µTm Scenarios, T33(M)
Why would disjointed [incre}mentalism (good offices of Astri Suhrke of the Peace Research Institute of Oslo, March 2011: the “Three Perspectives” section is most relevant here) at early stages in assembly-line production of a planetarized superstate so totalitarian as to chill incredulity (((the inevitable expansion of the Chinese-American no-fly HeatLists cum China's SCS system [good offices of Vicky Xiuzhong Xu and Bang Xiao of Aussie ABC, 31 March 2018] linked to brainrape [flash forward to see: “…China is mining data directly from workers' brains on an industrial scale”, Stephen Chen, South China Morning Post, 29 April 2018] cum the emerging US version [as portrayed by ZeroHedge in “DHS Creates Database To Track Journalists, Bloggers, 'Media Influencers', Calls Critics 'Conspiracy Theorists'”, 7 April 2018; Michael Snyder's 3 June 2018 contemplations of this can be seen here; and, flashing forward, Jim Naureckas has it correct in his FAIR piece, “NYT Sees 'Dystopia' in Chinese Surveillance -- Which Looks a Lot Like US Surveillance”, 10 July 2018] cum the Confucian-Napoleonic [e-Bona|part being an obvious misnomer] EU version [flash forward by good offices of Virginia Hale writing in “Compulsory Biometric ID Announced by European Commission”, Breibart reposted to The Truth Seeker, 17 April 2018], particularly that of France [good offices of Lori Hinnant of AP writing in “France puts 78,000 security threats on vast police database”, 4 April 2018] and Estonia [as per “Estonia's Large-Scale DNA-Collecting Project to Help Fight Rare Diseases”, Sputnik News, 4 April 2018: is it conceivable that such information will never be shared out or hacked out?] being integral components: only the naive could believe this emerging global MinorityReport PredPol [good offices of Daniel Dylan Wray writing in “New documentary Pre-Crime shows how Minority Report-esque police techniques are already a reality”, The Independent, 5 April 2018] framework will not become subject to all the same uses-[ab}uses-cabooses as was the Phoenix Pogrom put to during the American period of the war in Viet Nam; looking at Phoenix from habitus established in the field with Technical Intelligence Detachment, 525th MIG and, later, the information access given Strategic Research and Analysis, MACVJ2, whilst listening to the stab-in-the-back myth echo hallways of MACV-HQ and elaborate itself well beyond during immediate post-Tet-'68, as I've often testified to over the years when new indicators [this one reported good offices of Ryan McMaken, Mises Wire, 13 July 2018] have appeared, I began figgerin' from all that that circumstances eventually would be created in which, within the ZI, internal travel visas -- Have Visa Will Travel! -- will be required, precious permission slips to leave homeroom which will be hard to get for all those not government employees, corporate executives, superrich -- illegals, of course, being tacitly granted virtual laissez-passers))) have become the MO of choice for mollifying -- so it is imagined, asserted, claimed, and rationalized -- the myriad problem-causers (bootless gestures, I very early learned as a disgruntled mil.brat, are useless, counterproductive in most cases; this lesson was reinforced by experience during my SF-cum-TID/525thMIG-cum-SRA/MACV-J2 exposures) associated with the mounting anthropogenic global n-dimensional crisis? Not so incidental a factor to any believable answer to that question is the fact that the devices of popular narrative fiction and Hollywood realism in film, however unreal or [ir}real in many cases (consider The Wild Bunch, circa 18 June 1969, and The Deserter, circa 4 December 1970, justification-glorification-exoneration, personally conscious and/or collective unconsciously, of the My Lai massacre, circa 16 March 1968, for two instances: it's hard to understand where the self-proclaimed “upstanding” get off upbraiding water-torturers on moral grounds, given that it is no mean task to develop a hisstorical argument that mutilation behaviors, i.e., ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, of identity incorporation via, say, ritual gift exchange, are not defining characteristics of the quintessentially human; indeed, few Founding Fathers, whatever the particular case of founding, were not simultaneously mutilators; moreover, the likes of My Lai have been commonplace -- e.g., during 8 March 1782 [see: That Dark and Bloody River, Allan W. Eckert, Bantam paperback edition, 1996, pp. 314-322] -- throughout the hisstory of efforts to rid the human species of direct ontic experience of the state of animistic-pagan µTm-quantum relative-state identity-transparency, a state which is always mediated by, and could only be mediated by, “participation mystique” with the natural surround), in pandering to readers'-viewers' penchant for cultivation of the various types of Identifierung, identification, and/or their residuals from early childhood -- e.g., primary process imprinting, oral-phasic incorporation, regressive substitution, alienating narcissistic, in service to mechanisms of defense, Umwelt introjective: all unconscious processes as distinct, in that respect, from pedestrian empathy and generative empathy -- further perpetuation of the insidious infrastates in large part responsible for the paradoxically phantasmagoric convolution of individual, mass, and collective behaviors constellating the amplifying anthropogenic global crisis. Which assertion was not to mention the MSM. As an AU-SIS student, for two-and-a-half years I thoroughly read the daily WaPo and the Sunday NYTimes, often also the Christian Science Monitor and the Wall Street Journal. I found this a singularly unrewarding experience, circa 1963-'65, and when I finally got utterly fed up with D.C. and left the place, I rarely again ever looked at newspapers. Why would any one-of-conscience contemplate studying details of this-or-that, becoming a professional of this-or-that, when it was pelucidly obvious to all-sane that the uses to which this-or-that was to be put would undoubtedly be anathema to the best interests of person-place-planet? One increasingly common assessment: the “twist-and-shout”-funded-Vietnam-war-facilitated, post-1971 gold-in-locks has fostered the goldilocks preconditions to synoptic cuspover. Stopaspell. Heard tell, yep. In cohoots with, oh yeah. The leitmotif of one's life-design is thematically orchestrated to by-and-largely-so-to-accumulate possessions deemed 1T2-only ownable? Buy n-unnecessaries at malls, D-stores, C-stores? Buy through Amazon? Use a C-phone, an S-phone, and signed on with Facebook, Twitter, so on? Who then is culpable for the centralization associated with evolution of gangsterite (see Michael Woodiwiss and Charles Hugh Smith) neofascist surveillance capitalism, which got ultra-fat on off-shoring, out-sourcing, and in-pulling of cheap labor and indentured voters? The same who who disbelieves this evolution will ever go to cuspover, that who who ridicules the notion that if this does indeed cusp, the consequent phenomenologies will, by good offices of all the new tech, dwarf by orders of magnitude the holocausts in the Americas, WWII, Cambodia, Rwanda, and that the hunt-down of all-and-every in any way connected to the Old Order will, in flashback, make the FrenchRevolution guillotinists and the Bolshies look to have been rank amateurs? It's awfully hard to cultivate sympathy for those who think their likes and dislikes are theirs -- self-originated, however unexamined -- whatever befalls these “thinkers” as a result of “their” likes and dislikes. Per[son}ally, my I-am is an unabashed liberal -- in use of the mute button. “Do not go dark! Do you hear me?” Decades too late for acknowledgement of that order, sir. Jus' sit tight, why don't ya, eventually it will all clarify, even to those poorly informed. Throughout the whole of my life experience, every project I've had direct awareness of, and felt to be intelligent, without exception has been quenched by m-ons -- morons -- squenched into 1T2-decision-tree slots higher up on whichever of the involved branchings. “Oh no, that can't be right!” so sayeth the SilentMajority. Heh-heh-heh. As if any informed person on the planet with a 1T2-IQ of 80 or better did not know in hisher heart of hearts, certainly no later than Khruschev's and Eisenhower's famous speeches, that mil.dum, indust.crum, intel.scum, cop.gum, and bank.bum are composed of treasonous windups who devote most every waking hour to draining away whatever is found to be in the best interests of their homeland's people, the human species, the biosphere, the home planet. The drift of this, as near as I can ascertain, started to dawn on me as a nine-year-old standing there next to, strolling along with, my onetime-bomber-pilot father (“War For Air” in his heyday) in Nagasaki, circa 1954 (city pretty much restored by then: article good offices of Tomoe Otsuki). Passage from Ashiya, AFB, kita-Kyushu, to Nagasaki was not much of a drive for the big yellow 1953 Buick brought over during late-summer of 1953 by my mother on the USS Randall, riding out a killer typhoon in the process, a surgical emergency for one of the sailors, a crashed seaplane carrying a surgeon from Anchorage, later a stillbirth, a formal burial at sea, so on: all constituting a great adventure for eight-year-old me running free through the troop-billet lower decks (the overt beginning of my persistent childhood assimilation to GI culture), and, yes, I did take note of the ship's Inchon role, as plaques and pictures were duly posted on the bulkhead behind the Main Dining Room's Captain's Table, at which we were asked to sit once during the post-international-dateline late portion of the trip from Seattle to Yokohama, once given that my mother then was the wife of only a lowly Air Force captain. So, early on, relative to the fame of the Inchon Landing, I knew about “end runs” in the strategic offensive, but only when I became the waterboy for the Ashiya, AFB, football team did I learn of the real origins of such an offensive play. In due course of my pre-adolescence, I came to identify with MacArthur's Children, in that The General's persona epitomized the specter shadowing my mil.brat youth -- and this “attitude”, of which I had many, was only reinforced as subsequently I much later learned of his tactical incompetence immediate post-PearlHarbor and of his management neglect vis-à-vis the KMAG-incited CI overreach provoking onset of the Korean war. During this period of childhood “development”, though, I decisively learned to get my “attitudes” off the chip on my shoulder by sublimating them -- daredevil bicycling, judo, kendo, flower arranging, model building, the like. Honestly, with very few exceptions, I haven't had an altogether authentic conversation with an American since I was 10 or 11, by which time this mil.brat had learned to “Keep your mouth shut unless spoken to!” -- uh, learned to be quiet about actual beliefs and subjective experiences, that is. Ugh! subjected in youth to the free speech of cognitive clodhoppers wracked by projectile vomiting of PC blackpsyche. It was from the back of a six-by deuce-and-a-half carrying the team's gear that I saw Hiroshima, circa 1955 (city pretty much restored by then, as seen here and here and here). Had I much in the way of continued belief in prevention, I'd not have quit college in 1965. Do the right thing or (binary logic) rise in the machine. By gum, mus' be the best way to do good is to never take a leadership position in a failing civilization. Much ableeeged, m'Lord, but decline I must. Be to go, mine only can. And I haven't devoted even a wit of thought to prevention since the mid-to-late-'70s; what little I've been able to bring together has been in regards to post-cuspover under the WAG of a ten-percent human survival rate. This is not a most pessimistic forecast: Cornell meteorologist Doug Paine told me during the late-'70s that he believed it already too late by the late-1950s. From reading The Futurist and keeping up with World Watch Institute publications, I was aware of the 1973 Club of Rome commissioned MIT model predicting the “end of civilization” by the mid-2000s. And extinction of the species is a lot worse than a ten-percent survival rate. Given what is currently at stake, there's no denying that today's litigious TPsTB -- Gee, as in w[h]it|takers! you HolyRollers, you'ins; [Golly}Wobblies, they self-attribute in their feigned religiosity, and ruddy great… uh, well, for the most part, tom turkeys precariously perched on high watching the shovelheads catting about in the liquidity of ill-gottens -- are the worst humans-being-[sav}ages there have ever been on maraud throughout the ages. No on-b[rich}ing of befouled politicos can dislodge the nonproselytizable dolts from their jammed-up positions in the barrel of power -- according to The Stow-n-Show Dispatch Gazette. Beware the limits of your ADIs during your ADLs! It's not as if adjuvants, co-formulants, surfactants cannot be accurately determined independent of manufacturers' reportings, given the instrumentations currently available at dot.edu and dot.guv and dot.com and dot.org labs located in myriads the planet over. When in the hisstory of humanity has there been a holocaust which TPTB have not at least passively condoned? After-the-fact is that “when”. Hitherto, and likely well on: “They prob'ly ain't no prol' t'be reckoned better'n a rightly dead prol'!” The military-paladin-instrumented Inquisition and the MIC-implemented Holocaust have been ongoing for as far back into recorded hisstory as one cares to look -- with fulmination periods, formal mutations, alterations in virulence, changes in targeting from one to another transference-figured, subject people(s), out group, other, them, subhuman “pathogens”. And the hisstorian's reasons as to “why”, no less than those reasons stated by the whowhats responsible for induction of the proximal perpetrators, must be accounted: bunk. The German Nazis never advertized the extermination aspect of their extraordinary rendition forced-labor camps, so why should we expect that the nazified one-percent's Global Phoenix would do so as regards its extra-judicial “SS Stew”, uh, uh, Snatch & Snuff Stuff, its AC/ADNC, uh, that's Accidented Causes cum Apparent Death-by-Natural-Causes stuff, its insidious mass poisonings cum EM-interventive approach to reduction in the numbers of hoi polloi, prols, the mid-classes? The “intellectual reparations” leveraged post-WWII not yet altogether, heh-heh-heh, set aside, DARPA Wehrforschungsgemeinschaft fosters introjective ConveDDs like the Pentagon's decision to GPS the masses: conversion-disorder displacement of “Oh, My! Gus” -- uh, Office of Mil.Guv-US. Flashing forward, Charles Hugh Smith asks one of the relevant questions, as regards these increasingly automated (I'm waiting to see the first restaurant where robots have replaced the patrons) oppressive population control systems: “Who have the power to change the weightings within the automated software?” This is a question tangentially relevant to initialization and maintenance of µTm-LETS nesting foams, with their weightings on values ensheaved upon LETS-currency base-states: in that respect, the correct who-what answer is “the best outcomes open-source m-scenarios-strategically computer gamed on the e-commons”. But what about the real problem-causers? The probably insurmountable problem with humanity is that millions and millions and millions of people actually believe they believe in what they are doing. My lifelong personal credo has been: participate in this, this, this civilization, as little as possible consistent with a best effort to find a better way. The 21st century being no mere dream, we flash forward as a means of Looking Backward at how wrong even the best of writers can be: as if we hadn't already long supposed “Social Media Now Being Used by Police and Intelligence Agencies to Collect Biometrics”, Nicholas West, Activist Post, 17 April 2018; and “Police Testing Controversial Portable DNA Machine”, Aaron Kesel, Activist Post, 19 April 2018. Alvin and Heidi Toffler's War and Anti-War (Little, Brown, and Company, 1993) quotes a Pentagon general, to wit (memory serving from my reading when it first appeared on the rapidly changing scene): “…surreptitious acquisition of DNA fingerprints…”. 1993: one-quarter of a century memetime-after DNA superconductivity was first discussed by Charles Musés; fifteen years memetime-after appearance of our model of superconductant DNA pi-electron-parcel gas; and one-quarter of a century memetime-prior to today. How many decades behind state of the art is public knowledge kept with regard to whatsoever techno-advances construably impacting me[gal}o|man[i}acal-lunaticky intel.mil.cop operations? Shit-from-Bit, good offices of Dr. JASON. Louie le Grand Prix, an elementary particle physicist, uh, that is an elementary particle zookeeper, came into our office, SRA/MACV-J2, seeking assistance with his lucrative subcontracted tasking to design a better -- not mousetrap -- “hamlet defense system”. We could not stop laughing, so he had simply to turn around and walk out, egg on his face. Has that “surreptitious acquisition” been by good offices of The Molecular Biology of the Gene or by DNA's quantum biochemical wave effects? Effects affected by non-lethals like the vehicular stun gun (good offices of Patrick Tucker writing for Defense One)? Couldn't possibly be: the property of superconductance would mean openings of the DNA frequency-response windows of histological types are-- well, possibly nano-thin, and that would mean that all EM-tech could be redesigned to stay out of biologically-active windows. That, they simply wouldn't have suppressed for half a century. Just think of the… But then-- why are you still alive, speaking about this as you have? If DNA fingerprints can be read at a distance, from across the room, from outside the room, from across town, even from an intelsat-- how would bodyguards protect TPTB from shoulder-launched DNA-fingerprint-seeking non-missing rockets? Which is not even to mention the rapidly developing field of optogenetics (good offices of Karl Deisseroth writing in Nature Neuroscience, 18:9, September 2015, pp. 1213-25) on The Road To Reality of the population control technologies (flashing forward, good offices of Mojmir Babacek writing for Global Research, 13 July 2018) of the 21st century. Jus' think of this as coupled to the already being employed, as noted above in the South China Morning Post, Chinese mass-brainrape tech. Whoa! Ghastly creeps, what. As retards-- whoopse, regards, borning of etched and quenched 1T2-only molecular-cellular brains, reputation has it that Woolton-Under-Ledge has borne a greater percentage of underage Alzheimer's than has any other known spaceplace. I've no problem with one-sentence paragraphs -- when they represent inner monologue; one-trick oligarchs, however, I've real difficulty condoning, especially when they naively project the gossamer contents of their Umwelt introjections into concretion. Hankering after collective aphasia, agnosia, and apraxia, they are, aren't they. Not satisfied with being mere stock, they just simply had to make themselves into laughingstock. Banging howdies at fellow hams; delivering verbal cuffings; pulling faces at photo-ops; corralling cognitive cobwebs; those lookings-down; those feelings-woozy; nonetheless, managing spoutoff again and again: poobahs jabberwalking the scumbaggery, our Great Communicators! Witless whorls. Them who-what's spectating upon Buster-the-BurstBrusquer. “We tole y' ever'thin', ever'thin'. Yer wan dead?” Selling up, they do, don't they, in an overture toward maintenance of supre[man}cy: “Got the gen on all that, 'ave yer, sport?” -- so's says they to the likes of impenetrable ussins, the perfectly supposable gormless goons, oh-so disposable. Whenever I use we/they-qua-us/them-qua-me/you-related expressions, as I periodically do, it's mostly parody -- as, clearly, I do not resonate with any 1T2-only codification, whatever its cultural habitus may be. The A-bomb was not the most destructive thing to have issued from the WWII battle of the 200-years “War of the World”; warfare-generated infratech, like the 1T2-only Shit-from-Bit Turing machine, is largely responsible for It-having-taken-such-a-Hit. In my assessment-judgment-opinion, David Stockman (see The Great Deformation reviewed by Thomas J. DiLorenzo here and, flashing forward, in capsule version via Stockman's three-part “Why the Empire Never Sleeps”, reposted, without the repugnant sign-in requirement, to Antiwar.com, to wit Part 1, and Part 2, and Part 3) and Niall Ferguson (see The Pity of War: Explaining World War I reviewed by Jay Winter here and The War of the World reviewed by Jeff Collins here) date the War of the World only from onset of WWI (Ferguson includes the Russo-Japanese war, more or less just to get it back to beginning of the century), and thus underestimate complexity of the convolution and magnitude of the conjuncture, because their analyses are surface-structure only. Beyond the horizon set by the plays of Eugene O'Neill, late-night high school reading (how many of my Fairborn classmates were spawn of German scientists brought to Wright Field by the Operation Paperclip aspect of Operation Lusty I never did ascertain) for me included, to be sure, 1919 and Mr. Wilson's War -- so, I've had no trouble agreeing with Stockman's assessment of the impact of Wilsonian Democracy on world history, and even had reached similar general conclusions on my own, though I cannot say that I embraced a madman theory of hisstory, for even then, before reading C. G. Jung, I doubted the greatness of Great Men and the power of Force As History. I also agree with Stockman that the “command position” on collapse of the USSR is bunk, but I've had my own ideas on that: see our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh. A glance even a little below the surface would set the dating for initialization of the War of the World back to onset of the Franco-Prussian war. But, as I have argued, deep-structure origins of the prevailing fulmination -- etiology and pathogenesis of the symptomatology having a clinical hisstory running well over several thousand years -- came during the early-1820s in higher mathematics (this need not have been ultracrepidarian had history of maths, to include lives of those involved, been taught as fulsomely as “how we must calculate this and that”), and the War of the World had overtly begun by mid-century. The skyfall of holi skyspace; quality-in-fallin'; lyric-a-fallin'; just plain Fallin'; the coming O-so-Proto Strum und Drang (upon cuspover, logic qua logic is universally disparaged because undissimulated µTm-logic was never actually assimilated and employed); nuclear winter at nightfall. The politicomilitaries' VUCAization -- that's volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity -- of the planet and its near-abroad is an apt characterization of how the binary-mind has processed impacts of the inputs of µTm-quantum-based technologies. Archetypal collective behaviors are reflexive: tap and jerk, just like Foreign Policies of the Great Powers. Then there are the very worstest of the badest bad guys following in footsteps of the likes of John von Neumann (who, as noted by Julian Barbour, told Shannon that, technically speaking, information is to be regarded equivalent to entropy-uncertainty-[not}knowing, not negentropy: that's why the more information the intelligence agencies gather, the less they know, heh-heh-heh! and the more they-- uh, well-- when will people finally admit that forever intelligence products have been determined by policy, not policy by intelligence products?), blanketing their actual motives in a covering cloth of self-proclaimed good intentions: “Bill Gates Backs Plan to Surveil the Entire Earth From Space”, Rett Jones, Gizmodo, 19 April 2018. My thesis has long been that, even though the unadmitted aims are totally conscious -- do we even have to speculate, as per, for instance, The Daily Mail, “Bill Gates backs a $1 billion plan to cover the Earth in 'Big Brother' satellites…”, Joe Pinkstone, 19 April 2018? -- the actual impetus in such cases is altogether unconscious to those involved. Like, say, Hawking in youth looking over the edge of something, getting a good glimpse, recoiling in horror, suppressed, repressed, regressed, going into denial maintained ever thereafter. Jolly fellows, guv, what!; they be scratchy scrabblers, dot.guv, eh, hidey-holing anything grabbable. Boondoggle: if we are constrained to speak in binary-logic terms alone, as we are, then it is reasonable to hypothesize that bad money never accomplishes good work. Implementations of the intelsat swarm and the autonomous killer-drone swarm, whatever the conscious rationalizations, whatever the subliminal motivations, are actually collective-unconscious-instigated ConveDDs generated by the suppression of undissembled m-valued logics. Thank Platonia: absent growing younger, I'll not persist in this world long enough to participate in what they profess to love. Frankly, my I/im has always, and all ways it could muster, striven to be indefinable, non-logoable, an un|per{son], particularly of the 1T2-type. Fascists abs[con}ding from, not with. Materialistic-scientistic-racist militarism has long since eclipsed the Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion and the other Great Religions as the foremost spiritual commitment of modern and postmodern Sapiens, at least those post-industrialized. The [general}ized transition from prevent-war-by-preparing-for-it to the massacre-forces of the Armies of the Night has been a lot slower, tortoise on the beach, than many people -- especially those in the, uh, intelligence services -- might have thought. Right back at you, bub, with the globaloney! Don't want none of that, now do we. Aye, no niggling at the emotive, sir, got shot of those churlish, smeary id[i]ots -- puddlers all! -- long ago, we should 'ave, shouldn't we 'ave, [Colon}el. Flash forward to see how ninnyhammered capricious snollygosters démarche dirigisme in service to a GWOT surface-structured as resource warfare: problems with that GWOT discussed in the June 2018 Harper's piece by Andrew J. Bacevich, et al., entitled “Combat High” (a title which caught my attention because I had once written about “high combat” which is a byte of highbred warfare instead of a bit of that hybrid; this piece being far more moronic than were MACV-J2 bull sessions, I guffawed all the way through: these sorts of inanities are what a panel of “experts” concerns itself with in being concerned with an endless GWOT-which-at-the-outset-gifted-the-strategic-variables-space-and-time, thus being sure to gut itself n-trillions in along the course designed for it?). O, being saddled with these “diffs”! (those who would have best