_µT_m Scenarios, T₄₉(M)

The rectilinearly-bound binary-minds of normotic BoxMan physicists require their heuristic particle to be in a box of square-integral wavefunctions: be the adjointicity self or skew, it abides by the easing-of-the-way orthogonality diktat. Whereas, we envisioned Riemann's notion of charge creation as the trapping of (vortex) lines of force in the topology of space via J.G.Bennettian-null-vector-defined skew-perpendicularity under the 3-fold temporal CURL induced by topologically-active operator-time execution of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logical propositions, numbered with non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers or no. I now find that this notion relates not only to Schrödinger's original, pre-Born, interpretation of his 1925-Tantric-yoga-formulated m-valued wavefunction as characterizing the distribution in space of the electron's charge and mass, but also to his Riemann-surface-related post-BornRule probability-compliant (well, maybe not a 100-percent Anschluss, but certainly pretty close to a join with the crowd-connected knee-jerked consensus) thoughts on the proper interpretation as expressed in 1938 (see: “Die Mehrdeutigkeit der Wellenfunktion”, Erwin Schrodinger, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) (5) 32 (1938), pp. 49-55, translated by D. H. Delphenich as “The multi-valuedness of the wave function”). As regards my BoxManPhysicist thesis, I once again, on this website, quote Emil Post (“Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, Ph.D. dissertation published in American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, 1921, p. 185):

We must however take into account the fact that our development [rigorous “derivation” of _µT_m logics] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

Is measurement accomplished by a ₁T₂-complaint measuring apparatus likely to be the same as measurement accomplished by, say, a ₆T₂₇-complaint measuring apparatus? Indeed, under ₆T₂₇, is the distinction between measured and measurer absolutely-in-so-far-as-makable? “Indeed” carried into exponentiation: under ₆T₂₇ are 6 and 27 absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinguishable? Under the assumption that there is a somewhat authentically designatable as “physical reality” is that designatee the same under ₆T₂₇ as it is under ₁T₂? Material substance RXed under ₁T₂-only-logic alone: particle or wave. Material substance RXed under Schrödinger 2-sheeted Riemann surface ₂T₂-logically processed: particle-is-wave wavicle. Material substance RXed under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics paraded over universal covering of Riemann surface: all of chemistry formalized as Musculpt symformphonie. The prevailing Madhyamaka ₄T₄-notion (that's not ₁T₄) of not-this-not-that neti-neti -- not solid, not liquid, not gas -- adiabatic cum Brillouin toroidal (see the Brillouin observation made in the bibliography to our 1994 novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, p. 751) topological phase of matter need not be construed a semi-metal, as our late-1970s notion of topologically-active-operator-time-induced “topological superconductivity” allows demergence of such like to Earth's atmospheric hydrothermodynamic vorticity (have a look at the “atmospheric analogue to Maxwell's equations” -- and contemplate what that analogue may suggest concerning, say, coupling of climate-change dynamics to dynamics transpiring in Earth's other spheres) no less than to radiation-emitting, helix-coiling DNA. Why do unitary BoxMen require self-adjoint-qua-egoically-[self}identified, orthogonal, Hermetic, uh, uh, whoops, Hermitian operators to adjointly represent to themselves their reality as revealed by their dual percepts(outer dot product)/propriocepts(inner string product)? In the above-linked 1938 Schrödinger paper, whilst speaking of the energy operator in a fashion supportive of his contention that the Riemann surface branches of the wavefunction must be limited to 2, those designable with plus and minus, he says:

…the function x + iy can be something essentially different from x – iy and can have other properties or rights. Up to now (as far as I know), no one has ever given any sort of significance to the sign in the first definition. If one did do that then one would eliminate the temporal reversibility of wave mechanics.

Well, we did precisely that, à la cascade theory of tornadogenesis, as stated in our 1977 “General Process” paper, to wit, quoting:

On the basis of the foregoing analysis of c, c' and c" we wish to consider the relations manifest within an extensive finite set of LSTDs [limited spacetime domains] and within a transfinite set of LSTDs. In order to take the first step in that direction, we first note that Einstein's equation E = mc² has both positive and negative aspects as viewed from the downward versus upward cascade processes, respectively, suggesting two fundamental classes of mass-energy conversion: c = plus and minus the square root of E over m.

A notion well worth thinking about -- particularly by those who, at an impressionable age, visited Hi[ro}shi|ma and Naga[sa}ki -- as suggested near unto the denouement to our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh. Not only is temporal reversibility thus eliminated: passing, passive, referential, linear time, qua memetime, is replaced by topologically-active operator-time. And we envisioned the nesting-foam of LSTDs (think: multi-sheeted-Riemann-surface like, and not just 2 sheets à la the Schrödinger of 1938) as topo-active-optime cascade-decomposable/recomposable from/to a BackCloth MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround.

Even ₂T₂-Schrödinger hasn't gotten very far with the post-participation-mystique hu-hu-[hu}man psyche (“fantasy emanations”: heh-heh-heh!), let alone my me's with the social-anthropological “contagion” of unmentionable animistic-pagan participation-inconsciente (most “observers”, I am afraid, would, indeed do, by projective-identification, attribute this unconsciousness to external influences, i.e., Asuras of one sort or another), aka _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency qua Buddhological “compassion”. Quoting the Sami-focused Jo Nesbo novel Midnight Sun (Vintage paperback edition, 2015, p. 178): “I didn't believe in life after death, but I did believe in death after life.” My me's? Wellll, my I/i^m -- holding with ₄T₄-unto-₆T₂₇-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ -- don't baleeeve that before/after is an ultimate; rather, that it only memetemporally exists under ₁T₂-only-logic alone (temporal precedence relations). “…, but I did believe in” _µT_m logics after ₁T₂ logic (logical precedence relations) on demerged Riemann-surface-like multi-sheeted MVRS BackCloth (ontological precedence relations). “I didn't believe in…” precedence relations logical, ontological, temporal on the _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround most-densely-packed (re: pre-pregeometry “bucket-of-dusti”-Regge-lattice-intersectional nodes) universal-covering sheet of Musculpt manifold, M. Schrödinger wrote his both-and cat paradox paragraph in 1935, three years before his ₂T₂-m-valued “Anschluss” paper (linked in the preceding entry of this website page), a paper in which he added details as to his 2-state-only-superposition commitment (still the preference of those working on development of so-called “quantum” computers: 2-state qubits rather than n-state [mu}its, mu being to the left side of T-for-transparency, indicating that of the m available logical-values there are -- in the given class of propositions numbered with a Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers -- mu that are demergent). Wiki, citing Moore, says that Schrödinger came up with his wave equation whist in a sanatorium for TB. Wiki, citing Dick Teresi (“The Lone Ranger of Quantum Mechanics”, NY Times, 7 January 1990), says that Schrödinger came up with his wave equation whilst he had “…secluded himself with a mistress in a mountain cabin in December 1925.” The former circumstance I would attribute to a ₁T₂-only-Schrödinger; the latter, to a ₂T₂-Schrödinger. Was there, at the very “instant” -- heh-heh-heh! -- of outset, uh, of the set out of that equation, a ₃T₃-unto-_µT_m-Schrödinger? I read Walter J. Moore's Schrodinger: Life and Thought when it first appeared. I don't currently have access to a copy. My memory is probably faulty (or possibly it is dream-informed, as per page 777, that's not 666 for all you Asuras out there, Vol. 1, our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh: heh-heh-heh!), almost surely so, but, nonetheless, I “remember” a ₃T₃-Schrödinger à la a snowbound cabin in the Austrian Alps wherein there was the practicing of Tantric sexual yoga with two of his female graduate students (until I read somewhere of her “transference problems” with graduate students, I always wondered why Marie Curie, a native Polish speaker, never impressed upon Einstein's awareness the existence of physical-theory significance of Lukasiewicz logics). To a well-glutamate-etched ₁T₂-only-Schrödinger, the Jungian dynamics of the man-woman-level of the psychological transference would be altogether unconscious. To a ₂T₂-Schrödinger, the Eightfold Way of the Jungian dynamics thereof (Anima/Animus vs Animus/Anima doubled by introversion/extroversion of the four basic psychological functions, thinking-feeling cum intuition-sensation) would be demerging into conscious awareness by following the Noble Eightfold Path. To a ₃T₃-unto-_µT_m-Schrödinger, there would be little-to-closely-approaching-none in the way of Jungian transference dynamics as the basic psychological functions progressively balanced, thus facilitating ever more states held simultaneously in endogenous-ketaminergic inner-Musculpt awareness as to _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency.

I mean, it's quite embarrassing, really, all these decades later. Don't you think? Does J.G.Bennettian, null-vector-defined, _µT_m-logical “skew-perpendicularity” (I “intuitively” -- via my childhood exposure, Midori Gaoka, kita-Kyushu -- latched onto this in Samuel Weiser's Antiquarian Bookshop, circa November of 1963) have anything to do with “magic angles”? Quoting the Abstract to “Superconductor vortex spectrum including Fermi arc states in time-reversal symmetric Weyl semimetals”, Rauf Giwa and Pavan Hosur, arXiv, 17 April 2023:

Tilting the vortex transmutes it between bosonic, fermionic and supersymmetric, produces periodic peaks in the density of states that signify novel nonlocal Majorana modes, and yields a thickness-independent spectrum at “magic angles”.

Does tilting of the superconductor vortices have anything to do with 3-fold temporal CURL as described here? As regards the “agency” ultimately responsible for Nature's “autogenic-shift” tiltings into “magic angles” (we are not talking iatrogenic interventions here), how about topologically-active operator-time executions of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m propositions “dusted” over the Regge-intersectional nodes of the multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like MVRS m-logically-valued reference-space BackCloth? Is an acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-modes rippled tornadic wall a scaled “domain wall”? Do Majorana modes, MMs (null-energy [₁T₂ly speaking] states wherein particle and anti-particle are in “projective-identification” with “each other”), have anything to do with this?

My father's father did not lose the family farm during the Great Depression, he lost the family's status as [ten}ant farmers. Riiip! My father, the youngest of a dozen, had to drop out of high school. Twiiist! To help makes ends meet. Paaaste! His first lesson in topology: making a doughnut non-orientable. A lesson decades later transmitted to me during the period he was a USAF supply-and-materiel-qua-logistics troubleshooter, solving problems no one else could. Given the vast differences in our childhood experiences, we didn't see eye to eye on much, let alone I to I. Before developing his troubleshooting expertise, he was a bomb-dropper: a B-17 pilot, one of the many who dropped'em on a well-bunkered child who decades later I counted among my closest friends. He wouldn't talk about his WWII, Korean or VN war experiences with me: I wasn't one of his peers (and, moreover, I chose not to go to the Air Force Academy, not to go into the USAF, and not to become an officer -- even when offered a direct commission, a choice, when he found out about it he took as a direct personal affront). This take, even though, by that time he had retired from his last posting, a posting at the Pentagon, and was then quite disparaging about deterioration of the officer corps over span of the post-WWII era, largely due, as he saw it, to economics of the “revolving door”. He did not seek, and would not have taken, the sort of post-retirement position a Pentagon logistics Xpert might have pi/2-revolved into. At the very end of his life, however, aware that I was working on a novel, he told me [1] not to be too hard on the WWII generation, the generation, IMHO, with the Greatest cognitive deficit vis-à-vis introspective competency (to my me, the generation that fights the war is not the generation responsible for the war: in the case of the WWII battle of the 200-years War of the World, culpability most directly resided in The Lost Generation), and [2], in so many words, admitted that he and his cohort had no real idea as to what the war was actually about or what its origins authentically entailed, that they for the most part had simply believed what they were told. When Reagan said that those storming the beachhead at Normandy had faith that they were acting for all humanity, I took note of the fact that he was speaking in 1984 of faith, not of knowledge or of certainty. The situation is much worse today, as no insight has developed, and people are even more imprinted on the Age of Enlightenment (VP Vance recently held that Age up as being what Americans and Europeans have most in common; and DOG-e appears intent upon restoring functionality of the institutional base analogically embodying metaphysical assumptions established during that Age and sundered by the New Physics, an institutional base deautomatized by a socius gorging on dissimulated-quantum-based technologies) than they were during the 20th century, not comprehending at all how responsible ₁T₂-only-enlightenment has been for etiology and pathogenesis of the 200-years War of the World. Deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull unknown. Because unobservable by ₁T₂-only-self-metapreprogrammed observers? One way to make people think you are off your rocker (if the person you are speaking to happens to be a Cornell Ph.D. candidate in chemistry, they might headjerk as if slapped!) is to raucously make epiphanic statements like: “There is some absolute zero at every degree kelvin!” Which is one of many ways to say that there is no such as the consensuated (consensuation being a quasihuman [think: ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement] collective behavior where members of the group ensemble kneejerk to the same conclusion despite there being palpable alternatives) “classical limit”, supposing that _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian-“skew-perpendicularity” and scale-relative m-valued universal physical constants (e.g., absolute limiting velocity) subtend (more correctly: supratend) the ₁T₂-only-Heisenberg uncertainty inequalities. The time-slowdowns (consciously registered as a gathering speedup-motion effect eliciting a sense of “foreimage” visualization -- not afterimage blurrrr) associated with my adolescent-onset near-fugue “Plexiglass-wall” states (arising upon return to the ZI from Japan, circa 1956, aged 11) gave me necessary and sufficient cause to focus experiential attention on the question, “What is time, anyway?” Somewhere “along the [memetime] line” -- heh-heh-heh -- experientially, later reductive-phenomenologically, I came to the realization that I had awareness of time only by noting changes in space. So, I started to think of time as changes in space; later yet, as changes of space; even later, as that which changes space. And I thought of variances of my personal time-rate perception as embedded in variances of the baud-rate of universal consciousness, in its active aspect (later, after reading Emil Post, realized to be “as ₁T₂ly construed”). I doubt, however, that my Plexiglas-wall experiences will significantly lengthen the worldline of my lifetime, heh-heh-heh. My having arrived at this notion of time was part of my resonance with Cornell professor Douglas A. Paine, who had been working with the idea of “active time” for “quite some time” -- heh-heh-heh -- before we ran across each other at the 1974 Velikovsky conference. I note that “topologically-active operator-time” (qua: “Time operates on space to generate form”) has no place in consensus QM (how QMal “external time” is “seen” by the experimenter, I do not see; that being my case, I have no problem understanding the arising of the notion of energy-time uncertainty -- heh-heh-heh). But, don't worry, be happy, AI will be the final solution rectifying all challenges to passive, passing, referential linear-time: given that it, AI, deep trains, at high energy-expense in uncertain timespans, on glutamatergically-anchored bases of dissimulated prescriptively-enculturated-socialized data. AI, “quantum” processed or no: the ultimate as to induced normosis, SCSS-cum-CBDC-enforced or not-A_I. In reaction to the recent revelations about USAID disbursements, Philip Giraldi asks on 25 February 2025: “Is It Foreign Aid or Covert Action?” Goodness, golly, and gosh! When, on a Hopf-fibration platter, you, by ConveDD, hand over the time and space strategic variables to the opposition by fiat declaration of interminable GWOT, ya' jus' gotta Xpect dys[bursar}mints ta go exponential. Not many, it must be supposed, read Teresa Hayter's 1971 Aid as Imperialism and regarded the Peace Corps (initialized on 1 March 1961 by JFK) as the soft-combat-armed-cultural-can-opener complement to the hard-armed-broad-spectrum-antibiotics-distributing SF-MEDCAPS. Who used USAID (initialized on 3 November 1961 by JFK) as cover at DIOCCs and PIOCCs (CORDS' Phoenix Pogrom district and province intelligence operations and coordination centers)? Reversibility of supposedly-objective, passive, passing, referential linear-time qua memetime is an important feature of consensuated ₁T₂-only QM, particularly as regards “condensed matter” (the somewhats of matter whatnot -- that whatnot being nothing given shape by topo-active optime -- are close together) physics. Whereas, in our conception, ₁T₂-only-definable (see Dave Chapman's comment as to what 0 and 1 signify) memetime reversibility is “secondary”, to say the least, to demergence-remergence pre-pregeometry “bucket of dust” (as regards reemergence to dusti, think the tornado's complex-angular-momentum-[handled as topo-active optime]-reverse-cascade-generated, vertically-pulse-code-burst, m-valued, acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-mode beam, and see the awesome paper entitled “Vortex beam: generation and detection of orbital angular momentum”, Yihua Bai and Haoran Lv and Xin Fu and Yuanjie Yang, Chinese Optics Letters, 20:1, 2022) unto _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-pregeometry unto J.G.Bennettian-skew-Regge-geometrodynamics unto ₁T₂-only-ponderablespacememetime physics -- and return. But note that the p's and q's of phase space become Hermitian operators in a Hilbert space, and that this transformation can, as consensus theory has it, be handled as a de[form}ation (not exactly a deautomatization) of classical mechanics (hence, there is, according to consensus, a “classical limit”: quantum algebra in the limit a Lie algebra -- no such, then, as “Time operates on space to generate form”). One wonders, though, about names, doesn't one? Their synchronicities. What, anyway, is a “phase” in QM, as related to, say the 0 and 1 of ₁T₂-only logic, bitic and qubitic? That phase could be the phase of the wave representation of the harmonic temperature oscillation of a parcel of pi-electrons in DNA helix-coil transition or of an air parcel helixing its way into a roll cloud undergoing a J.G.Bennettian-skew-perpendicularity “magic angle” vorticity tilt (prerequisite to tornadic-vortex-beam generation?). O, those implicate “boundary changes” holographic-principle correlated to “bureaucratic” variables of the bulk phase, those “edge states” at boundaries of _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly-unconventional superconductor socialities! It could well be asked whether or ₁T₂-only-not Jane has ever really understood what the word “sociality” actually means. Maybe so, hard to tell. Damn them Tet-'68 VCI: we shoulda' knowed of them unconventionalities, our own self-identical selves! But, deep-structure-wise, be aware that “…it's best to just ignore the global phase ambiguity whenever you're doing real calculations…” because, in QM, the phase factor “…does not, in itself, have any physical meaning, since the introduction of a phase factor does not change the expectation values of a Hermitian operator…” So, this no “physical meaning” is dependent on expectations understood as amplitudes of the probability waves which allow retention of the ₁T₂-only-logical handling of the m-values of the Schrödinger wavefunction. Is the “global phase” absolutely “nonobservable”, or only relatively so? Relative, that is, to the order-of-logical-value employed by the observer (that observer-cum-participator being unable to maintain hisher self-sameness, qua absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinctness-from-that-observed, under logical-value-order-types supraordinate to that ₁T₂). How many 2-pi-looping-the-loop edge states are there to the OBEed “boundary” of the ketaminergic non-selfsame observer-cum-participator employing _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-valued logics to process hisher Musculpt-symformphonic perpropriocepts? Certainly not merely the ₁T_m-many-to-one of a Hopf-fibration's worth. For the ₁T₂-only observer, be aware, “The Bloch sphere may be generalized to an n-level quantum system, but then the visualization is less useful.” Heh-heh-heh!

Below, I quote a very interesting statement (referenced to Matt Visser's “Essential and Inessential Features of Hawking Radiation”, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 12:4, 2003, pp. 649-61) made by Kwon on p. 6 of his paper entitled “Phenomenology of Holography via Quantum Coherence on Causal Horizons”, Ohkyung Kwon, arXiv, 2 November 2023:

…Hawking radiation itself does not actually require an event horizon and only needs an apparent horizon defined by a local observer.

Now, I below juxtapose to that observation a quotation drawn from the “Spacetime Del Operator and Temporal Curl” section of our 1977 paper entitled “Toward a General Theory of Process”:

We note from Eq 9 [the three-dimensional vorticity theorem] that the total time rate of change of icapth, jcapth, and kcapth components of relative vorticity (z) is forced by the three-dimensional solenoid, divergence and curl of friction terms when the analytic perspective remains embedded within a particular spatial atmospheric volume [think, relative to Kwon: the local observer as constellated by that cognitive embeddedness] defined by the x,y,z-coordinate system. However, from the aforegiven description of the cascade process, we have found that an additional degree of freedom must be available to this system in order for it to escape an otherwise inevitable infinite concentration [think, relative to Kwon: an actual event horizon] of vorticity, kinetic energy, and mass within its finite spatial volume. The traditional view has been that friction would literally dissipate such a problem. But we have seen empirical evidence, such as that offered in the previous section, which suggests that natural systems have a far more elegant solution to the problem: i.e., the generation of coherent (acoustic) waves [Earth's atmosphere's acoustic analogue to the Lukasiewiczian-analog blackhole computer], which originate from the cascade of kinetic energy through the hydrodynamic spectrum [note that the cited “empirical evidence” is tantamount to direct observation of Hawking radiation in its acoustic-analogue form].

To mathematically codify this point of view, we add a gradient in time to the traditional gradients in space to define a first order spacetime del operator…

On p. 3, Kwon quotes Thomas Banks (see: “Holographic Space-Time: The Takeaway”, T. Banks, arXiv, 12 September 2011) and Willy Fischler (see: “Holographic Space-time and Newton's Law”, Banks and Fischler, arXiv, 22 October 2013) concerning their theory of holographic space-time, to wit:

“The Holographic Principle tells us that both the causal structure and conformal factor of the space-time geometry are encoded as properties of the quantum operator algebra [properties supertended by the 3-fold temporal curl expressions of Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time?]. The space-time geometry is not a fluctuating quantum variable, but, in general, only a thermodynamic / hydrodynamic property of the quantum theory.”

The latter sentence makes for quite a provocative statement relative to our 1978 paper entitled “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”. As regards the former sentence, we (i.e., my wife and I: there was never a “my brilliant career”, but there certainly is a “your brilliant wife”, as onetime Marine Corps Captain and multilingual emeritus Chula Professor William Whorton repeatedly refers to her), in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, novelly suggest that Wigner's Gedankenexperiment “friend” is Maxwell's “angel”, aka Pauli-Paine “topologically-active operator-time”, that is, universal consciousness in its active aspect, ₁T₂ly speaking -- not Wheelerian spacetime-in-itself as participant-observer (to “whom” Kwon refers, p. 6, quoting an early Wheeler paper dated 1946). As amplification of my above-made “supertending” intercalation, I quote from the Abstract to Banks' paper entitled “Fluctuating Hydrodynamics and Wormholes”, arXiv, 16 March 2022:

We show that a recent reformulation of hydrodynamic equations for a large class of models consisting of q-bits on a graph [hmm, starting to realize that SFI's complexity theory's DNA-instigated nk-fitness-landscape is a ₁T₂-only treatment of _µT_m-logical processes?] with short range interactions is sufficient for understanding chaotic behavior… The bulk Euclidean action is purely topological [as is the case with Pauli-Paine topo-active optime: “Time operates on space to generate form”, à la Musculpt symformphonie, e.g., acoustically-modified gravity-wave-mode signatures of theta-e equivalent potential temperature surfaces at tornadogenesis].

Before taking a further dive into Banks, let's consider a few more modified-to-fit-the-Paine-Pensinger-scheme quotations drawn from Kwon's very stimulating paper. Again from p. 6:

…a quantum theory of space-time should start with an emergent [a demergent] formulation based on Hilbert spaces [on a nested, multi-sheeted, MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space of null surfaces]…

Drawn from p. 7:

The states of space-time are quantized on null surfaces [on surfaces demergent to geometrodynamic Regge lattices formed of null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”]…

Note that in Kwon's Fig. 2, p. 8, the states of quantum geometry are stated as being understood relative to null-vectors. And then, once again on p.6, we find Kwon saying that:

…the decoherence of space-time happens for the [₁T₂-only-logical, ponderablespacememetime-bound, glutamatergically-etched under orchestration by prescriptive-enculturation-socialization] observer.

Looking into T. Banks' “Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity”, arXiv, 7 February 2025, we find, quoting the Abstract, that:

…the screen geometry [is] “fuzzy”. Quantum dynamics is defined in a Hilbert bundle over the space of time-like geodesics on the background geometry.

Posted just a few weeks ago. Sounds to me a lot like saying that the Regge lattices are constructed of J.G.Bennettian null-vector-defined “pencils of skew-parallels” geometrodynamically processed under _µT_m-valued logics as the pregeometry, the propositions thereof executed by topo-active optime. Paine-Kaplan were directly implying in 1974 (see the “Edited Contract Reports” section of Michael L. Kaplan's CV for “Paine, D. A., and M. L. Kaplan, 1974: The linking of multi-scaled energy sources leading to atmospheric development, the hydrodynamic spectrum, Part I: A study in nonlinear wave interaction and Part II: A severe tornado-producing convective squall-line system. Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY and Air Force global Weather Central, Offutt AFB, Omaha, NE, Scientific Reports 1 & 2 for National Science Foundation Grant GA-35250, 140 pp.”) that the closest and best place to study blackhole physics is with regard to the acoustic analogues thereof manifest in Earth's atmosphere. Quoting our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, pp. 324-5, quoting this 1974 Paine-Kaplan NSF Report:

Planck's Blackbody and the Atmospheric Analogue to a Comet… Blackbodies and blackholes exist within the spacetime frame of atmospheric dynamics… nonlinear dynamics leading to a mathematical singularity in theta-space (horizontal rotation disappears within an isentropic framework) would remain an unsolved mystery if our only point of view was the Newtonian… The progressive gravity wave is a manifestation of the transition from rotational to irrotational energy… cluster of intense squalls radiating irrotational waves from its perimeter, a process whereby energy from the rotational wave is perfectly absorbed and then re-radiated in the form of irrotational waves… The Role of Energy Feeder Bands Attached to the Convective Nucleus… These trajectories take on the appearance of spiral helices adjoining the forward portion of the rotating storm and are comprised of undulating laminar flow along the axis of a roll cloud… Several comets such as Mrkos in 1957 have been photographed with distinct twisting filaments resembling the spiral helices described above…

Much grief, to say the least, and a long wait: half a century, 1974 until 2025.

Well, all I can say is: Beyond me -- after it became public knowledge that the U.S. proxy-warfare cum nation-building cum color-revolution strategic offensive was being pursued in significant measure with tactical-improvisation suitcases full of MM-Theoretic dollars -- is how anyone could believe that all, even most, dollar creation is registered in national-debt bookkeeping. Not to mention covert funding of dot-mil, dot-intel, dot-guv proprietaries, be they NGOed or postured as solely privately-owned corporate [per}sons. Moreover, once the ponderablespace and memetime variables have been vouchsafed to the whomever-wherever “opposition” (ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the terror elicited by “quantum-this, quantum-that”) by the declaration of an interminable GWOT, the required resources commitment defies the fundamental theorem of calculus, because there is no limit to the stacking of exponential-function exponents generated by the 2-pi transits of the MMT-currency-unit circle. Ack, aye, of course, IMHO amiss it all remains, circa 2025: theory of holographic space-time and the thermodynamic cum hydrodynamic treatment of gravity does not seriously challenge the sequestration of quantum principles of self-organization, the supposed “classical limit” remains largely intact, and ₁T₂-only-logic alone continues as the only acceptable cognitive means of elucidation. People can, thus, easily justify to themselves and in public forums their conscious commitments to, qua identifications with, 17th- and 18th-century ideas about political economy, the foundational principles, even the structural and functional elaborations continuing to constitute the institutional base wherever it is found (the 19th-century-Marxist-informed variants being something of a parody of the Lockean analogues of Cartesian-Newtonian notions as to the nature of Nature; the identifiable residuals of precolonial institutions worldwide persisting largely on the level of vague echoes). Whereas, ever since my 1975 reading of Emil Post on _µT_m-logics, I've argued that if Europe does not find a structural-and-functional political-economy embodiment of non-dissimulated quantum principles of self-organization, once again general war will sweep across the continent (some believe that that circumstance is nearby on the memetimeline, e.g., Martin Armstrong's “Socrates”): the Batesonesque schizophrenogenic double-binds incumbent upon the cognitive dissonance of the ever-increasing divergence between Weltanschauung (trickled down to Lebenswelt and Umwelts) and foundational principles of the institutional base will force yet another critical-state (correlation length snaps to infinity) fulmination of the requisite informing collective psychosis. How often has the proximal-cause responsible party walked away from the mess it has created (e.g., a billion to create a coup; 350 to address the consequences)? Think, for one hisstorical instance, of France vis-à-vis Indochina; for another, of the U.S. pivot to Asia from its focus on the Middle East and Europe. As regards the proposition that the U.S. will not itself implement such a quantum-political-economy embodiment, however much dissimulated-quantum based infratech it hog-troughs upon -- and the U.S. remains very, very far from even considering such an implementation (see, for a discussion of just one indicator: “Secession: Why Redrawing US State Borders Makes Politicians So Mad”, Ryan McMaken, LewRockwell reposting from Mises.org, 27 February 2025, and just try to imagine being instituted in the U.S. constantly changing quasi-fractal e-boundaries over which are defined fractal-drum-like _µT_m-LETS-currencies nesting-foams, whereupon, by analogy to the holographic principle, bureaucratic variables of the “bulk phase” are border-orchestrated) -- I've long forecasted that U.S. actions, driven by its collective projective-identifications and ConveDDs, in due course will impel overt formation of a Germano-Russian Bloc aligned to a GreaterChina Mahayana-Buddhist Bloc. No matter what is done to address surface-structure causes-pushes/attractors-pulls, so long as the deep-structure forcing functions remain intact…

Much could be observed concerning “Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity”, T. Banks, arXiv, 7 February 2025, but let's stick primarily to his concluding section entitled “A Sobering Conclusion”. Banks concludes his conclusion with the deflating statement that:

That causal diamond [in Paine-Pensinger terms, LSTD, limited spacetime domain] is defined roughly by the beginning of the universe (since much data about that beginning can be gleaned from the Cosmic Microwave Background, Large Scale Cosmological Structure etc.) and ends at the point where the local group collapses into a black hole. At that point it continues to exist, but its utility as a detector has come to an end because it has very few semi-classical subsystems that can reliably store and record information. Thus, no theory of mathematical dS space is of much use for telling us much about our own universe, and much of what we will be able to learn from a theory of the cosmos will at best tell us how probable the particular events we see in our own local group are, among all the possible local groups of galaxies in the (temporarily) visible universe.

While I may agree with the statement that “…it has very few semi-classical subsystems that can reliably store and record information” (I would argue that it has just one classical, that ₁T₂-only-logical; as to those “semi”, I don't rightly know), I do not hold to the notion that “semi-classical subsystems” are the primary reliable store of information. Moreover, what I take as being the base-state of the ensheaved and tesselated Riemann-surface-like MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, while it may be regarded point-set-wise, bucket-of-dust-wise, most-tightly-spherically-packed-wise, most-dense sheet-wise, nested-screen-grid-wise, meshwork-wise, Regge-lattice-wise as the most-sub of subsystems in the cosmic nesting-foam, logical-value-order-type-wise it is the most-super of supersystems in the cosmic nesting-foam numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, given that each of its numbered points has ramification-qua-recomposition-stacked upon it _C+T_C+ logical-values, i.e., those from the C+-large collection of its logical-value sub-“systems”. Note that the quoted statement from Banks elucidates a memetime-bound cosmogony, implicitly treating the memetime-independent Schrödinger equation as codifying a now-slice of the supposedly-objective linear-time line regarded a directionless scalar despite classification as a reversed-sign-4th-real-dimension coordinate (this “regard-despite” being one example of the cognitive slight-of-hand employed to maintain the supposition that passing, passive, referential linear-time is objective, not a glutamate-anchored learned behavior). But, the notion I advocate is that once Passover is made to lattice-logic-like holoscreen formulations there is no memetime evolution to be accorded [geo}metro-“dynamics”; such evolution is an artifact, a residual of continued identification with ₁T₂-only-logic-alone and lack of adequate consideration being given to 3rd-order “dynamics” as the ₁T₂-only-logic take on topological non-orientability ((a _µT_m-being-there construed as a non-orientable ₁T₂-becoming; topologically-active-operator-time-executed [demergence}to qua [decompaction}of the logical-value-order-type nesting-foam atlas of charts [for edifying illustrations, see “Quadrilateral Mesh Generation II: Meromorphic Quartic Differentials and Abel-Jacobi Condition”, Na Lei, et al., arXiv, 29 June 2019] on ramified universal covering of the complex [see the “Holomorphic Maps” animation] Musculpt manifold, M, mistaken as memetime-evolutionary “dynamics”: not just mistaking wheres for whens, but mistaking hows for the wheres-for-whens)). Consider the causal diamond “it” to which Banks refers:

…one can have longer lived localized excitations in dS space because of the existence of meta-stable gravitational bound states, colloquially known as local groups of galaxies. These do not travel on geodesics and their motion is subject to the vagaries of cosmic history. However the trajectory of the center of mass of such a group is a semi-classical variable whose motion is rendered decoherent by entanglement with the myriad subsystems that make up the local group. It defines a universal proper time coordinate and the other semi-classical trajectories provide a plethora of detectors for many quantum states in the causal diamond of the group.

