µTm Scenarios, T8(M)
Even given Basho's barley-love and a monkey's raincoat to hide the beast in Elvis, it would be hard to PI whether John Perkins -- one more shadow-boxing drama-is person-I in a Javanese weigh-in cool-it! -- is writing dumbed-down or he actually knows as little monetary-system history as his discourse indicates (which is not to disparage his overall theme, though the proposed solutions are uninspired). In his The Secret History of the American Empire, Penguin, 2007 (containing no proprietary information and over-protective of pre-WWII U.S. history so as to retain something nearby to resurrect), for instance, no distinction is made between the “gold standard” -- largely a 19th-century affair -- and the very different gold-exchange mechanism of Bretton Woods One. Indeed, Perkins makes statements about BW1 which do not apply to BW1, but do apply to the 19th-century gold standard (distinctions regarding which are available these days to anyone accessing Wiki). Moreover, the transition from what was essentially a barter arrangement for movement of oil to dollar denomination of oil-market transactions was a process begun in the 1950s and early-'60s as the Seven Sisters lost “total control” (that “dodecaphonic” device permitting barter) over oil discovery, production, and refining; it was not an abrupt snap-over in relation to the Yom Kippur war as Perkins describes. Given the enormous global value of oil trade, early on understood sure to increase through the post-peak production period, what currency, especially in a floating regime, other than the foremost international reserve currency, could sufficiently protect itself against assaults as to be seriously considered a denominator of the trade? None and only none -- not only, There was no other. Speaking in superlatives, trade in all scarce commodities should be denominated, not in a vehicle currency, or a basket thereof, but in Hayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock”. Furthermore, the dollar was not “weakening” prior to outbreak of the Yom Kippur war, to use the word Perkins chose; Nixon had undertaken a major devaluation of the dollar, which was already -- before the Yom Kippur war, before the Six Day war (as I knew at the JFK Special Warfare Center at the time, being there an intelligence analyst of the Middle East) and increasingly so over the prior decade -- denominating oil transactions. Thus, the Nixon devaluations in the post-1971 period greatly reduced the “absolute value” of OPEC oil in the ground, as well as separated that “value” from a somewhat reliable store-of-value, as Nixon had already separated the dollar from BW1's gold-exchange (at a fixed value for MONETARY gold -- which is to say not gold bought and sold) mechanism due to the enduring inflation “spike” LBJ's Guns 'n Butter plus no increased taxes had created to further reduce the post-WWII value of monetary gold set to $35/oz. Increasingly, from the Kennedy era onward -- actually Eisenhower's 1958 tipping point -- even reduced-value monetary gold was better to hold than inflation-debilitating dollars, so there was accelerating use of the BW1 gold-exchange window by central banks, with an increased time rate of change of acceleration (one of the “impulses” shaking the black glass of MACV-HQ as I stood there in Strategic Research and Analysis during the wee hours starring in awe at the golden light-flowers of rocket rounds impacting the airfield's runways) in gold-window use immediately following the 1968 Tet offensive in Viet Nam. Perkins says that dollar denomination of oil transactions functions as an automatically collected global tax because the U.S. can simply print dollars to settle its obligations, the resultant inflation being the “tax”: this is true of any commodity trade conducted in dollars. It is also true that any nation-state can print its currency, exchange for dollars, and pay: it's just that the U.S., skipping a step, can do this without short-term negative consequences to a far greater degree than any other nation-state. In the period 1945-'71 under BW1, the difference between the U.S. and other nations in this regard was very much less than it has been since the 1971 closing of the BW1 gold window, because the gold-exchange mechanism functioned (as systemically non-functional as this mechanism was) as a restraint upon the printing of dollars over and above that amount required to fulfill responsibility of the foremost international reserve currency to maintain sufficient global liquidity to ostensibly clear international trade accounts. Nonetheless, there had been global inflation throughout the whole period 1945-'71 (telling us, not only about volume of dollar printing, but also influence of a wide range of externalities upon behaviors of internalities), so, with Nixon's unilateral renunciation of the BW1 gold-exchange mechanism (succinctly argued in public forums prior to the 1968 Tet offensive, most prominently by oil company CEOs: prefiguring, all but announcing to any Vietnamese ears which could hear, as well as to ears at SRA/MACV-J2, U.S. pull-out from Viet Nam), the U.S. DEFAULTED on the total value of post-WWII global inflation (a “tax” in Perkins' sense) dispersed over all sovereign holders of monetary gold and dollars as stores of value. This was an enormous, unprecedented default (from the beginning built into the structure of BW1, a structure the U.S. had insisted upon -- against advice of both White and Keynes) which the U.S. economy could never, but never, hope to cover (given the role HUAC and Nixon played in White's premature death, these two “entities” were directly culpable). Evidence of the impending DEFAULT had become so great by 1969 -- as exacerbated by LBJ's international borrowing to fund the Viet Nam war -- that IMF Special Drawing Rights were created as a sop (also a SNAFU become an SOP) to deflect demands for restitution of the default sure to come as U.S. gold stores depleted in fulfillment of the requirements the U.S. itself had self-interestedly and stupidly and anthropogenically insisted upon at Bretton Woods in 1944: the Greatest Generation as the worstest generation. Uninformed authoritative discourse on monetary-system history veils the fact that no commodity or commodity basket, no vehicle currency or basket of vehicle currencies, and no combination of these four, whether pushed through IMF SDRs or not, can yield a functional monetary system with a reliable store of value -- however “value” is to be defined. Which is not even to mention a monetary process capable of facilitating self-organization of externalities, the greatest present unfulfilled global need. The prevailing employed notions of “commodity” and “currency” and “store” and “value” are not sufficiently general, i.e., abstract, to permit the fashioning of a monetary process with the level of autopoietic competency required. The only “value” a reserve instrument should store -- if markets are to adequately process internalities and externalities -- is the relative-state of the quantum-composite, i.e., the “stack” of Hayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” of the overall global economy (an idea, admittedly, completely off the cognitive Richter scale, and likely to remain there). Such a reserve unit cannot be fashioned absent global implementation of m-logically-valued LETS -- which, in principle no less than in practice, can only be accomplished from the bottom up. It's not just issues of exploitation, as many people believe, but primarily issues of projective-identification in collective transference alienating insights long since achieved and necessary to intelligent response to prevailing circumstances. Not at all unusual, e.g., Harvard's Huntington -- originator of “forced-draft urbanization” -- became famous recycling a Toynbee theme (as almost noted by Perkins). The required ideas, though long in existence, simply can't be cognitively metabolized.
Being no fan of cyberiated SanFran mind, values-driven Berrett-Koehleria, rappered exogenous ketamine-stoked VRed house-music man-a-burnin', blood-banking, money-soul, cellularated, PDAed, What Every Foreigner Should Know about Each American, memo-bribing “wiwa that grinds smoke”, as my mother used to say, I don't believe, you see, in “rule”, which includes “majority rule” -- that principle of the 17th- and 18th-centuries Locke justified by appeal to Newton's Laws of Motion and the procedure of vector summation; I believe in what a century ago replaced Newton's idea: Schrödinger's wave-function, particularly as understood in relation to Everettian “relative-state” and Hayekian “time-shapes”. Looking Backward to Foundling Fathers, progenitors of 18th-century 1T2-logic rationalism, as role models to imprint upon in seeking solutions for a foundering civilization two centuries into the m-valued and a century into the m-logically-valued: no promising strategy. Four-hundred years of tweaking the demo and demo-crazy never became democracy: seems like Newton got more wrong than merely the limit in the calculus and how to mind the mint. Another example of executing moves appropriate to sock her, when the game being played is tent his: no real theory of moves. Therefore, I don't look for an electronic commons as a direct, participatory-democracy, referendered voting booth, WiFied and cellular-SmartMobbed, but as computerized “human chess” of yore, go, wei qi, m-logically-valued multiple-scenarios strategy game fulfilling some of the prerequisites to a close approach to quantum-based spontaneous social, economic, and political order by, step-wise -- as in Michi-gan (michi-yuki sacred-dance parade: not of Dark Angel; not of Deviant Art; not fan-dubbing doll-lyrics; not dyadically brown-shirting the walk-toward-death in a transference mirror reflecting mere shadows) goose-flight infrasound-signature surfing -- increasing competency at realizing the identity-transparent condition of relative-state. In FaceBook of quantum relative-state identity-transparency, where every action is omni-transforming, the very notion of limited liability is ludicrous, and of a limited-liability corporation, nothing if not an oxymoron, especially when legalistically concatenated to the 19th-century notion of corporate personage in a quantum universe which in principle absolutely precludes absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct individual persons (WholeFace transplants, or no). Is this an econoimmune-competency conundrum and social-tissue graft rejection, or an environmental-context conundrum, or both, or three? Got religion? Spiritual insight is not reducible to milk; religion has always been an organizational tool. Yeah, yeah, right. Stalking the angel over voodoo river on the sunset express, we all yearn for free fall into lullaby town. Bang on! And when the tripwire -- ever hit such a wire, stood in blowback of an IED? -- takes you to the killing floor, without fail you're running blind as you die trying. Brutal, riveting, tough, visceral, muscular: not what the doctor ordered. So, the idea of enticing issue-oriented pressure-lobbying-activist groups into supporting implementation of m-logically-valued LETS does not appeal, for the end achieved comes in the form of the means employed. Creation and deployment of touchable Musculpt is the way to go.
Man-O-War, War Admirable, 1938 November Steps prefiguring 1939 events, what a wilted collective-unconscious read on the Lettuce Queen's perverse inclinations: The Reluctant Belligerent, indeed. Reluctant to run with the full-field? Waiting until after the Kurst Salient to sprint for the wire? Couldn't sit in the same pressroom, just couldn't, could we. Still-sitting, what a chore. Prefiguration of what? And tell, do tell, please, how to have been does one understand deep structure in origins of the world wars?
Africa as the “dark-continent” holder of the “heart of darkness” has nothing much to do with Africa qua Africa: “darkest Africa” is the collective unconscious in transference by mass projective-identification, the “all against all” which is the projected “state of nature” that the Westphalian-Leviathan Cartesian-Newtonian nation-state was fashioned to suppress, keep at bay, slay. Collective suicide in displacement by mass conversion disorder. Post-Newtonian, Schrödingerian-Everettian relative-state identity-transparency is subliminally recognized a terrifying -- “the horror, the horror” -- upwelling evocation of that time-independent animistic collective occasion of experience which is m-logically-valued nature in the raw, uncooked by glutamatergic neuronal etching to 1T2-logic alone. This terror, this horror, in face of the projection come back as introjection to haunt modern man, now postmodern man, is the state, not of nature but of mind, guaranteeing that what has been done to Africa in due course will be done to the WholeEarth. Plunder and power are incidental, derivative “motivations” covering, hiding, concealing the fear-itself feared by the ego-in-service-to-regression in projective-identification as regression-in-service-to-the-ego -- e' what, E. Kris?
The nation-state is not only the worst thing that's happened to humanity, it's the worst thing that's happened to planet Earth. Pick a million people. How many believe that, really believe it? One, maybe. How many, then, in seven-billion people? That's the odds, the odds the human species will survive what's coming its way. No insight: “There will be a means of escape; always has been, always will be.” No preparation: “It's a scam; nothing has changed, everything is fine.” How do I know the nation-state is the worst thing? Because of how it facilitates the next worst thing! Quoting Rolfe Winkler (“Letting Goldman role the dice”, Reuters, 15 October 2009):
Saving Goldman was largely about saving the derivatives market, which is so big and unstable that the death of one counterparty could mean the death of all… Yet serious reform of the derivatives market -- something that would reduce its size significantly -- is nowhere on the radar.
But it is not so much the size of the derivatives market as the size and small number of counterparties and their market shares (this oligopolistic structure transferring risk up the “Devil's Staircase” -- percolation by reverse-cascade effect, like with vertically-propagating acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes -- from microscale to macroscale to the metaeconomy of central banks and We-Are-the-World fiat vehicle-reserve currencies, concentrating the risk to avalanche posture). This problem could not have happened under m-logically-valued LETS, no matter how big a derivatives market, because there would be a virtually uncountable number of counterparties and there would be fractal entrapment/band-pass e-boundaries mitigating against daisy-chained meltdowns. Avoid such precipitous chain reactions: that's why the Earth has an ozone shield; that's why the solar system has a heliosphere bubble around it (sporting a Riemann Hypothesis hydrogen stripe with Gödel-numbered tickertape spots recording cycles in solar-galactic information-exchange processes, processes that are analogue-variants of blackhole computing). Quantum economies, too, must have such devices -- if they are to attain high levels of autopoietic competency. On a bet with a friend -- me betting against; he betting for -- my 1995 paper, “Constructing a Chaotic Marketplace: Can Global Integration, Driven by Quantum-based Technologies, Sustain Itself in a Newtonian Macroeconomy?”, which describes the transfer/concentration of risk up the “Devil's Staircase” as well as m-valued monetary units in answer to derivatives, was sent to the New Yorker. When there was no answer back -- me having won the bet -- I dropped the editor a note predicting “nothing but a pile of broken bricks” if such perspectives continued to be ignored (earlier examples of such forecasting -- generally coming about five-to-ten years in advance -- on my part were: Cambodian holocaust, while at SRA/MACV-J2; a “dagger team” shutting down NYC and massive counterproductive U.S. military response, this one coming thirty years in advance; Rajiv Gandhi assassination, made to Douglas Pike; collapse of the baht, made in 1992 to the Thai Prime Minister's Chief Urban Planning Advisor). Elizabeth McNeill's novel, 9 1/2 Weeks, was a potent prefigurative attack on the underlying psychosexuality of the Wall Street mindset (SM compulsions metareferencing “quantum relative-state identity-transparency” being deeply involved in why fiber-bundle arithmetics were regressed to dysfunctional bundled derivatives: it was these sorts of issues to which the “gratuitous sex” in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, was directed). Holywood transformed McNeill's novel into a celebration of BDSM-violence, thus facilitating processes leading to the inevitable Wall Street meltdown. Viagra has been only one of the answers to a lifetime of the MSG in cheap Chinese lunches! The book hit too close to home, was too psychologically accurate, was too far beyond Holywood-Freud recipe-thematics, and, thus, had to be dissembled, if the primary role of Holywood was to be optimally sustained -- Holywood being a military-guvment industrial extension of Wall Street's embrace of OSS-MOed Madison Avenue. Which is not to say Holywood does not engage in “credibility operations”, such as making films critical of the superficial aspects of Wall Street behavior. Dyslexic yobwoc, O stone, my make dug loss that with brad pit -- or we will… Serialized total control is not required to orchestrate the collective ensemble -- conceived positivist-behavioristic or action-based. Don't have ta be no volvoP god, if even often so less no and more no… Well, if that ain't the dangbustiest thing I ever done heard.
O, the problem, the problem of pacing pell-mell prose in a variable time-pace universe -- Tullia Trench's Gemeinschaft being oh-so-much more interesting than Sam Spade's Gesellschaft. And what's to choose between getspatchos… uh, I mean, Gestapos? One little piggy, two little piggies, three little piggies, four.
However urgent a thing is, there comes a point where there are no more places to go. The urgency burns out, and you sit there like you've got all the time in the world, while the world rages on around you: Running Blind. (Lee Child, Putnam's, 2000, p. 184.)
Yep, it's just like that, and it can go on like that for decades, decades of awe in the thing: masses' opiate, neuronal etching. Eristic in accommodating clichés: my body, clear and present danger, the national interest… One inside the other: syllogistic, everyday life is, a collective hypnosis, a running blind in the 1T2-logic of a Bach Invention that turns against itself like Gödel's Proof, just one more EscherFormDance: meaning resident in patterned trivia -- or is it trivial patterns? In awe of the BEAUTY of logical necessity -- even, or most especially so, if that logic confounds itself. At least it's got a self to confound: existential confirmation, eh? The governing strange attractors insure that the requisite collective unconscious impulse-gradients trickle down to geopolitical determinants. Lodge Bill recruits to Special Forces were political -- well, rage-related politics. Then, early-'60s, it all turned Existentialist; motivation of the more intelligent was inner counterwork: use autohypnotic devices of stress-oriented training and actual combat to deautomatize participation in the collective hypnosis. Ice-cream torrents fall, shaking Sundae Hills, pelting sheets upon strawberry fields, forever undulating that plain, darkling nasty the night armies. Then came the religious violence of Generation X.
Robert Goddard, Closed Circle (Bantam, 1993): it is extremely well written, and the parallels to today are so… Y'know, the public history of Arbey's demise is sufficiently far and away from the most likely scenario, one can hardly dismiss as benign any… so one informs one's cohort. Receiving News of Shipping from Lido to Harry's Bar, a hole-in-the-wall at Newport Beach, one can only dream of Venice -- and not the so-named strip of coastal LA.
What are you saying? Securitization is tranching. What else is M-numbering all about? Asymmetric information talks of the tranche. The planted dense subgraph problem as distinguished from the hidden dense subgraph problem. Well, excuse me! Nested grid systems (with variable time-steps) are nothing I don't know about, surely. Are you MONEY MOTIVATED? Are you INFORMATION SENSITIVE? Does the factoring derivative have anything to do with derivatives? I mean, it's really tough talking with the boundedly rational (i.e., confined to the 1T2-logic order-type). None of this is an example of full rationality, not to my mind, mined and unmined. Complexity has its costs. Notation costs something. So do parameters. What about the densest of the densest, how much does that cost? In full rationality, the densest of the densest subgraph is the MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space, all numbered in numbered Gödel numbers). This costs, really costs, vis-à-vis the “time-shapes of total capital stock”. Bet your binary CDO into exponential time. Bet your tranched CDO (m-valued, not yet m-logically-valued) into poly time (which ain't exactly operator-time, but it is PROGRESS, after all these years). Can you doubt that indetectability is indetectability regardless of how random the binary derivatives you counterparty might be -- given that they aren't referenced to an MVRS, not any MVRS, let alone THE MVRS, nature's own? So, what are you saying? Gaussian copula? MonteCarlo simulations? Me, I can't see no, can't see no, nope, none of those. To me, it's timing conditions, uh, say Bohmian clocks within clocks within clocks, which ain't nothing if it ain't 3-fold operator-time laying down a little Hayekian time-shape. Put it there, bro. Slap-slap.
Not exactly the path to nesting foams I've had in mind: “Japanese firms to develop small nuclear reactors”, AFP, 24 October 2009. But the Japanese seem utterly to have forgotten structure, function, meaning of ma -- and that does not bode better for physics than it does for energy techno-innovation. Then, the cosmogenic role of Ebisu was… what?
Look at that SS manager: he's no pig-raisin' hell-himmer; he's a chicken farmer from Hog Heaven. Mouth big and loud as a Staatsoper! Collective-unconscious scripting, yes; archetypal it is, eh what. Too right! Fantasies of massively-parallel slaughter, radical planetary population detox, peopled oxy-redux, increasingly replace serial murder as the dominant Kriegshetze theme in post-9/11 bestseller American thriller fiction: oh-so-popular a fevered update on Jungian prefiguration. Amongst klingers, huddling in their warms as they do, it don't much matter what's old, what's new, what's due and overdue, what works or what couldn't: just so long as it's familiar, we'll cling to it! Smart as a Ludlum, no mere Luddite; lustbader than Van Ericaceaux; leaps Gail Winds in m-bounds, however much lyp-service from an existential ShallBe, Tricks-without-treat by Lark-in/Lark-out. Can't walk away, Hamlet, Sire, from parochial ties and a billion times over address the global conjuncture? Why? And what does that tell? There are more things in the world, dear girl -- more notions of money… Luddud playing on Toxin SinAndRotten, or is it Tocsin-the-Warning-Bell? Know that word? Missed that trope? Better watch out, Pantaraxia, or you'll get NanoTeched or Wild-Fired. NEXT or not, you PREY! BiosInc or no BiosInc. And why is the Rising Sun so stigmatized? MCing the world? 1930s sensitive? So very, very sorry, Mr. Moto, with your JerryLewis overbite.
Unclassified, but surely mostly classified, there exists a body of literature on quantum genomics utterly neglected by thriller writers. Why is that? The Man Who Never Was, Mr. i-pod, is black propaganda: there is no “I” in the pod. What do you think quantum-non-simple bottle-nosed sonic-visioning Musculpt is, anyway? Cro. Magnin blondes -- not to mention those of I-Magnon -- did not have more fun than Neanderthal carrot-tops, and bottoms. Nor have they come a long way, baby. Life is more complex than Evo So Lution might think, given that glutamatergic memetime makes mincemeat of a supposed objective referential linear-time. The very perplexed are not the most misunderstood; they only-are/not-only the posthuman. Consider oneself an example of developmental plasticity, yet one more rede[sign]able genetic-medicine dream: what hardwired behavior reveals the undiscovered mind? Caveboy/girl-genius, XX Double-Cross System, CloneAge speciation-complexity over nk-fitness landscapes does not -- agile-dependent transgenesis-connote-denote, so to say -- by contextualization to embryonics epiphenomenal of twisted molecular genomics and bent macromolecular proteomics, speak about the radiation-exchange processes of superconductant free-electron-gas core of DNA and its numbered Gödel-numbered quadripolar coherent-wave correlates to replicating nucleotide-pair sequences at helix-coil transition. The very existence of Karpenko functors demonstrates that! Ain't it cute how the Wurzburg Introspectionists prefigured “the Wurzburg”, i.e., radar, the protection of which, postwar, necessitated suppression/regression of research into quantum properties of DNA.
“The adrenaline pulsing through his system seemed to slow time itself…" (Robert Ludlum, The Lazarus Vendetta, Orion, 2004, p. 353). Sibs and more sibs. What undersight, what a dysinformed notion as to the origins of memetime-dilation! In need of yet another Bodyguard of Lies? And written twenty-five years after “active time” in DNA helix-coil transition appeared in the International Journal of Quantum Chemistry under co-authorship of a person trained as a Special Forces medic. Don't confuse him with the college educated: No Banners, No Bugles. Ludlum's focused attention to problems of selective “die-off”, it's clear, doesn't promote insight to fundamentals: it only produces one more prefigurative cartoon self-metaprogramming archetypal event gradients. Why, uh, the survival of nations was at stake, what! And nowadays it's survival of the nation-state system-itself in question. Call that progress? Whereas the real question is: how do you distinguish between authentic coherent states and goose-stepping Schutzstaffel states? And therein lays one source of hysterical dissociation in society. (You lie, I'll lay.) Yes, truly, these are days of dire deadly peril.
Look, the markets we've got have to go or not-go, and if they go, as inevitably they do, they must either go up or down: what level of self-generative capacity does that mark; what level of self-organizational competency? Single-valued, decoherent, binary identity is the lowest order-type of relative-state identity-transparency: common stock or livestock, the elemental tradable is itself-and-only-itself, and what little synoptic, holistic, hologramic, non-selfsame, coherent information it carries is negligible. Except and until derivatives, that is. A derivative -- as daisy-chained bundled bundle of bundles, once aggregated then non-disaggregateable, there being no escape-chain links -- on an overt exchange, bourse, board of trade, under the table or over the counter, dark-pooled, flash-ordered, 144-stocked, underwritten, overwritten, and counterpartied by The Tangled Web is an elemental tradable not itself-and-only-itself which carries significant relative-state, distributed (actually, “comtributed”, i.e., superposed), multi-valued, delocalized, coherent information. Yet, this derivative is denominated in singly-logically-valued currencies and traded in markets which handle only two directions of value: more or less. Are derivatives the problem? Are the limitations binary minds have imposed on markets and money and credit the problem? Why are existing markets unable to handle externalities? Look at it this way: with m-logically-valued LETS over e-nesting foams (no mere Double Webs), every commodity, every financial instrument, every elemental tradable is a derivative. Derivative of what? The F. A. von Hayek “time-shapes of total capital stock” in relative-state over the MVRS (a dense-into-and-onto-itself m-logically-valued reference space) non-vehicle, quantum-composite, reserve-currency domain.
Value for your money is not simply a matter of price; everyone -- live source or no -- has learned that the hard way. And in markets constituted such that a price can only go up or down, where the cost must be merely more or less, it is hard to find macroscopic justification for micro-behaviors directed exclusively toward capitalizing on market moves. Spare no blushes. In terms of the functions of the “magic hand” relative to “manual dexterity” over the various modulatory capabilities of markets, what does capitalizing on market moves contribute to self-generative and self-organizing competencies of the involved economies? Such capitalizing: it prices the prices of prices; it is the diabolical-tritone, the double-exponential subverting effectiveness of the Finger of God (economically, Smith's “magic hand”; thermodynamically, Maxwell's “sorting demon”). Off her tree, she is, isn't she: eWE, e' what. Economic Warfare Executive (special case of the Ministry of Economic Warfare). Church on the hill = the war party. IPOs place prices upon the prices (values of the involved investitures: plants, equipments, inventories, et cetera) of corporations; and, capitalizing on up-or-down market moves, prices the prices of those prices (simultaneously allowing concentration of capital for more capitalizing on market moves). So, what is the theory-of-moves synoptic function of this double-exponentiation handled merely as farther-move of a monotonic up-OR-down variable? One more failed Market Garden? The exponent-on-the-exponent here -- here in regards to singly-logically-valued price -- is treated a scalar product relative to coding along the 2-D price slide/lift, and that is one explanation for how speculation in commodities futures can be a price smoother and risk dampener at the expense of long-term market modulatory efficiencies: price-wise, the future is topologically transformed into a dimensionless scalar by the crossing of a double-exponent into the vectorial quantity which is linear-time: Game of Foxes in The Watery Maze. What is the Finger of God, of which the “magic hand” and the “sorting demon” are special cases? Why, operator-time, of course -- the Penrose twistor of topological handles like those associated with double-exponentiation. During the Middle Ages, such complex twists -- and their complement of diagonals, personified as vortices in general, tornadoes in particular -- were regarded signatures of the Devil, and banished to Hades. Reflexivity: Blowback, that Black Boomerang, harbinger of Talk Radio. Want to learn about this? Talk to veterans of OSS-MO. This is the catholic reason, with Ten Thousand Eyes, why markets and money and credit were constituted in just such a fashion that externalities vanish to market scalars and, thus, cannot be processed as factors of the “time-shapes of total capital stock”. In that regard, one has to regard “capitalizing on market moves” as an externality the market itself -- THAT market employing only singly-logically-valued currencies -- cannot process, self-organize, modulate, vector, productively employ. Silly cow's pWE: Political Warfare Executive. Just look at the ratio of speculative investments to stately loans on Goldman Sachs' books! Angry Angary, that was his name -- and abstractions made him so… so angry, he engaged in angary -- “legally” seizing and using property of those who would be neutral. Appropriation Art! Pulling more and more singly-logically-valued money out of the real-number multiplier-economy and complex-number-crediting it to capitalizing on market moves -- thereby leaving complex-numbered externalities as if dimensionless, and, thus, non-viewable to market-information processors. Hambro in The City! The Controller of Deception being controlled by Bevan of Barclay's -- Barclay's Bank, that is. Diamond Bank on the cow islands. Hubris as banking! Getting Images! When SOE is The Firm and CIA is The Company tasked with mayhem-without-mourning, all manner of deception, deceit, how else but by fraud could financial instruments and institutions have evolved as they have? Whatever justifications are made: exigencies of a war no fault of our own (so long as the m-logically-valued remains suppressed). Greatest as worstest: that generation! Fluxus: thirty-one years for throwing shit in the courtroom, that room where resonances only could it-shit find. There were they, masquerade of spies and saboteurs, talk of men who wouldn't shun the power of nemesis, the ultra of missions, the story inside the story of how tyranny forced, how radar pulsed, how operations uncountable combined to blitzkrieg defeat upon the labyrinth of war's science-corrupting/destructing wizards, those cats that moused to the bitter end stratagems, conspiracy, secret fronts, secret conversations, secret weapons, secret agents, secret stories, secret histories, secret wars of counterspies, crafts counterfeit and encoded. And you want to know where anthropogenic came from? The dog's foot, none other. Growing up in shadows of all that, O what youthful fits, finagled to the fulgent, one finally must fulsomely forget. Such men. Near a hundred-years old, couldn't see farther than that dog's foot; nonetheless, could see nothing was being done right -- there being no masquerades, no spies, no secrets. Analyze that! Rectify that! Consider the myopias required to successfully run a spy agency. Consider the myopias required to successfully run an investment bank. Grimace and bear it: that's what those do who still cognitively competent are. Why else did Turing eat Newton's apple? What a trope Turing thus became! He knew he had been had: hoodwinked over the transfinite. Homosex was disinformation: black propaganda and nothing but Jack-in-the-Black. Turing was too smart to fall for Dodgers Wheezing their pragmatism upon Science, and especially Mathematics: O so destitute had become postwar cognition! And so has it retained.
What donation to the collective cognitive coffer? Ananias, each of them has become; anfractuosity is their game. Consider this from The Financial Times' Martin Wolf:
The efficient market hypothesis, which has had a dominant role in financial economics, proposes that all relevant information is in the price. Prices will then move only in response to news. The movement of the market will be a “random walk”. Mr Smithers [in his recent book, Wall Street Revalued: Imperfect Markets and Inept Central Bankers, Wiley, 2009] shows that this conclusion is empirically false… (“How mistaken ideas helped bring the economy down”, 27 October 2009)
Hooray! But why assume that imperfect markets are what they are, and must remain so? And why assume that what currently constitutes a price has always and forever to remain what constitutes a price? Singly-logically-valued price is the current price, whatsoever the price. Why? Because the vehicle-currency price -- whatsoever the price -- is conceived in each and all currencies which only is/are singly-logically-valued. And markets employing such currencies and such prices and such wages/salaries are very elaborately imperfect because “all relevant information” cannot -- in principle, in econophysics, in economathematics -- be in such a price or carried by such currencies. Hence, markets are ALSO moved by what never gets a chance to be news, because the information not in price cannot enter collective cognitive coffers. Moreover, because price is thought to be what it is and only what it is, i.e., necessarily selfsame, again quoting Wolf:
The International Monetary Fund concludes, ponderously: “Simulations suggest that using a macroprudential instrument designed specifically to dampen credit market cycles would help to counter accelerator mechanisms that inflate credit growth and asset prices. In addition, a stronger monetary reaction to signs of overheating or of a credit or asset price bubble could also be useful.”
Price being only singly-logically-valued, accelerations/decelerations of money and time-rates of change of acceleration/deceleration of money cannot fulfill in economies the same functions they fulfill in general systems and material systems. But it don't necessarily need to be that way! There are quite a number of billionaires who have cognitively short-circuited over the notion of m-logically-valued monetary units and prices and wages/salaries and how such can mark to markets a Cantorian universe of externalities -- though I won't name them. I have hardly been sitting on my you know what all these years! But if you want to know the real reason markets are so very, very imperfect, look at the cognitive spaces occupied by the current crop of billionaires. Think it will be better once there is a current crop of trillionaires?
That's a gross understatement of the case: just another Feldgrau soldiering on through gray fields of early dawn. Not only is the science falsified, the processor of the science is malformed. And by “virtue” of the anthropic principle, the shoehorned malformation is so perfectly correlated with the falsification no rectification of either is foreseeable: secret of The [highly sanitized: no access to OSS X-2 documents, for instance] Secret War With Germany (Presidio, 1988) which William B. Breuer never saw, never said. And then there was the Nazi war against a Germany become secret because so many Germans rejected that Germany: Kunstwissenschaft (Kandinsky's meaning totally lost: see German Kunstwissenschaft and the Practice of Art History in America After World War I, Kathryn Brush, Verlag des Kunstgeschichtlichen Seminars der Philipps-Universitat Marburg, 1999) avant-garde insightfilling what the MiddeMosts most fulminated fear forever upon -- still do! The heron woke, fell asleep again. Moreover, this projective-introjective anthropic reflexivity has gone anthropogenic and autocatalytically subjected itself upon essential objective synergies of planet Earth. Educated at Oxnard, he was, wasn't he. Up themes! Of course veiling the m-logically-valued would make a 1T2-logical universe appear anthropic, wouldn't it: single-valued universal constants, according to Lord Haw Haw. Noon moon ascending, ruse de guerre in retrograde inversion, another attempt at serialized total control. Dudeleys be damned, there were always Nobles and Goodeves! For such reasons alone, no human being persisting can begin to imagine how bad Itgunnabe. Merde dans la Mer as people: so what's new, else?
You have to go, feverfew holding where place is time You learn what's to not-to getting there spaced and hyperprimed.
Kampf-kampf-kampf, he pugged, S-chained to the Z-ring. Having no sympathy for the humanistic, how could he be attached to those of MiddleSex, the UnderMench, or the Oberclassé, let alone the MiddeMosts? Knickebein, Ambewe -- not Iambe -- utterly absent fuehrertreu, whosoever's sitting President, whateverso Congress partei controls. See something come from notions such as these? Longevity is the sole platform. But why would Oneishe wish to live so long as that? No Life Extension University contemplated. A wog who tried to retain the poly forget the wog, poor sod. Too right to forget WAGs, too! Death due to autogenic brain discharge, what. All that blood and tears, sweat and toil, butcher and bolt: tried to bite off his tongue, he did, didn't he. Ah, well, soon enough again to die in The Hole at Middlesex during the next BoB over all the same deceased notionals. What will be, not only will be, it's highly inevitable! And hee-haw to you, too, Haw Haw. Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion at cultured autoimmune cytokine storm dyscrasia in reaction to meme transfer, on the desert and around the planet: can't argue with that.
I don't think genes are only single-valued. I don't think genes functionally articulate only according to rules of 1T2-logic: the single-valued binary order-type of genomics responsible for autopoiesis of proteomic structure is the lowest level of the multi-level-cipher language. Why else would chimps and humans and sea slugs have such similarity of lowest-level genomes? The quadripolar waves radiated by superconductant free-electron gas core of DNA, and correlated one-to-one with the nucleotide pairs, are waves with quantum properties, i.e., they are m-valued, and their superposed pagan composite as gene signature -- say, MC's beloved D4DR::T7(M) or ACMPD3N7::T8(M), heh-heh-heh! -- is internally phase-correlated according to the rules of µTm-valued Lukasiewicz logics: an overtone series of pluripotent codons subtending cellular pluripotency. Embryonic stem cells elicit collective hysteria not for the reasons people are conscious of; rather, because their pluripotency is a meme-suppressive genetic expression of m-valued logics: “the [pagan] horror, the [pagan] horror”. Chimerism in spades, babe, in spades. Ain't no monotheism to be found here! Because these acoustically-modified (i.e., coherent hologramic) quadripolar (hence, quadraphonic-Musculpt morphogenic) waves are generated in response to ambient radiation impingement at helix-coil transition -- affecting rates of twisting (i.e., endogenous biological clocks) and frequency-response windows (i.e., immune signifiers) -- environment-gene interactions not only involve m-logically-valued properties, but the higher-order nonlinear-temporal aspects of the waves (i.e., don't conform to the dictates of evolutionary linear-time, which is merely memetime). According to this anti-Fertile-Crescent-Religion AND anti-neo-Darwinian-evolution perspective, establishment of neurological maturation pathways by glutamatergic enculturation-socialization of meme-bound cognition is brain impairment by “virtue” of quenching (i.e., the stereochemical interruption of electron-transport processes) conscious access to m-logically-valued processing (sustained conscious access being ketaminergic and pro-electron-transport, à la Albert Szent-Gyögyi's demonstrations concerning “alpha and beta states”); and, neurodegenerative disease, by disruption of those automatization-maturation pathways, is actually erratic unassimilated bleed-through of de[un]automatized quantum-brain functions by fatigue in quenching. On the sociological level, this is MEMEtically and mimetically replicated in Appropriation Science by virtuosity at intertextuality. I consider socialization-impairment a function of the state by which the quantum state-function is subverted. I first learned about state control over “my body” -- and its cells -- in 1966 when I received an Article 15, charged with “destroying government property”, for having sustained a sunburn.
