_µT_m Scenarios, T₄₈(M)

While Niall Ferguson has regarded the 20th century as “a single hundred-year 'war of the world'” (see “The Next War of the World”, Foreign Affairs, 85:5, Sept.-Oct. 2006, pp. 61-74), David Stockman in “The Folly of Empire and the Albatross of Debt”, Antiwar.com, 12 July 2024, refers to “the 77-year world war which incepted with the 'guns of August'” 1914; whereas, since the late-1960s -- beginning in globaloney bull sessions transpiring at Psyops Group, JFKSWCS in runup to the Arab-Israeli Six Day War and at CICV-Targets pre-Tet-'68 and at SRA/MACV-J2 post-Tet-'68 offensive -- I've referred to “the 200-years war” beginning mid-19th century. The main difference between the F-S qua Ferguson-Stockman take and that of myself is the difference between surface-structure of war and deep-structure of war: I see ₁T₂-only-cause-push/_µT_m-cum-fractal-strange-attractor-pull etiology of fulminations in mass warfare as, à la C. G. Jung (((I got onto this in 1963, good offices of Prof. Abdul Aziz Said's assigned reading, AU-SIS, reading and rereading Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul, and during discussions of same at Said's MacArthur Boulevard apartment get-togethers, this realm of thought being a major factor in my decision, as the BORN-IN-THE-USA-on-Flag-Day-of-1945 mil.brat son of a onetime B-17 pilot and career USAF officer, to quit college to go to Vietnam so as to penetrate for increased understanding dynamics of what I felt to be a pathological process with dimensions not well comprehended by anyone, including Jung; for a recent rendition of Jung's take, see “Wotan in the Shadows: Analytical Psychology and the Archetypal Roots of War”, Ritske Rensma, Depth Insights, Issue 10, Fall 2017: with such reading it will become pellucid that my take is not identical to that of Jung, particularly as regards his exceedingly pessimistic notion of an “ineradicable instinct” for war as primally given, instead of the impetuses to war being non-instinctual and derivative -- derivative of enculturation-socialization-orchestrated suppression of non-localizable-quantum-brain-mediated ketaminergic direct ontic awareness of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency, that orchestrated suppression being glutamatergically anchored at neuronal plasticity to ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains -- even when those impetuses are fully embedded in the subliminal, Jung like Sri Aurobindo having assimilated then-prevailing consensus ideas about ₁T₂-only-definable-lineartime-bound evolution, Jung, but not the Sri-Aurobindo-of-The-Life-Divine, even assimilating memetime counter-Plato-sufficiently as to yield “archetypal flow” (the chemist might think “high-flow ion exchange” as psychic purification method, heh-heh-heh!) as distinct from archetype-in-itself, that's not archetypal imago, undergoing cyclotomic involutory decomposition (as regards archetypal imago, the computer geek might think “fractal compression/decompression” on the Musculpt manifold, M) which has nothing to do with collective hisstory and is integral to Platonia via the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering the pregeometry Regge-lattice-like meshworking of the geometrodynamics of so-regarded “spacetime foam”, absent, that is, the notion of topologically-active operator-time which yields a more elaborate world-picture, a Weltanschauung which Marie-Louise von Franz in Number and Time almost arrived at))), resident in regressed archetypal-imago dynamics of the collective unconscious -- which does not mean unknowable, as there are many consciously-initiated behavioral markers of unconscious processes, individual and collective; the secondary difference, F-S from me, is that I maintain that, so long as the deep-structure push-pull factors remain intact, unremediated by adequate conscious integration, the best that surface-structure geopolitical-cum-socioeconomic-cum-technological-cum-military “solutions” can achieve is to drive the deep-structure push-pull factors further into collective-unconscious obfuscation, thereby further regressing them and thus adding to their latent potency qua libido energy density at establishing and maintaining mass-unto-collective-behavioral gradients (the quantum physicist might think “deBroglieBohmHiley pilot-wave theory”). By far, most, if not all, of the smallish wars of the 19th century were quasi-resource wars-of-centralization, or local resistance to massed coercion cum forced assimilation qua identity ingurgitation. The pivotal wars of mid-century, however, while also about social-political-economic stacking of authority and identity swallowing, were, IMHO, more profoundly, and subliminally, about contestation as to the very idea of identity qua identity as a metaphysical whatnot. Leading to a collective pathological paranoiac-obsession with imposing and verifying simple-selfsame identity of whatsoever, wherever and whenever. ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, being involved: unconscious, à la “simple-identity”; conscious, à la “freedom”. The unconscious “Give me simple-identity or give me death” was consciously registered as “Give me freedom or give me death” -- the latter sentiment, verbalized or not during the 19th century, being a cultural lag, a residual become meme, carried over from the previous century (think: Patrick Henry). Deep-structure slowly DEmerging to surface-structure, unconscious to conscious: 1823, N. H. Abel's existence proof for trans-al-jabr knee-jerk consensuated as being an Impossibility Theorem, thus suppressing the identity-qua-identity implications of trans-al-jabr, driving them into the collective unconscious, there to fester; the memetime lapse required for festering (fill-in the intellectual hisstory of the period: take note of how limited is Britannica's idea as to what constitutes intellectual history); 1853, the Crimean War; 1861, the American Civil War; 1866, the Austro-Prussian War; 1870, the Franco-Prussian War (the intellectual history, particularly in higher mathematics, by the 1870s almost, but not quite, becoming conscious overt motivator of mass warfare); and on to WWI ((I read Mr. Wilson's War in 1963, senior in high school, and, while having enjoyed several of his novels, I couldn't, even then, quite buy into the take of John Dos Passos; nor do I now fully embrace David Stockman's quite contrary revisionist interpretation, having read Daniel Aaron's GreatestGeneration's-teenager-years GreatDepression-era 1930s-contextualizing Writers on the Left even before reading Dos Passos on Wilson, uh, can't quite fully embrace, particularly as regards Stockman's insistence in his article entitled “Living With Wilson's Folly Over 100 Years Later”, Antiwar.com, 16 July 2024, that there was no deep-structure impetus to the WWI-battle of the 200-years war)); the last-straw-trigger (mixed metaphor for the mixed-up era of the LostGeneration) guaranteeing onset of WWII being the 1926 probability dissimulation of Schrödinger's 1925 m-valued statefunction (rather than employing the m-valued logics rigorously explicated in 1921, best done IMHO by Emil Post). This hisstoryline is a central theme of our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh and is discussed in many aspects on this website, so I won't go into details here. But I will address the following two interrelated questions: (1) what could possibly have led me to that weird idea about identity-qua-identity-as-metaphysical-whatnot being ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced; and (2) how could I have arrived at that notion, and recognition of the associated pathological paranoiac-obsession with simple-identity, as early as 1968? Imagine yourself, a few weeks before the Tet-'68 offensive, assigned to Gen. West-more-land's intelligence staff, J2, at MACV-HQ in Saigon, and given the job, at Strategic Research and Analysis, of learning more about the underground Viet Cong (Political) Infrastructure (VCI) in the Saigon-Cholon-BienHoa area than anyone else. One thing you will immediately learn is that the VCI cadres each have multiple identities in the form of many AKAs, Also-Known-As's, to include alpha-numeric signifiers used to refer to them in VC internal documents. You also quickly see that this multi-identity thing -- along with each cadre “wearing many hats”, i.e., having ensheaved-qua-stacked-cum-parallel job titles and responsibilities within the double-stacked (the overlay being the party cellular meshwork) and tripartite VC political-military-front bureaucracy -- has elicited low-grade hysteria among the American personnel who must accommodate the fact of it. One “place” this hysteria appears is in the American hand-wrung fretting, at CICV (Combined Intelligence Center, Vietnam) and CDEC (Combined Document Exploitation Center), over the inability of the IDHS (the computerized Intelligence Data Handling System) to overcome the limitations placed upon intelligence analysis by frequently changing, encoded, multiple-identity signifiers (not only of cadres and some military personnel, but also of VC civil and military functional elements). And -- having once been assigned to the field yourself -- you recognize the correspondence of this multi-identity-obsession-induced hysteria with the hysteria in the field at the fact that communist combatants, not to mention members qua fish of the VCI, fulltime, parttime, temporary, cannot be simply-identified as being distinct from the sea of the general population of South Vietnam: this hysteria having led to the Strategic Hamlets Program, to “forced-draft urbanization”, to free-fire zones, to “We-Prevent-Forests” use of Agent Orange, to the Phoenix Program, so on and so forth -- with ever-increasingly indiscriminate lethality as the war evolved and the hysteria covariantly elaborated. Now imagine yourself having been assigned to CICV-Targets, site-choosing B-52 strike locations, before moving over to SRA/MACV-J2: so, at Targets, having seen evidence of full-blown hysteria over the unbombability inherent to targets with spatial nonlocality (e.g., COSVN -- Central Office for South Viet Nam, the HQ for the VC in the South -- which was composed of “particles” qua party cells in constant random motion spread over hundreds of square miles of triple-canopy rain forest, cellular automata, uh, uh, cells intra-networking, uh, uh, intra-communicating by myriad means), as discussed here, such that your recognition of nonlocality-induced hysteria prefigured your recognition of the m-valued-identity-induced hysteria which fixated upon the IDHS as the only possible prospective solution (this fixation prefiguring the surveillance state's total-information-awareness programs). Now imagine yourself witnessing, at MACV-HQ, the mere-matter-of-minutes-immediate hysterical reaction to the Tet-'68 offensive: the denials as to its effectiveness, the self-justifying, the blame games, the arising of a Weimar-imitating Nazifying “stab-in-the-back” myth, the annunciations of “Get some back from the Bear!”, so on and so forth. Had you taken PSSC honors physics in high school, you would have known that nonlocality and non-simple identity are problematic features of QM -- quantum mechanics, not the Quarter Master corps. Given all that, how big a leap would it be to suppose that the behaviors witnessed as generated by the hysteria were ConveDDs of the denials that were hisstorically forthcoming relative to QM nonlocality and non-simple identity? And, that being the case, then clearly seeing that the hysteria did not have its origins in the Viet Nam War and was not confined to that war. Moreover, not being so confined, very likely the phenomenologies generated by the hysteria in Viet Nam would be carried back to the ZI (Zone of the Interior, i.e., the contiguous US of A) and elaborated there within, particularly clearly so seen, as, even by summer of '68, a mistaken seeing eye-to-eye between the U.S. military command hierarchy and the anti-war movement leadership was emerging: the anti-war movement is responsible (as it turned out: for failure to grant permission to adequately promulgate the war, according to the military leadership elite, the “double-digit midgets” who stayed in after the war ended; for ending the war, according to the anti-war movement). And since the failure-to-grant was due to the anti-war movement -- thus felt the mil.intel establishment and likely a quorum within the civil service cohort -- many CI-type things must be done to prevent such as that from happening ever again relative to some future war. So, speaking of the collective obsession-compulsion with regards to simple-identity, nowadays, in order to get on the MySocialSecurity website to check and see if there's been an adequate cost of living increase to my monthly, I have to use login.gov, give my new password, get a codeback on my email account, show my cloud-registered face for recognition, and then enter 10 codes, receiving a new set of 10 codes for my next use of login.gov. Hmmm. Oh, well-- and how could “adequate conscious integration” of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency possibly transpire within the collectivity? One idea: money, obsessed-over and omnipresent money. Make e-money m-valued and transactions therein _µT_mly processed -- implement this slowly, bottom-up, thus progressively giving the collectivity hands-on personal experience of quantum non-simple identity.

Having long ago internalized, adopted as a premise, Autogenic Training's maxim, “Give carte blanche to the brain”, and having asked, “Which brain? My ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brain or THE nonlocalizable _µT_m-relative-state-quantum brain?”, my I/i^m regard the whole IT-realm of Cyberia -- especially the prevailing technology landscape of AIing neurocybernetics -- as a collective-psychosis-driven techno-ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, deploying infratech ((i.e., understood as directly manipulating “probability amplitudes”, a notion which Tantric-yoga-practitioner Schrödinger did not believe in: cf. Gerard Milburn's late-1990s Schrödinger's Machines: The Quantum Technology Reshaping Everyday Life; see also, “Other than nuclear war, the digital revolution is mankind's greatest disaster”, Paul Craig Roberts, Institute for Political Economy, 21 July 2024; and, as regards the reigning GLE's, that's the global leadership elite's, obsessive-compulsive Will to Power Monolithic Control, see “The CrowdStrike Global Outage Shows the Serious Dangers Of A Centralized, Digitized World”, ZeroHedge, 21 July 2024)) to regressively accomplish what nature routinely does in supra-fashion: the _µT_m-quantum brain orchestrating and conducting activities of its ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains. The CBI, computer-brain interface, is, IMHO, the currently-imagined absolute height of this sort of psychopathic ConveDDing via the control-obsessed (the need, need, need to always and all ways be “in control” being a compensatory abreaction to apparitional appearance of what the introspective-incompetent semi-subliminally regards, by facilitation of the psychological-function-imbalance-driven irrepressible impulse to introject, as being an existential threat: out-of-the-body OBEed nonlocalizable quantum non-simple identity) marshalling of infrasex, uh, uh, I mean, infratech based upon dissimulated (this dissimulation having been a cognitive knee-jerk imposed by the need, need, need to always and all ways be “in control”, the raison d'etre of the normotic state-of-consciousness in thorough identification with the ₁T₂-only egocomplex) quantum mechanics understood by rectilinear binary-minds relative to ₁T₂-only probabilities, rather than by inner-Musculpt-accessing acute m-valent-minds relative to _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency (the “ketamine bond” induced by exogenously-introduced ketamine clearly offering only the barest intimation as to the nature of these higher-logically-valued states). While the involved electron-transport-chain and quantum-field theoretical dynamics remain largely terra incognito, a few very-surface aspects have become clarified: e.g., the hallmark of the LSD experience is induction of a deautomatization of the processes underlying the perceptual modalities; the hallmark of the exogenous-ketamine experience is instant OBE with progressive return of in-the-body proprioception, accompanied, late in the experience, by automatization of the perceptual modalities as the glutamateric antidote returns the enculturated-socialized state of normosis. The current new neurocybernetic infratech-ConveDDs regressively mimic details-aspects of the psychobiophysicochemistry of inner-Musculpt symformphonie and states associated with its levels of elaboration. The endogenous-ketamine release associated with long-term intensive meditational practice is rightfully to be regarded as consequent of a medical procedure -- there being, as well as benefits, risks involved, particularly to the uninformed who are especially liable to fight-flight fear reactions, with the biochemical concomitants of such reactions, to the altered propriocepts-percepts, and to what in Autogenic Training are called “neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance” (to giving carte blanche to the brain, i.e., letting go, giving up the cultivated conceit of self-origination of ratiocination, this conceit being the seat of the egoic sense of self-control which requires a baud-rate of consciousness too slow to “catch” thoughts “coming in” from “elsewhere”, from the frequency domain, from the enfoldment, from the non-verbal Musculpt manifold). Self-observation has been denigrated, feared, because it immediately induces the rasa, inner taste, of non-simple identity (call this particular initiatory rasa Gurdjieffian “self-remembering”) by subtly modifying the feeling-toned sensation of personal space (with its minimal-permissible-distance-established “comfort zone”: don't crowd me!), such that that contractible-expandable space is binary-mind sensed to have, not only objective depth, but also “subjective depth” (think, along with Markus Zetto: “Embedding Calabi-Yau manifolds in projective space”, a form of thinking which has entered the arts by good offices of Mark Strafford's depictions of ketaminergic inner bailey), a zoomed-out/in intimation of spatial folding and enfolding, which zooming (a series of these being characteristic of “the ketamine experience”) may be one performative of 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, aka topo-active optime (speaking ₁T₂ly: universal consciousness in its active aspect is the set of all topological operators on space; universal consciousness in its passive aspect, the space operated upon). Learning transpires in the womb when the series of preadolescent neural-network wipeouts begin; so, it can be supposed that nascent memetime-boundedness is initialized prenatally (cf. Mythology of Prenatal Life, Francis J. Mott, Starwalker Press, 2013), as does its enculturation-socialization-orchestrated glutamatergic anchoring to ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains (which proposition raises the question as to what would happen to this and other prenatally-initialized processes given fetal carriage and birthings via artificial wombs). With concentration in self-observation cultivated through long-term intensive meditational practice, inner-separation (not merely into observed and observing selves, but also as regards the markers of proprioception and, in, say, walking meditation, the parameters of perception, e.g., with regard to the space through which the walking-meditator proceeds) becomes profound (this is not the same as the inner-separation characterized by R. D. Liang in his book The Divided Self; have a look at the film about Liang entitled “Mad to be Normal”). Such “inner-separation” by concentration in self-observation is a soft-weak-slow entry upon the deautomatization which, for instance, LSD rapidly and strongly induces, and which exogenously-introduced ketamine simply skips over in instantly proprioceptually inducing OBE's deep embeddedness in and between zoomable enfolded spaces (cf. there is a correspondence here between the thought of Jung and the thought of Einstein as regards dynamics of archetypes-in-themselves and geonic-self-gravitational reentries, à la John A. Wheeler's autobiographical late-1990s Geons, Black Holes and Quantum Foam, reentries, IMHO, possibly-probably executed by 3-fold topo-active optime). The “don't crowd me” in personal space of I/i^m has to do with self-referential reflexivity, an essential defining feature of the logical-value order-types of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency in-of this one-and-only universe. The multiverse interpretation of the Everettian relative-state formulation of QM is something of an analogical misnomer for an infinitely-massively-parallel supercomputer, where each separate ₁T₂-only processor is cubically stacked one upon another, hence spatially parallel, and, since the calculation task is split amongst n-processors, they run simultaneously in “parallel” (this manner of speaking by spatialization of time); but, by thermodynamic constraints, the n-universes of the m-verse are incommunicado and, being ₁T₂-only-definable-time bound, are always all ways schizotypically splitting-off new uni-verses. However, in order to explain the single-photon 2-slit-cum-4-slit-experiment detector banding, the incommunicado aspect of the theory is, largely by fiat, abandoned, with the single photon being “viewed” as under influences originating in other universes. IMHO, the self-interaction-induced detector banding (for duality-only, i.e., ₂T₂, discussion of this still-taken-to-be-wavicle issue, see here) of the I/i^m non-simple identity (i.e., in blatant violation of the ₁T₂-only Law of Identity) of the single photon is explained by 3rd-order topo-active-optime execution of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-orders of self-referential reentry, not by thermodynamically-incommunicado orthogonal bivalent universes, of a ₁T₂-only multiverse, interacting with one another. At issue is a superintegrated _µT_m-skew-perpendicularity spatially-articulated universe versus a decoherent ₁T₂-orthogonality spatially-articulated multiverse. While memetime is passing-referential and passive -- no mere nervous accident, but product of enculturated-socialized intentionality glutamatergically anchored -- operator-time is not somehow invariant; it's topologically active as space-articulator, shape-shifter, Musculptor, active for being a pregeometry m-valued-logic operator qua decomposer. Nowadays, in order to make faster bivalent computers, the physics community is focused upon making 2-superposition-state, qua qubitic, Q-computers -- not the mu-state or C-state or C+-state Q-computers (so to concretize) “used by Nature” (so to personify). But, according to Michael Crichton's late-1990s novel Timeline, the electron only has 32 quantum states! Hmmm. If so, as ₁T₂ly arrived at -- yielding the Pauli exclusion principle which precludes the [mid}evil alchemy C. G. Jung spent so much libido studying and affectively charging. Actually, unemotionally IMHO, the electron could have C+-infinity many quantum relative-states (cf. the thesis that quantum-vacuum zero = infinity potential), under the appropriate order of logical-value understood relative to relative-states of identity-transparency (the ultimate AllBase source of Bohmian “quantum potential”), not truth-value.

Being an imprudent impudent of a first [per}son, an insolent mil.brat early-on back-reacting upon the metric of imposed coercion, not least by that cross-culture-engendered in “multiwell-plate” enculturing-socializing and propagated through the learned behavior enforced at neuronal plasticity, my I/i^m (no digital surrogates, avatars, replicants, emulators, semblables: these being techno-ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements of the non-simple identity concomitant with m-valued logics) didn'tdoesn'tdon't accept the idea that there exists an objective, passing, passive, referential linear-time; however, my castlekeep of an egosphere firmly believes in memetime, glutamatergically anchored, under orchestration by prescriptive enculturation-socialization, to ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains; and, in that context, has no trouble with Michael Crichton's ideas, as given in his novel Timeline (for sooth, excepting the bibliography, in total hardly more than half-a-dozen or so interesting pages out of nearly five-hundred) about changing the past, such change in actuality being a neuropsychiatric matter of collective psychic surgery, of mass substitute-memory-store implantation, of the blackpsyche produced by this and that Psyops Group, an omnipresent, heh-heh-heh, aspect of hisstory as promulgated by whichever leadership elite and the obsecration of its obtunded and be[fudd}led sychophancy: uh, uh, by contrast, the people “here”, wherever that may be, they love their country (Kulturstaat + Landschaft) but don't like the government (Nationalstaat), any government, or the corporations -- and they don't much care, either, for what's been done to the landscape, by the government, by the corporations, in so far as the two are not one. And it just gets curiouser and curiouser, worser and worster, as government-corporate-instituted ₁T₂-only-scientific “progress” becomes ever more emergent: Paul Craig Roberts thinks the digital infratech revolution (a result of the ₁T₂ization of _µT_m-QM) is the greatest of human disasters; but, considering, for but three among myriad examples, contents of this and this and this, maybe the greatest disaster for planet Earth is memetime-bound ₁T₂-only science. Don't worry, be happy: we have the “classical limit” to protect us; Earth's atmosphere is a Newtonian domain. Heh-heh-heh! Quote Einstein: “Time is an illusion”. Quote Pensinger: “Memetime is a learned behavior glutamatergically anchored”. Except, as regards the REAL real world-picture, no mere psychofancy i.e., that REAL real aka Julian Barbour's Platonia, I would, as regards the involved worldview construct, change the word “past” to David Bohm's “implicate”, as cyclotomic pregiven decompositional involute, in the following quotation (my annotations in [ ] brackets) drawn from Crichton's Timeline, pp. 359-60, Ballantine paperback edition, 1999:

…the kid's entire social setting -- family, school, clothing, transportation and government.

None of this has been decided in the [memetime] present. Most of it was decided hundreds of [memetime] years ago. Five hundred years, a thousand years. This kid is sitting on top of a mountain [the VedicPythagoreanPlato Myth-of-Invariance Musculpt manifold's e-omnitonal unto dodecaphonic unto atonal unto well-tempered diatonic unto diatonic unto modally-ambiguous major-minor pentatonic unto the 7-unto-84 modal scales Mt. Meru, the logical-value ensheavement upon each PlatoniaCommonGround T_zog-chen AllBase “bucket-of-dust” mote through which the decompositional involute order-of-logical-value cyclotomically memetime-independently “proceeds” _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ by good offices of 3-fold topo-active-optime execution of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of m-valued propositions -- not field amplitudes understood in terms of memetime-bound probability waves] that is the past [the “implicate”]. And he never notices it. He is ruled by what he never sees, never thinks about, doesn't know. It is a form of coercion that is accepted without question [which can only be cosmic-consciousness overcome by seeing, thinking, knowing -- in, not ₁T₂ly about -- _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly].

David Bohm got onto an aspect of this in a letter exchange with J. G. Bennett over the nature of “the three kinds of time” (see, for discussion of this exchange: “Lukasiewicz-Gödel Encoding by Schrödinger Samaropa [superposition] over Kun Gzhi [quantal allbase] at Homeopathic Potentization”). Nearly twenty years later, I would not change the amplifications made in the commentary offered on that discussion. And holding to the notion of 3-fold imaginary-cum-hypercomplex topologically-active operator-time (_CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly operating pre-pregeometrically and pregeometrically on the geometrodynamics of ponderablespace), I see no need for ₁T₂-only-definable 3D linear-time (increasingly complex discussions of which provided here and here and here and here and here). In this case, I go with Occam's KISS: keep it simple, stupid. Having once been something of a sergeant, I've had No Time For Ossifers. No time without space? I don't think so. Using a prehended ₁T₂ly-familiar somewhat to comprehend a ₁T₂ly-incomprehensible _µT_m whatnot is mere selfuse, uh, that is, self-ruse, a kind of mental self-abuse. Topologically-active operator-time ontologically-before ponderablespace is. No memetime without change of ponderablespace. The only ontic-way in the normal-normatic state (the only cognitive state of physicists physics credits) we know of time is by change of ponderablespace. Operator-time memetime-independently operates on the precursors of ponderablespace to generate form. Form. Form forming. Form informing. If you don't know the memetime, you don't know where you are in ponderablespace, curved or Minkowski flat. None of this memetime-related stuff has to do with pre-pregeometric-cum-pregeometric MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) T_zog-chen quantal AllBase CommonGround and its decomposed BackCloth. Don't believe such exists? Since -- absent the ₁T₂-only [man}dated “classical limit” -- T_zog-chen quantal AllBase CommonGround and its decomposed BackCloth are memetime-independently omnipresent, one “place” to study this placelessness is the cascade dynamics leading to tornadogenesis. Another is with regard to the multileveled encipherment carried by helix-coil dynamics of the quantum-wave properties of the DNA molecule (be that molecule emplaced in a stem cell or a neuron).

Well, it's about time! -- even if the subject of the observation, back then, in that subject's era, wasn't exclusively concerned with the nature of time qua time and its then-recently-discovered dilatability (the observation in question drawn from “The Political Implications of Non-Representative Art”, Slavoj Zizek, The Philosophical Salon, 16 May 2022):

The Great War was not the traumatic break that shattered late nineteenth-century progressism, but a reaction to the true threat to the established order: the explosion of vanguard art, scientific and political, which undermined the established worldview. This included artistic modernism in literature -- from Kafka to Joyce, in music -- Schoenberg and Stravinsky, in painting -- Picasso, Malevitch, Kandinsky, in psychoanalysis, relativity theory and quantum physics, the rise of Social Democracy…

And we, the corpora of doltish, cognitively-spoon-fed Mr.Mrs.Ms. Everyman-Woeman in habitus at collections of locations spread all across planet Earth, had to wait for this hisstorical assessment until eve of the third great battle of the 200-Year War of the World! -- when, now, even so near as we are to global cuspover, there remains (Nero in the wings! indeed, how many more Neros can Homo sapiens sapiens suffer, and still survive? considering the democidal predilections built into the very defining properties of oligopolistic oligarchies…) no real awareness as to how profoundly the new physics and, later, the old chemistry-biology (stem cells, don'tyaknow, have a slate-gray-roofer upper-bound Locke on 18th-century-rationalist tabula rasa upon which non-_µT_m-quantum simple-identity is written by impress of ₁T₂-only hisstory! such cells aren't Schrödinger-memetime-independent demergents of MVRS m-logically-valued reference-space _C+T_C+-AllBase, thereby -- i.e., the involved relative-state identity-transparency -- being altogether unreadable to bivalent processors, bitic and qubitic) were suborned to, and thence dissimulated in the service of, hysterical back-reaction against imports of “the true threat to the established order”. To the innovatory pre-WWI avant-garde the class[ick}all was con[tempt}able -- that temptation being succumbed to in the immediate postwar period, e.g., in “L'Historie du soldat”. But, O, how they -- the loutish-philistine, leadership-elite lowbrows, no less than the materialistic-bourgeois hoi polloi -- ridiculed Point[ill}ism (think: Sri Aurobindo's “warm-golden dust of Supermind” qua Wheelerian pre-pregeometry “bucket of dust”, i.e., Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering elements of Borel sets expanded under _C+T_C+-orders of logical-value), were horrified by Analytical Cubism (think: facets of the Husserlian horizon of the object as nonlocally OBE-ketaminergically-experienced Schrödinger-memetime-independently), barfed over non-objective painting (think: Kandinsky's “Composition VII”, where non-orientability of references is unresolved relative to the higher-valued logics demerging the involved neti-neti), panned dodecaphonism (think: the continued focus upon tones, not gaps between tones, eventually yielding totaler Serialismus which facilitated the loss-of-secure-sense-of-₁T₂-only-self-identity-by-loss-of-coherent-Weltanschauung compensatory-abreactive obsession with Gesamtkontrolle and, nowadays, unto Palantir's TIA), rioted at first performance of animistic-pagan “The Rite of Spring” daisy-chaining, upon plowed-monophonic-melody furrow, of Schrödinger-memetime-independently-orthogonal chord stacks (think: “OMG, give me simple-identity or give me death!”). My early-1960s intuition and 1970s-gathering insight as to causes-pushes/attractors-pulls -- going into 19th-century higher mathematics plus early-20th-century logic, and back to N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr -- arose because I was primed and vectored to explore the question as to deep-structure in etiology of mass warfare from a depth psychology perspective: a mil.brat born Flag Day of 1945 to a B-17 pilot; Evangelical Grace Reform Sunday school in the small farmer's-market town of Greencastle, PA; whilst residing in a tiny wet-rice hamlet, Midori Gaoka qua Verdant Hills, inducted during preadolescence, circa 1953, into some aspects of animistic modes of comprehension; witnessed flying-boxcar lift-offs in the effort to resupply Dien Bien Phu from Ashiya, AFB, Japan; visited the A-bomb sites, 1955; from 1957 onwards had schizotypic Plexiglass-wall telescoped-derealization experiences and associated proprioceptive-perceptive gestalts; NDE after falling through the ice, Gull Lake, MI, 1960; NDE on the ice off Nome, 1961; had trouble accepting the rules of symbolic logic, independent study course, Eielson AFB H. S., 1962; experienced pilot fixation syndrome in a flight simulator, AFSC, Wright-Patterson AFB, 1963; learned basic ideas of quantum mechanics in PSSC honors physics, Fairborn H.S., 1963; by arrangement of my mother, spent six weeks of the summer following graduation from high school with family friends in Lexington, KY, he a military history academic, she a clinical psychologist specialized in childhood schizophrenia (many discussions of Clausewitz and the artworks produced by schizophrenic children: much directed reading, culminating in a struggle to comprehend Heinz Hartmann's Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation wherein the notion of “deautomatization” was first explicated: later, really got into this concept in studying Gill and Brenman's Hypnosis and Related States); assigned to read C. G. Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul during first semester at AU-SIS, 1963; research at SORO, Special Operations Research Office, for a long sociocultural analysis of the Strategic Hamlets Program in Viet Nam, 1964; sitting next to Elspeth Rostow, appalled by the callousness exhibited by Hans Morganthau and Stanley Hoffman and W. W. in their display of academic competitiveness in a highbrow, surgically-clean, clinical debate over issues of life and death associated with the war in Viet Nam (my youthful assessment was that a great deal of psychopathy was afoot in exulted circles of my country, the genesis of which I felt I had to deeply penetrate if ever -- given my background -- I was to understand myself). During six months of 1967, as an intel analyst tasked with keeping OB in runup to the Arab-Israeli Six Day War, I more or less lived in the classified library of JFKSWCS, where, in my very generous free time, I read into the history of Psy Ops cum Spec Ops in general, covert operations in particular. I got the impression -- never verified -- that, regardless of what the general rule was, some commands declassified docs of their own accord. Anyway, my informing impulse was the idea that the history of covert ops would be especially revealing about the hidden etiology and pathogenesis of mass warfare. I wasn't interested in the details themselves of these ops, only their implications for collective depth psychology. Anyway, this was a mistaken judgment: I was unable to pull together any patternings yielding interesting implications. Traffic analysis with this subject matter appeared to be useless concerning such implications. It was only soon after I arrived at CICV-Targets and, later, during my sojourn at SRA/MACV-J2, that I saw evidence, strong evidence, of behavioral gestalts clearly constellated, unconsciously, in back-reaction upon the metric of psychological, sexological, sociological, politico-economic [imp}lick|ations of quantum nonlocality and quantum non-simple identity. At West-more-land's Strategic Research and Analysis I studied dynamical processes of a hierarchical bureaucratic system, the Viet Cong (political) Infrastructure, VCI, modified by residuals of the traditional animism endemic to the society and likely responsible for the internal-system-state-unto-changing-boundaries mappings playing, in total, a strategic integral role in autopoietic-cum-self-organized functional and structural adaptational behaviors (think: all over overall deautomatization and re-automatization of subsystem-system-supersystem composite in country-wide year-plus-long preparation for Tet-'68 offensive) relative to the changing “field” of the combat, i.e., that combat's evolving imbalances in capabilities, an information-mapping principium soon thereafter discovered in physics and which became known as the “holographic principle”. Later, I studied dynamical behaviors of another hierarchical subsystem-system-supersystem composite -- energy-momentum cascade at tornadogenesis -- the hierarchical features of which are modified under good offices of scale-relative principles of quantum mechanics and relativity physics. But before the severe-storms research, I devoted my GI Bill to two years at George Mason University studying art history, comparative arts, studio arts, dance, and music -- in an attempt to better balance my psychological functions, à la C. G. Jung's theory of types, imbalances therein being the drivers of projective-identification at all levels of the psychological transference, collective no less than personal. At the Georgetown U. Medical School library, I ran across references to Autogenic Training: in due course, during correspondence and in conversations in Kyoto and Montreal, I learned much from Wolfgang Luthe about the historical setting in Germany (see our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, especially Vol. 2, pp. 267-70, and here, for my filtration residue from that information) within which Autogenic Training was invented and developed (first publicly presented to the medical community in Berlin during 1926, the year Schrödinger's 1925 m-valued statefunction was dissimulated to probability amplitudes instead of being interpreted by the m-valued logics rigorously codified in 1921: prob-amps being, in Luthe-ese, a “thematic evasion” type of collectively expressed “neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance” to conscious integration of the unwanted, indeed denied, irritants). It was during my period at George Mason that I began (having sought out, due to my visits to Samuel Weiser's esoteric, occult, oriental bookstore, found, and read Sixten Ringbom's “Art in the 'Epoch of the Great Spiritual', Occult Elements in the Early Theory of Abstract Painting”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute, Vol. 29, 1966: for context and comments, see Vol. 2, p. 536 of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh) being perplexed by how little Kandinsky and Schoenberg achieved (Kandinsky playing music; Schoenberg painting pictures) -- not much more than integration artifacts -- as regards the substantive issues involved in synthesizing an adequate, new, colorized, music-sculptured, Kuntswissenschaft world-picture analogically modeling the corresponding found-object discovered by theoretical physicists at the New Physics Inn. Over and above the fact that the physics generating the emerging consensus Weltanschauung was-is dissimulated in back-reaction upon the metric of non-physics implications postured over by the avant-garde, too much “compression” on part of Kandinsky-Schoenberg? To illustrate with a clear example: maybe Escher gives a feel for time-reversal symmetry and/or simultaneity of cascade/reverse-cascade ([in}volution/[re}volution), but, really, how deeply can the artist explore those issues and their proprioceptive-perceptive consequents with the material means and methods available in that medium? Darned awful reductive, too reductive, wouldn't you say. “But art is reduction; that's what it does!” so I've been told over and over. Hmmm. One of the problems, IMHO, was Kandinsky's notion of Innere Notwendigkeit, internal necessity, whereupon he “renounces the intellectual abstraction, rejecting the forms resulted from logic processes, in order to accept only those generated by the inner impulse of the artist's sensibility”, to quote “Aspects of the relationship between Music and Painting and their influence upon Schoenberg and Kandinsky”, Madalina Dana Rucsanda, Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series VIII: Performing Arts, Vol. 12 (61), No. 2, 2019. Only “the artist's sensibility”? As regards Kuntswissenschaft, art-science as the science of art, not as art-science fusion? Not also that aesthetic sensibility which is, say, l'essence mathematique, as analyzed in Jacques Hadamard's prewar-qua-1937 The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (first published postwar-qua-1945)? And, we must suppose, the “artistic” is to be restricted to Kandinsky's most-developed psychological functions, feeling first, sensation second, thinking and intuition being their Jungian opposites, the lesser and least developed in Kandinsky's case. “Intuition” in Kandinsky's use, not that of Jung, being a euphemism for “feeling-into”. “Feeling” commonly, as regards everyday understanding, mistakenly, conflated to affect-charge, i.e., “emotion”. So, it is not hard to speculate as to how Kandinsky missed what was going on in, say, Poland, in the field of logic, and what those goings on had to do with essential aspects of the esoteric contextualization of Kandinsky's theoretical orientation relative to a “new” Kuntswissenschaft world-picture rigorously codified musicologically and P&P-arts-wise, uh, uh, plastic and performing (actually, restoration and updating of something very old -- primordial, even). Old, what? Mt. Meru, of course. And Schoenberg -<<<>>>- in focusing upon tonal space, as distinct from “hearing” Music as Unheard: The Sounds of No-Sound (think: so-called “astral sounds” color-“heard”; actually, whispers of the MVRS-common-ground optico-acoustic eidolons of _µT_m-processed [mu}its of the nonlocalizable quantum-brain received by intraneuronal DNA: to my me-of-the-₁T₂-only-molecular-cellular-brain, some of the unheard-“heard” no-sounds “sound” like tremolo overtones evoking the harping whistles produced by a U-2 early-morning coming into Eielson AFB through dense ice fog and suffering “ground effect”) demerging in the spaces between the tones, i.e., in (or is it “of”, in the sense analogous to vacuum fluctuations demerging to “spacetime foam”) the Buddhological ma-space of the Musculpt manifold, M -<<<>>>- similarly failed to adequately grok essential aspects of the esoteric contextualization of his theoretical orientation. The esoteric context being, for both Kandinsky and Schoenberg, received wisdom from Swedenborg, Goethe, Steiner, Balzac as regards attempts to “portray a higher reality behind the physical one”. Quoting Schoenberg's Diary, circa 1923, as quoted in “Schoenberg and the Occult: Some Reflections on the 'Musical Idea'”, John Covach, Theory and Practice: Journal of the Music Theory Society of New York State, 17, pp. 103-18, 1992:

But the validity of this form of thinking is also demonstrated by the previously stated law of the unity of musical space, best formulated as follows: the unity of musical space depends upon an absolute and unitary perception. In this space, as in Swedenborg's heaven (described in Balzac's Seraphita) there is no absolute down, no right or left, forward or backward.

Consider the quantum-unspeakable telepathic language of the Angels, which Swedenborg “heard”, to have been Musculpt symformphonie, “spoken” Mus-wise between the tones, coloristically form-wise on the non-orientable hyperKleinBottled Musculpt manifold, the “unity of the musical space”, thereupon mapped as universal covering, being an expression of _C+T_C+-logical relative-state identity-transparency demergent _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m. By dumping on, and not paying attention to, the field of logic, Kandinsky and Schoenberg, no less than Russell and Eliot, were culpable for obstructing adequate conscious integration of “the true threat to the established order”, the lack of such integration being responsible for the violent back-reactions on the metric of implications.

It was not in art history classes, but in reading C. G. Jung, that I learned of Wilhelm Worringer's 1906 Ph.D. dissertation, Abstraction and Empathy (note that, in the typical current fashion based upon little comprehension as to deep-structure in etiology of the 200-year War of the World, the commenters on the linked website, not having read the book or Jung's commentary upon it, altogether neglect the empathy part and its contrast to abstraction as regards these two being ontic processors fulfilling distinct psychological functions, ₁T₂ly construed; abstracting empathy and empathically introjecting abstraction being higher-logically-valued processes) -- later also reading his, Worringer's, Form in Gothic. The easy way out with regards to assimilation of the imports of Analytical Cubism, for instance, is to treat it as epiphenomenal to African sculpture (without looking into the psychological origins of African sculpture stylistics, e.g., the perceptual gestalts given at ontic experience of relative-state identity-transparency in the various states of elaboration of “participation mystique”), whereas there is no way to give Analytical Cubism perceptual authenticity absent experience of _µT_mly-processed OBEs, ₁T₂ly easily glutamatergically-mis[under}stood as schizotypic (note that Jung was not into m-valued logics, hence tended toward normotic bivalence despite cultivating acausal notions like synchronicity and the rotational ₁T₂-logic of nonorientable Ouroboros reentry and the YinYang circularity signified by the TaiChi symbol), for a ketaminergic-OBE-level of elaboration of inner-separation is required if simultaneous viewing of n-facets of the Husserlian horizon of an object is to be actually registered. As an example of how general this sort of orientation potentially is, I offer the fact that for one art history class I wrote a paper essaying how I thought Jung's theory of psychological types could possibly be applied to periodizing stylistics of Roman sculpture relative to the Decline and Fall (I took it on the nose for this thesis because the instructor thought I stole this idea from Rudolf Arnheim, rather than came up with it from my own readings into Jung and relative to her lectures on Roman sculpture: I still don't know if Arnheim had this Jungian notion, as well as his Gestalt theoretical orientation). This Jungian contextualization of turn-of-the-19th-century aesthetic philosophy most certainly vectored the manner in which I assimilated Wassily Kandinsky's 1911 On the Spiritual in Art, wherein he advocated a turn to the painterly abstractive “non” -- nonobjective, nonfigurative, nonrepresentational -- in response to the gathering and multiplying political crises of the period (see, for amplification: “The Apocalyptic Visions of Wassily Kandinsky”, Shira Telushkin, Plough, 2 June 2022; and, for the continuing story into the interwar years, see: “Revolutionary expressionism: painting, music and social unrest in interwar Europe”, Guiseppe Bonaccorso, bonaccorso.eu, undated). Based upon my two years of drawing and painting, not music per se, but the colorized sounded-forms of my inner-Musculpt responses to the hearing of art music, I came to believe Kandinsky to have been too much “on the surface” to have actually achieved the Kuntswissenschaft synthesis apparently sought (which, IMHO, would have required of Kandinsky a greater focus upon problematics of accomplishing a post-post-Renaissance plastic-art-cum-musicological codification of the newly emerging math-logic-physics-generated Weltanschauung -- harmonious psychological integration of the socius with the metaphysical principles underlying its institutional base requiring concordance amongst all these aspects of culture). Complementing the dissimulation of Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction: one of the all-but unsung tragedies of the interwar runup to onset of WWII was the squelching out of the universal form “language” notion (think: cf. Musculpted _µT_m-symformphonie as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams) largely subliminal to the Unified Science Movement (founded during the late-1920s within the Vienna Circle and which “strove to develop a single, comprehensive scientific language”, but notice the absence of m-valued logics and the nowadays currently emergent preference function: i.e., pluralistic disunity and its compensatory abreaction, global Nazification), a “linguistic” notion belatedly essayed upon by Lancelot Law Whyte in his over-optimistic book entitled The Next Development in Man (I read the 1948 Henry Holt edition back when I was getting a lot of stuff through out-of-print book finders) and his Aspects of Form (first published in 1951). Kandinsky's Bauhaus-ed Point and Line to Plane (1926: the same year as ₁T₂-probability amplitudes co-opted _µT_m-valued logics in regards to the interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction, whereupon, by impress of collective-unconscious compensatory abreaction, lawyerly, even if painterly, Kandinsky explicates composition as “nothing other than an exact law-abiding organization of the vital forces”) is hardly on the same level of ontically-informed spiritual abstraction as is “warm-golden dust of Supermind” (Aurobindo meditatively registering this cosmogonic propriocept-percept-precept in the same period Kandinsky was contemplating motion of points, not to mention Boscovich's “point-centers-of-action” [so named by Lancelot Law Whyte], circa 1745), Jane Roberts' Sethian “coordination points”, cum Wheelerian “bucket of dust”-motes _C+T_C+-Pre-Pregeometry Borel sets and _CT_C+-logical Pregeometry to _µT_m-meshworked Geometrodynamics (this last involving null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”)! Now, I was acutely aware that this denigrative judgment of Kandinsky's effort on my part was, in Jungian terms, psychological-function bound: Kandinsky's second-most-developed function was sensation, the opposite of intuition; my most-developed function is intuition, hence sensation is my least-developed function. Being cognizant of this, my assessment of Kandinsky's orientation was assuaged, but, however mitigated, nonetheless, it seemed to me that his aesthetic principles prefigured the central-planning planometric, preference-functional command-economy approach to systemic organization cum industrial design Proletkult-taken by the post-revolutionary Soviet government against which, in projective-identification, he back-reacted. The involved sensibilities seemed to me similar. How so? By his most-developed function feeling-into the coloristic “reports” generated by his sensation function (this process being construed as driven by an “internal necessity” providing access to “timeless principles” qua universals), Kandinsky made what many would regard mere “preference functions” into spiritual-qua-cosmic commands as regards economies in design: e.g., “Kandinsky [₁T₂-logically] pairs shapes with specific colors” (see, for examples of this bivalence among those dictated in On the Spiritual in Art: “Kandinsky & three kinds of Inner Necessity”, Maria Matveeva, Design/ArtPractice, 23 December 2015; and, as regards Kandinsky's somewhat disingenuous -- given the actual proclamations -- disclaimers concerning being “prescriptive”, see: “How to Be an Artist, According to Wassily Kandinsky”, Rachel Lebowitz, Artsy, 13 June 2017). Blue circles, yellow triangles, red rectangles: a long way to go ((despite Kandinsky's alluding to “the electric theory of matter” in On the Spiritual in Art, as noted by Linda Dalrymple Henderson in “Abstraction, the Ether, and the Fourth Dimension: Kandinsky, Mondrian, and Malevich in Context”, Interalia Magazine, November 2000: notice Henderson's focus on the popular literature of the period, thus more or less concurring in the pedestrian notion that artists and composers have no need, indeed no social obligation, to read deeply and critically into the technical literature produced during their lifetimes; for instance, why? should Kandinsky in 1930 regard the circle as pointing to the 4th spatial dimension, and not the Klein bottle, which Felix Klein discovered in 1882)) from there to develop that, that sort of bivalent pairing, a pairing similar to the binaries played upon with Scriabin's color organ, into a painterly world-picture analogically modeling the 1900-to-1905 emergent quantum of action and spatial contraction cum time dilation. Kandinsky “sought to isolate absolute truths”, a rather Newtonian orientation; whilst Schoenberg relied upon “reinterpretation of traditional models” (as observed by James Melo in “The Forms of Subjectivity: The Aesthetic Theories of Schoenberg and Kandinsky”, Music in Art, 26:1/2, Spring-Fall 2001, pp. 142-4): pretty conservative approaches for leading lights of the vanguard, shouldn't it be said. Whereas, I felt that inner-Musculpt would best be holographically techno-exteriorized in the manner a natural language grows, through use, memory, and convention emergent from the accumulated practice of many parties (the notion of an orchestrating “demergence” hiding in the wings, à la Jung, as a non-regressed collective-unconscious archetypal-event-gradient “transcendent function”). Of course, the technology required of the facilitating colorized inner-sounded-forms medium, i.e., techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt holographic symformphonie as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-processed m-valued LETS nesting-foams, wasn't available in 1911, even in 1973 when I first read-into/viewed-listened-to Kandinsky-Schoenberg; whereas, today, it, that medium, probably could be brought together rather easily (were it not for the obsessional foci of this or that member of the GLE global leadership elite who hasn't personally devoted a significant portion of hisher life to studying it, whatever it might be, yet, nevertheless, cultivates firmly fixed opinions there concerning). The difference between techno-ConveDD (conversion-disorder displacement) and techno-exteriorization is the former being orchestrated by regressed collective-unconscious processes, the latter being carried out explicitly as a conscious integrative process. ConveDDs nowadays have become legion: e.g., “tunneling worms” being algorithmic ConveDDs of “spacetime foam”, no less than MMT (modern monetary theory) is a ConveDD of the infinite reservoir of zero-point energy of the quantum-vacuum ((a mathematical notion, distinct from that of the “luminiferous ether”, much more problematic under ₁T₂-only logic than on _C+T_C+-CommonGroundT_zog-chenAllBase of MVRS -- E.T.Bellian cyclotomically decomposed “m-logically-valued reference space” -- BackCloth [expressly not talking here “hidden dimensions” of complex manifolds under, to reiterate, ₁T₂-only-logic alone], the nesting infinitely larges hyperKleinBottle-reentering themselves-itself, I/i^mly, through the nested infinitely smalls at scale-relative absolute limiting time rates of change of acceleration: see here and here for two essays on the involved cosmic symformphonie)). Largely, I suppose, conflations like Klein bottle reduced to circle, are due to _µT_m-unto-₁T₂ how-where boggles -- that is, seeing _µT_m “hows” as if they were ₁T₂ “wheres” (this, epiphenomenal to operator-time-executed cyclotomic decomposition “seen” ₁T₂-only processed) -- being transposed to eye-dig-- uh, uh, Heideggerian how-what boggles, _µT_m “hows” seen in mirage as simply-identifiable “whats”.

