, again quoting our 1978 paper, “critical temperature designated by the domain's mean equivalent potential temperature (theta-e)”, that is, in other words, mapping the measurable temperature field to theta-e-surface configurations, is that to speak of, given that there are many levels involved, a value per function of each functional for each level of each of the involved functors, harmonic morphisms, more generally of critical-point harmonic maps? These are notions hard to discount, given that the operator-time-incorporating (consider that Penrose twistors, which we believe involved in quantization of temporal CURL, can be used to explicitly construct a harmonic map, the nilpotency employed by J. G. Bennett to construct “pencils of skew-parallels” being somehow involved: I've a long way yet to go if I am to significantly penetrate papers such as this, good offices of Martin Svensson and John C. Wood, Harmonic Map Conference, 16 May 2017) canonical equation of our model (functionally equivalent to Schrödinger's wave equation) is that of a harmonic oscillator! And, if so, uh, if on the road to reality, then it is equally hard to discount the notion that Earth's atmosphere is a _µT_m-logical information processor without “classical limit”. These are so spookily disruptive -- psychologically, sexually, socially, politically, economically -- a set of notions that they must, just must, be ConveDDed.

Hmmm. My MOS instruction received at SFTG was not that required to become a radioman, but one of my best friends went through the commo course and, thereby, I learned some aspects of the theory of frequency analysis. Informal cross-training. I later assimilated some theories of mass “communications” whilst assigned to PsyOps Group, the JFKSWCS. Even more was absorbed concerning information man[age}ment at SRA-MACVJ2, where my assigned SAoR (strategic area of responsibility) was SaigonCholonBienHoa. StratInFluOps in service to the billionerr-0.00003-percent: ArmStronging qua debauching ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular wetware by blackpsyche delivery of prescriptively-orchestrated glutamatergic etching at neuronal plasticity and associated StrongArmed cum knuckle-dragged quantum quenching (soon to be upgraded with brain chips, computer-brain interfaces, so on). So, in answer to questions about initialization of intraneuronal-cum-intraperineural-DNA helix-coil transition and damping-down which might correlate to quantum quenching across cellular-plasmahaut bi-layers… Aye, undoubtedly. There are lots and lots of questions, a big whole-lot, regarding all of this “stuff” which I couldn't possibly begin to answer. My concern is that the fundamentals in the body of this work are not altogether forgotten. Regards meteorology, there are probably half a dozen or more people still around who could detail the exact criteria (generally speaking: energy-momentum imbalance at the large scale in the spectrum of atmospheric wave motions) employed to initialize the Paine-Kaplan nested-grid (think: multiple bi-layers, each with its own accelerative limit) computer model of the cascade process leading to tornadogenesis. I never had occasion to learn those details, and many others, as my tasking remit was restricted to library research with regard to possible extra-systemic connections to the general properties of the model -- a task I did pretty much 40 hours a week in the period 1975-'80. Pro bono. Aged 30-35. A long memetime ago. To my understanding, the macroscale imbalance was believed to be primarily “spin-off” of Earth frequency-response characteristics (which can be modified by anthropogenic-iatrogenic interventions) relative to solar-terrestrial interactions (e.g., solar-wind inputted complex and hypercomplex angular momentum, mathematically handled as 3-fold temporal CURL, the domain-structure manifestation of quantal operator-time) understood as varying greatly over small memetemporal windows, not only in terms of solar cycles and supercycles. And that the initiator of the cascade process goes back farther, to the center of our galaxy, and even intergalactic. There have been made some relatively recent discoveries relevant to this thesis, a good summary having been provided in Mae-Wan Ho's “Earth's Magnetized Plasma Shield & Earth-Sun Connection”, Science in Society, 23 September 2015. There were discussions at Cornell during the late-'70s with Douglas A. Paine of the tornado being a plasma bottle cum what is now called a plasma window with respect to vertically-emitted acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes -- if not electron-beaming (by analogy to that sort of welder). And there were discussions with Paine of the DNA molecule self-protecting from ambient radiation intrusions, not only with the extremely narrow frequency-response window dictated by the superconductant pi-electron-gas core-cloud, but with plasma shield off during critical-temperature helix-coil transition and on during reference-temperature resting state (which may have some analogical-model-type comparison-validity to behavior of Earth plasma shield, as described by Lisa Grossman in “Earth raises a plasma shield to battle solar storms”, New Scientist, 6 March 2014). Such comparisons are not at all bizarre, given that the Paine-Kaplan model of tornadogenesis can be understood as involving a microphysical description of (air parcel) gyrokinetics in a fluid model, and that the same (with respect to pi-electrons) can be said of the Paine-Pensinger model of radiation exchange at DNA helix-coil transition.