booked face had their photo ops been edited out). How many memetimes can Déjà Vu alloveragain himself without fostering self-reflexive self-metaprograms strongly prejudiced toward self-destruction? The binary-logic chicken-or-egg qua it-from-bit/bit-from-it question: which came first, the police or the criminal, the counterinsurgent or the insurgent, the counterterrorist or the terrorist? According to the political spectrum Möbius strip, which spans anarcho-syndicalism unto anarcho-capitalism, uh, uh-- well, gosh, it's prescriptive glutamatergic 1T2-only-definable memetime, ain't it, what's deee[man}in' that thars gotta be initial conditions, duh! In advising the Marines about small-unit self-organized criticality, the best that could possibly be expected from Santa Fe Institute spinoffs are discourses upon fuzzyology; whereas -- intending, of course, no derogation -- we're talking here on this website full-blown µTm-logodynamics not dysterpreted to the closed real interval [0,1] -- basically, there's grift to be gotten in that rift, and that's the sole care of those offering the spin; yep, a [bale}ful of evil-intentioned mucking about by the acrimonious milling throng of individual, corporate, and institutional speculators menacing all rumors threatening advent of sound money -- uh, that's including however open the interpretation of closed may be entertainingly entertained. “What more can I say?”: “Are you not entertained?” Schrödinger's, as distinct from USsins', CAATSA gots vastly more dead-lives/living-deads than the probabilities would seem to indicate by good offices of the assumptions brought to the [ma}the[ma}tical calculations. Disjointed incrementalism takes its quotient of memetime: Dandy Doolittle, that's 'is name, laddy. I remember being informed in February of 1970 by Kelly L. Robinson, one of my onetime immediate officer superiors at SRA-MACVJ231-68, then a Masters candidate in Urban Design and Planning at University of Washington, Seattle, from whom I at that point in memetime learned the term “disjointed incrementalism”, being informed, that is, with regard to technological forecasting of a holographic home resource center (HHRC), and yet AR (augmented reality) is just seriously coming on nearly half a century later (see “Tech Giants Race To Create An Alternate Reality”, Michael Scott, SafeHaven, 3 April 2018). Moreover, AR is a far cry from what the HHRC was supposed to be. Don't even mention the much more involved task of exteriorizing inner-Musculpt-as-maths-notation and holographic user-friendly interface to µTm-LETS nesting foams. Instead of this and this and this, they prefer this diversion! And they absolutely will not countenance anything resembling the Musculpt symformphonie integral to VirFut Q-Pro. Why the chosen focus? Think about legends and plausible denials: just because a giant was started in a garage, the basement room, the onetime chicken-coop second-floor of the tractor barn doesn't mean the progenitors were not recruited as proprietaries -- whatsoever the level of genius they appear to have on the back of enormous resources surreptitiously provided. All the usual given reasons for the chosen disjointed-incrementalism MO -- underenergy, overpopulation, dyseconomy, moneygrubbing, infantilepolitics, pathosociology, overpowerdynamics, infrasexology, impendingpandemic -- I view as surface-structure-only symptomatology. The stinktank-cum-PAC equivalent to hormone-hacking endocrine disruptors, heh-heh-heh! When will come the occasion when we experience the first politician we've met who ever said no when he meant no, yes when he meant yes? The [extra}ordinary degree to which the youth-centered-upon-me-is-me-and-only-me-selfhood induced by beginning-in-the-womb prescriptive-enculturation-socialization-orchestrated glutamatergic etching and associated quantum quenching at neuronal plasticity is carried into adulthood and normotic professional life is a measure of the intensity of the pandemic paranoiac compulsion against µTm and for 1T2-only (Chinese rotational and Western syllogistic). O, if only the truth would out, uh, uh-- those ol'time truth-values would not out themselves. Paranoiac compulsions, when techno-collectivized, easily translate into disjointed incrementalism: e.g., compensating-the-mortification, compensatory-abreactive, “Get some back from the Bear!”, immediate-post-Tet-'68 impetus to initialization of the Afghan Sting, which led inevitably, step by incremental step, to hubristic overreach, and may yet lead to Samson pulldown, as surface-structure-insightfully described by Michael T. Klare in “Could the Cold War Return With a Vengeance?”, TomDispatch, 3 April 2018. The severely frayed Inside-the-Beltway Consensus cannot be construed as ever having been well-conceived. Ah, yes, just as with the U.S.-NATO legerdemain regards immediate post-Soviet Russia, America, out of the goodness of its heart, ever since advent of Wilsonian Democracy, has taken into its universities more and more foreign students, little petals, what, so as to help those needy wanting to learn -- not to recruit, mind you, agents-of-influence who might-- well, for instance, whatever it was that actually happened around, and maybe even in, Tiananmen Square… or, uh, errr, AIESEC-as-cover for recruitment vis-à-vis what later happened in Chile. Given the myriad means that have been, and are being, employed to expand the recruitment base of the global insurgency against the very idea of the Cartesian-Newtonian institutionalization, not least Boot Camps cum reeducation camps and lesser forms along the same theme, it will be interesting to see how successful is the AmerikoAnglic Bloc at preventing formation of a GermanoRussian Bloc and a MahayanaBuddhist Bloc. But can't hardly accuse the Chinese of being imaginative: the idea that OBOR is not a boring replication of the WorldBank-IMF Aid-As-Imperialism megaproject-debt-entrapment scam is, IMO, pretty darned funny. Another decades-long [dys}traction -- if such a benign word can be accepted -- from humanity's actual existential threat, the anthropogenic n-dimensional global crisis? Mus' be. Don't mean nothin'! As regards the possibly-wrong-headed optimism (after all, as the species self-poisons, irradiates itself, noise inures [earplugs are my constant companion], bodymods, dyseducates, self-incarcerates, more and more loses attention span and environmental awareness to device fixation, so on, a larger and larger and larger percentage becomes the dregs: not a good survival strategy) of a 10-percent-human-survival-rate-at-cuspover forecast by Son of B-17 Pilot and a onetime CICV-Targets analyst, consider how hard it is to bring about a return to the Stone Age, whilst contemplating the supersaturation bombing plus biological warfare unleashed upon North Korea during the early-1950s when my Berlin-Airlift-graduate and air-sea-rescue-out-of-BW1-pilot father was helping to organize air-sea-rescue operations over the Sea of Japan and, later, the resupply effort to DBP from Ashiya AFB, kita-Kyushu, Japan, by handover to CAT pilots. Donnybrooking generations of rattled brains infantilely attempting to shake off admission as to what they have espied, what they have cribbed from nature, then tossed through the window of the borning room. Knee-jerk consensuation of the probability amplitude interpretation of m-valued state-function having been the method of choice for skiving off, uh, uh, for suppression of collective self-Schadenfreude, which, when formalized, became the Witch Bull of the, in myriad ways stultifying, if also horrifying, 20th century. Rugged up in furry per[son}as, all [pre}tense at overcoming a blustery self-baffling, what! How does an authentically brilliant creative person get his and/or her ideas (possessive here likely a misnomer)? Well, I certainly have no basis for knowing -- but I can, for whatever it's worth, speculate. Identifying the critical areas to attend to vis-à-vis the Zeitgeist of an era is not best done by application of analytic techniques -- that comes after -- but by emptying: only the collective unconscious (CU) knows, and only an empty mind allows the CU to make its registrations, and then the CU will do so repeatedly only when there is demonstrated willingness to concretely live thoroughly through its indications; any failure, at such, results in a snub-out. Indulgence in prescriptive self-metaprogramming (one way to cultivate projective-identification: see Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer, John C. Lilly, Communication Research Institute, 1968) yields instant snub-out. Talk about subliminal self-metaprograms -- and their synchronicities! Within a few years of N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr (which set in motion the whole sequence of developments leading to the Lukasiewicz-logics challenge to fundaments of the Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean-Weberian institutional base), the U.S. began focusing its ManifestDestiny-unto-IndispensableNation collective-ego inflation on the western Pacific and Asia, leading eventually to Old Ironsides cannonading the Port of Danang (killing approximately 300 people) in 1848 (that's how I remember hearing it at SORO, Special Operations Research Office, during the fall of 1963; here is surely the more accurate version as remembered by the U.S. Navy) and the East India Squadron's Susquehanna BlackShip incursion upon Edo Bay in 1853 (the American flag Susquehanna then flew subsequently being displayed on a bulkhead just inboard of the table upon which representatives of Imperial Japan signed the articles of unconditional surrender at the end of WWII: Remove your cultural barriers to trade or we'll drop the atomic bomb on your heads!). I've believed since the late-1970s that by the 1850s, consequent upon the guttural collective back-reaction upon the metric of Abelian implications, a collective-unconscious “decision” for human species self-annihilation had been taken. Your mum! Can't've, couldn't've-- could they? Well, wouldn't've, they wouldn't. Then thars… hmmm. Hamstrung knick-knack minds wrapped in bloodwooded and honkynutted brains quarter sawn, uh, drawn, sans the sheepish yellow paddywhack, and sapping red at the slightest slight. Ain't no bones shared out by them dogs! Doesn't matter how much the ego is altered, alter egos don't mediate transition between glutamatergic-Benoitian absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct 1T2 and ketaminergic truth-value-independent µTm-unto-CTC+ relative-state identity-transparency (flashing forward, looking through walls [discussion of “RF-Pose” good offices of Kate Baggaley, NBC-MACH, 8 July 2018] is not what I am talking about). Admittedly, the 1820s choice to back-react was a bit delayed in its effects, but that's the BMI for you, the BMI trying to change the past -- uh, the Binary-Mind Inter[fear}ometer. Oops, a snarky Europe -- “Kill the Nineteenth Century dead, dead, dead!”: as Gertrude Stein said in Wars I Have Seen -- began serious self-destruction, relative to deep-structure, long before The Guns of August. To retrospectively remonstrate, à la a good hide tanning: in proclaiming advent of “The War To End All Wars”, the 19eeny-boppers were just two world wars off the mark. It will be interesting to see how well mass mind of our current crop of TPTB -- thieving sicko snottygobblers (Persooooonia longifellers) swaggering in fat-style Italian-cuts, miasmatic nattering monosyllabic mentation weighting glutamate-etched freight-on-their-brains -- fulfills dictates of its assigned role vis-à-vis the collective-suicide self-metaprogram -- which, to repeat, existence of which I became convinced of during the 1970s following my learning about m-valued logics, and which is just now entering the large frame of human awareness (see, for instance: “Our Strange Attraction to Self-Destructive Behaviors, Choices and Incentives”, Charles Hugh Smith, Washington's Blog, 18 April 2018). I would add to Smith the notion that the stability obsession is a recipe for one of the dishes on the human-species-extinction menu. Then there is, flashing forward: “Is Social Media Destroying Humanity on Purpose?”, Daisy Luther, The Organic Prepper, 7 May 2018. NewTech as Savior? Humph! No significant chance of that. The potential of the internet, for instance, to adequately address aspects of the accelerating global crisis has been systematically, and in virtually every detail, made subject to cooptation by the business model servicing the oligopolistic interests serviced by mil.intel.guv. Wherever in human history one cares to look there is always an Iroquois League willing to sell off for a pittance the future they do not own such that an oligarchy-in-waiting can become an oligarchy-in-fact by this or that legalized fraudulent larcenous pyramided privatization of the commonweal. The war often involved -- be it deemed revolutionary, for independence, for liberation, anti-this and/or pro-that, a war involving an extermination -- is always actually for furtherance of oligarchy and greater concentration of oligopoly. That is the phase transition inevitably facilitated -- a phase transition, in the present instance, that can only make the prevailing planetary conundrum worse. It's hard to distinguish in principle between the American-advised (see here and, flashing forward, here: we tried unsuccessfully from the very early-1990s to introduce into the devolving situation politico-economic notions derivative of the Viet Cong's tacit employment of what, well after the VC's animistic innovation, became known as the “holographic principle” -- but the NGOs and dot-guvs approached could not comprehend sufficiently, there having been so many categories of emotional blocks, blocks which persist unto this day) oligopolistic flash-capitalist privatizations which were orchestrated in immediate post-Soviet Russia and the oligopolistic land usurpations involved in the founding and expansion of the U.S.A. Arguably, it was not at all in the larger human interest, let alone that of the bioatmomagnetosphere, planet Earth, that great nations, not even to say “world powers”, were formed -- regardless of the question as to means, flashing forward, op/edly addressed by Patrick J. Buchanan. Even were I to “want ye aw tae coorie in thegither an be pairt o a Scots commonweel”, what we dinnae realize, then and now, is cum-corruptus-commonweel having long since become socius-status-epilepticus! Quite frankly, it's not to me anymore even interesting to comment on “current events” (which, these days, are not often “the news”), as most everything I forecasted during the early-to-late Sixties has by now already happened or is, to all but the most brain impaired, clearly prefigured. The more the human brain becomes impaired by subordination to algorithmic constants of world-war-born-and-lesser-war-borne binary computers, the less likely -- obviously -- that that brain will have the cognitive capability (not capacity) to facilitate transition to µTm-unto-CTC+ logics, a phase transition absolutely demanded if there is to be any hope of surviving in large percentage the current global conjuncture-going-to-cuspover. The complete failure of introspective competence should be evident to any acute observer -- and I, on that basis alone, admit that my decades old ten-percent-human-survival-rate forecast may be wildly overoptimistic, though I resolutely stick thereto, believing that “perseverance furthers”. Is it even 1T2ly-reasonable to hypothesize, for instance, that Global Phoenix cum police collateral-damage-killings of the unarmed will cease -- given the right choices of axioms, of course? It's not really, IMHO, mathematics qua mathematics that makes The Immoralist (good offices of Bill Barton speaking to the 13th International Congress on Mathematics Education), separates him from even the most pedestrian of empathies, gets him portrayed in Diary of THE Seducer; it's the quasi-religious fixation on 1T2-only logic alone. Dewonking 2T2-doublethinking news-speak, an expression of the omnipresent open-air karaoke machine, they -- [meme}bers of the irreality-based community, the ruggers of doublespeaking scrum, misconstrued, that is, as being easily replaced by agile software -- ain't about to do, not least because of the ever-increasing incidence of mimetic-estrogenated 1T2-only-identity dyscrasia, and because the whole modern aspect of mathematics and new physics is rooted in Orwellianisms and their ConveDDs, i.e., conversion-disorder displacements. Ln: lies on lies on lies… does not = µTm, however much TPTB may so ConveDD, i.e., projectively identify with. Given that 1984 became the foremost domestic CounterInsurgency-preceding-Insurgency training manual, doublethink may be regarded as conscious 2T2-blackpsyche or as subliminally-instigated numbskull parody of Polish-joke parody of Lukasiewicz-propositional calculi at supra-truth-valued cognition -- 2 parodying m, a way to self-justify a century-long failure to apply Lukasiewicz to interpretation of Schrödinger. Aw'right. The crusty and the grizzled, pick your side: other'ns, there ain't none. Us'ns versus you'ns. You's either fer us or you's ag'in us. Don leathers, men -- and don' be doin' no ditherin' 'bout, nother. Give me egoic simple-identity and binary logic, or give me death! Caught in one of those Nothing-Wrong-With-The-System, All-That's-Needed-Are-Morally-Upright-Heroes-Standing-Tall movies; never saw the movie about how there are no fundamental metaphysical foundations of the system that haven't been sundered by math and physics discoveries cum experimental verifications. Autopoietic self-assassination occasions hizsteracies (etiology: assumptions underlying the Weltanschauung greatly diverge from assumptions underlying the clung-to institutional base in a conjuncture where perseverance does not further, thus inducing massive mass-impress of schizophrenogenic 2T2-binds in Umwelts, this pathogenesis being most virulent with regard to the inner core of TPTB due to their utter identification with the founding principles of the eclipsed institutions), as, flashing forward, described by Doug Lynn in “Ten Ways the Democratic Northern Hemisphere Nations Became the Orwellian West”, TheTollOnline, 5 June 2018. Seemingly unseemly: horseholders in service to the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse? To those µTmly Up Above the [1T2] Rock, over-ripe mangos dropping on a hot time roof? On the human-species-extinction menu, seven courses of-- well, Whateeever: “Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth's Surface: Human and Environmental Health Implications”, J. Marvin Herndon and Raymond D. Hoisington and Mark Whiteside, JGEESI, 28 March 2018. Given that the lead bodyguard for ozone is magnetic, a related issue is the chronic weakening of Earth's magnetic field, markedly increased since the mid-19th century (see the recent: “Earth's magnetic field is probably not reversing”, Maxwell Brown, et al., PNAS-USA, 30 April 2018). Convection dynamics at the outer-liquid-core/lower-mantle interface are important, not only to functioning of the geodynamo, but also relative to plate tectonics (see: “First-principles constraints on diffusion in lower-mantle minerals and a weak D'' layer”, M. W. Ammann, et al., Nature, 465, 27 May 2010; and “The Earth's hidden weakness”, University of Bristol, PHYS.ORG, 28 May 2010). I remember discussions of this general topic with Douglas A. Paine at Cornell during the late-1970s. Think: no-“classical-limit”-quantum-relativistic complex-angular-momentum-cascade-mediated superintegration of atmospheric dynamics, plate tectonics, volcanism, mantle-core-interface dynamics. It would be interesting to see studied how cascaded complex-angular-momentum (handled as temporal CURL in the Paine-Kaplan model of tornadogenesis) injections (which likely can be anthropogenically altered by induced changes in the synoptic atmosphere's frequency response characteristics: e.g., changed gas ratios, electron temperature enhancements) affect “the most dynamic part of the planet” (see: “The Core-Mantle Boundary”, Raymond Jeanloz and Thorne Lay, Scientific American, 1 July 2005). Consider the complex angular momentum input modulations carried by variations in solar wind velocity, acceleration, and time rate of change of acceleration, as per, for instance: David A. Juckett, “Evidence for a 17-year cycle…”, Solar Physics, 183:1, November 1998, pp. 201-24. To my understanding, such “butterfly-wing-flap” variations (quoting Juckett's first sentence: “The oscillations of the Sun span minutes to centuries”) are considered in the physics underlying the Paine-Kaplan model as factors involved in creation of the macroscale energy-momentum imbalances (input 1T2-paradoxes hardly being unique to the atmosphere: see here, good offices of Doron Nof, for an example in another so-called “classical domain”, that is, if altogether neglected is “The Hydrodynamic Analogy to E = mc2”, Victor P. Starr, Tellus, 9:1, 1959) diagnosed as initiatory of cascade processes leading to tornadogeneses. The Trickster archetype's memory is long, long indeed, and the tricks play across full scope of that memory. Western civilization in general, and the Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion in particular, are most responsible for invocation of the collective suicide self-metaprogram clearly initialized by the mid-19th century. So, how very characteristic of Trickster behavior that, tying beginning to end, existential threat to the 1T2-only logic cornerstoning Western civilization should occasion advent of that self-metaprogram -- and even before the existential threat became explicit, Cantor and Lukasiewicz having been only implicit in Abel. Revenge of the abused-raped-abandoned animistic-pagan mother: just the mythological sort of compensatory abreaction the collective unconscious likes to engage in. Appetizer cum prequel: soberly oblivious; stumblebums into a teetotaller's wall; locks and loads in anticipation of the Garand prize; pumps the trigger; lurches; careens; pulls back; squints; can't see the next wall sneaking up; stammers into the fog; secrets banter; curses fate; sways to the unseen moon; trips a bend over a random brick; treads hate into a night sea journey's waters of the wishfulfilling dream; straightbacks; headsup into the night; like unto tumbles down an unlit staircase. Yoarsen!-- uh, yea-yah; I git the drift: unmollifying crimp on a wincer's prowl; acerbic; bilious; droll; wool-puller bloodhounding the bloopers among the troopers; quaffer of unrinsed amoral silt. And lo, it has come to pass that much of the global economy is devoted to the search for a better humantrap. Any tech derivatively spun off secondary to that effort can be used to dissemble the actual intent. The Trickster archetype at play in the fields of 1T2-paradoxicality: since the major progenitors -- Abel, Cantor, Lukasiewicz, Schrödinger -- issued from Christian backgrounds, Abel, who started it all, being born into a pastor's family, the breakaway animistic-pagan ideas cannot be attributed to the influence of Judaism. The intense back-reaction against, however, had (and has: the exact same deep-structure thematic dyscrasia is regressed-archetypally driving events today, as it has throughout period of the “War of the World”) a strong Rabbinate-against-the-Cabalists thematic feel to it -- a back-reaction culminating in state Communism and Nazism. Big licks into that! The central banksters' command orientation is Rabbinical, whilst µTm-logically-valued LETS nesting-foams are Cabalistic. Projection-personification-introjection-concretion-conflation-inflation-transference-conversion-displacement-reduction-repression-regression: the Biblical basis (some interesting observations, good offices of Laurent Guyenot) of the theologies of the Rabbinate and derivative priesthoods, sacred and secular. On the other hand, the promise of metanoiein and anastasis (upstanding from a well-rooted position) is built into the non-selfsame numbers through which the Cabalistic Tree-of-Life is Schrödinger-memetime-independently demergent/remergent from/to “pixilated” pre-pregeometry to CTC+-unto-µTm pregeometry to Regge-lattice-like geometrodynamic transforms to spacetime physics. So, as a perfect example of mass conversion and introjection followed by projective-identification, it can be observed that the self-purported Erdgeist-identified Nazis took a Rabbinical position as foundation for their scapegoating and holocausting of the Jews: Trickster at work. Days filled with lots of red wine, few black roses. To understand anything significant about hu-hu-hu-man hisstory, one has, really, to become something of a cognitive proctologist investigating gangrene of the mass mind. Identifying archetypal behavioral gradients, mass expressions of constellated complexes, group-groped projective-identifications, collective ConveDD dynamics: observe uncensored roof-brain chatter and write down recurrent themes as autogenic verbalization; do not stigmatize internal considering, write it down instead; make a record of what is read along with unfiltered spontaneous reactions to it; keep all of this over months and years; periodically do traffic analysis upon it. If there is an unacknowledged collective psychosis, inescapably the conditions of that condition are reflected in buried individual neurotic syndromes. By contrast, this and this sorts of things are the whats some people pay up to a hundred-thou/year to gain face-to-face access to, and this is regarded by many as the current state of the-- uh, thought. But, if no-mind is not absence of mind but presence of the multivalue, what, actually, is “emptying”? Is it a ketaminergic [kinhin}ing of the empty space between two [zazen}ed fixed points on the memetime line? Is it the generation of a temporal CURLing? “Get behind thyself!” is the quasi-Christian apocryphal which was Gnostic-Gospels attributed vis-à-vis concentration in self-observation at walking meditation, but maybe this sort of getting behind (which, if sustained, is an infinite regress, with all the attendant holo-part-is-whole Cantorian 1T2-paradoxes thereto for which to encounter) is merely an early stage in the side-stepping (by lateral thinking into, for instance, the latent content of peripheral vision) of manned-up 1T2-only selfhood, the initial functional prerequisite to entry upon µTm-unto-CTC+ relative-state identity-transparency. Speaking from primitive-Shinto-influenced (not the Nazi-imitative state Shinto) wet-rice-culture-facilitated preadolescent experience in Midori Gaoka of something, some state-of-consciousness, along these “lines”, I can say that, to my understanding, this greatly enriches a childhood. Non-Everettian µTm-relative-state is, by the multiversers, however, presumed guilty of equivalency to guilt by association with the precriminal -- which, by them, the multiversers being rule-abiders, is exactly why it was expunged.