Outlaw law! Law is criminal in preventing social, political, and economic autopoiesis. Make lawyers pay! The notion of “natural law” is a crime against nature. By m-logically-valued Schrödinger time-independent panentheistic cyclotomic pagan incarnate emanation of the Abelian transcendental, so-called “natural law” is decomposed pattern, each and every pattern being order-of-logical-value dependent and always and all ways being-there on the most dense sheet of the Lukasiewiczian Hilbert reference space. UCLA-Med is not so very nice -- and not just because of The Law of the Wild geneticist and his patents. Review for several years medical records from the metro area -- particularly those to do with neuropsychiatry -- to get a feeling for the case. Call me a Neanderthal for such opinions, if you must: I do have hirsutulous ears. But if there is a Neanderthal gene discounting the future, it could not possibly be single-valued and exclusively involved with modulating dopamine uptake, for ketamine potentials would control its expression. How do I know? Read between the lines of John C. Lilly's “Tank Logs”, do Zazen or walking meditation. Cro-Magnons were glutamatergic; Neanderthals, ketaminergic. It's not that big-brained Neanderthals were conservative-reactionary environmentalists; they directly experienced linear-time future as having no objective existence, as being something the small-brained Cro-Magnons introduced -- just as myriad scale levels of nesting foams of swarms are falsely attributed as simply-identifiable “my body”. Nobody amongst Neanderthals had a “my body”, a “myself”, simply-located in linear-time and absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct in a homogenous environmental space. Where do you think the residual collective memory of Nirvana comes from, anyway? The monastic, utopian socialist, Marxist réseau? Thou art the environment! -- by direct ontic experience of quantum relative-state identity-transparency: essence of pagan animism (the most straightforward, unsophist, Way of Being-There in a quantum world). And thus: Well, of course the Neanderthals disparaged the Cro-Magnon's small-brained representational art! Linear-time future is a learned behavior transmitted from generation to generation as a meme, so the title of Michael Crichton's thriller -- NEXT -- is a misnomer. The Cro-Magnon genome was banished from the DNA Nebula by coherent genetic-wave pulse-code burst -- origin of the myth of Beelzebub's descent -- banished to a rogue planet in a solar system habituated to periodic catastrophic behaviors (or so it appears in memed Kantian-category terms of the juddering Cro-Magnon mind). The very fact that during the 1970s the physics of Magic Without Magic “demonstrated” that a spacetime double-helix was impossible because it would dissipate into a probability fog, and that this “demonstration” was used to dismiss out of hand quantum theory application to description of superconductant processes involved in tornadogenesis and free-electron gas core of DNA -- in face of the recent discovery and photographing of the DNA Nebula -- argues strongly that Schrödinger's Neanderthal wave-function has been misinterpreted by Cro-Magnons ever since 1926 (this C-M scam, a real knees-up, being the straw that broke the camel's back -- front-stepped her, yes? -- on collective unconscious archetypal origins of WWII: but don't ever tell the Sicherheitsdienst!).
If SoftBank, Masayoshi Son, et al., don't see the writing on the wall of a Greater China incorporating Japan, and how bringing up a Japanese version of Lukasiewiczian m-logically-valued LETS could modulate that outcome, then they ought to read Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writing on Japan's current dilemmas: “It is Japan we should be worrying about, not America”, The London Telegraph, 1 November 2009.
Money as it has existed, as it currently exists -- fiat or backed -- is in most respects just another commodity, as the Austrian School maintains (see: Mike Shedlock, “What is Money and How Does One Measure It?”, Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis, 3 November 2009, where he references the online book, What has Government Done to Our Money?, Murray N. Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1963 thru 2005). However, this fact has been perhaps the foremost problem with economies since the gift-economies of the Stone Age. Being little more than one more commodity, there is much economies need done by units of exchange which money simply has not been equipped to do. The concrete commodity nature of money has precluded its fulfilling such functions. It cannot, for instance, in its totality, adequately represent total capital stock -- this, F. A. von Hayek implicitly understood in using the term “the time-shapes of total capital stock”. In terms of intellectual content, Stone Age economies were much more advanced than are those of the present day. The Trobriand Islanders -- Marcel Mauss studied in developing his “general theory of the gift” -- like Schrödinger's wave-function, had a time-independent language. Memetime future was totally discounted in the very notion of their unit of exchange: hau. Moreover, hau was understood an identity-transparency of giver-receiver -- a very good approximation to the quantum relative-state of physicist Hugh Everett, III, to which von Hayek's notion of “time-shapes” directly correlates. Time-shape and identity-transparency and relative-state are only in the most wild extension of metaphor construable as commodity-like. And not being capable of adequately representing total capital stock, present-day monetary systems cannot even begin to mark externalities to market processes such that they could autopoietically self-organize (this inherent disability being instrumental in population overgrowth, anthropogenic climate shift, global ecocide, and so very much more). What is the fundamental reason for these limitations and all of the incapacities derivative of them? The notion of identity defined into, and carried by, monetary units is singly-logically-valued, whereas time-shape, identity-transparency, and relative-state are Lukasiewiczian, i.e., m-logically-valued.
It is true. Resident of Potomac Palisades hanging out in Spring Valley and at Wesley Heights Pharmacy and environs amongst OSS-CCC functionaries (Oh-So-Social Congressional-Country-Club-trained operatives) -- not to mention Dumbarton Oaks and environs. During late-1963 and early-'64, I had disciplinary “counseling” sessions with retired Career Ambassador Loy Henderson at AU-SIS, with which he was then affiliated -- for having spoken unwisely, and accusatorily, at an SIS dinner to the keynote speaker, Mac Bundy, regarding the Diem assassination, which had transpired several days previously. These “counseling sessions” largely became discussions of counterinsurgency in Greece -- the foremost strategic policy person in that regard having been Loy Henderson. He was rather dismayed to hear me -- a member of the youngest generation -- saying I felt Churchill saved the situation in Greece before WWII ended by working out a deal with Stalin which had denied a safe base area to the Greek communists who, not incidentally, had acted prematurely in Athens during 1945. He was even more dismayed at my “theory” -- bounced around Special Operations Research Office, where I was using the library -- that the reason why Greece had been hyped as a great counterinsurgency success story was to diminish importance of the Churchill-Stalin deal and thus draw historical attention away from the fact that Churchill had been correct in advocating an attack on Europe's Balkan underbelly, rather than across the English Channel. These were notions Henderson had heard many times before, of course. He was simply dismayed that, years later, I should repeat and believe them. “You can only expect the man to have fought one war at a time”: the usual defense of FDR. “But, obviously, Churchill was thinking in more than one war at a time.” And so it went, the real and unaddressed issue being: What were FDR's actual political sympathies, and did they affect strategic military decision-making, such as from which direction to bear down upon Germany? Similar questions as regards Archimedes Patti and Indochina. Similar questions as regards White and the Bretton Woods Conference.
I don't think you know what the word “surly” means: stone-cold winnick, insolent, contemptuous. By 1953, as an eight-year-old, I already had a good case of that -- making observations at the Imperial Hotel, Tokyo, and leaping through fogs put out by the DDT trucks square-bracketing Ashiya-machi, and… By 1963, I was in high-disregard -- good preparation, surely, for ascent to High-Indifference. By 1968, this profound dismissal had turned to… lack of good will, fellow feeling -- to be nice about it. But growing up intimate with the military, I was too smart not to conceal these “strategic assessments” or to think acting upon them could effectively accomplish anything significant, howsoever affect-charged they might have become. Very early, back at the beginning, I decided I would do it right or be no participant at all. Indeed, being no one involved was to be much preferred: relatively simple, relatively quiet, life predominately attentive to the profound universals, not to the humanistic particular perverse pedantic pedestrian personal pustule. Running rapidly toward seventy years into this gig, I still feel there is nothing much they have to offer I have any serious interest in -- though I am not an aversive. By all means… Be my guest… Help yourself to self-destruction.
Who or what is being frisked at a distance? A Feinbild it is, you want? Genetic Zapfenstreich? Yet one more Wunderwaffen? Another techno-Wecken? Which DNA do terahertz waves tear apart? Muscle cell DNA, collagen DNA? Consider: “How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA”, the Physics ArXiv blog, Technology Review, 30 October 2009. Each cell-type DNA has its own unique frequency-response window. This was demonstrated repeatedly during the early-1980s, before papers on biological superconductivity largely dropped out of the literature. To talk of radiation-exchange characteristics of DNA as homogenous across cell lines is nonsense. All histological types of DNA torn apart to the same degree with the same intensity of radiation and the same period of exposure? And where exactly in the terahertz spectrum? Is this tearing apart independent of the frequency cone beating down ambient radiation, independent of the "tank", i.e., the superconductant free-electron gas core? Superconductant free-electron gas core of DNA, being instrumental in ambient radiation processing by the molecule, cannot be neglected, because -- as this recent research on terahertz waves indicates -- the breaking of chemical bonds is not required to severely undermine normative genomic functions of DNA. Nonlinear resonance effects with normative environmental fields structuralized into the molecule over geological time periods (speaking in conventional terms) as behaviors of free-electron gas core are precisely what is responsible for the molecule's superconductant properties and its norms of helix-coil transition. Disrupt those resonance effects with impressed fields and certainly helix-coil transition will be disturbed to one degree or another. Our 1979 account of radiation exchange by superconductant DNA was, indeed, a description of the molecule's “breathing dynamics”: see Alexandrov, B. S., et al., “DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz Field”, 28 October 2009.
Like during the 1930s, indicators of collective psychological forcing of concrete politico-economic events are not hard to find these days. While George Soros deals in single-digit billions, Leo Wantabe, at least according to LyndonLaRouche-types, wants to be dealing in double-digit trillions. And Leo's eWE (Economic Warfare Executive) for Reagan was apparently to help bring down the USSR, while Soros' Open Society Institute, by contributing to the fostering of Crash Capitalism in Russia, helped bring up the post-Soviet Oligarchs. And now Soros is reported to be committing 50-million to creation of an Institute for New Economic Thinking devoted to old economic thinking (calling the thing by the name of its opposite: a technique taught to Lenin by the man who became the Comintern's propaganda adept, Willi Muensenberg). The new-old is essentially regulatory Keynesianism applied transnationally along with FDRed top-down global institutional control, likely associated with some kind of fiat vehicle-currency bundling via SDRs as a new planetarization of the old concept of an international reserve currency unit. And this after The Office of George Soros had almost 15 years of lavish exposure to the notion of m-logically-valued monetary units. This exposure was provided because Soros has meticulously over decades built up the sort of infrastructure required to globally implement certain aspects of m-logically-valued LETS, although his infrastructure was conceived to facilitate a new-old in many respects quite the opposite. And although Soros simply does not have enough money to carry through such a planetary implementation: that would take the sort of funds Leo Wantabe wants to be dealing in. Where's the archetypal UNCONSCIOUS (no imputation of conscious intent) collective psychological driver in all this? Consider that Soros, a young refugee from Nazi warfare, oppression, and genocide, adopts the perspectives of philosopher of science, Karl Popper, and, by Soros' own admission, when introduced by Popper to self-referential propositions -- the sort used in Gödel's Proof, and more, much more, fundamentally the basis of Lukasiewicz m-valued logics -- he develops an interpretation of such propositions which becomes the inspiration for the Sorosian approach to investment and speculation by which single-digit billions in net worth have been made. What is so archetypal about that? Self-referential reentry -- the principle Soros employs as “market reflexivity” -- is a quintessential principle of The Unconscious as Infinite Sets (Ignacio Matte Blanco). But more than that, Popper's interpretation of Schrödinger's wave-function in quantum mechanics -- the theory of “propensities” -- involves a take on self-referential functions in basic principle indistinguishable from Soros' take on self-referential propositions giving rise to the Sorosian approach to investment and speculation, speculation, it might be added, to include heavy investment in the biotechnology-genetics-eugenics industry, an industry by implication denigrated by our superconductant model of DNA's free-electron gas core and m-valued coherent-wave dynamics, an industry which largely came of age subsequent to this paper's publication, a paper long ago made available to The Office of George Soros. Iatrogenocide is not a wonder weapon; it's a superWunderwaffen! And what is the archetypal-forcing-function significance of all this? Popper's postwar “propensities” were just one more falsification of Schrödinger's wave-function, the class of prewar falsifications being “the straw that broke the camel's back in regards to deep-structure in origins of WWII”. Moreover, all such falsifications of Schrödinger, falsifications which prevent application of Lukasiewicz logics to interpretation of Schrödinger, have been undertaken (largely by unconscious processes) to maintain the illusion of control, the sort of illusion of control big-band-era Keynesianism, which arose in significant measure on the back of Nazi approaches to macro-economics, gives an illusion to the illusion of. Sorosian thought and action, on deeper levels, exemplifies the “reflexivity” in market behaviors he would like to bring under regulatory control! Look at the transference dynamics involved here. Unconscious, by definition. Collectively unconscious, by induction. The snake eating its own tail, trying to get control over itself by sloughing its own skin. Compensatory abreaction? I thought I was God!
Well, what would you have done -- leaving out the usual four-letter words and coming clean? I was just-nine, and standing there in Hiroshima with my B-17 father contemplating the ruinage and something had begun dawning on me -- I knew not exactly what -- that surreptitiously took hold vectoring me I knew not where, the canary-yellow Buick Roadmaster standing stately in the background, but knowing or not-knowing, in a cloud of unknowing, having received the impulse nonetheless, impelled upon a course of mystery, as I knew I was just by standing there at that time, in that place, from my position a defining moment, somehow I knew even then I would eventually have to penetrate, come to terms with, comprehend, act upon. And in due course… and early-on, high school, early in high school, maybe even Mr. Higgins' seventh-grade English class, I knew that the flower arranging classes I had sat in upon with my mother in Ashiya contained some clue as to hidden origins of WWII and what deeply motivated that which I had seen in Hiroshima. A kind of free-association, like pasting up news clippings connected with bold arrows, emphasized with red underlinings, signified by gold stars: I followed my parent's deeper intuitions places they couldn't go, couldn't comprehend, but which on very rare occasions -- a sentence here, a sentence there -- they fully admitted to having had. There was a certain mutual acknowledgement, never explicitly stated. And my stream of consciousness was rare occasion to rare occasion -- all the rest being background noise. So later, much later, when autogenic approaches to brain-discharge phenomena proved not to be the required venue, I turned to meta-art as a medium for explication and implementation. Oriana Fallaci was strategically located by virtue of Rizzoli's avant-garde art publishing, girl wonder anarchist commo-liaison agent, Viet Nam intelligence exposure, victim of mass/Gestapo violence-wounding, reportage extraordinaire on transference dynamics with A Man and A Letter to a Child Unborn. But as it turned out, aborted initial interactions -- Such an extraordinary communication coming from an American! -- could not overcome the fact that reportage is not insight. So many contentful letters over a dozen years yielded nothing -- nothing but explication of the metapsychological content of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh. And she -- Nothing, And So Be It -- spun off uselessly into affect-charge dissipation, high risk to those in over-empathy. So, the same general-systems-theory orientation to fundamentals archetypally powering the present age transposed once again, this time to a focus upon m-logically-valued monetary units. And who was most strategically located in that regard? Failure at such overtures is no personal embarrassment-mortification, so on. Why? Because the collective problems to be solved are those of psycho-social relations, and if any real solution is to be found, one-to-one attempts at such relations must be the basis. Doesn't make sense to begin anywhere else. If that cannot be successfully launched, forget all the rest. And, truthfully, the obstacle is not actually interpersonal; it's collective psychological impress upon the personal disjunction by “neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance” -- most notably “thematic evasion” -- governing hubris epiphenomenal to socially-conferred role attributions and personas. Intense inner counterwork is a prerequisite amongst the principle parties. One does what one can with the situation presented, not what the situation deems one cannot. And one can't get overwrought about negative outcomes -- whatsoever their magnitude of import.
But one simply must acknowledge that regressive, collective unconscious, archetypal processes have an enormous influence over mathematics and science; indeed, within these areas -- far more than the fine arts -- do pathogenic cosmologies have etiology and generate infantile behavioral gradients with their strange teleological attractors: civilization, socialization, enculturation, higher-enculturation have always been the human brain's most virulent pathogens. Mathematicians and scientists who willfully cultivate introspective ineptitude and lateral mental cleavage have undoubtedly been those most destructive. Sigmund Freud, Herbert Marcuse, Norman O. Brown developed a sublimation-of-sex (not of relative-state identity-transparency) theory of civilization, civilization being an unquestioned summum bonum; Carl Jung, if to a lesser extent, continued with the sublimation theory, substituting “individuation” for civilization as the goodiest good and renaming “participation inconsciente” with “participation mystique” as the bound-state out of which the risen have arisen. And though Jung, after having studied some on Buddhist “attachment” and “maya”, changed “inconsciente” to “mystique” as his preferred usage, he remained willfully uninformed concerning Lukasiewicz logics and their relationship to the pagan “participation” issue underlying Schrödinger's wave-function and it's animistic identity-transparencies (“non-simple identity” in the parlance of quantum theory). In all the summa written by Jung, he never addressed import of Lukasiewicz, his contemporary. No more than Freud and his cohort applied their theories of civilization to analysis of the psycho-sociology of mathematicians and scientists (David Rapaport's Organization and Pathology of Thought did not do this) did Jung and his followers apply the theory of individuation-from-participation to analysis of pathogenesis of cosmologies via deduction and induction using 1T2-logic alone: those Freudian (“regression in service to the ego”) and those Jungian (Wilhelm Worringer's Abstraction and Empathy and Form in Gothic) took their notions of collective pathology largely from studies of art neurosis and applied them most particularly to analysis of the political dimension. Neither group could have seen that had N. H. Abel's existence proof for the supra-algebraic higher-mathematics transcendental not been denigrated as the “Impossibility Theorem”, and had not probability amplitudes, rather than Lukasiewicz's m-valued logics, been applied to interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function, a Hitler there could never have been -- not only would never have been. And there never would have been a Gödel's Proof, neither; though there could have been.
I would say the “when” of the financial aspects of the present crisis was twenty years ago when the Tokyo bubble burst. The immediate “why” was the bubble-making Plaza Accords; the prior “immediate why” was Nixon's unilateral renunciation of the Bretton Woods gold-exchange mechanism (rather than, at that point, consensually shifting to some precursor of m-logically-valued monetary units). The longer-term “whys” go way back. But such “whens” and “whys” are all quasi: the current cuspover in its many dimensions will never be “in the form” of the world wars, say, with discrete beginnings and discrete ends. Besides, “whens” are primarily useful for cultivating an illusion of control or to make money. From perspective of the collective best interest, the better approach is to assimilate the principles involved and develop a (multiple-scenarios) strategic orientation to those principles -- not to prospective events. An example of this, “in the form” of WWII-type “occurrences” -- an example no one likes -- was street-fighter Stalin's total lack of interest in the “when” of an inevitable Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union. The spy Sorge provided Stalin months in advance, Churchill, days in advance, warning of the day of the “when” -- which Stalin completely ignored, having long since assimilated the principles involved and formulated his collapsing-feather-pillow/that's-how-we-dealt-with-Napoleon strategic orientation to the involved principles of the case inevitable. And it was this strategic approach to principles which broke the back of the Nazi war machine; everything done on the Western Front, though important, even essential, was secondary.
CH040 is possibly the biggest contribution to biospheric survival Michael Crichton has made -- even if he doesn't quite grasp why (NEXT, HarperCollins, 2006, p. 274):
“I thought a gene was a section of the genome,” someone said. “A sequence of base pairs, ATGC, that codes for a protein.”
“That's one definition,” Garfield said. “But it's inadequate. Because a single ATGC sequence can code for MULTIPLE [emphasis added] proteins…” [the rest is important, but mere detail]
The so-called genetic code is actually a multi-level-cipher language employing Lukasiewiczian m-valued-logics, not 1T2-valued logic alone over single-level ciphers. Moreover, environment-genome interactions, not only are handled by radiation-exchange processes mediated by quadripolar quantum-wave superpositionings, but those interactions also involve codings over superpositionings of superpositions of higher-order, non-linear-temporal, topologically-active, operator-time-type modulations of Everettian relative-state identity-transparencies between m-logically-valued, phase-coherent waves belying the system of coding informing consensus single-valued-alone assumptions about immune signifiers, histocompatibility, biological clocks, homeostasis, morphogenesis, and so very much more. In a manner of speaking, that “gene's” higher(quantum)state is controlled by every chaotic butterfly-wing-flap in the cosmos (as beaten down through the frequency cone); but being so universally informed flies in the face of, is a violation of, the self-ish, 1T2-logical, lower(molecular)state demanded by markets employing singly-logically-valued exchange units and simple-ownability, so patent law discounts the m-logically-valued realities of quantum biology in order to underwrite a pathogenic cosmology -- unless, of course, there happen to be military applications of genetic recognition at a distance. Quantum biology is not epiphenomenal of molecular biology, quite the contrary; atomic and molecular structure is quantum Musculpt “frozen” to glutamatergically-etched memetime. Look at what modern medicine can't do if you want clear evidence. The big surprises won't be those anticipated -- and there will be big surprises. Especially skeptics of iatrogenocide should look at how far consensus molecular-biological-recombinomics assumptions must be stretched to quasi-explain functional integration, chimerism, explosion in violations of The Central Dogma, growing bacteriological resistance to antibiotics, increasing viral polymorphisms-reassortants, origins of AIDS, yuppie flu, bird flu, swine flu, degenerative disease induced by non-ionizing radiation, nanotech disruptions of conductivity properties of DNA, increasing incidence of anti-DNA-antibody-tagged autoimmunity, correlation of SLE incidence with the sunspot cycle (not simply UV exposure)… Those consensus assumptions are flat-footed. Look at how much structure of Earth's electromagnetic field has been anthropogenically altered in the post-WWII period, to include hot auroras with their “electron-temperature” enhancements -- free-electron-parcel temperature oscillations being the canonical mechanism of DNA radiation-exchange processes. And you think this has nothing to do with climate-shift dynamics? Now you got it. In the ever-so-thin, nanothin, DNA frequency-response windows, not only is there recognition from an intelsat, but pulse-code bursts can seed “drifts” and “shifts” and all manner of reassortments. The subject here is not stereochemical details. Talk to me of other sorts of details and I might not get up from the table and walk out of the room! The mainstream reaction to this particular submolecular perspective -- ever since 1979 when one of Carl Sagan's students brought him a copy of our superconductant DNA paper -- has been: How can a well-trained scientist come up with such bizarre ideas? Why, molecular biology would simply evaporate into a probability fog! But, then, the probability-amplitude interpretation of Schrödinger's time-independent Neanderthal-Tantric wave-function has been nothing more than one more dissimulation within just one more pathogenic cosmology. And if these cosmologies haven't been pathogenic, how is it we have had the his-story we have had?
Personally, I am not too interested in 1T2-logic ratiocination, however sophisticated the mathematical notation employed: mostly, I look for insightful variances there from, and other sorts of details hardly interest me at all. Timelessness, too, is a problem in genetics. What could time differentiation mean in a time-independent context? How in such a context could fluxion-calculus work? Standard time-dependent quantum mechanics of probability amplitudes is a linear-mechanics. Even Everett's treatment of the Schrödinger wave-function is of a single order-type. What could a time-independent “change” of quantum state-function mean? Unspeakable in quantum mechanics because unspeakable in fluxion-calculus and any calculus developed over principles of fluxion-calculus. Independence of what kind of time? Is Schrödinger time-independence independent of all kinds of time? Second-order time-independent wave-function; third-order time-independent wave-function: authentic nonlinear quantum mechanics. Would these be with respect to different kinds of time (rather than irregularities in memetime)? Is the notion of precedence hierarchy -- first, second, third… -- to be mapped upon orders of time-independencies? Selfsame numbers may be meaningful in a time-independent context, but what about counting? And if such distinctions are unspeakable in natural languages and existing forms of mathematical notation -- all such having been developed by glutamatergically-etched brains suffering “psychological neoteny”, normosis, regression in service to the ego, et cetera -- what about in the hologramic Musculpt of qualia order-types employed by brains flooded with endogenous ketamine at Samadhi, Satori, and so on? Domains of ness-nesses? Blueness, is-ness, suchness, and such that -- all the way to the base-state of Tzog-chen. Are non-selfsame numbers the numberings of different logical-value order-types in qualia of hologramic Musculpt -- and are these an aspect of the manner in which morphogenesis is chronotopologically orchestrated and conducted by ontogenetic operator-time? Ontological Gödel-numbering of Gödel numbers is one means to generalize Karpenko functors of Lukasiewicz logics over the primes -- generalize them, that is, into synaesthetic, Kandinsky-pure-feeling, Musculpt, qualia order-types (corresponding to the different levels of Samadhi).
And now -- Michael Jackson, defying death, still back-walkin' his BreakDance -- the electron in lightning storms is found back-walkin' memetime, producing signatures of operator-time's chronotopologies in the BreakDances which are severe storm genesis: “Signature of Antimatter found in Lightning”, Ron Cowen, Science News, 6 November 2009. It's becoming increasingly difficult for atmospheric scientists to maintain a distinction between the quantum atmosphere and the hydrothermodynamic atmosphere: every week they're back-walkin' more and more. Pretty soon BreakDance -- and time-reversal asymmetries will no longer Back-Off! antimatter and stave-off cold-fusing tornadoes. Where'd you say them gamma rays done come from?
Thrillers are now produced by industrial manufacturing teams (i.e., multinational marketeers determine content and form) and deemed by the press as the actual “serious American fiction” -- just as artists frequently farm out to the factory fabrication of the pieces they design. It's one thing to write a murder mystery, a spy thriller -- oh-so-historically atmospheric -- and quite another to grok event gradients of the collective unconscious. Though the former might certainly facilitate the latter -- as titling frequently involves free-association, something C. G. Jung assiduously studied in developing his notion of archetypes as collective unconscious E-gradients. Went the Day Well: The Flying Sword Overpaid, Over-Sexed and Over Here! Never knew. That's what they all say, eh. Makes your day go good? Heh-heh-heh. That Gödel's Proof, just a hugely complex analogue of The Liar's Paradox, what. Hermaphroditic it was, wasn't it. On the Natural History of Destruction. Nesting foams: Staffeln, Gruppen, Geschwader, Zerstoerergeschwader. 3 cross 3 = 1. No wonder this quarky Germanic quantum stuff leaves such a bad inner taste: rasa. Tally-ho! Bowling along in memetime flow, just more globalony amongst The First and the Last skating The Narrow Margin, praising The God of Chaos. Euler's narrow margin? Riemann's narrow margin? Great discreditation op Gödel ran, ran Gödel. Black, so black, the Polish principle wasn't even named. But not black enough to suppress Wehrfreiheit. Wup-Wup-Wuppertal! Jagdgeschwader 69. Riding wet thrust in G-stirrups, a 20000 dive upon the G-spot. G-gradients to the Einstein-Rosen Bridge, a retrograde inversion. But polymorphic, n-gramic, polyalphabeticity is m-logically-valued: an ultra hidden inside an enigma. Memory wheels perverse, pagan and perverse. And just think of the structure of the reflector! Involutes self-inverse: those paradoxical liars. Core positions stacked, holes upon holes: the blackhole-computing wormhole mesh in nesting foams as transference reflector for projective-identification. So very, very Jungian! Involutory transformations:: i, j, k: three rotors; l, m, n: three rotor settings. 3 cross 3 = 1. Temporal curl: the spin moment of operator-time modulating Musculpt rotors, those enigmatic Erdgeist twistors. Superconducting mirror, that reflector is, proud to say. M-logically-Valued Reference Space in regressed, black-propaganda, standing-acoustic analogue to the Lukasiewiczian interpretation of Schrödinger's time-independent wave-function. Who said Born's probability amplitude was not the straw that broke the camel's back, said he in regards to deep-structural/archetypal origins of WWII? This is not revisionist, because there was no vision to begin with: Lukasiewicz denied! Moreover, was Schrödinger the authority on Schrödinger's wave-function, or was Max Born? The snapover in consensus interpretation was indubitably psychopolitically motivated.
When, during this Age of Democracy, the “coercive we” considers that the words “black hole”, “dust”, “catastrophe”, “chaos”, “fractal”, “complexity”, “swarm”, “virtual”… have been used to popularize higher mathematics dissimulating the m-logically-valued and operator-time, no great leap is required to interpret this in psychopathic terms: did this to us, did they, and tetchy effects are to be seen even in the normotic round of glutamatergically-etched Lebenswelt unexceptional, no only in Breathless, Restless anticipation, a succumbing to death's timetable. Cope by hope. Plowing-on-Swale. Hiding-in-the-Hedges. Face it out. And if death a timetable has, then life so must, must life -- bye the bye unto by the by. Your good right. Were the timetable the most dense sheet of the M-logically-Valued Reference Space (Allbase of Tzog-chen), what would be life but long-term memory loss, death but Platonic anamnesis? Call these two self-imposed discontinuities in an equipotential surface (that hypersurface manifold a dense-in-itself into and onto intersection of Purusha and Prakriti) “catastrophes” if you will. But the hidden self-referential koan involves the fact that to truly not take one's persona personally necessitates non-personification of head-god.
Being without belief in numinous efficacy of naming
A nomen nudum, no nomenclator I-am-be
Nor a nomenclator will one find upon my me --
Though a nomological nomothetic my other-I-am is.
Yes, Your Willfulness, a nomogram of identity-transparency.
No-mind is not absence of mind; it's presence of the mulitvalue.
Humph! Whatever it is I have accomplished -- which may not be much -- was not for the most part done at university: spread over more than a decade, I used my two months of winter vacation from digging, when not odd-jobbing at the National Arboretum or chopping daikan in the Fuji Restaurant kitchen, to stand in the Library of Congress photocopying papers I spent the remainder of the year reading at night after ten hours a day of pick-and-shovel nursery work used as a form of inner-separation/counterwork meditation and stress-oriented autogenic training at identity-transparency with trees.
I don't like Hollywood values, Wall Street values, Capitol Hill values, inside-the-beltway values, D/FW values, Ivy League values, Eastern Brahmin values, shopping-mall values, suburban values… -- what part of north-central Alaska does that leave? And, obviously, I've never believed The System Works! Works for what? Hollywood values, Wall Street values, Capitol Hill values…?
(Tabloid speech figure of choice: alliteration) can't all always be alright, Professor, whatever the Freudian allusion, especially given that Stiglitzian Greenspanning turned out to be disastrous five years after the book was published:
For instance, the IMF suffered from inflation paranoia, even when the United States was facing the lowest inflation rates in decades. Its prescription was therefore predictable: increase interest rates to slow down the economy. The IMF simply had no understanding of the changes that were then occurring, and had been occurring over the preceding decade in the U.S. economy that allowed it to enjoy faster growth, lower unemployment, and low inflation all at the same time. Had the IMF's advice been followed, the United States would not have experienced the boom in the American economy over the 1990s -- a boom that brought unprecedented prosperity and enabled the country to turn around its massive fiscal deficit into a sizable surplus. The lower unemployment also had profound social consequences -- issues to which the IMF paid little attention anywhere. (Joseph E. Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents, p. 48)
Looking at this 2003 statement in late 2009… Sorry, I've never been into “reinventing government”, only reinventing markets and the order-type of information they deal in -- not simply more information or “better” information or more accurate information or more homogenous information-spread. While asymmetries of 1T2-logical information are of interest in this respect, these asymmetries are largely due to the limitation in logical-order-of-information-value imposed by defined properties of monetary units employed, and, hence, of prices, to include the price of wage, the price of credit, the price of rent, the price of transaction “rent seeking”, and so on. Whatever descriptive information used in establishing market action directives ultimately resolves to a matter of prices. Whenever rationing inequities regarding any of these exist, this is primarily due to the fact that there is inadequate range in logical-order-of-information-value available over the domains of exchange brought into being by the defined properties of the monies utilized in markets. Hold this range unchanged while reducing the number of domains and inequities increase: how surprising is that when markets employing only singly-logically-valued units of exchange gravitate upon oligopoly and monopoly? This is the main bone I would pick with Stiglitz's Globalization and Its Discontents (Norton, 2003) and other texts advocating the reinvention of that which never in the first instance, or any other instance, resolved the problems the reinvention is purported to address. Which is not even to mention externalities. How conceivably could governments adequately regulate market behaviors relative to that which markets employing only singly-logically-valued exchange units cannot possibly adequately process for being inherently incapable of properly valuing? They cannot: never have and never will. The Stiglitzian notion of market incompleteness is on a par with the Gödelian incompleteness which leaves Lukasiewiczian m-logically-valued completeness an unmentionable, howsoever Debreu-Arrowed the formalized mathematical “proof” (assuming simple-identity of actors, including those massively subsidiaried, sharecropped, timeshared, and of monetary/credit units, hence, wholly-ownability, if not holy-ownability of properties, concrete and abstract, including bundled derivatives) produced two-hundred years later -- in a universe of discourse proved proofless -- “proving” autopoiesis of complete Smithian markets, never complete, employing perfect 1T2-logical information (prices), never perfect, in an m-logically-valued Abelian-Cantorian-Lukasiewiczian universe, is able to obtain competitive equilibrium in a far-from-equilibrium universe where Pareto efficiency is anathema due to the quality-losses such “efficiency” imposes. Long lost sight of: the very notion of “equilibrium” was formulated merely as a heuristic principle of the “world picture”, not of “the world” (if there is such a selfsame whatnot). Check out the summary beliefs, there's bugger-all credible about them. Even if there were symmetrically perfect 1T2-logical information, hence, no possibility of market processing of n-bodied externalities; fully-expressed selfish-gene perfect competition amongst myriad simply-identifiable firms; complete markets in violation of Gödel incompleteness (if even simple 1T2-logical arithmetic is incomplete, how complete could the bundled arithmetics of derivatives markets be -- even theoretically?); well-legally-formalized rights to singly-logically-valued simply-identifiable properties (what about automorphic software modules, telepresent and distributed q-bitic computer hardware, self-modifying bio-piratical GMOs?); absence of self-referential market reflexivities disturbing the equilibrium clearing of markets and resultant Pareto efficiency -- even if all that, Smith's Invisible Hand could not possibly work so well as the Finger of God. Singly-logically-valued property is theft of the m-logically-valued Everettian-relative-state/Hayekian-time-shapes actually responsible for self-organizing processes. And no government regulatory action can possibly alter this circumstance, Pareto superior or whatsoeverwise, New Keynesian or old. When one looks at the material UC-Berkeley produced on action-based sociologies and the power theory, and at Stanford's output on “primitive” Shinto, is it any wonder Debreu-Arrow should have come up with yet one more veil behind which to hide from Lukasiewiczian-Schrödingerian non-simple identity? The Washington(WallStreet) Consensus was apotheosis of “thick” opposition to Everett relative-state and hysterical back-reaction upon the metric of implications yielded by outcome of the Aspect Experiments: how else understand the collective unconscious compensatory abreaction which is the derivatives parody of fiber-bundle arithmetics? One can hardly disagree with Stiglitz's statement, “After all, almost everyone believes in growth” (Globalization and Its Discontents, p. 82) -- because almost everyone has sustained the brain impairment induced by the glutamatergic neuronal etching which precludes direct conscious access to m-logically-valued quantum-brain processing. However, F. A. von Hayek's the “time-shapes of total capital stock” -- via Everett's relative-state -- fundamentally challenges the very notion of linear-time evolution essential to unending growth, for the corpus of such time-shapes exists at every instant of memetime, making “development” possible without “growth” -- and there is no schizoid thermodynamic dissociation into many non-communicating worlds insofar as Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function is understood with m-valued Lukasiewicz logics. Relative-state identity-transparency being nature's “relationship” (no simply-identifiable actors) of greatest trust in lieu of contracts always incomplete in a universe of economic “discourse” necessarily Gödel-incomplete by imposed initial and boundary conditions (logical: no m-valued logics; ontological: no simultaneous time-shapes; existential: no non-simple identity). Boundary rational? O, what they call “full rationality”! Heh-heh-heh. One order-type only permitted amongst an infinity of infinities of the order-types available. How much of the “real world” do you experience? Wheeler-Bohr imposed the von Neumann formalism upon Everett at a critical cusp of Bretton Woods One -- the late-'50s international-liquidity tipping-point flipover -- and one cannot possibly regard this synchronicity as not evidencing yet another collective unconscious compensatory abreaction. The illusion of control, control, control -- read von Neumann on weather engineering -- as a means of simulating self-control, control over a fictive simply-identifiable, single-valued selfhood. Tapping monetary well-potential whilst dragging along on Karman Vortex Street. Singing a power line, helixing the pitch space, breaching the circle of fifths into m-logical-values. Fully implemented from below, nesting foams of fractal e-boundaries, in conjunction with m-logically-valued e-monetary units, would function something like a superconductant-barrier-penetrating, Bose-Einstein-condensation bias-controlling, fuzzy-logic self-adjusting Tobin-tax-equivalent delivering exquisitely timed and measured kinematic viscosity to hot money flows. If refrigerators can do it… if autopilot can do it… then it can be done with capital flight. For instance, during the first six months of 1997, Thai banks did not have to lend billions and billions of baht to currency speculators; they did so, so owners of Thai banks could generate the resources to convert more baht to dollars and engage in more overseas capital docking, one form of capital flight. Lukasiewiczian e-monetary units over nesting foams of fractal e-boundaries would automatically and exquisitely dampen such activities -- of both farang and domestic baht-shorters. Moreover, with a straight Tobin tax, there would have to be a macroscale transnational agency attempting to use the funds collected to interdict microscale poverty distributed across 1T2-logical national boundaries, while, with nesting foams of fractal e-boundaries and local indicators fine-grain tagged to m-logical-values stacked on the base-states of e-currencies (these base-states superpositioning to quantum-composite as Tzog-chen AllBase m-logically-valued reference space brane of branes, non-vehicle reserve-currency domain: actual “Buddhist economics”), microscale poverty would be addressed in the first instance on the microscale -- as the fractal e-boundary nesting foams and m-logically-valued LETS were brought up from below. Given Bill Gates' name, he should long since have been interested in this… Perhaps, eventually, the Japanese -- given the cultural predisposition established by their traditional “primitive” Shinto notion of sacred space: multi-sheeted ma (anticipating by thousands of years the Riemann-surface handling of Abel's “impossible” cyclotomic m-valued transcendental functions).
