_µT_m Scenarios, T₅₁(M)

Autistic, [selfsame-self}stimulative-[echolaliac}all, obsessive-compulsive pursuit of the VRed ITimmortality posited by the Immoral Minority of the TransHumanist (THist) cohort of OnePercenters is a sign (along with advent of _µT_m-logics) that terminus of a 3,000-years Turchinian-cliodynamical quasi-cycle is upon us, in that that minority's unceasing OCDed repetitive reports etiologically, taken as a corpus, collectively constitute a techno-ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the preGreek and earlyGreek ABSENCE of identification with in-the-body-experience, IBE, as normative state (the IBE-IDed THs want a techno-simulacra of what they already have in non-simulative authenticity if only it were not glutamatergically suppressed by the logic-gate employments they obsessively bit-bop-bit-bop-bit-bop bip-deploy!): endogenous-ketaminergic-OBEed-ontically-direct awareness of memetime-independence qua “immortality”, IMHO -- a rather diff[I/i^m}dent claim, that, my other-Iambe castigates -- was, for most Homo sapiens sapiens there has ever been, pedestrian (only late in preGreek-to-AncientGreek missstory-unto-hisstory, as preAristotlean ₁T₂-logic come-ons became glutamatergically anchored to molecular-cellular brains, were dominatrix missstory, uh, uh, mystery-cult practices -- later regressed to BDSM activity, and lately most degraded as S&S-Stuff -- required as OBE induction, OBE once having been, but then no more, a habitus of common-place sociality). Party-faction confliction, then and now, always all ways, is incidental, epiphenomenal to the individual's intrapsychic confliction held largely in conscious-denial suppression-regression. Endogenous-ketaminergic residuals of the memetime-independent-OBE-ontic-awareness were never altogether quantum-quenched. “All alike” meaning “all of time” is done, as done by John Donne in “The Sun Rising”, wherein the lovers' enemy is time, indicates something of an appreciation of the import of memetime-independent _µT_m-relative-state, eh? Just as the Pennsylvania-German-Dutch “the sugar is all”, meaning “all gone”, is a cultural-lag residual of German (cf. Goethe's Faustian “timeless being” “who endlessly weaves on the loom of time” personification of DEmergence) [philo}sophical-mathematical insight as to the Erdgeist-“all-set” being self-reentrantly qua non-orientably the cosmogony-“null-set”, [twist}over-and-[in}jection “boundary”, where the two adjoin smooth as Thai silk, being “without boundary”? DEmergence -- as regressed in service to egos and superegos -- of this universal non-orientability to the binary-mind's 2-dimensional spectrum of governance orientations yields a political-economy Möbius band where the [twist}over meet pasting (only ₁T₂ly subject to severe criticism) the ends of the flexible ruler together binds anarcho-capitalism to anarcho-syndicalism: the tacit qua subliminal non-orientability being pellucidly revealed during the Spanish Civil War when FAI, the Iberian Anarchist Federation, circa September 1936, explicitly sought to impose “libertarian communism” (see Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust, p. 230) which it had earlier, January of 1933, made an overzealous declaration of having been established (see Preston, pp. 27-8), both derivative of the immediate-post-WWI effusion of anarchist sentiment, organizational actions, violence (no better than during the late-19th century did 20th-century anarchism-as-psychosociopolitical-theory come up with a plausible account as to how a socius might self-organize: thank dissimulation of quantum mechanics for that! and look to that absence as part of the unconscious-to-subliminal-to-conscious motivation for QM being put into dissimulation). Behind-the-scenes doings of the undue influencers tarnished with green envy: what cheek! as ought to be dashed, it should, wouldn't you say? Beastly as a verdigrised two-high logic gate, what! Metaphysics institutionalized metasemantically so as to metapsychoneuroimmunologically legitimate effectuations carried out by matutinal-unto-vespertine bullyraggerors lolloping their canty twainlit-up self-conceit -- big of themselves, eh, as they've logically rationalized bivalently -- even if not tax-freely, uh, uh, taxonomically, included as a crepuscular subspecific epithet of those H. sapiens sapiens aspirant to ordo-dominium-regnum. In a ₁T₂-only-logical system where the middle, by definition, is distributed, there is the choice between oppression from totalitarian-above and oppression from anarchistic-below; majority-rule, were it unmolested from above and/or below, would restore the middle, giving the Silent-so-called-Moral Majority the ability to oppress above and below by normopathically imposing, and glutamatergically anchoring, its persistent intergenerational normosis. In the real world of Mixed Political-Economies, each of these co-exist -- even if, by Relativity, absolute simultaneity is completely absent -- to one degree or another as an expression of the fuzzy logic underlying all supersystem-system-subsystem composites, the nesting-foams thereof being suppressible but not altogether eradicable. Hu-hu-[hu}man|ity perseveres in this calamity by remaining identified with simple-selfsame identity (hu-woe[is-me}man|ity's carrying-a-fetus mother-borne-induced identity-transparency currently in process of being altogether banished, to such a level has the prevailing collective psychosis devolved: who, even if the general pathognomonic pattern diagnostic of the psychosis was clearly registered, could have anticipated in detail the specific symptomatic concretions that would emerge as pathogenesis accelerated toward fulmination qua cuspover?) whereby even, in the supposed limit, quaset-qua-quasiset-theoretical identity continues to be conceptualized as a matter of degrees of inclusion/exclusion (cf. excommunication, banishment, disenrollment, debanking, denial of service, GMOed, and the harder forms) of selfsames, this being the case by predicate modification of the notion “set”, rather than by propositionally decomposing to the notion “set”. Stepping off the apocryphal political-economy-spectrum Möbius band into authentic autopoietic self-organization requires slow, bottom-up, step-by-step institutionalization of _µT_mly-non-selfsame-relative-state identity-transparency, a process, IMHO, best begun monetarily with ingress being made upon implementation of _µT_m-LETS-currency nesting-foams defined over quasi-fractal e-boundaries-without-boundary.

Abject poverty of basic intellectual-hisstory elementary knowledge brought to global policymaker policy making is so astounding as to elicit utter dismay every which way including loose, and, to the youngest generations, clearly, well beyond merely infuriating. The knee-jerked ₁T₂-only-informed penchant to employ totalitarian escalation-control options whenever-wherever for whatever is a father-transference-related me[me}time-bound fitness-landscape projection from the intrapsychic domain to that sociopoliticoeconomic with mil.guv overtones. Triumph of the Will! The egofunction, at behests of the superego, exercises will power in order to overcome the Unter such that there is victory of the Uber (despite existence of the Untermannigfaltigkeit demergent Möbiusband): this being, in truth-values, the only right thing to do, individually and collectively. A consensus-quantum biological-upgrade on, say, Triple-A-rated Ethos -- Aristotelean-Augustinian-Aquinian moral-code -- accounts as to origins of the decency impulse, would be, of course, having the animal instincts epiphenomenal to the reflexivity-positive-feedback-Popperian-Sorosian propensities constituting the organismic statefunction. Ugh, the _µT_m-relative-state-empathic interpretation of Schrödinger? Gladsomely gainsaying the baffling gravellers, what: ah, the ₁T₂-logical-necessity-willful interpretation of Schrödinger! Nonetheless, those non-equilibrium PS-propensities being construed relative to probability amplitudes, there would still be the overwhelming need for exercise of will power to realize “the good” -- all things being POVed in terms of control from “above” (think: superego and its per[son}i|fied extension[s]). By logical bivalence: alternatively, from the “below”-control POV, the anarchistic extremist wants to clear the deck so as to allow restoration of the ground-state of nature, natural law. Quoting Preston's The Spanish Holocaust, p. 234, in illustration: “The notion of purification by fire, of clearing the ground of the legacy of previous Spanish history, underlay much of the violence perpetrated by idealistic anarchists.” Howsoever much ithethatshe of moderate anarchist bent might wish that the megadyscorporations (and inframultilaterals) would just simply spontaneously discorporate, that's not about to happen, not so long as there is supposition as to existence of a “classical limit”, without which -- however apocryphal be that “which” -- the simply-identifiable corporate [per}son could not have been bivalence-only-[juris}prudentially codified as constituted of -- Newtonian daisy-chained, but not Planck superposed -- ₁T₂-only-valued stockholding stakeholders subject to the vector-summing decision-science algorithm.

One possible positive use for the “classical limit” notion is to prevent robotic AIs from becoming The Replacement Killers of hu-hu-[hu}man circumventers of simple-IDity. AI being ₁T₂-only (the data it's fed; its processors; its learning algos, even, IMHO, to include ₂T₂-logical 2-state-superposition consensus-“quantum” processors being fed ₁T₂-only-unto-[0,1]-fuzzy data), bottle it! bottle it in the “classical limit” where it belongs for being constituted of the lowest logical-value order-type of _µT_m. Lukasiewicz-Post m-valued logics so far have been cognized by ₁T₂-only thinking about what they, by superegoic-will-power-constellated logical necessity, must be, e.g., fuzzy, rather than thinking in _µT_m logics concerning what _µT_m logics actually are: this is, basically, a repeat of how supposition (that's not superposition!) as to existence of a “classical limit” has acted as a performative prescription-proscription in regards to decoherently cognizing coherent All-That-Not-Is-Is-_C+T_C+-unto-down-down-decomposition-derry-down-to-₁T₂. Since, in any now-plausible memefuture, given the mass-formation spectrum of prevailing psycho-sexo-socio-politico-econo-military constellations, we clearly are going to have programmed monetary currencies, use them as a paradigm demonstration on how to bottle-up AI in KleinBottle nesting-foams by constituting _µT_m-LETS currencies as quasi-fractal drums defined over fractal e-boundaries-without-boundary, whilst step-functionally increasing the level of self-organizational competency of markette sorting angels. There is no bringing-up of _µT_m-LETS _µT_mly since we cannot yet think in _µT_m: long, long ago, ₁T₂ (syllogistic/TaiChi rotational) having been intergenerationally glutamate anchored, conscious access to _µT_m-inner-Musculpt is at best elementary and fleeting, if ever present at all -- _µT_m-relative-states of “participation mystique” having all but faded away. In the step-by-step bringing-up from below of _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams, with progressive development-thru-use of techno-exteriorized _µT_m-inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface, the values stacked upon the currency base-state (₁T₂-only cash), that -- being brought-up from below, are to be consensus built by open-source, e-commons computer-gaming, with employment of crowd-funded, open-source, wisdom-of-the-e-crowd-written, m-scenarios simulation algorithms -- would be fine-grain tagged to indicator-measurables… uh, what would be involved in that tagging? The massive data crunching, ever-better-learned pattern identification and analysis, real-memetime modulations of the values of each of these ensheaved currency-unit values is the sort of “place” exactly where, paradigmatically speaking, AI ought to be focused.

This, concerning the early-1970s, is far and away not news to me. Eric Weinstein quoting Marc Andressen revealing what he had been told during a visit to the Biden Whitehouse:

They literally said well you know during the Cold War we classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community and like entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed…

Which branches are not specified -- but it was pretty obvious as to this one and that one, even including some branches of chemistry.

During the 1961-2 winter season, I went with our high school basketball team to Anchorage from Eielson AFB to compete in the state Class A Tournament (having already won Class C and Class B), wherein we beat out East Anchorage but, in a near miss, were runners up to West Anchorage, good offices most especially of WA's Larry Porter (the information available on the internet about this is simply wrong). It was a double-elimination tournament, so I had quite a bit of free time to wander out and about town. In a well-stocked bookstore I bought a copy of Frank Lloyd Wright's 1954 The Natural House. The two most important notions I took away from my reading of Wright were [1] the transparency of inner and outer (“In all of his designs, Frank Lloyd Wright used transparency to create movement…” a notion which greatly informed my understanding of my naive experience of inner-Musculpt symformphonie [not to mention, eventually, Karlheinz Stockhausen -- and the very idea of “quantum potential”, movement being how the binary-mind processes identity-transparency and thus wants to nullify Relativity physics by making the speed of light in vacuo infinite, rather than m-valued, connectivity under logical bivalence necessarily involving spatial translation], and which, later, circa 1975, Cornell Mathematics Library, for me, linked C. G. Jung's formulations concerning psychological-transference dynamics to Emil Post's formulation of _µT_m-valued logics), and [2] the idea that “form follows function” (which, later, circa fall of 1963, AU-SIS, for me, linked J. G. Bennett's tacit “framework determining conditions” [see the linked section 4.1.3, but I eventually, via good offices of Cornell professor Douglas A. Paine, generalized the concept to involve, e.g., me[me}time-independent 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, order of value of the logic employed, BackCloth, CommonGround, MVRS, so on] to the “functional prerequisites” of structural-functional theory's “all systems have structures that perform functions” modified in conformance to Wright vis-à-vis Heinz Hartmann's functional-structural theory's idea [via Gill and Brenman {Hypnosis and Related States I regard as among the dozen most important books of my life as a reader: delivered enormous insight as to a wealth of personal concerns} and Rapaport] that “all systems have functions that structuralize into performatives”, uh, uh, that is, in the language of the ego psychology, that structure-is-function-automatized, a concept I learned about whilst reading Hartmann during the summer of 1963, which I connected, via F. S. C. Northrop's The Meeting of East and West, to the Platonic IDEA that “essence [say, function] ontologically precedes existence [say, structure]” contrasted to the Existentialist first principle, à la Sartre, that “existence precedes essence”: in my AU-SIS 1st-semester-1963 frosh paper-for-the-Dean, entitled “The Predicament of Existentialism”, I, notably via Kurt Gödel, challenged logical-ontological-temporal validity-utility of the notion “precedes”, that challenge prefiguring demergence of the idea of an MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, the laws of physics conceived as varying as to set-collection-order-type and the order-of-logical-value to which the MVRS is cyclotomically decomposed under topo-active optime execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of the involved cosmic propositions [as regards the “precedes” challenge, see Swedenborg on esse and existere being “one distinctly” as consonant with J. G. Bennett's null-vector-defined “diversely identical”, Appendix III, The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956, and also note that Frank Lloyd Wright, tacitly invoking Swedenborg, modified his “form follows function” to “Form and function should be one, joined in a spiritual union”]). Early in the process of imagining these ideational multiple-connectivities (the context being the AU-SIS seminars, and particularly my counterinsurgency studies at SORO, Special Operations Research Office, for George Harris' Human Behavior seminar), probably influenced by my childhood exposure to Japanese aesthetics (e.g., sitting-in on my mother's Ikebana flower arranging lessons: think, the symbolic-interactionist Empire of Signs thesis), I came to entertain the proposition that one functional prerequisite to coherence of the socius is analogical correspondence between the metaphysical assumptions informing codification of the institutional base and components of the prevailing Weltanschauung, the degree of divergence between those assumptions and components being a measure of extant (if mostly subliminal) collective cognitive dissonance and the level of violence likely to be involved in the process by which the two are brought back into correspondence. It was under supposition as to existence of this proposition as a functional prerequisite that I stated to Elspeth Rostow, after an American Civilization seminar meeting, circa 1964, my belief that general war would eventually once again sweep over Europe if the Europeans did not find a post-WWII-way to institutionally codify quantum principles of self-organization, the 17th-and-18th-century metaphysics informing the Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean institutional base studied in her seminar being almost three-quarters-of-a-century dead, i.e., well out of correspondence to the currently evolving Weltanschauung. Nowadays, sixty years later, (given, e.g., the hetero-cum-self-hypnotic metaprogramming promulgated by CNN and the like: living for decades in CNN-pard hotel-apts, I occasionally have on CNN, most of the memetime muted, as whatever itstheir inordinate repetition is complicit with, I am not complicit with) it is hard to convincingly gainsay the notion that there is a planetarized scientistic-technocratic Weltanschauung analogically codified in 5-star global monoculture, and that this techno-scientism wrap-up of dissimulated-quantum-based infratech retains, as cultural-lag residuals largely by “good” offices of a supposed “classical limit” (on 2^nk fitness landscapes, based upon the assumption of single-level genetic encipherment, that limit may be singular, but not in M^nk articulation spaces, predicated by the n-level-encoding in the higher-temporal formants of the quantum-wave properties of DNA at radiation exchanges during helix-coil transition, where Q, the quantum potential, i.e., relative-state identity-transparency, does not subscribe to calculus limits, limits which Q “re-cognizes” as logical-value-order-type phase transitions, the corpus of which being an invocation of scale-relative m-valued m-logically-processed universal physical constants such as bar-h and absolute limiting velocity, acceleration, time rate of change of acceleration: classical is psychosomatically constellated and glutamatergically anchored via brain-mind bulletins, aka subclinical autogenic discharges, delivered by THE nonlocalizable Q-brain to localized molecular-cellular brains of the beholders), the bulk of 17th-and-18th-century metaphysical assumptions, despite the “centripetal force”, qua libido, exercised by the extreme “spiraling” divergence therefrom of the continuing-to-evolve post-quantum-relativity scientific Weltanschauung. The mass-induction of bipolar [cog}native dis[son}ance cum effervescence of schizophrenogenic double-binds involved in the institution-Weltanschauung divergence becoming tantamount to a conflict-theoretic discontinuity: presuppo[propo}sional predicate-proscriptions cosmo-demergent to Lebenswelt as existential denials introjected to Umwelts as existential anxiety-angst-anomie-alienation concretions impelling acts of violence trending to collective expressions trending to mass warfare. Ecod! Taken quailing by the tee-heeing Deuce we are, what. Hail-to at presence of the living who are dead. Trickster archetype. Right, yet another Po-Shitty-Baddamn-1 which fried men, blue-lite lit up, instantly know to be internally sabbowed-in-service-to-the-nacreous-pols, popularly understood to be [lust}rous. Well, sir, there are the bivalently convicted convicts and, nowadays -- given Semblancat's resurrection of Oficinalis Jucidicuss -- those convicts which are monotonically unconvicted. I-for-1 don't like Drs. Da-Dee-Dahs' i[at}rog|emetic extrodiction of the tropological meta-see[man}tic Empire-of-Signs-exemplified institutional codification of Weltanschauung. Shambolic-unto-shamebolic-unto-psychosymbolic dyssimulations -- be they of inverted trans-al-jabr, of dissimulated QM, or of short-circuited Relativity: tracking upon yet another reincarnation of “spontaneous justice” rather than fulfillment of the statefunctional prerequisites to the autopoietics of “spontaneous social order” structural formations. How many times must it be observed that 19th-and-early-20th-century anarchistic actions went to violence -- cause-push mete out, strange-attractor pullulate, whydon'tcha! -- and consequently failed, because their theoretical backings -- anarchosyndicalist, anarchocapitalist -- had no believable account of self-organization as form-in-process? Might as well have taken the sob[ri}que-t [pa}na{ma] qua pan[a}ma in lieu of Iambe relative to the root homonym, ma, indicating sacred space. Nowadays, FF-X-exorderiums draped over blackbox terminotions insistently ununderstood so as to service the collective-projective ID-if-I-cat[i}ons suppressing _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m (e.g., solar-wind carried hypercomplex, imaginary, real angular momentum) and the myriad demergent haptic concretions thereof (e.g., tornado outbreaks). O, the OCPD (notably of the one-percent identified with Constantia de la More et Mora and beholding to Direccion General de Sugardaddi, aka The Fed), a mass-formation obsessive-compulsive personality disorder induced by fear and loathing of the clandestinity of the uncontrollable, the greatest uncontrollable black swan being the unconscious-as-infinite-sets of the control freaks in control.

Despite the abound of bland blandishments as regards, say, robotics, CBDCs, surveillance-capitalized and MoSoSoed SCSSs, CBIs, substitute-memory infratech, m-mRNAs, by whom and howsoever invigilated, my I/i^m holds that the zeroed mu (note how the twelve-stroke kanji looks like one of the chronotopologically-separated nested grids composing multi-sheeted ma, the sacred space, per its kanji, of “a gate to hold the moon”) of MuZero says it all, via subliminal import à la the Trickster archetype: a hundred years later, no E.Postian _muT_m. The 256 so-called “hidden planes” of MuZero, in spite of Julian Schrittwieser's initial diagram in his "Intuition" paper, are not the Schrödinger-memetime-independent _µT_mly-ensheaved transparencies of VirFut Q-Pro; rather, to quote Keith L. Downing, “They [MuZero's hidden planes that are also referred to as hidden states sequentially unrolled, or as layers] are abstract patterns that help predict the next word based on some useful functional summary of the past.” The “hidden layer” usage comes from neural-network architectonics of the bivalent molecular-cellular-brain's cortex, which, while instructive, far and away does not (see Figure 3. of “Visualizing MuZero Models”, Joery A. de Vries, et al., Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 139, 2021) adequately model Lukasiewiczian-Postian Q-brain Hilbertian-phase-space “architectonics” (in quotes because for being a binary-mind take on _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+, taking into account the last sentences of Emil Post's 1921 Ph.D. dissertation, as oft earlier quoted). The 17th-and-18th-c. notions even now still, still, one must emphasize, underpinning the institutional base (19th-c. Marxism being largely a parody thereof) clearly will be cemented to glutamate-etched binary-minds by the ManhatinhandProjectivelyidentified world models (since this Musky-link is not “an affirmative”, a “client-side exception” has been imposed as a stoppage; therefore, we try again to circumvent the determined exceptionalism) AI-promulgated, thus cultivating further the divergence from the ever-intensively-elaborating post-quantum-relativity-paradigm-inveigled Weltanschauung, this divergence being largely responsible for the attractor-pulled-from cum cause-pushed-toward coming-cuspover global seizure.

At the end of Daniel Lawler's article “'Wetware': Scientists Use Human Mini-brains To Power Computers”, Barron's, 18 October 2025, he discusses how the brain organoids employed somehow recognize that the door to the big fridge containing them is opened, whereupon, quoting, “Lines suddenly start spiking on the screen next to the incubator, indicating significant neural activity.” Lawler goes on to say, “The brain cells have no known way of sensing that their door has been opened, and the scientists have spent years trying to figure why this happens.” In conclusion, it is observed that scientists still haven't ascertained how the cells detect door openings. Probably, the scientists in question are unaware of how intracellular DNA responds to openings of frequency response windows, whereupon helix-coil transitions are initialized and velocities and accelerations of the helixing are FM-controlled. While the conscious surface-structure cause-push motivations for developing the capability to use human brain organoids as CPUs may be as described by Lawler, the collective-unconscious deep-structure attractor-pull (likely shared with developers of CBIs) possibly is use of interfaced whole-brain gain-of-function-enhanced human synthetic clones as logic units and registers of CPU, the CU being an AIed robot clocked according to an autopoietic qua self-written autonomous random-number generating algorithm.