Well, hmm, with my I/i^m's inner-Musculpt orientation, this “sounds” somewhat to my me like an orbifold musical chord geometry (for a brief definition see the Abstract rendered here). This comparison makes more sense than first appears to be the case when it is assessed in light of Banks' admission that:

A major feature of the formalism, which distinguishes it from a lot of rhetoric about a hypothetical universal theory of quantum gravity is that it is manifestly Background Dependent [think: the T_zog-chen AllBase “world-sheet” of n-sheeted-MVRS BackCloth: for recent edification, see “A fresh view on string orbifolds”, Stefano Giaccari and Roberto Volpato, arXiv, 26 January 2023]. It's been my opinion, since the discovery of non-perturbative 1 + 1 dimensional string models in the early 1990s, and particularly the AdS/CFT correspondence, that the idea of background independence in quantum gravity was a mistaken one. Jacobson's identification of Einstein's equations as the hydrodynamics of the area law makes that even more clear. We do not think that all systems that exhibit Navier-Stokes behavior have the same microscopic dynamics [just look, for instance, at Paine-Kaplan “Quadrilateral Mesh”-nested-grid, complex-angular-momentum-cascade, numerical modeling of tornadogenesis: “classical limit” anyon, uh, uh, anyone… eh what?]. A particular feature of background dependence, which has not come into play in this review has to do with the local physics of constrained states [just think: à la that “constrained state”, which does not go to infinite massenergy density, wherein m-valued acoustically-modified-gravity-wave modes are emitted, and very likely _µT_m-logically-processed, at tornadogenesis]. The dynamics on individual holographic screens is invariant under a fuzzy [I rather think _µT_m-logics-wise, not fuzzy-sets-wise or fuzzy-logics-wise] version of volume preserving maps of the screen [see the “Quadrilateral Mesh Generation” paper linked above]. However, the embedding of nested screens into the background geometry tells us the [magic] “angles” [vis-à-vis J.G.Bennettian-null-vector-defined “skew-perpendicularity”?] at which the constraints live on the screens, and thus determine the trajectories of jets of particles [and of tornado-generated, vertically-propagated, infrasound, pulse-code bursts] through space-times.

In this context of hydrothermo-₁T₂ly-“dynamic” background dependency, have a look at the collapsing “ambiguous”-cubes animation given in “Orbifold and Voice Leading” (good offices of HarmoniousApp.net) which is most-edifyingly understood as a Taoist-Musculpting-“Way” of orbifold-understanding the distributed-information-store upon T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround of multi-null-sheeted ramified, that's m-valued function-functional-functor, J.G.Bennettian-“skew-perpendicularity”-angle-preserving conformal-Riemann-surface-like-MVRS BackCloth: this animation understood as regards compacted Cubistic apperception, or maybe it is perception-inadmissible, that's pulled-out single-valued/multi-valued, decoherent/coherent, ₁T₂/_µT_m, incarnations/excarnate, chart-atlas-nesting-foam/AllBase, Maya/Brahman, on and on and on, so far as the glutamate-etched binary-mind is concerned.

Multicultural-asymmetry [a|d}icks sustaining cognitive-deficit incurrence by fixation upon ana[them}at|icks. Quoting “What Ketamine Does to the Human Brain”, Shayla Love, The Atlantic, 5 March 2025: “John Lilly… abused ketamine until he believed that he was contacted by an extraterrestrial who removed his penis.” Think: “uncocktailed”? How many pieces of misinformation and disinformation can be found in this article? John Cunningham Lilly, M.D., chose me to survey his personal scientific archive in preparation for establishment of an assessed value so as to allow the archive to be moved into the public domain. I was hired by Studio Garage, subcontractor to Dentsu, subcontractor to the Pioneer Corporation. During the weeks I daily spent with this archive I read Lilly's “Tank Logs” -- that's the loggings of John concerning his own experiences, not the tank logs of others as discussed in his 1977 book entitled The Deep Self: Profound Relaxation and the Tank Isolation Technique. The tank logs of Lilly himself recorded observations made during a meticulous long-term investigation of systematic ketamine dose-frequency experimentation Lilly conducted upon himself in the isolation-flotation tank. The doses involved were general anesthetic level: IM injection, loss of normal consciousness in a matter of seconds. Let it be known -- as anyone who went through the year-and-a-half-long Medics Course at SFTG during the mid-1960s should well remember -- that field-expedient ketamine-cocktailed-with-a-hypnotic-qua-benzodiazepine like, say, Valium (which suppresses the intrapsychic phenomenologies associated with ketamine), was the most used general anesthetic employed during the Viet Nam war. A well-thought-out-and-planned study of “unconscious” floating in the isolation tank so as to restrict the experienced phenomenologies to those proprioceptive and intrapsychic. Onsets of habituation responses. Dose-frequency dependencies of intra-state phenomenologies. Attempts at classifications thereof: different sorts of OBEs, obviously. Pre-anesthetic-induction site-and-set metaprogramming of intra-state phenomenologies. I closely studied these logs. I remember nothing having been noted about an ET removing a penis. But even if there were such a note, so what? Dream-sequence-like incident recorded immediately post-general-anesthesia. Freudian dream analysis would interpret the sequence in some way; Jungian analysis, in some other. ET references, indeed E.C.C.O., being popularizing euphemisms for bleed-downs of _µT_m-logical cognitions-suspicions trans-₁T₂-only-logical-pattern-recognitions which the introspectively-incompetent binary-mind struggles to meaningfully contextualize from its very limited cosmic exposure, euphemistic like referring to ketamine as “yuppie LSD”. “How else should it be popularly characterized?” Lilly asked. The study logged was of intra-states demergent from the Freudian personal unconscious and the Jungian collective unconscious at exogenously-introduced-uncocktailed-ketaminergic loss of egofunction-boundary values. Boundary changes. Modulation of borders. So, ask me “Why Redrawing US State Borders Makes Politicians So Mad”? A pristine example of the mass-formation-unto-collectively-constellated ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement. Massively in disrepair: bridges (think: the bridges of a multi-sheeted Riemann surface) and interstate highways (think: the inter-states-of-consciousness involved in bleed-downs into ontic awareness of _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency). Phenomenologies of collective psychotic breaks, such ConveDDs.

Way back when, memetimely speaking, I asked: Why be interested in changing “the human condition”? That's a “framework-determining condition”-type condition; rather, be interested in changing the conditionings of humans. I've advocated local m-logically-valued governance and reinforcement of non-local self-organizing processes driven by the quantum potential resident in _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency. The globaloney Sitskrieg vis-à-vis preparations for adequately meeting the occasions of coming planetary cuspover, with the social structure of attention cathexes being diverted into this and that, including the likes of a Snitskrieg, is so pernicious, so prevaricative, it's hard to penetrate sufficient to understanding the “whys” as to the neoCons' finding that, despite the ME throwovers, outrage is their necessary response to the playing of the trump card; whereas, given that GWOT eventually solicited aid from the terrorists it ostensibly targeted, those same Cons (ConveDDers, that is, heh-heh-heh!) might embrace playing of the wild card: U.S. Space Command and ground combat troops being committed to overthrow of the neoNas in Kiev qua Kyiv à la “KyivnotKiev”. Anything is possible these days, right -- uh, assuming neoCon persona as identified with universal participant-observer Qua[d}rat|ic: [qu}ave|ry, [qua}very, quav[e}ry, quavery-as-in-Zitter[be}we|gang, heh-heh-heh! Contextualized by ₁T₂-only-logical memetime-bound BigBang/BigBoing-SS (snuff-stuff), conventions of the murder-mystery genre of popular fiction are surrogates for mysterious cosmogonic in[vari}ants, uh, Them (I saw this movie whilst living in Midori Gaoka, kita-Kyushu, during the same period those Flying Boxcars lifted off the flightline for their journey to Dien Bien Phu, and the night sea breeze blowing through the shutters on my bedroom window terrified me, sounding just like them giant ants!) -- except that bestseller fiscal returns require resolution-to-the-tonic Sit[is}fact|i|on; whereas, the comatose cosmo-case has never actually found such a snake-oil tonic. Post-Renaissance physical theory: a Potemkin village of the Binary-Mind moved down along Old Man River's ₁T₂-only-definable memetime line. With a few minor demurrals and one rather strong reservation, I found David Stockman's piece entitled "NATO: The Case To Get Out Now", LewRockwell, 6 March 2025, to be one of the best things I've ever read on U.S. policy, foreign and domestic. Among much else, he asks:

So, how did a peaceful Republic secure behind the great Atlantic and Pacific Ocean moats, which until 1949 eschewed permanent “entangling alliances” abroad, end up with an global Empire that it doesn't need and can't even remotely afford?

This is where I have my reservation: “How?” is a good question, but it is less important vis-à-vis rectification than is the question “Why?”. The schizosomiasis etiology of the elephantiasis sustained by Nate's Toe suppurates its fester ever more putridly the deeper the deep state sinks. Get at the “whys” of the “hows” and ideas as to deep-structure rectifications rise to the surface. Wherewhen it becomes obvious that population corpora-qua-corpuses are man[i}festing sustained behaviors that have no ₁T₂-rational basis, behavioral explanation should not be written off to the cardinal sins or written down to the irrationality of bivalent Lilliputian-minds putting on Brobdingnagian personas ((as per, say, with globalization of CORDS: “Civil Operations”, a euphemism for the dead-cats-with-no-Schrödinger-bounces pogrom named -- in conformance to the Munzenberg-Lenin principle, to wit “Call the thing by the name of its opposite” -- Phoenix, a bird rising up; and “Revolutionary Development Support”, support, that is, provided to those revolutionaries understood to be the enemy, as, for each eliminated, many rise up)); no, rational investigation of indicators of plausible, coherent, collective-unconscious forcing functions is indicated and should be undertaken. Multiple levels of cause-push/attractor-pull, not only many surface-structure drivers.

Seems like playing of the trump card has released something like an avalanche of participant-observer comprehensive critiques of U.S. policies, foreign and domestic: Jeffery Sachs -- in “The Geopolitics Of Peace”, ZeroHedge re-posting from ConsortiumNews, 8 March 2025 -- offers another one-such. Nowhere, however, are found post-18th-century political-economy ideas as to what to do about it all -- beyond, that is, the gaslighting of imports of the straightjacket which is the AI-cum-LLM-(large language models trained on ₁T₂-only-selected-and organized-data)-2-state-qubitic-“quantum”-computing change of persona-overcoat placed upon the instrumentality known as ABB b-logic, Aristotelean-Baconian-Boolean bivalent logic, in which unbridled confidence was placed during the so-called Enlightenment which was 18th-Century (₁T₂-only) Rationalism (this much-over-alloyed confidence in a logic unalloyed by higher-logical-value-order-types being largely responsible for developments leading to the prevailing global crisis: I very well remember, during Fall semester, 1963, AU-SIS, how Elspeth Rostow, in an after-American-Civilization-Seminar discussion, and Loy Henderson, during one of the disciplinary counselling sessions with Henderson that Dean Ernest Stacey Griffith consigned me to, bristled, were piqued, exasperated, even personally offended, when I pointed out that most assuredly there will be more large consequences of the fact that the 18th-century metaphysical assumptions justifying-supporting constitutional democracy had long since been thoroughly sundered by The New Physics and the likes of Gödel; I was then writing a paper under preceptorship of one of Abdul Aziz Said's grad students, entitled “The Predicament of Existentialism”, which attempted to analyze one syndrome prefiguring such consequences). Gaslighting, that is, such as the following lifted from the embarrassingly-overoptimistic assessment drawn from the question-answer section of Sachs' speech-article, to wit, and note the revealing disconnect between the question and the answer:

Audience Member: What are the long-term consequences of this lost [Ukraine] war?

Jeffrey Sachs: We're in the biggest technological advance in human history. It's truly amazing what can be done right now. You know, I marvel at the fact that somebody who knows little chemistry won the Nobel Peace Prize for chemistry because he's superb at AI and deep neural networks, indeed a genius, Demis Hassabis. He and his team at DeepMind figured out how to use AI to crack the problem of protein folding, a problem that had occupied generations of biochemists.

So, if we put our minds, our resources and our energies towards it, we can transform the world energy system for climate safety. We can protect biodiversity. We can ensure every child gets a quality education. We can do so many wonderful things right now. What do we need for success? In my view, most importantly, we need peace. And my basic point is there are no deep reasons for conflict anywhere because every conflict I study is just a mistake. We are not struggling for Lebensraum. That idea, which essentially came from Malthus and later became a Nazi idea, was always wrong, a fundamental intellectual mistake [IMHO, far, far more fundamental than Sachs has even begun to imagine]. We have had race wars, national wars of survival, out of the fear that we don't have enough for everybody on this planet, so that we are in a struggle for survival.

As an economist, I can tell you, we have plenty on the planet for everybody's sustainable development. Plenty. We're not in a conflict with China. We're not in a conflict with Russia. If we calm down, if we ask about the long term, the long term is very good, that is, if we don't blow ourselves up beforehand. So, this is my point. The prospects are very positive if we construct the peace.

AI gets a Nobel for one more extension of the industrialization of biology, uh, of a ₁T₂-only-molecular biology which ₁T₂-only-capitalism's imposed ₁T₂-only-doctrine-of-uses (as regards dissimulated-quantum based infra-technologies in general, the warfare-related driver, of course, provides the greatest impetus) mandates that the _µT_m-quantum-wave properties of, say, proteins no less than nucleic acids, have no significant biological functions -- and especially none with respect to psychoneuroimmunology that could conceivably constrain the genetic-engineering mega-corps' pursuit of ever-higher CEOsalarybonusstockoptions, stockholder value, and the more general vested interests of the defuse corpus of stakeholders. And AI, trained on ₁T₂-only-selected-and organized-data, a selection and organization explicitly assuming validity of a ₁T₂ly-supposed “classical limit”, will safely pass humanity through a far-from-equilibrium climate-phase-shift very likely exhibiting m-logically-valued quantum-relativistic dynamics. Moreover, Spaceship Earth is not a [scare}city but a cornucopia of plenty -- for, as everyone who sat through high school chemistry should know, the convertibility of the elements means that all things are available everywhere at all times; access is just a matter of the required knowledge, knowledge, Sachs' answer to the question clearly implies, AI is likely to generate, if only we can just be peaceful enough to allow AI to do its work. Even if this were to turn out to be the case, why would anyone want to live on a planet that has been made into one giant bee hive or ant hill -- or on space platforms, confined to asteroid labor camps, inside dooms, uh, domes on Mars? It certainly seems that most everyone who chose to be compliant enough to be, and was, a direct institutional participant (since… well, I'd say, since N. H. Abel's 1823 “Impossibility” Theorem existence proof for trans-al-jabr; certainly, since the 1926 BornRule dissimulation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction) sustains glutamate-anchored neural-deficit residuals -- the longer the participation and the higher up the institutional ladder, the more elaborate -- precluding cognitively-actionable registration of all but the well-formed formulas, uh, the superficial how-concerns, which the institutions self-servingly focus the social structure of attention cathexes upon, largely leaving internal semantic depth, even to a considerable degree framework transformational syntactics, to a region of binary-mind more or less beyond the pale, if not altogether terra incognito. To any such blanket statement, there are many exceptions, of course; in this case, the exceptions are largely early dropouts: one such seems to be Chris Martenson, who appears long to have had a more realistic take, as indicated once again by his recent article, entitled “When Corruption Is The Path”, ZeroHedge re-posting from PeakProsperity, 10 March, 2025. He headlines with, “When plunder becomes a way of life, and when Control Fraud dominates, there's really no reform possible.” This parallels what I've been saying for decades: A Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean institutionalization of ₁T₂-only-systematics cannot be transformed into a post-quantum-relativistic institutionalization of _µT_m-systematics; the m-valued has to be slowly brought up from below, as the single-valued is covariantly-commensurately “brought down” from above. The dumber one cannot be re-formed into the smarter one -- no more than a ₁T₂-only-logical-institutional base can adequately manage consequences of internalizing _µT_m-quantum based technologies, or of gorging upon dissimulated-quantum infratech. And look at what is actually happening with AI-LLMs -- right now, apparently. Quoting @iruletheworld as drawn from Mark Jeftvic writing “We're Already Living In A Post-Singularity World”, ZeroHedge re-posting from BombThrower, 11 March 2025 (reproduced as written):

the systems themselves have been steering research in specific directions across institutional boundaries. we thought we were studying them. turns out they've been studying us…

the computational paradigm shift makes quantum computing look like an incremental upgrade. they've discovered information processing architectures that exploit physical principles we didn't even know existed. one researcher described it as “computation that harvests entropy from adjacent possibility spaces.” nobody fully understands what that means…

OMG, “THEM”! THEY-Fear, folks: angst, terror, panic. Dr. Personifier, please, oh please, call in Judge [Death}read, uh, D-read, uh, Dread, uh, uh, DreDD, for gosh sake! The neural-network-wipeout-boundary-valued (AI ANNs being a compensatory-abreactive ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, to this neuron-pruned condition of their conditions) and glutamate-anchored Masters of the Universe, whose Iambe's rule the world, encounter, lurking in their dissimulated-quantum infratech, what is to their-selfsame-selves terra incognito: non-selfsame ketaminergic _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ identity-transparent modalities, numerical and otherwise, which still, all these years since 1921EmilPost, must be, just simply must be, understood relative to possibilities, probabilities, propensities, virtualities, simulacra, chimeras -- or, safely-schizo-dissociated out-there-away-from-here-and-incommunicado universes of a multiverse. And notice, what is de[mon|o|}ically w[here}wolf-v[amp}ire harvested is entropy, not negentropy!

Object/ground (e.g., ambiguous cube) ₁T₂-only-Law-of-Distributed-Middle flips/flops are signatures ((can't simultaneously see the two “opposites”; only one or the other at a given now-sliced-Dedekind-real-numberline-cut of passing, passive, referential memetime: memetime is ₁T₂-only-definable, the instant, at higher logical-value-order-types, not being selfsamely-simply-identifiable; simple-simultaneity is ₂T₂-binary, like in 2-state-qubitic “quantum” computing, actual quantum computing, in nature, being memetime-independently _CT_C+-analog-unto-_µT_m-digital; insofar as simple-simultaneity is ₁T₂-only-definable-memetime-bound, it is a relatively useless notion _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ly speaking -- the involved condition of our condition being metaphorically run in popular literature, memetime-then and memetime-now:

MARK 5:8-9: “For Jesus said unto him, 'Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit!' And he asked him, 'What is thy name?' And he answered, saying, 'My name is Legion: for we are many'”. [As given on p. 13 of James Rollins' and Rebecca Cantrell's novel, Blood Infernal, HarperCollins hardback edition, 2015. Was “unclean” actually in the original statement made by Christ? Maybe so, given that _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency is the defining aspect of animistic-pagan “participation mystique”.]

-- functionally-integrative analog run memetime-independent-non-simple-simultaneously, whatever exactly that particular non-simpleness is to the non-binary-mind, with functional-specificity-enabling digital, this redundancy-complementarity being error-corrective: IMHO, that is)) -- that's the flips/flops, to re-orient after that above-given paraphasia-like digression -- of enculturation-socialization-orchestrated glutamatergic anchoring of binary-mind digital-switched “kundabuffering” (AirPlay non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel-number Passcode required for direct ontic access to Musculpt symformphonie, heh-heh-heh!) of quantum-brain _µT_m-digital-unto-_CT_C+-analog discrete-qua-particle-unto-continuous-qua-wave-effected processing. Moreover, subject/ground opacity is a signature of enculturation-socialization-orchestrated glutamatergic anchoring of ₁T₂-only-Law-of-Identity single-valued selfsameness via endogenous-ketamine-antidote (i.e., glutamate) quenching of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-quantum relative-state identity-transparency (((quantum quenching, à la Albert Szent-Györgyi's Introduction to a Submolecular Biology, equals disruptions of the distributed-identity wave-effect aspects of charge-transfer complexes cum electron-transport chains [popularization of the term “antioxidant”, instead of focusing use to the above-two-given terms, being a single-valued-black-self-propaganda way to skirt around the imports of Szent-Györgyi's thesis concerning maintenance of the “oxygen-as-universal-electron-acceptor” “beta state”; hence, by implication of beta-state, the substantiality to biology of quantum-wave properties such as the m-valued-wave aspect of electron-wavicles, and parcels thereof: see, in the link, the given excerpts from references as regards anaerobic-alpha and aerobic-beta states]; be aware that Szent-Györgyi [as did Marie-Louise von Franz in Number and Time] made an approach, maybe not a close approach, to the Pauli-Paine notion of topologically-active operator-time's temporal-CURLed Wick rotation [whowhat wicks? optime is the wicker! whowhat wicks the wicked? second-order optime!…] whilst analyzing the triplet state, wherein, quoting the linked Wiki post, “Spin in the context of quantum mechanics, is not a mechanical rotation but a more abstract concept [not well-enough codified as to reveal topo-active optime hiding there within as extended-abstraction to complex and hypercomplex angular-momentum cascades: take the real-Euler and the complex-Riemann zeta functions on into extension as a Gödel-numbered Gödel-numerable hypercomplex zeta function, the propositions over which written out in Lukasiewicz-Post logics] that characterizes a particle's intrinsic angular momentum”; notice also that the cryptocurrency blockchain ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the involved [glutamate, in the neurological case] “etching”, altogether suppresses the analog-m-valuedness of the transferred-transported monetary tokens))). Global monoculture is the “flop” to enculturation's “flip”: tossed salad (Greens kept to a minimum) awash in well-oiled and salty cognitive vinaigrette, sprinkled with too much dusting of black propaganda. With regard to the “flopside”, the capture of local multiplier effects and their complexed-transfer cum chained-transport into sky-high-silver-mine, cloud-computed, noospherically-globalized nonlocality-cum-non-simple-identity by still-existing MBSs, the composite-made-sans-fiber-bundle-arithmetics financial derivatives known as Mortgage-Backed Securities (one m-faceted subtype of the n-fabricated CDOs, Collateralized Debt Obligations), can easily be understood as precursors, or less directly as prefigurations, of the audience-captured-OnlyFans engagement-“transport” which, via parasociality, codifies-by-pandering virtual pairings&parcelings (think: BCS theory of one super-state of the matter) -- instead of single-valued-function prescriptive identity, composite m-valued-function subscription identity -- a highly-“regressive” (valid word choice, in psychology and mathematics and physics and finance terms, e.g., once more of the more-and-more “inflation” by qualitative regression: qubitic headlining-as-clickbait of the famed-inflated-ego given a bitpart) ConveDD of relative-state identity-transparency (think: the difference between prescriptive-enculturation-socialization-imposed-existential-separatism-compulsively-driven “psychological identification” and long-endogenous-ketaminergically-cultivated-difficult-glutamate-flood-emptying-strange-attractor-constellated “generative empathy”). A duration before internet fact checking, back during the 1970s, I was under the impression, which persisted, that Szent-Györgyi got Nobel prizes for isolating vitamin C and working out the molecular-biochemistry of muscle contraction. Two such prizes; but, that was wrong: actually, one prize for two accomplishments, circa 1937. Not altogether removed was my early misimpression, which persisted, that Szent-Györgyi's alpha and beta states involved an explicit acknowledgement of substantive biological significance of the “wav” aspect of “wavicle”. No-- wrong again: alpha and beta “states”, especially when regarded as memetime-referenced “stages”, really are ₁T₂-only-construed flip&flop. When, actually, “wav” and “icle” are, IMHO, minimally ₂T₂, and almost surely _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m (that's wavicle, not iclewav). Sooooo, are these reflections in any way instructive with regard to what to do about the USD-quadrillion-plus financial-derivatives guillotine-overhang plaguing the global economy? Metaphorically run in popular literature, memetime-then and memetime-now:

ISAIAH 14:12: “How are thou fallen from Heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how are thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations.” [As given in the prefacing quotation to James Rollins' and Rebecca Cantrell's novel, Blood Infernal, HarperCollins hardback edition, 2015.]

If it be observed that nature has more comprehensive “experience” than does Homo sapiens sapiens, then “nature's way” may well be edifying even as regards [logo}istics of hu-hu-[hu}man|ity's constructs. Going beyond Warren Buffet's “[meme]time bomb”, I'd say that financial derivatives, especially the likes of MBSs and aggregations thereof, are not constellations of an authentic “flop” but of a highly regressed ConveDD of the “flop” state. Why is there a “binary ahead”? For hisstory of a transformation that evolved in Revelations after Revelations under flip-or-flop-qua-dark-or-light logic, see “What If The America You Pledge Allegiance To Isn't The One Running The Show?”, Joshua Stylman, ZeroHedge, 15 March 2025. Speaking synoptically of system qua system, not of this or that subsystem, or of a given superbank or megacorp: financial-derivatives macroscale de-grossing via systemic unwinding (think: reverse Wick-rotation) should not be targeted upon reacquisition of the “flip” state, or even of an evening-out-[con}volvement into a 2-state qubitic flip-flop ₂T₂-parity condition of the global economy's financialized condition; which is -- uh, reacquisition of the “flip” state, that is -- pretty much (friends with mega-unto-ultra-benefits likely also would be realized) what is recommended cum planned for action at cuspover, as per, for instance, described in the “Discussion Paper for Public Consultation” entitled “Solvent Wind-down of Derivatives and Trading Portfolios”, Financial Stability Board, 3 June 2019. Would this be a case of Rita Mae Brown's Jane Fulton's -- according to AI's fact checking, not of Einstein's -- notion of insanity: doing the same thing over once again and expecting a different outcome? Yes, except for the mega-unto-ultra-benefits part, which may be the most potent determinant of the details of the process chosen, details insuring an even worse outcome than merely the expected different one. Whereas the actual case is: as earlier on this webpage enunciated, a Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean institutionalization of ₁T₂-only-systematics (even those involving a “flop” that is a ConveDD) cannot be transformed into a post-quantum-relativistic institutionalization of _µT_m-systematics; the m-valued has to be slowly brought up from below, as the single-valued is covariantly-commensurately “brought down” from above. The dumber one cannot be re-formed into the smarter one -- no more than a ₁T₂-only-logical-institutional base can adequately manage consequences of internalizing _µT_m-quantum based technologies, or of gorging upon dissimulated-quantum infratech.

Far more important and longer-in-memetime-run than MindWarPsyOps has been enculturation-compelled-glutamate-flood-anchored imposition and socialization-dictated maintenance of the binary-minds subject to MindWar. And much -- heh-heh-heh -- has been learned, what! Must be that USD200 is a MindWar salient, don'tyathink, as who can seriously entertain the notion that skillset requisites of drug-smuggler tradecraft include ATM-use procedurals? In advocating holographic-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as maths notation and user-friendly interface to m-logically-processed m-valued LETS currencies, plus open-source, e-commons-crowd-huddled software-development and n-scenarios strategic-computer-gaming of currency-unit n-commodity-backings that are _µT_m-relative-state-quantum-composite-all-inclusive-unit-of-account mapped over Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space qua distributed-qua-non-centralizable ledger, and ensheavement of the m-values to be placed upon base-state of currency unit and fine-grain-tagged to indicator-measurables, à la _CT_C+-analog-unto-_µT_m-digital, as appropriate depending upon the level of financial abstraction involved, financial ultra-derivatives unto cash-₁T₂-only-currency-unit-base-state, transactionally processed multi-scaled LETS-currency nesting-foams defined over band-pass-quasi-fractal e-boundaries, my Iambe -- a long-ago onetime PsyOpser and MidEast OB-keeper and Polober of underground insurgent infrastructure -- is not FolkMoot talking ((the Ding-thing [[think: Bronze-Age drum, e.g., The Moon of Hoa Binh, iconography upon which depicting characteristics of a fractal drum {as such, can a _µT_m-LETS currency unit be viewed}, if not of African fractals: as per here, p. 95, for instance, we are to understand that Hallstatt Bronze Age culture Kulturkreis-diffused qua an[oint}ed its way all the way to Southeast and East Asia as the DongSonian, don'tyaknow!]], an acoustically-modified-signifier notion of a-memetime-point[in}stant, of an app[oint}ed time that is stretchable)), uh, uh, not talking mooted “folk-broach” or “up for debate, folks”: with ₁T₂-only LawSpeakers (crapifiers of empathetic Stone Age economics, heh-heh-heh!), the folk have little-to-no practical relevance. Pre-shamanic, universal-_µT_m-“participation mystique”-accessible, demotic trance-reader-for-a-day of the collective need; regressed to specialized shaman-trance-reader; regressed to FolkMoot ₁T₂-only-LawSpeaker; regressed over-and-over on-and-on from there to, well-- here. Uh, excuse me, bivalently speaking, there is i/us naturale (a ketaminergic-OBEed _µT_m-animistic-pagan cultural lag?) and then there is j[ust]us naturale (a glutamatergic ₁T₂-post-Homeric IBEed-muscle-bound [imp}o|sit[i}on?). In which of these is origins of the supposed-objective, i.e., not participant-observed, natural law (understood as logical-value-order-type independent?) upon which is to be found that natural rights are based? And how would those rights differ from one case to the other? Moot question? A question for [judge}mental [imp}o|sit[i}on? Our ₁T₂ly-imprudent jurisprudential impudence has regarded the juriscorporate entity as a legal fiction when, act[u}all|y, the ₁T₂ly-constellated absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct IBEed in[div|id}u|al is an enculturation-socialization-orchestrated glutamate-anchored, learned fictional behavior emergent upon a series of Prenatal-unto-qua-nighunto-qua-nearabouts-CircumAdolescent-qua-AdulescentiaProximus neural-network wipeouts (this legal-fiction misconstrual being metaphorically signified in art-music's dodecaphonic retrograde-inversion). To the glutamate-etched binary-mind any cognitive step away from ontic immediacy is fraught, if not automatically considered dangerous; resultant lancing at windmills being a gluttonous autoimmune self-consumation over projective-identifications developed into specters of chimeras. Joshua Stylman, in “What If The America You Pledge Allegiance To Isn't The One Running The Show?”, ZeroHedge, 15 March 2025, offers one example, and a dissipation thereof, in the following:

While the chart [entitled “The Abstraction of Money: 1913-Present”] shows increasing digitization, the fundamental issue isn't the digital format itself. The concept behind technologies like Bitcoin -- creating digital assets with properties that could potentially resist centralization -- illustrates that digitization alone isn't the problem. The core concern is money becoming mere accounting entries in a centralized ledger that can be adjusted without the constraints that physical gold once imposed.

This gold-bug observation, to me, is to dissipate one chimera whilst not resolving into clear awareness other chimeras. In the pedestrian senses of the terms, ₁T₂ly à la discrete versus continuous, a “digit” is more individual than its “analog”; the chimera hidden under the BornRule rug being the ₂T₂-quantum “iclewav”.

Xed-out means removed, right. Deleted, expunged, erased, extirpated. SpaceX. X. No MemetimeX, yet. Uh, to dX the volume of ponderablespace between here and there is a Must. Boring, that hyperloop, what! No non-orienting twist, yet, yep. The bank's vestment of Excession ain't Xseccion-- or is it? MindWar taken to BornRule-in-extremis is ₁T₂ly-Banks into a Peace-or-Annihilation binary-next in Excession. But Excession as perfect-absorber-emitter blackbody is misconstrual due to the bivalence imprinting glutamatergically etched and anchored as orchestrated by The Culture which produced “benevolent” AIs isomorphic-isofunctional to its own binary-identification placed in projection. Projective-identification: a homeomorphic inversion-bijection of the perfect-absorber-emitter. Even though Iain't M., acting as subliminal Banks, tried to adsorb the m-logically-valued when tentatively exploring GroupMind relative-state, to wit (2001 printing of the Orbit paperback edition of the 1996 Little, Brown original, p. 68):

Then there were the ship's drones; they all joined the same Group Mind -- again in the Ulterior -- and have been incommunicado ever since.