One corollary to the path of approach I have taken is that what Stephen Blaha designates TE, Theory of Everything, cannot be singular, cannot be selfsame, cannot be the same as itself, indeed, is doubly non-selfsame at the extreme minimum; rather, that there are C+nesses of non-selfsame TE, the each-of-it (not Wheelerian yes-or-no “It from Bit” engendering “Law without Law” as discoursed upon by Cristi Stoica in “The Tao of It and Bit”, arXiv, 24 August 2015) incomplete or inconsistent unto the themselves-of-itself according to which TL, Logic Theory of Everything, of whichever 1T2-unto-µTm-unto-CTC+ logical-value order-type (understood independent the notion truth-value and relative to non-simple relative-state identity-transparency, calculable iff the Doctrine of Uses is formalized in m-state mu-its, not 2-state qu-bits, universal physical constants being m-valued relative to, for one, nested classes of conservation laws, as argued in our 1977 paper entitled “Toward a General Theory of Process”, concerning which Wheeler was dismissive), is employed to elaborate the n-[gender}ing each-of-it of the themselves-of-itself of TE. Incidentally, I use C+ relative to T (for transparency, not truth or tree) as a shorthand way to say “as large as we like”, heh-heh-heh!, i.e., beth two and beyond. The reason why I've never cultivated serious interest in technical details of any of the truth-value-related discourses on interpretations, elaborations, utilities of m-valued logics, most of which I had not heard of during the 1960s and '70s, the real-time in which our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, is set: I came to the subject of multivalent logics in midst of a long struggle to comprehend identity-transparency. It was during the summer of 1961, whilst discovering various devices of attention manipulation qua self-observation during individual practice of basketball skills in the base gym of Eielson AFB, Alaska, that I began to get a topological handle upon the “Plexiglas-wall” cum tunnel-vision glazing the thousand-yard-stare gaze -- Oh, uh, yeah, right! Jus' thinkin', y'know -- cum near-blackout experiences I had frequently sustained since 1957, soon after return to the U.S. from three years in kita-Kyushu, Japan. I knew this syndrome was culture-shock induced: the shock of returning to the separatism characteristic of the West. What, by contrast, I didn't understand were the unusual states of consciousness I had experienced living in rural Japan. How could I be myself and not myself simultaneously? The first glimmer on the road to understanding came during the fall of 1963 when, in Samuel Weiser's Antiquarian Books, 845 Broadway, NYC, I bought the first volume of J. G. Bennett's The Dramatic Universe because of the appendix on null-vectored “diversely identical skew cubes”, a mathematical notion, which I couldn't actually penetrate, but which nonetheless seemed to offer some insight into the states I had experienced as a preadolescent running wild in rice fields of Midori Gaoka, Japan. The next glimmer came during the fall of 1975 in the Cornell Mathematics Library upon first becoming aware of many-valued logics by discovery of Emil L. Post's dissertation of 1920 published in 1921 by the American Journal of Mathematics. Again, while I understood little of this dissertation, the strong sense that the m-valued propositions discussed therein had something to do with null-vectors and Bennett's “diversely identical” and would help me understand the subjective imponderables of the Japan period of my childhood became a guiding light -- but the truth-value interpretation of Post made no contribution, in context of that guiding light, to the attainment of my ontic objective. By then, I knew the words “selfsame” and “self-similar”, and I knew something about the information stored on a holographic plate, a plate when broken into smaller and smaller pieces loses no information about the whole image, except that there is blurriness -- something similar to looking at a scene when having a “Plexiglas wall” experience. The “Plexiglas wall”, I was coming to understand, is a ConveDD, a conversion-disorder displacement, induced by identity-transparency deprivation -- denial of this non-selfsameness qua non-simple-identity state, once constellated, being traumatic. Considering the pre-pregeometry, pregeometry, geometrodynamics, and spacetime physics involved, what's on the holographic plate? Multivalent wave-effect information in fractal nesting foams of self-similar scale levels, each level alone selfsame, yet the whole whole non-selfsame by virtue of the broken piece, “as small as we like”, heh-heh-heh!, containing all the information of the whole: part-whole relative-state identity-transparency, but blurry when processed 1T2-only? In 1962, I almost became an Alaska high school dropout to homestead a big plot along the Steese Highway chosen and boundaries staked out with the help of sourdough Paul Connell. Unfortunately, being underage, this project was blocked by my parents. During 1968, at CICV-Targets and SRA/MACV-J2, I learned about self-organization by information (resource) exchange across frequently changed boundaries, and the mapping of bureaucratic variables upon those boundaries. Though during the very early-1970s I had two more misadventures (British Columbia and Nova Scotia) with Robert Ardrey's “territorial imperative”, I eventually gave it up, having come to believe that this “imperative”, at least in non-humans, is not Darwinian, but related to instinctively-ecologically-informed “reciprocal maintenance” of fractal-boundaries-without-boundary in “application” of the holographic principle. The standard way of handling Cantor's paradox, uh, uh, that's a 1T2-only paradox, mind you, is to change the rules established by mistaken “intuition” (in the maths-physics sense meaning: cognition-of-the-normotic) such that the critical “collection” can be redefined as a bijective “proper class”, thus, like the multiversers, pushing “the horror, the horror”, i.e., in this case, challenge to the foundational notion of mathematics, which is “set”, into the “out there”, no questioning being directed toward validity-utility of the notion 1T2-only-truth-value. My contention has been that C3, “Cogitate-cogitate-cogitate!” (quoting from John C. Lilly's “Tank Logs” and from his note entitled “Mantra Demystified”), concerning simple non-selfsameness, not to mention m-state non-selfsameness, is not aided, indeed, is obstructed, by alphanumeric maths notation; further, that cogitation in µTm-unto-CTC+ logics about µTm-unto-CTC+ logics, rather than in 1T2-logic about µTm-unto-CTC+ logics, would be markedly facilitated only with techno-exteriorization of inner Musculpt-as-maths-notation. Moreover, this approach and contention indicate that I do not believe all of everything, even much thereof, can be reduced to motion conjugated to number or vice versa, regardless and irregardless of “It from Bit” and/or “Bit from It”. The notion of motion is to be regarded notational signifier. Notation for the theory is the theory itself! Exteriorized inner-Musculpt (which is starting to come on, e.g., via Dan Tepfer, as VDOed in “Player Piano Blends Coding and Jazz”): a non-Chomskian, demergent, dis[in}generative, [in}form|ality notion of semantics (carried by superconductant pi-electron gas core-environment of DNA) in 1T2ly-ill-formed formulas of CTC+-unto-µTm-logical mathswise languages. The Unacceptables, to the normotics: notions in nonconformity to binary prescriptions and proscriptions. Suppressed-unto-repressed, hence regressed and libido laden, thus predisposing to ConveDDing, conversion-disorder displacing, and projective-identification at the subject-object level of transference. The anthropogenic Anthropic Principle (given assumption of single-valued universal physical constants under 1T2-only logic): in a participatory universe, the scientific quorum sees it when it believes it and designs an experiment to confirm what it believes it sees. To me, M does not mean model, but the M to the m to the m to the m… which is the Musculpt manifold qua Tzog-chen AllBase qua Platonia-sans-the-probability-fog. According to our understanding, it is via 3-fold topologically-active operator-time and two levels of hypercomplexity that the time-dependent Schrödinger equation geometrodynamically enters theory of gravitation (see Julian Barbour's “Time and complex numbers in canonical quantum gravity”, Physical Review D, 47:12, 15 June 1993): consider the role of gravitational acceleration in the canonical equation, Eq. 17, of our paper entitled “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, circa September of 1978; b, the “counter-force to the pressure-gradient term”, fulfills the same role in the canonical equation of our paper entitled “A Dynamical Theory Describing Superconductant DNA”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. XV, 1979, pp. 333-341. While I am certainly interested in C, the Cantorian continuum, and its supracardinals under chain-condition replacement (assuming logical precedence relations, generative recursion, and forced emergence of new models by adding -- as distinct from memetime-independent demergence and demergence-remergence self-canceling), B-valued M (Boolean-valued model) as it appears in Paul Cohen's method of forcing (see: “A beginner's guide to forcing”, Timothy Y. Chow, Center for Communications Research, Princeton, Contemporary Mathematics, 2000) as a means of proof regards independence from the axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory is of little interest, as the axiomatic method qua axiomatic method has, since inception, been dependent upon B-valued notions, and only B-valued notions, as to what is and is not (the yes-or-no interrogation method, which I began seriously to doubt upon becoming an experienced interrogator) self-evident, fit, worthy of premising (under the postulate that there is verisimilitude to be achieved by assuming an orientable starting is analogical to the case). I am not surprised that Separability is an axiom. And, to me, appearance of the Unboundedness axiom in characterization of the real number line is because that line lies on a nonorientable surface. Boolean-valued genericity, à la filtered forcing, is not particularly generous, IMHO, M-generic having no Lukasiewiczian sense about it, if M be understood independent of the notion truth-value. Under µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency, each number, quite obviously, uh, uh, that is, self-evidently as regards the non-selfsame, heh-heh-heh!, is Cabalistically-neoPlatonically infinite: “Cohen forcing” is required because axiomitization is embraced. Self-evident in TL over TE where Lit-conjugate-ItT is doubly non-selfsame? What is the likelihood of there being amplitude to the probability of that?
Even in use -- for the purpose of explicating generative emergence -- of forcing posets, it is found that the demergence-related notion preorder is required. But note that a “preorder” is defined as necessarily being a binary relation and only a binary relation, not an n-nary relation, not a C-nary relation, not a C+-nary relation (as is the case, it must be supposed, on the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space). It is no mere coincidence that binary total preorders are also called preference relations -- and that “preference functions” are an integral aspect of command economies employing 1T2-only currencies. Be aware that while Clifford parallels conform to the binary notion of identity codified in the idea of an antisymmetric relation (is that “different to” rather than “different from”?), J. G. Bennett's pencils of skew-parallels do not so conform. In Appendix III of Bennett's The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956, Bennett uses the term “diversely identical” as a characterization of non-selfsameness, mathematically codified in n-dimensional skew-cubes “drawn” by use of imaginary-dimensioned and null-vector constructed skew-parallels. Synoptic non-selfsameness -- of a whole which is less-and-more than itself (think of Cantor's paradox where the collection-to-class extension pseudo-resolution of the 1T2-only paradox is actually extendable class-to-whatever, whatever-to-whatever, ad infinitum regards addition of new axioms) by µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency of diversely-identical part-holographically-equivalent-to-whole, if a bit fuzzy when cognized under 1T2-only logic processing, superposed upon C+such parts presheaved and ensheaved -- is hardly captured by the arithmetic addition operation. Bennett, and Appendix III coauthor R. L. Brown, elaborate their skew-parallelism theory in Euclidian space. In the first paragraph, it is said: “If we are to set our ontology free of the limitation of single-valued existence we require a geometry that will enable us to represent situations in which each entity can be 'more than one thing at once'”. Hmmm: “at once”. At the end of the appendix, it is said: “…man's journey requires an imaginary dimension other than time…” So, what is the context and meaning of “at once”? Particularly if relativity physics is involved in definition of the context? This evocation of “imaginary time” and a supraordinate hyperimaginary dimension by Bennett and Brown came in 1956, well before Douglas A. Paine's 1970's use of imaginary-hyperimaginary-hyperhyperimaginary topologically-active 3-fold “temporal CURL”. So, what does non-selfsame identity-by-means-of-diversity under holographic-µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state do to the consensus notions symmetry, invariance, transformation?
Kate Morton in her novel The Lake House (Pan paperback edition, 2015, p. 509) has one of her characters think a thought with depreciatory implications regards the public-space-placed feelings-scanner (as discussed in “Spy cameras could soon know what we're thinking and feeling simply by scanning our BODIES -- and there may be no way to opt-out”, Tim Collins, The Daily Mail, 13 April 2018). The unconscionable resource waste at monitoring and storing the cognitive detritus of the seven-billion-plus horde of roof-brain-chatterers and feeling-toned internal-considerers! This, this, instead of the holographic smart dress and biofeedback in the flotation tank as training aid to EscherForm-dance humanpods learning sonic-visioning Dolphinspeak as facilitation of exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to µTm-LETS nesting-foams -- these foams and the m-scenarios, strategic, e-commons gaming of indicators-measurables-tagged m-value stacks insuring very low incidence of “investment” vehicles that are mere gambling-hall gambits. Though it's pretty hard to avoid speculating that at cuspover it will become non-controversial to hold the opinion that science and the technology it spawned were the worst things that ever happened to humanity. Until their bubble burst, the Japanese still very strongly advocated and relied upon “relationships of trust”, that's shinrai kankei, as the basis of good business practice -- not plaintext contracts, let alone trustless, encrypted, “smart”, self-executing software contracts (for an informed discussion of high-tech trustlessness, see: “Blockchain is not only crappy technology but a bad vision for the future”, Kai Stinchcombe, Medium, 5 April 2018). So, how is it the Japanese have become fond of useless-at-scale (see: “Ten years in, nobody has come up with a use for blockchain”, Kai Stinchcombe, Hackernoon, 23 December 2017) blockchained cryptos? Arguably the worst aspect of blockchain tech is the energy dissipation upon the solving of meaningless problems. Rebel Without a Cause? Only a mindless snot could find no cause to attend to. To keep it mindless, such that deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull not be penetrated: this is what over-ordered-set forcing PC PC-use is all actually about, for really real, dontchathink. As if there were no meaningful problems to solve at monetary exchange, e.g., those associated with the ever changing Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” and indicator-indexing of the m-values to be ensheaved upon, and continuously updated regards, base-state of each given µTm-LETS monetary unit. Bottom-up implementation required, for, despite IRscanning, paraphrasing William Blake, the Eagle in his command helicopter never can know what Moles could discover that they have to share. Presence of Eagles prevents initialization of the Moles' discovery algorithms. There are clearly a dozen and more activities humanity has been engaging in anyone of which alone could be sufficient to species self-canceling. Not The Last of the Finest, The Finest of the Last in the catalog of Last and First Men. No April fooling! Quoth Morton regards feeling-space voyeurism:
It occurred to her that it was a very brave thing to do, to write one's feelings down on paper and give them to another person.
The memetime frame of this thought was given as 2003, an altogether different era -- more different, so holds my I/im (the m-values of this I/i being-therehere in µTm-relative-state identity-transparency, there's no need to go anywhere, to follow all possible paths, in getting from my [me}s to [myself}s across the wide birth of C+-therehere), than most suppose. Once quantum-relativity physics, even though dissimulated, had gotten into the techno-base, largely a post-WWII phenomenon, there really wasn't any more left of the possibility to keep down unvarnished CTC+-unto-µTm-valued logics -- and all the other unwanteds, beginning with RAD-Lab-demonstrated bio-effects of low levels of ambient EM radiation, radar not the least -- no matter how many uncooperative researchers were removed. With their announcement of The End of History, the neoCons -- swift cuts, their [excre}mental impulses, aye, executed with tin-mined laughter -- felt as if they'd gotten pregnant when, actually, they'd fallen pregnant, collapse of the whole Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean-Weberian institutionalization having begun in earnest. There has been, and will be, no possibility whatsoever that the clung-to centuries-old Cartesian-Newtonian institutions can-will well manage quantum-based technologies. Given magnitude of what is currently at stake in full unambiguity, our Nazis are incommensurately more evil than were their WWII forebears. Bring it on! uh, the command-economy-forced trade-war (good offices of Charles Hugh Smith, “Why Trade Wars Ignite and Why They're Spreading”, Of Two Minds, 13 April 2018) drift toward PW1 (and the trade-war-forced enhanced reliance upon central bank command, good offices of Nomi Prins, “Why Trade Wars Will Unleash Central Banks”, The Daily Reckoning, 12 April 2018), which may be the war that actually ends all wars before nature seals the deal. Flaseflag a blackflag deconfliction strike, whydontcha? Even the most savvy prognosticators have wildly underestimated memeduration -- memetime-share rationalization being a focus for obsession, not only of the binary geek, but also of your run-of-the-treadmill, circular, particle-accelerator physicist -- until institutional cuspover because (1) 1T2-only human systems decisively preference-function structural stability over adaptive morphogenesis, and (2) non-equilibrium-thermodynamic cum catastrochaos-theoretic cum complexity-theory characterizations of rapid, critical-state, self-organized µTm-phase-transitions in nature are inaccurately formalized as being 1T2-only, for example, as mapped over SFI's 2nk fitness landscape, rather than within an Mnk articulation space. This mischaracterization led to the wrong supposition: human systems adapt as rapidly as natural systems do relative to their given memetemporal windows. The more every issue in every field of human endeavor is “successfully” renormalized to 1T2-only, the more perseverant structural stability of the existing institutionalization vis-à-vis adoption of morphogenetic plasticity -- and the more thorough the collapse at cuspover, adaptation having been longer and longer postponed, if not outright altogether rejected. Whatizzit all about, Alf? [Exem}plum: the imperialistic monopolistic (myriad historical examples) cum monopsonistic (think: e.g., Amazon, good offices of Paul Krugman) impulses receive their most fundamental cause-push/attractor-pull from the 1T2-only-logically-valued framework determining condition of markets in prevailing economies. Dey jus' love deir 1T2-only-Money Jungle! Dickens be on yer, what! As regards my indifference, low more than high, I'm a strong believer in karma, one of the ever clever basic cleaver principles of unfettered free markets -- all the better if the [mark}etts employ µTm-LETS currencies mapped upon nesting foams of fractal e-boundaries.
No mere barking of Berkeley Ideals! let alone trumpeting of mere [i}deals. If charge be Riemann's “lines of force trapped in the topology of space” as strings, does existence of quantum-numerological hypercharge, Y cum YW, (if the multiplicative constant is m-valued like universal physical constants under holographic-principled µTm-relative-state, then not T3-generated doubLETS, but 3-fold op-time de-generated nLETS qua multi[p}LETS properly “quantum-numbered”, à la Alexander.Karpenko functors over the primes, with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers: think some nm-cross-nm C+-Lukasiewiczian modification of the nonlinear, finitely-generated, infinite Tarski monster group, G, as the preorder, heh-heh-heh!) bespeak superstrings as CTC+-unto-µTm-Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” null-vectored via hypercomplex and imaginary 3-fold temporal CURL? Is isospin, I3 cum T3, a 1T2-way to look at Lukasiewiczian temporal CURL? Especially in view of the equilateral-triangular meshwork over which Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers are numbered on the Tzog-chen AllBase of Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space? Again, personally, I can't semantically buy into the role assigned to arithmetic addition (not only with regards to superposition, but also relative to taste-polymorphic hypercharge). Amping-up Blaha, consider a non-Turing-machined CTC+-unto-µTm-quantum computer program a model, and only a model, of the memetime-independent demergence-operator-composite (doc), this doc descriptive of Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time's transform, a transform read out Lukasiewiczian in terms of relative-state identity-transparency over Schrödinger's m-valued state-function. To a non-binary cognizer, not bought into the Born Rule Witch Bull, there must be µTm-and-m-more states betwixt, between, and |be}yon[i]her wavicle, continuous-or-discrete, legato-or-staccato being epiphenomenal to use of 1T2-only-logic lenses. Gödel undecidability, not only deems any apocryphal Blaha TE (Theory of Everything) as necessarily quantum in character, but also not possibly writable by employments of 1T2-only-logic alone, howsoever Schrödinger con[cat}en|ated.
Were the requisite employments made, what would then be the base-state of an m-valued µTm-processed monetary unit is analogous to the stem of a word; the values stacked on the base-state, its modifiers. The action-directives indicated by the base-state in given market circumstances would be determined by application of econometrically-relevant orthographic rules of the Musculpt language; the ensheaved values would activate morphological rules which modify those orthographic. “Au contraire!”, says John D. Beforeman to Dr. Badlatte's castigation of Musculpt. Why? Because synaesthetic Musculpt non-dominantly transcends left-right-eye dominance and glutamatergic pilot-fixation syndrome by virtue of memetime-slow-down mediated by baud-rate-of-consciousness ketaminergically approaching, eye-wise for one, Luneburg limiting velocity. Very likely a Lukasiewiczian version of an m-memory-tape finite-state-stack-transducer (see: “Finite State Stack Transducer for Functionality in a Multi-Parameter Environment”, Saurabh Ranjan Srivastava and Angela Joseph, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 10:30, August 2017) is required as monetary morphological parcer for processing of µTm-LETS transactions. Development of the Musculpt software for m-scenarios e-commons computer-gaming of µTm-LETS monetary-unit value-ensheaving likely would require applications of “General Morphological Analysis” (Tom Ritchey, Swedish Morphological Society, last revised 2013). Going to the CTC+ cases likely is of only heuristic utility regards µTm-logically-processed m-valued-LETS nesting foams. So, a finite-valued Lukasiewiczian generalization of n-stack-operating (an m-valued monetary unit, being a quantum-composite, all values in the stack act simultaneously in µTm-relative-state) nested-stack-automata, possibly complexed to m-stacks embedded pushdown automata qua EPDA (see: “A redefinition of Embedded Push-Down Automata”, Miguel A. Alonso and Eric de la Clergerie and Manuel Vilares, Workshop TAG+5, 25-27 May 2000: EPDA as tuple seems to be indicated for µTm-LETS purposes), may be sufficient to implementation of m-valued monetary units. However, with respect to a quantum-composite global unit of account, an ensheaved unit ledgering Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth, infinite Lukasiewiczian trees (likely of some considerable value here is “The Theory Of Ends, Pushdown Automata, And Second-Order Logic”, David E. Muller and Paul E. Schupp, Theoretical Computer Science, 37, 1985, pp. 51-75) Alexander.Karpenko-functors mapped to Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbering of the p-adic-cum-polyadic tiling systems covering the MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) may be required, if “Infinite-State Energy Games” (Parosh Aziz Abdulla, et al., arXiv, 3 May 2014) are to be employed at preparation and initialization and maintenance of such a unit of account.
Quoting from a piece resurrected by the Socialist Labor Party of America, January of 2006, that piece being an editorial in the Daily People entitled “Self-Stultification” written by Daniel de Leon, 16 March 1901:
No movement can survive self-contradiction. Self-stultification is suicidal… Living work, active work -- these are essential to keep pure and in strong pulse the blood of Principle coursing in a Movement's arteries.
A legal definition of “stultification” can be found here, as well as synonyms drawn from Burton's Legal Thesaurus. “Insanity” licks large: go figure. In doing so, consider, if you will, Alwyn Lau's “What's Wrong With the Law of Non-Contradiction?”, Medium, 5 April 2017. As for my me: “If we examine” whatsoever -- by employment of the 1T2-only logic prescriptively enculturated-socialized and glutamatergically-anchored to the molecular-cellular brain by cognitive “development” at neuronal plasticity -- we inescapably find binaries whenever-wherever we might look and listen before we go. “You cannot just assert, announce, proclaim conclusions; you must explicitly state assumptions, present evidence, analyze according to generally accepted principles so as to justify your conclusions. The way you think is prelogical, preadolescent even, and therefore without social value.” Even though very early on I learned the hard way to keep this stuff pretty much to myself, if the functional equivalent to that statement was said to me once, it was said to me a hundred times -- right up until I dropped out of college, in no small part for having gotten sick of hearing it. I did independent study courses as a sophomore and junior under tutorial of Mr. Moore, Eielson AFB High School, Alaska, 1960-'61, in symbolic logic, topology, and foundations of mathematics -- so I knew a bit about the “generally accepted principles”. Doubt this? Ask David LeBlanc and Ben Ray Smith. Incidentally, Mr. Moore never once told me I was preadolescent prelogical. I knew, however, from prelogical preadolescent experience in one of the most traditional areas of rural Japan, aged 8-11, that I could be both myself and not myself simultaneously. This was why I always emotionally rejected the “generally accepted principles”, based as they are on the explicitly stated assumption that A cannot simultaneously be not-A. If I could be subject and object simultaneously, then, quite likely, I could know things about the world of objects by simply looking at the subject and reporting what I saw. I learned that this was likely all the more the case by the holographic part-whole identity manifest in constitution of the transfinite cardinal numbers. “One” -- heh-heh-heh! -- could hardly have missed that, even with the most cursory introduction to foundations of mathematics (and even when the whole issue was dissembled by the likes of Bertrand Russell, and many others of similar luminosity). Nonetheless, it took me a period longer than it should have, my me being “not too smart”, to figure out -- requiring penetration of both the man-woman and subject-object levels of projective-identification at transference -- and bring into conscious awareness the fact that what I “asserted, announced, proclaimed” had little to do with verbal, symbolic, even simple imagistic thought processes (most specifically those of “logical accommodation”, a set not actually existent under µTm-unto-CTC+-valued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value); it had to do, “so to speak”, with stacked feeling-toned complexes “read” from subliminal “apprehension” of the inner-Musculpt that occasionally -- only at deepest concentration -- would demerge into fully-conscious symformphonic cinerama. Unfortunately, and for obvious reasons, that conscious access pretty much ebbed away by age 35. Well, for one, I never ran across any other “one” with whom it might have become intercommunicable. Nineteenth-Century utopian socialism, more specifically anarcho-syndicalism, and even anarcho-capitalism, full-blown Libertarianism that is, never amounted to much because they never produced a believable account of spontaneous social order, market mediated or no. Why? In my judgment because their identification with, no mere commitment to, the 1T2-only-logic “Law of Non-Contradiction” prevented them from seeing that self-referential reflexivity -- which in Lukasiewicz logics, understood independent of the notion truth-value, involves C+-levels of 1T2-contradiction, that's infinitudes of “self-stultification” -- is, indeed is, the relative-state identity-transparency underlying the quantum potential ultimately responsible for autopoiesis and self-organization.
Please note that what I say about seeing binaries (say: “spin-up” or “spin-down”) whenwherever our lookings are 1T2-only processed is not equivalent to the Wheelerian notion “law without law”; indeed, it is quite contrary to Wheeler's “it from bit” and certainly not an example of “magic without magic”. At Cornell, I read and reread Doug Paine's copy of the huge tome Gravitation over the period 1975 to '77 and adopted many Wheelerian perspectives; the notion “pregeometry as the calculus of propositions” most captured my attention -- though, from first encounter (having already read Emil Post's dissertation), I personally regarded pregeometry as µTm-logical not 1T2-logical. Wheeler's outlook and my own decisively parted ways during the late-1970s and into the '80s when he further elaborated his takes on information and natural law. Quoting his article entitled “Law Without Law” given in Quantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (eds.), Princeton U. Press, 1983, p. 210:
The picture of the participatory universe will flounder, and have to be rejected, if it cannot account for the building of law; and spacetime as part of law; and out of law substance. It has no other than a higgledy-piggledy way to build law: out of the statistics of billions and billions of acts of observer-participancy each of which by itself partakes of utter randomness.