Whorls within whorls within whorls; waves within waves within waves; foams within foams within foams; clocks within clocks within clocks; swarms within swarms within swarms: this is how natural systems self-organize, not by a single scale-level alone, large or small. Find me a single-scaled organism. Functional specificity and local efficacy require nesting domains: lamination. Yet, by nesting alone, there can be no adequate functional integration. The limitations of lamination are overcome in nature by hologramic properties of information and identity: the part containing all the information of the whole by virtue of being m-logically-valued. Lukasiewiczian interpretation of Schrödinger's wave-function. World communism, one national-socialist state, globalized capitalism-federalism, Islamic caliphate: each of these has been an attempt to create a single-scaled economic/political organism, a somewhat which -- by defining properties -- cannot function well. Being of The Jeffersonian Persuasion -- Hamilton anathema -- thus not in the least liking national economies and what convergence thereto has done to quality of experience, quality of inner-state, quality of food, quality of natural environment, quality of social relations, quality of work, quality of… on and on, I hardly think I would like anything at all about a realized global economy/governance, whatever were its terms of convergence. Particularly so, if globalization is a globalization of unfree markets, i.e., planetary oligopolies and geo-specific monopolies, as it is because markets employing only singly-logically-valued currencies and governments attempting to regulate such cannot, inherently, prevent oligopolization and monopolization. That whole universe of discourse is utterly nauseating. A Lebenswelt not in the form of process in nature is nothing I could ever endorse. If laws are fences, and borders but laws on landspace, as is popularly understood (cf: Ted Bell, Spy, Simon and Schuster, 2006), then a natural law -- one such, that is -- is fractal fences stacked upon fractal fences in constant motion and continuous modular redesign, given that universal physical constants are m-valued under m-valued logics. In due course, this will be found to apply to DNA and the genome to a degree not presently contemplated. Looking back almost half a century later, it is clear that quitting college was the best decision of my life, as there is no work university degrees could have gotten me I would have wanted to have done -- the planetary Lebenswelt having been what it has been: little more than a collection of static, single-valued fences of relatively fixed design. In Old Asia, Asia before Westernization, laws were never understood as unary fences: one of the primary subliminal features of current global conflict. Given that the U.S. lost its war in Viet Nam largely over this issue (the Viet Cong employing frequently changing boundaries upon which all manner of bureaucratic variables were mapped and stacked), that war can be considered the decisive event in collapse of the institutionalization of the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm. Collapse of Bretton Woods One over Viet Nam war funding was just a special case of the general principle stated here. Say one understood basics of this in some detail of a morning not long after the Tet-'68 offensive. What sort of forecasts would one have been making on the basis of such understanding? What sorts of research and analysis would one have wanted to undertake? Would such R&A have been acceptable to any academic program at any university? Not only not likely, absolutely not. Would The Whorton School, for instance, have granted a graduate degree for comparative studies in management of self-organizational dynamics of underground apparats, structures and functions of derivative financial instruments and currency fundamentals, quantum neuro-genomic biology of autogenic brain discharge phenomena, and extensions of quantum-relativity physics into theory of tornadogenesis? Should one have simply walked away from the R&A indicated because no university would permit such transdisciplinary studies? For me the deciding factor was… yellow jackets! Hives piled upon hives! Hundreds and hundreds of stings in a single incident (trying to save a near-dead dog) leading to anaphylaxis and IC (intracardial) Benadryl/epinephrine on the ER table. Constantly dogged by Hymenoptera -- Vespula and Dolichovespula. Reading Jung's Collected Works, I knew it was psychic, a constellated consequence of going for the “transcendent function”. Then, when I almost veered off into a normal career path, swallowed a Vespula feeding inside my Coke can. Stung me on the way down, in the throat. Off to the ER again, throat so swollen turning blue from O2 deprivation. This time, Benadryl/epinephrine IV was adequate. Two near-deaths in a six-months period was enough to convince me not to veer off again. After that decision, Vespula and Dolichovespula were impervious to my presence, root-pruning trees in the field, flying insects all around, even walking through swarms changing locations in the apple orchard. As if I wasn't even there.
I don't read the history that way. Keynes died when he did, how he did, he did, didn't he, from the stress of not getting what he wanted at the July 1944 UN Monetary and Financial Conference and subsequent meetings -- just as White died when he did, how he did, from vilification. The IMF was not Keynes' baby; bancor was, as was an International Clearing Union -- CHIPS to that, and much more than mere CHIPS. Keynes' attempt at contrition for military Keynesianism fostering war socialism: a specter he could see just beyond the horizon. White wanted unitas, his version of bancor. Neither wanted a return to the classical gold standard, and the Bretton Woods gold-exchange mechanism was imposed against the better judgments of both Keynes and White at the insistence of the U.S. Government, i.e., FDR, et al., and, at latest meetings, H. S. Truman, et al. Insofar as Keynes advocated an IMF and IBRD (World Bank) to insure adequate international liquidity and aggregate demand, these were regarded consolation prizes -- having failed, did he, to get what he actually wanted. History presented of this is always “retroflexive history” -- a Looking Backward: From 2000 to 1944 -- just like regards McNamara who produced three Edsels, not just Disaster in Dearborn: one for Ford, one for the Department of Defense, and one for the World Bank. Just like Zionist histories of Israel as a state, not a state of consciousness. Just like each generation of art historians rewrites history/interpretation of Roman sculpture according to dictates of contemporary thematic fixations. Just like… With ongoing real-time documentary falsification/fabrication, selective archive retrieval, facts from above, filtering by historiographic dictation, how much actual history do we actually know? Any more than we know about actual atmospheric processes once the models have separated noise from data according to the needs of a “classical limit”? Moreover, under the final terms of BW1, it was international reserve currency, i.e., dollar, creation -- however dispersed, involving the IMF and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, or not -- which was to maintain international liquidity and aggregate demand, the Marshall Plan being one expression thereof. The IMF and the World Bank became -- and likely were initially envisioned as -- combat arms of WWII victors, the coming combat largely to involve warfare by alternative means, cold war means, not those hot (discourse on international institutions under the assumption they are not combat arms is far less than interesting: on a par with the thesis that sex has nothing to do with biology). Bancor would have been a step in the right direction. Implementation of the notion of an International Clearing Union would also have been a good step, a step which later could have been greatly improved upon as bancor transited to an m-logically-valued, quantum-composite, non-vehicle international reserve currency unit. There has never -- since, perhaps, the Stone Age -- been a monetary system that has not come out of the barrel of a gun or the contemporary equivalent, just as there has never been a short-haired, suit-uniformed -- or contemporary equivalent -- orthodoxy inviolate that has not come out of prescriptive socialization compliance by enculturated endogenous glutamatergic neuronal etching. And how Habermas with what has been etched away? Centralized imposition of any economic philosophy, any unary notion of monetary referent -- to include fiat -- cannot work well, given the diversity of conditions extant upon planet Earth: Keynes highlighted, using his economic terminology, a fundamental conflict between functional specificity and functional integration, and trying to take the international reserve currency altogether out of the domains of vehicle currencies -- i.e., bancor -- can be considered a tentative initial move towards overcoming that fundamental conflict which ultimately brought down BW1, as Keynes it would. Technical literature of the period was rife with discussion of this irreconcilablility and -- given the absence of creative thought -- default choice was for global monoculture integration (a soft-Nazi update upon philosophical monism) at the expense of diverse specificity, one type of slow-motion mass econocide through participatory poverty. I'll see it when I believe it: how else could a civilization, taking as given an inherent conflict between freedom and order, have responded to the technological forcing it willfully had subjected itself to? Almost by definition alone, an IMF has to be even more dysfunctional for the national economies of a planetary economy than a FED is for the local economies of a national economy. There is no way whatsoever to transform Westphalian-Cartesian-Newtonian/Congress-of-Vienna institutions into those expressive of autopoietic quantum relative-state; altogether different prerequisites have to be fulfilled from the bottom up, quarks to galaxies. Premature and/or precipitous dismantlement of existing institutions is not indicated; what has long been indicated is a timely meeting of those prerequisites.
Hmmmm. “The Plaza Accord was a growth transfer policy for Europe and Japan that was wholly detrimental to the United States.” (Brian Twomey, “The Plaza Accord: The World Intervenes in Currency Markets”, Investopedia, no date given). Wholly detrimental to whom in the U.S.? Not the uppermost 1% who now own almost 50% of U.S. resources. And in the U.K., not the most wealthy 1% who now own 70% of U.K. resources. Which is not to mention the involved wholesale quality losses across full spectrum of the planetary LifeWorld. While I agree with Stiglitz, et al., that capital account liberalization played a role in origins of the 1997 East Asian meltdown, I do not believe, with them, that that liberalization was the most important factor, nor was it primarily an outgrowth of the triumph of the capitalist West over state communism (which, changing the time-step of one's historiographic assessment, is more likely the first stage in incendiary collapse of the institutionalization of the Westphalian-Cartesian-Newtonian/Congress-of-Vienna Weltanschauung). Merely one step made inevitable at Bretton Woods by rejection of bancor/unitas and an International Clearing Union, and the adoption, instead, of a gold-exchange mechanism tied to a vehicle currency, the U.S. dollar, as foremost international reserve currency, and, thus, the role that vehicle-reserve currency was assigned in maintaining international liquidity and aggregate demand. Strategic military considerations, the projected future needs of State, War, Navy -- and the soon to be created SAC -- determined outcome at Bretton Woods: U.S. national security concerns dictated the chosen role of the dollar in the new international monetary system, and the U.S., soon to be sole possessor of The Bomb, was in a position to assure adoption of that role, as well as creation of an IMF and IBRD as quasi combat arms. IMF and IBRD -- modern updated versions of Old Ironsides cannonading Da Nang in 1848 when its residents refused to grant market access and dreadnaught Susquehanna driving into Edo Bay, 1853, to open up Japan -- expressions of natural right and gravitation! ain't no crony-capitalist conspiracy; jus' a bunch of good ol' Wall Street boys lookin' to their IN-terests, using Madison Avenue MO savvy to hide that fact in a fog of self-serving fundamentalist ideology; mistakes, y'see, merely mistakes. Though, so far as I know, there is no record of unrecorded causeries, I would give White more responsibility than Keynes for adoption of the gold-exchange-mechanism constraint upon free creation of dollars, and this, to my judgment, not some imaginary responsibility for collapse of the GearWheel currency, was White's real sin in the eyes of HUAC and Nixon -- though one must admit that the gold-exchange orientation was probably set even before Pearl Harbor, by the fact that payment in gold was demanded for the arms the U.S. provided, thus transferring most of the world's monetary gold to the U.S. before the end of WWII. Unconditional surrender of Germany and Japan, the resultant power vacuums in conjunction with outcome at Bretton Woods, facilitated the assignment of security roles to occupied Germany and Japan. In the case of Japan, remnants of the zaibatsu were retained and given the task of economically defending Southeast Asia -- a role within which there accrued to them great benefits, even competitive edges, from both the Korean and Vietnam wars. When LBJ's guns-and-butter financing of the Viet Nam war put paid to the BW1 gold-exchange mechanism and Nixon closed the gold window, thus freeing dollar creation from its main constraint, competitive devaluations, oil crisis, Third World debt crisis, and so on transpired. One step in the sequence was the bubble-creating Plaza Accords -- and the transfer of yen bubble-monies to Southeast Asia, helping to create local bubbles there. Account liberalization -- no real choice: how else handle the enormous quantities of liquidity-creation in a fiat monetary universe? -- and yen-carry-trade exacerbated this situation, facilitating foreign-currency BOT financed mega-projects, in part a strategy to privatize what traditionally had been regarded public sector production, toxins sinandrotten, as well as other forms of foreign currency borrowing. Nobody in the world, excepting those least able to pay, have utility rates like this! -- further enriching the most-most 1%. And then the oncoming currency speculators, foreign and domestic, as the Southeast Asia bubbles reached cuspover. The speculative hot money generated by government and multilateral modulation of exchange-rate markets (vastly feeding income disparities) facilitates other mechanisms (e.g., market reflexivities) of bubble formation in a fiat monetary system where singly-logically-valued currencies are defined upon a single scale level, i.e., 1T2-logical either/or boundaries of nation-states. Derivatives traded on national stock markets compound this problem by bundle-concentrating risk to the same single scale level. Import/export is similarly defined on (econometrically focused upon) a single scale level, thus concentrating trade deficits to that single scale, enhancing the tendency to imbalances and placing drag upon redistributive processes by severely limiting multiplexing, which limitation encourages anti-competitive vertical-integration/oligopolization to the single transnational scale. Parallel observations can be made about labor mobility, employment/unemployment. No natural self-organizing system is re-scaled, renormalized, to only one scale.
I think i can… I think i can…
I think i can…
In midst of The Great Firesale
They would presently see
That bubble-monies continued to fall
On those of least need.Now it was starting.
Finality ran through the engine of
Financial loco-motion
An exhalation of funds.“There were thuds, hoots, whistles
And the shrieks of late arrivals.”
Expropriation Art, as some felt --
No mere Appropriation Art.
I thought i should… I thought i could…
I thought i would…
The various forms of country bailouts -- provided by the quasi combat arms: IMF, IBRD -- protect the big multinational banks and other financial institutions from what otherwise would be speculative losses, and this loss-protection bails out the wealthiest 1%. In preparing the Cold War between capitalists and communists, who were the quasi combat arms created to protect? And does that tell us something about why those quasis so easily underwent role transformation in flashover between BW1 and BW2? This is very much oversimplified, but I think the general gist is accurate enough. Now that the many factors involved in dollar confidence are on the slide, recourse to gold is in many quarters again the mantra. But, for all the same ol', same ol' -- and with post-peak gold -- this is hardly a solution to the planetary non-system monetary system, likely even a potential “causus” belli, if not actually becoming a casus belli, the dollar's role for more than half a century having been the cornerstone of U.S. national security policy.
The first scene, training from Tokyo, 1947, Shirley Hazzard's The Great Fire (Picador, 2003: but OMG is this well written, a lifetime's study focus in craft, e.g., p. 43, “He must write his account of the morning, and sat at once to the task -- which was his way when most reluctant” [third-person interior monologue] + [author's voice describing exterior event] + [author's voice describing interior event] in one short sentence!), punctiliously punctuated in staccato, each phrase offset contrary to current printer's space-saving, mimicking fast-moving, breakaway, windowed images, transported me back to my childhood in Japan, 1953, training from Tokyo, until -- “…the stench from an appalling latrine”. Even in 1953, the “latrine” was bare bottoms thrust through open windows, shitting along edge of the track. Scoff, scoff, scoff at the great railway bazaars of today. Days of yore, in a world where the Honey-Bucket Man was omnipresent, where squatted-peeing on paddy dike was woman's right and norm, who thought the least? Moreover, in third class -- my favorite -- most stripped to their underwear/fundoshi, or/and yukata-jinbei, no panties in those days for all but the most modern, got homey, laid back, passed the bottle of sake, sukebei rampant and back-in-the-throat lurid, paddy-song sung by rice planters none-too-timid, all the better the trip to enjoy. Minimal permissible distance in personal space was so minimal as to be… “appalling” to all Westerners repeatedly reaffirming to themselves “the value of the individual -- the individual heart, mind, spirit --” (Commonweal review of The Great Fire), except “That unregenerate child!” -- of which, amongst American military brats, there were more than a few.
Hey, what can I say? In 1996, I told a Japanese lady writing a Ph.D. dissertation on Akha people that in rural Japan through the mid-'50s panties were not worn, even under Western sundresses. She didn't believe me, got into a huff, said she would ask her grandmother. Three-months later, she sheepishly told me her grandmother had confirmed what I said. Earlier, New Years of 1990, I had attended a small party at the lavish home of a Kyoto Nishijin textile family with antecedents going back to the Muromachi Period. Delight of the evening was watching soba noodles being made from scratch, the old way, 100% buckwheat flour and grated yamaimo for gluten, no wheat flour. Cut with a knife on a big board. Conversation turned to tradition, and I was asked about my time in Midori Gaoka, Ashiya-machi, kita-Kyushu, circa early-'50s. I told a few stories of what I had witnessed there, one of the most conservative areas of Japan, in the little paddy valley where I lived surrounded by Verdant Hills near the small fishing town of Ashiya-on-Ongagawa. To uuhs and aahs, I described the traditional rice ritual still practiced -- for the last few times anywhere in Japan -- during the first years after end of the Korean war. Mention was made of the fact that dress amongst the female planting crew varied between those married and those single -- and that it seemed to me that the more sexually provocative paddy songs, sung to the pace-setter's pounding sticks, evoked emotive voice-throw characteristics among the unmarried planters I hadn't heard from female voices since the late-'70s. Sukebei was normative and primarily a female prerogative -- rural Shinto communities being largely de facto matrisystem in orientation -- so any normalization of sukebei to the male was largely Shinto Westernized, or Shinto in reaction to Westernization. This evoked a lot of discussion as to how playing the shakuhachi in groups as if it were the Western recorder, accompanying the female voice with a guitar tuned to the diatonic, not the pentatonic, scale, beat against traditional forms of emotional expression and may have contributed, over time, to a flattening of female emotional experience, even perceptive depth -- a much contested thesis. In midst of the ensuing hot discussion, I made mention of the fact that the whole valley had to be planted in one day, otherwise the yama no kami wouldn't come down from the mountains to protect the rice fields -- and that planting ended in a mud fight culminating in group sex involving the unmarried planting-crew cohort. Shock abounded, and there were assurances offered that no such thing could have happened. About this phase of the discussion, become an argument, the grandfather of the house disappeared, then returned 15-minutes later with an obi pulled from a tonsu tucked away in a storage room. None present, other than the grandfather, had seen this obi before. It was woven during the 1920s and depicted in exquisite detail planting day as traditionally practiced. Everything I described, including the group sex, was illustrated on this obi. And what was SoftCheeks up to, winter of 1967-8? It may be that 2nk-Out is because for so long so few -- maybe none -- have truly been Mnk-IN. Heh-heh-heh!
Russell Crowe's Hugger-Mugger to Marc Faber's recent doomy-gloomy (“In his gloomiest prediction yet, Marc Faber sees financial bust leading to war”, Business International -- Middle East, 20 November 2009) adds a dose of reality (the same reality I've been heying and naying since Nixon closed the gold-exchange window) to the plethora of professional commentary: coming from a longtime Swiss fund manager, this prognostication of war may be something of a late-coming first. Why is Faber's forecasted warfare chronomancy proximal to a certainty? One big reason is the near impossibility that British logicians working on Ultra to the Enigma -- given their contacts with Polish logicians -- knew nothing of Lukasiewicz logics. Anymore than one can believe Gödel and Einstein-via-M-Curie knew nothing of Lukasiewicz. M-Curie, masteress of m-valued transference with graduate students: cauldron of alchemical insight. While Gödel conversion-disorder displaced Lukasiewicz to a lost Leibniz manuscript on what may best be deemed “active time as a topological operator” (i.e., yielding Hayekian “time-shapes”), Turing became a “rogue elephant” because he could not accommodate what had been done at Bletchley Park to his 1930s perspective on the Cantorian universe, and he knew they would never allow him to return to his personal status quo ante, his body-mind having become a possession of the state. Hence, the suicidal signifier: eating Newton's lethal apple (individual mimicking collective archetypal event gradient). Bum this, bum that, even given the temper of the times, could not have been the decisive issue for Turing -- one of the dozen or so self-transcendent m-valued awarenesses of the 20th century -- it was made to be by Political Warfare Executive. While Keynes and White -- whatever their proficiency at sums -- may have been wholly ignorant of Lukasiewicz, surely they knew beyond all doubt that final outcome at Bretton Woods insured virtual certainty of Marc Faber's chronomantic forecast, no less than Versailles insured eventual onset of a WWII. Suppress a fundamental the collective unconscious has constellated, it becomes regressed and expresses elsewise as infantile violence -- until properly integrated. The particular constellation at issue here has been suppressed since the 1820s when N. H. Abel's existence proof for maths transcendental to algebra was “regressed” (both psychological and mathematical meanings) to an Impossibility Theorem -- and reverberations of that regression throughout 19th-century higher mathematics, fine and performing arts, early-20th-century logic and physics, mid-century monetary theory, submolecular biology, imposition of a classical limit upon atmospheric science… Has there been any elsewise not affected over the last two-hundred years? Yes, Faber's foresight, proximal to a certainty. This sort of “thick”, dense, depth, deep-structural notion as to origins of the world wars grew out of how world politics was taught at AU's School of International Service back during the 1960s (where C. G. Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul was required reading for all incoming freshman during the required first semester “Intro to World Politics” course), apparently at considerable variance from what is taught there now (see: “Unwarranted Optimism and Thoughtless Pessimism”, Couloumbis, Ahlstrom & Weaver, RealClearWorld, 28 November 2009). As an aside, I would observe that during the initial decade of AU's SIS, the first two years of team-taught, problem-based, interdisciplinary seminars were extraordinarily demanding upon cognitive complacency by systematically challenging orthodox worldview tenets, unprecedented, perhaps, by the degree of identity disequilibrium induced, and, thus, powerfully enticing fundamental consideration of the basic principles underlying those, largely tacitly given, tenets, while the last two years were standard trade school for diplomats, international business and NGO execs, missionaries: “SIS bullshit”, as many of the students struggling to make the transition deemed it. I never made the transition; couldn't see slam-dunking brilliance of the first two years, so I quit and went on to another exceptional experience, the Medics Course at Special Forces Training Group, JFK Special Warfare Center, Ft. Bragg, the only similarly demanding educational experience I personally have undergone (medical doctors with no association haven't the slightest idea what this 16-hour/day, 7-days a week for two years, ordeal entailed: a million-dollar-soldier's fine-grained sieve on a generation's talent, probably never to be repeated). Been running with what I began to explore during the first two years at AU-SIS ever since. And I would especially like to thank Professors Abdul Aziz Said, George Harris, and Elspeth Rostow for kindling many of the ideas I spent the rest of my life pursuing -- though I suspect they would not agree with much of what I have had to say. Professor Mott (can't remember his first name) multi-media, stage-acted, taught me in truly staggering form 6 hours of “Backgrounds of Western Civilization” -- magnitude of the impact of which I cannot begin to characterize -- and had much of a critical nature to say in private counseling sessions about my “highly unorthodox mode of thought”, my “attachment” to Unamuno, my “tendency to Platonize absolutely everything”: the contribution this criticism ultimately made to my understanding of the childhood “primitive” Shinto influences upon my cognition/perception, and trophotropic emotional vomiting of symbolic logic, was of inestimable personal value, and enormously enriching over half a century. I can tell anyone interested, with great confidence, and certain personal knowledge, that nothing at Georgetown, at the time, even began to compare to this. Coming to the end of my life, I am here, in these web postings, making a “Report to Greco” -- lifeform aesthetics being a major transincarnational issue, time-shapes being what they are, which one must fully assess, if…
Regarding the timing issue you raised. On 20 September 2008, T5M, I said:
I guess this bailout -- independent of immediates -- at about an 80-percent chance (simply by illustration) of significant short-term impact, and maybe a 20-percent chance of significant mid-term impact, and if in the mid-term it works relatively well, then about a 95-percent chance that this mid-term success becomes a significant factor in setting up long-term consequences vastly worse than those visible at present.
Then in October of 2008 I clarified:
I stand by my judgment as to immediates, short-, mid-, and long-term, offered before the bailout was codified. Immediate being 1-2 years; short-term, 3-5 years; mid-term, 5-10 years; long-term, 10-20 years.
This vague forecast seems to be in the same general realm as SocGen's recently devised worst cast scenario, as referred to in Ambrose Evans-Pritchard's piece of 18 November 2009, “Société Générale tells clients how to prepare for potential 'global collapse': Société Générale has advised clients to be ready for a possible 'global economic collapse' over the next two years, mapping a strategy of defensive investments to avoid wealth destruction” (London Telegraph).
Enunciating in ultimates on 17 November 2009, Graham Summers of The Market Oracle says, speaking of the top U.S. banks' derivatives exposures (“Goldman Sachs Betting on Derivatives Collapse Sparked Financial Crash?”):
This alone, explains in no uncertain terms that the Financial Crisis is anything but over. Sure the Federal Reserve may have pumped $800+ billion into the financial system, yes the Fed is buying some $1.2 trillion in mortgage-backed securities, and of course there are the Fed’s off balance sheet arrangements, which we cannot even begin to quantify.
But ALL OF THESE efforts amount to diddily-squat in the face of TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS in potential losses in the derivatives market.
Goldman Sachs: 34,262% of assets in derivatives exposure. This is the real skinny. What does that skinny indicate? Such a percentage does not disclose mere obsession/compulsion. Something far more psychopathological is clearly involved. Full-blown collective psychosis, no minor neurosis. These words are not just hysterical expectorations: this is the real skinny. And what are those derivatives but percolation theory's The Devil's Staircase in risk transfer/concentration from micro to macro to meta? Reverse cascade seeding cascade. Roll cloud. Anvil formation. Tornadogenesis. And what is the real reason these derivatives were created in the ways they were, if not by collective unconscious parody of fiber-bundle arithmetics and the notion of identity-transparency those arithmetics express? Neanderthal paganism of internal dimensions! The horror, the horror! Depotentiate the subliminally perceived threat by projective-identification, displacement, regressive transformation, and identity incorporation (psychological “eating”: introjection). That's what I call authentic “market reflexivity”! In the form of collecting ears of the vanquished. Taking heads, scalps. Same principle of sham depotentiation involved. One level of mass murder. Not only can the derivatives problem not be resolved independent of dealing with the real “whys” of the “hows” of derivatives creation, but the present financial crisis, and those sure to issue from it, cannot be transcended without re-creating derivatives -- given there is a quadrillion dollars worth (somewhat more than ten years of contracts on Chicago's Mercantile Exchange and its Board of Trade) of them out there somewhere -- in non-regressed, mature, expression of fiber bundles, the m-valued logics those bundles clearly impute, and the roles such play in facilitating systemic autopoiesis.
In my judgment, there may or may not be actual substance to these charges -- given how politicized and economicsized climate shift has become in this era of potential global financial meltdown, and, hence, the impetus to tweak the models so as to get facts to fit intuitive understanding in a science falsely circumscribed by a “classical limit” which prevents actual understanding: quite similar to what transpired in aftermath of the Viet Nam war's Tet-'68 offensive (and involving many of the same theoretical principles: but that is truly an insider statement). Under a “classical limit”, can't adequately support the greenhouse-warming thesis, then alter parameter definitions (see: George Manbiot, “Pretending the climate email leak isn't a crisis won't make it go away”, Guardian, 25 November 2009, and “Rigging a Climate 'Consensus'”, The Wall Street Journal, 28 November 2009): shades of the CIA-MACV enemy-strength-estimates controversy. BIA DOA. But don't question the “classical limit”! And if Dylan had sung “lie lady lie” -- grammatically correct -- instead of “lay lady lay”, where would he have gotten? Probably still will get a Cap-and-Carbon-Trade Agreement, which will founder upon implementation -- judging by Viet Nam war experience of “The System Works”. Couldn't be no carbon-credit derivatives crisis arise with Cap-and-Trade, not like no housing-debt derivatives crisis, nohow, not with the Pareto efficiency of our modern banking/monetary/credit system. Now that we know, by good offices of Stiglitz, a lead author for the IPCC, how to do proper interviews so as to symmetrically-information-value externalities such that government intervention can yield Pareto superior outcomes! (see: Al Gore and David Blood, “Time is up for short-term thinking in capitalism”, Financial Times, 26 November 2009) -- valuation of externalities not involving anything like the n-body problem, and, hence, no requirement for m-logically-valued monetary units. Market price, cost of time, hedonic price, bibliometric price, willingness-to-pay price, all synthesized (to a singly-logically-valued price) by stakeholder analysis (as if every chaos butterfly in the universe were not a stakeholder: your stakeholder or mine?). Heh-heh-heh! “Solution” imposed from above, ridiculed from below. Scuttled by Weapons of the Weak. That's all, folks! Whatever the case, it would be nice if commentators would learn a little about contentious issues in theoretical meteorology before spouting off about climate change and the magnitude of scientific scandals (cf: “Climate skeptics claim leaked e-mails are evidence of collusion among scientists”, The Guardian, 20 November 2009 and “Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'?”, London Telegraph, 20 November 2009 and “Hacked: Hadley CRU FO12009 Files”, The Reference Frame, 20 November 2009). Like maybe they could learn the differences between “real” temperature (given in real numbers), potential temperature, equivalent potential temperature, hypertemperature as the spin-moment of operator-time (with “imaginary” and hypercomplex components), submolecular temperature enhancement such as that of “electron-temperature enhancement” (violating traditional 19th-century thermodynamics definition of “temperature”) upon anthropogenic hot aurora, and so on. Were they to do this, they might discover that the real, but largely unknown (even to many meteorologists), scandal in atmospheric science transpired during the period 1950s thru 1970s. Scandals since have been mere footnotes. Back then, actual fistfights transpired at severe storms conferences: quantum and relativity physics banned from meteorology. Sham scandals -- scandals concerning sham issues -- arise when the issues involved in the actual scandals cannot be psychologically processed. And the real strange attractor here is: those scientists tweaking their models to fit what they intuitively know to be the case, but can't adequately explain, are those most vehemently affect-charged in opposition to quantum-relativistic treatments of atmospheric processes, the very treatments most likely to explain what they intuitively know to be the case! Reflexive circularity in projective-identification at transference as collective reflection of scientific psychosociology: were this reflexivity really to be explained, one would find oneself delving into the actual origins of the world wars (another insider statement). Them tornadoes is “pathological phenomena”, they is, ain't they, says he, in his armored car chasing T-family touchdowns over waving fields of grain with Doppler radar. The likelihood is (factoring in quantum and relativity perspectives, thus setting aside the “classical limit”) that the ongoing climate shift is greatly under assessed by those focused exclusively upon greenhouse warming, indeed, only warming, of whatever origin. As any Malay firewalker -- nanolevitating by biological superconduction -- any Lal Ded dancing nude Himalaya snows, will tell you: “real” temperature ain't what it's cracked up to be. No real predictor, being so relative as it is. Now, acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes (filtered from the models since 1948 so as to keep out quantum-relativity physics: acoustic analogues to blackhole computers) Musculpt modulating, chronotopologically transforming, equivalent potential temperature surfaces, that's an imaginary-time predictor with real consequences! Better watch out for superconductant exchanges of hydrothermodynamic properties associated with a limited domain of the atmosphere. It would also be nice if people could rise to the understanding that in far-from-equilibrium phase transitions there emerges a state of “deautomatization” -- call it extreme nonlinearity, chaos, disorder, what you will -- whereupon all extremes prevail, including extreme cold in a global warming cuspover. But you've got to have cognitive time-step flexibility to really comprehend import of this. And who (updating, see: John M. Broder, “Climate-Change Debate Is Heating Up in Deep Freeze”, NY Times, 10 February 2010) has that flexibility? Find me a far-from-equilibrium phase transition which does not exhibit such deautomatization behavior. Moreover, acoustically-modified gravity-wave mode orchestration of ozone metabolism in Earth's atmosphere has not been studied in relation to the quantum chemistry of therapeutic ozone -- for multiple VERBOTEN reasons. This is no small undersight, as the “homeopathic ozone effect” (“healing crisis” being another sort of far-from-equilibrium deautomatization state) may be relevant not only to staunching pandemics (cf: “H1N1 virus can be killed by Acidic Ozone Water”, PhysOrg.com, 9 November 2009), but also an important variable in climate-shift dynamics. Co-author Han Uhm of Ajou University in Korea said:
“The host cells used were the cells from advanced animals like green monkey kidney cells, human cells, or egg cells. These cells are breeding well even after the exposure to acidic ozone water. Meanwhile, the microbe cells are killed very effectively by AOW [acidic ozone water]. I believe that some kinds of antioxidant in the advanced cells may protect the cells from ozone attack. But the microbe cells without the antioxidant may be destroyed by the strong oxidation activity of ozone in AOW.”
These experimental findings are also suggestive of the notion raised in our 1995 article on the homeopathic ozone effect, the notion of quantum-level, frequency-dependent, m-valued, nesting-foam, identity signatures; indeed, antioxidants, themselves, may employ such signatures, as oxy-redux is largely a matter of intermolecular electron transport across fractal phase boundaries (which extend to the submolecular, even the subatomic), or no -- and the involved electrons are waves, no less than particles. The “planted dense subgraph problem” (full-blown as Tzog-chen AllBase m-logically-valued reference space brane of branes) as distinct from the “hidden dense subgraph problem”: heh-heh-heh. Sustained shift in any of these frequency-response windows might well be regarded (following John Cleary, Autumn Maze, HarperCollins, 1995: truly great sentences short-haired, suited people really talk, and though I can't write like that, is it natural -- straight off the tongue, not reworked over and over -- and if it weren't how could it be so fluid, but if it were how could it be so real?) “DEATH BY DEFENESTRATION” due to absence of proper “window guidance”. My gosh, Jumping (gene) Jack Flash and his irate cytokine storms! Cytokine storm? Why, isn't that one of those far-from-equilibrium deautomatization states?
While excoriating Western gleam and sheen In Praise of Shadows, Junichiro Tanizaki asked himself what the modern world would be like had science evolved over Asian metaphysical assumptions, rather than those Western. One could ask the same about market capitalism, had it evolved out of Japanese za guilds and the world's first organized futures exchange, the Dojima Rice Market (established over the period 1650-1697: see Wiki), along with “rice tickets” derivatives, rather than those European traced back through medieval “letters of the fair” to Thales' olive options (see: “The Origins of Derivatives Instruments”, Brandeis University, no date or author given). Why didn't market capitalism develop over za mapped upon ma (the m-sheeted notion of sacred space at the foundation of traditional Japanese aesthetics beloved of Tanizaki)? Western preemption, it would appear. From a certain perspective, there is little in the way of fact to contest the notion that present-day operative comparative advantage in world illicit drug trafficking, not only balances out First World agricultural trade barriers, but is delayed collective unconscious compensatory abreaction to the 1858/60 Treaties of Tientsin (beyond two-million taels of silver, the sin involving forced opium addiction) which retrospectively justified Japan's period of voluntary self-isolation (Sakoku). It may well be that exogenous incursions upon Asian endorphin mu-receptors postponed by centuries implementation of mu-itic m-valued monetary units. Was explosion in MSG (glutamic acid in seaweed extract, centuries later isolated by Ajinomoto) consumption unconsciously instigated inner counterwork to these exogenous incursions?