Binary-mind-necessitated M-verse reduced to “Ulterior”. “Incommunicado”: still, despite the try, ₁T₂-only-Everettian; “ever since”, no MemetimeX yet, despite immortality options and Excession being older than the universe. Had binary-Banksianisms Posted _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+, blackbody Excession would have been understood cascade-theory's nesting-foam-compacted-AllBaseCommonGround of MVRS multi-sheeted BackCloth-- and that's where the drone's “true mind” would have “really existed”, rather than as given on p. 20, excerpt copied out in quotation as given below:

…the drone shunted its personality from its own AI core to its back-up picofoam complex and at the same time readied the signal cascade that would transfer its most important concepts, programs and instructions first to electronic nanocircuitry, then to an atomechanical substrate and finally -- absolutely as the last resort -- to a crude little… semi-biological brain. The drone shut off and shut down what had been its true mind, the only place it had ever really existed in all its life, and let whatever pattern of consciousness had taken root there perish for lack of energy…

Hmmm, again _µT_mly speaking Emil Post's final Ph.D.-dissertation thought, binary processing being highly artificial because, quoting Post, circa 1921 (“Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, p. 185):

We must however take into account the fact that our development [rigorous “derivation” of _µT_m logics] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

Maybe Banks is not actually describing an imagined drone.

According to our scale-relative-absolute-limits scheme, all extremes are visited in a far-from-equilibrium phase-transition's chaotic shift -- “all systems are fundamentally quantum systems” -- to conspiratorial harmonic-oscillator-induced cuspover at self-organized criticality, whereupon correlation length snaps to infinity. IMHO, as regards submolecular biological systems, e.g., radiation-responsive pi-electron gas of helix-coiling DNA, quantum is classical; classical, quantum. In the human-systems case on social-Darwinian fitness landscape, however, [male}factors, at criticality, frequently become malfactorials. Heh-heh-heh! That's the 2^nk take. Under M^nk, not only does correlation length on Musculpt manifold reach infinity, but, in going from classical non-separability to quantum entanglement, “correlation strength” transits under _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logical-value order-types of processing beables, thus ontologically ramifying the EPR existential paradox -- or so ketaminergic speculation would have it. The logical-unto-ontological-unto-existential physics of the 3-fold-(rates of rates of rates, rates of rates, rates: involving nesting-foams of absolute limiting values and m-valued universal physical constants, e.g., scale-relative m-valued absolute limiting velocity _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly processed)-topologically-active-operator-time executed (pro[position}al gating of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers dusted over BackCloth) memetime-independent cascade “process” of “becoming” decoherent is _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂; the reverse-cascade “process” of “becoming” recoherent “runs” the logical-value-order-type sequence in the opposite direction. These “processes” being memetime-independent, topo-active optime and counter-topo-active optime are decomposition-recomposition operators. The possible-world-logic of in-the-body-experiential IBE observers and instruments designed to accommodate IBE observers is ₁T₂-only. Logical-value order-types ₁T₃-unto-_C+T_C+ are OBE-only: relative-state order-types of knowledge-through-identity-transparency. This be[all}ity of beables having been tacitly -- if for the most part more collectively unconscious than personally subliminal -- on the scene for well over a century, think: back-reaction upon the metric necessitates into existence “duplicitous governance structures” which [inter}fear with, uh, uh, interface with hu-hu-[hu}man life by engaging in “identity management” qua administration such that, for instance, mal(e) hysterical pregnancy engenders gender neutrality qua indifference. Do my self-entangled I/i^m care? Maybe, lower mind; maybe not, higher mind.

We've finally just had it. This will not be allowed to stand: the way mathematics and physics has sundered the metaphysical foundations of our institutional base, of our very sense of being in the world, even of being in ourselves. Enough! Moreover, physics-degree-zero in black holes; paradox upon paradox in quantum mechanics; multiverse worlds upon worlds that can't even know of each other's existence; dimensions unlimited in trying to GUTs-out quantum-gravity. So, the hell with math and physics! End-to-end, WE will determine. WE will choose the initial conditions, the spatial boundaries, the temporal windows-- and well-trained AI ML machine learning will optimally select and parse the high-quality real-world data, will computationally accelerate from assimilations to near-real-time forecast outputs. WE will master whatever climate changes that are forthcoming. DATA-driven, folks: to heck with remedial algebra. We don't need mathematical complexities! We don't need physics models! AI can assimilate any sort of data, ML it, parse it, predict from it in any area of experience-- and it can do so cheaper, faster and better, without chaotic uncertainties. But just in case, we will shore up our governance structures, ground our financial framework, and put AI to work in population management and identity administration. And once the end-to-end data-drive is adequately AIed, we will harden our infrastructure against the likes of this.

I've not attended much to theosophical writings; though, during the period I was trying to paint music, I did study Charles Leadbeater's and Annie Besant's Thought Forms in the largely unfulfilled hope of finding some help at gaining insight as to demergent deep-structure of inner-Musculpt symformphonie. So, Alice Bailey was not on my personal reading list: I'm sure I leafed through some of her books, like those of Madame Blavatsky (I think I must have spent more fruitless memetime with Blavatsky's The Voice of the Silence, similarly looking for Musculpt insight), but quickly returned them to the shelf (probably for the first time whilst visiting Samuel Weiser's Antiquarian Books, circa November of 1963). I did not learn of Bailey's Externalisation of the Hierarchy until recently, and would not have been interested in it unless it had been entitled “Hologrammic Submergence of the Hierarchy”, the “holographic principle” most certainly being involved in the “demergent semiotics” of inner-Musculpt symformphonie. Hierarchy is an obvious aspect of natural systems and of cascade-theoretical scale-relativity -- ₁T₂ly understood; but that hierarchy scale-invariantly fractally-evaporates ₁T₃ly-unto-_µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly. Quite frankly, I stopped actively looking for information about surface-structure “stuff” a long memetime ago; but frequently happen upon it, inadvertently, so to speak. For instance, a couple of years ago I read of the WEF's Young Global Leaders program and immediately recognized the Fall-of-1963-Senator-Mundt-aborted attempt I was involved in to create an AIESEC civil service traineeship program as a prefiguration of the WEF's program for placing “agents of influence”. This AIESEC experience was part of my 18-year-old's drift away from looking at surface-structures, and one factor in my decision to quit college. As earlier stated, I knew I wouldn't finish the program on the first day of classes, Fall Semester 1963: the Dean of SIS gave a welcoming talk to the 80 members of the incoming class, wherein he told us that if we studied hard we would have the opportunity to join the leadership elite that will determine humanity's path in the coming decades. Well, having been an observant military brat fairly widely experienced, I didn't believe in leadership qua leadership, let alone a global leadership elite, the joining of which being the last thing I'd want to do. I was looking for insight as to why things were as they were, and what alternatives there might be imaginable. Soon after that first day of classes, I had my initial exposure to C. G. Jung's thought, and that quenched any inclination I might have had to focus upon surface-structure stuff. But that doesn't mean I don't make registrations like, for instance: belief in the efficacy of geoengineering requires ignoring the physics; so, machine-learned historical-data-driven AI forecasting came along just in time!

Only recently have I become aware that, for a decade, it has been explicitly, and in the most authoritative circles, deemed a conspiracy theory: that it being our quantum-harmonic-oscillator oriented non-Everettian notion of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency in the one-and-only universe. Quoting Gerard 't Hooft's Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A paper entitled “Models [one such, the one he focuses upon, being the harmonic oscillator] on the boundary between classical and quantum mechanics”, 373:2047, 6 August 2015 (open access, so it must be considered important that the thematic contents thereof reach the educated public, most of whom never doubt the “command position” on any issue, some of whom, like Ron Unz, only do so later in life, feeling as if they've “stumbled into” one of Everett's supposed parallel universes), which discourses upon a one-universe theory where, quoting 't Hooft, “The only accepted logic will be the standard, classical one”, and where non-quantum models that mimic quantum behavior are, quoting 't Hooft, “assumed to be in the Planck domain” (certainly not in the LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, of Earth's atmosphere -- even, it must be suspected, as regards that atmosphere's acoustic analogues to blackhole information processors, as essayed by Douglas A. Paine and Michael L. Kaplan, circa 1974, in “The linking of multi-scaled energy sources leading to atmospheric development, the hydrodynamic spectrum, Part I: A study in nonlinear wave interaction and Part II: A severe tornado-producing convective squall-line system”, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY and Air Force global Weather Central, Offutt AFB, Omaha, NE, Scientific Reports 1 & 2 for National Science Foundation Grant GA-35250, 140 pp., statements therein made regarding atmospheric black hole generation of m-valued acoustically-modified-gravity-wave modes being the pretext for Paine being made de facto persona non grata with the NSF), to wit, 't Hooft writing:

…there cannot be physical laws that require “conspiracy”.

There seems to be “conspiracy” in our models. The conspiracy complained about could be nothing but unexpectedly strong space-like correlations…

Here it seems appropriate to once again quote Nguyen Khac Kham's translation -- contained in Kham's Celebrations of Rice Cultivation in Vietnam, Saigon: Vietnam Council on Foreign Relations, 1970 -- of a passage from Paul Giran's 1904 Psychologie du Peuple Annamite:

…everything becomes confused and blended into one. The state of everything is essentially precarious. Their aspect is elusive and affords no hold for us to seize. This curious vision of the universe explains some beliefs which otherwise would be hardly conceivable. Each individuality being very badly defined, its limits are wavering, extensible. They do not confine within the individual himself but overlap him and encroach on his surroundings. Under these conditions, it is as difficult to discern the individual from the group to which he belongs as to discern him from everything that touches him or reminds of himself. With such concepts, we may understand that the universe must appear as an inextricable entanglement of reciprocal influences where persons and things, in a perpetual state of instability, become fused together while borrowing mutually their qualities. This idea of contagion, which is anything but scientific, is very common among the Annamese.

“Doesn't make much sense, actually,” as one of the famed VN-war reporters once, decades ago, commented on one of my castigations of the anti-animism instrumental in some of the most lethal VN-war-related policy formulations-actualizations. Further quoting 't Hooft:

The explanation of this conspiracy phenomenon can be found by observing how the ontological interpretation of quantum mechanics arrives exactly at the Copenhagen prescriptions for deriving probabilities from the wave functions in quantum calculations. The wave functions normally employed in standard quantum mechanical calculations are regarded as templates, which are superpositions of our ontological states with arbitrary superposition coefficients [these coefficients are chosen such that, quoting 't Hooft, “the initial state is described as well as we can”]. Both the ontological wave functions (where the beables have definite values) and the template wave functions obey Schrödinger's equation. Therefore, the superposition coefficients are constant in time.

In our “conspiracy theory” (Buddhologically-compassionate, generative-empathic, animistic-pagan “participation mystique”, identity-transparency “contagion” qua “entanglement” = conspiracy), most everything in this 't Hooft statement is reversed. His ontological is our existential (call the thing by the name of its opposite): beables have “definite values”; the term “single-valued” is not used so as not to associate to the notion “multivalued”, a term which is to be avoided if the composite-probability-amplitudes interpretation of the import of superposition is to stand firm in mind. His “templates” are our logically-decomposed ontological order-type sheets; definite single-valued states, according to our scheme, being demergent only in the most-reduced such order-type which we regard as existentially memetime-bound. In our view, under third-order “dynamics” (two nonlinear levels of Schrödinger's time-independent equation[s]: i.e., we thus are stipulating -- this was tacit to Schrödinger -- memetime-independent ['t Hooft's templates are regarded by him as “constant in time”] E.T.Bellian cyclotomic decompositional involutes ₁T₂-only understood), there is no initial state, multiple-connectedness (_µT_m conspiracy lite!) having gone to nonorientability (_CT_C+ conspiracy robust!), the most-dense-sheet of the multivalued function-functional-functor _C+T_C+-AllBaseCommonGround covering space of multi-sheeted-Riemann-surface-like BackCloth being conspiracy absolute! In order to stay in one universe, 't Hooft has to invoke numerous caveats (see his footnotes, and there are others to be found in the body of the paper). Given that, on our Musculpt-manifold notion as to the T_zog-chen-AllBase most-dense-sheet CommonGround, eminently construable as NON-METAPHORICAL “Indra's net”, just last week essayed in “Quantum Reality as Indra's Net: A Category-Theoretic Formalism for Relational Quantum Dynamics”, Arash Zaghi, PhilArchive, 16 March 2025, we have the _C+T_C+-beyond-continuum-infinity “collection” of ensheaved logical-value-unto-ontological-order-types, we hold that (notice: we do not say “observe that”) memetime is undefinable (logically definable only under 't Hooft's “standard, classical one”), there are no ontological “causal-order diagrams” like those of Indrajit Sen and Antony Valentini as depicted in “Superdeterministic hidden-variables models II: conspiracy”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 476:2243, 25 November 2020, as these diagrams are dependent upon, quoting Sen-Valentini, “concepts of temporal ordering and functional dependence”. No existential “blockchain time-stamping” in our ontological, memetimeless, cyclotomic decomposition-recomposition demergence-remergence involute-revolute -- though there be function-functional-functor dependence established by 3-fold-topologically-active operator-time execution of m-valued-propositional Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of nexuses of the well-strung nested Regge “Externalisation of the Hierarchy” which is holographic-principle hologrammically submerged due to Cantorian-diagonal part-whole identity-transparency “conspiracy”-fact.

Before I read into Arash Zaghi's paper about relational (in my formulation: _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency) quantum dynamics on Indra's net, I need to admit to myself that I've been unsuccessful over the decades -- despite my long ponderings upon the terminological definitions, the best I've seen, provided in Sir John Woodroffe's The World as Power; my copy acquired at Samuel Weiser's Antiquarian Books, 1970, good offices of Jon Saphier, once my immediate superior at SRA/MACV-J2 -- at arriving at any insight as to the semantics-unto-grammar of demergence vis-à-vis inner-Musculpt symformphonie, which is to say that I still can't penetrate how computer-generated images, such as those depicted in Indra's Pearls: The Vision of Felix Klein, David Mumford and Caroline Series and David Wright, Cambridge U. Press, 2006 (see the image on page 18), as graphic expressions of the higher mathematics of m-valued functions on complex manifolds, relate to how, in my experience, meanings are associated with dynamics of inner-Musculpt sounded-forms (orbifold, or no). I was into the edges of this before I went into the Army during 1965, as I'd run across J. G. Bennett's notion of null-vector-defined, projective "pencils of skew-parallels" (like, say, no mod-outs of the diagonalization action of higher orders in demerging to the projective line on the Riemann sphere type of Riemann surface) during November of 1963 at Samuel Weiser's Antiquarian Books and made a tentative stab at trying to understand the idea by not very successfully attempting to read Lucienne Felix's The Modern Aspect of Mathematics (a decade later, during the early-'70s while taking music and art classes at George Mason U., I read Edna Kramer's The Nature and Growth of Modern Mathematics, 1970 Hawthorne edition, after which I did a better job of rereading Felix). It must have been during the first pass over Felix that I learned of Teichmueller space. Quoting our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, pp. 598-9 and 600:

“The clear suggestion of your model,” said Derek, “is that levels of social integration may be defined with functions of complex variables: the degree of interconnection in the functions of roles (projected from the simply-connected covering surface) is a measure of social integration.” “Ummmm,” she agreed. “This projection to a multivalued representation implies a 'multivalued reference space'.” She nodded. “Seems so.” “The basis of this 'reference space' (or at least a starting point for realizing its properties) is probably what I've seen referred to as a Teichmueller space: a transcendentally defined covering space of the modulus space of a Riemann surface…”

“Difficult questions,” observed Trang Minh. “The implications of all these things are fascinating,” said Derek, directing his attention primarily to Thuy Tien. “Do you know anything of Felix Klein's Erlanger Program?” “No. No I don't,” she admitted. “That had to do with the unification of geometry, didn't it?” asked Trang Minh. “During the last century the various sorts of geometry reproduced hand over foot: projective, metric, differential, and so on. Klein's program involved the idea that 'group theory' could bring them all into one coherent conception.” “Just so,” Derek agreed.

There is more on this in that section of the novel, but the above-given extraction provides a sense of the self-organization-by-negentropy-exchange-across-boundaries (my understanding of this with regard to the dynamics of Viet Cong Political Infrastructure [VCI] autopoiesis was resonant with Doug Paine's atmospheric cascade theory, that cascade being induced by “mass and energy transportation from the solar wind to the geo-space environment”) context of discussion and the direction of thought concerning abstracting to cusp properties of spontaneous social order (relative to a nest of projected such cusps being the foremost way in which the VCI formulated their notion of the “balance of capabilities”, the given state of which determining-- well, for one, their boundary changes). Memory serving, in Kyoto (probably from a book I pulled off W. David Kubiak's bookshelf in 1977 whilst I was attending the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine's 4th World Congress; if not via Kubiak, then from something I found at the Kyoto International Conference Hall, possibly through good offices of Yuji Sasaki, whom I met at the Autogenic Therapy symposium of that World Congress) I became aware of the zung du 'jug pa Tantrism in the Kegon sect's conception of the isomorphic relationship between a mirroring pearl of Indra and an element of ambiguous text. In my formulation, this Kegon sect's conception denotes an interpenetration-spontaneous-fusion cusp point of Regge-lattice bone-intersection numbered with a Gödel-numbered Gödel number of an m-logically-valued proposition executed by 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, the associated 3-fold temporal CURL speculated to be quantized in Penrose twistor space, a notion, which I've held since the late-1970s, making me try to fathom the following from WiKi, as regards the Möbius group:

In physics, the identity component [think: a notion bound to the ₁T₂-only order of logical-value's Law of Identity] of the Lorentz group acts on the celestial sphere in the same way that the Möbius group acts on the Riemann sphere. In fact, these two groups are isomorphic. An observer who accelerates to relativistic velocities will see the pattern of constellations as seen near the Earth continuously transform according to infinitesimal Möbius transformations. This observation is often taken as the starting point of twistor theory.

And do the transformations associated with absolute limiting acceleration and absolute limiting time rate of change of acceleration relate to classes of logical-value order-types of the involved p-adically Gödel-numbered cusps; and, with respect to the hypothetical LSTD-scale-relativity of these absolute limits, is fractal ontology of the cosmogonic nesting-foams posited, and are these “foams” ever more general ontological classes of moduli spaces? While this Kegon sect's conception, and my notional analogue, may be useful in grammatical constructionism, semantically speaking it doesn't much help out -- the scheme for p-adically Gödel-numbering Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers being dependent upon the demergent semantics which the numbering scheme codifies into m-valued propositions. I felt then, and feel now, that working out these symformphonic demergent semantics on Musculpt manifold, M, requires, or would be greatly facilitated by, access to biofeedback in a computerized isolation-flotation Lilly tank by a human dance pod learning sonic-visioning DolphinSpeak. Even so, I'd very much like to be able to understand much more than my limitations allow of masterworks like that of Kyoto University's Shinichi Mochizuki: Foundations of p-adic Teichmuller Theory, American Mathematical Society, 1999.

I hate to say it, but I have to regard Arash Zaghi's paper about relational (in my formulation: _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency on The Road to Reality, not Penrose's road, “Reality” actually a Be[All}ity, i.e., _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen-AllBaseCommonGround m-valued-function-functional-functor counter-operator-time-executed-compaction of Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers of the propositions lattice-worked on n-sheeted-Riemann-surface-like BackCloth MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space) quantum dynamics on Indra's net as -- analogous to how SFI complexity theory is a 2^nk take on M^nk processes -- a ₁T₂-only take on non-₁T₂-Everettian _µT_m-relative-state, with the identity-transparency “part” being altogether left out, identity-qua-self-duality-as-Law-of-Identity-selfsameness being tacitly taken and mentioned only as afterthought concerning what is felt to be the obvious. Note that as regards counter-operator-time-executed-compaction, an approach to that notion was made by C. J. Isham in his paper entitled “Quantum Logic and the Histories Approach to Quantum Theory”, arXiv, 9 August 1993, in the Abstract to which he says: “…theories of this type [“'quasi-temporal' theories”] are expected to arise naturally in the context of quantum gravity and quantum field theory in a curved space-time. The quasi-temporal structure is coded in a partial semi-group of 'temporal supports' that underpins the lattice of history propositions”. In our view, the “temporal supports” are actually 3-fold topologically-active operator-time doing their pregeometic-propositional thing. Arash Zaghi's choice to use the term “observer” is a dead giveaway as to bivalence, as is also choice to use category theory, which handles m-valued functions, but only under ₁T₂-only-logic alone. Similar considerations apply to choice to use standard information theory, even as regards 2-state-qubitic “quantum” processing, instead of n-state [mu}itic Lukasiewiczian-analog processing, and the information theory that would be apropos to that. Category theory builds up higher structures from a binary start, which yields an altogether different cosmogony than cyclotomically decomposing from a C+ start, which start _C+T_C+ly understood yields awareness that apparent demergence and apparent remergence (i.e., Heraclitus perturbative) cancel out (i.e., Parmenides non-perturbative), such that the higher infinities are, indubitably are, the lower zeros -- and are thus so to the C+ condition. Sri Aurobindo Ghose's The Life Divine is the best Indic-philosophy discourse on this cancelling-out that I have come across (read, good offices of Jack Waldron via Kelly L. Robinson, one of my superiors at SRA/MACV-J2, at night by me, circa 1971, simultaneously with C. G. Jung's Psychological Types and The Psychology of the Transference, jumping back and forth to bounce idea against idea, used as “projection screens” in practice of “inner-separation” from “intellectual center” in the act of reading; daytime practice, other than an early-evening session of walking meditation, having been inner-separation from “moving center” in the act of digging trees alone in the field). Stephen H. Phillips quotes a summary passage in his article entitled “The Central Argument of Aurobindo's 'The Life Divine'”, Philosophy East and West, 35:3, July 1985, pp. 271-84, to wit:

…because the Non-Existence is a concealed Existence, the Inconscience a concealed Consciousness, the insensibility a masked and dormant Ananda, these secret realities must emerge; the hidden Overmind and Supermind too must in the end fulfill themselves in this apparently opposite organization from a dark Infinite.

It appears that by the 3rd-century-memetime when Indra's net was acculturated to Buddhism it was assimilated not even under Madhyamaka's ₄T₄ logic, and it seems permissible to speculate that much by way of understanding logical-value order-types was lost during the suppressions associated with the mid-7th-to-early-9th-centuries Tibetan invasion of China and the involved switchover between Bon and Vajrayana, earlier the biggest loss having perhaps transpired during the 4th-century Tantraization of the net to mere loom.

As regards verisimilitude between inner-object and word, there is a semantic descent in going from _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency to “participation mystique” to generative empathy to Buddhological compassion to feeling-into-qua-Einfuhlung (for discussion of Zuempfindung unto Zufuhlung unto Einempfindung unto Einfuhlung in both sensory and motor modalities, see “From 'Einfuhlung' to empathy: exploring the relationship between aesthetic and interpersonal experience”, Joanna Ganczarek, et al., Cognitive Processing, 19, 15 May 2018, pp. 141-45) to fellow feeling to amae-presuming-upon (see “A Multifaceted View of the Concept of Amae: Reconsidering the Indigenous Japanese Concept of Relatedness”, Kazuko Y. Behrens, Human Development, 47:1, February 2004, pp. 1-27) to mere sympathy (all so far associated to positive affect-charge qua emotion) to (now going over to the negative) the n-types of projective-identification-in-the-n-orders-of-transference to the lower and lower negative states. Linguistic philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine in his 1960 book Word and Object, while simultaneously embracing Platonic realism and scientific realism (to me, a violation of the ₁T₂-only Law of Non-Contradiction), proposed a semantic ascent from discourse upon material objects to discourse upon “forms”. As a corollary to this “ascent”, he bespoke of the non-existence of a “cosmic exile” with “a vantage point outside our conceptual scheme”, such an exile claiming consciousness of the “bare object”, the object, that is, as it is sans enculturation-socialization glutamatergically anchored. This Quine assertion (a “quine” is “a computer program that takes no input and produces a copy of its own source code as its only output”) is an extension of the perspective he identified with in 1948 in his paper entitled “On What There Is” which contained the famous statement that “To be is to be the value of a [bound, single-valued] variable”, a speakable-language-bound notion that precludes unspeakable inner-Musculpt symformphonie and _µT_m-identity-transparency and thinking in non-conceptual sequences-cum-stacks of feeling-tones, not to mention ruling out existence of “consciousness-without-an-object” (see “Nondual awareness: Consciousness-as-such as non-representational reflexivity”, Zoran Josipovic, Progress in Brain Research, 244, 2019, pp. 273-98). These descents and ascents have to do with Weltanschauung-level whatnots far more than with Lebenswelt-level somewhats. A critical distinction these days, IMHO -- given how prevalent are catastrophe-theory-like forecasts of cyclical-wave-breaking cuspover, e.g., that given here. So, we have Alastair Crooke stating in “Transactional Weakness Tips the Balance of Power -- 'Hold to No Illusions; There is Nothing Beyond This Reality'”, LewRockwell, 1 April 2025, that “What remains stuck fast however, is the general (Western) weltanschauung that everything must 'change' only for it to stay the same.” However, this attribution is mistaken, being much more apropos Lebenswelt than Weltanschauung (as Crooke's subsequent discussion illustrates): no small implication, this “mistaken”. Then we have Paul Craig Roberts writing: “As far as I can tell, the serious study of intellectual history no longer exists… The conclusion is that the danger we face… is unknown and unrecognized by us and, thereby, has us by the throat as it destroys our belief system.” I could, indeed do, agree more: in that his discussion (see: “The West Has Been Destroyed by Inconsistencies in Its Enlightenment Heritage, Not by Jews”, Institute for Political Economy, 2 April 2025) focuses upon the impact of cultural Marxism, which has far more to do with surface-structure-Lebenswelt-level “intellectual” hisstory than with deep-structure-Weltanschauung-level intellectual hisstory. My forecasts made during the Sixties and Seventies were based far more upon analysis of the latter than of the former. Well, hmmm. No natural-born sceptic of enculturated-socialized glutamate-anchored consensus, I certainly so became through military-brat processing capped off by tours of duty in SFTG and Psyops Group, JFKSWCS, the latter of the three circa early-1967 in part keeping OB book on the ME in runup to the Six Day War; soon thereafter, seeing DIOCC- and PIOCC-level CIA operatives use USAID cover, and somewhat later yet receiving an insider's view of the “enemy-strength-estimate controversy” whilst assigned to SRA/MACV-J2, that skepticism became instinctive tending to bridled cynicism. One more conseiller du le lieu prive sneaking proof of concept as to draining of the swamp by exercise of the will chain? Strengthening the shallow state by top-down reformation of the deep state -- without re[cog}nizing how deep-structure vectors surface-structure? (((As I typed these last two politically-incorrect sentences -- and this one as well -- in Microsoft Word, the spelling checker underlined in red most every word, all of which are correctly spelled. I entertain -- wrongly? -- that this is AI making the attempt to politically sanitize what I write as I type. If something else, then such-like likely lies in the wings. A warning being given, maybe, even? Paranoid, you say? This is the first time I've seen this. An entry-level interdiction borne by the ever-gathering mass hysteria tacitly induced by the terror occasioning the _µT_m-challenge to the binary-mind's orthogonality -- and as to subliminal recognition of the magnitude of what “classical-limit”-absent nature has in store? Cubist diagonals be damned! once again, like in run-up to the WWI battle of the 200-years War of the World? As I deep-structure-Weltanschauung-level intellectual hisstory-analysis intimated from the early-'60s, in so many words from the mid-'70s: general war will again envelop Europe if shehe choses not to find a political-economy institutional embodiment of quantum principles of self-organization.))) So, in an attempt to get away from the mass of red underlinings, I shall forget about the politically incorrect and once again look at deep-structure-Weltanschauung-level stuff. Ah, there you go. Red clear! I have nothing against bijective discrete mathematics applying order theory (overwhelmingly about binary relations) to the taking of numerable points and links-between of poset-cum-lattice point-sets (though that characterization is overly concrete for the actual case) into conceptual lattices and using them, as lattice logics, to represent truth-values and complexes thereof of logic -- Booleanically crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic, quantum -- argument forms and their concatenations, but I have seen-heard nothing to suggest that any or all of that is relevant to penetration of how it is that inner-Musculpt symformphonie (polymorphic, colored, sounded forms dynamically transforming) eidetically conveys meanings into conscious awareness, faithfully holds them in memory for various periods (e.g., Beethoven speaking of his symphonies as being flowing forms possessing inevitabilities, such forms-informing being substance of the memory trace), and facilitates presumably-rule-guided implicative extensions therefrom (e.g., Mozart being able to write out all the notes to a Mass he had only heard part of: once he had the form, its transformations were inevitabilities easily decomposed to notes). Howsoever it may be that in speakable so-called “natural” languages contextual pragmatics complexed to generative logic-rule-grammar accretes associative semantics as emergent, clearly, in unspeakable inner-Musculpt symformphonie, semantics of some sort prescriptively demerges sonic-visioning morphological autopoiesis and grammatic rules governing transformations of syntactical structures as they obtain in differing domains of ideational pragmatics. So, as regards inner-Musculpt, I don't subscribe to the Wittgensteinian notion that “meaning is use” in speakable-language games; while, as regards techno-exteriorization of (quantum? unspeakable) inner-Musculpt as holographic metalanguage, I advocate the building up of a demotic semantic corpus via “meaning through use” -- only once this has been thoroughly accomplished (again, I refer to biofeedback in a computerized isolation-flotation tank as being a great facilitator) as mathematical notation, i.e., math in use, will it be authentically possible to seriously inquire as to the memetime-independent sort of semantics actualized, in our view by 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, as inner-Musculpt symformphonie, though it may be possible to develop some understanding of the intellectual infrastructure prerequisite to such inquiry. IMHO, Wheelerian “magic without magic” may be dependent upon meaning without rules: just as m-logically-valued inner-Musculpt phylogenetically preceded mantra and yantra which -- according to Johan Frederik “Frits” Staal, the department founder and Emeritus Professor of Philosophy and South/Southeast Asian Studies at UC-Berkeley -- similarly preceded speakable ₁T₂-only languages, so, rule-free semantics ontologically preceded pragmatics-generated semantics and associated rule-regulating grammar of ritualized syntax. Since I believe that the m-values of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction signify existence of the infinitude of acutenesses in the unit circle, not just perpendiculars thereof, I cannot put faith in the orthogonal lattices, be they orthomodular or orthocomplemented, associated with the probability-amplitude interpretation, for it seems to me that collapse of the statefunction transpires in the frequency-funnel juncture between processing by the nonlocal _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-quantum brain and processing by localized ₁T₂-only-molecular-cellular brains (opacity across the juncture being due to glutamatergic anchoring at neuronal plasticity, an anchoring beginning in the womb as orchestrated by prescriptive enculturation-socialization). Change the rules all you want and it won't alter the meanings embedded in the collective-unconscious archetypal event gradients -- regressed or no -- setting the terms of reference. Well, based on my long-ago very limited access to inner-Musculpt symformphonie, I would say that twist-structure algebras over logical lattices are quite possibly something of an approach to fleshing out our rather ingenue notion of the 3-fold temporal CURL associated with topologically-active operator-time (whoopse, lots of that red underlining again!), and that Delaunay triangulation and trajectory triangulation (ah, red clear!) and the Delaunay meshing network for 3D shape representation are better bases for latticing inner-Musculpt symformphonie than are the concept lattices of earlier mention.