The assertion that the It (of “It from Bit”) “has no other… way to build law” (none but by partaking of “utter randomness”) neglects to take adequate account of Wheeler's own notion “pregeometry as the [1T2-only] calculus of propositions”. Pregeometry: in the Wheelerian view, not synonymous with preobservation; more like subobservation, which raises the issues of (1) pre- as time-related and pre- as ontology-related (ontologically “behind” the stationary of the memetime-independent Schrödinger equation there are the “clocks within clocks within clocks” of 3-fold temporal CURL), and (2) the subliminal, the personal unconscious, the collective unconscious, the whole Wignerian protestation. And if a “bucket of dust” be pre-pregeometry, lattices of which (interconnected dust motes, that is) are numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, there quite likely could be a Lukasiewiczian Way, a way, not to build law, but to [CTC+-unto-µTm-unto-1T2: this being one kind of Bit-from-It way] demerge it. An act of participancy “BY ITSELF” is a pretty strange notion, one, heh-heh-heh!, has to admit, the origin of which needs to be explained. The self of itself, and the self of that self, and the self of the self of that self, so on and so forth (good offices of Hubert Benoit, Let Go! Theory and Practice of Detachment According to Zen, 1962; I studied the 1973 Weiser edition) unto-- what, absolute nihil? Beyond dread, well into fear and loathing. Dread, fear, loathing of what? “Participation mystique” by any chance? Tacitly regarded as equivalent to “participation inconsciente”? Is the Wheelerian notion of a participatory universe a ConveDD, a conversion-disorder displacement, of the fundamental defining property of the ontic experience responsible for pagan-animism, a property mathematically and physics-wise codified as µTm-relative-state identity-transparency? The very same Postian-Lukasiewiczian µTm (circa 1921) rejected when the Born Rule (which Schrödinger never accepted) was knee-jerk consensuated (circa 1926) as prefiguration of the Copenhagen interpretation? There must be dozens of ways to drop out in place. The incidence of that amongst the most intelligent and creative has grown and grown since WWI. Tantric Schrödinger was one such, essentially from the occasion whereupon he left Germany. The tidal wave of such “desertions” undoubtedly had a great impact on the 20th century. I applauded when I learned that Wheeler first presented his “It from Bit” idea to a conference at the SFI, for how very appropriate, given the anti-animistic Santa Fe formulation (“participation mystique” is registered only at high k-values spurned by SFI) as regards self-organized criticality on a 2nk fitness landscape -- rather than in an Mnk articulation space (where non-Everettian µTm-relative-state [Everett relative-state being 1T2-only; hence, misconstrued to multiverse rather than understood relative to m-logically-valued universe] demerges from high k-values to low, thus being productive of the heuristically-isolated system definable only under 1T2-only logic). The number of involved component processes is designated by n; the number of correlations between those processes is designated by k. In the SFI view, the order of logical-value of the processor is fixed at 1T2. In my view, as ordinality of the exponent increases without bound unto Cantorian cardinalities, the order of logical-value of the processor similarly increases (along with the quantum potential for higher and higher levels of self-organizational competency). Oh my, 1T2-paradoxically, Wheelerian “law without law” presupposes a preordering, uh, an objective, non-participatory, preexistent Law of Linear-Time Evolution, in that, if “delayed choice” in the present determines the past so thoroughly as to back-channel the laws of nature, even anthropically the single-values of the universal physical constants, then the distinction between present and past must be non-participatorily objective, not merely memed, and that law, the one concerning time, cannot be “without law”. Uh-oh, another of those “the set of all-- whatever, including itself” conundrums -- in this case as regards sets of laws -- which can only be resolved under 1T2-only by being pushed “out there”, collection to class, universe to multiverse, so on. Really, though, maintaining as I do that, binarily speaking, consciousness in its active aspect is the set of all topological operators (think, for instance, temporal CURL) on the MVRS, i.e., Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian m-logically-valued reference space (Tzog-chen AllBase Kun Gzhi of MVRS being composite tensor product of position basis and all other classes of bases, which is to say that with Lukasiewicz conjugated to Hilbert there are no preferred bases on the AllBase, all preference functions being demergent), and that consciousness in its passive aspect is the MVRS acted upon, I have nothing against It being non-selfsame-self self-informing information and the observer being information heuristically split off via demergence as if It were hiding from Its non-selfsame selfhood iff the information is m-state mu-itic, not only 2-state qu-bitic, in other words iff the information is CTC+-unto-µTm-unto-1T2-logically-valued. However, topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time; 3-fold temporal CURL; instantaneously m-valued universal physical constants; truth-value-independent-Lukasiewiczian m-logically-valued interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued state-function; all-paths-taken relative to µTm-unto-CTC+-logical processing being equivalent to no paths needed under C+ly-superposed relative-state identity-transparency (quantum teleportation is just a Newtonian way of conceptualizing µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency! and delayed initial conditions is just a Newtonian way to dissimulate logical-value-order-type memetimeless demergence, i.e., equivalent to throwing away “bad” solutions at infinity inside infinity inside infinity or clocks within clocks within clocks, in order to, say, get [pref}erred energy levels) on the Tzog-chen AllBase base-state of MVRS (no either/or's being-therehere): these and other principles of cascade theory are not easily made suggestive of “law without law”.
The Japanese word “nemawashi” may literally translate as “going around the roots”, but that descriptor really doesn't get at how the spade-work procedure differs from simply balling a tree for transplanting. What I know of this, I learned good offices of Nonkei T. Ishiyama (Taisho Era Chiba University graduate in horticulture), and Toshikasu Kajiwara (degree in regional planning, Kyushu University), my senseis for 3 and 4 years, respectively -- and also Sasaki Sensei, at the time, very early 1970s, the head gardener at the Embassy of Japan, Washington, D.C. Later, along with walking meditation, I used performance of nemawashi as a phylactery-context and framework condition within which to practice self-observation upon moving centers at conduct of inner work: alone with the trees in the field ten hours a day, day in and day out, over a period of some years -- with a few interruptions. In preparation for the transplanting of a large deciduous tree that has been sitting in its location for quite a few years, the nemawashi process begins, before the leaves come out, a number of early-springs prior to the actual act of transplanting. That number depends on many factors, the most important of which is how old the tree is: the older, the earlier the process is begun. Type of tree and many other considerations enter the judgment call: the more experience the gardener has, the better the call. Rochelle Kopp offers an improvement on the popular definition in her piece entitled “Defining Nemawashi”, Japan Intercultural Consulting, 20 December 2012. But let me detail what she suggests with the following statement: “In the process, each portion of the root system is given individual attention, and readied for the impending change.” We take the most elaborate case for the fullest explication. Say you've been following the rezoning announcements as publicized in the newspaper and check out the areas involved. In the present case, you discover an old Japanese red maple specimen sitting in front of a crumbling two-storied apartment building. You talk to the people involved and find out that the building will be torn down in five years and a high-rise put in its place. Perfect. You want to save that specimen -- incidentally worth a lot of money, especially if it could be successfully transplanted without the loss of a year's growth -- which has been sitting there getting more and more beautiful for at least 25 years. You make a modest offer to the owner and he accepts it, signs the contract which includes a description of the procedures involved. Why not? -- the tree would certainly be destroyed, otherwise. So, it being early-March, you set to work. You guess the ultimate size of the root ball to be made. Then you start two inches in from that circumference. Mark the circle. Using a hand trowel, you seek out and find the dominant lateral feeder roots. Using these finds as a guide, mark the circle into quarter arcs, each containing one of those roots. Next, you gingerly dig down and under at 2-inches in from circumference of the prospective ball, cutting as few roots as possible, so as, at what you deem to be 2-inches in from the bottom of the root ball you will ultimately make, to cut, with a curved pruning saw, the vertically-straight-down tap root. Now you return to the four identified dominant feeder roots. With the pen knife you use to cut burlap (if you are a young black nurseryman, you don't want to carry this knife in your jeans pocket home with you each night, as the likelihood of eventually being stopped on the street, searched, and suffering a felony arrest is very high in many areas: a life-debilitating event, which I have witnessed), starting at the distance of the 2-inch-in circle, peel 1-inch of bark off all around each of these four roots. Replace all the dirt removed in order to perform these procedures. Each of the next three springs, you return and cut one of the four chosen lateral feeder roots at the distal end of the bark peel-off, and also cut all the roots in that quadrant, ball-shape-wise down to the area of the tap root, at the 2-inches-in circumference. Adequately staking the tree at this point will insure it does not suffer wind damage. The last lateral feeder root is cut the last early-spring when the tree is finally root-balled and actually moved. On that occasion, the spade cuts 2-inches out from all the earlier work so the new fiber roots that have developed in the intervening period are not damaged. Done properly, when this tree is relocated there will be little or no damage viewable, and it will rapidly reestablish without experiencing disease or loss of growth. Illustrated by the above-given links, it is well known that the word “nemawashi” has been adapted for use in business management terminology, theory, and practice -- “consensus building” being the ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, qua the residual cultivated, which the Japanese have engaged in as compensatory abreaction since loss of direct ontic experience of the relative-state identity-transparency characteristic of “primitive Shinto” animistic modes of cognition. And this is not even to mention holographic-principle mappings of administrative variables upon partition boundaries, which could be done within corporations no less than within and/or between nation-states -- were there no phobia regards CTC+-unto-µTm-valued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value (the nth-degree of e-money = no banking system required; the nth-degree of such mappings = no government required: I'm no advocate of either, as I believe 1T2-only cash is the necessary base-state of a µTm-LETS currency, and that glutamate-etched humanity will not be psychologically able to make the phase transition to Summerhill-free-school in governance). The additive nature of the business-management nemawashi process is seen with the hankoing of the ringi (be aware that jitsuin hanko were innovated during the Meiji era as the countrywide registrar aspect of the surveillance-society response to animistic-modes-of-cognition-quenching imposed Westernization). The arithmetic addition operation in no way replicates the superposition (think of sacred-space, i.e., ma [an interesting paper by Kevin Nute, U. of Oregon, April 1999] function-functional-functor-space, uh, particularly its nested dan mosaic [the Samadhi-hearable aspect of this Musculpt manifold having been explicitly alluded to by Toru Takemitsu in the formal properties of his composition entitled November Steps {good offices of Glenn Pates Llorente, UCLA, 2015}: as readers of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, will note, my understanding {drawn from a paper I wrote for a course: “Music Appreciation: Twentieth Century”, George Mason U., circa 1973} of danmono was not relative to Western theme-and-variations, but in terms of time in ma as, using words I became familiar with two years later, active topological operator, i.e., by temporal CURL, a bridge builder; dan in the Takemitsu use-sense means “step”, not “section”, and it cannot be analyzed in the terms of Western diatonic harmony, within which it is non-hearable-cum-viewable and unspeakable as in quantum mechanics], the stacked Riemann-surface-like planes being space-like and the bridges of the function-functional-functor-space being time-like: personally, while I know a bit, heh-heh-heh!, about the topology of networks, I, unfortunately, know little of the topology of Cyberia's cyberspace) involved in relative-state identity-transparency. My understanding of what I believe to have been Takemitsu's use-sense for danmono (thank you Jonathan Richard Besancon, Ouachita Baptist University, 1984) is by good offices of Toki Miyakawa, under whom I studied Ikebana (Ikenobo School: during my period of instruction, Miyakawa Sensei was masterful, and maybe even designated some master rank relative to the Ikenobo Headmaster, I never tried to penetrate that sort of thing, who visited Kyoto regularly, and was, this is again a guess, President of the Washington, D.C. Chapter of the IKENOBO Ikebana Society of America) for three years and who was then also an accomplished kotoist and koto instructor. There were many, many discussions of Japanese aesthetics, to include those of music. This, the hanko-additivity, is deep-structure acculturation we speak of here, for the additive “hankoing of the ringi” transpose imitates the Hamiltonian transpose of the Lagrangian formulation of the Newtonian dynamics upon which The Wealth of Nations (the relative sums involved in the market supply and demand dynamic) and The Second Treatise on Civil Government (most specifically, execution of the franchise as a vector summation process) were analogically based. What blackpsyche impact? Belief that publically-aired hubbubs (DOX = discreditation ops, which are old hat, so very old that no intelligent person could…) concerning institutional malfeasance are not dysdirections helping to conceal the global-unto-domestic heinous actionables requires a state of delirium suppressed, don't y'think? Personally, I definitively lost “trust in our institutions” during 7th-grade civics class, Ypsilanti, Michigan -- circa 1958 -- with sudden realization, a feeble form of Satori, that the notion “countervailing forces” (an idea which I later learned had been borrowed from “old physics”) means social harmony is dependent upon maintenance of eternal conflict: this countervalence idea was profoundly contrary to my psychological experience in rural Japan, circa 1953-6. Moreover, that 7th-grade condition of disbelief carried on into my further education: what kind of person, who had direct immediate exposure to the personal lives of the Washington powers-that-were -- ah, they have station, self-thumps on flat chests, camouflaged knee jolts on a slow incline, some even break starch every morning -- during the early-to-mid-1960s, could have chosen to continue with plans for a professional career, in any profession? Bad paralleling bad, both on the same side of the logical-value cum identity-qua-identity puzzle palace. Following such memetime qua screentime, You Can't Go Home Again! Ah, yes, and beamtime under the total energy operator. This 1T2-only notion of a Hamiltonian has full faith and credit with the other sort of Hamiltonian: that banksterite ever since the moneychanger's tables took dominion over entrance to the temple. What they did (by government permission-inducement: e.g., to a onetime resident of the remnant redwood forest of Bonny Doon, Santa Cruz County, as regards Valley of the Giants and The Big Trees) to what was there: once I learned of it crossing the U.S. of A. time after time as a mil.brat child, it didn't take long to arrive at the impression that this “what they did” (“they”: paraphrasing-- Alicia was it?: “styes on eyes of fleas on the necks of gnats”) was unforgivable -- as is all its Hamiltonian derivatives. “Morally unjustifiable and absolutely [un]necessary.” EPA is what? But I thought it a carcinogen. Pursuit of such analogies is edifying, but if I got myself a credit card and started to pay 30 bucks for every paper I wanted to read, I'd eat up my SS check PDQ. Here's one I'd especially like to read, but won't be so doing: “On the definition of the time evolution operator for time-independent Hamiltonians in non-relativistic quantum mechanics”, Marcos Amaku, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Sao Paulo, American Journal of Physics, 85:9, 2017. Remove “non-relativistic” from the title, and something tantamount to this definition was a functional prerequisite for development of the Paine-Kaplan nested-grid, cascade-theoretic, numerical forecast model of tornadogenesis, where the relativistic part involves scale-relative absolute-limiting velocities, accelerations, and time rates of change of acceleration, topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time's 3-fold temporal CURL (this, of course, sans “unitary time evolution”, not least because two levels of nonlinearity are involved) transpiring at these relative absolute limits diagnosed by divergence to infinity or collapse to zero of critical variables. Ask me for details, I can't give them; though 40 years ago I surely knew many, details were not my remit; others were focused upon them. Quoting Amaku's abstract:
Unbounded operators are not defined for all the vectors (wave functions) of the Hilbert space of the system; when applied to some states, they give a non-normalizable state. Therefore, if H is an unbounded operator, the definition in terms of the power series expansion does not make sense because it may diverge or result in a non-normalizable wave function. In this article, we explain why this is so and suggest, as an alternative, another definition used by mathematicians.
I'd very much like to see if there is any correspondence between the Paine-Pensinger take (see here and here) and “an alternative, another definition used by mathematicians” -- because it is with each energy-momentum-imbalance-associated divergence of the indicators of complex angular momentum cascade that temporal CURL mediates inter-grid transport (even if one believes electrons are particles, somewhat analogous to electron energy-level transitions: ask what happens to the observable in its non-observable state when it is temporally-CURLed between observable and non-observable and observable states during such “transports”; wouldn't it be correct to say that < m | m > doesn't quite get it -- right? because a Lukasiewiczian Hilbert space is required to understand the non-observable state, observer-state/object-system-state being a 1T2-only “framework determining condition”; think “ketaminergic” in anyway applies to analogy-type formulations regarding the non-observable state?), seven times from synoptic scale to microscale, given choice of the correct parametrics. Oh, ma!: “the stacked Riemann-surface-like planes being space-like and the bridges of the function-functional-functor-space being time-like”. Oscillations of the air parcel with respect to the “pivot”, i.e., the reference-level temperature, are rheonomous (same for each pi-electron parcel of the pi-electron gas of helix-coiling DNA, totality of the gas itself being µTmly rheonomous), not scleronomous, the fixed point being a notion dependent upon identifications cultivated by the observer. Temporal CURL, by modifying the “time evolution factor” in the Dirac equation (for an interesting discussion of one take on operator-time and time-energy [not timeenergy, uh, well, not that active a notion of time] uncertainty, see: “A dynamical time operator in Dirac's relativistic quantum mechanics”, M. Bauer, Universidad Autonoma de Mexico, arXiv, 29 January 2013), and by violation of the energy-momentum relation, carries the process off shell (this shell not taking on the wild convolutions of theta-e surfaces, which Doug Paine once upon a memetime drew out by hand) into holes in the Dirac sea? Do such holes open onto only one kind of “place”? The “real” nonlinear complex and hypercomplex problem with the probability-cloud unto eigenstate-eigenvalue interpretation of memetime-independent Schrödinger (you, reviewer, circa 1978, did you not understand what Paine understood?, i.e., that “the spatial and temporal variables in the wavefunction are separable”: the real question here being: what understanding is to be gleaned from that fact?) is that that interpretation incorrectly assumes single-valued identity is a prerequisite to ontic existence (only those cultivating expectation of pretribrap maintain that “It is in dying that we awake to eternal life”). That is not the case, as clearly indicated by Schrödinger's cat, EPR, the Aspect experiments, small molecules being in more than one place at a given instant (chosen as small as we like) of memetime, and so on. However, if deep structure of what the 1T2-only Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is the surface-structure indicator of is not binary-conceptualized-lineally relative to the superposition principle cum quantum superposition principle simplistically understood in terms of stimulus-response behaviors, but in terms of ensheavement, Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”, and truth-value-independent CTC+-unto-µTm logically-valued identity, then “non-normalizable” does make sense, just not 1T2-only sense.
Regardless and irregardless of how The ICEman Cometh, or how becoming Electra may be at mornings, analogically speaking in binary-logical terms, here are two of the things I've learned from living in rice bowls of rural Southeast Asia: no matter how big the icebox, it's soon too small; and the bigger the icebox, the less fresh the food you eat. These two phenomena have a lot to do with the demands made upon the supply side, uh, that is, uh, ultimately, upon the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”. There is no problem discussed here -- the unearned income gained by privilege of innocently or scurrilously acquired windfall of economic rents; capitalization of economic rents into bungled bundled bundles of mortgages as well as other derivatives rehypothecated to the nth-degree, both classes of which ConveDD, qua convert-and-displace to money centers, local multiplier effects; private and public debt-service ballooning; sovereign debt service in LDCs financed by privatization of public assets; socialization of heavy external costs coupled to privatization of profits accrued largely by access to exorbitant privilege vis-à-vis exploitation of a finite resource base -- by Paul Craig Roberts, a supplysider, that could not be directly or indirectly addressed, which is not to say altogether resolved, with e-commons strategically-computer-gamed via Musculpt as user-friendly interface (regards Musculpt as maths notation: the m-grams informing forms of the Form, which adaptations of stylometric n-gram analytics may help establish formation of the theory and practice of: good offices of Maciej Eder and Jan Rybicki and Mike Kestemont, The R Journal, 8:1, August 2016), variously-backed, µTm-LETS monetary-unit nesting foams defined over fractal e-boundaries, transactions within which are evaluated in terms of a quantum-composite unit of account (brought up from below [relative to abductively-projected, hypothesized µTm-relative-states] in stages, each stage yielding results more accurate than the last; otherwise, the requisite information will never become available) formulated relative to the ultimate, this cosmological neighborhood, supply side: i.e., Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth. We're not talking compensatory lawfare, nationalization of positive externalities, boards of mediation, regulatory upgrading. And, even though, while extortionary taxes are most distortionary and the reverse is not always the case, still, in 1T2-only markets, there being positive or negative distortions only, nonetheless, we are not talking the taxes upon negative externalities proposed by Arthur Cecil Pigou. Internalizing some externalities, externalizing some internalities (say: transaction rents, incommensurate fee schedules, usurious interest rates at borrowing coupled to ZIRP-NIRP on savings, Tobin taxes, graft, rebates, kickbacks in general, kickbacks facilitating local monopolies, insider trading, prearranged bids facilitated by revolving doors, pyramiding schemes, colluded riggings, so on and so forth: relationships of trust in 1T2-only markets being either positive or negative in character, there being no inbetweens allowed and otherwhats being altogether inconceived; moreover, apparently most scientists tacitly believe that the inconceivability of those very same otherwhats is genetically determined according to 1T2-only-laws of logical necessity like supposedly are Kant's “categories of our understanding” [good offices of Kees van Berkel, “Kant's Logic in the Critique of Practical Reason”, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 28 August 2015]; however, if, as we have suggested, the radiation-dependent intracellular Zeitgeber is the temperature oscillation rate of electron parcels of the pi-electron gas core-environment of [particularly intraneuronal] DNA and this [glutamate-titer facilitated and modulated] Zeitgeber can be regarded the bottom line on bioclocks, then, not only are anthropogenically induced changes of the ambient radiation environment potent chronic stressors, but considerable credence is lent to the notion “genetic 'chronotypes'”, which may not be only simply day-night binary, i.e., there may be m-unrecognized subtypes, and that may suggest that the 1T2-only so-called “categories of our understanding” are themselves largely prescriptively-enculturated glutamatergic mental “disorders”). I will not deign detail it because dozens and dozens and dozens of specific ways would-will be found to address these issues if-when µTm-processed m-valued prices are counterpoised with m-valued wages, salaries, capital gains, and net profits of corporate persons engaged in these and those sorts of activities, any of which could be tagged to a value of a µTm-LETS-currency-unit ensheavement: while 1T2-only currencies exhibit rigid restriction in “ability to address”, µTm-currencies offer potentially infinite flexibility, the specificities of which will only emerge locally by trial and error at use. I am not of the mind to try to preprogam that process. By contrast, achievement of the quenching of alternative altcoins such that there emerges (see here and here and here and here) a single collective-ego-projective, We-Are-the-World, massively-energy-dissipative, global-monoculture-standardization-[proto}calling, blockchained, fiat, disintermediative cryptomonoscalecurrency (cryptominers factoring prime numbers not used to Gödel-number Gödel numbers of Alexander.Karpenko functors of µTm-valued propositions descriptive of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”) will be a major bootstrapping breakaway in the memetime evolution of the 200-years-running automorphic mass psychosis afflicting Sapiens, an inflammatory degenerative disease which apparently is not self-limiting. Externalities and internalities: bringing the outside inside, taking the inside outside, making the “garden” another room of the “house”, as the Japanese once did on a normative psychological basis: Frank Lloyd Wright regarded this as “transparency” qua Transparenz (good offices of Colin Rowe and Robert Slutzky, Birkhauser, 1997), which he discussed in his book The Natural House, written 1943, before I was born, but only read by me a few years after I returned, circa 1956, from my sojourn in rural Japan: and I recognized this “transparency” as a tropological-qua-analogical metareferential-conceptualization-in-design (words I would later put on it) of the “identity-transparency” I had experienced as a child, e.g., in contemplation of Obaasan's explications of the yama-no-kami whilst sitting under a wind-swept and rain-beaten old black pine underplanted with bloodgrass on the sacred mound located in the middle of the rice paddies endowing Midori Gaoka. As regards mathematical handling of quantum non-simple identity, I observe that arithmetic operations are based in the assumption that the “undifferentiated aesthetic continuum” is ontologically-already-cum-all-ready differentiable in a preorder founded upon “draw a distinction” ontologically-before arithmetic is which is ontologically-before spacetime is by virtue of elementary particle interactions. But, if the superposed concatenation required to yield an authentic quantum-composite unit of account isn't additive (“plus” somehow captures the reality of “entangled”? when those cosmologically distinguished are that ontologically undifferentiated: Those art That, to paraphrase) or multiplicative, as per “arguments” (maybe that's a stretch) earlier offered, then it can't even be conjugated, S-matrixed, tensored; so, what can it be? Answer: CTC+-unto-µTm Musculpted in accord with non-recursive ontological demergence by decompositional involutes, the holographic principle, transparency of implicate/explicate, cardinality superseding ordinality, Cantorian-holographic whole-part identity-transparency, memetime independence and consequent absence of initial conditions, so on. Memetime-future cannot be predicted with arbitrary precision because, most fund[a}mentally, it has no non-participatory objective existence. “Form finding” is not so difficult as that, if “Form and Idea are Inseparable” in “continuous [i.e., CTC+] space”, as FLW architecturally maintained in Genius and the Mobocracy, circa 1949 (at George Mason U., for a course entitled Comparative Arts, I wrote, circa 1972, among a number of others, a short paper on “Are Form and Function Indistinguishable?”). Abductively speaking of the swamp, good offices of Lorenzo Magnani (Abduction, Reason, and Science Processes of Discovery and Explanation, Springer, 1990), if Heisenberg position/momentum Uncertainty is 1T2ly surface-structure as regards non-simple identity, skew-parallelism, so on, then Gödel consistency/completeness Indeterminacy-Undecidability (good offices of Fernando Sols, Universidad Complutense de Madrid) is 1T2ly surface-structure as e-gads!, uh, uh, as regards, arithmetic operations and their conjugated concatenations (associative, distributive, so on). Yes, yes, I know, that assessment of Gödelia rather screws up Peano axiomatization, ZFC and all the rest of it, but, as scary as that is, as great an existential threat as that is to the ego-function (while 2+2=4 under 1T2-only, 2+2 infinitely-does-not = 4 under µTm-unto-CTC+ understood independent of the notion truth-value), it only illustrates the limitations of 1T2-only by way of pointing to µTm-unto-CTC+ (which, being nonlocal, Bell's Theorem does not preclude). However, rather than embrace the scary: singing the poor trump duce, a lox is put upon the Cabalistic matzah ball.