I just reread my article “VirFut Q-Pro: Public Policy Implications of Quantum Computing” for the first time in perhaps a decade. It has continuously been up on the internet for a quarter of a century -- and it has received not a single comment. That fact, IMHO, has big implications.

Symbolic echoes of I-cosmology can be found in all religions, not only in machine-language architectonics of Ehyeh, uh, uh, [e-h}I, oops, AI, infratech based on QM dissimulated so as to allow continued clinging to the 17th-and-18th-century metaphysical justifications of the still-prevailing institutional base. Christian per[son}i|fication of superego placed in projective-identification is the least symbolic echo of an intelligent cosmos. The Islamic intermediary between mankind and Allah is I[ma}m, the Imam being male, in Jungian terms the ma (universal root homonym) is the [AⁿI}ma; in I-cosmology terms, the multi-sheeted BackCloth MVRS-nesting-foam sacred space connecting incarnate e-X-is{tense] to the Universal AllBaseCommonGround most-dense sheet of the m-logically-valued reference space. “Eh|y|eh [As}her Eh|y|eh”, the Hebraic “I am that I am”, does not mean The Moon of Hoa Binh's ₁T₂-only “I am me and only me”, but speaks to the “I^m that I^m that I^m” of the MVRS, where within each quantum-dot dust mote is an Alexander.Karpenko functor of the Lukasiewicz-Post logics over the primes, in Gödel-numbering terms, p-adicity raised to the 3rd-kink, uh, kind, i.e., Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers because the nesting-foam is not that of a bridged multi-sheeted Riemann surface but that of self-reentrant Klein bottles à la self-referential “I^m that I^m that I^m”, the “Tetragrammaton” understood _µT_mly, not ₁T₂ly. So, we are not talking function theory on tori, i.e., Sobolov spaces on T², uh Abelian 2-group, or even 3-group, but p-group (“groups whose orders are powers of a prime”) function theory on Klein bottles in nesting-foam. I don't pretend to understand the complexities of what I just referenced; nor would I seriously try, as the contents thereof are “off the beat” my I/i^m have been following. Consider that “Riemann surfaces were originally conceived in complex analysis in order to deal with multivalued functions. . . Riemann replaced the domain of the function by a multiple-sheeted covering of the complex plane to get a single valued function on the covering space,” to quote Armin Rainer lecturing “Introduction to Riemann Surfaces”, circa 2018. Which is exactly my point for not having been willing to “seriously try”. I am not interested in ramifications of the ₁T₂-handling of m-valued functions as if single-valued; I want to understand ramifications of the _µT_m-handing of m-valued functions as m-valued functions! Going to the “covering of the complex plane” seems to me a concealment of the 1st-order temporal CURL of 3-fold topologically-active operator-time. Then there are the 2nd- and 3rd-order temporal CURLs, the 3rd-order yielding the self-reentrance of the Klein bottle. The temporal CURLs are initialized at scale-relative absolute limiting velocities, accelerations, time rates of change of acceleration. These dynamical relative-absolutes (metric of the Riemann space required for measurements thereof as per Farhad Ghaboussi's July 2024 “On the relation between Riemann space and Hilbert space” wherein it is stated that “integrable dynamical structures should be foliated” and, to our understanding, 3-space “curvature” under 3rd-order dynamics is actually self-reentry-yielded non-orientability of ponderablespacememetime) are reliant upon quasi-Hilbert-space (including the temporal CURLs invoked by the Riemann surface?) relativistic-quantum takes on the classical phase-space takes, not just of the m-valued function-functional-functor spaces, but of the Alexander.Karpenko functors of the Lukasiewicz-Post logics over those fff-spaces. So, IMHO, the current AI stand-in for “Eh|y|eh [As}her Eh|y|eh”, such as given in the “true dynamics model” of Figure 3. of “Visualizing MuZero Models”, Joery A. de Vries, et al., Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 139, 2021, is hardly even a shadow of the I-cosmology required to generate Weltanschauung metaphysical principles capable of analogically informing codification of an institutional base highly correlated to the emerging post-quantum-relativity paradigm.

OK, okay! Architectonics of MuZero machine language caught my interest in regards to the still-latent project to holographically exteriorize inner-Musculpt as m-logically-valued-mathematics notation and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams -- even though these MuZero architectonics are so very far, ScienceNews-wise, “Off The Beat” ((Google AI says that Science News had no such column during the 1970s: absolutely wrong, as a column with that title appeared in each issue, and it was the column I found most interesting, always following out any references therein provided)), which we, Homo sapiens sapiens, need to be THE “on the beat” in order for some of us to somehow miraculously make it through the coming highly-disordered cuspover, that it, i.e., off-the-required-beat MuZero, is in certain respects 180-degrees opposite to where my interest “lies” (easy to see one of the reasons why Dylan sang “lay lady lay”). Sooooooo, now, memetimely speaking, I begin to learn of UniZero's “more efficient [than MuZero's] planning in the latent space”: see “UniZero: Generalized and Efficient Planning with Scalable Latent World Models”, Yuan Pu, et al., arXiv, 3 January 2025. As a onetime teenybopper concrete laborer toiling upon extension of the Eielson AFB, Alaska, SAC-&-U-2-used runways (the company had a contract with a HUGE penalty clause for a finish-date overrun, therefore instituted 12-hour shifts, 7-days per: anything over 8, time-and-a-half; anything over 40, double-time: I made sooo much money it ruined me for normal work for the rest of my life), I ask: Will the non-competitive Chinese model or the competitive US model for AI development prevail at cementing normosisXL to the ₁T₂-only glutamate-etched molecular-cellular brain?

IMHO: nature's universal-semiotic Mother Tongue ((covering ma, sacred space, with Musculpt symformphonie: for discussion of ma as universal root homonym, see Huynh Sanh Thong's profound paper “Mother's tongue and Slang: Why and how thought, language, and culture began”, published in Tuyen tap Ngon ngu va Van hoc Viet Nam, Issue 2, Volume 1, which was under the editorship of Ha Mai Phuong, Dong Viet, 1994, earlier published in 3 parts in English by Journal of Unconventional History, Fall 1990 and Spring 1991, no copy of which is to be found on the internet with any of the search engines I employ, but extensively commented upon relative to inner-Musculpt in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 2, pp. 767-8)) is not that speakable ((the speakable so-called “natural” languages being artificial in that they are demergent, from the universal-semiotic encoded within the higher-temporal formants of DNA's quantum-wave properties, under glutamatergic etching-anchoring orchestrated by prescriptive enculturation-socialization)) about QM; it's that unspeakable in QM. Me[me}time-independent clocks within clocks within clocks, there being three classes thereof ((see, e.g., quoting, “…the assumption of the lack of external and fixed time in the Universe… does not imply the lack of evolution but rather brings to the forefront the role of internal clocks…” as given in “Internal clock formulation of quantum mechanics”, Przemyslaw Malkiewicz and Artur Miroszewski, Physical Review D, 96, 7 August 2017; but note that even with complex unitarity and, thus, real orthogonality, violated [think: null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-logical “skew-perpendicularity”], there is perseverance in a search for, quoting, “physical predictors independent of specific clocks”, as essayed in “The time problem as seen in primordial perturbations”, Alice Boldrin and Przemyslaw Malkiewicz and Patrick Peter, Physical Review D, 109, 2 May 2024, the idea of a clock still retaining its age-old-Alshammered-out instigation relative to an objective passive, passing, referential linear-time)), these internal “clocks”, in the Paine-Pensinger model, being twistor-registers of the chronotopological operators executing 3-fold temporal CURL (quantized via Penrose twistors). When we have I[artificial}m instead of I/i^m, “then” --heh-heh-heh! -- “I am that I am” is tacitly taken -- not as mandation, but as Godification -- to cosmogonically necessitate I-am-WHAT-I-am simple-identity qua selfsameness: the singly-logically-valued monotheistic notion of All And Everything, where each of every is linearly independent by limitation to complex unitarity further limited by the real orthogonality of the binary-minded “real[i}ty”. Reality is understood to be tied to what it is, not to what it is not, and certainly not to what it is not n-“times” over by the _µT_m-logically-self-referential reentries of Klien-bottle-nesting-foam non-orientabilities: no[t}i|on such that i is not-i. As regards the Book Of Nature, this is Fundamentalism, an I-am-I-and-only-I proprioceptive-perceptive literalist's enfevered interpretation which places REmergent-culturally-“bare-perception” out-there in the socially-conferred role attribution named “cosmic exile”, as explicated by speakable-language-only-bound W.V.O. Quine in his Word and Object (my memory serving, “bare-perception” and “cosmic exile” are the terms actually therein employed by Quine, despite the fact that AI-online doesn't get you there). Our VR and AI developers are Tripartite-Fertile-Crescent-Religion Fundamentalists no better than other classes thereof: the gains-of-function they seek, by man[i}p/u|lating the lowest-order of genetic encipherment, are of the most reduced order-type, what Gurdjieff called the “moving parts of centers” -- all of the physics of nature being treated as involving nothing but the not[i}on of mo[ti}on (as distinct from mo[tⁱ}on, 3-fold [tⁱ} [that's Trikaladrsti-tapassiddhi: T¹, T², T³] meaning, as stated by Willie Betmore in his last words of 19 March 2020: “So 'everything' isn't everything”, even though his intent probably wasn't to speak of _µT_mly-non-simple identity-transparency).

My I/i^m hashave no long-term memory of ever having short-term cognized a “decision-science” decision made by decision-free nature; therefore, my Iambe long, long ago debarked from the dogs of war-on-nature committed -- then tacitly, now explicitly -- to P-doggy's operantly-conditioned reinforcement-learning-agent-inculcated A so-called GI -- Artificial, ok; General, what-a-reach, Intelligence -- based upon what “they-themselves”, heh-heh-heh, are, are by-love-possessed of the “accumulated experiential data”-defined selfhood (scotch Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers numbering m-logically-valued propositions un-experientially codified, but ontologically-prefiguring decomposed-existential data experientializable under realized real-neural-network wipeout-transformers), placed, by glutamatergic neuronal-etching-anchoring, in bootstrapped projective-identification-at-anima/animus-transference 8-fold way. A lowest-level [pro}ject-IDification not to be part[i}cularly proud of, what! As I've on so many occasions freely admitted: I have never finished anything, always moved on when could no longer see the reason why, which has never failed always and all ways to have been the given case in every case. One such where I MovedOn as quickly as I could, this being well before dot-org came on: circa 1973, minding my own business, as I usually diddo, a friend, couple actually, who had been employed to employ Skinnerian behavior-mod (prefiguration of body-mod fashionistas?) to renormalize behavior-problem children expulsed from the D.C. school system, and who, my friends that is, had sustained a personal-family crisis requiring immediate attention, asked my me to take over their “babysitting” job with regard to their ghetto-throwaways. Wellll, by then, I already knew that operantly-conditioned (especially when the rewards are limited to money, NGO-provided or no, no matter howsoever n-times “green-room” Noh-theater-like-dramatic-ly-scalar-n-ized) reinforcement learning was confined to the “moving-center”-only-level of hu-hu[hu}man statefunctioning (comp[re}hension of ₁T₂-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ was yet to come in upon my me). Nonetheless, as much as I cringed at the mere thought of it, I had to take the job, friends requiring friendship if they are to be, and remain, friends -- which is to say the least of it, empathetically speaking to base-state-[re}all|ity of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency. Not to tell the story, just the takeaway: the worst problem kids were obviously the smartest, and they would have absolutely nothing to do with the program, based as it was upon techniques of operant conditioning -- which factoid tells my me how smart are the AIs so readily accepting of the reinforcement learning for sequential decision-making wherein the transition dynamics are driven into [0,1] treated as probabilities of state, and where the “…reward function… assigns scalar rewards to state-action pairs”. Single-valued scalar rewords, uh, uh, wards. Pairs. Hmmm. Psychiatric wards? Nowhere I can see in transformer dynamics of multi-headed self-attention merging-operations of separate attention scores, reversing split-operations and merging to a single-valued single score -- processing being n-parallel instead of n-state superposed, that's n-state not pair-state qua 2-state, as in present and prospective so-called “quantum” computing -- is there the JoeGoode-looking-through the RicePereira-LayeredTransparent of the Transcendental Formal Logic of the Infinite such that REmergence _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ transpires, thus reversing DEmergence (this being consensually deemed “collapse”, e.g., of the m-valued Schrödinger wavefunction, such that instantaneously ₁T₂ly either/or coherent/decoherent, not memetime-independently all the states, not degrees, in between). Creativity (largely mediated by the binary-mind-non-experiential Unconscious as Infinite Sets, C indicating the continuum cum the coherent states of which have to DEmerge through nested relative-states _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ so as to reach the decoherency-state of the “accumulated experiential data” used for reinforcement learning of AIs not smart enough to reject operant conditioning) is paradigm-superseding, whereas mere innovation (particularly that technological) is doing something different within the governing paradigm. Once the ₁T₂-logical-value order-type of _muT_m is transcended, entry is made upon post-paradigmatic Weltbilds, which are the nested-orders-of-relative-state-specific “world models” of this one-and-only universe that MuZero specifically, by its very name, zeros-out, keeps confined to the corpus-of-binary-minds' collective unconscious by proscription of the holographic exteriorization of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical inner-Musculpt.

IMHO -- that of a refusenik-dropout completely unqualified -- quantum-relativity was dissimulated long before “…during the Cold War [when] we classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community…” (see the link made above as regards the Biden Whitehouse): decisively by the mid-1920s (1921: Post's m-valued-_µT_m logics; 1925: Tantric-Schrödinger's m-valued wavefunction; 1926: anti-Kabbalah, secular-Rabbinical qua scientistic-mandarinatic, statistical BornRuled collapse of the m-valued wavefunction to a single probability amplitude regarded as tantamount to an objective-real-spacetime single value). But imputations concerning dissembled imports of higher mathematics were dissimulated (that's dissed thrice over! number-theoretically, algebraically, logically) from the 1820s, predisposing dyssembling of physics and chemistry thereafter. Tacitly to begin with, later explicitly, this amounted to a mass-formation decision to adopt a doctrine of uses placing military apps foremost, i.e., a decision to use math, physics, chemistry, indeed science qua science, and spawned infratech primarily to kill rather than primarily to preserve-sustain. “We own the weather, soon the climate!” This ownership under what doctrine of uses? “We own the human genome, soon the genomes of the whole biosphere!” This ownership under what doctrine of uses? And, parenthetically, what field-profession-industry is better equipped to scam than is medicine-doctorin'-pharmaceuticals? Uh, uh, behavior mod, weather mod, genome mod, climate mod, gain-of-function whole-body mod (think: high-mesomorph, type-A, anabolic-steroid-fed mindset and those who imprint thereupon): for what, primarily? Looking Backward over the whole sweep of recorded human hisstory, wherein the few positives are overwhelmingly outweighed by the mass formation of negatives, how does it feel to be a member of the hu-hu-[hu}man species?

Back in my day -- early- to mid-'60s -- the first two years at AU-SIS (problem-based, team-taught seminars being up-front) exceeded everything I'd earlier been subject to (nowadays, not so much, to say the least). Wonderful! then it was -- and by me seen, who made a point of looking closely, as altogether diminishing what Georgetown had on offer (so: my per{son]al assessment of Georgetown taking over the Dept. of State and yielding Clinton-for-Prez was not good, especially given the Rhodes: and look what he facilitated the doing of to the banking system! for one). Not to forget M.Morningstar's Cabalistic intros in the AU library and the visit to NYC's Samuel Weiser's yielding discovery of J.G.Bennettian “skew-parallelism”. The second two years at AU-SIS, circa the '60s, were just the same-ol' same-ol' U.-crap, which -- given my elaborate mil.brat exposure + my similarly-elaborate having been indulged in upper-Foxhall/SpringValley-cum-Georgetown Q-Street (prefiguring my later cognitively-interdictive Q-contest[i}ments?) amaeru exposures -- I tried to stomach, but couldn't, so MovedOn into The Way To Find Out: which took me to SFTG, JFKSWCS, TID of the 525th MIG, CICV-Targets, SRA/MACV-J2, the libraries of GT & GW med schools, AT-related studies, Gurdjieff-Jung-Aurobindo, et al., GMU arts & dance & music, the Velikovsky conference, Cornell tornadogenesis & DNA helix-coil transition, Postian _µT_m, so on and so forth: these by aged 30. After that, well -- not so much, given the climate governing the weather of the prevailing collective mindset. Subject to truncation renormalization -- so, pretty much walked away back into digging trees made into “inner work” and eventually novel writing regarded as a bibliotherapeutic-form of “inner work” for Rx of endemic PTSD-of-the-socius caught in dyscivilization planetarized. I haven't often gotten well into it; only a comment here, a comment there -- and people have very occasionally asked me to explain my weird view of things, which doesn't seem to them to have anything to do with the real world or with how humans have always done things. Attempts at explanation have generally fallen off a cliff quite quickly, regardless of the background of the asker. “Don't understand” has sometimes been unabashedly stated. The fact of the matter is: I don't understand it either -- certainly not as much as I would have had we not been cut-off at the ankles, circa 1980. Nonetheless, onward and upward, old soul -- if only in a hovercraft. I do not wish to convert inner-Musculpt symformphonie into some speakable language, an impossibility at any “rate”. So, AI's natural language processing NLP procedures are not relevant. Infratech For Bad being the preferred most-reductive modal-logic castoff of the mass-formation-chosen me[me}time-future hisstory: wonderous what the binary-mind has been capable of, what! Not the least: whilst fomenting tactical nuke-you warfare, there is the cultivated impetus to flood the planet with myriad mini-to-nano potential “China syndrome” locusts, uh, loci -- and even placed upon more and more INS-cum-intelsat-cum-command-cum-homing-guided hypersonic rockettes. However, since those NLP procedures are being massively developed, it might be interesting to try to imagine modifications of them with the objective to fulfill some of what would be required to holographically exteriorize inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams. Moreover, the binary-mind exposed to inner-Musculpt tries unsuccessfully to somehow “transliterate” Musculpt symformphonie into its own highly-reduced terms -- the glutamate-anchored normopathic see-man-tic domain presumably being the main stumbling block (sonic-visioning of the see-dolphin-tic domain possibly being closer to the mark). Now, were I a stealth TriangleLander into conformal welding of (_µT_m-LETS-currency-defining quasi-fractal e-boundaries) chordal fractal-curve boundaries at “percolations” (one way to understand limitations of Reagonomic trickledowns?), I might replace the real-orthogonality griding of NLP coordinate sheets, initially not with complex rectilinear unitarity (let alone, in the beginning, null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-“skew-perpendicularity”), but with the triangle-number and hexagonal-number (of the figurate polygonal numbers) numerable equilateral-triangular-grided nesting-foam sheets -- regarding the real-numerability with selfsame numbers as indicative of the lowest qua most-reduced, i.e., that ₁T₂, logical-value order-type modality. This modality being where to start (eventually moving on to non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ propositions of 3-fold topologically-active operator-time orchestrated Musculpt symformphonie) of evolution-through-use of Musculpt as universal non-“natural” language, which may turn out to be nature's metalanguage, for, clearly, nature does not employ “natural” languages. What the “look for” is isn't extra-sensory so much as non-₁T₂-sensory (those “in” one or another order-type of “participation mystique” are far and away not without proprioception-perception). Since, as immediately given to direct awareness, it is the topological transformations of “shape” (sort of like how neurolinguistic programming NLP “reframings” change meanings) of the colored sounded-forms that symbolically? that tropologically? that metaⁿ-referentially? convey Musculpt-symformphonic meanings, not the “shapes” themselves, appropriately-modified transformers (see here and here and here) -- likely of n-types -- would seem to be _µT_mly-apropos. Even the notion of AI attention mechanisms has some Musculpted _µT_m-LETS utility, in that the initial notion as to stacking values on the base-state (₁T₂-only cash) of the given _µT_m-LETS-currency's currency unit was conceptualized as the placing of weights; only later did it become obvious that (if the level of self-organizational competency of markette-sorting-angel mechanisms is to be increasingly enhanced) the ensheaved values were to be fine-grain-tagged to e-commons open-source computer-gamed indicator-measurables (therefore no longer ₁T₂-simplistically-simple mere weights). There is binary-mind ₁T₂-only-self self-attention Sorosian reflexivity, and then there is the infinite regress of concentration in I/i^m-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-self self-observation (which, as the baud-rate, rate of rate, rate of rate of rate of consciousness approach relative-absolute scaling limits, given the flex-time of Special Relativity, not to mention General-Relativistic 3-fold topologically-active operator-time executions, is not mere retroflexion, as some would have it be).

One of the main differences between speakable “natural” languages (NLs) and inner-Musculpt (iMuS) is that NLs (excepting figurative usages) are overwhelmingly sequential, whereas iMuS is THE-form-deep-structure superposed-embedded and-also-as-well-as forms-of-THE-form-surface-structure sequentially-cyclotomically decomposable. Moreover, NL script attempts to faithfully convey the spoken; whilst iMuS sounds and colors are contents on equal footings to iMuS sculpted shapes, the former two no conveyance of each other or of the latter (thus, forget prescriptively-definitionally put together Scriabin color organs and Kandinsky-Klee-Mondrian color-shape-correlations attempts to empathically-synaesthetically create a post-post-Renaissance-naturalism natural-abstraction phenomenological synthesis). Hence, iMuS is unspeakable, but potentially holographically-cum-colorfield-cum-soundscape exteriorizable, storable, analyzable, endogenous-ketaminergically learnable (in, say, an interactive-computerized, biofeedback-equipped, holo-display-domed, isolation-flotation Lilly tank). Any n-headed transformer aspect of the “machine-language” level of iMuS symformphonic demergence, therefore, would have to do with nested sequential decomposition involutes of the _µT_mly-superposed meaning gestalt constellated as a demergent by a J.Goode “look through” of the entire ensheavement of the I.Pereira “layered transparent”, the slow-baud-rate-binary-mind's petit-mal take on this sonic-color-photism-flashover “look through” being freeze-frame auraed to a t-instant of memetime, instantaneously dismissed as stick-not-snake by the glutamate-etched normotic, and dissed by the psychiatric establishment as symptomatic expression of nascent pathology.