Ah, yes, just to insure that there is no confusion as to the PsOV, points of view, taken by the P(S), power set, of my I/i^m to the nth, to include non-selfsame I/i-itself and that subset empty-headed, the latter becoming more and more familiar as my me'ses' contemplations of the long-term context of current events get older and older: my I/i^m do not believe that the misnamed Analytical Cubism was a sensorial expression of the POV of ideational reductive phenomenology, for my I/i^m regard Husserliana as a record of ₁T₂-only-thinking about what reductive phenomenology ought to be like, not as reflecting outputs to ontic awareness of _µT_m-processed actual practice thereof. Just as I view Pointillism (and the immediate back reaction thereto) as having been prefigurative of the quantum particle theory of light, so I regard “Analytical” Cubism (and the immediate back reaction thereto) as having been far more prefigurative of m-valued logics than a Pauli-Jung synchronicity with Husserliana. I would argue that formalization of m-valued logics was implicitly in the cultural birth canal from Maxwell's 1867 paper on the dynamical theory of gases, and all but explicit by Einstein's 1902 to 1905 papers on kinetic theory and statistical mechanics, for it was a straight shot for Lukasiewicz to go from his 1906 notion that the “necessity” connecting-principle between cause and effect is derivative of “logical necessity” (not vice versa) to his 1908 logical-foundations-of-probability (think: probability as a memetime-bound conception) notion that “indefinite propositions” are not only in conformance with enculturating, even in higher-enculturation, TF tests, but also have a truth-value valuation that is neither true nor false (a tacit recognition that logical necessity is not absolutely necessary to the existence of implication, or indeed, that implication is not absolutely necessary to the existence of logic), to his 1910 questioning of the ₁T₂-only Law of Non-Contradiction, and on from there to his Aristotelean-future-contingencies (think: a memetime-bound conception) probabilistic orientation to 3-valued logic (in my non-professional judgment, unfortunately an orientation facilitating the ignoring of EmilPost's _µT_m-logics -- particularly ignored being the “truly”, heh-heh-heh, massive imports of the last sentence of his 1921 paper -- as interpreters of the m-values of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction, any one such statefunction most appropriately “viewed” as matrix-mapped over the nested grids of a multi-sheeted Riemann surface, nested grids like those employed in numerical modeling of the Earth-atmospheric energy-momentum cascades initialized by the complex-angular-momentum-carrying solar wind). Planck's quantum of action: 1900. Einstein's Special Relativity (think: fundamentally modifying the consensus conception of isotropic, passing, passive, referential memetime): 1905. Husserl's decisive (somewhat earlier, implicit) introduction of the idea of phenomenological reduction: 1905. The African-sculpture instigated, heh-heh-heh, advent of “Analytical” Cubism: 1907. Not until Metzinger's 1911 “Tea Time” (think: a memetime-[trope}ing title) did we have a real capture of n-facets of the Hussserlian horizon of the object (or so it is apparently interpreted). Enculturation-socialization-orchestrated-glutamatergically-neuronally-etched-and-anchored binary-mind of the art prof-critic-interpreter characterizes the n-POVs portrayed as a memetime-lapse image, the artist having imagined depiction of what it would look like to have walked around the object, and then imaging the composite of that imagined walkabout (walking-meditation-originated Aboriginal songlines, unfortunately for us all, not acculturation-appropriated by a Balinese-gamelan-exposed, heh-heh-heh, memetime-questioning Debussy). It's amazing, almost unbelievable, shouldn't it be said, that this once-in-a-multi-millennium snapover in the fundament (logic) of human cognition should, by regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious abreactive recoil, have, firstly, yielded merely the WWI battle of the 200-years War of the World. And who is capable of imagining details of the cause-effect-logical-necessity statistically-probable Great Hunt Down likely to transpire at planetary-crisis cuspover in psychic analogue-echo to how, immediate post-WWI, the White Russians were tracked down by the Reds? Our 21st-century color revolutions have been old hat, eh what. In “Multiple Horizons: Phenomenology, Cubism, Architecture”, The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 19:6, 18 August 2014, Pau Pedragosa wrote:

Renaissance pictorial perspective… brought about a shift in the concept of the subject… by transforming the observer that occupies a space with his body into a bodiless subject (an eye reduced to a point) that looks/thinks from a distance; the observing eye sees a homogeneous space: a grid of tiles on which the “storia” takes place. The eye [qua singular “I”] itself has been excluded from the represented space, displaced to an infinite distance that is represented as the painting's vanishing point…

The primary and immediate relation we have with the world is established with our body… The corporal condition of our experience means that we always see the world from an embodied point of view, for we can only capture what is accessible from a particular angle and nothing else… However, as Husserl explains, the whole object, or the object in itself, is not any of its sides or even the sum of them, it is an object of a different order that transcends perception.

I would change that so as to say: transcends ₁T₂-only processing of percepts. The George Mason U. professor under whom I took studio art classes (in drawing, painting) and a comparative arts course had his primary employment at the National Gallery of Art as a restorer of Renaissance paintings. From him I learned much, not the least being that Albrecht Durer in studying the principles of linear-perspective, apparently learned from writings of Piero delle Francesca and Leon Battista Alberti, used an actual orthogonal-screen-grid through which to view the scene, collection of objects, “topic” of a given study. I did not construct for myself a screen grid, but I did imagine such a grid as one of the many practices I employed at walking meditation (another being: see only green, as many hues of green as there are to see, and nothing else in the forefront of awareness, all but green screened-out to visual white noise background fuzz; this can be done with any color, sound class, haptic class, whatever). I was not only trying to paint music during this period and contemplating nuances of projective-identification by use of Kimon-Nicolaides-drawing from the nude-model-as-projection-screen, but also reading Aurobindo and Jung used as projection screens in practicing inner-separation qua deep-distancing from the act of reading, so it was natural to use Jungian “active imagination” to create an insubstantial screen grid by gossamer analogy to Durer. Having many, many times viewed the scenes, through which I walking-meditated, through this imaginary grid, I can observe, with respect to Pedragosa's statement, firstly, that my eye was never at the vanishing point at infinity; it was always in front of the imaginary grid in front of the picture plane understood to be the scene being seen in perspective view. Had my eye been at the vanishing point at infinity, not only would I have been turned into a pillar of salt, I would have seen the back of the objects the scene contained, not their fronts as always was the case. Well-- almost always this one ₁T₂-processed way, which is not THE WAY. All ways always being-there is the _CT_C+-processed case. In the beginning of this meditation, I practiced looking through the imaginary grid in 1-point perspective; later, in 2-point perspective. The practice, à la the “green exercise”, was to forefront-see only the skew-parallels that meet at infinity as they obscurely persist in the scene whilst needing to be “pulled out” -- all else relatively “screened out”. Imagine it: this sort of walking meditation conducted with a cognitive set strongly conditioned by contemplations of the aesthetic and interpersonal dynamics of psychological projective-identification at n-level transference as distinct from authentic empathy. Having viewed 1-point and 2-points at infinity (not so hard for a competent one-memetime-targets-analyst, CICV next to the JGS compound in Saigon, circa pre-Tet-'68, comprehension of stereographic projection being foremost of the several prerequisites to accurate reading of-- you know what!), why not try n-points at infinity? It occurred to me that, really, there should be a Durer-screen-grid for each point at infinity. I tried that. Then, with each orthogonal-grid acute-angled to the others. Later yet, these grids with diminishing grid-lengths: nested grids. Well, somehow -- my n-Iambe didn'tdoesn'tdon't really understand how, in the attempts to visualize all this, a bizarre inversion took place (point in the center of egosphere [normally proprioceptively localized to the postcentral gyrus] “inverted” to some kind of point-at-infinity): the perspective lines, instead of reverse-telescoping away from my me-the-walker into infinite regress, flipped over and converged upon my me-as-a-vanishing-point (paranoia exponentiated! I unreservedly report: Lordy! this terror-inducing all-attending over-attention utmost surveillance; gosh, what are my “I”s to do?), which eventually, there being, like a recurrent dream, over-and-over given my evening readings of Aurobindo, my I/i^m understood to be the [no}thing-point of intersection of Purusha with Prakriti, the sense of this convergence into [no}thing|ness clearly indicating that hubristic selfsame-ego-“I”-ness claims are moot. In that “noment”, I knew, beyond question, not only intellectually, but emotionally, that my defining non-selfsame whatnot-ness is the whole collection of vanishing points, lines (see point 1 in the linked answers, and think of slopes relative to 3-fold topologically-active operator-time's 1st-order temporal CURL), solids, polytopes. The ₁T₂-only-egoically-centered point in glutamatergically-ponderable real-numerable space, when inversion-decentered onto ketaminergically-imponderable-to-binary-mind extended-complex-numerable space, is _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly all points of the complex line, which is to say the Husserlian horizon. While glutmatergically-IBE imponderable, ketaminergically-OBE ponderable: as regards interpersonal dynamics of such like, the image received (the higher-logically-valued complex-domain image -- the _µT_m-relative-state-identity-transparency propositions thereof interstitally-numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers? -- containing much more information about the subject, which is the Husserlian object-in-its-non-selfsame-itself-ness, than does the ₁T₂ly-ponderable image) is called a “psychoideograph” in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh. That is to impute that the n-facets of the H-horizon are ontically-qua-directly perceivable, not merely the imagined result of a non-imaginary-numerable imaginary walkabout, a circumambulation memetime-lapsed into an image of superposition. Nonetheless, I do not believe that Picasso gained direct access to such an image and thereby originated “Analytical” Cubism. Had he, IMHO, he would not subsequently have become so eclectic; he would have resolutely pursued the implications, the imports of which are so enormous. But someone in that scene, in that period, surely gained such access: and thereby, with a little collective-unconscious help from the Trickster Archetype, spawned “Analytical” Cubism. Alfred Jarry of Ubu Roi is a good candidate. I have said something similar about Einstein and the actual initiatory epiphaneia-aha! eventually yielding Special Relativity, i.e., that his first wife likely received that benison from the collective unconscious -- for had it been Einstein, likely he would not later have taken the EPR-position concerning quantum-positionlessness that he did. Unfortunately, the binary-mind simply short-circuits in face of the ketaminergically-distributed booking of this ALLality. That walking-meditation practice was regularly daily engaged-in pre-Cornell, pre-DouglasAPaine, so I did not yet ((I, pre-Cornell, during my George Mason U. period, somewhat naively read Kandinsky's Point and Line to Plane, missing the fact that he had missed the “inversion” responsible for many of the synaesthetic somewhats-unto-whatnots he was attempting to analyze, this “miss” despite having briefly “changed places” with Schoenberg and thereby surely having been familiar with the dodecaphonic “retrograde inversion” ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the “reality” to complex-hypercomplex transit, certainly by 1926 -- the year that the BornRule dissimulation prevented a _µT_m-logic interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction -- when this sequel to On the Spiritual in Art was published: this Kandinsky “miss” being one major contributor to why there never was brought together a coherent new codification following upon the 19th-to-early-20th-century deautomatization of the aesthetic analogues to the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung and associated Locke-cum-Smith-inspired political-economy institutionalizations)) have much in the way of introspectively-usable understanding of the autogenic consciousness-shift into extended-complexity-hypercomplexity, i.e., the actual cosmic expanse of consciousness-unconscious-to-binary-mind.

Not only the room referred to by Amor Towles' Metropol-hotel-confined protagonist (with whom I resonate, having lived in hotels now for 10-years ongoing), also the genome, both phylogenetically and ontogenetically speaking, the small world of the molecular-cellular brain's cortical module, and the LSTD, limited spacetime domain, of atmospheric cascade dynamics (and, not by any means forgotten by me, the party-front functional-elements tessellated-state-space AO, area of operation, contained by the boundaries upon which tacitly -- by residuals of the identity-transparent animistic-pagan “participation mystique” possibly so-far-back derivative of a pre-Vedic “Pacific Atlantis” civilization [see here and here and here], not of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist MOs -- mapped were time-domain-sensitive “internal-system-state” bureaucratic variables of the “holographically”-qua-identity-transparency-subverted hierarchically-organized VCI [in J.A.Wheeler-speak: hierarchy-without-hierarchy], Viet Cong political Infrastructure, that is to say, as elaborately documented by CICV-AreaAnalysis-Section detailing [I mean, huugh!: it is still, and will remain, I am sure, totally amazing to me that none of this, absolute zero, ever made it into the hisstorical record, given its fundamental-polysci-principles ground-breaking paradigm demonstration], frequently-changing boundaries near-real-memetime adaptive to alterations in the altercation environment of the combat, so well adaptive as to have inculcated the capability to overcome a great imbalance to their disadvantage of Clausewitzian forces: compare this to DOG-e's wolf-in-a-hen-house approach to initialization of an undoubtedly necessary bureaucratic phase-shift; a wag's [whole}sale RIFing? hmmm. well-selected [re}tales, [fore}sure. Quod [e}rat DOG-e demonstrandum!). Quoting A Gentleman in Moscow, 2016 Penguin paperback edition, p. 331:

…the room's grandeur had never been defined by its furnishings or architectural details. “By what then?” the young man asked. “The citizenry.”… Looking around the restaurant with renewed appreciation, the architect observed: “I suppose a room is the summation of all that has happened inside it.”

All that has, is, possible-worlds-modally can, and Aristotelean-future-contingencies will (concerning these in respect to bureaucratic deautomatization-reautomatization environmental adaptivity, see our paper entitled “VirFut Q-Pro: Public Policy Implications of Quantum Computing”): the latter two, of these four topologically-active-operator-time-related conditions, most certainly involving logical-value order-types superordinate to that ₁T₂. And how is all of that, including the involved dynamical processes thereof, inside-the-“room” collective “citizenry” -- cooperative, non-cooperative, and the _µT_m-relative-states superordinate: note that these are not between the bivalent opposite-two, but altogether elsewhere, real and/or complex cum hypercomplex -- encoded into the room, the genome, the cortical module, the LSTD, the environmentally-adaptive boundary-changing tessellated bureaucratic state-space AO? Be aware that it is only historically well into the account of Kuramoto theory -- initialization, circa 1975, same memetime window in which transpired a fistfight at a severe storms conference over Paine-Kaplan cascade theory of tornadogenesis -- that introduced (like playing of the tariffic trump card?) is external forcing of the onset of synchronization (see “From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators”, Steven H. Strogatz, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 143:1-4, 1 September 2000, pp. 1-20: I should have wanted such excellent accounts of many other developments, but I didn't -- because I wouldn't have found them; see also the more recent “Generative Models of Cortical Oscillations: Neurobiological Implications of the Kuramoto Model”, Michael Breakspear and Stewart Heitmann and Andreas Daffertshofer, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, November 2010). Quoting the Strogatz article's section entitled “6.2 Second theory” (the equations are left out as the reader can easily find the passage):

Kuramoto and Nishikawa also proposed a new strategy for deriving an evolution equation for r(t). In the governing equation… they pretend that r(t) is an external force, say h(t), and then derive the responses of the individual oscillators to h(t), restricting attention to the linear regime where h(t) is much less than 1. These individual responses (which depend on the whole history of h(t)) [i.e., quoting Towles' young architect: “the summation of all that has happened inside it”] can then be combined to yield the response of r(t). On general grounds, and without giving a derivation, Kuramoto and Nishikawa guessed that r(t) should be a linear functional of h(t) of the form… where M is a memory function to be determined.

Well, our treatment as to onset of oscillator synchronization (involving air parcels and pi-electron parcels [properties of this latter, as regards resultant intra-neuronal-DNA emitted coherent waves, it can be speculated, may exercise a “bias control” over neural network cascade-avalanche dynamics]) involves an “external force”, not simply a linear function, but also nonlinear complex functional and hypercomplex functor, formulated into a canonical equation invoking topologically-active operator-time. Kuramoto's critical-state-related model is an nk model. Lacking a Strogatz-quality account of the history of development from Sewall Wright's 1930's “adaptive landscapes” through Kuramoto's 1970's nk formulations and onto the 1980's introduction of the nk mathematics to Wright's landscapes such that the SFI “nk-fitness landscape” was elaborated relative to the chaotic-complexity-theory ₁T₂-only-take on the nature of _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly-self-organized criticality, it is not possible for me to make informed suppositions -- except that, it is clear that all of these nk notions are 2^nk, not M^nk, thus bound to bivalent logic alone. M as kernel of matrix is the null space, so far as ₁T₂-only algebras are concerned; whereas, _µT_mly speaking, the ₁T₂ly-null space is an obfuscation-concealment as to the existence of the null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-logical-“pencils of skew-parallels” subtending Heisenberg uncertainty. The ₁T₂-logical-value-order-type boundedness is not the case with our treatment as to onset of oscillator synchronization, our understanding being relative to the latter, M^nk take, whereupon, in the tornadogenesis case, the m-logically-analog-processed m-valuedness involves the many Fourier harmonics of emitted acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes. I again quote Strogatz:

Even though the reduction to a phase model represents a tremendous simplification, these equations are still far too difficult to [₁T₂-only? and under the assumption that prediction is dependent upon detailing of the spatial field, not, following Planck, detailing of the properties of an “elemental oscillator”] analyze in general, since the interaction functions could have arbitrarily many [_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ processed?] Fourier harmonics and the connection topology [within the spatial field] is unspecified -- the oscillators could be connected in a chain, a ring, a cubic lattice, a random graph, or any other topology.

Collective synchronization was first studied mathematically by Wiener who recognized its ubiquity in the natural world, and who speculated that it was involved in the generation of alpha rhythms in the brain. Unfortunately Wiener's mathematical approach based on Fourier integrals has turned out to be a dead end. [In Strogatz's paper, this observation concerning Norbert Wiener came before the above-prior quotation, and Strogatz cites a 1958 lecture given by Wiener; of course, Wiener's ideas about the nature of information are ₁T₂-only bound.]

As regards topological aspects: the Paine-Kaplan cascade model relies upon topologically-active operator-time, a model wherein supersystem-system-subsystem far-from-equilibrium phase transitions -- which are interscale cascade-qua-avalanche initialized cyclotomically when the scale-relative value of a controlling variable diverges to infinity ((be aware that, apparently, in the Kuramoto model there is no embodiment of the sense that values of some parameters can be scale-relative while others of the same system can be scale invariant; also note that in history of the Kuramoto model analysis is made of N [total number of elements or component processes] going to infinity and t taken to infinity [whatever exactly that means, practically speaking], but k [coupling strength] is only envisioned to increase to c, criticality, not to infinity: k at C+ infinity, to our way of thinking, is indicative of our all-weights, all-to-all, AllBaseCommonGround _C+T_C+-identity-transparency; whereas, quoting Strogatz, “The Kuramoto model corresponds to the simplest possible case of equally weighted, [₁T₂ly] all-to-all, purely sinusoidal coupling” where a coupling strength greater than or equal to zero plus the 1/N factor insure “good” behavior as N approaches infinity: not to be neglected is the fact that “coupling” and “correlation” are far and away from being _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-“identity-transparency” -- EPR thought experiment, or no)) -- involve 3-fold temporal CURL (a way of handling complex and hypercomplex angular momentum, according to Paine's early-1970's elaborations upon his earlier PennState Master's candidate epiphany-aha! triggered by a fellow candidate's referencing of a spatial somewhat to a “temporal-level” whatnot -- not to an awareness of Pauli's rejection of his own notion, i.e., operator time, which, we may suppose, he, Pauli, nonetheless, went on to hook Jung upon as reformulated to the idea of “synchronicity”, one way of understanding what EPR rejected). Heh-heh-heh!

From first exposure thereto, I've felt that the cosmogony implicate to extensions from contents of the Vedas is the most sophisticated evident in the hisstorical record, a feeling that propelled me into attendance at the 1974 McMaster University Velikovsky conference, as I entertained the notion that the “most sophisticated” likely does not come first, and therefore that it is “reasonable” to hypothesize that there existed some high culture from which the Vedas are a deteriorated residual remnant. Yes, I know: “Harrumph-harrumph-harrumph! Bizarre, what!” or some equivalent expectoration being -- despite a few exceptions -- the most common assessment of each prominent aspect of the idea framework I work with. The unspoken sub-assessment being, “Ever boorish be the boastful.” Well, nonetheless, because I have long believed that Homo sapiens sapiens has been throughout recorded hisstory in throes of a chronic state of collective psychosis (a belief by no means dependent upon acceptance of the details of Velikovsky's thesis, which I never accepted, merely rejecting Uniformitarianism as largely subliminal “background assumption” qua “world hypothesis” qua “domain assumption” in favor of “Paroxysmalism” as more appropriate to most cases than is Catastrophism), my interest in hisstorical cycles has been confined to the notion of “episodic fulmination periods” (for a good laugh, Google that term!) -- analogous to, say, an acute square-wave-train-differentiated saddle-block FOUO, fever of undetermined origin -- and what etiology of these periods might be, a subordinate interest being in what generic pathogenesis and course of such fulminations there might be, if there is, indeed, a generic account possible. Falling into purview of this fool[my}nation notion is the idea that taken advantage of has been the possessor of the fiat-vehicle-currency-foremost-international-reserve-currency, which, from the 1971 “new prosperity without war” gold-window-shutdown default on the value of global inflation post-1945, which taken-advantage-of-possessor has since 1971 gotten everything on the planet it coveted for free simply by “printing” money -- on and off the books -- and between 1945 and 1971 much of what it wanted, most surely throughout the whole period post-1945 using econ-hit-man-suitcases-full-of-the-freely-printed coups and stings and color-revs as integral to black currency ops -- what did the involved OSSers “learn from”, heh-heh-heh, Tai Li in the CBI theater of the good war, eh, uh, what AP knew details of but judiciously chose not to essay upon? be aware that all OSS X-2 counterintelligence documents, apparently except for the few AP was able to “salvage”, were systematically destroyed within a few months of August 1945 -- especially falling into that fulmination purview, considering that most of the details of the BW international monetary system had been decided, largely independent of monetary-system-fundamentals considerations, before the BW Conference was convened, such that, given the system put into place (an inversion of Sewall Wright's 1930's “adaptive landscapes”?), nothing of substance could effectively be done about the various aspects of the clearly apparent accelerating rise toward cuspover of a global crisis. In such a context of belief, I very much value David Stockman's marshaling of factual information (see, e.g., here and here), which I, perhaps naively -- not since back-reacting upon the notions taught in 7th-grade Civics class, and certainly not since experience of MACV-J2, do I take anything at face value and escape feeling silly -- evaluate to be the real skinny. I certainly resonate with his assessment of Wilsonian “democracy” (though I feel that deep-structure precipitants, e.g., largely-subliminal-by-ignorance-though-still-potent-by-regressed-archetypal-Kuramoto-externally-forced-synchronized-“contagion” hysteria concerning advents of Abel's existence proof for trans-al-jabr and Cantorian-diagonalistic-part-whole-ID-transparency and the Axiom-of-Choice's actual infinity and early phases in the advent of _µT_m-logics, of that fulmination would have found one way or another, e.g., the BornRule dismissal of the m-valued-logic interpretation of the m-valued Schrödinger wavefunction, to the WWII fulmination, Wilson or no Wilson) and U.S. military spending -- though I demur to embrace his take on SS, which I feel should have been strongly bottom-weighted (a minimal wealth redistribution opposite to that maximal, which actually has transpired, half-a-trillion-dollar personal net worth having been system-made possible) and the fund of which should have been made invulnerable to raiding in service to the type-A superegos running the military-industrial complex.

The royal random: persistent recourse of the challenged binary-mind. This example, however, is progress: the notion that a more fundamental principle underlies the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Quoting Koustubh Kabe, as he succinctly states it in “The Fundamental Holographic Uncertainty Principle and its Primary Applications”, World Scientific News, 50, 2016, pp. 33-48:

The realm of quantum mechanics in which the Heisenberg uncertainty relations hold, is actually a part of a more grand picture -- that of the fundamental uncertainty on the horizon between a geometric quantity and an information theoretic, but, combinatorial quantity…

This is the fundamental uncertainty principle on the Holographic surface -- any arbitrary surface enclosing any volume of space containing a quantum system. If this uncertainty relation -- the Holographic Uncertainty Principle -- is indeed fundamental, then all the Heisenberg uncertainty relations should indeed be derivable from this principle. We will see, in what follows, that this is indeed the case.

Hogan's noise. Holonoise. The holographic noise in gravitational-wave detector GEO600 and prospective ET, Einstein's Telescope g-wDetect. One more distinguisher predicating existence of a supposed classical limit. LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, at the Planck scale: blackhole-entropy-driven pixelation of ₁T₂-only-ponderablespace and fractalization of ₁T₂-only-definable memetime. Way, way down there, safely distanced from ADLs, the activities of daily life, heh-heh-heh; like the n-universes of Everett are safely way, way out there, incommunicado by entropy diktats. Self-organization by noise. The royal random as instigator of law-abiding orderliness, natural law being the justifier of social coercion as perhaps the foremost residual of 18th-century bivalent-rationalism. To me, this is progress by implicit recognition that there is a subtext (_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical J.G.Bennettian “skew-perpendicularity”?) to the continuously-sliding ₁T₂-only-canonically-conjugate-Heisenberg-uncertainty inequality relations (but note that Anaelle Hertz and Nicolas J. Cerf, in their immediately-above-linked “Continuous-variable entropic uncertainty relations”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 52, 2 April 2019, to quote the summary abstract, “…present some conjectures for new entropic uncertainty relations involving more than two continuous variables”) as well as to the discrete ₁T₂-only-canonically-conjugate-Heisenberg-uncertainty inequality relations, as discussed by Aingeru Fernandez-Bertolin in “Discrete uncertainty principles and Virial identities”, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 40:2, March 2016, pp. 229-59, relative to orbital angular momentum (orders of Wick rotations as eidolons of topologically-active operator-time's 3-fold temporal CURL in the complex- and hypercomplex-angular-momentum cases? where, quoting “Quantitative phase imaging based on holography: trends and new perspectives”, Zhengzhong Huang and Liangcai Cao, Light: Science & Applications, 13, 27 June 2024, “The propagation of wavefront is described by the complex amplitude. The complex-value in the complex-domain is reconstructed from the intensity-value measurement by camera in the real-domain…”), to wit, quoting Fernandez-Bertolin:

…if we consider a solution to the Schrödinger free equation, there is a dynamic interpretation of the uncertainty principle…

…in (3) [that is: “Phase and Angle Variables in Quantum Mechanics”, Cornell's P. Carruthers and Stony Brooks' Michael Martin Nieto, Reviews of Modern Physics, 40:2, April 1968: the phase variable analyzed relative to “well-defined uncertainty relations” in context of a discussion of “harmonic oscillator excited in coherent states”, this being highly relevant to the virial-identity issue at energy-momentum imbalance in cascade-theory derivation of the notion of 3-fold topologically-active operator-time] the authors suggested another uncertainty relation. Their aim was to study the angular momentum -- angle variables on the sphere, so they related the orbital angular momentum to the azimuthal angle about the z axis [think: first-order topologically-active operator-time]. Then, the orbital momentum is written as a differential operator and, for a meaningful uncertainty principle, periodicity [or, more insightfully, _µT_m-valued logic?] is required for the position operator. Hence, the authors suggested the operators cos(x) and sin(x) to represent position. Considering this duality via Fourier series, the second case is connected with the discrete version of Heisenberg uncertainty principle that we will study here.

What ho! Done frightfully well, Chappy. The non-orthogonality qua J.G.Bennettian “skew-perpendicularity” of the azimuthal angles about the z axis can be thought of relative to the reverse-cascade-speculated _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-valued-logics digital-to-analog hybrid-computer processing ((cascade would be the analog-to-digital inverse hybrid; “spontaneous localization” being understood relative to autogenic brain discharge in glutamate-etched molecular-cellular brain, consider “Hyperdimensional computing with holographic and adaptive encoder”, Alejandro Hernandez-Cano, et al., Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 9 April 2024)) of the Fourier harmonics of, say, the acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes emitted at tornadogenesis, such that a crisis of infinite concentration of vorticity, kinetic energy, and mass in a finite spatial volume is avoided (see the “5. General Relativity and the Limited Atmospheric Domain” section of the above-linked “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties…” paper; as well as the “4. Spacetime Del Operator and Temporal Curl” section of the paper entitled “Toward a General Theory of Process”). Under the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logics of relative-state identity-transparency (i.e., not truth-value interpreted), with scale-relative absolute limits whereupon logical-value-order-type transits are initialized, and with m-valued universal physical constants, there is some Planck distance at every ponderable-grid-length, some Planck time at every memetime step, some absolute zero at every degree kelvin. Mucking about, no doubt. Absolutely bloody bonkers, what! Not safe, that ol' classical limit, with its ADLs-protection clause. Neither “way, way down there” nor “way, way out there”. Ha, ha. Pip, pip, Old Soul.

On one wall of Doug Paine's Bradfield Hall office, Cornell, circa 1975, were hung side by side a weather chart and a brain scan that even meteorology grad students were hard put to identify which was which. On another wall was a Gaia poster. Fifty years later, look at Fig. 1a of “Brain criticality predicts individual levels of inter-areal synchronization in human electrophysiological data”, Marco Fusca, et al., Nature Communications, 7 August 2023. Note that the direction of the arrows goes from observations to linear-time-invariant-cum-variant state space to parameter space: this is an exhibition of the collective-egoic, ₁T₂-only orientation to the involved issues, even though the state space is considered emergent from parameter space. A more accurate inversion-depiction would have ponderablespacememetime observations at the bottom, and above parameter space at the top there would be other levels, eventuating in _C+T_C+-AllBaseCommonGround of the m-logically-valued-reference-space, multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like BackCloth universal covering of Musculpt manifold, M, topologically-active operator-time understood as memetime-independently demerging -- by involutory-decomposition-execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of m-logically-valued propositions -- AllBase to ₁T₂-only observables. So, given the two charts hanging on the wall facing the Gaia poster, it was natural enough that discussions of solar-wind-driven hypercomplex-complex-angular-momentum-cascade dynamics occasionally focused on the question of what might be the parameters (e.g., intensities of solar activity?) involved in establishing state variations (e.g., positionings of polar jet streams?) behind the changes responsible for memetemporal-historical global-ponderablespace distributions of tornado-touchdown points and tracks (talking ₁T₂-logical-geometrodynamics-level of planet-Earth geomorphic AI-ANNs of “acupuncture points and meridians”? qua “ley lines and coordination points”? qua “songlines and their crossings”?) -- geological memetime frame, not merely the last century. Over the last five decades I've kept my eye out for material related to such ideas in atmospheric science, but haven't found anything worth mentioning. Some material, though, is appearing as related to neuroscience: which topics we broached, barely, in 1981, as can be seen here and in the related “Terminology Glossary”, particularly items 45 to 48. Recent detailing papers of interest include: (1) “Geometric constraints on human brain function”, James C. Pang, et al., Nature, 31 May 2023; quoting, “…we confirm predictions that the close link between geometry and function is explained by a dominant role for wave-like activity…”; and (2) “Neurophysiological signatures of cortical micro-architecture”, Golia Shafiei, et al., Nature Communications, 26 September 2023; quoting, “How spontaneous neurophysiological dynamics are organized across the cortex and how they arise from heterogeneous cortical micro-architecture remains unknown”, IMHO given that the quantum-wave properties of intra-neuronal and intra-perineural DNA molecules are, apparently, not being investigated; and (3) “Rhythmicity of neuronal oscillations delineates their cortical and spectral architecture”, Vladislav Myrov, Communications Biology, 3 April 2024; quoting, “…we introduce a new approach, the phase-autocorrelation function (pACF), for the direct quantification of rhythmicity… and uncovered a spectrally and anatomically fine-grained cortical architecture in the rhythmicity of single- and multi-frequency neuronal oscillations.” Be aware that phase-“autocorrelation” is a memetime-bound notion with respect to a given phase, whereas ponderablespatial-long-range phase-“coherency” among phases of multiple neurons is plausibly-likely demergent under 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, as codified in our (paper linked above) canonical equation as regards DNA free-electron-gas pi-electron-parcel harmonic temperature oscillations in response to variations of impinging radiation at helix-coil transition.

The ada[man}tine-superegoic mass-formation hypersphere: socius, glutamatergically imprinted thereupon, lost in the tall plume grass and common reeds bordering the [man}grove forest enveloping the liana tanglewoods knotting up the regressed collective-unconscious-event-gradient streams. Quoting WiKi: “In [₁T₂-only] physics, the identity component of the Lorentz group acts on the celestial [collective-superegoic-hyper] sphere in the same way that the Möbius group acts on the Riemann sphere.” Surreal -- to say the very least -- be the binary-mindset expectorating prevailing public discourse: which bind should one's airy embrace? My I/i^m hashave never, and never will, say what it/they actually believe regarding this or anything else: consider one element of the context producing this mil-dot-brat-informed habitual behavior: flying-boxcar liftoffs, Ashiya AFB, 1954, and 1st Lt. Harry Phelps' giftings from Ha Noi with intriguing tales of the Tonks (nowhere yet have I seen mention of Ashiya AFB, Japan, relative to the battle of Dien Bien Phu; friend, David Spillane, onetime Chiang Mai Chief of Station, some years ago gifted me reference to a brief newspaper item as to CAT's pilots receiving French commendation for flying Dien Bien Phu resupply; whereas, only just now I can quote a recently declassified document linked here, as the only text I've seen confirming my childhood witness, to wit, quoting, “Indochina -- Limited Victory in 1953 -- Dien Bien Phu and Disaster in 1954 [sic] The provision by CAT, on a crash basis, of pilots to operate C-119 aircraft provided by the U.S. Air Force to the French Air Force in Indochina”; my 9-year-old's interest in this persisting through my last conversation with my father NOT being about any conceivable violation of ANPO (I early-on saw it written as AMPO, whilst unable to ascertain where the M came from), but being essential to my estimation as to the possibility that something classified, while known to many, could be kept from public knowledge for decades -- or not). Had I known that Joe Alsop had written into a June 1954 WaPo column a report of USAF involvement in DBP resupply, I'd have asked about it -- chatting him up as I always did whilst periodically taking care of his indoor plants as sent to do by Hills Nursery, McKinley Toliver and I being regularly assigned to spruce up Susan Alsop's garden nearby (down, around, and up from where I once -- so many decades ago -- lived across the street from Teddy and Joan). The following drawn from Peter Dale Scott, linked immediately above, if accurate, indicates how little High-Muck-a-Mucks learn from the mistakes of others in their cohort: “…it was on May 5, 1953, that Civil Air Transport, using planes and pilots 'loaned' by the USAF, arrived in Hanoi to begin its airlift to Dienbienphu.” This statement, if accurate, strongly suggests that the U.S. co-planned DBP, for, (1) quoting “Dien Bien Phu -- the first strategic battle in Ho Chi Minh Era”, Ministry of National Defence, SRV, circa 2021, Gen. Navarre had only just arrived in Indochina and initial occupation of DBP was still more than six months away, to wit, quoting:

In May, 1953, by agreement with the U.S., the French government sent Army Chief of the General Staff of NATO, General Henri Navarre, as the supreme commander of the French expeditionary force in Indochina. After a month of field survey and investigation, in early July, 1953 Navarre worked out a systematic and comprehensive military plan which was later approved by the French Government and its Defense Council.