Yes, of course, my I/im(s) is-are aware that Sapiens is composed of men and women, each 1T2ly in possession of the normative genetic endowment of one head and two eyes, two legs and two arms. But I am also aware of the m-armed-cum-handed-headed-eyed goddesses and gods of Asian religious iconography (not to mention the corybantic m-headed Gorgons of ancient Greek mythology) -- these m-endowments having all along been sold to the hoi polloi by the pip-spitters, i.e., TPTB of each and every era, as significations of supranatural transhuman powers. But, really, it takes an Indic Durga's Eight (Graves-Cayley octonions) to get a Chinese Buddhological Molizhitian Pusa's Six (three of representation space and three of topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time). Then there is 10-armed Mahakalika, embodiment of 10-dimensional octonionic superstring Lagrangians (good offices of John Baez, 2001). Not so parenthetically, note that Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” µTmly wedge the row-column vectors of the injective Plucker embedding (think: nesting foams of µTm-LETS currencies mapped over fractal e-boundaries), such that the r-dimensional subspace of the Plucker relations must be regarded rm-dimensional -- which, “sacrificing the basic operations of arithmetic” (good offices of Paul C. Kainen, “An Octonion Model for Physics”, preprint, ECHO 4, 2000), takes us into the thousand-armed-eyed depiction-signification of µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency represented (Buddhological compassion having much more to do with identity-transparency than with mere mercy) by Quan Am qua Guanyin. These iconic significations “speak”, not only of states of consciousness, but also of cosmological “framework determining conditions”. Let M be an 8-dimensional, compact, non-orientable, C+-manifold with boundary-without-boundary open-connected to rm-dimensioned subspaces… heh-heh-heh! Note that in the initial title to Stephen Blaha's book (The Metatheory of Physics Theories…, Pingree-Hill, 2005) there is claim made to “a Proof that Gödel's Theorem Implies Nature Must Be Quantum”, and in body of the text that “the theory of everything must be quantum”. He did not say “Nature at the tinier scale levels” and “everything at the tinier scale levels”. These omissions suggest that, at least tacitly, Blaha does not embrace the notion of a “classical limit” precluding application of quantum principles to mesoscopic and macroscopic atmospheric dynamics -- or, for that matter, monetary system fundamentals. Yet, “But not yet!”: thus sprach the reigning ideational gladiators in affect-charged back-reaction upon the metric of consequences resident-“evil” in prospective death of the notion of a “classical limit”. Just think of how many lives might have been saved since 1975 had the quantum-relativistic Paine-Kaplan cascade model of tornadogenesis been stoked with real-time data and adopted by the National Weather Service. And what that might have done to conceptions of solar-terrestrial/terrestrial-solar interactions and consequent impacts upon consensus notions as to fundaments of climate-shift models -- and prevailing ideas as to what would constitute authentic “green money” (certainly not merely green-directed 1T2-only-money creation cum QEing cum asset purchases, so on, as proposed by the research group named Positive Money, and as discussed in “Bank Of England Should Print 'Green' Money' To Prevent Climate Change, New Report”, ZeroHedge, 17 May 2018). Considering (1) that thermodynamics, as currently portrayed, is quintessentially memetime-bound, and (2) zero-point energy of the vacuum, and (3) the known unknowns as to what is not yet understood about strong and weak quantum measurement occasions, subclinical and clinical, the notion of pure creation and annihilation, underlying the analogy between elementary particle physics and superposed 2-state-quantum Turing machines, is something of a stretch -- even without the 1T2-only-so-regarded so-called vacuum's relation to the µTm-unto-CTC+ MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) being evaluated, an evaluation, even only intuitively, that makes one suspect that µTm-LETS monies, including their 1T2-only-cash base-states, mapped via the holographic principle over MVRS relative to Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, could not be purely created or annihilated, even though the black mother, Kali, has been misattributed that capability by generations of The Priesthood.
Review of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, provided by Amazon, with URL given as:
https://www.amazon.com/Moon-Hoa-Binh-Novel/dp/9747315696:
This is no common text nor hypertext, but one of the most intrepid and consistent thought-soul-world explorations written in centuries. The wealth and depth of insight reflects embodied knowledge, far from the academic dance-parlance, currently staggering as a consequence of the inertia of centuries of dualism. It nurtures, provokes, urges, pledges, creates, challenges, intuits, lays out, smacks and hard, ultimately repulsing the reader that has been hiding under the cover of social commentary-indoctrination. To me, as a (re)searcher, it meant bringing me to live the surmountal of the Janus faces of dualism, to face the neo-Cartesian Cut, and I am nothing but thankful to the authors for their work. For sure, there are issues here that require the works and lives of generations of wo-men. Be it, who can claim to be able to stop Time? It is Time and its logophysics that is one of the central issues that the authors, unmatched in the literature on the issue, bring to the fore.
--Posted by Diego Lucio Rapoport
I did not become aware of this review until it was drawn to my attention after I had read several of Rapoport's papers, as discussed in earlier-made postings to this website. Rapoport's papers in the vein of “Klein bottle logophysics: a unified principle for non-linear systems, cosmology, geophysics, biology, biomechanics and perception”, Journal of Physics, 437, 2013, have more in common with our “Toward a General Theory of Process” paper than any other known to me -- except that Rapoport in certain respects is very much more elaborate and sophisticated in his treatment of the basic ideas involved than were we able to be.
Diego Lucio Rapoport was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on May 28, 1952. He is a Jewish Argentinian Theoretical Physicist and Mathematician. After Obtaining his Ph.D. in mathematical-physics under Prof. Shlomo Sternberg of Harvard and Tel Aviv universities and that of Prof. Yuval Ne’eman of Tel Aviv and Austin-Texas universities, he did postdoctoral work at the Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana of Mexico City, the Instituto Balseiro of the National Atomic Commission of Argentina at Bariloche, Argentina, the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil and the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio. He became a full professor at the Universidad Nacional de Quilmes in 1991. Rapoport has been a visiting fellow at the University of Harvard, University of Denver, International Centre for Theoretical Physics at Trieste, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences at Cambridge, University of Pisa, University of Campinas, and the University of Sao Paulo. He is a senior member of the Telesio-Galilei Academy of Science Advisory Board and head of its Natural Philosophy Department, as well as a member of The Alpha Institute of Advanced Study, and of the standing committee of the International Association for Relativistic Dynamics (IARD). He has been a member of the editorial committee of several international mathematics and mathematical-physics journals. His research work has focused on developing a unified geometrical theory of spacetime, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, Brownian motion, non-equilibrium and equilibrium thermodynamics, and fluid dynamics, in terms of geometries with torsion. As an example of this approach, closed forms representations for the Navier-Stokes equations on manifolds with and without smooth boundaries were derived from this approach.
Selected Publications:*Diego Rapoport & S. Sternberg, “Classical Mechanics without lagrangians nor hamiltonians”, Nuovo Cimento, 80A (1984), p. 371-383.
*Diego Rapoport & S. Sternberg, “On the interactions of spin with torsion”, Annals of Physics, vol. 158, no.11, (1984), p. 447-475.
*Diego Rapoport, “On the derivation of the stochastic processes associated to Lie isotopic gauge theory”, pp. 359-374, in Hadronic Mechanics and Nonpotential Interactions, Vol. II, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, Univ. of Iowa, August 1990, Hyo Myung (ed.), Nova Science Publs., New York/Budapest, 1992.
*Diego Rapoport, “The Riemann-Cartan-Weyl Quantum geometries II: The Cartan stochastic copying method, FokkerPlanck operator and Maxwell-de Rham equations”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 36, No. 10, (1997), pp. 2115-2152.
*Diego Rapoport, “Stochastic processes in conformal Riemann-Cartan-Weyl gravitation”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 30, no. 11, (1991), pp. 1497-1515.
*Diego Rapoport, “Covariant Thermodynamics and the Ergodic Theory of Stochastic and Quantum Flows”, in Instabilities and Nonequilibrium Structures VI, pp. 359-370, Proceedings of the VIth International Conference on Instabilities and Nonequilibrium Structures, Valparaiso, 1995, and in Nonlinear Phenomena and Complex Systems V, E. Tirapegui and W. Zeller (eds.), Kluwer Series, Dordrecht/Boston, 2000.
*Diego Rapoport, “On the unification of geometric and random structures through torsion fields: Brownian motions, viscous and magnetic fluid-dynamics”, Foundations of Physics, vol. 35, no.7, (2005), pp. 1205-1244.
*Diego Rapoport, “Cartan-Weyl Dirac and Laplacian operators, Brownian motions, The quantum potential and Scalar Curvature, Dirac-Hestenes equations and supersymmetric systems”, Foundations of Physics, vol. 35, no. 8, (2005), pp. 1383- 1431.
*Diego Rapoport, “Random Diffeomorphisms and integration of the classical Navier-Stokes equations”, Reports on Mathematical Physics, vol. 49, no. 1, (2002), pp. 1-27.
*Diego Rapoport, “Stochastic differential geometry approach to viscous fluids and a remarkable pure noise representation”, Reports on Mathematical Physics, vol. 50, no.2, (2002), pp. 211-250.
*Diego Rapoport, “Martingale problem approach to the Navier-Stokes equations on smooth-boundary manifolds and semispace”, Random Operators and Stochastic Equations, vol. 11, no.2, (2003), pp. 109-150.
*Diego Rapoport, “Random Symplectic Geometry and the realizations of the random representations of the Navier-Stokes equations by ordinary differential equations”, Random Operators and Stochastic Equations, vol. 11, no.4, (2003), pp. 351-382.
*Diego Rapoport, “Torsion Fields, Cartan-Weyl Space-Time and State-Space Quantum Geometries, their Brownian Motions, and the Time Variables”, Foundations of Physics vol. 37, no. 4-5, (2007), pp. 813-854.
((This bio drawn from Wikibin.org with URL given as: http://wikibin.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=35520))
And, so as not to lose track of his comparative-literature-professor assessment, consider the comment made by David Kiremidjian:
Anyone interested in this ought to read The Moon of Hoa Binh, a two volume novel by Cong Huyen Ton Nu Nha Trang and her husband William Pensinger, published in 1994 in Bangkok. A masterpiece few people seem to know about.
That's all, Folks!
Hmmm. Well, my counter-Wheelerian I/im certainly did not mean to suggest that nature does not ask questions with only yes or no answers, only that nature only addresses such questions to binary minds. It may be that the double-slit experiment of 1801, by collective unconscious processes, predisposed the back-reaction upon the metric of implications only subliminally registered, implications as to N. H. Abel's 1823 theorem on solution of the general quintic equation, such that a 1T2-logical existence proof for µTm-trans-al-jabr was, in suppressed-hysteria, regarded an Impossibility Theorem, solution to the general quintic seemingly requiring a transfinite process, or a reduction thereof by use of elliptic analogs of the exponential function (analogs which have been, throughout period of the “War of the World”, elliptically ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, to the unending exponential growth that 1T2-only-[mark}ett capitalism requires in order simply to organize: this is the unconscious deep-structure dimension to the subliminal deep-structure dimension, discussed by Robert J. Burrowes in “Conflict Theory and Biosphere Annihilation”, Global Research, 30 May 2018, to the mil.pol.resource surface-structure dimension to etiology of the unending-growth fixation-compulsion-obsession). De[pre}dat|ions in dominance (think, for instance of the Treaties of Paris, 1763 and 1783, whereby vast tracks of land were usurped, much of it being handed over to a snooty, genociding, slave-owning, nature-raping oligarchy), no one will scruple, however easily accomplished. The one thing we can't deal with is the truth; the truth is impossible to deal with, so please tell us lies, please entertain us with blackpsyche, please serve us fake news: this is, and has long been, a mass ConveDD, a conversion-disorder displacement in compensatory abreaction to the hundred-year-old fact that truth-value cannot authentically be held the foundation of logic -- as it once mistakenly was, for at least two rapacious millennia. Truth isn't true! except under 1T2-only-logic alone, be that logic Aristotelian-Baconian syllogistic or TaiChi rotational. Thomas Young in contesting Newton's billiard-ball corpuscles of light chose to do a double- (rasped by a bastard's double-cutting cognitive push-pull), not an infinite-slit -- even by analogical modeling as regards Dedekind cuts in the closed real interval [0,1] -- experiment. From demergent, no-classical-limit, CTC+-unto-µTm-aperspectival logophysics (T = transparency, not truth), light is neither wave nor particle and no wavicle; it's -- 1T2-only speaking, now -- the absolute limit of n scale-relative absolute limiting velocities; superlight being self-similar with respect to accelerations; ultralight, with respect to time rates of change of accelerations: these indicators of classes of actions of 3-fold topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time being necessary and sufficient to-- well, Klein-bottle reentry. The Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space qua multi-sheeted ma, to employ the Japanese designation) is, via Alexander.Karpenko functors over the primes, a Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered logical-lattice mapping over -- see the immediately-above-given two hypertext links -- Klein bottles inside of Klein bottles inside of Klein bottles (which ontologically precedes quantum mechanics as “clocks within clocks within clocks” -- “clocks”, I should add, so construed relative to topo-active Pauli-Paine operator-time, not mere memetime). Each sheet having its own unique logical-value order-type, understood independent of the notion truth-value, characteristics of lower-order Heraclitian motion, understood from “perspective” (figure of speech only), uh, the “nonlinear-perspective”, of the MVRS qua MVRS, are signifiers of properties of higher-order Parmenidian relative-state identity-transparency (“propagation” in ponderable space, for instance, being a 1T2-way to cognize non-simple identity on the MVRS). But consider a different understanding, that of B. Misra and I. Prigogine and M. Courbage, as provided in “Lyapounov variable: Entropy and measurement in quantum mechanics”, PNAS-USA, 76:10, pp. 4768-4772, October 1979. Quoting the paper:
There is an interesting connection between the nonexistence of entropy operator M in H and the impossibility [noted by Pauli (11)] of defining an operator of time in the usual formulation of quantum mechanics. Such an operator of time would be, by definition, a self-adjoint operator T which is canonically conjugated to the generator H of the time-evolution group; or
[H, T] = iI............................................[2.7]
However, as shown in ref. 3, if such a T exists then one can obtain an entropy operator M satisfying conditions 2.1 and 2.2 by simply taking M to be a monotonic operator function of T: M = f(T). One thus obtains yet another proof of Pauli's remark that there can be no operator T in the standard formulation of quantum mechanics. Let us also mention that more recent attempts to define a more general concept of operator T that need not be self-adjoint or satisfy condition 2.7 still conflict with the fact that the generator of motion is the Hamiltonian operator and hence is bounded from below (cf. ref. 12).
According to our (I/im being something of an exponentiated retrograde to 2.7, above) understanding, and contrary to that of Prigogine (he sent us a preprint of the above-linked paper after we sent him a copy of our paper entitled “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, circa September 1978), the superoperator operator-time, a nonequilibrium entropy operator, M, is factorizable, factorizable into 3-fold temporal CURL, each such “fold”, more properly “folder”, identifiable by the class of topological operations it actively accomplishes at scale-relative absolute limiting values of the involved Lyapounov variables. This notion has profound implications. Monotonicity having no role in CTC+-unto-µTm, as regards a non-“usual” nonlinear formulation of quantum mechanics, since demergent topo-active operator-time does not transpire in memetime -- that is to say that memetime is ontologically after operator-time is -- operator-time cannot be conjugated to the memetime evolution group of the memetime-dependent Schrödinger equation, and, even if it could be so conjugated, negative values of the total energy operator, i.e., not bounded from below, would constitute no problem, as those negative values would be indicative of counter-temporal operations, i.e., those operations accomplishing remergence. Topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time would be involved in a Musculpt-re“write” of the memetime-independent Schrödinger equation, where superposition of the m-values of the state-function is understood relative to Lukasiewicz, not the probabilistic Born Rule. This is contrary to the Prigoginian notion that anything deterministic can be described probabilistically: only that 1T2-deterministic can be so described; all the other classes of determinism, µTm-unto-CTC+, do not so conform. The linear, stimulus-response, non-Klein-bottled notion of superposition, appertaining to the “usual” formulation of quantum mechanics (as well as that of non-linear superposition characteristic of turbulence involved in, say, tornadogenesis: see here and here relative to an aspect of Musculpt, and read of Cornell studies thereupon in “Principles of Nonlinear Superposition”, Simon A. Levin, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 30, pp. 197-205, 1970), is, not only additive, but also assumes existence of initial conditions and initial conditions permitting simply-identifiable separability, to include that of the instants of memetime, which, thus, cannot be chosen as small as we like, despite popularity of the “river of time”. On the most-dense sheet of the Klein-bottled MVRS (sheet within sheet of the holographic-principled boundary-without-boundary of bottle within bottle of the involved logical-lattice mapping), i.e., the CTC+…,-Tzog-chen AllBase, which is ontologically before even operator-time is, all superpositions are already all ready and always all ways being-there constituted, if only archetypally constellated by Platonic amnesis (the dropping out of “view” of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering “dust motes” of Wheeler's “bucket of dust” pre-pregeometry), effectuation of this forgetting involving logical operations carried out by the actions of Pauli-Paine operator-time. Now, if we consider the following very stimulating observations made by commenter “Salmo trutta” (search this name for four comments) in reaction to “What Was The Real Purpose Of QE?” (good offices of Chris Hamilton of Economica blog), ZeroHedge, 21 May 2018, we may come to conclude that QE has a 1T2-deterministic (which, via Prigogine, could be recast as probabilistic) deep-structure causation altogether unconscious to its instigators. Quoting Salmonid Trout, from his first comment:
Said “trap” (idled savings) is like a *superposition* in physics. The capacity of a single bank to create credit as a consequence of a given primary deposit is identical to a financial intermediary. L = S (1-s). The superposition is that all primary deposits are actually derivative deposits from the system's belvedere.
Quoting Salmonid Trout, from his third comment:
Savings flowing through the non-banks never leaves the payment's system (where all savings originate). There is simply an exchange, a transfer of title between counter-parties, to existing DFI liabilities, a money velocity relationship occurring within the payment's system.
Paradoxically, this is somewhat like the physics principle of SUPERPOSITION:
“The general principle of superposition of quantum mechanics applies to the states [that are theoretically possible without mutual interference or contradiction] … of any one dynamical system…” [and “]that every quantum state can be represented as a sum of two or more other distinct states.”
The capacity of a single bank to create credit as a consequence of a given primary deposit is identical to a financial intermediary. L = S (1-s). The superposition is that all primary deposits are actually derivative deposits from the system’s belvedere.
In other words, there is an increase in the supply of loan-funds, but no change in the money stock, a velocity relationship, where savings are matched with investments (a non-inflationary relationship). This process is the exact opposite of stagflation.
Unless savings are activated, put back to work, a dampening economic impact, a deceleration in money velocity, is engendered and metastases, resulting in secular strangulation. This is the source of the pervasive error that characterizes all developed countries slower growth rates.
I assume, from the equation provided, that ST, in characterizing superposition, is drawing a correspondence between state-function and sample-space within a probability-interpretation context, à la, see, for instance, the “Comovement of firm and intermediary capital” section of “Financial Intermediary Capital”, Adriano A. Rampino and S. Viswanathan, U. of California, Davis, March 2012, which is relevant even though what is there considered is dynamics of a deterministic economy (which, via Prigogine, could be recast as probabilistic). What I find most provocative about ST's comments is that “The superposition is that all primary deposits are actually derivative deposits from the system's belvedere” (an intuitive memetime-independent formulation on ST's part) is in contradiction to “every quantum state can be represented as a sum of two or more other distinct states” (the conventional stimulus-response, memetime-bound, formulation as to how superposition is to be arithmetically construed). What is the system's belvedere? “Bel” = beeeutiful; “vedere” = view. What offers a beautiful view of the system? I say that that can only be the “base state of Tzog-chen”, which is to say the most-dense sheet of “the MVRS”, the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian m-logically-valued reference space. George Soros has a macroscopic black-box term for this “belvedere”: that is “market reflexivities”, which notion he explicates in terms of “self-referential propositions” understood by him as signifying Heisenberg uncertainty and all we cannot know. An asinine hypothetical, since “self-referential propositions” are the foundation of the Lukasiewiczian µTm-unto-CTC+-orders of logical-value deep-structuring semantics of supra-Everettian relative-state identity-transparency, if, that is, Lukasiewicz not be reduced to merely the reals in the closed interval [0,1], that collection of inclement increments to binary-minds encompassing All Of Everything. Whether acknowledged or not, even if not cuing (think: Newton's billiard balls) 1T2-markette-mediated action directives, µTmly-econometric information exists in [eco}nomic state-space by virtue of general systems subscribing to hologramic relative-state identity-transparency -- if the “classical limit” is a chimera: that µTm-valued information simply isn't marked (this absence in marking signfying Soros' black box). This is not to speak of simple feedback loops, or even multiple-connectedness. Note that Salmonid Trout has the macroscale reenter itself at the microscale. This is exactly correct: the “belvedere” generates all primary deposits, by self-referential reentry, by, that is, a Klein-bottling of the quantum-of-action directives expressive of ontologically-prior superposition, superposition of values unmarked in 1T2-only markets, e.g., in response to massive infusion of quantum-based technology, singly-logically-valued currencies fostering 1T2-only-logical expectations, expectations financially ConveDDing µTm-non-simple quantum-identity to bungled bundling of bundled (sans fiber-bundle arithmetics) MBSs, a ConveDDing cloistered in the dissimulated guise of asset stripping, in this case, the conversion and displacement of local multiplier effects, a form of larceny perpetrated by money-center operators. QEing, not only amplifies this larceny, but substantially reinforces the ConveDDing that conceals inherent quantum-economy attributes of all [eco}nomic processes. “QE-sedated price dynamics” and narcotized “NIRP-impaired price discovery” (for astute analysis, see here and here and here, good offices of Fasanara Capital confessed reliant upon formulations associated with the 2nk fitness landscape, complexity theory, non-equilibrium phase-transition theory, so on, as explicated and applied in “Dynamics of market correlations: Taxonomy and portfolio analysis”, J.-P. Onnela, et al., Physical Review E, 68, 056110, November 2003): even if these were heuristically rectified to the apocryphal status quo ante, this rectification could in no wise approach the orders of self-organizational competency offered by the µTm-logically-processed m-valued price regime with the coherent quantum channels that, given the requisite elaboration, would replace binary-contagion behaviors (as catalogued by pair-wise correlations). Note that Fasanara uses the DNA analogy (see Figure 8 of the third Fasanara paper linked above) upon which the 2nk fitness landscape was initially formulated, but, like SFI, does not give the quantum properties of the molecule dynamical significance. Given that CB monetary policies and dot-guv fiscal policies are not the only extra-systemic factors affecting heuristically-econometrically-isolated market mechanisms -- indeed, there are m-many environmental externalities heuristically denied access to econometric behavior equations -- market “framework determining conditions”, largely set by 1T2-only processed movements of single-valued currency units, trend binary-logical markets toward crashes riding in upon the back of orientable-system, low-1T2-only-information entropy qua high tail risk, both referenced to 1T2-only-definable memetime, crashes highly unlikely to all but occasionally transpire (though still possible, as organisms with DNA µTm-quantum-wave properties still fail, if rarely, to fulfill their growth-and-repair-processes requirements) were the “framework determining conditions” of markets set largely by µTm-processed movements of m-valued currency units internalizing externalities, the m-values of which are fine-grain tagged to multiple indicators-measurables. In face-to-fact running from fact-to-face when confronted with the “bizzzarre” properties of quantum-based tech interfaced to market dynamics, the 1T2-only mindset, however, ever so simplistically, maybe even normotically, following the precedent set by bungled bundlings of bundled MBSs, ConveDDs µTm-valuation to on On on On on On on On, e.g., an ETF on ETFs on ETPs on ETNs on ETVs. Heh-heh-heh! With rare exceptions, whatever the situation, whatever the ARP, the alternative risk premia, it is impossible to overestimate the level of stupidity which will inevitably be brought to it. Why? Because the logic employed excludes the Middle Way (i.e., “gap-risks” reign large), deems correlations contagion; indeed, only acknowledges polar-pair{“wise”] correlations such that they can be deemed contagion -- thus, so rendezvoused as it were, denying the system action-directive access to the µTm-relative-states underpinning the holographic principle and externality-free super-states of self-organizational competency. Read the think-pieces of Milton Friedman or the declassified policy memos of Henry Kissinger to get an impression as to just how identified with 1T2-only logic the hu-hu-human organism can become. Macro-impudence, uh, uh, imprudence-- sorry, displayed in not µTming the tranches of all classes of ABSs, which µTming would be macro-prudential through employment of autopoietic operators in habitus upon the currency-unit-definition level of market “framework determining conditions”. The microscopic econophysics of the “belvedere” is to be found in the m-valued ensheavement (think analogically relative to electron energy-level shells) that should be placed upon the base-state of what should be the µTm-LETS monetary unit, this ensheavement being Klein-bottle nonorientably the basis of, and the expression of, Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”. If this is so, and I think so, then the top-down-only approach to e-monies (good offices of the Bank of England's Michael Kumhof and Clare Noone, May 2018), not to mention surveillance capitalism's top-heavy internet (good offices of John Battelle, Searchblog, 25 May 2018), is 1T2-determined to be counter-productive with respect to fullfilling the full spectrum of [eco}nomic requisites which the prevailing n-dimensional global crisis is imposing, or has already imposed (see: Robert Hunziker, “There Is No Time Left”, CounterPunch, 19 February 2018), whichever the case may be.