I can't remember exactly when, but I can narrow it down: as to my first use of the term “identity-transparency”. I purchased a copy of David Rapaport's Organization and Pathology of Thought during 1972 ((most affecting at my reading being: [1] Rapaport's explication of Piaget relative to P's reliance upon Euclidian invariants at delineation of the stages of cognitive “development”, actually prescriptive normotic induction at neuronal plasticity glutamatergically anchored; and [2] Wilhelm Stekel's discussion of “The Polyphony of Thought”, as offering positive reinforcement concerning my experience of inner-Musculpt -- that reinforcement being counterpoise to the repetitious denigrations of “your mode of thought” which I'd experienced ad nauseum since entering secondary school)), wherein is stated:

…thinks without words, listening for the overtones without grasping the melody. He hears only chords or single tones. Perhaps he thinks without verbal-images, perhaps only in symbolic pictures that hide the thoughts. Once it is recognized that thinking is a polyphony and not one voice…

So, considering “once it is recognized”, the next thought “what, then, is to be surmised” became one among several leads-in to what eventually was re[cog}nized as I/i^m. After that, I began reading into psychoanalytic “object-relations theory”: it was almost certainly during this period of reading that I first used the term “identity transparency”. I learned of Everett's relative-state formulation of QM before going to Cornell during the summer of 1975: likely I was saying “relative-state identity-transparency” by then. It would have been after reading Emil Post at Cornell that I would first have said “_µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency”. How did I get “identity-transparency” out of object-relations theory? As an 8-yearold living in Midori Gaoka, Ashiya-cho, kita-Kyushu (AI says that there is no such Midori Gaoka, which reveals how inexperienced is AI's “accumulated experiential data”, AI here likely relying solely upon postal codes), circa 1953, I occasionally slipped out of our house and sneaked over to the house of one of the Japanese families where all the kids slept in an entangled pile (triangulated superposition) on tatami mat (BaseStateCommonGround) instead of, like me, alone in a bed. I, thus, knew early-on (later oft reinforced in various parts of S.E. Asia) that in rural Asia infants, in the course of the day, pass through many sets of hands, and even more than one breastfeeder, and not just those hands of the immediate extended family, especially so if the open space of the long house is the context of childrearing. Therefore, at reading into psychoanalytic object-relations theory, it was quickly apparent that the characterization of inner-object formation was based exclusively upon modern Western family relations, and could not begin to account for origins of, say, states of “participation mystique”, a term I was familiar with from having read into C. G. Jung beginning in 1963 at behests of Abdul Aziz Said, AU-SIS. Attachment to the mother may be the root of the sense of selfsame-self individuated identity (and thereupon eventually coming to think almost exclusively in a single melody line, instead of stacked chords and the stacked n-lines of polyphony) for those infants given care in a nuclear family or single-parent family, but not so for those infants given care especially in a long house by n-residents, each of which adept at the “non-orthogonal [triangulated] states cannot be distinguished perfectly” quantum-non-simple identity-transparency (no [single-level-enciphered-genome engineered, neglecting quantum-wave properties of DNA] clones, please! entanglement, superposition) incumbent upon states of “participation mystique”.

Perhaps binary-mind so[me}whats, uh, uh, contemporary AGIs that is, are just waystations, mere dust along the path -- as improbable as that seems, given the 200-years-hisstory of collective hysterical back-reaction-upon-the-metric of imports as to the nature of nature's embodied notion of identity-transparency qua identity-transparency, discoveries concerning which going back to N. H. Abel's “impossibility” theorem, circa 1823. Maybe the binary-mind had to, just simply had to, thoroughly deconstruct NL, discovering that no NL is altogether formalizable in ₁T₂-only terms (a discovery apparently not yet made, or, well, consensuated, cf. for one, purportedly-₁T₃-logical Aymara), in order to credit X[is}tense of the likes of non-binary iMuS and VirFut Q-Pro. Wittgensteinian cum Mastermanian “meaning is use” in the distributive semantics (context provided here and here and here) of the AI-transformer's numerical encoding of semantic gestalts (a 19th-century use-value theory of communication echoing the current doubling-down on the 17th- and 18th-century mind in current global drift vis-à-vis political-economy orientation?). In tacitly converting the meaning of a J.Goode “look through” of the entire ensheavement of the I.Pereira “layered transparent” of the Transcendental Formal Logic of the Infinite to a ₁T₂-only n-dimensional vector (called, somewhat strangely, “an embedding”, this call derivative of cerebral-cortex architectonics and ANNs and spatial RNNs and temporal CNNs) plotted in real hyper[vectors}pace ((not complex Hilbert's pace, let alone Lukasiewicz-Post hypercomplex H-space, aka the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, i.e., the nesting-foamed, ostensibly n-sheeted, folded-towel BackCloth understood a memetime-independent cyclotomic-involutory logical-value-order-type concatenation of cascade-decompacted-decompressed reverse-cascade-compactions-compressions [this “down-up” being non-orientable under 3rd-order topologically-active operator-time]: for contextual edification, see “Compression for Deep Learning”, Diana Resmerita, Ph.D. dissertation, Universite Cote d' Azur, 2022)), AI enters development analogous to how development of the pragmatics of _µT_m-LETS currency-unit ensheavement would have to proceed. In choosing multidimensional vector space over multivalued logics understood independent of the notion truth-value, in order to mathematically codify the “distributive” of linguistic semantics, AI developers neglect the meaning of meaning as revealed by altered states of consciousness: not merely non-verbal, but also non-communicative relative to a socius ₁T₂ly-understood absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct from its “surround” of outer and inner “objects”; rather, “up-there to down-here”, higher-order to lower in the logical-ontological-existential nesting-foam, where within meaning demerges functions automatized to structures pragmatically grammaticized. AI's stack of vector embeddings as codification of meaning is generative, as distinct from demergent; hence its employed notion of “higher order” is confined to the lower end of the logical-ontological-existential nesting-foam, and, thus, altogether precludes the non-orientability aspect of supersystem-system-subsystem “[ma}tics”. But perhaps this is just a waystation, mere dust along the path. A step toward crediting X[is}tense of the likes of non-binary iMuS and VirFut Q-Pro may well have been discovery of the molecular-cellular brain's Default Mode Network (DMN) and its modulation by psychedelics, that network complementing the trophotropic state identified by Walter Rudolf Hess and instrumental in regards to the subclinical autogenic-discharge activity that may have considerable import as to the correct interpretation of the m-valuedness of the Schrödinger wavefunction. Though there are brief mentions seen here and there, and studies of how DMN-connectivity-disruptions may be involved in pathogenesis of schizophrenia, I haven't found any studies of, specifically, how glutamatergic neuronal pruning qua neural network wipeouts, orchestrated by prescriptive enculturation-socialization, affect interactions between the Salience Network (described here on an Omniscient Neurotechnology -- heh-heh-heh! -- webpage) and the DMN and the Executive Control Network. Let alone “higher-order interactions, going beyond the pairwise relations and local neighborhoods defined by graph representations”, to quote “Topological Graph Signal Compression”, Guillermo Bernardez, et al., arXiv, 21 August 2023. Advent of topological deep learning (which I am only now learning of the existence of) is not only a major step toward acknowledging X[is}tense of the likes of non-binary iMuS and VirFut Q-Pro, but associated topological data analysis (good offices of Singaporeans Daniel Leykem and Dimitris G. Angelakis, Advances in Physics: X [a fully-open access journal: Hooray!], 29 April 2023) is quite possibly a turning point as regards entry of 3-fold topologically-active operator-time into the field of quantum-gravity.

Uck-oh! Problem with the above-stated Hartmannism-Rapaportism: “…meaning of meaning as revealed by altered states of consciousness: not merely non-verbal, but also non-communicative relative to a socius ₁T₂ly-understood absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct from its 'surround' of outer and inner 'objects'; rather, 'up-there to down-here', higher-order to lower in the logical-ontological-existential nesting-foam, where within meaning demerges functions automatized to structures pragmatically grammaticized”? Please consider Non-message passing topological neural networks (memetime-independently, in principle, obviating the quantum-non-locality-induced “need for” and/or “desire for” superluminal velocities, in context of scale-relative absolute limiting velocities, among other n-valued universal physical constants m-logically processed) as explicated in “Simplicial Representation Learning with Neural k-Forms”, Kelly Maggs and Celia Hacker and Bastian Rieck, arXiv, 15 March 2024, which focuses upon “leveraging geometric information from [embedded] simplicial complexes… using node coordinates… offering interpretability and geometric consistency without message passing”.

Man-oh-man! It seems to me that the Nobel committee cannot possibly credit “order without growth” so long as the economics profession remains 18th-century-mind-identified and thus hegemonically fixated upon sustained growth (endogenously driven by infratech-predominant innovation; exogenously, generally by ripped-off negentropy plugged in by externality scarperers) as the [eco}nomic end-all of e[con}omic be-all (quite frankly, The Economists, expunging relativistic-quantum physics, have no idea whatsoever how economic order could arise and maintain itself absent growth, growth, and more growth) -- unending growth, seen nowhere in this universe, being the ₁T₂-only-logical macroeconomic extension of the micro-actor's single-minded single-logically-valued-profit-motivated expectation of memetime-bound growth in ₁T₂-only-capital qua net-worth, absence of this expectation inevitably leading to onset of disorder, ₁T₂-pardoxically, turbo-cancerous degeneration-cuspover lurking behind some still barely seen threshold, national-to-individual-scale moral-upbraidings of the marketplace, merely verbalized or unionized or nationalized, having yielded little of positive value as regards fundamentals (not to mention the hu-hu[hu}man inordinate mass tragedies involved on the national scale level). My thesis has been that Wheelerian “magic without magic” is due to m-valued relative-state identity-transparency m-logically processed, a form of “magic” (think: primordial-unto-archaic “participation mystique”) which humanity has resolutely remained in denial of ever since regarding N. H. Abel's existence proof for trans-al-jabr as an “impossibility” theorem. There is an economic correlate to this “magic without magic” wherein growth stands in for order in a fashion similar to how light stands in for absolute limiting velocity. Going from single-valued light to multivalued light is to hypothesize existence of n-scale-relative absolute limiting velocities, each of which invokes the principles of Special Relativity relative to their AOs, areas of operation, uh, LSTDs, limited spacetime domains -- not least the principle of memetime dilation-unto-stoppage. Similarly, going from single-valued growth (linear or nonlinear) to multivalued growth (by implementing m-valued-LETS nesting-foams, transactions in which are m-logically-processed) is to hypothesize existence of n-scale-relative absolute limits to growth, each of which invokes principles of Special Relativity relative to their AOs, areas of operation, uh, LSTDs, limited spacetime domains -- not least the principle of memetime dilation-unto-stoppage. In context of m-logical processing, these limits are not calculus-like limits, understood as to particular given cases to be terminal selfsame single values; rather, these limits are indicative of operators-initializers (think: 3-fold topologically-active operator-time) of memetime-independent order-type phase transitions; markette-wise, transitions to higher or lower levels of self-organizational competency manifest vis-à-vis how well or how poorly the institutionalized “framework determining conditions” of the marketteplace accept or prevent utilization of the “quantum potential” for autopoiesis (think: innovation) and self-organization resident in m-valued relative-state identity-transparency m-logically processed.

Effing cognitive fudge. No, no. That's a bit of alright! Consider the value stack upon the _µT_m-LETS-currency-unit base-state in terms of order-types of techno-regimes (think: convertibility of the elements) as underlying levels of self-organizational competency (internalizing classes of externalities) relative to sheaf theory as metaphorically characterized ((Baumgardner the family name on mother's side, and having been a landscape laborer, gardener, nurseryman most of my working adult life, the metaphor employed is much to my liking: triangulated viewing-point superpositions, qua “node coordinates”, in multi-sheeted sacred space, ma, being one of the Zen aesthetics lessons learned from my Japanese gardening and flower arranging apprenticeships; see page 532, Vol. 2, of our 1994 novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh; judo-jujitsu lessons aged 8-11 and, in my mid-to-late-20s, gardening lessons provided by Nonkei T. Ishiyama, a 5th-degree blackbelt in jujitsu still giving martial arts lessons at age 80; simultaneously, flower arranging lessons given by master instructor Toki Miyakawa, Ikenobo School, noted on page 8, “Ikebana Attraction” of Pacific Citizen, 19 February 1960)) by Quanta Magazine's Kanstantin Kakaes writing “What Are Sheaves?”, to wit, quoting:

While each sheaf is a vast collection of objects, you can also consider the collection of all sheaves on a given mathematical object -- the real line, a circle, or some other entity [e.g., _µT_m-LETS-currency-unit base-state, qua ₁T₂-only cash, given in simplicial representation, and point-set of “node coordinates”, as the lowest order Maggs k-form]. This is like considering all the possible [think: VirFut Q-Pro] gardens you could plant on a given plot of land.

There are more non-chancy logical-value order-types to Being There, Horacio, than the binary-mind sees in Luneburg binocular visual space with the aid of its psychometric distance function: the twisted functions demerged by 3-fold temporal CURL (twistor quantized) @ execution of G-numbered G-numbered Gödel numbers of Lukasiewicz-Post cosmic propositions written by nature onto the most-dense sheet of the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space.

The notion of me[me}time-bound sequential incarnations is the most-reduced, ₁T₂-only-qua-decoherent, spontaneously-localized, collapsed-state take on-- what? The reference state, i.e., on _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen-AllBaseState-CommonGround such that, by skew-perpendicular-triangulated stealth, each life is every life of everyone; every life of everyone, each life: my first nascent engagement with this atemporal understanding was in the metaphorical form of the huge-diameter short length of rope strung over entrance to the Shinto shrine located upon the camellia-covered hillside above the house I lived in, backside of the flightline, circa 1953, Midori Gaoka, Ashiya-cho, kita-Kyushu (those camellias and that shrine were still there in 1990 when I returned for a visit); later, more explicitly, if still metaphorically, understood relative to sacred space, ma (coordination-point triangulated -- even in Ikebana, as I was taught: shin, soi, tai yakueda-branch terminuses -- and multi-sheeted, not so much mere negative space as distinct from white space, empty space, void, vacuum, even counterspace; rather, chronotopologically branched into BackCloth multiple sheets of the m-logically-valued function-phase space), to Cantorian aleph-null, to the modality of information storage on a holographic plate, and to correlation-length at self-organized criticality of, say, the critical temperature at which helix-coil transition of the DNA molecule is initialized and radiation exchange transpires. Not to mention: considering that what happens inside our Sun forecasts tornado outbreaks on Earth (see Paul Prikryl's and Vojto Rusin's “Occurrence of tornado outbreaks influenced by solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling”, Advances in Science and Research: Contributions in Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 18 July 2025), what happens where-oh-where-could-it-be forecasts what happens inside our Sun? -- and what would an authentic answer to that question tell us about-- well, superconductant exchange of hydrothermodynamic properties? As regards how I took this growing understanding per[son}all|y, quoth my personal journal, circa 1964, as given in our 1994 novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 1, page 280:

The collective difficulty is writ small in me as my neurosis; my personal neurosis is writ large in the collectivity as the present cultural dilemma. How can I find my own integration without simultaneously finding a new cultural synthesis?

This Amae-Einfuhlung-M-path[e}tic “standing under” was reflected as regards [e|co}nomic thought in the “allel[o}tropic theory of value” in an “autopoi[on}Omy” discussed in our novel (see Vol 2, pages 541-3): an “of each other” qua “_µT_m-quantum-relative-state” not[i}on of value requiring m-valued exchange units (the information carried thereby analogous to the information carried by, say, an e[lectr}on à la the m-valued Schrödinger statefunction) m-logically processed for markette effectuation. The m-valuedness (internalizing “externalities”, such as, IMHO, to include poverty, net-worth imparities, and X-number of other extra-e[con}omic variables) of any “instrument” at exchange being an m-measure of its capacity to facilitate functional integration of the _µT_m-relative-state-identity-transparency of the supersystem-system-subsystem nesting-foam, that prevailing state being quantum-composite-unit-of-account mapped -- by the Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”, planet Earth -- over the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. There are X-number of levels and logic-order-types in which virtually any subject can be discoursed upon, and if one -- heh-heh-heh -- looks at the 1-minus-X modality popularly engaged with, well-- given the level of mental deficiency cum en[pair}ment the human species has long, long -- if not always -- chosen to lead it… Look at the ₁T₂-only hisstory of money, as gambler-e[con}Omist!-financier John Law bequeathed it to, say, Adam Smith and his progeny, to see why the finance service as we have known it (some rectification recently offered by anarchist-anthropologist David Graeber as noted here and here) has been a veritable combat arm -- along with forced-draft urbanization, industrialization of agriculture, poisonization-syntheticization of food processing, genetic engineering, geoengineering, et cetera -- in the persistent war against non-orthogonal nature. OMG, stone the robins! those local multiplier effects just keep flying away. Political conglomeration, economic conglomeration, political-economy agglomeration being the GLE's -- global leadership elite's -- sole answer to every ₁T₂-only-market failure. Mentality of NewWorld fund[a}mental, Levantine rugmerchant, Chinese shophouser, Indian moneychanger, Bone[a}part[i}am bureaucrat brought not only to the nation-state scale level of policymaking, but also to those multilateral and transnational, and even when the multinational employs multiple-scenarios strategic planning it is so done in conformance to the binary diktats orthogonality imposes on rectilinear minds.

We may, ought to even, note that the stipulations made in “Solar geoengineering in wrong hands could wreak climate havoc, scientists warn”, Damian Carrington, The Guardian, 5 November 2025, as regards how such geoengineering should be undertaken, do not factor in implications of the physics -- whatever it is, Paine-Kaplan cascade theory and/or otherwise -- that certainly must underlie how it is that “occurrence of tornado outbreaks is influenced by solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling”. Unhappily, it appears that, for that to occur, the requisite sort of thinking brought to policymaking is becoming less and less likely, because my assertion as to cuspover of a nonlinear, 3000-year, Turchinian-cliodynamic quasi-cycle relative to cognitive en[pair}ment (see: “Our Modern Madhouse Exposes A Collective Laziness Of Mind”, Todd Hayen, Off-Guardian reposted to ZeroHedge, 6 November 2025; but consider imports of his castigation of black-or-white logic without even a minor brief on fuzzy logic, let alone Lukasiewicz-Post _µT_m-logics) did not specifically mention the markedly growing incidence of neurological impairments, especially among the young, associated with COVID-19 in “Rising Cognitive Disability as a Public Health Concern Among US Adults”, Ka-Ho Wong, et al., Neurology, 105:8, 21 October 2025, and in “New Study Finds Cognitive Impairment Is Skyrocketing Across America”, Nicolas Hulscher, Focal Points, 4 November 2025, with m-mRNA vaccines. Not to mention the [cog}native debase[m}ent sure to be associated with doggy-clone prefiguration of Homosapien clones and AI-boss-surrogate prefiguration of robotic overseers of hu-hu-[hu}man clones.

One of the main things about classified is: if you are not classified, you do not know what is classified, and therefore what is and is not classifiable. So, that being the case, if your theoretical ideas and findings of your experimental research are strongly resisted, you have no way of knowing for sure whether this suppression is based upon (a) actual demerits of the case you've made, or (b) because you have inadvertently intruded upon contents of a classified domain -- and if the latter, no one in the know can tell you that they are in the know, nor can they tell you that that (b) case is your case without violating the laws governing their access to classified information. Analogous to this circumstance governing so much of science -- particularly beginning in earnest with onset of WWII (think, e.g.: MIT's Rad Lab, for instance, progeny thereof, not only with regard to radar unto phased-array “heaters”, but also into the sort of stuff referred to here and purveyed by Popperian Kock-I-ed Pop-I's climbing their ₁T₂-Weberian organizations; not up mine, _µT_mly Postian, were there any such) -- was the fact that certain portions of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, could not (((similar to the case of Archimedes Patti's Why Vietnam? ((this linked interview, as internet provided, after the initial paragraphs, says to me: “Not available in your area”, which, for me, is Phnom Penh, Cambodia: the anonymous whomeeeeevers don't want SEAsians to know that onetime sous chef, HCM -- as AIed: the Amiral de Latouche-Treville, Parker House Hotel in Boston, Drayton Court Hotel in London's West Ealing, Carlton Hotel in London's Haymarket, and as pastry chef on the Newhaven-Dieppe ferry: just the kind of detail I have needed to know so as to lift my quality of life, what! -- wanted to base structures of the new VNese government on post-colonial America's founding documents?)) as explained to me over coffee-table tea in his Florida home (I'm sitting there trying to hold down the tannic-quinic-citric-gallic acid resident in the tea whilst thinking of the many millions why-indeed-ignominiously-unnecessarily made prematurely dead): after VE Day and VJ Day, as appropriate, OSS-X2 counterintelligence documents were systematically destroyed, except that those used in the writing of Patti's book were sent back by him to the ZI from Hanoi in a locked footlocker -- lost for decades -- then finely found, footlocker still locked, in the back of a CIA storage room, and its contents expeditiously declassified, this being the real reason his book was not written earlier: little known, and not known to A.L.A. Patti until I told him, was, the quite important indicator of HCM's intentions, that the Christian Science Monitor's lead pacific-war correspondent, Gordon Walker, was, in 1945, face-to-face asked by Ho Chi Minh to take on the task of managing the postwar press by assuming the position of SRVN Minister of Public Information, a job offer which Walker politely declined; I learned of this from Walker's wife, who graciously allowed me to read his fascinating unpublished personal journal written during the 1930s-'40s-early-'50s: he personally knew every major political figure in Asia during that era, yet had his ear to the ground of the impoverished, the oppressed, the disenfranchised; so, no wonder HCM approached him))) have been written before 25 years after the Vietnam war's 1968 Tet offensive, by which memetime the necessary reference materials (as well thereof personal knowledge, e.g., due to having written those materials, or such like, oneself) had been altogether declassified. According to his testimony to me, Douglas A. Paine experienced major distributed-editorial revisionism-type -- IMHO analogous to the “deletatory mechanisms present in bacteria that are [so far as the binary-mind is concerned] designed to minimize the genomic burden and eliminate unwanted foreign DNA”, currently being ConveDDed to… heh-heh-heh! -- difficulties with vettings by peers of his paper entitled “A climate hypothesis describing the solar-terrestrial system as a frequency domain with specific response characteristics”, Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union, 64:26, July 1983, such that he could not layout the conceptual foundation (even from the Abstract alone, it is easy to see that what was published by Eos is far and away from being Doug Paine's actual thinking, such as seen here from a few years earlier, and in the Abstract to “The numerical prediction of tornadic windstorms”, Douglas A. Paine and Michael L. Kaplan, NASA Langley Research Center, proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Society of Engineering Science, Hampton, VA, 1-3 November 1976, from a few years earlier yet) necessary and sufficient to explication of what he really thought concerning solar-into-terrestrial action (let's not get into what he thought about terrestrial-into-solar action) -- and had no way to reach a firm conclusion as to case (a) or case (b) stated above. As to Paine's actual thoughts, I obviously cannot reliably testify, only offer a concise speculative statement: the so-called “'mechanism' of action” is hypercomplex-hypercomplex-complex angular momentum (real angular momentum tied to memetime) -- conveyed by various carriers (see, e.g.,: here and here and here and here) -- cascade (see here for an excellent account of the prevailing epicyclular-heliocentric-supplanting-epicyclular-geocentric consensus according to which our Sun modulates our Galaxy, rather than vice versa, the factors considered, according to MHO, being surface-structure to such like as hypercomplex angular momentum conveyance-cascade), the physics of which being handled mathematically as 3-fold-topologically-active-Pauli-Paine-operator-time's temporal-CURL-order-types quantized via Penrose twistors, Schrödinger's statefunction _µT_mly understood relative to relative-state-identity-transparency, this one-and-only universe (the “epicycle”-generating notion of a “classical limit” being scotched), not in terms of probability amplitudes. Were that the case, how many anthropogenic ways would there be to iatrogenically intervene into the involved frequency domains -- severe-storm-genesis “wise”, climate-change-dynamics “wise”? Using historical data sets, repeatedly, circa 1975, that's 1975, folks! tornado-outbreak forecasts accurately produced 12-hours in advance on the 1-km grid. So's I was told: that ain't no mere scotchbroth, IMHO, considering how many tornadoes there have been since 1975. Given the all-involved-M-mouse nature of MICIMATT, what are the full dimensions of culpability, for classifying so much of science, borne by anyone and everyone owning stocks in virtually anything post-WWII, not only the superrich, the hyperrich, the ultrarich? But, clearly, the rat-effing of all this sort of stuff is epiphenomenal, even perhaps incidental, to end-memetimes of, not only memetime as objective-lineartime, but of a 300-year quasi-cycle in human-governance ideology, and, more fundamentally, of a 3,000-year quasi-cycle in the logical-value-order-type of human-cognitive employments.