I think it is very interesting that the hacked smoking-gun AGW (anthropogenic global warming) e-mails were first posted to a Russian server (see: “Climategate: University of East Anglia U-turn in climate change row”, Robert Mendick, London Telegraph, 28 November 2009): due (archetypal) compensation! Under influence of Ukrainian geochemist Vladimir Vernadsky (once reputed to have coined the word “biosphere”, now, apparently, only to have given it its modern usage, and who greatly contributed to the intellectual climate, little to the weather, less still to the storms, undermining the Soviet intelligentsia's “faith” in Marxism: a fact I became aware of at international scientific conferences during the 1970s and early-'80s) a Russian/Soviet ecological approach to the geosciences developed very early and quite differently from that of the West -- and was adamantly opposed by many Western scientists -- wherein Einstein's Special Relativity was applied from the 1920s to macroscopic meteorological processes, with a strong emphasis upon acoustic modes (explicitly filtered from Western models from the late-'40s) nowadays entertained outside atmospheric science under the rubric “acoustic analogues to black hole computers”. Even as late as the 1960s and '70s, when similar approaches were independently arrived at in the U.S. in multiscale numerical modeling of tornadogenesis, they were suppressed, not to say merely summarily dismissed. The real issues deeply embedded in the AGW controversy are not, in my judgment, those of secrecy (see: “Secrecy in science a corrosive force”, Michael Schrage, Financial Times, 27 November 2009), or of data falsification, or of populist black-propaganda cartoon notions of scientific method taught in “Philosophy of Science 101”, which no creative scientist has ever actually followed, the realities of which scientific paper-writing conventions, along with the realpolitick of peer reviewing, conceal, but those of broad paradigm conflict whereupon constraints have been imposed from without upon fundamentals in atmospheric science. Atmospheric scientists are not those scientists who dictate a “classical limit”: breaches of such a limit by atmospheric science would have to be approved by the quantum-relativity theoretical physics community, otherwise they could find no hearing. When, in late-1976, I approached John A. Wheeler with ideas related to nested-grid, cascade modeling of tornadogenesis run since the late-'60s on NASA's largest mainframes incorporating quantum-relativistic perspectives, he freely admitted (August of 1977) that he was unfamiliar with the equations of meteorology, but felt, nonetheless, that atmospheric scientists would not appreciate incorporation of “exotic physics” into their models. He noted a similarity of some of the ideas expressed with those of Roger Penrose and suggested I get into contact. The effort in that regard was no more productive than earlier efforts had been with Hawking. Note that few dynamical meteorologists, those most familiar with contentious issues in theoretical meteorology, publicly participate in the climate change debate. Why is that? I believe that imposition from without of a “classical limit” upon atmospheric science has contributed greatly to creation of circumstances within atmospheric science inevitably giving rise to the sort of thing revealed by the smoking-gun e-mails. Non-classical science is very likely involved in climate-shift dynamics in ways no one has ever been allowed to study. No one. This is the opinion of a person who has absolutely no formal training in atmospheric science, indeed, a college dropout, so I heartily recommend no mind whatsoever be paid to it. Moreover, most climate-change skeptics are likely to be especially unsympathetic to non-classical accounts of atmospheric processes, so they have all the more reason to ignore this opinion.
Exponential growth in post-WWII private debt to GDP ratio, identified by Steve Keen (see: “Debtwatch No 41, December 2009: 4 Years of Calling the GFC”, Debtwatch, 1 December 2009, my attention drawn to this article by Mish), I believe to have been spun off as a secondary effect of the way in which the Bretton Woods monetary system employed a vehicle currency as the foremost international reserve currency. Though the gold-exchange mechanism was a constraint on liquidity creation until Viet Nam war funding choices forced closure of the gold-exchange window, the “engine” of liquidity/aggregate-demand provision from Bretton Woods beginning was, fundamentally, one of dollar creation. The base-state of the global economy, therefore, was, and is, “liability financed”. This systemic base-state dynamic set the tone for all financing, private as well as public. The specific mechanisms by which this dynamic played out, however fascinating and important, are of subordinate concern. Related observations could be made about pre-WWII monetary-system fundaments. It can also incidentally be mentioned that if Keen's ratio is a true exponential function, the SuperMinskyMoment comes when FED/Treasury pump has to deliver transfinite quantitative easing from pipe-mouth: SuperMinskyMoment is realization of Marc Faber's warfare chronomancy, for there is only one way to call off the global economy. Keen has also identified the root cause as to why consequences of this exponentiation were not foreseen by most economists:
The proposition that comparing debt to GDP is making a stock/flow error may appear wise at first glance, but it is in fact nonsense. It instead shows that the person making the comment does not understand dynamics -- which is a failing shared by almost all neoclassical economists.
In dynamic terms, the ratio of debt to GDP tells you how many years it would take to reduce debt to zero if all income was devoted to debt repayment. That is an extremely valid indicator of the degree of financial stress a society (or an individual) is under.
I find that members of the general public understand this easily. Only economists seem to have any trouble comprehending it -- not because it is difficult but because their own training pays almost no attention to dynamic analysis, and therefore they don't learn -- as systems engineers do -- that stock/flow comparisons can be extremely important indicators of the state of a system.
I learned this lesson during 1968 from studying the Map Gazetteer of Viet Cong geographic boundaries at the Order of Battle (OB) section of CICV, the Combined Intelligence Center, Vietnam, and later at Strategic Research and Analysis, MACV-J2, while developing “indicators of enemy intentions”. The VCI, Viet Cong (political) Infrastructure -- the communist underground apparat/network -- used village, district, province, and military region boundaries different from those employed by the South Vietnamese Government. While GVN boundaries remained virtually unchanged throughout history of the war, the Viet Cong boundaries were changed frequently, but the OB Map Gazetteer only contained a disordered collection of snapshot maps, images of the instantaneous state at a given time. There was no evidence to be found anywhere that any attempt whatsoever had been made to gather the information required to trace the world-lines of the dynamics of boundary changes, nor were discoveries made as to how to record such world-lines and engage in frequency analysis upon them. And there were no systems-theory-type ideas as to why the VCI changed geographic boundaries so frequently, an utterly unique bureaucratic phenomenon, so far as I was able to determine. Arriving at an answer to this “why” was a cryptanalytic task I took upon myself. In all likelihood, I was equipped for this task largely due to the fact that, throughout my youth, my father was an accomplished supply-and-materiel-systems troubleshooter for the USAF, and I grew up frequently hearing observations made about systems dynamics. What I and fellow analysts found through a long series of small discoveries (described in detail in our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh: see especially the reproduced 1968 SRA paper subtitled “A Dynamical Analysis of VC Strategy, Tactics, and Intentions”) was that the VCI “mapped” (in the mathematical sense) bureaucratic variables (such as the personnel allocation to a given functional element, agency, section) -- i.e., “stock” -- upon changing phase boundaries -- i.e., “flow” -- which their Organization Section at each level of their echelon hierarchy studied in order to ascertain the state of self-organizational competency they had obtained, so as to properly time strategic initiatives -- the whole war being understood by them as a series of transformations over levels of self-organizational competency. But their stock/flow “ratio” was not merely an analytic tool; it was structurally and functionally embedded (nowadays: “planted dense subgroup problem”), built-in, by mapping algorithms, to topological properties of the bureaucratic dynamics employed. Self-organization by resource exchange across boundaries (and trophic levels): autopoiesis by trophallaxia (trophikos = nourishment; allaxis = exchange). VCI cadres would not have stated -- and in the many interrogations I personally conducted, did not state -- it this way, but it was, nonetheless, exactly as I state here. Reaching an understanding of this greatly facilitated cognitive transitions I made in arriving at the notion of m-logically-valued monetary units. It should here be noted that F. A. von Hayek's notion of “the time-shapes of total capital stock” is a flow/stock conception involving structure-function embedding analogous to the embedded stock/flow algorithm employed by the VCI. As von Hayek's formulation is a restatement of Everett's quantum relative-state, which is the “engine” of self-organization in material systems, the VCI should be credited with having made, and applied, a fundamental discovery in political-economy.
How often did the odd letter to Milton Friedman elicit a response, let alone by return mail? My 1998 letter to Friedman on von Hayek “time-shapes”, Everettian relative-state, and Lukasiewiczian m-logically-valued monetary units received an immediate reply: I can't understand what you are talking about because you do not seem to understand the proper meaning of the words you use. Further attempts at explication were even less rewarding. What is said in Steve Keen's article, “Steve Keen's DebtWatch No 31 February 2009: 'The Roving Cavaliers of Credit'”, DebtWatch, 31 January 2009, concerning the actual sequence of events in multiple-bank credit expansion, true as it likely is, does not address the issue Friedman could not understand: there is no reason in the universe why money/credit has to be singly-logically-valued.
Lauri Love (nsh) recently observed, quoting from “Is Global Warming Unstoppable?”, ScienceDaily, 24 November 2009:
“In a provocative new study, a University of Utah scientist argues that rising carbon dioxide emissions -- the major cause of global warming -- cannot be stabilized unless the world's economy collapses or society builds the equivalent of one new nuclear power plant each day.
“Garrett says his study's key finding 'is that accumulated economic production over the course of history has been tied to the rate of energy consumption at a global level through a constant factor.'
“That 'constant' is 9.7 (plus or minus 0.3) milliwatts per inflation-adjusted 1990 dollar. So if you look at economic and energy production at any specific time in history, 'each inflation-adjusted 1990 dollar would be supported by 9.7 milliwatts of primary energy consumption,' Garrett says.
“Perhaps the most provocative implication of Garrett's theory is that conserving energy doesn't reduce energy use, but spurs economic growth and more energy use.
“'Making civilization more energy efficient simply allows it to grow faster and consume more energy,' says Garrett.”
Evokes your comments on economy as a complex adaptive system feeding on external negentropy to maintain internal order, necessitating continual growth to stave off death.
One imagines your projections remain consistent with systemic collapse followed by a pivotal contractionary period, where the density of potential global social trajectories increases at the cusp surface of the catastrophe.
The question remains, as ever, by what means may this trajectory-space be so seeded as to maximise the likelihood of a “landing you can walk away from.”
Very interesting thesis. It is of note that economists tried to suppress this paper. Consider that, in consensus econometrics (given perfect information, perfectly private property, perfectly complete contracts, et cetera, i.e., the full set of present perfect cases, which is to say the “superfluid” case described by quantum mechanics): most effective allocation = greatest efficiency = highest return on investment, iff (non-consensually speaking) the markets involved employ only singly-logically-valued monetary units (externalities of the third kind -- locus of the larger present global crisis -- being inexorably excluded: first kind: extrasystemic effects of internalities; second kind: intrasystemic effects of externalities; third kind: extrasystemic effects of externalities). The standard economics notion of externality as mere “spillover” of a transaction is typically anti-econophysics, counter to a systems orientation, and subverts dynamical approaches. Garrett's “inflation-adjusted 1990 dollar” is such an iff case: singly-logically-valued monetary unit. In an economic system where organization (efficiency/effectiveness of resource allocation) requires growth (debt/GDP ratio exponential or near exponential, according to Steve Keen), at least the expectation thereof, and with a population base growing almost exponentially (hence, speaking of double-exponentiation), indeed, what can the solution be? As regards a “landing you can walk away from”, F. A. von Hayek's restatement of Everett, i.e., “the time-shapes of total capital stock”, it seems to me, may be a key, for those time-shapes are simultaneously available, if only they could be discovered. Given enough such discovery, one can envision “development” independent of “growth” -- and hence, also, organizational competency independent of growth. Were such to be realized, would population settle into a regime consonant with carrying capacity, i.e., the planet's renewable resource base and ability to process waste? For interesting reflections on population ceiling, view “Terror of the Situation: Global Population 100 Million”, Subrealism, 23 January 2010. For a discussion of Herman Daly's critique of unending growth, see: “Growth Isn't Possible” by Andrew Simms, Victoria Johnson, and Peter Chowla, Energy Bulletin, 25 January 2010.
A given time-shape (T-S), in and of itself, certainly, is not the same as a given Hayekian time-shape of total capital stock (T-S/TCS). Rubbish Theory and Mumford's Art and Technics helped me a lot in thinking about this. A given T-S/TCS is a given technological regime: no technology not conforming to the T-S/TCS in question can be discovered, for such a technology is not a possible-world logic of that T-S. This makes no sense so long as Everett relative-state is understood through the lens of von Neumann formalism, where T-S is regarded singular, reduced to heat engine, and employed to dissociate universe into many non-communicating (virtual) worlds. Consider that any given T-S of the m-available must be memetime for those in membership to the associated T-S/TCS, the only technological regime permitted by the T-S in question. Formalization of the T-S human beings have long been membershipped to came with Newton-Leibniz notion of a limit-value to an infinitesimal sequence. This limit-value is selfsame, simply-identifiable, single-valued, and singly-logically-valued: inviolate properties prerequisite to formalization of an objective linear-time (absolute or relative, variable time-pace or no), the T-S given in the T-S/TCS to which we have been and remain membershipped. The standard probability-amplitude interpretation of quantum mechanics preserved the T-S given in the Newton-Leibniz T-S/TCS to which we are membershipped -- and subjection of Everett to von Neumann formalism (by good offices of Wheeler-Bohr) sustained that preservation. Hayekian econoformulation of Everett's relative-state formulation tacitly rejects von Neumann and the many-worlds interpretation of Everett. How? By transduction of the many(virtual)worlds into multiple simultaneous “time-shapes of total capital stock”: “shapes” is plural; “stock” is singular. M-flows/stock “ratio”. One econometric universe in myriad simultaneously available chronotopologies: no economic reason to mention m-time-shapes of a stock were they unavailable. In terms of complexity theory, Hayekian total capital stock would be represented on an Mnk articulation (i.e., relative-state) landscape (each point of which is multi-colored m-valued); whereas standard complexity theory, following Newton-Leibniz, is on a 2nk fitness landscape (each point of which is on-or-off/white-or-black single-valued). Mnk articulation landscape as Mt. Analogue to Everett relative-state makes no sense so long as Wheeler's “pregeometry as a bucket of [kami] dust” is understood a 1T2-logic calculus of propositions. Pregeometry (intimately involved with chronotopology) must be Lukasiewiczian: m-logically-valued. But Lukasiewiczian pregeometry makes no sense so long as Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function is interpreted to probability amplitudes, and not understood with Lukasiewicz m-valued logics. But how cometh multiple time-shapes? Answer to this cannot be adequately formulated so long as operator-time does not replace the Hamiltonian in Schrödinger's wave equation. And operator-time cannot so replace so long as Newton-Leibniz notion of a single-valued limit-value to an infinitesimal sequence is retained. In the limit, there is transit between order-types in logical-value of articulation-landscape point in question. But this can make no sense so long as universal physical constants continue to be regarded single-valued under single-valued logic alone.
Impermissible topic: psychodynamics of transference between professor preceptor and Ph.D. candidate as integral element of de facto scientific/maths/academic method/mode-of-production, e.g., Kronecker-Cantor syzygy. Candidate/chela deals an existential-denial blow to chin of prof/guru by discovering/creating something different from, and unacceptable to, the old paradigm which professor preceptor had incorporated into his Umwelt. Scientific/maths/academic guru devotes the remainder of his career to fostering obstructions, subtle and/or overt, to his chela's discovery/creation. In the Kronecker-Cantor case, Husserl was thus employed. The whole of C. G. Jung's analysis of medieval alchemy -- and resultant characterization of the “Eight-Fold Way” of the psychological transference -- applies to this aspect of the scientific method which has had profound influence on evolution of physics, including atmospheric physics, at critical cusps, in significant measure explaining the prevailing situation with regard to the notion of “time-shapes”. What is unconsciously transferred between figures aparty to transference, figures claiming to be absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct, i.e., claiming to be “selfsame, simply-identifiable, single-valued, and singly-logically-valued”, is all their Lukasiewiczian m-logically-valued properties, regressed by suppression and denial -- such suppression and denial being integral to higher, no less than lower, enculturation, with its glutamatergic neuronal-etching dynamics (prevailing “physiologic” glutamate titers being normative only to the normotic become the norm). Psychologically project this “internal system state” and one has the corpus of renormalization methodologies: filtering, rescaling, p-adic truncation, and so on -- each of which being designed to preserve Newton-Leibniz single-valued limit-value.
As regards time-shape in and of itself, virtually by definition no amount of 1T2-logic notational display can shed significant light thereupon -- the case involving m-lights of m-limiting-velocities into and onto m-time-shapes. Geo(metry) is too spatially prejudiced to help much with chronotopology, chronotopology not being a 1T2-logically-valued Kantian category of the glutamate-etched cognition. Which is in no way to denigrate African Fractals (Ron Eglash, Rutger's U. Press, 1999), origins of which -- to any practitioner of autogenic training -- undoubtedly were in the fractal-image photism flashes characteristic of one class of the discharged visual phenomena of ketaminergic autogenic abreaction in trophotropic brain states habituated to the archaic identity-transparent awareness accustomed to the “contagion” of “participation mystique”. Eglash demonstrates not only that human ontogenesis/cognitive-development was not from concrete to abstract, but also that abstracting empathy was at the root of “participation mystique”, i.e., conscious registration of the “collective occasion of experience” which is quantum relative-state identity-transparency. Moreover, “fractal settlement patterns” were undoubtedly facilitators of the non-simple identities exchanged in Stone Age gift-exchange economies, just as they are an inspiration for the currently-needed fractal-entrapment/band-pass e-boundaries upon which nesting foams of legal m-logically-valued-LETS tenders are to be defined. Not even to mention fractal drums! Was the primordial the primitive, or is the modern? And how many thousand years has it taken us to rediscover what we already knew? But there is a transition to be made between being photismically dusted with Cantor-dust derivatives and being spun over color-field topologies by the various orders of temporal curl (dreamtime and songlines and Bushman sound, or their equivalents, likely being involved). Not sculpture, music-sculpture. Direct access to ketaminergic inner Musculpt seems indispensible. My particular (za)zen was arboreal, conducted as I root-pruned -- my (za)guild-locus being the tree-farm nursery. Viable options appear to include cultivation of “dynamic polymorph colors” at autogenic state by autogenic training; entry upon m-states of Sa(ma)dhi at Satori by ZaZen (so as to transit into and onto m-time-shapes of sacred Buddhological space, the general case of the collection of Mnk articulation landscapes traditionally employed geomantically-chronomantically in feng shui stock/flow dragon-current fractionated-boundary-value mappings -- qi signifying the stock; wind/water, the flow).
“Don't ask fundamental questions, or you will lose interest in class materials,” so said my 'Calculus I' instructor. Practical enough (being impractical, I dropped the course) -- but, at every stage of your career, abrogation of some facsimile to this principle guarantees there will be no further stages. Until, that is, you have become a grand old man of science. Then, you can write your swan song asking whatever fundamental questions you wish. And if you do so, there will, of course, be quiet snickers: “He had become senile by then, you know.” Such as with Victor P. Starr's late paper: “The Hydrodynamic Analogy to E = mc2”, Tellus, 9:1, 1959. Note the date of publication: real insight has been around for quite some memetime. Even as a swan song by a grand old man, this paper could not have found publication without the word “analogy” in the title. But consider the paper in relation to ”acoustic analogues [quote, unquote] to black hole computers” and see how completely convinced you can remain that Earth's atmosphere and oceans are, in fact, subject to a “classical limit”. Those who are into multinational-corporate-investment-scheme approaches to meeting “the challenges of global greenhouse warming” are no less committed to maintaining inviolate fundamentals of the Cartesian-Newtonian institutionalization and the associated set of dominance relations than are climate-change skeptics -- so there is no constituency for serious investigation of the “classical limit”.
And won't these folks be… chagrined, when Earth's atmosphere, not subscribing to a “classical limit”, simultaneously produces in climate shift a new North Atlantic ice age and global warming: Gary Sutton, “The Fiction of Climate Science: Why the climatologists get it wrong”, Forbes, 4 December 2009. And now that black propaganda has become propagandized as "perception management", one can hardly expect texts like "The Danish Text" not to be "leaked": John Vidal, "Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak", The Guardian, 8 December 2009.
Like the notion “my body”, the idea of perfectly private property requires deployment of an understanding of boundary that is scale dependent (or, alternatively, frequency-response-window dependent: a strange cognitive loop in relation to early history of The Law and Capital Movement's Coase Theorem, which utilizes the anti-econophysics concept of externality), a scale dependency which cannot be established without employment of a “classical limit”. The classical limit for biology involves cell-organ-body, because the farther from these scale levels the less “simple-identity” is definable through use of the 1T2-logic laws of distributed middle and non-contradiction by which absolutely this-side OR that-side fence-type boundaries are established. Psychosocial construction of simple-identity is by means of renormalization: filtering, truncation, primarily. Any evidence contradicting non-contradiction and distributed middle is treated as “externality” (full sense of the word). Economics handles the elements of social capital largely as externalities (full sense) because to do otherwise would undermine simple-identity of any given piece of property, the ability to put a singly-logically-valued price upon it, and hence the capability to wholly own it. The more externalities (full sense) internalized to markets employing only singly-logically-valued currencies, the more any given piece of property, product, anything ownable, loses its absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct boundary conditions. At some critical cusp in the number of internalized-externalities (full sense) boundaries of ownables become fractal Koch curves. Coase's Theorem demonstrating that well-definition (according to the rules of 1T2-logic alone) of property automatically yields efficiency (of those processes only which are internalizable to complete markets -- the notion of such markets assuming an objective linear-time is not mere memetime -- employing singly-logically-valued currencies only) must exclude externalities (full sense) if it is to avoid violation of the 1T2-logic law of non-contradiction -- for, including full-sense externalities, would prevent well-definition of property. Same dilemma The Prisoner's Dilemma succumbs to: if one assumes that the only sort of identity is simple-identity (achievable only by renormalization), then, of course, the only actors there could be would be prisoners. Moreover, the high efficiency of internalities is achieved at thermodynamic expense of the excluded externalities (full sense) by means of negentropic transfers across scale levels filtered by renormalization in set up (idealized heuristic world-picture) of the conditions considered in elaboration of the theorem (to include systemic omniscience, i.e., perfect information, and intersystemic, high-temperature -- e.g., hot money -- superconductivity, that is, no frictional transaction costs, neo-classical economics, adhering to a “classical limit”, having no principles available by which to explain such high-temperature superconductivity). High efficiency over both internalities and externalities-internalized can be achieved only with m-logically-valued e-currencies (frequency-response-window specific: cf, The Coase Theorem strange cognitive loop) over fractal e-boundaries permitting pricing of the non-simple-identities of property (e.g., including their social-capital dimensions).
The bureaucratic variables the Viet Cong (political) Infrastructure (VCI) mapped upon frequently changing geographic boundaries were the wartime equivalent of what, in peacetime, economists call “social capital” (something that should have been of interest to Russian-American economist Andrei Shleifer). I understood this “mapping algorithm” in 1968, and began twenty years before collapse of the Soviet Union arguing its importance to anyone who would listen. Failed attempts to get research grants, create a consultancy. Had I been involved, my approach to the post-Soviet transition would have endeavored to greatly rely upon details of the VCI precedent, would have been bottom-up employing the existing institutional base, and would simultaneously have appealed to Sakharov's “multi-sheet model of the universe”, Russian contributions to m-valued logics, and traditional Russian animistic notions of non-simple identity transliterated to the terms of modern societies via early Russian approaches to avant-garde art -- “White on White”, for instance, involving representational allusion to the prerequisite function-space concept: identity-transparent functional elements mapped upon relative-state boundary conditions, Lukasiewiczian Hilbert space in a nutshell. The Suprematism of the Russian Kasimir Malevich, born of Polish parentage, came on the scene following Hilbert's generalizations of Euclid and anticipating Polish Lukasiewicz's 1921 breakthrough paper in logic -- no small synchronicity. This endeavor I would have attempted being preliminary to tying participatory, anyone-can-play, computer-gamed, relative-state town, urban, regional, natural and cultural resources Sakharov-m-sheeted, multiple-scenarios strategic planning to market mechanisms, not by command, by management, by regulation, by legislation, by referenda, but by mappings of computer-gamed governance variables and indicators upon changing fractal e-boundaries with nesting foams of m-logically-valued, Karpenko-functor, Gödel-numbered LETS. Movement of m-valued/m-logically-valued information units across smart boundaries-without-boundary as “mechanism” of self-governance/Selbstorganization. This is the method used by nature -- once the cell “wall” is understood a plasmahaut, once the tropopause boundary is understood a plasmahaut, once the heliosphere is understood a plasmahaut… Making a successful transit to, and/or development within, a failed system, as is China, for instance, is not exactly an enlightened enterprise: neo-17th/18th-century political-economy, based upon Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung, is responsible for the prevailing global crisis, in its many dimensions; successful transits thereto, and/or within, are hardly the required responses. Summiteering-summiterring as decision algorithm for global-problem solving is repetition of the foremost mistake made in the post-Soviet transition, why the U.S. failed to impose its will in Viet Nam, and why countering the gathering global insurgency against the very idea of the Westphalian-Cartesian-Newtonian/Congress-of-Vienna nation-state system will, at cuspover, fail -- victory having been declared every step along the way. Johnsonvilles to Obamavilles to…: in the end, that's all, folks. What sort of people strive to reach the institutional summit of a dead paradigm?
So far as I understand, the IMF Special Drawing Right (SDR) is a transnational planetary metaeconomy unit-of-account/debt-instrument with no present-day significant connection to IMF gold reserves (of a present quantity approximately 3/8ths of U.S. gold reserves) other than gold-denominated fees the IMF charges for handling currency exchanges and gold-denominated interest payments made to the IMF for credit extended. The bulk of gold presently held by the IMF came to it through quota payments (subscriptions, like those paid via PayPal to an online magazine) made by member countries soon after the end of WWII, with another much smaller amount coming to it by similar payments after its agreement articles were altered in 1978. Though IMF gold reserves can be stated in SDRs, there is no direct connection between SDR issuance and IMF gold reserves. The SDR is not money, not even so reliable as fiat money. Possession of an SDR implies no claim upon the IMF as regards either payment or other forms of IMF action. The closest analogy I am aware of to exactly what an SDR is, is an “element” of an “equivalent potential temperature surface” associated with Earth's atmosphere (the type of temperature climatologists ought to be most monitoring, along with factors affecting behaviors of such surfaces). An SDR conveys the potential of a claim, the potential of an IMF action (both of which require to be “negotiated” upon each specific occasion). And if that potential is realized to a “condensation” of vehicle currency by some change of economic “temperature”, that condensation will begin to transpire in equivalents of the world's major currencies conceptually gathered by the IMF into a valuation basket based upon estimates of exports (phase-boundary crossings) denominated in the involved vehicle currencies and reserves held in them (analogous to the variables of functions defining “equivalent potential temperature surfaces”), which is to say that, since Nixon unilaterally shut the Bretton-Woods gold-exchange window, the valuation of the SDR is a potential equivalent “relative state” of the world's leading fiat vehicle currencies -- and reflects their “health-sickness” condition. The fact that the SDR is a reflection of a health-sickness condition means that the IMF's potential actions are controlled by that condition, not vice versa (as was the original intention). Given that the present global economy is over-hung by reverberations of something on the order of a quadrillion dollars worth of derivatives contracts (including what may be regarded meta-derivatives put out by central banks over the last 18 months), that controlling health-sickness condition is one of fiber-bundled morbidity, hence greatly limiting IMF potential. Indeed, the IMF's current resources arguably are inadequate to meet its current intentions in face of the gathering global financial crisis, and hence it may be required to sell gold (as it has in the past) in an attempt to do so: forward commitment projections, borrowing arrangements, concessional facilities, emergency assistance. If, however, SDRs allocated to the wealthy nations are employed as virtual-“collateral” for green loans to developing countries, in association with a carbon trading scheme, as George Soros has suggested at Copenhagen, there is the potential that the potential which SDRs represent (as relative-state of the health-sickness condition of the world's leading fiat vehicle currencies) will be ponzi-depleted, thus becoming unavailable to the IMF in meeting its current intentions (forcing it to sell its 100-billion dollars worth of market-value in gold presently set against the reverberations of a quadrillion dollars in derivatives contracts). This is all the more likely in that carbon chits will be denominating an externality as a new class of derivatives to be added to the present global overhang in derivatives contracts. Ponzi of the Ponzi! An externality like carbon generation needs to be (by analogy to the “equivalent potential temperature surface”) denominated relative to the behavioral factors of its “spillover” -- otherwise those behaviors will not be fine-grain modulated through local ADLs (activities of daily life), and the desired aggregate effect will not be achieved by the trading scheme, even if that scheme were to gain universal approval. Only m-logically-valued monetary units could possibly implement such denomination (and in the process unscramble fiber-bundled derivatives).
My estimation is that the science has been wrong, otherwise we wouldn't be in this situation. As regards atmospheric science, due to imposition of a “classical limit” the odds appear very high that climate change is different and worse than currently assessed by the IPCC. Growth, stability, and prosperity are not be-alls and end-alls economics should be in hot pursuit of (whatever the Arrow preference functions involved): these desired states have been defined upon economics by science which has been wrong. Arrow, Coase, and Stiglitz (respectively, action/preference; identity/property; and symmetry/information): the involved theorems have codified falsification/exclusion (if subliminally -- archetypal processes being what they are) of Schrödinger's wave-function into/off neo-classical economic theory (tacit falsification made explicit falsification). Not only is Arrow's postwar Impossibility Theorem a virtual parody of 1T2-valued logic and deduction from self-evident axioms (debunked by Gödel's prewar theorem), it is a ludicrous attack upon undistributed-middle interpretations of Lukasiewicz (fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets) undertaken (if subliminally -- archetypal processes being what they are) specifically to prevent quantum processes of self-organizing systems from invading the social sciences. Science made more wrong. These three Nobel prizes were awarded for stigmatization (if subliminally -- archetypal processes being what they are) of quantum non-simple identity, Everett relative-state (by extension F. A. von Hayek's “the time-shapes of total capital stock”), Lukasiewicz m-valued logics (by extension back into 19th-century higher mathematics: Axiom of Choice, Cantor, Abel…). Arrow completeness is simply a restatement of the 1T2-logic laws of distributed middle and non-contradiction which Lukasiewicz superseded (without contradiction) before onset of WWI and upon violation of which the Japanese have built better refrigerators, refrigerators more self-regulating. Complete markets: simple synthetic set theory (strike Abel, strike Cantor, strike Lukasiewicz, strike Schrödinger, strike Gödel, strike Aspect…). At any time t and gambling (probability-amplitude interpretation) on future states of the world-picture (strike F. A. von Hayek's time-shapes, hence strike Everett). Asymmetry = spillover (externality). Spillover = far-from-equilibrium thermodynamics, through the lens of Everett interpreting Everett -- not Wheeler-Bohr interpreting and not Prigogine interpreting. By any systems definition, not the limited neoclassical-economics definition, “externality” (positive and negative relative to this and that time-shape, not merely or) is part of “total capital stock”; by holographic information theory, the part contains all the information of the whole (if a bit fuzzy-logical), which is to say contains its Cantorian sets of Hayekian time-shapes (acoustic analogues of black hole computers). Want “development” without “growth”, systemic adaptation to a changing environment absent rigid boundary-value stabilities, fulfillment without garish “prosperity”? Strike Hawking!
I don't view climate-shift dynamics -- whatever the magnitude of AGW effects -- as the greatest current threats to life on Earth. There are also the extraordinary anthropogenically-induced changes to Earth's electromagnetic structure over the past century -- likely including magnetic core changes, however slight; the threat these planetary EM field changes pose to geological-timeframe normative values of the quantum properties of DNA in genomes across full spectrum of the biosphere; the coupling of these non-ionizing field-induced alterations to those quantum-property genomic changes associated with quantum effects of chemical pollutants and genetically-engineered recombinants/GMOs; the DNA frequency-response-window modulated immune-system responses and DNA free-electron temperature-oscillation modulated stress-reaction and biological-clock responses to these alterations across full spectrum of the biosphere; the epidemiologic and pandemiologic consequences of these immune/vector-virulence and stress and clock responses. Moreover, given the falsification/redaction higher mathematics and science have been subject to since the 1820s (fallout from Abel's so-called Impossibility Theorem), just like with climate-shift dynamics (almost certainly involving “acoustic analogues to black hole computers” type processes: e.g., acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes Swiss-cheesing the tropopause boundary and modulating stratospheric-tropospheric ozone exchange/metabolism), “classical” explanations will be developed at every stage of biospheric deterioration, explaining away, veiling, the actual dynamics transpiring.
The more vehicle currencies are unionized -- particularly in absence of a quantum-composite non-vehicle reserve unit and clearing-union equivalent -- the less capacity the global economy, and any sub-economy of the global economy, has for functional specificity, and the less specificities, the less there is actually there to integrate. A pan-Arab caliphate gulfo currency (see: Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, “Gulf petro-powers to launch currency in latest threat to dollar hegemony”, The London Telegraph, 15 December 2009) would contribute to the prevailing pandemic, collective unconscious, archetypal effort at disintegration currently traveling under the name integration. As regards denomination of classes of transactions, fungiblility of currencies is largely irrelevant in a fiat system because confidence is the only thing standing behind the vehicle-reserve currency: in relation to the dollar as foremost fiat reserve currency, the more the U.S. can demonstrate control, control over every aspect of the global agenda, including denomination of oil transactions and other classes of transactions, the more the confidence, and the less the U.S. has to rely upon fungibility to acquire all and everything. Fiatization demands absolute power, total control, in order simply to function. The same would be the case -- if some other fiat-vehicle currency or fiat-vehicle currency basket were to take over the dollar's reserve role -- of whatsoever replacement emerged within the existing monetary conventions or their equivalents, except that dispersion of the fiat reserve over multiples would disperse confidence and fiat-system functionality would suffer. Moreover, mere change in conventions could very little improve system behavior, so long as the fundamental monetary conception remained the same. Interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function to probability amplitudes, stochastics, statistical ensembles, aleatoric dance, cosmic casino, book of chances, deistic klepto-gambling den preserves the single-valued variable, hallmark of the Newton-Leibniz limit-value -- and preserving this preservation preserves exclusivity of 1T2-valued logic. That being the case, was the Master of the Mint -- Newton -- likely to innovate as regards the fundamental conception of the nature of money? Were any subsequent such Masters, psychologically imprinted -- as they were, as they are -- upon the Cartesian-Newtonian notion of simple-identity, likely to so innovate? Hardly -- and so the case remains until the present day. The global/synoptic collective-action issues addressed by Keynes in General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money are of the essence of quantum mechanics, a theory of collective and cooperative behaviors in material systems (which, indubitably, are not fiat). Keynes took a Cartesian-Newtonian approach to these collective-action issues and came up with a scheme of governmental behaviors to rectify market failure. He did not seriously look at the quantum mechanics of collective and cooperative behaviors -- and certainly not with a critical eye. Nor have subsequent economists. How many economists have studied Cooperative Phenomena (H. Haken and M. Wagner, eds., Springer, 1973), dedicated to physicist Herbert Fröhlich, let alone read from the journals a sampling of his articles (e.g., “Long-Range Coherence and Energy Storage in Biological Systems”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 2, 1968; “Evidence for Bose Condensation-Like Excitation of Coherent Modes in Biological Systems”, Physics Letters, 51A:1, 1975)? Very few, we can be sure. Not having done their homework, how could they possibly have innovated as regards the fundamental conception of the nature of money? What is the most basic difference between a Newtonian information unit and a quantum information unit? The former is single-valued; the latter, m-valued. Keynes missed this in coming up with his notion of bancor, a notion in no small measure a resultant of having accepted/condoned renormalization/filtering of econometric equation sets to the scale levels nation-state and above (focusing collective action -- the principles of collective action -- solely to the nation-state and its relations, thus, essentially, precluding actual collective and cooperative behaviors from economics). And not getting even a bancor at Bretton Woods, there was nothing left to Keynes but an IMF. Furthermore, the scale-level renormalization/filtering of econometric equations is a tacit dimension of Pareto efficiency, setting the terms for the prevailing concept of “optimum currency areas” (a defining of currencies upon 1T2-logical geographical boundaries only at a single scale level) largely by appeal to removal of transaction costs (whereas such costs over multiscale fractal/band-pass boundaries are the viscosities/“sand” required to modulate hot-money flows, in absence of monetary controls, such that non-Pareto efficiency can be achieved -- efficiency incorporating social-capital functions via m-logically-valued monetary units: i.e., multiscaled quasi-Tobin tax-without-a-tax unscrambling fiber-bundled derivatives with Karpenko functors of Lukasiewicz logics as “machine language” of exchange-rate markets over Buddhological AllBase). If one were to look into the history of why this happened, this renormalization, one would see the deep structure in origins of the world wars. My thesis from the 1960s -- based largely upon consideration of psycho-cultural-set variables, mode of induced entry upon nation-statehood, national-culture historical play-outs in higher maths, logic, physics, fine and performing arts -- of eventual formation of a Germano-Russian Bloc aligned to a Greater China incorporating Japan, can only view advent of the euro as motivated by political considerations, not those economic (anchoring of Germany to Western Europe: as noted by an observer quoted by Evans-Pritchard in the above-referenced article, an observation, in general terms, which equally applies to international monetary system conventions as a whole), and as one more in a history of coercive circumstances auguring for a Germano-Russian Bloc. When the European sub-economy of the global economy scrubs to zitterionic breakdown, into what fabric-fragments will the politically-forced detergent-integration shatter?