Given that m-valued logics were rigorously codified and published in Polish and English during 1921, four years before Schrödinger brought together his m-valued state-function, my assertion is that the knee-jerk consensuation a year later of the Born Rule probability interpretation was, and is, an example of what George Burchett designates “denialism”, not that those interpretations calling for subjection of the m-valued state-function to some interpretation of m-valued logics engage in denialism. In very significant measure people perceive as a function of what they bring to and project upon the given situation; science and the technologies it spawns are no different. A variant of Murphy's Law: if there is a stupid thing that can be done, it will be done. If it is entertained that quenching validity-utility of binary logic with respect to the existing legal system would lead to psychosociopoliticoeconomic chaos, then this contention would simply add fuel to the present thesis regarding dissimulation of Lukasiewicz logics and the Schrödinger wave-function. Of course, this observation does not begin to address the possible judicial validity-utility of µTm-valued logics. Frankly, I don't fear the transhumanists overthrowing the transsexuals; it's the antisexuals and the asexuals who have long set the global normotic agenda what be plaguing us: “Why, just look at that pervert Schrödinger! Writing an m-valued state-function, of all the horrid things, as expression of his damnable Tantrism and a mountain-cabin ménage à trois. Two wives no less! Well, we'll show him: reduce his ridiculous m-valuedness to a mere matter of probabilities, we will, won't we.” Along with Schrödinger, I'm primarily interested in quality-of-state in life, which means that quantity-of-things in life is way down on my list (especially so since manufacturing has been subbed-out to cheap labor pools, because it's more frustrating to have things that don't work right than to not have them at all), and that the indices calibrating the quality-of-life indicator are only of middling interest. Musculpt concerns what is generally subliminal to what is actually thought, what is actually thought never actually being written into scientific papers; such papers, to be peer-review-judged publishable, are composed of acute reworkings -- according to glutamatergically-etched chronically-consensuated conventions -- of what is actually thought. I believe highly likely that the origin of Special Relativity came to Einstein's first wife in what is generally subliminal to what is actually thought (as thought is normotically thought to be) -- and that what she had come to comprehend, by concentration upon patterns of superposed diffuse feeling-toned complexes, she was able to communicate the gist of to Einstein. Moreover, I believe highly likely that Schrödinger spoke with his wives and Tantric paramours about what he actually thought, concerning the m-valued wave-qua-state-function and quantum superposition (i.e., Rainer Maria Rilke's -- Neue Gedichte, 1907-8 -- plastic essence of the physical object qua particle as a simultaneous stack of occurrences in spatialized time: pretty quick on the uptake, eh, given that Planck's breakaway paper was published in 1900: as regards Schrödinger's dead-and-alive cat, good offices of Peter Mosley, “Physicists prove 'quantum spookiness' and start chasing Schrödinger's cat”, Phys.Org, 26 October 2015, choosing dead/alive as illustrative criteria betrays reliance on 1T2-only-logic alone, thus precluding interpretation of the state-function with µTm-unto-CTC+ logics understood independent of the notion truth-value), but never wrote into his scientific papers; ditto, Herbert Fröhlich and his wife concerning collective and cooperative phenomena cum critical-state coherency. Fröhlich's consciousness habitus had being-there as presence to the memetime-present of his times, whilst so many others, however contemporary they considered themselves to be, were cognitively stuck somewhere in the last century or two. Consider, for instance, the 2013 film entitled Coherence: each value of the m-valued state-function is conceived to signify a 1T2-only simple-identity resident within a given memetemporal window and associated ponderable-space box (like are the 1T2-only universes of the 1T2-only multiverse epiphenomenal to the 1T2-only interpretation of Everettian relative-state). Hardly indicative of, say, coherent motion (think: troop of goose-stepping soldiers marching across a rope bridge over an abyss filled with zero-points: this couldn't be the same notion of coherency ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, constructed by the designer-implementers of “smart pavement”, could it?), not to mention of each such value being-in-itself Kleinbottle-nesting-foamed as nonselfsame. Coherence or superposition (good offices of Khaled Ben Dana, et al., “Resource theory of coherence: Beyond states”, Physical Review A, 96, 20 June 2017) regarded a resource (good offices of T. Baumgratz and M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio, “Quantifying Coherence”, Physical Review Letters, 113, 29 September 2014) is a very interesting proposition relative to DNA superconductant-pi-electron-gas-generated coherent waves and superconductance of atmospheric hydrotherodynamic properties in association with generation of acoustically-modified (that is: coherent) gravity-wave modes, even if these two (both involving long-coherence-time tunable-by-external-flux superconductant resonators? good offices of Lin Tian, UCMerced, November 2009) are not properly resources of Sapiens (despite being inspired by the [protest}ant ethic, destruction-of-frontier-RESOURCE-abundance in service to The-Abundant-Society by a mushrooming population dispersing and/or confining and/or destroying that pre-resident, a destruction transferred from frontier to environment qua environment, is The-Territorial-Imperative component to the mass of mass behaviors responsible for the 1T2-only-anthropogenic drivers of the prevailing global crisis), and even if high k-correlation-values on the 2nk fitness landscape are deemed [detri}mental by the Santa Fe Institute and the ICEed New York Stock Exchange. I'd certainly like to read H. S. Holevo's and M. E. Shirokov's “Mutual and coherent informations for infinite-dimensional quantum channels”, Problems of Information Transmission, 46:3, 2010, pp. 201-18, with abstract posted to arXiv, relative to µTm-processing (think: “mutual” in respect to µTm-relative-state information) of the temporal CURLings of m-valued information carried by vertically-propagating acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes in the quantum-relativistic Paine-Kaplan nested-grid cascade forecast model of tornadogenesis. “How Close Are We -- Really -- to Building a Quantum Computer?” (question asked by Larry Greenemeier, Scientific American, 30 May 2018). IMHO, not close at all to a real quantum “computer” (good offices of Leo Mirani and Gideon Lichfield, “Why nobody can tell whether the world's biggest quantum computer is a quantum computer”, Quartz, 15 April 2014), such as like that of the DNA molecule and that involved in (think: an acoustic-analogue to a quantum-relativistic blackhole “computer” vis µTm-unto-CTC+-processed m-valued acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes) tornadogenesis, wherein, regards both DNA and tornadogenesis, all three approaches described by Greenemeier are simultaneously, heh-heh-heh, used with respect to mu-its, not different sorts of qu-bits. Authentic quantum “computers” in nature at many scale levels do not involve m-calculations performed via m-2-state-qubits in m-mutual coherence sharing m-additive-mixed states represented by imaginary numbers, m-calculations, that is, of a single problem so-called-simultaneously (Hooray! good offices of Bjarke Monsted, Technical University of Denmark, 23 February 2018) executed during lapse of coherence time understood relative to 1T2-only-definable memetime, so as to very much faster get a Wheelerian yes-or-no-type binary answer to the problem posed; they employ m-“discrete” states, indeed, those µTm-unto-CTC+ (T = the relative-state identity-transparency inherent to coherence) beyond (not between) 0 and 1 to memetime independently Christmas-tree-effect translate (not exactly the quantum interference cancellation effect, but such interference is a step in this direction) between always and all ways being-therehere AllBase (all lights lit) and lesser-logically-valued (patterns of lights unlit) component “processes” of the logophysical nesting foam. The more lights unlit, the closer the logophysical approach made to memetime-bound egoic consciousness. If the autologicality (i.e., the phase, uh, uh, phrase, has the property it expresses) built into Emanuel Swedenborg's “As far as one is in the Form of Heaven, so far is he in Heaven” (A Treatise concerning Heaven and Hell…, 203, p. 114); then, “Don't keep your light under a bushel” takes on a very elaborate logophysics meaning: “shine forth” and “diffusion” and “share” are poor renditions of µTm-relative-state identity-transparency. And, given certain dimensions of DARPA's transhumanist agenda (see, as regards one of the for-instances: “Resident Evil? DARPA Unveils Genetic 'Tuning' To Fight Chemical, Radiation Attacks”, ZeroHedge, 30 May 2018), close approach to a real quantum “computer” won't be permitted any memetime soon. That rapidly-becoming-pandemic agenda may be understood as a ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the regression known as “Regeneration Through Violence” (see Richard Slotkin's book by that title, Wesleyan U., 1973, and as evaluated by Dina Cvrtila, U. of Zagreb, 2015, for those interested in a non-American, specifically Croatian, take on this quintessential American “sentiment”) to [trans}mutation through [iatro}genic intervention. While the American hunter-hero may have sought (and continues so to seek via life trajectories subliminally propelled by metaphors) union with his Anima-in-transference, projectively presented to his egosphere in the guise of the Earth Mother archetype at habitus in Injun Cuntry, he rarely, if ever, actually achieved-achieves conscious psychological integration of his Anima-as-she-is-for-herself, the actual attributes of whom have absolutely nothing to do with mastery of the skills of warfare against man, animal, geo-hydro-bio-atmo-magneto spheres and out into ponderable sidereal space: my main reason (stated in a personal journal entry reproduced in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 1, p. 281) for quitting college in 1965, having read some Jung by then, was to explore in depth this highly-programmed realm of American male character which I was acutely aware of as an observant and self-reflective mil.brat. Son of the muck of humanity, muck throughout the species' loathsome hisstory. Following a public lecture I gave decades ago at Tsukuba University (good offices of Yuji Sasaki, Autogenic Therapy clinician and specialist in the electrophysiology of zazen meditation) on our model of superconductant DNA pi-electron gas, I was asked “Why do we need such a theory?” I answered that much is not understood about the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases. And that this model in part came out of my reading into the literature on systemic lupus erythematosus. Fulminations in individual cases of SLE are known to be correlated with direct exposure to sunlight; epidemiologic outbreaks of SLE have correlation to sunspot cycles; anti-DNA antibodies in conjunction with the LE cell are diagnostic of SLE. Consider the implications of, not only that histological types of DNA, e.g., collagen DNA, have identifying frequency-response windows, but that, I would now add, individual DNA molecules have some functional equivalent to unique RFIDs, particularly the implications in the case of intraneuronal DNA molecules. The mu-itic quantum computer programs, required to externalize inner Musculpt into holographic techno-Musculpt symformphonie as mathematical notation, would not correspond, à la Stephen Blaha's The Metatheory of Physics Theories…, Pingree-Hill, 2005, to memetime-bound evolution operators (i.e., 1T2-only-observables) for emergent qu-bitic quantal-patterned output; rather, the correspondence would be to memetime-independent Abelian-E.T.Bellian evolutory-decomposition operators (i.e., 1T2-only-non-observables) for demergent mu-itic quantal-patterned output. Collective soteriology in face of the gathering global crisis being a pressing issue these days, whatever the current realist cohort dispersed amongst the physicist corpus may think (good offices of Dan Falk, NBCnews-MACH, 2 June 2018) of the philoSOPHIA-perennis (the only historically-genuine basis for a global metaculture that demands diversity for its realization: good offices of Peter Samsel, Encyclopedia of Global Religion, 2011) notion that real reality has little to do with physical physics, the logophysics of such autopoietic operators necessarily involves CTC+-unto-µTm-valued Lukasiewicz logics understood independent of the notion truth-value, Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, and orders of temporal CURL. To the 'I'-identified binary-mind, mu-itic quantum computer processing would appear to involve lapse of memetime; but, since memetime is definable only under 1T2-only logic, to I/im non-binary-mind(s), not only is there non-schizophrenogenic loss of memetime, no “wasting” (GI sense of the word) of TimeWaste is involved, not least because the decomposition output is already all ready all there, uh, uh, being-therehere -- that is, that's over universal covering of the decomposable (actually: always all ways already decomposed) MVRS (Lukasiwiczian-Hilbertian m-logically-valued reference space) Tzog-chen AllBase.
Memetime-independent demergence-cascade can be regarded as the not-tree relative to the Cabalistic tree of remergence: the former represents Abelian-E.T.Bellian involutory decomposition; the latter, revolutory recomposition. The whatnot de-ed and re-ed is the Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered (this numbering of the numbering, an m-enumeration [not merely a Raymond M. Smullyan double enumeration cum double indexing cum double stacking cum double recursion], is required to numerically represent in various number systems µTm-unto-CTC+ orders of logical-value to a given proposition, as regards propositions codifying orders of self-referential reentry [no mere circular-return recurrence calculable iff recursive] and associated orders of non-simple transfinite-diagonalizable quantum µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency) Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. In our scheme, 2nd-order-dynamical, cyclical-history, vicious-circle-recurrent, self-referential paradoxes inculcate non-selfsameness at relative-state identity-transparency through invocation of non-orientability via 3rd-order-dynamical nesting-foamed reentries requiring µTm-valued logics Musculpturally understood independent of the notion truth-value -- and ultimately, of course, infinitary reasoning employing CTC+-valued logics. Thus, neither “primitive recursiveness” nor “recursive under code” (see: Peter Smith's answer at Math.StackExchange, 26 April 2013) would be preserved. The best approach to Gödelization of the MVRS I've yet seen intimated is the Gödelized Pascal-triangle analogue proffered to Math.StackExchange by Henning Makholm on 4 March 2017. But, differing from Makholm, in the above-indicated scheme there are negative-branch lengths with counterleaves, just as, under Lukasiewiczian-Schrödinger time-independent wave equation, there are valid negative values to the total-energy operator (here understood a Gödelized input number cum the logophysics “process” thus initialized) relative to the counter-temporal operations carrying out the Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered propositions-algorithms descriptive of remergence (keeping in sullied-mind-awareness that de-ed and re-ed are simply Platonia's universal consciousness Barbour-forgetting and Barbour-remembering, in the latter such Platonic anamnesis being a de[meme}bering by cosmically-endogenous ketaminergic epiphany-Satori qua deautomatization -- in the particular case, an approach to Nirvana). A major step (Gödel number assigned to each node of the involved logical lattices) toward Musculpturalization of the MVRS (ma in the Japanese) has recently been taken by Hiroyuki Terakawa and Suguru Yoshioka in their paper entitled “Diagrammatic Calculus for Order-sorted Logic”, Tsuru University Review, 87, March 2018 -- if it be considered that the MVRS involves Regge-like lattices over and through the universal covering of the Riemann-surfaced nesting foams of involutorily-decomposable sorts on the Musculpt manifold, M.
Thus far, other than in the work of Diego Lucio Rapoport (see earlier-posted entries), I've run across, or had drawn to my attention, five essays exploring the notion that m-valued Lukasiewicz logics should be used to interpret Schrödinger's m-valued state-function, a proposition I have espoused since 1975. These are:
Florentin Smarandache and V. Christianto, Multi-Valued Logic, Neutroscopy, and Schrödinger Equation, Nexis-Phoenix, 2005. Quoting the abstract:
…paradoxes known in Quantum Physics are not yet solved. In our knowledge, this is because the solution of those paradoxes requires re-examination of the foundations of logic itself, in particular on the notion of identity and multi-valuedness of entity.
This statement, if not the whole book, very closely accords with the position I have long blabber-mouthed.
Jaroslaw Pykacz, “Can Many-Valued Logic Help to Comprehend Quantum Phenomena?”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 54, February 2015, pp. 4367-4375. Quoting the paper:
Description of properties of quantum objects before they are measured should be performed with the use of propositional functions that form a particular model of infinite-valued Lukasiewicz logic. (I substituted the word “infinite” for the infinity symbol employed in text)
I would argue that, via subclinical autogenic-brain-discharge activity, the act of measurement collapses infinite-valued CTC+-Lukasiewicz logic to the logical-value order-type employed by the observer-participator. Indeed, one must suppose that relatively-memetime-independent participants become authentic memetime-bound observers iff the state-function is collapsed to 1T2-only-valuedness alone.
Francois Dubois and Zeno Toffano, “Eigenlogic: a Quantum View for Multiple-Valued and Fuzzy Systems”, arXiv, 7 July 2016. Quoting from the abstract:
We propose a matrix model for two- and many-valued logic using families of observables in Hilbert space, the eigenvalues give the truth values of logical propositions where the atomic input proposition cases are represented by the respective eigenvectors… in this approach fuzzy logic arises naturally when considering non-eigenvectors. The fuzzy membership function is obtained by the quantum mean value of the logical projector observable and turns out to be a probability measure in agreement with recent quantum cognition models. The analogy of many-valued logic with quantum angular momentum is then established…
The most exciting part of this for me is the last sentence quoted, wherein an analogy between m-valued logics and quantum angular momentum is claimed. This notion, with respect to complex and hypercomplex angular-momentum cascade dynamics, has, essentially, been our way of comprehending topologically-active quantal operator-time as effectuator, via 3-fold temporal CURL, of pregeometry Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered Lukasiewiczian propositions understood independent of the notion truth-value. We speculate that Penrose twistors are involved in the quantization of temporal CURL. The very notion of a “logical projection observable” (first time I've seen this term) is, to me, something of a concretion, not of “time” as understood by Jean Gebser, but of Pauli-Paine operator-time. See Zeno Toffano's paper entitled “Interpolation Methods for Binary and Multivalued Logical Quantum Gate Synthesis”, arXiv, 13 February 2018, for elaborations concerning multivalued logical operators in Hilbert space. I must admit, though, to feeling that the generalized addiction to always returning excursions into the m-logically-valued to the 1T2-only-valued is very disappointing -- as is the nearly universal compulsion to make m-logically-valued theoretical models appear to generate the experimental findings made by experiments designed under the constraints imposed by identification with 1T2-valued-logic alone.
Anthony Sudbery, “The logic of the future in quantum theory”, Synthese, 194:11, November 2017, pp. 4429-53. Quoting the abstract:
According to quantum mechanics, statements about the future made by sentient beings like us are, in general, neither true nor false; they must satisfy a many-valued logic. I propose that the truth value of such a statement should be identified with the probability that the event it describes will occur. After reviewing the history of related ideas in logic, I argue that it gives an understanding of probability which is particularly satisfactory for use in quantum mechanics. I construct a lattice of future-tense propositions, with truth values in the interval [0, 1], and derive logical properties of these truth values given by the usual quantum-mechanical formula for the probability of a history.
In my view, this is an interpretation (truth-value as probability) of an interpretation (m-valuedness viewed as indicating probable states), not an interpretation of the thing-in-itself, i.e., Schrödinger's m-valued state-qua-wave function. Moreover, again in my view, making the so-regarded fundament of logic, i.e., truth-value, into a mathematical expression of memetime-future is to indelibly bind superposition-entanglement to memetime evolution and/or superluminal propagation velocity, thus concealing the essential character of Schrödinger's m-valuedness, i.e., quantum non-simple identity, that is, as being indicative of µTm-relative-state identity-transparency, or, in the words of Smarandache and Christianto, “multi-valuedness of entity”.
Arkady Bolotin, “Truth Values of Quantum Phenomena”, arXiv, 3 April 2018. Quoting the abstract:
In the paper, the idea of describing not-yet-verified properties of quantum objects with logical many-valuedness is scrutinized. As it is argued, to promote such an idea, the following two foundational problems of many-valued quantum logic must be decided: the problem of choosing a proper system of many-valued logic and the problem of the emergence of bivalence from logical many-valuedness. Difficulties accompanying solutions of these problems are discussed.
As regards all five of these essays: wowzy-dowzy! Very nice, indeed! I've been hoping for something like this ever since running across, in the Cornell Mathematics Library during the fall (memory serving) of 1975, Emil Post's 1921 Ph.D.-dissertation-derived article on µTm-valued logics (the T-notation I choose to employ, for being most illustrative, having been innovated by Post) entitled, “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, American Journal of Mathematics, 43:3; less directly, earlier, upon a first reading, circa 1963, of J. G. Bennett's Appendix III, “The Geometrical Representation of Identity and Diversity”, to Volume 1 of his magnum opus The Dramatic Universe, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956, pp. 506-9. Though I wish the word “logic” would have been employed in Bolotin's title instead of “truth”, and that the words “not-yet-verified” (in both senses this can be read) would have been left out of the abstract. As regards the body of the paper, it is easy to see why the tact chosen was chosen, given that the Evangelical-Calvinist (Hilbert the Mentor) cum secular-Rabbinical probabilistic Born Rule (1926) was knee-jerked in order to avoid the Cabalistic (non-selfsame numbers employed in both Catholic and Jewish Cabalistic numerology -- not to mention neoPlatonic gematria) Weltanschauung-Umwelt consequences of embracing unvarnished m-valued Lukasiewicz logics (1921), which even Lukasiewicz and Post could not quite bring themselves to do (take note of the very end of Post's paper, for instance, where he denigrates all orders of logical-value supraordinate to that 1T2, a denigration essentially self-canceling import of the body of the paper: the functional equivalent in logic to Hugh Everett's pivotal statement, given in his [1T2-only] relative-state paper [I bet few people nowadays read the actual paper, given its relative unreachability on the internet], asserting that objects in our experience always have a definite position, a statement made [1957] in direct contradiction to the optics experimental findings [no localization in visual space independent of learned psychological factors] underlying the Luneburg theory of binocular visual space, a theory formulated and published [1951] some years before Everett wrote that statement as a justification for adopting the von Neumann formalism in the second half of his paper, this second half essentially self-canceling undissimulated import of the first half and in so doing “pushing” [i.e., ConveDDing, conversion-disorder displacing] µTm-valued logics “out there” as multiple-1T2-worlds concretions of a 1T2-multiverse and/or as multiple-1T2-'I's concretions of a collective-1T2-supraego) -- such that, when not applied, that's speaking of m-valued logics, to interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued state-function, led, via deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull, to other consequences, i.e., WWII, being sustained. Clearly, there is no 1T2-experiential way to know what µTm-relative-state identity-transparency is: being “in” µTm is required (i.e., not merely 1T2ly thinking about what µTm must signify). Likely, some analogue to this stricture applies to data generation via processes of experimentation. Back in the late-'70s on the Ithaca-qua-Cornell cocktail-party circuit, the stereotypic response to such an observation was: “His favorite is a Harvey Wallbanger, so you can just imagine! It must be that he has succumbed to the taste-polymorphic superposition of flavors in the Galliano, don't y'think.” When the “framework determining conditions” (to employ J. G. Bennett's term) of the observer-state-apparatus/object-system measurement occasion are fashioned to conform to dictates of 1T2-only-logic properties, “not-yet-verified” is sure to be “inherently not verifiable”. Bolotin hasn't gotten the notion that T = (relative-state identity-) transparency, not truth-value -- or that there is imaginary and hypercomplex reality to memetime-independent DEmergence by involutory decomposition accomplished by 3-fold operator-time. He chooses to regard the m-logical-values of a given proposition at issue to be a partially-ordered set within the real interval [0, 1], this set a subset of the sets apropos a set of propositions on a complete propositional lattice. “Not-yet-verified” with regard to “future non-certain events”. Hmmm. Memetime dependence via bivalence, uh, uh, bivalence via memetime dependence, uh, well, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics!, is-are cooked into posets by definition (good offices of Wiki): “…a set together with a binary relation indicating that, for certain pairs of elements in the set, one of the elements precedes the other…”. What Lukasiewiczian-Schrödinger state-function indicates is not binary relations qua 1T2-relative state; rather, n-ary relations qua CTC+-unto-µTm-relative state (speaking demergently here). Using Lukasiewicz logics to process memetime-bound probabilities, not the uncooked raw m-values of the state-function! The choice was made to apply m-valued logics to the interpretive dissimulation, not to the case qua case as nakedly written into the wave equation. It is not at all surprising why this choice was made, given the stages -- still many to go -- by which the probabilistic dissimulation of Schrödinger's wave equation has been pushed back, but, uh-- hmmm again. The reference-level base state, not the initial state, where the prescriptively-enculturated and socialized boundary values [meet, join] are altogether not maintainable, is at deepest well-potential, well beyond [meet = join] and full into CTC+-identity-transparency: Tzog-chen AllBase most-dense sheet of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. As regards the imaginary and hypercomplex reality of memetime-independent DEmergence, consider “The Hydrodynamic Analogy to E = mc2”, Victor P. Starr, Tellus, 9:1, 1959, heuristically “crossed into” Vladimir E. Zakharov's envelop solitons (see: “Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid”, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 9:2, March 1968, pp. 190-94), a consideration written in three spatial dimensions under 3-fold Pauli-Paine operator-time, as is done here and here and here. As soon as processing of the “process” which the canonical equation describes is understood as at least one-plus-one dimensional, as possessing two orders of nonlinearity and 1T2-unto-µTm-unto-CTC+ logicality the involved system is known in fact to be non-integrable because there are no initial conditions and no memetime evolution. Very few comments were elicited by the 1979 appearance of our model of radiation exchange at helix-coil transition of superconductant DNA. Of those few, the one I most appreciated was made by a Russian who read closely enough to realize that we had presented a soliton model not of the Davydov alpha-helix type (we did not describe superconductance along the sugar-phosphate backbone), but of the Zakharov type (we described superconductance of pi-electron parcels, these parcels acting like bosons: the Pauli exclusion principle is especially excluded with the second order of non-linearity at origin of non-orientability, non-selfsameness, m-valued identity, skew-parallelism, so on) in the free-electron-gas core-environment of the molecule. The nonlinearity of our canonical equation (somewhat akin in its import to that of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for a Bose-Einstein condensate) is due, in our conception, to the µTm-relative-state existent between the pi-electron parcels.