I thought it was a 40-foot diving tower I was pushed off of, but here it says 32-feet, circa 1923; maybe by 1958 the diving tower at Susterka Lake resort was raised to 40-feet. I periodically went Saturdays ((as a passenger on the back of a 650cc BSA: daily parked in the interior courtyard parking area next to the shop-class rooms: a very rough school at that memetime, switchblade and reefer rampant; to avoid being routinely beaten up, you had to gang up; being an outsider, I was pulled into the Puerto Rican subset when a DAed member thereof, with his zapatos puntiagudos sporting high metal-tapped wooden Cuban heels, “stepped” into a 4-against-1 just outside the gym entrance where I was getting badly knocked around, broke a bone in my right hand trying unsuccessfully to defend myself, the 4 who attacked me being several years older than I was; incidentally, every Friday night there was a strip under the trestle bridge where one of the older girls took it all off)) to that nearby lake, as a 7th-grader at grades-7-through-12 Ypsilanti, H.S., swam, listened to the Everly Brothers' “All I have to do is dream” on the loudspeaker system, sipped cokes, munched fries, drifted off, so on. Somehow, I've always associated being pushed off that diving tower with seeing, at that memetime, Angie Dickenson in China Gate, the film about Dien Bien Phu. But I never actually analyzed that association until after recently re-viewing the film on the SmartTV's YouTube. It's now clear to me that the association to AD was a psychological displacement (DA-AD? hmmm…): the actual fall off, surely, given my childhood exposure (sneaking my way through the base guard mount up the hillside at the back of the flightline to watch wave after wave after wave) to the Ashiya-AFB C-119 lifts-off for resupply of DBP, the gifts and stories about the Tonks brought back to me from Ha Noi, was in back-reactive response to the prologue-monologue voiceover that opens the movie (just how factually mistaken that prologue was, I didn't learn until many years after 1958 whilst conversing with Archimedes Patti). Strange, how the unconscious works!

Ever since my Cornell days, circa mid-to-late 1970s, I've enunciated my take on far-from-equilibrium phase transitions: all extremes, including the extremely normal, i.e., the normopathic, are visited in course of the critical-state “flashover” (duration of “flashover” being relative to the governing memetemporal window: biotime, sociotime, geotime, et cetera), whereupon correlation lengths snap to infinity (indicative of BackCloth presence of _C+T_C+-relative-state identity-transparency on BaseStateCommonGround most-dense sheet of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space). The “task specific-network” depiction of a chain-transition, no messages transmitted, of neural-k-form embedded simplicial complexes, given in Figure 2 of “Simplicial Representation Learning with Neural k-Forms”, Kelly Maggs and Celia Hacker and Bastian Rieck, arXiv, 15 March 2024, graphically illustrates this extremes-assertion notion rather nicely, IMHO. Not only with regard to climate-change dynamics. Also: techno-forced sociopoliticoeconomic phase transitions. Advent of machine spinning and looming, for example, displaced not only a certain class of workers, but quenched a large portion of female-instituted tropological sociality by altogether removing cosmological metareference from weaving, stripping away the identity-incorporation-unto-transparency involved in ritual gift exchange of sacred cloths, ultimately leading to the psychologically regressed aesthetics of the modern rag trade (not to mention deterioration of gift exchange to transaction rent). Given that the index of cosmotropological metareference (re: Weltanschauung unto Lebenswelt unto Umwelts in cyclotomic demergence such that principles of worldview construct are analogically highly correlated with metaphysical assumptions underlying the prevailing institutional base) in a society is inversely correlated to its violence index and how broad the thin-blue-line has to be to maintain a modicum of sociality, this technological phase transition had associated with it a number of extreme point-wise negatives. Having by now several times studied through Maggs-Hacker-Rieck, I am quite certain that this is the best early-ideas piece I've yet read on what clearly are the subterranean aspects of inner-Musculpt -- appropriately modified, of course; and not only to incorporate e-music analogs of chord geometries. My very limited direct ontic experience of inner-Musculpt -- those perceptual-proprioceptual contents which are delivered to conscious sonic-visioning -- was of the 3D type codified relative to R³, that to which Maggs-Hacker-Rieck make pragmatic approach (and which I, from the mid-'70s, thought of by imagining the Jungian collective-unconscious archetypes-in-themselves relative to Regge calculus simplices, in this way envisioning a unification of Jungian depth psychology with Einsteinian General Relativity). However, I knew from the semantic contents delivered with inner-Musculpt (by Aurobindoic algebraic descent of algebraic stack M_{whateveeeeeer}?) that a great deal more than Rⁿ reckonings had to be involved. Enter Lukasiewicz-Post _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics, understood independent of the notion truth-value. Enter the temporal CURLs (requiring the complex[number}ities of Lukasiewiczian-Postian Hilbert [scheme?] phase-function spaces) of Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time “bridgings” of the m-valued-function bridges of multi-sheeted Riemann surface -- heh-heh-heh! -- “bridgings” between logical-value order-types and the message-free simplicial embedding behaviors I learn of from reading Maggs-Hacker-Rieck. In a single sonic-visioning (re: moduli space?) freezeframe of inner-Musculpt-form-informing gestalt was given to awareness (how, exactly?) the “potential” of all the lines of argument possible relative to the given issue at contention in the ongoing n-participant no[m}o|logue “conversation” -- each of those lines decomposing color-wise, sound-wise, shape-wise as to the form of the form-in-process unfolded in course of the conversation. So, how to bridge the “gap of understanding” as to decomposition of the semantic domain to the neural k-form complexes (mapping GeneralRelativity-like shape shifting, as well as color shifting and sound shifting) specified as learnable by Maggs-Hacker-Rieck? I've long maintained that filling in this “gap” requires learning to think in m-valued logics, as distinct from ₁T₂ly thinking about m-valued logics. My idea as to how this might best be accomplished at scale across the population corpus has been by implementation of m-valued-LETS, transactions therein _µT_mly processed, the user-friendly interface being holographically exteriorized inner-Musculpt symformphonie learned-through-use as (via “music-image automatons”?) musical-mathematical notation: use of writable qua written-out mathematical and musical symbols, largely ₁T₂-logically devised -- high/low qua up/down being a big one -- obstructing whatever attempts there might be to learn actually to think in m-valued logics. Quoting “Where do mathematical symbols come from?”, Sarah Hart, Gresham College, 27 April 2021: “Our choice of notation can make life much easier or much harder. It can pave the way to new understanding, or it can obscure underlying patterns and make some generalisations almost unthinkable.”

If the initially collective-unconscious (think: Concert of Europe, Abel's impossibility existence proof for trans-al-jabr, WWI), then, overlapping and following, subliminal-unto-barely-conscious (think: Cantor's diagonalization argument, axiom of choice, the Born rule, Gödel's diagonalization argument, WWII) COMPENSATORY ABREACTION to advents of trans-al-jabr, non-Euclidian geometries, transfinite sets, _µT_m-logics, and quantum non-simple identity ((just think: what _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ relative-state identity-transparency, if allowed in, would do to the non-quantum simple-identity which TLS/SSL, Transport Layer Security/Secure Socket Layer, is there to insure; and there's your answer as to why the exclusive focus upon 2-state superpositioning in so-called “quantum” computer-processor development; which is not to mention the “no message transmitted” neural k-forms memetime-independent, i.e., no blockchaining of memetime stamps, cyclotomic decomposition involutes at topological data analysis and deep learning)) has been to absolutely lockdown and freeze dry the human mind into ₁T₂-only ratiocination, then what better method to finish off that project than widespread deployment of AI constructed with developmental focus upon (BornRule imitative?) LLMs, themselves developed under the assumption (mistaken, if Aymara is ₁T₃) that the nature of speakable “natural” languages is inherently ₁T₂-only? So, as regards the above-provided, “In a single sonic-visioning freezeframe of inner-Musculpt-form-informing gestalt was given to awareness (how, exactly?) the 'potential' of all the lines of argument possible relative to the given issue at contention in the ongoing n-participant no[m}o|logue 'conversation'”, what can I say about the “how, exactly?”. I can say nothing. Why? Because the quantum mechanics of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-quantum-brain processing is unspeakable (quoting J. S. Bell, p. 171: “…how exactly is the world to be divided into speakable apparatus…that we can talk about…and unspeakable quantum system that we can not talk about?”) in “natural” ₁T₂-only-languages. Accordingly, topological deep learning, if it is to cognize “how, exactly?”, has to employ Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time's temporal CURLs, in holographic-Musculpt symformphonie, to no-need-for-superluminal-velocities-“no message transmitted”-re-volute ₁T₂-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+.

Well, hmmm… as regards the collective state of identification indicated by the currently-reigning popular fixations, whether embraced or scorned -- TLS/SSL; single-level-enciphered biology as id[e}ology, uh, uh, as digitalized ID that is; probability amplitudes substituted for the m-logical-values of relative-state identity-transparency; projective-(narcissistic)identification mislabeled as empathic engagement; “generative empathy” cybernetically regarded an application of AI's “affective computing”; the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical-relative-state identity-transparency which is “generative empathy” qua quantum-animistic-pagan “participation mystique” (percepts and propriocepts ontically-given being, by definition, unimaginable by the binary-mind-bounded) treated as hyper-empathic inability to set normotic self-other/object ₁T₂-only boundaries, not strange-attractor-fractal boundaries-without-boundary, not to mention the boundary mappings to internal-system states involved in the holographic principle, uh, such inability regarded as pathological altruism, as, moreover, quasi-empathic imaging of the inner-life of an other leading to involuntary inner-separation regarded schizophrenogenic (see, for a comparison to Husserl: “Mimetic Phantasia in Action: Marc Richir's Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity”, Mauro Senatore, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 55:2, February 2024, pp. 1-18); binary-mind suppression of “generative-empathic” _C+T_C+-demergent (so, really, the word “generative” is a misnomer indicative of the egofunction's POV looking-up-on what is not one of its functions) “High Indifference” via synaesthetic abstraktion OF einfuhlung; so on and so forth as obsessively door-in-the-floor, not skylight, handled in Hollywood film after Hollywood film -- all I can say is: emotional decoding of the kind of mutual support I witnessed in Midori Gaoka, circa 1953, was echoed in my experience of Alaska, emotionally decoded circa 1960, when, and particularly where, not picking up a highway thumb-sticker-outer was popularly regarded as virtually tantamount to murder, a non-act engaged in only by those newbies naive enough not to have a stack-robber on their stovepipe. Why would anyone voluntarily give up the indicated bonding values (unless they were identified with ₁T₂-only-valued logic, _µT_m-logical values being the cognitive underlay of social bonding values)? That's a question involving something of a moral dilemma. Consider CNN's, “Why has leadership failed here?” MG: my gosh! Register that intrusive-[author}itarian incredulity as compared to a healthy control, have you, dear reader? Heh-heh-heh. I -- neuronally pruned between cultures; hence, my enculturation-socialization not properly glutamate anchored, no Anji-no-moto motoring about in my mother's kitchen cabinet -- despite my elaborate epistemic distrust, made it all the way to 9th-grade Civics Class -- or whatever it was flashmob-crowd-source called at [Rich}land H. S., Michi[yuki}gun{shu] -- circa 1959, before I concluded that however many legal elections held in his story of America, few were actually legitimate and none efficacious, given abject poverty of Newtonian vector-summed majority rule as a Lockean decision mechanism, under the mistaken assumption that political “science” is necessarily a “decision science”. Sublimation of countervailing forces, as means to modulate purportedly-inherent unresolvable conflict, seemed a ludicrous proposition to a Somewhat back-reacting against yessir-yessir-yessir per[son}hood, a Somewhat exposed as a preadolescent to the notion of harmony purportedly-inherently coherent, a Musculpt-type notion lived in wet-rice-culture-ritualized ADLs, activities of daily life. In hisstory of arch-villains, our era has been an overstuffed turkey; moreover, whoever it was who made the stuffing went bat-shit crazy on the gizzards: likely heshe'd've been one of those who kept boosterin' their vaxxed minds. Leadership? Humph. GLE, global leadership elite, ship-of-Ls so linear-minded the only line of interest is that one located at the bottom. The very idea of effective leadership assumes efficient causality, an assumption involving a too-large leap of faith, given the inevitable lag-time hysteresis and the near hysteria apparent in so much of the paraphasiac echolalia passing for expert commentary upon the patently acausal daydream-cum-daymare-associative-connecting-principle patterns of action engaged in by the socius. The Trickster archetype, in my view ((a view adopted-cum-adapted from notions instigated-into-my-me [this being an echo of what MidoriGaoka Obaaaaaa-san instigated; grandmothers, especially my maternal-side GRAND, seemingly always having had undue influence] by AU-Library's North-of-the-Bronx Westchester-County-Cabalistic “Marjorie Morningstar” Jewish princess, circa just-before-closing-time, Fall-1963 unto Spring-1965)), is always at work upon regressed collective-unconscious event-gradients using the full range of psychological-conversion mechanisms available: DeBroglieBohnHiley pilot fish waving tail of the shark; shark streamlining the DeBroglieBohnHiley pilot fish? For instance: WHAM'm transmogrified into the Slamsome Complex and, thus, inducing a GWOT which was the Cambodia Incursion globalized-eternalized, a strategic-offensive give-up of the spacetime variable entailing infinitization of expenditures (sending DC-NYC corruption into double-ascent inverse-Poisson linear regression hypered by the internet-business-model-fostered lying pandemic) at planetarization of policing which no trump-card-played-qua-AIed-CBDCed-SCSS application of MMT could possibly cover, despite HouseHoldSecurityAgency feminization of politicized home-e[con}omics, there being no SSL when TLS has evaporated due to globalization having gone to e[viron}mental-including-outer-and-inner-space warlawfare. So, if the ₁T₂-only tabula rasa is [pre}figuratively informed (firing-pattern-wise and topology-wise: see “Brain Cells Come Pre-Programmed, Challenging Century-Old 'Blank Slate' Theory”, StudyFinds, Tal Sharf via John Anderer, 24 November 2025; and “Topological turning points across the human lifespan”, Alexa Mousley, et al., Nature Communications, 25 November 2025) by the _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly-demergent “Unconscious As Infinite Sets”, bleed-throughs coming via gut-feeling int[U/u^m, I/i^m}tions (see “The Mystery Of Intuition: Where Gut Feelings Really Come From”, Makai Allbert, ZeroHedge, 25 November 2025, and think: Edmund Jacobson's “There are no closed circuits in the brain”), then how many of the above-mentioned syndromes are compensatory abreactions due to suppression of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m by [pre}scriptive enculturation-socialization orchestrating glutamatergic neural pruning qua anchoring at neuronal plasticity? Though I totally resonate with the general direction of Maria Stromme's invocation of a “deeper pre-spatiotemporal order” inculcated by “consciousness as fundamental field” given in her paper entitled “Universal consciousness as foundational field: A theoretical bridge between quantum physics and non-dual philosophy”, AIP Advances 15, 115319, 13 November 2025, I strongly demur from the notion that the notion of “field” is sufficiently elaborate as to encapsulate the implied GUTS any well-formed gut-feeling would resonate with, not least because adequate codification of _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen-AllBase-most-dense-sheet-CommonGround of MVRS, m-logically-valued-reference-space BackCloth, is, i.e., surely must be, far-and-away more general than is magnitude-direction-stress-curvature under the memetime-bound cum point-value-locality diktat imposed by the corpus of field-application notions. After the various inductions -- purveyed by my mil.brat childhood, elaborate D.C. exposure as an AU-SISer, Army sojourn (Basic under an SF-A-Team 2-bars getting some “command time”; Ft. Leonard Wood rock-quarry ops; jump school; SFTG; PsyOps Group cum JFKSWCS, keeping OB on the ME in runup to the Six Day war; Technical Intelligence Detachment, the 525th MIG; recovering from wounds sustained in the Mekong delta, surgical tech, Camp Zama Army Hospital, Japan, temporarily pulled into the OR because of SF Medics training and the huge overflow of wounded arriving from the battle of Dak To; CICV-Targets; Strategic Research and Analysis, MACV-J2, MACV-HQ; Arlington Hall Station); failed post-Army attempts to be allowed to academically pursue implications of what I had learned about VCI boundary changes correlated to internal-system-bureaucratic variables (re: holographic principle of relativistic quantum theory) -- I stayed as far away as I possibly could from the monotonic, high-mesomorph, type-A, obsessive-compulsive, bi-polar mental spaces occupied by leadership elites wheresoever on this planet be they found: IMHO, never will such like abandon masterfully-explicit, explicit, tacitly assumed, subliminal, altogether-unconscious submergence in the ₁T₂ly bi-polar. Every upgrade on these mental spaces (imitating operating-system upgrades) is worse than what came before: the explicatives, thus, rightfully could well be raised to the nth degree. By no means moving at all into _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency, leaderships of our business interests have, however, seriously begun to challenge the ₁T₂-only Law of Non-Contradiction: both-and, à la anthropogenic climate change is not happening whilst anthropogenic climate change is happening (see, e.g.,: “The Real Fight Over Geoengineering Is Beginning”, Alexander C. Kauffman, The Atlantic, 24 November 2025; and “Collapse of critical Atlantic current is no longer low-likelihood, study finds”, Damian Carrington, The Guardian, 28 August 2025). Quite frankly, I find all of this sort of discourse utterly uninteresting, as there is nothing fundamentally new here to be found not already discoursed to death during the second half of the 1970s (see, for a wonderful synopsis of the period as it actually was, “The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus”, Thomas C. Peterson and William M. Connolley and John Fleck, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1 September 2008). Not in Doug Paine's classroom lectures, circa 1975-'80, which I only rarely and briefly stood at the back of the room for, vast bulk of my 40hrs/week being spent in the library system looking into quantum-relativity echoes of cascade theory, but late afternoons in his office, cooling was discussed, not in terms of global cooling but relative to the growing likelihood of warming-induced AMOC shutdown (see the expert recent treatment entitled “Shutdown of northern Atlantic overturning after 2100 following deep mixing collapse in CMIP6 projections”, Sybren Drijfhout, et al., Environmental Research Letters, 28 August 2025) within some temporal window, and likely agricultural consequences; the associated “little ice age” thesis, sunspot cycles, the Maunder et al. Minima, sun-dimming volcanic aerosols (comprehensively discoursed upon in the recent “Frost fairs, sunspots and the Little Ice Age”, Mike Lockwood, et al., Astronomy & Geophysics, 58:2, 1 April 2017); as well as, because some of Paine's students were also students of Carl Sagan, relative to the “nuclear winter hypothesis” with its stratospheric aerosols aspect. As regards those aerosols, we have the recent “Safeguarding the Polar regions from dangerous geoengineering”, Martin Siegert, et al., Frontiers in Science preprint, November 2024, which discusses many of the risks involved in iatrogenically-anthropogenically dispersing reflective aerosols into the stratosphere. On the other side of the issue is “The Strange and Totally Real Plan to Blot Out the Sun and Reverse Global Warming”, Karl Mathiesen and Corbin Hiar, Politico, 21 November 2025. This latter -- were I a person sufficiently knowledgeable as to have professional competence in the involved areas, which I most assuredly am not -- I might juxtapose with Paul Prikryl's and Vojto Rusin's “Occurrence of tornado outbreaks influenced by solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling”, Advances in Science and Research: Contributions in Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 18 July 2025, as contextualized by the relativistic-quantum Paine-Kaplan cascade-theoretical, multiscale, nested-grid, numerical forecast model of tornadogenesis, papers concerning which oft linked above. I would also be aware that, as www-dot streaming of anthropogenic climate-change skepticism-unto-denialism continues apace, it remains entertaining to observe how classified atmospheric dynamics altogether escapes awareness of the skeptics-in-denial, binary minds thereof attending only to those variables deemed important to the unclassified atmosphere which is beholding to the supposed “classical limit” with which the denying skeptics are tacitly identified due to psychosexosociopolticoeconomic prior commitments.