The more I reread Stephen Blaha's monograph, The Metatheory of Physics Theories, and the Theory of Everything as a Quantum Computer Language (Pingree-Hill, 2005), the more I understand I could not more fundamentally disagree with him whilst I could not more superficially agree with him. He gives objectivity to passive, referential linear-time; I say that that sort of time is glutamatergically-anchored memetime. He credits time-bound emergence as expressed via a recursive, generative, “Chomsky-like”, elementary-particle grammar; I credit Schrödinger-memetime-independent demergence via 3-fold topologically-active hypercomplex and complex Pauli-Paine operator-time. Blaha, thus, models the unspeakable in quantum mechanics on properties of speakable languages; I, thus, model the unspeakable in quantum mechanics on properties of unspeakable inner Musculpt understood maths notation. He carries ₁T₂-only logic into quantum theory by embrace of the Born Rule and the two-state qu-bit “within the framework of a [deified] polycephalic (multi-tape) Quantum Computer formalism”; I would carry _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m logics, understood independent of the notion truth-value, into quantum theory by rejection of the Born Rule and embrace of the m-state mu-it within the framework established by _µT_m-relative-state qua Buddhological identity-transparency. He Gödel numbers elementary-particle Lagrangians in context of recursive-generative production rules; I would Gödel-number Gödel numbers of the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-valued pre-pregeometry and pregeometry propositions by which 3-fold Pauli-Paine operator-time demerges geometrodynamics from a Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, qua T_zog-chen AllBase. Embracing ₁T₂-only logic, Blaha credits the notion “final theory of everything”; embracing _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m logics, I discredit that notion on basis of the observation that the, yet to be identified and formalized, myriad,myriad,myriad,…,m number-types, associated with these logical-value order-types, altogether preclude the possibility of realizing such a notion. Yet, the general thrust of Blaha's basic approach is similar to the approach I have had since the mid-1970s upon first encounters with Paine-Kaplan complex-angular-momentum cascade theory and Lukasiewicz-Post m-valued logics. Moreover, it seems to my multi-tape m-me(s), that many specifics of Blaha's approach could be the ₁T₂-only-glutamate-etched-logical-value-order-type-nested “Aspects” of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ “framework determining conditions”.