Edifying it is to register that in Mark Harmon's and Leon Carroll, Jr.'s NYT-bestselling Ghosts of Honolulu (HarperCollins, 2023) the chapter introducing the pre-PearlHarbor-attack espionage and counterintelligence details is entitled “Identity Crises” -- the job of the CIcorps being to dissipate those crises by returning n-valued multi-identity to single-valued simple-identity. Counterintelligence, indeed! Speaking _µT_mly, that is. This CI-tasking is deep-structure driven by arbitrary but long-inhabited [logo}metaphysical commitments, prescriptive and proscriptive -- the connection between driver and tasking being unconscious. Promulgation of blackpsyche -- a psyops-undertaker-absorbed assignment aligned with the chores charged to CIops -- is predicated upon the assumption of stupidity, naivete, willfully-self-serviced delusion-illusion-fantasy, risk aversion on part of the targeted socius: often the case, but not always so, and not always to the same degree. The index of duress, under global Phoenix, rising to exponentiality these days of runup to unalloyed cuspover planetarized. This judgment from a onetime PSYOPSer, JFKSWCS, who used teaching materials illustrating techniques derived from the SOPs developed by OSS-MO and the OWI, techniques nowadays taught as mainstream “investigative”-qua-“creative”-reporting methodology in university commo departments -- graduates of OSS Morale Operations and the Office of War Information having, immediate post-WWII, infiltrated journalism departments, the newspapers, and radio. OSS-R&A grads generally finding their ways into PPE departments. My, isn't it entertaining to analyze output of the MSM! In that respect, quoting Paul Craig Roberts (“Our Future”, 11 August 2024): “Over the course of my life [which includes “immediate post-WWII”] I have watched interest in ideas die.” I'll second that: no matter in which university courtyard, my I/i^m haven't overheard any snippet of conversation remotely resembling Socratic dialogue, let alone J.C.Lilly monologue, since the 1970s. Mass minds around the planet clogged with ConveDDs (conversion-disorder displacements) and myriad projective-identifications, and, moreover, increasingly overpowered by the ever-more-omnipresent growing density of dissimulated-quantum-based infratech. One of the repeated criticisms of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh: though some of the conversations begin realistically, they always degenerate into ideational-gobbledygook, everything-related-to-everything-else nonsense. No one talks like that! Uh, in answer: Hmmm, y'don'tsay. Relative-state identity-transparency, m-logically-valued, eh? Ah-hah, yes, Yessiree! praise thee, praise thee, praise reserved for those identified with (i.e., can't otherwise “keep a hold on” their own minds) hege[1-mono}iously-imposed contra-self-fulfilling [2-hetero}morphs, ₁T₂-only-logical laws and standards, that is, autopoietically generative of their avaricious self-adjoint opposites by way of own-dual status under symmetric-bilinear-formed, and bivalently-spun, compensatory abreactions facilitated by avid projective-identification and prehensively-gripped proscriptions of the _µT_m-logical-quantum-potential drivers functionally prerequisite to demergence (involving m-valued-logical supervenience as distinct from ₁T₂ly-simple downward causation) of spontaneous social order signified by, and facilitated with, a profusion of meta-referential tropes vis [cosmo}logical anti-Saussurian relative-state ID-transparency. And the thriller writers, don't forget them, their manias, the blackpsyche passages incorporated into their products, these being what they get paid for, why the decentralized propaganda ministries so strongly support them, feed them information, lionize them and the efforts of their many helpers. The most interesting thing about this blackpsyche aspect of their thriller products is how deep the well is those froggies-so-maniacally-identified have sunk themselves into and out of which they peer -- with no access to well-potential, and with the unmitigated will to impose by force of arms their regressed condition upon each and every, that will being wholly in-denial for being utterly projected onto the chosen bugbears of the day, chosen from among the collection of despotic regimes left in wake of the demise of rapacious cohorts of colons, cohorts put to death largely by the WWII battle of the 200-year War of the World. Then -- not to drift off altogether into paraphasia -- there is self-blackpsyche, an intrapsychic process of “internal considering” qua self-justification rooted in the knee-jerked urge always to all ways service the “objects” introjected to Umwelt at behests of the currently-adopted Weltanschauung. Wherever and whenever there has been the possibility of intent, assume intent. Easy-peasy! Certainly, there must have been exceptions; but, nonetheless, assessing human hisstory in bulk, particularly contents of its paradigm conflicts, intent, conscious and/or orchestrated by collective-unconscious event-gradients, to this or that proportional mix at abetting, is required to receive back any sort of coherent picture of the drift in human behavior, not simply its affairs. Yuckity-yuk! No pretty picture, that -- for sure. From the get-go, human-systems governance: psychotomimetocrazy. One result of pathological Weltanschauungs? That pathology, in turn, the resultant of intended subversion of the given nascent world-picture of the period, as regards this or that socius? Rigid hierarchization of self-reentrant, part-whole hologramic, cyclotomic, fractally self-similar involutory decomposition being the repeat offender of greatest malefaction. Now, that's the conspiracy-theoretical, bivalence-normotic, linear-time-bound take. Or, ack, aye! “stumbling out… and trudging forward… across the relentless sweep of time…”, as the WaPo has it regarding the yet-to-bloom outflanking-the-Chinese-in-alliance-jockeying Saffron Revolution (see the [pre}face to the very-well-written and subtly “informative” while, nonetheless, somehow evoking the sensation of having waded into an empty-headed ideational void, The Rebel of Rangoon, Delphine Schrank, Nation Books, 2015, for the quoted poesy concerning memetime; page 91 for, “They needed to understand the international context”, e.g., here, which was not a lacuna in the case of the Burmese studying for graduate degrees at AIT; a different group, what). How the obviously superintelligent individual can subtly promote remote apposition of organizational ideas, quoting Schrank, p. 184:

It was the mission of the National League for Democracy, the greatest alliance of citizens his country had ever known, to honor their perseverance, to guide the impulse for change from spontaneous and freewheeling, passing through the organized phase of strike committees and directed action, and into the slow-bore construction of institutions and democratic processes.

Weltanschauungly in their places of origin deader than dead by memetime of the runup to the WWII battle of the 200-year War of the World (Newtonian-Lockean single-valued rationalization, by recourse to laws of nature, of the franchise as a majority-rule-decision algorithm having been utterly and irrecoverably sundered by the 1925 m-valued Schrödinger statefunction) can be explained absent collective psychology ain't exactly apparent. The _CT_C+-relative-state, operator-time-executed-demergence take, however -- I/i^m scrutinization of the apocryphal superegoically-singular “The Scrutinizer” [ConveDDed to “TIA Panopticonartist”: the drift has been slow enough that the vast majority still don't credit it despite all the clues, e.g., sub-lethal remote-controlled machine guns mounted around cities like are CCTV cameras being early-stage of pre-crime population culling associated with larger-scale population sweep-ups based upon the personal info stockpiled under the guise of surveillance capitalism: I learned from reading Mark Harmon and Leon Carroll, Jr., that planning for the Japanese internment under FDR began as early as 1935] postulating several types of Kandinskyesque “internal necessity” -- deeply augurs for the absence altogether, indeed the impossibility, of cosmic unintentionality (universal consciousness in its active aspect being the set of all topological operators on the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space; universal consciousness in its passive aspect being the reference space acted upon). But even cases of the predicated-supposed sort of supra-superintelligent, identity-transparent collectively cum cosmically shared “inherent intentionality” ((group-mental-state aboutness qua spontaneous-directedness; _CT_C+-unto-_µT_mly “altered” unto ₁T₂-normatively normotic; demergently introverted unto extroverted; abstractive unto empathic; Morvan-wise transparent, translucent, opaque; topo-active optime-wise 3rd-2nd-1st-order temporally CURLed at scale-relative-absolute-limiting values: binary-mindedly-speaking, that is, absent the nesting-foamed hyperKleinBottle-reentered nonorientablenesses)), have their corpora of memetime-bound signifiers; and it's personally instructive to parse them as best as can be done by the binary-mind. Early-on, in elaborations of my limited access to inner-Musculpt, an indelible associated image from my childhood recurrently appeared: vibrantly-colored reams of silk floating-curing in Kyoto's Kamogawa, circa Summer of 1953. Still a captivating medieval city, then, was Kyoto; the handicraft artisans' shops most fascinating, as strollers could walk into the back spaces and watch masters bent over their work: ivory, wood, cloisonne, pottery, kimono, and on and on. Carving tools (click on the top picture) of the miyadaiku temple carpenters, the tools by which “figural shapes” were obtained, captured the preadolescent boy's attention, even though he would eventually follow his mother's ancestral trade as Baumgardner, tree gardener, nurseryman, landscape laborer, stonecutter and niwa shi garden designer. The three well-pondered souvenir choices made during that first Kyoto visitation: a utilitarian -- not ornately carved -- ivory chess set contained in an intricately inlaid box cum orthogonality-checkered opening-out-imaginarily-twice-over board; a riotously-glazed clay Hakata figurine of The Happy God caught in heartily-derisive laughter, so it seemed to my me; an outrageously fragrant sandalwood-covers-bound fold-out copy of Sesshu's Long Landscape Scroll. Each found-object well-introjected to Umwelt and, thus, prefiguring adult [pre}occupations. Not valuable, these, but long cherished; however, the floating image of the Kamogawa-waving silk was most valuable for facilitating access to colored inner-Musculpt, later that summer reinforced by earliest exposures to non-militarized-cum-stateless Shinto modes of cognition and the eerie non-temperamentized hochiku bamboo flute chikurai music suffusing the hills above the rice fields of Midori Gaoka where that boy temporarily resided in a country house built during the 1890s and encompassing a rather large walled-in naka niwa courtyard garden featuring a well-trained half-century-old black pine specimen. In youth, having subliminally absorbed folk paddy song and the female voice-throw, return visits each decade to Japan by this boy were marked by larger and larger disappointments at the stripping away of essential features of these two remembered characteristic properties of the MidoriGaoka experience -- these losses likely the result of establishing musical habitus with instruments tuned to well-tempered scales: this stripping away possibly indicative of a flattening of the emotional range that once accompanied everyday life in rural Japan, one local cost of the imposition of global monoculture in lieu of the J.G.Bennettian “diversely-identical” metaculture an authentically-Musculpted Kunstwissenschaft would help inculcate. If Kandinsky's intense, prescriptively-imposed, affect-charged, sensory absolutes yielded a language of figurative painting that construed “…pictorial space as nothing more than simply 'an aggregate of discrete shapes'” ((see the thought-provoking “Figures Without a Ground: Kandinsky, Schoenberg, and the Dissonance of German Modernism”, Roger Rothman, 1995 or later by “Notes”: but, demurring, I don't think the picture plane so plain as to be finitely bound and thus [C}limitGreenberg-determinative of figural shapes; the boundary can be conceived fractally, thus by magic-without-magic being boundary-without-boundary, ground understood as quantal AllBase and thus permitting “borrowed space”, non-Euclidian and hyper, enfolded or no, discrete shapes seen as cyclotomic decompositions of AllBase unto multi-layered BackCloth)) and Schoenberg's equal-temperamented, dodecaphonic-tone-rowed, matrixial re-formation -- of the wohltemperierte twelve notes of the chromatic scale of the key-signatured diatonic system, which had, by the late-19th century, spawned the highly-chromaticized-diatonic-sequences-imbued idiom of the quite-late-Romantic Period -- in due course, once Grundgestalted, yielded an obsession with “total control” that mirrored the collective psychological state of the polity post-late-Romantic, what did the space-between-the-tones-focused path taken by Heinrich Shenker and Karlheinz Stockhausen yield relative to a prospective Kunstwissenschafted analogical model of the NewPhysics-emergent Weltanschauung, if not, simply, a re-formation of mere memetime as -- borrowing self-referential memory-wheeled “figural time”, à la Rothman, from painting -- musically-effectuated topologies in the spaces between the tones, musicologically-informed hearing understood as cueing altered states (see, for instance, “Colour Wheel for Music: Tonal pitch space and Colour Mapping for [Ouroboros-memory-wheeled] Ragas”, Tejaswinee Kelkar, 2014 or later by references) including specification of the ways in which passive, passing, referential linear-time is processed (see: “How Time Passes By”, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Vol. 3 in the English edition of Die Reihe musical journal, 1959, the original German, 1957: explicates a “concretion of time” to the spaces between the tones designated as “phases”; and “Karlheinz Stockhausen's New Morphology of Musical Time”, Christopher K. Koenigsberg, Mills College, December 1991), the ₁T₂ly-normotic normative binary-mind (not that of the brain bathed in glyphosate, an Agent Orange upgrade) insisting on its memetime-bound either/or distinctions, e.g., consonance/dissonance, Schoenberg (subliminally resonating in synchronicity with Lukasiewicz) having anticipated fuzzy logic in his pre-WWI treatment thereof, but not so much fuzzy sets in his post-WWI matrixial handling of the Grundgestalt, basic shape, of the tone row, a sequential corpus which allows no degrees of membership (that row, à la Rothman, being the painterly finite frame qua boundary -- the anhierarchic holographic-principled “edge-as-interior” cum “center-as-multiple”, i.e., m-valued -- establishing the “framework-determining conditions” qua “ground” upon which architectonics of the given piece are generatively built qua composed, not cyclotomically decomposed in demergence from quantal AllBase as ground-state)? The former approach to art music is grounded in the intentional-in-existence, the intended existent object not necessarily material and permitted to be purely cognitive, affective, feeling-toned, so on; painting-wise exemplified in Kazimir Malevich's “White on White”; whilst the latter approach, in the [zero = infinity] intentional-inexistence, i.e., consciousness-without-an-object (entry via deautomatization unto Platonic anamnesis; Platonic amnesis aka demergence): the distinction here made between former and latter being ₁T₂ly construed, the latter alone being whereupon the truth-value-independent m-valued logics of relative-state-identity-cum-referential-transparency are apropos, the _C+T_C+-AllBase being the semantic ground qua teleological strange attractor under topologically-active-counter-operator-time-executed involutory reemergence through the supervenient multi-sheeted syntactical domains of the ontologically-decomposed-qua-cyclotomically-demerged BackCloth. It is useful to me in several respects to review the meme-chronology of my engagement with this area of thought: deepening understanding; discovering superficialities; by traffic analysis, identifying knee-jerked interpretations run as tape-looped roof-brain chatter; running across papers containing related ideas new to me, so on. I first read the above-linked 1957 Stockhausen paper whilst I was studying at George Mason U. during the period I researched and wrote an analysis of the two contrasted notions of time presented in Toru Takemitsu's “November Steps” (reentering this area of thought two decades later during my association with Fia, Inc., a Kyoto-based art agency, and on a cultural visa to Japan whilst in midst of writing our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh). This transpired during the apex of my access to inner-Musculpt (becoming explicate immediate post-adolescence, peaking mid-twenties, fading to a whisper by age 35) when the time-dilation aspect was at its height: thus, I did not fully buy into either composer's take on the nature of time. I was also reading into relativity theory at that memetime, and, by experience of inner-Musculpt, simply had to regard time as topologically active, indeed, as somehow a function of universal consciousness (there's Aurobindo coming in). Just as we each have our own unique personal Luneburg “psychometric distance function”, thus do not live in the exact same visual space; so, topologically-active operator-time being a function of universal consciousness, experiences of time dilation are not merely alterations of “time-rate perception” but of the chrono[topo}logical micro-structure of the “local time tendency” itself. At the memetime of my initial engagement with Stockhausen's thought and music I was only several years back from the Viet Nam war, the experience of which cued me as to deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull in respect to the introjection, as I saw it (nowadays it's apparent that colonialism's extraterritoriality has become its self-adjoint opposite, “intraterritoriality”, in process of planetarization), of counterinsurgency techniques back to the ZI, under impress of paranoiac-compulsion concerning non-quantum simple-identity and the gathering collective hysteria over the metaphysical imports of “quantum craziness”, a “craziness” which the vanguard of plastic and performing arts had been explicitly struggling to functionally-structurally consciously integrate (obstructed by the mainstream at every juncture) ever since at least the advent of Pointillism in painting, which actually prefigured Planck's formulation of the quantum of action (which the Penrose twistor may help “localize” -- heh-heh-heh! -- to topo-active optime). People with “lateral mental cleavage” simply can't credit the notion that The Drift, however superficially justified, is not consciously instigated -- and is orchestrated by regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious.

Without individualism there is no ₁T₂-only-egospheric identity! But _µT_m-identity does not altogether nullify ₁T₂-identity, as ₁T₂ is integral to _µT_m. However, once experientially inferred just how teensy-weensy is ₁T₂ relative to _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+, the states of consciousness hu-hu-[hu}man|ity has self-imposed make hisstory little more than that of hell on Earth. The largely-heterogeneously-imposed social structure of identity is hardly distinguishable from the similarly-imposed social structure of attention cathexes: in Burmese [pri}sons, apparently, introverted Satipatthana-unto-Vipassana is a coping saw; in U.S. [pri}sons, apparently, the extrovert's pumping of iron, among other things. Again, ₁T₂: [a}cross full spectrum of the bivalent choices being orthogonal-mind made and imposed -- via more and more Popperian open-society satrapper-sitzkrieg propensities-predilections-proclivities Q-mechanically funding-placed in collective habitus -- upon humanity, the biosphere, the various other spheres of Earth, the hubris being so expansive prospectively the solar system, my I/i^m, actively suppressing a pernicious penchant for panache, cannot find a single one with which to resonate: many, many, aye, are the disillusions. The drift of cultures: Kulturkreis circumscribe acculturative processes. And just because there are Kulturkreis boundaries-without-boundary, there is the potentiality -- almost certainly to be unrealized -- of “skew-perpendicular” and, hence, “diversely-identical”, global metaculture, the transmitted learned-behaviors of which would involve meta-conventions _µT_mly codified, not only ₁T₂-only-concrete functional-structural prerequisites and requisites and conventions and rules. It should go without saying that my take on Kulturkreis is not that of concrete culture diffused through memetime from one localized source; but, demergent nonlocally and memetime-independently from metaculture encoded upon _C+T_C+-AllBase ((compare this conception of T_zog-chen CommonGround of BackCloth to Kandinsky's notion as depicted in “Vasily Kandinsky and His Idea of Ultimate Reality”, Jerome Ashmore, UTP Journals Press, 31 July 2024 (the dualistic-qua-logically-bivalent polarity of Kandinsky's prescriptive assertions as to the principles explicated by his paintings is what most thoroughly prevented their utility for decoding _µT_m-semantics-demerged-to-syntactics in my experience of inner-Musculpt [it looks like the technology for a holographic display dome for a computerized isolation-flotation tank is now at hand], thus providing no lead as to the semantic-syntactic “hows” of holographic techno-exteriorization as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams); and to Schoenberg's accretion to the idea of “Musical Worlding” (understood by me in the expanded sense of in the design-of-the-art-music-system-qua-system as analogical modeling of the prevailing Weltanschauung) as discussed in “Schoenberg's Turn to an 'Other' World”, John R. Covach, Music Theory Online, 1:5, September 1995, and in “Deconstructing Dualism in Musical Analysis”, John R. Covach, ibid., 0:11, November 1994)), circles within circles relating to the temporal-CURL aspects of topo-active-optime execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of m-valued propositions ((consider the “ghost sectors” to involve C+-J.G.Bennettian-skew-perpendicularity, such that twistor-accomplished quantization of temporal CURL yields “an irreducible representation of spin^C (n)”, à la “Spin in Schrödinger-quantized Pseudoclassical Systems [e.g., Earth's atmosphere, as understood in the Paine-Kaplan angular-momentum-cascade model of tornadogenesis]”, Theodore J. Allen, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, 1 October 2021)). However, as regards Kandinsky-Schoenberg and “The dilemma of ultimate sound” (à la Ashmore), having waded through so much K-S style to get so little K-S content -- sort of like reading C. G. Jung and Sri Aurobindo; the Collected Works of both being especially good, however, as texts over which to practice “inner separation” from “thinking center” -- one had to suppose style was content. But that over and hopefully done with, now for a heavy dose of content as content. How often, in the prevailing “intellectual” regime, has it been necessary to say that? Petulant. Dissatisfaction with dodecaphonic dissonant dissidence (see the “Evolving Perceptions of Kandinsky and Schoenberg: Toward the Ethnic Roots of the 'Outsider'” section of Constructive Dissonance, Juliane Brand and Christopher Hailey, UC Press, 1997). Subject constancy, the continuity of ₁T₂-only selfhood, is a learned behavior no less learned in infancy than is Piaget's “object constancy”. What does that tell us about continuity of supposedly-objective, ₁T₂-only-definable, passing, passive, referential linear-time? One thing for sure: such non-memed time doesn't figure in Buddhological _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state dependent-origination pratityasamutpada ontology. Nirvana clearly involves slipping between the instants (infinitesimals of the nanoseconds used to define the arrowing timeline: were the title “Space Created by Seconds” instead of “Space Calculated in Seconds”, I might feel a loss at encountering this link to a review of Marc Treib's book: but then how much of what JSTOR locks up should I feel to be a loss to my me?) upon achieved adequacy at unlearning, i.e., sufficiency in “looking away” from the subject constancy no less than the object constancy. But this “looking away” does not mean: “Ignore the object; ignore the subject!” It means going from ₁T₂ unto _µT_m: Zen no-mind is not absence of mind, but presence of the multivalue! Continuity ₁T₂ly construed is not _CT_C+ continuity. Drop through the ₁T₂-perennial onto the _C+T_C+-perpetual. In time-dilation such sorts of distinctions appear unbidden to the awareness not in consciousness-without-an-object -- possibly transiting thereto, or away from. Flirtations with such transits can be inferred from Stockhausen's music, most notably, IMHO, from “Kontakte”. Yet, this may have been almost “despite himself”: quoting the “Introduction” section to “Karlheinz Stockhausen's New Morphology of Musical Time”, Christopher K. Koenigsberg, Mills College, December 1991:

It [“How Time Passes By”, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Vol. 3 in the English edition of Die Reihe musical journal, 1959, the original German, 1957] marked Stockhausen's embarking on a new direction of investigation and composition, in which he adapted his serial system to control statistical and qualitative musical parameters, rather than deterministic and quantitative parameters which had proved self-defeating. It also opened up the world of the micro-structure of sound, in which he began to think about the smallest atoms of acoustic phenomena.

Hmmm. “Control statistical” and the “smallest atoms”: both of these orientations, unfortunately, indicate uncritical embrace of consensus physics. Iannis Xenakis, in his 1963 Formalized Music, similarly uncritically embraced: “stochastic” programming of “particles of sound” and “clouds of sound particles”, the programming being accomplished via Q-mechanical equations, the resultant statistical graphs transmogrified into architectural motifs. Is inner-Musculpt built-up from below or decomposed-down from above -- or actualized-in-the-cancellation (cf. the so-called “virtuality” -- actually, _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ -- induced by the Q-annihilations billions of USDs have been cyclotronically spent upon, rather than cyclotomically explored) by these two (reverse cascade cum cascade) memetime-independently “transpiring” simultaneously, à la _C+T_C+? The transcendental “world” which Swedenborg, Goethe, Schopenhauer, Steiner, Kandinsky, Schoenberg thought the individual could directly access by means of refined generative-empathic pure-feeling-into IMHO can authentically be fully accessed only as a collective-occasion-of-experience (no such exists even the quantum-physics classroom insists with all the perdurable recitative histrionics of the Wagnerian Sprechgesang prefiguration of the inner-city rapper's Sprechstimme), this restriction being due to the logical semantics of inner-Musculpt expressing as _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency qua Buddhological “compassion”, a “framework determining condition” symbolically acknowledged in a few Buddhologies by the transcendent Buddha's rejection of the final state of Buddhahood until each-and-every hashave attained that state -- this “until” being, so it seems to me, a tilting to the Varada mudra in acknowledgement of the practical utility of ₁T₂-only-definable memetime to the bespoken Im|per[man}ence enveloping Buddha-nature incarnate, ₁T₂ in any case being a decomposition product of _µT_m.

I have been saying, since GeorgeMason days and Music Composition IV, circa 1974, “Listen to the empty spaces between the tones, not to the tones themselves”, with the same intended sense that John C. Lilly said, “Ketamine is yuppie LSD”. How else convey a sense of the ketamine experience? so sayeth Lilly. How else, in a few words, encapsulate the ramified contents of Stockhausen's “How Time Passes By”? Moreover, in saying, “the multilevel genetic encoding carried by the higher temporal formants of the emitted DNA coherent waves”, I have, since Cornell days, circa 1975-'80, been using the word “formants” in exactly the fashion employed by Stockhausen. But it is much more elaborate than that. Quoting, at length, the end-thought of the paper Stockhausen wrote during 1956 (when I was still in Japan trying, as a preadolescent child, to integrate the identity-transparency aspect of “participation mystique” I had inadvertently sampled good offices of the rice fields, the valley, the hills, the sacred pine, the hochiku, the fiber-bundled rope under which entry to the Shinto shrine was made, and Obaasan):

What follows from all this?

A new instrument would have to be built, on which, for example, different pressures on a continuous band produce oscillations with phases that are more or less constant. The location of the pressure determines the pitch. If one presses only very lightly, the oscillation keeps a constant phase -- the pitch remains the same. The heavier the pressure, the more irregular become the phase relationships and the more indeterminant the pitch. This means, in fact, that this kind of continuous phase-modulation gradually transforms a tone into a noise. The strength of the pressure then corresponds to the spectral width (the field-size) of the noise. Maximum pressure finally obliterates any perception of pitch, and “white noise” is produced. Minimum pressure produces a “pure tone”. This would make possible field-regulation of fundamental phases. Just as in field-composition with formant-spectra of macro-time durations, we require field-sizes for simultaneous micro-time phase-relationships. Thus it must be possible to alter the register and number of the formants in a time-spectrum continuously, and therewith the formant-rhythm (“tone-color”) of a fundamental tone. Thus the minimum pressure on the band not only produces a “pure” oscillation with a constant phase-length, but also a continuum of “tone color” on the same tone. This is easy to imagine. The secondary oscillations would be added to the fundamental oscillation by pressing near the front or near the back (of the continuous band-keyboard), and when the sounds have several formants, these are controlled by the number and distance apart of the fingers exerting pressure simultaneously. These secondary oscillations, too, would vary in the constancy of the phase-lengths, according to the amount of pressure exerted by the individual fingers. Lastly, the intensity of the oscillations could be continuously altered by the use of a pedal.

Such an ideal instrument would meet all the requirements for continuous alteration of time-proportions: for fundamental macro-time phases (durations), by the duration of the action; for fundamental micro-time phases (pitches), by the location on the continuous band-keyboard; for micro-time phase-relationships (the transition from “tone” to “noise”), by the amount of pressure on the band; for micro-time formant-rhythm (“tone color”), by the location of the pressure point, and the number and distance apart of several pressure points across the keyboard; for amplitude of the oscillation (loudness) by pressure on the pedal. Formant-spectra of durations (superposition of various processes in time and in sound) would be achieved by several of such instruments playing together.

This “new instrument” is our model of the quantum-wave properties of the radiation-exchange processes of DNA at helix-coil transition (see here and here) -- except that, other than the topologically-active operator-time aspect of our canonical equation, “Formant-spectra of durations (superposition of various processes in time and in sound) would be achieved by several of such instruments playing together”, are achievable by one such “instrument”, the quantum-wave properties of which are under _µT_m logic understood independent of the notion truth-value and relative to relative-state identity-transparency, not under only ₁T₂-only logic (i.e., supposing a nesting-foam of levels of genetic encipherment, quantum properties of the DNA molecule taken into account: which is not to suggest that several or more _µT_m-such “new instruments” playing together is somehow ruled out). The “different pressures on the continuous band” are delivered by variations in the ambient radiation environment (intra- and extra-organismic) of the DNA molecule. Quoting our DNA paper:

We have proposed that a coherent wave phenomenon [think: sound] with two components of information is associated with superconductant DNA molecules [be aware that this claim of superconductivity refers to the pi-electron gas, not the sugar-phosphate backbone]… The limiting velocity, c, identifies the phase velocity of the coherent wave, while also setting the time rate of change of nucleotide pairing… the second-order temporal derivative of the rate of change of nucleotide pairing serves a functional integrative role. Thus, the acceleration (deceleration) of bonding serves to transfer information into/out of the DNA system. This acceleration (deceleration) of pi-electron parcels, which constitutes the second component of information associated with the coherent wave phenomenon, is in direct response to radiation impingement upon DNA…

In order to test this theory of DNA superconductivity, empirical studies would need to address themselves to the time rates of change in bonding which may be mapped in terms of the DNA transit between T₀ and T_c. Lacking any external radiation impingement upon DNA, it appears that the DNA molecule will maintain a constant time interval in going between T₀ and T_c… The theory further states that a specific time rate of change in the rate of bonding… may result as the frequency of impinging radiation is changed…

Equation (20) in our formulation suggests another test of the superconductant DNA model. The term to the right-hand side of the equal sign would become nonzero if an external field (such as imposed by an electromagnetic source) were influencing the DNA molecular environment. These field intensities, upon dividing through on the left-hand side of Eq. (20), would serve to amplify or damp the fundamental frequencies of the postulated parcel of pi-electrons. Thus the amplification of the first- and second-order temporal derivatives of (T₀-T_c) should be an observable response to specific field strengths imposed upon the DNA molecular environment.

So far as I know, these tests have never been made. Maybe I should have been saying, “Look at and listen to the empty spaces between the nucleotide pairs, not at-to the pairs themselves”.

“My planet right or wrong!” seems still to be a morally-justifiable credo. Though I did not then recognize it, in retrospect it became apparent that the preadolescent experience of identification with lifeways of a wet-rice hamlet conjoined to witnessing the flying boxcars lift off to resupply Dien Bien Phu coupled with visits to the A-bomb sites squelched generic no less than patented insistency of the “My country right or wrong” commitment schooled into my me, a mil-dot brat. My errant “I” skipped right over “My company right or wrong”. Only briefly did my more-mature “I” entertain the moral compass of “My species right or wrong” -- given progressive discovery of the etiological factors driving/pulling the global conundrum toward incendiary cuspover. Consider direct import of the utterly-strange attractor: “History began when humans invented gods, and will end when humans become gods.” So sayeth, 12 August 2014, Yuval Noah Harari of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Dr. Harari also maintains that, “Empire is the most successful political system humans have invented, and our present era of anti-imperial sentiment is probably a short-lived aberration.” The “History began…” quotation substitutes for the frontispiece to the novel entitled Clive Cussler Fire Strike by UC-Davis International Relations Ph.D. Mike Maden (G. P. Putnam's Sons, 2023), a popular thriller containing, virtually by definition, its complement of blackpsyche intercalations, e.g., “…bring power -- and thus peace -- to bear” (p. 191, hardback edition); and “…his team of Gundogs had to go in for a snatch-and-grab” (p. 305), snatch-grab being logically-bivalent, reduplicative, tautological, redundant repetition, whereas the actual term, originating during the Vietnam-war-era of Phoenix, is “S-n-S stuff” qua “snatch-and-snuff stuff”. This novel also contains the best-ever, up-front, brief summation of the strange attractor, pp. 111-112:

[The] clinic was on the bleeding edge of transhumanist technology -- the science of creating Humanity 2.0. The first step was to vastly improve the performance of the human organism through biotechnology. The next step would be to merge the advanced capabilities of that improved organism with artificial intelligence through wireless brain-computer interface implants. Those implants would not only link every mind to the power of a quantum internet, but also to each other for true telepathic communication. Ultimately, human biology would be done away with and immortality achieved by uploading human consciousness into a universal and immortal cloud.

It would not be too awayword, uh, wayward, to suppose that no better statement of the governing psychopathic ConveDD (conversion-disorder displacement) is ever likely to be made. The m-valued Schrödinger statefunction, interpreted _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly relative to relative-states of identity-transparency, not in the terms of truth-valued probability waves, dictates that -- when not suppressed by prescriptive enculturation-socialization orchestration of glutamateric anchoring at neuronal plasticity -- “true telepathic communication” was inherent to ermine, uh, [er}mine (not to laesa maiestas crown royal!), I mean Ur-Man, residuals persisting, despite glutamatergic etching, unto this and that socius retaining a modicum of access to processing of THE nonlocal-quantum-brained animistic-pagan “participation mystique” m-valued statefunctions. That ConveDD: dissimulate Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction and, by compensatory abreaction, the resultant autopoietic emergent is the Will-to-Godhead simulacra expressed in a ₁T₂-only-digitalized cloudheadedness. Hmmm, so to say, what was that again, ur, uh, that's, err, not the Old High German primeval, uh [prim}eval, oops [prime}evil -- can't seem to get away from those m-madmen ket-bra Q-this/Q-that -- ur: “…human biology would be done away with…”? What? What? Is that an id, uh, indiv[id}u|al articulation of mass-formation holocaust hysteria placed in projective-[id}ent|if[i]cat|ion up there on the phased-array-radared, electron-temperature-enhanced, hot-aurora-red-greened, magnetic mirror (bumper for acoustically-modified gravity-wave-mode pulse-code bursts)? Wow! Look at all the dimensions of that ConveDD. Pretty well contextualizes aspects of the strategic offensive undertaken by TPTB as seen manifest these days around the planet, wouldn't y'say. But not only human biology, eh, is to be “done away with”. What happens to this attractor if it is, indeed, found to be the case, and when it is finally acknowledged, that virus-bacteria-plant-animal-human genomes involve not only ₁T₂-only-logical, single-level, molecular-biology encoding transcribed under good offices of random heat motion, but also _µT_m-logical, multilevel, quantum-wave-property (e.g., frequency-response window as immune signifier -- this quantum-wave property facilitating functional integration as distinct from lock-and-key-device-facilitated functional specificity random-heat-motion driven), operator-time-formant encipherment? And what of all the damage done (more and more CRISPR critters, planet Earth; think: ConveDDs of Lon Nol, heh-heh-heh!) under orchestration arranged by the governing synoptic ConveDD -- affect-charged and libido-driven, as it is (check out the latest computer-generated assessment of [Arms}trongE[con}omics), by regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious gradients?

As I read through the “References” section to “A Black Hole at the Center of Earth Plays the Role of the Biggest System of Telecommunication for Connecting DNAs, Dark DNAs and Molecules of Water on 4+N-Dimensional Manifold”, Massimo Fioranelli, et al., Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 7:18, 30 September 2019, pp. 3073-80 (a retracted article, it is most readably reproduced at the very end of this website), I again find myself way behind in my attempts to get up to speed with current avant garde thought (however, it goes without saying, that our take is very different from that of this paper [see one scathing review here; whereas, I assume that there is always a collective-unconscious impetus, and try to psych-out the intuitive resonances recorded therein; of course, peer reviewing strips away this aspect of human cognitive function, so, when looking over other than normal-science papers and into paradigm-violating papers I always take peer-reviewed material with a grain of salt], especially given that topologically-active operator-time is central to our theses, and that what is herein intuited-designated “dark DNAs” we envision as “the multilevel genetic encoding carried by the higher temporal formants of the emitted DNA coherent waves”) -- and chagrined when thus reminded of Cornell-tornadogenesis-modeler Douglas A. Paine becoming de facto deemed persona non grata with the NSF for stating in Paine, D. A., and M. L. Kaplan, 1974: “The linking of multi-scaled energy sources leading to atmospheric development, the hydrodynamic spectrum, Part I: A study in nonlinear wave interaction and Part II: A severe tornado-producing convective squall-line system”, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY and Air Force global Weather Central, Offutt AFB, Omaha, NE, Scientific Reports 1 & 2 for National Science Foundation Grant GA-35250, 140 pages, that there are black holes in Earth's atmosphere (in reference to the “acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes” vertically pulse-code burst from tornado-tops and, in part, Musculpturally signaturing theta-e equivalent-potential-temperature surface topologies which Paine was during that period studying (then, laboriously weather-chart data-plot-drawing in 3D-projection by hand: for an example drawn during the early-1970s, see page 323, Vol. 2, our 1994 novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, whereon depicted is an actual total static energy field as fictionally displaced from its actual North American Great Lakes region location to near Matsumoto, Japan); acoustic black holes being “first” -- heh-heh-heh! -- theorized in 1981), the imaginary and hypercomplex topologically-active operator-time quantum-relativistic physics involved being more thoroughly described in our 1978 paper entitled “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, somewhat more generally in our 1977 paper entitled “Toward a General Theory of Process”. Paine and I certainly never discussed acoustic-blackhole computing by Earth's fluid outer-core, but we did speculate (whilst mulling over Paine's faculty conflict with upper atmosphere physicists concerning possible deleterious effects of hot auroras boreales) that anthropogenic electron-temperature enhancements could alter frequency response windows to cascaded complex and hypercomplex angular momentum conveyed by the solar wind and injected into Earth's crustal-mantle and core dynamics, such that quantum processes of superintegration (à la the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ interpretation, as opposed to the probability-amplitude interpretation, of the Schrödinger statefunction, sans a “classical limit” by virtue of scale-relative m-valued universal physical constants, relative absolute-limiting-values of dynamical variables, and J.G.Bennettian “skew-perpendicularity”) of Earth's various spheres would become discombobulated. We did not have the opportunity to look closely at that idea, but Paine did have some specific notions in mind, never systematically pursued. It is similarly thought provoking to juxtapose the mathematical model of the DNA radiation exchange process mediated by the quantum-wave properties of DNA's pi-electron gas core-environment as essayed in our 1979 International Journal of Quantum Chemistry article entitled “A Dynamical Theory Describing Superconductant DNA” with thematic contents of the mathematical model ((mentioned in T₃₉(M) on this website)) essayed in “5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells”, Massimo Fioranelli, et al., Journal of Biological Regulators And Homeostatic Agents, 34:4, 16 July 2020 (apparently this article was pulled by the journal, citing peer-review irregularities, before being actually published). Again, we never discussed the idea that modulations of DNA's ambient radiation environment could stimulate the molecule to induce production of a virus, but we did speculate in discussions of Richard Goldschmidt ((see, for current thought in this area: “Emergent evolution but without Mysticism! (Richard Goldschmidt) Systemic Mutations and Saltatory Speciation”, V. N. Stegniy, Journal of Bioinformatics and Comparative Genomics, 5, 6 June 2022, pp. 1-12: explore the extensive list of references)) that systemic mutations could be incubated qua memetime-lapsed by non-ionizing-radiation-induced shifts in waveform-response cum frequency-response “windows” of DNA.

Really, it doesn't matter what sort of reading material happened upon, not long into it the attentive reader finds instances of self-metaprogramming, the deepest of deep-structure blackpsyche {as regards the reality of such self-blackpsyche, cf. John C. Lilly's Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer, which I read in 1972 and found edifying (particularly so given my USAF-childhood; and ODing on exposures, mainly interpersonal, to the “D.C. swamp” as an AU-SIS student qua AIESEC participant qua live-in staff amongst the high-muckamuck superrich onetime OSSers; and in SFTG; and at Psyops Group, JFKSWCS; and fielded to the Mekong delta in Technical Intelligence Detachment of the 525th MIG; and, post-IEDed and recovery in Japan, assigned to CICV-Targets, located adjacent to the JGS compound; and transferred to the DIP's SRA/MACV-J2 in West-more-land's HQ), but only a few years later, circa 1975, upon reading Emil Post on _µT_m-logics, I came to realize how limited the ₁T₂-only-finite-iteration-computer metaphor is for the 3-fold statefunctions-functionals-functors of complex-hypercomplex “human biocomputer”, as is also Timothy Leary's idea of n-circuit modeling of consciousness, localizable (as “conscious” processing of ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains) and/or nonlocalizably universal (as “collective unconscious” processing of THE _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-quantum brain, à la, among much else, The Unconscious as Infinite Sets and the Laws of Form demonstration that distinction is logically more fundamental than truth-value, thus opening to the notion that identity qua identity is logically more fundamental than distinction): _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logically-resolvable evidence nonviewable to binary-mind leaves only the normal-science scientist scatologically facebooked, uh, IMHO, that is, heh-heh-heh! “facts” and their [man}dated logical necessities, being order-of-logical-value dependent, are much more complicated than mere “truths” which, in all honesty, are bound to ₁T₂-only-logic alone}. For instance, David Baldacci's thriller No Man's Land (having been raised up a mil.brat self-wrapped in silent insolence, thus generally regarded somehow deficient of gear, a bit, not a byte, of stone-winnick, my I/i^m isare always interested in seeing the stereotypes and the Hollywood-Freudianisms projected into literary characterizations of U.S.-military families), page 37, the Pan paperback edition, 2016:

It was his brain after all. The most important organ he had. It was what made him him.

An instance of self-metaprogramming -- which is mostly, but not always, unconscious to the self-metaprogrammer as being such. C'mon, who'da thunk? as is faux-spoken. Ah, well, that's the idiot-docket for you: bunch of wastrels! Subject-constancy is no less learned behavior, under orchestration by prescriptive enculturation-socialization glutamatergically anchored during infancy, than is object-constancy: that being the case -- if so, we grant -- “what” then actually makes “him him”, that “then” being another exemplification, as regards memetime predication, of self-blackpsyche? If there actually is a simple-identity “him him”, that is (Now Johnny, you just stop that! No more talking to yourself in strange voices, and calling yourself by those names. You are scaring me to death! You know very well that, uh-- they are only imaginary friends. Anymore of that and you will get no ice cream. It will be early to bed. You won't be able to watch “Leave It to Beaver”.) not a product of collective intentionality expressed in enculturation-socialization achieved via insertion of substitute memories and their glutamatergic anchorings, this being the main means by which memetime-boundedness is phylogenetically (cf. Mankind in [Platonic] Amnesia) and ontogenetically induced. Ah, the dances of Lebenswelt. One example of self-rejiggered saltations: in the broad sweep, hu-hu-[hu}man|ity has transited from commitment to propitiation-behavioral [eco}nomics unto normotic commitment to [econ}omics unto obsessional commitment to e[con}omics. Less deep than auto[quasi]hypnotic self-blackpsyche is the hetero[quasi]hypnotically-induced, ₄T₄-anima/animus metaprogrammed “her him” cum “him him” cum “him her” cum “her her” whowhat, who, “for the life of 'me me'”, can't see that the many cases of this sort of thing (what is the best weapon for escaping the kill zone of an ambush site? certainly not an “AR platform-style weapon”!) is complementary to this sort of enforcement of the emergent Woke Kokutai-no-Hongi sort of thing, thereby being a “this this” (which “this” came first? 30 years ago I saw a patrol car, pump shotgun prominently on display, daily sitting hour after hour on a small skateboard facility used by teens: what compensatory abreaction does this “this” ConveDD, conversion-disorder displace? the physicists' probability-amplitude compensatory abreaction to the m-valued statefunction's breaking of the Law of Identity?) -- this heteropoietic lacuna-on-brains being most thoroughly introjected to Umwelts of proactive, if hapless, politicos cum paladins, having taken to bellowing soundbites, lethal and nonlethal, as well as does any pedestrian berserker. To repeat the central question here in habitus: “what” then actually makes “him him”? My, uh, I/i^m -- a singular that (by practice of Aurobindoesque “concentration in self-observation” induced Gurdjieffian-Laingian “inner separation”) is plural: thus, by virtue of ataraxic Husserlian epoche concerning objectivity of ₁T₂-only-definable memetime's diachronicity, violating “the feeling of the sameness of one's self” as emphasized by Stanley B. Klein in his “Sameness and the self: philosophical and psychological considerations”, Frontiers in Psychology, 5:29, 2014 -- hashave long spoken of the non-selfsame (“superposed” only in egoically viewing it in reverse-cascade fashion), even of non-selfsame numbers (by Cabalistic neoPlatonic gematria, or no; by, reverse-cascade speaking, Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ propositions, or no; neglecting non-orientability of cascade/reverse-cascade). Consider the Abstract to “Numerical Identity: Process and Substance Metaphysics”, Sahana V. Rajan, 2018 or later by References. Quoting the first sentence of the Abstract:

Numerical identity is the non-relational sameness of an object to itself.