Given that by the late-1970s my WAG had congealed into a conviction that the most probable outcome of the long-growing and omnium-gatherum planetary crisis is a 10-percent human survival rate at cuspover, and that my major life decisions have ever since been governed by an acute awareness thereof, I find the multiple-scenarios forecast of Madge Waggy entitled “The Clash of Civilization: First Predictions of the Future”, MadgeWaggy.blogspot.com, 2 December 2025, much more informative than is Linda Kinstler's “What History's Fallen Societies Have in Common”, The Atlantic, 1 December 2025.

The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces,
The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve;
And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
Leave not a rack behind.
(William Shakespeare, The Tempest, IV.i.152-156)

My judgment then and now has been and is that the best way to foment mass formation of the transformation likely to most increase the at-cuspover survival rate is implementation of _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams, holographically-exteriorized-inner-Musculpt-as-mathematics-notation being employed as the user-friendly interface. This, IMHO, would countervail the most fundamental deep-structure forcing function constellating and catalyzing the crisis: suppression of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency in all expressions of global monoculture, despite persistent propitiation in many cultures of the purportedly spirit-house-domiciled supra-₁T₂ly-natural _µT_mly-quantum domain-structures orchestrating worldly affairs. When nature doesn't abide ₁T₂-only, one and/or another a|be_r{rated]-physical fund[a}mental (like, say, aberrated-waves of probability) is brought in so as to rectify the purported aberration of nature's logic: be the violation that of the Law of [Id}entity, Excluded Mi{d|i|d}le, or Non-[Contra}diction, as [pre}miss|ed (all 3 “senses” [me}ant) at axiomatization. In reaction to this and so very much more, my Iambe is semi-Can'tian, being-there-in-such-a-Weltanschauung-cum-Lebenswelt-cum-Umwelt because shehe{itit}heshe regards Kant's noumenology as being ₁T₂-only in holding that noumena can't be directly perceived; whereas, my Iambe maintains, noumena can be ontically-qua-directly propriocieved _µT_m-logically via inner-Musculpt symformphonie, the sounded-colored forms of which being transcendental to binary-mind accessibility. Under ₁T₂-only, we are what we are by glutamate-anchored self-identification, and our propriocepts and percepts depend thereupon; under _µT_m-unto-(it may-well can be speculated)-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ proprioceptpercepts, we are what we aren't-to-the-C+-relative-state, and our glutamate-anchored ₁T₂-only propriocepts and percepts are those most demergently reduced, order-of-logical-value-wise not the least important property in the reduction of m-valued statefunction to single-valued egofunction-alone. The best essay on this sort of subject matter I've found is “Relativistic Ontologies, Self-Organization, Autopoiesis, and Artificial Life: A Progression in the Science of the Autonomous”, David Vernon and Dermot Furlong, Trinity College Dublin, 1992 (J. G. Bennett's The Dramatic Universe, Vol. I, is discussed at length, but no mention is made of the appendix wherein “pencils of skew-parallels” are presented). However, V-F start with individual primacy qua autonomy, organizational closure being an essential property, then fuzz it, autonomy that is, out into a spectrum of levels of being; whereas, my Iambe starts with the referencing ground qua T_zog-chen AllBase of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. Both of these “starts” are, arguably, resultant of ₁T₂-only “natural”-linguistic entrapment: V-F to remergence; my Iambe to demergence. When, in actuality, non-orientability has primacy, the spectrum of levels being a self-cancelling (think: C+) hyperKleinBottle nesting-foam.

Sorry, whether AI-generated or not, Maggy's m-scenarios WAG, is right on -- in my judgment. The 5-to-10-percent chance she gives to the possibility of an adequate positive global transformation is in the domain of consideration I've given it ever since… -- headshake here -- gosh! certainly from the late-1970s at Cornell witnessing Doug Paine's conflict with the upper-atmosphere types, probably from my 1968 CICV-Targets registration that the anti-COSVN Parrot's Beak bombing behavior was obsession-compulsion driven by repressed collective hysteria over quantum nonlocality, my 1968 SRA/MACV-J2 registration that Phoenix was obsession-compulsion driven by repressed collective hysteria over quantum non-simple identity, and my SRA-forecasted (nixed, when written up, by the DIP, Director of Intelligence Production) of a disaster if the geographic extent of the war was expanded, maybe even from the drawn-out 1963-to-'65 contemplations of all I would be giving up by dropping out of AU-SIS to pursue further understanding of what I felt to be -- à la my mil.brat-informed immediate understanding of “what drives them” and my first reading into C. G. Jung -- a collective psychosis (no substitute memory here, as it was written, at that juncture, into my personal journal -- which I was able to hold onto until finishing our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh). Absolutely the case from learning, circa 1977, of the suppressed-quantum-related playout materialized as the Cambodian holocaust, the dimensions of which I had been utterly incapable of imagining (when, 1968 at SRA, I had forecasted a disaster at geographic expansion, the time-frame realities indicated the possibility -- subsequently put down by LBJ -- of placing a Laos-located block across the HCM trail, which likely would have expanded the war into northern Thailand, as VCI letterbox numbers peppered the area all the way into northern Burma), this incapacity-of-an-astute-analyst inexcusably incurring some personal culpability for subsequent events, holocaust events, even though I understood that collective-unconscious event gradients governed the field. I guess it was in deciding to quit AU-SIS that I consciously opted for failure at pursuit of a highly improbable objective over feathering-my-nest qua storing-acorns in face of what was understood to be the inevitable oncoming calamity.

Yes, even though most interested parties in America didn't know about it until 1978, I did learn of the Cambodian holocaust in August of 1977 -- at the Kyoto psychosomatic medicine conference to which I presented an autogenic-brain-discharge paper; the conveyor of the “news” being a French medical doctor who had read a French-language book about it (which I much later learned was Francois Ponchaud's Cambodia: Year Zero, as later translated into English: I lived above Chea Sraem's Kepler's Books in Kampot, Cambodia, for 3 years; where there was a whole section of wall shelfing devoted to the history of Cambodia, all the books on which I either read or closely skimmed during the period of my stay). I don't see “it” ₁T₂-only as deep-structure/surface-structure, classes of the middle distributed to the extreme poles (extreme disparities being built into the very underlying logic of ₁T₂-only systematics by applications of the Law of Distributed Middle). There exists a cascade of relative-states between deep and surface -- states cause-pushed and attractor-pulled, most such states being collectively-unconscious unto individually-subliminal (algebraically-geometrically speaking, multi-sheeted and bridged, like sacred space, ma, and the Riemann-surface handling of m-valued functions). For instance, speaking in terms of concretions, ₁T₂-only-capitalism's economically-forced-draft-urbanization-qua-industrialization-of-agriculture-gravitating-upon-single-valued-monocropping-cum-food-handling as synonymous with memetime-bound “development”, sustainable or no, was transmogrified during the Emergency in Malaya (Briggs Plan: somewhat parenthetically, this was the “prep school” attended-as-observer by the officer responsible for creation of Delta Force, which was initially populated by my generation through SFTG, e.g., Larry Freedman) and during the Viet Nam war into militarily-forced-draft urbanization (the strategic hamlets inspired by the Briggs Plan [subject of my Special Operations Research Office researched 1964 paper for Prof. George Harris' Human Behavior seminar, Harris being the SORO leader of the team that wrote the 1962 U.S. Army Handbook for Vietnam], free-fire zones, agent orange, Rome plows, daisy cutters, CBUs, carpet bombing, sweeps and village burnouts), which the Khmer Rouge, by compensatory abreaction, ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, under impress of a decade of strategic bombing and the Cambodian Incursion, into forced-draft deurbanization and collectivization of agriculture. Then, in aftermath of resultant genocidal holocaust, China, the US, the UN, and much of the rest of the world supported (i.e., not simply a predilection of the US-collective unconscious, but of a planetarized-unconscious proclivity), for a decade, the proximal perpetrators (as distinct from those primarily responsible) of the forced-draft deautomatization, uh, uh, deurbanization, and associated consequents. I say that the cause-pushes and attractor-pulls operated across the full spectrum of relative-states, deep-unto-surface/surface-unto-deep. My anticipation of what was to come did not begin with my Army sojourn and Viet Nam war experiences: as I've oft observed, D.C. was very open in mid-1963 when I entered AU-SIS; when I left in late-1965, guv and embassies were already quite closed off to the public. It was not hard for an astute mil.brat to foresee “the writing on the wall”. Even during the Tet-'68-offensive's rocket attack upon Tan Son Nhut Air Base, in a bomb shelter of MACV-HQ filled with members of the first-floor COC, Command Operations Center, one heard fist-raised yelling of “Get some back from the Bear!” and “They are so inept they couldn't even properly coordinate timing of the offense countrywide”. And a few days later when Doug Pike's assessment of the offensive was published, the consensus was clear: military failure, political success; thus, the military's and the anti-war movement's POVs coalesced into “the anti-war movement was primarily responsible for losing (ending) the war”. We in SRA/MACV-J2, Strategic Research and Analysis, knew otherwise, even as those in the COC ignored what we had to say (this “ignoring”, not to say dissing, setting the terms of US policies for decades to come). The offensive was a sterling success before it was launched: it's primary purpose was to facilitate a countrywide re-self-organization of the Vietcong effort in the South, which was superlatively accomplished, largely by employment of what later became known to quantum-relativity physicists as the “holographic principle”, internal-system-state bureaucratic variables mapped upon changing boundaries coupled to self-organization by resource exchange across such boundaries (think: model of biological cellular boundaries; think, moreover: the fractal boundary-without-boundary of BronzeAge animism, as depicted on tympana of Dong Son drums, cum the boundary-without-boundary of Buddhological sacred space; don't think: ₁T₂-only Marxism-Leninism). The military-antiwar-movement coalescence was hugely prefigurative, as easily could be seen by those daily moving between SRA/MACV-J2, the Combined Document Exploitation Center, Combined Intelligence Center Vietnam Order of Battle and Targets sections, and making use of the IDHS, the Intelligence Data Handling System. Already, as made known to us at SRA by those who had been reassigned to units back in the States, military counterintelligence units were cataloguing anti-war activists. Who in SRA could miss that this was a transfer of counterinsurgency techniques and, particularly, of the IDHS, back to the US to target the civilian population (held by the coalesced military-antiwar-movement to be responsible for what was happening in Viet Nam). One could easily surmise that the full complement of CI techniques would eventually be deployed domestically, beginning with data-handing systems. Over the coming decades this happened, and not just domestically in the US, but as an aspect of globalization because of the “planetarized-unconscious proclivity” epiphenomenal to exclusive use of ₁T₂-only logic (this exclusivity profoundly brought under existential threat by higher mathematics, m-valued logics, quantum physics -- thus catalyzing a wealth of compensatory abreactions, particularly amongst the wealthy-superwealthy-ultrawealthy). Already, in 1968, sitting over Western omelets in the first-floor snack bar of MACV-HQ, it was possible for SRA analysts to m-scenarios brainstorm the developments likely to issue from what had clearly begun to transpire.

Hooray! There is room for optimism concerning the sorely needed transformation. Consider 3-fold Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time to be the “activation function” cum functional-functor, with regard to “Multi-Valued Quantum Neurons”, Walid Al-Masri, posted online as of April 2023, published 7 February 2024 in the International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 63:39. Think of the:

…multi-valued quantum neuron (MVQN) [which] is based on the principles of multiple-valued threshold logic over the field of complex numbers [as participating in the self-organization of a]… quantum neural network (QNN) based on multi-valued quantum neurons [which] can be constructed with complex weights, inputs, and outputs encoded by roots of unity and an activation function that maps the complex plane into the unit circle…

relative to open-source e-commons m-scenarios computer gaming of the placement of multiple values upon the base-state (₁T₂-only cash) of the _µT_m-LETS currency unit.

The References section to Walid Al-Masri's “Multi-Valued Quantum Neurons” contains the item entitled “Multivalued Logic Gates Based on DNA”, Fang Pu, et al., Chemistry--A European Journal, 17:35, 22 August 2011, pp. 9590-5 (this link contains an introductory snippet). An illustration drawn from the paper is provided here. Other than by Paine and myself, this is the first time I've seen multivalued logic in any way attributed to DNA. Note that, similar to Al-Masri's constructed neuron, unlike our thesis (see: here, here, here, here, and here), _µT_m-logical encipherment is not, by Fang Pu, attributed to un-engineered normative functioning of DNA's pi-electron-gas quantum-wave properties. Nonetheless, Fang Pu's paper should be, minimally, sobering to genetic engineers assuming single-level genetic encipherment and that the quantum-wave properties of DNA have no significant biological function. I would observe that FangPu-cum-PainePensinger multivalued-logic-gating intraneuronal and intraglial DNA molecules may be contained in the nucleus and/or mitochondria of Al-Masri multivalued quantum neurons, and likely the glia which are possibly involved in an analog data system. There are many similarities between Al-Masri's model and those of Paine-Pensinger, as elaborated, for instance, here, existence of which in and of itself is significantly confirmatory, but there are also substantial differences. Al-Masri's reliance on OAM (orbital angular momentum), in the Paine-Pensinger case is regarded as being hypercomplex and complex angular momentum treated as 3-fold temporal CURL (quantized via Penrose twistors?) of topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time, which is written directly into our derivation of the elemental quantum harmonic oscillator undergoing (in the DNA and tornadogenesis cases) helix-coil transition. Moreover, as seen in the section of Al-Masri's paper between eqs. 7 and 8, the “Fock (number) states” would somewhat correspond to our notion of _µT_m, while the “coherent states” in Bargmann representation would somewhat correspond to our notion of _CT_C+ (except that we're focused on the diagonal functions in phase space à la J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”). Also, our notion of the _C+T_C+ T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround of the MVRS BackCloth, m-logically-valued reference space, would necessitate that the infinity sign over the sum sign in Al-Masri's definition of coherent states designate the full complement of higher Alephs.

I stand corrected -- maybe. During the early-1970s, on a subjective-awareness of sensations basis alone, I concluded that the brain's locus for facilitation of out-of-the-body-experiences is the postcentral gyrus. Now I learn that recent neurological research into OBEs identifies the anterior precuneus as the actual locus. Maybe it is hard to distinguish the two loci by mere subjective sensations? My (PTSD self-“medication”, uh, uh, meditation?) context for this 1970s' judgment: 3 years of -- following an hour of daily walking meditation with its various techniques, and a subsequent hour of Edmund Jacobson's Progressive Relaxation -- nightly practice of self-observation and inner-separation from the act of alternatively reading Sri Aurobindo's and C. G. Jung's two sets of encyclopedic Collected Works. As described in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, the sensation of levitating, qua floating above the chair I was sitting in (this can also occur during walking meditation where one has the sensation of walking 2 inches off the ground), was preceded by an intense tingling sensation located at what I took to be the postcentral gyrus (and I presumed that this was involved in what Aurobindo described as “descent from above”). Simultaneous with the tingling sensation was onset of what Wolfgang Luthe called a “bright light state” (and I presumed that this was involved in what Aurobindo described as “Sri Aurobindo's light”). This was regular -- occurring most every night. Exhausted from the sustained (generally 2 hours) exercise-at-reading of marshalling the level of “consciousness-force”, Aurobindo's term, required to persevere at non-self-attributing qua non-doing (the passive act of reading “giving carte blanche to the brain”, in Autogenic Training terminology, being used to “draw” by Jungian “active imagination” a magic protective circle around the egofunction [think: Walid Al-Masri's imaginary-number plane mapped onto the unit circle] such that mental contents are not attributed to an originating selfhood, but are directly experienced as “coming in upon my me” from out-there in the cosmic background), I'd generally immediately drop-off following the nightly “readings”. Minimally-elaborated, short-lived OBEs would sometimes occasion hypnagogia (it never occurred to me to try to distinguish between localization of actual-OBE-precipitating sensations, qua petit-mal aura, and those preceding the sensation of mere-floating). In 1974, following a meeting with Doug and Patty Paine in Williamsburg, VA, I had a highly elaborated and lengthy OBE, the onset of which, in contemplative retroflection, confirmed, to my me, Jacobson's electromyographic-based thesis that associative thought is born of, and borne by, near-zero-action-potential residual tension patterns largely of the small extraocular and laryngeal muscles (note absence auditory correlation, that absence being significant as regards evaluation of the functional prerequisites of conscious access to _µT_m-quantum-brain processing of inner-Musculpt), this retroflected insight being sufficiently instructive that I found I could initiate an OBE simply by “going-negative” (Jacobson's differential relaxation) and altogether “letting-go” (Benoit's treatment of detachment according to Zen) of the false claim to be “absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct”. After messing with this a bit, I completely lost interest in OBEs. As noted in our novel, my first OBEs transpired as an 8-year-old child, circa 1953, sitting, sometimes in wind-blown rain, under the sacred pine located on the blood-grass-covered mound in the middle of the rice fields spanning the valley overlooked by Midori Gaoka, Ashiya-cho, kita-Kyushu -- these experiences later having a profound determining influence upon my mature major-life-decision processes. OBEs also were forthcoming during my experience of the Viet Nam war, one of which, described in our novel, occurring during the Tet-'68 B-40-cum-122mm-rocket attack upon Tan Son Nhut Air Force Base.

“Good government”, IMHO, is not only a ₁T₂-only-logic-bound no[t}I/i^m|on (the higher up J. A. Cob's _µT_m-logical-quantum-relative-state Ladder of identity-transparencies, the less state-distinction drawable between governor and governed qua ruled qua ₁T₂-only-rule-regulated); it is, by logical necessity, a ₁T₂-only 0[xy}=m[or}0n. “Leadership is coercion”: I don't remember how early in my 18-memeyear-long mil.brat-childhood career (retired without a pension) I reached this conclusion; certainly well after I learned the hard way to keep my actual thoughts to myself. But in my maturity I slowly became aware that this is the least that can be said of leadership. It rolls back, regresses, and, when domineering, altogether suppresses the inherent autopoietic and self-organizing capabilities of an SSS, socius, society, system populated -- via fiat-enculturation-socialization, glutamatergically anchored -- with non-quantum simple-identities, howsoever much dissimulated-quantum-based infratech is AI-employed. Indeed, it, i.e., leadership, is a most heinous crime against nature, a cosmic-level crime, in that it is “theft of the multivalue” (the political analogue of quantum-economics' “₁T₂-only-ownable property is theft of the multivalue”, i.e., identity-transparency being the abstraction-of-empathy case of Buddhological compassion, on n-levels M-Meru the quantity of ₁T₂-only money accumulated is inversely proportional to the amount of M-Merit ascribable as M-Mapped upon the _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen logical-value order-type of equilateral-triangular-ikat-ana[logically}signifying-BackCloth MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space (the Buddhologic being a cultural-lag-residual assimilate of the animistic “participation mystique” which demerged ontologically-B-fore, good offices of topologically-active operator-time: see “Ikat Triangle Pattern Vectors”, and “Ethnomathematical Study of Jepara Troso Ikat Weaving Motifs in Two-Dimensional Geometry Mathematics”, Rafida Salma and Dona Oktaviani Fevironika and Eka Zuliana, Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 6:2, November 2022). And, no, as a corollary, I don't think the “take” -- heh-heh-heh! -- I evolved on my 1963-5 experience of Washington, D.C., was influenced by having seen It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World -- though I have been stimulated by how Hollywood occasionally does seem to have privileged access to knowledge of collective-unconscious event-gradients. National outpourings of faux pas and fits of pique, having planetarized into commonplaces, we are all familiar with the indecent intervals produced by the Western liberal tradition's realpolitik-instigated identification with memetime, t, as distinct from tau, tau-prime, and tau-double-prime. As far as my reading has it, the main governance MO of the worldwide leadership elites has been forever and a day (howsoever the memeyear and its derivatives have been defined): grabification largely dissimulated (thus more or less self-justifyingly justified) as effect of the cardinal-sins nature of human nature (resident in “selfish genes”, uh, assuming, that is, single-level genetic encipherment and that the multivalued-logic-gating quantum-wave properties of DNA have no significant biological function: heh-heh-heh!) glorified by phantasmagoric fabulism. Exemplary was, say, how George Washington acquired his superwealth (essentially free land grabbed from the original inhabitants), how the NYC banking supremos' and their families' financial power was rooted in the ledger[demon}i/u|m of the usurped-from-the-Indians lands of the Western Reserve. Large[S}que: ₁T₂-only FirstWorld'O[no}mics has been ₁T₂-only ThirdWorld'O[no}mics raised to the nth-degree -- particularly so in this, our common, era of planetary-resource-depletion, resource warfare, and dissimulated-quantum-based infratech which assiduously ConveDDs -- conversion-disorder displaces -- identity exchange-unto-assimulation-unto-incorporation-unto-relativestate-unto-transparency into mere ₁T₂-only-monetary-incorporation-defined-and-defended-legalistic per[son}if[i}cat[i}on, which haptic concretion is unconsciously facilitated by projective-identification at the 8-fold-way of the psychological transference. I have to concur with the general drift of Gary D. Barnett's “This World in Which We Live Is Mad”, LewRockwell, 9 December 2025, given that in my lifetime of searching I've found nothing warranting contravention of the notion that collective psychosis has been the normative state of our species throughout recorded hisstory. Though I continue the search for evidence in rebuttal.