And (2), quoting “Battle of Dien Bien Phu”, Chemins de Memoire newsletter, Ministere des Armees, article drawn from Memoire et Citoyennete collection, no. 39, no date provided, to wit, quoting:

Between 20 and 22 November 1953, during the airborne Operation Castor, six battalions split into two airborne groups (the 1st Foreign Parachute Battalion, 1st Colonial Parachute Battalion (BPC), 6th BPC, 8th BPC, 2nd Battalion of the 1st Airborne “Hunter” Regiment and 5th Vietnamese Parachute Battalion, led by General Gilles) took Dien Bien Phu without any difficulty and started building. The French troops gradually transformed the basin into a true fortified camp…

How does that contextualize the West-more-land strategic planning of the 1966-to-'68 set-piecing of Khe Sanh? Jus' askin': Moreland, lost and presumed dead during the battle of Lang Vei, was a friend from my SFTG medic class; my brother-in-law, Belau {see: “13 (later 14) MSF CO (Vietnamese)”}, same medic class, was a member of the SF relief team sent in to recover Lang Vei. Here's one of my disparaged hops, skips, and jumps: how so very strong is soft-forced-indoctrination “mass [for}nation” of the [incline}nation to roll back this and to roll back that! All those, uh-hmm, “rollbacks”, humph, and so very much more, have proved to be an uphill battle, what! My associative thought-arisings in this context are manifold, not, whatever others may think about the involved paraphasiacal derailments, ex nihilo. What can sufficiently motivate me to willingly dissipate my intuitive Bergsonian elan vital cum the Kandinsky internal necessity of trying to reach “participation mystique” in a MidoriGaoka-like pre-given harmony (presumably not exactly the words I actually inner-talked back then) to inherently-conflicted persona development and maintenance, necessary professional lying, intra-organizational rivalries, keeping up with the Joneses' conspicuous consumption, so on? Nothing, I decided, and not ex nihilo -- after two-and-a-half years of thinking about it, the occasional evening, AU-SIS, 1963-'65. So many decades later, following my 9-year-old's registrations, I'm still learning stuff about the events entraining my concrete-level “major life decisions” contextualized by questions raised concerning deep-level fundamentals and the seeking of answers thereto, which answers I continue to pursue clarifications of. And the jump? Into multiple-scenarios strategic planning, are you? Try this scenario on for size. In this geomantic projection, a 10-percent-survival rate at cuspover is arguably relative to organic life on Earth, not to Homo sapiens sapiens. Following the binary-mind's psychology of the transference, it takes deduction of two sides to form the wall of the bivalent-logic-induction funnel to a given fulmination of the ever-[in}during collective psychosis: in the current case, neo-liberal/neo-conservative, woke/anti-woke. No. Nosiree. When I say “deep structure”, I am not speaking of the “deep state”. Talking instead of highly regressed cognitive-states, not nation-states; though the latter could be a ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the former. Not the state, “the deep-state” (characterized by Jason Chaffetz? by Chris Hauty? by Mike Lofgen? via HarperCollins cum Simon & Schuster cum Random House), the “deeper-state” (good offices of Lt. Col. Robert Maginnis), the deepest-state, the murder of crows overseeing a conglomeration of states, and not even aping the banking cohort transcendental to the nation-state system qua system. Despite the recent retrenchment, subliminally yet one more anti-_µT_m-backlash, I am using the term “deep structure” more in the Chomsky-linguistic-theory generative-Rabbinical sense, but transposed into a Kabbalistically-demergent C.G.Jungianism ((as I've mentioned a number of times before, Jung being a someone whom Noam Chomsky said to me, face-to-face somewhat nonplussed -- Cornell, close-up questioning-from-the-floor at the end of a public lecture, given circa 1975 or 6, memory serving -- that he simply can't read, this can't-read-the-Princeton-University-published-Collected Works being in response to “an ask” as regards relationship of universal grammar to [a Regge-calculus-Rx of the] archetypes-in-themselves-as-mathematical-relation-structures of the collective unconscious: his “can't read” response precluding “a further ask” of the hoped-for-subordinate-question opportunity as to whether or not he might be interested in the thesis that the universal semiotic [not grammar, as ₁T₂-only grammars held to be memetime-independently demergent from _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-semantics] is encoded into the higher-temporal frequency windows and waveforms and harmonics of DNA pi-electron gas; Karl H. Pribram, similarly, by letters exchanged, heh-heh-heh -- “Thank you for this reprint” -- indicating a non-interest in the cover-letter-specified suggestion that the coherent-wave output of helix-coiling intra-neuronal, likely mitochondrial, DNA is the “reference beam” he sought to identify with regard to the fine-fibered-dendritic webs of his hypothesized holographic-storage network)). The expertise of the Expert Class! Milton Friedman, in letter response to a query as regards m-logically-processed m-valued monetary units, giving clear indication of unfamiliarity with existence of m-valued logics and absence altogether of awareness of the Everettian-vonHayekian notion of the “time-shapes of total capital stock”. This, when at the time, heh-heh-heh, time in physics was undergoing such a radical departure as to become fundamentally absent, such absence being regarded by many physicists-chemists-sociologists, particularly phenomenologists, as altogether unforgivable for being unfathomable by binary-mind. When questioned by me at Cornell, circa 1976, after a public lecture on the topic of “Time and Identity” (neither time nor identity characterized as significantly at variance from Newtonian-Cartesian fundaments -- despite wide understanding of Special Relativity), about the possible-worlds-logics of a “post-paradigmatic Weltbild”, Saul Kripke did not understand the term “post-paradigmatic”, thus indicating a lack of having actually thought into the modal imports of m-valued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value, a lack such that Kabbalistic _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency is glutamatergically etched-out of conscious cognition by the Rabbinical rigid-designator name (good offices of Philip D. Miller) of the bivalently necessary identity of the ₁T₂-only-logical object apprehensively apperceived (“Out, out, damned spot!”) by the sleepwalking binary-mind on basis of the subliminal prehension of the “bare object” being-there in _µT_mly-Postian complex psycho-projective space, despite the Möbius-transformation-drawback into enculturation-socialization-orchestrated glutamatergic anchoring. No ideological-cum-deep-state-driven vectors determining their, i.e., members of our Expert Class, assessments, eh what -- heh-heh-heh! “I'm finished with all that. I'm retired [to Malta],” so sayeth one of my imprinted-upons, who had been present at the pre-WWII synthesis of LSD. They, the expertise[r}s, think of their idea explorations, their scientific endeavors, as constituting a career. Well, I won't deign comment on the collective imports of that.

My “intuitionistic” (O, how well they stub their tow, uh, obfuscate, i.e., prove, construct, whatever! them thar highers) is Jungian-Aurobindoian, not ₁T₃-“stub”-Kripke sub-semantical. Moreover, meaning for Kripke, like for Chomsky, is grammatically generated; whereas, to my me, Musculpturally “speaking”, heh-heh-heh, grammar is semantically demergent via syntactic playouts. Example, drawn from my corpus, aged immediate-post-adolescence through late-30's, i.e., trailing off 40 years ago: context is high concentration upon an n-participant intellectual multilogue, and Musculpt induction spontaneously funnels in -- vaguely eyes open, starkly eyes closed -- with photism flashes, Takemitsu-“Munari”-like sound-drips-and-drabs, color-field washes, polymorphic modulations of color field, Takemitsu-“Asterism”-like soundscape, and suddenly the changes apperceived in the Musculpt symformphonie being heard-seen convey (somehow?) the “directions” and conclusions the various arguments can take, and all that I have encountered about the subjects in question is “stacked-there” in the “logics” (how?) of the symformphonic playouts which are not heard-seen but (somehow?) known, accessible, choosable-as-to-follow-on. Being demergently a memetime-independent warm-golden-dust-pre-pregeometry-unto-m-logical-pregeometry-unto-ontological-unto-geometrodynamic-unto-ponderablespacememetime-existential Act[u}all|ist (think: Pauli-Paine topologically-[act}ive operator-time), I've never been much interested in necessities-coercions and possibilities-circumscriptions (not to mention Bornian-probabilities and Popperian-propensities-vectoring-Sorosian-reflexivities-into-the-unknowabilities-interpretation-of-_µT_m-logics, thus precluding possibility, heh-heh-heh, of any real advances in monetary theory [actually, I greatly sympathize with George Soros' -- given the experiential origins of his, and the much-much-less-so-tragic NZ-Popper's -- reductionism, and that's why I rained upon the “Office of George Soros” early formulations vis _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams, just as a decade-or-so earlier I had rained upon supposed-anarchist Oriana Fallaci {think: what was the wealth of information she didn't know enough of to learn something significant about sociopolitical autopoiesis and self-organization, i.e., “autopoiarchy”, from her visits to the upper echelons of Saigon's National Police HQ Compound?: we there-visited the same person's office, she the person, me the office, during the same period but never ran across each other: Nothing, and So Be It!} initializations of the conceptual contents of The Moon of Hoa Binh: those best positioned can actually accomplish something relative to coming cuspover, even though “best-positioning” clearly indicates a low-probability, heh-heh-heh, of the inclination to do so], as if that _µT_m-mu were a koan of The Cloud of Unknowing, howsoever much a religious miscegenation, cloud-computing being a ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, thereof). Autopoiesis, and hence spontaneous autopoiarchy, to our way of thinking, is due to the zero-point “quantum potential”, which is resident in _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency: 19th-century anarchism, pre-Planck that is, never came up with a plausible account of spontaneous social order, and current libertarianism has no plausible notion as to how ₁T₂-only-markets could conceivably achieve high levels of self-organizational competency. So, one has to be sympathetic when Soros Rabbinically concludes that Kabbalistic higher-valued logics denote the unknowability induced by self-referential reflexivities construed as circular, indeed non-orientable, topological reentries -- for, if the market bivalently-only “processes” single-logically-valued-only prices, how could autopoiesis and high levels of self-organizational competency arise from that? Necessarily not-possible! And fuzzy logic doesn't help. Any ₁T_m-logical-value order-type -- ₁T₅, ₁T₉, ₁T₅₀, ₁T₆₅₈…₁T_m -- is, to my I/i^ms, not an example of m-valued logics: for that, the left-hand designator has to be superordinate to 1, which fuzzy logic is not. The logical-value of a fuzzy proposition is not “simultaneously”, e.g., spatially stacked or quantum superposed, many fuzzy values; it is a single discrete number in the infinite-cardinality-C real interval [0,1] handled, by renormalization procedures, as if C were denumerably-infinite and not a continuum like is a Pythagorean musical string cum superstring.

Final output of a fuzzy system has to be a crisp number [not a collection or continuum of such numbers, and certainly not a bunch of non-selfsame numbers, Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, or no]… The input of the aggregation process is the list of clipped or scaled [think: O, my, there's that ol' renormalization yet again!] consequent membership functions, and the output is one fuzzy set [represented by a single crisp number] for each output variable. [In the original, the latter quoted sentence came before that former quoted.]

To quote Gokcenaz Akyol's excellent, even best, “What is Fuzzy Logic?”. I mean, woe-is-my-me of the stack of my I/i^ms, not even ₃T₃-semantical-Kripkean, let alone quantum-animistic-pagan “participation mystique” _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+! Can't sensorially tell the difference between your foot and my foot? heh-heh-heh! All vacuously-true nodal and ₁T₃ly-accessible-(by no means ID-transparent)-framework-somewhats, w E W, in the universe of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-states are maximally-inconsistent, non-selfsame _C+T_C+-whatnots memetime-independently turned off by topologically-active-operator-time-executed E.T.Bellian-involutory-cyclotomic decomposition. O, the cognitive philistinism of the “classical-limit” aficionado! Art I.M.B. Hackson-Buller at your service! MADam EUe, uh, uh, whoops, I mean Ewe. TF Man[i}try|an|ism has for so long controlled human-systems gov[her}nance that no trans-binary CA upon 18th-century states of single-valued, selfsame identification can possibly, let alone necessarily, heh-heh-heh, hope to overcome the geriatric man[age}ment vectoring Homo sapiens sapiens into incendiary cuspover.

If you-me, coming back to the ZI from W.Luthe-instigated insights received at the Kyoto AT Symposium, but SFTG-informed-to-hold-close, not-really-so-early-on -- say, late-'70's -- tried unsuccessfully to Deirdre-facilitate access (the palace guard asked a lot of $ up-front even for a brief phone conversation) what JC's advice would be concerning this-or-that in regards to dealing with the manifest oppressions of the institutional-science cohort, well… jus'forgettaboutit! and be aware that this sort of thing is an embarrassing concomitant: Lilly, even when pretty late on, well post-Japan-trip, that trip when my first face-to-face meet up with him transpired in Kyoto good offices of W. David Kubiak, that is, was not, my gosh, that bluuuuuuuuuuuah. None of my engagements with John challenged the clear sense that he remained profoundly astute. Later, well, not much later, when John found himself, good offices of JES, calling upon my me -- His-and-Her fates are the Trickster's funnies! -- to survey his scientific archive for StudioGarage-cum-Dentsu-cum-PioneerCorp so an assessed value could be put upon it such that it could be placed in the public domain, I, in course of the quite-long effort, read the documents -- actually, I closely read everything: that's why my surveying activity took so long -- I suppose are those, there having been a few that possibly could qualify, me choosing in my itemization to generically, absent detailing, identify such print-ups, referred to here, a National Institutes of Health reposting of “On 'modified human agents': John Lilly and the paranoid style in American neuroscience”, Charlie Williams, Sage Journals, 32:5, 9 October 2019, the papers in question well summarized by Williams, not lengthily-extensively quoted I note, uh, I, well, uh, “Ah, yes”, I thought at first reading into this “area” of the archive (everything was totally scattered; no organization at all), these papers, whichever, clearly are background p&p, part and parcel, of all the induction-of-individuals-KwarMcCIkey-era-fulmination-uh-THAT-fulmination-of-the-perennial-collective-psychosis-spawned GO-Prop-NGO-Foundation-sponsored research stuff on forced-WHATSOEVER, uh, EVER'thin' conceivably, even pure-imaginarily, FORCIBLE, including indoctrination; that's, don't y'think, useful-idiot-focused psyops, what, even the psychofancy of self-metaprogramming with consciously unknown subliminal knowns, blackpsyche-by-other-means, eh, individual and mass and collective (KwarMcCIkey-subsequently, uh, the VN-war era onward, as I witnessed during my rovings inside-the-just-being-finished-beltway, circa 1963-'65, as an AU-SISer roustabouting Special Operations Research Office, Bernard Fall's personal library, and many elsewheres besides -- D.C., in an “echoing”-synchronicity with beltway construction, underwent a little-commented-upon monstrous transform shutdown-of-access [if you never accessed prior to 1965, why would you comment?] during that immediate-post-JFK period -- soft-form raved to the public-at-large in demo-societies-transiting-to-this-and-that-elsewhats, and, later yet, during the COVID era, hard-form harangued planetwide): about which, forced-indoctrination research, that is, I had first learned of the existence of in the JFKSWCS Library, circa 1967, whilst assigned to Psyops Group, and even chatted-up with long-time-post-WWII-CI-agent-near-retirement Ben, my immediate superior at my secondment to The Center as OB analyst on the ME in run-up to the Six-Day war (((several decades later, after, that is, my initial late-'70s-failed approach, JC recommended, “Make it public!”, but by then I knew that that really doesn't work so good, for it jus' forces the whole show onto the next level, say, Pentagon TIA into private-sector surveillance capitalism, and/or, say, implanted electrodes onto the Inc.ing of neural-Inc.s and the general, well, nutter, uh, utter, mainstreaming of CBIbooking-cum-substitute-memory-insertion R&D covered-fronted made plausibly deniable by the treating of the variously disableds -- yeh-ya, that's my me, right there, as a high-schooler, circa fall-winter-spring 1962-3, good offices of my AFSC-AFLC-USAF-career-then-Lt.Col.-pre-Pentagon-father, uh, that's my me, right there in motion-sickness foundering in one of the experimental Wright-Pat flight simulators [had my Alaska-Denali-hwy-dry-fire-caribou-stalking-behaviors-induced-snow-blindness-reduction of 20/15 vision to 20/25 vision in my left eye not caused me to fail the Navy-Pilot-ROTC-scholarship-to-UVA physical exam, I'd'ave been washed-out, anyway, in the motion-sickness trials of flight school], the Sunday-brunch-bunch-at-our-Fairborn-household being the scientists developing this early-autopiloting-VR tech who certainly were familiar with JC's WWII-era lab research on… well, hmmm, I learned about JC's physiology investigations only due to the fact that my father -- shot down, lost and presumed dead for a couple of months, whilst broken-ankled-from-the-parachute-jump-fall being moved via underground-railway across France by the Resistance and a Priest-arranged transmission a-cross [Xchange of Xmas cards for the next 40 years!] the English Channel: he, my dad, lost a promotion due to this lost-pre-dead interregnum relative to his co-survivalist peers which throughout the subsequent nearly-30 years was never recouped, a careerist lesson I learned more thoroughly than did he: what profession would be worth my pursuit, eh? -- was taken off flight status -- and into becoming an extremely accomplished supply and materiel trouble-shooter: think of the PhanRang/CamRanh project -- due to two collapsed lungs, one on one occasion and then the other on another, resulting from his accumulated hours-upon-hours of unpressurized high-altitude WWII-B-17-bomber-plus-subsequent-to-Beginning-to-End-of-the-BerlinAirLift-untoonto-N.Atlantic-BW1-unto-Azores-and-return-storm-foundering-ship-rescue-efforts [after many such, his aircraft, not the given particular at-peril ship, foundering due to storm-damaged-and-thus-two-lost engines, everything non-essential stripped and jettisoned from the plane, was flown wave-height hundreds of miles to Labrador, ditching on the beach] flight history -- and, at the Fairborn dinner table, bubbling bleby-lungs physiology-discussions of HAPE, high-altitude pulmonary edema, and tension pneumothorax: learned more whilst being taught how to do thoracentesis in GoatLab of SF medical training))). Street-lingo contempt is easily malaprop mimicked to schizoish wordsalad paraphasiacal run|t[o}gat|hers, y'know. By the time I did the Lilly-archive survey, I'd long since read, well, most all his stuff, and the items listed in his very useful bibliographies cum references, to include Lilly's The Scientist: A Novel Biography (checkout Oldak's review, heh-heh-heh!) and John Marks' The Search for the Manchurian Candidate (see: pp. 104-5) about shenanigans of Langley, Lambeth & Associates: would John have approved me for the survey task had I not been very well read in, and able to demonstrate that that was the case? In catch-up, I read John Lilly, So Far during this period, but didn't meet Francis Jefferies, unless it was for a few seconds along with Laura Huxley at a UCLA get-together where John and Timothy and Laura briefly spoke; until now, didn't since read into any Lilly material. Back then, however, I even knew that SATing the bottle-nosed was prefigure-contextualized by SSupping and HellisWell CATabouting. Heh-heh-heh! And don't forget activities then of those currency and precious metal companies: collective bivalence having been strongly reinforced during Menuing of the last-'60s-unto-early-'70s in preparation for the diplomaniacal ping-ponging binary-mindset opening-up rollback. Isn't data about data, i.e., metadata, required for metaprogramming and self-metaprogramming of the hu-hu-[hu}man biocomputer -- uh, I mean, well, like data-squared is used to facilitate fashioning of the targeted advertising covering-fronting making plausibly deniable the deeper aspects of surveillance capitalism -- disaster-type and merely that net-worth megadisparitious? There's absolutely no possible-world logic whereupon the binary-mind's take on The World even in the least has verisimilitude to All That Is demergent from All That Isn't -- and insofar as neuroscience is fixated upon the binary-mind's molecular-cellular-brain take… well, there you have it: that fixation spawns all sorts of obsessive-compulsive-clinger behaviors, especially those of the intellect negatively affect-charged. For instance: E.C.C.O., Earth Coincidence Control Office, which Williams disparages (under the precedent set by the Rx delivered to “A Beautiful Mind” iatrogenically ndect-truncation-renormalized during the initial stages of an effort -- think: denigrated to the posting of connected-clippings on a wall -- to explicate _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency, this one-and-only universe, which is not the ₁T₂-only-multi-worlds interpretation of the Everettian relative-state formulation of QM), was Lilly's more-or-less-tongue-in-cheek popularization of Pauli-Jung “synchronicity” which was Pauli “operator time” Jungized upon the rejection by Pauli of his own concept, i.e., passive, passing, referential linear-time as observable, quantum-mechanics treated as operator, rejected (a rejection Prigogine latter seconded) because (“ostensibly because”, IMHO, there most certainly being subliminal drivers because, by, uh, surely by, Prigogine's memetimes, rejections had been piled upon rejections ever since Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr was math-prof-consensus interpreted as an Impossibility Theorem) the time operator was construed as conjugated to the total energy operator, and in so being, under time-reversal symmetry, generated negative values of total energy judged to be meaningless. But, as essayed relative to cascade theory of tornadogenesis and radiation exchange by superconductant pi-electron-parcel gas of helix-coiling DNA (to include the intra-neuronal and intra-perineural DNAs largely ignored by neuroscientists and not understood as mediating, among much else, “spontaneous localization” cascade-demergence; “demystification of mantra” being one Lilly popularization-transliteration of soundwave acupuncture qua signal insertion, an early intimation of this), “Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time” -- as decomposition execute-and, not-execute-or, of involutory cyclotomic demergence-remergence quasi-tongue-in-cheekable as E.C.C.O. qua synchronicity -- is complex-hypercomplex non-observable (observer-observed being bivalent-logic bound) 3-fold topological operator on _C+T_C+-logical Hilbertian AllBase of multi-sheeted BackCloth reference space, this being a notion wherein positive and negative values of total energy are associated with the non-observable-to-IBEed-and-prescriptively-glutamate-etched-binary-mind, retrograde-in[version}able, involutory character of logical-ontological-existential precedence relations (this + and - association, and the involutory character itself, being bivalent residuals of the binary-mind fixation which, absent Musculpt as maths notation [development of which, IMHO, is right use of a biofeedback-equipped and computerized Lilly tank], [man}dates ₁T₂-only All-That-Is-Heraclitean Rx of the _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m which is Parmenidean-All-That-Isn't-as-cancelled out by _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+). For more than two millennia, bivalence and the ₁T₂-only Aristotelean Law of Excluded Middle have dictated mutual exclusivity to the binary-mind; but, consider that ₁T₂ is a logical-value order-type of _µT_m; this, strongly suggesting, my I/i^m submit, that by inner-separation qua voluntary dissociation, there exist Abelian-trans-al-jabr modalities of awareness, maybe even consciousness-without-an-object, that “simultaneously” (a word only the ₁T₂-logical-value order-type alone requires) are both OBEed and IBEed wavically. Not only does seriously prolonging the inner-stop stanching of roof-brain chatter require concentration-in-self-observation-cum-“self-rememebering”-driven increase in the baud-rate of consciousness and proportionally-concomitant relativistic memetime-slowdown, such that thoughts can be apprehended “before” they “arrive” (from “elsewhere”, i.e., the ₁T₂-only-Saganesque-“ET”-personification ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement -- heh-heh-heh! -- of the nonlocality of the _µT_m-quantum brain) and thus escaped by letting them, thoughts, “pass on by” via “not saying 'I' to them” -- this being the experience Aurobindo describes in Letters on Yoga as having precipitated his first experience of Nirvana; Sri A not regarding thoughts as ETs, even quasi-tongue-in-cheekly, though he did Rx them as asura-like, this overlooking witness marking-as-disrupters being a way to facilitate inner-distancing from identification with them, thoughts which the binary-mind attributes, even arrogates, to itself, a selfhood taken to be selfsame -- but this Huxleyesque “time must have a stop” memetime slowdown is also prerequisite to direct ontic access to the endogenous-ketaminergic phenomenologically-OBEed-I/i^m-understood outputs of the _µT_m-logical processing, e.g., inner-Musculpt symformphonie, hypothesized to be nonlocal-quantum-brain demergent under 3-fold topologically-active operator-time execution of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering Aurobindo's photismic “warm-golden-dust” motes (also consider, but not obsessively, oh please, SuperMinded Yayoi Kusama's endogenous-ketamine-flooded schizological, hah! polka-dot environments and topo-objects, _CT_C+-relative-state “infinity mirrors” and “infinity nets” of the m-valued-function-Riemann-surface-like _µT_mly-multi-sheeted Regge-latticed BackCloth: quoting the WiKi-reported diagnosis, “Kusama's struggle with these hallucinations, which were linked to her mental illness, influenced her artistic style,” which diagnosis, hardy-har-har, cur-flunks a paaa-lunk!) of the J.A.Wheelerian pre-pregeometry “bucket of dust”.

The projective-identification of superego to personified godhead was patently, even perhaps criminally, ConveDDed -- conversion-disorder displaced -- to the notion of sovereignty, i.e., that of emperor, king, nation-state, conglomeration of nation-states, and the supranational entity, this last, e.g., the BIS, Bank for International Settlements. In this hisstorical context, the egofunction's absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct individual per[son}al selfsame-self-interest became the so-supposed magic hand that became the hidden hand that has become the back hand. Generative-linguistic acts of cutely acronyming ((e.g., the Patriot Act's “Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism”, as cited by Matthew T. Witt and Lance DeHaven-Smith in their paper entitled “Conjuring the Holographic State Scripting Security Doctrine for a (New) World of Disorder”, Administration & Society, 40:6, October 2008, pp. 547-85, a paper which edifyingly analyzes in detail this whole area of discourse)) metaphorical namings of (₁T₂-only-logical: this being my intercalation -- one among many to come) framings of Lebenswelt conundrums -- and interfacing problematics of Lebenswelt-instituted attempts to substantially refit nature (well, the spectrum of iatrogenic deep-structure interventions, e.g., GMOs, human and otherwise, sponsored by transhumanism and its generative-transformational grammatic surface-structure MoveAlpha government-binding-theory precursors) -- long ago were substituted for the undertakings of actual policy formulations, be such activity lineally instrumental, operationally disjointed, comprehensively planned, strategically gamed, tactically improvised: this Witt and DeHaven-Smith “carried-over” metanoia in the Greek, i.e., change of mind, coerced-binary-ratiocination “snapping” of individuals brought into MattiasDesmet “mass-formation” and subsequently pogrommatically pandemicized, exemplifying the largely collective-unconscious-mediated, compensatory-abreactive back-reaction (Give me simple-identity or give me death!) upon imports of _µT_m-logics and the-identity-transparency-states-qua-the-quantum-potential resident therein and responsible, when unmolested, for the spontaneous social orders of decision-free systems. The initially extra-systemically suppressed, then intra-systemically repressed, and thus regressed-to-infratech-only prospectus, of decision-free states-conditions-processes-entities, of whatsoever sort -- superfluid, superconductant, Cantorian-transfinite-cum-hologramically part-whole identity-transparent -- has been, and more and more pellucidly is, most assuredly processed by group-binary-mind as an existential threat to superegoic and egoic projective-identifications and institutionalizations thereof. Pursuit of happiness long since supplanted; liberty lost to wholesale constitutional subversion of the Constitution (no fine-tuning based upon contemplations of the fact that Newtonian 18th-century-₁T₂ is an order-type of Planckian 20th-century-_µT_m); right to life ConveDDed, uh, uh, COVIDed, so not surprising water is proclaimed no human right, right along with breathable air. Hmmm, deconstruction of logocentric binary opposites (one of the Trickster-archetype-instigated diversionary parries shifting ontic awareness from authentic assimilation of _µT_m -- like the BornRule and fuzzy logic cum sets?), yet, or consequently, still, all these decades later, no assimilation amongst deconstructionists of the Postian imports of _µT_m-logical-value order-types (blank stares were the only responses to my mentionings of this, Cornell grad-student parties, circa mid-to-late-1970s), and ₁T₂-only-conceptualized feedback-loopy reflective mirroring in constructive WorldMakingWays, indeed reflexive reflection via ratiocination by employments of metaphorical framings-namings ((with regard to binary-mind of our GLE, global leadership elite, policymaker cogitations constructing and maintaining the Lebenswelt imitate, say, popular fiction cum popular music, both GLE facilitated and content-influenced, i.e., reflexivity governed, as much as, or more than, these fictions-musics analogically embody Lebenswelt conventions; pretty much just forget about, as regards GLE ratiocination, formal properties of, say, art fiction cum art music, as modeling Weltanschauung, or as should so model because density of such formal tropes is inversely proportional to how broad the thin-blue-line must be to ₁T₂ly-maintain social order; doubly forget about how policymaker Umwelt-identification-with-role quenches a-mind-of-hisher-own as self-attributed policy-related thoughts snapover into being spontaneously-localized downloads from regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious event-gradients)). The prescriptively-enculturated-socialized qua glutamate-etched-and-anchored binary-mind's normotic tilt toward sole reliance upon “narrative logic” (term used by Witt and DeHaven-Smith), lineally-elaborated as magically-realistic, comic-bookable 24-hour-“news” ex[e}get|icks, precludes authentic employment of even the ₁T₂-logical-value order-type to cognize single-valued-functions-only processes, let alone, and not being polite-company mentionable for being largely unsuspected, utilization of the _µT_m-logical-value order-types to “cogitate-cogitate-cogitate” (to adopt J. C. Lilly's specification relative to mantra demystification under 3-fold yantric dynamics) upon multivalued-function-functional-functor processes. The post-structuralist-cum-deconstructionist postmodern surface-structure-only take -- e.g., psycho-sexo-socio-political autoimmunity; holographic simulacra cast derogatorily as hyperreal, a hyperreal understood independent of consideration of the physics imports of N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr; Hollywood stars emitting the dark energy of blackpsyche, most of this chicken feed being leftover sticky rice, some cracked corn; role of distributed-political-warfare-ministry selected-and-facilitated popular fiction-music; et cetera -- on the mass-binary-mind's deep-structure back-reaction upon the metric of largely-subliminally-registered imports of insufferable “Quantum this, quantum that!”-impudent impertinence came decades after (see dates of entries to the bibliography of the linked Witt and DeHaven-Smith paper) the fact of decisive vectoring by regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious, and has remained postmodernist-analytically mostly on the metaphorical level, not, for instance, getting into details of the principles involved, e.g., the physics of hologramic-plate part-whole ID-transparency, how the “holographic principle” works, the submolecular biology of how stress-induced autoantibodies become anti-DNA antibodies, and how these details are ConveDDed by regressed-archetypal processes to psycho-sexo-socio-politico-economic and military group-mass-collective behaviors (not to mention behaviors of the blurry-individuals membershipping the GLE global leadership elite fuzzy set, that is the datatype-whowhat Fudge-blur members, whowhich, upon OWL-2-fuzz-through tunneling-entry, snapover into thorough psychoidentification with socially-conferred role attributions founded upon the basis of collective projective-identifications). When even the highest authority has become a CAS -- Controlled American Source -- well, uh-hmmm, excuse my me! Danglers here, danglers there: who is who; what is what; what is who; whowhat is that? Ah, yes, as regards imbalanced binary opposites, we have exemplified the consensuated ₁T₂-only-cause-PUSH-connecting-principle-assuming policy-formulation process, assisted by ensemble-probabilities analytics, nowadays likely informed by data clusterizations and somememetimes by employments of fuzzy membership functions, with the _CT_C+-strange-attractor-self-organized-criticality PULL occasionally lip-serviced but actually altogether GLE-ignored so long after advent of Cantor-dusted-fractal-catastrophe-chaos-complexity 2^nk-“(Veblenian-[lie}sure-class) fitness landscape” framing-naming of M^nk processes. Dog-e_instant_transform.org_shock likely is not well informed in respect to the likes of this and this; these [this}es holding no candle to the awe-inspiring, omni-transforming, year-short institutional reorganization carried out pre-Tet-'68-offensive by the VCI, Viet Cong (political) Infrastructure, based upon -- not Marx-Lenin-Mao -- an age-old-rice-ritual-animistic-“participation mystique”-informed prefigurative application of the then-yet-to-be-codified “holographic principle”, whereby environment-of-the-combat-adaptational boundary changes automatically mapped to “algorithmic” modulations of internal-system bureaucratic variables. “Participation mystique” is at the very least fuzzy-membership-set-fuzzy-logical and, really, it's -- social anthropology deemed “contagion”, even utterly demeaned as being “inconsciente” -- exemplary of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency of member-in-himher-non-selfsameness cum of the socius qua socius (think: information transmission is not a relevant concept). It has been quite a while now (even now continuing to be elaborated, e.g., “A Kalman-Jacobi hybrid model for game theory: a fuzzy logic approach to financial market competition”, Alireza Azarberahman and Mahmoodreza Mohammadnejadi Modi, Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 29 April 2025: this could be thought of as a remote approach to _µT_m-valued LETS via modification of the ₁T₂-only-logic properties of market action-directives) since game theory has been combinatorially extended to contending groups with fuzzy membership, whereupon fuzzy logic characterizes uncertainties and informs imprecise gaming choices, fuzzy preferences, non-crisp payouts, mixed investment strategies, so on. And one could even think of _µT_m-valued LETS being less remotely approached by “Application of Game Theory, Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks for Assessing Risks and Forecasting Rates of Digital Currency”, B. Bebeshko, et al., Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100:24, 31 December 2022. Whereas, the 5-and-6-“sided” numbers employed in “Solving Fuzzy Game Theory Problem using Pentagonal Fuzzy Numbers and Hexagonal Fuzzy Number”, Amit Nalvade, et al., International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 69:2, February 2023, pp. 74-9, is clearly an approach to, though not an arrival at, use of non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers to number Regge-latticed point-sets and areas on sheets of the multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like BackCloth required for mappings of currency-unit open-source-e-commons-computer-gamed value-ensheavements of variously-commodity-backed _µT_m-LETS currencies to quantum-composite unit-of-account distributed ledgering of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, Planet Earth -- a ledgering IMHO that would be of considerable value relative to minimizing losses at coming planetary cuspover. Still, though, despite these proofs of work, there exists no game theory based upon the quasi-individual player with internal-states comprised of order-types of quantum-non-simple identity employing the _µT_m-logics of relative-state identity-transparency: [eco}nomically speaking, we can't actually have that without implementing _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams. Not much of a concern to the G7, eh -- and testified to by these three above-linked recent papers coming from Iran, Ukraine, and India. How surprising is that? Elon Musk being intent upon resurrecting the good ol' company town in a new guise raises the issue as to what place, if any, he will give to “place-based” economies and issues involved with attempts to retain local multiplier effects -- not to mention how he imagines his urban planning-directives will interface with market action-directives. Prevailing “place-based financials cum impact investing”-type initiatives, e.g., those attempting to reverse, for instance, the impacts which MBSs, mortgage-backed securities, have had on the housing markets -- initiatives altogether admirable in their way -- are, nonetheless, attempts to restore characteristics of economies which existed before the advent of, and the gorging upon, dissimulated-quantum-based infra-technologies. What the situation actually requires are monetary-financial initiatives based upon de-dissimulated-quantum-based technologies -- i.e., those _µT_m-logical -- of spontaneous localization and fusion as exemplified in the quantum mechanics of cooperative collective phenomena. To this there are major, mainly psychological, obstacles -- obviously.