Earth economy -- with regard to the post-industrial-revolution corpora of techno-determined Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” -- has overlong been in the annuitization phase, such that payout-default risk is rising exponentially to those realms where critical-state behaviors (e.g., Prigoginian, far-from-equilibrium, phase-transition snapovers) become characteristic -- resource warfare being the currently prevailing surface-structure cloak for the collective unconscious deep-structure origins of conflict within a severely-brain-impaired species. Delicately wending our tempered ways through the ambient hubris, so we have always [adam}ant|ly supposed -- by no means, including with acerbity, mending those habituated knee-jerks. Bustling amongst the insouciant bluster and giddy fluster: coveted, yes; crouched, never. Name the shame, if only wryly as mere attempt at redirection of the animus (in the common sense cum, rather tartly, I must acknowledge, with regard to, say, Tmay, in the Jungian sense). O, the ignominy of self-assuagement with ignorable conceptual hominy -- uh, that is, to put it bluntly, self-ass{u]age|men)^t within the army of smarmies! Doubt that? Follow laneways, attend to interfaces, look for hidden doorways, map mass migration patterns, do traffic analysis. The Twitter-twatter King believes (see: “Twitter CEO Says Bitcoin Will Become World's 'Single Currency' Within A Decade”, Molly Jane Zuckerman, Cointelegraph, 21 March 2018), and is well-placed to make an informed judgment, that ₁T₂-only, synoptic-monoscale cryptocurrency will soon become the one-and-only WeAreTheWorld (the coercive “we” wielded as electron-beam welder by the billionerr-0.00003-percent, in collusion with the millionaire set, to include the 700,000 new millionaires the U.S. econodyscrasia RobinHood-retrograde-inversion spawned in 2017) currency of the NWO's aspired-to, top-down-dictated, Cartesian-Newtonian, Westphalian, Congress-of-Vienna PUF, Planetary Union Federation, implemented by apps of dissimulated-quantum-based technologies (as if this conceptually-hundreds-of-years-old institutional base could conceivably comport well relative to even dissembled quantum-this-quantum-that! even absent an n-dimensional planetary crisis). If that monetary reset transpires, and such does seem quite likely, the much thereby accelerated subsequent, and consequent, [eco}nomic cuspover surely will be largely induced by payout failure, nature's annuity fund having run out its resource base as accessible via the ₁T₂-only-engineered techno-regime. Interesting to try to guess how much seed finance has already been thrown at this unsavory ₁T₂-only monocurrency option, and to speculate how very much more, looking memetime forward, will be such like so tossed. Also interesting is to speculate as to how and why -- whatever the constellation of inductive factors for any particular given case of econ[oh-oh-oh!}mic travail -- movement toward the correct strategy for address to the global [eco}nomic crisis is elicited by quantal “spontaneous fusion”, e.g., the current case being Venezuela, as described in “'There's No Cash To Spend' -- Elorza Becomes Largest Venezuela City To Launch 'Community Currency'”, ZeroHedge, 21 March 2018 -- only to be subsequently quenched by control-freak normotics-in-service-to-mass-ConveDDing, conversion-disorder displacing. What asset classes, locally mappable, likely will still be standing tall post-planetary-cuspover? That is a research project worthy of anyone committed to building a house of cards predisposing to post-cuspover implementation of _µT_m-LETS monetary units (the corpus of which may profitably be regarded “a colloid-rich viscous liquid phase”) variously commodity-backed -- high- or low-tech, as the case permits. Personally, having come of age in a thatched-roof hamlet (the scenery captured on location in the 1955 film, House of Bamboo, most thoroughly, relative to other films, evokes memories of that period in my life), I prefer the low-tech version. Under assumption, that is, of a ten-percent human survival rate. Kakistocracy. Kakistogarchy. Kakistodemia. Kakistogopoly. Kakisto.mil. Kakisto.media. Kakisto.whatever! “Dominance of the dumbest” being the prevailing predominant theme wherever one might look. Identifying infinity (think: _CT_C+, for a particularly terrifying instance) with the “abyss of nothingness”, Hegel lamented, in