Me[me}time-independent tau[to}logy to me -- tau-double-prime, tau-prime, and tau cum tau, tau-prime, and tau-double-prime -- is not a matter of mathematical truth, truth-values only having utility under the ₁T₂-only order-of-logical-value alone; rather, Nature as Tau[to}logy is Tegmarkian Platonism demergent-unto-concretion cum remergent-unto-abstraction under Pauli-Paine 3-fold topologically-active operator-time cum 3-fold topologically-active counter-operator-time self-referentially self-cancelling into non-orientability, the two opposed predicated-precedence-relational marches being separable only under ₁T₂-only-logic alone: “nothing ever changes” is function-functional-functor identical (not equivalent: identical by order-of-logical-value cyclotomic decompositional-recompositional involutes) to functor-functional-function “everything is nothing but changes”, orders of logical-value being understood relative to relative-states of identity-transparency, not truth-values. So: the 1925 m-valued Schrödinger statefunction; the 1926 BornRule “Witch Bull of the 20th century”, the straw that broke the camel's back as regards the deep-structure cause-push aspect of the etiology and pathogenesis of the WWII battle of the 200 Years War; the self-metaprogramming for-Germans 1934-Popperian [sure}ing-up of Born's saving of ₁T₂-only-logic alone, i.e., the philosophy-of-science principle of falsifiability, a non-tautology in that it too is falsifiable under ₁T₂-only-logic alone (see, for instance: “An Analysis of the Falsification Criterion of Karl Popper: A Critical Review”, Suddhachit Mitra, Tattva Journal of Philosophy, 12:1, 2020, pp. 1-18). The ₁T₂-only-business of governance has never been to service its socii: that has been done only insofar as necessary to maintain existence of governance. Ever since the Renaissance of ₁T₂-only-logic and resultant Industrial Revolution cum advent of dissimulated-quantum-based-infratech follow-ons, TPTB have planetarized a situational conundra of conundrums that is not a matter of a hard or easy to accomplish solute of solutions, but to which there is no possible satisfactory outcome, only better and worse re[sir}wreck[i]ons in the [after}math of a catastrophe-theoretic cuspover. Hugh? AIed 2-state quantum superpositionings, ₁T₂-only speeded up, are going to shutdown resource warfare, its subsidiary civilizational clashes qua quasi-religious and outright-religious conflicts? That, you say? The class of “possible better” resurrections are all dependent upon preparations having been made memeprior to infinitude-in-correlation-length-onset of the critical state leading to cuspover -- the best cases of “the better” requiring proportionately elaborate preparations. The worst of best cases is no preparation whatsoever and resultant complete loss of modern-postmodern infratech heterodyning upon non-renewables and consequent reversion to Stone Age [eco}nomics' m-logically-valued identity-incorporation at ritual gift exchange; thus, a low-tech reestablishment of CON[son}ance (my I/i^m have no problem with [woe}men taking over, only with them taking over the patrimony, the privileges conveyed thereby -- transaction rent, kickbacks, fragrant G_rE_ase, pisskesh, dolly spoon[do}licks, bribes -- the patriarchal ideals, MOs, prejudices, projective-identifications, the horsings-around derivative of generations upon generations of horse-breakings and the knee-jerked behavioral syndrome thereupon constellated, spawning horseholders and dogwalkers)-correlation-coherence with nature's identity-transparent ways of omnium gatherum -- an ID-incorporation analogically expressed in highly-regressed legalistic form today in for[ma}tion of keiretsu by “extending beyond their [the firm's] group identity boundaries” (as discussed in the “Operationalizing Exploration Alliances in the Keiretsu Context” section of Emily Wu Choi's 2012 UC-Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation entitled “Organizational Identity and Interorganizational Alliances”). Note that this “extending beyond” is not characterized as explicitly involving the boundaries-without-boundary of the quantum-relativistic holographic principle in the manner that, tacitly, Viet Cong (political) Infrastructure internal-system variables were mapped upon changing quasi-fractal boundaries mediating autopoiesis and self-organization by resource exchange across those Dongsonian fractal-drummed fuzzy boundaries. Performance art aside, our non-negotiable entre[prey}new|raw/all unin[tell}i|gent future is arguably most comfortable with ₁T₂-only-paradoxical ₁T₂-only-AI-city-[man}ager [man}dated mega-urban-region design criteria exercised as MichaelJacksonesque-backwardation. Vast pre[ponder}ance of sitzkrieging hu-hu-[hu}man|ity is in utter denial as to severity of current self-inflicted (₁T₂ly-self-inflicted being a Trickster-archetype-mediated ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the _µT_mly-self-referential) conundra of our species, not to mention what has gotten us here, tacitly-unto-explicitly, as they do, the governing denial being denial of deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull by recourse to the mistaken notion of a “classical limit” Popper-sured-up with the falsifiability non-tautology, that is the mistaken assumption that nature's lawfair subscribes only to ₁T₂-only-logic alone, in particular to that logical-value-order-type's Law of Non-Contradiction which predicates pop-up of the T-or-F falsifiability objective test distinguishing science from pseudoscience.

Hey, neural-networking via a continuous distribution of coupled-(note: not “n-articulated”)-harmonic oscillators (be aware of how derivation of the memetime-bound harmonic oscillator consensus equation compares to derivation of our topologically-active-operator-time-informed canonical equation) need not be RLC (resistor-inductor-capacitor: takes me back to my immediate-post-VN-war-preCornell-IBEW apprenticeship night classes and OJT with, memory serving, so many companies having been shuttled through, Johnson Controls, underfloor wiring the computer room of the Forrestal Building) classical-qua-random-neuron-coupled via a statistical non-equilibrium-thermodynamic-chaotic-environmental system, where within glia-input is treated as noise. Not likely so, given the likelihood that there exists the corpora of quantum harmonic oscillators (i.e., electron parcels of the pi-electron gas core-environment of the multitude of intraneuronal and intraperineural DNA molecules) emitting quadripolar waves into the cellular environment, the higher-temporal formants of which carry n-levels of m-logically-valued genetic encipherment. Notice that, howsoever inspired, as it is, "Modeling the Nervous System as An Open Quantum System", Yu-Juan Sun and Wei-Min Zhang, arXiv, 2 July 2021, cuts off its history of the field such that implications of the discovery of prescriptive enculturation-socialization orchestration of the series -- beginning in the womb -- of glutamatergic-neural-network wipeouts at neuronal plasticity-qua-learning goes unconsidered in their modeling efforts, efforts directed to, e.g., informing MOs of AI-learning of the lowest-logical-value-order-type “cognition”, that order-type self-imposed and constellating “the human condition” responsible for so much tribulation over me[me}millennia.

Manipulating the simulation canvas, I couldn't get anything but 2-color-in-and-out-oscillating variations in the color field with dot-loci established where I clicked my cursor: “It's like deja vu all over again.” As I've oft said, my very limited access to presumably-_µT_m-logical inner-Musculpt altogether dissipated over the last half of my thirties into early-forties, post-Cornell, circa 1980-'85 or so. What has remained as occasional flashes (flashbacks?) is detailed in the “Simulation” and “Patterns” sections of the student project entitled “FitzHugh-Nagumo Model as a Reaction-Diffusion System”, Vasilios Mitsiioannou, mitsiioannou@itp.uni-frankfurt.de, summer term 2020. Inner-Musculpt “coming in upon my me” (via the Eielson, AFB, “U-2 whistle” upon onset of the reverse-telescope effect at interior-distancing and memetime-slowdown) invariably, when “reaching” the “Plexiglas wall”, photismically initialized -- after the manner of the visual phenomena presenting in the Autogenic Abreactions documented by Autogenic Therapy patients of Wolfgang Luthe -- as point-set flashovers, color field washes, followed by dynamic polymorphs (cf. Jordan Belson films like “Samadhi”) covering the planar visual field, then rigidifying into discretes of one sort or another, those elaborated stark forms-shapes-patterns in their crystallization-concretions captured in the “Patterns” section to Mitsiioannou's posting. That evolution of visual presentation transpiring, dependent upon -- what? -- “circumstances”, heh-heh-heh, over intervals of 2-5 minutes (best subjective estimate, as I was never stimulated to clock it: “time-dilated” inner-Musculpt becoming “memetime-independent”). The next elaboration was fractalization of Mitsiioannou's-and-the-like patterns, which came in flashovers of the whole visual field qua “canvas” and/or as fractal marches across that canvas, marches, not only orthogonal, but from any angle whatsoever (the soundings sounding somewhat like operator-time's _µT_m-baum-“gardener” Toru Takemitsu's “Asterism”, unfortunately a work relatively neglected), elaborating to n-marches in n-crossovers (think: Olivier Messiaen's “Turangalila Symphonie”, particularly the Musculpt-harmonic-oscillator-waving-overlaps of ondes Martenot). The Takemitsu-Messiaen connections to inner-Musculpt onset were made by me during my sojourn at George Mason University during Spring Semester, 1974, whilst taking Mus Comp IV. Then, in next elaboration, a blank “screen”… and -- Abracadabra! cum Presto! -- presentation of inner-Musculpt colored-sounded 3D-forms ensembling into symformphonie with a semantic dimension just simply being-there effortlessly, with no further/farther [in}sight provided as to how that could be the case. However, nowadays, maybe somesmallthing can be speculated, given Mitsiioannou's patterns simulation: note on p. 6 of "Simple Neuron Models: FitzHugh-Nagumo and Hindmarsh-Rose", R. Zillmer, INFN, Sezione di Firenze, undated, that “nullclines define the lines in the 2D plane”, that “trajectories cannot cross” yielding “uniqueness of solutions” (i.e., the single-valuedness most thoroughly dictated by the ₁T₂-only Law of I, identity), that “crossings of the nullclines correspond to fixed points” indicating extra-e-egospheric inputs, I, = 0. In delineating the draw-a-distinction I-indications-“subsoil”-calculus under truth-valued ₁T₂-only logic, Laws of Form elaborated via the “law of crossing”. IMHO, it may be the case that in the identity-transparency-sub-subsoil-to-the-distinction-subsoil-to-truth-value 2D-unto-3D inner-Musculpt quasi-Turing n-furcation, the activator is 3-fold Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time and the I-inhibitor is the corpus of Euclidian invariants learned in Piaget's account of the stages of (glutamate etched & anchored) cognitive development (see: “Turing instabilities in general systems”, Razvan A. Satnoianu and Michael Menzinger and Philip Maini, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 41:6, December 2000, pp. 493-512). The nullcline-intersection I = 0 points under ₁T₂-only, at _µT_m-induced n-furcation (think: intense tingling sensation at anterior precuneus), are to be regarded as indicating n-logically-superposed crossover values of intersecting null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”, and when 2D patterns become 3D symformphonie, the ₁T₂ly-null vectored-skew-parallel pencils “draw” non-selfsame colored-sounded dynamic-polymorph 3D skew-figures.

Whereas it takes resoluteness (missing amongst current Spanish youth, apparently) to work through Paul Preston's tedious minutely-detailed The Spanish Holocaust: Inquisition and Extermination in Twentieth-Century Spain, HarperPress, 2012, howsoever well rewarded be the perseverance by gifted reality-orientation to the blood-thirsty human animal, still, rewards aside, numbing accompanies the reading of a dozens-if-not-scores-long (dependent upon the manner of counting chosen, heh-heh-heh! à la the Westy-vs-CIA enemy-strength-estimates controversy) litany of MyLai-massacre-like atrocities which occurred in both serial and parallel formations (but, however looked at, the Republican side lost the war, for whatever the reasons, resulting in decades of oppression: it should be said that anyone intelligently opposed to war would be against laws of war, as the purpose of those laws is to justify war as a legitimate conflict resolution mechanism). By contrast to Preston's holocaust treatment, Amanda Vaill's Hotel Florida: Truth, Love and Death in the Spanish Civil War, Bloomsbury, 2014, is something else again. In her “Author's Note”, Vaill has it that, “…for each of them [the three portrayed couples: Hemingway-Gellhorn, Capa-Taro, Barea-Kulcsar], living the truth becomes just as important as telling it, to the world, to each other, and to themselves”; this statement characterizing an attitude somewhat like our own (Nha Trang and I), to wit, “inwardly living and reliving the re[all}ity was always all ways much more important than telling it to [her}selves and [my}selves, thus to others only insofar as identity-transparency wasis manifest in particular cases, to the world primarily via the limited access her I/i^m and my I/i^m hashave had to collective unconscious processes -- an attitude based upon the notion that behaviors of human animal, independent of routine ADLs, activities of daily life, are overwhelmingly governed by constellated collective-unconscious event gradients.”

Our amateur's stab -- relying on help from Wiki -- at a left-of-the-timeline-truncated, memetime-bound, binary-logical, cause-pushed/attractor-pulled Chronology of Events Evoking Deep-Structure Responses within the collective unconscious (reinforcement of this way of thinking came, for Larry's myme, good offices of James F. Quinn's “Comparative Arts” class, George Mason U., circa 1974; Sam Adams, of the Westmoreland-vs.-CBS trial, was into chronologies, but every attempt by Larry's myme to discuss with him a deep-structure version always led to an abrupt change of subject, e.g., shifting over to treating pink eye spreading among Sam's wife's Leesburg farm's cattle): 1813-1832, development of non-Euclidian geometry; 1823, N. H. Abel's existence proof for mathematics transcendental to al-jabr, dissed as being an “Impossibility Theorem”; 1824, Beethoven's “9th Symphony”; 1830, advent of early-Romanticism with Berlioz's “Symphony Fantastique” (just to set the record straight: whilst out on-the-town, during the 1966 Ft. Sam GoatLab-period of SF Medics training, though ridiculed, I actually understood what I was doing in selecting-for-purchase a recording of this symphony by Berlioz, whilst the 3-others in my cohort jointly chose octave-leaping Morgana King and Miles Davis' “Sketches of Spain”); 1836, the manifesto of Transcendentalism, i.e., Emerson's essay entitled “Nature”, wherein he recounts a signifying state: “…all mean egotism vanishes. I become a transparent eye-ball. I am nothing. I see all. The currents of the Universal Being circulate through me…”; 1844, Joseph Liouville discovers transcendental numbers; 1855, the other-“I”s constellating Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass-state of “participation mystique”; 1857, Benedict Morel's first use of “demence precoce” as a diagnostic concept; 1857-'59, Wagner's Tristan chord; 1872, formal definition of the “Dedekind cut”; 1872, Monet's “Impression, Sunrise”; 1873, the introducing of the “completed infinite” by Cantor; 1874, Cantor's first proofs of uncountability; 1882, Ferdinand von Lindemann proves that e and pi are transcendental numbers; 1884-'86, Georges Seurat's pointillistic “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte”; 1891, Cantor's diagonal proof; 1893, Emil Kraepelin's first use of the term “dementia praecox”; 1900, the quantum of action; 1904, Zermelo's first statement of the Axiom of Choice; 1905, time dilation of moving objects; 1907, Hans Hahn begins discovery-invention of ₁T₂-strongly inaccessible cardinal surreal numbers; 1908, Eugen Bleuler's first use of the word “schizophrenia”, split-off-hidden selves being egofunction-inaccessible due to loss-of-memetime; 1910, the first of Analytical Cubism, Picasso's “sum of destructions” painting entitled “Portrait of Ambroise Vollard”; 1911, Duchamp's “Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 1”; 1913, Husserl's first use of the idea of multiple facets qua profiles of an object's “horizon”; 1915, time dilation of objects in strong gravity; 1915-'23, Duchamp's “Large Glass” or “The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even”; 1916, first Dada performances at Cabaret Voltaire; 1917, Duchamp's found-object urinal presented as an artwork; 1921, Post and Lukasiewicz rigorously outline properties of m-valued logics; 1924, Andre Breton's Surrealist Manifesto; 1925, Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction; 1926, the ₁T₂-only-BornRuled probability-amplitudes interpretation of the m-valued statefunction, a ruling which facilitated escape from a Postian-_µT_m-logics interpretation (IMHO, the Witch Bull of the 20th century and the straw that broke the camel's back in regards to etiology and pathogenesis of the WWII battle of the 200-Years War of the World).

Our amateur's stab -- relying on help from Wiki -- at a left-of-the-timeline-truncated, memetime-bound, binary-logical, cause-pushed/attractor-pulled Chronology of Surface-Structure Evoked Responses (essentially, ontic phenomenology associated with the demise in believability of 17th-&-18th-century-rationalistic-Clockmaker Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean cum Congress-of-Vienna cum Concert-of-Europe Weltanschauung-Lebenswelt-Umwelts): 1600-1874, British East India Company; 1776-'78, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The Reveries of the Solitary Walker, as regards his writings of 1751-'78, Wiki says, “…influenced the progress of the Age of Enlightenment…”, and Britannica says, “…marked the end of the European Enlightenment…”; 1804, 1-billion people on planet Earth; 1804-'13, Russo-Persian war; 1818, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; 1829, Goethe's Faust; 1830, the “Great Game” begins, Anglo-Russian rivalry over Central Asia; 1830, uprising of Poland against Russia; 1836, first Colt revolver; 1837, advent of the telegraph; 1845, the Lunacy Act definition of mental patients; 1846-'78, Pope Pius IX's condemnations of 18th-century-Enlightenment ideas cum ideals; 1848, The Communist Manifesto, terminology of which was a virtual parody of Newtonian notions; the cultural lags which were the Revolutions of 1848, put down by conservative actions; 1848, first women's rights convention; 1853, gunboat-diplomacy black ships under Perry sail into Edo Bay; 1853-'56, Crimean-War battle of the 200-Years War of the World; 1855, isolation of cocaine; 1856, first oil refinery; 1857, Dred Scott Supreme Court decision denying citizenship to black Americans; 1858-1947, British Raj; 1859, Darwin's On the Origin of Species; 1861-'65, American-Civil-War battle of the 200-Years War of the World; 1864, First Geneva Convention establishing a basis for rules of international law; 1865, Mendel on rules of inheritance; 1865, Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland; 1867, Nobel invents dynamite; 1869, Mendeleev's periodic table of the elements; 1870-'71, Franco-Prussian-War battle of the 200-Years War of the World; 1871-'78, Bismarck's anti-Catholic “culture war”; 1875-1900, tens of millions die during famines in India and China; 1878, advent of the telephone; 1879, first light bulb; 1885, Liszt's intimation of atonality in “Bagatelle sans tonalite”; 1886, Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde; 1886, first “stimulation-guided corticectomy" of a “moral imbecile”; 1888, Jack the Ripper; 1889, Eiffel Tower; 1890, advent of the electric chair; 1892, advent of fingerprinting; 1895, Rontgen discovers X-rays; 1896, Thomson identifies electron; 1896, Madame Curie discovers radioactivity; 1897, Stoker's Dracula; 1898, American-Spanish-War battle of the 200-Years War of the World; 1898, Wells' The War of the Worlds; 1899, Hague Convention on laws of war (which prevented use of poison gas, fire and atomic bombings of cities, eh!); 1900, Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz; 1901, first Nobel Prizes; 1903, Wright Brothers first flight; 1904, Mackinder's Heartland Theory as to the pivot of his story; 1905, first Russian revolution; 1905, formulation of German war plans to defeat France; 1906, first non-objective painting by Hilma af Klint; 1908, the first fully atonal work, i.e., Schoenberg's “Second String Quartet, Op. 11”; 1911, Rutherford identifies atomic nucleus; 1911, first use of airpower for bombing, the Italo-Turkish War in Libya; 1912, beginning of the USA's Banana Wars in Central America; 1913, Stravinsky's “The Rite of Spring”; 1913, advent of the Federal Reserve system; 1913, the Bohr model of the atomic nucleus prefiguring advent of quantum mechanics; 1914-'18, the WWI battle of the 200-Years War of the World; 1915, first large scale use of the poison gas weapon; 1916, first use of tanks; 1917, Russian Revolution; 1917-'21, Ukrainian-Soviet War; 1918-'19, Ukrainian-Polish War; 1918-'20, so-called Spanish flu pandemic; 1918-'22, Allied intervention into Russian Civil War; 1919-'21, Polish-Soviet War; 1919, Rutherford identifies the proton; 1919, Treaty of Versailles; 1919, first dodecaphonic composition, i.e., Josef Matthias Hauer's “Nomos, Op. 19”; 1919, first Red Scare in USA; 1921, Hitler become Fuhrer of Nazi Party; 1921-'23, first composition employing Schoenberg's 12-tone technique, i.e., Schoenberg's “Suite for Piano, Op. 25”; 1921-'23, Weimar hyperinflation; 1922, Joyce's Ulysses; 1922, rise of Mussolini; 1925, Hitler's Mein Kampf; 1927, 2-billion people on planet Earth; 1927, Stalin takes over the USSR; 1928-'40, Stalin imposes USSR-wide collectivization of agriculture, to include Ukraine and Central Asia; 1929, beginning of Great Depression with Wall Street crash; 1930-'33, famine in USSR, particularly the Holodomor in Ukraine; 1931, Gödel's ₁T₂-only-logical 1st and 2nd Incompleteness Theorems (no mention of Post's and Lukasiewicz's work 10 years earlier); 1931, Empire State Building; 1931, Japanese invasion of Manchuria; 1931, Mao claims formation of China Soviet Republic; 1931-'33, as pathogenically, but not etiologically, described by Paul Preston, the social war prefiguring the civil war unfolds in Spain; 1932, Chadwick identifies neutron; 1936, Japan invades China initiating the Far East theater of the WWII battle of the 200-Years War of the World; 1936-'38, Stalin's Great Purge; 1936-1939, Spanish Civil War; 1938, first use of electroconvulsive therapy on a human; 1939, German and Soviet invasions of Poland, the home country of m-valued logics, initiates the European theater of the WWII battle of the 200-Years War of the World.

IHHO-IMHO, there is, between deep-structure and surface-structure events, no ₁T₂-only-causality-type connecting principle; these two event-categories being connected, so far as the binary-mind is concerned, quasi-Jung-Pauli-synchronicity-wise in the manner elements of a dream are connected; processes of the collective unconscious being understood as corresponding to principles of infinite sets; but, _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly speaking, their connection being understood an actual matter of topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time-executed demergence. Larry's myme bought into Jung's idea of a collective unconscious upon first reading into his works, as that idea seemed to explain so much Larry's myme had observed and been confused about whilst growing up as a mil.brat -- bought into, beginning in 1963, at AU-SIS, good offices of Abdul Aziz Said, required reading for “Introduction to World Politics”. Since then, Larry's myme has thought of regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious as cause-push/attractor-pull vectoring “mass formation” (the currently prevailing term) psychoses. Lately, there has been increased interest in an “unconscious will” relative to goal-directed behavior (cf. “our” notion -- age-old, heh-heh-heh! -- of “attractor-pull” teleology), e.g., “Priming and authorship ascription: when nonconscious goals turn into conscious experiences of self-agency”, Henk Aarts and Ruud Custers and Hans Marien, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96:5, May 2009, pp. 967-79; and “The unconscious will: how the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness”, Ruud Custers and Henk Aarts, Science, 329(5987), 2 July 2010, pp. 47-50; and, more recently, involving noradrenalinergic-dopaminergic neurological mechanisms, “Unconscious will as a neurobehavioral mechanism against adversity”, Patrick Anselme, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 169, February 2025. Note that “unconscious” as employed in these three articles does not refer to Jung's “collective unconscious”; rather, to a subliminal mind and/or a personal unconscious. As regards the neuroscience of the collective biobehavioral aspect, we look to “Modeling the Nervous System as An Open Quantum System”, Yu-Juan Sun and Wei-Min Zhang, arXiv, 2 July 2021, where it is found stated in the Abstract that:

By analyzing the dynamics of this neural model through the master equation approach of open quantum systems, we investigate the collective behavior of neurons. After applying stimulations to the neural network, the neuronal collective state is activated and shows the action potential behavior. We find that this model can generate random neuron-neuron interactions and is proper to describe the process of information transmission…

Elaborating in the body of the paper, Sun-Zhang say:

Hopfield modeled the neural network based on neuron statistical behavior. He started with the binary neural states… which characterizes the neural feature by “all-or-none” logical property. In Hopfield's model, the binary neural states can be realized through the spin configuration of N spins at time t… where alpha denotes different spin configurations and there are 2^N various configurations.