This is not questioned, or justified, in body of the paper: it is a proposition stated as a rather obvious definition; thus, something of an axiom, or tending toward being an axiom; something unlikely to be seriously questioned; something fundamental. As given in body of the paper:

In case of numerical identity, an object x is related to itself, in an absolute and non-relational sense, that is, “x is x”.

Hmmm: related in a non-relational sense. Sounds like a good definition to my me! Can't have our smarty-pants school kids scratching their heads over that one. That is: “x is not not-x” and, most assuredly, “x is not not-xⁿ under _µT_m”. Why? Because 2 +2 = 4 is racist and 2 +2 = 5 is not? Uh, uh, because, were x not-x, that would violate not only the ₁T₂-only Law of Identity but also the ₁T₂-only Law of Non-Contradiction. Is this “x is x”, or is this “x is x” not, a definition qua quasi-axiom ₁T₂-only-logic bound? The mathematician-philosophers of number qua number, being ₁T₂-only-logic bound, constructed, and projected extensions from their constructions, ordinal-unto-cardinal (thus, despite what they may have philosophized, treating the origin and ontology of number [see Jeremy Horne's very informative February 2020 preprint entitled “The ontology of number”] as having an empirical basis); they did not deconstruct cardinality-as-logically-pregiven into ordinality (see, for one interesting account, “Frege versus Cantor and Dedekind: On the Concept of Number”, W. W. Tait, a paper delivered to a reading group in 1992). But what about under the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logics of relative-states of identity-transparency, not of truth-values crisp and fuzzy? Quoting again from Rajan's Abstract:

Every process is an emergent organization of constitutive interactions and is individuated on the basis of its interactive powers, that is, the ways in which it interacts with the world around it. Interactions are situated adaptation to changes.

This is definitely not a cascade-oriented notion of process-in-non-real-numbered-complex-hypercoomplex-RealReality, as, for instance, essayed here (check out Figures 9-11 of “Theoretical and Numerical Study of Self-Organizing Processes in a Closed System Classical Oscillator and Random Environment”, Ashot S. Gevorkyan, et al., Mathematics, 10:20, 2022, for a few visualizations of the Musculpting-cum-signaturing effectuations of 3-fold topologically-active operator-time; also note the mathematical correspondences to our paper), a notion explicitly reliant upon “demergence” (of the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-Musculptural forms of THE _C+T_C+-Form) as distinct from “emergence” of ₁T₂-only-organ[i]nation, uh, uh, I mean organization. Indeed, Rajan argues against modern-postmodern residuals of Upanishadic-cum-Greek Substantialism -- the Parmenidean-Platonic “substance” nowadays of interest, according our lights, being THE Gödel-numbered-Gödel-numbered-cum-Regge-boned-cum-bucket-of-dust-dusted hyperKleinBottled _C+T_C+-Form E.T.Bellian-cyclotomically decomposed-demerged as memetime-independent “downward causation” (see Stuart Glennan's review of editors Michele Paolini Paoletti's and Francesco Orilia's Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation, Routledge, 2017: note that the discussions concern ₁T₂-only-memetime-bound emergence-supervenience, and that there is no idea of chronotopologically-topologically hyper-non-orientable preexistent beingness contemplated: à la Rajan, interactions constitute -- over periodicities of an objective linear-time -- situated individuations; rather a non-quantum and non-relativistic notion, shouldn't it be said) by 3-fold-topologically-active-operator-time execution of m-logically-valued propositions numbered with _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly-non-selfsame numbers.

Incidence of pedophilia numerically magnified (multiplicative inverses in rings? heh-heh-heh! however much not needed), the involved collective affect-charge amplified in intensity, these two together as a kind of compensatory-role-reversal-imprinting in attendance to mimetic-estrogenized gender dyscrasia, the adult frozen in glutamate-anchored [mono}dent|ity, the pre-to-immediate-post-adolescent object-fixation/reversed-transference-figure still with residuals of [multi}dent|ity, whilst the gross edu.com.cop.guv engages in suppression-back-reactions upon those residuals as compensatory-abreactive ConveDD (conversion-disorder displacement) of the fear and loathing subliminally elicited by the quantum-non-simple-identity imports (obsessively-compulsively ConveDDed to sponsorship of illegal-alien mass migrations) of m-valued logics and Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction? Devilish clingers! Them. The assgerpered-naughtistics whowhat won't submit ta adequate glutamate-etching-out of generative-empathic identity-transparent “participation mystique” are the very worst, the most threatening. That is beyond reasonable dispute! “Separation anxiety”, my butt! Tee-hee hee-hee! No want CCTV. Elementary school gaggle-gaggle-gaggle! Hot-sheet pedo-no-tell motel bottomed out at the end of a strip [m}all. Not X[act}ly a love'otel in Osockher! Intermittent blackpsyche gone constant wash of infomercials upgraded to surveillance capitalism fronting introjective-identification of-with Phoenix globalized: “Give me [us your] simple-identity or give me [we give you] death!” That's conversion sans displacement. Hmmm: pogroms; indeed, THE Pogrom. Elimination qua cancellation as a surrogate for self-cancellation. The found-object selfhood found actually to be an n-self (cf. I/i^m of Schrödinger's cat under m-valued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value, not interpreted as dead-and-alive under the diktats of ₁T₂-only-logic alone: thus, no mere monic poly[no}m|ial, howsoever iterated into Wiki's…there was an issue, there was an issue, there was an issue…, more like the n nth roots of unity of the set of fields under the _µT_m-valued logics of relative-state identity-transparency, a J.G.Bennettian “diversely-identical” unity which topologically-active operator-time CURLs around), must, by internal necessity dictated to by ₁T₂-only logical necessity, somehow be removed -- even if only symbolically. O, those cancellative semigroups! Note that, mathematically speaking, invertibility (such as in, say: transference/counter-transference; multiplicative inverses; cascade/reverse-cascade, E.T.Bellian cyclotomic involutes) is further abstracted, that is generalized to cancellativity; but, involutory self-inverse functions reestablish the cancelled property, which gets interesting under circle inversions, complementations, reciprocals, temporal CURLed quarter-turns, simultaneity of cascade/reverse-cascade, polyalphabetic-cipher half-turns under _µT_m-logics helix-coiling or no, so on and so forth. Gee-willikers, bud, uh dud, uh, dude, just think of, I mean simply sit there and contemplate, the myriad ₁T₂-psychosexosocioeconopoliticomilitary imps, uh, implications there are of experimental physics irretrievably challenging numerical selfsameness; indeed, drawing into question the empirical basis of the very ontology of number qua number. Particles, small molecules, in more than one ponderablespace place at a given Dedekind cut of the real-numbered memetime line, this dysplacedness a function of non-self-identical numbers multiply-located in the rings associated with their types. Aye, those prime ideals of a Dedekind domain: whowhat is the factoror.exe? In executing Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m propositions does topologically-active operator-time factor ideals into products of prime ideals? Or is that counter-topo-active optime? Be thinking here of primitive roots of unity. O, quantum-this, quantum-that! Will there ever be respite?

The ideas are all yet? In the PA-Deutsch sense once, and maybe still, commonplace in my hometown of Greencastle: all gone? Seems so. To my understanding, the semantics of the subject matter dictate the grammatic form best expressing; therefore, such like the APA Style Guidelines (which are in no way to be violated) altogether preclude any interest I might have had in sharing any and all ideas I may have had. Verbally inculcate J.G.Bennettian “skew-parallelism” by contravening preservation of clausal, phrasal, serial parallelism in a given sentence; indicate nonlocality in memetime by using more than one verb tense in a given sentence; the piling up of adjectives and adverbs to suggest object multi-identity; promulgation of ₁T₂-only-logical incoherence in order to mandate existence of _µT_m-valued logics; dedifferentiation of character-actors so as to analogically model _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency. Character-actors talking about -- heh-heh-heh -- thinking without words: in strings of feeling-tones; with transforms of shape, color, sound, tone-color. Certainly can't make the ideas -- be they conscious and/or unconscious -- into the plot and subplots, the storyline, the well-differentiated characters! Think: regressed archetypal event gradients of the collective unconscious-as-infinite-sets, these being novel elements cum component processes. What is that already? Not for nice yet! Cachectic-zaftig gobbledygook. Fuddy-duddy snookums. No tatty go-go's smasheroo! Best get rabbited, bub. As memetemporal decades have flown by -- according to how the pedestrian sense has it -- only three such novel ideas appear to have become poorly registered: (1) the fundamental physics consequences of there being no “classical limit”, e.g., m-valued scale-relative universal physical constants like absolute limiting velocity, _µT_m-logical skew-parallelism/perpendicularity subtending Heisenberg uncertainty; and (2) operator-time as topologically active, i.e., concretion of time sufficient unto reification, hypostatization, anthropomorphic-qua-anthropic-principled personification as physical actor effectuating changes in topological properties of space by execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-valued logical propositions as regards Regge bones and bucket-of-dust dust motes; and (3) the notion of m-valued-LETS-nesting-foamed monetary units, referenced to a _µT_m-quantum composite unit of account, transactions in which are processed by Lukasiewiczian analog computation made user friendly by holographic techno-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation.

“O, pon haus!” pretty much works as a mordant exclamation, whereas “O, scrapple!” does not, being rather achromatic -- however much the latter fulfills the need of a [mere}tric|ious Scrabbler. Lukasiewicz being likewise a Polack, surely, no joke intended, was he the polyhistor Copernicus of logic -- even though, IMHO, Post, by virtue of the last thought (hardly noticed enough to be inveighed against) recorded in his 1921 paper qua Ph.D. dissertation on _µT_m-valued logics, had far greater understanding. Once again on this website quoting Emil Post (“Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, Ph.D. dissertation published in American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, 1921, p. 185):

We must however take into account the fact that our development [rigorous “derivation” of _µT_m logics] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

There are the “great” bon-ton novelist-formalists who once all over again structurally, in deja vu to the nth-iteration, analogically codify the memetime-bound qua memory-tape-looped-and-roofbrain-chattered functionality of the Weltanschauung slayed during the 1820s by N. H. Abel's “Impossibility” proof, and magnificently capture, by perspectival Auerbachian Mimesis, the agonies and ecstasies of affect-charges, negative and positive, vested in the commonplaces of everyday human experience -- need they be named once more? -- captured, that is, over and over again, ad nauseum, thus simply or profoundly reinforcing the states of identification, personal and collective, maintaining habitus in “moving parts of centers” -- to employ a Gurdjieffianism -- qua knee-jerked automatisms. Not least by cultivation of the mechanisms by which identification with the protagonist is fanned, thus reinforcing the omnipresent pedestrian states of identification everywhere on display in normative behaviors! And that not-least identification, not least with the Nietzschean-SS-Ubermensch Type-alpha predator currently made superegoically deity-introjected-cum-glutamatergically-fixated as transhumanism's modified-messengerRNA-mutated, ₁T₂-only-AI-enhanced, CB-implanted, n-gendered, post-human cyborg blockchained to the cloud-deposited, sky-high-E-invested matrix as a Russelled-up and Eliotically-imPounded Schrödinger's cat, unalive and undead amongst those of The Third Kind (see also: “Biobots arise from the cells of dead organisms -- pushing the boundaries of life, death and medicine”, Peter N. Noble and Alex Pozhitkov, The Conversation, 12 September 2024). Where is evidence of substantive improvement in the “human condition” that has issued out -- torturously, or no; tortiously, so far as those dedicated only to popular storytelling are concerned -- of our “Great Works” of art fiction? None with significant intellection were depicted in, for instance, War and Peace, as all of the rather superficial conceptualizations on offer by Tolstoy were tacked to the very end of the novel as afterthoughts, not integrated into body of the work as concerns of the characters. Then there are those forward-deployed with avuncularity promulgating “last thoughts” parring that above-quoted with respect to Emil Post. It is the introspectively-inept, unexamined life that facilitates the regressed-archetypal gradients of the collective unconscious constellating symptomatology of the collective psychoses which have episodically plagued hu-hu-[hu}man|ity -- an incompetence and insouciance driving the lack of consonance between changing precepts of the prevailing Weltanschauung and the metaphysical principles informing the contemporary institutional base, this dissonance, and the concomitant Batesonesque double-binds, being fundamental to etiology of the involved pathogenesis. Whilst hisstorical facts -- e.g., actual origin of the Afghan “sting” (see: “US Provoked the 1979 Russian Invasion of Afghanistan: Parallel to the Ukraine War?”, David Gibbs, AntiWar.com, 16 September 2024) in the Viet Nam war's Tet-'68 offensive, as asserted in our 1994 novel The Moon of Hoa Binh: the 0400 rocket attack on the Ton Son Nhut flight lines and taxi areas near MACV-HQ vectored me to the same bunker as those from the COC, Command Operations Center, where the unsuppressed field-grade-officer fury found expression in fist-pumped hollering “Get some back from the Bear!”, a refrain heard echoing halls of the HQ building in days and weeks to come, some of those assigned to the COC at that juncture going on to become Pentagon high muck-a-mucks -- “may” (one might accurately say “generally”) take a lengthy period of memetime to gain credence amongst the mainstream, constellated-collective-unconscious gradients never gain general awareness, let alone such credence. And just to be perfectly clear, “regressed-archetypal gradients of the collective unconscious” conceived as “deep structures”, this term being understood here as akin to meaning of the term as used in linguistic theory, are not the same as, and neither affirm nor deny existence of, “structural deep events” as defined by Peter Dale Scott, or SCADs, “state crimes against democracy”, as defined by Lance DeHaven-Smith.

It is extremely easy to become utterly mortified for the human species when looking at this, presenting a Scale Relativity model in 1977, and this, applying that model to econophysics of m-logically-valued currency units regarded as being multifractal drums moving through nested econometric partitions defined over fractal e-boundaries in 2008, and “Boundary Layer via Multifractal Mass Conductivity through Remote Sensing Data in Atmospheric Dynamics”, Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., Fractal and Fractional, 6:5, 2022, the introduction to which begins with, “It is a recent development that new models based on Scale Relativity have appeared…”, where within, as Nica, et al., elaborate, it is presupposed that, given that, “…the atmosphere is both structurally and functionally assimilated to multifractal objects, atmospheric dynamics can be described through the motions of such multifractal structural units on continuous and non-differentiable curves, also known as multifractal curves”. Then comparing all that to this, a current account as to what the human species has done instead with geofencing. Mortifying, yes?

What… the world… needs now: network-powered money that embodies in its own defining properties exponential growth, i.e., Bitcoin, as portrayed by Kane McGukin in his “How the Revolution of Money Will Reshape Our Future”, Bombthrower, 21 September 2024. On an overpopulated, resource-depleting planet, no less! -- a planet undergoing decades of frequency-response-window-altering anthropogenic-iatrogenic phased-array-induced electron-temperature enhancements. This money, having been defined over a global monoscale, hasiswill henceforth from the get-go to the end-all be top-down instituted; moreover, thus, hasiswill continue misnomered as decentralized; when, actually, psychologically paving the way for, ultimately, a single “We Are the World” central-bank-as-only-bank with its single CBDC tied to a planetarized SCSS, social credit score system. Humph! going, à la McGukin, from probability to exponent; when, in (₁T₂-only) truth, the path is literally from the probability-amp dissimulation to an exponential-function prescription, the latter actually a malediction. What, contrary to McGukin, we in point of fact absolutely need is viscosity across quasifractal e-boundaries upon which monies are defined, viscosity adequate to moderate dampening of hot-money flows to and between money centers (distributing the additional costs), such that local multiplier effects retain a modicum of localization and specificity: that's analogous to structure and functioning of natural systems, as discussed in, for instance, “Boundary Layer via Multifractal Mass Conductivity through Remote Sensing Data in Atmospheric Dynamics”, Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., Fractal and Fractional, 6:5, 2022. The leadership cohort -- of the mass of ₁T₂-only-“identitarians” (those insistent upon non-quantum simple-identity “in all things”, as distinct from Les Identitaires; more generally, as differentiated from Identitarianism per se) -- in instigating control over drift, currently accelerating, toward a far-from-equilibrium global phase transition to overtly induced planetarization of an enforced dictatorial monoculture, has more and more thoroughly resorted to a “poison-pill defense” -- adopting, with adaptation, a term from M&A's hostile-takeover raider-lexicon -- in their hysterical, unconscious-unto-subliminal-unto-vaguely-conscious, ever-gathering -- transiting to apoplectics! -- back-reaction against the many confusing and confounding psychosexosociopoliticoeconomic imports of m-valued logics and Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function (these two potentially, even prospectively, much belatedly properly interpreted): that's (the instigation, that is) diagnostic, uh, pathognomonic of the next collective schizophrenic break, arguably already once again strongly incubated and demerging from its most recent latency period. Oh-my is me-me! Due to hisher confirmation bias shehe has charged my me's contrarianism with fell-lone-E-o|us [in}s|alt. But, obviously, to general systems theorists, the degree to which extrasystemic interventions -- e.g., regulatory activities of ad hoc and/or de-facto-unto-de-jure oversight committees-agencies-departments; lawfare engagements; exercise of police powers -- are required, to maintain operational efficiency via sustainment of the consensuated rule framework, is (that's the singular verb, that is, heh-heh-heh -- as regards interventional “degree”) a measure of autopoietic and self-organizational incompetency, and, thus, of failure-in-conception of the “framework-determining conditions” (e.g., order of value of the logic employed) adopted as systemic foundation. All such failures likely, in one way or another, indeed, in n-ways, involve preclusion of the intrasystemic -- partpart, partwhole, wholepart -- identity transparency facilitated by appropriate tropology, that is, consonant cosmogony-institution metareferential mutuality of sufficient magnitude and incidence as to be ketaminergic. When C. P. Snow's two cultures (science versus humanities) are not one culture (not the same as a Third Culture of popular science writing) -- one culture by all-4-Jungian-psychological-functions-equally-engaged (this being my notion of “equality of opportunity”, an equality which requires inner-work in relation to outer-work which generally requires an ambient environment of good-work), hopefully someday via Musculpt as mathematical notation (for the two cultures of mathematicians , i.e., problem solving versus theorizing) and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS -- such consonance cannot be adequately manifested, as cultural density of interoperative bivalent metareferential multi-utility functions-functionals-functors (not to mention m-logically-valued m-utilities: the measure of being the _µT_m-order of logical-value involved in the type of relative-state identity-transparency facilitated thereby) produced by metascience, metaphysics, the fine and performing arts, folklore and folk arts, popular song, so on, will be too sparce to re[son}ant|ly accomplish that consonant outcome. This prescriptive barrier is “obstruction of justice” (psychosociopoliticoeconomic) by foundered foundations of the prevailing institutionalized systematics.

Okay. Here, as I see it (a frog sitting at the bottom of a well), is the main difference between Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., “Boundary Layer via Multifractal Mass Conductivity through Remote Sensing Data in Atmospheric Dynamics”, Fractal and Fractional, 6:5, 2022, and the Paine-Kaplan nested-grid cascade-computer-forecast-modeled physics of tornadogenesis (see 1977 here and 1978 here, and here for citing of the involved refereed papers and severe-storms-conference preprints), circa early-to-mid-1970s (this was before and when the term “fractal” was coined by Mandelbrot). Quoting Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al.:

…for a large temporal scale resolution, with respect to the inverse [note “inverse”] of the highest Lyapunov exponent trajectories, these structural units can be replaced with collections of potential trajectories; it is then possible to replace the notion of “deterministic definite trajectory” with that of a probability density.

Now quoting our 1978 paper entitled “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, linked above:

Equations (17) and (18) describe a harmonic oscillator. If the coefficient of tau in term 3 is positive, the solution for tau is a sinusoidal function of time. That is, the parcel will oscillate about its original position with a fundamental frequency [v₀] given by… The inverse [note “inverse”] of v₀ defines the minimum time for the process of spontaneous localization to occur at the system level. [Whereas, earlier in the paper we have…] The reader will note that we are taking the unusual step of defining a thermodynamic concept (Stefan-Boltzman Law) at the system level: the air parcel, composed of a subsystem of gaseous molecules, does not call to mind the traditional interaction of molecules constituting a liquid. However, this step, invoking a superfluid approach to atmospheric dynamics, will directly link the thermal exchange of energy achieved between the localized domain structure (parcel) and the limited atmospheric domain exhibiting quantum properties. We are thus hypothesizing that blackbody physics must be an integral part of all superconductant processes. We, therefore, seek to mathematically describe the manner in which the quantized signal, or time of transition from T₀ to T_C, is communicated from subsystem to system to supersystem. To capture the essence of superconductance, we, therefore, assume that spontaneous localization at any one of these three levels is synchronously tied to spontaneous fusion of the signal into the next higher level. [Emphasis in original] This hypothesis as to the function of time ordering in the interplay between the subsystem (molecular), the system (air parcel), and the supersystem (limited atmospheric domain) will lend itself to several empirical tests…

Instead of the Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., “potential” and “probability”, the Paine-Kaplan model involves tau being understood as “active time” (following a later letter exchange with Prigogine, the term was changed to “topologically-active operator-time”) being analogous to Maxwell's sorting “angel” -- at cyclotomic cascade-decomposition of hypercomplex-complex-real angular-momentum composites (think: “pencils of skew-parallels”, or, if you wish, _µT_m-logical fiber-bundles, the active-time operations being quantized via Penrose twistors, about which we were then aware). No mere mal[add}ick|i|on, IMHO, to fol-de-rol and demo[gog}UeRee. We were also aware of fractals at the memetime the above was written. We were aware of _µT_m-valued logics at the memetime the above was written. We were aware of J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” at the memetime the above was written. We were aware of catastrophe theory (particularly of the fold and cusp catastrophes relative to tornadogenesis; and the cusp catastrophe relative to Victor P. Starr's 1959: “The hydrodynamical analogy to E = mc²”, Tellus, 9, pp. 135-138), coming on during the 1960s and '70s, at the memetime the above was written. But given the history of conflict with upper-atmosphere physicists at Cornell and a fistfight at a severe storms conference over the relativistic-quantum aspects of Paine-Kaplan cascade theory, Paine felt that bringing in the above-five-mentioned was just simply way, way too, too much “for the atmospheric science community to assimilate” (Paine's words) at that memetime. To contextualize a [mu}it: my experience of inner-Musculpt -- such as it was: certainly nothing like what authentic _µT_m-inner-Musculpt must involve -- peaked ages 15-25, dissolved to dynamic color fields and Belsoneque images containing fractal mandalas ages 30-35 (this denial-of-service discorporation transpiring during my period at Cornell where I first heard the word “fractal”: focused on physics, math, logic; no longer reading into Jung, Aurobindo, Gurdjieff literature, Lancelot Law Whyte, AT, so on; no longer focused on art-music, Japanese aesthetics). Inner-Musculpt -- being on The Other Side of Silence (take that, John Cage!) among The Secret Whispers in The Shadow of Shadows (so far as ₁T₂-only-logic is concerned) where All Our To[mor}rows are _µT_mly ensheaved -- is numinous to the normotic binary-mind of the most-reduced 'I' of my I/i^m. Even now, aged 79, I still receive the color fields and Belsoneques; but the scale resolution is inadequate to bring forth clarity of the fractal figurations which early-on carried the semantic-gestalt contents (post-1975, upon having read Post, taken to be _µT_m-logical) of inner-Musculpt correlated to whatever area of cognition covariant with its onset. Certainly I did not have the exposure to theory of polytopes I imagine prerequisite to resolution of the fractal figurations adequate to envisioning-hearing their geometric J.G.Bennettian-“skew-parallel” Regge-meshworkings of _µT_m-logical [mu}itic processing (take a fractal tree as a ₁T₂-only-logic generative-entailment tree and, by retrograde-inversion, _µT_mly “skew-parallel” it into cyclotomically-decomposed multifractal motion signifying relative-states of identity-transparency -- this being the alternative to Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., “potential” and “probability”). In an attempt to gain further insight, I am currently trying to study “The Degrees of Freedom of Area Regge Calculus: Dynamics, Non-metricity, and Broken Diffeomorphisms”, Seth K. Asante and Bianca Dittrich and Hal M. Haggard, arXiv, 26 February 2018.

Douglas A. Paine's early-to-mid-1970s way of thinking himself toward what likely would have become a notion of multifractal atmospheric dynamics was via the idea of spontaneous localization and fusion of nested, indeed, superposed, atmospheric LSTDs, limited spacetime domains. He believed -- so far as I understood, i.e., my interpretation -- that in turbulent 2-hypercomplex-cum-1-complex cascade dynamics there are repeated transforms (as critical variables diverge-converge -- go to: positive infinity; zero, non-viewably unto negative infinity, i.e., fractalize -- that is, appear to the ₁T₂-only-observer “embedded in the system”, the system of partial-differential equations, to go into singularity) yielding sequential onsets of temporal CURLings between classical Newtonian dynamics (the LSTD take, i.e., the memetime and ponderablespace take) and scale-relative quantum-relativistic dynamics. IMHO, this roughly translates to the distinction made in Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., “Boundary Layer via Multifractal Mass Conductivity through Remote Sensing Data in Atmospheric Dynamics”, Fractal and Fractional, 6:5, 2022, between differentiable models (re: integer-dimensional spaces) and non-differentiable models (re: fractal/multifractal-dimensional spaces), in the body of the paper handled relative to differentiable and non-differentiable velocity fields. Quoting the summary conclusion to Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al.:

…this then implies, through various nondimensionalizations, the existence of a specific multifractal force field that drives non-differentiable interactions between the atmospheric multifractal entities. Supposing then, that there exists a mass current density-type relation regarding these entities, then multifractal atmospheric mass conduction is found at differentiable, non-differentiable and global resolutions.

Okay, “a specific multifractal force field that drives”. Consider this “driver” to be, not so much a “force field” as 3-fold (2-hypercomplex-cum-1-complex: cf. global, non-differentiable, differentiable “resolutions”, and, in our cascade “view”, _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ logically-valued) topologically-active-operator-time executing _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ logically-valued propositions Gödel-numbered over universal coverings of area Regge lattices with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers (cf. pregeometry level of analysis; the Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., “Lobachevsky plane metric” relating to the geometrodynamics level of analysis whereupon “regions where it is absolutely impossible for states to exist” intimate existence of the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-pregeometry level of analysis), and we have a rough approximation of the Paine notion of the temporal-ordering factor qua state-functor-functional-function (understood relative to Emil Post, not Max Born). Two other correspondences that should especially be pointed out: (1) Paine speculated that the nesting dimensionality relation (gap-length-scale resolutionality within the cascade-theoretical nesting-foam “sieve”) involves the natural log distribution, possibly related to the log log treatment of the Riemann hypothesis, and this appears to be an intimation of Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., Eq. 20, where within the factor containing the theta parameter (“a measure of the multifractality degree”; its inverse being “a measure of an ordering degree”) is exponentiated by Eulerian e, itself complexly exponentiated, the modifying imaginary i, in our notion, being indicative of 1st-order temporal CURL (reverse-cascading qua spontaneously-fusing from ₁T₂-unto-_µT_m, pregeometrically speaking); and (2) the Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., “Conduction mechanisms at the two types [differentiable and non-differentiable] of scale resolutions are simultaneous and reciprocally conditional” intimates the Paine notion that, considering classes of sets of LSTDs: under 1st-order topo-active operator-time, cascade and reverse-cascade are memetimelessly simultaneous and retrograde inversions of each other; and that under 2nd-order topo-active operator-time, cascade and reverse-cascade are memetimelessly multiply-connected; and that under 3rd-order topo-active operator-time, cascade and reverse-cascade are memetimelessly non-orientable. As regards “parallels to be drawn between theory and experimental data” Dragos-Constantin Nica, et al., rely upon light (ceilometer data), whereas Paine relied, in part, upon infrasound (microbarometer data): the two together equal atmospheric “Musculpt” (the term Paine coined relative to changing infrasound signatures of theta-e equivalent potential temperature surface topologies, which in those days he laboriously plotted out by hand in 3D-linear-perspective projections). I wonder what such a view of atmospheric dynamics would do to currently prevailing assumptions brought to the debates over climate change and geoengineering.

The forward-deploying fraternity-buds, “Two Chucks”, pioneered and perfected the best method of doing more whilst being a student in AU-SIS during the early-1960s: attend classes the day before each scheduled test and as little elsewhile as to raise no more than an eyebrow; thoroughly skim the required readings and listen closely to classmate scuttlebutt concerning the lectures (not actually a proselytizer's prefiguration of the stigmatizing of face-to-face in preference for e.edu); study the recommended readings; spend bulk of the semester doing off-campus research at the National Archives, in embassy libraries, with Department-of-State desk officers, in the recently-created USAID library (thanks be to JFK), in the USIA library (thanks be to Ike), at the SORO, so on; and make sure that, by some plausible “hows”, contents of answers to the essay test questions (the only ones there were) focus upon the recommended readings and the extra-curricular research. It was thus at the National Archives pouring over OSS-R&A documents looking for WWII-era reflections on the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact (doing a paper, circa 1964, for “Foreign Policies of the Great Powers”) that I first began thinking something was amiss, off, missed altogether, suppressed, indeed uncanny, about origins, that's origins, of the 1 September 1939 German invasion of Poland, followed some two weeks later by the Soviet invasion, supposedly to protect Ukrainians located therein. A decade later, in the Cornell Mathematics Library reading Emil Post and learning of Lukasiewicz, I flashed back upon my sense of the uncanny and didn't think that those [ab}us at the memetime of WWII and telling Polish jokes understood that 3-valued logic -- the early focus of Lukasiewicz and the first stabs made at quantum logic -- was the Bee-Bee, the Big Bugaboo: the raison d'etre of the jokes remained and remains in the collective subliminal. As does the deep-structure casus belli of the raison d'etat for the Ukraine war today: be the surface-structures of that deep-structure (the shadows of THE shadow) strategically about keeping Russia and Germany unpacted (“Remember the R-M Pact!” being as much a policy-formulation-informing meme as is “Remember Munich!”); be it in battlefield prep for a war against a GC, Greater China; and/or be it simple ol' alliance/strategic-resources jockeying in gathering anticipation of the B-BO, Biggest of Big Ones. Har-har-har! A spoofing of the supplication extant in the prescriptive Popperian-plentipotentiary-propensities interpretation of m-valued Tantric-Schrödinger's [mu}nificent open-society statefunction. O, how I do remember -- memory triggered by this -- all the time spent with the NATO Handbook of Emergency War Surgery, during 1966-7, which later, while recovering at Camp Zama Army Hospital from a Mekong-delta-inflicted wound, got me levered into being a surgical tech during the overload of wounded coming in during the battle of Dac Tho. The “why” of the by-now-long-governing Wolf-o-wizz Doctrine, even more so than of the S&Aing Pow-well Doctrine, is first and foremost: money. So sayeth the best OP-EDers: to wit, here and here and here -- for several examples. Then there is prediction as thinly veiled requisitioning, uh, uh, goading. No comment from me on any of the immediately-above linked, as not wise (got warned about that on the Radio Catinat of Retired Intel Types, circa 1995) -- other than to note that deep-structure cause-pushes/attractor-pulls go altogether unaddressed, even, perhaps, unsuspected. And if nonpacting is amongst interests, goals, and objectives, then, likewise, is at least one sort of empacting, that of the UN -- again, deep-structure going unaddressed: Pact for the Future, as negatively assessed here and here -- for two examples. This question is askable fully half a century later because Cornell chose to support Sagan over Paine (who was then, circa 1975, actively opposing phased-array electron-temperature enhancements). Lordy, this child o' honey would jus' die ta live in Dixie! O, those policymakers most high: among hisstory's more squeamish, dipsy-doodled ruditi, they are, aren't they? Rudito fantastico to ill popolo, eh what, the unconsnimble snobs. Boo-unissimo! Nips and tucks: their ideas as to [re}voluting the system. But mite ain't might, nor, ipso falso, is it right -- not when the Weltanschauung and derivative Lebenswelts have passed in bye-bye beyond the assumed fundamental metaphysical principles informing, and justifying, the institutional base psychostabilizing its Umwelt constituents. But, basta! we don't need another berobed e-he[r|o|w}in, do we. And auf Wiedersehen to you too, coconspirator, you SS Uberfeuder qua mobile social software superposter.

My interest in the Regge calculus (thanks be to R. R. Cuzinatto and C. A. M. de Melo and C. Naldoni de Souza for this wonderfully accessible 1 April 2019 introduction) has been, and is, first and foremost, as a likely aid to gathering insight as regards deciphering semantics of how spontaneous autogenic abreactions of inner-Musculpt symformphonie transcribe colored-sounded shape-shifting qua form-in-process kinematics (as distinct from “dynamics”) into powerful meaning gestalts (“meaning saturation overload”, to quote our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh) only in small part non-quantum-speakably verbalizable, and vice versa, transcribe inner-talked and/or outer-spoken conceptions into colored-sounded shape-shifting qua form kinematics (eyes closed for eidetic crystal clarity of the visual aspect, or, if eyes open, given as a thin faded-pastel wash superposed upon the heavy contents of the consensus-reality visual field): my most elaborate experiences of this, at the height of my access, involving n-person intellectual conversations, were wherein shape-shifts of spontaneously-arising-to-inner-awareness colored-sounded forms instantaneously, in their given freeze-frames with their photismic Husserlian-n-facet Analytical-Cubistic flashovers, somehow signified not only what was being said at the given moment but simultaneously relations of what was being said to possible lines of argument that could spring therefrom. The somehow has been an imponderable: the symformphonie was simply given, not called forth, and its meaning gestalts were immediately just as simply “there”. Known, with no indication as to how. Having read a lot of C. G. Jung (and taken note of the Pauli-Jung notion of “synchronicity”, which I later, rightly or wrongly, speculated was an appeasing concessional sop issued out of Pauli's rejection of his own idea of “operator time”) and a little bit about Einstein's General Relativity, at the June 1974 McMaster University Symposium, I asked Immanuel Velikovsky, via his niece Naomi Sharon, what he thought of Jung's idea that there is a correspondence between the Jungian conception of archetypal processes of the collective unconscious and Einstein's theory of gravity. Velikovsky answered that he knew nothing about a correspondence between Jung and Einstein. He thought an exchange of letters was being asked about: so obscure, even then, was such a notion of psycho-physics parallelism, and that lacuna to a psychologist with considerable interest in astronomy. It was not until late-1975 that I read Marie-Louise von Franz's 1974 Number and Time: Reflections Leading to a Unification of Depth Psychology and Physics, but by then I had already delved into MTW's 1973 mega-tome Gravitation, and learned of the Regge calculus, and speculated that this calculus was essential to transcribing collective unconscious event gradient as archetype-in-itself understood mathematical relation-structure into the gravitational curvature configuration of General Relativity which orchestrates some categories of spacetime event gradients. Moreover, I had by then absorbed Doug Paine's mathematical ideas about “active time”, my introduction to Gödel numbers having come, by my independent effort, during Fall Semester, AU-SIS, 1963. So, active time as executor of Gödel numbers of propositions codifying archetypes-in-themselves corresponding via the Regge calculus to curvature configurations dictating spacetime event gradients. This was what I was thinking as I read von Franz on number and time. Naturally, then being at Cornell as pro bono unofficial research assistant to Prof. Douglas A. Paine, a meteorologist specializing in the forecast modeling of tornadogenesis, I looked up Tulio Regge's 1961 paper on his calculus -- but I couldn't get a whole lot out of it. And, during that period, I didn't find much else that was helpful. By good offices of a lady student I'd met in the AU library, circa 1963, I knew enough about Kabbalah and Pythagorean gematria to have flashed on the notion that inspiration for both Gödel numbering and the Regge calculus could have come from, been triggered by, awareness of Kabbalistic gematria. Like I imagined G. Spencer-Brown had done early in the process of coming up with Laws of Form (see the summarizing paper entitled “Some-thing from No-thing”; whereas, nowadays, my I/i^m do not embrace entailment-dictated generative emergence of self-reference from Boolean algebra; rather, cyclotomic involutory decomposition-demergence of bivalence from _C+T_C+-self-referential identity-transparency), I, therefore, began looking at esoteric literature on the Tree of Life, Greater Maze, neoPlatonic numerology, gematria of the Sermon on the Mount, scholarly works on the ancient Greek notion of Hyle, the mathematics of involutory decomposition (using Eric Temple Bell's orientation to this sort of material as a kind of wave-guide). It was in trying to find something in the Cornell mathematics library about how one number can stand for another in neoPlatonic numerology that I ran across Emil Post's 1921 paper on _µT_m-valued logics, a discovery that greatly illuminated my long struggle to make sense of J. G. Bennett's “pencils of skew-parallels”, pencils I found myself wanting to “use to draw” out the “bones” of the Regge calculus, which I eventually came to think needed to be numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, along with the lattice vertices, such that _µT_m-valued propositions of archetypes-in-themselves could be specified with the Regge calculus and General-Relativity curvature configurations. All this, then, mapped over shape-shifts of spontaneously-arising-to-inner-awareness colored-sounded forms instantaneously somehow signifying not only what is being said at the given moment but simultaneously relations (_µT_m-relative-states?) of what is being said to possible lines of argument that could spring therefrom (or, more likely, that were superposed thereupon as actual arguments, not possible-probable argumentative Popperian-propensity pop-ups). I had this idea gestalt by the memetime Paine and I wrote this, circa 1977 -- and have been able to gain very little further insight since then (having no access to a biofeedback-equipped, computerized Lilly flotation-isolation tank). However, most informative has been “The Degrees of Freedom of Area Regge Calculus: Dynamics, Non-metricity, and Broken Diffeomorphisms”, Seth K. Asante and Bianca Dittrich and Hal M. Haggard, arXiv, 26 February 2018, with its 105-item reference section (I stopped looking into the Regge calculus around 1980, and see from searching through these references that subsequent to Regge's 1961 paper the next cited are two published in 1981: so, I was out of luck while at Cornell, whenwhere my opportunity lie; by these references, things picked up somewhat from the mid-1990s, whereas most of the work has been done well after the year 2000). The reference that immediately drew my attention was from the mid-'90s: “A Parallelizable Implicit Evolution Scheme for Regge Calculus”, John W. Barrett, et al., arXiv, 3 November 1994. Conjugate “diversely-identical” J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” to this treatment of teleparallel motion of Regge-vertices advances and a method of incorporating _µT_m-logical-value order-types may be found (think higher-cosmo-order and fractal-bio-order gravity?), if the vertices are numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers. But, one problem with that is that the notion that Regge vertices advance is based upon the assumption that linear-time is objective, not a meme. The Pauli-Paine notion, topologically-active operator-time, however, would not involve vertices advancing, but (in cascade) higher Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers on Regge vertices being cyclotomically decomposed (as distinct from such like as “sum over spacetimes”) such that the skew-parallels of the Bennettian pencil undergo untwistings via counter-temporal-curls (twistings, in reverse cascade). Quantization of temporal CURL by means of the Penrose twistor! Time operates on space (the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space) to demerge (geometrodynamic) form(s) of THE Form (Mayamistaken, under ₁T₂-only-logic alone, to be, by concretion, absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct objects in ponderablespacememetime).

Ever since the mid-1970s, I've been saying -- and it's written into our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh -- that, All and Everything considered, the Parmenidean “Nothing ever changes” equals, is the same as, is indistinguishable from, the Heraclitean “Everything is nothing but changes”. Actually, this notion was implied by my required first-semester-freshman “thesis for the Dean”, AU-SIS, Fall 1963, entitled “The Predicament of Existentialism” (received, memory serving, a grade of B- and disparaged by my frat-bros as “Existentialism this, Existentialism that!”, their version of “Quantum this, quantum that!”), wherein I challenged the assumption “precedes” common to Existentialism (“Existence precedes Essence”) and Platonism (“Essence precedes Existence”). This challenge also, of course, subjected to Husserlian epoche the notion “logical necessity” qua entailment. Yet, once again, I find myself playing catch-up in running across Martin Calamari's paper entitled “The Metaphysical Challenge of Loop Quantum Gravity”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, 86, April 2021, pp. 68-83, wherein it is argued that, in LQG-theorist Rovelli's view, “there is change without time”. The problem for me concerning loop quantum gravity (LQG), however, has not been this metaphysical challenge, but the account provided for origin of the loops, one account being that given in “Loop quantum gravity: Does space-time come in tiny chunks?”, Paul Sutter, Space.com, 24 February 2022, to wit:

The word “loop” appears in the name because the theory's foundation is based on a rewriting of Einstein's general relativity in terms of lines (instead of points as it's usually done). It doesn't change any of the physics but makes some calculations easier, especially when it comes to quantizing space-time.

What does it mean to quantize space-time? It means there's a fundamental unit, a discrete chunk, of space-timey-ness that sits at some imperceptibly small scale.

Well, I've never established in my mind an identity between the Planck scale and the pre-pre-pregeometric MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space (the logical-value order-types even faintly understood, such “pre's” self-cancel). Nor have I figured the nesting-foam of LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, qua loops, to have come about by changing points to lines or, for that matter, to vibrating strings, super or no. IMHO, the MVRS is logically- and ontologically-“before” Planck-scale spacetime is. Now, I am fully aware that that “before” ₁T₂ly-contradicts my challenge of the notion “precedes” as understood logically, ontologically, and temporally. But, I modified the challenge by stipulating as regards “All and Everything” (a Gurdjieff term and notion): this not only implies that passive, passing, referential time is memetime, but that space, as commonly understood, is ponderablespace -- be it construed quantum-background or relativity-actor -- with no more objectivity than has memetime. On the _C+T_C+-logical MVRS, “Nothing ever changes”; yet, on “All and Everything” of the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂-logical cyclotomic-decompositional-involute nesting-foam, “Everything is nothing but changes”. The more taken away, the more changes are: only with ₁T₂ does spacetime is, uh, does ontic becoming be existence is. Yet, since AllEverything on the decomposition is already there on the MVRS, nothing has really changed, all things considered. The easiest way to visualize this, heuristically speaking, not rigorously so as to suit the mathematician-physicist, is with an infinitely dense (no Planck limiting distance -- or limiting time) nesting-foam of equilateral triangles in a fractal meshwork: regularly dropping interior points (pre-pregeometry “bucket of dust”) out of view (“the more taken away”) reveals the next larger scale-level, ad infinitum, of the meshwork. Start com-part[mental}i|zing, superposing across scale-levels, twisting, moving complexes and archetypes, folding, so on, i.e., start applying topological operations to the nesting-foam, and all sorts of “stuff” comes out: e.g., spacetime double-helices, spiral-banded galaxies, DNA nebulas, double-helical cometary feeder-bands, tornadoes, DNA, and on and on. So, according to this schema, where do the loops of LQG come from? Whowhat engages in the topological operations responsible for “demergence” of the nesting-foam of loops qua LSTDs, limited spacetime domains (see our 1977 “General Process” paper, beginning with the section entitled “Topological Connectivity and the Cascade Concept”: as mentioned above, Paine speculated a Riemann-hypothesis log log distribution as to LSTD scale nesting as demergent from pregeometry determinants subject to “choosing as small as we like”, ponderablespacememetime being ₁T₂-only-dependent and not being objectively determinable; whereas, in “Discreteness of Area and Volume in Quantum Gravity”, arXiv, 2 November 1994, Carlo Rovelli and Lee Smolin, find, via use of the Penrose treatment of spin networks, area-volume spectra measurements are matter-dependent relative to a spatial referent with a lower bound qua Planck limiting distance)? Why, the Whowhat is topologically-active operator-time, of course! And which topo-operation(s) specifically demerge the LSTDs-loops as all-scales -- not merely Planck length-scale -- nested-cum-modular-tesselated spacetime (concretion apparent only under ₁T₂-logic alone)? That's 3-fold temporal CURL (for the binary-mind's heuristic value only, think of these temporal operations as transpiring transverse to the ₁T₂-only-definable, passive, passing, referential linear-time-qua-memetime arrow): active time operating on the MVRS demerges form, quantization of temporal CURL likely involving Penrose twistors operating within a context of pregeometry _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency, these states being what the nonlinear-unto-linear m-valued Schrödinger statefunctor-functional-function (see section of the linked 1980 paper entitled “Quantum Theory Under Non-Linear Reinterpretation for Biological Systems”) signify, not corpus of single-valued probability amplitudes. And those “states” can't really be separated from those “loops” as expressions of the self-referential propositions Gödel-numbered with the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering Regge vertices and bones.