The hypothesis that the limit of an infinitesimal sequence is not some finite single-value, but an order-of-logical-value transform, will be demonstrated, I believe, with Karpenko functors over Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, once the Riemann zeta function is generalized to hypercomplex numbers and the primes are arrayed over a non-orientable universal covering of nested multi-sheeted Riemann surfaces mapped into fractal dimensions. Such a construct likely cannot be fully achieved absent Musculpt as mathematical notation. Moreover, it appears the Cantorian C and higher orders of infinity cannot be adequately explored without this construct. One wonders over import of such a pregeometry relative to Sakharov's multi-sheet model of the universe, Everett relative-state, and operator-time as fully-fledged topological operator. In all likelihood, there are many different consciousness-without-an-object states, many different no-mind states, corresponding to limit-transforms over Tzog-chen AllBase.
Since Karpenko functors may actually be Jungian archetypes-in-themselves, and I-Ching hexagrams may actually be rotational-1T2-logic cyclotomic decomposition-involutes (Abel-Bell) thereof, I thought I would, for safe keeping, copy the following (circa 2000) into this document from Matthew Watkins' website on the Riemann Hypothesis: "Some Thoughts from the Pensingers".
These many years after the “General Process” paper, we are getting better insight into how the multivalued reference space has to be constructed on Hilbert space under m-valued logics. Musculpt and the hierarchy of c-s, c'-s, and c''-s are right at the heart of it. If these insights are pulled out of their m-logically-valued context and put into 2-valued syllogistic logical march via written notation, they will have lost all their intrinsic meaning. On the contrary, cognition has to be pulled out of march in logical syllogism and let fall into Musculpt. Absent Musculpt as mathematical notation, circular presentation is the only real approach, because engagement with it forces the visualization pre-requisite to conscious emergence of always-there subliminal Musculpt (which conventions of written notation deny).
Our tornado-genesis-related speculation that interval spread in the hierarchy of c-s, c'-s, and c''-s is in natural log distribution clearly relates to the N/logN distribution of primes, made more precise by Euler's zeta function relative to only the real numbers. Riemann generalized Euler's function to the imaginary numbers and identified a critical band within which all the primes must fall. That they all fall on a line within this band is the famous Riemann Hypothesis. In order to encompass the hierarchy of c-s, c'-s, and c''-s, the Riemann zeta function will have to be generalized to hypercomplex numbers (à la Charles Musés) and the critical band will have to be mapped on multiple sheets relative to m-valued logics. (Distribution of c-s represented by Euler's zeta function relative to the real numbers; distribution of c'-s represented by Riemann's zeta function relative to complex numbers; distribution of c''-s represented by a zeta function relative to hypercomplex numbers.) In this manner, issue of trivial versus non-trivial solutions (sets of zeros) will disappear.
What will happen is this: on each prime (arrayed on Riemann's line) on the m-logically-valued reference sheet will be stacked other primes from the multiplicity of single-logically-valued sheets composing the Riemann surface map of Everett’s universal wave-function. (In this approach, Cantorian fractal spacetime relates to the stack of single-valued sheets, which, in turn, relate to Sakharov’s collapse/anti-collapse multi-sheet model of the universe.) On each of the multiplicity of decomposed single-valued sheets, Riemann’s line will be located differently within the critical band than it is located on the m-logically-valued reference sheet, such that, when the complete superposition of numbered sheets is considered, the line will have spread across the whole critical band on the reference sheet (as a result of expanding consideration from single-valued logic to logics of m-values). Because the hypercomplex zeta function would represent distribution of limiting velocities, accelerations, and time rates of change of acceleration, the waveform configured by the distribution step function would be an idealized chronotopological invariant characteristic of the genus (connectivity) of that universal covering surface which is the reference state of a perfectly efficient autopoietic process in optimum self-correlation (which is anything but a catastrophe! to all those not identified with the ego-complex).
A supradense m-logically-valued Hilbertian reference space constructed in this fashion has nonlocality of embedded objects as a fundamental property. Locality is a decomposition issue involving cycles of self-reentry (or, alternatively stated, of cosmological self-forgetting, amnesis -- while recomposing the m-logically-valued reference space is Plato’s anamnesis). Lesser levels in efficiency of autopoiesis have chronotopological invariants based on proper subsets of the primes, each with their characteristic step functions and waveforms. (Though these subsets can be put into one-to-one correspondence with the set of all primes, their distribution patterns vary.)
Gödel used prime numbers to encode each element of a logical statement. He defined a specific prime number as corresponding to the “equals sign”, for instance. And another for “plus”, and another for “minus”, and so on. The product obtained by multiplying together all such prime number factors (which, taken together, encode the given logical proposition) is called a Gödel number. So, all possible statements have their equivalent Gödel numbers. Any real number can be factored uniquely into a product of prime numbers.
This Gödel methodology for proving his famous theorem is, of course, a very sophisticated form of gematria, sharing properties with Kabbalah -- the portion of gematria missing from Gödel's treatment being the point-set topology associated in Kabbalistic thought with each Hebrew, Greek, or Sanskrit letter. In the present context, consider Stan Tenen’s discoveries, and consider them relative to operator-time. (Operator-time would be characterized by the hypercomplex zeta function, which we believe our canonical equation for harmonic temperature oscillation of p-electron parcels of superconductant DNA can be understood as -- via Julia’s work on primes and critical Hagedorn temperatures.) Tenen’s topologically configured strips (gematric equivalents to the first sentence of Genesis in Hebrew) are Gödel-encoded segments of Riemann’s critical band (as it meanders the multi-sheeted Riemann surface) corresponding to invariants of classes of temporal operation on the m-logically-valued reference space.
So, were the Gödel-numbered point-set topologies of Gödel-encoded m-logically-valued propositions to be Riemann surface mapped, every point on the multiple single-valued sheets would have a number associated with it -- some prime, some non-prime. Logical propositions of m-1 and less values would be equivalent to lattices of prime-number points, the values of which are multiplied together (such multiplication being very much like neuronal firing pattern sequences mapped on Szentagothai’s multi-sheeted model of the cerebral cortex). The Gödel numbers resulting from this multiplication would be located on points on the m-logically-valued reference space (the most densely point-packed Riemann surface sheet). The fully-Gödel-numbered m-logically-valued reference space would, thus, contain all possible propositions (which is a very good notion of a “degenerative” universal grammar, i.e., based on archetypal decomposition, rather than recursive generation) in superposition of factorial involutes mapped as lattices on the decomposed single-valued multiple Riemann surface sheets. We believe these lattices are “Regge lattices”, and the involved propositional calculi, Wheeler’s “pregeometry”.
Gödel did not prove that arithmetic is more fundamental than logic; he proved that arithmetic is more fundamental than 2-valued logic. Gödel did not prove impossible Leibniz’s dream of a universal calculable language; he proved such language (i.e., Musculpt, laser Esperanto, holographic Volopuk, logovisual technology) impossible under 2-valued logic. Just as written mathematical notation is inadequate to transcribe m-logically-valued modes of thought (which require Musculpt as mathematical notation), so proof is no longer an interesting mathematical problem/exercise: no obvious self-evident axioms; no final or first cause; no ultimate decidability, making all decidabilities relative.
Proof is a relatively meaningful, but fundamentally meaningless, move in a glass-bead game. Other mathematical activities are far more interesting: injunctions, interrogatories, proclamations, constructions: in the real world, a priori and a posteriori are identity-transparent Kantian categories of unus mundus. The physical universe we are conscious of is the unconscious we strive to bring into consciousness. Not in(t)here is not out(t)here! Non-orientable self-reference is a matter of difficulty only under 2-valued logic. Not only is the thing-in-itself unknowable; not only is there no thing-in-itself to know; but the “itself” purported to be distinguishable from the “thing” to be known is no-thing, knowable or unknowable.
We believe that the rules of dodecaphonic music composition Schoenberg evolved in the second decade of the 20th century (in Vienna with Kandinsky, where the two briefly exchanged the roles of musician and painter) for post-atonal composition can be applied to Gödel encoding of logical propositions, such that the universal grammar, contained in the transfinite set of Gödel numbers on the m-logically-valued reference space, can be displayed/played as Musculpt. We believe Kandinsky's ideas, like “a triangle can only be yellow”, explicated in On the Spiritual in Art (1910), was in direct reaction to Planck’s notion of a quantum of action and an attempt to crystallize the synaesthetic colored-hearing aspects of Musculpt he was soon to paint as universal grammar of form in process, which can be rigorously developed by studying frequency correlates of Gödel numbers which involute into logical propositions arrayed on the multiple sheets as lattices. The harmonic statements plotted on dodecaphonic composition matrices can be stacked, and clearly can be Gödel encoded, which means that an m-logically-valued argument can be played back musically and holo-sculpturally. Or, vice versa, music-sculpture topologies can be decrypted into their equivalent logical propositions.
Gödel’s definitions on primes, relative to “equals”, “plus”, “minus”, and so on, thus, need to be empirically verified relative to nature’s form in process. His specific choices for prime number codons were made on basis of the glass-bead game play which concerned him. Other choosing algorithms related to classes of natural process (such as severe storm genesis, DNA generated coherent waves) would establish other sets of prime number codons generating other classes of Gödel numbers (including those generated under m-valued logics and “axiooooomitized”; relative to non-self-identical numbers in MOON).
But this “direction” of formulation is ego-complex inverted from the unus mundus case. The universal consciousness (“collective unconscious” from perspective of the ego-complex) moves as Musculpt. In order for Musculpt movement to enter (more accurately “congeal”) a brain, trigger neuronal firing patterns, and thus engage in spontaneous localization, it must involutionally Gödel encode: this is why the ancient world was so transfixed by gematria, by stellar configurations (point sets) as astrological propositions, injunctions, interrogatories, proclamations, constructions. Paradoxically, and tragically, the Inca appear to have succumbed to 200 Spaniards by being thus transfixed. The question is, Is there a universal grammar of Gödel encoding for the hierarchy of Russellian types of Gödel numbers?
What is most interesting to me about Gödel's work is that he chose to ignore Emil Post's m-valued logics, which were on the scene for over a decade when Gödel published his famous proof. This choice on the part of Gödel is roughly on a par with the performance of G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann at about the same time, i.e., three years prior to the Nazi invasion of Poland, the home ground of m-valued logics. (See: “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics”, Annals of Mathematics, 37, 1936.)
One truly must wonder at the extraordinary lengths the mind is willing to go in order to avoid looking the multivalue straight in the face. Here, Birkhoff and von Neumann recognized that quantum logic has some relation to projective geometry, but where is the Riemann surface stack? Though some doubt is cast on the utility of Hilbert space, where is the recognition that every point in the referencing phase-space is multivalued, that translation across a single-valued sheet is projected as a static lattice to the multivalued referencing function-space? How strange that they should invoke the concept of a logical “lattice”, but not view it as a true point-set topology!
These logical lattices of Birkhoff and von Neumann, of course, are of the essence of Post's µTm logics (1921). Standard Aristotelean-Baconian-Boolean logic is a 1T2 logic. Two values are available, one of which is permitted per proposition. This is logic reduced to truth-value and all the standard syllogistic rules. Post generalized this to the µTm case, where all logical values available are permitted per proposition.
On the Riemann surface stack of single-valued sheets, there are 1, 2, 3… values available on successive sheets, but only one permitted per proposition (represented by a given logical lattice of connected points). All the values on equivalent points on each such sheet are stacked on their equivalent point on the multivalued reference space (most-dense sheet), where there are m-values available and m-values permitted per proposition. Gödel numbering of these m-valued logical lattices necessarily involves expanding the universe of discourse which has grown up around the famed Riemann Hypothesis on distribution of prime numbers (which are factors of Gödel numbers).
With similarly inexplicable myopia, Birkhoff and von Neumann used involutory relations and the concept of skew-fields, but the multivalue screaming in the background, without which skew-fields are impossible, was completely ignored (along with the whole notion of skew-parallelism, qua skew-perpendicularity, underlying skew-fields, with its profound implications for Riemann's thesis on the origins of charge, Heisenberg's indeterminacy, and resultant non-conservation of energy and virtual phonon exchange underlying mechanisms of high temperature superconductivity, such as that of DNA). Dropping distributive laws for 2-valued propositions, indeed! Can laughter be suppressed? B and vN knew of Post's logics, just as did G. These missing recognitions by Birkhoff and von Neumann are not ignorance speaking; they are expressions of psychological dread. And this paper, summarizing at the very least a decade of collective psychoneurotic posturing, was published a mere three years before the inevitable avalanche of consequences!
In arriving at his famous proof, Gödel falsely assumed that: (1) “language A” is orientable, i.e., that “in language A” can be absolutely distinguished from “not-in language A”; (2) infinite regress is linear in nature, i.e., that regresses are not self-reentrant marches; (3) description reduces to truth tables, i.e., that there is nothing in logic more fundamental than truth-value; (4) logical calculi are limited to only one order of logical-value, i.e., the 2-valued variety; (5) single-valued propositions are the only legitimate propositions, i.e., that self-contradiction is a violation of the rules of all logics; (6) completeness is an absolutely meaningful notion, i.e., that there are no languages for which completeness is undefinable -- which is not the case for languages involving use of logical calculi with orders of logical value greater than two and propositions with logical values greater than one.
We wonder, What is the Gödel number of this 6-fold proposition?
Gödel numbers need to be plotted, not calculated! More accurately stated: factors of m-valued Gödelized propositions need to be plotted on the Riemann surface sheet stack composing the Musculpt manifold, not calculated to supposed single definite values which non-self-identical numbers do not authentically possess. The collapsed-value of a superposed number (such as a Gödel number), localized on the Cartesian grid, is not the full measure of this number. Single-valued Gödelized propositions are a special case (likely a trivial case, cosmologically speaking) of all the m-valued Gödelized propositions there are in this world.
Non-self-identical superposed numbers are not numerical values! They are FORMS of Musculpt, i.e., archetypes. Arithmetic operations involving such numbers are carried out by operator-time. Non-self-identical superposed numbers are “dreamtime” configurations of “songlines” (like Riemann's “critical line”). How are such arithmetic operations represented?
Factors of m-valued Gödelized propositions are plotable, even if their multiplied “values” are Turing uncomputable. The resultant plotted lattices are Regge lattices, which are transformable into skew-field curvature configurations by the Regge calculus -- which transforms Einstein's field equations into n-dimensional lattices, and vice versa.
Where do these lattices underlying the semantic sounded-forms of Musculpt fall? Not on the real line. Not on the complex plane. The s (a complex number) of the Euler and Riemann zeta functions is logically 2-valued. Its 1/2 + it does not conform to the requirements of µTm as t ranges. The zeta function's s, like the nk landscape of complexity theory, is formulated in terms of ordinary binary logic. The nk landscape is actually a 2nk landscape (for a fuller account of this see: “M-Valuation in a Generalized Currency Basket”) where the elements in question must be either on or off.
This is a highly relevant comparison because k indicates the number of correlations between the involved elements or factors, n, and, also, because non-self-identical numbers under m-valued logics are numbers in superposition (i.e., correlated) stacked on a point in the reference space. Generalizing the landscape under µTm yields an Mnk landscape.
Were the elements or factors arrayed on this landscape prime factors of Gödel numbers of m-valued propositions, the s of the zeta function would become sM. Now, the power set (set of all subsets of the original set) in Cantor's continuum hypothesis has 2n members, just like the nk landscape of complexity theory has 2n elements or factors. This is a statement about cardinality: the power set has cardinality n.
The power set of non-self-identical numbers of cardinality n, however, is 2nk -- correlations being involved in the non-self-identical. But this is an incomplete statement, because we are not talking about only the relationships between members of the set (i.e., the many ways in which they can be arrayed into subsets), but about their changing animistic identity transparency under increasing orders of logical-value, m. The power set under m-valued logics is not identical to the power set under 2-valued logic.
The m-logically-valued power set of non-self-identical numbers of cardinality n, is actually Mnk, where M is the order of logical-value and k the number of correlation factors (of the involved logical lattice with n bifurcation points). Under such considerations, however, Riemann's zeta s could not be merely a complex number; it would have to be a hypercomplex number, because the complex plane is a 1T2 logical construct.
Constructs of order µTm are beyond the complex plane. sM is the order of hypercomplexity of s. The m-logically-valued power set of non-self-identical numbers, sM, of cardinality n, is 
. On this power-set continuum, not Cantor's, can we begin to plot the Gödel number factors of the m-valued logical lattices underlying the sounded-forms of Musculpt semantics.
It is only non-self-identical numbers that make the notion of “cardinality of the continuum” plausible. Degrees of identity transparency, of order m, between the discrete and the continuous, dictated by µTm orders of logic, is the fundamental modification of Peano's axioms required. It can be seen that under Post's logics there is no limit to the number of infinities between that of the natural numbers and that of the continuum, such that, for instance, the “critical line” of Riemann's hypothesis has a unique shadow line under each order of logical-value greater than 1T2.
Actually, we do not regard consistency an inherent attribute of any “possible world semantic”, except those world semantics of the 1T2 variety. But, then, I do not regard any possible world semantic as merely possible, for the “possible” 1T2-variety world semantics are actually treatments of the variety of µTm world semantics as if they were merely possible -- merely possible, that is, because consistency is mistakenly considered an inalienable right of world semantics qua world semantics. I must, however, protest that this is no small, purely theoretical, matter in an esoteric corner of one of the myriad fields of logic. If, as regards the 1/2 + it of the Riemann zeta function, the t defined as a Hermitian operator on Hilbert space, as some have suggested (including Hilbert himself), the “semantic” (import of the involved quantum logic, that is) of some “possible” (in consensus quantum theory, “probable”, however improbable) world is subject to interpretation under µTm such that it becomes iTM, where T would be an m-logically-valued Hermitian operator on an m-logically-sheeted Hilbert space. In such a Hilbert space under such a Hermitian operator, the idea of consistency one can entertain becomes a very peculiar notion, indeed. The orders of truth table multiply without bound. Moreover, the double-exponentials associated with such truth-tables indicate they literally turn an imaginary corner (truth table deposed in hyperdimensions) in propositional space, meaning that the i of iTM indicates, not only that the involved numbers have an imaginary component as Riemann's zeta function indicates, but, when given any interpretation whatsoever, so must their resultant contextual meanings have imaginary components: when 1T2 goes to 2Tm to 3Tm to 4Tm and so on, the imaginary semantic dimensions of the involved worlds multiply hand over foot, as consideration of G. Spencer Brown's calculus of indications would indicate.
In face of unbounded and exponentiated orders of truth table, we personally prefer superposed “actual”, as opposed to separate “possible”, world semantics. Just as Everett-Wheeler-Graham (EWG) argued on basis of linear-time-bound thermodynamic considerations that their multiple universes (mapped in a 1T2-logic-constructed Hilbert space) are incommunicado, in solitary confinement, so Saul Kripke, in constructing world semantics on basis of possibilities, rather than actualities, treats, by direct implication, any meaning-intersections between worlds-of-meaning as tantamount to trivial: worlds of horse-sense, pig-sense, dirty-rat-sense, and so on are overwhelmingly 1T2 worlds unto themselves. Both the EWG and Kripke cases so transparently justify the individualistic mode of ego-sphere-identity, caught in inherent alienation and anomie of Existential “separatism”, one is inclined, on that basis alone, to reject them.
Saul Kripke has long been committed to this notion of identity as the only possible world semantic of identity (as a Kantian category). In 1976, if memory serves, Kripke delivered a lecture at Cornell University mistitled in campus promotion as “Time and Eternity”. He began the public lecture by informing his audience that the correct title was “Time and Identity”. Everyone had a good laugh, as all knew no reputable philosopher would be caught these days lecturing on eternity. Some of the more informed in the audience, however, would have been the more happy had the logician lectured on eternity as opposed to identity in relation to linear-time, or more happily yet on eternity in relation to identity, as the monotonic notion of identity he derived (implicitly as a Kantian category) from linear-time-only so thoroughly neglected the variety of identity constructs experienced historically by the human species, one had to wonder whether or not the promotional snafu was a possible cosmic joke. This possible joke, if it was indeed actual and cosmic, was all the more poignant in that the imaginary corner inevitably turned in propositional truth-table space through double-exponentials is an imaginary turn away from truth-value toward animistic identity transparency, which imaginary turn Kripke's derivation of monotonic identity from linear-time-only implicitly rejected -- which rejection, of course, is a foundational assumption of his "possible world semantics", i.e., configurations of meaning arrived at through nonmonotonic reasoning about monotonic identity.
I'm not actually reporting to Greco, don't know whom to report to. If ever I find out, I'll let you know. Long ago stopped with the brief-backs. Aspects. Not exactly Chomsky “Aspects” -- but possibly those, too. Spread over every religion, every cultural set, are Aspects of the Perennial, virtually all of which have been suppressed by one or another form of etching. There is no reconstructing the deconstruction without aspectival resurrection to full accountancy -- which is not necessarily Against Method or Against the Modern World. The truly postmodern may well be primordial. But the scientific issues are so intractable, entrenched, institutionalized, there is no expectation to be entertained from that direction. PPP on ya, yellow dawg! Parsonian Power Parsing. International institutions instituted as quasi combat arms of the WWII victors, aid as neo-imperialism/extractionism, multilaterals as fiat money-pumpers to financial-sector players, as panderers of moral hazard and premium-free insurers of the billionaires created by closure of the gold-exchange window, exchange-rate-market interventions, and bailouts with freely-“printed” monies. Kleptocracy of the more subtle variety, certainly a symptom of… When I walked into Li Jiang, China, there had been thousands of years of uninterrupted organic farming in the valley, and no use whatsoever of pesticides or herbicides (but that's the past: soil in China is being depleted 57 times faster than nature can replace it; see Andrew Hough, “Britain facing food crisis as world's soil 'vanishes in 60 years'”, London Telegraph, 3 February 2010). Isolated enough to grow certified seed, like the Bella Coola Valley, B.C., Canada -- another favorite place of mine. The nutritional value of the food in Li Jiang was unprecedented to the modern eater: a rush like an IV injection of epinephrine; after a week, bowel-transforming. And now, on top of plummeting nutritional value in an endangered food supply and depletion of other commodities, yet another class of derivatives marked only to national boundaries: derivatives of carbon trades. Soon, LiveSoil derivatives, given that arable soil is depleting so rapidly, soil structure destroyed wholesale, composting no longer even a cultural lag: the old Meiji-Taisho gardener I worked under would not allow soil in his propagation beds to be turned with a spade, only a garden fork. There was a man concerned with soil structure! And later, when the involved problems cusp, mimetic estrogen pollution trading derivatives, and EM pollution trading derivatives, and GMO degradation trading derivatives, phosphates, water, fishing, and so on -- all marked to only 1T2-logical boundaries of the single scale level of the nation-state. Hey, military childhood; trade school for diplomats; Special Operations Research Office; Special Forces Training Group; intelligence analyst, JFK Special Warfare Center, Psychological Operations Group; advisor, Technical Intelligence Detachment, 525th Military Intelligence Group; target analyst, Targets Branch, Combined Intelligence Center, Vietnam; analyst, Strategic Research and Analysis, MACV-J2: I'm an unmitigated realist. So much a realist, I know I do not possess the cognitive capacity to develop the degree of pessimism prerequisite to full-blown realism relative to realities of the present global conundrum. Simply cannot get my head around it all. But enough cognitive capacity to be aware that monetary system conventions (as distinct from system behaviors) have always come out of the barrel of a gun, have always been politically motivated, not economically so, such that nothing I am speaking about here could possibly be implemented prior to the coming cuspover. And how much of the requisite technology will survive that cuspover? How many, and their progeny (considering the Tzarist precedent) remotely construable as responsible will survive that cuspover, given the collective hysteria sure to be unleashed, as bodyguards become the greatest risk? Yep, the fine art of “fragging” -- a lost art? Sins of the father. This Man, of Last and First Men, appears, 200-years ago, to have subliminally “decided” he simply would rather not make it. Far better to renormalize anything found unacceptable, than actually to adapt. But, hello, interior Musculpt Samadhi, primordially speaking, was never technologically exteriorized, so who can arrogate the moral authority to gainsay such a subliminal collective “decision”? Particularly as action-based actors and communication-based communicators in active communication of Communicative Action be deemed simply-identifiable only. Janet Daley seems to get it, somewhat:
The nation-state has never quite recovered from the bad name it acquired in the last century as the progenitor of world war. But if it is to be relegated to the dustbin of history then we had better come up with new mechanisms for allowing people to have a say in how they are governed. (“There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government”, The London Telegraph, 19 December 2009)
I've been “running” (from, more precisely, the modern world) for many years, right down the socioeconomic scale, transforming wants to needs, needs to necessities -- full spectrum of amenities being most elaborate where traditional socialities somehow have more or less maintained -- despite, even, holocausts. Unfortunately, there is no interest in “new mechanisms” because there is no tolerance for new fundamentals -- and hasn't been for a hundred years and more. And why is that -- other than the fact of the dominance of the dumbest? Consider that the Brits are the world's leaders in advocacy across the full spectrum of environmental “concerns” -- which, of course, is very good, and surely in no small part due to their landscape gardening tradition -- but, at the same memetime, some of their most illustrious scientists, i.e., scientists who control the institutions, have for decades, and for obvious reasons, been the most entrenched stick-in-the-mud insistors upon a “classical limit”. Speaking, today, of degrees of cognitive dissonance, culture to culture, society to society, nation-state to nation-state, is moot, the dimensions of such degrees being so enormous. Yet, the UK must top the list. The Copenhagen Accord is not only a disappointment; it is a travesty and a joke. Lords Hah-Hah, once again, this time as the world's leading personages. Who would sit down to dinner with those people? And as far as I can ascertain, no attendee, including the Brits, raised any substantive issue concerning climate-shift forcing functions other than greenhouse gases -- let alone as regards contentious issues concerning fundamental principles of atmospheric science. How much egg on the face there will be when it is finally acknowledged that chaos theory is a 1T2-logical 2nk-handling of m-logically-valued processes! It's as if atmospheric science -- owning the weather, weather as military force, artificial ionospheric mirror, smart nanoclouds, counter weather, virtual weather, artificial weather, aimed lightning strikes, HF-induced electron beams, artificial ionization patch, chemical injections to modify the ionosphere, electron-temperature enhancement, space weather modification, magnetospheric modification, climate modification, anthropogenic hot aurora, and so on -- were an understood science, because, beyond controversy, it is a classical science, which is very far from the actual case. I invite you to spend 40 hours a week for five years studying atmospheric physics, and, if, after that, you can still regard meteorology an understood science, I will kowtow to you.
Yes, I do definitely believe that the concept of “deautomatization” -- designating an unstable transition state between two stable states -- applies to all dynamical systems undergoing far-from-equilibrium phase transitions, including climate shift of Earth's atmosphere. An interesting portrait of atmospheric deautomatization at climate shift -- where all extremes prevail -- is provided in the long series of farmer comments on the weather given in Eric deCarbonnel's “2010 Food Crisis for Dummies”, MarketSkeptics, 17 December 2009. The facets, dimensions, sectors, elements -- whatever one wishes to call them -- of the prevailing global crisis are superintegrated, over-determined relative to one another, so far beyond any notion that can be pulled out of the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm, upon which the existing institutional base is still altogether predicated, that, surely, there has not been a possibility of general comprehension, let alone intelligent, not to mention adequate, institutional response.
Pareto efficiency of markets is a zero-sum sorting demon presiding over a 1T2-logical growth engine yoked to positive or negative feedbacks, only, in a linear-time (i.e., memetime) sequence by renormalization of F. A. von Hayek's “the time-shapes of total capital stock”. The collection of time-shapes available (i.e., the right-hand C of CTC) at any instant of memetime is transfinite. Admit time-shapes, and 19th-century thermodynamics is indefinable (except over a linear-time shape, i.e., memetime). Just because 19th-century thermodynamics is indefinable does not mean there is no thermodynamics! Admit that open systems are not equivalent to non-orientable systems and, with the non-orientable, growth is not essential to efficient allocation, which is to say not essential “simply to organize”. Filter time-shapes from worldview construct and aspects of natural processes go unobserved, e.g., the cascade of complex angular momentum leading to tornadogenesis (with such filtration, m-logically-valued tornadogenesis -- involving “acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes” -- can only be viewed an expression of 1T2-logical chaos/complexity). Non-Pareto efficient economic organization without tacit pretension to perpetual growth-motion can only transpire by accessing the m-logically-valued time-shapes of natural processes currently filtered from worldview construct. One area within which to look for such access is “acoustic analogues to black hole computers”. Computed twists between real, complex, and hypercomplex momenta (requiring 3-fold “imaginary time”) mark shifts between time-shapes. The m-sheeted, nested-grid forecast model generated by the cascade theory of tornadogenesis initialized energy-momentum cascade at each such computed twist. Cornell specialist in tornadogenesis, Douglas A. Paine, was deemed persona non grata in 1972 by the National Science Foundation for submitting an NSF report which described “[acoustic] analogues to black holes in Earth's atmosphere”. A decade or so later, Hawking formulated his notion of “imaginary time”. Approximately a decade after that, the field of acoustic analogues to black hole computers emerged (but has yet to be applied -- except by Paine-Kaplan back during the late-'60s through the mid-'70s) within atmospheric science to acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes, which remain filtered from the primitive equation set employed in severe-storm and climate forecast models.
How much post-WWII morale operations penetrated mathematics and the hard sciences, I certainly do not know; but, clearly, from the early-'70s, as the world has more and more geared up for space-based Planetary War I, availability of justifications for such subversion of academic disciplines has greatly increased. Consideration of the range of variables likely involved in AGW, alone, provides a range of relevant concerns in this regard. A “classical limit” and chaos/complexity modeling, for two instances, well serve the required justifications. Think about exactly how. Moreover, a civilization readying its every dimension for war in Earth's upper atmosphere is hardly on the verge of decentralizing via m-logically-valued LETS -- a notion developed for realization during the post-cuspover period (a period I personally have no plans to be around to see) and understood to be possible only if prefiguration were accomplished prior to cuspover. Thirty years ago, I thought such prefiguration eminently possible; nowadays, that judgment seems to have been more than a bit naive. Live and learn. And if you learn, turn, turn, turn away into interior Musculpt: e.g., luminous purple color-field spiraling upon bright-gold embroidered dollies inside of dollies inside of dollies (endlessly fractal curves) -- fuuwap, fuuwap, fuuwap: “stairway of 10,000 virgins” -- deep under alpha, far removed from theta, being Lukasiewiczian, as they are. Each fuuwap being what “enlightened” linear-time-bound cognizers regard the space of a given incarnation.