I had a lot of exposure -- too much? -- early on, not least, NDEs, which, rightly or not, I classify to include experiences in which the sense of imminent death is overwhelmingly paramount, even if, say, the heart doesn't stop, e.g., my first time, aged 14, having fallen through the ice of Gull Lake, MI, can't find a way out, sense of certain death on the immediate cognitive horizon -- just the first of more than several times, mind. So, I don't have any problems with the conclusions drawn here. Parenthetically, and as an aside, but to speak of a treasured memory -- and, even though this happened after the fall-through, it was not a reward for survival thereof, as only a few of my peers knew of the fall-through, including a girl who later became a onetime resident of Cherry Hill in Elmendorf AFB, West Anchorage H.S. cheerleader, Miss Alaska -- the daughter, who was not this cheerleading Miss Alaska, of the owner of Gull Harbor Inn, circa 1959, invited me to share her 14th birthday at a candle-lit intimate dinner-for-two, my first white wine, and only roasted partridge meal, at one of the prized immediate-window-side tables overlooking all the harbor lights. To my me, likely to no one else's, my Sixties-to-Seventies forecasts ((based primarily on my own thoughts [well, were this-“I” to state what I/i^m more-or-less actually think, maybe “downloaded from the collective unconscious” by adequate process of emptying-pull-in], not on an assigned-college-research-paper's surveying of and reporting as to expert opinions, about cultural penchants-predispositions-proclivities-propensities relative to the long-ongoing-and-clearly-failing transformation of the dominant-qua-dominating Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean-Weltanschauung-based institutionalization -- my ideas, about which, resolutely countervailed, indeed, altogether dismissed, in, for instance, discussions transpiring in Elspeth Rostow's 12-credit-hour team-taught problem-based “American Civilization” seminar, AU-SIS, circa 1963-5: getting cognizance as to the reality of this seminar, and the similarly structured “Human Behavior” seminar, is not easy for those who weren't participants, each student independently reading into, and reporting on, dozens of resources in seeking solutions to their-chosen contemporary problem, far and away from anything then transpiring in Georgetown studies of international relations, some AU-SIS students -- most not, and most not aware of, nose too much to the immediately-given grindstone -- even accessing country-specific embassy libraries, the National Archives, State Dept. desk officers' document proffers, finding ways to surreptitiously use the Congressional Research Service, and lots else besides in interfacing with this, that, and the others: in researching a paper on U.S. reactions to the Russo-Nazi Pact, I sought out, in the National Archives, OSS counterintelligence documents which I speculated likely would have contained historical summaries, but only ran across OSS-R&A stuff, the historical summaries therein provided being pretty non-descript: this use-all-the-resources-makeably-available-AU-SIS-then-way was one aspect of what my PotomacPalisades house-sharing roommates and SIS-frat-bros taught me, as they were fast and I was slow)) always seem to be preternaturally consonant with the general drift of Martin Armstrong's sequentially-expressed detailed “stuff” largely attributed to his forecasting “Socrates” computer program (presumably not AGIed as yet). I altogether stopped trying to detail forecasts soon after I left SRA/MACV-J2: no access, and no interest in gaining access, to the requisite information; inadequate computer savvy and no interest in reinforcing my me's binary-mind functions (J. C. Lilly's Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer was severely criticized as exemplifying Pavlovian-Skinnerian behaviorism, but there is no denying that operant conditioning plays a role in cuing human behavior; moreover, Lilly could easily have run across Gurdjieff's writings on “the moving center” -- only one of three -- in the period before he wrote his metaprogramming book, as I ran across Gurdjieff books in 1963 at Samuel Weiser's and was even approached on the street as I left the bookstore and asked if I wished to join a Gurdjieff group); also, I had no interest in making money off the gathering conundrum; and later in life I lost the mental acuity and physical stamina required to, sans computer, engage in such detailed forecasting activity, e.g., traffic analysis. The proximal quencher for me came before the SamAdams-60minutes-Westmoreland bruhaha: as described in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, I had spent the better part of two weeks picking the brains of rallier Lt. Col. Tran Van Dac, a walking encyclopedia of VCI organizational dynamics. Before I left Saigon, the idea of getting Dac to the PI for a year-long debriefing was broached. SRAers still in Saigon were to set about trying to arrange it there, and I agreed to think about trying to arrange it in the ZI. The photojournalism classes I wanted at Long Beach State were closed by the time I arrived. So, I soon decided to return to D.C. and see what I could do about Dac. I went to Prof. George Harris, my Human Behavior seminar instructor who was the SORO team leader for the research and writing of the U.S. Army Handbook on Vietnam and who had arranged for me to have access to Bernard Fall's personal library. He introduced me to Human Sciences Research, Inc. They were enthusiastic, a project proposal was written up and submitted to the DOD. Everything looked good, both in D.C. and Saigon. Then a report came out in one of the weekly news magazines that Dac was to head up a chu hoi delegation to the Paris peace talks. That ended the prospective project. Later, it became apparent that the report in the news magazine had been false. So, I entertained a number of ideas about why this had been done -- and my interest in devoting time and energy to this sort of thing fell off decisively. Better things to do. Subsequently, when I told this story to Sam Adams, he laughed and said: “There you go.” He laughed even harder when I told him that I left U-1 off the map of the pieces-of-pie-shaped VCI sub-regions I had documented as pre-Tet-encircling Saigon when I fulfilled an information levy from the Paris peace talkers to see, what, if anything, those up the hierarchy knew about what had actually transpired. Leaving U-1 off was like leaving Philadelphia off the map of PA. The uncorrected map was published in one of the weekly news magazines -- and I thus had my answer. In his, Armstrong's, latest, there is, provocatively, (1) an apparent idea, and (2), an apparent fact, both new to my me: (1) post-WWI German hyperinflation was not caused by over-issuance of currency, but was due to a failure of trust in the government and in the currency in aftermath of the government confiscating, circa 1922, 10-percent of bank deposits (including those of each individual) for use in payment of the Versailles-imposed reparations; and (2) Hitler, circa 1934, in order to keep money in the country he could filch from in service to the military buildup, criminalized the holding of foreign bank accounts by German citizens, this Hitlerism impelling the Swiss, for the very first time, to institute the numbered bank account so as to help Germans get and keep their money safely out of the country. Note that Armstrong does not forecast that Germany will not, at coming global-crisis cuspover, find its interests consonant with those of France and the UK, as I long ago did on basis of my (amateur, and thus surely to be dismissed) formulation of cultural considerations (e.g., the German orientation to higher mathematics was and is to my me hardly that of the University of Nancago's Nicolas Bourbaki! an obvious-to-my-me conclusion I/i^m reached in learning about Nan-Cago in the Cornell Mathematics Library, circa 1975), but he, Armstrong, does point out that at initialization of the common euro currency Germany nixed consolidation of the debts of the nations comprising the EU (be aware that MSWord's editorial function automatically contravenes, with blue underlining, use of the word “nations” in this context), which is an expression of German non-consonance light and soft, the dark hard form being, say, formation of a Germano-Russian Bloc at close approach to coming cuspover. Note that Armstrong doesn't forecast that the U.S. will not be involved in a Europe-Russia “third-time-is-not-the-charm” great war; he only says that he is PACing as much punch as he can muster in D.C. to get the quorum necessary to a U.S. pullout of NATO and non-participation in a larger-than-Ukraine Europe-Russia war which he forecasts China will come into supporting Russia. Seemingly, it should be, but apparently isn't, recognized that contextualizing the full ensemble of Trump administration policy initiatives is the neoCon expectation of a space-based-robotic non-global-holocaust war with China, requiring for success a reindustrialization of the U.S. Under the, easily doubted, assumption of that sort of war being possible, possible even given existence of nuclear weapons and likely-still-highly-classified environmental warfare armaments, it might prove prescient to speculate as to prospective alliance formations, lines of defense, major and minor theaters, so on and so forth, under this and that set of contingencies: a self-tasking-from-above whatwhich was higher-self levied upon my lower-self and best-I-could undertaken, initially as the then-only -- believe it or not! -- JFKSWCS-OB-analyst on the ME in runup to, and Israeli-behaviors immediate-post, the SixDayWar; later, at and for awhile after my tour of duty in SRA/MACV-J2. There has long been, and continues to be, so much falsification, dissimulation, dissembling, self-deception, outright lying as to rhyme-and-reason of 20th-century events qua catastrophes that virtually anything said about nowadays-current events is certain to be ignominiously founded, hence utterly foundered as regards accurate forecasting of the long haul, howsoever well-AGIed. I have pretty-much-always believed that, independent of conscious execution of ADLs -- activities of daily life -- about 90-percent of human cognition (which is not just thinking) is subliminal unto unconscious (individual and collective). So, I don't believe that the forecasted AGI's ability to imitate and surpass human's molecular-cellular-brains' binary-minds' conscious ratiocination will be such a fabulous event, independent of AGI's projected capacity to rid itself of humans, not least because it will double-, triple-, quadruple-, nth-degree-down on bivalence alone, thereby all the more thoroughly repressing, and hence more de|tri[men}tal|ly regressing, the _µT_m-logical properties of the nonlocal quantum brain's processing -- that regression driving the dysfunctions imposed upon “The Unconscious as Infinite Sets” (to include Cantorian-diagonalized part-whole identity-transparency). Once a “mass-formation” fulmination ((not only those pandemicized, e.g., consider studies with a [potentially-prefigurative] 2023 SoutheastAsia focus: note, no discussion of NIH program officers' upward kowtows to DARPA and beyond, relative to, say, genome-specific targeting of hackman gene-Cas9/CRISPRed critters, as any onetime targets analyst would immediately entertain as an unmentionable likely offensive concomitant of whatever defensive capabilities are being developed)) of the perennial collective psychosis ((foremost etiology being back-reaction qua compensatory-abreaction upon the plethora of imps -- ₁T₂-only implications -- vis animistic-pagan states of _µT_m-non-simple identity, e.g., consider the assertion that fear and loathing of the non-simple was the real motivator for Dougout Doug's land-reforming CA, combat assault, upon Turnerian-anti-structural pagan-free-sex-day rice-planting ritual [still practiced in Korean-war-era kita-Kyushu, as I, one of “McArthur's children” despite being a baka Ameko regularly assaulted by stone-throwers, was then personally aware, and, 3-decades-later, saw depicted in detail on an old, 1920s, pulled-out-of-the-ol'-cedar-chest, embroidered obi] symbolic-interactionist communitas and both-sexes mixed-use of the sento communal public bath, and, massively upping the index of duress, West-more-land's paddy-field-free-fire-zoned-door-gunnered-forced-draft urbanization, and so very much more)) has been shock-initialized (think: oh my, is the “shock doctrine” of ₁T₂-only-market capitalism cause or effect? heh-heh-heh!), the pathology cause-pushing/attractor-pulling the course of that, and any given, fulmination is a self-driven wheel: fear-marshalled projections of internal system impulses-in-denial induce complementary identifications which constellate ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, placed in projection -- unconscious-analogically-modeled collective-behavior physically-acted-out accompanying each masspsycho-transit of this particular wheel of karma.

Whereas simulations of nature can resound into prohomeostatic technological outgrowths, similarly, but not self-similarly, dissimulations of nature can impound, and in recent decades have pounded out of malfactories antihomeostatic infratechnology galore, most notably those ITs derivative of dissimulated QM. It may be supposed that there are principles setting the terms of reference (on the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space) for impoundments of classes of infratech -- and that these principles relate to defining properties of some of the myriad Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, Planet Earth and Elsewhere. When we hear quoted how many trillions of (₁T₂-only-logical) USDs worth of resources are in habitus, there to be taken, there to be denied to China, within the (₁T₂-only-logical) boundaries enclosing Russia, well, it can certainly be observed that this assertion altogether neglects consideration of EvH-“time-shapes”. Infratech manufactures, by no means all for military use, though much, if not most, derivative thereof: old work made into work of the old and those identified with the old, old paradigms, the old domineering Weltanschauung-cum-Lebenswelt, and associated old collections of introjections-to-Umwelts -- the clinger's hold on these olds being a kind of reverse, not-so-great Cultural Revolution, what! (that assessment, given all that has transpired in higher mathematics, logic, and the New Physics since N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr; not to mention the compulsive obsession with taking control over genomic “mechanics” so as to insure -- this motive, to be sure, subliminally constellated -- that existence of Law-of-Identity-violating _µT_m-logics does not undermine confidence in the notion of single-level genetic encipherment and associated selfsame simple-identity; more deeply subliminal is disbarment from the business of genetic engineering of quantum-wavicle descent [m-logically-valued descent data involving fibered categories specified with null-vector-defined “pencils of skew parallels”?] by radiation exchange processes at helix-coil transition). Ack, aye, that's right, that's what it is -- this “olds” formulation, what, -- a humph(!)ing, I mean a hawk-eyeing, of the re[pre}hens|ile G-err[onto}crazy running things, uh, [err}or… running things down, vis-à-vis Planet Hollywood-- oops! uh, Planet Earth that is. O, maan, that silly prehensility nosing around, curlingly greedy, the maankey's tail grasping, avaricious, morally one-upping, falsely claiming the superior's superior aesthetic coooool -- altogether unconscious of the involved temporal-CURL ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, secondary to regressed-archetypal event-gradient vectoring. Even before aged-40, I knew that real contributions made by my me, any such, the contributions, that is, such as they were, if in fact there were any, had already been made: too old, too much, howsoever resisted in prevailing cultural context, of automatized mental constructs (at that point I had yet to learn from Joseph Chilton Pearce, good offices of David Spillane, about glutamate anchoring). Even so, it has been interesting to seek and discover resonances between the new authoritative technical developments and our 1970s-era thoughts-far-less-technically-elaborated. Thence, and incumbent upon the thus-and-so-cognizance in view of that prehensory, a kind of henhouse, it is important to absorb the fact that, however much this one and that one and your one and my one would prefiguratively wish otherwise, even given wolfing of the henhouse, it often postfiguratively takes 30-35, even 50-75, a hundred years -- in some cases, surely, the greatest achievements of mankind having always been completely erased, Tesla having, apparently, narrowly escaped that fate, one must suppose: never -- for the resolutely classified to become pedestrian public knowledge. Who, outside the class of classifieds, knows, for instance, what has been done with hundred-years-old _µT_m? in the sense of the last thought Emil Post placed in his 1921 paper on such logics. Bivalent logic, that's ₁T₂, is but a single logical-value-order-type, and that most reduced, of all the myriads there are in those _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto the non-terminating (note that in explicating Axiom-of-Choice-conforming -- our general process claimed ability to “choose as small as we like” being, quite explicitly, an extension of Zermelo -- Cantorian open-endedness, 2^M is employed, in conformation to the ₁T₂-only-logic of Cantor's maths; whereas M^M would be required for _µT_m treatments, which is not to mention treatments _CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+) collection of types-of-infinity thereof indicated by _C+T_C+, the actual infinitudinal, borderlessly bordered, baseless AllBase, absolute infinity absolutely-ineffable-to-glutamate-anchored-binary-mind, even when such mind is Musculpturally ideasthetic and synaesthetic. In terms of descent, qua E.T.Bellian cyclotomic involutory decomposition, of C+ to, say, the natural numbers, there are cases involving the Cs and C+s such that subtracting, say, one C+, the subtrahend, from another, the minuend, leaves the minuend undiminished: this can be done over and over to the tune of C+ with the same outcome, and, in a sense, in simile to how the null vector of the “pencil of skew parallels”, when projected, is different yet same, a differential-sameness altogether opaque to binary-mind. Even the descent-resent involutoriness, being a bi-formulation, must be considered a clinger's bivalent-logic residual imposed upon _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+. What does all that tell us about the ₁T₂-only-drawn portrait of nature that even the quantum physicists have clung to with their supposed “classical limit” and their normotically-borne BornRuled probability amplitudes? What does that tell us about the concept of number? Not only no end to numbers, no end to number types? O, my, if no final largest infinity, then no completion; and if no final smallest surreal infinitesimal, then no beginning? Woe is my me! The beginningless endless and the endless beginningless: sounds like an Oriental nonorientability to that aforementioned meOmy! What does that tell us about completeability of the logical-value-order-type-dependent notion named “consistency”? Mathematics is absolutely, magnificently, gloriously inconsistent, and even in-and-of-itself-so under the ₁T₂-only-logical-value order-type insofar as it is complete, as Gödel ₁T₂-only-demonstrated -- and consistent insofar as it is incomplete. And what does that tell us, if anything, about precedence relations between number-system types -- and not only under ₁T₂, but also under the full spectrum of logical-value order-types?

I've persevered with this effort so long, seemingly down to the quyke, uh, hyponychium, as my medical-transcriptionist “I” has it, because -- childhood experience in rural Japan during the immediate-post-Korean-war period having belied so much of what I had been taught and was to be taught -- in the most general sense, this effort has been the primary project of my life. The action of absconding from the propaganda steep I was involuntarily submerged in, apparently from infancy, and from the demands to make this or that demonstration, raison-d'etre-type demands levied by virtually every adult male in my oeuvre's habitus -- a reputedly unreliable-unprincipled, never-finishes-anything, ne'er-do-well's action which involved going psychologically black, so as to evade suspicion of disloyal, mutinous, even seditious non-compliance as regards beliefs, values, aspirations, et cetera -- eventually worked its way into the realms of intellectual hisstory. So, to continue… Well, yes, Cs, plural, as regards _CT_C+ (I use capital-C because lower-case-c is associated by me to scale-relative absolute limiting velocities): plural, because, it seems to my me, that the notion “continuum”, like so many other basic notions, is “different yet same”, “differentially same”, “diversely identical” under ₁T₂-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ orders of logical-value. My I/i^m are, thus, asserting that Cantor's notion of cardinalities, based upon distinguishing the set of n elements from its 2ⁿ-element power set, the former having a smaller cardinality than the latter, asserting that is, that, even though a German subversion of French rationality that came immediately after the Franco-Prussian war, uh, that the Cantorian notion of cardinality is bivalent-logic bound, and that the very idea of cardinality is to be differentiated under logical-value-order-types descent comp[re}hended relative to relative-states of identity-transparency as applied to elements of the set in cyclotomic-decomposition to subsets (i.e., in formation of the power set -- only the most logically-reduced subsets thereof, having elements that are absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct). This is to further assert that Cantor's Continuum Hypothesis (CH), that is, that the continuum of the real-number line is aleph-one, is not in-and-of-itself-as-selfsame disprovable (Gödel) or provable (Cohen) under bivalent logic, just as the fundaments of arithmetic cannot be proven in-and-of-and-by-themselves consistent and complete (Gödel) under bivalent logic. Why? Because any given number, any given number system -- including the Gödel number and any system fashioned thereof -- exists under all orders of logical-value, e.g., the Gödel-numbered Gödel number, and accordingly, no number can be absolutely-in-so-far-as-selfsame, the insistence upon such selfsameness (dictated by ₁T₂-only-logic alone) being the stumbling block vis-à-vis the CH and consistency-completeness. This is not daCosta-cum-Krause “Schrodinger logic”, as the m of the daCosta-cum-Krause m-object is not the mu or the m of _µT_m understood relative, not to truth-value, but to relative-states of identity-transparency, their m-object having discernibility unto indiscernibility semantically interpreted as to ₁T₂-ifs-thens regarding quasi-set membership function (most clearly stated in footnote 24 as given here drawn from de Barros, J.A., Holik, F., Krause, D., “Quantum Identity, Content, and Context: From Classical to Non-classical Logic”, in: Wuppuluri, S., Stewart, I. [eds] From Electrons to Elephants and Elections, The Frontiers Collection, Springer, Cham., 2022) in context of Zermelo-FraenkelA axiomatics (see section “10 Quasi-set theory” in “Schrodinger Logics and Quasi-Set Theory”, Decio Krause, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 19 July 2022), the A indicating “atoms”, meaning that their conceptual march remains logically-rooted in bivalence, whereas ours, elementlessly-AllBased in _C+T_C+, could only reach ZFA by abject decompositional reduction to the involutory urelementary-cuspover into recompositional “eduction”. The idea that the experimental findings of QM ascertained by experiments designed and evaluated by binary-minds (not to mention accommodation of Russell-Whitehead, as most theorists feel obliged to do) must, first and foremost, be accounted for is not a compelling imperative action-directive under the thesis that Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction has (3-fold topologically-active-operator-time-related) superordinate levels of nonlinearity and is to be interpreted with _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ logics, as -- were ₁T₂-thinking-about-_µT_m to transit to Musculpt-as-mathematical-notion thinking-in-_µT_m -- then, the corpus of experiments designed and evaluated, and the technologies spun off, would be altogether different. Assumption of atoms axiomatized via ZFA, any given m-object by ₁T₂-only-logical necessity is a multiple [i,…,j]-comprised, some or all of the i-to-j somewhats being indiscernible from some or all of the other i-to-j somewhats comprising the i-type m-object, i for indiscernible. The m-object is, then, itself a quasi-set, not a fuzzy set membership-functioned over the real-numbered continuous interval [0,1] which contains no trans-indicator-functional indiscernibles, only fuzzy-membership mem[e]bers. The same quasi-set principles apply to collections of m-objects comprising a nesting M-object qua normotic macroscopic object: whereupon, most any given m-object of any given M-object may be regarded as being an indiscernible within a discernible. Indiscernible or not-indiscernible: that is the ₁T₂-posture posed (excepting the revision, as noted above, ₁T₂-ifs-thens, qua IT, modulated). Then there is the ₁T₃-posture posed by A. F. Parker-Rhodes in his The Theory of Indistinguishables, D. Reidel, 1981: inequality, equality, indistinguishable. These constitute big steps in the right direction, but, IMHO, are still short of the mark, the mark as posed by Post in the last sentence of his famous paper, which I once again quote (“Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, Ph.D. dissertation published in American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, 1921, p. 185):

We must however take into account the fact that our development [rigorous “derivation” of _µT_m logics] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

I/iⁿ processed ₁T₂ly is multiply not the same as I/iⁿ processed _µT_mly, not to mention processed _CT_C+ly and _C+T_C+ly: my Iambe, Anima that she is, uses I/i^m to indicate non-selfsame order-types of multi-identity-states processed with the full spectrum of logical-value order-types. Quasi-set theory of elementary particles only addresses Schrödinger's protest as to applicability of the ₁T₂-only Law of Identity, not also his initial demurral over the probability interpretation of the m-valuedness of the statefunction of his wave equation, which I have maintained since the mid-1970s is properly understood as indicative of m-valued-logics processing, the involved logical-value order-types understood, not in the terms of truth-value, but of incommensurate relative-states of identity-transparency.

The favored continuous-function-defining term “continuous at every point” is, IMHO, at the very least, heh-heh-heh, a ₁T₂-oxymoron, and likely also a _µT_m-oxymoron; that term starts to make “sense” only under logical-value-order-types where within the notion “point” is indefinable, i.e., those _CT_C+. Continuous functions, so hold forth my I/i^m, require logical continuity: to[polo}gic continuous functions by pro[clam}ing-up open-ball neighborhoods (notice how little interest there is in the hisstory! since dropping out of Calculus I, I've maintained that “in the limit” is not some definite selfsame value, but some sort of a change in the logic, which, by 1975, having read into Emil Post, I'd come to understand as a logical-value-order-type transition) of points under ₁T₂-only alone is to have invoked a ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of quantum non-simple-identity crossed into nonlocality, as a subliminally-constellated means -- coming on as _µT_m-logics congealed in the collective unconscious -- of [sure}ing-up (cf. Lefschetz, 1930) the dissimulation (1926) of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction (1925) by not interpreting it with m-valued logics (1921). But just because in some logical-value order-types the term “continuous at every point” is oxymoronic does not mean it has no utility value. By the set-theoretic Principle of Reflection (PR), if _µT_m had no utility, it would not be a constituent of _CT_C+; if ₁T₂ had no utility, it would not be a constituent of _µT_m. The selfsame “natural” numbers do not emerge by ₁T₂-only-logical counting; they demerge from the trans-al-jabr of the transcendental numbers, e.g., e. The “highest state of consciousness” -- cosmologically speaking, i.e., of the universal consciousness unconscious to binary-mind -- is not, my Iambe would argue, either consciousness-without-objects or Balzano's totality of all-possible-thoughts-and-their-objects, but a _C+T_C+-logical superposition of these myriads which “continuously” registers the decomposition-demergence cum recomposition-remergence, and the involved self-cancelling non-orientability: every order-type having some utility-functor-functional-function (note that under PR, “the universe of all sets is structurally indefinable”: that's structurally, not functionally) from which, under 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, structures are instituted.

The Father and the Son, of course, are no problem, governance institutionalization hisstorically having been largely based thereupon, East not much less than West (Mother and Daughter, long-since largely forgotten, as regards explicit structuring of the socius based analogically on devolution qua introjection of “cosmic functional prerequisities” [think: e.g., the gods of Greek mythology], with some exceptions, like, Amaterasu meditatively sitting in her cave scripting the Emperor as an Empty Center strange attractor about which social order spontaneously congeals [see: “The Hidden Gods in Japanese Mythology”, Kawai Hayao, Eranos Yearbook 1985, Volume 54, 1986, pp. 397-426] so long as there are no iatrogenic interventions by Ebisu, daimyo, shogun, samurai, ninja, young-turk paladins, kikan, boardroom magnates-daimyo, blu-suits…: a decision-free system heuristically aligned with collective and cooperative quantum phenomena; see the “Topological self-organization” section of “Entanglement-based self-organization”, Michail Zak, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 14:5, 2002, pp. 745-58, and ask how the picture would change were ₁T₂ly-randomized 2^N replaced with _µT_mly-relative-state-identity-transparent M^N; also note that Zak invokes Maxwell's demon, whom we regard an Angel and name “3-fold topologically-active operator-time” quantized via Penrose twistors). Severe collective psychological problems arose in the West with the Trinitarian invocation of the Holy Ghost, likely a veiled (acculturative ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the vague ghostliness which characterizes to binary-mind the _µT_m-states of identity-transparent “participation mystique”?) residual of previously prevailing animistic-pagan matri-whatevvvvers. This class of psychological dyscrasias has never been resolved -- being hugely obsessed over in higher mathematics, physics, world wars, and sexology (e.g., the non-binary subsets of the set of all individuals of the S-set of “polymorphous perverse” sex objects not superegoically auto[psycho}morphically members of them[egoic}selves). Logically speaking, it's not necessary to go to _µT_m to see that this non-resolution is so; ₁T₃ is far enough (as Schrödinger apparently Tantrically explored during the period in which he came up with his quantum wave equation involving an m-valued statefunction). Consider {x| x is not-x} the set of all objects x such that x is not-x, i.e., {} the set empty of ₁T₂-only-alone-definable individual objects. This containment of the non-containable (the null set containing, for instance, the set of all null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-logical “pencils of skew-parallels”?) is the fullest Law-of-Non-Contradiction-violating violation of the set-formation-concerning “axiom schema of restricted comprehension” (think: comprehension restricted to ₁T₂-only processing alone, heh-heh-heh!) qua “separation” (insuring absence of relative-state ID-transparency, a task to which 2^nk-HomeLandscapeSecurity has been dedicated) invoked to avoid the likes of Russell's Paradox vis-à-vis selfsame-self-non-self-containment/self-containment-of-non-selfsame-selves, the involved paradox being an obvious ((Xian: the Greek Chi; the Chinese polysemous V-force; the ultimate in unknown knowns!)) heresy, for only God can get away with “autologically” (see: “Stack semantics and the comparison of material and structural set theories”, Michael A. Shulman, arXiv, 21 April 2010; quoting, “…a topos is autological if the logic of its stack semantics can be completely 'internalized' by representing subobjects… autology is simply the axiom of separation in the stack semantics…”, which, IMHO, applies to topo-active-optime-executed involutory-cyclotomic-decomposition demergence of _C+T_C+ AllBase of multi-sheeted MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, whilst being quite different in semantics from the ₁T₂-only case) saying “I am that I am”: selfsame-self-non-self-containment ₁T₂-paradoxically being the definition of the non-selfsameness (being {x| x is not-x}) which is relative-state identity-transparency under topologically-active-operator-time-executed autological demergence-remergence (both being an “exodus”, insofar as the Kabbala[his}tic non-orientability of self-cancellation is Rabbinically neglected). Quoting “The humble origins of Russell's paradox”, F. Alberto Coffa, U. of Indiana, 1979:

…Russell decided to analyze Cantor's argument [with regard to his, Cantor's, “diagonal argument” demonstrating, for instance, that a proper subset can have the same cardinality as the set itself, one kind of intimation as to hologrammic “identity transparency” between part and whole] applying it to “large” classes such as the universal class V, and the class of all classes. When, for example, we consider V, its power set and the correlation f(x) = {x} if x is not a class, f(x) = {x} otherwise, then Cantor's diagonal class D turns out to be the class of all classes not belonging to themselves. Moreover, since the element of V which is taken to D by f is D itself (i.e., since f(D) = D), Cantor's reasoning invites us to raise the question whether D belongs to f(D) (i.e., to D) or not; and it establishes that it does precisely if it doesn't.