Across the dining-room table there transpired a mildly-heated discussion, in which I did not participate, concerning intrafamilial conflict occasioned by the “war at home” during the Viet-Nam-war era. When the conversation leaped to more general issues and the assertion was made that it remains (this wrangle, conducted over platters of food, transpired circa early-1980s) necessary to stick to fulfillment of the requirements of the Containment Policy, I ill-advisably and impulsively entered by commenting that I thought it had been a mistake to generalize the Containment Policy to the Third World (thus announcing my concurrence with the views of Hans Morgenthau and Stanley Hoffman, which I had learned of face-to-face by good offices of Elspeth Rostow). The aggressively stated retort to me was: “In order to entertain that opinion you must have an alternative. What would you have done instead?” Hmmm, must be an affaire d'honneur for it certainly involves no matter of [con}science. O, what I have learned over the decades! -- about “can't possibly go into all that”. Hardly speaking here of Bucky's rather gelastic, but not so much so as to induce syncope, recently explicated “critical path” to a reorganized global economy. So, correcting my impetuosity, I shrugged my shoulders, thus admitting to absence of fulfillment to that demanded, and stayed out of the remainder of the talk over the excellent meal. I wasn't about to try to dissuade, as regards Containment, the Director of the U. S. Senate Republican Policy Committee, Ned Beach, of Run Silent, Run Deep fame. Hmmm. How deep that silence, actually? Sitting back in the chair, I couldn't help but think: the attribute most dominant in my mind as characteristic of, my most enduring impression of, the Greatest Generation, that of my parents, is their introspective ineptitude. Not much into depth psychology, kilter quite off, it should be said: particularly as regards transference dynamics, intersexual and intrafamilial, even when sufficiently Freuded and Junged and Gurdjieffed: John C. Lilly, M.D., was well aware of the “ketamine bond” and the _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency therein manifest, even physically so, as in “OMG, I can't distinguish your foot from my foot!” (modal-logic speaking, that's I/i^m as _µT_mly-actual, not ₁T₂ly-possible, which belies the Existentialist's commitment to the principle of psychophysical “separatism” qua Aristotelian-actualist “individualism”, discussed in depth in Karol Lenart's 2022, Jagiellonian U., Ph.D. dissertation entitled “Metaphysics of Ersatzism about Possible Worlds”. American-Pragmatism-cum-neoPragmatism character[is}tics influencing American institutional formats and decision science. Why, I think the Treasury Department should tax social security and disability benefits, don't you, so as to pay the salaries of those policing and processing collection of such taxes. Who said those identified with the binary-mind don't cotton to self-referential propositions? What does countering counterfeiters have to do with protecting the Prez? The job description and TAOR assignment is a typical bureaucratic FUBAR. An institutional ConveDD -- that's conversion-disorder displacement -- of ₁T₂ly-suppressed nested-supersystem-system-subsystem-and-tessellated _µT_mly-hologramic identity-transparency? Not that I would have allowed myself to be at all disruptive amongst such a dinner engroupment (whatsoever be the operative multi-modal intertextuality revealed by sociolinguistic analysis), august in its way: including the wife and one daughter of Gordon Walker, the Christian Science Monitor's foremost reporter covering the whole of South, Southeast, and East Asia from the mid-1930s through the early-1950s -- all friends of Haruko Reischauer. As an Air Force brat, I grew up with that demand for an alternative: “If you have no alternative, keep your mouth shut!” Well, all I can say -- in Hamletian recriminative inner talking alone, that is; in unspoken verbalization -- is that anyone whose quantum proclivities has probability-wavicled the condition of hisher condition so as to be bought into the Facebook strategy of going after assumed-to-be-extra-systemically-imposed-governance face cards as the be-all to end-all doesn't understand the autopoiesis-unto-self-organization-related reasons for failure of the precedents, e.g., Phoenix and McNamara-chagrined homicidal escalation control options under Everett algorithms GWOT-advanced to omnicidal escalation dominance: as we are seeing more and more definitely effectuated; in The War of the Flea, the counterinsurgent reserves the option to destroy everything, to bomb back to the Stone Age. Black cloud of man-on-the-moon ticks swarmed into a vortex drain! VIAP: vincible identified anomalous phenomenon! In youth, I found the inner-separation-divided-self to be exemplified by the myself-behind-the-Plexiglas-wall which was myplaint (not the Third Voice, that “voice from nowhere”, propelling my _µT_m-processing I/i^m into “distinct impairments in the brain's ability to [₁T₂-only alone] process and predict [₁T₂-only alone] sensory information”; how so-very-very scary, so scary, even, as to be brain-chemistry altering, these imploding-from-elsewhere voices are if existence of non-localizable “THE quantum brain” is altogether unsuspected, eh!) becoming Son-of-CaptMajCol, stone-winnick insolent in silent contempt, first and foremost for the pomp in military circumstance; later, in those of our institutional bases. Tedious bivalent [or}deals substituting for authentic _µT_m-Weltanschauung-related Empire-of-Signs metareferential multi-utilities tropologically denied to the artifacts of daily life: that proscription to large degree having secured habitus, uh, place, of the “thin” blue line and its hisstorical predecessors. Actually, I'd always had alternatives, unacceptable alternatives -- altogether unspoken after the first few “misadventures”. The “alternatives” demand, I regarded as being a trick -- because that which could be accepted had to be based upon all the same assumptions as were those substructuring the policy brought into question: no exceptions to the assumptions allowed, particularly the assumptions lodged in The Tacit Dimension of prejudgmental values-traditions-practices (expressing as, for instance, the regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious gradients nowadays determining behavioral responses to the wealth of double-binds imposed by an institutional base divorced from a justifying metaphysical substratum carried by a con[son}ant, but not necessarily agnate, Weltanschauung; not as Oliver Stone has it: “There is about us a wall, alone, beyond which our conscious mind will not let our unconscious go”, to quote him introducing L. Fletcher Prouty's JFK; whew! what power is attributed to the conscious mind's ₁T₂-only-egocomplex). Besides, proposing alternatives always involves extended deliberation accompanied by disputatious discourse: not over dinner, please -- and not in the O Club, thank you (two of the [cave}ats to the demand for an [alter}native). I don't know about the “strawberry fields forever” part, but “nothing is real” is a notion I've embraced from early-pre-adolescence, several neural-network wipeouts into the process of glutamate etching. A variously-commodity-backed m-valued-LETS quantum-composite Lukasiewiczian-Postian-_µT_m-logical unit-of-account extension-cum-nixing of the centralized-we-are-the-world non-vehicle reserve currency idea like that of White's “Unitas” or of Keynes' “Bancor” (if White was to be the villain wipped, his “Unitas” idea had to be wiped clean off hisstory's whiteboard: link good offices of Ed Tout, London School of Economics, 10 March 2023; Unitas not mentioned in this IMF Working Paper on White; but not completely wiped clean, as Robert Mundell mentions it in promoting establishment of a single world currency, the global monoscale presumably being the only really OCA, optimal currency area, a notion that came on the international scene in the period of the Gary Powers U-2 incident -- I was scrimmaging basketball with U-2 and SAC pilots in the Eielson AFB base gym two months later -- and Cuban Missile Crisis as the Viet Nam war ramped up and the run on gold accelerated; whereas Alan Bollard, in “Rebuilding the World: Harry Dexter White and New Dealers” says, circa June of 2023, that “White's proposed currency, the 'unitas', was intended to only fix the US dollar to gold, giving the US Government the power to determine monetary conditions”) was and is an alternative to the vehicular gold-backed dollar cum petro-dollar cum color-revvOed-jackboot-dollar or a monoscale-one-world ₁T₂-only-CBDCed special-drawing-rights fiat-reserve necessitating a Containment Policy directed toward Russia, China, and (well-oiled) Associates. But that would now, and would have then, mean-meant sacrifice of the inherited patrimony, the globalized Bretton-Woods-imposed American Amercement via exercise of Privilège Exorbitant, so named by Valery Giscard d'Estaing as the U. S. troop build-up took place in Viet Nam (think: generalizing the Containment Policy to the Third World) and Charles de Gaulle began seriously to convert France's U. S.-dollar reserves into gold as LBJ's “Guns and Butter” deficit spending increasingly threatened terms of the gold window sustaining the dollar-gold-convertibility mechanism of the Bretton-Woods monetary system, which was put in place to sanctify transfer and docking of the locus and habitus of the CEOship of the British Empire from London to New York City. Explicit assumption: “natural right and growth” from the Virgin Land of the Turner Thesis to the New Frontier to West-more-land “over there” across the Pacific. Corollary: nothing will be allowed to stand in the way of the U. S. taking over and sustaining the mantle of empire, whatever the larger costs. Sub-corollary: the Wolfowitz Doctrine and a supporting top-down-imposed ₁T₂-only-logical CBDC system cum associated SCSS enforcement proto-call (the Contained and the Container each will have their own versions until the Container can find a way to eat the Contained -- there being, and has been, a whipped-to-poverty dearth of creative ideas all around due to the collective psychosis rising once again to fulminating pandemic status). Standing on a rooftop looking down at JFK's funereal caisson being solemnly slow-parade drumbeat down the boulevard, the closely-following dignitary most easily recognizable by me trudged tall and big-nosed: the standout, Charles de Gaulle. I remembered that rooftop vantage and view, and that the two -- JFK, de Gaulle -- had once conferred in Paris, when some months later, in “Problems in World Politics”, AU-SIS, I was required to write a hypothetical world-leader's speech (this assignment was unusual, position papers being more common). Choosing de Gaulle, I made the problem, occasioning the make-believe speech, LBJ's bridling umbrage at those behind France's unconscionable presumption in demanding so much by way of dollar-to-gold conversion. At the memetime of this college-course tasking, I was a student live-in member of the Georgetown household staff of LBJ's -- Harvard classmate-friend of JFK; onetime-OSS, MO maybe; I never paid attention to the official title, but something like the Director of the Bureau or Office, whatever, of Public Affairs of the U. S. Department of State; when asked where he went to school, he didn't say Harvard, he said Eton, not Phillips Andover; Sherry-Netherland integral to the family pedigree, staid there, per chance, have you; Martha's Vineyard for generations holding the beautiful O-so-Radcliffe-wife's family's summer retreat “cottage” -- then-foremost speechwriter: and I knew, by virtue of the perquisites of being a semi-adoptive member of this household closely bonded to that of McGeorge Bundy up in Spring Valley (both on the crème de la crème list of Hills Nursery's carriage trade: which Who's Who did Jerry Hill not know?), that part of the reason the French were thought to be insufferably ungrateful was the way in which the Marshall Plan had strongly helped the French in their postwar return to, and “re-engagement” with, Indochina. “Hitting us with this magnitude of conversion demands at this point in their interminable war! The gaul, uh, gall, of that damned de Gaulle!” Such was to be “heard” as the unspoken subtext on display in polite platitudes uttered around the townhouse as the Viet Nam war was discussed with a student of international relations, just to see what informed non-professionals were thinking (I was even queried for my observations on being asked to read a couple of LBJ's speeches before they were delivered to the nation). Sixty years later, I can't remember what, exactly, I wrote into my hypothetical speech that Charles de Gaulle could conceivably have given under the circumstances (it couldn't have been all that smart, as my 6 credit-hours of Backgrounds -- not Foundations -- of Western Civ, 6 of Econ, 12 of American Civ seminars, 12 of Human Behavior seminars, and the various international relations courses hadn't been much on international monetary system fundamentals: I probably got an A for content and a B for style: my habitual for most AU-SIS assignments). While none of this is untold, still, unapologetically I find that it bears retelling due to the appearance of “How France Secretly Repatriated All Its Gold Before Nixon’s Dollar Devaluation”, Jan Nieuwenhuijs, Activist Post, 7 October 2024, and the fact that this informative article (no criticism offered concerning the arbitrary criteria upon which the [₁T₂-only] relative [states of] fixed-values assigned to currencies were set for initialization of the Bretton-Woods system), containing much I did not know (especially so as of 1965, by which memetime the run on gold had entered the public domain via the MSM's news mags), startlingly makes no mention whatsoever of the Viet Nam war (and the financial burdens incurred by handing to the adversary, on a platter of fine gold 999 qua 24 carat, warfare's variable space and time parameters, “containment” being relative thereto). Despite Judy Shelton's gold-backing investitures ((see here and here: not enough nests or tessellations to the economic-financial-currency en[foam}ment to effectively facilitate autopoiesis and self-organization [compare to the human body, for instance]; not enough superposed values stacked on base-states of the currency units [compare to the m-valued Schrödinger state-function of the electron, for instance]; no all-inclusive _µT_m-relative-state quantum-composite unit-of-account mapping over the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth, not least because not enough diversity of commodities backing currencies of the monetary system to facilitate such a mapping: an adequate new monetary system, today, must solve-resolve not only the plaguing economic-financial-currency conundrums, but also facilitate efforts to deal with the ever-intensifying myriad aspects of the anthropogenically-imposed planetary crisis; moreover, there can be no contagion between reserve currencies when there are no vehicular reserve currencies)) at endowing the wain carrying American democracy's wane, note that the deflationary post-WWII gold-exchange mechanism did not prevent the inflationary deficit spending cum expanding deficit in balance of payments servicing mass warfare, even if that mechanism's collapse was instrumental to ending of the Viet Nam war (in the many VC/NVN pre-TET-'68 strategy-briefing captured enemy documents I analyzed, there was no explicit mention of Bretton Woods or the gold-backed dollar, but “the gathering economic difficulties suffered by the American capitalists as a result of their aggressive war against Viet Nam” will make them relent, therefore, relative to the General-Counter-Offensive stage of the war, “carry out the 3-pronged attack with unrelenting and ever-increasing vigor”). Arguably, in the case of the U.S.S.R., the post-WWI incursions and post-WWII containment, relative to China, the post-1949 incursions and the imposed isolation, in all likelihood postponed by half a century abandonment of Marxist-Leninism in general, preference-functional gosh-planned economic planometrics in particular; and, also arguably, the current commitment to containment is postponing, with expiration date nonviewable, adequate address to, not to mention rectification of, the multiplicity -- most areas of collective endeavor involved -- of anthropogenic discombobulations to which Homo sapiens sapiens has subjected planet Earth, all of its various spheres.

Given the rapidly growing magnitude of misfortune of the ever increasingly man|u[fact}u|red “exposure 'opportunity'” -- heh-heh-heh! -- prevalent today (38 different pesticides and heavy metals and glyphosate identified in a single school lunch? (thanks be to RFK, Jr.: I wonder if he remembers when SF troopers were brought to Hickory Hill to demonstrate marshal skills, and whether he periodically strolled through nearby Beeches Nursery along with his father, my years of apprenticeship to the Ishiyamas at that nursery coming shortly after that period of memetime) and 3,601 of 14,000 “food”-packaging chemicals found in human blood and breast milk and hair samples? and how many of these are mimetic estrogens impacting introjected sense of gender identity, if not yet of sufficiently high titers for mutagenically inducing her{man]phoditic indels, uh, insertion/deletion polymorphisms?), there needs be Much To Do About Something, however often, preceding the “Adieu!”, we are told it “don't mean nothin'”. What “it” is that? Why, the HennyPennied mass psychosis which introjects ChickenLittled skyfall! Does omnipresence of such “don't mean nothin'” neurotoxic-blackpsyche leveling fully justify the malicious vigilante Dogberryisms disparaging D. J. Plots' discreditation ops run on Heros of the opposition to TPTB deeply instated? Who can say with confident surety? In context, that is, of the digital poisoning which long, long ago reduced pedestrian cognition, and glutamatergically anchored that reduction, to only the [demi}UR|gent ₁T₂-level of nowhere-near-even-half-competent processing -- actual primordial URmen, i.e., the Last of the First, not the Last of the Last Men, underSTANDING the skyrise fact that there was no Last and there will be no First upon the MVRS (3 upon stationary ground), m-logically-valued reference space, and its E.T.Bellian cyclotomically-involutory processors “powered” by 3-fold topologically-active operator-time as Trikaladrsti-tapassiddhi qua the trihypostatic Christian Trinity reverse transubstantiated, via concretion-at-identificative-projection, from principle into the anthropomorphic terms of personhood (logically speaking, cultural-lag ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, of ₂T₂ and ₁T₃ and ₂T₃ and ₃T₃ logics, depending upon the chosen residuals of animistic-pagan identity-transparency emphasized in the ₁T₂-only-ratiocination-violating given discursuses). Awareness of this is probably essential to comprehension of the degree to which the likes of Henry Kissinger (read his declassified memos) and Milton Friedman (read his op/eds: when I sent him a letter about _µT_m-valued LETS currencies, his reply clearly indicated that he was unaware of m-valued logics and Friedrich von Hayek's Everettian notion of the “time-shapes of total capital stock”) were utterly identified with ₁T₂-valued logic and it's rules of entailment, identified to a degree indicative of zero realization that all such entailments are lion's tails with big fat dark hairy tufts at the ends, tough tufts indicative of the _µT_m-in-denial ((attempts at handling such fat tails include: conflations of world-pictures and “the world”; calls made upon demons like that of Maxwell; stochastics with unobserved _µT_m-degrees of freedom [think: temporal-CURLed cascade of hypercomplex and complex angular momentum delivered for injection into Earth's crustal and core dynamics, and see, for instance, once again, “Deterministic and stochastic chaos characterize laboratory earthquakes”, A. Gualandi, et al., Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 604, 15 February 2023]; probability amplitudes; Lyapunov lambda-exponents of ₁T₂-only separation vectors [no _µT_m-logical J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”] of deterministic-chaos butterflies sensitive to small perturbations which can grow exponentially, such as in the case wherewhen weather ₁T₂-only-manipulations grow into _µT_m-climate-shift dynamics; renormalization schemes; preference-functional planometrics; reverse representation; regulatory oversight; ad hoc committees; special prosecutors; firing squads; area bombing; CBUs; so on right up to “Give me simple identity or give me death!” human species self-annihilation). How many logicians (not to mention physicists; forget altogether other academics, let alone JoeJoAn Blow on the street) have actually read Emil Post's signal paper (“Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, Ph.D. dissertation published in American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, 1921, pp. 163-85) on _µT_m-valued logics? How many of those actual readers focused on the last two sentences of that paper? To wit, quoting:

We must however take into account the fact that our development has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

Post himself never followed up on this, uh, his, italicized “if”. Nor, so far as I can see, has anyone else. Couldn't authentically step aside from the “whips and scorns of time” in order to enter “The undiscovere'd country”. These two sentences of Post, IMHO, are the most important written during the 20th century -- indeed, likely during the last nearly 2,500 years, since Aristotle tentatively, as regards the Law of Excluded Middle (To pee, or not to pee, that is the proposition), tipped one of his big toes into the scalding water of m-valued logics, quickly jumping back into a penchant for ₁T₂-only-categorization schemes. Why so important as that? Because everything, that's EVERYTHING, I emphasize, has been codified by employment of ₁T₂-only-logic alone, i.e., “our development [of everything] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted”. When, actually, any-one-thing, and all-everything, can just as well be codified “into the language of any one _µT_m”, such that, over the last nearly 2,500 years, we've confined ourselves into an infinitely exponetiated infinitesimally small domain of All That Is, an infinites|i[ma}lady -- the prevailing science, of whatever specialty, by which we assess the current conundrum, planet Earth and near abroad, by that criterion, being far, far, far off the mark. And quite possibly, in being so, informing extremely destructive policy choices. Quoting myself in “TimeWaste of Half-Objects”:

One core meaning of the haiku poem is that a full realization of any any-one-thing (Rilke's plastic essence of the physical object) is a complete summation of All-every-thing. Hologramic poetry! Any any-one-thing cannot exist in absence of All-every-thing because the infinite “images”, or “facets”, or “horizons” -- needed to Cubistically constitute it (“all equally correct”) in the object-constancy -- each correspond to the infinite points-of-view upon itself (regress in reflexivity) possessed by all the any-one-things of All-every-thing. The state of any any-one-thing is relative to the state of All-every-thing: relative-state as a premise in set theory. TimeWaste is needed to stack, to superpose that is, the all points-of-view required to constitute any any-one-thing.

This “not having read” Post's last two sentences to his dissertation (not to mention Everett's mistaken dissertation pivot, i.e., that objects in our experience are always localized, contrasted to Luneburg's experimental finding that there is no localization in visual space independent of a “psychometric distance function” as well as to Piaget's findings as regards “object constancy” being an early-childhood learned behavior) is constellated and hyper-potentiated everywhere one might look, including at “Here's the Problem with Bitcoin”: having bought into the ₁T₂-only Law of Distributed Middle, Jeff Booth argues that an economy is either free market or controlled. I would argue that this tends to be the case insofar as aspects of the given economy are formalized in the terms of ₁T₂-only-logic alone, particularly so if the monies employed are logically-single-valued, and marketplace incentives and sanctions are not scripted relative to _µT_mly-metareferential multi-utilities, e.g., the sacred cloths signifying relative-state identity-transparency once used in ritual gift exchange, a practice from which keiretsu and omiyage and “transaction rent” and the like derive in regressed form. With m-valued and _µT_m-processed LETS currencies in nesting-foam thereof, the programming currency-unit value-ensheavements would not be able to target individuals (such as is already being instituted via banks, as, to wit, seen in “Top Bank Launches Payment Tracking System to Crack Down on Meat Purchases”, Frank Bergman, reposted to ZeroHedge, 22 September 2024), only mass behaviors -- unless SocialCreditScoreSystem-like apps were dysfunctionally-antihomeostatically iatrogenically appended. In _µT_m-LETS not extra-systemically subverted -- such subversion would be a matter of collective will because of the involved open-source e-commons computer gaming -- this “not be able to target individuals” would be the case given that most categories of transactions would remain in single-valued cash ₁T₂ly processed and only critical indicator-measurables would be value-ensheaved. Booth, in the terms of bivalent logic, points out that there has never been a free-market economy, which he calls the “natural” economy wherein untrammeled competition forces a deflationary price regime considered an unquestionable benison. Since a free market has never existed -- a point repeatedly made by Booth -- “natural”, to me, even in ₁T₂-only terms, is a misnomer: heuristically “ideal” as regards ₁T₂-only “world picture”, not world, is much more apropos. Like in an ideal gas, the myriad order-types of ₁T₂-lateral-vertical interactions (also “skew-parallel” _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparencies) between n-foamed "micro,…,n-meso,…,n-macro-actors,…,n" qua “particles” are econometrically ignored in stripped-down equations of state, at best treated en masse statistically. Statefunctions are conceived as being single-valued or as probability statements, not as authentically m-valued, and this way of conceiving imposes on the economy the “either/or” which Booth conceives-perceives as being prescribed. Entertainingly, Booth allows the Rebel Capitalist, George Gammon, to make his, Booth's, point for him concerning what is wrong with Bitcoin: this is done in the Argentina story (watch cum listen to the YouTube VDO) told by Gammon, who simply doesn't get it that Booth is illustrating economic thought marshalled in general systems terms, not those of the micro-actor misconstrued in idealized self-interest-only terms (altogether unaware of the “unobserved _µT_m-degrees of freedom” constituting the Bohm-Hiley “quantum potential” actually responsible for autopoiesis and self-organization, however restricted by imposition of ₁T₂-only-logical formalizations of markette parameters). The NatWest tracking system assault upon individual discretion (strongly tending toward “hard utopian” MOs as distinct from those soft, e.g., currency-unit value-ensheavements and associated metareferential multi-utility tropes) is bank-justified by taking recourse to a ₁T₂-only-logic-alone climate assessment and notion of causation, whenwhilstwhereupon there are many non-₁T₂-only-logic-alone “reasons” to doubt accuracy of this assessment and, especially, to doubt this notion of causation as being sole or foremost (read here and here to see how much non-classified, publicly-available, consensus atmospheric science, based, as it is, on continued embrace of the supposed “classical limit”, is to be vested with uncritical belief: given nature of the cascade-driven self-organized criticality issuing out of quantum collective and cooperative behaviors, the assessed situation could well be far worse, all of Earth's spheres considered, and the spectrum of cause-pushes/attractor-pulls quite different from those publicly aired). Forecasting a tornado outbreak 12 hours in advance on the 1-km grid is proscribed by nature -- if the “unobserved _µT_m-degrees of freedom” are understood ₁T₂ly and memetime-boundedly as chaos-theory sensitivity to (real-numbered-memetime bound) initial conditions wherefrom small differences can grow exponentially (see, for edification: “Controlling the Evolution of a Simulated Hurricane Through Optimal Perturbations: Initial Experiments Using a 4-D Variational Analysis System”, Ross N. Hoffman, et al., Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., January 2005, posted by ResearchGate and also by AMS, the American Meteorological Society; and Ross N. Hoffman's “Chaos and Weather Control” powerpoint delivery, April 2003). And if that prediction proscription is the case for tornadogenesis cum outbreak forecasting, then no ₁T₂-logical-leap is involved in supposing the same as regards the full spectrum of outcomes generated by instances of weather manipulation -- particularly when the density of such instances grows and grows over decades of memetime, as it reportedly has. Note that “deterministic chaos” small differences which can grow exponentially are, properly speaking, trajectories, not energy densities. So, still, in controlling the trajectory of a hurricane, an enormous amount of energy input would be required to get the chaos butterfly's wings flapping (of considerable note, for, as observed by Hoffman, et al., iatrogenically-induced “wind perturbations are more effective than others”, including well-placed -- position, power, frequency, orientation: à la Hoffman, et al., “An example of an element of the control vector is the temperature at a particular grid point” -- deposition of microwave-transmitted heat). The Hoffman, et al., simulation is dependent upon use of space-based solar power, SBSP, as the UV-energy source for effectuating the optimal perturbations required to control “evolution” (size, intensity, speed and direction of movement; but the Hoffman, et al., Mesoscale Model 5 computer simulation was used solely “to calculate 'optimal' perturbations to control the intensity of a simulated tropical cyclone”) of a hurricane. Were, presently, adequate-to-controlling-a-hurricane SBSP effectively rocket-satellite-deployed, this would be publicly known all around the world -- even were resolution of the required data greatly increased so as to greatly decrease magnitude of the required iatrogenic microwave-delivered perturbations (it is to my largely-unschooled imagination impossible to visualize how enough HAARP-ionospheric-heater-hot-aurora-generated energy density, however well-placed, to “control evolution” of a hurricane could be delivered by a HAARP-electron-temperature-enhancement-generated “mirror”). Whatever side-effects, unintended consequences, collateral damage HAARPing on the upper atmosphere may entail, e.g., altering the frequency-response window of Earth orb to angular momentum carried to it by the solar wind. Be aware, as an aside, that Hoffman's et al., radiative transfer model has its transfer origin in the Sun and a cascade-like structure focused on simple-temperature, whereas the Paine-Kaplan cascade model involves hypercomplex and complex angular momentum, waystation primarily in the Sun, transmission to Earth primarily via the solar wind. And in the Paine-Kaplan case, orchestrator of the cascade is topologically-active operator-time, inter-level cascades involving 3-fold temporal CURL. Consider the pieces by Paul Craig Roberts entitled, “Could Helene Have Been a DARPA Creation?” and “Hurricane Milton Is So Unusual That It Does Not Seem Natural” wherein no idea is offered as to how HAARP could create a hurricane. HAARP-type facilities and processes, IMHO, are alone unlikely to be capable of intensifying and steering a hurricane -- let alone the enormity of the very notion of creating one. Doug Paine's paper presented at the 1974 McMaster U. Velikovsky conference, which so upset Carl Sagan, entitled “The Universal Nature of Discharge Phenomena”, did not involve modeling creation of Jupiter's “red spot” hurricane, but discussion of angular-momentum-cascade dynamics conceivably adequate to a mass ejection involving that hurricane's reverse-cascade dynamics. Whether or not, in the 20 years since the 2005 Hoffman, et al., paper, the capability to “control evolution” of an already existing hurricane has been attained, I have no idea -- nor could I possibly know. Were that capability currently to exist, it would be a combat arm in the lexicon of environmental warfare and its development and deployment would all along have been, and would now be, highly classified. No publicly working meteorologist would know details of it, and any scientist in the know publicly speaking of it would be putting his life and his family's lives in jeopardy. If the capability to steer a hurricane currently exists, it would, IMHO, involve deep understanding of the 3rd-order dynamics (think: 3-fold Pauli-Paine topo-active optime) which Arthur M. Young, inventor of the rotor for the Bell helicopter, pioneered and called “control”, mastery of the physics of which made possible steering of the helicopter. Quoting Young: “Thus, the way a helicopter functions is a demonstration of the orthogonality of control (the third derivative in calculus) and acceleration (the second derivative).” Overcoming the huge problem of the enormous energy demand may have involved generation of much greater knowledge of the reverse-cascade dynamics of what transpires inside a tornado than has been made public -- as well as (contrary to the unclassified-atmospheric-science consensus concerning ₁T₂-only-chaos-theory-imposed limitations placed upon “classical-limit”-abiding NWP, Numerical Weather Prediction) the ability to pinpoint well in advance tornado outbreaks.

Part of the motivation, I knew, was military-brat related: I was sick and tired of being constantly screwed over and around (by virtually every male I had to deal with, and many wives of officers of higher rank than that of my father) -- particularly when it was the case that those doing the screwing were dumb jackasses I had no respect for; indeed, had considerable suppressed contempt for. By aged 15, it was clear in my mind that I wanted nothing to do with “their” world: “their” transcending the military and designating those responsible for existence of “modern civilization”. Nowadays, I imagine, very many 15-yearolds might well have reached a similar orientation. During my high-school years in Alaska, 1960-'62, I met several other teens who felt the way I did. The Homestead Act was still in place in Alaska and we tried to file together on a full-quarter, but filers had to be 21 and none of our parents would sign for us. After my return from the Viet Nam war, I again tried to get away from “their world”: first in British Columbia; later, in Nova Scotia. I didn't have the resources and neither attempt worked out; so, I gave up that aspiration after three tries: it wasn't going to happen. I decided, à la C. G. Jung's Psychological Types (German original, circa early-1920s) and The Psychology of the Transference (Vol. 16 of Jung's Collected Works, English translation, Princeton U. Press, 1966: projective-identification and associated ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, at multi-spectral transference [e.g., subject-object level; interpersonal, I-thou, level; man-woman level; intrafamilial level; parent-child level; therapist-patient level; Ph.D. preceptor and candidate level] being force fed by the relatively underdeveloped psychological functions, out-of-balance temperaments -- gnomic, sylphic, salamanderic, nymphic -- and unjust apportionment of the Shelton body-type components, endo-meso-ecto-) to use the GI Bill to develop my (most: sensation as opposite of intuition; second most: feeling as opposite of thinking) relatively underdeveloped psychological functions by taking courses in areas I normally would not venture into: art, music, dance. Now, making one of my paraphasia-type leaps (the connectivity is on the synoptic scale, not in step-by-step entailment: adequate reading of such leaps requires cultivated multiscale cognitive “inner separation” facilitated by a “carrying” [like of a mantra] of the awareness of part-whole relative-state identity-transparency, and my I/i^m do not know of any way to cultivate this “carrying” facility independent of practice at concentration in self-observation unto onset of memetime dilation and ponderablespace contraction): there were quite a few general-drift-type forecasts I [mad}e during the 1960s thru the 1970s. Somewhat strange are the cognitive states elicited by watching those forecasts play out these days in details I never imagined. Strange, in part, because I wasn't, back then, interested in what the details might be, and am not much interested even now in such details. Why? When it comes to human behavior, the Devil is in the details. Non-participation in those details, to the degree most practical given personal circumstances, has seemed to me the best individual path -- karmically speaking. For instance, except in directing part of my pay, whilst assigned to Viet Nam during the war there, into a mutual fund -- which I got rid of upon return to the ZI -- I've stayed away from stocks and bonds: ₁T₂-only-capital gains being amongst the Devil's details, given that what Homo sapiens sapiens has done and is doing to planet Earth and near abroad in large measure has been and is motivated by search for ₁T₂-only-codifiable growth, absence of the expectation of which is ₁T₂-systemically equivalent to absence of an ordering principle (even in planometric command economies -- the fundamental objective of the preference functions chosen being economic growth). Less is never more in bivalent-logic-governed systems (otherwise there would be violation of the Law of Non-Contradiction), even in fuzzy-logic-governed systems (violating the Law of Distributed Middle: “The heck with that violation!” say the 1%) which incorporate allowance of finely-graded modulations of more-is-the-most-best. Moreover, observing human behavior up close at multiple levels in a number of activity sectors during the Viet Nam war (the whole advisory effort was an exercise in the paraconsistencies of epicycle-type ad hoc hypotheses compensating the unanticipated for which no opplan contingency prescriptions were formulated, hypotheses marshalled in ad hoc committees [ad hoc to the preexistent bureaucracy under advisement, civilian and military] by binary-minds oversaturated with blackpsyche parapraxes and staving off logical explosives!) -- this on the back of exposure to the D.C. fecal swamp and a mil.brat childhood -- strongly encouraged me to always suppose (of humans in general, but particularly so of those identified with socially-conferred role attributions: most all of TPTB, that is) unconsciously-driven ₁T₂ly-irrational behaviors after-the-fact consciously ₁T₂ly-rationalized (as-unconscious-defense-mechanism, one of the many omnipresent in The Psychopathology of Everyday Life in War and Peace). And I subsequently came to believe that this condition of our condition characterizes the paradigm shifts involved in scientific revolutions, not only normative inner and outer behaviors of consensus scientists. It was in context of thoughts such as these, once I'd learned about the existence of trans-binary self-referential orders of logical-value, that I began having the strong lateral-thinking-associated sensation that looking out at stars in [side}real space I was simultaneously (think: topological nonorientability) looking into the collective-unconscious aspect of inner-GreatSpace, the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. This “sensation” was reinforced by awareness that Jung thought his notions as to the structure and dynamics of the collective unconscious formally correspond to, that is, conform to, principles of Einstein's General Relativity, and was reinforced again by first reading of Marie-Louise von Franz's 1974 Number and Time: Reflections Leading toward the Unification of Depth Psychology and Physics. Myself never having been in vacuo, I've not personally verified the speed of light in vacuo; what I do have in that regard is faith in the consensuated value of the speed of light in vacuo, a faith possibly by an increasingly mistaken trust, the horizon of which is shrinking. That speed, I imagine, has by now cascaded down from its status in the prevailing Weltanschauung to also being an element of the dominant Lebenswelt; and from there to also being a factor of introjection-to-Umwelt for some members of the population corpus. The same for speed of light as absolute limiting velocity: it by now surely has cascaded down to the Lebenswelt level, but further down to very few introjectors at the Umwelt level. Whereas, the notion scale-relative absolute limiting velocities cum accelerations cum time rates of change of acceleration has yet to achieve any Weltanschauung status whatsoever -- except, nowadays, perhaps, only to my me, which also acknowledges personal cascade of that notion down through the Lebenswelt level unto being a factor of the corpus of Umwelt introjections. I run through this as an illustration that loss of trust spread over expanse of the socius has profound pathogenetic etiological potency as regards origins of collective psychosis in sub-cognitive dissonance between “advancing” Weltanschauung and the metaphysical assumptions cultivated as principles justifying properties of the prevailing institutional base (embodied in Lebenswelt and introjected to Umwelts, particularly the Umwelts of those [per}sons identified with socially-conferred role attributions). Think of ponderablespace in terms of Georg Groddeck's 1923 Das Buch vom Es -- The Book of the It -- as mass-mind-projected Chemouni “illness space”: collapse thereof being indicative of inflammatory autoimmune disease of the collective unconscious mediated by constellation of regressed-archetypal event gradients. Currently, It is not manifesting simply as China rearising to reclaim all it lost and to rectify its era of humiliations; the West is going into occlusion-abeyance because its (think: autoimmunity) discoveries in higher mathematics-logic-physics belie fundamental assumptions held since Homeric-era Greece when identification with in-the-body experience (fixation upon musculature introjected to Umwelt) became normative, thus setting the stage for glutamatergic anchoring of self-other cum subject-object insistent ₁T₂-only-logic alone. But it's not so simple as that, for during roughly the same period as in the West there was in China a spiraling down to glutamatergic anchoring of YangYin TaiChi-rotational ₁T₂-only-logic alone, spaces higher than that ponderable being registered in the I-Ching, for instance, only in the “arrays” qua URrays, attributed to Higher Heaven. Not to mention animistic-pagan quantum-supersession of foundational precepts of the Tripartite Fertile-Crescent Religion: the tetrahedral Judaic mind, the cubitic Christian mind, the dodecahedral Islamic mind (the pre-pregeometry MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, popularized as the "Pure Land", being indicative of icosahedral “mind” undergoing E.T.Bellian cyclotomic decomposition via octahedral involutes; the C+-collections of pre-pre-pregeometry incenters of inspheres being the Wheelerian “bucket-of-dust” constituting Aurobindo's “warm-golden-dust-of-Supermind”). Critical-state (correlation length going to infinity) cultural occlusion-abeyance is widespread nowadays, if most acute in the West. By the collective-psyche's ConveDDed qua conversion-disorder-displaced analogical mimesis and with a little help from the Trickster archetype driven into regression -- not only due to institutional and leadership-elite failure -- the “trust horizon” is rapidly collapsing all the way back to the boundary of personal space embedded in ponderablespace, i.e., the “[mini}mum permissible distance” (think: thumb-sucking Linus Van Pelt's “that stupid blanket”) circumscribing the Umwelt, just as understanding of Husserl's notion of the multiple facets of the “object horizon” is escaping confinement to Analytical Cubism and expanding into the popular mind (human cognitive inertia is so great, it has taken over a century for this escape to be substantively initiated; whether it will actually be accomplished is another question, a question the answer to which is dependent upon whether de-dissimulation of ketaminergic out-of-the-body-experienced _µT_m-valued-logical “reality” is ever accomplished sufficiently by the community of logicians to allow initialization of popular-mind-affecting applications such as _µT_m-valued-LETS nesting-foams: a highly-unlikely possibility). Pushing back against dimensions of this ponderablespace collapse is expansion of “[mini}mum permissible distance” in personal space (not least by advent of dissimulated-quantum-based-techno “telepresence” and the like: telepresence in cyberspace equals distancing in social space embedded in ponderablespace, thanks be due to the Trickster archetype driven into regression) which itself has been conflated-identified with my-car space and my-house space (it's not just mere matters of conspicuous consumption and keeping up with the Joneses and self-images and Id-Ego pissing contests). On the collective level, that of mass mind qua popular culture, Weltanschauung collapse, subliminally registered, is met with by a demand for Lebensraum: since the secular Rabbinate has played such a determinative role in judicially institutionalizing the fundamental assumptions under existential threat by math-logic-physics discovery, the Zionist my-homeland-space “Next year in Jerusalem” has expanded to a Lebenswelt-level cohort-protocall for Lebensraum. When a [per}son identifies with a socially-conferred role attribution, hence, no longer is able to effectively distinguish self from cohort, hisher policyspeak is a mouth-piecing of collective-unconscious regressed-archetypal contents, not a verbalization of hisher binary-mind's apparently-autonomously-arisen contents. Archetypal imago, archetype-in-itself as mathematical relation-structure. Imago is what Jung spent much of his text essaying upon; about archetype-in-itself he had little say other than evincing a visualizing of the archetypes-in-themselves in the static terms suggested by “Platonic ideas-forms” as mathematically signified by the regular polyhedra, dynamics, it may be supposed, coming in via Ad Quadratum Construction (thanks be due to Jean Le Mée) and stellation of the polyhedra, perhaps also their higher-dimensional polytopes. The meaning here (and maybe even as regards the Form-in-Gothic notion of how the Divine Light shining through and accompanying multi-paralleled plainsong chanted through leaded glass illuminates-ensounds qua informs the “floorplan” of the incarnate world of ponderablespacememetime) of “To the square” would indicate “squared” as a stand-in for exponentiation as a stand-in for Higher (be it of trans-al-jabr, transfinite cardinalities, multivalued logics, pre-pre-pregeometry outerversal whatnots of Platonia). It was during my 1975 reading of MTW's mega-tome, Gravitation, that it occurred to me that, if Jung's ideas as to the archetypal structure and dynamics of the collective-unconscious (conscious contents gravitating upon event-gradients of the psyche) are categorically conformally-isometric (re: Riemann-surface-like Musculpt-manifold-enfolded symformphonie: the holistic, as in hole, enfoldment indicative of the m-valued algebraic functions-functionals-functors being _µT_mly “handled”-processed) cum homomorphic-homeomorphic to Einstein's General Relativity characterization of gravity in terms of spacetime-curvature configurations, then the Regge calculus is, perhaps, the most important mathematical means of “working out” these conformality-cum-identity-transparent algebraic-and-topological mappings, which may become fully codifiable only when Gödel numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers.

It's not only the “classical limit” that poofs-out -- instantaneously “evaporates” -- absent an objective, passing, passive, referential, linear-time-qua-thermodynamic arrow (each -- i.e., linear-time, the Second Law -- used to mutually define the other). At the limiting velocity, such dilating time has a stop, and contracting physical space in the direction of movement stops; at the limiting acceleration, physical space multiply-connects qua wormholes; at the limiting time rate of change of acceleration, physical space reenters itself and becomes non-orientable. Even under ₁T₂ly-formulated ((use of axioms presupposes “logical necessity” belied by _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logics; the rules of the presupposed entailment are ₁T₂ly conformational, hence indicating a thinking ₁T₂ly about m-valued logics, not _µT_mly in same; if-compaction is employed to collapse-normalize the m -- of even _µT_m, not only C+ and C -- to fuzzoids)) m-valued logics, e.g., under Lukasiewicz-Moisil algebras, the case is much more complex than that: see, for instance, “A Conceptual Construction of Complexity Levels Theory in Spacetime Categorical Ontology: Non-Abelian Algebraic Topology, Many-Valued Logics and Dynamic Systems”, Ronald Brown and James F. Glazebrook and Ion C. Baianu, Axiomatics, 7:3, April 2011, pp. 409-93 (some memetime ago full text of this paper was available online, as I have a copy, but no more -- so, so, so sorry, Mr. Moto). This notion of ontology is linear-time-bound in that the levels of complexity proposed are construed as emergent, local to global, even though Lukasiewicz-Moisil algebras are employed. The binary-mind's [cog}native duopoly is responsible for emergence as dysestablishment of Maya; and, lately, the memetime-bound ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements -- emergence being one such -- have awoken polymoreface purburst ethmockcrazy; whereas, it may be observed, Tantric-Schrödinger memetime-independent demergence-remergence is the foundational principle of antidysestablishmentarianism. Yet, this foundational principle -- de-re -- “whilst” -- heh-heh-heh -- memetime independent is “still” -- heh-heh-heh -- obviously ₁T₂-only-logic bound, “when” -- heh-heh-heh -- whole of the system can be, à la Post, construed in terms of “any one _µT_m”, a construing we cannot authentically accomplish, IMHO, absent holographic techno-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation. Under m-valued logics understood relative to relative-states of identity-transparency, however, we have demergent scale-relative absolute limiting values of dynamical variables and associated m-valued universal physical constants, such as Einstein's conversion factor, the absolute limiting velocity and its exponentiations. Given linear-time-as-memetime ((instants thereof being ₁T₂-only-definable as absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct; beginning in the womb, glutamatergically etched and anchored -- under orchestration delivered by prescriptive enculturation-socialization, and short-long-term-memory reinforced -- to bivalently-processing molecular-cellular brains, as distinct from the ketaminergic, nonlocalizable, _µT_m-processing, quantum brain)), Heraclitean motion qua change -- that's change, not chance -- if not altogether Parmenidean apocryphal, then a semiotic signifier (this semantics-demergently-precedes-grammar notion being one take -- a non-orientably-looped inner-outerversal-<<<>>>cut-3-fold-temporal-CURL-paste<<<>>>-intraversal-inner Musculpt symformphonie take -- on Rovelli's understanding of loop quantum gravity, wherein “the physical world can be timeless yet ever-changing”), such motionchange not “being” Prigoginean “becoming”, not being physical-given in the classical Copernican-Newtonian-cum-Rutherford-Bohr sense of planettes going around a sun, of electtrons energy-level-circling a pro-neu-nucleus, but being topologically-active-operator-time-induced ontological “becoming” where within physicality is cyclotomic-end-stage demergent-decompositional involute (this I-am-me-and-only-me I-am-here-in-its-body is nothing, nothing but the form-informing-qua-shape-endowing topo-active-optime-established “intersection” of Purusha-in-cascade and Prakriti-in-reverse-cascade, a cosmo-encapsulation popularized by Alan Watts as hide[cascade]-and-seek[reverse cascade] in Godly terms: my Iambe an ephemera here memetoday and gone memetomorrow, yet never act[u}ally gone for never act[u}ally here, there being no here not also there, no now not also then -- all the “way” to, as my I/i^m suppose[s], states order-typed _C+T_C+). Cascade: That art thou; reverse-cascade: thou art That. Bivalently speaking in TaiChi-rotational-₁T₂-only-logic terms: pure, unsullied, universal consciousness in yangactive aspect is the set of all topological operators on GreatSpace; pure, unsullied, universal consciousness in yinpassive aspect is the GreatSpace acted upon. In General Relativity terms, matter is nothing-given-shape. What gives? Topo-active optime! Schrödinger's cat, with m-valued statefunction, is, more accurately, a lion, a lion whose entailment comes with a big fat dark hairy tuft at the end, a tough tuft indicative of the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+-logics-in-denial, and, when stepped upon, excites expectoration, ₁T₂ly speaking, of a logically-explosive roar. Yet, this explication is really, really simple-minded. And it's not just a matter of the whole being more than the sum of its parts. Note that the first two sentences of R.R. Cuzinatto's and C.A.M. de Melo's and C. Naldoni de Souza's “Introduction to Regge Calculus for Gravitation”, arXiv, 1 April 2019, state that:

Since the ancient Greeks, the method of decomposing a complicated problem in simpler parts is one of the fundamental pillars of science development. Indeed, it is possible to consider this abstraction as one of the techniques of logical thought since it permeates natural science including mathematics.