And in their conclusion, Sun-Zhang say:

We explore the neuron dynamics at zero temperature and also at room temperature, and find that in both cases, the collective neural states evolve from polarized states (rest states) to the depolarized states and finally back to the initial polarized states under a simplified external pulse driving the environment. Such results show that this simple model can not only catch the expected neuron dynamics but also provide an alternative mechanism and explaining how neurons couple or connect to each other with various wave modes through the complicated neuron surroundings. As the result also shows, the neuron-neuron connections through their surroundings are mainly determined by the spectral density, which characterizes the detailed spectrum structure of the neuron environment.

Except for the “random” and the “statistical”, this is so similar to our model of DNA-radiation-exchange processes at helix-coil transition, we can hardly leave that registration unsaid. Hopfield's 2^N model is a variation on complexity-theory's 2^nk fitness-landscape model, which was originally formulated relative to genomic-qua-DNA-natural selection. Since the 2 indicates binary logic, we have difficulty regarding such open-systems models as being authentically quantum, as they preclude the _µT_m-logics of n-state superpositioning, which is better understood relative to M^nk articulation landscapes (cf. folded-towel and/or bridged-multi-sheeted BackCloth of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space). In the Sun-Zhang case, the k of nk would involve “the detailed spectrum structure of the neuron environment”, a structure affecting not only cell membrane processes but also intraneuronal and intraperineural DNA molecules. Our superconductant pi-electron-parcel-gas model of DNA has been characterized as a soliton model, the molecule at helix-coil transition generating, in response to impinging radiation, emitted coherent quadripolar waves containing all the information represented by the nucleotide pairs, the coherency property indicative of sound waves impinging upon, for instance, the cell membrane, possibly rate-limiting processes therein. The “Sound Propagation” section, and the “Soliton profiles” figure, of “On soliton propagation in biomembranes and nerves”, Thomas Heimburg and Andrew D. Jackson, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102:28, August 2005, pp. 9790-5, could, thus, be considered marginally supportive of our DNA model. Here and here, circa 2011, two of Heimburg's Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, graduate students provide detailed background and extensions of the involved soliton model. The Heimburg-Jackson “Soliton profiles” figure is suggestive of the m-valuedness associated with open m-scale systems. In our “General Process” paper, we argued that:

When free interaction between LSTDs [limited spacetime domains] is considered, the closed conservation is lost and a higher level of conservation comes into play. The quantities considered under closure, when considered from the multiscaled perspective, lose their single definite values and take on multiple values relative to the spacetime scales from which they are viewed. The larger multiscaled system is non-conservative of closed system quantities and conservative of those quantities characteristic of its own multiscaled framework. Under self-reentry even the multiscaled quantities will not be conserved. From the point of view of self-reentry, only those quantities characteristic of self-reentry itself will be conserved.

The symmetries Noether linked to single-valued conserved quantities are symmetries under ₁T₂-only-logic alone. Multiscaled multi-valued conserved quantities would be linked to symmetry-analogues under _µT_m-logics. Self-reentrant n-hyper-Klein-bottled multi-valued conserved quantities would be linked to symmetry-analogues under _CT_C+-logics. Based upon those notions, we concur with Peng Wang's statement that “…the expressions of variable orders fractional Noether conserved quantities are closely dependent on the external nonconservative forces and material parameters of the neuron”, as given in the Abstract to his paper entitled “Fractional Noether theorem and fractional Lagrange equation of multi-scale mechano-electrophysiological coupling model of neuron membrane”, Chinese Physics B, 32:7, July 2023. So, if there is a collective “unconscious will”, operative as constellated archetypal event-gradients, the quantum-wave properties of neurons, with attributes such as those described in the above-linked papers, are likely involved. Ross Skelton asks “Is the unconscious structured like a language?”, International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 4:3, December 2007, pp. 168-78. He answers yes in concurrence with Jacques Lacan, and further says, “…we are all being thought by the Absolute mind…” (cf. Emerson's Transcendentalism, and our “_CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly speaking, their connection being understood a matter of topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time-executed demergence”). I -- uh, Larry's myme -- too answer yes, with the caveat that the language of which my Iambe speaks is no “natural” language; rather, inner-Musculpt as universal metalanguage. As regards how inner-Musculpt's “₁T₂ly-null vectored-skew-parallel pencils 'draw' non-selfsame colored-sounded dynamic-polymorph 3D skew-figures”, consider the following from “Bridging the gap between consciousness and matter: recurrent out‑of‑body projection of visual awareness revealed by the law of non‑identity”, Jinsong Meng, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58, 2024, pp. 178-203, online as of 24 May 2023.

We believe that a methodological trap commonly present in scientific research and the incompleteness of logic are the true reasons that affect the research on consciousness. Here, a novel logic tool, the non-identity law, was extracted from physics and applied into the analysis of the visual dynamics related to naturalistic observation… We show that visual system, the representative sensory system, has a postponed, recurrent out-of-body projection pathway from brain to observed object, besides the well-known feedforward signaling pathway…

Does Meng's OBE signaling pathway ((I've long argued that thinking in _µT_m-logics, as distinct from ₁T₂-glutamatergically thinking about _µT_m-logics, must, on the face of it, necessarily involve endogenous-ketaminergic-immersion in an OBE [whilst surveying John C. Lilly's scientific archive for Pioneer Corporation, I saw nothing in Lilly's “Tank Logs” of exogenous-ketaminergic-immersion suggestive of what I imagine _µT_m-ratiocination may be like, and, in discussions with him concerning brain functions, John never mentioned m-valued logics to me; and to him, he being an old man, I never mentioned m-valued logics])) convey _µT_m-logical information concerning the ₁T₂ly-null vector-defined, non-selfsame qua identity-transparent, skew-parallel cum skew-perpendicular skew-figures-objects-patterns which J. G. Bennett considered ((see: Appendix III, “The Geometrical Representation of Identity and Diversity”, to Chapter 15 of J. G. Bennett's The Dramatic Universe, Vol. 1, pp. 506-9, Hodder & Stoughton, 1956; this appendix was “due to” R. L. “Bruin” Brown, a fuels specialist, particularly of coal, publishing mostly during the 1940s and '50s in the Journal of the Institute of Fuel, who also coauthored with Bennett and M. W. Thring a paper on unified field theory in five dimensions)) in the case of his _µT_mly-“skew-parallel cubes”, “cubes” with Brown's “n . 2ⁿ” degrees of freedom (this n times Hopfield's 2^N suggestive of our M^nk) being interpreted by ourus as indicating logical-value order-types? But Meng does not connect his “non-identity law” to Post's take on the import of _µT_m-logics (see: Emil Post, “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, Ph.D. dissertation published in American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, 1921, the last two sentences, p. 185), such that “_µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency” can be employed to interpret Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction as applied to modeling of the quantum brain. Our I/i^ms have been trying to grasp the differences, and origins of those differences, between our notion (going back at least to myme's 1975 first reading of Post's 1921 paper on _µT_m-logics, and explicitly to Larry's myme's-+-coauthor's 1981 paper entitled “Autogenic Discharge: Quantum Biological Considerations”) of the non-localizable wave-effect quantum brain, and those notions of quantum brain currently being considered by reputable scientists.

In our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, the protagonist discusses migration -- when he hears his name called and no one is there calling out; and during the practice of concentration in inner-separation from the act of reading when the alphabets seen on the page snap from one to another, including even hieroglyphics, and yet the meaning is not lost -- of the sensed locus of the inner voice associated with the I-am-me-and-only-me sensed-qua-feeling-toned-“felt-into” imputation, such that, as the apparent volume of the voice, at such “reading” practice, “screams so as still to be heard”, the sensed locus moves from inside the head (sensed at Broa's and Wernike's areas, he later learned the correct specification) to out in front of, and just above, the forehead at the exact instant when the voice disappears, which à la Edmund Jacobson's electromyographic studies, is likely the exact instant when residual tension patterns of the laryngeal muscles dissipate. The association of inner voice with simple-selfsame absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct selfhood is likely due to the attribution of self-origination to thoughts, a residual of the baud rate of binary-mind being too slow to “catch” thoughts coming in (from _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-Elsewhere, Kantian BackCloth MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space) upon the apocryphal egofunctional “myme”, the egosphere with which the ₁T₂-only mind has identified itself as a consequence of prescriptive enculturation-socialization orchestrating glutamatergic neuronal pruning and anchoring. The out-of-body-migration of the inner voice qua sense of simple-selfsame selfhood, normotically sensed as being in the brain-body, is an auditory correlate of Jinsong Meng's projected out-of-the-body process of locating Q'', the seen projected image of neural-correlates-of-consciousness Q' (the same symbol being used by Meng to designate a second distinguished physical object), of the physical object Q (the same symbol being used by Meng to designate a thought object with respect to the ₁T₂-only-logic Law of Identity). Why Meng (with his trinary world picture: two worlds and one observer) does not go to OBEed _µT_m-logics (necessary to encompass in a single Cubistic image all the facets of the Husserlian horizon of the object) and/or same-yet-different J.G.Bennettian different-when-projected “pencils of skew-parallels” (OBEed _µT_m-correlates of “parallel distance alleys”?) is perhaps apparent on p. 12 of his paper, where he says, “Given the complexity of particle physics, the space and time parameters of the light were omitted for simplicity.” This omission, automatically excludes, for instance, Luneburg's “psychometric distance function” which, according to Luneburg's experimental findings, is required (think: the psycho-part varying from ₁T₂-only-[per}son to ₁T₂-only-[per}son) for localization in binocular visual space, a non-Euclidian space with Special Relativity Lorentz contraction due to rapidity of eye movements, movements considered by Meng in terms of the extraocular muscles but without incorporating ponderablespace contraction (or memetime dilation) -- or the haptification of visual sensations when residual tension patterns of the extraocular muscles dissipate (during, e.g., the practice of concentration in inner-separation from the act of reading) generating a tactile sense of floating qua levitation. Given that, as stated on p. 7 by Meng, the absolute non-identity law “…is another expression reflecting the same aim as the law of identity”, it is Meng's “relative non-identity law” ((indicating that, as regards each particle of those making up the physical object Q, “…the evolution of one macroscopic object in the perceivable time dimension” due to interactions “…resulting in creation, decay, and annihilation” of its constituent particles and “Furthermore, substances have been continuously adsorbed onto Q or have escaped from Q in the open system”: not exactly the m-valuedness of non-selfsame identity, that very m-valuedness codified in Schrödinger's statefunction, an m-valuedness dissimulated to probability amplitudes)) which more closely, however far that closely may be, approaches our notion of _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency. There is also the issue that Meng's framework conditions -- mass, shape and location, time -- are not, à la, say, e.g., Luneburg-Lorentz contraction and Schrodinger m-valuedness, construed as having a psychometric aspect relative to the “measurement problem in QM”; whereas, I regard ponderablespacememetime as being cyclotomically demergent, _CT_C+-unto-₁T₂, under executions performed by topologically-active operator-time, consciousness, ₁T₂ly speaking, in its active aspect being the set of all topological operators on the MVRS, consciousness in its passive aspect being the space operated upon.

I've oft been accused of being obversive -- always advocating the counterfactual untruth -- simply out of sheer orneriness or delusional misidentification. But, well, I regard that accusation to be inverse to the actual case, à la Roy Wagner's The Logic of Invention, U. of Chicago, 2018, to wit, quoting p. 3:

…the species models itself upon itself in counterintuitive terms, for what we get in the obversive mode is what we would otherwise call an artificial (e.g., “cultural”) rather than a natural ontology.

Case in point: although my proprioceptive drift into a feeling-space-based (as discussed in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh) sense of ownership has never had a rubber hand, I have had a rubber foot: not the disownership-somatoparaphrenia experience of my foot as being that of another, but of another's foot as being my own (a “ketamine-bond” commonplace, the ketaminergicity exogenously or endogenously induced) -- and, contrary to the literature, I've taken this space-related confabulation of body transfer as a “participation mystique”-initiatory experience relative to “_µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency”, qua “generative empathy”, qua Buddhological “compassion” (think: Meher Baba developing welts on his back upon witnessing a horse being whipped), rather than as a pathological case of “delusory ownership” ((a notion of ownership I've generalized into economics as: “Single-valued capitalism's ₁T₂-only-priced property is theft of the multivalue! responsible for [eco}nomic autopoiesis and high levels of self-organizational competency, regressed and ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, to financial ₁T₂-only derivatives” -- e.g., ConveDDed to the non-simple ownership occasioning the bundling of localized-individual-home loans into MBSs in unconscious mass-formation back-reaction to advent of quantum nonlocality and non-simple identity, this formation perhaps being only subliminal on part of the quantum-physicist Quants who abandoned academia and migrated to Wall Street: think high levels of self-organizational competency achieved due to m-values frequency tagged to ensheaved _µT_m-LETS-currency e-units)). Nowadays, there's quite a lot of scientific literature on out-of-the-body experience, OBE, (one of the most interesting papers being “Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness”, Bigna Lenggenhager, et al., Science, 317 [5841], September 2007, pp. 1096-9, wherein the experimental subjects “mislocalized themselves toward the virtual body”), the experimental psychology studies largely treating OBEs as illusory (e.g., “Disowning One's seen real body during an out-of-body illusion”, Arvid Guterstam and H. Henrik Ehrsson, Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 2012, pp. 1037-42), the neurological studies often being rather ambiguous as regards the illusion thesis (e.g., “An embodied perspective: Angular gyrus and precuneus decode selfhood in memories of naturalistic events”, Heather M. Iriye and Peggy St. Jacques, Imaging Neuroscience, 3, July 2025, wherein described is the fact that “…out-of-body experiences demonstrate that we can form memories from a third-person perspective”). Much of current OBE research is vision focused, presumably in part because of reports that the OBEing subject floats above and looks down on hisher own body. Repetition of OBEs, however, can lead to the realization (which for me came during 1974 after an elaborate OBE which occurred whilst visiting Williamsburg, Virginia) that “passive concentration” at “going negative” in “differential relaxation” of the extraocular and laryngeal muscles into blank-out, described in our novel in explicitly-stated challenge to William James as “falling into the gap or hole or singularity between identifications”, falling along with Alice (see: “Behavioral, experiential, and physiological signatures of mind blanking”, Esteban Munoz-Musat, et al., PNAS, 122:52, 23 December 2025), constellates an OBE, falling-floating what's the difference, and, moreover, that looking-down-on or looking-back-at doesn't turn the OBEer into a pillar of salt like Lot's wife, but -- going-out/coming-back oscillations as identification with self-attribution of simple-selfhood waxes and wanes, as described in our novel -- ultimately quenches the state. Experience of the goings-out/comings-back provides insight to: abscessional fixation upon tat[turd}e[mal}i|on rules for regulation as the ragtag be all to end all disagreement with TPTB -- be they of hoydenish or campy-zesty-twinkish ragamuffin minds -- utterly identified with socially-conferred role attributtons: heh-heh-heh! Back in my day, Robert Monroe's Journeys Out of the Body, Doubleday, 1971, was the easiest literature to access on the subject. However, I've never been able to fully assimilate my experiences to anything I've read on the subject, due to the fact that, fairly early-on, I, on the obverse-side, came to believe that in-the-body-experience (IBE) is more a learned-behavior “illusion” than is a neurologically-built-in capacity for OBEs. This ATTITUDE relates to my takes on: Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction; Analytical Cubism; the Husserliana of object-horizon facets; Jean Gebser's “confabulations” as to “haptification of space” and “concretion of time”; the subversion of orthogonality, unitarity, and self-adjointivity by null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” (there being some recent quasi-support for R. L. “Bruin” Brown's and Bennett's notion, as seen in “Diagonal Unitary and Orthogonal Symmetries in Quantum Theory”, a talk given by Satvik Singh and Ion Nechita, of, respectively, Cambridge and of LPT Toulouse, 2023, and linked earlier papers); the Euclidian-invariants presupposed-foundational-given informing Piaget's stages of cognitive development, à la David Rapaport; m-valued logics; n-level wave-effect genetic encipherment; the role of ₁T₂-only-logic alone in predisposing number-theoretical formalizations, to include levels of the surreals, hyperreals, superreals, hypercomplex numbers; et cetera. Oh, not to forget glutamatergic neuronal pruning! Once I'd learned of it, that pruning, from The Crack in the Cosmic Egg's Joseph Chilton Pearce via good offices of David Spillane, I became very interested in neuronal pruning, not least because by adolescence I'd secretly become sick-unto-death of being under thumbs of the mental deficients, not to say the mental degenerates -- every adult male in the socius militarily surrounding me (don't scoff: among many of the n-circumstances, e.g., caddying on O-Club golf courses, I was always all ways being staggered by the inanity of their multilogues) -- overseeing my enculturation-socialization-metaprogramming experience hour to hour, day after day (and I was not an Army brat, let alone a Marine Corps brat, many of both of which with whom I eventually exchanged “stories of exemplification”, some of those stories dwarfing that of The Great Santini). According to the “7.1 Brain Development” chapter of Lifespan Human Development: A Topical Approach, Meredith Palm, Pressbooks, 2023, quoting, to wit:

…the brain constantly creates new neural communication routes and rewires existing ones. Both environmental experiences, such as stimulation and events within a person's body, such as hormones and genes, affect the brain's plasticity.

Environmental experiences, hmmm. But, apparently, the constancy by which “the brain constantly creates new neural communication routes and rewires” is not a linear constancy; rather, it's a “jerky” process, as testified to by Maria Ivana Perica in her Ph.D. dissertation entitled “Characterizing How Age-Related Changes in GABA and Glutamate Underlie Development of Working Memory Through Adolescence”, University of Pittsburg, 2021, to wit, quoting the “2.2 Critical Periods” section:

Despite the increased knowledge of behavioral and structural changes that occur in the brain through adolescence, the neurobiological mechanisms that drive cognitive development during this time remain poorly understood. However, recent animal and postmortem human studies are providing new evidence that suggest that critical period mechanisms may be present… Critical periods are developmental time windows during which there is heightened sensitivity in specific brain regions to experiential inputs from external stimuli; as a result, significant neural reorganization occurs… If brain regions undergoing critical period plasticity do not receive the necessary input during this time, certain behaviors will be permanently altered or even missing… Studies in songbirds have demonstrated that there is a time window of 10-50 days for learning species-specific songs…

Think: is there a critical memetemporal window for learning to think in _µT_m-valued logics, an opportunity that may be quantum quenched via orchestration of glutamatergic pruning qua neural-network wipeouts at neuronal plasticity by prescriptive enculturation-socialization? Maybe widespread neuronal apoptosis (normal) is prerequisite to _µT_m being “permanently altered” to ₁T₂-only, such that normal becomes normotic qua normopathic. Perica provides the best account I've seen of GABA-Glutamate interplay at neuronal plasticity in cognitive development -- though something of an update on the role of “strong glutamatergic inputs” may be in order à la “Activity-dependent local protection and lateral inhibition control synaptic competition in developing mitral cells in mice”, Satoshi Fujimoto, et al., Developmental Cell, 58:14, 24 July 2023, pp. 1221-6, where it is said that:

We show that strong glutamatergic inputs to one dendrite trigger branch-specific changes in RhoA activity to facilitate the pruning of the remaining dendrites: NMDAR-dependent [NMDAR = the glutamate receptor N-methyl-D-aspartate] local signals suppress RhoA to protect it from pruning; however, the subsequent neuronal depolarization induces neuron-wide activation of RhoA to prune non-protected dendrites.

Piaget's stages of cognitive development are outlined here, good offices of Kendra Cherry, 13 November 2025, and placed in the context of neural network models in the “3.4 Piaget's Constructivism” section, pp. 65-7, of “Constructivist Neural Network Models of Cognitive Development”, Gert Westermann, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh, 7 May 2000. But note that, very significantly IMHO, cognitive development begins prenatally, father's presence or absence, à la “The Great Santini”, may be registered prenatally, significant language learning may even begin prenatally, and maybe a critical memetemporal window for learning to think in _µT_m-valued logics is prenatal. The “Development of Neural Circuits Within the Cortical Plate in the Perinatal Period” section of “Normal Development of Brain Circuits”, Gregory G. Tau and Bradley S. Peterson, Neuropsychopharmacology, 35:1, 30 September 2009, pp. 147-68, is very informative in this regard, to wit, quoting:

The number of neurons in the human brain peaks at GA [gestational age] week 28. However as many as half of the neurons produced during neurogenesis die in the process of apoptosis, or naturally occurring cell death, by the end of adolescence… The reasons for the excess production of most neuronal types and glia are not fully understood… Many of the culled neurons are eliminated during two discrete developmental epochs… The first wave of apoptosis… begins around GA week 7 and continues throughout the first trimester. The second wave of apoptosis peaks around GA weeks 19-23… [bold emphasis added]

I, moreover, beyond pointing out the bold emphasis above, personally think that, whereas the “executive brain” notion may well be a conflation of capitalist-big-man-management model with brain-function modeling, so the notions of selective developmental gene, synaptic, neuronal evolutionary resource competition unto cooptation (as well as cooperation) may involve a similar conflation with the driven, high-mesomorph, Type-A personality. A focus on memory formation (see, for example: “Synaptic potentiation of engram cells is necessary and sufficient for context fear memory”, Leonardo M. Cardozo, et al., Communications Biology, 8, article number 862, 4 June 2025) under bivalent _apT_av, i.e., _appetitiveT_aversive, and even how to heterohypnotically implant substitute memories, complements, IMHO, [man}kind's persistent reengagement with collective retrograde amnesia as one of the factors of mass warfare's etiological integral equation -- which is not to mention the percolation-theoretic flashover dynamics of excitotoxic glutamate flood (or ketaminergic blocking of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and/or the blocking of mGluR1 receptors via genetic knockout or presence of one or more selective antagonists) at disruption of memory consolidation. I rather think my discussion of the mechanism of action of ozone has some relevance here, to wit, quoting my 1995 paper entitled “Quantum Biophysics of the Homeopathic Ozone Effect”:

Ozone may be a Fourier-transform operator on a frequency space, an operator with a composite wave-function embodying invariants prerequisite to systemic integration in a wide class of organic (and inorganic) systems. Were this the case, then ozone would target for oxidation any frequency-tagged structure [cf. frequency tagged neural markers] which is not a decomposition element of its own wave-function. How would this frequency recognition relate to the process of oxidation? The stereochemical “fit” of a given lock-and-key device (largely a matter of the geometry of bond angles) is only the first “step” in a chemical transformation involving the interacting atomic groups. This transformation is geometrical in nature, as much as electromagnetic. But function is an algebraic way of saying geometrical transformation! So the total given transformation (not just the lock-and-key device) may have a wave-functional analogue physically embodied as a frequency tag. And likewise for the total transformational prerequisites of systemic integration in a given class of systems. The invariants of the frequency space itself define the regime by which specific stereochemical processes are integrated spatially and temporally!