I'm a pretty smart guy, am I. Had I liked life in the modern world, the American way of life, the good life, the EU imprint, the Japanese willow world, the Southeast Asian primate city, I would have participated, made a lot of money, spent a lot of money, serviced my ego, over-ate, defecated in proportion, died a consummate consumer: one more coveting a Rolex when linear-time is mere memetime, unforgiven for knowing exactly what he/she/it do. Having more or less grown up in America, I knew the basic Hollywood and New York Times coloring-book cutouts and recipes: could have picked one or two simple ideas, dumbed them down, added bad guys subverting the Cartesian-Newtonian system-that-works, good guys protecting it, a double-edged-sword technological innovation, and written a catastrophe thriller during the early-'80s. But one has got to want to participate, one does, doesn't one, to make such sterling contributions; otherwise, there is no motivation, is there. For instance, soon after Time Storm (Gordon R. Dickson, St. Martins, 1977) came out, I wrote the author and told him he didn't know how right he is. Did not hear back, of course. Why does one think “acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes” have been filtered from atmospheric models since the late-1940s? The reason given, not the actual reason? Because no atmospheric wave travels at the speed of sound. Fair enough. True enough. But which Earth atmosphere are we talking about? The one in which 1T2-logical prediction requires a detailing of the spatial field or the one in which µTm-logical prediction requires description of a Planckian elemental oscillator? The “real” atmosphere or the “imaginary” atmosphere? Would a time storm (involving even only “first-order temporal curl”) transpire in the real-numbered space of Earth's atmosphere or that atmosphere's imaginary-numbered space? Is “imaginary” space just like “real” space -- only in a different “direction”? Personally, I don't think so. If, according to Hoyle, life was transmitted to Earth from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy -- nowadays, say the DNA Nebula -- what “device” could have been the receiver? Ever hear of the long-discredited “vortex theory of matter”? Well, I'm certainly not suggesting such vortices as receivers of DNA-wave imprints, but how about a tornado? Not a “real” tornado, an “imaginary” one. Does one think there is any significance to the co-occurrence -- a Jungian-Pauli synchronicity, that is -- of an Earth climate shift, possibly also Mars, advent of genetic engineering, and half a century (read John von Neumann's papers of the early-'50s on weather manipulation) of human preparations for space-based Planetary War I in Earth's upper atmosphere? The collective unconscious is something of a “Trickster”, as Jung so well essayed: regressively mimicking the “form in process” of natural systems, forms not consciously elaborated. Add to that the prevailing popular fascination with the ancient notion of a universal language/grammar/code -- generative universal grammar (encoded into the genome), Hebrew Cabala, Greek gematria, Sanskrit yantra/mantra, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Laws of Form, Unified Science Movement via universal form language, The Next Development in Man, The Cosmic Code, The Miracle Strain, and so on and so on -- and with the peoples of the involved books, and one would do well to pray for pre-tribulation rapture, rather than one of the post-trib varieties. Had one attended American Meteorological Society severe-local-storms conferences during the late-'60s and early-'70s, one might have run across a discourse incorporated into various preprints -- in the original, little more than a long series of equations -- describing rationale of the notion “temporal curl” in derivation of “The Atmospheric Analogue to Maxwell's Equations”. This derivation was developed by way of explaining the radiation of “acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes” by severe local storms, including tornadoes -- not the “real” storms, their “imaginary” counterparts. During the 19th century, J. C. Maxwell developed his electromagnetic wave equations explicitly upon a hydrodynamic analogy. The severe-storms derivation involving “temporal curl” was a 20th-century reversal of Maxwell's analogical method (this time from electromagnetics to hydrothermodynamics), a veritable retrograde inversion involving solitary waves, solitons, like tsunamis -- not the “real” ones, of course, those “imaginary”. Maxwell based his equation writing not only upon a fluid analogy, but also upon the experiments conducted by Faraday with twisted wires, with coils. In the Genesis of severe local storms, there's a whole lotta twistin' goin' on: twist and shout (archetypal nature of childhood games) -- the “shout” being “acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes” which, being infrasonic, and involved with “well wires”, cannot be heard by the human ear, but can be “heard” by migratory birds, for instance (probably also by premodern Aboriginals as “songlines”). These wave modes develop “secondaries” when interacting with landforms, lake fetches, and so on: some bird varieties use these secondaries for local homing -- star maps and magnetic field for long-range navigation. Is the consciousness of migratory birds “located” in the “real” atmosphere or the “imaginary” atmosphere? Indeed, is the “imaginary” atmosphere the real atmosphere? The physics behind “temporal curl” (Special Relativity extended: e.g., Starr, V. P, Tellus, 9:1, 1959) and “The Atmospheric Analogue to Maxwell's Equations” involves a Spanish generalization (Iraundegui, J., Revta. Geofis., 11:43, 1952) -- non-classical-limit-type ideas have been engaged with atmospheric/oceanographic science for a long memetime; including the Soviets, from the early-1920s -- of a famous theorem in meteorology: Hans Ertel's potential vorticity theorem. Iraundegui's generalization harked back to Maxwell's reliance upon Faraday, and is sort of like counting the number of “twists” to a Faraday coil -- not the “real” twists, of course, those “imaginary”. One could reasonably say that the count of these “twists” is a signature of the emitted solitary wave. There being many such waves emitted in trains at severe-storm Genesis, one could reasonably say that the count of such counts is a cipher of some sort of esoteric code -- particularly if collections of such codons are in one-to-one correspondence with other properties of the atmosphere, e.g., the topological configurations of “equivalent potential temperature surfaces” or, more “real”, the banding patterns exhibited by hail-producing storms (atmospheric time-storm “barcode”: regard it as Orphic-Rayonist Neo-Plasticism). Incidentally, this one-to-one correspondence actually exists and can be taken as one example of the physical principle by which synaesthetic fusion of music and sculpture into Musculpt transpires: a principle Scriabin and Kandinsky hoped to find, but didn't. What if air parcels enter the environment of a tornado-producing severe local storm -- “local” in the “real” atmosphere, “nonlocal” in the “imaginary” atmosphere -- in a double-helical flow pattern, as they, indeed, do, by virtue of an underlying “imaginary” spacetime double-helix? What would that bespeak about “acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes”? These modes would involve quadripolar waves, waves with four poles. Could each such pole have something to do with the esoteric code of the count-of-counts of “imaginary” twists? Classes of count-of-counts couple to a given type of pole? What kind of classes? Can't merely be numbers as “real” sets, “real” cuts, because the twists are “imaginary” and counts of the “imaginary” are “imaginary-imaginary” and counts of such counts are “imaginary-imaginary-imaginary”. So, maybe some other kind of numbering is involved: a prime number for each “twist”; Gödel numbers for counts of “imaginary” twists or “temporal curls”; and Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers for counts of such counts. But Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers do not have to do with propositions of traditional logic; they have to do with Musculpted symformphonie of m-valued Lukasiewicz logics. Does that mean Karpenko Lukasiewiczian functors over the primes, as expressions of the counts of counts of “imaginary” twists (temporal curls), are decomposition products (Abel-Bell cyclotomic involutes/cascades) of manifold topological configurations of “equivalent potential temperature surfaces”? And if so, what does that tell us about tornadogenesis? Indeed, what does it tell us about “imaginary” morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis? Does DNA free-electron gas core have analogues to “equivalent potential temperature surfaces” (by virtue of radiation-induced electron-temperature enhancements)? Does DNA emit “imaginary”, quadripolar, coherent waves one-to-one correlated with the four nucleotide-pairs (see: Paine, D. A. and W. L. Pensinger, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 15:3, 1979: could this paper have been written without prior discussions of the internal workings of a “genescope” transmitter/receiver)? Are these waves involved with higher levels of the genetic language? Are the higher, m-level, quantum relative-state cipher codes of the genetic language identity-transparent with properties of the environment and “enumerated” as Gödel numbers and Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, the numbered propositions and symformphonie guiding embryogenesis, more generally morphogenesis, according to functors over Tzog-chen AllBase Buddhological “imaginary” MVRS (multi-valued reference space)? Has socialization of affect/cognition by glutamatergic neuronal etching, i.e., Allan Schore's origin and dysregulation and disorders and regulation and repair of the single-valued/singly-logically-valued egoic self (Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994) “veiled” human conscious awareness of MVRS via a reduction of cogitation to only the binary order-type out of the continuum-infinity of order-types available? Did DNA coherent waves have to propagate to “get here” from the center of the galaxy (do coherent waves of nuclear-intraneuronal DNA have to propagate to “get to” cell-wall/plasmahaut?) -- or are they always already nonlocally “herethere” and just need the right sort of “decoder ring” to be “real”ized, a “ring” like a tornado or its “primordial soup” precursor? Is this the case for all “forcing functions” of decomposition/cascade, all involutory/cyclotomic “natural cycles”, including climatic cycles? And what happens to functionality of “decoder rings” if Earth's “imaginary” upper atmosphere is anthropogenically manipulated in preparation for space-based Planetary War I? Under what circumstances does nature no longer nurture? Could some bad-guy conclave of the super-rich get hold of this and, for all the usual Hollywood-Freudianisms, try to destroy the Cartesian-Newtonian system-that-works? Trouble is, to have written this “up to” a catastrophe thriller during the early-'80s, I would have had to have had the motivation, I would, wouldn't I.
If I remember my reaction -- generally, three days after reading a thriller I forget what it is about -- Michael Cordy's The Miracle Strain is another piece of propaganda for the CD-GGmen (Central Dogma-Genetic Gestapo). DDD (Dumbing-Down Disinformation) is highly rewarded, and I am certain Cordy made a lot of money on the book, offering, as he did, such a pristine statement of the Central Dogma: genes instruct absolutely everything along one-way streets. Even on the basis of the molecular biology of the gene alone, it has been known since the 1970s that the McCarthy Era Central Dogma (so commercially necessary to genetic engineering) does not hold: one needn't consider quantum properties of DNA, let alone quantum non-simple identity (swarm or not), and quantum relative-state, to reach this conclusion. Irreversibility, single-valued codons, single-level cipher system, linear-time evolution wrapped in a package designed to entice anti-animist/anti-pagan Christian fundamentalists: wasn't Cordy a marketeer before writing this recombinant hagiography/paean?
What do I mean? Well… Huu-huu-huu! Rather an anthropomorphism, shouldn't one feel, to imagine life had to have been written-down/read-out before it could be realized? Being who they are -- afflicted bread -- against what -- Cabalistic brainspread -- they are, they remembered, of the Zohar, the letters engraved on tablets, forgot the letters all of Israel saw flying through space in every direction. If one happened to have had severe cognitive impairment -- Casablanca -- imposed, successfully underwent higher enculturation and all the wretched rest, sustained a glutamatergic, well-etched, egoic selfhood committed “to take charge of its destiny”, then -- Heh-heh-heh! -- one has likely extrojected introns and introjected extrons, so as to very selectively open-frame one's reading -- excluding K-Deva's principle of intertextuality, of course, literary relative-state ignored according to 1T2-logic rules of start-or-stop binary switches, as if that 2nk, single logic-level, single scale-level switch type were the only switch type there were in this m-logically-valued world/landscape, with its various bodyswarms. The GEs -- Genetic Engineers, germ-cell focus -- and their Saviors from Genetic Disease, stem-cell focus, filter quantum scale-level chemistry of the genome, tagging even the galaxy the DNA comes from, as having no biological significance; plus they filter the vast bulk of human DNA molecular-level codons, lowest-order encryption only, as nothing but gibberish because that bulk cannot be read into their single logic-level, 1T2-logic, warfare-imprinted notion of human body-identity (i.e., binary self-or-nonself immunological selfsameness-only recognition), and its structure and function. Renormalizing biology, just as atmospheric science has been renormalized. Only by re-scaling (i.e., glutamatergic socialization of cognition to origin of a “self”) nested swarms to The Swarm, i.e., “globalization” in biology, can life and death be 1T2-logically defined. How to make globalization work, hah-hah-hah! I mean… What could one possibly mean under such collective-cognitive circumstances? One certainly could not mean: Just as proteomics expresses genomics, so genomics expresses quantal operator-time (third, second, and first-order temporal curl) -- but given the omni-“directional”, m-logically-valued nature of quantum relative-state, the memetime-bound notion “expresses” cannot have the topological and logical properties currently attributed to it. Causality no longer being a 1T2-logical, antecedent-consequent relation (cause-effect, chance, statistical, probabilistic, chaotic) but a multi-termed relation under many logical-value order-types. But one could not possibly mean this because, if so, that would mean rejection of tacitly-given governmental social contracts for action-based sociologies over corpora of absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct individual actors, and enunciation of a preference for quantum relative-state identity-transparency as m-logically-valued “engine” of spontaneous self-organization -- the nth degree of Asiatic/peasant/tribal (not mandarinate, clan, caste, court kowtow culture), mere, what today are called, “relationships of trust”. If one fashions one's notion of time appropriately, one can get the type of historiography one wants, and if one chooses one's historiography well, one selects the only class of scenario architectures (i.e., graphed array of permitted causal factors) one is willing to consider: this gives one the illusion of control over futures. But then one might, as a cognitive “externality” of this renormalization/filtering, misconstrue various properties of natural processes, e.g., mistake climate change as being identical to greenhouse warming.
Hoshana! Hoshana! Hermeneutical connection or dysconnexion? Major philosophical issue debated over decades, right? Having doubly exponentiated Verstehen to Communitas, the notables stood before the village gate as a barrier (check out the classic photo always offered) to insure Confucianism never entered: leave that mandarin muck to the upper classes, the urbane, the culture of the court! Monogamy not practiced here, never has been, never will be, frequent movement between several life partners, kinship bonding values behind the village gate, not “family” values (deteriorates to “second-wife trauma”); hierarchicization of kinship imputations beyond the village gate under the rhetorical guise of a moral economy, importune/opportune in its various classes of obediences. The contemporary service economy has deep historical roots, eh what. One big happy family, right? One big happy Vergemeinschaftung, right? “One” being the controlling word, right? One scale level, right? Now that glutamatergic neuronal etching of human brain to 1T2-logical processing only is undergoing massive anthropogenic amplification… states of consciousness mistaken for physical locations (Central Kingdom, Pure Land, Ersatz Israel, Virgin Land, God's Country…); metaphysics of Aristotelian noesis noeseos thoughts-over-thought mistaken as self of self-presence bei-sich-sein of a people-as-history (“self-remembering” regressed and debased, i.e., removed from AllBase), indeed, a people of this or that book-as-history, say, The Analects, which ain't exactly analogical. Pray for The Last Book! Pray for Musculpt! When “As you were!” is so far removed as to be off the present-day corpus of human brain scans… But who can fret when there are -- by any reasonable criteria -- 4-5 billion too many? Not exactly the same situation as two-thousand years ago, eh? So, what the relevance of the Great Religions? Ah, the Confucianism in post-Confucian, big-man-management societies economies corporations! Uh, and why is neo-Keynesian (the Washington Consensus being Keynes-in-a-closet) globalization but Nazification born again on another scale level? Well, if one wishes to speak of Heinrich's Heinemost, one must acknowledge that people with the courage of their convictions are weeded out all along the way; the nail head that sticks up is loped off (forget pounding it down!); they are not granted higher degrees -- even lower ones, if convictional courage is strong -- don't measure up to professional standards, lack leadership qualities, aren't prized, awarded, elected, stock-optioned: this observation is by now such a cliched assessment, no evidential expose is required by way of justification. One interesting thing about Buddhism is that cause-effect is transincarnational -- i.e., is Riemannian-Sakharovian multi-sheeted, doesn't map within only a given incarnation, whether “incarnations” are understood as sequential, which they aren't, or as stacked under third-order operator-time, which they are (people always transfix on cultural stylistics/display, and simply don't register CONTENT) -- such that the consequences of self-induced karma, the destiny one grabs, cannot be fully deciphered by the binary mind, only suffered, as the apparent endless summer of linear sequence, whatever the given linear sequence might be, seeks its hypothesized, but unrealizable, single-valued limit. As one definitive statement of the involved action-based sociology, consider Joseph E. Stiglitz's “We cannot talk meaningfully about the motivations and intentions of any institution, only of those who constitute and govern it” (Globalization and Its Discontents, Norton, 2002, p. 207). Bah! Konfuzianismus! Give me a general theory of social actors -- not of identity-transparent quantal action. What academic sociologist has directly experienced an instance of the involved odious state? We'll get those Behaviorists, yet -- with a better theory of collective behavior! And don't forget Symbolic Interactionism. Heh-heh-heh! Form follows function, structure follows strategy? Or is it: form is function; structure, strategy? As if the m-slots of a role (wearing many Riemann-surface hats), occupied or not, were not “framework determining conditions”, whatever the Cartesian-Newtonian Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness might have to say about that; as if there were no MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space). And when one looks at (pp. 206-08) the circumlocutions by which Prof. Stiglitz imputes that the IMF primarily serves the special interests of financiers, one sees a truly successful academic at work. Can't just simply state the obvious. Drivel polemic over derivative detail, no address to The Plaza Accords, the closing of the gold-exchange window, the failure (international institutions as quasi combat arms) at Bretton Woods in 1944, the fundaments of the long-prevailing notion of money, why military force insures those fundamentals, why space-weather warfare will, indubitably and unquestionably, be fought over their consequences. Enough said. Paul Krugman, during, and Stiglitz, after, advocated capital controls in response to the 1997 Southeast and East Asia crisis, controls like Malaysia imposed. One or several or a few countries may be able for some period to use these gross tools and benefit without negative fallout -- but that fact should not be confused with an indicator of systemic policies or preferred framework determining conditions. Capital controls are far and away not nesting foams of m-logically-valued monetary units (e.g., computer-gamed price discovery on social capital) over smart, self-modulating, band-pass, fractal e-boundaries. At the memetime, I wrote Prof. Krugman, criticizing in these terms his advice to Malaysia; he was, however, obviously not interested in alternative notions of money. Whatever the percentage of carbon dioxide not leached out by forests and oceans, whatever magnitude of the roles of CFCs and flaring/venting at oil fields in origins of ozone holes, whatever the role of acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes in punching holes in the tropopause boundary allowing drawdown of ozone, AIM (artificial ionospheric mirror) plus AIP (artificial ionization patch): anthropogenic hot auroras, phased-array electron-temperature enhancement, HF-induced e-streams, magnetospheric modification. Into Earth's upper atmosphere is where smart boundaries are being placed, not down here where they are needed.
This is the most accurate observation I've seen lately -- even, longly! Paul Smith (commenting on Ambrose Evans-Pritchard's 2010 forecast, “Global bear rally will deflate as Japan leads the world in sovereign bond crisis”, The London Telegraph, 4 January 2010) exclamaTORYing, if not expleTORYing: “Without money reform -- kiss [it] good bye to the planet!” But ain't nobody interested in m-logically-valued monetary units. So, no kiss will be needed, as Planetary War I unfolds. Won't be long, now.
The Call: great photos, follow the money, Getty, et al. But OMG, highly-funded spiffy propaganda, and absolutely no ideas. I'm still optimistic, however: a 10-percent human survival rate continues to be plausible to me. Given my background, back into the Fifties, what verbal venue could cause me to laugh more fulsomely? Having closely observed my own Book of Hours for a decade and more of root pruning -- repetitively re-mindering “my other I am” to return to observer-state over physical activities, easiest form of practice for concentration in self-observation -- I have no difficulty being dismissive. Know what I mean? Heh-heh-heh.
Quite frankly, I sincerely doubt that a well-armed self-sufficient farmstead will be much in the way of self-help with onset of space-based Planetary War I driving deautomatization, unstable transition-state climate-shift extremes-of-every-sort dynamics up several notches. One could well be living in the wilds of Canada's British Colombia and get drenched by fallout from a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan, even if tactically carried out in the Rajasthan desert. Indeed, given present location -- know the whys and wherefores? -- of the jet stream… And the notable Dr. Dooms (see: Paul B. Farrell, “Optimist? Or pessimist? Test your 2010 Strategy! 12 'Dr. Dooms' warn Wall Street's optimism misleads, will trigger new crash”, MarketWatch, 5 January 2010) should pay more attention to the EU in peril/travail (Iceland, Greece, Spanish unemployment, north-south split, Turkish disappointment, overgrowth of NATO and what that has/is provoking in terms of global realignments), for its breakup is more likely to signal kickoff of PW1 than the next major terrorist attack within the American ZI. I've always (enunciated from the late-'60s) felt that global monopoly, once having left Park Place behind, will skip over Great Depression 2 and advance directly to PW1. George Soros' old “New Paradigm”, like Roger Penrose's The Road to Reality, has no place for Lukasiewicz logics, definitions of monetary units therewith, nor a quantum-composite MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) as the meta-domain for “rationalizing” fiber-bundled derivatives and over which functions of an international clearing union are to be defined. With a quadrillion in derivatives having transferred all local risks -- present and near-term future -- on the planet to the money-centered macroscale, and with the current singly-logically-valued currency-printing binge transferring that concentrated risk to an ill-defined (defined as ill) meta-domain of the international monetary system, no easier way to call off the global economy will be found than PW1. This option will be taken, for there will be no alternative except Cambodia/Rwanda-type planetary implosion to disorganized holocaust of the WholeEarth. Faced with controlled versus chaotic, they will choose controlled.
I hear data where others see noise (fine-grained small changes and their embeddings): this synaesthetic-Musculpt pattern-recognition diffuse-awareness facility is considered by the APA's DSM (American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) a medical condition, Asperger syndrome -- among autistic others NOS (not otherwise specified), if it is acknowledged that painful “electrical surges”, photismic flashovers, paresthesia rushes, and other petit-mal/aura-type phenomena (autogenic brain discharges) “alert” to the existence of a pattern to be recognized by the focused awareness. Collective unconscious being the “alerter”! Cognitive carte blanche to the infinite regress in bei-sich-sein selves of self-awareness greatly attunes to such schizoaffective “alerts”. Knowing what the “right” associations are is what glutamatergic neuronal etching (excitotoxic nerve-cell selective necrosis and phagocytosis) is all about: it's called socialization of cognition at prescriptive enculturation (instinctive spontaneous resistance to this coerced etching generally taking on forms like ASD and PDD: autism spectrum disorders and pervasive developmental disorders, i.e., forms of being caught between 1T2-logic and µTm-logics). The “psychotomimetic” aspects of ketamine general anesthesia (suppressed by valium in the pedestrian anesthetic cocktail) are deeply engaged with the synaesthetic pattern-recognition capabilities (m-logically-valued) glutamatergic neural-network wipeouts suppress -- the endogenous neurotransmitter glutamic acid being the 1T2-logic antidote/antagonist/agonist (dose/flood dependent) to the m-logically-valued-facilitating endogenous neurotransmitter ketamine, and vice versa. No reference is made here to the dissociative and hallucinogenic sub-general-anesthetic effects of ketamine (dose/flood dependent). Once I began (age 23) insightful conscious elaboration of the synaesthetic pattern-recognition facility (p-recfac), I briefly considered art-music composition as a prospective profession, but it did not take long to understand that this p-recfac inculcated value divergence of such magnitude from those values glutamatergically socialized through induced excitotoxicity that I simply could never submit to the requirements of any profession -- the cost to quality of consciousness being too great. Cyclotomicity -- re: Abelian functions; re: Eric Temple Bell's Ph.D. dissertation on Abelian transcendentals, The Cyclotomic Quinary Quintic, 1912 -- is the foremost identifying cognitive signature of ketamine general anesthesia (absent valium and the like) and also a marker of fractal-curve, color-field boundary-marches at therapeutic autogenic abreactions and also of Cantor-dust/Koch-curve “warm-golden dust of Supermind” photism-flashover, Yayoi Kusama polka-dot object-awareness and also of kami-dust, Wasa-sheaf function, Thor's hammer-swastika/spinor, Samadhi-state nesting-foam, Tzog-chen AllBase, synaesthetic p-recfac and also of flat-space, multi-sheeted, Sakharov-Novikov universe model (“The World” truly is “flat”) ketamine-facilitated, ZaZen-facilitated no-mind Satori. It's just that the normative modern mind electrochemically functions on a so-much-more logically-primitive order-type than did most pre-modern minds. Don't believe it? Please consider the nature of idealized Buddhological space relative to the spinor properties of temporal curl and quantal operator-time. How does one think the swastika spinor became associated with Buddhism? An issue long at hand, not yet in hand. One has to “square” Hamlet's Mill to get Thor's Hammer! Something Robertus Fludd, The Queen's Treasurer for War, well understood. Moreover, one has to “Y the T” and “T the Y” to set Thor's Hammer (Mjqllnir) into full-blown topological operations: genetic quadripolar wave, operator-time, twistor as quantization of temporal curl. Thor being the God of Thunder, his “hammer” is associated with antimatter-signaturing lightning (whereas Hamlet's Mill is more directly associated with the temporal curl of tornadogenesis) -- this antimatter-signature of memetime reversal being only a Platonic shadow of three-fold operator-time (hence, three-legged “swastikas”, with their component “Ys” and “Ts”: when insight is lost, there is semantic deterioration, corruption of meta-referential images no less than of tropological words). The Nazis regressed all this, indeed, were a regression of it, an infantile violent conversion-disorder expression thereof; and that's why -- though, clearly, they were unconscious as to this why -- they so vehemently destroyed the Polish seat of Lukasiewicz logics, those logics offering mature insight into operator-time symbolically represented by the hammer/spinor of Thor. Whereas, the most mature such understanding has always been on deposit in Tibetan Buddhism and Bon -- which is a 21st-century problem currently-prevailing collective unconscious event gradients embody as determinants of mass behaviors.
Forget -- don't foreget -- random number generators! Foreget Coincidence Control! Embrace linear-time-independent third-order dynamics! One has been thinking in terms of incidence and magnitude, not even order-types thereof. Forget all that! Just forget it. Discharge cycle, phase angle, “location” in/over/under the critical-variable representation manifold, marches of phase-boundary re-articulations… Spiral-banded galaxy; DNA nebula; double-helical cometary feeder-bands; complex angular-momentum soliton cascade tunneling through heliosphere; spiral-banded hurricanes; double-helical feeder-bands at tornadogenesis; acoustically-modified gravity-wave-mode solitons rippling tornadic wombwall; current (gamma/anti-matter countertime modulated) injections to Earth's crustal/core dynamics; soliton radiation from superconductant free-electron gas core of DNA at helix-coil critical-phase transition… and reverse-cascade. These are the major “component processes” of actual simulation environment for “climate” shifts -- planetary, solar system, and galactic. Don't model planetary without solar-system; don't model solar-system without galactic. Don't model DNA without modeling planetary! Talk of nesting foams and then develop a flat-management model of Form in Process of nature? Why -- during 1975 at Cornell -- would a biometeorologist, shifting from dynamical severe-local storms numerical modeling efforts to studies of solar-terrestrial interactions and climate-cyclicities, be generalizing a nested-grid/nested-time-step gravity-wave-mode model of tornadogenesis to modeling of radiation-impingement at DNA helix-coil transition, if these were not long-range phase-correlated aspects of a unitary process? The only people who seemed to understand this were associated with the India Institute of Technology's highly interdisciplinary (including medical doctors) “atmospheric sciences” division, chaired by a Cornell-trained mathematician. Hah! Met the man there in Delhi at a quantum chemistry symposium I happened to happen upon: always look for such things whenever I happen to be knocking about, on walkabout, seeing the sights, traveling the world, groveling to officialdom on The Way to Find Out. Nowadays, Long Time Passing: haven't groveled much this past week. Forget: if-then scenarios; antecedent-consequent simulators; simulacra environments; time-line/flowchart software; ThinkTank; BrainWane; Elicit; helix/spiral cleartext functions over rotating yin/yang logic on cylindrical coordinates; public-key encryption; sender pass-key; encrypt/decrypt keys; mutation strings; nonconformity search strategies; key-code spatial curls upon rotating coordinate systems; the real(number) rotating solution!; replication strings; worms; kill codes; security gates (Hah!); access hierarchies; security filters; variant filters; FTP filters; packet filters; funnel enhancers; tunnel blocks; beat-down bullies (robust functions); dysauthorization windows/identifiers; fails-safe; fireswall; shields and their sharks; alpha and/or numeric grouped-orphans, debugged/compiled; sourced, free-floating extralines; authorization programming protocalls; complex non-Abelian functions over quadratic residues… What's needed is not to be found in 1T2-logic, there being no truth-value conformation to… that. Heh-heh-heh! No Abel-Bell cyclotomic cascade/reverse-cascade Paine-Kaplan digital transmission in QuickTime (whatsoever framing of the steps). I mean: 1967 people-sniffers; 1969 NORAD “glutamateric” memory etching at Cascade Model runtime. Off-it? Hah! How could one ever guess? What does one think “my dad” (to quote one of our Presidents) did at Willow Run? Years with NORAD before AFSC/AFLC. I learned nothing, interacting with those scientists? Hmmmmm. There is knowing, and then there is KNOWING. If I were killed on the next try, succeed at that recurrent theme, who, what, will not “make it” as a consequence? QuickTime is not even first-order temporal curl, let alone third-order operator-time! The Riemann-Hypothesis-“band/critical-line” set of non-trivial (trivial vs. non-trivial being order of zeta function dependent) zeros in first-order hypercomplex zeta function is a helix (i.e., first-order temporal curl prime mapping; second-order, a Gödel-number mapping; third-order, a mapping over Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers: plainchanted skew-parallel organum, I'd say, at this level of conception, no boundary tones to preserve modal integrity). No mere 137, that's for sure! See: Arthur I. Miller's Deciphering the Cosmic Number, W. W. Norton, 2009; and, for a review, Kendall Whitehouse of U of P's Whorton. Pauli sold Jung a bill of goods, because the physicist had already, before meeting Jung, rejected his own notion: operator-time. Number the numbering in VirFut Q-Pro over Musculpt manifold! Maybe not next year. Maybe not next century. Maybe there won't be any survivors. Know what I mean? G. I. Gurdjieff, early in the 20th-century -- ten or more years before the Technocracy movement of M. King Hubbert (see: Patrick Wood, “Carbon Currency: A New Beginning for Technocracy?”, The August Review, 26 January 2010) -- not of his own volition, its seems likely, promulgated a “theory of carbons” as celestial influence, a kind of retrograde inversion of the present greenhouse-gas consensus orientation to climate shift, explaining the “principle of reciprocal maintenance” relative to exchange of “carbons”, the requirements of which were not being fulfilled by members of the human species, not understanding “relative-state” as they didn't/do-not. As “theosophical” as this Gurdjieff theory may appear, it may be the most enlightened indicator we presently have available -- given how normal renormalization has become. But -- for all the reasons offered on this website -- an endorsement of Gurdjieff's metaphorical carbon-currency theory does not mean that I embrace the Technocracy movement's desire to replace price-indexed economies/monies with a We-Are-the-World monoeconomy employing univalent energy-credits/energy-certificates (with expiration dates, i.e., analogous to Silvio Gesell's effectively-negative-interest-rate “free money”). It was primarily scientists who got us into this mess, and turning them into social engineers will not get us out of it.
“…with the aim of paying for future crises rather than past ones” (“Little European support for bank levy”, Ben Hall, et al., Financial Times, 15 January 2010): call it what you will -- say, a “stability fee” imposed on banks; or configure it as an insurance premium imposed on big financials -- it always will be passed on to become highly regressive, like user fees on a BOT-financed toll road, like the “transaction privilege tax” will be passed on, like a Keynes/Tobin international-transactions tax (see: “Making Banks Pay”, Yalman Onaran, Bloomberg Markets, January 2010: beg to differ, the Keynes/Tobin tax is not a “radical change”, nor does it address deep structure of the real problems which involve a century of suppression of Lukasiewicz logics) would be passed on to become regressive and much of its revenues would be squandered on service costs for yet another transnational bureaucracy and the corruption involved in funds disbursement (from a global agency, i.e., macroscale, to those persons around the planet most impoverished, i.e., at the microscale: transaction-rent seeking at all intervening scales). Keynes/Tobin international-transactions tax would be an attempt to institutionalize “rent seeking” behaviors! Be aware, all you ragpicker non-actual readers of General Theory, that raison d'etre for Keynes-(Tobin) tax was not the raison d'etre for the Tobin-(Keynes) tax: the former being regulatory, the latter being redistributive. Present-day Keynes-Tobin tax proposals transmogrify both Keynes and Tobin into a neoNazi attempt at restitution of the contemporary functional equivalent to the Versailles imposition of German restitution for WWI. Rather strange, don't y'think, that Germans should be strong supporters of Keynes-Tobin transmogrification? Not exactly an example of pristine clear thinking by one component of the international leadership elite! Moreover, a stability fee to pay for future crises institutionalizes future crises, thus helping to induce them. Rather than doing something intelligent to smooth cycle amplitudes, something like nesting foams of m-logically-valued monetary units as provision of the viscosity spread over all scale levels which the Tobin-(Keynes) tax would introduce top-down from the macroscale with the intent to control microscale processes with disbursement from a macroscale pool, i.e., no local tax base built in, with all the problems that entails. It should not be forgotten that Keynes was an intellectual vacuum cleaner of the Zeitgeist of his era, the Big Band Era, his General-Theory approach having been pioneered by the Nazis: neoKeynesianism is neoNazism no less than trans/national-socialism! Like so many Sixties-Marxists never actually read Marx, so many neoKeynesians nowadays never actually read Keynes. The “neo” being resurrection of old ideas, not “radical change”. You don't repair a failed system (cf: Viral Acharya's Restoring Financial Stability: How to Repair a Failed System), not a system in chronic recurrent failure over hundreds of years; you find its Jungian/Abelian “transcendental function” (by, for instance, understanding why bundled derivatives regressively mimicked fiber bundle arithmetics: not something Keynes was privy to, given that his vacuum cleaner did not extend so far as Lukasiewicz logics and internal dimensions, both on the scene a long time before he arrived). And with the ongoing “disaggregation” of what once was the Third World (see: Walter Russell Mead, “Global Trends of the 2010s #5: Disaggregation and the Death of the West?”, The American Interest, 15 January 2010), all the more reason to implement a disaggregated global monetary system like Lukasiewiczian LETS.
The Pakistan Daily is certainly a strange place to find an article on leaking time holes, phased-array radar, HAARP, and unstable/chaotic deautomatization state (where all extremes prevail) at climate shift, but there you have it. Thanks for drawing the anonymous article to my attention: “Norway Time Hole 'Leak' Plunges Northern Hemisphere Into Chaos”, Pakistan Daily, 8 January 2010. Very interesting -- given the role of “temporal curl” in acoustically-modified gravity-wave mode generation -- that a hole punched in the tropopause boundary should, without explanation, in the article's title be deemed a “time hole”. This article was likely written by someone familiar with the fact that, during the Brezhnev-Reagan era, Soviet phased-array radar literally blanketed the USSR (see, for instance, Frances Fitzgerald's Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars and the End of the Cold War) and engaged in widespread “electron-temperature enhancement”. Here's the consensus view (Geoffrey Wheatcroft, “Boxed In: The Constraints of U.S. Foreign Policy”, World Affairs, Jan/Feb 2010:
What actually happened was that the Soviet Union imploded from within, partly because, after one of the longest and bloodiest experiments in history, it was conclusively demonstrated that the socialist central command economy simply didn’t work. The Soviet state had long been predeceased by Marxism-Leninism as an ideology anyone actually believed in. The rulers lost the will to rule, and once Mikhail Gorbachev openly renounced the use of force, the game was up.
My shout, were I chasing the dime in lost light: the Soviet Union did not disintegrate-from-below over economic-failure issues; rather -- intellectual-history issues aside -- the Soviets lost control over a top-down-initiated systemic phase transition largely motivated by response to fundamental breakthroughs in strategic weaponry. Being long on the nickel, one reason I know there is an extremely high likelihood of the actuality of ongoing severe atmospheric high-jingo crisis is because, the real skinny being told, Earth's atmosphere is not a classical Newtonian domain, yet, even under assumption of a “classical limit”, mainstream scientists, bless their hearts, have finally identified a climate-shift dynamic as actually transpiring.
As I understand it, one of the breakdown products of short-lived atmospheric methane is long-lived atmospheric carbon dioxide. So, the short-lived big heat trapper becomes the long-lived smaller heat trapper. And vice versa, as methane clathydrate can be produced by microbes reducing carbon dioxide. Don't want any nuclear weapons detonations in the arctic or other methane clathydrate oceanic deposit areas: studies in the Platonic regular-polyhedral “Greater Maze” -- in this case, collected dodecahedrons -- by burning ice (Ice Nine?) is not what we need. And one almost never sees mention made that venting of natural gas from oil fields globally, beginning in the 1850s, until recently was a major source of methane in the atmosphere. Nor is there discussion of the fact that one byproduct of flaring natural gas from oil fields has been destruction of ozone (check out the many forms of sulfur dioxide and complexing with ozone). Such flaring dropped off about the time CFCs were identified, according to popular understanding, as the primary, even sole, cause of ozone-hole formation (think of the volume difference between CFC release by air-conditioners, shaving-cream cans, et cetera, versus oil field natural gas flaring globally since the 1850s). Not to mention, absolutely no discussion of acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes (filtered from the models since the late-1940s) punching holes in the tropopause boundary layer, thus allowing drawdown of stratospheric ozone. It is also my understanding that the reservoir of arctic permafrost-trapped methane is enormous (ever been out into the muskeg areas of the interior of Alaska, for instance?), though, because it remains frozen, not presently contributing much to total methane in the global atmosphere. Arctic methane is not a serious present problem, only a prospective enormous problem. The most interesting aspect of the Guardian article (“Arctic permafrost leaking methane at record levels, figures show”, David Adam, The Guardian, 14 January 2010) was, as usual, provided by a commenter. Quoting Mankell:
I think Guardian readers, whichever side of the argument they are on, need to get some basic understanding of what 'the greenhouse effect' actually is.
Molecules have distinct rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy levels. A molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere may absorb a photon of radiation that is tuned to the quantum of energy needed to raise one of its electrons the next energy level. In this way, CO2 captures and retains (for a short time) infra-red energy of specific wavelengths. CO2 molecules in this 'exited' state subsequently re-emit the captured energy in reverting back to their 'ground' state…
Most of the light and heat radiation emitted by the Sun is able to pass through an 'atmospheric window' to reach the Earth. The Earth in turn emits radiation back into space and thus maintains the 'Radiation Balance'. However, because the Earth is cooler than the Sun, the Earth's radiation has a different spectral distribution, peaking in the infra-red rather than in the visible part of the spectrum. However, the atmospheric window is opaque to some infra-red wavelengths, between 5 to 7 microns because of water vapour and between 14 to 15 microns because of CO2. The heat energy in these bands is thus initially 'trapped' and that produces a warming effect, which makes our planet habitable.
The glass in a greenhouse performs the same function. It is transparent to incoming visible radiation (as we can see), but opaque to infra-red radiation emitted by the warmed interior of the greenhouse. This is why CO2 is called a greenhouse gas, because it functions in the same way as the glass in a greenhouse. However, that analogy only goes so far because there is no roof on greenhouse Earth. So, although some direct radiation is trapped, heat is still able to escape from the surface by convection into the upper atmosphere and from there heat is radiated into space to restore the 'Radiation Balance' (which is actually only in balance is at the top of the Earth's atmosphere, not at the Earth's surface.) One of the major failings of all climate models is that they cannot accurately simulate this 'turnover' of the atmosphere. In fact Lindzen estimates their errors in this regard to be as high as 50%.