They go on to observe that, “…it took almost 2,500 years for this proposal being coherently implemented by Quantum Mechanics.” Yet, in general hologrammics, a ₁T₂ly-dissimulated-quantum-based technology, if not the “holographic principle” of astrophysics relative to the absolute-limiting-acceleration-induced blackhole-event-horizon boundary, the part, any and every part, contains the whole; just like is found to be the case in transfinite set theory where, indeed, a single given part can contain more than the whole: break the hologram plate and project through a piece, any of the broken pieces, and what is gotten is the whole holographic image, if a bit fuzzy due to ₁T₂ instead of _µT_m processing. By virtue of the relative-state of part and whole, ₁T₂-only brains construct the virtual-reality of whole objects, their Maya, from visualization of a part thereof. One Husserl-facet of the object, one POV, point-of-view, is all such brains require, and this moment-to-moment waking (even in REM-dreaming sleep) VR-construction iterated on and on and on largely carried by residual tension patterns of the small extraocular muscles (this can be verified via practice of progressive and differential relaxation, as Edmund Jacobson electromyographically documented) keeps egoic-consciousness in-the-body bound; indeed, muscle-bound, as Greek and Roman sculpture so lavishly illustrate. It doesn't take exogenously introduced ketamine or a stopped heart to get out of the body. Cognitive certainty of imminent death (e.g., falling through the ice and can't find a way out; token American amongst escort troops night-barging down a Mekong-delta canal and suddenly coming under intense fire from both sides, and can't break out of the ambush kill zone by rushing at and blowing a hole through the wall of attackers), however mistaken, is enough. Endogenous ketamine flood -- meditatively induced, combat induced -- can do it. In long-practiced walking meditation, for instance, the achieved highly-developed space-articulation sensitivity can facilitate induction of a brief OBE-flashover simply occasioned by going down steps into a high-ceiling room (think: Aurobindo's “opening upward”, a term frequently used in his encyclopedic raw-silk-bound Collected Works, e.g., word search here). Transit triggers are myriad, and largely symbolic. The ₁T₂-obsessed dot-mil mindset, exemplified in the numbered-outline style-“[guide}lines”-enforced in[SIS}tense -- you WILL… whatever -- is belied not only by intel-factoids-requisitions-in-service to facts-ignoring prefabricated policies frequently formulated psychopathically, e.g., forced by mechanisms like projective-identification, ConveDDing, regression-in-service to the collective ego, but also belied by the easily ontically-verified fact that the bivalent-logic-entailment-analogically-modeled chain-of-command, while maintaining integrity in ₁T₂-only-computer simulations and physical exercises of the peacetime military, does not at all conform to realities of the real-memetime battlefield, filled as it is with fat tails (be they ₁T₂ly understood in the terms of chaos theory or by insight gained via attempts to employ _µT_m-valued logics: 9 out of 10 of these lessons could easily have been learned by the late-1960s, had PCR-emphasized insouciance not been so thoroughly the case). Consider the findings detailed in “From Blindness To 360-Degree-Vision: What 4,000 Near-Death Cases Bring To Light”, Yuhong Dong, ZeroHedge, 22 October 2024. In certain circumstances of “high-combat” occasioning the tightly-bonded expert cohort, e.g., an SF half-team -- I learned by unsolicited and uncoached testimonial, not from my own direct experience -- OBEed, not only 360-degree-vision, but a seeing of what another member of the cohort can see but you can't, become momentarily available. In my conceptual terms, and relative to Husserliana, being OBE-located above, say, the operating table, is a ₁T₂-logic-cum-Luneburg-psychometric-distance-function residual carried into the OBE; whereas, the 360-degree-vision is _µT_mly-unto-approaching-_CT_C+ly OBEed -- that is, OBEed fully enough as to see-cum-_µT_mly-unto-approaching-_CT_C+ly-process simultaneously the full infinite collection of Husserlian facets of the object's Husserlian horizon. Painterly Analytical Cubism managed to depict only a small number of simultaneously-viewed facets, and this done, we may speculate, largely without awareness that each facet-POV-part, by hologrammic _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+-relative-state identity-transparency, contains the whole object. However, 360-degree-vision whilst ₁T₂ly localized above, say, an operating table, only largely sees the “whole” of, say, the self lying on the OR table, as construed by the VR-constructing binary-mind, not as would be seen, à la Post, as construed in terms of “any one _µT_m” -- let alone, à la Platonic forms, _CT_C+ly-unto-_C+T_C+ly. Indeed, as Yuhong Dong concludes: “We are not just constrained operating machines but lives with numerous possibilities beyond our current recognition.” And if that is so, and nowadays being subliminally registered by the popular mind -- even by the “if-then” entailment of bivalent logic -- then the current global-crisis conundrum, and plausible-possible-predicted chaos following the upcoming U.S. presidential election, cannot simply be due to the fact that “The Neo-Liberal Consensus Is Coming Apart”, an essay good offices of the Brownstone Institute's Jeffrey Tucker, circa 22 October 2024.

Briefly venturing into domains I generally don't expostulate publicly upon ((arg![u}mentation, with those stone-winnick crazy, recognized as exemplifying a “don't mean nothin'” activity, this recognition being one of the lessons my I/i^m took away from my mil.brat childhood, AU-SIS-facilitated exposure to D.C.-muck-a-mucks, and Viet-Nam-war experience; another VN-war takeaway being the should-have-been-obvious-to-any-intelligent-participant-in-the-war aware of the Brass-plus-Civil-Leadership-Elite's Dolchstoss im Rucken stab-in-the-back-myth take on impact of the anti-war movement, particularly as that take was largely mistaken as regards strategic impact, and, thus, mostly a mere defense-mechanism rationalization psychopathically hyper-affect-charged, that the whole litany of counterinsurgent MOs employed during the war would be brought home, developed, and deployed in the ZI, zone of the interior, against the civil population, the most potent subverter of leadership-elite-formulated policies)), fifty-years later, laughter can be the only insightful authentic response to the likes of this and this from PCR. Fixation upon cognitive-cultural rubbish is a deplorable, potentially cusp-catastrophic, mass identification state: according to the principles elaborated in Rubbish Theory (note that the book author's mode of thought is sculptural, if not Musculptural, and that the book reviewer wants an enchained ₁T₂ly-tight-entailment-type account, not one “associational”, the latter prefiguring employment of _µT_m-Musculpt function-functional-functor correspondences, recognition of these amongst the identity-transparent reducing verbalization-need; indeed, decision-need), simple-identity theft cum identity-concatenation, and, for instance, say, free-speech, have long-since become “rubbish” in Michael Thompson's definition, and that is the reason why they, the various classes of cognitive-cultural rubbish, are popularly obsessed over by those captured by, in syzygy with, the involved constellated regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious. Yesterday's amendment. This, this, when for those few living ideationally in contemporary circumstances -- not cognitively arrested and linear-time localized to the mid-1960s free-speech-movement era -- focus of attention is put upon freedom of thought (FoT) and integrity of memory store (IoMS). So, we have freedom-of-speech advocates overseeing development of the technologies that will make FoT and IoMS impossible: e.g., the CBI, computer-brain interface (eventually accomplished without the need for a hardware implant). Analogously, we have those maintaining that the Neocons want nuclear war, which these cons apparently believe they can win, saying Putin should have early-on used shock-and-awe on Ukraine so as to have prevented developments leading to nuclear war -- when a Putin S&A may have been exactly what the Neocons wanted in order to justify initialization of their desired nuclear war. Same kind of “analogously” -- obviously -- with the question of abortion. Yesterday's issue, given the technologies being developed in the fields of genetic enginerring (under the misassumption that DNA's quantum-wave properties fulfill no biological function) and [pro}creation (e.g., artificial wombs). Clearly, beginning in the artificial womb, the CBI will be employed to fine-tune glutamate etching of neuronal plasticity in the genetically-engineered fetus-child, so as to implement total control over prescriptive enculturation-socialization, and contents of (largely implanted) memory store. My I/i^m isare not against technology, only against the Doctrine of Uses (as regards Swedenborg's DoU, I note that I am FORBIDDEN access) which the techno-ConveDDs (conversion-disorder displacements) are being subjected to. Aged eight, fall 1953, sitting-in on my mother's Ikebana lessons, Midori Gaoka, Ashiya-cho, kita-Kyushu, I was flummoxed upon recognition that Japanese flower arrangements look like nature, while the Western ones my mother formerly made looked artificial. A year or two later, I was altogether stunned upon learning that the Ikebana arrangements are modular and largely prefabricated (the materials can be, I overheard, ordered by telephone from the florist, by giving just the Ikebana school, the type of arrangement, the materials chosen: the prescribed branches will arrive properly cut). Yet each arrangement is unique and executed with spontaneity! This childhood experience undoubtedly strongly levered my adult attitude toward technology (though it took me years to figure that out). And, with much nature-mesmerized sitting under the sacred pine in the middle of Midori Gaoka rice paddies, strongly levered my eventual adult attitude toward the modern world in general. One learns to wait calmly, move quietly -- whilst slipping past the base guard mount into the off-limits caves tucked amongst the cliff-face edging the flattened-out expanse of flightline, Ashiya, AFB, circa 1954 (from which the flying boxcars lifted in Japan embarkation to resupply Dien Bien Phu); off from the summer job of building log cabins for the USAF campgrounds a couple of miles east of the ALCAN north of Ft. Greely, Alaska, off in the hide, hoping to see the huge old moose come down to feed on the lily pads of Birch Lake, circa summer 1960; tracking caribou way out the Denali Highway sweep of tundra, only to dry fire, no ammo in the rifle, circa 1961; spying undetected upon the brown bears scavenging the dump, Eielson, AFB, circa 1962; listening to Paul Connell describe his methods of research upon wolf-pack behaviors, research conducted for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, circa 1962 -- practice at patiently cooling it, biding memetime watching for what may or may not ever happen, and this practice can evolve into a talent life-long cultivated. No Iambe for banging back a green-bomb handful, my I/i^m transmogrified this waiting-watching-quietus, the psychological contents and nondenumerable nitty-gritty learned in sports practicing and during SF training and whilst intel analyzing, into principia of meditative activities and intellectual pursuits: no letup -- that perseverance at being self-devised-mission bound, expressly because based upon allegiance to mixed metaphors (intimating identity-transparency) and ₁T₂ly-logical non sequiturs, yields, well, comes to pass, one way of increasing and sustaining quality of state, even if that quality be not authentically _µT_mly articulated.

Ms. Civility's rules have become Madamn Incivility's habitus, as all can clearly see -- even as it could have been expected that publication of Amor Towles' 2016 A Gentleman in Moscow, having become a New York Times bestseller, would have, indeed, should have, at least somewhat dampened the well-voiced Neocon hysteria two years earlier put into concrete action (much too late for that, the TV mini-series). Quoting the She/f Reflection review written by Brittany Shields:

The unique thing about this book is that there is no driving plot… The question at play is: How does a man find purpose in such a predicament?

The protagonist is sentenced to house arrest in the Metropol Hotel, which he long “endures”. To my me, the higher-order analogue of the Metropol Hotel is, not so much the Cube ((powers of primes standing-in for the “Number the numbering!” Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering the ensheaved, Riemann-surface-like, Regge-latticed nesting-foams of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, ontically intimated in phosphenic bright-light states [good offices of Philip T. Nicholson, Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine, 7:2, 1996: fascinating paper with long list of references], e.g., those occasionally quantum-brain presented during the “autogenic abreactions” forthcoming during practice of AT, Autogenic Training: cf. “long-practiced”, as Nicholson repeatedly emphasizes, remaining “passive and ready to acquiesce” to the “efficiency of dissociation” -- that's in Wolfgang Luthe's terminology, “giving carte blanche to the brain”, in my terms, to the _µT_m-relative-states processed by the quantum brain -- eliciting the described “receding annuli” of reversed-telescoping interior-distance wherein the mistakenly claimed absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct selfhood is drawn through the annuli, and eigengrau, and tinnitus cerebri being early precursors in initialization of the presentation of presumably-_µT_m inner-Musculpt symformphonie)), as confinement to just simply ₁T₂-only-logic alone. Plot is logical entailment, and noh, uh, no-plot is escape from logical necessity, which is bivalent-logic-bound, a boundedness which prevents Platonic anamnesis, the discovery of anxiolytic higher purposes than… The Gentleman protagonist escapes the Metropole [en}duration qua [end}oration from the moment he is therein confined. Rhetorical questions aside -- of what possible use are they? -- rhetorical statements forthwith, sir! Given the circumstances, they, such statements, are dim[and}did -- ought[her}wise, man-to-man, there will be… a de[man}ding-a-ling. Bivalent logic has been an irremediable, constellated regression for 2,500 memeyears, and some non-logicians think that it's about memetime that that condition, given the involved malignancy, needs a review-committee decision in favor of EU[than}i|zing. Never really a writer, as couldn't get much into writing assignments and style guidelines, my I/i^m disciplines itself to get through thrillers and action movies by searching for, scoping out, the blackpsyche MOs employed and the memes that reveal the informing subterraneans indicative of operative regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious gradients orchestrating… Ack, aye, 'e's a simpering calumny, 'e is, isn't 'e, that lot, exponential-m for mates, at risk of im-meme-minute ear-rat[i}on|al exhubris. Heh-heh-heh! While to become rich is surely glorious, never could understand how the choice could be made to endure subjugation to the span of attention cathexes to such content and style as is required in order so to become. As regards art fiction, my exponential-m prefer content to be style, rather than style as the content -- if the two can't be brought into identity-transparent equipotential covariance. Socialist realism, of course, never appealed -- as it altogether shunted aside the obligation, amongst other obligations, of art fiction, no less than art music, to analogically model the changing Weltanschauung, such modeling being the most REAL way to fulfill the all-but-inescapable fund[a}mental needs of an easily-assailable qua highly-vulnerable socius, e.g., reestablishing consonance between altering Weltanschauung principles, Lebenswelt prescripts, Umwelt introjects, and the metaphysical ABCs justifying the prevailing institutional base.

Under Einstein's 1915 General Relativity (GR), gravitation is the spacetime-curvature quantified by the 1861 Riemann tensor (wherein the contravariant upper index indicating the time dimension is lowered by means of the metric tensor, i.e., handled as covariant to the spatial coordinates): note that jelling-memetime (especially when lowered?) can be stretched out, 1861 to 1915. If gravity is in the spacetime-curvature, what is the spacetime-curvature in? Quoting R.R. Cuzinatto's and C.A.M. de Melo's and C. Naldoni de Souza's (C-M-S's) “Introduction to Regge Calculus for Gravitation”, arXiv, 1 April 2019, as regards Tulio Regge's 1961 discretized-GR orientation to that question:

…the higher the number of simplexes N [the polyhedrons latticing the spacetime manifold, and “By the way N is the product of the density of bones [[articulated polyhedron edges touching each other]] in the joint…” establishing the Regge-lattice vertex] associated to the vertex p [p relative to the bundle forming the joint] the more significant the curvature [the stronger the gravity] and the higher the angular displacement of [the vector] A.

Our answer (not just our orientation) is: the _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency cyclotomically REduced by 3-fold temporal CURL (cyclotomically-demergent decomposition involute 3rd-order to 2nd to 1st to 2nd to 3rd: this cascade/reverse-cascade ordering being a ₁T₂-apocrypha of m-valued, memetime-independent, nonorientable what[not/some}what) quantified in the “apokritical interval” (see section “9: Multivaluedness, Self-reentry, Non-Orientability, and Hyparxis”, of our 1977 “General Process” paper: apokrisis, following on J. G. Bennett, circa 1956, is the capability of a structure to maintain its own identity under the influence of multiplicity; the apokritical interval is a measure of the state of that capability geometrically-qua-symbolically represented by degree of skewness) summed over the “bone”-density of “skew-parallels” composing the bundle constituting a given null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian-cum-Postian-Lukasiewiczian m-logically-valued (as regards quantum-gravity, think: Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction) “pencil of skew-parallels” forming a “bone”-joint of edges to a Regge-calculus-type vertex, m (m relative to the manifold), the collection, M, of such, covering the hypercomplex (think: 3-fold temporal CURL) Musculpt manifold. Quoting the Introduction section to C-M-S:

…Regge uses the [₁T₂-only-logical] method… where some geometrical quantities of the theory assume complex values… [the following is given in the attached footnote] In terms of coordinates, this is equivalent to an “imaginary time” x⁴ = ict.

In our case (see section “7: Topological Connectivity and the Cascade Concept”), c becomes multiple and also multiple c' and multiple c'' (think: reverse-cascade). The imaginary-qua-complex i becomes topologically-active operator-time's 3-fold temporal CURL; chronotopologically speaking, complexity plus two levels of hypercomplexity. And t, treated as the 4th power of x, is understood as signifying glutamate-anchored memetime; while x⁴ is understood as signifying glutamate-anchored ponderablespacetime, where within vector displacement @ curvatured-transport is the reduced, ₁T₂-normalized, archetypal imago of the _µT_m-composite as colorized-qua-chromodynamic Musculpt symformphonie archetype-in-itself motive. As in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, with respect to Penrose-twistor-quantized temporal CURL: the “color of time”; quasi-Stockhausen “chromodynamics of the instant”. Further quoting C-M-S, one of their parenthetical remarks:

(The component of [rotated vector] A along the perpendicular direction to the bundle does not generate contributions to… [the rotation-angle vector, arrow-capped sigma]).

In our terms, the sum, sigma, of contributions to the bundled “pencil of skew-parallels” along the perpendicular direction, is actually indicative of the _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly-logical-skew-perpendicularity (see section “10: General Process” of our above-linked paper) which we imagine as subtending, not only the Heisenberg uncertainty inequalities, but also Riemann's notion as to the origin of charge as “lines of force trapped in the topology of space” -- these “lines”, however, being understood by us in the terms of Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logical propositions demergently exe. by ops of 3-fold topo-active optime. The C-M-S-provided description of the coordinate-manipulation-formation (think: cf. 1st-order temporal CURL, à la a roll cloud before the 90-degree tilt at tornadogenesis and vis-à-vis the emitted coherent quantum-quadripolar-encoded-wave properties of the helix-coiling DNA molecule generated during radiation-induced pi-electron-parcel-gas temperature oscillations) of a *dual, as appearance of a physical object in the empty-curved spacetime manifold (think: matter as nothing-given-shape) seems to me a ₁T₂-only memetime-bound condensation-tilt of the cyclotomic decomposition-demergence cascade-dynamics-tilt by which a tornado-physical-object appearance transpires-manifests-localizes. This C-M-S-provided description in discretized terms, however, while Musculpturally evocative, as regards my primary interest, still does not shed much light upon how geometrodynamic symformphonie universal grammar (demerged to symmetrical-nonsymmetrical distributions of matter-as-nothing-given-shape) is demerged by topo-active optime from the pre-pregeometry (_C+T_C+ Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered “bucket of dust” of hyperposed Regge vertex joint-points universally covering C+-bridged-multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, of the Musculpt manifold) and pregeometry (_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m propositions mapped over superposed Regge-lattice simplexes numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers) domains. This is a problem only AI can solve? No. Nonesuch available even to 2-state qubitic quantum computers. Only by the C+-state [mu}itic quantum (Lukasiewiczian-analog?) computation which nature qua nature has memetime-independently “all along” employed.

So much of what we surface-structure think we think is epiphenomenal to identification with the real-simple-minded Bucky-balled sensory ego-sphere (good offices of Katherine Achim Fleming and Richard Alan Peters II and Robert E. Bodenheimer, Vanderbilt University, 2006), SES, sitting upon the horizontally en[plane}ed, lateral-mental-cleavaged, Cartesian-coordinated I-think-therefore-I-am ego-self axis, in lieu of the complexity, not to mention levels of hypercomplexity, of the deep-structure-form-informing Riemann-sphere. Whilst considering “Projection of an object onto the SES”, contemplate how matter-objects are introjected to spacetime manifold in the ₁T₂ly-discretized General Relativity of the Regge calculus. If the Self signifies the archetypal imago of the Whole, what is the archetype-in-itself of the whole holistic-holographic Whole? The MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space? We have ₁T₂-individuation diffeomorphisms going to the _µT_m-valued homomorphisms of al-jabr going to the _CT_C+-valued homeomorphisms of topological spaces. In a small unit infused with bonding values by good offices of Maypoling MerryJane (look at continuity of how the composition of functions geometrically mapped over the unit circle is no matter of orthogonals but of acute skews), it may happen that one amongst the unit socius trucks off to the john-- and the feeling-space (which interpenetrates ponderable space) cavitates, like a continent had dropped off the globe. This acute collective le debaisement sense of l'extermination being an alert-type intimation-by-sudden-absence of the _µT_mly-identity-transparent social “dimension” of animistic-pagan “participation mystique”. It may so happen that, in a group groping for hyperreal reality on LSD, that one member of the corpus resolutely refuses, saying, “Get up? No, I simply can't do that. I have a cosmic responsibility to continue sitting here holding down the floor!” Hah-hah-hah. Hmmm. What could that centripetal-force SES-inversion, delivered to conscious binary-mind via empathic feeling-space implosion, possibly intimate subtle awareness of? Existence of counterspace negative geometries of the cosmic scale-relativity-enformed nesting-foam? Factorially speaking, the retrograde-inverses of vectors, _ijkA^lmn, in kick-ass psychodrama! The energy-momentum tensor-enfold is divergence-free under all states _µT_m? Or just under the ₁T₂-only state? Div _uT^uv = 0, ₁T₂; whereas, as _C+T_C+ shifts to _CT_C+ and _CT_C+ shifts to _µT_m and _µT_m shifts to ₁T₂, topologically-active operator-time, at each logical-value-order-type-class transition, invokes -- in involutory demergence via decomposition cum energy-momentum cascade -- 3-fold temporal CURL (and associated dys[man}tell|ment of levels of hypercomplexity-complexity). More hmmms hummed around the unit circle. Ack, aye. My me, too. I was, similarly, thinking how much I'd like, uh, uh, that is, how much Id-like egofunction-perpetrated enforcement of renormalization (the quantum of loop-quantum-gravity remaining probability-dissimulated, not Posted with all-every of “any one _µT_m”) makes stress-energy tension look like being torsioned by Riemannian affect-charge: _µT_m-en as if ₁T₂-or.

c: conversion factor between matter and energy
c': conversion factor between space and time
c'': conversion factor between spacetime and MVRS

We -- well, at least those who were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- know that the magnitude of E in c equals plus or minus the square-root of E over m is pretty big; so, what of the magnitude of E' and E'' relative to c' and c''? Oops! this is only the ₁T₂-only [comp}re|hension blabbered along Radio Catinat by physics gossipmongers. No thought given to the notion that, in the ₁T₂-only cases, E and E' and E'', are unnatural, by iatrogenic intervention lifted out of nature's relative-state identity-transparency contextualization: the scale-relative Cantorian-fractal nesting-foam. Desolutory. Oh my, certainly not just desultory -- no matter how much they might Pira…, uh, PIROuette “It Is So! (If You Think So.)” Ano ne, jus'solutory, hai? Ah, so-so-so. Looking at the SES, the real version of the imaginarily complexified Regge lattice universally covering of the Riemann sphere, it's easy to see why ((quoting mvp, 10 March 2014, answering the question, “Why would spacetime curvature cause gravity?” [viewed 55k Newtonian times, not Einsteinian timespaces: such a high number of viewings, intel-analyst traffic-analysis mindset suggesting widespread continued perplexity more than a century on from the 1915 point-instance of origin]: flyballs all over the park from the experts as to the exact relationship of geometrodynamic curvature and gravity, for if gravity is simply curvature why then, even if no longer a gravitational force, WHY a gravitational field, gravity waves, geons, acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes, so on, uh, say gravitational potential?)) “Spacetime in gravitation field is curved, so the time axis (in simple terms) is no longer orthogonal to the space axes.” Since imaginary is portrayed-normed-closured as being perpendicular to real (convenient to the imagination's visualization), that, nonetheless, may mean there is a “continuum hypothesis” (even a _C+T_C+ hypothesis?) to be made relative to all the acutes-qua-skews visualizable between the reals and the imaginaries -- if the non-normed non-closured non-orthogonality is to be quantitatively imagined. With, say, Charles Muses' hypernumbers? See Muses' “Hypernumbers and time operators”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 12:2-3, May 1983, pp. 139-67. Just contemplate the myriads of Platonic polyhedra with dihedral angles no greater that 90-degrees. And the myriad shadows they cast upon the MVRS universal covering surface. Or is it that the involved twistorized tilt is subject to _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics, not only to that ₁T₂? Whoa. That many kinds of number systems between the reals and the imaginaries? Just think what that would do to the Weltanschauung! And if temporal CURL is Penrose-twistor quantized. Well… N. I. Lobachevsky, primarily, circa 1829, in the wake of N. H. Abel, circa 1823, is to blame for all this -- having taken the Fifth into question. Parallelement, humph! How hyperbolic is the logic of that? Quite eccentric, I'd say. Well, not elliptic, it must be said. O, those eccentricities! Sectioning the Dunce's cone. But then there are null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “skew-parallels” -- in pencils, even -- to draw out the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics. Yet, given only ₁T₂-spacetime curvature alone, still, the case is not so simple as it at first seems to binary-minds affectively, if no longer intellectually, clinging to the old axioms-postulates differentiating (passive) time from (passive) space. Oh, lordy. Time becoming space, space becoming time: whew! And c' being the conversion factor. Again quoting mvp:

The “velocity” through spacetime is called a four-velocity and it is always equal to the speed of light… The apple moving first only in the time direction (i.e. at rest in space) starts accelerating in space thanks to the curvature (the “mixing” of the space and time axes) -- the velocity in time becomes velocity in space. The acceleration happens because the time flows slower when the gravitational potential is decreasing. Apple is moving deeper into the gravitational field, thus its velocity in the “time direction” is changing (as time gets slower and slower). The four-velocity is conserved (always equal to the speed of light), so the object must accelerate in space. This acceleration has the direction of decreasing gravitational gradient.

So, we have J. A. Wheeler's “Matter tells spacetime how to curve; spacetime tells matter how to move” -- note that Viktor T. Toth's flyball retains the notion “field” in rephrasing Wheeler, to wit: “Matter tells the metric (aka. the gravitational field) how to curve…”. However, in the shift to _µT_m, to _CT_C+, to _C+T_C+, try to keep engaged with passive, passing, referential time regarded objective, not memed, be it a dimension of ponderablespacetime or no. So, so, so sorry: just can't do it. Enter stage left and right non-orientable 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, executing the propositions encoded by the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering the Regge lattices covering scale-relative, sans a classical limit, LSTDs, laminated and tessellated limited spacetime domains, i.e., what is left behind once MVRS pre-pregeometry decomposes to pregeometry decomposes to geometrodynamics decomposes to ₁T₂-only spacetime physics.

The _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency can, IMHO, be usefully imagined as corresponding to -- vis-à-vis the real[m}s of interior distance as state-places -- conditions of separation from sensory ego-sphere SES-identification with ontic presence to ₁T₂-only-corporeal existence, i.e., “my body”, “your body”, discrete physical objects, the glutamate-anchored collective projective-identification known as “consensus reality”. Places have “faces”, y'see, i.e., infrasound signatures -- as any locally-homing pigeon well knows. From POV of ₁T₂, i.e., statefunction of the egofunction, that is the “normal state of consciousness”, the prime numbers used to number the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers Gödel-numbering pregeometry propositions invoking-defining Regge-lattice-polytope-simplex geometrodynamic LSTD (limited spacetime domain) post-cursors under cyclotomic [re}volutory-[re}composition (of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space) reverse-cascade executed by 3-fold topologically-active counter-operator-time (optime's temporal CURLs: thrice-tolled fat-taled clockers manipulating the nesting-nested spin-foam), are more and more scarce as corporeal presence becomes more and more ketaminergically insubstantial (automatized glutamate anchoring being, gluck-gluck-gluck, nest-by-nest deautomatized over “hexagonal” cortical-substructure simplexes). From POV of cyclotomic _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-involutory decomposition (no Nietzschean eternal return for being Schrödinger-memetime-independent, an exclusion whereby static Parmenides _C+T_C+ly contains “All And Everything” decomposed as ₁T₂-Heraclitian dynamism; the 3-fold temporal CURL of topo-active optime arguably being a memetime-independent supra-, not super-, Hegelianism), hypered hyper-real primes (choosable from all those constituting hypered-hypercomplex domains) become less and less scarce as the simply-real primes of simple-₁T₂-only-Gödel-numbered propositions are more and more closely approached as presence of insubstantiality decomposes into identification with concretion of corporeal LSTDed ponderablespacememetime. What does this have to do with anything here and now? Aside from deep-structural cause-pushes/attractor-pulls upon surface-structures, the functional prerequisites and “framework determining conditions” need to be factored-in to capability-cum-power analytics and operational assessments. There have been many comparisons made of Wokesterism to the Chinese Cultural Revolution -- the Wokester being against principles of the Constitution; the Red Guards, against “the Olds” (little mention being made of Mao's attack on the “deep state” in the form of the entrenched, corrupt party-infrastructure apparatniks). I have yet to see a comparison between the failed attempts to drain the Washington-consensuated swamp and the colossal and successful year-plus-“long” countrywide subsystemic-systemic-supersystemic (got that, local to synoptic?) reorganization undertaken by the VCI (Viet Cong [political] Infrastructure) in preparation for initialization of the 1968 Tet offensive (this awe-inspiring far-from-equilibrium organizational phase transition being ignored, indeed altogether denied, by our lessons-learned on-strategy globaloney hotshots: concealed in the blackpsyche fog numinously expectorated in course of the Westmoreland-vs-CBS phantasmagoria). Successful and omni-transforming largely due to low-tech mostly-tacit (a cultural-lag subliminal-carryover from animistic-peasant modes of comprehension qua states of “participation mystique”) application of the “holographic principle”, wherein internal-system states qua bureaucratic-infrastructure variables mapped upon boundary conditions autopoietically and self-organizationally undergo “autogenic shifts” in response to dictated geographic LSTD-boundary changes (the ensuing infrastructure dynamics being analogically correspondent to Regge-lattice geometrodynamics). Compare that to appointments prefiguring extensions of same ol' same ol' with regard to foreign-policy-induced behaviors (the psychological projection is a mighty powerful device: nothing scares people more than what regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious event-gradients dictate they not understand about themselves); domestically, potential agents of substantive change plausibly-deniably shunted off into ad hoc commissions-bureaus and ritualized daily-brief taskings (were it me, I'd do away with the daily brief by a once- or twice- or thrice-removed briefer, receive a printout wherein attached to each item is the name and secure, direct, unmonitored contact info for the person most substantially responsible for content of each item, in case I had questions) plus approximations to IG functions where all are appraised of the inspections before they occur. More power to RFK, Jr., if his appointment to HHS is confirmed, if confirmation is not sidestepped, though it is hard to see how the American collectivization of agriculture (the USA-soviets qua communes being composed of shareholders in agro-industrial combines) could be overturned absent advent of _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams (this from one whose family lost their family-farm-tenancy status during the Great Depression). Hope for a mere exercise of eminent domain is rather a diminution of the case, wouldn't you say? Oh, well, don't mean nothin', eh. Kong sao ca. De rien. Mai pen rai. Prob'ly should look at Big Mac's land-reform MO in post-WWII Japan for inspiration. Heh-heh-heh. And, let it be noted that Mojmir Babacek has observed that free-speech advocate 'E. Must, uh, Elan that is, is developing technologies potentially capable of ending freedom of thought, i.e., a 20,000-strong regiment of satellites and CBIing [neural}inc (but also be aware that M.B. did not cite our 1979 paper on DNA-pi-electron-parcel-gas-mediated radiation-exchange processes, including the gases of intraneuronal and intraperineural DNA, or our 1981-WolfgangLuthe-requested elaborating Illustrated Terminology Glossary, both continuously linked online for nearly a quarter century). Ack, aye, so very much is epiphenomenal to harrying of horse-traders hee-hawing the donkeys kicking back beneath the I[on}ick capitals retrogressively delineating the binary-mind-plowed harrows of a capitol late-afternoon! Vector of which, factorially speaking, full-fledged A reduced to the kth-component, _kA^m/n; m/n indicating myte/null. Heh-heh-heh into factorials! The politician's pappo-free, limoed prerogs: gawd, after squatting on CIA-overlooking Potomac Palisades nigh unto upper-Foxhall and Spring Valley, living-in on Q Street in Georgetown, three years working one block away from Rodeo Drive whilst living at the intersection of Santa Monica and Brentwood and West LA, I can easily distinguish the pols' prerogatives from those celebrified. Nurturance from a group of schmoozes? Absotively! Ain't no blogging on the Buzzosphere, this, ol' buddy. The Kino-Pravda-emulating docufictional MSM's hidden-behinds of cinéma politique vérité!

Chivvying politico jocksandapes constantly
harrying the “laggards” with their globaloney.

All assinduty at per|for[man}cy of mem[or/and}a,
putting a spanker sail on the croak
of their bivalent 4-masted bark.

Aye, aye: belay there thee ladies, thou lords;
their animuses, their animas! Costive is costly:
constipated -- in a manner of speaking.

Socksonapes, those skating lapses over orlop deck
just beneath waterline of the swamp?

Impresarios of the bight-elastique.

Each and every striving for stations aft-fore Topgallant
and mains Topmost, they are, aren't they --
and to the devil belongs the Untermenschen,
their toil, their troubles and grumbles.

_pi{qua}ⁿc_y-cap added to the polity.

Sales would'st be exe.c.rable studdingmales,
uh, uh, sails, what!

O, how very, very [qu}ain't be their too-state qubits:
going to, at the extreme least, tangle the backchannel
mizzen and larboard ratlines of the deeply enstated ship,
USS USG.

Belief in which cultivated by the lying-legacy agit-prop troopers of the MSM and de[part}mental-agency public-affairs-qua-information officers (not to mention the PIOs constituting JUSPAO and the troopers of Psyops Group, JFKSWCS). Elements of my Joe Blow biography. I was a secretly-disgruntled vet by aged 12, having: viewed the arrogance on display within FLW's Imperial Hotel, Tokyo, circa 1953; received tales of the Tonks and gifts brought back from Hah-hah-hah Noi; watched the flying boxcars take off from Ashiya AFB to resupply Dien Bien Phu; been subjected to the intentionally-ramped-up rampant stupidity of individuals and institutions, military and civilian. Until my last conversation with him, I repeatedly asked my father about the USAF's role in the resupply of DBP. Not because I wanted to know. I knew -- from aged 9. I wanted to see how long he would withhold the facts from a witness, his son. He was never forthcoming over the ensuing half century. This perseverance reinforced my conviction as to virulence and chronicity of the collective illness infecting the realpolitik of the bodypolitik. So, all things considered and reconsidered, and having had some experience of identity-transparency, I per[son}ally never compulsively felt that propagating the species into a psychotic civilization on a massively-overpopulated planet would be an expression of some unappeasable-qua-essential part of my SES's absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct, ₁T₂-only-opaque, selfsame identity, this propagating guaranteeing me yet another surrogate receptacle for projective impositions and a plausible vessel of egocentric immortality. Insistence upon, and glutamatergic anchoring of, the ₁T₂-only-logic Law of Identity. Humph! Quoting Tim O'Brien's explicit statement of one of that Law's misdirections, to wit, from In the Lake of the Woods, p. 101, the Penguin paperback edition, 1995:

…a craving to force entry into another heart, to trick the tumblers of natural law, to perform miracles of knowing… We are fascinated, all of us, by the implacable otherness of others. And we wish to penetrate by hypothesis, by daydream, by scientific investigation those leaden walls that encase the human spirit, that define it and guard it and hold it forever inaccessible.

This, this, in diametric opposition to the peasant's identity-transparent, animistic-pagan “participation mystique” informing the VCI's boundary-changes application (see our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, for details and extensive documentation) of the “holographic principle”. Doubt that assertion? Okay. So, once again I quote (in IDyoddic contrast to that, intrusively egoic and authorially unaltered, of O'Brien) Nguyen Khac Kham's translation -- contained in Kham's Celebrations of Rice Cultivation in Vietnam, Saigon: Vietnam Council on Foreign Relations, 1970 -- of a passage from Paul Giran's 1904 Psychologie du Peuple Annamite):

…everything becomes confused and blended into one. The state of everything is essentially precarious. Their aspect is elusive and affords no hold for us to seize. This curious vision of the universe explains some beliefs which otherwise would be hardly conceivable. Each individuality being very badly defined, its limits are wavering, extensible. They do not confine within the individual himself but overlap him and encroach on his surroundings. Under these conditions, it is as difficult to discern the individual from the group to which he belongs as to discern him from everything that touches him or reminds of himself. With such concepts, we may understand that the universe must appear as an inextricable entanglement of reciprocal influences [think: _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency] where persons and things, in a perpetual state of instability, become fused together while borrowing mutually their qualities. This idea of contagion, which is anything but scientific, is very common among the Annamese.

Exogenous-ketaminergically can't tell my foot from your foot; endogenous-ketaminergically, being of the giant oak from self-being? Well, hmmm. That's a taste. Below, provided in Tim O'Brien's In the Lake of the Woods, pp. 135-6, as given in a quote from the Report of the Peers Commission investigation of the My Lai massacre, we have a typical example of the depth of “territorial-imperative” insight Americans achieved concerning traditional peasant “holography” and associated identity-transparency of boundary values (a transparency going at least all the way back to sounded-out, DongSon-bronze-drummed, quasi-territorialistic, “fuzzy-logical”, indistinct frontiers: in Southeast Asia there was no need for immanent, well-defined, ₁T₂ly-in-or-out, fixed boundaries in sacred “Buddhological space” -- not until the imperialists-colons established geo-borders, corp[o}really in service to resource alienation largely as one ConveDD, psychopathic conversion-disorder displacement, of regression-in-service-to-the-corp[o}ate-ego, à la Thongchai Winichakul’s Siam Mapped). To wit, from O'Brien's pp. 135-6:

The Vietnamese [the VCI frequently used different names and boundaries from those employed by GVN: the question, few asked, was “Why?”] knew many of these subhamlets by names different from those indicated on US topographic maps… For example, the subhamlet identified on topographic maps as My Lai (4) is actually named Thuan Yen.

But how are soldiers to be exclusively damned for going amuck with murderous mass hysteria when the social anthropologists denigrate generative-empathic ID-transparency qua Buddhological compassion as being pathological “contagion” and reductively construe “participation mystique” as being “participation inconsciente”, when the logicians sidestep _µT_m-logically-valued ID-transparency by mandating it as being a fuzziness of truth-value, when the physicists suppress ID-transparency by interpreting Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction, not with m-valued logics, but as being indicative of the existence of waves of probabilities? Non-zero is a really simplistic way to smother the myriad imports of identity-transparent _µT_m; and not at all surprising that an international-relations Georgetowner would fall for it, the misdirection. [Ana}thema: the “thematic avoidance” type of NAFR, AT's “neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance” (for a comprehensive treatment, see Wolfgang Luthe's Autogenic Therapy, Vol. 6, Grune and Stratton, 1973, pp. 4-32). Ana[the}ma: against the very notion of sacred space qua ma. Winning, like leadership, has to me long seemed a kowtow to bivalence -- including [0,1]-type “zero-sum”, fuzzy-leadership game or no, not that a[rath}metic and TaiChi-rotational -- a subversion of autopoiesis and self-organization by preclusion of the requisite “framework-determining conditions”. Speaking of the Lummi tribe of the San Juan Islands and the mainland adjacent to Bellingham Bay, Annie Dillard writes, “They had no chiefs until the whites needed chiefs to sign treaties” (The Living, HarperCollins paperback edition, 1993, p. 11). Molto bene(s) a'hiding be'nigh among the th[w]rong? Nay nay. Taking a leadership position in a bad civilization is better than in a bad war? The more credentials and onetimes after a name the less is the person to be believed? Nevertheless, I have not been ignoring the wealth of proposals for reformation of the nation-state under a second Trump administration; I am reading about them, for and critiqued, here and here and… well, I've read a whole bunch of commentaries, and there being no standouts, most rating high on the laughability scale, I won't list any more of them, as I had planned. But, anyway, as I've oft stated, of much greater interest is deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull than is mere “Newtonian nudging”. I keep asking myself, “How far back into the 18th century do they wish to ideationally burrow, these supposed aficionados of quantum-based technologies?” I repeatedly ask myself this question because the presumably-_µT_m-of-one-and-another-state of relative-state identity-transparency qua “participation mystique” being -- however much this gives the 18th-century-identified binary-mind the willies -- the raison d'etre of the collective propitiation behaviors (think: _µT_m-LETS currencies “programmable” with value-ensheavements stacked upon currency-unit base-state) servicing the high levels of ecological adaptivity demonstrated by Native Americans over the millennia prior to European incursion-genocide-usurpation-naturerape. Even given my childhood Eureka! gapping whilst riding in a car through the trunk of a Claimith Redwood tree and my highschooler's wide-ranging Alaska travels (every place where basketball was played), I did not adequately appreciate magnitude of the despoilation-devastation wrought upon ecological integrity of the continent until, circa February of 1969, I came down off the wind-blown, snow-bound, deep-frozen Chilcotin Plateau along George Draney's switchbacks into the deep-of-the-valley far and away from fiord head and foreshore, into, that is, the 50-degree-farenheit dripping-wet virgin forest of the Bella Coola Valley of British Columbia, the sense of which being well-captured by Annie Dillard's description of Whatcom, circa 1855, to wit, p. 10 of The Living: “A big fir [say, 200 feet tall] was seventeen feet through the trunk, and they all grew right close together, so you needed to turn sideways and tamp your skirt to pass between them.” Everything, everything in nature, was so big I felt myself to have slipped into the lilliputian hallucinations of size-inconstant, multimodal alcohol hallucinosis: again from Annie Dillard, “…robins the size of ducks, ivy leaves the size of plates, maple leaves the size of platters… sides of halibut the size of horses…” O, the [lost}algia of our most-esteemed 18th-century burrowers. Theatric Vietnamese hat cai luong renovated-operatic Sprechstimme recitative has the vong co “sigh”, a plangent “longing for the past” -- nostalgia triggered, perhaps, by “the scent of green papaya”, the actual smelling of which likely requiring special training, e.g., similar to the incense-sniffing lessons once available to foreigners lodged in Kyoto on cultural visas. Hot, stuffy shiso days of noh and natto, mountain ryokans serving cold habu cha with yokan. Those were the days, eh! Moving federal departments to the hinterlands (the technocrat-magician's psychological projection of “causal transportation”? good offices of Tim O'Brien's In the Lake of the Woods, p. 192) is hardly on a par, is leaps and bounds incommensurate with, mapping -- à la the blackhole computer's “holographic principle”, acoustic analogue or no -- bureaucratic functions-functionals-functors (functionals and functors in dynamical processes are not examples of “overfunctioning”) on changing quasi-fractal e-boundaries over which variously-commodity-backed, unit-n-value-ensheaved (no [haugh}tiers invoked), _µT_m-processed, LETS-currency nesting-foams are defined so as to generate an authentic-quantum composite-unit-of-account for effectuating modulation enhancement of resource-utilization efficiencies, planet Earth. Well beyond “double-stacked political infrastructures” and O'Brien's-cum-Wheeler's magic-without-magic, it-from-bit, non-zero “double consummations”. The telegraph and telephone; the telex and fax machine; the internet, cell phone, and smartphone telepresence being, over and above the choo-choo and the aeroplane, the greatest of globalizers; the foremost robbers, prior to advent of financial derivatives, of local multiplier effects; the facilitators par excellence of the oligopolistically-pyramided rickmatick-government authority accompanying oligarchization of federation -- how, then, given all those technologies, and those high and infra currently in the birth canal, could removing office buildings to the outback possibly significantly help restore state's rights and individual freedom? At the very, very least, required would be initialization of some fundamental (think: “framework-determining conditions”) technological viscosity, and, given that democracy is more and more thoroughly moneyocracy, the “place” to introduce that viscosity is into the very defining properties of a currency unit: change the definition from that ₁T₂-Aristotlian-Newtonian monotonic to that _µT_m-Lukasiewiczian-Schrödingerian polytonic. But little more than such-like de[part}mental dissociations, removals, uh, uh, relocations, and VIX-volatility-index-agitated, logically-bipolar, local-multiplier-effect-stealing, synoptic-monoscaled cryptocurrencies, can be expected -- so long as our techno-gurus and their politico-chelas [re}lie upon psychotomimetically-imprinted qua male[fact}or|ed-conversion-disorder-displaced qua immersively-blindered identification with dissimulated-quantum-based infra-technologies. Be the cryptos celebed-up with myriad mini-Fukushima nuke-powerhouse-energized AIed oligarchical miners, or no, the global monoscale-cryptocurrency P2P is the egomaniac's POV, not that of the subsystem-system-supersystem: be it whole-part-hologrammic _µT_m-quantum-composite contextualized or not, monotonic P2P-telepresence is a ConveDD, a ₁T₂-separatism-preserving, Law-of-Identity-articulated, blockchained-and-thus-verified-ID-opaque, single-valued, pathogenetic, conversion-disorder displacement. No Schrödinger-m-valued fun; funny, perhaps. A vast interior distance musk, uh, uh, must separate psycho-socio-politico-economic automatizations cum institutional bases from authentic undissembled principles of QM and _µT_m-logics. No consonant absence of schizophrenogenic double-binds allowed between prevailing Weltanschauung and metaphysical principles informing its analogical models. Ask: Why, pray tell, this infernal au[tomb}nal Existentialist existence-precedes-essence separatism?

In regards to the UK[raine}nemesis and so very much more, my I/i^m hashave little to say, except that, to myour way of thinking -- admittedly not dyssuasive kosher naivete, at least not Chomsky-naive secular-rabbinical “generative” as distinct from kabbalistically “demergent” rickety staircase, the “[alpha}bet” in the latter case being a universal-grammar-type [WAG}er concerning “All That Is” being Schrödinger-memetime-independently hologrammically pregiven -- maintaining that _µT_m-“skew-perpendicularity” on gravitational Regge lattice subtends, heh-heh-heh, quantum Heisenberg ₁T₂-uncertainty does not indicate my GUT as having established its habitus in the 9th Erran[diss}-e-ment, uh, uh, I, [me}ant P|ar[all}ax-i[ll}ary. U_{r µ}T_m-demergence transmogrified to O_{r 1}T₂-memetime-bound cause-push/attractor-pull -- the “trans” in the “mogrification” being orchestrated by collective-unconscious regressed-archetypal event-gradients -- means that connectivity of corporeal events as processed by the binary-mind, individual and mass, appears just like that of contents “materialized” in dreams, nightmares (note the gender attribution) even. As told to me by Hans Ext, Ph.D. candidate in clinical psychology, Case Western Reserve, Alpha Tau Omega roommate during summer of 1964 when I was, good offices of Steve Lau, “working high steel” with a group of Native American and Russian immigrant ironworkers above Cleveland's “the Flats”: “You have to study changing contents of pornography in conjunction with the shifting symbolic references subliminally made in haute couture, if you want to really understand demotic human behavior”. I say, “The same goes for the self-propagandistic black-psyche contents of popular (as distinct from art) fiction and film”. How else traffic-analyze and pattern-identify with respect to regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective-unconscious? Quoting, for instance, James Patterson's London Bridges, Time Warner paperback edition, 2004, pp. 239-40:

…it scared the hell out of me. Because it was so incredibly unthinkable, so preposterous in a way. But so much that was happening in the world [post 9-11] seemed preposterous these days.