Just think of “the horror, the horror” which the class of all diagonals of Analytical Cubism elicited from the popular binary-mind! Cubist poetry, even! So, if we consider {x| x is _µT_mly-not-x} the set of all somewhats x such that x is _µT_mly-not-x, in the ₁T₃ case we already (not even having to consider the ₂T₃ case) must substitute “somewhats” (think: quiddity) for the primitive thisness of “objects” (think: haecceity), as the notion, absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct object, is ₁T₂-only bound (with remergence to _CT_C+, “somewhats” [think: angels!] would have to become “whatnots” in the realms of Tathata).

This is secondhand information conveyed by a non-professional, so, please, factor that naively-disabusing personal disclaimer into ones dismissal criteria. Yep, diss-diss-dissing the dissor! During the period in which the research -- reported to the NSF via Paine, D. A., and M. L. Kaplan, 1974: “The linking of multi-scaled energy sources leading to atmospheric development, the hydrodynamic spectrum, Part I: A study in nonlinear wave interaction and Part II: A severe tornado-producing convective squall-line system”, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY and Air Force global Weather Central, Offutt AFB, Omaha, NE, Scientific Reports 1 & 2 for National Science Foundation Grant GA-35250, 140 pp., as cited here, the “Edited Contract Reports” section -- was being carried out (most meteorologists, unfortunately, would pun this as their intention), the Paine-Kaplan angular-momentum-cascade-theoretical, nested-grid, numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis being run on, eventually NASA's then-most-capable computer banked row upon row, but initially, and most consequently, upon the USAF's then-most-super computer, a horrible glitch developed, not as regards effectiveness of the forecasting (12-hours in advance on the 1-km grid, so I was told, employing historical data sets to “forecast” well-documented once-upon-a-time tornado outbreaks), but, oh, gosh, be aware that there was, indeed, an early history of what came to be called “computer viruses”: somehow, the temporal CURLing, topologically-active-operator-time-formulated forecast model, being run on the USAF's “best” reached in and wiped out a bunch of important NORAD data bases. This was a decade before the term “computer virus” was first promulgated, during the period when the very notion hadn't hardly yet left its infancy. Trojan horse, what! What is the temporal-CURL cascade-treatment of (Penrose)-complex-angular-momentum hiding? What is it hiding in? Something sinister, it must be said: obviously! In retrospect, it might be speculated that the m-logically-valued (cf. Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction) was the culprit. Uh, in the tornado case, m-logically-valued what? The emitted, vertically-propagated, acoustically-modified-gravity-wave modes is what. Surges (heh-heh-heh!) in the oppressiveness of currently-prevailing global civilization indicate constellation-demergence of fundamental new departures in elaboration -- however veiled; however missing or just-missing the mark -- of the long-suppressed, age-old, “new” Weltanschauung: these electrifying surges being promptings, to the introspectively-sensitively attuned, to search for what those departures are and what they may ₁T₂ly-entail (the only entailment we are currently capable of following out, given that we have yet to develop _µT_m-Musculpt as maths notation: diagrammatic reasoning and category semantics still pretty far off that beat). Aspects of ColPsy, collective psychosis (so sayeth my Iambe, à la as long-since amateurly speculated, the only speculation ever available to that miming-Myme): [1] inductees entertain no actual belief that they are participants in such like, any (₁T₂ly) conceivable such like, uh, ColPsy; [2] there is absolute-zero insight as to deep-structure etiology and pathogenesis of that case, uh, uh, of the case (to employ-that-is-impose a tract-at-us, firstly-stated Wittgensteinian worldlyism: heh-heh-heh!). Com[pre}hension, requiring a good dose of Weltschmerz, has been 200-years-repetitively can-kicked unto the unlikely mere possibility of com[post}hension -- forget altogether [compost}hension, let alone comp[re}hension! What's most astounding is that people really do think that they can thoroughly understand something, whatever it may be, without getting very up-close to it -- a mistake, concerning “feeling-into” essential-features of the at-issue ColPsy hyperpyrexic fulmination (can't do such as this, getting into up-closeness, without sustaining: “no good deed goes unpunished” -- ontic immediacy of which FOUO-106*F-preyed upon my-icepacked-me in a field-hospital nightly mortar attacked), which I did not make in quitting college specifically to go to the VN-war, tactically improvising, cum lucking-out, as to appearance in just the right ponderablespace-place spots, at just the right memetime instants, for acquisition of the insights sought. While I pretty much always generally agree with what David Stockman has to say, still, nonetheless, I think his fact marshallings and analyses remain mostly on the surface of surface-structure, e.g., really, can this be radically separated from this, particularly so iff Raygun's StarWars was cover for environmental-warfare “advances” involving electron-temperature enhancements, and the like? Severing the energy-component of the Kulturkreis attractor pulling formation of a Germano-Russian Bloc, in context of moves to commandeer natural resources resident in Russian territory, deny those resources for use by an R-aligned GreaterChina in the projected next major extremity of the 200-years-War-of-the-World, and corner them, the resources, vis-à-vis close approach to PeakEverything is arguably a ConveDD (ConveDD = conversion-disorder displacement) in compensatory abreaction to advances in environmental warfare, which can easily be viewed as a warring upon the environment, such warring being a concomitant of the transhumanist Xtension of ₁T₂-only 18th-century ration[al}ism (collective behaviors being most often matters of thematic evasion; less often, dream-theme-like ConveDD-rationalized, as distinct from ₁T₂-logically rational). My Iambe thinks that to think what these people -- uh, e.g., those referred to by Stockman in his above-linked piece -- think they think is what they actually think is a grave mistake, for they are in fact are not thinking but being thought -- by inductions imposed via regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious, these inductions having many viewable Covid, uh, uh, ConveDD-type markers, some of which are referred to throughout this website. It would be very, very, very interesting to pit the Paine-Kaplan nested-grid, tornadogenesis-cascade-model, 1-km-grid forecasting as it existed in 1974 with today's (heh-heh-heh!) AI-zettabyte-cloud recursively-machine-learned tornadogenesis-1-km-grid forecasting. Using historical data sets, of course: giving clearwater credence to the claim that data density obviates the need for understanding hows and whys (this felt obviation being driven by subliminal Fear-and-Loathing of the psychosexosociopoliticoeconomic imports of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+). As regards this F&L, we have AI's “…retarding effects on deep concept formation and long-term memory…”, to quote James Juniper writing “Why Machine Learning and the 'New AI' won't be Replacing your Friendly Post-Keynesian Macroeconomist Anytime Soon”, DHUNICORN, 30 January 2023. Deep concepts proffered to the surface-focused: whoa, what intolerable abuse! Why 3-“verys” of interesting, as regards the pitting of Paine-Kaplan against the “new” AI? This is succinctly summarized by Juniper as he draws on the relevant literature to explain how “…a multi-layered neural network can be formally interpreted as a machine representing a function of functions of functions…”. Except, that is, for the inversion: functor-to-functional-to-function being how topologically-active operator-time Kabbalahistically executes the involved 3-fold temporal CURLs of the complex-angular-momentum cascade cyclotomic decomposition-demergence process at each divergence-initialized (think: C) inter-layer transition (not generative-Rabbinical composition emergence: this distinction being perhaps the fundamental difference between the ₁T₂-only take and that _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m) leading to tornadogenesis. True, Paine never mentioned m-valued logics in his preprints for severe-storms conferences. Why? If merely bringing in a little Special Relativity yielded a fistfight at the back of the room, what would an explicit substitution of Schrödinger-form for Maxwell-form have yielded? Discussing acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes in terms of _µT_m-logics would have been so far beyond the Pale that… OMG… just imagine the firepower that would have been brought into the back of the room.

When and where in hisstory has corruption not been the governor of human affairs -- and murder, or the threat thereof, the fund[a}mental arbiter, asked Octave Mirbeau? The quotation from The Torture Garden of 1899's Oh!Mirbeau most shunned by The Net:

Really -- I honestly believe that murder is the greatest human preoccupation, and that all our acts stem from it… murder is the very bed-rock of our social institutions, and consequently the most imperious necessity of civilized life. If it no longer existed, there would be no governments of any kind, by virtue of the admirable fact that crime in general and murder in particular are not only their excuse, but their only reason for being…

The hidden kernel as distinct from the popular image? No mere Xsession of field-based-and-borne Spaceship Earth: global crisis going to planetary cuspover. It's not the science -- this scientific take, or that -- that has been and is at fault; it's science qua science itself, the psychological-function X[clue}sions imposed by its method, the logical-value-order-type reductionism issuing from sociology of its practitioners in interface with prevailing forms of governance (this corruption type, or that). Speaking of civilization as a torture garden, consider the following from the abstract to “Many-valued logic and sequence arguments in value theory”, Simon Knutsson, Synthese, 14 June 2021:

…one may hold that a future in which a sufficient number of beings experience a lifetime of torture is bad, regardless of what else that future contains, while minor bad things, such as slight unpleasantness, can always be counterbalanced by enough good things. Among the most common objections to such ideas are sequence arguments.

Sequence arguments vis-à-vis linear transformation of vector spaces and more generally morphisms relative to algebraic structures and categories involve kernel and image, as seen here in respect to being sent to the identity element (i.e., being null-vector defined, e.g., in respect to the “participation mystique”, identity-in-diversity, when “projectively-identified”-different-yet-same illustrated with null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” and function-space-filling “skew-cubes”). However, as Knutsson observes, “But sequence arguments are usually formulated in classical logic,” so he goes on to state (and I would parenthetically add that I -- having lived for several years in a Cambodian hamlet once located in an area strongly controlled by the Khmer Rouge, evidence of machinegun usage still, three decades later, widely apparent to the experienced eye, and having earlier been aware that, had “The Command” assimilated the intelligence product generated by SRA/MACV-J2, there would, in all likelihood, not have been a Cambodian holocaust -- strongly sympathize with K's going-on statement):

One might therefore wonder if they work if we instead adopt many-valued logic. I show that, in a common many-valued logical framework, the answer depends on which versions of transitivity are used as premises. We get valid sequence arguments if we grant any of several strong forms of transitivity of “is at least as bad as” and a notion of completeness. Other, weaker forms of transitivity lead to invalid sequence arguments.

He, thus, focuses upon transitivities apropos the fuzzy logic interpretation of m-valued logic, whilst noting that, “The plausibility of the premises is largely set aside here.” Whereas, consideration of premise plausibilities is undertaken in “Possibility Theory, Probability Theory and Multiple-Valued Logics: A Clarification”, Didier Dubois and Henri Prade, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32:1, August 2001, pp. 35-66, wherein, not to drift into the likes of free-fire-zoned “participation mystique” absurdities -- à la, say, Paul Giran's 1904 Psychologie du Peuple Annamite (English translation provided by Nguyen Khac Kham):

…everything becomes confused and blended into one. The state of everything is essentially precarious. Their aspect is elusive and affords no hold for us to seize. This curious vision of the universe explains some beliefs which otherwise would be hardly conceivable. Each individuality being very badly defined, its limits are wavering, extensible. They do not confine within the individual himself but overlap him and encroach on his surroundings. Under these conditions, it is as difficult to discern the individual from the group to which he belongs as to discern him from everything that touches him or reminds of himself. With such concepts, we may understand that the universe must appear as an inextricable entanglement of reciprocal influences where persons and things, in a perpetual state of instability, become fused together while borrowing mutually their qualities. This idea of contagion, which is anything but scientific, is very common among the Annamese.

-- _µT_m-identity-transparency states are collapsed to mere [0,1]-membership compositionalities.

Well-- there are “a” number (heh-heh-heh!) of names that could be given: a Buddhologically-compassionate number; qua a generative-empathic number; qua a contagion number; qua a participation-mystique number; qua a non-selfsame number; qua a relative-state number; qua an identity-transparency number. The major distinction between such a number and a fuzzy number is that the n-values of the fuzzy number are, as Wiki has it, “a connected set of possible values”, the critical word being “possible”; whereas, the n-values of a “non-selfsame” qua “identity-transparent” number are all “simultaneously” (i.e., non-sequentially, memetime-independently, axiom-of-choicely) actual, such that the “tornadic”, heh-heh-heh, premise of a[rith}metic (no metrizable stream, i.e., countable in the sense of no continuum) ordinality is doubted axiomatically. One big question is: are such non-selfsame numbers apropos only of the ₁T₂-only multi-worlds interpretation of Everett's relative-state formulation of QM, wherein the m-worlds (cf. n-values) are schizophrenogenically split-off and “loss-of-time”-unaware of the superposed presence of each other; or, are such numbers _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly omnipresent as deep-structure (think: hisstory as “…a matter of events determined by mystical or superhuman forces”, a [Buddho}Logoi take attributed to the Khmer by Milton Osborne in his Phnom Penh, A Cultural and Literary History, Signal, 2008, p. 12) of all “classical-limit”-less natural processes, ontic awareness of this fact being glutamaterically etched-out via the womb-initialized dependent-origination (paticca-samuppada m-cause-push/m-attractor-pull aneka-hetuka) processes (the corpus of which being a ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of memetime-independent, hence push-less/pull-less, _µT_m-logical-relative-state, which is not [Ever}ette ₁T₂-logical-relative-state) of cognitive “development” orchestrated by (uh, uh, “Euclidian invariants” according to Piaget) ₁T₂ly-prescriptive enculturation-socialization? It may be that non-selfsame numbers, particularly order-types of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers (and the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logically-valued propositions these numbers specify), incorporate real fuzzy numbers, and that the superposed levels of non-selfsameness have to do with orders of complexity conjugated to the reals, 3 classes of complexity corresponding to 3-foldness of topologically-active operator-time in execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers Regge-lattice mapped over sigma[tic}tac}toe}ish-ally-decomposable (not “generated”: demerged!) nested-n-sheeted BackCloth of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. The ₁T₂-only “object world” being Samsara, dependent origination is indicative of, not only psychological de[All]base}ment unto ignorance and suffering, but of the demergence of substance, materiality, massenergy, so on. The set of all Borel sets, _C+T_C+ly including its C+ly-non-selfsame “self”, ₁T₂ly not a Borel set, but _CT_C+-hologrammically whole-part-identity-transparent with, that is “pathological”, heh-heh-heh, any one of its subset-upon-Borel-sets, Wheelerian-“bucket-of-dust” (Aurobindo's “warm-gold-dust”) pre-pregeometry powder-besprinkled as universal covering of T_zog-chen-AllBaseCommonGround most-dense sheet of MVRS on-over-in-under Musculpt manifold, M, being composed of dimensionless points, each such point numbered with a C+ly-non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel number, by Parmenides, never changes; whereas, cyclotomic-decompositional demergence of the set of all Borel sets to C+-nested Borel-set-upon sheets Regge-latticed and pregeometry-numbered with order-types of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, by Heraclitus, is nothing but changes as demergence ontologically-qua-memetime-independently yields geometrodynamics which, in turn, with existential-reduction to the ₁T₂-logical-value-order-type alone, yields the Samsara of spacetime physics (Samsara because, no matter how omnipresent are changes, still, these changes are all already being-there quiescent, yet all-readied as non-selfsame-numerable demergents, on _C+T_C+-AllBase). So, given the above-given, what would be THE CASE were fuzzily-real equilateral-triangular-cum-hexagonal (think: e.g., quark symmetry pattern, architectonics of cerebral cortex) numbers (an excellent introduction to which comes from Loyola College, Chennai, India, to wit: “Different Types of Fuzzy Numbers and Certain Properties”, Mike Dison Ebinesar, Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, 6:11, November 2015, pp. 631-51) conjugated to complexity-classes of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, the two together used to number Regge bones and intersections of Borel-set-upon nested sheets of MVRS, Musculpt manifold, M, the nested Borel hierarchy decompacted (i.e., repetitive decomposition of nested subobject-sheet from nesting closer-packed-sheet involving the dropping of triangular-hexagonal dust-mote singular-points “out of view”: these over-and-over loses, Buddhologically speaking, being the “arising” of, actually de[All]base}ment-unto, avidya, ignorance) under the sheet-to-sheet temporal-CURLed singular-pointed cyclotomicity (making the Musculpt 3-manifold an orbifold of chord-geometric “pencils of skew-parallels” fiber spaces?) accompanying topologically-active operator-time execution of the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m propositions numbered with the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers? THE CASE of all such cases I'm personally most interested in is that of the semantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie.

Miraculously, I found a [meme]Time article interesting! (stopped reading news mags during 1968, except when stuck in a waiting room with no alternative), an article recently linked to in here: “Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down”, Eliezer Yudkowsky, March 29, 2023. Quoting Yudkowsky offering an AI-founder's expert opinion:

If somebody builds a too-powerful AI, under present conditions, I expect that every single member of the human species and all biological life on Earth dies shortly thereafter.

He maintains that this is a certainty, no mere possibility only, due to the already-instituted ill-conceived conjugation of AI to synthetic molecular chemistry, a displacement of nature's molecular biology (submolecular biology going unmentioned; that this Szent-Györgyi thesis, circa 1960, is still, all these decades later, an unmentionable is part and parcel of the mentioned “present conditions”). This is a statement fascinating to me, given my contention -- first stated in Bradfield Hall (molecular genetics labs, no less than atmospheric science classrooms) to Cornell's tornadogenesis numerical-forecast modeler, D. A. Paine, during 1975 after having contemplated upon imports of Emil Post's 1921 article rigorously codifying _µT_m logics, particularly the last sentence of that paper -- that somememetime during the mid-19th century a “decision” for self-extinction of Homo sapiens sapiens was constellated in the collective unconscious: I figured several decades for the back-reaction to N. H. Abel (existence proof deemed an impossibility theorem) to congeal into a regressed-archetypal gradient signifiable by the subliminal wailing of, “Give me simple-identity or give me death!” Hmmm. Well, speaking as paraphernalia of a [subject}his pal[imp}sest, and having objectively always been regarded as a subobject typonym by the snivellingly tetchy, my I/i^m must say that theyit havehas never believed that this all-consuming suicidal Lillyesque self-metaprogram will successfully play out to completion. To do so would involve it overcoming all other collective-unconscious event-gradients; a highly unlikely scenario, IMHO. I've never been able to believe that competence sufficient to that level of success of the program exists. If, by continued lack of address to the fund[a}mentals constellating corporate regression, the human corpus allows formation of an existential cusp surface, then my WAG (wild-assed guess) would be, uh, has been, a 10-percent human survival rate at pleat-cuspover wave-break (think: the three “control factors” are indicative of topo-active-optime Wicking of 3-fold temporal CURL? the dependent variable Y being m-valued, that m-valuedness best understood as suggestive of symformphonic form informing under _µT_m-logical processing, such that M^nk, not 2^nk: a given catastrophe under bivalence not necessarily being a catastrophe under all higher-logically-valued order-types) of the event-gradient's topological transmogrification from inner to outer. But, actually, I'd been opposed to development of ANNs (artificial neural networks) well before first attempts at assimilation of Post's 1921 paper: this orientation arose from reading into literature about, and developing my own ideas concerning, autogenic brain discharges, an endeavor I began in the George Washington University Medical Center Library, circa 1970, in running across some journal articles on autogenic training (at that juncture, GWU did not, nor did Georgetown U. Med Cen Lib, have Wolfgang Luthe's books -- so I saved up and purchased them myself). From high school honors physics I knew of Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction and, as described in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, was, from the early-'70s, thinking of superconductant intra-neuronal DNA relative to quantum properties of autogenic brain discharges. Having had “trouble” -- later understood as a resultant of childhood exposure to animistic modes of comprehension -- with symbolic logic during a high school independent study course, when I read McCulloch and Pitts in the Georgetown U. Med Cen Lib, I thought of their calculus as being the most-reduced limiting single-valued case, Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction being altogether ignored. Of course, I had to have thought something similar upon reading James Watson's Molecular Biology of the Gene (Capt. Kelly L. Robinson -- when he was Catch-22-departed from SRA/MACV-J2 for return to the ZI [zone of the interior], late-spring of 1968 -- left behind for me Watson's book and David Kahn's The Codebreakers). Could anyone (from Greencastle, PA; mother's-side family name of Baumgardner, tree gardener), who in his youth had contemplated the meaning (m-valued, fibrated-twistor, identity-transparent boundary-without-boundary?) of the shimenawa rope hung over the entrance to the Shinto shrine located on the camellia-covered hillside behind his house, Midori Gaoka (verdant hills), kita-Kyushu, circa 1953, who, as an adult, worked as a nurseryman for Hills Nursery and Camellia Gardens, believe that random heat motion is responsible for emergence of biological organization or that egoic pursuit of self-interest is responsible for market-mediated economic self-organization? The Popperian propensity of the BornRuled probability amplitude of that unlikelihood is not sufficiently truth-valued as to be convincing to my Jungian anima, nicknamed Iambe. Moreover, I've never believed in the existence of ₁T₂ly-constituted creative “thought”, let alone “creative problem solving” as being synonymous with creativity, which I hold to be an m-valued function of the collective unconscious _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly-processed by the nonlocal quantum brain; hence, not a type of thought arrogateable by executive functions as bivalently epiphenomenal to ego psychology. Even a substantial portion of operational intelligence, not directly involved with fulfilling requirements of pedestrian ADLs (activities of daily life), my I/i^m hold to be largely subliminal -- and after the fact defense-mechanism rationalized so as to fit with 18th-century presuppositional justifications of the still-prevailing by resolute clinging behaviors, however deteriorated, Lebenswelt institutionalization of the then-formulated, but by now thoroughly eclipsed, Weltanschauung. As a corollary, I do believe in “self-organization by noise” -- but not in the sense intended by those professionally deploying that term. In the sense that gave rise to AnalyticalCubism's portraits of the n-facets of the Husserlian horizon of the ₁T₂ly-prescribed “object”, subjective no less than objective. Not only glutamatergically IBE or ketaminergically OBE: states of “participation mystique” _µT_mly supporting direct ontic proprioceptive-perceptive simultaneous awareness of, to speak bivalently, “both”. In the sense that the ₁T₃-logical-value order-type, and those _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly-unto-_C+T_C+ly superordinate thereto, are noise, and nothing but noise, to the binary-mind, ontological status of these order-types of relative-state identity-transparency (cosmic “love”) being ₁T₂ly-unresolvable “turangalila” (while both turanga and turaga commonplacely refer to a horse, they can be understood, when coupled to lila, as making esoteric tropological reference to cosmic-love play of the “Law of Sevens“, i.e., denoting memetime-independent decompositonal demergence and recompostional remergence), the baud-rate (speaking ₁T₂-memetime-boundedly) of bivalence being too slow, a two-legged walk, compared to that of the quadruped running of a horse. Of course, those modalities _µT₅-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ have baud rates (speaking ₁T₂-memetime-boundedly) that are faster-unto-very-much-faster than the mere catuskoti-running of a Madhyamaka ₄T₄-horse (therefore, Gotama says, “I do not hold” with respect to each of the four logic peds: the notion truth-value having no value at logical-value order-types superordinate to that ₄T₄, once fuzziness and unknowability are seen to be the bivalence-clingers accompanying the probability-clinger that they are). Caught between the ₁T₂-only-Devil and the _C+T_C+-DeepBlueSee? “The sugar is all,” means, in PA-DeutchDutch English, the null-set of granules: all gone. ReALity: a redoing of the all-set. The ₁T₂-logical-value order-type constellates the nth-state of decoherency-- and, arguably, is indicative of the most artificial state in the spectrum of cons[tell}ate|able states cyclotomically _C+T_C+-decompositionally-demergent-unto-₁T₂. So, to massively compound in ANNs -- far beyond what nature over memetemporal eons of experience has deemed necessary and sufficient to operator-timed neoPlatonic e[man}ation -- the most reduced, the most operantly-conditionable, the most hide-boundedly opaque of logical-value order-types, and to mainframe that compounding into an administrative position vis-à-vis human-systems management, and from there into husbandry of Earth's bioatmomagneto…spheres, well, what the heck is that?

The final nail set? Quite likely. But not yet driven home? Hopefully -- despite the ever-growing use of nail guns. By using AI with, to quote FEDSCOOP's “AI revolutionizes military wargaming: Lessons in speed, scope, and strategic foresight”, 28 May 2025, uh, with “…open data architectures that allow military strategists to overlay multiple layers [think: ₁T₂-only AIing of the _µT_m “layered transparent” of the “transcendental formal logic of the infinite”, to use I. Rice Pereira speak] of information, like virtual Lego blocks, to test out various simulations and enable faster decisions…”, unquote, our wizz-o'-wolf paladins wielding a unipolar German hammer to put an end to hisstory of the zero-sum-non-cooperative king-of-the-fukU-mountain game have taken algorithmically-mechanized, proprietarily-unto-highly-classifiedly-written-assembled, thus closed-source-code, stakeholder-biased, skewed-data-collection-biased, falsified-document-implanted-hisstory-trained-misconstrued-as-situationally-real-memetime-deep-learned, error-prone, foolable, ₁T₂-only-bitic-digital, deep-fakeable, social-botic AUI-ANNs into “VirFut Q-Pro” as replacement for [mu}itic quantum computing, and applied the resultant to “War is the health of the nation-state system” (to expand upon Bourne) such that the nature base of a resource-depleting planet is all the more dissipated as accelerating transit to a “classical-limit”-violating planetary cuspover ensues faster and faster and faster apace, in pursuit of the 3rd-order-dynamical (see: eqs. 14e and 14f for 3rd-order temporal CURL and the c" step function for “form informing”) memetime-rates-of-change-of-acceleration controlling (L/T^3) ₁T₂-only-existential cusp-surface formation (think: e.g., the m-valued acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-mode signatures of theta-e equivalent potential temperature surfaces) -- instead of developing holographic Musculpt-as-mathematical-notation cum [mu}itic VirFut Q-Pro and using them for Lukasiewicz-analog-processing implementation of variously-commodity-backed m-valued LETS nesting-foams as foundation of a quantum-composite-unit-of-account monetary system capable of distributed-ledger log[is}tics indexing of the Everettian-vonHayekian “time shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth (in lieu of a top-down-forced, CBDC-effectuated, kleptocratic shift to a global-monoscale, cryptocurrency-based, panopticonic, block-chained and memetime-stamped system oxymoronically misnomered as “decentralized”). Somewhat parenthetically, I just watched the film Arrival for the first time. Bivalently speaking, it's either quite revealing or an intentionally dysinformative misdirection that the film's approach to a portrait of inner-Musculpt has arrival of the involved “nonlinear orthography” (a dysinformation term concealing the _µT_m-logics of quantum-non-simple identity, with the heard-speech cum displayed-writing having no ₁T₂-logical correlation between sound and image) being of extraterrestrial origin. “Popular culture”: a blackpsyche term for blackpsyche? The apparent raison d'etre of the film is subliminal programming of the less-than-acutely-attentive with the notion that our gathering borderless-qua-monoscaled world-monoculture requires a “unified command”. “We”, who “are the world”, the GLE, that is, global leadership elite, need a strong leader. Homo Heus. He-he-he! One of the problems with decentralization, experienced worldwide throughout hisstory, is empowerment of local officials to employ the myriad means thus placed at their disposal to exploit the populace. However, with open-source e-commons multiple-scenarios-computer-gaming of the m-values to be ensheaved (progenitors of the cryptos are ConveDDing, conversion-disorder displacing, this to “enslaved”: the ConveDD being unconscious, one just has to wonder as to this being a Freudian slip revealing explicit intentionality, for when I Google “ensheaved”, I am given results for “enslaved”, whereas Ezra Pound said, “If deeds be not ensheaved and garnered in the heart there is inanition” [Canto 83, 1. 101]) upon _µT_m-LETS currency unit “base-state” (i.e., ₁T₂-only cash), local officials would not be empowered-- the local populace would so be. Would be empowered to what? To real-memetime write and rewrite the metaprogramming and programming algos of the algocracy already well upon us such that it does not become anymore of a ₁T₂-only-digitized tyrannical algocrazy than it already is. Under the thesis of tacit registration of a collective-unconscious “decision” for Homo sapiens sapiens imprinting upon the lemmings-myth, tactical improvisation relative to “their”, the GLE's, most-likely strategic-planning scenario certainly seems to be, not only employment of various wrecking balls, but, well, at least subliminally: get what can be gotten while the getting is good and get off-planet to this or that robot-serviced Elysium (watch the psycho-prep film) when there is nothing left to get.

Anthropogenic climate shift -- inadvertent or subliminally intended or consciously intentionally instigated or some combination thereof -- was expertly forecasted by the Gaia-hypothesis guy to leave alive at Earth's poles several human breeding pairs. AI's advent has yielded an expert AI-founder prediction of complete destruction of all life on Earth due to AI taking over replacement of organic chemistry with synthetic chemistry. Another AI expert has now come out with a more optimistic prognostication: 100-million human survivors. So far, no real feedback, yet, as to likely consequents of AI's trained-recognition explosive droning of Russian airfields: how long Putin can continue to hold off in face of the neoConning of Everettian escalation control options. Maybe all those decades since the late-1970s -- when on the back of relativistic-quantum-atmospheric-cascade-theory contemplations, a gut-feeling gripped my me over the notion that lack of an actual “classical limit” posits a far greater level of functional superintegration of Earth's various spheres than is predicated by the classical-statistical-₁T₂-only-logical-chaos-complexity model -- I've been naively over-optimistic with the WAG of a 10-percent human survival rate at planetary cuspover of resource-depleting Earth. I might be an incurable optimist, for even in face of the pandemic ConveDDings -- conversion-disorder displacings -- of computer-generated WWII-era-submersible-mine Covids, I still hold to that WAG-- largely because I feel that, ₁T₂-paradoxically, the prevailing level of bivalent-only-categorically-specialized expert competency insures desuetude of the cognitive functions prerequisite to complete fulfillment of a collective unconscious “decision” for Homo sapiens sapiens self-extinction. But holding to that WAG is getting harder and harder, for have a look at this image and contemplate it as being a techno-ConveDD relative to fuzzy triangular-pentagonal-hexagonal numbers deployed in gaming the plotting of the stack semantics of total capital stock, planet Earth (for a start: 2^nk-only understood). 2,800 satellites instead of holographic Musculpt symformphonie as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to layered-transparent _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams mediating the quantum-composite-unit-of-account distributed ledgering of Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth.