But MIT's atmospheric science professor Richard Lindzen's “Iris Hypothesis” -- reduced global cloud cover water vapor negatively feeding-back upon increasing carbon dioxide retained heat, thus greatly (50%?) reducing model-projected magnitude of anthropogenic greenhouse-warming effects -- is a sterling example of one-or-two variable theses concerning a superintegrated n-body problem. Not only does each atmospheric gas molecule type have its unique radiation-frequency-response window, with the “atmospheric window” being a QUANTUM composite relative-state of the molecular ensemble and changing gas ratios shifting that composite response window superposition, those individual gas molecules and the overall global atmosphere receive varying quanta of complex angular momentum delivered to Earth's upper atmosphere by the solar wind and cascaded down through the various scales of atmospheric wave motion, contributing greatly to formation of Earth's weather patterns, patterns which affect climatic variables like density of global cloud cover. Oil field venting and flaring affects the mechanisms of solar-terrestrial interactions (Sun-Earth/Earth-Sun communications) -- and may be one climate-shift chaos-theory butterfly wing-flap (which in no way alleviates the charge that chaos theory is a 1T2-logic way of understanding m-logically-valued processes).
These revelations (“World mislead over Himalayan glacier meltdown”, Jonathan Leake and Chris Hastings, The London Times, 17 January 2010) reinforce my impression that the present state of understanding of ongoing climate shift is analogous to press treatment of the 1968-Tet offensive: the press intuitively understood the implications, but had little insight as regards the actual reasons why. When such a circumstance arises, the collective unconscious response is to (in the shadow realms between the subliminal and the fully conscious) seek ways to make the facts fit the intuition. What is intuitively understood about the prevailing climate shift (greenhouse warming being only one factor) cannot be explained by an atmospheric science subjected to a “classical limit”.
I have never liked living in a Hamiltonian world Made in the U.S.A. -- which is a clear indication of how much less I would like living in a world Made in China by billions slave-laboring for 1T2-logic-money centers; thank my lucky stars I will not be living in that world. Been to China, have you? Seen the obsession with big and garish? Makes the bowl-legged Texas obsessive look like a well-rode islander. Within a civilization extracting negentropy from the planet at well past carrying capacity, an obsession with unbridled growth is more than merely garish. Glut of glitzy kitsch as megadeath in the wings. Over the last century, the Hamiltonian U.S. economy grew thirty-fold when zero growth was synoptically indicated; now, when sustained negative growth and natural attrition of global population base is indicated, China's century promises to overgrowth America's. Development upon a post-developable world is incipient incendiary mass demise. Polished off by Shanghai, shanghaied by the Big Apple: what is the difference? In a global economy worth something like USD forty-trillion/year GDP, we have approximately -- all things considered -- USD one-thousand-trillion in derivatives and central-bank instruments transferring local multiplier effects and local risk to a few discrete megaurban-region 1T2-logic-money centers engaged in displacement from the microscale to the macroscale to the meta-level to the concrete economy. These transfers of multipliers away from local effects, and associated concentration of intrasystemic risk to the macroscale, are intimately connected to obsession with unending garish growth (and growth of the garishly unending superstring of obsessives). Let that be a lesson to ya in Back-Alley Banking! Can and have imagined many scenarios; cannot find a single plausible scenario I in any way would like to participate in. Been on this godawful trashed planet far too long already. Pity the poor immigrant from the villages, those economic free-fire zones; pity the world's victims of the poor forced-draft urbanized immigrant; pity the poor shanghaied world. The higher they rise, the harder they fall. Leonardo R. Silos' book, Management and the Tao: Organization as Community (1998), issuing out of the Asian Institute of Management, Manila, and to a lesser extent, the Center for Chinese Studies, University of Hawaii, is a rather extraordinary essay, not the least for how well its title illustrates the Leninist principle of taxonomy: call the thing by the name of its opposite. As the Preface explains the book's central theme (p. xix), an explanation not contradicted by body of the text:
We shall use Confucian tradition to represent Oriental tradition… Confucian philosophical reflection which is generally recognized to be more practical than speculative provides us with a privileged entry point to the formal structures of Oriental action, in the sense of Parsons…
Not only does Silos falsely assimilate Taoism to Confucianism -- as if the former were merely a trope, an intercalated grace note, a plainsong theme placed within the body of the latter -- he does this by refashioning and “modernizing” Confucianism (Modernisierung und Konfuzianismus) by employment of some of the most destructive social science the West has produced: action-based sociology (individual, collective, communicative), a forefront, roll cloud, shear gradient of decentered cognitive back-reaction against ketaminergic quantum non-simple identity, hologramic relative-state, superposition, Bose-Einstein condensation, the m-valued under m-valued logics (central animistic features of actual Taoist “the center in midst of the conditions”: cf, The Secret of the Golden Flower). Days of End, the Gong Falun: surely. Thing by the name of its opposite! People actually understand self-expression as choice between alternative purchases: does a Mercedes best express my personality, or a BMW? Wholly vacuity! If this is the way the self is understood, what chance is there quantum non-simple identity can be understood -- and what chance did the human species have of avoiding a “decentered cognitive back-reaction” to The New Physics (even by physicists)? Mao assimilated Confucianism to Taoism in order to build and manage the apparatus for a peoples' war, then failed to disassimilate the two with a Cultural Revolution -- disassimilation of false assimilations always involving mass violence. I find I cannot find any institutionalization today whatsoever which is not de facto a Nazification, and that includes National-Socialist/capitalist Confucian fascism no less than Washington-London-“Concensus” capitalist/nanny-state neoNazism. So many just walked away, immediate post-9/11, on prospective SeeTech, HearTech, TouchTech. When WWIII breaks out at Greater China's always-has-been most vulnerable Central Asian back door (see, e.g., Harsh V. Pant, “India's Controversial New War Doctrine” [preparation for a two-front war with Pakistan and China], International Relations and Security Network, Zurich, 25 January 2010), one Nazi bloc will quickly array against another Nazi bloc (read Sentaku if you think Japan will not be a part of Greater China!) -- and this, when both such blocs (and the bulks of their population bases) are on the same side as regards fundamentals: i.e., totally opposed to Taoist/Tzog-chen/stateless-Shinto ketaminergic-Cabalistic Whirling-Dervish quantum non-simple identity, hologramic relative-state, superposition, Bose-Einstein condensation, the m-valued under m-valued logics. Same ol', same ol': genesis of WWII and WWI. I guess it could be framed so as to get a “Long-Emergency” picture: begin the emergency during the 1820s with Abel's “Impossibility” Theorem throwing the Weltanschauung into hysteresis. Islamofascism, though a probable trigger element, is certainly too far behind the military-industrial/post-industrial strategic leading edge -- where, likely, fission/fusion and ICBMs long have been obsolete -- to greatly affect outcomes in a space-based violent unstable transition-state phase cusping to some post-carbon, stable-state world-framework-determining condition. Opportunity to optimally leverage their oil was lost to factionalism, internecine strife, elitism, conspicuous consumption, religious zeal during the 1950s and '60s: after U.S. oil production peaked, it was too late for such leverage (I understood this during the first six months of 1967 at JFK Special Warfare Center studying strategic factors involved in onset of the Six Day War). The Final War of Godzilla: Pudong or Virtual Tibet? Climactic or climatic? I think temporal operations over Tzog-chen Buddhological space will be decisive. But, as I say, I'm optimistic: there could well be a ten-percent human survival rate. Third time's the charm! But warfare, on the scales so far experienced, is, obviously, no solution: there has always been a postwar population boom.
It is not possible to empty-into bad ideas; just doesn't happen, never. Origins of bad ideas are not associated with high states of consciousness. Bad ideas and full-blown euphoria, perhaps; bad ideas and the shaking “creative” tension energy of psychological identification with cognitive in-flow, surely. If the source is shipped off to the Paris Peace Talks, so be it; if the journal goes bankrupt, so be it; if the sponsor has a heart attack, so be it; if the web-server altogether shuts down, so be it… I am an observer, a watcher, a witness, not a participant, actor, determiner, doer, closer. Because -- though I very well understand the value of these ideas -- I do not arrogate attributes of the collective unconscious; rather, I am interested simply to see whether or not corpus of the human species will (subliminally) choose to survive (or is it to overcome the prior “decision” not to survive?). Lift no finger; twist no knobs. Make no claims upon the “Finger of God”, the magic “Invisible Hand”: such claim upon absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct distinction is projective-identification in transference (that inner movement seeding Nazification, by whatever name it may be known). I simply am not activated, period. Wolf, No Wolf :: hu-hu-hu-man, no hu-hu-hu-man. Indifferent as to the difference.
Who should be most interested in m-logically-valued LETS? Hmmm. Very interesting question! Le' me tell ya, You Can't See Paris From Here, either: rural Cambodia. Even though the horse-holder best knows the horse, it's still just a leap of belief. At one memetime, I thought: the Vietnamese. Then I spent an afternoon with Tran Bach Dang and another with Tran Van Giau -- and I realized that overt Confucianism (too many references to the Singapore model) had so overwhelmed any latent populist Taoist inclinations to such an extent that whatsoever incipient Lukasiewiczian predispositions (what the social anthropologists stigmatize as “contagion” by “participation mystique”) there once might have been, had, along the way, been totally lost. And, of course, I at one memetime thought, the Russians, having as a kid been partially reared on R. S.'s Songs of a Sourdough, but the wholesale Russian buy-in to encounter-group, shock-and-awe, Jeffery-Sachs/George-Soros primal scream, instantaneous flip-over, top-down capitalist therapy dispelled that naive notion. Never entertained the Chinese, given their mind-bend burden of 19th-century shoulder chips and resultant compulsive collective-massive behaviors. But were the Chinese to get into Lukasiewiczian LETS, their TVEs (township and village enterprises) would be the critical interface (just as we were fifteen years ago almost able to try in Cesky Krumlov, C. R., with a town development stock company, an idea The Open Society Institute could not understand). TVEs are made to order for instituting LETS, tagging local indicators to local currencies, stacking m-values according to outcomes of local computer gaming, and so on. Moreover, the existing nesting foam of quasi-public/quasi-private TVEs would be Lukasiewiczian “rationalized” by m-logically-valued LETS in much the same fashion derivatives would be Lukasiewiczian “rationalized” by nesting foams of m-logically-valued LETS. The actual answer, however -- given the coming flat-lining of the global economy -- to Who should be most interested? is: the Japanese, if they wish to stay out of a Greater China; and the Germans, if they wish to stay out of a Germano-Russian Bloc (aligned to a Greater China). Create springboards for planetarizing nesting e-foams of m-logically-valued LETS. What a humongous commercial opportunity! Or, more realistically, if the Germans and Japanese wish to have something to gravitate upon in the after[math] of Sceneshifter -- insofar as there is an after[man]th. Forced-draft urbanization: utopia to a targets analyst! What's the critical Curie temperature of this bellows-blown migratory motion? Eighty-five percent? Ninety percent? The fact that rap music is globalized night after night into each language culture is one clear brain-drain indication of what is to come. Thai-German/US-Chinese MSG “hams”: ugh-ugh-ugh! O those enterochromaffin cells and their serotonergic agents set against serotonin deprivation, not to forget serotonin together with the tryptamines. Do read the synoptic implications of one's labels, Mr. Smarty U. Pants, one among the very few of all-yous-guys understanding neurotransmitter pathways/cascades. But then, this whole perspective was once constellated by the early-Weimar collective unconscious (as evidenced by, for instance, origins of Autogenic Training) and I studied Japanese gardening under a late-Meiji-trained Taisho exemplar, so this answer to that question of Who should be most interested? is not really at all surprising.
An aside: I once taught English vocabulary of postmodernism/deconstructionism to a group of Kansai University Ph.D. candidates needing to read English-language technical journals in the field of architectural criticism (ichiman yen/hr. + some of the finest sushi Osaka had to offer: one of the best jobs I ever had). They all thought late-Meiji the most fascinating, and no matter what commentary I brought to bear -- over Ebisu and sashimi in a wonderful little sushi bar -- the notion that Taisho was far more prefigurative (and universally interesting) never washed down with them. Draw your own conclusions. Middleburg horse farms were my most lucrative landscaping adventures. And Lexington was where I hung out after Ohio high school, Calumet and Citation, et al. You liked Seabiscuit's Laura-Hillenbrand's smug-Middleburger account of a turn-of-the-20th-century's bicycle-repairman's affair with Buick racecars, you'd just love the story of my Taisho exemplar's wife's late-Meiji (French-father/Japanese-mother, foreign-enclave, rejected-by-all, half-caste) childhood adventures with one of the first automobiles/drivers in Tokyo. And then my mother, my twin sisters, and me brought a canary-yellow Buick Roadmaster to Yokohama in 1953. What a confluence that eventually constellated. Wind-blown blonde toe-heads in a royal-yellow bomb all us children were! But the car was a two-door, and the resale value of anything-but-black was a… disappointment. Always wondered what yakuza escapades that master of the road eventually had. Don't mean nothing to nobody else but me. He-he-he.
Fee-simple allodial title to private property is limited by local covenants, eminent domain, the PO-lice, easements, tax collectors, public claims upon factors affecting environmental quality, title liens and caveats and encumbrances, time-shares, time borrowing, distributed holdings, future buying, escheat, bundled bundles of bundling, intertextuality… indeed, most financial instruments (what a bloody mess compared to m-logically-valued monetary units). There are no such things as wholly-ownable absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct private properties. Private property is a myth which never has been, never will be, never -- in the nature of nature and its things -- could have been. A population heavily black-propagandized with the fallacious myth of private property is extremely ill-prepared for the coming transit to the quantum economies which quantum computing will boot-up. Single-valued property is theft of the multivalued relative-state (of components and component processes) intrinsic to the quantum potential responsible for self-organization, wherever found. Human systems engineering is anathema enough, whereas natural systems engineering is height of the repugnant -- especially when there is so much to be gained from getting into reciprocally-maintaining Everettian relative-state. Ignore F. A. von Hayek's “time-shapes of total capital stock” and the relative-state which is quantum potential is denied, thus, by memetime-bound thermodynamics, insuring unending growth is necessary simply to organize (such growth being perpetration of grand larceny upon cascading negentropy budget of planet Earth), which, in turn, insures the stolen negentropy will be turned into a garganCHEWin' glut of garish kitsch: built-in obsolescence, disposables, irrepairables, unceasing deterioration of quality (even to reducing the number of belt loops on Levis 517s to dysfunctionality: by topological operation, changing jean genus), commodity-fetish style-faddism (males, even: tie-died, cuff-linked, pin-point caughtened; has the human mule ever worse worn?)… Megamonocrop, vertically-integrated (i.e., one scale), green-revolution, corporate chemiagribusiness being family-value capitalism's answer to Stalin-Mao collectivization in the increasingly violent UP/RP (urban-parasite/rural-provider) global divide resolvable only by monolithic/totalistic forced-draft urbanization. When every body not a robomachine or a nanoswarm lives in Macrocity eating GMOs and hydroponics… live on buds, get used to it. Heh-heh-heh! I once did a Japanese-style garden in Washington, D.C., for the man who headed up the command element responsible for the land reform imposed upon Japan by MacArthur: no more sub-nation-state scale-level communal lands; henceforth, common property will be held only by husband/first-wife, 1T2-logically-valued corporate persons (a violation of nature and mathematics), and the monotonic nation-state in its various echelons; the landlord issue was mere smoke-and-mirrors (how long did it take before key-money exchanging rentors-rentees reemerged?). I questioned this onetime MacArthur staff officer as to whether the land reform was forward looking, directed toward undermining growing popularity of the Japan Communist Party. He denied it, saying that the collective mindset of feudal Japan, as embodied in traditional land tenure, was the target, Shinto having been responsible for the war in the Pacific. So, the reform policy was largely another Looking Backward, which was consistent with my view of MacArthur -- once, as a kid in Japan, I became aware that the General had separated the sexes (thus severing the psyche) in the local sento (public bath), another foremost traditional institution facilitating collective and cooperative behaviors essential to autopoietic processes transpiring within the socius, and to thinning the Thin Blue Line.
M-logically-valued LETS can only be brought up from below, but this cannot transpire unless permitted from above. Such LETS, however, strongly violate sacred premises of the prevailing nation-state system, its monies and corporate paladins; so, there will be forthcoming no permission from above (other than depotentiating tokenism). But, in this age of quantum-based technologies, warfare needs of nation-states insure development of quantum computing -- and, however much it is dressed in Newtonian clothes, this quantum computing, like the internet before it, will bleed over into non-warfare-related applications, such that m-valued logics and quantum economies will be powerfully facilitated. Resultant time rate of change of acceleration in pandemic cognitive dissonance all but certainly predisposes to Planetary War I, auguring forcefully that the low-tech, tribal-peasant, contagion/participation-mystique, ten-percent-survivor version of m-logically-valued LETS is that globalized LETS nesting foam most likely to be realized. I see the collective-unconscious “choice” as having been made by the memetime the Tristanakkord was written, the only inauthenticity being that “half-diminished” was gross undersight.
Well, surely Patient zero-ONE-zero, being mucho macho, once knew all about that. And Jonathan Maberry must have been a real MindReader to have anticipated the spontaneous quantal fusion of Google and the NSA, don't y'think? Any one of several dozen things transpiring right now could, in due course, utterly wipe out the human species -- just as many other species are currently being wiped out. This is one of those several dozen. Behind every functional integration (think: quantum-wave properties) there is a group -- in some critical cases likely even an algebraic group -- of functional-specificity effectors (think: stereochemistry): this is the most fundamental redundancy in living systems. Prions may self-replicate without good offices of stereochemical DNA, but not without some functional equivalent to DNA's quantum-wave properties (which, with a little help from microwave friends, can breach the blood/brain barrier). Indeed, the misfolding of proteins is very likely radiation induced -- as is helix-coil transition, according to our mathematical model of the superconductant free-electron gas core of DNA. Modification/modulation of the EM properties of autogenic brain discharges transposing/shifting/distorting intraneuronal DNA's quantum-wave properties -- a notion first publicly aired at a psychosomatic medicine congress, Kyoto, 1977 (a good -- especially for mentioning Allan Frey's work at Cornell on biological effects of pulsed fields at specific embedded frequency modulations, i.e., nesting foams of modulations stacked on the carrier wave, and Henry Lai's work on DNA strand breaking by modulated EM radiation -- related recent popular article is: Christopher Ketcham, “Warning: Your Cell Phone May Be Hazardous to Your Health”, GQ, February 2010). In thirty-five years of talking about what are currently called “genotoxic effects”, I've found there is absolutely no interest in the fact that electronic devices could be designed to stay out of biologically-active frequency-response windows, which are extremely thin due to the superconductant properties of DNA free-electron gas core (the coherent radiation generated by superconductant DNA, in turn, modulating membrane/plasmahaut potential, protein folding at DNA/RNA replication, and so very much more: quantum signatures are now -- thirty years late -- CONSENSUALLY experimentally demonstrated at physiologic temperatures with regard to DNA/mRNA, photosynthesis, membrane potentials, but without significant theoretical insight -- such insight being long since in the literature for those actually reading the literature). Ketcham quotes Frey: “'It just so happens,' Frey had told me, 'that the frequencies and modulations of our cell phones seem to be the frequencies that humans are particularly sensitive to. If we had looked into it a little more, if we had done the real science, we could have allocated spectrums that the body can't feel. The public should know if they are taking a risk with cell phones. What we're doing is a grand world experiment without informed consent.'” Because, ever since 1980, research into biological superconductivity has been either military-service funded or suppressed, even an Allan Frey does not understand that it is not necessary to deny IT allocated “spectrums” of the EM spectrum, only the thinnest of thin lines (like a barcode), to stay out of biologically-active windows. The technology for this WOULD HAVE BEEN developed thirty years ago, if it had not been for… The mind just folds in contemplating consequences. Brain cancer aside, this “modification of autogenic discharge” notion is only one of the possibilities for radiative induction of misfolding, i.e., morphed morphogenesis. At the memetime this proposition was put in Kyoto, I was studying a stack of papers on protein folding processes handed to me by Suzi Daniels, a person then completing her Ph.D. research in a Smithsonian radiation lab who had critiqued a first version of our superconductant DNA model developed at Cornell at the same time Frey's work was being published in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. And if misfolding can be radiation induced, remisfolding can be, too. Maybe not by terahertz waves, but by… and since, according to implications of our quantum DNA model (published during 1979 in Sweden by the International Journal of Quantum Chemistry), base state of immune signifiers are frequency-response windows, waveforms, intensities, then prions, were they, indeed, radiation induced, would be… Quoting Ketcham's article: “…what will it take to change the paradigm? -- Frey shook his head. 'Until there are bodies in the streets,' he said, 'I don't think anything is going to change.'” I think Maberry would agree with me that it will take many, many more bodies in the streets. “Designed by evolution”: not exactly a concept I can buy into. Conscious evolution “designed” by the quantum brain not contained by the molecular-cellular brain, perhaps -- if “conscious” is understood to denote the “universal consciousness” which is the “collective unconscious” articulated by operator-time over an MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) as Tzog-chen AllBase (universal merit forensic accountant). You didn't think you were going to get off that easily did you?
I didn't vote for Kerry not only because I don't vote, have never voted (my military background?), nor because his swift-boat antics apparently were those of the oft-fragged company-grade officer (lack of which reveals something about his shipmates, and the guilt driving their personal attacks), later seen to be politically motivated, not merely ticket-punching shenanigans, but primarily because his wife's fortune is largely based upon glutamatergic etching of human brain. One snapshot of The Good Life. Over the decades, how many “No Place For Amateurs” have walked, not because of the Rules of Engagement, but because of the idiot strategies informing The Rules of Engagement? Probably have not been counted. Kill zone at an ambush site. Been there? I, luckily, haven't, but know some who have been. Contrary to the popular history, there was a single unsung discrete person who created the best weapon for getting out of that zone alive. He had the bunk below mine at SFTG. Generation that created Delta Force. A runaway at age 13, apprenticed to a gunsmith. As an SF trainee taught the Smoke Bomb Hill weapons specialists. Stranger things have happened! How many contemporary commanders know about this? Still, one can find nothing in the prevailing literature not a replication of the “command position” established decades ago! Get my meaning? Such “walking” started, according to my informants -- Heh-heh-heh! -- near Wackersberg in Bad Tolz some memetime during the mid-1950s. Lodge Bill Recruits, even. Reaching epidemic proportions nowadays, I suspect. Doubt that? See, for instance: Greg Jaffe, “U.S. commanders in Afghanistan face tougher discipline for battlefield failures”, Washington Post, 5 February 2010. I am not even there. I am far from there. And my attitude is… O man, one thing to remove “team integrity” and “mission-specific assignment”, quite another to… Batesonesque schizophenogenic double-binds are interesting topological structures, don't y'think, especially when spread over one-way hierarchies. No small issue in… Lots of “handles” that can be used for… military proselytizing. Containdications ignored, one of the “side effects” of -- “drug tolerance” being what it is -- not attending to the systemic… “Risk averse” is the absolute smallest possible… Those who lay/lie the foundations for collective self-destruction -- what interesting personality profiles! Looking at AFPAC one sees the symptoms to be played out over… locus of NAFTA? The Yalu/Amnok times… how many? Couldn't process it then; can't process it now. Cognitive equipment not available. How do I know? Group Dynamics class at AU-SIS was something I excelled at. Knowledge of non-verbal communications. Tells. Of team-taught, problem-based, role-playing seminars at AU-SIS, this was the least liked -- but, in retrospect, the most valuable. Professor George Harris, widely disparaged amongst the students, though, clearly, He Who Should Have Been Believed. Peer reviews are of little value. Vietnam: man, how many interrogations/debriefings/interviews did I do? Talk about tactical behavior assessment. Did John C. Lilly, M.D., create that field in Philadelphia during the Korean war? If you don't think so, you are not in the know! Heh-heh-heh. The Philadelphia Project. What was that? Techniques of attention diversion. Psychological Operations Group, the JFK Special Warfare Center. Information assurance is not a recent obsession, however much Loco is Yobbed! Get that allusion? Backscattered I was, wasn't I. What a glory. O me! Sundogged in ice halos. How many microsieverts must I convert merely to mesh with my girlfriend in privacy of health? The travail of long-distance regressed relative-state! The rich, of course, won't have to submit sieverts, micro or macro.
A recent astute assessment of the prevailing global circumstance: Roger Wiegand, “Derivatives Scam Slides Into The Sunshine”, KITCO, 2 February 2010. Quoting:
The order of collapse could be moving from current deflation to inflation, hyperinflation, back to deflation and lastly, world war to escape the final disaster. War is always the final solution to divert the attention of Sheeple from their pathetic broken economic existence.
Civil disorder appears this summer in several countries instigated by hungry, jobless people from all working classes. So far its been contained to car fires, vandalizism, protest marches and small riots. The deeper we go into Greater Depression II, the worse it gets expanding into stronger and more wide-spread violence.
The larger questions become: What happens on the other side after the war? Who will lead the world? Will the US Dollar continue to be the world’s reserve currency? Will we attempt to return to the gold standard? Will those who were responsible for these disasters pay the price? If so how? Will they go to jail? Will they escape the wrath of the Sheeple? What will the economic world look like after the monster obligatory war? Who will control global energy?
“Catabolic collapse” is a useful term -- perhaps better than my “incendiary collapse” -- as it insinuates another, non-percolation-theory, set of insightful clues as to the mechanisms likely involved. Wiegand doesn't use the term, but he would probably find it of value. And the more one can gain insight into the mechanisms involved, the more likely one is to come up with a creative, which is to say, effective, response relative to “the other side after the war”. Wooh! FINALLY, someone thinking about what comes after! And what relation does the catabolic have to the incendiary? Well, I think we have had episodic catabolysis in service to the Westphalian/Cartesian-Newtonian/Congress-of-Vienna Weltanschauung for centuries, whereas the climactic expression -- certainly no apotheosis -- will be incendiary, onset across many dimensions transpiring within a six-months period, running its course within a decade. When, exactly, I haven't the foggiest -- but, the window of opportunity for affecting route of exit from the deautomatization state will have snapped shut prior to the critical six-months period. Looked at, that is, purely from the perspective of far-from-equilibrium critical-state phase transitions -- whereas human factors may have insured that there has never actually been a window of opportunity.
What do I (a complete non-professional who, nonetheless, by unusual circumstance, spent 40-hrs./week in the Cornell library system and meteorology group plus untold nighttime hours for 5 years studying atmospheric physics and related subjects under informal tutelage of one of the field's most innovative practitioners) think? There is, according to my lights, no possibility whatsoever, none, that public policy persons, whatsoever their non-dynamical-meteorology scientific backgrounds, could ever, will ever, comprehend what is currently happening with Earth's atmosphere. No place for amateurs like me! It is just far, far too complex, and there are just so very many paradigm-conflict issues spread across the full spectrum of physics at stake. Only those who have lived for decades through details of all the conflicts could hope to get their heads around it.
Alberti's encipherment-disk nesting foam (as Lester Hill well understood) was simply a riff run over memory wheels -- rhythmic nonsense mnemonics made generative semantic, origin of sense, of meaning. Unction in extremis delivered for such oily misbehaving! Gödel borrowed Alberti's tail-eating snake and ran an abstracted foundational retrograde inversion of Alberti's riff: made a semantic demonstration -- using gematric Alberti encipherment (i.e., Gödel numbers for foundational “objects”) -- that meaning is nonsense. This medieval Cabalistic demonstration as to the nature of self-reentry so transfixed the modern mind that that mind missed the diversion of its attention cathexes away from logical-value nesting foams: i.e., the “self”-referential Lukasiewicz logics essential to actual understanding of Schrödinger's wave-function (“self” being a misnomer insofar as Schrödingerian non-simple identity-transparency is understood). This is not a conspiracy theory -- at least not a theory of conscious conspiracy. What is the most regressed, energetic, libidinous, violent, destructive? Why, Conspiracy of the Third Kind, of course: not of the conscious mind, not of the personal unconscious, but of the collective unconscious. Alberti, moreover, ran his own retrograde inversion which transfixed and diverted the Renaissance mind: the rhythmic nonsense mnemonics Alberti modeled his notion of encipherment upon were with regard to Platonic remembering (anamnesis), which he mistook as being with regard to what eventually became known as Brentano remembering (origin of memetime). Platonic remembering is Brentano forgetting -- but Alberti never understood this (nor does modern psychiatry in naming the preliminary case history “anamnesis”), and thus contributed greatly to codification of perspectival awareness. How could Alberti's “transposition” have happened? The Machiavellian temper of the times? In part, I would argue. Masterful neoPlatonists like Plotinus fully comprehended that Platonic anamnesis does not transpire in “passing time” (more accurately deemed “memetime”) -- that the only way the memetime-bound cognition can at all process Platonic anamnesis is by way of encipherment, this sort of gematria being a revelation, not a concealment. Whereas, by Machiavellian temper of the times, Alberti transposed revelation into a hiding by mistaking Brentano forgetting for Platonic remembering. And the institutions of the times picked up this transposition and used it to further their Machiavellian machinations. Projective-identification in transference, a collective behavior no less than one “individual”.
But Gödel numbers are lattice-logic constructs, cantus firmi; it's just that Gödel never followed out the idea as far as did the Cabalists he borrowed from. The academic authorities, of course, can't see past their own introspective incompetence to view origins of Gödel's “eating” disorder. Heh-heh-heh! In the terms of Mathematics in its Modern Aspect, this would require codification of a hypercomplex zeta function and hyperprime mappings of Karpenko functors (i.e., Lukasiewicz logics over the primes). Gematria does not involve only assigning a number to each letter and making sums over words in various ways (face value, absolute value, triangular value, ordinal value, truncation/renormalization value, et cetera): simply simplistic numerology. Moreover, it cannot be seriously doubted that gematria far predated Hebrew of Old Testament times, far predated Vedic times. Pre-Vedic tribal artifacts displaying point-set topologies in relation to pottery making and weaving and bare-foot dance-choreography grids are in the predominantly female history of origins of yantra-Sanskrit equivalents in the Garland of Letters. Furthermore, heh-heh-heh, Pythagoras' “God ever geometrizes” was a sand-lot statement, for each letter of the Greek alphabet had its equivalent point-set topology punched by stick into the sand. So, not only was there a number for each letter and word and phrase and verse, but also a point-set lattice, and numerical equivalencies between letter-sequences of whatever length and value-calculation algorithm, corresponded to geometric transforms (“topological operations of temporal curl” symbolized by compass- and straight-edge-executed procedures: e.g., gematric depiction of Christ ACTING as a Fisher of “Men”, using a net to pull them into the boat) between “modes” (logical-value order-types) of the numerical equivalents (non-selfsame numbers): actual scalar origins of scale-modes in Greek musical theory (numerical equivalents being boundary tones in octave-leap nesting foams of tonal space). Form in Gothic: abstract (non-figurative) geometric shape modulated in 2-D, predominantly (just like the fundamental aesthetic principle of medieval Japan). What is rarely understood is that the 2-D (i.e., most-dense sheet of Cantorian-transfinite[s]-valued non-selfsame Borel-set dimensionless points: kami dust) contains all its emanations (the World is FLAT), all its cyclotomic Abel-Bell decompositional involutes (such mathematical involution not transpiring in memetime). All possible-world cantus firmi superpose as The Cantus Firmus base-state of Tzog-chen hologramic frequency domain. This emerged out of an esoteric Al-Andalus fusion of the divergent vectors of the Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion with what Aurobindo called Plato and Vedic Idealism. The libraries of Cordoba! In Rayonnant style (breaching the unit Circle of Fifths, as is required on a Riemann-surfaced Riemann sphere [[[arching styles: e.g., ceiling of upper chapel, Sainte-Chapelle]]] to obtain quantal operator-time) -- Louis IX's palace chapel, Sainte-Chapelle, consecrated 1248. 13th-century motectum plainchanting the principle of relative-state by relative movement of superposed voices (not “set against each other” as in the derivative counterpoint). How much practice Gregorian chant required! How much peripatetic meditation upon its meaning proper execution demanded! The FLOOR of the cathedral could not be walked upon, only the floor. The floor plan was not the FLOOR, nor, even, was the idealized sacred geometry in[form]ing the floor plan (design of the design system), though that sacred geometry was “closer” to the FLOOR, the AllBase. Gödel “accidentally on purpose” ignored the emanations of logical-value order-types in deciding how to number his “letters” and “words” and “verses” (foundational objects and operations): he had an agenda which determined his numbering choices. The descant over The Cantus Firmus incorporated 1T2-valued Baconian logic; it was not such logic itself, in Thomism incarnation or otherwise. Same with the “revealed” Rabbinical gematria's value table: ordinality of the alphabet is arbitrarily in service to a given agenda. Letters can be put into any order to form words/worlds! Even proceeding by opposites, a Tang-style device: Atbash. Same with the color-tone assignments of a Scriabin or a Kandinsky: glutamatergic neuronal etching by prescriptive enculturation. Cabalistic assignments, however, are ketaminergic and multiple for multiple purposes/Swedenborgian-“forms-of-uses” (such “multiplaiting” generally was pejoratively deemed “mystical” once weaving variables were taken from the hands of women), just as emanations from a given point-set on Cathedral of the World's FLOOR come in wave trains, multiples, transparencies, numbered “aqua-tint” etchings, stoppages. Roger Bacon had it wrong about the dozen disciples of meaning hidden in a plastic art object, howsoever Javier Sierra's The Secret Supper (Atria, 2004) may have it, whereas the medieval illuminist knew whereof he enlightened: “infinite light” beaming through glazing area, window tracery, leaded-glass lattice-geometry projecting in hologramic superposition transcendental Abelian ideals upon -- not the walkable floor, not the floor plan, not even the masons' sacred geometries -- the FLOOR of the cosmic cathedral. Interior Musculpt exteriorized into social space (conscious projective-identification in transference! projecting a talpa!) as synaesthetic integration of the socius relative to the natural world as symbolized by the cathedral. A Platonic “idea” not actually actualized in the ancient or medieval worlds because of… Could anyone think that I, enamored of the (Cabalistic Sabra) Lady of the Library -- AU, circa 1963 -- and taken, at that time, on a visit to Samuel Weiser's bookstore, would not know of Florian Cajori's A History of Mathematical Notations? And who can believe that current Middle-East/Central-Asia conflict can be resolved without some 21st-century replication of the esoteric Al-Andalus fusion of the divergent vectors, a spontaneous quantal fusion facilitated by Musculpted m-logically-valued LETS? Who? The prevailing global leadership elite? I am not a nihilist in principle, only in practicum of the prevalent.
Have you personally met any “creative” exemplar of the prevailing system which requires an income differential of USD1-billion+/year to less-than-USD2/day, in order simply to function, the incentives, otherwise, being inadequate to stimulate GROWTH (in negentropy larceny)? I've personally met several, and read many, and let me tell you, these people are not… So, don't talk to me about unions, though I am a person who quit a union apprenticeship program late in the game because I'd simply had it up to HERE with all that union… Quoting the recent speech of Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey on the State budget, 11 February 2010:
One state retiree, 49 years old, paid, over the course of his entire career, a total of $124,000 towards his retirement pension and health benefits. What will we pay him? $3.3 million in pension payments over his life and nearly $500,000 for health care benefits -- a total of $3.8m on a $120,000 investment. Is that fair?
But $3.8 million is far less than one month of income for many well-connected (i.e., you put a name on it!) financial sector CEOs, and even a good swath of their subordinates. There's the rub! Is it at all surprising, then, that my projected most-probable outcome, from gradients active in the prevailing global circumstance, is… Panic in The City: not a nonrecurring phenomenon. Make a great homu durama!
Dancin' dicey, whoot, over geegaw in Dimwit Street,
An anodynic rain spotting abaht on a diaphoretic wind.
Looks like dorky mortises an' buried tenons
Dovetailing the joint, dunnit?
These git pency, those got shirty, 'ows aboot that?
No icy vichyssooise, 'e said, for yous an' me!
Out for Dorking, chickens from Napsbury, wouldn't it be?