his Phenomenology of Spirit, the horror, the horror of the death of God. Regardless of what God is reputed to have said in response, Nietzsche later, 1882, wrote “Gott ist tot”, God is dead. That issue is alive today amongst physicists in the universe/multiverse qua one-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-quantum-brainmind/multitape-multimind debates. And now the biologist author of the 1968 big seller, The Population Bomb, Paul Ehrlich, says, essentially, that civilization is almost dead -- as per the Damian Carrington interview, “Paul Ehrlich: 'Collapse of civilization is a near certainty within decades'”, The Guardian, 22 March 2018. I remember reading his book, probably during 1972, and registering his estimate that Earth can comfortably support 1.5 to 2.0 billion people. Some few years later, the Cornell meteorologist, Douglas A. Paine, said to me concerning the climate-shift dynamic: “You know, don't you, that it's already irreversible, and probably has been since the 1950s”. The two of these together, along with a bunch of other related factors, pretty much vectored my subsequent major life decisions. Apparently, a minimum of 150 million (good offices of David Wallace-Wells, “The Paris Accords Are Looking More And More Like Fantasy”, New York Magazine, 25 March 2018) are likely to die from climate-shift-driven air pollution alone. But I've never been much interested in any of the Accords, as I've believed since the late-'70s that altered greenhouse gas ratios are only a small part of the altered frequency-response-window problem. “Collapse of civilization” is a very nice way to put it, a particularly kind kind of black-box term. What do those words mean, really, in details? Already, the index of coercion, day in and day out, moment to moment even, to which the average middle-class first-worlder is subject, largely due to the computer, internet, cell phone, e-finance, surveillance technology -- not to mention what is already in the techno-birth canal -- is worse than what the average middle-class Saigon resident was subject to at height of the Viet Nam war. With the exceptions of those scapegoated, in prisons, in militaries, nowadays in schools, directly targeted by COINOPS, possibly an index of coercion unprecedented in human history. Such coercion as it ramps up and up, predisposes to larger-and-larger-scale instances of mass-hysteria snapping. The French Revolution and the Russian Revolution, where all those associated with the Old Regime were hunted down and killed, are not adequate models with which to facilitate precognition in regards to the presently rapidly approaching conjuncture. Nor is the Nazi holocaust. During WWII, in their occupied territories, the Nazis never had an occupation force to civilian population ratio of better than 1-to-80. This is the figure I remember from my period, circa 1963-5, as an AU-SIS student doing research at SORO, Special Operations Research Office, for, most notably, a long paper on the Strategic Hamlets Program and its precursor, the Briggs Plan implemented during The Emergency in Malaya (as to how residuals of such programs-pogroms persist and persist, even as, for instance, determinants of current housing patterns in KL, see the rather amazing paper by Cheryl Choo entitled “The Briggs Plan and its Causality towards the Disappearing Identity of Kuala Lumpur”, U. of Westminster, 22 January 2015). Personally, for whatever reason, I've never much needed identity assistance, or borrowed identity, so, so far as I remember, I've never once bought a piece of clothing with visible logo -- though, not being an obsessive, I've worn those such pieces gifted to me. With the ever more sophisticated technology of intelsat surveillance, drone and robotic interdiction, 1-to-80 will soon seem archaic, then primordial, as regards the index of impressed coercion. No. Think Rwanda. Better yet, the Cambodian holocaust. If, at cuspover, only the excess five-plus-billion humans, planet Earth, MoSoSo-facilitatedly, thus near simultaneously, snap over into mass hysteria, even these two prefigurations, by comparison, are likely to be viewed as having been only akin to mere child's play. Nonetheless, I spent three years reading into literature of the Cambodian holocaust, whilst living in a small rural Cambodian hamlet, by way of an attempt to get my head around what “collapse of civilization” might actually mean.