According to my opinion, clear distinction between prescriptively-enculturated-socialized glutamatergic-“memetime” and “the dictatorship of the proletariat” has never been well established -- no underplay as to importance of the beta-endorphin, uh, enkephalins, uh, dynorphins, uh, uh, that is, “the opiate of the people”, intended. Per[son}all|y, my I/im have not yet met, let alone come to know, the future or the past; all the more so regards eternity as the limit of an infinite sequence (a rather churchy “forevermore”) of moments, instants, cuts of the real-number line numbering discretes of memetime-passing and the continuum of “the stream of consciousness” at slow enough baud rates. The “eternal now”? Now, that's a different matter al[to}gather, it is, isn't it. An astute person could easily regard Zeno Toffano's and Francois Dubois' paper entitled “Interpolation Methods for Binary and Multivalued Logical Quantum Gate Synthesis”, arXiv, 13 February 2018 (this is a fascinating abstract, concerning which, while having no access to the whole paper, I register only one demurral: the statement, and I quote, “The common control gates can be easily obtained by considering the logical correspondence between the control logic operator [which I have long referred to as an 'autopoietic operator', which must be µTm if not CTC+] and the binary propositional logic operator”, bothers me because it is another case of the pandemic addiction to “diatonic resolution to the fundamental 'tone'” always construed as being 1T2), as one approach to modeling the Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, the Tzog-chen-AllBase-state of which is the most-dense-sheet-“domain” of the “eternal now”, over which is mapped the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, any one of which can ontologically demerge unto (not be in correspondence with) 1T2-only-memetime onticity. This is far and away from the, to be top-down-administered, Chicago Plan for monetary sovereignty, which the Swiss recently voted down. Having from youth been something of a metaphysical perennialist-primordialist (not an ethnocentric nation-statist primordialist), I never considered nature a “brute Creation” which had to be subdued by ADAMic spawn, subdued, that is, along with eradication of the animistic-pagan “primitives” spuriously claiming Rights by recourse to long-term prior residency and millennia of right use, to include not overpopulating the planet. To the Legion: [Pag}anus = lout for a soldier, a X'ian soldier. Think: [Pa}gan = [pa}ple of ga, aga, uh, [villa}ga, the village, a collective of the soil. So, so sorry, my dear Prof. So & So, but 1T2-modes of expression quench µTm-modes of comprehension (a refinement of the strong Humboldt-Boas-Sapir-Whorf hypothesis), not to mention the very much more difficult µTm-modes of perception-proprioception (suggested by, say, for one, Analytical Cubism). Or is it most properly [Ma}gan = ga of ma, module of sacred space, one such among glass-bead ga-game “Courts-of-Light” Xm[as]-tree effect on the quantum-computer-latticing quantum brain not contained by molecular-cellular brains? One tacit dimension to the complex/hypercomplex angular-momentum-cascade model of tornadogenesis is the notion that animistic quantum jumps occur at all scale levels, this being permitted by m-valued universal physical constants (e.g., light speed in vacuo understood one case of the corpus of scale-relative absolute limiting velocities) processed by nature CTC+ly-unto-µTmly (µTm at its most demergent being 1T2). While a quantum jump may be nearly memetime instantaneous, it is within that nearly Tantric-Schrödinger-memetime-independent instantonic memetime interval that Pauli-Paine operator-time operates via 3-fold temporal CURL, thus imparting k-morphismic Schrödinger [cat}e|gories of the topological twists (where, upon reverse cascade, inside/outside cum Seele/Leib “become” same) demergently modularizing unto LSTDs, limited spacetime domains. This CTC+-unto-µTm scheme is in no respect a µTm-braned attempt to flesh out, heh-heh-heh, Einstein's [(Spin}ozan] God Model (the del-cross “spin” qua “rotary telephone” good offices of Joe [Ben}del) -- or (1T2-only M-theoretic 1T2-only multiverse of 1T2-only membranes) violations, uh, uh, superstrung ketaminergic vibrations, thereof. Facts, they be a-changin' allthetimes, don't y'know. In 'is 'spearments, 'e heered tell of-- well, got well riled up, 'e did, didn't 'e. Thought 'e spied one a-them mimetic-estrogenated Shemanese dressed in the latest French fashion, I be a-bettin'. Paltry cognitive peltry, what! Yep, 'bout par, I reckon. Cowering in wegiwaas of the mind, clutching weewaas that grind smoke. The condition of the collective psyche is well beyond simply being “in denial”; there is, whatever temporal window chosen, complete inability to consciously assimilate what has actually happened -- and that cognitive circumstance very greatly predisposes dynamics of the run up to cuspover. Sicko normotics auguring for, if not guaranteeing, deletion of the species. Violence as comedy: quintessential PC-Hollywood -- an essence which, eventually, is likely to elicit a convulsive tidal bore of blowback dwarfing everything that came before: “compensatory abreaction”, the preferred MO of the CU, collective unconscious. Well, humph! Oh, Hizuru to all that. Calling, Iambe, for My Favorite Tune. Maybe that scheme mentioned above is merely a Mellow Dream -- so what -- played out at the Slowboat in Sapporo (a domain of identity-transparency which I believe I stepped into one night in January of 1990 whilst out-to in Susukino during a visit unto onetime co-worker gardener and housemate, Kajiwara Toshikasu). Superconductant (say, intraneuronal) DNA-pi-electron-parcel-gas core-environment at helix-coil transition and tornadogenesis, self-similarly, on different scale levels, generate acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes (i.e., infrasound): each, taken as corpora, being examples of acoustic analogues to CTC+-unto-µTm-valued blackhole computers? The Lukasiewiczian M-theoretically (M = multiverse cum membrane cum manifold cum module cum m-valued cum m-logically-valued cum Musculpt) modularized-by-demergence according to equilateral-triangular quark-symmetry pattern -- by scale-independent self-similarity, on some scale levels, regarded as hexagonal networks, uh, tiling space in a hexagonal grid pattern? As regards that scheme (given the principle of self-similarity, a cosmological analogue of presynaptic cum postsynaptic density arranged in a hexagonal lattice?), particularly its most-dense sheet, three hexagon-related papers of considerable interest:
J. Szentagothai, “The 'module-concept' in cerebral cortex architecture”, Brain Research, 95:2-3, 23 September 1975, pp. 475-96.
C. von der Malsburg and W. Singer, “Principles of Cortical Network Organization”, in Neurobiology of Neocortex, P. Rakic and W. Singer, eds., John Wiley & Sons, 1988.
Arturo Tozzi and James F. Peters and Ottorino Ori, “Cracking the Barcodes of Fullerene-like Cortical Microcolumns”, BioRxiv preprint, 7 November 2017.
Quoting Tozzi's and Peters' and Ori's most remarkable and elaborately illustrated paper:
Because architectonic relations among minicolumnar elements (e.g., pyramidal cells) are conserved under spatial and temporal variations (Casanova et al., 2011), it is possible to assess the tubular structure of a microcolumn in terms of a 3D cylinder with the typical regular structure of the Fullerene, e.g., a mesh of variously fused hexagons and pentagons. When the cylindrical structure is flattened [see my 1996 article on “VirFut Q-Pro”] into a 2D rectangular sheet, we achieve a lattice that allows us to investigate microcolums’ microcuircuitry and its operations in a way different from the classical logic of ON/OFF neural firing. Indeed, a Fullerene-like 2D sheet is a structure where countless transformations, dictated by accurate rules and constraints, might occur. This structure can be compared to a barcode, or a biological matrix [or the weave of a sacred cloth], in which every sequence of neuronal activation stands for a mental activity. We may also think to the bronze cup-shaped bells of a carillon, in which every sequence of diverse punchers gives rise to different melodies. In sum, we achieve a fullerene-like brain which activity is dictated by topological transformations taking place just on hexagons and pentagons. Such an approach not only allows us to build a model that faithfully simulates the biological brain activity, but also allows us to assess neural computations in terms of topological relationships and transformations among spiking neurons, instead of [1T2-only] logic gates series or parallel circuits.
Wow! Note the analogue to higher-valued, higher-temporal-order encoding in cylindrically-coordinated helix-coiling DNA, Musculpt, and demergent semantics via topotransforms under operator-time's 3-fold temporal CURL. Probably, though, in order to analogically carry this fullerene-likeness into inspiration for that scheme, mentioned above, by which the MVRS is to be modeled relative to Everettian-vonHayekian time-shapes, we likely need a little ah-ha-type epiphany-help from The Philosophy of the Spiritual, such that Musculpt-as-mathematical-notation can be techno-exteriorized.
With the following quotation from the article (p. 4):
Holographic surfaces can be unfolded into sheets, one on top of another, with each sheet or surface being a higher dimension of information. New dimensions of information emerge from the lower-order surfaces as they unfold onto the higher order surfaces, which carry information of their own respective areas. The higher dimensions manifest information from the lower dimensions that was not there to start with. Higher and higher orders of the quantum wave function exist on the surfaces of world within worlds. Information is extracted from the wave function as we move higher and higher in the hierarchy of “worlds,” until we reach the highest dimension of information, the boundary of the Universe, which is in constant and instantaneous interaction with the “worlds” beneath it.
my attention was drawn to Mark Germine's brilliant paper entitled “The Holographic Principle of Mind and the Evolution of Consciousness”, County of Siskiyou Behavioral Health Services, Yreka, CA, 96097, U.S.A., undated, but by bibliography 2007 or later. Contemplating this statement of Germine, one has to wonder: how, then, could a borderless brain function, and why would any intelligent person wish for a borderless world? Could THE quantum brain not contained by its molecular-cellular brains function without boundaries-without-boundary? IMHO, not too likely: in the right state of consciousness -- diffuse-state “thinking” in concentration upon Musculpted sequences of feeling-toned aesthetic judgments, a kind of prehension-from-above -- on the one-on-one basketball floor and the 2nk battlefield-fitness landscape, I often had available my own personal OBE command helicopter. How better to destroy a global monetary system then by removing the boundaries upon which its currencies are defined, such as is done by Bitcoin and the like? And how better to build a smart monetary system than by expanding boundary surface area with myriad µTm-valued-LETS currencies defined over nesting foams of fractal e-boundaries-without-boundary? For one, the changing viscosities built into µTm-valued LETS nesting foams would delicately mitigate the ill effects of hot money flows, without heavy-handed iatrogenic governmental currency-controls interventions. In this regard, associated in my mind is memory of mentions of “surface as measure theory” in Science News during the mid-to-late-1970s with applications thereof to PBL (planetary boundary layer) studies, e.g., “Comparative Effect of Stability, Baroclinicity and Scale-Height Ratio on Drag Laws for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer”, S. P. S. Arya, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 35:1, January 1978, pp. 40-46. In regards to baroclinity/barotropicity, think stratification, think m-sheets. When, general-systems-wise, it is considered that the various sheets each have different logical-value order-types, be cognizant of the fact that, à la Gurdjieff, upon “saying 'I' to” the glutamate-etched egoic state of consciousness generally regarded normative, the orientation to cosmic beingness thus chosen is that of reverse-cascade remergence, rather than the cascade-demergence (Germine adopts Whitehead's “ingression”, but I have long thought that “demergence” better captures the concrescence of “reality” -- i.e., spontaneous localization unto functional specificity, not spontaneous fusion unto functional integration -- a Schrödinger-memetime-independent “process”: I read Process and Reality conjointly with readings of Sri Aurobindo Ghose on “involution-evolution” in The Life Divine [by good offices of Jack and Cathy Waldron, I acquired a copy of the raw silk bound edition of Aurobindo's encyclopedic Collected Works, spending half of my then total net worth in order to do so] and of Plotinus on neoPlatonic devolution in Enneads and of C. G. Jung on The Psychology of the Transference [I was able to purchase Jung's collected works one volume at a memetime], circa 1972, three years before becoming a research assistant to D. A. Paine at Cornell) orientation achieved by Jungian “active imagination” unto meditative placement of awareness on the base-state of Tzog-chen -- as regards equilateral-triangular qua hexagonal meshwork covering the Sakharovian multi-sheet-modeled MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, think fermion family generation, flavor, color relative to 3-fold temporal CURL in cascade/reverse-cascade Heraclitian dynamics, i.e., down/up, by charmed-cause/strange-attractor at top/bottom -- both of these perspectival “orientations”, of course, in being orientable, exhibiting residuals of the binary mindset whereupon mutual cancellation of demergence/remergence is not Parmenidean entertained. However, the aperspectival notion suggests an unbecoming non-JenannIsmaelian reconciliation of Heraclitus with Parmenides (see: Cosmological and Psychological Time, Yuval Dolev and Michael Roubach, eds., Springer, 2016, as reviewed by Esteban J. Beltran Ulate, Phenomenological Reviews, 7 May 2017). A non-CarlSchmittian (The Nomos of the Earth, 1950; and see Mika Ojakangas, if you can) primevalist (good offices of Francois Debrix writing in Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt: Geographies of the Nomos, Stephen Legg, ed., Routledge, 2011 [not including, I note, the Viet Cong's holographic-principle-tacitly-applied mappings of bureaucratic variables upon frequently changed boundaries: in early-1968, when we discovered that one of the most characteristic things that the Viet Cong Political Infrastructure {VCI} did -- yes do think of the unacknowledged, unwelcome, inconvenient back-story on how the VCI was able to overcome the extreme disparity in available force, of Sam Adams and the Westmoreland vs. CBS trial, as well as of the CICV-CDEC-MACVJ2-IDHS {the Intelligence Data Handling System computer having been physically located in the CICV building across the hem from the RVN JGS-HQ compound} Vietnam-war-era origins of the Secret Military History of the Internet {good offices of Yasha Levine, Surveillance Valley, PublicAffairs, February 2018} -- could be characterized as mapping the bureaucratic variables internal to a given Tactical Area of Responsibility on the changing boundary of that TAOR, I knew little of holography, or anything of the “holographic principle” yet to be formulated, but, as a result of symptomatology associated with multiple-fragment wounds “received” in the Mekong delta, I was already contemplating DNA superconductivity and coherent wave generation, contemplation as described in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh]) take on metaphysical perennialism-primordialism: in the truth-value-free, non-probabilistic, non-Turing, superstrung, continuum, universal-quantum-relativistic-"machine" understanding of the m-valued-Schrödinger-wave-function approach to modeling the multi-sheeted, Lukasiewiczian-Hilbertian MVRS, the Pauli-Paine-operator-time-demergent degenerative Cabalistic (think of the Greater Maze and the Tree of Life as numbered in Gematria by non-self-identical numbers) “grammars”, <<< Nm, DL>>> (see Stephen Blaha's The Metatheory of Physics Theories, Pingree-Hill, 2005, p. 14, for cogent discussion), uh, that's non-[1T2-deterministc] but non-probabilistic-[µTm-unto-CTC+-deterministic] grammars (see Blaha, Chapter 4), of the topologically-active 3-fold <<<>>> temporal-CURL-involved, non-Chomsky, cosmic “languages”, due to an inherent self-reentrant non-orientableness (no externality-type inputs or outputs, the supersystem-system-subsystem composite being autopoietic and automorphic), would have no start or terminal symbols, all non-terminal (N) symbols would be m-valued, and all transformational rules would involve Lukasiewiczian (L) decomposition (D) involutes, not production emergents -- and the non-multicephalic (“multicephalic” is a Gorgon-ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the truth-value-independent Lukasiewicz logics not used to interpret the Schrödinger wave-function) wave-effect (including deposition upon, say, equivalent potential temperature surfaces) processor would be CTC+-unto-µTm-logically-valued. This Cantorian-Lukasiewiczian CPU simile metaphorically, if abysmally reductively so, signifies the sole “Pure Land”-unsullied-universal-consciousness one-and-only “Real-I/im”, the exponential-m of which indicates no multiverse, but the infinitudes of infinitudes of infinitudes… of self-referential reentries constitutive of CTC+-unto-µTm-relative-state identity-transparency. Consider this statement made by Germine (p. 19):
The integration of information in the brain is not algorithmic, as in conventional computers. The so-called neural networks currently employed in certain specialized computers are inappropriate models of the neural network, as they fail to account for the information capacity of surface within the neuron and on its surfaces, in particular the dendritic surfaces. Information processing in computers, because of these limitations, does not reach the level of experience that we could attribute even to the single celled organism, and will not reach the level of experience associated with consciousness in the foreseeable future, even as we develop vast networks of computers such as the global internet.
set side by side with the content of Robert Epstein's (past editor of Psychology Today) 18 May 2016 Tweeted Aeon essay given the title “The empty brain: Your brain does not process information, retrieve knowledge or store memories. In short: your brain is not a computer”. As regards an absence of externality-type inputs and outputs to the Cabalistic “grammars”, consider the following question: Zero-point energy and big-bang/big-crunch are what, cosmologically speaking, non-orientableness “looks like” to the memetime-bound binary-mind? Under the imputation, that is, that memetime duration of the present moment is relative to the logical-value order-type employed and the associated absolute limiting baud-rate-velocity in cognition of propriocepts/percepts of that order-type, i.e., “instantiation” is m-valued, like is the Schrödinger wave-function, not single-valued -- and in the C+ case infinity = zero, such that there is being-there instant without instant. With Lukasiewiczian Schrödinger we have WaveNotation: Slow Way. Had Anton Webern not been killed in the immediate [after}math of WWII by an American soldier, killed, essentially, for taking an unauthorized smoke break, we likely would have had a wealth of aural evocations of Lukasiewiczian Schrödinger. The manner of Webern's death (good offices of Michael Stein) I've long believed to have been one of those Pauli-Jung meaningful coincidences, a synchronicity illustrating, irrespective of binary sides, the actual, if unconscious, thematic contents of WWII. For all us jumping beans, then, Samadhi-type saltations, thus, are k-morphisms, 3-fold temporal CURL mediated, no mere matter of break-danced step-ups. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, his Cambridgification, probably, a [neo}tenacious Aurobindo, differing in this respect from Plotinus, did not quite get it that neoteny is not a memetime-bound evolutionary process -- memetime being Maya, and the origin of the misconception that Samsaric metempsychosis is a matter of sequence, a notion made comportive with dissimulated quantum theory by dissembling memetime-independent CTC+-unto-µTm-superposition as if it were a memetime-bound, additive, 2T2-elaboration. Only those who attribute to themselves objective life think themselves capable of objective death. What in tarnation is that? Every speed is an absolute limiting velocity, i.e., a “light”, for some sheet (or, more accurately, adapting Sakharov's “pre-universe” term, the on-sheet pre-LSTD [limited spacetime domain] operator-time topoinvariant predicating the given relative absolute limiting velocity: think also of the triangular-hexagonal Upper and Lower Heaven of the chronomantic I-Ching); hence, memetimeless “light” is everywhen and allwhere (see the latter sections of our 1977 paper “Toward a General Theory of Process”). This type of ma(multi-sheeted sacred space)hikari(light) was deeply understood, I believe, in old, old, old “primitive” Shinto. For discussion of Sakharov's “null-Lagrangian” (i.e., CTC+-unto-µTm handlings thereof being null as far as the 1T2 handling is concerned) contemplations of this cosmological issue, see here. Also: think of the “null vectors” involved in the derivation of J. G. Bennett's “pencils of skew-parallels” (see: Appendix III of Bennett's The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956). This multi-sheet MVRS model would involve a nonlinear deFocked (see Blaha, Chapter 8) Konfigurationsraum whereupon on each intersection point there are ensheaved C+ ACTUAL states (each such state a state relative to some other intersection point, on and across sheets), and between-sheet articulators would not be simple Riemann-surface-type bridges, but, by General Relativity, Regge lattices (point-dustings from the Wheelerian pre-pregeometry “bucket of dust” [the back-story on the “Novikov dust” employed in Sakharov's multi-sheet model?], a pointillism superstrung together with pregeometry strings qua “primitive”-Shinto fiber-bundle ropes) marked with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of the pregeometry logical and ontological propositions involved. Moreover, it must be admitted that when it is considered that the various sheets have different logical-value order-types, if those order-types be understood independent of the notion truth-value and relative to CTC+-unto-µTm-relative-state identity-transparency, then the “Bekenstein bound” (be aware that, associated with three classes of conservation laws, E-prime and E-doubleprime [see our “General Process” paper] are not entertained, and that Bekenstein considers the quantum of action to be single-valued), as noted by Mark Germine, based as it is on the memetime-bound notion as to what constitutes entropy, is with respect only to 1T2-only information -- not also with respect to information CTC+-unto-µTm logically-valued. There are definitional problems with the Bekenstein bound even without consideration of the m-valued Lukasiewicz logics interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function, as noted by Don N. Page in “The Bekenstein Bound”, arXiv, 27 April 2018: “Bekenstein's conjectured entropy bound for a system… has counterexamples for many of the ways in which the 'system'… may be defined”. Beyond Page, we note that C+ actual states at any point on the boundary vastly supersedes two possible states at any such point; and, furthermore, as regards Germine's portrait, calculating cosmic “eternal now” information-load-max-qua-carrying-capacity bound by employment of the memetime-bound notion as to what constitutes entropy doesn't actually compute on a universal 1T2-Turing machine, be it of the 2-state quantum type, be it of the continuum type. Such a computation would require, at the very least, an acoustic analogue to a CTC+-unto-µTm-logically-valued blackhole computer. Parenthetically, by contrast, and by analogy, not only, à la Schmitt, is land usurpation insouciantly (nonchalantly heedless by appeal to the North American Injun Cuntry precedent: I lived in Long Beach, CA, 1950-'51; in LA, my father was occasionally stopped on the street and asked for his autograph, he looked that much like John Wayne; so, living amidst a defeated people's long-time-passing-away wet-rice culture, when I saw Hondo in 1954 at the base theater, Ashiya AFB, Japan, I never forgot Hondo's last words: “End of a way of life. Too bad. Good way.”) considered THE sanctified source of lawfare and top-down-enforced socio-politico-economic organization, but, nowadays, genetic mutations are patentable, terms of terminologies can be trademarked, e.g., à la Blaha, p. 19, “Probabilistic GrammarTM” and “Quantum Probabilistic GrammarsTM”, and duration of copyright altogether ignores (good offices of Saqib Shah, New York Post reposting from The Sun, 8 June 2018) the predominant “intertextuality” role of the collective unconscious in all and every act of authentic creation (mere innovation to a much lesser degree), as well as the quantum-collective-and-cooperative-phenomena characteristics of quantum-based technologies like the internet. More hubristic embezzlement of the component-processes of the commonweal. What the 18th-century Enlightenment binary-rationalist deemed “natural laws” of a “brute Nature” were actually the “laws” of his own 1T2-only-prescriptively-enculturated-cum-socialized glutamate-etched brain that were imposed on his brute mind, and which were cast upon nature by processes of projective-identification, “laws” falsifying nature but which yet allowed development of nature-destroying technologies. That circumstance persisted all the way through the 20th century, and is still the case today as falsified quantum physics spawns more and more technologies of iatrogenic intervention into natural processes dyscharacterized by continued maintenance of the mistaken notion of an objective “classical limit”. To whensoever is dated the “death of truth” (good offices of Piers Brendon, The Guardian, 11 March 2018), conflation of 1T2-only-truth-value-free and denigration-of-the-utility-value-of-truthfulness is a covert blackpsyche way to persevere in suppressing application of Lukasiewicz to Schrödinger and, thus, to promote sua sponte a continuance at overcoming the persistent postponement of a rehearing regards the m-valuedness of state-function (a retrial no state on the planet has been willing to court). Don't Be Stupid, listen to the Dragon King (music in the style of some of Osamu Kitajima's fusion pieces, e.g., “Hot Springs Invasion” and “Dragon King”, might well have been heard back in the day, late-'70s, I believe, memory serving, at the David Kubiak created Kyoto “live house” named Jittoku featured in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh). If, say, the Perimeter Institute, wants to experimentally verify µTm-logical predictions issuing out of quantum-gravity and M-theory, the places to look, IMHO, are pi-electron-parcel-gas-core-(cylindrical “perimeter”: that any surface can manifest the “holographic principle” was demonstrated by Raphael Bousso, cited by Germine, in “The Holographic Principle for General Backgrounds”, arXiv, 2 November 1999, and in “The Holographic Principle”, arXiv, 29 June 2002)-boundary-qua-interface-qua-plasmahaut-mediated DNA radiation exchange (I'd like to read Dirson Jian Li's and Shengli Zhang's “The holographic principle and the language of genes”, arXiv, 31 May 2008, but obviously I'm not real confident in the Boolean networks estimation of degrees of freedom) and the acoustic analogue to blackhole computing at tornadogenesis and associated rippling of the tornadic wall as nested-grid, i.e., multi-sheet, computer-forecast modeled in Paine-Kaplan complex and hypercomplex angular-momentum-cascade theory (to get a real feeling for the sophistication of this theory have a look at Mike Kaplan's CV; now ask: on what elementary school reading level qua grade of cognitive sophistication has the climate-change, volcanism, earthquake, hot-aurora, so-on debate been transpiring? and when Santa Catalina temperatures have become those of Woodland Hills which have become those of Death Valley which have become those of… then ask…). Think especially: acoustically-modified gravity-wave-mode signatures (µTm-logically-valued information) of theta-e equivalent potential temperature (good offices of Jeff Haby: note that Kaplan's 1968 MS Thesis was devoted to this subject as it relates to Washington, D.C., dynamics, heh-heh-heh!) surfaces (be aware that these surfaces are two levels of abstraction away from concrete surfaces with thermometer-readable temperatures), an experimentally verified “idea” much discussed with Doug Paine during the mid-to-late-'70s and a substantial part of the origin of the notion we then termed holographic “Musculpt”, music-sculpture. For those with a financial bent, register, relative to atmospheric theta-e, options and other financial derivatives, then think rate-of-change sensitivities like delta and rate-of-change-of-rate-of-change sensitivities like gamma. Now -- given that one of Doug Paine's grad students moved on to Wall Street during the late-'70s -- think of how we then thought about how atmospheric µTm-processing of the m-valuedness of acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-mode signatures of 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-order constant entropy surfaces ought to be mapped back (using m-valued LETS currency units) upon financial derivatives such that they could be properly formulated as signifying µTm-relative-states of the synoptic real [eco}nomy's Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” (this notion was just an analogical replication of Paine's reversal of Maxwell: hydrodynamics unto electromagnetics taken to electromagnetics unto atmospheric hydrothermodynamics). According to our thesis, the mapping of information upon geometry (a Wheelerian pre-pregeometry and pregeometry Schrödinger-memetime-independent “process” of Platonic amnesis-by-AbelianE.T.Bellian-involutory-decomposition, remergence being by Platonic anamnesis, good offices of Dominic Scott, The Classical Quarterly, 37:2, December 1987, pp. 346-66) is carried out by the operations of topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time. Just for the birds? Hmmm. Well-- sure, mebbe so, as bird-brained pigeons locally home on veridical infrasound signatures of landforms, lake fetches, so on -- as demonstrated by Cornellians at Doug Paine's promptings. Magic without magic: boundary without boundary; wall without wall; ridge without ridge. If 3-fold temporal CURL, which tri-adically cum p-adically cum topologically loops the quantum-gravity loop, is quantized by means of Penrose twistors, what quantizes the quantizer? Certainly not the Higgs field particles as composites or the three gauge field groups -- both of which could be imagined binary-logic functional-specificity residuals carried into the relationist 1T2-only-egoic handling of unacknowledged µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency. More likely, it is, isn't it: superstrings of acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes rippling walls of these cosmic-- whoopse, I won't say it (good offices of Tara Carlin, The Panoptic, 25 August 2017) has anything to do with collective ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, uh, uh, the V-multilogues of vortices, that is to say, vibratory ripplings superstrung in composite acoustic analogues to CTC+-unto-µTm-blackhole computers?