Reading British place names, which I love -- Hog Back, Box Hill, Mole Valley, Goosemall Furrow -- and contemplating their transport to N. America, how embarrassing the colonial toponymists' mentality for simply transplanting names, rather than creatively applying the onomastic principle involved: this continuing failure obviously informing the prevailing strategies for historical preservation, maintenance of cultural integrity in face of inevitable change, response to paradigm shifts, utilization of tropes, and so on. A British MOP says that, quoting RealClearWorld: “Governments Worldwide Lack Ideas” (David Howell, “In search of a big, new idea”, The Japan Times, 10 February 2010). Nor, apparently, has this MOP “a big, new idea”. People without ideas cannot evaluate ideas, put no faith in ideas; therefore, they give their confidence to people without ideas. Give me a mot, build me a moat; that's all I ask! Sorry to be a buttinski, but, hello, sovereign debt default crisis, sub-sovereign (states of the USA) debt default crisis, sub-sub-sovereign (cities like DEEtroit) debt default crisis, provoked by non-sovereign debt default crises of every sort: if not a new idea, then certainly a big idea for getting rid of the little, old idea of governance. No need to attack a system two-hundred years into catabolic collapse.
To what purpose write such a mordacious book? Coulda, oughta, shoulda, mighta. Always laveering. But what books, indeed, what scientific papers -- including even Planck's of 1900, Einstein's of 1905 -- have significantly altered the institutionalization of which we speak? How would revelation of the allomorphs of this or that meme -- excepting, of course, memetime -- disturb the phonemic differences repetition of black-propaganda mantras morphemically reinforce? Of what possible utility a cultural morphophonemics? Put it THERE, bro'. Slap! Slap! Mean -- and I mean mean -- deviation from swaption-implied volitilities will git-ya evertime. And now we 'ave the Citi CLX ta PROtect us! According to the forecast offered by Risk.net (“Citi plans crisis derivatives”, Laurie Carver, February 2010, noted by Mish). Yet more vacuuming up of local multipliers from around the planet so as to transfer them to the macroscale as concentration of risk to a few 1T2-logic-money centers! And there are those who wonder why I don't proffer these ideas more pleasantly. Wouldn't that be like handing the quantum atmosphere to conjurers of counter weather, superconductant DNA to the recombiners?
Whoopsy Daisy Angel (Ian Traynor, “Angela Merkel dashes Greek hopes of rescue bid”, The Guardian, 11 February 2010: again, the reader comments are most interesting). Symformphonie No. Nein. French and Germans never brought to book together, can't ever be on the same page. Following 150 German economists of yesteryears, Maastricht denied, then what? As the readers comment, Kant use Marx againe. What type of monetary system will a Germano-Russian bloc aligned to a Greater China embrace? Been asking this question, in just so many words, since the late-1960s. Doubt it's been that long? How else explain origins of the notion of Lukasiewicz monetary units? The extended series of fundamental revisionisms involved in formulation of this idea could not have come easily or over a short period. Not all Greek to me. Bluff or huff-and-puff (Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, “Will markets call EU bluff on Greek rescue?”, The Telegraph, 11 February 2010). Not only one-size-fits-none, but fixed-by-fiat in perpetuity fiscal and monetary stability criteria: about as likely to succeed in a universe of flux as unanimity being the only action directive for united nations. I've not known when, or what specific occasion. Soon, perhaps (see what SocGen has to say: "Collapse of the euro is 'inevitable': Bailing out the Greek economy futile, says French banking chief", Sam Fleming and Tim Shipman, The Daily Mail, 13 February 2010; and, citing figures and graphs, Albert Edwards at Zero Hedge concurs: “At 500% Net Liabilities to GDP, It is Too Late to Prevent the Collapse of the G-7; Greece is Irrelevant, We are All Now Insolvent”, 12 February 2010). Haven't much cared when (to care, one must want to make money off the human travail involved, money being largely a matter of memetiming, as the various classes of confidence tricksters well know). But, then again, what EUnic these days hasn't been hoping for something, anything, even, perhaps, a Greek crisis, to push value of the euro down so that Euroland exports can rise up. And Niall Ferguson calls it “the fractal geometry of debt” while arguing in parallel to Zero Hedge (“A Greek crisis is coming to America”, Financial Times, 10 February 2010). Debt on a fractal curve transferred by derivatives regressively mimicking fiber bundle arithmetics; one would think that Lukasiewicz logics would be required to sort that out. If only there was the option of choosing between depression and Planetary War I. Unfortunately, choosing depression would only postpone advent of that war. None of the fundamental issues were resolved by the Franco-Prussian War, WWI or WWII, the Cold War: they were just driven more deeply into the marrow, there to fester, and fester again and again. None of the resurrections were authentically anabolic. That being the case, “thematic evasion” (one of the myriad types of “neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance”) and variations has been, and continues to be, the only possible outcome.
One reason why I believe in decision-free systems imprinted upon the strange attractor which is m-logically-valued self-organizing quantal relative-state: “Popular Delusions: Government hedonism and the next policy mistake”, Dylan Grice, Societe Generale Cross Asset Research, 11 February 2010. Oriana Fallaci recommended to me 19th-century anarchism. I relentlessly argued at her: anarchism never came up with a plausible account of governance without government. Benazir Bhutto, before her fateful last journey home, responded to an e-mail from me wherein I urged her to act in a global context relative to m-logically-valued LETS, not to become an indentured servant of a dead paradigm. Missionary schooling. Radcliffe in the Fifties or in transition between the Sixties and the Seventies: what a burden! as I intimately knew from my Georgetown live-in days. At the beck and call of whose bidding? Behavioral finance is a sub-discipline of… John A. Wheeler's “Magic Without Magic” could have been world-shaking, but wasn't -- given prior commitments to…
Why would I choose to focus my attention on life's trivia, the pedestrian daily round, when, clearly, the issues addressed here are the leit motifs of the context of my current incarnation? Simply to gain more memetime? Hah! Thirty years ago I got to the point where I couldn't stop laughing every time I read into American politics, so I just altogether stopped reading. Haven't revisited. And long since have lost all inclination to reprisal, knowing full well that that will be more than adequately handled by systemic factors alone. Blu Book, Gn Book, Yellow Book… There is not a chance in effing 'ell that the view of “reality” we've been membershipped to has any significant correlation to what Wittgenstein called “the case”. Nonetheless, I stand accused of pure intellectual fantasy, of being a conjuring prestigitateur, in attributing the roles I do to a collective unconscious in historiography and to distortions of higher mathematics, logic, and physics in origins of the world wars. Hidden in this accusation is a subtle subordinate tarring -- a simile of apposition, I shouldn't wonder -- typical of the type-A high-mesomorph suffering lateral mental cleavage, and who, thus, doesn't see deeper than sex and spondulicks, power, prestige, privilege, the territorial imperative. Humph! Being significantly anaclitic, I won't stand still for that. Recurrent theme over decades, amongst Sir So-and-So's women. Mesomorph, I am not, high or low. But my mesomorphic component is equivalent to mine ectomorphic, and only one indices higher than mine endo. Calculate the physio-tempermental index-type indicated! Know something about that? Natural athlete, skinny or not. Throughout Jump School and SFTG training -- in which both SEALs and SAS's participated at various “exercises” -- I was always in the upper twenty-percent upon physical testing. Passed the swimming test for hard-hat diving school. Not to mention Mekong delta, Vet-num. That stuff! Did better than average in modern dance class. Made my living with a pick and shovel in hot, humid Washington, D.C. Hardly “out of touch with my body”. So, it definitely is not credible to discredit my historiography by denigrating my temperamental and physical type.
Google “animal societies” and you will not find in the first several hundred entries cited any evidence whatsoever of the role 19th-century studies of animal societies played in development of pre-WWII German and Japanese political thought -- let alone mention of the (translated into English) powerfully influential 1877 book of that title -- Des societes animals by Alfred Victor Espinas (who also wrote in 1897 Les origines de la technologie). This, in itself, is strong supporting evidence for Jaron Lanier's theme in You Are Not a Gadget (Knopf, 2010). Google's algorithms -- first approximations thereto developed by CDC for the MACV IDHS and undoubtedly later improved with the help of the ASA and the NSA, and lately, no doubt, by the MDA -- program not only the information retrieved, but also minds of the retrievers. Moreover, not only -- yet again -- was this one of the foremost reasons for the last helicopter off the roof in Saigon, circa April 1975, but the whole anthropogenic information space of Mother Earth has now been consigned to consigning the same fate. Intelligent intelligence analysts at CICV and SRA/MACV-J2 refused to use the MACV IDHS, and in a similar vein, though one can easily dismiss reviews of Lanier's book by Slate and The Wall Street Journal, intelligent atmospheric physicists will refuse Lanier's judgment that:
Cloud computing means using the Internet to create the illusion of a giant computer that is actually a composite of many computers. It is a crucial tool in understanding global complex phenomena like climate change…
For no amount of 1T2-logic cloud computing will yield actual understanding of climate change -- and so very much more. What does a Lanier know about climate change? Far-from-equilibrium critical-state climate shift -- forced in the upper atmosphere and/or the lower -- is not a digital phenomenon and can never be encompassed by Turing machines, however clouded they may become. Authentic Lukasiewiczian quantum computing would help, but that is not merely the so-called “quantum processors” aspired to today, so as to yield faster binary computing, clouded or not. The reason intelligent intelligence analysts rejected the IDHS was because it prevented exploration of the actual issues needing to be studied. That problem persists unto today. Chaos and complexity theory are 1T2-logic takes on µTm-logically-valued processes, hence, great falsifications. No amount of cloud computing will overcome those falsifications. Why the falsifications? Lanier has no insight, not having even recognized existence of the fundamental problem. Endogenous ketamine is not exogenous ketamine. Even John C. Lilly, M.D., freely admitted -- late in life -- that he had overvalued ketamine (as did some SF medics). He did not, however, in such statements, distinguish between endogenous and exogenous (a fact I remember being strongly struck by, raised to him, and received only confusion over the question in response). Similarly, Lanier is not aware of the massive distinction between quantal non-simple identity and what exogenous ketamine-saturated SanFran/Berkeley mentality calls “hive mind” or “smart mob” or “the wisdom of the crowd”. Nor, clearly, did Weimar/Taisho youth culture encompass understanding of these distinctions. Only once the involved youth became part of the panzer or the kamikaze did understanding suddenly dawn -- however momentarily. Indeed, the only evidence of ontic/experiential understanding of these distinctions I've personally encountered came out of those surviving PEO and White Star, 1950s engagements with tribal animism. PEO… could well have been “large amplitude oscillatory shear behavior” -- as Googling would lead one to believe. Signmons me on! Hotfooting it, idiosyncratically dressed. Heh-heh-heh. Special Service Force disbanded in 1945, reactivated in 1953. To anyone who actually knew people directly involved, the apocryphal hagiographies really are quite a hoot!
No, I am not a strong believer in the Jungian stages-of-life approach to spiritual development -- call it “individuation” or whatever. Even G. I. Gurdjieff's in-the-world Fourth Way tends in actual practice strongly toward this Indic notion, which Aurobindo rejected: “good householder”, the “second line of work”, and so on. Those in the Gurdjieff work will contest this claim, of course, as all sorts of “wiseacre youngsters” were invited in (absolutely no such orientation, whatsoever, whensoever! I can tell you, wouldn't I, I mean, I should, shouldn't I? iff I am a good householder, what!) -- but there was a subliminal internal logic of the message carried through to the practitioners, of whatever age group: how many “good householders” make their living with their “left foot”, as did Gurdjieff? How many “good householders” had Gurdjieff's Women, for instance? Double-bind cognitive dissonance being taught to those who would be… not Kings, necessarily, but certainly… Re: practicum, as regards capabilities possessed of most “good householders”, mortgage and all -- nowadays, proceeds from second mortgage invested in bundled bundling of bundles of mortgage-backed securities… rather a distraction from the “first line of work”, I should affirm, shouldn't I, if I were… well, not a King, of course, but… Fulfill one's “obligations” to the socius first, then, late in life, family, career, parenting responsibilities taken care of, devote oneself to spiritual attainment; this is the Indic stages-of-life approach -- perhaps even embark upon a monastic adventure during the twilight years. Vertical man, Maurice Nicoll, being a Harley Street Jungian, also used his repetitive “feather pillow pounder” to bongo-drum and hammer home -- aside: Nicoll's method being a Pavlovian strategy I fully concur with, the lower-parts-of-centers indubitably having a Skinnerian need for such a Cesta Punta upon “those parts” -- by his own example the stages of life (during a very difficult stage of life: London, WWII: what a Blitz!). Maybe this was one reason why, during the interwar years, P. D. Ouspensky, having traveled all the way to Pondicherry, found Kings College, Cambridge-trained Aurobindo had little to offer. Sri Aurobindo Ghose, in Letters on Yoga, repeatedly told his Indian correspondents that they had no chance to authentically enter upon his Integral Yoga so long as they retained their familial indenture: they must break with all that. A proposition repeated by J. C. Pearce decades later with his Crack in the Cosmic Egg cautionary tale about effects of enculturation per se (not merely specific enculturations). The tribal rites-of-passage approach -- centered to the launching platform which is the adolescent hormone surge -- more directly corresponds to my experience, and also to implications of recent findings with regard to neurotransmitter metabolism: endogenous ketamine being the antidote to glutmatergic neuronal etching at prescriptive enculturation/socialization-of-cognition (Kundabuffer quenching of superconductant free-electron gas core of intraneuronal/intraperineural DNA: mass murder of brain cells; genocide -- directly involving genomics -- of neural and perineural networks, so as to deny conscious access to Lukasiewiczian processing by the quantum brain not contained by the molecular-cellular brain). What would be the reason to practice “inner separation”, i.e., voluntary dissociation, if not to regain the lost capacity to consciously process simultaneous logical-value order-types? Could a non-dissociated cognition think in (not about) Lukasiewicz logics? Is, or is not, to apply a little 1T2-logic, authentic animism -- i.e., the “contagion” of “participation mystique” -- intrinsically dissociative? Even John C. Lilly, by example and à la The Center of the Cyclone, implicitly advocated the stages-of-life approach, and, beyond man/woman transference issues, that stages-of-life commitment was part of the reason, I think, Lilly, in discussions with me, made no real distinction between endogenous and exogenous ketamine flood, a mistake no neuroscientist of his caliber and generation should have made, let alone no informed deep practitioner of ZaZen, autogenic training, Philokalia walking meditation (my personal thanks to the Falls Church Orthodox retreatant center, circa 1972, for extremely insightful counseling sessions with regards to so-called psychotomimetic phenomena associated with “addiction” to walking meditation: turn to those with the most experience). Pre-puberty -- certainly before the last glutamatergic neural network wipeout “fixes” 1T2-logical cognition -- is the period in which inner spiritual work is best begun.
More great diagnoses (harkening back at least 150 years); but, like Naomi Klein, absolutely no innovative ideas about truly plausible therapeutics: Raj Patel, Stuffed and Starved (Melville House, 2008) and The Value of Nothing (Picador, 2010). What is it about Ph.D.s, anyway?
Unfortunately, the Whuffie Bank sounds to me like one more great pretext for cellular- and internet-based surveillance, privacy invasion and data-basing, Confucian moral-economy fascism: not the sort of money I would like to handle.
It's awfully interesting to watch -- yet again. Just as they all pulled together in regards to HIV being the explanation for how HIV got through human anti-viral immunity, and how CFCs were the primary -- even “only” -- cause of ozone depletion, they have pulled together with regard to the thesis that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are the primary -- if not “sole” -- cause of climate change which is synonymous with greenhouse warming (though, obviously, they are splitting apart again: see, “Defections Shake Up Climate Coalition”, Stephen Power and Ben Casselman, The Wall Street Journal, 17 February 2010). Might it be that all these three -- AIDs, ozone depletion, climate shift -- have a common unacknowledged "causal" factor, other than being anthropogenic? Which is not necessarily to say the only or sole factor. Now what could that be? Hmmmm. And why would it go unacknowledged and be black-propaganda ridden over decades?
My recall continues to recede, which doesn't mean I can't remember, but does mean rolling-sentence immediate-expectoration of signifiers is not seamlessly forthcoming. Hence, I definitely shy away from briefbacks -- whereas forty years ago recall by hologramic Musculpt propelled me into whatever cognitive fray became available. My attitude toward the EU goes back explicitly to 1963-4 at AU-SIS when I took a course on the UN, where within there was much discussion of nascent European integration, such discussions themselves transpiring within a context of gathering enthusiasm for the concept of regional and even global federation as the royal road to… whatever. Holy Federalism, the pyramiding-of-authority answer to all problems. Our Order. Reincarnation of Futurist cultural monism as techno-intro to High Heaven? Explaining why I thought then, or why I think now, the way I did, the way I do: those two tasks are easy enough -- and not particularly interesting. The wherebys, howhats, therebuts, hmmmms -- thems be anothers altogethers. Japanese flower arranging lessons -- sitting-in with my mother, circa 1954 -- jujitsu, bamboo swords, even a little Japanese archery, exposure to traditional music, endless tea as a child wild running over paddy dikes, strongly set my attitude toward the dysfunctions of rules and the non-utilities of yet another additional echelon. When large-scale organization -- Our Order -- breaks down, what then? when the technology, the infrastructure, even in green version, is articulated solely to that scale. Didn't even build an m-logically-valued LETS house-of-cards for rapid reaction decentralization! Being “that 'unregenerate child' military brat”, the last things I ever hoped to see, or would devote my life to, were additional dimensions of command: slammed back into the barber chair as a six-year-old, crew cut ordained as someone else's political statement, certainly not mine. Truthfully, I can't remember whether I actually enrolled in the UN course, officially audited it, or simply sat-in and studied citations noted in the reading lists -- required, recommended, related. I sat-in much more than I enrolled. I increasingly gravitated upon rarely attending classes of the courses in which I enrolled, glanced over required readings, skimmed those recommended, intensely studied related materials noted and which I ran across on my own downtown at the museums, embassies, archives, departments, agencies, Library of Congress, and so on. Scale higher enculturation, up the organization, master the money machine, the babe bazaar, the guru-hopping genie, the political parlor game, the celeb circus, the paladin polo-circuit, the thrill-seeker rodeo: (imitating what divine occasion?) bingo, This Is Your Life! “I am being lied to” was one first thought as early as junior high, maybe even 1954 standing at ground zero, Hiroshima, and that thought always was, and continues to be, the greatest catalyst to real learning I personally have encountered. Never fails.
Even the most incidental conversational initiative ever-so-timidly challenging sacred fundamentals, any fundamental in regards to any aspect of faarkin' human misfeasance, that lot, is inevitably scuttled to the scupper, because the pedestrian mind is so knee-jerked against any innovation that conceivably could save lives of its myriad exemplars, innit so? Forty years of repetition-and-response of/to my chosen propositions relieves me absolutely of all good will regarding the bleedin' pedestrian mind. Its wont being thus or so, nackered it is, isn't it, an' never will unnacker. Everywhere one looks, whatever the realm of action, the human swarm -- like its idols, the lemmings -- is hard targeting to edge of the cliff, all the same psychological behaviors circa Viet Nam, 1968, just short of a decade cold-sweating the inevitable: Cambodian holocaust. Only, today, those behaviors -- exactly the same -- have been planetarized by globalization. When every fundamental attribute of a belief system has been sundered by experience, those still committed to the dead Weltanschauung are not those any same person would choose to rely upon: learned that lesson right well in Viet Nam, I did, didn't I. They can kill you or get you killed, but there is little else they can accomplish: mental constipation is literally a lethal brain disease. Those who think this is a mixed metaphor/simile/analogy don't really get it, do they. Figure out for oneself “the inevitable” this time: holocaust of the WholeEarth as large-scale systems fail, emptying conurbations large and small? Hardly the pastoral mission most needing fulfillment -- whether undertaken by prior Prior, post Prior, friar Prior, or Father Prior. And if one is not yet in a cold-sweat -- studying daily events, prevalent human reactions -- what does that tell one about one's cognizance? Ten to twenty-nine: willingness to self-sacrifice for the larger purpose is a prerogative of youth and more or less ends as the sex-hormone surge-titers fall off. Can't be faarkin', can't be savin' nothin'! Never trust anyone over twenty-nine. If most survivors will be aged ten to twenty-nine, that will in significant measure be due to the greatest sacrifices having been made by that age group. Thanks El Alotum, you Sneak-a-Whole-Salami, for leaving me The Last El Coyotum on the Santa-Moniya/Westwoodamah Line. Don't be shy, no danger in that, matey. Might as well be drivin' the PW's R&R, Her own DS, from the Home Counties right back to The-Slough-Before Beverlyy Al Hillsirivah.
Bare reality, a bare percept, a bare propriocept, the naked hyletic data: either bare or not-bare. Taxonomic mind: Aristotelian Thomism. But that, however much stated with Dominican court-cleric aplomb, is not the question! How bare? Pure Land, pure man, pure feeling. Vegans, fasters, practitioners of high colonics. Magdalenean Platonism. Ev[e]angelical truth? If one wishes to see how the collective unconscious registers this, look to contemporary porno stylistics. Naked singularity, blackhole without hair: butterfly-spread straddle-option, naked call, naked put, crack spread, crush spread; all with implied volatility! Commodity fetishism, what. If the Query in Apotheosis were not How bare? there wouldn't be levels of Samadhi, logical-value order-types, Koch curves, degrees of Cantor dusti, densities of nesting foams, over- and under-tone series of the frequency domain, superposed branches of the wave-function, inner and outer dimensions, skew-parallels, fiber-bundle arithmetics, more and less swarms of the swarm constellating a so-called body, boundaries more and less without boundary, genes on rheostats and not on/off switches, and so on and so forth, more and less. An extraordinary chapter, no, the broken record of closed-loop mind raving its house music rap, millennia after millennia. Same-ol'/same-ol' thematic evasion: i.e., anathema. And, yet, somehow the surpassing species will continue to progress -- heh-heh-heh! -- through what is soon to tsunami the planet. As Javier Sierra re-minds: centuries before the first New World village massacre, “Kill them all, including the women and children. God will sort out the Katharos from the Papists.” Today, with the help of science courts, homeland inquisitions, latter-day pogroms, forced-draft migrations, jihads, et cetera -- not to mention actual cusp events.
Buy gold and farmland, maybe, as Dr. “Doom” Marc Farber recommends in coming around to the “dirty” scenario (Leo Lewis, London Times, 22 February 2010), but certainly don't buy the farm in El Nino hit Venezuela or Philippines (these droughts quite possibly being not unrelated to a far-from-equilibrium climate-shift “deautomatization” state: see, “Drought hit Venezuela declares energy emergency”, Commodity Online, 9 February 2010 and “Philippines El Nino impact remains severe”, Commodity Online, 22 February 2010) as such deautomatization could persist (see: “Climate change to hit Midwest US crops in 60 years”, Commodity Online, 23 February 2010: “…continues to hit… for…” would yield a more accurate article title). “Oddball” is another name for “deautomatization” state. Quoting Dr. Staudt: “Odd-ball winter weather is yet another sign of how uncontrolled carbon pollution amounts to an unchecked experiment on people and nature…” (see: “Global warming impacts climate in North USA”, Commodity Online, 15 February 2010).
Jest love, 'e do, reading bestseller mynute parsings of bureaucratic-in-fighting Christic super'eros breaching, leaping, penetrating every conceivable procedural obstacle in order to catch bad guys -- blue collar, white collar, brocade collar, rag-headed. For five-hundred years, focusing on the latest fulmination, the system-that-works has won every battle, bad guys being the bad “elemental generator” -- and with each such “win”, human brain has been all the more etched, acid scored, necessitating the winning of ever more battles, if 'eresies insistent are to continue to be dispelled. An onset over five centuries in cyclotomic brain-drain impairment is rather a long incubation period, I shouldn't wonder. Light-night, heart-depart: what is that? Rhyme or/ Reason doesn't INNterest me, it don't.
But when one falls through ice foundering
Too early of a springing lake fetch,
Life's fading current swept away by
Underside tapping that one wills, exit seeking
From cold black space in forcing time to persist
Beyond its ken, death stares down, then, for
Known it is how the Underside is the other side.
Who will believe it? Few of the current corpus of humans, virtually none of the next generation -- i.e., the most poisoned generation, the most glutamatergically-etched, the most microwaved, the most GMOed (thus far). Just one example: imitation food, pseudo-food, food simulacra. This is, and will be, one consequence of the fact that each identifiable class of products is dominated over the WholeEarth by several multinationals only (see “Robert Bork, William Baxter, and the Monopolization of America”, Corporate Crime Reporter, 13 February 2010): in most cases indicative of highly inappropriate scaling. Debussy, in his aversion to “development” and preference for harmonic gestalts, was the first post-classical economist! Nowadays, Tsingtao is the cheapest Budweiser in Asia, though nothing like the old Tsingtao and having no resemblance to the Bud of bar bottles available so many yesteryears ago: same multinational makes “both” beers so-called. Believe what? That the normative notion of time in, say, pre-traditional China and early-Andean civilization was functionally equivalent to quantal operator-time. The most-glutamatergically-etched brains, for instance, simply have no (non-drug-induced) experiential access that could convey conviction in temporalities not memetime. Chronomancy via the I-Ching and archaic precursors, as a case in fact, had nothing whatsoever to due with chance, probability, statistics: that is a modern aleatoric interpretation (so-called “scientific”). Coin tossing was a confusing Confucian counter-valence to the pre-traditional conception. The yarrow stalks fell into yantric lattice-logic interstitial patterns, and these patterns were superposed in multivalued chronomantic cognition to the prevailing “pattern of the time”, i.e., the collection of event gradients (arabesque curvature configurations) which operator-time topologically imprints. The fact that these pattern-of-the-time gradients could be read in superposed yarrow-stalk fall-patterns (thus, no electromagnetic involvement, the stalks being wood) is indicative of a thorough comprehension of the basic principle involved in Everettian quantum relative-state: the quantum-state of everything is readable in the quantum-state of anything. Such “haiku” states are in “relative-state”, i.e., Being John Malkovich, they are in “contagion” by “participation mystique”, no matter how greatly nonlocal, how far removed in ponderable space and/or memetime. The “correlation length” is always and all ways infinity; whatever the temperature, that temperature is the “Curie temperature”. The unified multiverse is “critical”, never can escape “self-organized criticality” (however “understood” by memetime-bound binary mind). That such aperspectival “intersubjective” (this word indicating “understood” from a classical perspective) animistic “identity transparency” was a defining characteristic of pre-traditional Chinese comprehension, I began clearly to see by, in one instance, early-in-my-“development” exposure to Marcel Granet's La Pensée Chinoise (1934) -- sections of which were translated for me by a friend named Michele. The clearly involved tacit general theory of chronomantic practice beyond doubt posited a temporal comprehension in no way treated by, say, Martin Heidegger in his History of the Concept of Time (translated by Theodore Kiesel, Indiana U. Press, 1985). William Sullivan (The Secret of the Incas: Myth, Astronomy, and the War Against Time; Crown, 1995) provided me with insight to the likely pre-Incan Andean case (the Aymara language, we now know, being based upon three-valued trigram logic). But it must also be in one's Platonic anamnesis -- if comprehension is to dawn -- that pre-traditional chronomancy has nothing to do with predicting a “future”, as such exists only relative to memetime, which pretrad chronomancy don't hardly abide, being rooted as it is in relative-state nonlocal in ponderable space and/or memetime.
Being an unmitigated Platonist, I believe that even the details of mental illness and associated behaviors are tropological-metareferential reflections of suppressed, and hence regressed, higher mathematics -- the collective psyche being nothing but maths. The Unconscious as Infinite Sets is only a small part of it; African Fractals of the mind, and so very much more (some of this more having to do with the fact that the very notion of “fractals” is developed only under the 1T2-logical-value order-type out of transfinite-transfinite collections thereof). Freud, Adler, Jung, PTSD, neurochemical anomalies: nine degrees over the surface of deep. Tropological-metareference after the fashion of how mortgage-backed securities parody fiber-bundle arithmetics! And why did such a parody demerge from the collective unconscious? Because of the extreme mass existential anxiety induced by verification of quantum non-simple identity with the Aspect experiments (and their precursors). Why so much group anxiety? Because suppression of m-logically-valued identity-transparency was primary deep structure in origins of the world wars -- and this suppression has only yielded more elaborate regression in the post-WWII era. Each cyclotomic repetition -- going back, in the present fulmination, to N. H. Abel's cyclotomic “Impossibility” Theorem of the 1820s -- has been more cataclysmically violent than the last. Moreover, it does not take a crowd, group, mass, mob for the collective unconscious to be present: one person acting alone can engage in collective behavior by tropological metareference. The “atrocity” is not so feared, so stigmatized, so punished simply for the physical-mental horror involved, but because it re-minds of the omnipresence of the collective unconscious which socialization of cognition (i.e., suppression, and hence regression to Piaget's Euclidian-Baconian stages of cognitive “development”) unsuccessfully attempts to eradicate. There is only one virtual world and that is the taxonomic, memetime-bound, glutamatergically-etched, ponderable universe of the prescriptively enculturated positivistic realist -- the only really negative “cosmic exile”, Professor Quine.
Tut-tut-tut, 'e do, don't 'e, at scoff-scoff-scoff. Tut-tut-tut! What about fear-and-loathing of The Newt Bomb (see: Michael Crowley, “The Newt Bomb”, The New Republic, 3 June 2009)? This is not an example of mass projective-identification in collective transference? What about The Newt Bomb itself, leaving out the fear-and-loathing? This (piece of technological hardware) is not an example of mass projective-identification in collective transference? Quoting from The Federation of American Scientists (“Nuclear Weapon EMP Effects”, 21 October 1998):
These electrons are then trapped in the Earth’s magnetic field, giving rise to an oscillating electric current. This current is asymmetric in general and gives rise to a rapidly rising radiated electromagnetic field called an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). Because the electrons are trapped essentially simultaneously, a very large electromagnetic source radiates coherently… The EMP produced by the Compton electrons typically lasts for about 1 microsecond, and this signal is called HEMP… this causes the geomagnetic field to “heave,” producing a “late-time” magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) EMP generally called a heave signal… The “acid test” of the response of modern military systems to EMP is their performance in simulators, particularly where a large number of components are involved. So many cables, pins, connectors, and devices are to be found in real hardware that computation of the progress of the EMP signal cannot be predicted, even conceptually, after the field enters a real system. System failures or upsets will depend upon the most intricate details of current paths and interior electrical connections, and one cannot analyze these beforehand. Threat-level field illumination from simulators combined with pulsed-current injection are used to evaluate the survivability of a real system against an HEMP threat.
According to my personal understanding (i.e., no imputations involved as regards understandings of others), the above-excerpted statements, with appropriate minor modifications, very likely apply to the coherent waves generated by the free-electron gas core (“plasma bottle”) of superconductant DNA at helix-coil transition (see: Paine and Pensinger, “A Dynamical Theory Describing Superconductant DNA”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, XV, 1979, pp. 333-41). And all the complexities of the “acid test” simulators would apply to function/dysfunction of human bodies, and animal bodies, and plant bodies -- with the caveat that the Chinese obviously have long since learned something about “pulsed-current injection” to the human simulator. My thesis here is not to repeat content of our 1979 paper, implications as regards biological radiation exchange processes, intracellular effects of microwave exposure, and so on, but to IMPUTE that suppression, during the 1920s and '30s, of Schrödingerian perspectives in biology (with their Lukasiewiczian subtexts) yielded an array of mass projective-identifications in collective transference, one of which was The Newt Bomb and another of which was fear-and-loathing of The Newt Bomb. I should also mention here that the above-noted anthropogenic “magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) EMP” has its natural correlate in the “acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes” renormalized from atmospheric models since 1948 (i.e., suppressed, and hence regressed to chaos butterfly wing-flaps), and that it is very likely that co-occurrence of these two classes of pulsations would yield interactions as regards their functional effects upon atmospheric processes (for background see: Paine and Pensinger, “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, September of 1978). As a further illustration, The Federation of American Scientists piece is again quoted:
When the nuclear detonation occurs near to the ground, the SREMP [Source Region Electro-Magnetic Pulse] target may not be located in the electromagnetic far field but may instead lie within the electro-magnetic induction region. In this regime the electric and magnetic fields of the radiation are no longer perpendicular to one another, and many of the analytic tools with which we understand EM coupling in the simple plane-wave case no longer apply.
In this context, the reader is referred to the last several sections of our 1977 paper, “Toward a General Theory of Process”, for discussions of “skew-perpendicularity” in relation to the “atmospheric analogue to Maxwell's equations”, m-valued variables, m-valued logics, temporal curl, and how these are involved in tornadogenesis and climate dynamics.
Unlike Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, I don't worry so much for Greeks (“Greek rescue in danger as deputy prime minister attacks 'Nazi' Germany”, London Telegraph, 25 February 2010) as for Germans, whom, along with the Japanese sit on a far more dangerous precipice than do Greeks: space-based Planetary War I -- the third such war driven by evasion of Lukasiewicz logics and their implications -- hard on the threshold, and associated broke-back EU, will not find the Germans aligned with the French or the Japanese with the Americans. Those who think the world wars resolved some fundamentals have been greatly mistaken: nothing essential was put to rest, and no new order in coherent relation to post-Cartesian-Newtonian thought has emerged anywhere on the planet, which does include Europe. “Cyclotomic decomposition” is the important notion here -- whether it be with regard to Abelian transalgebras, branch-sheets of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function, order-types of m-valued Lukasiewicz logics, one total war befathering the next, credit default swaps deep-stating national financial collapses by peaking over a 1T2-logic agglomerated currency (see: Nelson D. Schwartz and Eric Dash, “Banks Bet Greece Defaults on Debt They Helped Hide”, NY Times, 24 February 2010). Simply couldn't happen with nesting foams of m-logically-valued LETS made legal tender over fractal e-boundaries. But, unfortunately, that's a “post-Cartesian-Newtonian thought”!
The massively fulminating obsessive-compulsive disorder displacement-conversion evidenced in current patent-copyright law essentially outlaws creativity by conflating it to mere innovation, this conflation being an expression of mass projective-identification at collective transference upon the occasion of experimental verification of quantum non-simple identity and what that verification implies about informing metaphysical assumptions of the prevailing institutional paradigm. Intellectual property does not exist; what exists is corporate-person executive exploitation-rape of intellectuals. Actual creative writing, for example -- which is all about “intertextuality” simply because actual intellectuals are all about “intersubjectivity” if they have yet to attain access to m-logically-valued relative-state “identity-transparency” -- is against the law in the English-speaking world. Single-valued corporate marketeers pull together teams to produce formula books meeting requirements prescribed by copyright conventions in service to the Shareholder Bill of Rights. In our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, for instance, there are thousands upon thousands of expressions of the myriad types of intertextuality -- across not only literature, but also full spectrum of the sciences, the plastic arts, art music, and across half-a-dozen cultures -- because the novel is specifically about “identity-transparency” and “intersubjectivity”, the main literary expression of these being the largely outlawed “intertextuality”. Moreover, the novel pointedly parodies prevailing literary values as they have evolved over mistaken notions of the metaphysical properties of identity: this parody often read as poor writing. Given the way the unconscious works, the authors themselves are unaware of hundreds and hundreds of these intertextual expressions. In fact, while the novel was still being composed, a literature scholar at University of Hawaii analyzed a short passage, noting presence of several examples of intertextuality the authors had no conscious knowledge of. What publishers would touch such a book? None. Their lawyers could not possibly find the thousands upon thousands of such expressions -- and getting all the required “permissions” would be utterly impractical. We never took the book to an agent or a publisher. From the earliest planning stages, never had the intention to. Just as much of what became known in regards to cascade theory of tornadogenesis and implications about solar-terrestrial interactions and climate variability was never submitted for publication. Just as much of what became known to POLOB-SRA (Political Order of Battle/Strategic Research and Analysis) was never written up for submission to the MACV-DIP (Director of Intelligence Production). These are just a few examples of a widespread phenomenon, consequences of the totality of which may cost the human species much of its LifeWorld.
- Return to:
- •Top
- •Homepage
- •Top