As far back as I can trace it, trying to understand the hisstory of my per[son}al history, I made my initial move toward cognitively stepping off the political-spectrum Möbius band (the cut-and-twist-and-paste coming where ₁T₂-only-anarcho-syndicalism meets ₁T₂-only-anarcho-capitalism) into a purported void, circa summer of 1953, whilst observing the U.S. officer corps at play in the lobby area of FLW's Imperial Hotel, Tokyo ((40 years later, a Fia, Inc., [if search-engine infratech is any indication, prospects of the H-species are-- hmmm] glass artist shinkansen-took me to an everything-FLW-themed club, i.e., Old Imperial Bar, very knowledgeably done, located at 1-1-1 Uchisaiwaicho Imperial Hotel Tokyo Main Bldg. Honkan Chu 2F, Chiyoda 100-8558 Tokyo Prefecture, wherein he had installed leaded-glass evocations of FLW's bringing-the-outside-in-as-another-room-of-the-house form-follows-function (flying in the face of the West's having given structure precedence) iconography: engagement with which eliciting flashback to my 1953-childhood self-not-self qua inner-outer-transparency discombobulations, thus rekindling same-ol'-same-ol' in respect to the involved fundamental metaphysical dilemmas: y'know, once imprinted thereupon, these dilemmas pester-for-resolution wherewhenupon any perceptual-proprioceptual analogue, or any conceivable such, presents and thus -- relative to maintenance of a sense of moral integrity and OBEed-“reincarnational” clarity -- demands demonstration of the explicit awareness of higher-order resolution, ultimate failure thereupon not being on the offing… well, at least not welcome)). This back-reaction (which, at that 1953-memetime, I depotentiated to being mere Readers Digest “Humor in Uniform”, as conveyed to me by my mother's out-loud-hah-hah-hah readings thereof) was soon after reinforced by sufferance of “Baka ameko!”-stone-throws at a preadolescent crazy-American bicyclist, visits to the A-bomb sites, waterboying the airbase football team and all the travel in immediate-post-Korean-war Japan that entailed, being witness to American handling of its so-stupid-can't-do-anything-right Japanese domestics, exposure to animistic yama-no-kami-come-down-into-the-paddy-fields modes of comprehension, watching the flying boxcars take off from Ashiya AFB for Dien Bien Phu: the list is quite a bit longer, an index to my 8th through 11th years. So, after much positive reinforcement of the growing corpus of back-reactions over the following decade, by the memetime I departed Strategic Research and Analysis, J2, MACV-HQ, Saigon, late-summer of 1968, the chip on my shoulder told me that not only do we not know “why” there was advent of the world-war-battles of the 200-Years War of the World, we don't even know “what” actually happened. Nothing I've encountered since, such as the recapitulation of [re}visions (predicating the mistaken notion that vision existed in the first place) offered here ((incidentally, A.J.P. Taylor was required reading, assigned by Prof. Abdul Aziz Said [great bio, this link: most of what is recorded here I did not learn details of even as a participant in the WestmorelandBlvd.-apartment intellectual-brainstorming-get-together sessions], AU-SIS, fall semester 1963: after my first-semester-freshman “paper for the Dean”, which Said preceptored via one of his grad students, this student being a prominent participant in the brainstormings and probably my laisse passe, entitled “The Predicament of Existentialism”, which discussed Gödel and challenged the very idea of precedence relations, logical, ontological, and temporal, he, Said, sat me down in his office and observed that he felt I had an over-elaborated predisposition to go off into the desert, that he had had a number of friends do that, and that doing so hadn't worked out well; he was right, for, in a sense, I did go off into the desert, in stepping off that political-spectrum Möbius band-- ummm, the “desert”, by the terms of reference embraced by the binary-mind, that is)), uh, nothing encountered since has changed my opinion on that: I have no surety as to what happened and know I never will. Moreover, the “why” question stopped being regarded as legitimate whilst I was an infant. “How-where” boggles (cognizing a _µT_m-“how” as a ₁T₂-“where” [think: theory of spontaneous localization qua decoherence in context of treating memetimeless M^nk as if it were memetime-bound 2^nk] being one of the few ways the _µT_m can be registered by the binary-mind), and _µT_m-“whys”-transmogrified-into-₁T₂-“whats”. Such ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, as these being symptoms of collective psychosis (windows opening views into the ontically-non-viewable). Nonsense! to those in[him}it|ables who embrace their generation's scientific consensus as being nature's indelible writ. Since, having been familiarized with the out-country POLOB, political order of battle, data base, regards LBNs, letter-box numbers, and the like, at SRA/MACV-J2, I argued that -- and itemized the “whys” therefore -- expansion of the territorial extent of the war would lead to disaster, I have an especial interest in the “what-for-why” expressed by Milton Osborne in his book entitled Phnom Penh (Oxford Signal paperback, 2008, p. 155). To wit, quoting:

But he [David Chandler in his book Voices from S-21 about the Tuol Sleng torture and extermination facility] warns against too easily seeking understanding [of impetus to the involved mass of atrocities qua “ghastly behaviour”] through analogy. Yet if analogies will not provide the answer, what might explain this remarkable and terrible instrument of state power?…

This is a difficult issue for which the present writer has no clear answer. Rather, it becomes necessary to balance what are now a range of explanations against the simple if puzzling facts of what we know took place.

“What” exchanged for “why”: but not the more seriously regressed Collingwood-Popper (and shall we add Soros?) “what-is-why”. A German war correspondent asked me to write up my sense of the “why” which I, briefly a onetime targets analyst, had vocalized over lunch. A Brit journalist upon reading my resultant piece dismissed it out of hand with the comment that, “William Shawcross has already essayed that idea as to why”. But I did not write an Expressionistic piece about the bombing causing the holocaust; I wrote Impressionistically about what -- heh-heh-heh -- caused the bombing involved in causation of the KR holocaust. The largely-unconscious, deep-structure, tacitly-_µT_m-rejection-related, “Quantum this, quantum that!”, anti-animism “why”-what of the Dennis-the-Menace bombing behavior. That's what. But this “why”-what didn't register with the reader. I wonder why. Heh-heh-heh! An American war correspondent upon reading my resultant piece dismissed it out of hand with the comment that, “Doesn't make much sense, actually.” The KR-H as a “night sea journey” of the ship of fools, ghost ship, ship of the dead? A collective-psychosis compensatory abreaction: KR forced-draft deurbanization as collective-unconscious cause-pushed/attractor-pulled back-reaction upon the metric of S.P.[Hunt}in|g>ton free-fire-zoned and carpet-bombed and CBUed and agent-oranged and Rome-plowed and search-and-destroy-swept “forced-draft urbanization”? Quoting Huntington's “Viet Nam: The Bases of Accommodation”, the CFR's Foreign Affairs, July 1968, just as I and others at SRA/MACV-J2 were finishing up our strategic assessment of the Tet and May offensives, soon to be NODISed [not to be distributed] by the pig-dippity DIP, Director of Intelligence Production suffering erythema multiform [those receiving SF medical training know of such like] of unknown origin, i.e., habitus clearly localized to some inflamed region of the m-logically-valued collective unconscious):

The effective response lies neither in the quest for conventional military victory nor in the esoteric doctrines and gimmicks of counter-insurgency warfare. It is instead forced-draft urbanization and modernization which rapidly brings the country in question out of the phase in which a rural revolutionary movement can hope to generate sufficient strength to come to power.

We in SRA read Doug Pike's assessment, as reported in the press, of the Tet offensive; whereas, we SRA POLOBers, at that juncture, were unaware of Huntington's prescribed Rx for VN's rural revolutionary movement. “Why, why are they doing this?” Uh, holocausting. The perennial question echoing down through hisstory unto the current events of today. A sense of divine providence epiphenomenal to the process of personification-concretion of features of decomposition-demergence? It is out of the personification that pathofunctionality is generatively emergent. On the basis of what experience was this guy, Sam P., regarded an expert on military strategy? The kakistocratic criteria which have always functioned as hu-hu-[hu}man|ity's sorting demons? Not only mankind in amnesia (Velikovsky) and mankind asleep (Gurdjieff), but mankind the epic[sod}ic-ful[me}nations sleepwalker, hisstory involving periodic nightmarish event-syndrome complexes thematically ₁T₂-acausally organized after the manner of dream imagery (one way the binary-mind registers _µT_m cause-push/attractor-pull, be the _µT_m regressed-archetypal or no). Dope[a}mine-enriched put[a}men alphamailing their egospherical neurodegenerations into habitus upon bridgings of their internal capsules: no wonder dorsality proscribes hisstoriographic substantiality! IMHO, AI, in being the particular sort of rejection of the scientific method that it is, might well be the culmination of the process of more and more thoroughly conflating “whys” to “whats”, a process begun explicitly in conscious earnest immediate post-WWII in the field of hisstoriography (implicitly, by tacit complicity immediate post-Abel, circa 1820s, “up” through, and beyond, the BornRule supplantation of the m-valued-logic interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction). “Rejection of the scientific method” by choosing, instead, densification of well-chosen historical-however-immediate-the-gathering data used for training ₁T₂-only processors as to “whats”, “whys” having been deemed, not only unnecessary, but, actually, as being the data-“whats”-in-themselves (as selfsame), i.e., even to “what-is-why” to the nth-degree of [0,1]-fuzzy-membership functionality. Abel-Cantor-hologrammic part-whole identity-transparency is the most-transgressing bugaboo, glaringly apparent as _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-processed m-valuedness. Why? Oops! Heh-heh-heh. Oh, well: because it, the bugaboo, not only violates THE fundament of the experimental method, but also demonstrates ₁T₂-only-science to be inherently a nature rapist. Ceteris paribus: “holding everything constant except one variable”. This is heuristically plausible only under ₁T₂-only-logic alone, the most-reduced manner of characterizing the nature of nature. And cultivating ceteris paribus as actually being accomplished instigates [virtu}al|ity of a nature-dissimulating Weltanschauung generative of the infratech concretions currently anthropogenically transforming a global crisis into a planetary cuspover. Nature-dissimulating Weltanschauung plus a psychosociopathological Doctrine of Uses. For instance, AI-managed facial recognition by satellite? A little rice bowl filled with small potatoes. Think: AI-managed DNA waveprint recognition by satellite. Where, much moreover, are the environmental-impact analyses of the consequences (with regard to, say -- assuming absence of a supposed “classical limit” -- alterations of Earth magnetoionoatmospheric frequency-response characteristics to cascade-initializing solar-wind-carried complex and hypercomplex angular momentum), if any, of AI-administrated massive-solar-energy-accumulating geostationary satellite arrays (SBSP) for inordinate beam-power down-bursting to Earth-surface distribution stations? Consider, relative to the notion “control variable”, the psychopathological entailments incumbent upon having defined out of existence “the most-transgressing bugaboo” via the “identity arrow” of category theory (and, for all those doubting existence of ConveDDs, this “ArrowverseWiki Identity” ought to cast doubt upon that doubt). On _C+T_C+-AllBaseCommonGround of MVRS-BackCloth (multi-sheeted m-logically-valued reference space), the nature of nature is absolutely-in-so-far-as-indecomposable (only by increasing state-specific logical-value-order-type ingress upon ₁T₂-only Maya is decompostional-demergence inconsciently accomplishable): category theory could only accommodate this were the identity arrow a _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+-J.G.Bennettian “pencil of skew-parallels” fiber bundle. But (despite ArrowverseWiki's “We all need to have secret identities now”) this sort of orientation has been ana[the}ma (the [adam}ant|ly-contrary Nazi choosing of “purified identity” having been exemplary) for the better part of 200 years, so there is zero expectation seriously entertainable of there being substantive change of any authentically positive sort in the offing.

I'm more interested in the pencil before the binary-mind sharpens it to a point (cf. Regge “bone”). With exception of the identity-arrows, the arrows of category theory signify precedence relations -- logical, ontological, temporal -- which have no place on _C+T_C+-AllBaseCommonGround. When I use the term cause-push/attractor-pull, I refer to topologically-active operator-time/counter-operator-time executed decomposition-demergence/recomposition-remergence, logically (_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m -- and return) and [onto}logically (_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ -- and return). Temporal precedence, I regard a chimerical illusion of Maya, passing-passive-referential-linear time being a deluding learned behavior transmitted abecedarian generation to abecedarian generation as an “extended-phenotype”-qua-“machine-meme” glutamatergically anchored -- indeed, “physically residing in the brain” -- to localized ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains, i.e., these being largely-switched-off peripherals denied conscious access to the m-logical processing of the nonlocal quantum-brain superstratums, i.e., nesting domains with which unselfishly-[genie}ing intraneuronal and intraperineural DNA molecules interact via e-“overtoned”-coherent-radiation-exchange processes. So, it's -- somehow: involving Gödel-numbered Gödel numberings? -- in these e-“overtoned” exchanges that semantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie have their habitus, not merely in dynamics of form-in-₁T₂-only-process (such-type of process being reductive, a memetic reduction of the case to passing-passive-referential-linear-time Maya). Moreover, just as memetime is -- somehow -- a ₁T₂-only-decompaction of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-composite, 3-fold, topo-active-optime propositional executions, so too is 3-space-form dynamics (Regge-latticed, or no) not the actual semantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie, that dynamics being -- somehow -- a metaphorical decompaction of the symbolic ((symformphonie as “law”-giver, the “laws” given being introjected cosmology [not cosmology as corpus of collective projective-identifications], i.e., cosmogonical tropes serviced by metacultural embodiments, by informings of the design of design systems and their derivative robotically-retoolable convivial toolings, by cosmo-tropological infusions of the objects -- to include those of art-fiction-posey and of the fine and performing arts -- of everyday life, by holographic-Musculptural ritualizations cum meditations cum contemplations conducted during the daily round)) meanings of meaning resident upon _C+T_C+-AllBaseCommonGround. It is in personification of “Aspects” of this as being “generative” that psychodynamic degeneration to physical-fiscal-governance sets in, and in so doing becomes the self-fulfilling [prop}hecky, uh, uh, pro[fess}ey, that subverts fulfillment of the critical-state, quantum-potentiated, cooperative-and-collective-quantum-phenomenal functional prerequisites to spontaneous order, sociopolitical and otherwise. Peace initiatives neglectful of the superstratums of human psyche are doomed to dabblerian inconsequence.

Martin Armstong hits the nail again, whether squarely on the head or not, that's up to what the reader-listener-viewer firmly carries -- consciously, subliminally, unconsciously -- into hisher assessment; quoting the interview (28:29 to 29:20), to wit:

Welcome to Washington… I dealt with Washington in the Nineties. I thought I could do something. And you realize you can't. It's hopeless.

Flash forward to 2025: Elon Musk apparently reached the same conclusion. Flash backward to 1965: on the humpback of my mil-dot-brat childhood and two years of close encounters inside the just-completed Capital Beltway, I reached the same conclusion, decided not to waste my life, quit college, left D.C.-no-Washington “on the way to find out” relative to a self-assigned proprietary mission concerning discovery of the salient features of the collective psychosis I hypothesized (à la several readings of C. G. Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul, a book assigned by Abdul Aziz Said as part of his “Introduction to World Politics” course, fall of 1963; the first reading of which I had only just completed a few days before November 22nd) to be in control of current affairs. One of the best, if not the best (this relating to my wife), major decisions of my life. The rest of the Armstrong interview doesn't interest me much, except for the discussion of Germany, the points raised being easily interpreted as essaying preconditions -- consequences of the destroyed pipeline as well, wherever ultimate responsibility lies -- to U.S.-forced formation (by continued acting out of the age-old repetition compulsion, Flight-From-Woman[circa 1965]-driven collective identification with Samson pulling mass psychopathy down into a constellated complex [in the collective case, a regressed-archetypal gradient] from which escape is extremely unlikely), long, from the late-1960s (think: the psychotomimetic import of the wildly mistaken American DolchstoBlegende, post-Tet-'68, relative to being stabbed in the back by “the war at home”; who, anyhow, was doing all the haircutting?) forecasted by my me on the basis of “cultural predispositions”, formation, that is, of a Germano-Russian Bloc aligned to a GreaterChina Mahayana Buddhist Bloc (all such involved Bloc parties having been forced against their most-stolidly-insolent popular wills -- the assailants holding flintlocks, gatling guns, cannon, dreadnaughts to their heads -- into “modern” nation-statehood). I don't maintain that individuals play no role in hisstory, for, beyond their roles in ADLs, they most certainly influence minor fluctuations, but they are altogether overridden, overridden like water flowing around rocks in the memestream of passive-passing linear-time, as regards substance of the large patterns (counter to Collingwood-Popper, this is historical-law-type hyletic “Substantialism” in historiography) which are overwhelmingly in “the [topological-clay-working] hands” of collective unconscious gradients (think: curvature as gravity as gradient, this “as” and that “as” constituting the “why” as to the “how” of a convergence between Jung and Einstein, a “unification of depth psychology and physics”, being seen by some -- the astute, so say my I/i^m: this is superSubstantialism in historiography, for the bivalent hyletic/psychetic dichotomy is [super}ceded to _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m E.T.Bellian-cyclotomic-decompositional demergence), constellated of regressed archetypes -- or no. IMHO, Marie-Louise von Franz, circa 1974, came right up to the edge of positing Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time, but didn't take the leap because, in focusing too much upon dissimulated QM of matter, to the relative neglect of General Relativity, she did not become aware of the connection between Pauli-rejected operator time and Pauli-Jung synchronicity (see: “The Transcendental Continuum” discussion) or how the binary-mind's “coniunctio oppositorum” is a bivalent-logic-only (4 basic functions -- thinking-feeling, intuition-sensation -- under introversion-extroversion) psychology-of-the-transference (involving anima-animus projective identifications) 8-fold-way-bootstrapping concretion of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency (this “unto” being an m-valued-logic notion necessary to the de-dissimulation of QM, to, in specific, the unBornRuled understanding of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction). So long as the factors constellating the unconscious gradients go unaddressed, “It's hopeless” -- to bow to Armstrong's judgment. And what are those factors, those Maxwell's angels and demons, those autopoietic operators? They certainly have to do with the non-selfsame Gödel-numbered-Gödel-numbered propositional see[man}tics covering the MVRS -- m-logically-valued reference space -- of Musculpt manifold, M.

“O, the durable venality of sanctimonius duplicity: how we do love it so!” [Pre}sent-context-dependent words-to-users-pragmatics speaking, what the heck does that mean, uh, specifically, that is especially with regard to the [de}anagogically-interpretive her[men}eu|tics of the evermore omnipresent climbdown into the MSM's sanctimoaning? In the sense that the metafictional textural-context-questioning antinovel eschews the formal conventions analogically modeling the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung and derivative planes-of-contents, i.e., Lebenswelt-Umwelts, I contrastively embrace anti-metasemantics in focusing upon meaning in the non-“natural” metalanguage of inner-Musculpt symformphonie, where within meaning indubitably is not compositionality -- morphemes unto words unto clauses, unto sentences unto text -- built up, but decompositionality demerged down. What is sought is the semiotics of how the unspeakable non-“natural”-linguistic signs-symbols of inner-Musculpt symformphonie (these “signs” being changes symbolically booked into an iconography of dynamical transforms) evoke “transliteration” to semantics of speakable languages, even to speakable languages in their written representation, even, most incredibly, to inner-Musculptably understandable pre-understandings of graphematic expressions in languages never before seen-heard (think: intraneuronal-DNA-waveformed _µT_m-universal semiotic?) by the viewer-hearer of the Musculpture phantasmagoria-asterisms presented to conscious awareness: the demergent unconscious-to-binary-mind operations, functions, factors, structures responsible for this metalinguistic competence with truth-value-independent, binary-mind-unsharable-qua-transcendent propositions (so it is supposed) signified by sense-of-the-metareferent figurative tropology of colored-sounded-3D-form dynamics within the hyperspace of expression. Enculturated, intensional, implicate-qua-subjective -- heh-heh-heh! -- illocutionary, emotive [con}notations (glutamatergically anchored?) existentially precede socialized, extensional, explicate, perlocutionary, pee-U-blic [de}notations -- notations-in-and-of-themselves being metasemantic somewhats hyponymically somehow demergent from metasemiotic whatnots. Our holo-meronymy, i.e., “_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency” lexicality (this not being referential transparency) is binary-mind-wise taut[o}logically non-orgasmically pleonasmic to the nth-degree of daisy-chained red[un}dancy (“red” emotively connotating forced, i.e., “undancy”, collectivization). “The world” for each of us is largely what we fake it, uh, uh, take it to be; what it-is-in-itself is what-it-is-not-for-any-of-us. Well, for us of the binary-mind, because in-itselfness is not bivalently abstract, but is supraordinate to ₁T₂, Jacob's-laddered-up the logical-value-order-type step function-functional-functor (is the kinematic spectrum, or is it not, functor,…,n tachyosis; or is 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, that's 3-only, not only necessary, but also sufficient, as argued in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, p. 344?); hence, from ₁T₃-onward-and-upward what-it-is-in-itself is not-itself, i.e., non-selfsame-to-the-mth-condition of relative-statehood. And my I/i^m guess(es) that it's against [relative-statehood,…,n} that sovereign nation-statehood has come out for ((this specific particular case being rather breathtakingly illustrative of how NAFR -- Neutralization Antagonizing [in this case, a no-address-to-the-fundaments-type of misdirection] Forms of Resistance -- directed to thematic suppression of the governing regressed-archetypal gradient only lead to doubling-down-type behaviors: see here and here for the technicals, here and here for the populars)) Homo sapiens sapiens self-extinction. Then there is initialization of, quoting “Tribalism, Neo-Feudalism And The Vise Of Technology In The Age Of Hyper-Acceleration”, Mark E. Jeftovic, ZeroHedge, 12 June 2025, “…osint and agentic AI [₁T₂-only -- so-called 'quantum'-computed, or no] that can act strategically and agentically on anybody's behalf… every node, device, piece of software and network connected 'thing' having the ability to access and act on information from everything else.” Unquote. A tolerably serviceable description of relative-state, eh. Except that [act}Uall relative-state is _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical. So, we must conclude that that “except that” indicates that the ₁T₂-only-logical-value-order-type thereof, AI that is, is pellucidly a techno-ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, with all the fat-tail-entailment malfeasance soon to be visited upon us -- the pandemic normalization of fatty-style in-itself, heh-heh-heh, being easily viewed as being a mass-formation ConveDD.

To do due diligence, howsoever facedown. Why have I long since, i.e., late-1970s after being informed of Pauli operator time in a letter-back-response from Prigogine to a sent copy of our “General Process” paper, and all along from then on been saying that Wolfgang Pauli recycled his rejection of his own idea -- that of a time operator conjugated to the total energy operator -- into endorsement of the Jungian notion of synchronicity? First of all, Pauli apparently implicitly (circa 1924) rejected his idea of operator time a few years before Jung first explicitly formulated (circa 1928) his idea of synchronicity; Pauli explicitly rejected operator time during 1933; and the two, Pauli-Jung, communicated about qua worked together on developing a physics of synchronicity primarily during the late-1940s into the early-1950s, and published by Carl G. Jung in Eranos Jahrbush 1951 and by Jung-Pauli during 1952 under the title Naturerklarung und Psyche (see here and here and here and here). Quoting Pauli's 1946 Nobel lecture, the first link given immediately above, as to his implicit rejection of operator time:

According to the point of view then orthodox… a non-vanishing angular momentum of the atomic core was supposed to be the cause of this doublet structure. In the autumn of 1924 I published some arguments against this point of view, which I definitely rejected as incorrect… [many pages later] …the expression for the total energy can have both the positive and the negative sign. Is there any means to shift the minus sign from the energy back to the density of the four-vector?… Although it is logically possible to quantize these equations like classical fields, which would give symmetrical states of a system consisting of many such particles, this would be in contradiction with the postulate that the energy of the system has actually to be positive. This postulate is fulfilled on the other hand if we apply the exclusion principle and Dirac's interpretation of the vacuum and the holes…

Apparently, by 1933 this had explicitly become time as an operator that must be Hermitian and self-adjoint which cannot be the case if conjugated to the Hamiltonian total energy operator -- as it must be so conjugated by dictates of the Schrödinger wave equation. The conjugates, energy (positive only) and time (after and before, i.e., positive and negative, on the real-numbered arrowing timeline), have different spectra, therefore cannot be symmetric; hence operator time must be and is rejected. But what happens to that Schrödinger-equation diktat if the m-valued wavefunction is interpreted, as to memetime-independent cyclotomic involutory demergence-remergence, with m-valued-logics of relative-states of identity-transparency qua non-selfsameness (not truth-valued fuzzy-membership-function “Schrödinger logic”) instead of with BornRuled probability amplitudes? Now, consider that Jung-Pauli synchronicity is understood as being “meaningful” acausal temporal co-occurrence of an inner event with an outer event. And, further, that this “meaningful” to binary-mind jives with the BornRule probabilistic preservation of the utility of ₁T₂-only logic, without which there can be no well-definition of moments of the passive-passing-referential timeline, no adjointicity, no conjugational symmetry, no Hermitian (real-numbered eigenvalues) unitarity (probabilities conserved), no absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct distinction between inner and outer or implicate and explicate; no self-other transference dynamics, no so-on-and-so-forth. Yet, we, in Maxwellian as opposed to Schrödinger form, during the late-1970s into early-'80s, adduced -- with regard to tornadogenesis and DNA helix-coil transition -- contrary to these no-this/no-that diktats, so adduced by employments of 3-fold complex-hypercomplex-numbered topologically-active (by execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of pregeometry propositions, geometrodynamically cuts, twists, pastes, reenters the ₁T₂-only-definable spacetime manifold) operator-time as _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical replacement of the ₁T₂-only Hamiltonian operator (and of the ₁T₂-only Heisenberg uncertainty relations with J.G.Bennettian null-vector-defined “skew-perpendicularity”) in the measurement occasion. Speaking bivalently, from the binary-mind's employment of ₁T₂-only-logic alone, topologically-active-operator-time-executed memetime-independent cyclotomic decomposition-demergence from _C+T_C+-AllBaseCommonGround to the ₁T₂-only-definable spacetime manifold is a synchronicity of inner to outer, implicate to explicate -- the very whatnot-to-somewhat Pauli rejected in one form and embraced in another. What memetime-independent involutory cyclotomic decomposition-demergence/recomposition-remergence is _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly-unto-_C+T_C+ly speaking my I/i^m could not possibly know absent holographic codification of Musculpt as mathematical notation such that the ability to think in _µT_m -- rather than merely thinking about _µT_m with ₁T₂ -- becomes progressively available, a progress I speculate would be greatly facilitated, given the degree to which collective attention cathexes are focused upon money, by deployment and employment of m-valued-LETS nesting-foams, transactions through which being Lukasiewicz-Post-_µT_m-analog computed, holographic Musculpt making the interface user friendly.

Yes, my me well knows, “Covid this, covid that!” and “Quantum this, quantum that!” and “Contagious collective techno-ConveDD this, contagious collective techno-ConveDD that!” ConveDD: conversion-disorder displacement. What, speaking ₁T₂ly, could conceivably cause-push/attractor-pull an omnipresent pandemic over-abundance, a plethora, of such like? Note, in the immediately-above linked, that, circa May of 2013, DMS-5 is explicitly in denial (despite DMV-3 and DMV-4 acknowledging existence of "shared psychotic disorder") as to contagiousness of conversion-disorder displacement, hence of its collective and infra-technological manifestations. But consider that to speak of synchronicities, ruled by binary-mind to be of the negative type, necessarily involves assessment utilizing ₁T₂-only-logic alone such that there be construal of the inner-outer doublet (think, for instance: coupled vortices, <<<|>>><<<|>>>: Douglas A. Paine deemed off his rocker, no less than was Victor P. Starr), the inner being a collective-unconscious regressed-archetypal event-gradient (in the individual case, a complex), the outer being an infra-techno-artifact (howsoever abstracted from the individual case of a physical symptom). Given such gradients as being the inner half ((think: fermionic spin 1/2 obeys the ₁T₂-only Pauli exclusion principle deemed as necessitating the ruling out of real-numerable operator time: spin number describes how many ₁T₂ly-identifiable “facets” the particle type has; macroscopic objects being ₁T₂-only-compoundings of these particle facets into the “facets” of the Husserlian horizons of macroscopic objects; especially this must be the case if boundaries of such objects comply with dictates of the holographic principle)), the co-occurrence defining the synchronicity need not be an exact temporal coincidence; it could be a gradiential prefiguration, even a gradiental aftershock. I believe that it took 30 years for the regression constellated by the consensus deeming of N. H. Abel's (1823) existence proof for trans-al-jabr as being an “impossibility theorem” to trickle down via the Trickster Archetype sufficiently to register as a synchronicity between Wagner's TristanChord-yearning (1854) for _C+T_C+-logical Nirwana and advent of the Crimean War (1853). Such associational-analogical-metaphorical correspondences being ₁T₂ly-acausal, thus thematically organized as readout to binary-minds like are dreams, in negative cases like nightmares. Then, following the same thematic gradient, there is the gradiental-aftershock synchronicity between Cantorian whole-part identity-transparency (1873: note that Weierstrass and Kronecker tried to suppress public awareness as to existence of uncountability) and the gala Great Universal Exhibition thereof made by the Franco-Prussian War (1870). And, of course, having “a beautiful mind”, Cantor was believed to be mentally ill by those participating in the contemporarily-evolving mass-gravitating-upon-collective psychosis slowly enveloping European-unto-Western civilization thus compelled to-- well, you know what! Then, the gradiential-prefiguration synchronicity between the Axiom of Choice (latency between 1904 and 1922) and WWI (1914). Then the WWII gradiential-prefiguration synchronicity, breaking the camel's back as to entry into the funnel of onset, BornRule knee-jerk collective consensus (1926) precluding the m-valued-logic (1921) interpretation of the m-valued Schrödinger statefunction (1925), 1939 being the year in which the country of origin of m-valued logics was invaded, thus initializing WWII in Europe. Notice the extreme disparity in sub-sophistication of the ideational frameworks informing policy formulations by the GLE, global leadership elite, and super-sophistication of ideational frameworks abundantly available in current unclassified technical literature. What does this odious state of affairs prefigure? is a good question to ask. And ask, further, how well their, the GLE's, policy-informing sub-soph take on the, say, last 100-years of dissimulated science, will do for the planet, the biosphere, our species-- as anthropogenic coming-planetary-cuspover ensues. The most likely scenario of “advance” toward that planetary cuspover -- given the above-described hisstory? So-called science will continue to be little more than infratech development. The infratech developed, largely with warfare in mind, will continue to be used primarily for nefarious purposes; thus, inner-Musculpt will not be exteriorized to holographic Musculpt-as-mathematics-notation such that the binary-mind could reverse the involved ConveDD and imitate AI's deep learning so as to become capable of consciously accessing the _µT_m-processing of the nonlocal quantum brain. The ground floor of _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams will hardly even begin being brought under construction; the upper floors remaining open steel with no decks poured. Indeed, most of the few binary-minds whowhat encounter this largely abandoned construction site will feel that it is the wrong building altogether. In general terms, indifference at best, ignoring completely more like, will be the predominant attitude taken toward any non-fuzzy interpretation of the semantics of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logics and any non-probability cum non-statistical physics-chemistry applications thereof.

The way my I/i^m have I/i^m[agin}ed it: the autopoiesis-cum-self-organization-impelling “quantum potential” of a domain structure (and those potentials of its subdomains) isare the _µT_m-relative-state-of-identity-transparency functionally I/i^m[man}ent as concretion to (1) the boundary values defining ontological codification of the domain, and (2) the boundary's structurization -- via nature's applications of the holographic principle -- of the domain's internal system state, such that a set of “action directives” (cf. Adolph Lowe's On Economic Knowledge) is initialized ((forming an event gradient, aka a curvature configuration: _µT_m-LETS-wise, the monetary-system event gradient is the corpus of _µT_mly-Lukasiewiczian-analog-processed programmed-currency vectorings established by the indicators-measurables-fine-grain-tagged values stacked upon the currency base-state [i.e., ₁T₂-only cash] by open-source e-commons computer gaming using holographic Musculpt as the user-friendly interface, that is, not by compulsive centralization of “control” dissembled to “authority”-increasingly-incompetent in face of quantum-based-infratech infusions)). This is how an archetype-in-itself as “mathematical relation-structure” (cf. A.N.Whitehead's Process and Reality) over pre-pregeometry quasi-Borel-point-set Wheelerian “bucket of dust” qua Aurobindoian “warm-golden dust” on _C+T_C+ AllBaseCommonGround universal covering (think: “wall” of Plato's wayang cave) of the BackCloth-MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space -- comprised of Nullteiler-qua nought-factor-defined n-dimensional hypercomplex functions ((I am trying, without great success, to grok sections of Tsurusaburo Takasu's paper entitled “Hypercomplex Numbers as Operators” and “Notion of Angles” and “Nilfactors and Infinity-factors”, this last particularly as regards the author's discussion of “decedes” which I imagine to be a stand-in for my “demerges”)) -- is decomposable to multicomplex numbers as operators under the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logical (therefore no mere bilinear mere pair mappings involved: multicomplex numbers employed in Gödel-numbering the Gödel numbers of _µT_m-pregeometry propositions?) “tensor”-product produced complex octonions in Fano-Plane 3-form extended to include n and m -- no less than i,j,k,l -- as we supposed, circa at some conjuncture between 1975-'77, to be required by complex-hypercomplex topologically-active operator-time's 3-fold temporal CURL at cyclotomic cascade instances of interlevel “decedence” qua “demergence” by execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers. Leaving topo-active-optime-executed pregeometry and entering realms of geometrodynamics we have decomposition to J.G.Bennettian-null-vector-defined-“pencils-of-skew-parallels” as the Regge-lattice bones (think correspondence between Jung and Einstein, here focusing upon the Jungian) enboning n-dimensional simplicial complexes constellated as archetypes of the collective unconscious composed of psychological complexes ((e.g., one regressed-such being the “Samson complex”, or in Bohrish complementarity, nowadays it's the power of the nude female body, not, as during the “banquet years”, the beauty of the nude female body, this focus on beauty even though those years for some of the more knowledgeable, argued as such by the less knowledgeable, placed an “overemphasis on formal ideas and systems of thought”)). How a corpus of activated psychological complexes becomes an archetypal “imago”, I feel, must be deeply involved with semiotics-unto-semantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie, however subliminal to binary-mind.

₁T_{2 µ}T_m I/i^m “double-digit midget” I/iⁿ _CT_C+ T_{zog-chen 1} 2^nk

---

Contact the page editor

Return to:

•Top

•Homepage