As regards the anti-Russia storyline of this piece of black-psyche, and so many other anti-this/anti-that such pieces (fiction and film), superheroes, and their level of “the ridiculous”, are “required” into mass-mind imagination to the degree collective-unconscious “compensatory abreaction” dictates. And what is the diktat of the prevailing “dictates”? The [pro}found (the armor-me-showed shingled-nude-descending… what? what was she descending?… having become the Grand Central Palace's parodic l'Interieur “object” qua ur[in}al) existential threat (depicted on the _C+T_C+ly identity-transparent “Large Glass” of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, a piece first exhibited in 1926, five-years after rigorous codification of m-valued logics and the very year Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction was Born-dissimulated to probability amplitudes such that the m-valued was not interpreted with the m-valued) posed to the statefunction of the in|divid[u}al (a seemantech oxymoron) I-am-me-and-only-me egofunction by, earliest, N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr; collective-unconscious mid-19th-century “decision” for “Give me simple identity or give me death!” of the species (my firm assessment, circa 1975, upon reading Emil Post's 1921 paper on _µT_m-logics); part-whole identity-transparent Cantorian cardinalities; Axiom of Choice; m-valued logics; Schrödinger's m-valued (prefigured by Marcel Duchamp almost a decade earlier with his ur[in}al: not only Realist-cum-Magical-Realist fiction and film, but also consensus physics, imitates art) statefunction; the ever more mortifying experimental verifications of “Quantum this, quantum that!”. And, hmmm-- how could he[gem}on|l|y superheroes be justified to the collective fantasy machine without projection of anti-heroic Mock-11 supervillains?

Yowlza! Meliorate those oxymoronic fricative ([friction}ated and turbulent) [con}son|ants, uh, uh, whoops, constants of what has critical-state-phase-transition ((in the natural realm, as regards weather and climate, say [see, e.g., “Mysterious heat waves are popping up worldwide without explanation”, Chris Melore, StudyFinds, 26 November 2024], they, our popular science OP/EDers, still don't get it, i.e., that dynamics of far-from-equilibrium such transitions visit every extreme, even the extremely normal “non-significant change”; why so not-get? because they, even the authorities in dynamical meteorology and climate science, still continue to assume a classical limit, i.e., believe that dynamics of Earth's macroscopic atmosphere do not abide by the principles of quantum and relativity physics handled in scale-relative fashion, as described here and here)) degenerated from being the pedestrian normative to becoming the everywhere-omnipresent normotic? Yet, then, after a lengthy hiatus, cracks of light progressively appeared trumpant, uh, triumphant that is, in the forest of fear as pillars, fibrating the spherical yoke of the glutamate-anchored cosmic-egg Weltanschauung, once again summer-sunning themselves in splints of cognitive illumination. Or so perceived was it widely -- yesterday and tomorrow. A virtually, for all intents and purposes, defining behavioral characteristic of the USG's for-us-or-against-us leadership elite ((again quoting Annie Dillard's The Living, p. 81: “As a moral thinker, John Ireland admitted the categories right and wrong only, and could not compass or endure complexity, misstep, or paradox… Literature pained him, and science addressed nothing of moment”; and I, a long-term practitioner of walking-meditation-induced top-down behavior mod, the “place” to which top-down should be confined, observe here that, as a gardener in and out of the households of the Washington establishment, I noted that their bookshelves were chockful of coffee-table books)), generation-upon-generation going back at the very least to the dysentreatied and variola-orthopox-blanketed legerdemain virally perpetrated upon the Nat-Am-qua-indigenous population -- knee-jerked lying and instinctive deceit, manifestations of which strongly governed under the yank-by-yank pulls of the strange attractor: democidal serial-unto-mass murder (note that “strange” indicates fractal, the choice for compensatory-abreactive democide [I hate to say it] “trumping” all possibility of choice for quasi-fractal e-boundaries and associated governance applications of the holographic principle) -- is upfront-and-straight-backed attention gathering in the made-for-TV film The Last Days of Patton: he is relieved of duty for keeping technically-competent low-level wartime-Nazi-compliant bureaucrats in office immediate postwar, at the same instant as those U.S. leaders who cut him low were conspiring to bring high-level Nazi-party members into the U.S.-intelligence effort and Nazi scientists into the American hydrogen-bomb-and-rocket R&D programs (and that U.S.-leaders' travesty isn't mentioned in this black-propaganda film: but production of “memory suppression” cum “memory substitution”, individual binary-mind and mass mind, is not dependent solely upon omnipresent blackpsyche, as to wit: “Stress can scramble the brain so badly it changes your memories”, Chris Melore, StudyFinds, 15 November 2024). A pristine example today involves the high-tech-unto-AI mega-corporations, intel-dot-mil proprietaries that is, that comprise a substantial portion of the valuation dyscalibrated on the NYSE (I might, [per}son|ally, have held and/or traded stock had this exchange been a mechanism of actual investiture and not merely a speculative casino for exploiting flaws in the ₁T₂-only-capitalist e[con}omic system). The ₁T₂-only-lawfare antitrust suit brought against Google monopoly: just like the DEA [under}mining the CIA chain of blockheads? Dot-gov suing intel-dot-mil: who is kidding whom? Supply-side trickledown of gump to every echelon of government, all across the spectrum of corporate to sole-proprietor private enterprise: e.g., by personal testimonial, in nearly 15 years of nursery-landscaping cum carriage-trade gardening, indeed, embassy-garden maintenance in the D.C. area, I never once witnessed work, of any trade, done at a building general contractor's personal house that was not a kickback. Not merely the national debt, but also private-sector debt-classes, particularly those debts bubbling amongst the [saga}c|iou|$ club-this/club-that corporates. Two-trillion dollars per year gainsaid that won't touch the black economy, or the deeper-deception-than-merely-classified black-currency -- altogether off treasury-bond bookkeeping -- money creation in service to hegemonious “interests, goals, and objectives”. Heh-heh-heh! What will our sub-superhero ((I naturally enough liked Charles Hugh Smith's thoughts on superheroes, “Superheroes Reflect Our Powerlessness”, Of Two Minds, 25 November 2024 -- coincidentally appearing just after I wrote my reflections on the subject -- but, obviously, I regard his take as being formulated concerning surface-structure manifestations, even though the term “collective unconscious” is employed)) DOGErs do about all that? Half-wittedly promise us folk here in La La Land yet another Wodehousian lallapalooza? Below-linked is an Indian economist's losssaid take on the prospects of DOGE: “Dead On Government Expenditures” by Shanmuganathan N., ZeroHedge, 27 November 2024. Rectify that! without bottom-up implementation of quasi-fractal-e-boundary-defined _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams? No quick fix being proposed here, with this seed idea (yet to be properly formed by professional experts in the many involved fields of study -- in none of which do I have actual competency). No simple Fourier transform available for this envisioned phase transition. No Fourier phalanstery writ large as a quasi-fractal e-boundary-defined “territorial form” informing utopian practice -- for no angelic utopian fantasy involved in this authentically-quantum _µT_m-logical notion of money. A three-career-qua-man-lifetimes researched -- me, a mere dropout-autodidact amanuensis-mediator; Douglas Allan Paine, Ph.D.; and Nguyen Phuoc Cong Huyen Ton Nu Nha Trang, Ph.D. -- seed notion (no sponsorship; funding non grata; dissed here and there, here in high school, there at this and that U; dissed by the perts and the [ex}perts alike). How elsewise, really, to genuinely penetrate the physical-theory veracity of identity-transparent, _µT_m-quantum-relative-state “participation mystique” without some such mediated confluence as that between Paine-one-of-the-greatest-20th-century-physicists and NhaTrang-royal-family-folklore-insight-[no simplistic non-semantic mere catalog]-repository-superieur?

Ain't Misbelievin'! “No one to talk with”, or no: psychologically placing my me, I arrived in flower-powered San Francisco for the first time during 1956 -- on a ship from Japan. So, later, I strongly resonated with the initial image presented in The Flower Drum Song, having come in under the Golden Gate Bridge. As absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct -- heh-heh-heh! -- from my ego-I-ness identification, my I/i^m when -- nowadays non-existent, somememetime ago on very rare occasions -- sufficiently reposed as to be in _µT_m-modal cognitive states, find(s) that what-is is what is not in-itself, not a selfsame thisness (good offices of Robert Merrihew Adams, January 2022) irreducible to non-selfsame suchness (my I/i^m agree with Chiong that there are no fuzzy-logic degrees of suchness, but obviously disagree with Chiong's heuristic intent, in that I/i^m maintain there quite likely are _C+T_C+ states of suchness universally covering “the sphere of unbounded equanimity”, i.e., the T_zog-chen AllBase of the MVRS-backcloth (m-logically-valued reference space) reverse-cascade-compacted upon Musculpt manifold, M. To my me, “The World” is obviously -- axiomatically -- not being-there only, not even primarily, on basis of an ontology derivable exclusively from registrations made in “the normal state of consciousness”. With-mad-he: the various stages of allowing (i.e., non-doing) the “I”-ness-existent to be spontaneously lifted out of identification with, attachment to, objects of the collectively projected object-world into generative-empathic relative-state identity-transparency with the ontological being-ness-precursors of discrete objects-bodies. Are the heuristically-elaborated “levels” of samadhi most accurately [de}lineated by the classes of logical-value order-type employed within the given state, _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m? _C+T_C+: “Gautama B once said that there are six million samadhis in every blink of the eye”, to quote Marvin Glover as regards a particular Buddhological metaphor. My I/i^m maintain that any state ₁T₃ and beyond of _µT_m and beyond those beyonds is tantamount to a condition of the asamprajnata-samadhi conditions, because, for one, quoting Sarasvati Buhrman, “…it is non-dual in nature -- and thus there is no sense of an experiencer and an object of experience in asamprajnata samadhi -- 'meditation experiences' cannot be properly discussed in relation to this samadhi” -- but would be phenomenologically communicable in detail were inner-Musculpt holographically techno-exteriorized as mathematical notation capable of non-reductively handling the spectrum of m-valued logics of the relative-states of identity-transparency. Thinking in _µT_m, not ₁T₂ly about _µT_m. Given that, à la Einstein and Wheeler, something is nothing given shape, the nesting-foam of swarms taken to be my body-object is a whatnot construed a somewhat which some feel obliged to authenticate with the attribution of ontological thisness, holding that the swarm of swarms is emergent as physical body-object. However, since body-object is subject to subject-object duality, its existential physicality is ₁T₂-only-logic bound, and, in the context of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m logics, it must be understood demergent, not emergent -- its ontology-of-being being reduced to existence only upon transition to the lowest logical-value order-type. To aught or to naught? That's all, folks! The only question; the ₁T₂-only question. Claiming the “absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct” (good offices of Hubert Benoit, Let Go! Theory and Practice of Detachment According to Zen, first English edition, 1962) so as to ₁T₂-logically entailment-legitimate (these rules of the lowest logical-value order-type, based on the assumption of primitive thisness [good offices of Robert Merrihew Adams, Journal of Philosophy, 76:1, January 1979, pp. 5-26], constituting a Linus van Pelt security blanket) the declaiming of that which is illegitimately claimed! Speaking here ₁T₂ly: using the term “relative-state identity-transparency” establishes the ontological referent as being the aught-functional declaimed via _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ cascade-demergence; using the term “non-individuals” (see: Decio Krause and Jonas R. B. Arenhart and Otavio Bueno, “The non-individuals interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, arXiv, 29 August 2020; and, briefly, Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart, “A no-individuals account of quantum mechanics”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 381:2255, 18 September 2023) establishes the ontological referent as being the naught-functional reclaimed via ₁T₂-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ reverse-cascade-remergence (the latter iff m-valued logics replace probability amplitudes as the interpreters of non-linear-Schrödinger statefunctions-statefunctionals-statefunctors). Higher metaphysical suprastanding, however, supersedes second-order-dynamical aught-naught functionals with the non-orientable third-order-dynamical functors universally covering _C+T_C+-MVRS (but note that ₁T₂-only-[pre}judicial “natural”[sic]-language-use dictating employment of the binary-indicative term “non-orientable” [for that matter: “non-selfsame”, “non-denumerable”, so on] insures that, absent holographic techno-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation and universal metalanguage and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS-currency nesting-foams, there will always be bivalent residuals constraining suprastanding to mere understanding, as well as communications initiated therefrom). Note that the Krause-Arenhart-Bueno non-individuals scheme, quoting their above-linked paper, “…acquires metaphysical content only once it is specified what an individual is and how something may fail to be one…”; whereas, our scheme “begins” (actually: no beginning and no ending logically, ontologically, temporally, even with topologically-active operator-time, given _C+T_C+) with All That Is Not, a something being nothing given shape, which, under cyclotomic involutory decomposition, is a quantum composite of the relative-states of identity-transparency of All That Is (the cosmological case of THE self-referential proposition, which informs the m-valued logics that should be used to interpret Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction). We may further note that the Krause-Arenhart-Bueno non-individuals scheme takes account of the experimentally supported observation that quantum particles “lack well-defined trajectories” (hence manifest nonlocality, and possibly even absence of “object constancy” in the Piaget sense of the term qua John A. Wheeler's sense of the Christmas-tree effect), but do not gainsay with a detailed geometrodynamic mechanism the ₁T₂-only-probabilistic account of these “lacks”; whereas, in our scheme, J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” plus skew-perpendicularity on Regge-latticed ensheaved backcloth are offered as subtending “lack well-defined trajectories” as well as Heisenberg ₁T₂-only uncertainty inequalities. Whilst reading into the above-linked papers, I've been trying to res[ur}rect-[re}member (think: ontological ur-thisness-individuality -- ontology trumping epistemology -- as ₁T₂-dueling counterfoil to _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m relative-state identity-transparency) the first occasion upon which I used the term “identity-transparency”. Ur-ness qua ur-ness, it's nature as fundament, being at issue here. Hmmm. The prescriptively-enculturated-socialized, glutamatergically-anchored, normal-state-of-consciousness, “Received View”-consensuated, ₁T₂-only-logical epistemology precludes _µT_m-knowledge-by-identity; knowledge-by-through-identity, ₁T₂ly speaking, conflates epistemology and ontology -- whereas, by Gita-speak and BrihadaranyakaUpanishad-speak, above linked, the _C+T_C+ly-nonselfsame “Self” (a bivalent personification-residual of natural-language self-metaprogramming placed in projective-identification) is proclaimed-indicated-declaimed. So, well, uh, anyway, I experientially knew about identity-transparency from aged 8 (arrived in Midori Gaoka, Ashiya-cho, kita-Kyushu during late-August 1953, aged 8, birthday 14 June; somememetime in the next six months inducted, I was, not, I would assuredly guess, deep-structure-wise into, but onto surface-structure of non-state, “primitive”, animistic-Shinto, some-small-number of the m-modal-logics of comprehension there being therewith) in a feeling-toned, indeed affect-charged, non-articulatable mode of cognitive registration qua introjection. Had no idea, really, as to what was happening to me. That much, I clearly reassemble (despite the fact the every Japanese I've spoken with about this, either [1] has no idea what I'm talking about; or [2] becomes aggressively emotional, impetus to violence held in check -- as I reiterate the thesis). How I was inducted is altogether another question -- which I have tried to understand in depth over the course of my life experience. For sure I never used the term “identity transparency” as a kid in Japan. Almost certainly I said “transparency with nature” (I did not encounter the term “participation mystique” until several years later whilst reading C. G. Jung's Collected Works) in the first-floor-snack-bar, Western-omelet-for-breakfast discussions with Capt. Kelly L. Robinson, one of my catechizing superior officers at MACV-HQ, circa immediate post-Tet 1968, wherein we debated my contention that peasant animism, not the Maoist take on Marxist-Leninism, was the origin of the VCI's (Viet Cong [political] Infrastructure's) boundary-change behaviors, whereupon internal bureaucratic variables, tacitly mapped upon boundaries of the given area of responsibility, automorphically shifted in value once the boundaries were changed in response to altered battlefield conditions and/or strategic reorientations. I believe I first used the term “identity-transparency” in the lengthy discussions with Kelly during our February of 1969 trip over British Columbia's Chilcotin Plateau and into the Bella Coola valley (ours being a frigid and much more arduous graveled trip than that which the link describes; the farther west we went the more we seemed to be entering the 19th century; had to every so often get out and push boulders off the “road” descending the “homemade” switchbacks into the Bella Coola valley: see, for fun, the 1950 Randolph Scott film entitled The Cariboo Trail): context for use of the term was probably Kelly's observations concerning northwest-Pacific-coast Indian totemism. Uck!-oh, here we go again: ₁T₂-so-called derailment-paraphasia, but to my _µT_m-me(s), [Ad|am}bra/ket[i]ons of the real skinny, the only way the dealreal ever is man[i}fessed. Analogically-modeling-wise, _µT_m-relative-state “devolves” (like institutionalization -- indeed all institutionalizations, for the most part, heh-heh-heh -- subliminally transpires, whatsoever the overt arrogations of those involved and identified with socially-conferred role attributions), it could accurately be said, to the thisness-socialities of knowledge, themselves devolving to ₁T₂-only Rules of (₁T₂-only) Civility, Amor Towles' literary product which has yet to cross my path, and to which I patiently await. In my life-long reveled-in iconoclasm-devolved-to-abject-contrariety as regards projective-identifications of the mass-binary-mind, my I/i^m [i/m}a|gine A Gentleman in Moscow to have, probably induced subliminally by collective-unconscious vectors, been metaphorically prefigurative of substantially-subsidized Statue-of-Liberty-awoken NYC under COVID lockdown, heh-heh-heh, just as I kowtow to the Randolph Scott who, in 1946, blackpsyche-call-the-thing-by-the-name-of-its-opposite signified and exemplified the bad guys (another being Robert Mitchum as the 1955 follow-up “town tamer” in Man with the Gun: just think of it, the Greatest Generation as the most mass-behavior generation of all time, and the one most adamantly in denial of “collective occasions of experience”, idolizing signifiers of the extreme opposite of the “no-individuals”-socialities analogically modeling “non-individuals” cosmo-ontologies) who facilitated [pro}position-[imp}o|sit|i|on of the federated-“evolved”-unto-the-monolithically-federalized state apparat unlikely to be effectively-adequately Newtonian-nudging-trumped (under [think: “spatially distributed environmental variables”] the mistaken -- discounting Planck's “elemental oscillator” notion -- assumption that detailing of the spatial field is prerequisite to accurate dynamical forecasting), so-fully-elaborated as it is. In the glutamate-flooded, in-the-body normal state of consciousness, quoting Krause-Arenhart-Bueno linked above, “…superpositions are never observed: only determinate results are.” This assertion, of course, altogether discounts the myriads of ketaminergic “participation mystique” states qua “collective occasions of experience” which predominated human experience-observations over the pre-Homeric, particularly pre-European-Renaissance, eons when ₁T₂-only-logic was not glutamatergically anchored sufficiently as to “kundabuffer” ontic awareness of the _µT_m processing engaged in by the quantum brain. It is useful-unto-edifying (as regards _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency) to note that = is not only a “binary predicate” signifying “logical identity”, as Krause-Arenhart-Bueno have it, but that it is also a bivalent operator (qua “observable”): strongly suggesting that each of all the =s under ₁T₃-unto-_µT_m signifies a different operator from all the rest of them. And, if that is so, what -- considering the possibility that the “classical limit” is apocryphal -- does it tell us about the roles, plural, played in dynamical meteorology by the m-valued, vertically-propagated, acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-modes signaturing theta-e equivalent-potential-temperature surfaces -- again, considering the possibility that acoustic analogues to blackhole computers exist in Earth's atmosphere?

I now learn what I know I knew I know not when -- whenever, that is, I first assimilated principles of Hegel's tripartite thesis-antithesis-synthesis dialectic “syllogism” {{{contextualized by my childhood exposure to states of identity-transparency, somememetime before I was read into quark symmetries and Gurdjieff's “Law of Threes” and Bennett's skew-parallels Appendix and Everett's relative-state formulation (for the longest period, I [significantly?] knee-jerk misspelled Everett as Everette) and Emil Post on _µT_m-logics: i.e., that the hologramlike-hologramatic-hologrammic notion “relative-state identity-transparency” (e.g., that part-whole relation attributed to Cantorian infinite cardinalities; that part-whole relation built into the “holographic principle” of, say, blackhole computing -- acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-mode atmospheric analogue, or no) is a Hegelian “relation” idea neither reflexive nor non-reflexive nor irreflexive on the non-metagnostical, heh-heh-heh, domain designated as the _C+T_C+-logical, most-dense sheet, T_zog-chen AllBase of the MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like, smooth-noodle-mappable, passively-active/actively-passive, trans-bijective, vertical-horizontal-diffeomorphism-invariant qua fiber-bundled, folded-towel (I first read of the existence of this area of research in Science News, circa 1977, memory serving) BackCloth (pregeometrically _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly logically operated cum geometrodynamically Regge-lattice-worked/fibrated with null-vectored “pencils of skew-parallels”), these neither-negatedORs (Oops!) because absolute monadic selfsameness (which is not “same” or “equal” or “identical” vis-à-vis the binary,…,n-ary à la, say, diffeomorphisms) on that T_zog-chen domain is, indubitably is, n-adic non-selfsameness, to quote Antonio Wolf (word search “non-selfsame”) essaying as regards the second entailment-movement of the Hegelian “syllogism” (no actual syllogism in the strict bivalent-logic-definitional sense)}}}:

A second Law [antithesis] is now conceived in contrast to the first Law -- the law of the external object [thesis] -- whose content was enduring distinction remaining selfsame. This second Law “expresses the becoming-non-selfsame of what is selfsame and the becoming-selfsame of the non-selfsame.” That is, the second Law is the conception of Understanding's operation regarding the external object itself. Whatever the Understanding encounters in the external object, its truth is the opposite of what it appears. [Consider, in respect to the here-above-given, the difference between “opposite” and “different” as regards J. G. Bennett's statement contextualizing “pencils of skew-parallels” made in Appendix III to Chapter 15 of The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956, to wit, no shambly mere metaphoricity involved here: “If we are to set our ontology free from the limitations of single-valued existence we require a geometry that will enable us to represent situations in which each entity can be 'more than one thing as once'. Since adding a null-vector to a finite vector leaves the latter unchanged and yet such that when projected it appears to be different…” Now, further consider adding Cantorian C+ null-vectors, the resultant projection to the MVRS being _C+T_C+ly processed via involutory decomposition.]

But, according to my “lights” -- as childhood lit (emplacement between cultures during the critical window [birdsong, for instance, is not learned by birdie if exposure does not occur during the critical dedicated-phase of maturation] for neural-network wipeouts at neuronal plasticity, hence the poor enculturation not well glutamate-anchored?) vis-à-vis direct ontic experience (inadequate automatization of selfsame selfhood) of relative-states of identity-transparency qua generative empathy qua “participation mystique” qua compassion -- Hegel got it wrong in being identified with bivalent logic, thus “syllogizing” ontological-precedence trans- as movement, such that second Law “selfsameness becomes non-selfsameness” and the third Law synthesis becomes a new first Law thesis (not, as we hold to be the case, that third-order-dynamics synthesis is the non-orientable case where selfsameness is, absolutely is, always and all ways indistinguishable from non-selfsameness on the _C+T_C+ domain where the bivalent Law of Non-Contradiction is most completely irrelevant). That is to say: “when” the actual when-less ontological-precedence case is not a matter of movement but of _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m E.T.Bellian cyclotomic involutory decomposition: the well-glutamate-etched binary-mind, as bleed-over from being memetime-bound, conceives-misperceives -- indeed, transforms misperception into misbelieving into actual seeing: “I'll see it when I believe it!” for “It Is So! (If You Think So)” -- m-logically-valued decomposition as bivalent movement-entailment. So, again, I do not believe that a non-reflexive logic (though that certainly is a vast improvement over probability amplitudes) is adequate (such a logic is necessary but not sufficient) to interpretation of the infinitely-m-valued canonical quantum-state codified in Schrödinger's statefunction (which, when understood relative to 3-fold topologically-active operator-time as decomposition logic-operator, is actually also a statefunctor and a statefunctional).

The last e-mail communication I received from Cornell tornadogenesis specialist Douglas A. Paine, before his fatal heart attack, was short, but not sweet: “You were right.” And I knew exactly what he meant. For decades, he had profoundly and resolutely disagreed with my oft-repeated assertion that what is publicly known is a quarter to a half century behind the classified memetimes. So, it is not sweet to see that 20-years elapsed before the CIA declassified a document (and 40-years elapsed before it received much public attention) wherein the U. S. Army OpsGrp of I&SCOM reviewed publicly available literature most of which I had read during the second half of the 1970s: to wit, “Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process” concerning induction of out-of-the-body experiences (the Japanese kanji for Ma, multi-sheeted, i.e., m-valued, sacred space, I believe, derives, Hiragana-wise, from the Chinese “GATE holding the moon”, that is, moon GATE, a Yayoi-DongSon bronze-drum moon-tympanum like the Ma River valley “Moon of Hoa Binh” which represents the sun: drop the “sweep” and “comma” on moon to get sun; this engendered-menstrual-cycle transmogrification being a counterfoil to the accusation of effeminate and unsophisticated; ditto the Sun GODDESS, changing Chang'e into A[ma}terasu). Note that the Gateway-Process-provided rationalization of so-called “fundamentals” is largely ₁T₂ talking to itself more or less in repeated, received-view, roof-brain-chattered, psychological-rationalization tape loops: half-a-century-old m-valued-logics remain unmentionables. Recently, such declassified documents, based upon never-classified materials, keep coming up in internet op/ed postings -- postings that treat the material as somehow startling. Be aware that Itzhak Bentov's (whom our coauthor Beverly Oliphant, M.D., conferred with) and Lee Sannella's de-kundabuffering idea that “…drawing energy up the spinal cord ultimately results in what appears to be creation of acoustical standing waves in the cerebral ventricles…” has an acoustic-blackhole-computing analogue in the m-valued (and likely _µT_mly processed) vertically-propagated acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes (qua infrasound) emitted at tornadogenesis by autogenic discharge as the spatial multiscale nesting-foam collapses under topologically-active operator-time and associated 3-fold temporal CURL, and which modes Musculpturally signature constant-entropy theta-e equivalent potential temperature surfaces. We were well aware of this Gaia analogue to de-kundabuffering, not least because of the self-similarity of brain scans and many of the types of data charts studied by atmospheric scientists -- not to mention awareness that ancient Chinese medical manuscripts devote much text to the weather within a medical model formed of “systems of correspondence” (the Eulerian notion of mathematical “function” being a matter of correspondence, generally understood to be one-to-one into/onto but can be m-valued) based upon explicate qualitative “technical standards of value”, which, in terms of the I-Ching's unelaborated implicate Higher Heaven, may be construed as involving _µT_m-logical-values (m-valued variables under such logics generally being renormalized, e.g., by “branch cuts”: “Give me simple identity or give me death!”). Monroe “Hemi-Sync” is, of course, but one of the many bodily “dimensions” of “long-range phase coherency”, a Fröhlich-Cope-Chance macroscopic-quantization-deepening of phase correlation whereupon critical-state correlation lengths snap to infinity. Very unfortunately, regardless of efforts made, I never gained access to a computerized, biofeedback-equipped, Lilly-isolation-flotation ThinkTank -- in order, whilst the capability likely still existed, to make a personal contribution to furthering the task of holotechno-exteriorizing inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation adequate to thinking in OBEed _µT_m-logics, not IBEed ₁T₂ly thinking about _µT_m-logics. Gone, baby, gone.

Degrees of social closeness in propinquity (think: scaled diminishments of “minimum permissible distance” in personal space) do not constitute a close approach to what I mean by _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-states of identity-transparency. Hmmm. Arrogating Distinction by claiming ownership of the living of a Life, of annexing as own-and-only-own a bivalent piece of Mind. Ego ideals: passed over, gone to glory they are, these post-quantum post-relativity days; notwithstanding: if fact of the case only fully registered by the collective unconscious -- even though they, those ideals, were so late out the gate, phylogenetically and ontogenetically. A ₁T₂-only-Everettian multiversicle, schizo-polyphonically planesung into a “Plurality of Worlds”? Only if logical-value order-types, and/or classes thereof, be deemed constitutive of “worlds” -- but even this lightness of having put being-in-a-skirting-of-the-case involves denial of the utter transparency of the states, an abstraction-pushing-away, in lieu of a cut-branch-cutting-away renormalization, of the clear-channeled acetate-overlay-superimposed m-branches of the multi-sheeted Riemann-surface treatment of the m-valued function cum functional cum functor (this branch-point-bridging Riemann treatment itself being a skirting-of-the-case: back, back I say, so as to keep non-simple identity at bay). Incompossibility is possible only under ₁T₂-only, the only logical-value order-type mandating absolute negation. Oft[he}bungs it, the whiskey barrel of Life: these days, subliminally, by exercise of negation qua color-revolution and obsession with the unilineal notion of the shape of hisstory -- progress, folks! as biblically essayed, Old Testament before the New's candlestick-enlightened “city that is set on an hill” prefiguration of St. Augustine's City-of-God counter-GOTH prefiguration of pro-GWOT BlackPsyche -- having introjected to Umwelts and having singularly reduced Kripke's modalities of necessary-cum-possible-worlds semantics, in a swivet our heartless, Heartland-obsessed, I-con-ick, [Half}ord([i]nation) MacSprog neoCons have transmogrified Leibniz's compossible into their Conpossible. And this, this rocketless, sea-powered, turn-of-the-19th-century, pivot-area geography-in-hisstory MACkindergardenism nowadays, these days of non- and in- and un- and tele-: quantum non-locality and non-simple identity, incompleteness, indeterminacies, inconsistencies, infinities, indefinabilities, uncertainty, telepresence, so on. The secular-rabbinate ego-ideally projectively-identifies with Aufhebung because its universal-grammar-cellular-automata generativeness can easily be conflated to an attractor-pulled, linear-memetime-bound, hisstorical objective: numinous “new” JerUSAlem (think: “objet petit a”) in secular deus ex machina Gebserian haptification of sacred space and concretion to-misunderstood-as-of passive-passing-referential linear-time. Whereas, the Kabbalah's memetime-independent, Regge-latticed, Tree-of-Life Abfall presupposes a cyclotomically-decomposable (multivalued, most-esoterically speaking) pregiven “sphere of unbounded equanimity” which cannot be arrogated-to cum identified-with absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct Distinction projectible as (single-valued) personified godhead. Kabbala[his}tic ₁T₂-only Abfall was Hegelized, and Hegel was materialistically Marxed: the bivalent Hegelian reason-spirit concretion-accomplishment Abfall being most concretely the appearance of material substance; less concretely, hisstorical events in figural-dialectical “syllogistic” schemata. Obviously, this -- the preference for either Auf or Ab -- is not just an internal Jewish bifurcation, but a disjunction which plagues the whole of post-“Old-Europe”-animistic-pagan (à la Marija Gimbutas: IMHO, the found-objects of archeology are of small evidential interest compared to that of the found residual cultural lags coercively assimilated via glutamate-etched-and-anchored prescriptive mass acculturation cum subsequent individual enculturation [link choice made to illustrate the current Zeitgeist-take]) Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion psycho-socio-politico-military dynamics, and the hisstory thereof. Over the millennia no deconfliction algo has dissipated the vitriol, so why would the well-informed contemplate such a possibility as nowadays existing? Except, perhaps, by the fact that the logics of animistic-pagan identity-transparent “participation mystique” were rigorously formalized over a century ago. In trying -- à la Slavoj Zizek's Lacanian-Hegelian ontological discourse on “la petit mort”-sought “objet petit a” as the ₁T₂-only “I am” existential-confirmation predicated-therefore of “I thing”, oops, uh, uh, “I think” -- to distinguish between semantic imports of sublation versus subsumption, Arsh K.S observes that, “The unconscious is structured like a language. This was one of Lacan's lessons…” If Lacan meant by this one or more or all of “natural” speakable languages, as he did, or the generative universal grammar thereof, rather than the unspeakable (“hidden” language) in quantum mechanics, then I demur -- and not only on basis of “The Unconscious as Infinite Sets” (₁T₂-only understood), but by supposition that the logical bases of synaesthetic inner-Musculpt-symformphonie involve the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-order-types of logical-value rightly employed to interpret the Cantorian-fractal infinitudinal-infinitesimal m-valuedness of the statefunction-functional-functor of the lineally-nonlinearly-nested Schrödinger equation[s] (speaking in terms of Schrödinger-memetime-independent sublation-Aufhebung as sublime to the sublimation involved in mere memetime-bound subsumption). Once it was entertained as a postulation, I decided to try to understand something of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, rather than simply to regard it as a Jungian mysterium tremendum, as does, say, The Cloud of Unknowing and the probabilistic memory-fog suffusing Barbourian Platonia. Bully hell, uh, with puppyfish! say the whole boodle of quailed, mugwumpish, puffball blamefools to that decision, given that such understanding would be undermining to their vestments, in- and est inter- -- and, given the fervidity, perhaps even more so from those ultra-rich who don't remain aloof. If N. H. Abel's 1823 existence-proof-for-trans-al-jabr re-tripping, (gallows-enhumored, echolalia-ASDed, metempsychotic, saddle-blockchain-enfevered fulminations going episodically back into prehisstory) of the n-leafed “butterfly trigger”, propelled a “Give me simple-identity or give me death!” (as my I/i^m doesn't-don't believe that the cardinal-sin usual suspects are adequate for etiology and pathogenesis of this level of mass psychosis at exacerbation of global crisis) collective fate yet to reach blizzarding-cuspover fruition, its incubation-period onset-latency was lengthy, slowly coming into its own with the Crimean-, the AmericanCivil-, and the Franco-Prussian-war lead-ins to the 200-Years War of the World (the “long emergency”, nowadays accelerating, not least as having become iatrogenically-induced nature-driven, toward incendiary cuspover, IMHO, has been ongoing for more than a few generations). This evolutionary -- look at the techno-spinoffs, infra- and arguably otherwise -- development certainly was not abetted by a self-abasing panic, uh, uh, public. Karl Popper (and his chela George Soros) apparently believe(d) that lack of ₁T₂-only-falsifiability, and the inability of the binary-mind to reliably foresee technological innovations, bivalently precludes hisstorical-general-laws-type (((see here and here and here à la Carl G. Hempel: I reject ₁T₂-only hisstorical nomothetic induction-deduction, whilst maintaining that hisstorical unfolding of the enfoldment is archetypally-unto-regressed-archetypally [for the anti-archetype view, see Graeme Snooks] collectively unconscious _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m and individually-massmindedly conscious unto ₁T₂, ontological-precedence “vertical” 1st-order-temporal-CURL twisted into the existential-memetemporal-precedence “horizontal”))) theories in hisstoriosophy, the embrace of which, according to Popper-Soros, always engenders totalitarianism -- except, of course, embrace of the unilinear law of idiographic hisstorical progress. What, anyway, I ask, does human epistemology cum predictive capability have to do with existence/non-existence of general metahisstorical laws -- which, in being meta-, altogether transcend human agency? Nowadays, of course, Utilitarianism-Pragmatism has taken over hisstoriography-as-what-hisstorians-do and transformed it into plausibly-deniable BlackPsyche. The kind of abetting public subordinately involved in regressed-archetypal demergent fomentation of the collective fulminations (if there be general laws with regard thereto, they are suprahuman cause-pushes/attractor-pulls, not superhumanly generative) which transpired up through the failing-gold-standard-induced 1893 ((prefiguration of the 1971 Nixon shock: why, nowadays, would many of TPTB still choose a basketed, privileged-vehicle-currencies-international-reserve, single-valued-logical, monometal standard rather than a variously-commodity-backed, non-vehicle-currency, no reserve as no memetime reference, _µT_m-quantum-[part-is-hologrammically-whole]-composite, universal unit-of-account mapping of constantly-adapting Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth, as distributively ledgered upon CommonGround of the econometric version of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space? TPTB haven't heard of the latter? And why haven't they heard of it, as it has been implicit in econophysics for 100 years, 1925 being when Schrödinger Tantric-sexual-yoga [m}engage-a-trois-codified his m-valued statefunction replacement of single-valued Newton's laws of motions?)) PANIC is aptly characterized in numerous passages by Annie Dillard in The Living, HarperCollins paperback edition, 1993, to wit, such as:

…the times get into them, and they wear out their brains learning what folks expect, and spend their strength trying to rise over those same folks. [p. 189]

Society's loyal members, having sacrificed their only lives to its caprices, hastened to entrap the next generation into agreement, so their follies would not have been in vain and they could all go down together, blind and well turned out. [p. 218]

It was impressive, how people's natures persisted from childhood directly on through to the grave, in every circumstance. [p. 247]

…drew most of his convictions from the common pot, and distrusted dissenters. Since his wife possessed the same mental habits, he never noticed them in her… rightly considered the chief force in most minds… the restless urge to discover the newest opinions as fast as consensus formed them… [p. 268]

He had long ago concluded that he possessed only a small and finite brain, and he had fixed a habit of determining most carefully with what he would fill it. [p. 346]

Once I became aware -- and this happened early-on in no small degree via exposure to Japanese aesthetic principles -- that habituation applies to virtually all aspects of experience, such that, for one of myriad examples, not the least in Japanese gardening, the astute Japanese aesthete would not build his house on top of the rise overlooking the beautiful view, but well below so he would have to periodically walk up to enjoy that view (for a contrary take, word search “habituation” here; also consider Alessandro Bertinetto's “Habits and Aesthetic Experience”, Aisthesis, 17:1, 2024, pp. 61-77), my want-spectrum dropped way off, as I realized that quality of life in ontic immediacy only super[silly}ously elevates momentarily with increases in material advantage, once the basic creature comforts are persistently met. Consequently, given omnipotent omnipresence of habituation (just study John C. Lilly's super-detailed “Tank Logs” relative to extensive documentation of a prolonged intensive study of the OBEed dynamics of habituation exogenous-ketaminergically induced, as I once surveyed in service to Studio Garage subbing to Pioneer Corporation's writ to accomplish liberation into the public domain of John's scientific archive by coming up with an assessed value), if increasing material advantage becomes a person's resolute primary objective, that resolution places himher on an ever-accelerating intrasubjective treadmill chasing after an attractor ever self-redefining, even if not also in the rat race which “keeping up with the Joneses” imposes. But memetime can be felt as “beating you senseless”; it can can spring leaks putting bounds on the racers racing in races; it, the time meme, can also be a hook strung for teleologically reeling-in -- as portrayed by Annie Dillard in The Living. Something similar surely applies to an economy as a macro-whole, not only to its markette-action-directive-obeying micro-actors, if tied to expectations of unending growth as a foremost factor driving self-organization. Moreover, botherating with low-indifference the hoi polloi -- whilst messianically considering themselves (e-)Pursesane-Netters-of-Men -- has always provided TPTB with an endless stream of econometrically-hot-housed existential confirmations. Memory serving, it was upon studying, as assigned reading in Dr. Mott's “Backgrounds of Western Civilization” class, AU-SIS, circa 1963, Herbert J. Muller's The Uses of the Past, Oxford U. Press, 1952, that I came to regard hisstori[o}graphy (which I prefer to "hisstoriosophy") as the study of the “shape of metahisstory”, not of what it is that hisstorians do. Well, I admit that this misunderstanding, arguably an understanding, had its origins in the small [mu}it of access I had had to the shape-shifting-as-semantics involved in colored-hearing inner-Musculpt symformphonie. Memetime passing, I came to envision metahisstory's chronotopological “shape” not as unilineal (one attractor) or multilineal (n-attractors) or simply-cyclical “Indo-Hellenic uniform rotation” or as ancient Chinese social blockchain of recurrent links or as Ouspensky's eternally-returned exact recurrence or as an attractor-pulled closing-spiral form -- each of these hisstori[o}graphic envisionments being ways in which memetime-bound binary minds choose to process the Schrödinger-memetime-independent, cyclotomic involutory, decomposition-recomposition Abfall(existential confirmations)-Aufhebung(existential denials), _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ unlooking-looking through Irene Rice Pereira's “layered transparent” of the “transcendental formal logic of the infinite”, thus with respect to T_{zog-chen C+}T_C+-AllBase of the BackCloth which is the multi-sheeted MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. Bivalently speaking, universal consciousness in its active aspect is the set of all decomposition-recomposition operators (3-fold topo-active optime/counter-optime) on the MVRS; universal consciousness in its passive aspect is the reference space acted upon. And _µT_mly “speaking”? Ah, well, that would require holographic exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation -- a somewhat not yet accomplished.

I find Jonathan W. Tooker's “Preliminary” to his paper entitled “Infinitudinal Complexification” (preprint, viXra, March 2017) to be instructive as to the contrast between prevailing prevalent interpretations (including the multi-worlds interpretation of Hugh Everett, III's, ₁T₂-only-relative-state formulation) of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction and the interpretation involved in our G.Spencer-Brownian 3-fold-higher-order-time-differentiation-formulation (of _µT_m-pregeometry-logical-operator as memetime-independent topologically-active-operator-time cyclotomic-involutory-decomposition inducer of geometrodynamics) given here, circa 1980. Quoting Tooker, as linked above:

The main bottleneck in big bang cosmology is that it is difficult to define an evolution operator that can evolve the non-existent state of the universe, equation (1), into the current many-particle state that satisfies equation (2).

Tooker's eq. (1) sets the involved Schrödinger statefunction equal to 0; Tooker's eq. (2) sets the involved Schrödinger statefunctions equal to 1. So, 0/1 as non-existent OR existent: ₁T₂-only-logic defined on the cosmology as a first thought in development of the notion. And the “main bottleneck” is how to get this bivalent OR out of passive-passing-referential-linear-time evolution understood as to a quantum-operator-qua-observable to a ₁T₂-only-processing glutamate-etched-and-anchored observer (anthropomorphic POV of the well-enculturated-cum-well-socialized; not the system-qua-system POV, à la, say _C+T_C+-logical-universal-“observer-participant”-Q; “observer[₁T₂]-participant[_µT_m]” being an obvious misnomer in context of _CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+). Note that in our Brownian formulation, in contrast to Tooker's 0/1, we employ zero and infinity. To wit, quoting the above-linked Brownian “Appendix” to our paper entitled “Some Preliminary Considerations toward Development of a Mathematical Model of the Autogenic Brain Discharge as Spontaneous Localization in Quantum Measurement”:

This formalism expresses a set of permissible operations upon the binary set of singularities (zero, infinity). Mathematicians use the adjective “naked” with regard to such singularities because the term serves to express the concept that zero and infinity both define a limited spacetime domain [LSTD], while existing outside of space and time. In most physical problem solving, the zero and infinity states of the system are considered to represent “trivial” solutions. The present approach, in contrast, considers the zero and infinity states to designate singularities at the interface between limited spacetime domains. All the energy dynamics of critical and cooperative exchange processes are considered to take place at these singularities.

The upper bound to a given LSTD is zero equals infinity; the lower bound to a given LSTD is zero does not equal infinity. There are an infinite number of “states” (functional-analysis speaking; “slices”, geometrodynamically-speaking) between the upper and lower bounds of any given LSTD, of any finite collection of LSTDs, of any transfinite collection of LSTDs: the “laws of nature” differing according to the three classes of these collections (involutorily decomposed [from ontologically-pregiven M³, CommonGround, BaseState, BackCloth whatsoever the choice be made as to how to designate it] under 3-fold topologically-active operator-time). As regards our equivalent to Tooker's eq. (2), we do not represent a “many-particle state”, but the m-valued state of a particle, of a given LSTD, of a finite collection of LSTDs, of a transfinite collection of LSTDs: all wrapped into “one” _C+T_C+-relative-state of identity-transparency, i.e., the infinitudes of infinitudes of values signified by Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction (isolation-ness) extended to functional (multiple-connectedness) and functor (non-orientableness). Under memetime-independent demergent topo-active-optime executions, _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ (in lieu of probability amplitudes), the full collection of collections of identity-transparencies the universal ur-particle ontically assumes become manifest according to the logical POV assumed by universal consciousness understood, bivalently speaking, as: universal consciousness in its active aspect is the set of all decomposition-recomposition operators (3-fold topo-active optime/counter-optime) on the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, M³; universal consciousness in its passive aspect is the reference space acted upon. So, in our formulation, the complexing of aleph-null to the statefunction, as given by Tooker extending his eq. (2), is unnecessary, as that “Infinitudinal Complexification” is built into the very basis of the m-valued Schrödinger conception once that conception is interpreted to m-valued logics understood relative to relative-states of identity-transparency this one and only universe, not to probability waves or to multiple incommunicado “worlds”.