Acceding to the point, if only with umbrage attached, that those which had long been insidious, even designated clandestine, were now overt, e.g., discreditation ops, does not, the academic powers-that-be insist, indicate mirroring of hidden-from covert logical-values having suddenly popped up like jumping beans under auspices of Lukasiewicz-Post, or enfolded Calabi-Yau dimensions having become explicate by good offices of Bohm cum string theorists (see, for instance, “Hidden dimensions”, Marianne Freiberger, Plus Magazine, 21 December 2010), let alone does it signify amplification of mass ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, long operative in governance of the social structure of attention cathexes. Oh, no, it's schizophrenic mentation to connect things assiduously -- and by considerable collective disciplinarian expenditure -- disconnected. How brain-impaired can brain-impaired get? Well, in my very inexpert, if not altogether inept, opinion, aside from lobotomy, non-dominant ECT, the lesser iatrogenic interventions, blunt trauma, puncture wounds, infectious disease, genetic disease, EM pollution, mimetic estrogens, blackpsyche interventions, brain chips, prospective kill-switch brain chips, so on, what is currently regarded the normative human state of consciousness is, _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly speaking, the n-1^th-most altered state, the normotic state being the n^th-most altered. If it is internally consistent, it is wrongly form[u}late|d: from “perspectives” apropos _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logical-value order-types supraordinate to that ₁T₂-only, from, that is -- speaking ₁T₂ly here, to neglect of, particularly the third, but also all of the other supraordinate terms -- the logic step-function that pushes Gödel undecidability logic-state by logic-state toward _CT_C+ and the coacervate logic attractor that pulls Gödel undecidability logic-state by logic-state toward _CT_C+. This logic function/attractor altogether relegates the notion truth-value to that logic-state ₁T₂-only. Contrary to consensus (see: “On the Question of Absolute Undecidability”, Peter Koellner, Harvard, June 2009), I believe that only under _CT_C+ (which is the most-prior, in terms of logical-unto-ontological-unto-existential precedence-relations) is completeness completely completed-as-T_zog-chen-AllBase, hence decidable, i.e., there is there-and-only-there absolutely no relative undecidability, even though, surely, gravitating upon the politics of that vacuum-space, that-art-thou, Nirvanic, zero-Ricci-curvature, massless experience involves employments of no-decision sciences, but this observation is moot in that _CT_C+ permits no logic gates or wave-effect analogs thereof, discretes being-there, there under, being altogether (all to gather) ₁T₂ly-indefinable because, contrary to Kurt Gödel's opinion (see his November 1947 paper entitled “What is Cantor's Continuum Problem?”, The American Mathematical Monthly, 54:9), the points on the real-number line in Euclidian space are not simply-identifiable, given that each integer numbering each such point is m-valued under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics, just as the Cabalistic neoPlatonists have always maintained (this is no reference to second-order arithmetic, where each element can be treated as a set, indeed, even as an infinite set). Counting is one form of countenancing, aye, when single-values are [man}dated by logic. Though somewhat interested, I find myself comparatively more unintrigued, indeed, superlatively most unintrigued, by arguments ₁T₂-rule-abiding concerning somewhats, and especially whatnots, not ₁T₂-definable, e.g., any [any}thing qua [no}thing under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+. Stand in the door! Arrow up, you real men, you. The additional-₁T₂-axioms-of-counter-laxity program, relative to ₁T₂-paradox-preventing ZFC, is simply another epicycle of the pagan-animism-participation-mystique-phobic avoidance syndrome, when actually the question is as to how many “angels” can be ensheaved (“If deeds be not ensheaved and garnered in the heart/ there is inanition”, Ezra Pound, The Pisan Cantos, Canto LXXXIII, lines 101-2, 1948) upon the point of a pin. The new-axioms-pogromatic approach to a final solution in logic, if not a logic GUT, was parodied in our 1994 novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, p. 668. O aye, new axioms of counter-laxity such that, for instance, there can be no [con}fusion between it, itself, the self of that itself, the self of that self, and so on into infinite regress: a glutamatergic ConveDD of the ketaminergic “Inner Counter-Work” in theory and practice of detachment according to Zen. Prove it? Demonstrate it? Construct it? Under the appropriate order of logical-value? You mean: relatively prove it, relatively demonstrate it, relatively construct it? What kind of proof, demonstration, construction is that? That is what you call proof, demonstration, construction? What for? The utility functions that may be derived? Perhaps so. Under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics, axiomatics (see: “Does mathematics require axioms?”, Math Stack Exchange), rules of inference, proof theories become tigers-turned-to-ghee-around-the-logic-tree as the logical-value-order-type ladder is climbed, but this is not the case because calculability (see: “Why can't we keep adding axioms forever?”, Math Stack Exchange) is iff ₁T₂ly recursive, for calculability by quantum computer use of m-state mu-its (m-logically-valued vibrators) coded on DNA superconductant pi-electron gas (rather than merely 2-state “flip-flop qu-bits” coded on phosphorus atoms: good offices of Fiona MacDonald and Mike McRae, “Breaking: An Entirely New Type of Quantum Computing Has Been Invented”, Science Alert, 6 September 2017) will not have this iff limitation. Proof utilities, what! But as regards comprehension of, and living in direct ontic awareness of, the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ world… well, hmmm.