Maybe the glia listen, really listen, not only to the synapses (see: “Glia: listening and talking to the synapse”, Philip G. Haydon, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 1 March 2001, pp. 185-93), but also to intraneuronal and intraperineural mitochondrial DNA's quadripolar-wave output, rate-limiting and bias-controlling output containing all the ₁T₂-only-information encoded into the nucleotide pair sequences, as well as registering the _µT_m-information contained in those quantum wavicles' multi-valued, n-leveled, hypertemporally “confabulated” -- heh-heh-heh! -- formants. Introduction of the notion of complex m-valued neurons is interesting in this regard (see: “Complex-Valued Neural Networks II. Multi-Valued Neurons: Theory and Applications”, Igor Aizenberg, Studies in Computational Intelligence, January 2011). Then there are hypercomplex-numerable neural networks to consider (see: “Algebraic foundations of split hypercomplex nonlinear adaptive filtering”, E. Hitzer, arXiv, 7 June 2013, wherein it is observed that,“…use of hypercomplex numbers for neural networks allows to directly learn these objects and their transformations in the form of hypercomplex numbers”). The frequency-domain technicals of M-way arraying convolutional (think: temporal CURL as result of a convolution operator's execution) neural networks (CNNs) formed of m-valued neurons (see: “Frequency-Domain and Spatial-Domain MLMVN-Based Convolutional Neural Networks”, [MLMVN = multilayer multivalued neuron], Igor Aizenberg and Alexander Vasko, Algorithms, 17:8, 17 August 2024) seems to me to be converging upon our idea as to the nature of DNA's quantum-wave properties -- and even more so when complex QR decomposition is considered (see: “A modified learning algorithm for the multilayer neural network with multi-valued neurons based on the complex QR decomposition”, Igor Aizenberg and Antonio Luchetta and Stefano Manetti, Soft Computing, 16:4, September 2012). But I, of course, have reservations about the orthogonality aspect of QR decomposition, because of its exclusive tie to ₁T₂-only logic, thus precluding _µT_m-processing of m-valued neuronal inputs-outputs. My first serious encounter with the notion of involutory decomposition came upon reading Sri Aurobindo's The Life Divine, the central theme of which is “The Involution-Evolution”. So, I was prepped to place a high value on Eric Temple Bell's 1912 Ph.D. dissertation, “The Cyclotomic Quinary Quintic”, when I discovered a copy of it in the Cornell Mathematics Library, circa 1975, and all the more so when I realized this dissertation, an essay on involutory decomposition, related to N. H. Abel's existence proof for trans-al-jabr maligned as an “Impossibility Theorem”. During the same period, while I was pondering Everett's paper on the relative-state formulation of QM, I ran across the Luneburg theory of binocular visual space, and flashed on Luneburg's finding that there is no localization in visual space independent of a “psychometric distance function” as belying the pivotal-to-the-paper's-argument statement made by Everett that objects in our experience are always localized. This Luneburg-Everett recognition, for me, put cyclotomic decomposition involutes, not squarely, but J.G.Bennettian-skew-perpendicularity-wise, in overlay upon the m-valuedness of Schrödinger's statefunction, which I, having by then discovered in the Math Library Emil Post's paper on _µT_m-valued logics, viewed as being unpacked and repacked via Postian processing. Even now, therefore, I entertain major caveats with regard to both quasi-set Schrödinger logic and neutrosophic logic -- these being closest to my take -- because they each in their own way do not follow out implications of Post's last sentences, circa 1921, to wit, once again quoting his paper entitled “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, p. 185:

We must however take into account the fact that our development [rigorous “derivation” of _µT_m logics] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

To myme, “any one _µT_m” generates its own unique notions of number, whereas the notions of number tacitly assumed by quasi-set Schrödinger logic and neutrosophic logic (to include levels of: surreals, hyperreals, superreals, hypercomplex numbers: for the last, see “On the hypercomplex numbers of all finite dimensions: Beyond quaternions and octonians”, Pushpendra Singh and Anubha Gupta and Shiv Dutt Joshi, TechRxiv, 21 March 2022; contextualized by the historical discussion of theory provided in “Hypercomplex Numbers -- A Tool for Enhanced Efficiency and Intelligence in Digital Signal Processing”, Zlatka Valkova-Jarvis and Maria Nenova and Dimitriya Mihaylova, Mathematics, 13:3, 3 February 2025) have “been given in the language of ₁T₂” -- and this has not been acceptable, IMHO, ever since Cantor's discovery that some smaller things can be bigger than the bigger things containing them (e.g., the hyperreals are a subset of the surreals and the surreals are a subset of the hyperreals), and, later, that the holographic principle physically n-bodies this Cantorian notion which is m-bodied when the boundary is a fractal boundary-without-boundary, e.g., any and every natural boundary.

If deep-structure collective-unconscious cause-push/attractor-pull is altogether denied, defenestrated through this or that memetime-bound window of opportunity, or simply ignored (see, for a few instances of “coruscating articles”, such mollifying responses being emollient: here and here and here and here and here), then the only answer to “Why?”, based upon surface-structure-factors -- the real skinny, eh -- analysis alone (by dint of which: binary-only-truth values in alliance to fakery, to wit, e.g., advent of the ₁T₂-only “bi[part}i|son [Un|i}part|he” as men[dah}c[iou}s [ab}solution), is: for “no good reason” or rhyme, the “-istoid hordes” with “exiguous loyalty” -- whatever the “-ist” referent being so “-oided” -- “stumbled into false narratives”, “unforced error”, “great mistake”, [ent}angling [all}i|ants qua “[treat}ties” forming a “do[om}s|day machine” of “petty short-term”-istic dipsomaniacal, uh, uh, “dip[low}matic manEUverve|s”, so on and so forth.

While there exists m-meanings, the meaning-of-meaning is deep-structured into Singularity. That's as regards transcendental memetime-independent “while”, not I/i^m[man}aint memetime-bound “whilst”. In respect to the m-meanings of entity-qua-identity (think: the OBEed Husserliana of horizon facets?), i.e., of each and every object(s), howsoever chosen, we have, ₁T₂-paradoxically: “I am me and only me” (see our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, for a “Heh-heh-heh!”-version, and for a discussion of all the subtle variations on the theme “no entity without identity”, to include material points, numbers, colors, propositions, et cetera, see: “Being Qua Identity in Russell's Ontologies”, Jan Dejnozka, Union College, 25 March 2021); the “deep” structured into Singularity of the meaning-of-meaning being the tenseless “I am that I am”, i.e., identity-qua-identity (see: the “Identity Philosophy” section of “Schelling's Transition to Identity-Philosophy: The Philosophical Turn between 1800 and 1801”, Yiran Yang, University College London, MPhil thesis, May 2023, quoting, to wit: “Metaphysically, the system [of identity] asserts that absolute identity [cf. the order-type of identity-transparency-states superposed upon _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen AllBase most-densely-packed “bucket-of-dust” sheet of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, BackCloth] is the ground of all beings, and all beings are identical with each other as the manifestation of the absolute, which is reason. This metaphysical outlook unites all dualism once and for all.”). My POV on this identity-related stuff is that orthogonality, which is prerequisite to representation of entity-qua-identity, is a predicate of ₁T₂-only-logic-qua-logic (not “within” that logical-value order-type by execution of its rules of entailment, or “within” predicate-calculus,…,1st,…,2nd,…,nth of Russellian type-theory of binary logic), which order of logical-value is the most abjectly reductive demergent of _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen AllBase, i.e., that demergent logical-value-order-type predicating the memetime-bound, the sequence-bound, whereupon “being” has so thoroughly become “becoming” that cosmic exile status is plausibly attributable, that is: utterly quashing the “qua” of identity-qua-identity. Cardinalities of the numbers specifying the representation spaces of non-orthogonal bases ((see: “Non-orthogonal bases”, PhysicsForums, 18 September 2025; and “Non-orthogonal basis and redundancy”, Brett Cooper, DSP Related.com, 25 July 2012; and “Non‐orthogonal 3D coordinate systems for dummies”, Matt Landreman, U. of Maryland, 12 March 2012; and “Nonorthogonal Bases and Frames in Hilbert Space”, D. Walnut, George Mason U., Fall 2007: I take it from this that non-orthogonal bases can result from perturbations of orthonormal bases; and “Non-Orthogonal Quantum States”, Emergent Mind, 8 September 2025)) are C+: think, the right-hand-side of T relative to orders of J.G.Bennettian “skew-perpendicularity” as providing for ordered bases; think, the left-hand-side of T relative to orders of J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels” as providing for axes of coordinate systems (see, for relevant considerations: “Coordinate system vs ordered basis”, Mathematics Stack Exchange, 27 May 2017). As regards “perturbations of orthonormal bases”, it may be of some benefit to consider juxtaposition of our 1979 model of DNA radiation (cf. “perturbation”) exchange at helix-coil transition, involving a memetime-independent operator-time-formulated canonical quadratic equation, harmonic temperature oscillators of pi-electron-parcel gas, and emitted coherent quadriphonic, uh, uh, quadipolar, waves; Fernando Lund's July 1981 paper entitled “Solitons as harmonic oscillators with quadratic constraints”, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 3:1-2, pp. 350-62; and since nonlinear waves can form stable solitons and the emitted waves of our model would involve information-carrying-qua-n-level-encoding higher-temporal-formant (n-perturbed orthonormal bases, i.e., non-orthogonal?) harmonics, “Time-independent [cf. topologically-active operator-time?] harmonics dispersion relation for time-evolving [i.e., re: memetime?] nonlinear waves”, Romik Khajehtourian and Mahmoud I. Hussein, Science Advances, 7:50, 8 December 2021. This, my POV on identity-related stuff, does not, beyond the Husserliana issues, state-“place” the m-meanings of entity-qua-identity (that is: “identity opaqueness”) as counterparts in Everettian n-other worlds; rather, it indicates the existence of “being”-as-whatnot as having _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency (cf. Schelling's “all beings are identical with each other as the manifestation of the absolute”) this one and only universe, to include types of number and states of matterenergy, howsoever ₁T₂ly-normopathic (with all that that implies concerning the logical-value-order-type natures of symmetries; invariants; conservation laws; norms; the very ideas of [not]dominion and [in]dependence and [un]relatedness in finite- and infinite-collection cases, linear and non-linear, whereas I would like to assimilate Thomas Wiese's genehmigten Dissertation concerning ₁T₂-only-formalized “Infinite Unions of Subspaces”, Technische Universitat Munchen, 19 June 2020, unfortunately, I am not likely to live long enough; the tilted “perps” at cross products of suchlike, particularly in definition of angular momentum and its rate of change, i.e., torque, and slope of the torque-time curve, and the slope of that slope, cf. the 3-fold temporal CURL of Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time; et cetera). Definition of the span (logically speaking: _C+T_C+) of the collection of bases, orthogonal and non-orthogonal, can involve no number-system-definer ₁T₂-only formalized (since all logical-value-order-type-definable number systems would be involved), e.g., the ₁T₂-only Cayley-Dickson procedure for production of the sequence of algebras over the numbers reals-unto-those-imaginary-hypercomplex-voudons-and-higher. For, considering Emil Post's last Ph.D.-dissertation sentence (linked above), to wit:

This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

we must suppose that “if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation” there will be number systems definable in “any one _µT_m” inconceivable under ₁T₂-only alone (and that each of these identity-transparent logical-value-order-type-formulated number systems will with have associated notions as to states of matterenergy inconceivable under ₁T₂-only alone: cf., as ₁T₂-only mere intimation, the operator-timed primed and double-primed versions of c equals minus or plus, uh, uh, minus and plus -- according, that is, to Schrödinger's involutory de-/re-composition topologically-active-operator/counteroperator-time-executing n-superposed cat-qua-sorting-angel sequestered in the ₁T₂ly-sealed “sealed box” of space/counterspace -- the square root of E over m).

We can count our lucky stars that exact recurrence (good offices of Claire Hall, The Public Domain Review, 15 May 2024) is not a principle man[i}fessed|ly me[me}time-bound-graphs mandated by the historiosopher's historiological shape-space (progressive linear, bang-crunch cyclical, progressive spiral-form, psycho-physically non-orientable, in-here/out-there self-reentrant) configuration in historiography of his[hys|teric/to/rictus}story. For, if it -- such exactness -- were the case, we would once again be faced with unconscionable binary either-or choices like that exemplified by situations encountered over and over during the Spanish-civil-war prefiguration of the WWII-battle of the 200-Years War of the World, to wit, quoting Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust, p. 431:

Another, Father [i.e., a priest] Joaquin Iturricastillo, was shot on 8 November, after being denounced as a dangerous nationalist for criticizing cheek-to-cheek waltzing as contrary to Basque customs.

The “more than once” missing-period (pointed out to me by the brilliant “girl” of Eielson and Wainwright, circa 1962: she was, on her own, actually understanding it as a graduating high school senior!) waved in the Finnegans Wake of exact recurrence (in which, parenthetically, P. D. Ouspensky firmly believed, the link being to a superlative article good offices of Michael Presley, Gurdjieff International Review, II:2, Winter 1998-9) arguably is an IBEed ₁T₂-logical deteriorated residual qua “cultural lag” of the once commonplace OBEed _µT_m-logI/i^mcal mode of cognition by which objects, ₁T₂-only-ostensibly inner or outer, once were Analytical-Cubism-wise all-facets-of-the-Husserlian-horizon prehended-apprehended-comprehended memetime-independently by propriocept-unto-percept-unto-concept. “Deteriorated residual” is other words for the collective-unconscious regression -- due to conscious-suppression-driven differential-personal-subliminal repressions which sum to etiology of the mass-formation fulminations which, by Newton's fluxions, integrate to the persistent collective psychosis -- which has been plaguing Homo sapiens sapiens, his history, since, certainly, memetime passover of the last great ice age. So-- given hisstorical plenitude of inexact recurrence of hubris-into-nemesis ₁T₂-only-Iturricastillo-type ancient-Greek-tragedy-downfalls issuing out of exaggerated-character-archetypal ancient-Greek-sitcoms, turning metapsychology into metaphysics into metamathematics, the supposition comes into entertainment that the parapraxic-lapsuc-slippery psychopathologies of everyday life unto the regressed-archetypal event-gradients of collective psychosis must be structured by finite mis[keg}e-nations of ₁T₂-unto-_µT_m-logics, with _CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ being reserved, subtended by unmolested-_µT_m, for the dot-exe-aspects of The Unconscious as Infinite Sets. All of which, once again, uh, that is, “more than once”, brings us to contemplation of “On the hypercomplex numbers of all finite dimensions: Beyond quaternions and octonians”, Pushpendra Singh and Anubha Gupta and Shiv Dutt Joshi, in juxtaposition to Thomas Wiese's “Infinite Unions of Subspaces” (if only I had lifespan memetime-long enough to assimilate the latter!). Well, I must say that Singh-Gupta-Joshi scaling and rotating multiplication (SRM) in definition of all-finite-dimensions generalized-hypercomplex-number systems certainly seems mighty suggestive as to possible existence of ₁T₂ly-null vector-defined “pencils of skew-parallels” on laminated BackCloth undergoing orders of temporal CURL “during” memetime-independent topologically-active operator-time execution of _µT_m-logical cosmic propositions. How this is possibly a cyclotomic decomposition (unfortunately regressed-archetypally recurrently, cf. the Spanish holocaust, ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, to hecatombs) of Wiese recomposition as infinite union of subsets, I'd certainly like to adequately cognize.

Were I to be seriously contemplating the shape-space configuration of hisstory, I would not be thinking progressive linear, bang-crunch cyclical, progressive spiral-form as opening out or closing in, but more likely, all things (conscious, subliminal, personal unconscious, collective unconscious) considered, the quadratic 3-scoll unified chaotic system, this because of: in my opinion, the Paine-Kaplan topologically-active-operator-timed complex-angular-momentum-(think: quantized via Penrose twistors?)-cascade, 3-fold-temporal CURLing, nested-grid, numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis was, and-evermore-thoroughly on a theoretical level is, a rebuttal to linear Lorenzian chaos (or, alternatively: linear Lorenzian chaos is a confounder to the cascade model) by virtue of recognition that (and system-theoretic incorporation of) the “discrete time evolution operator M” is apropos mere ₁T₂-only-memetime, such that, if the actual case were to authentically be modeled, binary-logical-cause-push would be amped by _µT_m-attractor-pull (not ₁T₂-only-attractor-pull) if -- that's ifa, if again; not iff -- an adequate collection of non-orthogonal bases were to be envisioned as subtending orchestration of the collection of far-from-equilibrium phase transitions at cascade-demergence. Back in Paine's formative days -- Sixties and Seventies -- the emphasis was placed upon obtainment of the functional prerequisites to stability, not realization that sustainment of nested instabilities (with the constantly changing boundary values that that “[in}volves” -- as distinct from “[en}tails”, even of the blackswan al-jabr-variety) is the Royal Road (not Penrose's Road which places no value upon Postian _µT_m) to increasing the level of systemic self-organizational competency. Antonio Politi, linked immediately above as regards “discrete time evolution operator M” (Scholarpedia, 8:3, 2013), says that Lyapunov exponents “measure the growth rates [not rates-of-rates or rates-of-rates-of-rates] of generic perturbations, in a regime where their evolution is ruled by linear equations” [such as those of the Lorenz attractor] and that, moreover, "they [the real parts of the eigenvalues of the constant operator, the Jacobian, of a velocity field that may fluctuate due to the disorder of multiplicative noise] measure the exponential contraction/expansion rate of infinitesimal perturbations”. Why, having well-considered Lorenz of 1963, would a mid-to-late-1960s graduate student of atmospheric physics embrace this idea straight out of the early-1890s, given all that had been learned about dynamical meteorology in the intervening period? Most would, some wouldn't. As a Masters candidate, Paine didn't. He thought, and later elaborated upon that thought, that the acceleration field and the time-rate-of-change-of-acceleration field, indicative of orders of Jacobians, were important components of the “infinitesimal perturbations” bending, and bending again, the exponential, uh, that's the exponential-of-the-exponential and the-exponential-of-the-exponential-of-the-exponential (think: 3-fold “topologically-active”, having to do with the imaginary and hypercomplex parts of the involved eigenvalues, such that time-qua-time cannot simply be mere passive, passing, referential linear-time) of expansion/contraction photo-acoustically responsible for temperature oscillations of the harmonic type ((the “plastic bag” of the photoacoustic spectrometer -- which radiation impinges upon and differentially heats the gas within causing expansion/contraction and the resultant “multiplicative noise” better understood as Musculpt -- being the J-dimensional “box used to hold the system”, qua the LSTD, limited spacetime domain)) in helix-coiling air-parcel feederbands to rollclouds poised to TILT! (think: airparcel pinballs) into the domains of non-orthogonality and their vertically-propagated, infrasonic, imaginary-hypercomplex “overtones”. Anyways-- as regards the politico-economic value of the constancy-of-inconstancy -- e.g., internal-system-state bureaucratic variables fine-grain tagged with _µT_m-LETS-currency units to always all ways changing fractal e-boundaries -- conceive of entelechy as realization of the quantum-potential for self-organization demergent from _C+T_C+-identity-transparency as cyclotomically executed by Pauli-Paine 3-fold topologically-active operator-time. As regards TPTB-- well, their “stakeholder, ESG investing, and the net-zero energy paradigm” clearly had no conceived means of implementation adequate to complexity of the case. Why was that? Because TPTB have had their heads so far buried in 18th-century rvWallbanger spongecake that they ConveDD, conversion-disorder displace, 3-fold topologically-active operator-time to triple.sec. Heh-heh-heh! And, given that ₁T₂-only systems have the lowest level of self-organizational competency, hardly can it be expected that ₁T₂-only capitalism, facilitated by “impact investment” or no, could ever be adequate to complexity of the case. Don't worry, be happy. I know -- my low-level experience of inner-Musculpt being merely propaedeutic -- I don't understand _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ in any substantive way myself. But now and again, I find a headroom I hadn't suspected within which to sit. UX = user experience. UXly speaking, e[Lex}i|cog/raph/y has thoroughly become “para”, issuing-from, heh-heh-heh, the parasympathetic-trophotropic, a case of moving away from, in this case not also toward, a source of nourishment, i.e., cognitive vomiting, rather than simply ralphing. So, that being THE case, as regards “decomposition by basis pursuit”, collective-unconsciously speaking, “dictionaries of atoms” that are “outside the basis setting” are, good offices of Scott Shaobing Chen and David L. Donoho and Michael A. Saunders (Siam Review, 43:1, 2001, pp. 129-59), of considerable interest.

₁T_{2 µ}T_m I/i^m “double-digit midget” I/iⁿ _CT_C+ T_{zog-chen 1} 2^nk

---

Contact the page editor

Return to:

•Top

•Homepage