No. Ex-per[son}ally, my apostatizing I/i^m don't think that _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency are commercial applications in marketing realms of the self-extension-business model (see: “Possessions and the Extended Self”, Russell W. Belk, Journal of Consumer Research, 15:2, September 1988, pp. 139-68), howsoever greatly conspicuous consumption by the leisure class contributes to GNPs globally -- howbeit generously calculated. However, as a caveated modification-if-no-full-retraction, I credit the idea that the identity-incorporation primordially-archaically-traditionally involved in ritual gift exchange of cosmology signifiers, e.g., the sacred ulos ragi hidup pattern-of-life cloths, bespeak a simulacra-type foreshadowing-portending of authentic relative-state identity-transparency, symbolic contents of the cloths being tropological reminding talismans, phylacteries, vis-à-vis the operative part-is-whole-hologrammic Weltanschauung then concretized to Umwelts via “participation mystique” states of consciousness -- this tropological function and incorporation facilitation being missing from modern deteriorated forms of gift giving like bribes, transaction rents, omiyage, Mother's Day chocolates, birthday presents, Christmas gifts, so on. Since modern gift giving doesn't fulfill the memetime-honored folk-universal of helping to carry Weltanschauung-into-Lebenswelt-into-Umwelt ((this being a Geertzian “thick” explanation, obviously quite different from that of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Eugene Halton as given in their book entitled The Meaning of Things, Cambridge U. Press, 1981, wherein psychic energy is treated as conscious-unconscious-[and, I would add, BlackPsyche-manipulated]-allocation of attention cathexes, qua projective-identification, to ₁T₂-only-object-relations-cum-bonding, crisp or fuzzy, sans Weltanschauung significations empathically introjected such that part-is-whole hologrammic transparency in _µT_m-“object”-relations-cum-bonding is ontically realized qua demerged)), uh, since it, modern gift giving, doesn't thereby help minimize the index of coercion required to sustain the basic modicum of sociality amongst members of the socius such that the thin-blue-line can actually be thin and ₁T₂-only-lawfare jurisprudence actually be prudent, ObsessiveCompulsiveDisorder has taken over shop-until-you-drop gifting behaviors. One occasion by which my I/i^m lost theirits reflex always to engage in projective-identification-incorporation-to-Umwelt was when my Iambe fell asleep and was sunburned, thus yielding my me an Article 15 whereupon its “I” was found guilty of destroying “government property”. If Belk can quote Simmel ₁T₂ly-to-wit, “material property is, so to speak, an extension of the ego, and any interference with our property is, for this reason, felt to be a violation of the person”, then I can quote Proudhon _µT_mly-to-wit, “Property is theft”. Having moved more than twenty times in our first-quarter-century together, Nha Trang and I each packed our total complement of possessions into two small suitcases each for check-in plus carry-ons: the implied market behavior of this state of transience hardly qualifies us for inclusion in consumer research. Me: two Levis (boot-cut 517s, even though, ugh!, they aren't what they used to be [ask me why, going back to 1955]; I'd hardly qualify 501s as “jeans”, let alone the designer ilk: ruined this product was, once they began using preshrunk fabric) and 3 shirts, a few accessories, belt, boots-shoes-zoris, socks, underwear: that's about it (ski jacket, if out of the subtropics). Personal docs, a couple of books, and some recently acquired photocopies used in research for writing. Whatever little else had been accumulated between moves got given away, sold, dumped: later in life, we “amassed” -- heh-heh-heh -- a bit more between moves; always getting back to the suitcases (in my case, the same aluminum Samsonites purchased in August of 1963 when I went off to college: sixty years later, still using only these: easy to see why they stopped making them, as no conformity to mandated built-in obsolescence) and carry-ons. Not really identified, is my Iambe, with jeans and suitcases, as I could quite well be satisfied possessing tiger-cammie cargo-pants-and-tunic, jungle boots, and two olive-drab rucksacks -- if the Kandinsky-esque internal-necessity arose to demand it (though the whole corpus of my I/i^ms long ago left all that behind as mere dust along the path) -- my non-monetized other-selves having long since chosen quality-of-state over quantity-of-things. This “preference function” choice made not least by having “tried out”, for the heuristic moral-integrity value, lifestyles, not of the rich and famous, but of backstreet babes Descartes-localized to, well, no Hoovervilles, but certainly Newtonian-nudged into the likes of Kennedyagrovilles-Johnsonvilles, garbage-block slums located halfway between Ba Chieu market and the Binh Loi bridge and down tapped-out hems near the JGS compound, up Bangkok sois good offices of LaurieAlwaysGalivantingMoss Sites-&-Services cum SollyAngel Habitat cum DougWebster NESDB, and along Jakarta's Alleys of Eden good offices of EdInskeep Integrated and Sustainable. The straightforwardly-without-any-elaboration-ordinarily-identifiable ₁T₂-only-sense of non-quantum-simple-self living in a “classical-limit”-circumscribed world, being Yi-Fu-Tuan “fragile”, is overdependent upon material-object-provided existential confirmations being projectively-identified with Umwelt components along with those few cognitive artifacts unconsciously sublimated from Weltanschauung via intermediating non-explicitly-designated Lebenswelt components (and this dysnerving-unto-unnerving debilitated specific condition of our Existentialist-separatism-alienation-anomie general condition is greatly inculcated-facilitated-overexploited by ₁T₂-only-capitalist marketeers, particularly those RSS-internet- and MoSoSo-smartphone-active). Ah, yes, we I/i^m do see. That's ₁T₂-only maintenance of the interiority/physicality absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct distinction in invariant worlding behaviors, eh, isn't it. A distancing from the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-states of identity-transparent “participation mystique”? In all likelihood, the more thoroughly absorbed the binary-mind becomes in relationships-of-telepresence, by principle of bivalence the greater becomes the hot-housed sham character of performance-enacted-out physically-present Goffman-dramaturgical face-to-face togetherness; indeed, the more amplified is a general sense of inauthenticity concerning physical ontic presence per se qua of being-in-the-world qua of da-sein being-there; resultant derealization-driven ascent into anomie vis-à-vis separatism-unto-alienation eliciting ever further hot-housing of links, connections, membership, commonalities, sharing, so on, in a doomed attempt to gather existential confirmations from a wealth of virtualities qua simulacra. The Ur-Thing: MACV-IntelligenceDataHandlingSystem-initialized-and-introjected-to-the-Zone-of-the-Interior, ZI, (one of the facilities facilitating the combat-arms faculties aspiring-to-global-Full-Spectrum-Dominance, massively-inordinate-privilege-overfunded, aggressively-forward-deployed-to-the-tune-of-750-bases-in-80-countries-120-in-Japan-alone, paranoiac-compulsive-national-insecurity-driven-surveillance-state), instituted-by-an-internet-business-modeled-reaching-for-actionable-Total-Information-Awareness, advancing-by-blockchained-global-monoscale-cryptocurrencies-cum-SocialCreditScoreSystems-cum-CentralBankDigitalCurrencies, anti-AKA, one-alphanumerically-designated, facial-recognition-and-n-biometricsignatures-verified “TruYou” (found, fixed, and optionally to be finished!) placed in a CONcentric-n-encircled enclosed CIRCLE, psycho-socio-politco-militarily formalizing an aspiration qua policy that is an obvious affect-charged-compensatory-abreactive ConversionDisorderDisplacement ConveDD of the ketaminergically-OBEed m-valued Schrödinger statefunction's existential threat to identification with the glutamatergically-IBEed single-valued-qua-truth-valued egofunction. Schrödinger m-valued: 1925; Born dissembled as indicating probability amplitudes: 1926, and quickly knee-jerk jury-rig consensuated. The term “jury rigged” would not successfully have entered demotic nomenclature independent of having accurately signified a chronic condition of ₁T₂-only-lawfare oft and widely observed: the age of that term bespeaks as to how “demo” democratic has actually been, and/or suggests that the emphasis has always been on the “cratic” side -- ₁T₂ly construed as a CloudGirl-reddit-summarized 5th-grade-Civics-class freedom-or-order proposition -- of the governance impulse. Humph! Obvious -- if widely placed “in denial”, the schizophrenogenic import of that Schrödinger-unto-Born transmogrification. Glaringly, barefacedly pronounced, uh, collectively amplified as a “mass-formation”-psychosis-induced ConveDD; indeed, a patentable pathology incarnated via dissimulated-quantum-based infratech: this specific condition of our general condition constituting the etiology and pathogenesis of the whole trajectory of modern-unto-postmodern-unto-posthuman “civilization”. Suppress the multivalue and what, by ConveDD, pops out of the resultant regression-in-service-to-the-egofunction? Epidemic of Book-Of-The-It-etiological multiple sclerosis? Standardizing what shouldn't be; not standardizing what should? Monetizing what shouldn't be; not monetizing what should? Should monetize: e.g., _µT_m-internalities which have been ₁T₂-only-defined as externalities à la the WilliMunzenberg-Lenin BlackPsyche principle “call the thing by the name of its opposite” adopted by the long-since-ex-OSS-MO-infiltrated-and-subverted academia and MSM. Policy Formulation 101: objectives, goals, interests. ConveDD that! whydon'tya: omni[tele}presence, omni[tele}science, omni[tele}potence. Oops, onLINE cellular-tesselated-nested [tele}pre|sence as a degenerate substitute for authentic generative-empathetic “participation mystique” (which is never one-to-one, person-to-person, peer-to-peer: always mediated by part-is-whole hologrammic transparency: see, “Following the path of light: Recovering and manipulating the information about an object”, Maria Bondani and Fabrizo Favale, Proceedings of SPIE -- The International Society for Optical Engineering -- Conference: Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, July 2013; and take note, to wit, quoting: “…each diffraction point [“self” among n-subsets of n^n-1 such “selves”] emits waves that reach every point of the hologram. Thus, the entire object is encoded into each subset of the hologram”; but, still, this “thus” doesn't much help me with “hearing-seeing” how semantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie geometrically encodes [_µT_m-pencils of skew-parallels involved, the fuzziness being due to ₁T₂-only processing?] shape-shifting as form informing). Constantly being ADVERT-no-conception-of-the-inadvertent hit with an ASD-ADHD-inducing barrage of diddy-boppin' doofus doo-wop! O, doobbie-doobbie-doo is the best I can do -- under these cognitive circumstances! COVID-jabbed brain fog unto brain rot Walden-fled. Dotguv-dotmil-dotintel-dotngo-dotedu-dotpseudocom-proprietary TPTB in hyperbole: rolling before them their mopey drolleries on wabbling push-trollies: can't control their own minds (constant intrusions of the unconscious-as-infinite-sets; such roof-brain-chattered “vampings” being dissembled as mere brooderisms, and ConveDDed into the criticism-yet-to-be-imposed-self-criticism blogsphere encompassing inner-outer-mergeable-but-still-₁T₂ly-distinctly enclosed as the cellular, uh, well, as projected: The Thing, if not The Ur-Thing which is That Thing which is not what it is), so, by compensatory abreaction, oh, woe e-arth we! must control the minds of “the others”, i.e., “themmuns”. For, foremost is/are us 1-percent, i.e., “ussuns”, on this overpopulated planet, whereupon even AIed-cum-CBIed TIA and memory-implantation will be inadequate to drone-swarmed FSD: hence, our bop-'n-swag-demonstrative commitment to people disestablishmentarianism -- or at least to forced-draft relocation of 5-billion or so to asteroid-Moon-Mars NEZ reserve-labor-concentration… camps. Much more acceptable to have the “Adjustment Bureau” do this yada-yada-yada off-planet, don'tyathink? Heh-heh-heh! That guffaw, well, that's evocative of compensatory-abreactive, schizotypal, ₁T₂-only-self-concept-threatened, prefronto-striatal-network disrupted Schadenfreude -- in case yadidn't know. No hyperbolics here, not when truth-value is tertiary to distinction secondary to ID-transparency. Functionalist-to-action-based-structuralist-to-dramaturgicalist-to-poststructuralist-to-deconstructionist-to-symbolic-interactionist-to-pluristic-constructivist-to-multitudinous-perspectivalist-to-actor-network-theorist-to-the-pluiversicle-n-ontologies of ontological anthropology's alterity. Shush! Don't be like that -- that skulking thought as to wondering why one of these ist's-ism's-istic's-inous's-ies's-ical's-icle's-ity's should be the only one. Decentration, m'man-woeman! Quantum-nonlocatedness is a spatiality gain: Hilbertfunction-functional-functor, with “penciled”-in infinite sequences that are J.G.Bennettian-null-vector-defined-samely-insame-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-skew-parallel-hypercube-summable, maybe even. C+ly-non-selfsame-order-typed T_zog-chen-CommonGround-AllBase of the multi-sheeted BackCloth. Martin Holbraad, via Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, stating anthropology's cosmological-perspectivism take on Amerindian multinaturalism's take on the samely-insame, non-selfsame, “Mirror-that-Smokes” pre-pregeometry, to wit:

Viveiros de Castro writes… [that] different species do not see the same thing (or 'world') in different ways, but rather “see in the same way… different things [or 'worlds']”.

Not exactly the _C+T_C+-AllBase, but getting pretty close. Hard to imagine that any indigenous world-construct-view-vision could have existed that did not fall out of some-“where” -- no elsewheres therehere! -- in the cyclotomic-involutory pregeometry-demergence of _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂.

Were the basic ideas in our model experimentally tested and supported, then there would be confidence that there are at least two non-ionizing ways in which ultrasound can damage DNA and conveyance -- to intra-organismic structures and phase boundaries -- of the genetic information the molecule contains: (1) by altering the harmonic temperature oscillation rate of the pi-electron parcels in the molecule's enveloping free-electron gas environment; and (2) by beating upon the coherent qua acoustically-modified quadripolar waves emitted by the molecule, waves which contain all the information encoded into the nucleotide-pair sequence (one pole of quadripolar wave for each of the four nucleotide pairs). Because the mathematics of this model were developed by Cornell tornadogenesis specialist Douglas A. Paine during his contemplations concerning the acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes (infrasound) associated with severe local storms, we were discussing (and I occasionally wrote up) from late-1975 our ideas as to the likelihood that ultrasound could damage DNA. Almost everyone we mentioned this idea to scoffed, and when our DNA paper was published in the International Journal of Quantum Chemistry the exemplifying Cornell reaction was encapsulated with the statement of a leading biochemist: “I can't understand how a well-trained scientist can come up with such hair-brained ideas!” The few who didn't scoff -- most notably Bill Keeton (whose lectures on biological clocks I sat in on at Doug Paine's request, taking detailed notes) and Mel Kreithen and Doug Quine -- were associated with the Cornell Neurobiological Behavior Laboratory and Pigeon Loft, research by whom later verified the notion that pigeons use infrasound signatures of geographical features in their homing. What we didn't know then, and I've only now become aware of, is that there are reports in the scientific literature going back to 1929 documenting tissue-genetic-chromosomal-DNA damage due to ultrasound exposure (see here and here for an article dated 22 December 2024 containing links to these many reports).

“The center of the circle is everywhere” -- polylogically speaking from habitus established in a _µT_m-metacultural context -- is certainly not ₁T₂-bitically-true or 2-state-qubitically-true, probably not so even of a circular hologrammic plate, but if actually the case, then it can only be _CT_C+ly so. Not by any consideration is Cyberia's binary-bitic-cum-two-state-qubitic-information “transparency” same-same autological (think: autogonic cosmogony by memetime-independent involutory demergence-remergence via cyclotomic decomposition-recomposition) relative-state identity-transparency, which has no ₁T₂-only equivalent -- as Everett's ₁T₂-only-relative-state formulation tacitly acknowledges, by allowance as to predication of the opacity definitional of the radical dissociation immanent in the multi-worlds heterological interpretation of QM. As differentiable from Heidegger's take on Aletheia, I see the Aletheia-close-approach to, or closely-following-upon, truth as a closure, not a disclosure, a closure of propositional logic to the ₁T₂-only-truth-value-order-of-logical-value, logical-value understood relative to relative-states of identity-transparency. Time to Heidegger is a Husserl horizon, a William James “fringe”, for “intentionality of meaning” ((think: walking past a construction site, instead of JohnCage-hearing a pattern of pure sounds, one hears what one stigmatizes as being noise and attributes identification of a hammer hitting, of a saw sawing, so on: corpus of projected semantics constitutes the “horizon”; this concept can be extended to inner and outer objects, time, space, the world, into transcendental domains: walking meditation involves practice at withdrawing attributed, i.e., prescriptively-enculturated-socialized and glutamate-anchored, meanings, so as to obtain -- or, practically-speaking, and this apparently involves endogenous ketamine flood, make close approach to -- “bare” propriocepts-percepts: phenomenological “reduction”, ontically experiential as distinct from ₁T₂ly-introspected, is an emptying sufficient to allowance of conscious access to cum registration of cum memory of the “facet-analytic-Cubist” [this is the conventional art-historian's take, shorn of the influences of Husserliana and Planck-Einstein], m-valued-logic processing which is Schrödinger-memetime-independently executed by counter-topologically-active operator-time in cyclotomic reemergence qua reverse-cascade)). Heidegger's idea of Being is as a function of memetime (temporal horizon imparts the meaning -- see-man-tics -- of human Being: [us}sons are time), there being in his concept no notion of a “synthetic-Cubist”, uh, “downward causation” of a world-of-things in time or of time in a world-of-things, let alone of memetime-independent topologically-active-operator-time-induced-qua-executed cyclotomic-decomposition qua demergence to the ponderablespacememetime of the decoherent-things modality of the world. Not a matter of your doxa or mine, those of soft-utopians, hard-utopians, posthuman-AIbot-perfection-utopians (human, themmuns transhumanists yet are, take note). Perfect-information-transparency TIA (actually TIC, C for control) quite simply is a highly-regressed, deeply-pathological ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the post-consensus-QM specter of _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen superconducting-mirror (perfectly absorbs and reflects back with perfect blackbody verisimilitude anything projected upon it) BaseState. Relative-states of identity-transparency are _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+; so, they have nothing whatsoever to do with ₁T₂-only-information-transparency TIA cum bivalent-logic opensource programming, absence of privacy, surveillance society, social-credit scoring, techno-sharing-recording-storing of binary-mind roof-brain chatter and all the secondary-tertiary-n-ary analytic-products thereof. Not, as per Dave Eggers' The Circle, “Privacy is theft”; but: (₁T₂-only) “Property is Theft” (of the multivalue). The holographic principle's “boundary contains in-itself all that it circumscribes” subsumes the hologrammic principle's “part contains its whole”, which predicates the notion that the center is everywhere, which predicates QMechanical memespatial nonlocality, if not memetemporal nonlocality. The polyperspectivity (this link illustrates how obscure a hundred years later are m-valued logics and their manifold implications: not good as regards prognosis relative to coming cuspover, global crisis) of facet-analytical-Cubism (see post by “Assistant”): moving around the object in no-time? Being no-[well-definable]-being in real-numbered ponderablespace? Circumambulation of the glutamatergically-etched constant object Piaget-learned by exercise in sight-touch-movement-memory, the first such learned-constant-object being the physical body identified with, this IBEed circumambulation being in lieu of OBEed spatial and/or temporal nonlocality. Archaic-Shinto ma, sacred space: multiple plane-sheets Riemann-surface-like bridged by time (“November Steps” in Toru Takemitsu's collection d'oeuvres: “There is a time [concept] difference between Tokyo and New York.”). Each plane sheet of the cosmological collection d'oeuvres a perspective on the object-world, a facet of the Husserlian horizon of the world-of-simply-located-simply-identifiable-things? Facet Cubism non-linearly back-projects (not introjects) the superposed multiple POVs onto the plane surface of the canvas: is that Shinto or is that Shinto? The archaic Shinto, the Shinto which modernist Shintoists forgot? In-here body constancy being no less a glutamate-etched-and-anchored learned behavior than is out-there object constancy, that Laws-of-Form-drawn distinction no less ₁T₂-only-definable than is the selfsame-instant of the arrowing memetime line, and localization in binocular visual space being dependent upon a “psychometric distance function” -- well, all those humongous data centers being constructed to store the binary “roof-brain chatter” of every found existential object-subset-set-superset-category and to facilitate AI learning, what are they but an infinitely abysmal reduction of _C+T_C+-AllBase of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, ConveDDed-in-service-to-regressed-archetypal-gradients of collective-unconscious-as-infinite-sets expressing the current fulmination of a “mass-formation” psychosis persistent over millennia. Andddd, here yet again is one of my paraphasic skipovers: frequently hopping like Hedy Lamarr, or like the story-“line” of The Moon of Hoa Binh! Is there an ascertainable hopping pattern, or is there not? For one ₁T₂-only question! “Planckian jitters”? Oh, lordy, that's another question -- a 2-state qubitic question, as currently framed. Ack, aye, polyperspectivity in multinaturalism's take on the samely-insame non-selfsame, directly experienced in the various states of “participation mystique”, which can be objectified only under the subject-object dualism endemic to users of bivalent logic alone amongst all the logical-value order-types there are of this world. Each piece of a broken hologrammic plate-plane (I like “hologram” for the recording device and “holograph” for the projected image: but that's just my binary-mind sorting-out; whereas mixing meanings of the two words as the dictionary authorities have done, well, that's P.C.) contains the whole image as seen from a given angle-perspective. The smaller-the-piece/the larger-the-piece: is there change to angle-perspective, not only in fuzziness, dimness, resolution? No? What about the order-of-value of the logic involved (think: Tantric Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction interpreted with m-valued logics, not as indicative of the existence of probability-wave amplitudes) in the wave interference à la the waves' superposed “overtone” series (think: electron holography and acoustic holography, both of which implicit in our 1979 “superconductant DNA pi-electron gas” model of DNA radiation-exchange processes)? Yes? Hmmm. If yes, do these pieces of broken hologrammic plate-plane correlate to the facets of facet Cubism? What of a hologrammic cube (a sheaf of transparencies each with recording-medium embossed thereupon: extending the practice of storing multiple holographic images on the same plate) instead of a single single-valued plate-plane productive of multiple output beams? Only more brightness-clarity from a broken-off multi-sheeted piece and more image movement upon viewer movement? What, I wonder, of a J.G.Bennettian hologrammic “skew-cube” _µT_mly-fabricated with null-(as regards real-numbered-space)-vector-defined “pencils of skew-parallels”, skewness related to temporal CURL? Is there, as I have long thought and frequently stated, a relationship of the facets of facet Cubism to the facets of the Husserl horizonality of an object? If so, what is it, precisely? Maybe not, no such relationship, for the binary-mind, eh! Does each broken-off-piece qua and/or cum facet correspond to an order-of-value in _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ logics? Does each broken-off piece contain the full spectrum of m-valued logics, and when projected with ₁T₂ly-only-constructed projectors and image processed by binary minds, the resultant is fuzzy and, uh, uh, angle-fixated? Is there anything in Husserliana that is not ₁T₂-only bound -- other than generalizations of fuzzy vaguenesses regarded as reductive phenomenologies? Oops! Here, again, frequency hop-hop spreadout, opening the choke on the cognitive shotgun! Pellets flying hither and yon, bouncing off and connecting up in the most unlikely of fashions. Colored-phosphene, dot-matrix-photism flashovers (cf. brain-discharged visual phenomena orchestrated during “autogenic abreactions” by the “centrencephalic safety discharge mechanism”, as closely studied and cataloged by Wolfgang Luthe) in superposed sheets predicating “fairy lights”! Jack Dwosh, circa mid-1960s, as related by Deirdre Campbell, circa 1968, talked of intersecting-laser-beams-projection of cubes (myriads of junction-dots densely packed, sheaf-theoretically sheeted, even) of light free-floating over tables in a Las Vegas casino: this notion has ever since inspired my imagination as to a pre-pregeometry “bucket-of-dust” qua “warm-golden dust” approach to pregeometry decoding of the feeling-tone-conveyed geometrodynamic semantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie: I note here and here and here that interacting-lasers-projection of moving holographic images is being realized-if-not-yet-perfected, the “fairy lights” version with potential applications to computerized, laser-projection-domed, biofeedback-equipped, isolation-flotation Lilly tank as research lab for developing holographic exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS.

In “Multiple Horizons: Phenomenology, Cubism, Architecture”, The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 19:6, 18 August 2014, Pau Pedragosa footnotes (#12) his statement that “What Cubism achieves by pictorial means is what phenomenology achieves by theoretical means” (note: “theoretical”, not by direct ontic experience, such as in walking meditation as I practiced it during my twenties and thirties) with a phenomenology-related quote from Eliane Escoubas, to wit: “…the eidos (aspect) -- insofar as the aspect is no being, but the appearing of that which appears.” I take this -- “aspect is no being” as an “appearing” -- as being indicative of the presence of a null vector in the sense elaborated by J. G. Bennett (an accurate Escoubasian vagueness given some Bennettian precision) at definition of a “pencil of skew-parallels” [the involved skewness being the “eidos (aspect)”, with “aspect” as POV-angle-of-unit-circle of circumambulation around the facet-Cubism object, which is related to temporal-CURLed _µT_m-relative states demerged under execution by 3-fold topologically-active operator-time -- according to our, Paine-Pensinger, scheme, that is]: this Bennett elaboration given in Appendix III to Chapter 15 of his magnum opus, The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956, to wit, “If we are to set our ontology free from the limitations of single-valued existence we require a geometry that will enable us to represent situations in which each entity can be 'more than one thing as once'. Since adding a null-vector to a finite vector leaves the latter unchanged and yet such that when projected it appears to be different…” Now -- for me anyway -- Escoubas' “appearing” and the “appears” of Bennett's “when projected it appears to be different” are vaguenesses needing additional precision -- if the involved notions are to assist in fathoming out geometrodynamic feeling-toned symbology as the semantics dimension of inner-Musculpt symformphonie semiotics. Some of the required additional precision may be evident in Fig. 5 of “Phenomenology of Holography via Quantum Coherence on Causal Horizons”, Ohkyung Kwon, arXiv, 2 November 2023, where within the Escoubasian “eidos (aspect)” qua Bennettian “skewness” is designated “holographic space-time uncertainties” and geometrodynamically graphed with bent vector-arms and pictured with “causal diamonds” (in our, Paine-Pensinger, scheme: LSTDs, limited spacetime domains) in stacked overlay of transparencies (think I.RicePereira “layered transparent” of the “transcendental formal logic of the infinite”), the ₁T₂-only-orthogonal (probability-amplitude-compliant) bending of the bent vector-arms, in our terms, that of Paine-Pensinger, being an intimation of Bennettian-skew, _µT_m-non-orthogonal (re: m-logically-valued interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction) “1st-order temporal curl” as depicted in our 1977 paper entitled “Toward a General Theory of Process”. Kwon postulates that his scale-level-layered schema can be extended such that it “might apply generally”. He goes on to say that, “If one takes this seriously in flat space-time, the density of information in a causal diamond -- the number of microscopic degrees of freedom per volume -- decreases as the inverse of the system scale.” Paine-Pensinger speculated that the scale-level step-function obeys a log log value distribution analogous to that involved in the Riemann hypothesis concerning the complex zeta function -- and that the universal physical constants governing dynamical behavior in layered-nested and tessellated LSTDs (qua “causal diamonds”) are m-valued, with these values being scale-relative, such that “holographic quantum uncertainties” qua “holographic noise” realized at horizon-imposed scale-relative absolute-limiting values of dynamical variables are related to _µT_m-logical relative-states of identity-transparency geometrically codifiable with null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”, the binary Heisenbergian uncertainty relations being epiphenomenal to employment of bivalent logic alone to assess _µT_m-logical-relative-states. The bivalent-logic diktat of consensus QM is reinforced by the probability-amplitude interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction and a reliance on the associated notion of thermodynamic randomness (from which Kwon has space-time emerging, à la coherent quantum information on black hole causal horizons, i.e., noisy random motion as generator of coherent causality as generator of the space-time referent for a decoherent object-world). In this context, Kwon's scale-level step-function is randomized such that, “This 'Planckian random walk' scaling is analogous to the standard quantum positional uncertainty… and corresponds to the scale of quadripolar distortions a black hole horizon needs to radiate the standard Hawking flux…”. Whereas, in our, Paine-Pensinger, treatment, within the LSTDs-causal-diamonds scale-levels of DNA and its quantum-wave properties, the coherent Hawking radiation emitted during helix-coil transition is quadripolar as conveyor of the information stored in the sequence of the four nucleotide pairs. Within the LSTDs-causal-diamonds scale-levels of Earth's atmosphere, the quadripolarity has to do with topologically-active operator-time's temporal CURLing of the involved field quantities.

Quite frankly -- no encomium offered here -- when the plethora of vaguenesses becomes a blathering bucket of vagaries quirkishly back-channel proclaiming itself “clear conceptual language”, my Cubistic I/i^m facets (walking-meditation-authentically-experienced facet-Cubism object without facet-Cubism subject? Humph!) take recourse in a tendency to intercalation as a means of fathoming out. Looking for help from phenomenology in decoding the semantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie, I run across two quotes from Jan Patocka as given by Jan Josl in his article entitled “Patocka's Philosophy of Art and Care For the Soul”, Horizon, 8:2, 2019, to wit, quoting:

[Unity of the human ability to conceive of non-objectifiable transcendence, make moral choices, and exercise the ability to experience the {CommonGround?} “final horizon”] …in aesthetic attitude world surfaces {these surfaces being: the feeling-toned apperceptions of the… what? spiritual qualia? resident in the tactile surfaces of things in the object-world; the facets of Husserl horizon; the multiple sheets of ma, sacred space?}, but it is now not just a “collection of things” but a “harmony of meaning” {all the ₁T₂-only-specifiable significations experienced in composite as an m-valued-logic supersession?}, which appeared from the depths of the abyss {by gaining access to inner-Musculpt symformphonie?} “aided by the participation of a finite, mortal being that is used up {far-from-equilibrium dissipation of the egofunction?} in this magnificent occurrence”, which, as the “birthplace” {multi-sheeted MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space?} of all meaning, also raises a question about another, deeper, ultimate meaning as its unalienable point of convergence {most-dense sheet of MVRS qua T_zog-chen AllBase?}.

The work of art lifts itself above world time {Schrödinger time-dependency qua ₁T₂-only-definable memetime?} to the time itself {Schrödinger time-independency; topologically-active operator-time?} and in this joint {critical-state far-from-equilibrium phase transition; breaking wavefunction cusp catastrophe wherein correlation lengths go to infinity; divergence marking initialization of temporal CURL?}, where everything finite and ephemeral is put aside; the specific character of time, the world in its totality and secrets is incorporated to present, but in its reality irrelevant figure, and so the veil of awe shines in new light, in light of what is essential, in light of being.

Individually- and collectively-designated internal memetime: re[tent}ive in[man}ent temporal constipation. Guff-guff-guff -- no awe; not a wed. This guffawed disparagement, although Patocka is apparently explaining the metaphysical-cosmogonic depths he sees the Analytical Cubist painter delving to in the artist's painterly essays-on-canvas -- deep-structure exploration being a defining feature of art qua art. Patocka is said by Josl to doubt adequacy of Walter Biemel's account (this account being too much a surface-structure treatment?) of polyperspectivity with its superposed-transparent-facets-geometry focus (Husserliana-wise, as I see it: the ₁T₂ly-hidden Abschattungen facets of horizon being the inaccessible and absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct analogues to the dissociated Everettian multi-worlds, à la “world horizon” as differentiated from Patocka's “final horizon”, these larger-scale horizons beings extensions made vis-à-vis, qua from, the binary-mind's imputation as to discrete-decoherent object as functional-structural requisite to confidence in the empty claim of unalloyed existence, no “facets” thereof, of egofunction subject), an account addressed in Otilia Huzum's paper entitled “Interpretation Testing of the Poliperspective”, Dezvoltarea economico-sociala durabila a regiunilor si a zonelor transfrontaliere, Vol. XXXII, 2018, and, in respect to the Czech take thereupon, in Jaroslava Vydrova's article entitled “The intertwining of phenomenology and cubism -- In the analyses and works of art of Czech Artists and Theoreticians”, Horizon, 5:1, 2016, pp. 214-31. My main observation from reading into the above-given being: apparently, even in Eastern Europe, no connection is made between logical-value order-types of Lukasiewicz logics and Husserlian Abschattungen. One ₁T₂-only POV or n-₁T₂-only PsOV: no matter; still ₁T₂-only, i.e., single-valued: the phenomenologist's logical-positioning-of-the-being which supports the probability-amplitude dissimulation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction no less than does the dissociated-multi-worlds interpretation of Everett's relative-state formulation. Moreover, the “psychophysiological space” of the reductive phenomenologist is not, for instance, binocular visual space (BVS), if we are to believe Rudolf K. Luneburg: for Luneburg BVS is a non-Euclidian metrical space with Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction; there being no localization in BVS independent of its “psychometric distance function” ((Everett assumed, and explicitly stated in a pivotal assertion made halfway through his signal paper, that there is phenomenologically-given localization, and this misassumption led him off into the vonNeumann formalism and away from his post-adolescent fascination with the self-referential propositions that could have carried him to a _µT_m-logical take on Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction)). Your psychometric differing minutely from my psychometric, we do not experience the exact same BVS -- embodied “understanding through flesh”, or not. Semi-parenthetically, Karl Popper's protentional “propensities” interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction (which -- clearly, given his reductive Heisenbergian take on m-valued self-referential propositions and associated reflexivities -- George Soros naively bought into) most pellucidly codifies how dissimulated-quantum-based technologies, like www-dot, have magnified beyond all previously-imagined cases, the normotic-human propensity to lie-lie-lie plus F-you whenever circumstances allow just for the H-of-it, as a matter of principle, even when there is little or nothing to be gained thereby. If abjectly-₁T₂-only Husserliana cum transparent-facet Cubist superpositionism has so accurately portrayed The Human Condition (in Hannah Arendt's characterization -- by tilting decisively to an action-based bias -- neglecting the fact that the Japanese craftsman made of his “work” a contemplative state-of-being and that even a tree-digger can transform his “labor” into a form of meditation), as our Existentialist ((“existence precedes essence” ₁T₂ly-[man}dates an inherent separatism which can inculcate alienation and anomie; whereas Sartre's imputation that we are always other than ourselves, actually has much more substance in _µT_m-habitus upon T_zog-chen AllBased “essence precedes existence” -- leaving, that is, validity-utility of logical-ontological-temporal precedence relations unchallenged by retention of identification with ₁T₂-only-cognitive residuals like memetime and ponderable space)) phenomenologists claim, why then, over the century of Husserliana's existence, has the conflicted condition of The Human Condition ever more transmogrified (collapse of the contemplative trophotropic to the active ergotropic, of work to labor, of plurality to singularity, of public to private, of worth to value) into a going-to-in[send}i|ary, toxic-shock, Chockerlebnis, global-crisis cuspover? Because, first and foremost, the ₁T₂-only -- that is the single-valued-logic -- POV of Husserliana fosters the very condition it most stigmatizes: i.e., the “single perspective”, the “official story”, the “command position” (e.g., COMUSMACV's diktat on the “correct” enemy-strength-estimate figure, modulatable, for instance, by determinations as to which categories to count and which not to count; that is, the modulations [those politically motivated, regards U.S. electoral politics, being among the collection of such modifications] being the facets of the Husserlian horizon of enemy strength, there being no actualized estimate until approved by COMUSMACV's dippy DIP, Director of Intelligence Production). This disparagement of the single-valued-logic positioning-of-the-being is not to say that Husserliana has been responsible for the prevailing condition of The Human Position, uh, uh, [Con}dition, only that it has been ₁T₂ly-consistent with inducement thereof. Unmitigated growth (as the fundamental prerequisite to markette-mediated so-supposed self-organization) of ₁T₂-only strip-developed-and-urban-blighted, inanity-infused, dehumanizingly-built e[con}omic development understood synonymous with forced-draft urbanization as essence of The Human Condition in n-logged n-logical public spacetime (glutamatergically etched and anchored via ₁T₂-only prescriptive enculturation-socialization) was the regressed-archetypally-delivered recipe by which corporeality unfortunately was AynRand (as a teenybopper I read Rand, Up From Liberalism, the whole lot -- until it became apparent to me that conservatives have no actual commitment to authentic self-organization; nth-degree ditto that re: neoCONs) cum HannahArendt remade as corpo[rate}reality, the latter currently reconstituting itself as XedoverFaceBookedCBIed virtualreality: these transitions -- ever further from _µT_m-participation-mystiqued immersion in the natural surround -- from, that is, nature to built-environment to psychoprojection, establishing the structural and functional prerequisites to mass hysteria unto collective-psychosis-individually-experienced-as-normative. How many “no-brainers” -- those members of the GLE, global leadership elite, thoroughly identified with regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious -- the hu-hu-[hu}man species can incorporate without going into core-meltdown is an open-unanswered question. Not least because urban-and-regional-planning-arrived-at “protensions” -- phenomenological “stretchings forth“ -- have no direct interface with ₁T₂-only-markette action-directives which generally override diktats of the comprehensive or strategic urban-regional-development plan, even if attempted implementation is via disjointed incrementalism and/or tactical improvisation (a situation that will persist so long as there is absence of _µT_m-processed m-valued-LETS-currency nesting-foams, the currency-unit value-ensheavement e-commons, n-scenarios-StratPlan, Vir-Fut Q-Pro, open-source computer-gamed, not preference-function e-referenda-voted as per The Circle. Authentic metareferential tropological multiutilities, qua Benjaminian “multiuses” (((note that the linked paper contains an excellent account of action-based Hannah Arendt as well as certain aspects of Walter Benjamin on the City-as-Art-Object [good offices of Alan Wall, The Fortnightly Review, 4 June 2018], the Arendt-action-bias-basis facilitated by the action-based sociologies of Harvard's Talcott Parsons and UC-Berkeley's Neil Smelser-of-collective-behavior-₁T₂-only-theory fame: the “Arendt Theses” are notions I haven't “actively” contemplated since BKK Conversations, good offices, as always, of wife Nha Trang, the Constant Consummate Instigator-Assimilator-Facilitator, circa 1986, with Solly Angel [my earliest opportunity-for-airings-with-an-expert of the notion of _µT_m-LETS and associated concepts, airings with challenging brief-backs within which I learned a lot about texts availed of by Sixties-era UC-Berkeley-planning Ph.D. candidates, not least by studying contents of Angel's personal library], a member of the UC-Berkeley “planning mafia” which globally dominated international urban-regional planning consultancies over several decades, sophistication of the manifold insights-foresights of which, insofar as I am aware, were largely dissipated by… well, you, the reader, can surely name many of the involved its]))), for instance, can't actually exist in a ₁T₂-only-logical “public spacetime” -- only those sham. Auric authenticity has habitus, not in glutamate-etched and -anchored ₁T₂-only-definable ponderable space and memetime, but can only exist in endogenous-ketaminergic _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency, the so-supposed object-in-itself cum isolatable subject-as-object/object-as-subject being apocryphal, derivative of ₁T₂ly-prescriptive enculturation-socialization. Contemplate the notion that The Circle depicted by Dave Eggers actually portrays a collective projective-identification, not a satirical techno-future history of the internet age: the unitarity, the orthogonality, the self-adjunctivity imposed upon in-the-box cognitively-cubitic BoxMen throughout the last two-and-a-half millennia by The Circle closed in identification with the bivalent-only logic -- [0,1] or [yin,yang] (be The Circle the unit circle or the TaiChi circle) -- which is ₁T₂-exclusively qua _µT_m-exclusionarily glutamatergically neuronally-etched-and-anchored, via orchestration provided by prescriptive enculturation-socialization, to the hermeneutic spheroid of the cortico-striatal GABAergic and glutamatergic dysregulated ₁T₂-only egofunction social-structure-of-attention-cathexes carried into ultra-high risk of fulminating normosis. Throughout the ages, very few have found ways to escape that closing circle of ultra-high risk -- a level of risk recently amplified by the impacts upon attention cathexes made by the advances of social media: Eggers' depiction of The Circle is really that of just a few degrees of amplification of what has long been the case, the case responsible for the ever more exacerbated condition of The Human Condition.

Psychologist George Harris (who headed up the SORO, Special Operations Research Office, team that wrote the U.S. Army Handbook for Vietnam) was not the flamboyant personality some of the other AU-SIS instructors were, circa 1963, so the “Human Behavior” seminars he oversaw the team teaching of were not nearly so well regarded by students as they should have been: what I learned in his seminars benefitted me later in life far more than any other source I tapped at AU. With a few minor exceptions, one being an assignment given by Abdul Aziz Said during “Foreign Policies of the Great Powers” or “Problems in World Politics” (memory of such details is fading): we were tasked with writing the speech we believed a foreign dignitary would give under prescribed circumstances. Achieving verisimilitude required a considerable act of imagination, not only stylistic study of the supposed speechmaker. How would they react, with what affect-charge; what general realm would they be thinking into; what considerations would be given preferential attention, under which governing impulse; how would the manner of expression be chosen? Working on this, I found myself introspecting upon my own introspection -- such that I became once removed from my own thought processes in a way that allowed me to imagine what “speech” I would “write” under these and those possible circumstances. And to try to answer why I would so “write” in “that” circumstance. So-- I found: in order to reach plausible such answers, I needed to let my imagined reactions unfold untrammeled, with no self-censorship: then, I could get a real sense of what the actual motivating factors would be. If I intervened, criticized, and self-censored the “roof-brain chatter” (which, having read C. G. Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul, I knew to have a large component of collective-unconscious forcing), then those personal-impersonal motivations would likely remain pretty well subliminal. I discovered that in many imaginary circumstances negative emotions in general, feelings of being slighted, of not receiving my proper due, of being ignored, revenge fantasies, the imagining of getting some back (“from the Bear”?), and the like were the real impetuses behind the likely reactions. And, moreover, I knew that these knee-jerked responses had to do, in significant measure, with the exposure I had had growing up as a military brat learning how dangerous is the world we live in. Since I was studying international relations, and, circa 1963-5, virtually every course I took in some way or another touched upon the Viet Nam War, I asked myself a functional-equivalent facsimile of the following question; and I quote David Stockman, from his article entitled “Wilson's Folly, The Washington Hegemon and Why There Is Still No Peace On Earth”, AntiWar.com, 1 January 2025:

How in the world did the notion that the planet is teeming with incipient monsters that can only be tamed by the global presence and continuous vigilance of a Washington-led and -kitted planetary gendarme ever take such deep roots and persevere for so long?

I knew back then, 1965, that “such deep roots” lie hidden in my me (born Flag Day of 1945 to a B-17 pilot; coming of age at Ashiya AFB, Japan, during the interminable Occupation and at the pseudo-end of the Korean War; visiting the A-bomb sites; witnessing an early stage in the several-stage resupply effort to Dien Bien Phu) well below my range of normal consciousness. Is this not a collectively-imposed psychological cage arresting my prospective personal inner development, I asked myself? Yes, was the answer given to the rhetorical question. Therein was revealed a hypothesis, which demanded a search for attestation: answering the collective question is prerequisite to resolution of my personal “neurosis”; resolution of my personal “neurosis” is prerequisite to answering the collective question. So-- I knew I had to get up close to the collective behavior involved if I was to develop the real insight required to expand the range of my normal consciousness in relevant fashion. Therefore, I quit college, and joined the Army “Airborne Unassigned”, intent upon finding my way into Special Forces Training Group. But, operating in the field in Viet Nam with Technical Intelligence Detachment, 525th Military Intelligence Group, provided no impetus to my attestation search, for I started to get “the real insight” (see the abstract to: “Who Caused the Cambodian Holocaust, Anyway?”) only upon arrival at Targets Branch of the Combined Intelligence Center, Vietnam.

Prescriptive adventitious psychological immersion is not exactly the same as di[rig}is|me-type submersion -- speaking, that is, in terms apropos roof-brain-chattered imprecations. Having had imposed a focus established upon ₁T₂-only-egofunction processing: that is immersion; submersion: that is being induced into exclusive identification with contents of such processing (no Gurdjieffian “reciprocal maintenance” here between immersion and submersion). Immersion can support group-mind awareness in n-benignant fashions, given a level of competency at introspection sufficient to distinguish between empathy (the passively cultivated intentionality gravitating upon emergence from subliminality of _µT_m-processing) and identification (the active intentionality to the intensionality of being in-service-to-blackpsyche-manipulation-unto-introjection of the transferred-projected figure-object intensionally compensating-reciprocating the apocryphal ₁T₂-only-boundedness neuronally anchored via prescriptive glutamatergic etching). Black psychological operations (promulgated via passive-allowance/non-interdiction of prescriptive enculturation-socialization; or by active institutional implementation thereof) can leverage fetishized selfhood (cf. selfsame absolutely-in-so-far-as-₁T₂ly-distinct individualism) into pro-logo-commodification of the various regressions-in-service-to-the-₁T₂-only-egofunction. Really, all this sort of “stuff” is old hat to me: it goes without saying that several of Cornellian Edward Bernays' books were in (not to mention the Cornell Library system) AU's SORO, Special Operations Research Office, library (circa 1963), in Bernard Fall's personal library located in his office at Howard U. (circa 1964), an incredible library on Viet Nam which George Harris organized my access to, and in the JFKSWCS library, Ft, Bragg, during the period I was assigned to Psyops Group (circa 1967), our office (a Capt., me, and Sgt. Major Ben Hirano in his last station before retirement from a CI career under cover in East Asia beginning toward the end of WWII) being located adjacent to the library last named. Memory serving, that is: instant recall for technical terminologies, even for general vocabulary -- recall, prefatory and/or post-facto -- being far from what it once was, reckoning up is also entering decline. By the term “competency at introspection”, I refer far less to methods in Cornell's Titchenerian Introspectionism than to Edmund Jacobson's specifications on autosensory observation, Aurobindo's lessons on the difference between meditation, contemplation, self-observation (each harder but more effective than the one before), and the practices taught by Gurdjieff and followers concerning “correct” self-observation techniques (the last named, IMHO, being the most efficacious). As a consequence of the sentiments evolved by studies of these works, I never took seriously, nor put much stock or store in, IQ tests, these constituting a misdirection in being focused on the “other-directed”, no attention-assessment given to the “inner-directed” capabilities, that prejudice being a Western-modernist-bound-testing limitation, the bulk of questions involving numerical- cum geometric- cum ₁T₂-only-logic-pattern recognitions, bivalent antinomies being prominent. I became aware of the Travistock Institute's engagement with group-unto-mass-unto-collective psychology in reading (circa: lost to the mists of memetime) a Travistocker's disparagement of Introspectionism in general, self-observation in particular -- [con}descending by making the assertion that “self-observation is retroflexion” (thus denying existence of differing baud rates of consciousness, of my I/i^m's voluntary dissociation, and of Special Relativity's Einsteinian-flextime). Ack aye! those cognitive diminuendos accompanying emotional crescendos in back-reacting reciprocation upon the metrics of nature's non-compliance with consensus psychological projections of the socius. But I didn't know that J. P. Morgan had a role in Woodrow Wilson's decision to cast the U.S. into WWI, that Thomas A. Edison controlled essential aspects of the early-Hollywood cinema industry, that the Rockefellers suborned medical practice, that RCA began as a U.S. Navy spinoff, that the Ford Foundation was instrumental in establishing foundations of Behaviorism in UC-Berkeley polysci. These and quite a few other salient facts are discussed in the three-part article by Joshua Stylman entitled “Engineering Reality: A Century of Cultural Control”, ZeroHedge, 1 January 2025, and the many edifying links provided therein. In reference thereto, I note that, unlike Ms. Steinem, once I learned of CIA infiltration of a student organization I was involved in (not to mention then-current “rumors” of wiretappings and eavesdroppings from well-placed “birds”), I dodged like the bball forward I'd once been and got out of Dodge, carrying knowledge of that infiltration into my subsequent efforts “on the way to find out”. Like the ₁T₂-only-cap[it}al|ist collectivization of agriculture -- taking farming away from organic family hands (e.g., those of my paternal grandfather) and giving it to the poison-food manufacturing machines of the [a}gro-industrial complex -- uncentralized, distributed, diversified prescriptive enculturation-socialization is being globally monocropped via employments of dissimulated-quantum-based technologies marshalled in service to surveillance-₁T₂-only-cap[it}al|ism, thus taking immergence into submergence, the horrid consequences just now peeking out of the Weltanschauung's cracked cosmic egg as if the tiny head of a dead duckling. Glutamate-etched-anchored, ergotropic, egofunctional self-behavior-mod extended itself to self-body-mod as a ConveDD (conversion-disorder displacement) of suppressed, trophotropic, endogenous-ketaminergic OBE, and even extended unto blocking qua kundabuffering subliminal collective quasi-integration of the pagan-animistic “participation mystique” that would be overtly tropologically metareferenced qua semiotically signified by Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction were that function interpreted with m-valued logics, not as indicative of the existence of probability amplitudes. The ₁T₂-only unitarity of multi-sectorial population-control MOs (think: a hisstorical precursor being COMUSMACV-CORDS “unity of command”, facilitated by installation of the MACV-IDHS, intelligence data handling system) prefigured by nascent advent of a We-Are-The-World-CBDC-enforced AI-algorithmically-administered globalized Social Credit Score System is a direct regressed psycho-socio-politico-economic consequent of the unitarity “achieved” by the ₁T₂-only-egofunctional dissembling of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction. And, just as many of the dimensions of financial derivatives were midwifed by second-rate physicists who escaped the psychological implications of QM by fleeing to Wall Street where they could much more easily embody psychosociopathic expressions of their having succumbed to the “philosophical disease” Wittgensteinianism incumbent upon interpretation of dissembled QM, so, similarly, with the ConveDDing of QMical unitarity to Wall Street's surveillance-₁T₂-only-cap[it}al|ism's unitarity. Seventy years of experience interacting with people about this and that aspect of the at-issue idea framework -- explicated by D. A. Paine's research-modeling efforts, catalyzed for me in my mil.brat childhood and military experience, essayed in our novel and on our websites -- has made abundantly clear that, in all likelihood, the fundamental issues involved will remain inadequately explored and the finer points altogether obfuscated -- hu-hu-[hu}mans continuing in indefinite denial until The Full Monty of Consequences is realized at critical-state incendiary cuspover whenwhere correlation lengths snap to infinity.