As regards creation of a smart monetary system, we would do well to remember that the I-Ching was originally The Book of Changes, not the book of chances, and that use of head-or-tail coins to cast a reading of the prevailing chronotopology is a relatively modern innovation, for, before coinage, the chronomantic cast using yarrow stocks which fell into interstices-bonds analogically articulating the lattice pattern equivalent to the curvature configuration capturing the chronotopology at issue. Moreover, it being very difficult to pick up a quark symmetry pattern with binary-logical chopsticks, quite likely is the notion that the first formalized 1T2-logic was Tai Chi rotational, and that this is the reason the form of Higher (if not Highest) Heaven, with covering space in trigrammic-hexagrammic array, is a circular multi-level, i.e., nested equilateral-triangular-qua-hexagonal foam, encryption disk (cylindrical roll cloud in the case of pi-electron-parcel gas core-environment of helix-coiling DNA). Likewise, we surely would greatly benefit were stocks, and their instrumented bundles as derivatives, to articulate and bond according to the fiber-bundle arithmetics locally-latticing, via self-referential market reflexivities, relative to the global curvature configuration capturing and concretizing the prevailing synoptic quantum-composite of Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth.
Yes, I am saying that I believe the ledgerdemon, uh, uh, that's the sorting demon's legerdemain, in the domain of financial derivatives, has been, and is, a ConveDD (conversion-disorder displacement) operator directly borrowed from its correspondent in the world of the quantum physicist. The editors of ZeroHedge appear to have gotten this, i.e., groked the omnipresence of ConveDDs on the current scene, even if their authors haven't (see: “Kunstler On The Resistance's Displacement-Projection Syndrome”, 20 July 2018). Supposing, that is, that the 1T2-only currency units on the current scene are personas cloaking unsung macroquantum µTm-exchange units, a notion Richard Feynman might have agreed to: “…Feynman was saying that the Schrödinger equation should apply to macroscopic objects unless a newly invented set of equations could show otherwise", Peter Byrne, The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III, Oxford U. Press, paperback edition, 2012, p. 181. Doggoneit and dadgumit! them summed-- somethin's in that thar superposition jus' don't look righteous. Quoting Stephen Blaha, The Metatheory of Physics theories…, Pingree-Hill, 2005, p. 20: “The actual summed probability has to be normalized or rescaled so the sum of probabilities equals one” (the involved quadratic losses generating the expected expectation values). And the probability amplitude has to be squared so there are real, non-negative probabilities (complex and hypercomplex negative probabilities -- by definition doubly or triply not physically observable, under our take a miscegenation [introjection-incorporation] with respect to µTm-unto-CTC+-logical-values -- would be, if dismiscegenated, apropos of, and signifying, the remergence Parmenides-canceling demergence: the function decomposed in our “Fourier transform” is of Pauli-Paine operator-time, not of memetime). Shades of the rescaling employed to exorcise the m-valued and m-logically-processed acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes from the atmospheric models used in dynamical forecasting and climate-change assessment. I've long wondered if normalization or rescaling has anything to do with the troubled asset-- oops! GUTs, of quantum-gravity. Blaha's statement indicates to me that the “actual summed probability” isn't actually a probability at all; and that summing (Feynman's “sum over histories”) isn't the correct arithmetic operation to employ at characterization of the ways (plural) it, the superposition, is, not “transpires”: act{u]ality of the memetime-independent Feynman-diagram (see: Blaha, pp. 21-2) infinite case (which Feynman regarded “horizontally” reversible and we consider “vertically” reversible) is holographic CTC+-unto-µTm-relative-state identity-transparency (note that Blaha observes, p. 20, that the “relative probability amplitude”, which he signifies with the symbol g, is “similar to a coupling constant”: consider that this constant at any given memetime instant is m-valued, and, in the CTC+-processed case, is equivalent to the state of, not degree of, utter identity-transparency), the non-simple identity being -- not becoming -- demergent under topologically-active, memetime-independent, Pauli-Paine operator-time via three-fold temporal CURL. One might regard the probability amplitude of the Born Rule as being a blind built to hunt dear prescriptively-enculturated ConveDDs lurking in the forests of the Lord, and oh-so capable of normalizing every patch of wild grass that might appear. If we speculate that that which takes a “real, non-negative, Fourier polynomial” to the “absolute square of a complex Fourier polynomial” (see: “The Riesz-Fejér Theorem and Probabilities” section of “Missing Link Between Probability Theory and Quantum Mechanics: the Riesz-Fejér Theorem”, F. H. Fröhner, Z. Naturforsch, 53a, received 28 January 1998, pp. 637-54) is temporal CURL (complex and hypercomplex twists), then it must be supposed that topologically-active, memetime-independent, Pauli-Paine operator-time is the logic agent responsible for execution of this transpose. And what involved logic would that be? That manipulating mu-itically, not bitically or qubitically. The m qua M here, unfortunately not for the [mu}sculpt of Mal, for moo, maybe even the koanic mu. Of course, full-blown Musculpt-expressing-quantum-gravity would, following Victor Zuckerkandl (I studied his book at George Mason U., circa 1973) and Karlheinz Stockhausen (good offices of Paul Miller, his Ph.D. dissertation), focus no less on the configurations of emptiness in The Space Between notes than upon “relations between the notes themselves” (in this latter respect, think of Iannis Xenakis' Formalized Music, Indiana U. Press, 1971, which I studied at George Mason U., circa 1973: his approach to algorithmic composition is musicoanalogically based upon the Born Rule interpretation of Schrödinger's state-function, particles of sound, clouds of sound particles, so on, stochastically handled; quite different, it goes without saying, from the empty-spaces-filled compositions of, for instance, Anton Webern). If, as J. A. Wheeler maintained, “The question is: 'What is the question?'”, then that question may be: How do you write Lukasiewiczian code for topological transforms over the generic µTm-valued-LETS currency referenced to Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”? Write that code and a way to build a capable processor will be found. That code may be an expression of the GUTs of quantum-gravity at the pre-pregeometry, pregeometry, geometrodynamic, and spacetime physics levels of demergent-remergent Musculpt concretion-abstraction. Given that (here we quote Leonard Susskind's The Black Hole War, Back Bay paperback edition, 2008, pp. 333-4):
There are other ways for an electron to go from a to b -- for example, by juggling photons along the way… Obviously there is no end to the possibilities, and according to Feynman's rules, they all have to be added together to find the actual probability. Every diagram can be decorated with more structure. Each propagator and vertex can be replaced by a more complicated history involving diagrams within diagrams within diagrams, [shades of Bohm's “clocks within clocks within clocks” à la three-fold temporal CURL's classes of collections of clocks: one, finitely many, infinitely many] until they are just too small to see. But with the aid of a high-powered magnifying glass, even finer structure can be added -- endlessly… The infinite potential to add ever smaller structure [think, for instance, of defining µTm-LETS currencies on holographic-principled nesting-foams of fractal e-boundaries] to a Feynman diagram is one of the disquieting consequences of the space-time continuum of Quantum Field Theory…
the involved logic(s) would be CTC+-unto-µTm-valued Lukasiewicz logics understood independent of the notion truth-value.
By saying “write Lukasiewiczian code”, I did not imagine that that “write” will end up being “write” in the right sense of the word, authentic semantic imports of CTC+-unto-µTm orders of logical-value being unsignifiable by whatsoever concatenations of discrete selfsame symbols; more likely, such code ultimately will be symformphonically “scored” in holographic-[Mu}sculpt-as-mathematical-notation. In committing The Fuzzy to writing, the purport of which is “closest packing” of “Dedekind cuts” as “close as we like” in the quasi-closed hyper-cum-super-cum-real interval {([0,1])}, we have thereby decisively predicated m to n and, thus, have denied existence of Tantric-Schrödinger memetime-independent animistic-pagan quantum-non-simple identity on basis of numerical selfsameness as specified by the 1T2-only Law of Non-Contradiction, which we have carried into our mistaken objective-TF-bound-test-question it-from-bit/bit-from-it notion as to what µTm-unto-CTC+ can signify -- discovery having been mistakenly consigned solely to 1T2-only-definable memetime (topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time being supra to superpolynomial time [more specifically, supra to exponentiated exponential time], “running” in fractally-nested Mnk steps, both n [number of muits, as distinct from qubits and bits] and k [number of correlations] taking on any value to include those of C+ cardinalities, hence processor “elements” cannot be discretes, with or without selfsameness). From what I've seen, and our being well into the War of the World and much further into the War on the World, this unfortunate circumstance is altogether unlikely to be rectified. Closeness conceived [duet}able: my I/im is|are not Against All Logic, though he|she|they believe all logics will be rejected at coming cuspover (for who among us can deny that recorded hu-hu-human hisstory is overwhelmingly populated by historical-figure whatnots who were imbeciles?) due to a failure to embrace Lukasiewicz logics understood independent of the notion truth-value and in terms of the holographic-principled states (not fuzzy degrees) of CTC+-unto-µTm-relative-state identity-transparency (each such state -- the full range of Samadhi states, not just those heuristically designated? -- having non-reducible unique properties, however relative and however readable on the boundary of All That Is: no vagueness here to be reasoned out or about). Not to denigrate self-referential circularity (the [Mu}sculptural epiphany involved here, in the compositional inspiration, is undoubtedly an example of the C.G.Jungian “transcendent function” in full constellation), but reentry-by-self-reference is altogether more elaborate than a mere calliope-accompanied carousel, howsoever [fado}ed by the Mother-of-God, as wonderfully absolute as her voicings often are. M-me|we believe T-norm Lukasiewicz logics to be normotic. O-no! Fly, FLew, Flown, Okie dokie? Note that permissible interpretations of “intersection” and “conjunction” both, binary-logic speaking, stand in for some senses of the 1T2-only, set-theoretic, Venn-diagramable notion “inclusion” which is involved in the identity-incorporation [pre}non-linearity associated with µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency, M<<<>>>* which is not 2sum*. There is a pregnant correspondence, I believe, between Adolf Lowe's goal-incorporating “instrumental inference” (see: the “Instrumental Inference” and “Goal setting” and “Goal-adequate path” sections of the downloaded paper, good offices of Ranjan Nalin of Jai Prakash University, Chhapra, Bihar, India, presented to the European Society for the History of Economic Thought conference, Complutense University of Madrid, 7-9th June 2018; as well as here) and the “'goal-directed' proof methods” cum “goal-directed calculi” for Lukasiewicz logics explicated by George Metcalfe and Nicola Olivetti and Dov Gabbay in “Lukasiewicz Logic: From Proof Systems To Logic Programming”, L. J. of the IGPL, 0:0, pp. 1-25, 0000, Oxford U. Press (maybe a preprint of some sort or another version of the authors' "Goal-Directed Methods for Lukasiewicz Logic", in J. Marcinkowski and A. Tarlecki, eds., Computer Science Logic 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3210, Springer, pp. 85-99), particularly the “Goal-Directed Methods” and “A Basic Goal-Directed System” sections, wherein “The aim is then to compute the highest truth-value with which a goal is entailed…” or “More precisely, the derivation of a goal is performed by combining SLD[selective linear definite]-resolution steps with the backward calculation of truth values using the truth functions associated to connectives” (in Lowean terms, quoting Nalin, “Instrumental part involves discovery of paths and goal-adequate motivational and behavioural patterns while deductive part involves achieving the final goal with the premises discovered through the instrumental analysis”; and, in our case, the function of interest would be the m-valued Schrödinger-memetime-independent state-function associated with cascade-theoretic-demergent CTC+-unto-µTm-relative-state identity-transparency and, 1T2ly speaking, self-cancellation thus cancelled, reverse-cascade-theoretic-remergent µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state identity-transparency, this last abduction-retroduction, under the mistaken supposition that memetime is an objective linear-time, ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, to the notions “spontaneous localization” and “spontaneous fusion”). Quoting from my 1996 “Santa Fe paper”, linked above immediately after the Nalin link:
Superimposition of extrasystemic upon intrasystemic factors is the underlying condition which planometrics struggled with as a submerged non-linearity and econometrics treats as stochastic instability.
As this problem still exists in the era subsequent to collapse of the Soviet Union, a new approach is warranted.
Upon first encounter, circa 1977, abductive-retroductive Lowean “instrumental inference” appeared quite natural to me, a onetime student at American University's School of International Service, Washington, D. C., when much of the required curriculum involved “problem-based” instruction delivered in team-taught seminars. Moreover, I was the son of a USAF supply-and-materiel troubleshooter whose cognitive orientation was job-wise necessarily “problem-based”. I was relocated so many times as a youth because he was sent from one problem to the next at one base to the next: a problem-based ensemble I could not possibly have missed as it had a profound impact on my enculturation cum socialization -- or relative lack thereof. My interest in the correspondence between Lowe and Lukasiewicz (the main consideration, the “macro-goal” [to me, a µTm-valued goal is not equivalent to “a multiset of {1T2-}goals”], being to find ways to maximize systemic self-organizational competency toward the holographic-principle level, not, as Lowe had it, to establish more thoroughly a politically “controlled economic system”) would be not rooted in truth-values, but the logical-values to a given proposition understood independent of the notion truth-value, as µTmly-wave-effect processed by a processor handling the internalizing-externalities m-values ensheaved upon any given LETS currency unit (complexities of converting such currencies handled by automated reasoning via algorithmic interpretations involving n-ary connectives [the heuristically-holographic-principle C+ case = utter identity-transparency] not necessarily “intuitive”, i.e., normotic): this ensheaving being the bottom-up means by which self-organization-facilitating market mechanisms interface with local, urban, regional, planetary m-scenarios strategic planning (not in any way to be confused with command-economy centralized-comprehensive planometrics implemented by dot-guv threat-sanction-mandate-policy-legislation-regulation-lawfare-force-incentive: it's not a matter of the existence of, or absence of, “optimality criteria” and “preference functions” -- for these, or their facsimiles, always exist en masse, even in heuristically-unfettered free-market laissez-faire capitalism, tacitly, if not explicitly -- but as to how objectives, goals, interests are interfaced to market forces, in the present proposal, on the currency-unit-definition and planetary-unit-of-account-definition levels of econometric “framework determining conditions”, conditions giving due respect to the quantum-superposition principle) methodologies (expanded along the “lines” of VirFut Q-Pro cum participatory e-commons open-source computer-gaming-qua-simulation to discover ponderablelocally-memetemporally-specific best cases of the full range of involved values, indicators, measures, taggings, goals, paths, so on, gamings engaged in at each holographic-principle nesting-foam fractal-e-boundary level) for “goal setting” and “goal-adequate path” determination.
Conventions of globalized English and associated languages (for considerable insight, see: “Behemoth, bully, thief: how the English language is taking over the planet”, Jacob Mikanowski, The Guardian, 27 July 2018) being the Great Sapir-Whorf Normoticizers (see “VirFut Q-Pro”: “Not English as the imposed onelanguage, Musculpt as universal metalanguage”), we have had, and have, baud rate, rate of rate, rate of rate of rate considered memetime-related-counts of discretes (rate-wise, in terms of intervals, ponderablespatial and memetemporal) construed as small as we like -- not understood 3-fold topological operations on continua -- the probabilistic qualifier being required so as to retain the atomistic qua particlistic qua “dust”-motistic [pre}miss (which may be mootistic). Attempts to get over this 1T2-only imposed limitation involve the calculus of discretes taken to the infinitesimal limit of the separation function as continuum -- not by going to CTC+ Lukasiewicz logics understood independent of discrete truth-values apropos only of the 1T2-order of logical-value alone. Metaphysically speaking, the ontological distinctions physically drawn are between states of identity-transparency, not between selfsame identities qua selfsame identities, as is the Fuzzy Way, sets and logic construed as arrayed solely in the real interval [0,1]: T, to me, indicates transparency, not truth. Classes of elementary particles are states of T, and, speaking 1T2ly, “individual” particles are part and, by interactions, parcel of the operator-time-induced involutory decomposition-demergence by which spacetime is. Non-Everettian CTC+-relative-state, in terms of a supraFocked, holographic-principled, complexity-theoretic, articulation “landspace”, would not be 2nk, but MNk, where M denotes order of logical-value to a given proposition, value understood independent of the notion truth-value, and mi denotes the states of M, i indicative of identity-transparency, i ranging from 1T2 through µTm unto CTC+; N denotes the number of observables numbered lineally and nonlineally (numbered in such fashion with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers) represented in the supraFock space of nested discrete lattices, in the limit, heh-heh-heh, of CTC+ an ensheavement of brane-bridged sheets, and nmu the totality of states available to N, mu indicative of the states permitted to any given element of N, the values of mu ranging from 0 to mi-1 (stated in AlexanderKarpenko functors of Lukasiewicz logics over the primes); k denotes the relative-state (the correlation, the coupling, the condensation) demergent under the 3-fold involutory-decomposition operations of topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time, and ks the degree of J.G.Bennettian “skew-parallelism” predicating the given demergent relative-state vector, s ranging from minus-infinity (absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct) to plus-infinity (utter identity-transparency), s = 0 indicating the normotic null-vectored internal system state, heh-heh-heh. My I/im question(s) the arithmetic operation addition as appropriate to superposition, particularly quantum superposition. The rationale for this questioning involves the belief that the Born Rule probability interpretation of QM ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displaces, the M of a logically-multivalent superposition (C+ logical values to a given demergent ontological-cum-temporal-cum-spatial-cum-existential proposition, logical-“values” being understood independent of the notion truth-value) to a set M (ranging from plus[matter]-infinity to minus[anti-matter]-infinity) of 2-state (qubitic: a hugely reductive treatment of the spin-component, i.e., temporal CURL, of topologically-active operator-time) observables, the possible ontic existence of the elements of the set, M, at a given instant of memetime, each having a particular probability amplitude. Stephen Blaha (The Metatheory of Physics Theories…, Pingree-Hill, 2005: a book about another linguistic “behemoth”, the counter-Cabala Chomskyan reformulation of QM as a generative cosmic language) describes the arithmetic operation multiplication as not being adequate to the combining of relative probability amplitudes (think: power spectrum of coupling constant understood m-valued as the Trickster archetype's trick-mirror-image reflection of the eidolon which is µTm-unto-CTC+-relative-state). Quoting Blaha, p. 39:
A general Quantum Probabilistic GrammarTM is an entangled Quantum Probabilistic GrammarTM in which we cannot assign a probability amplitude to each individual grammar rule transition. The relative probability amplitude for a sequence of grammar rule transitions is not the product of the relative probability amplitudes of each transition.
Instead, in an entangled Quantum Probabilistic GrammarTM the relative probability amplitude for a sequence of grammar rule transitions is a function of the combined set of grammar rule transitions. Thus we call it entangled.
Strip away probability and memetime: the unspeakable, but [Mu}sculptable, CTC+-unto-µTm-relative-state signified by a superposition of grammar rules is a function of the identity-transparent quantum-composite ensheavement of those grammar rules. In a holographic-principled universe, quantum-animistic-pagan Each-and-Every-of-All-That-Is-Not-and-Is panentheism is monotheism, such that I-AM-That-I-AM is C[aba}list|i[c}ally CTC+-logically-valued. It would be interesting to learn if, or if not, a present-tensed “to-be”-form of I-AM-That-I-AM was once correct in Hebrew, and lost or suppressed, for the absence thereof decisively precludes Schrödinger-memetime-independent demergence-remergence. Ugh! dear me, so tired, so poor, so huddled has become the m-mind, uh, the mass mind, that polycephalic tapehead field, that we are swamped by edge-effected “bad bits”: O, my-oh-my, my I/im must be one of them! one made muitic when placed as close as we like, measure zero, on the holographic boundary-without-boundary, in the most general of general cases each lattice point having C+-actual states (not 2-possible states: those of us in a condition of attachment may re[son}ate with this portrait), states signifying, essentially, quanta of 3-fold temporal CURL, 1T2ly read as quantum spin signified with 2-state qubits -- that quantum-computer lattice being the Regge lattice representation of the “curvature” configuration of that boundary-without-boundary, the m-“sheets” of the involved supra-Fock space of nested Hilbert spaces in cascade each having a different Lukasiewiczian order of logical-value, such that, when JoeGoode-looking-through the relative-state identity-transparent corpus of “sheets” stacked upon the most-dense-“sheet” boundary-without-boundary, the points of the, actually, superlattice (subset-set-superset of all non-selfsame integral/fuzzy, linear/non-linear combinations/composites of a suprasuperset of C+ mutually-interdependent “pencils of skew-parallels” in the hypercomplex domain) representation have C+ ensheaved values (understood independent of the notion truth-value) requiring a wave-effect CTC+-logical processor (the Q-comp hidden subgroup black box being a CTC+-unto-µTm calculator, hence, “black” to 1T2-only 2-state qubitic processors) to calculate the non-linear combinations (the most important difference, it appears, between the consensus nonlinear Schrödinger [NLS] equation and our nonlinear Maxwellian-form canonical equation vis-à-vis air-parcel dynamics at tornadogenesis and pi-electron-parcel gas-core dynamics of helix-coiling DNA is that canonical evolution under NLS is referenced to linear-memetime [see: “The Hydrodynamic Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Space and Time”, Amin Chabchoub and Roger H. J. Grimshaw, Fluids, 1:3, 23, 19 July 2016] while, in our equation, temporal reference is relative to memetime-independent, 3-fold, topologically-active, Pauli-Paine operator-time accomplishing Abelian-E.T.Bellian involutory decomposition of the all ways and always being-therehere most-dense “sheet”) as quantum-composites: cross-“sheet” branes and such like. From “perspectives” of the most dense “sheet” it would appear that postmodern science dreaming of a final theory actually knows little about the physical universe. This may also be the case as regards the econometric universe. Is the global monetary unit of account, which is optimally to be interfaced to the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth, to be defined in terms of bits, 2-state qubits, or [mu}its? If total capital stock does, indeed -- by virtue of: “there exists multiple techno-regimes for utilization of any selected collection of resources” -- have many time-shapes, then the answer obviously is muits, i.e., muTm-state information units. That the political-economy of a given techno-regime's time-shape may be clung to, may be identified with, thus blocking awareness of other time-shapes, is equally obvious: e.g., capitalism-1T2-only insured that TV never left the breast, then it killed cable TV, and now the “internet business model” mandates that the internet will never have the socially redeeming value it conceivably could have had had it not had the mil.intel.gov.edu.com origins that it had. As regards alternative political-economies of “time-shapes of total capital stock”, could AI (even if only 1T2-only: see, for instance, “Learning and Deduction in Neural Networks and Logic”, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Ireland, Cork, May 2007), applied to LETS-nesting-foams currency-unit processing, enhance market-mechanisms'-qua-forces' self-organizational competency by facilitating time-shape transitions of supply-demand Lagrangians operative in market phase spaces? Given the low level (think: lag[range}ians) of market-mediated self-organizational competency exhibited by 1T2-only markets, the answer is an obvious yes -- all the more so if the involved LETS-nesting-foams were externality-internalizing µTm-logically-valued, and the AI was similarly valued, the involved facilitation µTming ostensibly 1T2-only market reflexivities.
- Return to:
- •Top
- •Homepage
- •Top