Throughout recorded history. And here we go again. Returned from war, we might have done -- but never altogether arrived, never again fully [re}sided. War against each other, war on nature. Ever since the species devolved to employments of ₁T₂-only-logic alone (rotational and syllogistic), there has been a direct line of mounting abuse. And gathering castigation of those states-of-consciousness opposed to that abuse. No pride; no shame; doesn't even know the meaning of the word “jealousy”: such a horrid fellow, what! Another insufferable animist. Ah, yes, nowadays the cogitational blancmange (CB) of prattling senility-in-youth -- as many bloggers and commenters lavishly display with their textural spritzings and jumblings posted to the gorse which www-dot has become. Leading the planetarized race to globally impose CB is China, with its soon to be fully operational “SkyNet” and “Social Credit Score” system (see: “China Deploys 'SkyNet' Facial Recognition, Can Compare Three Billion Faces Per Second”, ZeroHedge, 28 March 2018: however believable-fanciful this comparison rate may be at the present techno-juncture), achievement of fully-operational 2-state qu-bitic computing (that is: 2ⁿ simultaneous virtual-probabilistic states as distinct from the Mⁿ simultaneous actual-relative states which _µT_m-logics indicate vis-à-vis the Lukasiewicz-independent-of-truth-tables interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function) being the prospective clincher as to whose particular take on the synoptic monoculture of coercion will set the species-wide agenda until planetary cuspover is reached (very unlikely that one nation-state, or collection thereof, would EMP another state or collection, as they all agree on the explicitly-shared fundamental objective-goal-interest: use of dissimulated-quantum-based tech to impose the synoptic monoculture of coercion, this agreement having been tacitly adjudicated by their common logical-value-order-type at judgment). Note that, just as did bitic-one-or-zero ₁T₂-only, 2ⁿ = WAR on _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ nature, whilst Mⁿ = animistic-pagan relative-state identity-transparency with nature (as, according to our thesis, is exhibited by “classical-limit”-defying tornadogenesis and the radiation-exchange-with-the-environment process [which conceivably could employ “non-binary fields with small non-binary non-elementary absorbing sets” to blackbody absorb frequency-funnel-fed ambient m-valued information, à la good offices of “Analysis and Enumeration of Absorbing Sets for Non-Binary Graph-Based Codes”, Behzad Amiri and Jorg Kliewer and Lara Dolecek, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62:2, February 2014] involved in DNA helix-coil transition where superconductant-pi-electron-gas-mediated mu-level encoding likely is Calabi-Yau enfolded qua/cum temporal CURLed). Amaerued to, and cosseted by, nature -- yet, still, on we go railing against her, violating her (as essayed by, for instance, Raul Ilargi Meijer, “The Science of a Vanishing Planet”, The Automatic Earth, 26 March 2018). Whatever role the climate-shift dynamic may be playing. The Devil being in the 666-details of ¹²C -- 6 electrons, 6 protons, 6 neutrons -- HeSheIt clearly is anthropogenic, at least as regards the global atmosphere's frequency-response characteristics related to greenhouse gas and isotope ratios. The glutamate-etched principle of thinking in ₁T₂-logic about _µT_m-logics, rather than ketaminergically thinking in _µT_m-logics about _µT_m-logics, extends quite easily to set theoretics, the ideational context within which the ZFC-formalized primitive notion, set, supposedly cornerstones and foundationizes all mathematics. Interesting, co-incidental even, how hereditarily well-founded are the binary notions simply-before-or-simply-after, simply-less-or-simply-more, simply-ascending-or-simply-descending, simply-A-or-simply-not-A, simply-on-or-simply-off, so on, in definition of the well-founded relation and the well-order. Even as extended to the ternary, the quaternary, and so on. As a “for instance” concerning the “principle of thinking” above cited, offered is the following quotation from the abstract to “Constructive Sets with Non-binary Inclusion”, Mikael Fors, Uppsala Universitet, U.U.D.M. Project Report 2013:26, October 2013:

We ask fundamental questions regarding how to represent and understand non-binary inclusion within the constructive framework outlined by Martin-Löf and further illustrate the implied limitations and problems associated with the required high level of explicity. While it is possible to simulate non-countable collections, we concern ourselves with sets that are bijective to N as to showcase the design principle of representation; extendable to more complex collections. (italic emphasis added)

“Artificial entity sets” appear to the binary-mind as preferable to the semantics (not syntactics) of nature's higher-logically-valued relations codified by _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency. Consider, for instance, what is taught in Rutgers University at the 400 level. Just as Prigogine maintained that whatever appears deterministic can be handled as if probabilistic, so Rutgers maintains that whatever appears to be non-binary can be handled as if binary. The actuality being: if whatever is _µT_m-deterministic can be dissimulated as if ₁T₂-probabilistic, so also can whatever is actually non-binary be artificially dissembled as if binary. In my judgment, this and the many associated compulsive attachments to the artificial (I remember attending a flower show in Japan only to be shocked to find it contained no natural flowers) are subliminally “designed” to protect ancient, battleaxed ideas stoutly dressed in fat-style clothes and offered up snooty in grave, gravelly voices by the insufferables.

See[man}tics is vaguely reflected in [sin}tactics, not so much so vice versa, yes-- uh, uh, well, sure, in saying that I believe tornadogenesis does not abide the supposed “classical limit”, my I/i^m(s) is-are certainly not referring to that quantum mechanics or that relativity physics (where the speed of light and other universal physical constants are understood as being single-valued; where there is no absolute limiting acceleration and no absolute limiting time rate of change of acceleration; where passing time is handled as a single, passive, objective, real, referential dimension and not understood as the memetime veiling of complex and hypercomplex 3-fold topologically-active operator-time; where temperature is not understood in terms of the spin components of operator-time, à la temporal CURL; where the logic employed -- in establishing, say, the notion of “equivalence” -- is classical-binary and only classical-binary). The pig-headed regard the multivalue (i.e., the instantaneous stacked values of the given variable, not to say of the given constant, and especially of the given logic proposition) as Gorgon-headed polymorphous [per}verse, every qubit as contemptible as Cubist poetry Sprechstimme shouted out in a Dadaist coffeehouse to accompaniment of a screechy-screamy, staccato, dodecaphonic piece performed by violin-piccolo-coronet trio qua triptet. To me, the arithmetic addition operation does not at all reflect the notion quantum superposition (no arithmetic operation, or combination thereof, could; perhaps a Musculpt operation), because I believe that the Schrödinger equation is actually not linear, that it has two levels of non-linearity built in to its relative algebraic interiors (good offices of Anca Grad, “A Note on Generalized Interiors of Sets”, Didactica Mathematica, 31:1, 2013, pp. 37-42) through which the cascade process proceeds (the same for Maxwell's equations, as written by Douglas A. Paine in his account of the “atmospheric analogue to Maxwell's equations”, which could be, were there some purpose for doing so, rewritten in Schrödinger form: much better given in G.S.Brownian form as a wave statement decomposable to a multilevel nonlinear equation set). Exercise of a quantum “axiom of choice” is involved when choosing (in the Cartesian way) basis (good offices of Harsh Vardhan) kets as orthonormal (not only is there cylindrical and spherical, so on, but the basis set could involve any finite or transfinite number, depending upon the order-of-logical-value chosen for processing (in that quantum mechanics, bijective-only transposes and Kronecker products, so on) and when choosing to normalize states by setting them equal to 1 -- which is to say choosing to make those states signify probabilities, not m-logical-values understood independent of the notion truth-value (think: _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ relative-states of identity-transparency qua transmission-free entanglement [see, for the latest: “Quantum entanglement, science's 'spookiest' phenomenon, achieved in space”, Sarah Kaplan, Washington Post, 15 June 2015] qua Buddhological compassion). Nor, obviously, do I believe measurement, clinical and subclinical, converts basis states to classical ₁T₂-only logic, as I do not believe Cantorian cardinalities of “basis” (on T_zog-chen AllBase, thus suggesting that the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, is not merely a complex-hypercomplex vector cum function-functional-functor space; it may be the Musculpt manifold) states emergently evolve by spontaneous fusion (each basis being independent, so it is believed, of the others, and all the others taken as a whole, heh-heh-heh!) from two only such states, |0> or |1>, because I do not believe there is anything like an isolated quantum system, or a single-valued ₁T₂-onlied one-particle system, not to say an asystemic one-particle-particle-altogether-free-of-identity-transparency any ponderable heretherewhere at any memetime in the _µT_m-relative-state universe. What is converted-collapsed at measurement, clinical and subclinical, in my view, is universal cognizance: it becomes radically reduced and anchored at the molecular-cellular level (thereupon roof-brain-chatter readable, apparently, as demonstrated over the last decade and reported in The Telegraph by Sarah Knapton, notably as recently accomplished with a software package developed at UC-Berkeley, the report of which was published 27 February 2018 in the Journal of Neural Engineering, 15:3, as “Real-time classification of auditory sentences using evoked cortical activity in humans”, David A. Moses and Matthew K. Leonard and Edward F. Chang, a report recently exclaimed over in The Sun and in “No more secrets! New mind-reading machine can translate your thoughts and display them as text instantly”, Danyal Hussain, The Daily Mail, 31 March 2018), this anchoring being etiological in regards to the full spectrum of vice-versa dualisms, to include topological dual spaces, normalizing cones and their duals, beat-down frequency funnels and their duals, so on and so forth. And when the neural-engineering implanted-electrode array of the mind-reading machine is attached to an embedded kill-switch brain chip RFIDed by brain-computer interface to the cloud-meshworked matrix and realtime evaluated by the global social credit score system interfaced with the GPS system for continuous mapping of locations and movements of every internet-of-persons-and-places-and-things RFID tag and every radiating DNA fingerprint, all of this run by mobile robotized self-regulating autonomous algorithms, the whole WiFied framework-grid-mesh-matrix fueled by mobile compact fusion reactors (see: “Lockheed Martin Patents Nuclear Fusion-Powered Fighter Jet”, ZeroHedge, 31 March 2018: apparently LM's Skunk Works [appropriate name] believes it has solved in the lab, with dissimulated QM, the problem _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-nature solved eons ago, e.g., close at hand in the tornado, i.e., the leak-proof plasma bottle)… this, this, is what is being envisioned, aspired to, by TPTB, and their active and passive supporters in the myriad related areas of endeavor, in lieu of e-commons-gamed _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams mapped over fractal e-boundaries and made user friendly with holographic Musculpt-as-maths-notation.

---

Contact the page editor

Return to:

•Top

•Homepage