There is the 3-cube; the 4-cube tesseract qua Coxeter gamma-4 polytope; the n-hypercube; the ambiguous cube ((see Peter Hettich's paper entitled “The Philosophy of the Aesthetic, Ambiguous Cube”, 2018; for the “event-related-potential” cum “visual-evoked-potential” neurology of the involved “mental switch” [[contrary to Hettich, I maintain that it is, indeed, possible to hold both “interpretations” simultaneously in visual superposition image as if on stacked “clear acetate sheets”, sort of like a low-resolution -- think of the holographic image projected through a broken-off piece of a hologrammic plate -- diplopia, without horizontal-vertical displacement, afterimage that, with practice, can become like a cultivated form of illusory palinopsia -- and one wonders how the superpositioning relates to, possibly multiple, Luneburg “psychometric distance functions”, if at all]], see “The Necker cube -- an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing”, Jurgen Kornmeier and Michael Bach, Vision Research, 45:8, April 2005, pp. 955-60)) that is itself/not-itself (i.e., non-selfsame) ₁T₂-logically-2-“times”-over; and then there is (see John Godolphin Bennett's Appendix III to Chapter 15 of The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956) the null-vector-defined “J.G.Bennettian skew cube” (which is not an impossible cube) that is “drawn” with “pencils of skew-parallels” and is itself/not-itself (i.e., non-selfsame) _µT_m-logically-n-“times”-over. I believe that the semantic domain of inner-Musculpt symformphonie is somehow rooted in or reflected in or substantially related to the last named -- and that the really edifying understanding of the m-valued Schrödinger statefunction is to be found in memetime-independent _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-remergence convolving to comprehensive _C+T_C+-cognizance of the relative-wave-states convolution constituting that symformphonic domain (a reference domain which transcends the bivalent-logic dualism of the full range of antinomies like mind/body, subjective/objective, inner/outer, psychetic/hyletic, spiritual/material). The (decomposable to point patterns of Pythagorean gematria) hexagon mosaic (2D) unto cube (3D) ambiguity (see the Hettich paper) is particularly apropos the extension of quark symmetry pattern unto the equilateral-triangle-meshwork way of visualizing the nesting-foam of multiscaled-multisheeted Riemann-surface-like MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, and how cross-n-sheet lattices in principle could by extension be convolution-construed as Regge lattices (nD) of the Regge-calculus-treatment of General-Relativity-curvature configurations. Even so, this would remain in the realm of bivalent logic: the visual n-analogues of the Bennettian “skew cube” would not be evoked as regards semantic imports of that which is visualized. But the 2-valued qua 2-image case alone has been sufficient to extraordinary discombobulation. Quoting Hettich:

This [the “thousands of years old” ambiguous cube] is a visual analogy to the sentence by Epimenides the Cretan who said: “All Cretans are liars”. This sentence is also approximately two thousand years old and it was in a deep sleep until it suddenly awoke again approximately 115 years ago. It led a terrible punch against the foundations of our thinking. In mathematics and logic it even caused an earthquake.

Hettich goes on from that evocation of logical self-referential reflexivity (there being order-types thereof in _µT_m-logics) to discuss musical harmony as reducible to bivalence (re: Pythagorean bifurcations of the monochord string), to wit, quoting:

The Greek philosopher Heraklitus attempted to define the concept of “harmony” in dialectal terms as the unity of opposites: “Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony”. . . The term “harmony” has now been theoretically compressed into the following definition: “Harmony is the unification of opposites to a wholeness.” Form, harmony and the wholeness refer to the same thing.

Opposites. This one being [jux}T|ap|osed to a second: i.e., ₁T₂. Bivalence. But consider the possibility that the non-localizable wave-effect _µT_m-quantum brain articulates-superposes n-[n}ly-ambiguous n-hypercubes in Regge-latticed nesting-foams, and that inner-Musculpt symformphonie is the barest of conscious registrations of quantum-brain processing, and further, that semantics of inner-Musculpt involves the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logics (the hypercubes being numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of the involved propositions) of dynamical transforms of the articulates (what Hettich calls “interfaces”?) of the involved n-[n}ly-ambiguities. Could this be worked out without systematically developing-thru-use insight to inner-Musculpt semantics via employment of holographically techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt in a computerized, biofeedback-equipped, isolation-flotation Lilly tank with holographic-projection dome, best approached by a dancer pod of humans in process of learning the sonic-visioning of the bottle-nosed dolphin? It appears to me that realization of the imports of this orientation in the activities of daily life -- ADLs -- as more than an accumulation of epiphanies, is not actually available to the individual independent of an accommodating Weltanschauung expressing as an accommodated Lebenswelt expressing as accommodated Umwelts. And, by-the-bye, if the Weltanschauung falls apart, the resultant reaction formation could look something like “In a New Age of Empire, Great Powers Aim to Carve Up the Planet”, Yaroslav Trofimov, WSJ, 17 January 2025. Moreover, note that “blockchain technology's inherent global nature”, which facilitates projected problems with $TRUMPing (see “Constitutional Crypto: How TRUMP's Solana Token Could Force a SCOTUS Showdown”, Jackie Singh, Hacking, but legal, 19 January 2025), is exemplary pellucid and pristine of a P2P-₁T₂-only-impelled myopia as regards the superposed scale-levels directly imputed by, indeed inherent in, “the Aesthetic, Ambiguous Cube”, an impelled myopia that would be absent under _µT_m-LETS-currencies nesting-foams deployed bottom-up with holographic Musculpt as user-friendly interface. Stating, by implication, the “P2P-1T2-only-impelled-myopia”-thesis poetically, rather than literally as in the above-given, in “When 'Future Shock' Meets 'Mass Formation Psychosis'”, ZeroHedge, 21 January 2025, Mark Jeftovic says, “…they [politicians, central bankers, technocrats, and pundits] are all, as a group, collectively out of their depth and completely tone-deaf. They're trying to function in a 3D world that's in the process of turning into a hypercube.” I also note that Jeftovic speaks of accelerated acceleration very nearly in context of discussion of money dynamics (though he doesn't overtly quite make that connection), the first time I have seen such a close approach being made -- and he, therefore, making only an approach, does not get to the point of offering some insight as to the function of time-rate-of-change-of-acceleration in systems theoretical terms, a subject addressed in our “General Process” paper.

“Future shock” as etiology of “mass-formation psychosis” is, IMHO, a notion of pathogenesis confined to surface-structure. While I do not outright disagree with anything Mark Jeftovic says in his article entitled “When 'Future Shock' Meets 'Mass Formation Psychosis'”, I find myself asking: Can, for instance, bushwrapped-qua-gwotted pursuit of Greater Zion be assessed at facebooked value? Memetime-boundedly speaking from tacit employment of ₁T₂-only-logic alone, mayhaps -- particularly so if done amongst the “adult” ADHD-suffering-sort populating the GLE, our rather moldy and arguably brainless 17th-to-18th-century-political-economy-mindset-bound global leadership elite, where within instant recall for terminology being far from what it once was, reckoning up is in decline, even if other-directed operational intelligence remains intact via a slimy-historiographic spatial memory function. Slime-mold planners we have, what! in this era of the reemergence of a burgeoning penchant for centrally-planned and command-dictated political economy. “Neba neba!” How many words for different kinds of slimy do the Japanese have? By the means of slimy preference functions (instituted by internal-system-state quantum harmonic oscillators hidden from ₁T₂-only viewers?) will we find our way out of the maze located in the “paper bag” constituting the currently prevailing global crisis? Heh-heh-heh! Hmmm. Is Greater Zion, engaged to by the secular rabbinate, a retrograde-inversion-type ConveDD -- conversion-disorder displacement -- of the recoil from the manner in which the 100-year-old m-valued-Schrödingerian “new” physics and the 100-year-old m-valued logics hashave increasingly, indeed, hashave with Jeftovic “accelerated acceleration”, ever more overtly supported precepts of Kabbalistic cosmogony and neoPlatonic numerology? Not a simple question, especially so given the early-initialized and long-persistent dissimulation of QM, and the transhumanist-unto-posthuman scientistically-spiritualized intoxication (drug assisted or no) expressed in fixation upon the infratech generated thereby. Regards a massive modulation of the reality engine, it is, isn't it! Requiring more and more nonlinear-n-POVed cognitive VsNG, victuals and grub; no more schlocky transhumanist mere-memed, nonet-pitched-NinthParallax, superego-projectively-identified GodFakers. Not only operational intelligence, AIed or no; the ability to elaborately think abstractly on multiple levels simultaneously -- and to empathetically introject resultant presented abstract gestalts (quickly skip over Wilhelm Worringer's Abstraktion of Einfuhlung so as to facilitate immersion in the _µT_m-orders of generative empathy inherent to the superordinal strata of abstractions) such that the sensorium which comes crashing-in with each “newyou”-unto-youme-modulated identity construct (_µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency) is unabashedly resonated with. If no such introjection, there will be defense-mechanism “reaction formation” (((collectively speaking, we have a War Department renamed a Defense Department: by jingo! favoring attention as if in service to God Against The Gods; unfortunately, not only does a Paul Craig Roberts underestimate the degree to which the pull-the-global-temple-down Samson complex has captured the neoCon mindset, even the likes of an eminently rational David Stockman misses, or conscientiously ignores, the fact that rationalizations of mass actions, being subliminally unconscious-as-infinite-sets driven, don't even employ ₁T₂-only rationality; the Roosevelt grizzly in the room being the spending on dreamtimed, imaginary, imagined, apocryphal, conjured, projected, and rarely real, wars; my SoSec benefit, for instance, isn't even half the average monthly))); more accurately, particularly as regards mass-unto-collective behaviors, back-reactive ConveDDing. Clear-channeled clarity is so much in popular demand it reverberates in echolalia. The memed here-there-everywhere idea that complex ideas can be explained simply is hogwash. Complex ideas are inherently complex, not clear such that they can be washed up, explained simply -- no matter how smart be the explainer. Simple-unto-simpleminded explanations of the complex, howsoever satisfying, mislead pursuant to the intensionality hidden in the intentionality, and thusly mislead far more often than is thought to be the case. This circumstance is especially so, if the complex subject at issue involves non-truth-preservation orders-of-logical-value: no amount and no quality of ₁T₂-only explanation of _µT_m-logical propositions adequately conveys the nature of, especially the semantic-cum-higher-order-qualia imports of, _µT_m-logics -- given the involved alterations of indicated identity-qua-identity constructs. Thinking ₁T₂ly about _µT_m-logics, e.g., the [0,1]-fuzzy explanation, is misleading; indeed, there can be no doubt that the relative-state identity-transparency explanation is also misleading by comparison to that which would be conveyed were there access to holographically techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt systematically developed-through-use as mathematical notation. But what do we get instead? Pertinacity of the dog's foot placed firmly with a rashness unconscionable, the dogged recklessness being a regression-in-service-to-the-egofunction, individual and in Messianic-complexed collective extension to ostensible supernal effulgence. If the initial ConveDDed reaction-formation-disaster kneejerk to advent of Lukasiewicz-Post rigor vis-à-vis m-valued logics was the Martingale doubling-down on bivalent logic, a doubling-down executed by promulgation of the Born Rule interpretation of the m-valued Schrödinger statefunction, then the final catastrophic reaction-formation kneejerk to egofunction-phagocytosing L-P logics may well be the quadrupling-down on ₁T₂-only-logic alone which the $500bn AI-“ManhattanProject” qua Stargate cum DeepSeek cum Kimi-by-MoonshotAI, et al., clearly entail: throwing a binary-logic (2-state quantum computed, or no) wetware Blob cum cognitive tarp covered in slime mold (see: “How brainless slime molds redefine intelligence”, Ferris Jabr, Nature, 13 November 2012) over human consciousness, and tying that drop cloth down tightly so as to keep the m-valued, polyphyletically-assembled Boogeyman at bay (structures of transnational megacorps being modeled, by compensatory-abreactive ConveDD, thereupon). All that having been said, on an optimistic note, it should be observed that Mark Jeftovic is clearly moving from surface-structure explanatories toward deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull etiologies: in his “When 'Future Shock' Meets 'Mass Formation Psychosis'” not only does he approach the general systems import of memetime-rate-of-change of acceleration and invoke hypercube poetics of dissimulated-QM infratech in lieu of 3-space Boxman, he latches onto the portmanteau neologism Douglas Adams coins in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, i.e., the term “recipriversexclusion”, as referring to “a number whose value could be anything but itself”. Hey, what: the _µT_m-logical, identity-transparent, nonselfsame numbers (e.g., Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of Regge-latticed m-logically-valued propositions) predicated by Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction! On a less-than-optimistic note, however, look at the popular interpretations of “recipriversexclusion” vis-à-vis identity dyscrasia as exemplified here and here and here and here.

“God is dead”-- Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science. “Nietzsche is dead”-- God. “Philosophy is dead”-- Stephen Hawking, The Grand Design. “Hawking is dead”-- The Ontological Physicist. If ruled out be introspection, excluded, that is, by the ₁T₂-only-inferential, naive, “Externalist” method of inquiry and associated fiat definition -- “intuitionistic” (see here and here) understood, not in the sense of C. G. Jung, but that of The Physicist cum The Mathematician as apprehension of, or as exemplifying, the automatized-consensuated of preprogrammed pedestrian consensus reality, or not so understood, uh, that's as whatevvver -- then well-defined “individuality” (abstractly: individuals as “extensions”) can be depicted as the ability to specify by self-reference an “I” deemed to be imperial, uh, uh, empirical. Be the intellectual salient utilitarian Pragmatism or pragmatic Utilitarianism, the orientation is high-mesomorph qua thoroughly-unbalanced muscle-bound extrovert, focused near-exclusively outward and other-directed (whereas the “bare” Externalist holds that “bare” Internalism is inadequate to “justified true belief” -- “What is truth?” in this context being left to the snap essay quiz, first day of class, Intro to World Politics, Abdul Aziz Said, AU-SIS, September of 1963). Our notion of m-valued-LETS nesting-foams, transactions therein _µT_mly processed, being eminently practical, the ₁T₂-only base-state qua space of any given such currency's currency unit is cash and e-money of the simply simplistic single-valued sort (that unit as quasifractal drum involving _µT_m-value ensheavement fine-grain tagged to indicator-[quantum-econ]measurables stacked upon base-statespace). However, PragmaUtili or no, if actual practice of introspection be ectomorphically allowed, then, experientially speaking, self-reference indubitably involves Tantric Schrödinger-memetime-independent inner-separation (referrer and referent), and this inner-separation involves an empirical separator (no mere endomorph!), which in turn requires another such separator, this nesting-nested condition of the condition of inner-separation at actuated referentiality-cum-metareferentiality “evolving” (to binary-mind, memetime-bound evolving; “remerging” insofar as higher-“mind” is concerned -- that's remerging, not devolving, i.e., memetimelessly making an ontological mountain out of existential molehills) into infinite regress -- or some approach thereto, depending upon the level of introspective competence of the inner-separator, the infinite-regress parameter being not only a logometamathematical “similitude” but also a “reflection” of the nature of form in general demergence-remergence “process” of Nature. “Bah! Word salad, what? Bedighted chimeras”, you aver? “No”, will you say, “provability predicate in an appropriated”, oops, that's “appropriate theory?” Hmmm. Self-consciousness is monadic (no such as a “phenomenon”, i.e., knowledge through identity-transparency in snapover, the baud-rate of ₁T₂-only consciousness being too slow to induce the memetime-slowdown required to register transformations through superordinate logical-value order-types), whereas -- not whilst -- self-reference is expansively [bi}no|me|al -- unto mu[it|ic}statefunction/functional/functor (that's counter-operator-time remergent ordination via counter-temporal-CURL as 1st…,2nd…,3rd and operator-time demergent ordination via temporal-CURL as 3rd…,2nd…,1st). What “it” -- certainly not the Wheelerian “'it' from bit” -- is, from even the lower pregeometry reaches of _µT_m, let alone from approach to _CT_C+, “I” haven't the foggiest. How could “I” possibly know what “it” is -- absent studies made with holographically techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation? “I” signifies Cartesian, memetime-bound, ₁T₂-only, ergotropic, glutamatergically-automatized agency; “I/iⁿ m-logically processed” signifies Tantric Schrödinger-memetime-independent, _µT_m, trophotropic, ketaminergically-deautomatized receptivity (the more empty the egofunction cup, the greater the facilitation of higher “mind”: clearly, the egofunction is a glutamatergic matter of bivalent inference, while introspection qua introspection can be a non-predicative ketaminergic matter of direct non-dual knowledge-through-identity-transparency) -- bivalently speaking, of course, this rectilinear West-East duality. Given that -- due to the skew-perpendicularity subtending Heisenberg uncertainty and scale-relative values of non-selfsame universal physical constants m-logically-processed in Nature (rather, IMHO, that is; except that, as regards “scale-relative values of non-selfsame universal physical constants m-logically-processed” consider the following quoted from “Everett and Structure”, by David Wallace, arXiv, 28 July 2001: “I address the problem of indefiniteness in quantum mechanics: the problem that the theory, without changes to its formalism, seems to predict that macroscopic quantities have no definite values [this being a direct 180-degree ₁T₂-contradiction of the pivotal statement made in Everett's famous 1957 paper whereupon he shifted over to the vonNeumann formalism, subliminally, I am sure, so as to escape resort to his adolescent fascination with logically-self-referential propositions, i.e., m-valued logics]… the macroworld must either be written directly into the formalism or be regarded as somehow illusory”) -- the so-believed “classical limit” is apocryphal, Tantric Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction indicates that no real object is a singular object; only ₁T₂-only-absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct objects of the consensuated bivalent-logic universe, objects, that is, publicly “abstracted in hypostatic mood”, are singular, and selfsame; all really-real objects (those processed by the nonlocal quantum brain and registered by the Unconscious as Infinite Sets), whatsoever be the involved scale level, are, in “act[u}all|ity”, _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-states of identity-transparency, the whole (mountain, say Meru) that isare demergent parts (molehills) and parts that areis the remergent whole (singular and plural being, [cosmo}logically speaking, nonorientable under 3rd-order operator-time). Selfsame self-consciousness is a confirmation of the ₁T₂-only-logic Law of Identity; self-reference is no such confirmation, as its n-levels of nonorientable self-reentry substantiate _µT_m-logical non-selfsame selfhood, ₁T₂ly speaking, “multi-identity”. Has truth set us free, or has ₁T₂-only truth-value (not Jees[us}ian truth, which cannot be relative in the sense of homomorphic bijection; Jees[us}ian truth, if like Buddhological “compassion”, perhaps indicative of the identity-transparency inherent to relative-state) as fundament of logic been our enslavement? IMHO, Marco Stango's cum Charles Sanders Peirce's (well contextualized here à la taxonomic cenoscopy) so-regarded (à la Stango's paper entitled “'I' Who? A New Look at Peirce's Theory of Indexical Self-Reference”, The Pluralist, 10:2, Summer 2015, pp. 220-46) “phaneroscopic givenness” of the “present&effort-percept” (“ergotropic” corresponding to “effort”) as developer of the memetime-bound and selfsame “[co}native-externality” popularly known as the “private self” (referent of [according to my me: neuronally-etched-closed-“system”] “I”) is derivative of the glutamatergic anchoring secondary to orchestration by prescriptive enculturation-socialization of neuronal plasticity during the series of neural-network wipeouts occasioning Piaget's childhood stages of [cog}native “development” (Piaget's conceptualization of these stages involving not only empirical observations, but also a ₁T₂-only logocentric component). Not to gainsay cognitive V&G, vittles and grub, of whatever sort, nonetheless, chary am “I” of the pliability -- Amaeru you, too! you helpless sluggard, you -- of the in[dull}gent what Donne been begot. Uh, cough-cough, well, hmmm, howsoever that may-might-should be, according to the scheme embraced by my I/i^m, “form in general demergence-remergence 'process'” can be comprehended relative to “an indexical component in self-reference” iff were the indices signifiers of the cardinalities cum ordinalities indicated by the subscripts of _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m and the involutory inverse of that Schrödinger-memetime-independent cyclotomic decompositional “march”. The ₁T₂-only-definable supposedly-“conative” present-instant supposed “externality”, of the memetime-bound ostensibly non-fictional “I”, being a learned behavior glutamatergically anchored, as distinguished from direct ontic identity-transparency with the non-[instant}i|a|table Schrödinger-memetime-independent “now”, which, given the requisite baud-rate of consciousness, is enterable and leavable, does not “come” from a supposed future and does not “[be}come” a supposed past, is all ways already all being-therehere on T_{zog-chen C+}T_C+-AllBase of MVRS Riemann-surface-like multi-sheeted nesting-foam, that is, the m-logically-valued reference space, a distributed qua nonlocal Lukasiewiczian-Postian indexical ledger of “All and Everything” non-singular demergent unto singular, heh-heh-heh! Quoting Stango, to wit: “According to Peirce's taxonomy, 'I' falls into the class of 'rhematic [in Peircean semiotics: of a rheme, and pertaining to a qualitative effect on an interpretant of a sumisign] indexical legisigns'” -- such signs, by definition, referring to singular objects, material and otherwise, otherwise allowing for general cases, “I” being one of the non-general otherwises. Pursuant to Peirce-Stango, the objectively-real singular “I”, “private self”, “individual self” is epiphenomenal to linear-time being objectively real. Since my I/i^m regard(s) linear-time as a Piaget-staged glutamatergically-anchored learned behavior, it follows from Peirce's arguments that singularity of “I”-ness is fictional, the nature of “I”-ness in general being order-of-logical-value dependent -- were my I/i^m's regard(s) found to be the case by substantiation of the m-logically-valued interpretation of the n-branches of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction. As noted at the very end of the Acknowledgements section (we came across Lockwood just as we were going to press) of our 1994 novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, Michael Lockwood's “compound 'I'” interpretation of quantum mechanics got it partially (no _µT_m logics) right in 1989, published as a book in 1991, further elaborated in 1996 in his “'Many Minds' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics”, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 47:2, pp. 159-88, a paper admirably commented upon by David Deutsch, same journal, same issue, including the following observation; quoting Deutsch, to wit:

At the philosophical foundations of our best and deepest theory of the structure of reality, namely quantum mechanics, there is an intellectual scandal that reflects badly on most of this century's leading physicists and philosophers of physics… The scandal is that there is very little other work of that description [i.e., in the vein of Lockwood] in the literature, and what little there is, is systematically disregarded by mainstream thinking in both philosophy and physics. Despite the unrivalled empirical success of quantum theory, the very suggestion that it may be literally true as a description of nature is still greeted with cynicism, incomprehension and even anger.

The “and even anger” part, however, I regard as an enormous understatement of the case. The Born Rule (instead of an m-valued-logic interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction) was the Witch Bull of the 20th century, and knee-jerk consensuation thereof was the matchstick that broke the camel's back as initiatory deep-structure prefiguration of WWII's onset. Such having been the case, that Rule is culpable for a great deal of horror, not least the Nazi holocaust of the Jews. I found strong evidence in support of that assertion during my brief sojourn as a targets analyst, Targets Branch, Combined Intelligence Center, Viet Nam, where with and when during it became obvious that inherent non-bombability not only engendered anger, it was sufficiently maddening as to inculcate mass hysteria and resultant Dennis-the-Menace bombing criteria -- this non-bombability being a psychological-conversion stand-in for, cum reflection of, and incessant reminding factor concerning the subliminal dread, fear, and loathing of quantum non-locality and non-simple identity -- criteria that were, in ensemble, the most outstanding of proximal causes of the Cambodian holocaust.

One question is: Is the compounding (of the “I”s and their referents, to “include” the spectrum of abstract cases, whatsoever be the deemed ontological-existential statuses of the two “classes”) a matter of inclusion, as is the case with [qua}sets, or is it a matter of, say, the [qua}lia qua [qua}Lalita (word search “Lalita” in the given link: name of the goddess -- made idiomatically demotic via concretion and personification -- of counter-operator-time-induced 3-fold temporal counter-CURL [demotically concretized to “world”, as was “relative-state” in the m-worlds interpretation of Everett's formulation], as distinct from Bhairavi, name of the goddess of operator-time-induced 3-fold temporal CURL), embedded in the corpus of signs, indexical and otherwise, it may be supposed constitutes Musculpt symformphonic semantics, e.g., the m-valued acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-mode mantric signatures qua “names” (re: Peirce; re: Kripke) of theta-e equivalent-potential-temperature-surface topologies and their Regge-lattice yantras -- uh, that is, as regards the apperceptual “see[man}tics” of Earth's atmosphere (for those dynamical meteorologists and climatologists not psychologically over-identified with ₁T₂-only “practical identity” -- that's identity glutamatergically etched and anchored via prescription transmitted generation to generation within the involved population corpus -- and thus not suffering complete “apperceptual agnosia” vis-à-vis percepts tied to logical-value order-types superordinate to that ₁T₂)? Only the most superficial, most reduced of Musculpt symformphonie semantics could be ₁T₂-only logical. Another question is: Are the “I”s, howsoever compounded, signifiers of selfsame “singular objects” or of non-selfsame _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency only heuristically singular under the ₁T₂-only-logical-value-order-type-of-_µT_m? Even as regards the elements of quasets (“m-atoms” and “Matoms”), _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+-relative-states of identity-transparency are not explicitly invoked (hence the involved “quantum potential” remains largely concealed, “locked away” and thus constellated in regressed-archetypal event gradients of the “collective unconscious” qua “universal consciousness”). And… quoting once again Marco Stango's paper entitled “'I' Who? A New Look at Peirce's Theory of Indexical Self-Reference”, The Pluralist, 10:2, Summer 2015, pp. 220-46:

According to Peirce, perception is in a sense the epistemically fundamental operation, since all the concepts are acquired through it.

Whoa! Wow, what an assertion… Well, maybe, as Stango-Peirce have it, the single-event percept occurring hic et nunc, here and now, as regards the [CON}cepts resident in Maya and responsible for paticcasamupada, Buddhological “dependent arising”, but certainly not the ideas involved in my epiphanies (early on, post-adolescence through my late-thirties, I had many of these in the realms of maths and physics -- only to later learn in every case that the involved idea was new only to me, and that in many of these cases someone had already written a book about it, or at least there had been a number of papers there concerning), ideas that clearly came from the collective unconscious, archetypal or no, and often were prefigured in my awareness by metaphorical appearances in dream imagery. Appercepts: the senses made of new (to my me) ideas assimilated to ideas preexisting in my conscious awareness. My epiphanies were not of this sort; they were Platonic appercepts: particular cases of Platonic remembering of that lapsed (assuming P-ideas to be in constant demergence-remergence “circulation” from and to _C+T_C+-AllBaseState of GreatSpace understood as being the ReferenceSpace from which execution of non-orientable 3rd-order topologically-active operator-time is continuously “initialized”, heh-heh-heh) into collective unconscious Platonic anamnesis, any given “lapsoid” sense, numinosity as to origin due to habitus upon T_zog-chen AllBase of MVRS BackCloth qua CommonGround of “universal consciousness”, once constellated for “P-embering”, appearing in (actually: directly perceived as “coming in upon”, if “one” -- he[h]-he[h]-he[h]! -- be adequately inner-separated and thus not identified with the prevailing binary-mind state) multiple minds during the prevailing Kairos season for its given demergence. IMHO, very few concepts that are not [CON}cepts “are acquired through it”, i.e., corporeal perception. Moreover, the P-embered lapsoid sense, one must suppose, still being a content of the collective unconscious even after selective P-embering, is happening nunc et omni temporo, now and every time -- hic et oblique, here and everywhere, being a nonlocality-consequent of the “identity-in-diversity” of the J.G.Bennettian “skew-perpendicularity/parallelism” subtending the ₁T₂-only Heisenberg uncertainty inequalities.

I would suggest that the “apparent contradiction” between a timeless now and the duration of the experience thereof (see: “Awareness without Time? A Deep Look into Timelessness in Deep Meditative States”, Akiko Frischhut, The Philosophical Quarterly, 23 July 2024) is a ₁T₂-only contradiction and that it is localized to decoherent binary-minds of the Externalist scientistic research establishment, minds glutamatergically-memetime-bound attempting, from the outside, to ₁T₂-only-logic-alone accesslessly assess _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical, ketaminergically-Tantric-Schrödinger-memetime-independent, long-range-phase-coherent relative-states, into which advanced meditators have entered, and which they fall out of (the really real handled as if it were a case of mere reification!) by slipping back into memetime-bound ₁T₂-only modes of cognition, a slipping in no small measure because of clinging to (maintenance of residual tension patterns [cf. Edmund Jacobson's extensive studies: see bibliography to his swansong book entitled Biology of Emotions], particularly of the tiny extra-ocular and laryngeal muscles, is required to remain memetime-bound and immersed in, qua identified with, in-the-body-experience) self-consciousness of the enculturated-socialized, glutamate-anchored, selfsame, singular “practical identity” associated to a lack of the staying-power-enhancing notion of topologically-active (₁T₂ly speaking in terms of active-passive, yang-yin, so on) operator-time as the 3-“handled” effectuator-aspect -- 3-fold temporal CURL skew-parallelly [“instant”}i|ated -- of un[i}versal consciousness, in its passive aspect, i.e., All-And-Everything's anything and all things being nothing but “nothing given shape”, most fundamentally the _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround of the n-sheeted BackCloth qua MVRS m-logically-valued reference space, multi-ensheaved ma in Japanese. Whowhat, in Nature, performs the role taken by the stretcher-and-bender-and-pusher-and-puller-and-twister in the immediately-above-linked hole-within-hole-within-hole VDO? Why, topologically-active operator-time, of course -- a “vehicle” of universal-consciousness-rightly-understood, as per, for instance, Sri Aurobindo à la Trikaladrsti-tapassiddhi. Have many advanced meditators been able to long enough persist in not “saying 'I' to” incoming impulses to engage with a Stango-Peirce “present&effort-percept”, such engagement i|m[me|di|ate}ly quantum quenching the state of timelessness “momentarily” -- heh-heh-heh -- occasioning epiphanies, “long enough” -- heh-heh-heh -- as to explore that state sufficient to recognition that the limit to any sequence is not some definite value but a logical-value turnover? Not many, it must be supposed -- especially so if accidental accidents are not vested with accorded belief, a belief unsustainable in face of the MVRS. The psychology of creativity mobilization don't work so good in free-falling elevators; free-falling elevators are invoked long after the _µT_mly-epiphanic event as ₁T₂-only rationalization, and as establishment of an egoic claim to exclusive ownership. But, it must be admitted that, by Freudian slips, free-falling elevators are apt metaphors for “descent” from the collective Unconscious As Infinite Sets. How old is this ontic-immediate _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-EternalNow versus after-the-fact retro-₁T₂ly-judged unenumerable-duration contradiction, anyway? Certainly existing well before my great, great grandfather was born. And how long yet will it persist as topical amongst Externalists? -- those who are the authentic “cosmic exiles” (the Logical-Posit[i}vist Externalist holds that cl[aim}ants to the existence of “bare-percept” awareness are “cosmic”, not Weltanschauung-derivative “Lebenswelt”, exiles) subject to a species of ontological expulsion. The biggest Freudian slip schizotypally structuralized in the m-worlds interpretation of the Everettian ₁T₂-only-relative-state formulation of QM is that this interpretation cathologizes, qua generalizes with a universal wavefunction, excommunication by thermodynamically freeze-framing Existentialist separatism as all-around, unqualified, habitual, wonted principle-- a bivalent frozen-wave paradox substituted for _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency as quantum potential. Banishing, spurning, deporting, pushing away unto being sufficiently out-there as to no longer be construable as existential threat (the hazard, the peril, the intimidation which is the egofunction-dissipating, part-whole-ID-transparency manifestation of this one and only universe): eviction unto an exorcism modernized as ECT ((electroconvulsive “therapy” -- instead of treating with the autopoietically-arising autogenic brain discharges which were therapeutically on the scene from well before the 1926 Born-Rule dissimulation (think: secular Rabbinate defending against further potentiation of the Kabbalistic Tree of Life) of Tantric Schrödinger: Schultz presented his autogenic training research to the Medical Society of Berlin in 1926)) two years before the country of origin of _µT_m-valued logics was invaded (patent for ECT granted 5 months before the 1 September 1939 attack) as kickoff to the European theater of WWII. But it doesn't take advanced meditators to, at least momentarily, experience _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-timelessness (the memetime instant being indefinable under logical-value order-types superordinate to that ₁T₂): many humans over the eons have so experienced, whilst, say, uh, well, “…listening to the wind until it faded into a greater stillness… surrounded by immensities of silent time” (Robert Stone, Dog Soldiers, 1973 Ballantine paperback edition, p. 71). But it doesn't even take repose, as those who report having experienced time-slowdown-unto-timelessness, OBEed 360-degree vision, identity-transparency-within-the-expert-small-unit-cohort in the unexpected engagements, e.g., caught in an ambush, of “high combat” claim to well know -- this ketaminergic, not adrenergic, experience being an attractor for engagement in warfare, an attractor having long since been archetypally embedded in the collective unconscious. Timelessness, OBEs, non-simple identity, m-valued logics -- the list of horrors goes on and on -- are part and parcel of the quantum-relativistic package. Deep-structure-wise, on the subliminal level -- more sub-subconscious even than was opposition to the post-Cartesian-Newtonian-metaphorical content of avant-garde poetry and prose, of the leading edge in the fine and performing arts -- national socialism and national communism abhorred -- even more than did national and colonial oligopolistic-unto-monopolistic-and-syndicalist ₁T₂-only capitalism -- those horrors which embrace of Lukasiewiczian Polish logics explicitly and implicitly entail psycho-sexo-socio-politico-economically, not to mention the post-postmodern old-heave-ho given by substitution of remunerative euthanasia systems for adequate healthcare delivery, medicine, that is, preventative and remedial. When the huge pile of cognitive rubbish which is composed of the component processes instituted by the outmoded Weltanschauung-Lebenswelt-Umwelts is clung to and propagandized, the value of that pile -- à la the findings essayed in Thompson's Rubbish Theory -- rises in the popular imagination, as parallelly do the number of schizophrenogenic double-binds the increasingly dyscrasiac population corpus is subject to, the inevitable outcome being yet another fulmination of the millennia-running collective psychosis orchestrating human affairs over the long haul. In the resultant whipstalled far-from-equilibrium phase-transition psy[cop}a|thy, every extreme of malfeasance is visited -- the latest major revelation, on a par with that of Snowden, being the dog-e, uh, uh, DOGE-discovered documentation as to the enormous magnitude of kleptocratic criminality involved in the “normal” course of “governance” these last few decades. However beneficial the DOGE revelations, nonetheless, the form of deep-state remediation (not the same as deep-structure transformation) undertaken has the initial appearance of being more like the failed Maoist Cultural Revolution than the highly successful omni-transformation of the VCI (Viet Cong [political] Infrastructure) bureaucracy accomplished over the span of a year prior to the 1968 Tet offensive (for details and extensive documentation, see our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh), the self-organized properties of that multiscale nesting-foam metamorphosis facilitated by an animistic-pagan facsimile of the quantum holographic principle, whereupon boundary changes throughout the nesting-foam, instituted in anticipation of modifications to the environment of the combat, entailed automatic alterations to a wealth of bureaucratic variables tacitly correlated to shapes of the boundaries containing AOs of said bureaus. Transmo[grif}i|cation of a civil service into a deep-state requires considerable impetus. I may have seen early -- circa Fall of 1963 -- indication of the drift to that rift whilst an AU-SIS student engaged with AIESEC, the Marshall Plan spinoff organization (founded 3 months after the Economic Recovery Act was signed by Truman) providing college business majors with post-graduate international-business internships. Steve Lau was the full-blown member and I was the entering freshman understudy Alpha-Tau-Omega little brother. Not much industry in the Washington, D.C., area to which to promote internship agreements, so the idea “arose” to create Civil Service internships under the auspices of AIESEC: bring future leaders from, particularly the Third World, cycle them for a year through a range of Civil Service departments, the experience of which they would carry back to their home countries. Sounded like a great idea. We first presented it at the Wharton School to Fred Hornbacher, the then AIESEC-US national committee president. After we received tentative concurrence from the AIESEC national committee, the idea was presented to HHH in his senatorial office, Skip Humphrey being an AU student and close friend of Steve Lau mediating. The Senator liked the idea and provided a letter of introduction to Secretary of the Treasury Douglas Dillon, whose endorsement would make the program possible. Following a face-to-face presentation, the Secretary did give the green light and assigned a subaltern to work with us toward realization of the program. Steve was to plan out details of the internships, whilst -- because the government couldn't legally provide the necessary money -- I was assigned to do the funding “search”. Not much of a search, as I was provided introductions to managers of several foundations by the Office of Secretary Douglas Dillon. Things looked great. Then a member of the Advisory Board of the AIESEC-US National Committee called us into his office, the office of Senator Mundt. Boy did we get a thundering dressing down! There would be no government-related programs under the aegis of the private-business organization AIESEC. Period. I was initially very put out about this, even tried to argue -- yielding more thunder. Months later, however, news of AIESEC having come back from Chile, it occurred to me that Civil Service interns returning to their own countries could easily be regarded as “agents of influence” -- and I wondered where the idea for a Civil Service internship program had actually originated. Had that program been instituted, it would have been a politicizing and internationalizing development. And had the government found more direct, say, USAID, ways to fund the program… well, how would DOGE nowadays be regarding that? Contextualize such like with a constant diet of psychological projections (naively introjected, via processes of the psychological transference, by those subsumed to the prevailing fulmination of the collective psychosis, subsumed so naively that they have no suspicion that the projections are, indeed, projections), and what issues forth? Which of the following is a projection? Quoting Brad Thor, Backlash, Simon & Schuster hardback edition, 2019, in lockstep with the COVID whateveritwas, p. 36:

What they [the Russians] didn't want was to be forced to play by the same rules as everyone else. They fomented revolutions, invaded and annexed other sovereign nations, violated international agreements, murdered journalists, and strove to subvert democratic elections and other democratic processes throughout the Western world.

Or this.

Fusing AI (see: “The World As You Know It Is About To End”, Porter and Company, ZeroHedge, 15 February 2025) to this (as reviewed by The Long Emergency guy), still, since the omni-transformative new technologies -- electronic, information, biochemical -- are concretions of dissimulated QM, dissimulated precisely so as not to allow inducement of deautomatization of the long-persisting institutional base and the distribution of vested interests qua privileges conveyed thereby, or, in the case of genetic engineering, denial of relevance thereto, it is not at all surprising that those poohbahs of the GLE, global leadership elite, deploying the infratech (those, thus, not solely committed to “getting while the getting is good”) are disposed to apply themselves only to political-economy reformations that attempt to restore 18th-century-conceived structures: old wine in new bottles, the old supposedly capable of adequately managing the new. Once inside 495, particularly if on 123, anosmia helps. Outguesstimating “unenviable” low-rollers however high on the lux food chain don't take no rocket science, given how thoroughly introspective ineptitude alienates them from assimilating deep-structure etiology -- not to mention that surface-structure: e.g., given the worldwide omnipresence of slave-unto-extremely-exploited labor, anyone who has done well in the stock markets has directly benefited therefrom. Living high on the back of that! It, again, don't take no AI-enhanced ANN-registration -- of the poorly-distributed-qua-.001-percent-concentrated amassing derivative of the “inordinate privilege” (much of it altogether off all the books, it must be supposed, uh, uh, contrary to the “command position” as, for instance, Volckered via the dot-org Syndicate) of being able to unabatedly “print” the dot-mil-backed money required to corner and control global resources extraction and utilization -- to have foreseen that when privileges of the privileged become habituated, “inordinate privilege” ain't enuf, such that to stack or not to stack onto the wildly-tilted playing field unfair trade practices, so as to make those providing resources for free to the money printer pay for the opportunity to so provision for free, will not be a to-or-[not}to question worth considering.

Mark Davidson's “Multi-valued vortex solutions to the Schrödinger equation and radiation", arXiv, 5 June 2020 (published the next month in Annals of Physics, Vol. 418), is a brilliant paper which substantively supports this and this, not to mention the very notion of 3-fold temporal CURL and associated topologically-active operator-time.

The dissembling of a fundamental functions like the rotten apple in its Bushall. I learned about self-referential neck riddles from my wife Cong Huyen Ton Nu Nha Trang. IMHO, Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction is far less a koan than a neck riddle -- and the hu-hu-[hu}man species, in turning its back upon self-referential propositions, like George Soros considering them, if not bivalently-simple fallacies, as indicative of outright unknowability or Heisenberg uncertainty at reflexivity, consensuated THE, as well as one and another, wrong answer. Next year, 2026, marks a hundred years of running from the neck riddle's consequences of failure to correctly answer. Well Born, eh what! Not knotting the nots: no neti-neti to the mth-logical-value order-type. Just think of the winding number and link structure as a handling of the knot potential as a handling of the quantum potential as a handling of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency. Mark Davidson, in his 2020 “Multi-valued vortex solutions to the Schrödinger equation and radiation”, says:

…we can see that for a free particle, the only situation which is clearly free of radiation is if j = 1 for all j. Thus, even in the case of a superposition, it is quite plausible that radiation will occur and equilibrium will be reached only when the superposition becomes [think: cascade] single-valued. If experimental evidence can be found for this radiation, then it will provide clues on how to generalize the standard quantum theory to describe this radiation exactly without resorting to plausibility arguments.

I would suggest that this and this provide such experimental evidence ((the referenced severe local storms conferences preprints detail the Paine-Kaplan [see “Conference Preprints” section of Kaplan's CV for a complete list] tornadogenesis nested-grid complex-angular-momentum-qua-temporal-CURL-cascade numerical-forecast model's performance with historical data sets: reliably predicted outbreaks 12-hours in advance on the 1km grid, or so I was told; while this accuracy at forecasting interested the USAF and NASA, mysteriously, heh-heh-heh, the NWS was uninterested)) as regards an air parcel treated as a “free particle” scaled to the spacetime dimensions of Earth's atmosphere (under the hypothesis that -- given m-valued logics, skew-perpendicularity, and scale-relative m-valued universal physical constants -- there is no such as a “classical limit”); whereas, this suggests ways to arrive at such experimental evidence as regards pi-electron parcels of a DNA free-electron gas. Think of the nested-grids of Paine-Kaplan cascade theory concerning Davidson's “…we can consider the wavefunction to have multiple Riemann sheets that differ from one another by constant phase factors of the form…” Relative to that form, see the “form forming” and “form informing” discussions of e recorded here, particularly “Conversation Four”. Davidson's discussion of compressible, rotational, irrotational, winding numbers, solenoids reads like sitting in on conversations in Doug Paine's Bradfield Hall office, Cornell, circa 1975, as recapped in our 1994 novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, a taste of which I give below, extracted in bytes and bits from Vol. 1, pp. 715-20:

A strange twist in Maxwell's ideas had always been disturbing. In using his approach, you treat the system as though there are no compressible components; and you go for the most elegant, simplified description of the mapping of the rotational elements being exchanged between two fields: electric and magnetic. But what you end up obtaining is a coupled equation set descriptive of an acoustic wave which requires eliminating all but compressible physics. This incompressible-compressible reentry in the logical structure of the conception! Paradoxical, to say the least… Ertel focused our attention on the fact that all atmospheric energy transformations can be characterized by the three factors governing solenoid intensity… Iraundegui went on to abstract the three central factors in Ertel's theorem and in so doing found a marvelous parallel to the formalism expressing the importance of solenoid physics to both electromagnetic and hydrothermodynamic domains… Does this tell us anything about the famous “divergence error” associated with Richardson's PE set -- the fact that a large-scale disturbance is subject to “having the heat turned up”, to suddenly having acoustic waves make Swiss cheese out of the previously simply-connected structure of spacetime? You bet it does…

1975 'till 2025: half a century. Paine's forecast was that it would be a century before the contents of Moon were assimilated.

₁T_{2 µ}T_m I/i^m “double-digit midget” I/iⁿ _CT_C+ T_{zog-chen 1} 2^nk

---

Contact the page editor

Return to:

•Top

•Homepage